them For as Plutarch say's there are some 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 distempers infirmities of soul which do Unman us 2 Our obligation as to the exercise and discharge of some Natural duties is by the Law of Nature only bound upon us on supposition of some fundamenta or relations and circumstances that we are brought into Now though the thing be alway's a duty in it self and the Law requiring it unalterable yet antecedently to my entring into that Relation or those circumstances it was not my actual Duty For example the Law commanding a Husband to love and cherish his Wife or a Father to provide for his Children is immutable and invariable though in order to my being under the sanction of it as to the actual discharge of these duties it is needful that I have a Wife and a Child Si creditor quod ei debeo acceptum ferat jam solvere non tencor non quia jus Naturae desierit praecipere solvendum quod debeo sed quia quod debeb am deberi desiit If a Creditor should forgive me what I owe and am justly indebted to him I stand no longer under Obligation to payment not because the Law of Nature ceaseth to command me to pay my just debt but because that which was a debt is no longer so Grot. de jure belli pacis lib. 1. cap. 1. § 10. By what hath been said 't is easie to discover how weak and impertinent the Ecclesiastical Politician is in all the instances he brings of Natural Laws alterable as circumstances do require or as the Magistrate thinks fit It is well if upon every times changing our condition or upon every humour of the Magistrates altering the civil penalty of a moral crime the Law of Nature must change also Yea according to the rate that any Laws of Nature are alterable I will undertake to prove that they are all so We readily grant that a man by putting himself into new circumstances or new relations is thereon obliged to performance of many duties which as so circumstantiated he was not bound unto before but we altogether deny that therefore the Laws of Nature suffer the least alteration and the Reason is because they did never bind to such duties but on supposition of such Relations and Circumstances In a word the whole Law of Nature bearing upon the Nature of God and the Nature of Man while these are unchangeable it is unchangeable It is strange that we should envy the Pope to dispense with a Natural Law if the Magistrate at pleasure may § 10. That mankind notwithstanding the fall abode still under the obligation of the Law of Creation and that every Precept of the Law of nature is of an unchangeable unalterable obligation hath been already unfolded and made Good The evils which overtook us through the lapse in reference to that Law come next to be disclosed and manifested And besides what befel us in relation to it as it was ratified into a Covenant whereof I shall not now treat there were two mischiefs arrested us in reference to it under the reduplication of its being a Law namely Darkness and Ignorance that we do neither clearly nor fully discern it and Weakness and Enmity whence we neither can nor care to keep it First Darkness and Ignorance and these are grown upon us two ways 1 From an Eclipse of primigenial light in the mind it self The Soul at first was a lucid orb embellished with all the Rayes of light created 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in knowledg Col. 3.10 in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 true holiness Eph. 4.24 that is in sanctitate voluntatis veritatem â—mplectentis Cocc 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Holy with Wisdome Plat. in theat But Alas an Universal darkness hath arrested us 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The eye of the Soul is drowned or immersed in the barbarick gulf of Ignorance Plat. de Repub. lib. 7. The concreated beams of light are lost and vanished There remain none of those Radii Solis or lucida tela diei What the Poet says of dyed Wool Nec amissos colores Lana refert medicata fuco is applicable to the Soul deprived of the Image of God and tinctur'd with Sin and Lust. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 There is none that understandeth Rom. 3.11 We are born 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without Understanding Rom. 1.31 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 blind 2 Pet. 1.9 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 darkned or benighted in our minds Eph. 4.8 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 darkness Joh. 1.5 Our light is not only too dim to preserve us from the mistakes of Error and Ignorance but abuseth us with false representations The Minde is now like an Icterical Organ which imagineth all the objects of sight tinctur'd with false colours 2. This Ignorance of the Law of Nature may be partly ascribed to that disorder and confusion which have invaded the Creation 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Creature is subjected to Vanity Rom. 8.20 An 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or disorder hath overspread the Universe through the Curse inflicted upon the Creation for mans sin objective mediums are become in a great measure both dark and fallacious They have lost much of that fulgor by which the glory of God's Wisdome and Goodness and our duty to Him our selves and others was at first visible The present calamitous scene of things not only with reference to Brute Animals but inanimate Beings doth strangely impose upon our easie and distorted minds Secondly Weakness and pravity hath arrested us in all our faculties so that we are neither able nor careful to observe and perform what we know Impotency and corruption cleave to our very Natures by the loss of that Rectitude which was concreated with us and impressed upon our faculties the subordination and subjection of the appetite to Reason is in a great measure lost likewise so that the animal life doth now sway us our passion doth both baffle our Judgment and enslave our Wills we are at once not onely weak but corrupt Impotent and averse to Good and propense and disposed to evil As darkness doth naturally ensue on the withdrawment of light or as lameness doth necessarily attend the interruption of the Loco-Motive-faculty so doth inability and aversation to good and positive inclination and adaptedness to evil ensue on the loss of that Rectitude which disposed us to live to God Ungodly and without strength is the just and due Character of every one of the Posterity of Adam But more of this chapt 4. § 11. Notwithstanding the Ignorance Darkness Weakness Corruption c. that man was thus sunk into yet retaining still his Faculties he retain'd likewise some knowledg of the Duties he was obliged to by the Law of Nature and in the vertue of his abiding still endowed with Intellective and Elective powers he continued likewise able for the performance of the substance of these duties and that in his own strength A promptitude readiness and facility of
the same Mint that the former term did and we are beholding to the schools of the Philosophers for it Aristotles books 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 gave the principal rise to this word Quintilian denies that there is any Latine word by which 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 can be expressed lib. 6. cap. 3. But Tully renders them by mores manners Lib de fato and Orat. de lege Agrariâ ad Quirites The Schoolmen brought this exotick phrase as they did many other first into Divinity And it must be acknowledged of most of them that they seem to have traded more in the writings of the philosophers than in the sacred Scriptures and to have taken their measures of the notions and apprehensions of things rather from Aristotle than the Bible You may see this laid open at length both as to matter of fact and the mischievous consequences which have ensued thereupon by that great and incomparable man Dr. Owen De natur ort c. verae Theolog. lib. 1. digress lib. 6. a pag. 509. ad p. 521. However it being now universally taken up and having harboured it self both in the minds and discourses of men it would be in vain for us to contend against it we shall sufficiently approve our selves if we can manifest the just acceptation of it Moral as it relates to vertue is capable at most but of a threefold signification First to denote the conformity of our minds and actions to the whole law of God regulating our practical obedience But this description whether we take our measure from vertue to which it is an adjunct and of which it is predicated or from law which first claiming the Denomination of Moral doth afterwards impart it to certain habits of the mind and its operations is much too large If we determine of the meaning of it by vertue Then for as much as in all true affirmative propositions there must be an identity betwixt the subject and the predicate Moral must relate onely to an observation of these things and a practice of those duties which vertue refer's to namely an observance of what Reason without any superadded declaration can conduct us in and natural endowments and self acquirements inable us to the performance of Nor could the first Authors of this Term mean any more by it being at once strangers to all external Revelation Subjective grace Or if we should choose to decide the import of Moral as it refers to Vertue by taking our measure of its signification from Law as that to which the stile of Moral primarily belongs and by analogy only to habits and operations we shall still find that the foresaid signification of Moral is too wide for according to this method of proceed Moral as referred to vertue can be of no larger extent than Moral as referred to law is Seeing then it were against ordinary sense and the custome of mankind to stile every law of practical obedience moral it is no less irrational to stile the conformity of our minds and actions to those laws by the name of Moral Vertues A Second signification put upon Moral as it hath reference to Vertue is to intimate thereby the observation of the precepts of the Second table of the decalogue and this is the common acceptation of it among practical Divines whereof I judg this to be the reason either because the Philosophers in their writings vulgarly called Ethicks and Morals do principally treat of the duties which men owe to themselves and one another which are likewise the subject of the Second Table or because they discourse of those only with any consistency to reason and commeâ—â—dableness while in the mean time in what soever we owe immediately to God the imaginations are vain and their sentiment dark and ludicrous But this acceptatioâ— of Moral Vertues I take to be as much toâ— narrow as the former was wide nor dâ— any that handle these matters accurately so straiten and restrain them For whether we state the meaning of Moral by its Habitude to Vertue or to that Law which is so denominated We must admit it a greater latitude of signification than meerly to imply Second-Table duties If we judg of its import by its 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to Vertue we must then allow it the same largeness of sence whâ—ch we allow that namely to declare whatsoever is required of us by the Law of Nature in the Light of Reason and I suppose it will be readily acknowledged that there are some duties which we owe immediately to God and which respect him alone as their object that can be demonstrated by principles drawn from Nature and the foundations and grounds of them discovered in the Light of Reason and by consequence Moral Vertues ought not to be confined to the observation of the precepts of the Second Table Or if we determine the sense of Moral by its 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and Relation to that law which is so called and with respect to conformity to which the Habit 's and Operations of our minds are afterwards denominated Moral it will with the same evidence follow that the Duties of Morality consist not alone in obeying the commandments of the Second Table forasmuch as the Precepts of the First constitute a part of the Moral Law as well as these of the Second do There is a Third sence which Moral as it belongs to vertue is capable of namely to declare those habits and operations of the mind required by the law of creation And this sence of Moral will prove either stricter or larger according as we take the measure of the term from vertue or from law If we define the meaning of it by its habitude to vertue it will then signify only those duties that we are under the obligation of by the law of creation which we are able to discover by the light of Reason But if we determine the sence of it by that law which is commonly called moral it will then express all those duties either to God or Man which we are obliged to by the rule of creation whether there reside in man in his lapsed state an ability of discerning them by Reason yea or not Now this being the most comprehensive notion of moral vertues or duties of morality that any one who have treated those things with exactness have pitched on and being the largest sence which in any propriety of Speech the Term can be used in I shall be willing to admit this as the true notion and idea of it Morality then consistâ— in an observance of the precepts of the law of our creation that by the alone strength and improvement of our natural abilities whether the particular duties we are under the sanction of by the foresaid law be discoverable by and in the light of Reason yea or not § 5. Besides these moral vertues whereof we have been discoursing and whose nature we have fixed and stated There is frequent
the matter it self And that what is afterwards to be offered may be the more clearly apprehended and the lines measures principles of Vertue and Grace the more duly stated I shall in this Chapter propose and endeavour to establish several conclusions which as they are of considerable import in themselves so of no less influence to the enlightninâ— of what we have undertaken First then All moral actions become Good â— Bad from their agreeableness or disagreeableâ—ness to some Rule which is as their measâ—â—â— and standard to which being commensurâ—â—â— they appear either equal or unequal As in mâ—â—terial and sensible things we judg of theâ—â— streightness crookedness by their agreeâ—ment or disagreement to a material rulâ— which is the measure of their Rectitude anâ— Obliquity so in things Moral we judg wheâ—ther a thing or action be Good or Evil bâ— their agreement or disagreement to somâ— moral Rule For an Action then to bâ— good or bad it imports two things thâ— entity of the Action the Rule to whicâ— it is commensurate They greatly misâ—take who state the moraâ—lity of an action As Compton doth de bonitate malitiâ humanorum actuum Disp. 89. Sect. 1. N. 4. formally to consist in its being spontaneous voluntary and free for though no action can be Moral that is not free yeâ— its morality doth not lie formally in its freeâ—dom Hence those very Philosophers who made Vertue and Vice to be thingâ— only Arbitrary founded alone in the imaginations of men did nevertheless acknowledg man to be a free agent and that â—iberty is inseparable from every Humane â—ction Freedom intrinsecally belongs to eâ—ery action as it is an human action whereâ—s morality is but partly intrinsecal namely â—s it imports and includes the entity of the â—ction and partly extrinsecal viz. as it deâ—otes the measure by which it is regulated § 2. The second thing we premise is That â—he immediate and formal Rule of Moral â—ood or evil is Law or the constitution of the Rector as to what shall be due I â—â—ant that the fundamental measure of â—ctions unchangeably Good or Evil is 〈◊〉 Divine Nature and of things and â—ctions indifferent and variable the Diâ—â—ne Will But the formal and immeâ—â—ate Rule of both is Law No action 〈◊〉 otherwise Good or Bad than as it is â—â—ther enjoyned or forbidden It is imâ—ossible to conceive any action or omisâ—â—on to be a duty abstracting from obâ—â—gation and it is as impossible to conâ—â—ive obligation secluding Law This â—â—nd's abundantly confirmed by that of â—he Apostle John 1 Epist. chap. 3. ver ◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sin is the transgresâ—â—on of the Law An illegality or deviation â—â—om law To which accords that of Paul Rom. 4 15. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Where no Law is there is no transgressioâ— It is a great mistake which yet I find toâ— many guilty of to make either the objecâ— or circumstance of an aâ—ction In hoc hallucinantur Iâ—sâ—ite fâ—re omnes vid. Vâ—sâ— diâ—p 57. Compt. dist 84. Sect. 2. de act Ham. the rule of its Moâ—rality or to constituâ—â— them the measure whâ— we judg an action gooâ— or evil An action is â—ot otherwise Gooâ— or Evil with respect to its circumstances then as cloathed with them it is either prâ—â—hibited or enjoyned It is true the cirâ—cumstances of an action conduce and coâ—â—tribute towards the discerning and defiâ—â—ing when it is forbidden when commanâ—ded when allowed and when disallowed But still the Law permitting and enjoyâ—ning the action in such cases and circumâ—stances disapproving and prohibiting it iâ— other is the proper and immediat Rule oâ— its morality § 3. The Third premise it this that maâ— being created a rational creature was uâ—â—der the Sanction of a law It is a contraâ—diction for man to be such a creature as hâ— is and not to be obliged to love fear anâ— obey God All creatures according tâ— their respective and several natures anâ— necessarily subject to him that made them â—t is impossible that whatever owes its enâ—â—re being to God should not also be in â— suitable subjection to him Man then â—eing a Rational creature must owe God â— rational subjection and on supposition â—hat his being is of such a Species and kind â— necessarily follow 's from the constituâ—â—on of his nature and his Habitude to God as his Maker that he should be acâ—ordingly bound to love reverence and â—â—rve him that made him so this being 〈◊〉 only Reasonable subjection But forâ—â—much as not only Pyrrho Epicurus c. â—f old but Hobbs and some other wild â—theistically disposed persons of late have â—anaged an opposition to all natural Laws â—ontending that all things are in themâ—elves indifferent that Moral Good and Evil result only from mens voluntary reâ—training and limiting of themselves and â—ow that antecedently to the constitutions â—ppointments and custom's of Societies â—here is neither Vertue nor Vice Turpiâ—ude nor Honesty justice nor injustice That there are no laws of Right and Wrong previous to the laws of the Commonwealth but that all men are at liberty to do as they please I say matters standing thus I shall discourse this head a little 〈◊〉 amply That there have been some who eithâ—â— through a supine negligence in not exâ—â—â—cising their faculties or through have defiled and darkned their Reasons by coâ—â—verse with sin have lost the sence 〈◊〉 distinction of Good and evil as well 〈◊〉 memoir's of ancient times as the sad â—â—â—perience of our own do evidently 〈◊〉 Diogenes Laertius in the life of Pyrrho 〈◊〉 us that he denyed any thing to be just unjust 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by nature But that all this were so only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by positive law 〈◊〉 Custom Nec Natura potest justo secernere 〈◊〉 quum There is no difference betwixt what 〈◊〉 call good and what evil by nature 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Forasmuch as there are different lawes 〈◊〉 different places it thence follows that theâ—◠〈◊〉 nothing in it self honest or dishonest but that according to occasion the same thing may be sometimes the one and sometimes â—he other In Fragmentis Pythagoreorum â—nter opuscula edita a D. Theoph. Gale Seâ—eca as well as others chargeth the same â—pon Epicurus and saith that therein he will dissent from him Ubi dicit nihil esse â—ustum naturâ where Epicurus affirmeth â—hat by nature or natural law there is noâ—hing just and honest And this indeed â—ecessarily follows from Epicurus his disâ—harging God from the Government of the World For if there be no Government â—here is no law and if no law there is neither moral Good nor Evil As Good and Evil are relatives to law so is law the â—elative of Government and all these â—tand and fall together With those already produced doth Mr. Hobbs fully agree Ubi nulla Respublica nihil injustum where there is no Common-wealth there is
had never assumed the Sacerdotal Office which they did by their offering Sacrifices these two being Relates But I find I have been already too prolix upon this head and they who can withstand the force of the fore-going Arguments are not like to be influenced by any thing I am further able to subjoyne § 5. We have already shewn that the whole of Obedience which we owe to God belongs either to Worship or Manners We have also declared the insufficiency of Natural Light for the Regulating of Worship Our next task is to demonstrate the defectiveness of it as to the conduct of Manners Manners are either such Duties as in themselves are acceptable and good or such as derive all their goodness from a Command with respect to the first revealed Laws are only declarative of the goodness of the Duty The Absolute Bonity of it having an antecedent foundation in the Nature of God the Nature of man and the Relation that man stands in to God But with reference to the second supernatural Law is constitutive of the goodness of the Duty There being nothing in the thing it self previous to the Command rendring it so And here though obedience be a Moral Duty yet the Law prescribing it is not properly Moral Law For the Morality of Obedience ariseth not from the Nature of the Command but from the Relation we stand in to God and the Dependence we have on him whereas the Morality of Law hath its Reason in the Nature of God and the congruity or incongruity of things enjoyned or forbidden to it That there are acts of Obedience distinct from Natural Duties which yet are not properly acts of Worship might be demonstrated by innumerable instances Of this kind there are several Duties founded in personal commands whereby none were obliged but onely they to whom they were immediatly given Such was the Duty of Abrahams leaving his Fathers House being built on a precept wherein he only was concerned The like may be said of the Obligation laid on the young man in the Gospel of selling all that he had c. Of this sort also there are several Duties arising from Divine Laws which concerned only a particular Nation and yet emerged not from Laws properly Ritual Of which number we may reckon the Obligations proceeding from the Judicials given to the Jews at least where the Reason of them was not Natural Equity By these Laws they came under Obligations that the rest of man-kind were not concerned in Yea they became bound to some things which setting aside the positive Law of God could not have been lawfully done and which at this day no Nation or Person can practice with Innocency viz. The Marrying the Widow of a Brother dead without Issue Such Laws Gods Dominion over all men as his Creatures authoriseth him to make and that as a proof of his own absolute Prerogative and for tryal of his Creatures obedience Nor did God ever leave man since he first Created him singly to the Law of Nature for the payment of that Homage he owes him but even to Adam in Innocency he thought fit to give a positive Law a Law which for the matter of it had no foundation at all in Mans Nature further than that he was obliged by his Nature to do whatsoever God enjoyned him Now these Laws having their foundation in Institution not in Nature The Reason of them being not so much the Holiness of God as his Soveraignty Natural Light can no ways be suppos'd a due measure of them nor able to instruct about them All that Obedience that resolves into the Will of God must suppose Revelation in that nothing else can discover its Obligation to man-kind saith a late Author Def. continuat p. 427. How consistently to himself in other places where he tells that all Religion consists in nothing else but the practice of Vertue and that the practice of Vertue consists in living suitably to the dictates of Reason and Nature I leave to himself to declare That there are positive Laws of God now in being and that in the vertue of them we are under Obligation to several Duties I shall God willing evince when I come to shew the insufficiency of the Law of Nature as it's Objective in the Decalogue as to being the measure of the whole Obedience we owe to God § 6. That there are Natural Laws as well as positive and that the latter are but accessions to the former we have else-where demonstrated Now these Laws being stiled Natural non respectu Objecti not because of their object many of the Duties we are under the Sanction of by them referring immediatly to God but respectu principii medii per quod cognoscimus because communicated to our Nature and cognoscible by Natural Light If the Light of Nature alone be of significancy in any thing 't is here And indeed the Writings of Heathen Philosophers such as Aristotle Plato Epictetus Seneca Plutarch Cicero Hierocles Plotinus c. The Laws of Pagan Common-wealths especially the Republicks of Greece and Rome the vertuous actions of persons not enlightned by Revelation of all ranks and qualities such as Socrates Aristides Phâ—cion Cato and many others not easie to be recounted shew that men left to the meer conduct of Natural Light can attain a better insight into the Duties of Nature than of Religion and know more of Vertue than of Piety For as both Amyrald and Sir Charles Wolseley besides others observe Cicero wrote to better purpose in his books de officiis than he did in those de Naturâ Deorum Yea even the Platonists the great Refiners of Religious Ceremonies who in stead of obscene and barbarous usages introduced civil and modest Rites discoursed much better of Vertue than Divinity Their Sentiments for the conduct of conservation being for the most part Rational and Generous whereas their Theological Notions are either obscure uncertain or romantick If we be then able to prove that Natural Light or the Law of Nature as it is subjective in man since the Fall is no sufficient measure of Moral Duties or of those Duties we are under the Sanction of by the Law of Creation we shall get one step farther in our design namely that Natural Light is a very inadaequate measure of Religion In confirmation of this I might in the first place take notice how the great pretenders to the conduct of Reason prevaricated in all those prime Laws of Nature which Relate to the Unity of the God-head Though not onely the Being but the Unity of the Divine Nature be witnessed to by every mans Reason and we need onely exercise our faculties against Polytheism as well as Atheism Yet the Universality of man-kind setting aside those who had the benefit of a supernatural Revelation not onely sunk into the belief and adoration of a plurality of Gods but into the worshipping those for Gods whom to acknowledg for such is more irrational than to believe that
that essentially belonged to them â— Interrogas quid petam ex virtute ipsamâ— nihil enim est melius ipsa pretium sui estâ— Senec. de vit beat vid. etiam de Clement cap. 1. Epist. 113. But first it is 〈◊〉 palpable contradiction that any action or habit should be Morally beautiful otherwise than as it respects God whose Nature and Will is the measure of all its Moral pulchritude and therefore it ought to be referred to the honor of its Model Yea not onely the Will of God but his Nature requires that what-ever derives from him either as its idea or source should be ultimately resolved and terminated in him as its Center Secondly It is most false that either Habit or Act can be Rationally chosen or finally rested in for it self But either some benefit to our selves and friends or the honor and glory of some other must be proposed and intended by them For as all Habits are desired in reference to actions and operations so if in every action we design not an end in order to the attainment of which we so act we declare our selves brutish and irrational Though Brutus was as far tinctur'd with a persuasion that Vertue was its own End and Reward as any man else whatsoever yet it is most certain that he reckoned upon the accruement of something else by it whereof judging himself disappointed he proclaim'd Vertue to be but an empty Name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I shall shut up this with a sentence or two of Austin Virtutes cum ad seipsas referuntur nec propter aliud expetuntur inflatae ac superbae sunt When Vertues are sought onely for themselves they degenerate into Pride and become Idols and the prosecution of them is Idolatry Proinde virtutes quas sibi videtur habere homo nisi ad Deum retulerit etiam ipsa vitia sunt potius quam virtutes Therefore the Vertues which a man thinks he hath if they be not referred to God they are Vices rather than Vertues de Civit. Dei lib. 9. cap. 25. vide Jansen de Stat. Natur laps lib. 4. cap. 11 12 13. It appears then from the whole of what we have said that the Law of Creation or of Reason as it is subjective in Man is so far from being the Rule of Religion in its utmost latitude that it is not a sufficient measure of Moral Vertue § 7. We come next to consider the Law of Nature or Right Reason as 't is Objective in the Decalogue which we have declared to be a transcript of the Law of Creation chap. 2. § 4. and have also demonstrated its perfection and sufficiency for the Regulating the Duties we are under by the said Law chap. 2. § 13. We cannot without very unbecoming thoughâ—s of the Wisdome of the Legislator but judge it a compleat Measure of all Moral Offices and performances seeing God designed it for a Law of Morality For as Plato says it belongs to a Law-giver not only to have an eye to a few things 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but to have an Universal respect to all and to every Vertue de legib 10. Nor can this be denyed of the supreme Rector presupposing him supernaturally to reveal a Law of Manners without reflexion both on his Nature and Government We will allow the Orator to complain latius patere officiorum quam Juris Regulam That there is more belongs to our Duty than ever was enacted by any Civil Law but we dare not entertain the like thoughts of the Divine Law especially when it was given by God for this very end that we might be illuminated and conducted by it in the offices of Morality It is no part of my concern at present to enquire whether the Decalogue comprehend any more in it than a transcript of the Original Law or whether besides its being a Collection of Natural Laws there may not be some positive precepts as well as arbitrary appendices added to it It is enough to me that it contains an Epitome of the Dictates of Right Reason and that 't is a compendious Draught and Model of the Law of Nature nor will I at this time interest my self in that Controversie whether there by any thing else required in it yea or not I withal readily grant that Obedience to all the Duties of Instituted Religion is bound upon the Soul by the Law of the Ten Commandments seeing that obligeth us to obey God in all the declared Instances of his Will As there is nothing in positive Religion repugnant to any principle of Nature so these very duties which do immediately fundate in Gods Will do challenge our obedience in the Vertue of a Natural Law I crave also to have it observed That the Decalogue may be considered either as it is a meer Draught and Delineation of the Law of Creation or as having annexed to it a Remedial Law to which in its most exacting Rigor it was made subservient Though the Law of the Ten Commandments for the matter and substance of it be one and the same with the Law of Creation being in this respect only Renovatio antiquae Legis not Latio novae and still Natural with reference to the things enacted though positive as to the manner of the promulgation Yet as given by Moses there is a Law of Grace couched in it which no wise appertain'd to it as communicated at first with our Natures Hence the Lord in the very Preface of the Decalogue treats with them as their God Exod. 20.1 i. e. as their everlasting Benefactor which in the Vertue of the Covenant of Works and in Reference to the meer Law of Creation he neither was nor could be since the first ingress of sin In this sense David takes the Law in most of his Encomiums of it And in this acceptation I acknowledge the Law to be the measure of all the main Duties which we owe to God either in the way of Natural or Instituted Religion It is true there are some Duties of peculiar New-Testament institution but those as they are in themselves of a subordinate Nature to the great demands of the Law of Faith being chiefly stipulations of our performing the conditions of it So both the constituting practising of them had been unsuitable to the Old Testament oeconomie The like may be said concerning those obligations which we are manumitted and set free from which the Mosaick Church were under the Sanction of That which I undertake the Justification of is this that the Decalogue as it is a meer transcript of the Law of nature or right Reason is not the measure of the whole of Religion nor as it is Christian of the most momentous parts of it Nor can the contrary be affirmed without renouncing of the Gospel which I am afrai'd too many as being weary of it are ready to doe For First if the Decalogue as it is a meer new Edition of the Original Law of nature be the sole and only Measure
meer digest of the Eternal Rules of Nature right Reason § 2 All that Relates to Religion may be reduced either to faith or obedience to what we are to believe or what we are to perform Faith and practice engross the whole of mans duty Credenda agenda constitute the System of Religion nor are the Articles of our Creed less necessary than the precepts of the Decalogue It is not therefore the running after a Bubble of our own blowing as a late Author phraseth it def continuat p. 326. To discourse the obligation we are under to Articles of Belief For as they constitute one entire part of Religion and are bound upon our souls by the same Authority and under the same penalty with Moral services So our assent to them and belief of them is not only a necessary part of that Homage and Fealty we owe to God but it is introductive of all the other operations and services we exert towards him Every distinct act of obedience supposeth a distinct act of faith with reference to some Article or other So far as we preclude any Article of faith from our Belief we so far discharge our selves from the practical obedience that emergeth from it Our obeying the Soveraign will of God doth not only suppose his Veracity in every Revelation of his will concerning our Duty but a distinct knowledg and fiduciary assent to the several Articles from which it ariseth and on which it attends The Articles of our faith are not like the Theories of Philosophy which no way influence obedience but every Dogma in the Creed is subservient to and authoriseth a practical Homage So far then as Natural Light fals short of being a sufficient measure of the Credenda of Religion so far doth it also fall short of being a Measure of the Agenda of it Is it probable that it should direct us to the conclusions when it is ignorant of the premisses or that it should inform us of the superstructures when it hath no knowledg of the foundation Though nothing proposed to our belief be repugnant to Reason yet I hope we do not so far Socinianize as to deny but that there are some things above the reach and comprehension of it Some Articles of our Religion as they have no foundation at all in Nature by which they can be known or understood such are the Doctrines of the Trinity The Incarnation of the Son of God The Resurrection of the dead the Oeconomy of the Spirit and the whole method and means of our Recovery by Jesus Christ So being most plainly revealed they exceed the Grasp of our minds as to the full comprehending of them Though Reason be the great Instrument by which we come to discern what is Revealed for our belief yet 't is no way's the Formal Reason of believing them Though we examine the Truth and certainty of Revelation by it whether such a Declaration be from God or not yet it neither is nor can be the Standard Regulating the things Revealed There are other Doctrines which though as to our perception of them they have a foundation in Nature and there be Natural Mediums by which they may be discerned yet such is the present Darkness and pravity of our minds that without the assistance of a Revelation they only puzzle mislead or leave us sceptical about them Of this kind are the Articles relating to the Production and Fabrick of the World the Origine of Evil the Corruption of Humane Nature the Ingress of Death c. Concerning which never any without a supernatural Revelation attained either to satisfaction or certainty Much of that Homage and practical obedience which we pay to God results from Truths depending on meer Revelations Yea it were not difficult to demonstrate thaâ— there is hardly one Article of Belief so fully and certainly known by Natural Light as is requisite to a through incouragement and practice of vertue and suppression of vice A knowledg of the Entrance of sin the corruption of Nature our obnoxiousness to Punishment together with an account of the means provided of God for the Removing of Guilt and the bringing us to a Reconciliation with himself are absolutely necessary to be understood in order to the performance of the Duties of the Gospel On these Heads doth the whole of Instituted Religion and Christian odedience depend Now whatever dark and uncertain guesses men through the exercise and improvement of Natural Light may arrive at as to some of those yet no one left to the conduct of meer Reason arose ever to any clear perswasion full certainty about them See Amyrald his Treatise concerning Religions from page 183 to 264. That Light wherewith every man is born hath served the best improvers of it for little else but to mislead them about these things Nor needs there any other evidence of this but the sad prevarications of the most knowing persons of the World where a Revelation hath not been heard or received concerning them Forasmuch therefore as Natural Light is every way uncapable of instructing us in these Truths it necessarily follows that it can direct us unto none of the Duties which proceed from them It is a poor Apologie of a late Author that intending a comprehensive scheme of the practical Duties of Religion he purposely omitted articles of meer belief as impertinent to the matter and design of his enquiry Def. Continuat p. 326. For besides that there are no Articles of Meer Belief every one being adapted more or less to influence our conversation either towards God or man The doctrines represented by the learned person whom he there reflects on are such as ground the whole of Christian practice and to exclude them the Scheme of Religion is plainly to vacate all the Duties which as Christians we are bound to § 3. Whatsoever appertains to Obedience must be referred either to Worship or Manners To one of these branches do all the practical Duties of Religion belong That which we advance to then in the next place is That the Light of Reason or the Law of Nature as it is subjective in man is no due measure for the Regulating of Divine Worship We do not deny but that Natural Light instructs us That God is to be Worshipped That there is such a Homage as Worship due from man to God we need no other Assurance than what our Reason gives us Though the School of Epicurus differ from the rest of man-kind in their inducements of venerating the Deity yet they acknowledg that we ought to venerate Him Never any that confessed a Supreme Being but they also confessed that such an honour as worship ought to be paid him This is indelible in every mans Nature without devesting our selves of our faculties we cannot gain-say it Nor do we deny in the second place but that we may arise by the Light of Reason to that knowledg of God Primus est deorâ—â— cultus Deos
of Religion then the New Covenant is nothing but a repetition of the Old Yea there is no such thing as a New Covenant with respect to the Terms of it onely it is so called with respect to the manner of its Promulgation For where the Terms and conditions vary not neither do the Covenants vary 'T is their differing in their Demands that gives them the Denomination of distinct Covenants To assert a coincidency as to the whole preceptive part betwixt the two Covenants is in effect to bid us disclaim a great part of the Bible What tendency some expressions of a late Author have this way I shall refer to the judgment of others As in the State of Innocence the whole Duty of man consisted in the practice of all those Moral Vertues that arose from his Natural Relation to God and man so all that is superinduced upon us since the fall is nothing but helps and contrivances to supply our Natural defects and restore us to better ability to discharge those duties we stand engaged to by the Law of our Nature and the design of our Creation c. def contin p. 315 316. The supposition of sin does not bring in any New Religion but only makes new circumstances and names of old things and requires new helps and advantages to improve our Powers and to encourage our Endeavours And thus is the Law of Grace nothing but a Restitution of the Law of Nature ibid. p. 324. Secondly there are several duties incumbent now upon us which also constitute the chief part of our Christian Obedience that the Decalogue as ' its a transcript of the Law of right Reason or of Nature is perfectly a stranger to For proof of this I shall only insist on Repentance towards God and Faith towards Jesus Christ. I suppose it will be granted by most that Repentance in all the parts and branches of it viz. conviction of sin Contrition for it and conversion to God from it are Duties we are all under the obligation of I said by most because of some expressions in a late Author which I can hardly reconcile with the account which the Scripture gives us of Repentance or with that modesty which we ought to exercise in the things of God The Fathers first preachers of the Christian Faith did not fill peoples heads with scruples about the due degrees of Godly sorrow and the certain symptoms of a through-Humiliation def contin p. 306 307. And a little after They says he meaning the Noncomformists examine the truth and reality of mens conversion by their orderly passage through all the stages of conviction And unless a man be able to give an account of having observed and experienced in himself all their imaginary Rules Methods of Regeneration i. e. conviction and contrition c. they immediately call into question his being a Child of God and affright him with sad stories of having miscarried of Grace and the New-Creature And he is lost and undone for ever unless he begin all the work of conversion anew and he must as it were re-enter into the Womb again pass through all the scenes workings of conviction in which state of formation all new converts must continue the appointed time and when the days are accomplished they may then proceed to the next operation of the Spirit i. e. to get a longing panting and breathing frame of soul upon which follows the proper season of delivery and they may then break loose from the Enclosures of the Spirit of Bondage and creep out from those dark Retirements wherein the Law detain'd them into the light of the Gospel and the liberty of the Spirit of Adoption p. 309 310. However I can justifie the forementioned steps and degrees of Repentance both by Scripture and Reason Now this the Moral Law as 't is a meer summary of the Law of Nature neither know's nor allow's I confess the Law of Creation obliging us to love God with all our Heart Soul and Strength and in all things to approve our selves perfect before him doth by consequence in case of the least faileur oblige us to sorrow And thus men wholly strangers to the renueing grace of the Covenant may repent witness among others Judas as to the act of betraying Christ. But to encourage us thereunto by any promise of acceptance without which no man will ever be found in the due practice of it Heb. 11.6 Or administer help for the performance of it this it neither doth promiseth nor can do or promise For being once violated it know's no other language but the thundring of wrath against the transgressour Now one and the same Covenant can not be capable of two such contrary clauses as denouncing an inevitable curse on whosoever shall not observe the Law in all points and promising mercy to those that repent of the transgressions which the do commit They like may be said of Faith This is the great condition of the Gospel Gal. 3.22 Act. 13.29 Rom. 10.9 One of the principal Duties we are now obliged to 1 Joh. 3.23 Joh. 6.29 Now this as 't is the condition of Gospel-pardon the Law is utterly unacquainted with know's nothing at all of it It is true there is a general Faith terminating on the Existence Authority and Veracity of God which comes under the Sanction of the Law of Creation But Faith as respecting a Mediator and Gods treating with us through him the Law is both ignorant of and at enmity with Gal. 3.12 The Law is not of Faith Rom. 9.32 33. Israel which followed after the Law of Righteousness hath not attained to the Law of Righteousness wherefore because they sought it not by Faith but as it were by the Works of the Law I know not whether it be upon this account because Faith comes not smoothly enough within the compass of being a Moral Vertue that a late Author is pleas'd to scoff at Faith in our Lord Jesus Christ not only by stiling it in mockage the dear darling Article of the Religion of Sinners Def. Contin p. 322. but by representing what the Scripture every-where ascribes to it in such terms of Drollery Scorn and Contempt that I tremble to transcribe them They make says he a grievous noise of the LORD CHRIST tell fine Romances of the secret amours betwixt the believing Soul and the LORD CHRIST and prodigious stories of the miraculous feats of FAITH in the LORD CHRIST Reproof to the Rehears Transpros p. 69. See also Def. Contin p. 135· 140. But while men believe their Bibles they are not to be jeered out of their Duty and Happiness And this is all I shall discourse of the first Instrument of Morality viz. the measure of it and I hope it appears by what hath been offered that the Law of Creation which is the Alon◠Rule of Moral Vertue whether we take it subjectively as it is in Man since the Fall or objectively as it is in the Decalogue