the two former Chapters the Lord gives divers precepts which in this Chapter he ratisies with sanctions by their respective punishments The words contain a denuntiation of punishment for a crime and the confirmation of that punishment by repetition both of the crime and punishment When any man curseth his Father or his Mother he shall surely be put to death Which words are repeated for aggravavation 1. The crime he hath cursed his Father or his Mother 2. The punishment of the crime his blood shall be upon him What is here turn'd Father or Mother although read copulatively in the Hebrew his Father 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and his Mother yet are the words dis-junctively to be understood his Father or his Mother and that by the authority of the only Lawgiver who warrants the dis-junctive reading of this sentence Matth. 15.4 He that curseth Father or Mother let him die the death So that he who curseth one and but one of his parents is liable to death otherwise the Law might have been eluded Howbeit the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 here read is not only to speak evil to or of or to imprecate and so wish evil unto any one as it is wont to be rendred by maledicere to curse or speak evil of And so what we read Exod. 22.27 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 S. Paul Acts 23.5 renders 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thou shalt not speak evil of c. Yet the word signifies more properly to slight and make light of to vilifie and dishonour And so this verb 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is opposed to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifies to honour as elsewhere so 1 Sam. 2.30 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 those who honour me 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I will honour but they who despise me 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vili pendentur they shall be lightly esteemed When any man speaks evil of or to his Father or Mother or flights either of them he shall die the death that is he shall certainly die as he is worthy to die being guilty of so great a crime Which is explaind in the close of the verse his blood shall be upon him Under the notion and name of parents we are to understand not only our Fathers that begat us and our Mothers that bare us Prov. 23.22 Nor only those whom the Law makes such Ruth 3.1.5 but the name is also extended in a civil respect unto Governours and Magistrates as Eliakim was a father to the inhabitants of Jerusalem Esay 22.20 21. And Naamans servant called him Father 2 Kings 5.13 And Deborah was a Mother in Israel Judges 5.7 Yea in a spiritual sense God himself is our Father and Jerusalem above is the Mother of us all as I may shew afterward And they are also called our Fathers who beget us unto God Gen. 45.8 1 Cor. 4.14 15. And consequently honour is due unto them and for slighting or cursing them like penalty is due to those who analogically are called their children This denuntiation of punishment will appear to be reasonable if we shall consider 1. What the duty is which is here violated and 2. the reason of that duty as also 3. the violation and breach of the duty and 4. the punishment of that breach and violation The duty violated is honour of parents And what is it to honour The word used in the fifth Commandement and elsewhere is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifies to be heavy or weighty and that in quantity as in bulk or number Prov. 27.3 Or quality as dignity honour glory whence we say that Honos est onus Honour is a burden accordingly the Scripture speaks 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an eternal weight of glory 2 Cor. 4.17 So 2 Cor. 12.16 I was not burthensome unto you In this sense the Apostle speaks 1 Thes 2.6 Neither of men sought we glory neither of you nor of others when we might 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 have been burdensome the Syriac hath been honourable as the Apostles of Christ that is such as God and Christ appointed first in his Church 1 Cor. 12.28 Ephes 4.11 and therefore ye read in the margent we might have had authority 1 Thes 2.6 Now the honour due to parents from their children is a weighty business a matter of great weight and moment which is either inwardly performed as an high esteem of them love and fear of them Or 2. outwardly expressed as a testimony of that estimation love and fear in Reverence to their persons Obedience to their commands Supply of their necessities The reason why this honour is to be given to parents will appear whether we consider the parents themselves or their children who owe this duty to them The parents deserve all honour from them as being in eminency above them both because Authors of their being and of their better being by nurture and education Their love and care and labour and cost challenge all respect from them for their unrequitable love For when they have done all that possibly can be done by them and have followed them with all their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 their utmost requital that they can make yet being and education exceeds all gratitude as the hinder wheels of the Charet run as fast but can never overtake the former The Father hath his name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifies to will desire to be tenderly affected to his children as implying that all that influence of care and labour and cost is from love which sweetens the authority of Parents over their children 2. In regard of the children themselves justice and gratitude requires this duty of them Children obey your parents in the Lord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for this is just Ephes 6.1 That natural love 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 mixt with due awe makes up Reverence which is the first part of that honour unto parents And love is the strongest principle of obedience Exod. 20.6 that 's the second Whence will easily follow requital of parents to the utmost of their power because to love is not only bene velle but also bene facere Which is the third part of honour due to parents 3. Since the duty is so just so reasonable the breach and violation of that duty must needs be most unreasonable and unjust The violation and breach of the duty it is slighting vilifying disesteeming dis-honouring whether by word as cursing and evil speaking to parents or of them or by gesture or deed as denying them obedience to their commands or supplying their wants as Matth. 15.4 5. This slighting which they call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 little-accounting is a great sin yea a greater injury done to him whom men slight then if they did some open violence unto him Quem quis contemnit eum non curiosiùs calcabit him whom a man contemns he will not take any great care how he kicks him saith Seneca When Paracelsus begun in Germany to make known his principles
Childe hee 'l complain to his Father though he the poorest and meanest subject It is a duty that children never live to out-grow a debt that they can never fully pay though they be ever paying it as it is said of the childe sequiturque patrem non passibus aequis The thankfull childe follows his father but with unequal steps Now since the Obligation is so great the greater is their sin who 1. in opinion or 2. practise undervalue and slight this Commandement of God touching honour unto parents and the Ratification of it 1. In opinion as they who under pretence of honouring God slight and neglect their parents This was that which our Lord blamed in the Scribes and Pharisees Mat. 15.4 Where having recited the Commandement of God and the penalty due to those who break it but ye say saith he whosoever shall say to his Father or his Mother it is Corban a gift given and consecrated unto God wherewithal thou mightest be holpen by me such an one shall be free from honouring nourishing clothing supplying the wants of his Father or Mother But should not Gods worship and service you 'l say be so dear unto us that it ought to be preferred before our father and our mother Men are wont in this and other cases to plead for God such as they conceive him to be Some there are who think that God sees as man sees and that he is much taken with beautiful out-sides of Temples made with hands and to such use was that Corban of which our Lord speaks for reparation of the Temple And for this the Scribes and Pharisees were zealous and so zealous that they preferred it before the Commandement of God They knew not nor do many know or at least they consider not that to do justice and judgement is more acceptable unto the Lord then Sacrifice Prov. 21.3 To obey is better then Sacrifice and to hearken then the fat of Rams 1. Sam. 15.22 So that our obedience unto the Moral Law of God our love to our neighbour our honour unto parents is more pleasing unto him then all his ceremonial worship and service Because the Kingdom of God consists in righteousness peace and joy in the holy Ghost and in these things consists our service of God and Christ acceptable before God and men Rom. 14.17 18. Yea without brotherly love there is no love of God For he that loves not his brother whom he hath seen how can he love God whom he hath not seen 1 John 4.20 Therefore our Lord dispenseth with his own service when the brotherly love is wanting till it be fulfilled leave thy gift at the Altar and go first and be reconciled unto thy brother and then come and offer thy gift Matth. 5.24 2. The more are they to blame who by their practise violate this duty a sin very rife among us and to be accounted among those which have brought the wrath of God upon us in these last dayes For the Prophet puts this sin among others in the Catalogue of those which brought the national judgement upon the people Ezech. 22.7 In thee they have set light by father and mother that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that weight of honour due unto them they performed not It is a sin that is extream frequent in this City God avert from us that judgement which he threatned and inflicted on his ancient people for this sin That for this and like sins he would burn them like dross in his Furnace Verse 19. 22. And therefore it is a sin worthy that punishment which the Lord hath denounced great as the reward is great For this is a rule consonant unto sound reason That 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the weightier things of the Law Matth. 23.23 are ratified by the heaviest punishmants Such is the capital punishment due to the breach of this Law Exod. 21.15.17 And we may read the like Deut. 21.18 21. and 27.16 Prov. 30.17 Whence it is that he seems to appeal to our equity whether his sentence be just or not For having said When any man shall curse his father or his mother let him die the death he presently repeats the crime He hath cursed or set light by his father or mother his blood shall be upon him The evidence of the fact justifies the sentence of God We finde like appeals made elsewhere Gen. 49. Jacob now about to deprive Ruben of the birth-right Thou art my first-born saith he and the beginning of my strength c. thou shalt not excel because thou wentest up to thy fathers bed thou didst dishonour and slight thy father then defiledst thou it Then as it were making an appeal to any who should judge whether his sentence were just or not he adds he went up to my Couch v 4. Thus the Lord now denouncing judgement against Moab Esay 16.7 Moab shall howl for Moab we have heard saith he of the pride of Moab then turning as it were to any one who would judge of it he addes he is very prowd The like we may finde Jer. 44.9 10. Ezech. 13.3 6. Let the people of God be warned of this judgement perform the duty required and so expect the promise made even long dayes dayes of eternity in the land of the living It s the first Commandement with promise It s reckoned by the Jews in the first Table whence the duty is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Piety which is proper unto God so the Apostles phrase sounds 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to shew piety at home to be pious or godly toward ones own house which he presently explains 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to requite the Parents which is good and acceptable before God 1 Tim. 5.4 Yea great is the reward of such piety a lasting an everlasting reward Jer. 35.18 19. There shall not a man be cut off from Jonadab the son of Rechab one who shall stand before the Lord for ever Josephus tells us that these Rechabites were a race of pious and holy men from a long time whom he describes Antiq. lib. 18. cap. 2. And what is become of them now They were called Esseni and Asidaei whereof we read mention made 1 Mac. 7.13 and elsewhere But surely these were not nor are to be understood only according to the flesh no more then Israel is but according to the Spirit So that they who reverence obey and support their parents they are the true Asidaei the true 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the pious holy merciful ones And these are the true 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Jer. 35.2 the Rechabites the sons of him who 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 rides in glory and triumph upon the word of truth meekness and righteousness Psal 45.4 Who rides-on conquering and to conquer Revel 6.2 and his spiritual children conquer with him and through him and so reign with him For the Law is spiritual and the words have their spiritual meaning For is not God thy Father who bought thee Hath he
sense which our Translators have given of the words To sit on my right hand and on my left is not mine to give Now that Christ hath right and de facto that he doth and shall bestow the divine honours of his kingdom upon persons duly qualified appears evidently by Matth. 19.28 Ye who have followed me in the regeneration shall sit on twelve Thrones c. Luke 22.29 I dispose unto you a kingdom c. Father I will that they whom thou hast given me be with me c. John 17.24 The reason why the Lord Jesus hath this right to confer divine honours upon his followers to set them on his right hand and on his left may be considered from the vertue and merit of his fufferings For as a son while yet under his fathers immediate authority Quicquid acquirit acquirit patri what he gets he gets for his father But if the son get spoil in the wars with hazard of his life which the Civilians call Peculium castrense that is properly the sons own And thus because the Lord Jesus descended into the lower parts of the earth was dead and buried Ephes 4.9 when he ascended up on high he led captivity captive gave gifts unto men Which was figured by David distributing his spoils to his friends 1 Sam. 30. Yea our Lord saith expresly and properly to this purpose Rev. 3.21 To him that overcometh will I give to sit in my throne even as I have overcome and sit in my Fathers throne By all this which hath been said its evident that this Supplement It shall be given to say no worse of it is a superfluous redundancy We meet with an example of the second kinde 1 John 3.18 19 20. which they render thus my little children let us not love in word 1 Joh. 3. v. 18.19.20 and in tongue but in deed and in truth And hereby we know that we are of the truth and shall assure our hearts before him For if our heart condemn us God is greater then our heart and knoweth all things In the 20 verse of this Paragraph 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is twice found in the Greek text The former the Translators turn amiss the later they quite leave out I would render and open those words thus My little children let us not love in word and in tongue but in deed and in truth And herely viz. by our loving in deed and in truth we know that we are of the truth and shall assure or rather perswade 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 our hearts before him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Because if our heart condemn us viz. for any former failing incident unto little children to whom he directs those words ver 18. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that God is greater then our heart namely in wisdom grace mercy and goodness and knoweth all things even the present frame and disposition of our heart in the truth of love And this exposition is most agreeable to the persons to whom the Apostle writes the little children and to the duty which he exhorts them unto to love in deed and in truth and to the effect of that duty the assurance and perswasion of their hearts before God Thus whereas many a poor soul dejects it self out of a meer mistake of this Scripture ill rendred and worse understood it being truly turn'd and the genuine sense thereof given it s a strong consolation to the little children Howbeit lest these little children should rest in this age and estate the Apostle proceeds Beloved if our heart condemn us not according to 1 Cor. 4.14 we have boldness or confidence towards God and whatsoever we may ask we receive of him because we keep his Commandements and do those things which are pleasing in his sight An example of the third which is inversion of the words is Hebr. 10.34 which the Translators render thus Ye took joyfully the spoyling of your goods Heb. 10. v. 34. knowing in your selves that ye have in heaven a better and more enduring substance That we may the better know the mis-translation and undue inversion of these words we must understand that the goods whereof the Hebrews were spoyled were either their temporal goods whereof S. Paul saith he robbed either them or other Churches taking wages of them to do service to the Corinthians the spoyling of these goods the Hebrews took with joy Or else These goods may be also spiritually understood and that in the worst sense for such as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 seemingly and to the yong professing Hebrews appeard to be their goods which really and truly were their evils Such were the goods of Sodom which Abraham would not receive or own Gen. 14. The spoiling of these goods by him who is Maher-Shalal Hashbaz who in hastening the spoil makes speed to the prey Esay 8.3 the taking away these seeming goods but true evils the Hebrews took with joy also The inversion of the Text is in the following words Knowing in your selves that ye have in heaven a better and enduring substance A little labour sometimes does a great deal of work The moving of the Helm turns the Ship quite another way The same letters distributed and placed differently make all the different words and so the same words placed in a diverse order make extream different senses Such different senses arise from the different placing the words of this text For the words are inverted and changed from the genuine order of them which is extant in the Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which I render thus Knowing that ye have in your selves better wealth in heaven and that which will endure What a difference is here Knowing in your selves that ye have in heaven a better c. This translation perswades men that they shall have hereafter in heaven a better kinde of wealth The true reading of these words Knowing that you have in your selves c. supposes believers to have already a real possession of the better and enduring substance in themselves so that they take the spoiling of their outward goods with joy The words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in heaven are not in the Vulg. Latin nor in some of the Greek nor English Manuscripts And with the Vulg. Latin agrees the French Bible the Spanish and Italian the High Dutch and one Copy of the Low Dutch So likewise Pagnin and Vatablus with the Tigurin Bible Which order of words is wholly neglected by all the printed English Translations that I have yet seen And hereby the sense of the holy Spirit is much obscured which points at the present and real possession of the better and durable riches which wisdom hath and brings with her to the believing soul Prov. 8.10 According to which the poor are said to be rich in faith and heires of the kingdom Jam 2.5 and rich towards God Luke 12.21 What is here said that they have in themselves better wealth a learned Critick understands to be only a right unto it
resemblances between Shem and the Lord Jesus and that Christ himself is the true Shem. The derivation and descent of the word Shem is not known unto men It s commonly derived from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to name which rather ought to be derived from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Nor is the descent of the Lord Jesus knowen unto the world So they confess John 7.27 we know not whence he is Verily thou art a God that hidest thy self The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies a name Esay 45.15 And names are either Verbalia Verbal or Realta real names Christ is that Shem real that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that great that honorable name as the Cabalists call him that glorious and fearfull name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Deut. 28 58. This is understood by the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so often in the Chaldee Paraphrast where Christ the true Shem is understood Thus Esay 1.13 my soule hateth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 my word So Jer. 1.8 I am with thee 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 my word my name Immanuel Esay 45 17. the true Shem is with thee Psal 110.1 The Lord said unto my Lord Chald. Par. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 unto his word Mat. 22.44 which is that Scripture wherewith the Lord proved his Deity and put the Pharisees to silence So that it was no new expression Iohn 1.1 but well known unto the Jewes when S. John calls Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the word which is indeed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that real substantial and essential Name of God It 's usual for the word Name to signifie a person Acts 1.15 Rev. 3.4 11.13 as the number of names that is persons and a few names a few persons As for that dispute whether Shem were Melchisedec or not S. Hierom received it for a truth by tradition from the Jewes and others have followed him in that opinion However spiritually and mystically most certain it is that the true Shem is the right Melchisedec 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gen. 14. He is Shem the great saith the Thargum of Jerusalem And how shall that be made good that Shem and Sheth were glorious among men Ecclus 49.16 whereof yet so little is recorded either in the word of God or humane writers unless we understand there especially the true Shem and Sheth What therefore is disputable in the letter is reconciled in the spiritual meaning Melchisedec For the true Shem is the true the King of righteousness So the Prophet Esay Esay 32.1 ver 17. Hebr. 7.1 2. A King shall reign in righteousness and afterward King of Salem that is King of peace as the Apostle speakes So we have done with the first quaere who Shem was 2. Come we now to the second what he did and herein we shall finde him a type of the true Shem whether we consider his acts Natural as a Father begetting his children naming them if that may be called natural Moral 1. Shem is said to be the Father of all the children of Heber Gen. 10.21 And was not Shem also the father of Elam and Assur and Lud and Aram c. And so the father of all the children of Elam and Assur c Surely if we look no further then the letter it 's as true of these as those as true that he was the Father of all the children of Elam Assur c. As that he was the father of all the children of Heber If therefore we shall enquire who are the true children of Heber and the true Hebrews we shall finde that no other then the true Shem was their father For who are the true 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 who are the true Hebrews who else but such as are Irati such as are angry with themselves that they have continued so long in their sins who else but such as are therefore angry with themselves that they may not sin So diverse of the Antients as also Calvin understood Psal 4.4 Ephes 4.26 Be angry and sin not To lay down all our anger one towards another It was the speach of the Deacon to the Communicants as mine now to you 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Let no man have a quarel against any man A fit qualification for us all who come unto the Lords Table whose profession is to shew forth the Lords death untill he manifest his life in us by dying daily unto sin truly and earnestly to repent us of our sins to be angry with our selves that have so long lived in sin from which we resolve now to dye to be angry with our selves when any thought or evill motion ariseth in our hearts that we give not our consent thereunto and so sin These are the first children of Heber 2. Other children of Heber there are who are transeuntes So 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies such as are in their passage from sin to righteousness from death to life such as are about to keep the Passover with our Lord such was Abraham the son of Heber and great grandchild of Shem whom the Scripture calls 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gen. 14.18 LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one that passeth over whom Philo Judeus understands to be one who passeth out of the state of sin and corruption into the divine nature 2. Pet. 1.4 Out of Vr of the Chaldes the light of Devills toward the holy Land Which is the dutie of us all O ye children of Abraham who profess our selves believers the duty of us all who pretend now to keep the Spiritual Passover 1 Cor. 5.8 3. There are yet a third sort of Hebers children who are praegnantes such as have conceived Christ in their hearts and such as are as it were with child by the holy spirit Gal. 4.19 of whom I travail in birth again saith S. Paul till Christ be formed in yo These spiritual Hebrews are of the circumcision who put away the sin of the flesh and worship God in the spirit Col. 2. Phil. 3.3 2. Act. His naming of his children As the true Shem begets and is the father of all the children of Heber so he gives names unto them Rev. 3.12 So Ab. Joachim Cant. 1.3 Esay 62.2 Thy name is an ointment powred out Even that unction from the holy One 1 John 2.20.29 truly Christ himself according to the Spirit 2. As for the moral or spiritual acts of the true Shem they are two especially 1. That notable act of Shem which hath made him glorious among men Ecclus 49. he covered his fathers nakedness and may not the true Shem be said to do the like doth not the Lord Jesus Christ cover the nakednesse of that soul where he is begotten He is the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 John 2.1 2. He covers with the covering of his Spirit Esay 30.1 Rom. 8.13 by which we mortifie the deeds of the body and live 2.
persecuted the flock of Christ the same became as a Lamb. And he who was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the bird in question or indeed now out of question that Avis furibunda as Arias Montanus renders it a mad bird exceedingly mad against them persecuted them as he himself confesseth Acts 26.11 even to strange Cities the same is now become 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 like the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 merciful and pious like the Stork He who was as the evil servant who smote his fellow servants he became a faithful servant of Jesus Christ and a servant unto all the Church of Christ yea as a Nurse cherishing her children 1 Cor. 9.19 1 Thes 2.7 Yea the persecuting arrogant Saul now became humble Paul the convert the Lamb the Stork he also becomes a patern unto all that shall believe and turn unto Christ and his long-suffering 1 Tim. 1.16 There may be yet hope of thee thou persecuting evil servant ravening Wolf and furious bird of prey if thou yield to so blessed a change and follow that patern and example which is set before thee Even they whom thou hast used despitefully and persecuted pray for thee But we must not forget the mistaken Heron whom our Translators have much wronged that chaste and continent that pious and loving that wise and provident Heron. O thou Israel of God! let it not trouble thee while thou art chaste though thou be reputed an unclean fowl though thou be accounted impious and blasphemous care not while thou art loving and pious be content to be esteem'd a fool in this world while thou art wise and provident for a better world Be thou a patern and example of continency and chastity to the Triorchi to the lascivious and incontinent Hawks and Buzzards Reprove and instruct in love and piety the persecuting birds of prey Teach by thy wisdom all unwise and improvident fowles to escape the judgements of God which are coming upon the earth Jer. 8. Be a true Ardea an Heron 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Scaliger gives the etymon flying aloft above the clouds even to Heaven it self even to God himself Arise with Christ and minde the things that are above where Christ sits at the right hand of God Col. 3.1 So shalt thou learn and teach all by thine holy example that the way of life is above to the wise that they may escape the Hell that is beneath Prov. 15.24 So when thou loving and merciful one shalt flee to him unto whom thou art like the loving and merciful God thou shalt escape the heavie judgements of thy God when he shall rain snares fire and brimstone storm and horrible tempest the portion of their cup. For the righteous Lord loveth righteousness his countenance doth behold the upright Psal 11.1 6 7. Thus shall ye separate the children of Israel from their uncleanness Levit. 15. Ver. 31. that they die not in their uncleanness when they desile my Tabernacle that is among them What exception I have against the translation of this verse or a part of it lies as well against some hundreds of places more where 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are rendred the children of Israel which should be turn'd the Sons of Israel This mis-translation I confess should have been noted long since where it first meets us as Gen. 32.32 Doth it seem too slight or unworthy our notice I shall propound only two considerations according to which the male or son is necessarily to be understood and not to be smothered in conceptu confuso as here it is in the name of children The one in regard of diqnity and authority which argument S. Paul made use of 1 Tim. 2.12 13. The other in regard of strength and ability for the performance of some hard duty required and thus also the same Apostle understands it Rom. 8.16 The Spirit gives testimony to our spirit that we are the sons of God which in our translation are rendred the children of God In the former Chapter the Apostle had described the spiritual child who had only a good will which he calls a babe 1 Cor. 3.1 So 13.11 When I was a childe I spake as a childe c. So likewise Gal. 4.1 2.19 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 my little children of whom I travail in birth until Christ be formed in you and many like places But the opposition is clear Rom. 8. when ver 15. he opposeth to children under the spirit of bondage which differ not from servants Gal. 4.1 sons under the spirit of adoption Such are no more children but sons that is strong and able to suffer with Christ and so to be glorified with him as it follows ver 16 17. which is the scope of the place and hereto they are impowred and inabled by the Spirit of God which makes them sons of God ver 14. And many convictive proofs there are if humbly and docibly we look into the Scriptures I shall name some few Matth. 5. Where our Lord incourages his Disciples to the highest duty to love their enemies bless them that curse them do good to them that hate them pray for them who despitefully use them and persecute them that ye may be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not the children as our Translators render the word but the Sons of your Father which is in the heavens v. 44 45. So they who have mastered their appetites are called the sons of God though our Translators call them children Luke 20.36 They are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sons of God being 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sons of the resurrection Gal. 3.7 They who are of faith the same are the sons of Abraham and the sons of God ver 26. In both places is the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sons which are turn'd children So Gal. 4. The heir while he is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a childe differs nothing from a servant though he be Lord of all but is under Tutors and Governours until the time appointed of the Father Even so we when we were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 children were in bondage under the elements of the world but when the fulness of the time was come God sent forth his son made of a woman made under the Law to redeem them who were under the Law that we might receive 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the adoption of sons And because ye are sons God hath sent forth the Spirit into your hearts crying Abba Father Wherefore thou art no more a Servant but a son and if a son then an heir of God through Christ Gal. 4.1 7. This testimony is so full and home that I could leave out none of it And the Apostle speaking of the sufferings of Christ and the glory that should follow unto both which estates his believers are to be conformed it became him saith he for whom are all things and by whom are all things in bringing many sons unto glory to make the Captain of their salvation perfect through sufferings Heb. 2.10 I shall adde
but there are certain distinct periods of ages observable in most languages if they were taken notic of In the Greek and Latin tongues greater industry hath been used unto which we may fit our English And so the distinction of ages may be as followeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Infans an Infant until the seventh year compleat which is to be understood in the following ages 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Puer a childe until fourteen years of age 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Puber when the beard begins to grow a yongling from fourteen till eighteen years of age 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Adolescens a youth from eighten until twenty five years 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Fuvenis a young man from twenty five till thirty five 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vir a grown man from thirty five until forty nine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Senex viridis a green old man from forty nine till sixty years old 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Semicanus turn'd grey from sixty until seventy 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Decrepitus a decrepit old man or capularis one ready to be laid on the Biere that is capulum from seventy years old until death Of all these ages they have taken the second or as some count them the first when they call the sons of Israel children which are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the LXX turns by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 yea 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gen. 33.14 and other words importing minority and nonage But our Translators herein erre not alone for Luther Piscator all the Low Dutch and all our old English Translations Ainsworth only excepted render the words as our last hath them who ever was their leader herein Sequimur ut pecudes antecedentium greges saith Seneca we are prone to follow ill examples But the Translators of the French Bible have made choise of the very first age and render the words Enfans d' Israel the Infants or little ones of Israel These no doubt or some of these had but low thoughts of Gods eminent designe as if he intended to beget nourish and bring up children of a span long Lam. 2.20 Nor yet have all been so deceived For beside these named all the ancient Translations as the Chaldee LXX Syriac Arabic and Vulg. Latin and the later as the Spanish and Italian Munster also Pagnin Tremellius and Vatablus have Sons of Israel O ye sons of Israel Consider ye are by this title called to actions of honour and strength Ye know how reproachful it is in our language What! alwayes a childe Brethren Be not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 children in understanding howbeit in malice 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 be children but in under standing be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not men only as ours render the word but perfect men 1 Cor. 14.20 Yea the same Apostle Ephes 4.13 14. Let not us propound unto our selves a measure and stature according to our own or others cize and opinion but let us remember that the King of Israel even Christ John 1.49 hath given his gifts unto men even all the Pastors Teachers for the perfecting of the Saints for the work of the ministry for the edifying of the Body of Christ till we all come to the unity of the faith and the knowledge of the Son of God unto a perfect man to the measure of the stature or age of the fulness of Christ that henceforth we be no more children tossed to fro by every winde of doctrine but grow up unto him in all things who is the Head even Christ And to this purpose the place before us requires of the Priests a duty to be performed to the sons of Israel The Priests must separate the sons of Israel from their uncleanness where in the sons of Israel are comprehended the daughters of Israel also as its clear ver 18. 30. For then we read of the womens uncleanness and their manner of cleansing there ver 31. saith Moses Thus shall ye separate the sons of Israel from their uncltaness Even the Sons of Israel have their uncleanness until they be separated from it by the Priests The Priest is said sometime to pollute Levit. 13. Ver. 3. sometime to cleanse from pollution and separate from uncleanness We have diverse examples of the one and of the other Of the former Lev. 13.3 The Priest shall see the Plague 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and shall pollute or defile him which our Translators with others turn The Priest shall pronounce him unclean So very often in that Chapter But how can the Priest be said to pollute some say when he pronounceth him unclean and polluted which also is true but may he not be said to pollute him who is unclean when he leaves him in his uncleanness according to that Revel 22.11 He that is filthy let him be filthy still And so the Lord is said to harden when he mollifies not the impenitent and obstinate heart but leaves it as he findes it in its hardness And when he cleanseth not the unclean as Exod. 34.7 He may be said to pollute him Not that he otherwise causeth any positive hardness or pollution And herein the Priest is as the Lords mouth Jer. 15.19 The Priest also for like reason is said to cleanse from pollution and separate from uncleanness when he expiates and purgeth away the true spiritual uncleanness as very often in this book Which he doth typically as a figure of that High Priest who 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hath and doth make the purging of our sins by himself and so really separates the sons of Israel from their uncleanness So that although the Priests the sons of Aaron and the Evangelical Priests are said to binde and loose absolve and excommunicate as a sort of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vice-Dei as Gods Substitutes on earth yet oftentimes these acts are done with very much ignorance and arrogance As when of old the Priest said I absolve thee from thy sins And some of later time more modestly pronounced and declared absolution and remission of their sinnes to the penitent and believing souls yet its possible that both one and other might be in great errour For althogh both alleaged authority from Christ yet it is very much to be questioned whether either of them were qualified as they ought yea it s much to be doubted that either or both might mistake their Commission I speak not this of the true 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 such Priests as have been or are called unto that holy Function by God in some proportion like as Aaron was Hebr. 5.4 but of such as for a livelyhood or other by-end and out of the suggestion of their own Spirit have taken that honour to themselves without the motion and call of Gods holy Spirit let such pretend uninterrupted succession from the Apostles dayes downward which yet it s very hard to prove let them plead imposition of holy hands whether by Bishops or Presbyters let them
of Physick and Philosophy much different from those received the learned men despised him and vilified him as if he had been a Mountebank or Quacksalver but when Erastus the Emperors Physitian and a very learned man wrote against him men then began to change their mindes concerning him and to think he was not despicable as they had supposed but that he had great worth in him Whereas he who slights and neglects another he thereby declares his opinion of him that he has neither wisdom nor strength nor any thing in him worthy of estimation And from such a slight opinion commonly proceed sutable words gestures and actions 4. Such as these done by children to their parents to whom they owe the greatest honour deserve according to divine justice extream punishment even death it self For God who knowes the hearts of all men sees a disposition to kill where there is a boldness to curse According to which justice Traytors against their civil fathers are to die by the laws of most Nations as being such as go about to take away the lives of those who have given and maintained theirs Whence we perceive a main difference between the prescience and providence of the Great Lawgiver and all inferiour ones The Romans made no law against Parricides because they could not foresee that any could so degenerate or put off a man as to kill his father but the only wise God foresees this and makes lawes against those who would be murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers 1 Tim. 1.9 But what if my father be a wicked man may I not slight him speak evil of him c Surely no the wickedness of the parents exempts no childe from his duty to them Nor is it said honour thy good father and good mother but honour thy father and mother Nor is it said when any shall curse his evil father or mother but his father c. As we may reason from a less obligation Hagar must submit her self unto her Mistris though she dealt roughly with her For it is the Apostles rule 1 Pet. 2 18. Servants obey your Masters not only if good and gentle but also if they be froward David honoured Saul his Father-in-law and often preserved him from death even at the same time when Saul sought Davids life But obedience is a part of honour due to parents must the children be obedient to their parents when they command what is evil I answer the fifth Commandement is a part of the second Table or howsoever accounted by Josephus and Philo Judeus in the first Table yet it s taken out of the first and great Commandement Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart with all thy soul with all thy minde and with all thy strength and therefore must obedience unto our heavenly Father be preferred before obedience to our Fathers upon earth Here that rule is true he that loveth Father or Mother more then me is unworthy of me Matth. 10.37 Our Lord Jesus Christ was obedient unto his parents Luke 2.51 yet he staid at Jerusalem when they departed thence And therefore being reproved by his Mother when she found him in the Temple saying thy Father and I have sought thee sorrowing how is it saith he that ye sought me wist ye not that I must be about my Fathers business Or rather which is a more true translation and a more proper answer to his Mothers expostulation how is it that ye sought me Luke 2. Ver. 49. wist ye not that I must be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in my fathers house that is in the Temple so that ye needed not go far to seek me The Apostle makes answer to this doubt Children obey your parents 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Lord Ephes 6.1 Here also lies an obligation upon Parents by their sober and grave deportment to preserve their authority over their children and to be careful that a rational love decent and becoming gravity be such as may win upon their children elicit draw from them a willing love awe reverence and honor that they shew no example of light behaviour but to be exemplary in all holy conversation It is most reasonable that a man behave himself as a father if he would be honoured as a father saith one of the pious Antients And how equal is that precept Vt ameris amabilis esto Be lovely that thou mayest be loved And by like reason Vt honoreris honorabilis esto that thou maiest be honoured by thy children demean thy self as one fit to be honoured Wouldest thou not be slighted and despised Be not contemptible be not despicable That which the Apostle writes to Titus takes place here with analogy to the spiritual fatherhood Let no man saith he despise thee Titus 2.15 Alas how could Titus how can any man else help it but that he may be despifed his meaning is Let thy sober grave behaviour and thy doctrine be such as may challenge honour and due respect from thy spiritual children Be not thou despicable so shalt thou not be despised The words foregoing make this reason good These things speak and exhort and rebuke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with all authority yea as the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 properly signifies with all command as from divine authority Titus 2.15 and out of the word of God And then follows Let no man despise thee Which discovers the fondness of parents who by the lightness of their example and remissness and negligence in their government betray their gravity and authority This was Eli's sin 1 Sam. 2.29 his sons should have honoured him and he honours them and that not only above himself but above God also as God himself interprets it They say the old Ape so embraces and grasps her young ones that by hugging them she kills them Such is the Apish indulgence and unreasonable love of some parents that should they hate their children they could do them or themselves no greater injury For this fin God left his place at Shilo and put out Eli and his house from being Priests before him and brought that ruine upon Eli and his sons and the whole Nation that was not recovered a long time after What Parents are wont to say in this case My son is now of age and discretion he knowes how to behave himself c. It may be well answered by a rule known in the Civil and Canonical lawes Jus reverentiale remitti non potest No man can remit of that reverential right which is by the law of God and Nature due unto his place Whence children also may learn that there is a perpetual obligation and tye upon them to honour reverence obey and support their parents it is a principal Lesson 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 let them learn first to shew piety at home and requite their parents 1 Tim. 5.4 to obey them and have an honourable esteem of them it is a natural impression Should a Prince strike a