noteth upon that place in Luke that we are not bid onely to hate our fathers and mothers c. but even our owne life and soule also Nihil est homini anima sua conjunctius tamen nisi etiam hanc oderis c. Nothing is neerer to a man than his owne soule yet if thou doest not hate this also for Christ thou shalt not be rewarded as one that loveth him Homil. 36. in Mat. QUEST XII How farre children are bound to obey their parents NOw then it is evident how farre our duty is extended to our parents 1. Though they bee froward and perverse and endued neither with vertue nor wisdome or any other good qualities yet they must be reverenced and relieved as our parents and the reason thereof is that conjunction whereby they are joyned unto us by nature Hanc conjunctionem alia attributa non tollant This conjunction cannot be taken away by any other attributes but seeing by Gods providence they are our earthly parents and so instruments of our outward life wee must honour them as herein obeying the will and pleasure of God and submitting our selves to his providence Simler 2. But wee must so farre obey them as that wee disobey not God our heavenly father and so the Apostle doth limite our duty and obedience to our parents Children obey your parents in the Lord Ephes. 6.1 So Chrysostome Si habes patrem infidelem obsequere ei c. If thou hast an unbeleeving father obey him but if he would draw thee into the same pit of infidelity wherein hee is plus dilige Deum quâ—m patrem quia pater non est animae then love God more than thy father for he is not the father of thy soule but of the flesh therefore render unto every one that which belongeth unto him Carnalibus patribus praebete carnis obsequtum c. Unto carnall fathers yeeld carnall and outward obedience but unto the father of spirits reserve animae sanctitatem the holinesse and freedome of the soule Homil. 26. in Matth. Our duty then unto God being alwayes excepted in all other things wee must obey our earthly parents though they be evill and wicked for officium à personis discernendum c. the office and calling must be discerned from the persons wee may hate their vices and yet because of Gods ordinance honour their calling Vrsinus QUEST XIII At what age it is most convenient for men to marry to get children TOstatus here hath a politicke and wise consideration that because children are to honour their parents not only in giving them outward reverence but in helping and relieving them in their old age when as the aged parents cannot provide for themselves that parents should neither marry too soone nor yet stay too long but beget children in the middle and strength of their age as Aristotle would have men to take them wives about 37. yeeres of age lib. 7. politic c. 15. For if they should marry at 14. or 15. yeeres they themselves being yet but young and wanting experience are scarce able to provide for themselves much lesse for their children and for the same reason if they should deferre their marriage till their old age as to 65. yeeres or thereabout neither they growing impotent by their age can discharge the part of fathers in the education of their children and their children cannot bee of any growth in time to succour and relieve their aged parents But if they take the middle age of their strength both these inconveniences will be prevented for both they shall be sufficient for strength of body and mind to take care for their children and they also will bee attained to perfect growth and strength to helpe their parents in their age Tostat. qu. 17. QUEST XIV Whether the reciprocall duty also of parents toward their children be not here commanded AS children are here commanded to honour their parents so the reciprocall duty of parents is required toward their children for although expresse mention be made onely of honour to be given to parents and superiours yet the other also is included for seeing God tribuit eis nomen etiam tribuit eis rem doth give them the name of parents he doth also give them the thing and if he would have them reverenced with due honour his meaning is also they should doe things worthy of honour Vrsin Neque enim veri sunt parentes qui labores negligunt For they are not true parents indeed which doe neglect their children Basting And seeing the Scripture doth in many places urge and prescribe the duty and care of parents in bringing up their children this morall duty should altogether be omitted and so the Law of God should not be perfect if it were not comprehended in this precept Calv. QUEST XV. Wherein the duty of parents consisteth toward their children THe care then of fathers toward their children consisteth in these three things in their education in providing all things necessary for their maintenance and life in their instruction and institution and in due and moderate correction and castigation S. Paul toucheth all these three together thus writing Ephes. 6.4 Yee fathers provoke not your children to wrath then he saith but bring them up and further in instruction and information of the Lord. For provision and sustentation the Apostle saith If any provide not for his owne and namely for them of his houshold he denieth the faith and is worse than an Infidel 1. Tim. 5.8 that is herein he commeth short of the example of many Infidels who were kinde and naturall to their children For instruction and institution Moses saith thou shalt rehearse them continually to thy children Deut. 6.7 And the Wise-man saith Teach a childe in the trade of his way and when hee is old he will not depart from it Prov. 22.9 Concerning due correction and chastisement the Wise-man also saith Withhold not correction from the childe if thou smite him with the rod he shall not dye thou shalt smite him with the rod and shalt deliver his soule from hell Prov. 23.13 14. And this was the overthrow of Eli his house because hee did not reprove his children with a fatherly severity according to the quality and merit of their sinne Basting QUEST XVI Whether all the duties of mercy and charity are commanded in this precept LYranus and Tostatus consenting with him as he seldome useth to doe will have by the name of fathers here understood all men that are in need and necessity whom we are bound to succour as Augustine saith Pasce fame morientem quod si non poteris occidisti Feed him that is ready to be famished if thou doest not feed him thou hast killed him And Tostatus by honour here understandeth all the workes of mercy and charity and generally all good workes which a man is bound to doe nam mala opera qua vitare tenemur c. for the evill workes which we are bound to shun belong unto the other
knowne as that none could doubt of them as are the first rules of direction there needed not be any law given of them but they are of the second sort so knowne by the law of nature as that many doe doubt of them and doe erre about them 2 The old law was the ministration of death not of it selfe but occasionaliteâ— by occasion because it commanded such things as were not in mans power to keepe and so the morall precepâ—s also did mortifie and kill Quia importabant difficultatem ad conservandum ea Because they did bring in a difficultie or rather impossibilitie to keepe them therefore in this respect there was no difference betweene the old law and the Morall law Tostat. quast 32. QUEST VIII Of the perfection and sufficiencie of the morall law BEside it will be thus objected against the sufficiencie of the morall law 1. Because the law prescribeth onely duties concerning God and our neighbour it speaketh nothing of the sinnes of man toward himselfe 2. It forbiddeth perjurie whereas blasphemie and heresie were as needfull to be forbidden 3. The precept of the Sabbath is expressed whereas there were many other festivities as of the Passeover Pentecost and others which the Israelites were bound to keepe 4. The dutie toward parents is commanded but not the love of parents againe to their children 5. The inward act of murther is not forbidden as the inward act of adulterie namely concupiscence therefore there is not a sufficient enumeration in the morall law of all morall duties Contra. 1. That the Morall law is perfect and every way sufficient it appeareth first by the generall contents thereof in prescribing all kinde of duties both toward God and man For first as three things are to bee performed to terrene governours namely fidelitie reverence and obedience so likewise the like duties but in an higher nature and degree are required toward God 1. Fidelitie in acknowledging him our onely God which is commanded in the first and second precept 2. Reverence in the third not to prophane his glorious name 3. Obedience and service which is performed in consecrating the seventh day wholly unto Gods worship Toward our neighbour our duties are either speciall toward those to whom we are bound by any speciall kinde of benefit as we are to our parents and superiours which is required in the fift precept or generally toward all in forbearing to doe them any hurt first either in deed as in their single person concerning their life or their coupled person touching their wife or in their goods we must not steale either in word where false witnesse bearing is forbidden either in heart as in the tenth Commandement There can be no dutie rehearsed appertaining to God or man which is not comprehended under some of these therefore the Decalogue containeth a perfect law 2. Now for answer to the objections in particular 1. It was not necessarie that any particular precept should bee given as touching the duties of man toward himselfe both because nature is not so corrupted in such duties but that a man still retaineth love to himselfe as it is in our love toward God and our neighbour 〈◊〉 also for that the rule of our love toward another is taken from a mans love toward himselfe he shall love his neighbour as himselfe therefore this is presupposed as granted of all and as a ground of the rest that a man loveth himselfe 2. The law giveth instance of the more generall and notorious transgressions such as at the first would be acknowledged of all and therefore because perjurie is more generall and more easily discerned than blasphemie or heresie under that the rest are understood 3. The other festivals were memorials of particular benefits which concerned the Israelites onely as the passeover and feast of Tabernacles of their deliverance out of Egypt but the Sabbath is a memoriall of the generall benefit of the creation which concerneth all nations therefore this precept concerning the Sabbath onely of all other festivals was onely to be inserted in the morall law 4. The love of parents toward their children though it be naturall yet the dutie of children toward their parents is more agreeable to the law of nature and the contrary namely their disobedience more unnaturall and therefore instance was to bee given in this rather than in the other and beside the names of father and sonne being Relatives the duties of each toward other are reciprocall and one may bee inferred upon the other 5. The concupiscence is expressely forbidden rather than the first motion of anger and revenge 1. Because it is harder to resist the motion of concupiscence than of rage and revenge and wee are more apt to sinne by that than this 2. Because the inward wrath and purpose of revenge Nâ—scitur ex concupiscibili beginneth with a desire for there are two things in revenge ipsa persequntiâ— id quod persequimur that which we pursue and pursuit it selfe that which we pursue we judge to be evill and so hate it but the action of pursuit we thinke to be good namely to seeke revenge and so we thinke it good and desire it Seeing then all kinde of coveting and desire is forbidden even that also is included from the which rage and revenge taketh beginning but in the other kinde of coveting when wee propound unto our selves an object of some delectable or profitable good both the thing which is pursued with desire is judged good and the action it selfe of pursuing it with desire Sic fere Tostat. quast 24. But the better answer is why the first motion of anger is not expressely forbidden as of concupiscence because anger never riseth but with the consent of the will and therefore being a voluntarie motion it belongeth to the other precept Thou shalt not kill but concupiscence which is involuntarie and hath not the full consent of the will is forbidden in the tenth precept See more of this difference before quâ—st 1. QUEST IX Of the abrogation of the law NExt unto this question of the perfection of the law it followeth to consider of the perpetuitie and continuance of it for in some places the Scripture testifieth that Christ came to fulfill the law not to destroy it Matth. 1.17 and some where againe it so speaketh as though the law were abrogated aâ— Rom. 6.14 Yee are not under the law but under grace Heb. 7.12 If the priesthood be changed there must of necessitie be a change of the law For the solution hereof thus much is to be added here though this question partly be touched before 1. First then concerning the ceremoniall law which was prescribed unto the Jewes to be observed in the worship of God it is wholly abrogated 1. Because the bodie being come the shadow must give place but all those ceremonies in their sacrifices purifications festivals and the rest were shadowes the bodie is Christ Coloss. 2.17 Ergo. 2. Those ceremoniall observations were tied unto a
words of Adam as Epiphanius thinketh or immediatly uttered by the Lord to Adam but of Moses directed by the spirit of God who inserteth here a perpetuall law concerning marriage 2. The man is said to leave father and mother either comparatively and in degree that he is rather to leave them than his wife Oecolamp or conditionally if they shall seeke to dissolve the knot of marriage therein the sonne is to leave them Muscul. as also the leaving of the father and mother signifieth the erecting of a new family as the Chalde readeth hee shall leave his father and mothers bed for the ancient use was for children unmarried to lye in their parents chambers Mercer 3. They shall be one flesh not only in respect of carnall copulation as R. Sel. for so bruit beasts may be said to bee one flesh but in respect of their perpetuall society the conjunction both of their bodies and minds Now whereas the Apostle saith that he which is joyned to an harlot is one flesh the Apostle there applieth not that which is proper to marriage to fornication but sheweth what injury they doe to marriage which commit fornication yeelding that to harlots which is peculiar to wives to be made one flâ—sh with them And yet this difference there is that the man and wife are joyned together both in flesh and spirit as it followeth in the same place he that is joyned to the Lord is one spirit 1 Cor. 6.17 but the harlot though joyned in body is severed in heart and affection QVEST. XLV How man was not ashamed of his nakednesse Vers. 25. THey were both naked and were not ashamed 1. Adam was not ashamed not as some Hebrewes say because Heva was of his owne flesh for afterward they were one ashamed to behold the nakednesse of another neither doth Moses set them forth as impudent and unshamefast persons such as the Adamites are pretending this example companying together like bruit beasts but this nakednesse of their bodies sheweth the nakednesse and simplicity of their minds for shame is the fruit of sin and therefore before sinne entred they were not ashamed 2. Some thinke that there remaineth yet in children that are not ashamed of their nakednesse some shadow of our first estate but children are therein unshamefast for want of reason as the like is to be seene in bruit beasts But in the kingdome of heaven we shall be all naked and without shame as Adam was and without feare or danger of sinne which Adam was not 3. Further notwithstanding their nakednesse they should not have beene offended with the weather either heat or cold not that their skin was like unto the nailes of the fingers as R. Eliezer thinketh which waâ— taken away after their fall but God would have so tempered the elements and the quality of their bodies as that all things should have beene serviceable unto them 4. The places of doctrine 1. Doct. The Dominicall or Lords day is grounded not upon tradition or Ecclesiasticall institution but upon the scriptures IN that the Lord sanctified the seventh day and made it a day of rest we inserre that as the Sabbath kept then upon the seventh day in remembrance of the creation was of the Lords institution so the Lords day is now observed by he same authority in remembrance of the resurrection of Christ and our redemption by the same contrary to the Rhemists who count the observation of the Lords day but a tradition of the Church and Ecclesiasticall institution Rhemist Matth. 15. sect 3. Our reasons are these 1. The observation of a Sabbath or day of rest unto the Lord is commanded in the moral law which is perpetuall and not to be abrogated if this bee denied it will follow that there are but nine commandemets if that of sanctifying the Sabbath doe not binde now And although wee observe not now the same day for our Sabbath which the Jewes did yet the seventh day we keepe still retaining the substance of the law which is to keepe one day holy of seven The manner of computation and account of seven where to begin where to end and to bee tied to the very same prescript of the day was ceremoniall and a circumstance of the law and in that behalfe doth not conclude us 2. That which was by the holy Apostles by precept enjoyned and by example observed was of a divine institution thus the Lords day is prescribed by Saint Paul 1 Cor. 16.2 where the Apostle enjoyneth them to make collection for the poore in their meetings upon the first day of the weeke which then began to be observed for the Lords day he himselfe also Act. 20.7 observeth the same day and preacheth in it Saint Iohn calleth it the Lords day Revel 1.10 3. Every symbole significative or representing signe mentioned in scripture had a divine institution but so is the Sabbath a symbole or type of our everlasting rest Heb. 4.9 There remaineth therefore sabbatismus a sabbath rest to the people of God which words doe conclude that both the type remaineth that is a sabbatisme and the signification of the type everlasting rest 4. No constitution of the Church doth simply bind in conscience for Gods commandements only do so bind Iam. 1.12 There is one law giver which is able to save and destroy but the keeping of the Lords day bindeth in conscience for therein we are commanded not to doe our owne wayes nor to seeke our owne will nor to speake a vaine word Isay 38.13 which duties are alwayes commanded so especially upon the Lords day but these precepts the observation whereof is properly incident to the Lords day doe bind in conscience Ergo. c. 5. If the Lords day were but a tradition of the Church there should be no difference betweene that and other festivall dayes but all of the like necessity and with as great strictnesse are to be observed and kept these as the other But that were very absurd seeing we find the Lords day by the Apostles to have beene observed whereas no mention at all is made of the other in the scriptures and the Church of God in her practice hath alwayes made a difference betweene the observation of the Lords day and other festivals enjoyning that with greater devotion alwayes to be celebrated than the rest 6. This also hath beene the constant doctrine of the Church of God and the judgement of the fathers that the Lords day is of the Lords institution as may appeare by this sentence of Augustine Dominicum diem apostoli apostoliâ—i virâ—religiosa sanctitate habendum sanxerunt c. The Lords day the Apostles and Apostolicall men have ordained with religious holinesse to bee kept because in the same our Redeemer rose from the dead and therefore it is called the Dominicall or Lords day that in it we onely may attend upon the divine service this is the first day in the world in it were created the elements
word of God and prayer 1 Tim. 4.5 Therefore the Lords day must be warranted by the word before it can be sanctified and set apart to holy uses 5. And seeing the Jewes Sabbath is warranted by the word it must also be changed by the word there must bee the same authority in the alteration of it which was in the first institution The Lords day then was not appointed by the ordinary authority of the Church for then the Church by the same authority might constitute another day if there were cause which cannot be admitted but as Vrsinus saith Apostolica Ecclesiae pro libertate sibi à Christo donata c. The Apostolike Church according to the liberty given them of Christ did make choice of the first day for the seventh The Church then by the extraordinary power of the Apostles directed specially thereunto by the Spirit of God did alter the day and Tostatus saith well Tota Ecclesia Spiritu sancto ducta hunc deem instituit The whole Church being led by the holy Ghost did institute this day quaest 11. 7. Conf. Of the preeminence of the Lords day beyond other festivals ANother errour of the Romanists is that they require sanctification and necessary keeping of all holy dayes as making a necessity of keeping all alike Rhemist annot Galath 4. sect 5. Contra. 1. The same difference that was betweene the legall Sabbath and other their festivals remaineth still betweene the Lords day observed among Christians and other holy dayes but the Sabbath day was more strictly observed than the greatest festivals besides for on their Sabbath it was not lawfull to kindle a fire Exod. 35.3 nor to dresse their meat Exod. 16.23 but on other festivals they were not forbidden to doe such works as were to bee done about their meat Exod. 12.16 they were onely restrained from doing servile works Levit. 23.7 but the works about their meat and drinke were not servile 2. The observation of the Lords day doth simply binde every Christian in conscience though there were no positive Law of the Church for it that wheresoever a Christian liveth in any part of the world it is his dutie in remembrance of the resurrection of our blessed Saviour to sanctifie the Lords day but other festivals of Saints a man is not bound in conscience simply to keepe but as hee is bound in generall to yeeld obedience to the superiour authoritie in lawfull things for onely Gods immediate Commandements doe simply bind in conscience in respect of the thing commanded as the Apostle saith There is one lawgiver that is able to save and destroy Iam. 4.12 and no more but he alone therefore by this reason the Lords day hath a preeminence before other festivals 3. Hereunto I will adde Tostatus reason Sabbatum vel una quaecunque esset dies in hebdomada observanda videbatur dependere à ratione naturali The Sabbath or what other day is to be kept in the weeke seemeth to depend upon naturall reason as is shewed before quest 5. Caetera observationes sunt magis ex voluntate legislatoris Other observations depend rather of the will of the lawmaker Tostat. qu. 13. So our Lords day succeeding the Jewish Sabbath is grounded in part even upon the law of nature but other festivities depend ab arbitrio Ecclesiae of the determination of the Church So then to conclude this point as Augustine saith Quomodo Maria virgo mater Domini inter omnes mulieres principatum tenet sic inter caeteros dies haec omnium dierum mater est As the Virgin Marie the mother of our Lord is the principall among women so among other dayes this day is as the mother of the rest Sermon de temper 36. 8. Controv. To commit any sinne upon the Lords day is a double transgression THe Romanists here have another erroneous assertion that the internall act of religion pertaineth not to the keeping of the Sabbath but the externall and so consequently they denie that any sinne committed upon the Sabbath is thereby the greater Bellar. de cult sanctor lib. 3. cap. 10. prop. 4. Contra. 1. But the contrarie is evident out of Scripture that it belongeth to the rest of the Sabbath to abstaine from the works of sinne ut vacantes à pravis actionibus c. that being vacant or ceasing from evill actions they might suffer God to worke in them by his Spirit therefore the Lord saith speaking of his Sabbath It is a signe betweene me and you in your generations that I the Lord doe sanctifie you Exod. 31.13 And to the same purpose Ezechiel chap. 20.12 I have given them also my Sabbath to be a signe betweene me and them that they might know that I am the Lord that doe sanctifie them These places are urged to this purpose by Pelargus Bastingius 2. So the Fathers expound that precept of doing no servile worke upon the Sabbath Ne nos voluptas corporis libido succendant That the pleasure and lust of the bodie should not inflame us upon this day qui enim facit peccatum est servus peccati for he that committeth sinne is the servant of sinne So Hierome in Esaiam cap. 59. Likewise Augustine thus writeth Spiritualiter observat sabbatum Christianus abstinens se ab opere servili c. A Christian man doth spiritually observe the Sabbath in abstaining from servile worke what is this from servile worke from sinne Tractat. 4. in Ioann So also Thomas Est triplex servitus una qua homo servit peccato c. There is a threefold service one when a man serveth sinne altera qua homo servit homini c. another when man serveth man and this service is according to the bodie not in the minde tertia est servetus Dei the third is the service of God If we understand servile worke this last way it is not forbidden upon the Sabbath day sed alia opera servilia primo vel secundo modo c. but other servile works the first or second way are contrary to the keeping of the Sabbath Sic Thomas 2.2 quaest 122. art 4. addit 3. 3. Hereunto I will adde Tostatus reason Hence it followeth that hee which committeth adulterie killeth or is drunken upon the Lords day magis peccat quà m si aliis diebus idem ageret sinneth more than if he should doe the same thing upon other dayes quia sic est transgressor duplicis praecepti because he so transgresseth two Commandements that precept Thou shalt not commit adulterie thou shalt not kill or any other and this of sanctifying the Sabbath Tostat. qu. 12. See more of this question elsewhere Synops. Centur. 2. err 70. 4. Morall observations 1. Observ. Against hypocrisie and vaine glorie Vers. 8. REmember the Sabbath day to sanctifie it c. Rupertus applieth this text against the doing of any thing for vaine glorie or to bee seene of men but wee should referre all to the praise of God In omnibus operibus tuis Deiretributionem
wicked as Abraham followed after the foure Kings that had taken Lot prisoner and delivered him out of their hands Gen. 14. 3. The manner also must bee considered that although the cause of warre be just yet that it be not rashly set upon but all other meanes must first be tried as Ezekiah before he would by force resist the King of Assyria sought to have pacified him by paying a certaine tribute 2 King 18.14 So the children of Israel before they assaulted their brethren the children of Benjamin by open warre because of the wickednesse of the Gibeonites committed against the Levites wife first required of them that those wicked men might be delivered into their hands which when they wilfully refused then they resolved to set upon them Iudg. 20.13 Ex Simlero 4. Confut. Against the Romanists that make difference betweene counsels and precepts IN the next place the Romanists are to bee dealt withall and here commeth first to be examined that assertion that whereas we affirme that even in this Commandement Thou shalt not kill that dutie of charitie is prescribed even in loving our enemies they affirme that this is no precept which we are bound to keepe but a counsell of perfection and a worke of supererogation Thom. Aquin. 2.2 qu. 25. art 9. Contra. 1. This derogateth from the authoritie of Christ to say that he gave counsell to his Disciples and did not by his authoritie command them 2. Seeing all the duties of charitie are required by the law for love is the fulfilling of the law it followeth that even this dutie also in loving our enemies is enacted by the law and not left free 3. Our Saviour adding further as a reason hereof that ye may bee children of your Father which is in heaven sheweth that wee cannot otherwise bee the true children of our heavenly Father unlesse we be like him herein even in loving of our enemies then it will follow that it is not a counsell of conveniencie but a precept of necessitie Ex Bastingio See more of this popish distinction of counsels and precepts Synops. Centur. 1. err 84. 5. Confut. Against the Popish distinction of mortall and veniall sinnes ANother assertion of the Romanists here to be taxed is that anger si sit talis motus ut deducatur ratio est peccatum mortale c. If it be such a motion as that the reason is drawne to consent it is a mortall sinne Si usque ad consensum non pervertitur ratio est peccatum venidle c. But if reason be not perverted to consent then it is a veniall sinne but if it bee not a mortall or deadly sinne in the nature and kinde thereof as is murther and adulterie then although there be a consent it is no mortall sinne Sic Thom. in opuscul This distinction of sinnes veniall and not veniall in their owne nature in respect of the greatnesse or smalnesse of the sinne is not to bee admitted for these reasons 1. In the respect of the nature of sinne which of it selfe deserveth death Rom. 6.23 The wages of sinne is death and sinne is the transgression of the law 1 Ioh. 3.4 and every transgression of the law is under the curse Galath 3.10 2. In respect of the infinite Majestie of God which to violate can bee no veniall sinne of it selfe considering also the perfect and absolute righteousnesse of God which cannot abide the least blemish or imperfection therefore in regard of the perfect righteousnesse and infinite Majestie of God no sinne committed against God can in it selfe bee veniall 3. And concerning this motion and passion of anger even when it is sudden and unadvised though there bee no further purpose or intendment to hurt it is guiltie of judgement Matth. 5.22 Where by the way it shall not bee amisse to note the difference here betweene Thomas Aquin and Bellarmine for Thomas holdeth this anger here spoken of to bee a deadly sinne in that he saith He that is angrie with his brother shall be guiltie of judgement it must be understood dâ— matu tendente in nocumentum c. of a motion tending to hurt where there is consent and so that motion is deadly sinne Sic Thomas in opuscul Ex Lippoman But Bellarmine affirmeth that this is a veniall sinne and so deserveth not everlasting damnation because hell fire is onely due unto the last to call one foole Bellarm. lib. 1. de purgator cap. 4. Contra. 1. Every mortall sinne deserveth damnation but in Thomas Aquins judgement as is shewed before this anger here spoken of is a mortall sinne Ergo. 2. The naming of hell fire onely in the last place sheweth not a divers kinde of punishment from the rest but a divers degree of punishment for otherwise judgement in Scripture â—s taken for damnation as Psal. 143.2 Enter not into judgement with thy servant for no flesh is righteous in thy sight So Rom. 2.1 In that thou judgest another thou condemnest thy selfe Here to judge and condemne are taken for all one to be culpable then of judgement is to bee guiltie of damnation 4. Yet we admit this distinction of veniall and mortall sinnes if it be understood not in respect of the nature of sinne but of the qualitie of the persons for unto those that beleeve all sinnes are veniall and pardonable through the mercie of God Rom. 8.1 There is no condemnation to those that are in Christ Iesus but to the wicked and unbeleevers all their sinnes are mortall Rom. 6.23 to them the stipend and wages of sinne is death See more also hereof Synops. Papis Centur. 4. err 6. 4. Morall observations 1. Observ. Not to be hastie to anger THou shalt not kill Our blessed Saviour expounding this Commandement Matth. 5.22 sheweth that even hee which is angrie unadvisedly transgresseth this precept which may bee a caveat unto furious cholerike and hastie men that they should bridle their intemperate affections and not give place to rage for as Chrysostome saith Si concedatur licentia irascendi datur causa homicidii faciendi If libertie be granted unto anger even cause many times will bee given of murther But if any man shall say when hee is angrie with a man for railing and reviling that hee is angrie with his sinne let him consider that when he heareth the name of God blasphemed he is not so much moved which sheweth that he is angrie in respect of his owne name and person which is called in question and not simply for the sinne Simler 2. Observ. The challenging of one another into the field forbidden ANd if it be simply unlawfull to kill then let such looke unto it that take it to be their honour and estimation to challenge one another into the field whereupon often ensueth murther for we have otherwise learned in the Scriptures Omnem cupiditatem seipsum ulciscendi vetitam esse That all desire for a man to revenge himselfe is unlawfull Simler For such doe usurpe the Lords office The
which is actâ—â— imperatus the act commanded therefore the externall worke being by this coherence and connexion an act of the internall powers hath some good or evill in it though not so properly as the internall Sic fere Tostat. quast 29. QUEST VI. The law of Moses did not onely restraine the hand but the minde BEside this opinion of the Hebrewes some other doe hold that the law of Moses did onely restraine the hand and not the minde and to this purpose they urge that place Matth. 5.27 where our Saviour saith It was said unto you of old Thou shalt not commit adulterie c. But I say c. So that of old it seemeth the law onely restrained the outward act but Christ doth forbid more even the inward desire c. Contra. 1. Our blessed Saviour secundùm corum opinionem loquebatur speaketh according to their opinion because they thought they were onely obliged and tied to the outward act and therefore he doth deliver the law from their corrupt interpretations he giveth not a new exposition and this appeareth vers 43. Yee have heard that it hath beene said Thou shalt love thy neighbour and hate thine enemie but in all the old Testament there is no such precept given by God or libertie for any to hate their enemie our Saviour then meaneth not such sayings as were found in the law but such expositions as they made among themselves Now that even the law of Moses did binde not onely the hand and externall act but the inward will and desire it thus is proved 1. None are said to repent but of that which is evill but they under the law were to repent and to shew themselves contrite even for the internall acts of their minde as Psal. 4.4 Tremble and sinne not examine your heart upon your bed c. Ergo c. 2. It is directly forbidden Levit. 19.17 Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thy heart which was an internall act and many other such like sinnes of the heart are reproved by the Prophets 3. The law doth not justifie that which is naturally unjust but forbiddeth it now to covet another mans wife is naturally unjust Ergo. For the proposition or first part of the argument if the theft of the Israelites the killing of Isaack intended by Abraham the fornication of Ose chap. 1. be objected these were singulares casus which the the lawgiver commanding thereby declared quod non includerentur sub lege communi that they were not included under the generall law but if this whole law Thou shalt not covet had given a generall libertie for the Jewes to covet anothers wife Non jam declaretur lex sed destrucretur The law should not by this meanes be declared but destroyed For the assumption that it is against the law of nature to covet another mans wife it is evident 1. Because he faileth in the end coveting her onely of lust not for procreation 2. Matrimonie est de jure naturali is grounded even upon the law of nature if then to breake and violate matrimonie bee against the law of nature then to will and purpose so to doe is against nature also yea the will and purpose is rather sinne than the act it selfe for it may fall out that the externall act is sometime without sinne as when a man ignorantly lieth with another woman taking her to bee his wife as Iakob tooke Leah for Rachel but the will and desire is never without sinne Tostat. Burgens addit 7. in cap. 20. would thus excuse this assertion that Moses law prohibebat manum 〈◊〉 anâ—â—â—um did inhibit the hand not the minde not that their meaning is that in no part of Moses law there is any prohibition to be found of the minde for hatred is directly forbidden Levit. 19.17 but that when any externall act is forbidden Non intelligitur ex vi illius praecepti prohiberi actus interior The internall act is not understood to bee forbidden by vertue of that precept as in this precept Thou shalt not kill he is not judged to be guiltie which purposeth to kill and yet killeth not Contra. 1. But our Saviour saith that even this precept is transgressed by the anger and hatred of the heart Matth. 5.22 therefore the law intendeth even by the externall act to forbid the internall also QUEST VII Whether any morall and naturall duties were to be restrained by positive law BUt it will further be objected that the old law was not to give precepts of morall duties 1. The morall precepts are grounded upon the law of nature and such precepts are knowne unto all but the divine law prescribeth such things as otherwise are not neither can bee knowne 2. The keeping of the morall law giveth life Galath 3.12 but the old law was the ministration of death 2 Cor. 3.7 therefore the old law was not to containe morall precepts Contra. 1. The law of God was not onely to give rules of such things as men know by the law of nature but to keepe and preserve them also from errour in those things which they know And therefore because men doe erre and swarve in such things as they know their will and affection not giving way to reason it was fit that a law should be given as well to rectifie their affection as to direct their understanding 2. Beside although these morall duties are grounded upon the law of nature yet seeing the naturall instinct is obscured by mans corruption that dimme light of nature had need of a clearer light by the law to helpe it If man had continued in the perfection of his creation hee should not have needed any other law but seeing mans naturall knowledge is much decaied it was to be revived and renewed by the divine law 3. The rules of direction of mens actions are of foure sorts 1. Some are so well knowne by nature as none can doubt thereof as these that evill is to be shunned and good to be desired that no unjust thing is to bee done of such knowne principles it is not necessarie that any law should bee given 2. Some things may so be searched out by the law of nature as yet that many may erre therein such 〈◊〉 the particular precepts of not committing fornication not coveting anotherâ— wife therefore because many may erre in these duties it was requisite they should bee determined by the law of God 3. Some things are so derived from the law of nature as yet they are onely searched out by those which are wise such are the positive and judiciall lawes of men that wisely can applie the principles of the law of nature to particular circumstances of this kinde are Moses Judicials 4. Some things cannot at all be concluded by naturall reason but altogether depend upon the will of the institutor and law-maker of this kinde were Moses Ceremonials So then for a full answer to the first objection wee say that if morall duties were so generally and perfitly
out B. Babing So the Apostle exhorteth That no man presume to understand above that which is meet to understand but that he understand according to sobrietie Rom. 12.3 CHAP. XXI 1. The Method and Argument IN the former Chapter was propounded the Morall law chiefly mixed with ceremoniall constitutions in the end of the Chapter now follow the Judiciall lawes unto the 10. verse of the 23. Chapter from thence unto the 20. verse are propounded certaine ceremoniall orders in generall as touching sacrifices and their feasts the more speciall and particular prescriptions concerning ceremonies are at large set forth in the booke of Leviticus This Chapter consisteth of three parts The first is of the manumission and setting at liberty Hebrew servants both men and women unto vers 12. Concerning the man servant these Lawes are given 1. How long he shall serve vers 2. 2. When his wife is to goe out with him when not vers 3.4 3. What is to be done to the servant that will not be made free vers 5. to vers 7. Concerning the maid servant 1. Upon what condition she may be sold to her masteâ— not to be sold againe to a stranger vers 7 8. 2 What is to be done unto her if she be betrothed to his sonne vers 9. 3. What must be performed to her if he marry another wife vers 10. 4. What must be done if he doe not performe these things vers 11. Secondly there follow certaine mulcts and punishments for divers offences committed by man as of murther vers 12 13 14. smiting of parents vers 15. stealing of men vers 16. cursing of parents vers 17. hurting of a man vers 19.18 beating of servants to death vers 18 19. hurting of women with childe vers 22. blemishing of servants in their eye tooth c. vers 24. to 28. Thirdly of mischiefe and dammages that are occasioned by other mens default as by their oxe that useth to push and goare man or woman vers 28. to 33. or hurteth anothers oxe vers 35 36. and of dammages which are caused by the digging of pits and wells vers 33 34. 2. The divers readings Vers. 3. If he came with his body A.P. alone with his body I. If he came in single V. or alone B.G.C.S. The sense is kept not the word better than with what garment he entred c. L. but the word guph signifieth a body as gupha in the feminine is taken Exod. 21.3 Vers. 7. She shall not goe out as men servants B.G.V.I. cum caeter not as maids S.L. Vers. 8. Who hath not betrothed her I.V.A.P. better than betrothed her B.G.C.L. S. for here the negative 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 lo is omitted Vers. 8. In dealing deceitfully or perfidiously with her I. or trespassing against her A. better than in despising her B.G.C.L.S. for bagadh signifieth properly to deceive and breake covenant as Malach. 2.10.14 the meaning is he hath broken appointment of marriage with her Vers. 10. Her rayment and dwelling or habitation I.A. conversation S. better than price of her chastity I. or recompence of her virginity G. or duty of marriage B. V. lying with her C. her time P. ghorah of ghâ—r signifieth an habitation or dwelling Vers. 16. And it be found in his hand I.A.P.C.V.G. that is the person which he hath stollen better than if it be proved upon him B. or if he be found in it S. if he be convicted of the fault L. Vers. 22. If no destruction follow B.V.I. or death G. A. P.C. better than if the child come forth without fashion S. or but she liveth L. for it is as well understood of the infant as of the mother if neither of them dye c. 2. Questions discussed QUEST I. Of the necessity of the Iudiciall lawes Vers. 1. THese are the judgements c. 1. After the Morall law followeth the Judicials for the Civill law issueth out of the Morall law which is the fountaine and foundation of all other Lawes And as the Morall law is principally grounded upon the Law of Nature so in the next place the Civill law also floweth from the same fountaine as it may appeare by the generall use thereof seeing no common-wealth can stand without Civill and Judiciall constitutions Borrh. 2. And Moses having propounded the Lawes which binde in conscience so now he setteth forth the Penall lawes whereby the obstinacy of men might be restrained for if a man were left to himselfe Nemo est qui non suo arbitrio mâ—lit vivore there is none that had not rather live as he list himselfe Galas 3. Therefore because it might fall out that all would not be obedient to the Morall precepts necessarium suit praescribere c. it was necessary to prescribe what punishment every transgressor of the Law should be subject unto Rupertus QUEST II. The difference of the Morall Iudiciall and Ceremoniall lawes THe judgements 1. The Judiciall lawes Ceremoniall and Morall are thus distinguished some precepts have vim obligandi ex ipso dictamine rationis power to binde by the very inducement of naturall reason though there were no other Law to enforce them such are the morall precepts some Lawes doe not absolutely binde by the instinct and perswasion of naturall reason sed ex institutione divina vel humana but by a divine and humane institution which if they concerne such things as appertaine unto God are ceremonials if they respect the ordering of men and directing of humane affaires they are Judiciall lawes two things then are required in Judiciall lawes that they concerne ordinationem humanam the ordering and directing of men and that they doe binde non ex sola ratione sed ex institutione not by reason onely but by the institution Thom. 1.2 qu. 104. art 1. in Cor. 2. Now there are foure sorts of Judiciall lawes one of the Prince toward the subjects another of the Citizens among themselves the third of the Citizens toward strangers and the fourth concerning domesticall duties as of the fathers masters husbands toward their children servants wives Thomas QUEST III. How the Ceremonials are abolished FUrther concerning the validity of the Ceremoniall law 1. The Ceremonies were of two sorts either such as were meerely figurative signifying such things as were to be performed in Christ as Circumcision and the paschall Lambe which are in no respect to be observed for this were in a manner to deny Christ to be come if the figures should still remaine in use then the body is yet to be expected 2. There was another sort of ceremonies which doe not directly concerne the signification of Christ to come but only shewed munditiam populi illius sanitatem the cleanlinesse and health of that people as to abstaine from swines flesh which if one should now observe as it was commanded in the Law he sinneth but if for some other end as for his health or such like he offendeth not Tostatus quaest 1. 3. Some ceremonies were
to bring in such an uncertaintie into the sacred storie as that we should never know in what order any thing was done 2. Beside the manner of speech used by way of transition vers 12. when the Lord began againe to speake of â—actifying the Sabbath afterward or then or further the Lord spake unto Moses c. sheweth that this speech followed immediately upon the other communing which the Lord had with Moses concerning the Tabernacle 3. The space of time even fortie daies while Moses communed with God sheweth that God had conference with Moses about more things than the morall and judiciall lawes rehearsed chap. 20 21 22 23. 4. And the second fortie daies was an unfit that for Moses to receive all these instructions in for then he fell downe 〈…〉 nights before the Lord Deut. 9. â—5 to intreat him for the people there was not then such opportunitie for Moses to receive those directionâ— all the time being 〈…〉 unto God Tostat. qu. â—3 QUEST XXII Why Moses stayed fortie daies with God in the 〈◊〉 WHen the Lord had made an end Which was after fortie daies 1. Because all this time needed not be spent in promulgation of the former lawes which might have been delivered in a shorter time the Hebrewes thinke that Moses further received then their Cabala which if they indeed did understand to be the mysticall doctrine of the Messiah they therein should not thinke amisse but the Jewish Cabala hunteth after letters and syllables and doth gather mysteries out of them which hath no warrant from Moses 2. During then this time beside the receiving of these lawes and instructions Moses no doubt was exercised in the meditation of them and made perfect in the sense and understanding thereof as likewise the mysterie of the blessed Messiah was now revealed unto him 3. And although the Lord by the illumination of his Spirit could in one day have inspired Moses with the knowledge of all these things yet it pleased God that Moses should continue in this exercise the space of fortie daies for these two ends 1. That he himselfe might hereby be more assured of his calling and by this continuall meditation be throughly prepared and made fit 2. And that the people by this miraculous worke of Moses abode with God fortie daies without meat and drinke might be induced to receive Moses message and ministerie with greater reverence Simler QUEST XXIII Why the Lord gave the written law HE gave him two Tables of the Testimonie 1. the Lord gave not the written law to the ancient Fathers but deferred it till Moses time because as the Apostle saith lex non est posita justiâ— the law is not given unto the righteous habebaâ—â— in semetipsis justitiam legis they had in themselves the law of righteousnesse but after that this law of righteousnes grew into oblivion extincta esset in Egyptâ— and was as extinguished in Egypt c. it was necessarie to be renued by the written law Irenaeus 2. Lex data est ut per â—am lux qua in nobis est accendatur c. The law was given that thereby the light which was in us should bee increased Cyril The light of nature being dimmed it was to be cleared and renued by the law 3. Ambros addeth further Lex quid operatur nisi ut omnis mundus subditâ—s fieret Deo c. What else doth the law worke but that all the world should bee subjected unto God c. for by the law commeth the knowledge of sinne 4. Hierom giveth another reason why the written law was given which was first written in all mens hearts because Iudei se solos accepisse legem gloriantur c. The Jewes only boast that they received the law hereby is signified that seeing the law commandeth nothing which was not before imprinted in the heart by the instinct of nature that they qui leges haâ— observavâ—riut c. which should observe these lawes should obtaine the reward c. whether they were Jewes or Gentiles as S. Peter saith In everie nation he that feareth God and worketh righteousnesse is accepted with him Act. 10.35 5. The law also was given to prepare men for the Messiah whose comming then more and more approached for two waies did the old law lead men unto Christ one way Testimonium de Christo perhibendo by giving testimonie of Christ as our blessed Saviour saith All things must be fulfilled which are written of me in the law the Psalmes and the Prophets Luk. 24.44 alio modo per modum dispositionis another way by way of disposing by drawing men from idolatrie and holding them to the worship of the true God and so preparing them for Christ Thomas QUEST XXIV Why the Lord gave the law to the Israelites and to no other people THis law was also given unto the Jewes rather than to any other nation 1. Not for that they only were found to continue in the true worship of God all other nations being given to idolatrie foâ— they also fell presently to idolatrie in worshipping of a golden calfe and the Lord telleth them that he did not set his love upon them for their righteousnesse 2. But the reason was because the Lord would performe his oath and promises to their fathers to make them his people Deut. 7.8 So it appeareth quod ex sola gratuita electione c. that onely by the free and gracious election of God the fathers received the promises and their children had the law given them 3. But if it againe bee asked why the Lord did chuse the fathers of whom Christ should be borne Augustine answereth Quare hunc trahat illum non trahat noli velle dijudicare si non vis errare c. Why the Lord draweth one and not another do not take upon thee to judge if thou wilt not erre 4. The law also was given unto the Israelites especially for these two reasons imponitur duris superbis c. it was imposed first upon them that were stubborne and proud De duobus enim naturalis homo superbit de scientia potentia c. A naturall man is proud of two things knowledge and abilitie or power Therefore because the Jewes might take themselves to bee wiser than other people as both having more knowledge and greater strength to do those things which were requisite God therefore gave them the morall law written both to shew their ignorance in the duties which God required as also their insufficiencie of strength imponebatur etiam lex bonis Likewise the law was given unto the good and well disposed that they thereby might be holpen to performe those duties which they desired To this purpose Thomas ibid. 5. Hierom seemeth to give another reason of giving the morall law unto the Israelites first the Lord gave them his morall law but after they had committed idolatrie than hee required sacrifices to bee offered unto him rather than to idols Auferens
of coveting 5. qu. Whether sinne properly consist in the internall or externall act 6. qu. The law of Moses did not onely restraine the hand but the minde 7. qu. Whether any morall and naturall duties were to be restrained by positive law 8. qu. Of the perfection and sufficiencie of the Morall law 9. qu. Of the abrogation of the law Questions upon the rest of this twentieth Chapter 1. QUest In what sense the people are said to have seene the voices which are properly heard and not seene 2. qu. What is meant here by voices whether the thunder or other voices 3. qu. VVhether there were a sound of the trumpet beside the voices 4. qu. Of the feare of the people and their going backe 5. qu. VVhy they desire that Moses would speake unto them 6. qu. VVhy the people are afraid they shall die 7. qu. How the Lord is said to come unto them and why 8. qu. How the Lord is said to tempt and prove his people 9. qu. VVhy the people stood afarre off and where 10. qu. How Moses is said to draw neere to the darknesse 11. qu. VVhy the Lord saith he spake unto them from heaven 12. qu. Why this precept is repeated of not making any graven image 13. qu. Of the meaning of these words Yee shall not make with me 14. qu. VVhy mention is made onely of images of silver and gold 15. qu. VVhy the Lord commanded an Altar of earth to be made 16. qu. VVhy the Altar was not to be made of hewen stone 17. qu. VVhy the lifting up of the toole is said to pollute the Altar 18. qu. How Jeremie is made to agree with Moses who saith the Lord commanded not any thing concerning sacrifices 19. qu. Of the difference betweene burnt offerings and peace offerings 20. qu. Whether it was lawfull to sacrifice in no other place than before the Arke or Tabernacle 21. qu. Whether it was lawfull to sacrifice before the Arke at the Tabernacle while they were asunder 22. qu. How long the Arke was severed from the Tabernacle 23. qu. Of the removing of the Tabernacle 24. qu. Of the places where it was lawfull or unlawfull to sacrifice 25. qu. How God is said to come and goe and how he is said to be in the world 26. qu. Whether it were not lawfull to goe up by steps to the Altar 27. qu. Why they were forbidden to use steps up to the Altar 28. qu. Of the abominable Idoll of the Gentiles called Priapus and the filthie usages thereto belonging 29. qu. Why the secret parts are counted uncomely Questions upon the one and twentieth Chapter 1. QUest Of the necessitie of the Iudiciall lawes 2. qu. The difference of the Morall Iudiciall and Ceremoniall lawes 3. qu. How the Ceremonials are abolished 4. qu. How far the Iudicials are now to be retained 5. qu. Why these lawes are called Iudgements 6. qu. How Moses propounded these lawes by speaking or by writing 7. qu. Why the Israelites were called Hebrewes 8. qu. How the Hebrewes became servants 9. qu. The difference betweene Hebrew servants and strangers 10. qu. Of three kinds of libertie and how servitude is agreeable to the law of nature 11. qu. How these six yeares are to be accounted 12. qu. The reasons why they ought to set their servants free 13. qu. Why the space of six yeares is limited for their service 14. qu. How the servant is said to come in with his bodie 15. qu. What manner of wise the master was to give to his servant 16. qu. Whether such separation betweene the servant and his wife were lawfull 17. qu. Why the servant was brought before the Iudges and what doore he was set to 18. qu. Of the divers kinds of punishments used among the Israelites 19. qu. What is meant here by Ever 20. qu. When the servant was to goe out free in the seventh yeare when in the fiftieth yeare 21. qu. Certaine cases put when the yeare of Iubile came before the yeare of remission 22. qu. Whether it were lawfull among the Israelites for the parents to sell their children 23. qu. In what sense it is said She shall not goe out as other servants 24. qu. Whether it must be read betrothed or betrothed not 25. qu. How shee was to be redeemed 26. qu. Why it was not lawfull to sell their maids to strangers 27. qu. What the meaning is of these words He hath despised her 28. qu. What kinde of betrothing is here understood 29. qu. Whether it were lawfull to take another wife to the former 30. q. Of the true reading and meaning of the 10. vers 31. qu. What these three things are mentioned in the text 32. qu. Whether maid servants were set free in the seventh yeare and not sometime before sometime after 33. qu. The summarie sense of this law concerning maid servants 34. qu. Of the end scope and intent of this law 35. qu. What kinde of smiting is here meant 36. qu. Why the murtherer was to die the death 37. qu. In what sense the Lord is said to offer a man into ones hand 38. qu. What places of refuge were appointed 39. qu. Why the Lord appointed places for such to flie unto 40. qu. What is to be counted wilfull murder 41. qu. Of the difference betweene voluntarie and involuntarie murder and the divers kinds of each 42. qu. Why the wilfull murderer was to be taken from the Altar 43. qu. What manner of smiting of parents is forbidden 44. qu. Of the grievous sin of paricide 45. qu. The law of manstealing expounded 46. qu. The reason why manstealing was punished by death 47. qu. What kinde of cursing of parents is here understood 48. qu. What manner of strife the law meaneth 49. qu. What punishment the smiter had if he which were smitten died 50. qu. VVhat should become of the smiter if the other died after he walked upon his staffe 51. qu. Of the equity of this law in bearing of the charges 52. qu. VVho should beare the charges if a servant had done the hurt 53. qu. VVhat servants this law meaneth and what kinde of chastisement is forbidden 54. q. The meaning of this clause For he is his money 55. qu. VVhether this law meane the voluntarie or involuntarie hurt done to a woman with child 56. qu. VVhether the death of the infant be punished as well as of the mother 57. qu. VVhether this law extendeth it selfe to infants which miscarie being not yet perfectly formed 58. qu. VVhy the action is given unto the husband 59. qu. VVhether the law of retalion be literally to be understood 60. qu. VVhether the law of retalion were just and equall 61. qu. Of servants freedome for the losse of an eye or tooth 62. qu. VVhat manner of smiting and goaring of a beast is here understood 63. qu. VVhy the ox that goareth was commanded to be stoned to death 64. qu. VVhy the flesh of the ox was not to be eaten 65. qu. In what case
little inferiour as it is in the Psalme 8. Thou hast made him a little lower than the Angels 4. But if man be compared with the omnipotent and eternall God hee is but as dust and ashes before him and indeed as nothing as the Prophet saith Behold the nations are as a drop of a bucket and as the dust of the ballance all nations are before him as nothing and they are counted to him lesse than nothing and vanity Isa. 40.15.17 therefore Gregory saith well Sancti quanto magis interna divinitatis conspiciunt tanto magis se nihil esse cognoscunt c. the Saints the more they consider the divine nature of God so much the more they acknowledge themselves to be nothing 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Angels are not to be adored or worshipped Vers. 2. HEe bowed himselfe to the ground From hence it cannot bee concluded that Angels are to bee adored and worshipped as the vulgar latine readeth for Abraham supposed these to be men and not Angels and therefore it is but a civill kind of reverence which hee giveth unto them otherwise though Abraham should have forgotten himselfe in yeelding unto them adoration yet would not they have accepted it as the Angell forbiddeth Iohn to worship him Revel 22.8 Thomas Aquinas answer that Iohn would have given unto the Angell the divine and highest kinde of worship due unto God and therefore was forbidden is insufficient for this were to make so great an Apostle ignorant what duty was only to be yeelded to God and it is misliked by Pererius one of that side And whereas he findeth out an other shift that this adoration exhibited by Iohn was not unlawfull but inconvenient to bee done in respect of the great excellency to the which man was now advanced by Christ this is as slender an answer as the other for in that the Angell forbiddeth Iohn to worship him because hee was his fellow servant it sheweth that it was not only inconvenient but unlawfull also for one servant to worship another Iohn then adoreth the Angell not of ignorance but of forgetfulnesse being in an ecstasis of minde and ravished with the glory of the Angell for if the Apostle had not forgotten himselfe he would not twice have failed herein Apoc. 19.10.23.9 2. Confut. The foresight of our obedience not the cause of the increase of grace Vers. 19. I Know him that hee will command his sonnes c. Pererius here noteth that God foreseeing Abrahams godlinesse and obedience doth bestow upon him these great benefits among the which was this revealing of his councell concerning Sodome whereas the onely reason as Vatablus well noteth why the Lord doth accumulate and multiply his graces upon his servants is his owne fatherly love toward them who having once made choyce of them doth for ever love them for what else doth the Lord here make mention of but his owne graces vouchsafed to Abraham it was not then any merit in Abraham that procured this increase of graces but Gods favour who leaveth not his but addeth graces upon graces till he have accomplished their salvation Calvin 3. Confut. Chrysost. Errour of freewill HEre further may bee noted Chrysostomes errour who saith that Abraham ex seipso scientia sibi naeturaliter insita ad tantum virtutis fastigium pervenit of himselfe and his naturall knowledge did attaine to such an high degree of vertue Pererius would thus excuse Chrysostome that by saying of himselfe c. he excludeth all externall helps by the instruction of other and not the secret revelation of Gods spirit and supernaturall gift of faith If Chrysostome could be so handsomely expounded for mine owne part I would be glad but who seeth not that his words carry another sense for the scripture useth to set these two one against another by grace and of our selves Eph. 2.8 By grace are yee saved through faith not of your selves if Abraham then was made righteous of himselfe it was not by grace The Scripture also sheweth that God first called Abraham from his idolatrous countrey before he did yet any commendable worke Gen 12.1 Wherefore all Abrahams righteousnesse depended upon the calling of God as Chrysostome in another place hath this sound saying quamvis fidem adducas à vocatione eam accepisti what though thou hast faith thou hast received it from thy calling 4. Confut. There is no preparation in a mans nature to his calling Vers. 19. THat the Lord may bring upon Abraham c. Hence Chrysostome noteth that Abraham primum in omnibus virtutis suae dedit specimen sic divinum meruit praesidium did first shew every where an example of vertue and so merited the divine assistance Pererius two wayes would justifie Chrysostome 1. he saith he speaketh not of merit of condignity but of a sufficient and fit preparation only unto grace 2. or hee meaneth not that Abraham merited the first grace of justification but onely the amplification or increase of it Perer. in 18. Genes disput Contra. 1. It is Gods mercy and love which first calleth us before we can be any way prepared thereunto there is no fitnesse aptnesse or congruity in our nature but all is of grace so Moses saith because the Lord loved thy fathers therefore he chose their seed after them Deut. 4.37 Gods love was the first motive for the choyce and calling of Abraham And againe seeing Terah Abrahams father was an Idolater under whom Abraham was brought up and by all likelihood infected that way before the Lord called him what preparation could there be in Abraham or provocation to his calling 2. Neither was the beginning only of Gods favour toward Abraham of grace the increase thereof by merit for Iacob being of Abrahams faith confesseth that he was not worthy or lesse than the least of Gods mercy Gen. 32.10 he confesseth that none of Gods graces neither first or last were conferred upon him for his worthinesse therefore Calvin well noteth that this word that consequentiam magis notat quam causam doth note rather a consequence than a cause Where the Lord findeth his servants faithfull and obedient he will increase them with further graces not merited by their obedience but added in mercy according to the gracious promise of God that vouchsafeth of his fatherly goodnesse so to crowne the faithfull service of his children For otherwise if our service and obedience bee weighed in it selfe it deserveth nothing as our Saviour saith When we have done all things which are commanded we must say we are unprofitable servants wee have dine that which was our duty to doe Luke 17.10 Morall observations 1. Moral The commendation of hospitality Vers. 2. HE ran to meet them from the tent doore Ambrose here well noteth non otiosus sedit Abraham in ostio tabernaculi c. Abraham did not sit idlely in the doore of his tabernacle sed longe aspicit nec aspexisse contentus cōcurrit obviam festin◠vit
occurrere quia non satis est recte facere nisi etiam maturei quod facias But he spieth a great way off neither was hee content to espy but went to meet them hee made haste to meet them because it is not enough to doe well unlesse thou speedily dispatch that thou doest Abraham therefore is commended for his hospitality and thus is he rewarded whereas hee thought he entertained men he received Angels as the Apostle noteth Heb. 13.1 and Ambrose saith qui scis an Deum suscipias cum hospitem putas how knowest thou whether thou receive God whom thou takest to bee a stranger But now adayes men are so farre off from hasting to meet strangers to invite them home that many of the poore members of Christ with begging and intreating can hardly find entertainment 2. Moral Against curious building and carelesse hospitality Vers. 6. ABraham made hast into the tent to Sarah c. Abraham is not curious in his dwelling but courteous in entertaining of strangers much unlike is the practice of these daies great men delight to build great houses but keepe no hospitalitie Abraham contrariwise contenteth himselfe to dwell in a tent yet his dores are open to strangers This example of Abraham shall condemne the curiosity of this age in trimming their houses and their carelessenesse in entertaining strangers 3. Moral Women must learne to keepe their owne houses BEside in that Sara kept in her tent the property of a modest matron is expressed which keepeth her selfe at home and loveth her owne house by which example such gossips and busie bodies are reproved that use to goe from house to house giving themselves to idlenesse and pratling as the Apostle describeth them 1 Tim. 5.13 4. Moral Against curiosity in diet Vers. 7. TOoke a tender and good calfe here is a patterne of frugality Abraham prepareth for his guests no wine curious fare or dainty dishes but wholesome countrey fare as cakes butter milke veale and such like curiosity then and nicenesse superfluity and excesse in feasts and bankets is not commendable Perer. as the Apostle saith Be not drunke with wine wherein is excesse Eph. 5.15 5. Moral Against curiosity of the eare Vers. 10. SAarah heard in the tent doore Sara being otherwise a most modest matron yet sheweth her infirmity and curiosity in listening behind the doore what the Angels said to Abraham which is a fault very much incident to that sexe to be harkening and giving eare to heare things to which they are not called unto The Preacher giveth a caveat against such curiosity of the eare Eccl. 7.23 Give not thine heart to all the words that men spake c. Muscul. 6. Moral Against mariage for lust in old persons Vers. 12. AFter I am old shall I have lust Sarah thought it a shame for her in her old age to give her selfe to the sport and pleasure of youth hereby the dotage of aged persons is reproved which doe provoke their decaied and dead bodies to lust againe and doe revive their abated heat by unequall and unseemely marriages Perer. Hereunto agreeth the counsell of the Apostle that wisheth younger widowes to marry but such to bee chosen as were not under sixty yeare old 1 Tim. 5.10 supposing such to have not such need of marriage 7. Moral The duty of wives to their husbands Vers. 12. ANd my Lord also Saint Peter from hence exhorteth wives to be obedient and dutiful to their husbands as Sarah was to Abraham calling him Lord or master 1 Pet. 3.6 8. Moral Sinne must not be excused but acknowledged Vers. 15. SArah denied c. Though Sarah shewed her infirmity in her deniall yet being convinced she by silence yeeldeth she in obstinacy replyeth not to justifie her sinne so likewise Peter after he had denied Christ did not double his sinne by defending it but diminish it by lamenting for it Musculus 9. Moral Gods love appeareth in revealing his will to his servants Vers. 17. SHall I hide from Abraham that thing which I doe c. Like as a true friend will impart and reveale his secrets to his friend so the Lord herein sheweth his love to Abraham in vouchsafing to reveale unto him his counsell So our Saviour saith to his Disciples Henceforth call I you not servants for the servant knoweth not what his master doth but I have called you friends for all things that I have heard of my father have I made knowne to you Iohn 15.15 Even so also are the faithfull bound to propagate the knowledge of the truth as Abraham is commended because hee would teach his sonnes and his houshold after him to walke in the feare of the Lord Calvin 10. Moral Examination must goe before judgement Vers. 21. I Will goe downe and see c. The Lord which knoweth all things needed not to have searched or examined the truth before hee proceedeth to punishment But this is for our example as Gregory noteth ne mala hominum ante presumamus credere quam probare that wee presume not to give credit to the report of mens sins before we have proved Thus the Lord did in punishing the old world and in confounding the languages Gen. 11. first take triall and knowledge of the transgression before he inflicted punishment which is a patterne for Judges to proceed maturely and gravely to sentence after due examination and searching out of the cause as Iob saith when I knew not the cause I did search it out Iob 29.16 11. Moral The efficacy of the prayers of the Saints Vers. 29. ANd he yet spake to him againe 1. Here appeareth the great liberty of speech and boldnesse of the Saints in their prayers Abraham renueth his requests 9. times 2. We see also the goodnesse of God that cannot withstand the requests of his servants nor be offended with their importunity Muscul. So Moses when God had purposed to destroy Israel did strive in his prayers and obtained favour by his importunity 3. If God so patiently heard Abraham praying for wicked Sodome much more graciously will he receive the supplications of the faithfull for his Church Calvin CHAP. XIX 1. The Method THis Chapter intreateth of such things as happened to Sodome and of such matters as concerne Lot Three things are declared touching Lot his hospitality in receiving the Angels vers 1 2 3. his deliverance out of Sodome which containeth 1. the warning which Lot gave to his kindred and their refusall vers 12 13 14. 2. The mercy of God in hastening and pulling Lot out of the City 15 16 17. 3. The request of Lot concerning Zoar vers 19. to vers 23. 4. The judgement upon Lots wife vers 26. Thirdly concerning Lot is expressed the incestuous practice of his daughters and the fruit and issue thereof 31. to the end Concerning Sodome first their sinne and iniquity is set forth where 1. we have their ungodly attempt against the young men in Lots house vers 4 5. 2. Lots pacification with their outrage
Pauls rare using of allegories ought to teach such that they also should be verie sparing 2. Unlesse they could say of themselves as Paul did I think I have the spirit of God 1 Cor. 7.4 They cannot challenge the like liberty in expounding of scripture as S. Paul did therefore it may be said unto them as Christ said to his disciples you know not what spirit you are of Luk. 9.55 3. Perer. to this purpose useth a good reason It only belongeth to God which inspired the Scriptures perfectly to know all things that were to come and not only to know them but to dispose direct them as it pleaseth him wherefore he only can appoint that things formerly done veram totamque figuram gerant c. should beare a true and certaine type and figure of things afterward to bee done Man therefore that cannot dispose of things to come is not to make types and figures according to his owne device 5. Confut. Types are said to be that is to signifie the things whereof they are types ANd Saint Paul saith these are 2. testaments that is Sarah and Hagar signifie two testaments Galath 4.24 so the rocke is said to be Christ that is prefigured Christ 1 Cor. 10.3 This Pererius acknowledgeth and yet could not see that Christ c. after the same manner said This is my body that is a figure of my body as both Tertullian and Augustine expound although there is great difference I grant betweene the figure and representation in types and in sacraments for there is only a signification of spirituall things but in the Sacraments there is a lively and effectuall oblation of the things signified and shadowed forth yet in the phrase and manner of speaking in both there is no difference Beza 6. Places of morall observation 1. Moral Mothers should nurse their owne children Vers. 7. THat Sarah should have given sucke c. Ambrose well noteth hereupon that by Sarahs example mothers should learne to nurse their owne children they which of necessity for want of milke or weaknesse doe put forth their children to nurse are excused but of nicenesse to refuse this duty is worthy of blame The Prophet saying thou hast given mee hope at my mothers breasts Psal. 22.9 and the Apostle commending widowes that had nourished their children 1 Timoth. 5.10 sheweth that God hath laid this duty upon mothers which they that refuse are but halfe mothers which nourish the infant in their wombes but forsake it when it commeth into the world 2. the infants many times drawing the milke of bad women doe imitate their evill manners as we see in plants and young cattell that follow the nature of the ground that feedeth them and the dammes that suckle them 3. The purpose of nature is made frustrate when for this end God hath provided milke for the food of infants for God hath made nothing in vaine Calvin 4. By this meanes also the mothers affection is alienated from the childe whom shee cannot so well fancy as whom shee hath nursed and kissed at her breasts Perer. 2. Moral Our affections must be subject to Gods will Vers. 11. THis was very grievous to Abraham yet Abraham though his affection stood otherwise after the Lord had spoken unto him doth bridle his naturall affection and submitteth it to Gods pleasure Wee likewise must learne to confirme our desires to the Lords will And if commendable and naturall love such as Abrahams was must be overswayed by our duty toward God how much more unnaturall and unlawfull lust ought to be extinguished which are flat opposite and contrary to the will of God Calvin a man is to forsake and deny himselfe for Christ. Mark. 8.35 3. Moral The counsell of inferiours not to be despised Vers. 12. IN all that Sarah shall say unto thee heare her voice Abraham is bidden to give eare to the counsel of Sarah And we must learne not to despise the advice of inferiours when they speake the truth unto us and perswade us to that which is right as the Apostle saith set up them which are least esteemed in the Church 1 Corinth 6.4 Muscul. 4. Moral The truest love leaveth not a friend no not in the instant of death Vers. 16. I Will not see the death of the child Hagars heart would not serve her to see her child dye but this was but a compassionate and effeminate love give me such a friend and lover as will not forsake one in the greatest extremity and will stand by him in the agony of death when hee hath most need of comfort I condemne not the first if it proceed of tendernesse of affection rather than of nicenesse and want of duty but I preferre the other So the Lord said to Iacob moving him to goe downe into Aegypt Ioseph shall put his hand upon thine eyes Genes 4.6 4. This duty is the dearest and nearest all other performed to their friends to close their eyes when they were dead 5. Moral God heareth our prayers every where Vers. 17. GOd heard the voyce of the child c. God is every where ready to heare the complaints of the poore Ismael was heard in the wildernesse Daniel in the Lions denne the three children in the fiery furnace Ionas in the whales belly Therefore Saint Paul saith I will that men every where lift up pure hands c. 1 Timoth. 2.8 no place is then barred to our prayers Muscul. 6. Moral Old rancour must be left where true reconciliation is made Vers. 25. ANd Abraham rebuked Abimelech c. Abraham did well being now to make a firme and faithfull league with Abimelech to powre forth all the griefe of his heart at once not as the fashion of some is which make semblance sometimes of reconciliation and attonement and yet doe retaine rancour and seeds of malice in their heart as Ioab did that embraced Abner with one hand and strooke him to the heart with the other 7. Moral Inferiour officers often abuse the name and authority of their Lords and masters Vers. 26. I Know not who hath done this thing c. also thou toldest mee not c. Abraham is found to bee here in some fault that finding himselfe grieved and wronged by Abimelechs servants would complaine of it before the King but powreth it out upon this occasion Luther so many that hold themselves quiet a long time sometime in their heat will utter their stomack But the greatest fault of all was in Abimelechs servants who abusing their masters name authority do without his knowledge take away a well from Abraham Such is the officious disposition of many inferiour officers and Ministers under Princes and other great men that they will father their injurious dealings upon their authority that neither knew nor consented So Gehezi abused his Master Elisha 2 King 5.22 CHAP. XXII 1. The Method THis Chapter entreateth first of Abrahams purpose to sacrifice Isaack his sonne with other things adjoyning vers 1. to 20. secondly of
servants the Physitians c. 1. At the first it seemeth that Physitians were not much regarded seeing the servants were Physitians so also it was among the Romans but afterwards they grew in credit and were much honoured Plini libr. 29. initi 2. It seemeth also that some among the Egyptians were especially deputed for this service to embawme the dead Diodâ—r writeth that they used to come to the house of the dead to know in what manner they would have the buriall solemnized for there were three degrees of buriall some after a costly manner some in a meane some poorely had their funerals kept and of these embawmers some did only cut the body and take out the excrements who were hated of all some did embawme them with spices and these were greatly honoured Diodor. lib. 2. cap. 5. 3. Divers countries had divers fashions of buriall The Hircani devoure dead bodies with dogs the Iberi expose them to the vultures the Nasamones bury them in the Sea the Garamantes in the sand the Celtae drinke in dead mens bones the Scythians hang them up upon poles to waste and consume the Indians hang them up in their houses the Romans from the dayes of Scylla untill the time of the Emperours Antonini used to burne them the Egyptians to embawme them 4. The Persians burne not the dead because they hold fire to be a God and therefore not fit to feed of dead carkasses the Egyptians burne not because they hold fire to have life and to devoure and when it hath devoured it dieth it selfe Perer. ex Herod lib. 2. QUEST II. Of the time and continuance of the Egyptians mourning Vers. 3. SO 40. dayes were accomplished 1. These 40. dayes of embawming are part of the 70. dayes of mourning that is they embawmed him 40. dayes and mourned 30. dayes more Mercer not as Diodorus that they embawmed 30. dayes or as Herodot that after the embawming they salted the corps 70. dayes or as Comestor the Egyptians did mourne forty dayes the Hebrewes thirty for the Egyptians are said to have mourned seventy dayes 2. Before the times of the Gospell when the hope of the resurrection was not so common the Hebrewes used more ceremonies in buriall and the Egyptians and other nations that had not that hope more than they so that this use and custome of the Hebrewes borrowed of the Egyptians which they retained in burials of great persons as Asa was laid into a bed of spices 2 Chron. 12. 3. Ioseph did not observe this custome of embawming for feare to offend the Egyptians but partly to honour his father with this solemnity without superstition and partly of necessity because they were to carry the corps a long journey Mercerus 4. The Egyptians are said to have mourned because it was no wonder that he was bewailed of his owne children and family neither doe they mourne because by Iacobs comming into Egypt they escaped two yeeres of famine as the Hebrewes imagine for there were seven yeeres of famine compleat but they mourned to shew their love unto Iacob and their reverence to Ioseph 5. Here the Egyptians mourne seventy dayes the Israelites for Moses mourned thirty dayes following the Egyptian use Numa Pompilius alloweth mourning of some ten moneths the mourning for Constantine the great at Nicomedia continued twenty dayes the custome was divers for the time but the usuall stint was seven dayes Ecclesiast 22.13 so long mourned Ioseph for his father Iacob v. 10. so many dayes did the Romans bewaile the Emperour Severus Herodian lib. 4. Iun. QUEST III. Why Ioseph moved Pharaoh by others not by himselfe Vers. 4. IOseph spake to the house of Pharaoh 1. Ioseph used other intercessors to Pharaoh because he had need of a great company to goe with them which could not be done without Pharaohs leave Muscul. 2. Ioseph also mourned and therefore was not fit to present himselfe before the King for such used not to come in the Princes presence Esther 4.2 Iun. 3. Beside it was least suspicious for this matter to be moved by others lest if Ioseph had spoken himselfe hee might have beene thought to have despised the land of Egypt and therefore he maketh mention of his fathers purpose before for his buriall and the oath wherewith he bound him Calvin 4. Pharaoh also might have thought that Ioseph had intended to leave Egypt and therefore promiseth to returne againe Mercer 5. Beside seeing the Egyptians moved for him it was better accepted because he had the consent of the whole court Mercer 6. The Hebrewes thinke that Ioseph did in policie set others a worke to decline the suit of the countries who would have beene instant with Ioseph to bury his father in Egypt QUEST IV. Why Iacob is said to have digged or made a grave for himselfe Vers. 5. BVry me in my grave which I have made or digged for me 1. This is not understood of the purchase of the place of sepulture made by Iacob as the word carah to dig sometime signifieth as Deut. 2.6 Thou shalt dig that is buy water for money for Iacob did not buy this double cave but Abraham 2. And Iacob cannot be said to buy it because Abraham bought it as Lyranus for Abraham every where is said to have bought it and not Iacob Gen. 49.30.50.13 3. That also is but a fable of the Hebrewes that Iacob is said to have digged or gotten it because he bought out Esaus right with a summe of gold 4. And it signifieth more than that Iacob appointed himselfe a certaine place of buriall there Perer. 5. Therefore it is most like that in deed Iacob did cause a place of sepulture to be digged and made ready for himselfe against he died though this be not else where mentioned August qu. 170. in Genes and so was it the use for men in their life time to make their sepulchers as Asa did 2 Chron. 16.14 and Ioseph of Arimathea Matth. 27.60 Iun. QUEST V. Why Christ refused to give leave to his disciple to bury his father yet Pharaoh granteth it to Ioseph Vers. 6. ANd Pharaoh said Goe up and bury thy father It need not seeme strange that Pharaoh an heathen King giveth leave to Ioseph to bury his father and yet our Saviour would not grant so much to one of his disciples for the case was not alike 1. This disciple was called to preach the Gospell and he could not attend that businesse unlesse he neglected his calling 2. His meaning was not presently to goe bury his father and come strait againe but to stay with him till he died 3. Beside his father was none of the faithfull or beleevers but he was of their number that were spiritually dead and therefore it had beene dangerous for the disciple to converse with such 4. Neither was he bound by an oath to performe that duty as Ioseph was here Muscul. QUEST VI. Why they left their children and cattell behind Vers. 8. ONly their children and their sheepe
usuall phrase in Scripture that the Lord speaketh of himselfe Tanquam de aliquo tertio As of some third person as chap. 19.11 The Lord himselfe saith to Moses The third day will the Lord come downe Lippom. 4. This further was admirable that all the whole host of Israel containing so many hundred thousand did at once heare and understand the voice wherein God spake unto them as Moses witnesseth Deut. 4.10 Iehovah spake unto you out of the middest of the fire and you heard the voice of the words I remember that Chrysostome in a certaine homily did gesse there were about 100. thousand that were then present to heare him but in the campe of Israel there being 600000. men of warre above twenty beside the young and old women and strangers which might well make five times so many toward 30. hundred thousand as Tostatus and others conjecture it was a wonderfull and strange thing that one voice should be heard of them all as Iosephus saith Omnes audiebant vocem sublimi descendentem ut nemo non intelligeret All heard the voice that came downe from above so that there was none which did not understand and as Cajetane saith Proportionata erat tam propinquis quà m distantebus auditoribus The voice was so proportioned that all heard both neere and further off And therefore it is called A great voice Deut. 5.22 5. And where it is said All these words the meaning is the ten Commandements only to the 18. verse of this twenty chapter for all the Judicials and Ceremonials following were not uttered by the voice of the trumpet but delivered to Moses Tostat. And these words were spoken in this order here set downe and as they were afterward graven in the two tables of stone Moses doth not set them downe altogether after the same manner Deut. 5. which hee doth as an interpreter and expounder of the law Iun. QUEST VIII Why it pleased God himselfe to speake to his people in the giving of the law NOw it pleased God himselfe to pronounce this law in the hearing of the people for these reasons 1. To win the more authority unto his Commandements that they should not contemne and despise them afterward Ferus As Moses afterward rendreth this reason vers 2. That his feare may bee before you that you sinne not Burgens 2. That they might afterward give more credit unto Moses the Lord speaking unto him in the hearing of the people So the Lord himselfe saith Loe I come unto thee in a thicke cloud that the people may heare whiles I talke with thee and that they may beleeve thee for ever chap. 19.9 3. That the people might know that the Lord was their Lawgiver that he and none other did prescribe them Lawes and that to him and none other they should yeeld obedience 4. The people hereby had experience of Gods mercy that vouchsafed to speake unto mortall men as they themselves confesse Wee have seene this day that God talketh with man and he liveth Deut. 5.24 Burgens QUEST IX Of the division of the Morall law NOw the Morall law is first divided according to the subject and matter into two tables the first comprehending those precepts which concerne the worship of God in the foure first Commandements the second those which command the duties to our neighbour This division is warranted by our blessed Saviour Matth. 22.37 dividing the law into two generall or great Commandements Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart c. This is the first and the great Commandement and the second is like unto it Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thy selfe Simler And the reason of this division is that by this order in setting our duty toward God before our duty toward our neighbour the greatnesse and eminencie of the one over the other should be manifest according to the Apostles rule It is better to obey God than man Act. 4.19 And therefore our blessed Saviour calleth the first the great Commandement Vrsin Iosephus then is deceived who putteth five Commandements to the first table making the fift Commandement of honouring the parents one of them But beside the former reason that the precepts onely commanding our duty toward God belong to the first table S. Paul convinceth him who calleth the fift Commandement the first with promise Ephes. 6.2 meaning the first of the second table but in Iosepus opinion it should be the last of the first table Simler Another reason of this division of the tables in setting the precepts first which prescribe our duty toward God is to teach us that no morall or civill duties as of justice chastity sobriety are pleasing unto God if they do not proceed from faith and from an heart setled aright in the true worship of God And therefore those glorious outward workes among the Heathen of justice fortitude temperance were not true vertues before God because they proceeded not from the knowledge and feare of God 2. Another division of the law is into the severall particular parts whereof it consisteth that is ten Commandements therefore called ten words Exod. 34.28 and Deut. 4.13 which are so many not because God delighteth in that number but because of the summe and argument of the things therein contained which are necessarily drawne to so many heads nothing being either omitted or superfluously added Vrsin 3. The law further in respect of the matter of the particular precepts is divided thus that generally in the morall law is contained the worship of God and the same either immediate or mediate The immediate which directly concerneth God is either internall both who is to bee worshipped prescribed in the first Commandement and after what manner with spirituall worship in the second or externall which is either private in not prophaning Gods name precept 3. or publike in the sanctifying of the Sabbath precept 4. The mediate service of God which indirectly is referred to him but directly and properly concerneth our neighbour is likewise either externall which consisteth either in speciâ—ll offices as of the mutuall duties betweene superiours and inferiours precept 5. or generall toward all sorts of men as in the preserving of our neighbours life precept 6. of his chastity precept 7. of his goods precept 8. of the truth precept 9. The internall is in the rectifying our very desires and inward affections toward our neighbours precept 10. Vrsin Which subdivision is very apt and fit saâ—ing that hee maketh all the law but one great Commandement the worship of God whereas our Saviour divideth it into two which division of necessity must be received Some concurring with Vrsinus in the subdivision of the first table doe otherwise distribute the second in this manner it commandeth either speciall duties of some certaine callings in the 5. or generall in the rest and that either in respect of our neighbour in the 6 7 8 9. or of God who knoweth the heart and so the very inward concupiscence is forbidden in
the 10. So Pelacherus Pelargus Iunius in his Analysis somewhat differeth the first table he subdivideth thus that it prescribeth first the worship of God who is to be worshipped in the first and after what manner in the second 2. The profession of this worship in the third 3. The meanes belonging to the worship of God in the sanctifying of the Sabbath and the religious exercises thereof The second table he likewise divideth thus into speciall duties in the 5. common duties in the 6 7 8 9. and into the roote and spring of all the concupiscence of the heart in the 10. Now of all these divisions I have made choice to follow Vrsinus and Pelatherus in the first and Iunius in the second table as is set downe before in the method and argument of the chapter QUEST X. Whether foure Commandements or three only belong to the first table IT followeth as we have seene the division of the whole law and of the number of the precepts in generall so to consider of the number of the particular commandements to be assigned unto each table The opinion of the Romanists is that there are but three Commandements to the first table putting the two first into one and seven to the second dividing the last Thou shalt not covet into two So Tostat. quaest 2. Ferus with others and of this opinion is Augustine quaest 71. in Exod. Some other doe make five Commandements in each table as Iosephus lib. 3. de Antiquit. cap. 6. But this opinion is confuted before And beside Iosephus reason is nothing for he thinketh that the two tables being written both within and without that two Commandements and an halfe were written of a side for the foure first Commandements will take up more roome and space in writing than all the six of the second table This opinion is ascribed to Hesychius in his Commentary upon Leviticus that rejecting the fourth Commandement of the Sabbath yet he maketh foure in the first table and six in the second but if the fourth Commandement be excepted there will bee but nine in all for these Commandements as they were delivered here by the Lord himselfe are called the ten words Exod. 32.28 The common and received opinion is that foure Commandements teaching our duty toward God are to be referred to the first table and six to the last So Origen hom 8. in Exod. Nazianzen in Carmin Chrys. hom 49. in Matth. Oper. imperfect Zonaras tom 1. Hieron in cap. 6. ad Ephes. And Ambrose upon the same place Sulpitius Severus lib. 1. histor sacra Ex Simler Vrsin Procopius also holdeth this precept Thou shalt make to thy selfe no graven image to be the second So also Rupertus lib. 3. cap. 32. Now the reasons to strengthen this opinion against the first which the Romanists follow are these 1. Because those precepts which differ in sense and matter are divers and not one such are the first Thou shalt have no other Gods c. and the second Thou shalt make no graven image for one may offend in the first as they which worship the Sunne and Moone and yet make no graven image and some may transgresse in the second and not in the first as the Romanists themselves which worship graven images and yet we will not thinke so hardly of them that professedly they would make other Gods So then the matter of these two Commandements being divers as the first shewing who and none other is to be worshipped the second in what manner they must be two precepts and not one 2. The distinction which Moses maketh is to be observed the last Commandement of not coveting the neighbours house and wife are joyned in one verse as shewing but one Commandement but these two are severed in two verses which sheweth a division and distinction of the precepts the matter also differing for otherwise in the fourth Commandement there are divers verses but the agreement in the matter sheweth that they all belong unto one precept 3. The last Commandement which they divide into two shall be proved afterward when we come to that place to be but one whole and entire Commandement and this one reason shall suffice in this place because Moses repeating this last precept Deut. 5.21 doth put in the first place Thou shalt we covet thy neighbours wife which is here placed in the second so that if they were not all one Commandement it would be uncertaine which should goe before the other As for the reasons of the contrary opinion they are of no value Augustine would have but three precepts in the first table to expresse the Trinity but the beleefe of the Trinity is commanded in the first precept directly and therefore need not bee insinuated in the number Another reason is because man oweth three things unto God fidelitatem reverentiam cultum fidelity reverence worship Lyraâ— As though worship also includeth not reverence Ferus maketh other three the first precept requireth us to worship God in heart the second to confesse him with the mouth the third to acknowledge him in our workes All this being acknowledged that this must bee yeelded unto God yet another precept must of necessity goe before as the foundation of the rest that wee must acknowledge but one onely true God QUEST XI Whether all Morall precepts as of loving of God and our neighbour be reduced to the Decalogue NExt followeth to bee considered whether all Morall duties may bee reduced unto these ten Commandements 1. It will be objected that they are not because there is no mention made in the Decalogue of the love of God and our neighbour therefore all Morall precepts are not thither referred To this 1. Thomas answereth that these precepts are written in the heart by the law of nature that God and our neighbour are to bee loved and therefore they needed not to bee given in precept Contra. By the same reason then they needed not to be mentioned in Scripture at all if they were so manifest by the law of nature yea the grounds of all the Morall precepts are printed in our nature and yet the Lord thought it necessary to write them in his law 2. Burgensis answereth thus that like as in speculative artes and sciences they use to proceed from knowne and manifest conclusions and principles to those which are more obscure So the Lord propoundeth his law in the easiest and plainest precepts as in the second Commandement It is easier to abstaine from idolatry than from other kindes of superstition and in the sixth a man will abhor murder which cannot so soone decline all other wrongs and injuries These precepts of loving God above all and our neighbour as our selfe because they were hard and difficult the Lord would not propound them at the first to a rude and ignorant people but reserved them till another time when the people were growne more able and strong as in that 40. yeere in the wildernesse then Moses beginneth to explaine this law
dishonour offered to the Image of God is a dishonour to God himselfe therefore the honour thereof redoundeth also unto God Answ. If any with a despiteful intention against Christ doe deface his Image or picture it is contumelious against Christ because of the evill intention of his heart but if any doe it of a zealous mind against Idolatry and superstition it is no dishonour unto Christ as Epiphanius did rend a certaine picture of Christ in a cloath which he found in a Church Epist. ad Ioan. Hierosol and therefore the argument followeth not Vrsin 4. Object Some say that the second precept against the making of Images was only temporall and concerned the Jewes Ambros. Catharinus in opuscâ—l de imaginib Answ. The condemning of Idolatrie in the new Testament as in the places before recited 1. Cor. 6. 1. Ioh. 5. Revel 21. sheweth that the precept is morall and so perpetuall 5. Object The Idols of the Gentiles are condemned because they represented those which were no Gods Answ. The Gentiles in their Idols also had a relation to God they were instituted as Maximuâ— Tyrius saith Vt admoneamur Divinae naturae to admonish us of the Divine nature 6. Object The Lord saith by his Prophet Zephanie 2.11 He will consume all the Gods of the earth but Popish Images Images are not yet destroyed therefore they are not the Idols condemned in Scripture Answ. This Prophesie was fulfilled under the reigne of Constantinus and Theodosius when Idols were every where destroyed And this Prophesie concerneth the true Church of Christ that all Idols should be taken away and therefore the Romanists shew themselves not to bee the true Church of Christ because Idols are not removed from among them Simler Of humane precepts and traditions 8. Controv. Against humane traditions IT hath beene briefely touched before that among other transgressions of the first Commandement this is one the bringing in of superstitious inventions and usages into the service of God without the warrant of his Word See before Doct 1. transgress 5. Here then exception is to be taken against the Romanists for their presumption herein But first let us see the divers kindes of those things which are commanded by men which are of foure sorts 1. The Governours Civill and Ecclesiasticall doe sometime command such things as are injoyned by the Lord and prescribed by the Word as such are the Christian lawes of Princes inflicting punishment upon the offenders against the Morall law concerning our duty toward God or our neighbour such are the exhortations and admonitions of the Ministers of God out of the Word these Commandements all men are bound in conscience absolutely to obey Of this kinde of precepts is that place to be understood Deut. 17.12 That man that will doe presumptuously not harkening unto the Priest that standeth before the Lord or unto the Iudge that man shall dye 2. There are also politicke constitutions of the Magistrate which determine of circumstances concerning the better keeping of the duties of the second Table such are the positive lawes of Princes as when to beare armes to appoint law dayes to prescribe orders and rules for apparell and such like wherein wee are commanded to yeeld obedience to our superiours As the Apostle teacheth Rom. 13.1 Let every soule be subject to the higher powers and vers 7. Give to all men their duty tribute to whom tribute custome to whom custome feare to whom feare c. And these precepts doe not simply binde in conscience in respect of the matter commanded but in regard of the generall band whereby wee are bound to obey the Magistrate in all lawfull things and to avoid offence 3. There are also Ecclesiasticall precepts which concerne ceremonies and other Ecclesiasticall orders belonging to the duties of the first Table which concerneth the worship of God as to appoint times and houres of prayer to prescribe a forme of prayer and what gesture is meet to be used therein as to kneele to stand in what order the Scriptures should bee read these and such other Ecclesiasticall constitutions being appointed according to the generall rules of the Word that all things be done to edifying in order and without offence are obediently to be received in such things men should not bee contentious but willingly yeeld their obedience as the Apostle saith If any man lust to bee contentious wee have no such custome nor the Churches of God And these ordinances of the Church doe not binde in conscience otherwise then in regard of offence and scandall and as wee are generally bound in conscience in all lawfull things to obey our superiours 4. The fourth sort of humane precepts are those which are superstitious and command things not agreeable to the Word but rather contrary unto it Such are the seven Popish Sacraments the multitude of ceremonies which they have brought into the Church their superstitious fastes their pilgrimages to Saints processions with the crosse and such like Such were the traditions of the Pharisies which our blessed Saviour speaketh against Mark 7. Such precepts are not to be obeyed but herein we must follow the Apostles resolution It is better to obey God than man Ex Vrsin These foure kindes of precepts are thus distinguished the first doe absolutely binde in conscience as a part of Gods worship directly the second doe binde in conscience not in respect of the matter commanded but of our obedience which we owe unto the Magistrate in all lawfull things the third for avoiding of scandall and offence the fourth sort doe not binde at all as being unlawfull and contrary to the Word of God But for the traditions of the Church that they are a part of the worship of God it will be thus objected 1. Object God commandeth obedience unto our Superiours Answ. No otherwise than they command such things as are agreeable unto his will either directly which are prescribed in the Word or by way of consequent that are consonant to the rules of the same 2. Object Such things as are done to the glory of God are a part of his worship such are the determinations of the Church Answ. Those things which of themselves serve to the glory of God as being by the Lord himselfe commanded belong unto his worship not all those things which accidentally onely serve to that end and as secondary meanes attend upon the service of God 3. Object Some of the Saints did worship God after a manner not prescribed so also may the Church now so Samuel sacrificed at Ramah and Elias in Carmel Answ. 1. To sacrifice unto God was a thing commanded though the place were indifferent before the building of the Temple 2. These were Prophets and had the extraordinary direction of the spirit Vrsin 4. Morall observations upon the second Commandement 1. Observ. God is full of long suffering Vers. 4. VIsiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the third and fourth generation c. Hierom out of these words well observeth the lenity
Vrsin QUEST III. Why the precept of honouring parents is set first in the second Table THis fifth Commandement is set before the other for these reasons 1. Lyranus Primò ponitur praeceptum circa operationem boni First this precept is put which concerneth the operation of that which is good as in giving honour to parents the other precepts are touching the shunning and avoiding of evill 2. Thomas giveth this reason because first those duties are prescribed Quibus homo ex aliqua speciali ratione obligatur c. whereby a man is specially bound to some particular persons as to parents then those follow Qua indifferenter omnibus debitum reddunt which indifferently yeeld the due unto all men 3. Tostatus thus divideth the precepts of the second Table according to the threefold facultie of the minde which are rationalis irascibilis concupiscibilis the rationall part the irascibile or irefull power and the coveting and desiring facultie the rationall is the most worthie in giving honour unto Superiours for by the rationall part wee desire such things which are of an higher degree than those things which brute beasts do covet the irefull part is seene in revenge either against a mans person directly which is met withall in the next precept Thou shalt not kill or against some principall thing belonging to his person as his good name which is provided for in the ninth precept The coveting facultie is seene either in the act it selfe which is twofold either in carnall desire toward a mans wife forbidden in the 7. precept or in a covetous eye toward his substance in the 8. or in the desire onely of these things as in the 10. Tostat. qu. 17. 4. Procopius yeeldeth this reason why this precept is set first Quia parentes secunda post Deum causa 〈◊〉 quòd simus Because parents are the next cause after God of our being And so as Thomas saith Est quadem affinitas hujus praecepti ad praecepta prima Tabulae There is a certaine affinity betweene this precept and the precepts of the first Table Likewise Tostatus because next unto God we must reverence our parents as most bound unto them as the Heathen Philosopher could say Quòd patribus diis non possumus rarebuere aequalia That to God and our parents wee can never render equally that is as wee have received Aristot. 8. Ethicor. 5. But the best reason is because this precept is Nervus fundamentum obedientiae c. is the very foundation and band of obedience to the other Commandements which would soone be violated if men did not stand in awe of the Magistrate the father of the Common-wealth And beside this precept is set first because of the promise annexed that wee should be the more easily allured unto obedience Vrsin QUEST IV. Why speciall mention is made of the mother THy father and mother c. Speciall mention is made of the mother for these causes 1. Because in these three things are children bound unto their mothers because they are the meanes of their generation as the father is the active and formall cause so the mother is the materiall and passive cause of their conception and beside the conception it is peculiar to the mother to beare the childe 9. moneths in her wombe with much sorrow and griefe and at the last with great paine and danger to bring forth The second thing is the education of the childe which being yet young and tender is brought up with the mother and is apt then to receive any impressions either to good or evill and therefore it is no small helpe to make a childe good to bee brought up under a vertuous mother The third thing is nutrition for the mother doth give the infant her pappes and though the man and wife should be separated it is the wives dutie to nurse the childe and that according to the Canons till it be three yeare old Extra de convers infidel cap. ex literis Tostat. quaest 17. 2. Because women are the weaker vessels and the chiefe government of the house is committed to the father the Lord foreseeing that mothers might easily grow into contempt hath provided by this law to meet with disobedient children Basting QUEST V. Whether the childe is more bound to the father or mother BUt if here it shall be demanded to which of the parents the childe is most bound the answer briefely is this that whereas the childe oweth three things unto the parents sustentation and maintenance honour and reverence dutie and obedience the first of these is equally to be performed unto them both to relieve the parents because they both are as one and feed at one table and therefore in this behalfe no difference can be made Likewise for the second as they are our parents they are equally to be reverenced and honoured but where there may bee more eminent parts of wisdome and vertue and such like as usually are in the father there more honour is to bee yeelded unto him but otherwise to the mother if shee be more vertuous Concerning obedience because the man is the head of the woman and the master of the familie obedience ordinarily is rather to be given to the commandement of the father than of the mother Tostat. QUEST VI. Why the Lord commandeth obedience to parents being a thing acknowledged of all BUt it seemeth superfluous that God should by law command obedience unto parents seeing there is no nation so barbarous which doth not yeeld reverence unto them Answ. 1. So also there are by nature printed in the minde of man the seeds of the other precepts but this law of nature being by mans corruption obscured and defaced God thought it needfull to revive this naturall instinct by the prescript of his law and the rather because men might be more allured unto this dutie by the promise propounded Simler 2. And the Lord intending herein to prescribe obedience to all superiours thought good to give instance in parents because these precepts Sunt quasi quadam conclusiones immediate sequentes ex principiis juris naturalis c. are as certaine immediate conclusions following out of the principles of the naturall law which are easily received and acknowledged of all but those things which are understood are Tanquam conclusiones quaedam remotae c. as certaine conclusions fetched further off Lyran. QUEST VII Who are comprehended under the name of fathers and mothers BY father and mother are understood 1. Parents of all sorts whether our naturall fathers or mothers or those so called by law as the father and mother in law and such as doe adopt children Tutors likewise and Governours 2. Publike officers as Magistrates which are the fathers of the Commonwealth 3. Pastors and Ministers as Elisha calleth Elias father 2. King 2. 4. Masters as Naâ—mans servants called him father 2. King 2. and generally the elder sort and aged persons whom usually we call fathers Vrsin The reasons why all
to serve and worship God and to bring up their children in his feare and in their matrimonie which is a sweet and amiable fellowship is set forth that mysticall conjunction which is betweene Christ and his Church Ephes. 5.32 Ex Bucan Vrsin QUEST XVIII Of the mutuall matrimoniall duties betweene man and wife THe duties to bee performed in mariage are first such as are common betweene man and wife as 1. Mutuall love that they should one love another to love as they are beloved 2. Matrimoniall faith in keeping themselves one to another not seeking after strange flesh 3. A communion of their goods one supplying anothers wants and a communion of affection one having a lively fellow-feeling of anothers griefes 4. The education of their children wherein both the parents are bound to shew their Christian care 5. And mutuall hearing and forbearing one another tolerating their infirmities 〈◊〉 a great desire to have them amended and healed Vrsin 2. The duties required on the husbands part are 1. To instruct and teach his wife and bring her to the knowledge of God 1 Cor. 14.35 2. To be her head to protect and defend her from injuries to guide direct and governe her in discretion Ephes. 5.23 The husband is the woman's head as Christ is the head of her Church 3. To be amiable unto his wife not bitter or cruell unto her Colos. 3.19 not to use her as his maid or servant but as his yokefellow and collaterall companion and coadjutrix in the government of the house 4. To provide for her all things needfull in sicknes and in health for hee is worse than an Infidell that doth nor provide for those of his owne house 1 Timoth. 5.8 5. To honour the wife as the weaker vessell 1 Pet. 3.7 and in his Christian discretion to winne her with lenitie 3. The speciall duties on the behalfe of the wife are 1. To shew her care and diligence in preserving of her husbands domesticall estate and wisely disposing the houshold affaires as that hâ—swively Macâ—on is described Prov. 31. 2. To give due reverence and honour to her husband as unto her head as Sara is commended 1 Pet. 3.7 3. And to bee subject and obedient unto him in all things in the Lord Ephes. 5.22 QUEST XIX Whether marriage be left indifferent to all MAtrimonie is neither denied unto any by the divine institution nor yet commanded unto all 1. It is lawfull and granted unto all to marrie if they will for the Apostle saith that mariage is honourable among all men Hebr. 13.4 because that blessing given unto mariage Increase and multiplie was generall to Adam and all his posteritie 2. As mariage is not necessarily imposed upon all so is it indifferent unto those which have the gift of continencie for although they need not the remedie of matrimonie against fornication having received that speciall gift yet they may desire mariage for mutuall comfort and to have issue and for other ends whereunto marriage was appointed 3. But unto those which cannot containe it is necessarie to use this remedie and to them mariage is not indifferent So the Apostle saith It were good for a man not to touch a woman neverthelesse to avoid fornication let every man have his wife c. 1 Cor. 7.2 and vers 9. If they cannot abstaine let them marrie for it is better to marrie than to burne 4. But though this libertie be given to use the remedie yet there must bee a temperate sobrietie and moderation both in the use of mariage that they doe not give themselves over to fleshly delight but sometime sequester themselves to fasting and prayer 1 Cor. 7.5 And a comely decencie must bee observed both in first and second mariages not hastily and greedily to fall into them as among the Romans Numa made a law that a woman should not marrie within ten moneths after her husbands death Vrsin 2. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. Of the generall and particular contents of this precept IN this Commandement under one speciall kinde of adulterie all other acts of uncleannesse whatsoever are restrained and whatsoever belongeth unto chastitie is prescribed and commanded as these three vertues principally 1. Chastitie 2. Shamefastnes 3. Temperance The contrarie unto which vertues likewise are forbidden 1. Chastitie is commanded which is a vertue keeping both the soule and bodie chaste avoiding and shunning all uncleannesse and unlawfull lust both in mariage and in the single estate as also all causes occasions opportunities egging and provoking thereunto as likewise the effects and inconveniences that ensue thereon So the Apostle teacheth This is the will of God even your sanctification that yee should abstaine from fornication that every one of you should know how to possesse his vessell in holinesse and honour not in the lust of concupiscence c. 1 Thess. 4.3 4. Contrarie unto this vertue of chastitie are 1. Such kinds of inordinate lust as are against even this nature of ours as it is corrupt as first the confusion of divers kindes as when men are given over to vile affections to defile themselves with bâ—uit beasts Secondly the abuse of the sex as when men with men worke filthinesse which was one of the sinnes of the heathen Rom. 1.28 Likewise may the feminine sex bee abused Rom. 1.27 Thirdly when as the lawfull sex is used but in too neere a degree as in incest all these are unnaturall lusts and deserve of the Magistrate to bee extraordinarily punished 2. Other kindes of lusts there are which proceed from this our corrupt nature 1. Fornication betweene parties not married when as one with one committeth follie or which is more odious one with many which is the vile practice of strumpets and whores 2. Adulterie either the one partie being married and it is called adulterium simplex simple adulterie or both which is adulterium duplex double adulterie 3. There are beside these evill inclinations of the heart and inward inflammations which the godly doe resist by prayer and cut off the occasions of them and the remedie against this kind of lust is mariage according to S. Pauls rule It is better to marrie then to burne 1 Cor. 7.9 4. Shamefastnesse is here required which abhorreth all kind of turpitude and uncleannesse being alwaies accompained with a certaine griefe and feare lest any thing uncomely should bee committed such was the shamefastnes of Ioseph that being entised often by his shamelesse Mistresse would not afterward come into her companie Contrarie hereunto are 1. Immodestie and unshamefastnesse such as was in Herodâ—as daughter that came in impudently and danced before Herod and the rest that were at the table 2. Obscenitie and uncomelinesse in word or in deed as in Iosephs Mistresse that was not ashamed to move him with her owne mouth to lie with her 3. Temperance is also commanded which is a moderate and sober use of such things as belong unto the bodie as meat and drinke agreeable for the time place and
VVhat works are permitted to be done upon the Sabbath 10. qu. VVhy the children servants and cattell are commanded to rest 11. qu. VVhat strangers were injoyned to keepe the Sabbaths rest 12. qu. Why a reason is added to this Commandement 13. qu. How the Lord is said to have rested 14. qu. Of the changing of the Sabbath from the seventh day to the first day of the weeke 15. qu. How the Lord is said to have blessed and sanctified the day Questions upon the fifth Commandement 1. QUest Whether this precept belong to the first table 2. qu. VVhy the precepts of the second table are said to be like unto the first 3. qu. VVhy the precept of honouring parents is set first in the second table 4. qu. VVhy speciall mention is made of the mother 5. qu. VVhether the child is more bound to the father or mother 6. qu. Why the Lord commandeth obedience to parents being a thing acknowledged of all 7. qu. VVho are comprehended under the name of fathers and mothers 8. qu. VVhy the Lord here useth the name of father and mother to signifie the rest 9. qu. VVhat is meant by this word Honour 10. qu. Certaine doubts removed how and in what cases parents are to be obeyed 11. q. In what sense Christ biddeth us hate our parents 12. qu. How farre children are bound to obey their parents 13. qu. At what age it is most convenient for men to marrie to get children 14. qu. VVhether the reciprocall dutie also of parents toward their children be not here commanded 15. qu. VVherein the dutie of parents consisteth toward their children 16. qu. VVhether all the duties of mercie and charitie are commanded in this precept 17. qu. Of the true reading and meaning of these words That they may prolong it 18. qu. In what sense the Apostle calleth this the first Commandement with promise 19. qu. Why the promise of long life is made to obedient children 20. qu. What other blessings are promised under long life 21. qu. This promise of long life did not onely concerne the Iewes 22. qu. Whether long life simplie be a blessing and to be desired 23. qu. VVhy wicked and disobedient children are suffered to live long 24. qu. How this promise of long life is performed seeing the righteous seed are many times soone cut off Questions concerning the dutie of Subjects unto Civill Magistrates 23. QUest Of the dutie of Subjects toward their Prince 24. qu. How farre Subjects are to obey their Governours 25. qu. Whether it had beene lawfull for David to have killed Saul against Bucanus Questions upon the sixth Commandement 1. QUest Why this precept is set before the other that follow 2. qu. Whether it be here forbidden to slay any beast 3. qu. Of the divers kinds of killing 4. qu. How the soule is killed by evill perswasion 5. qu. That it is not lawfull for a man to kill himselfe 6. qu. The inward murder of the heart forbidden 7. qu. What things are to be taken heed of in anger 8. qu. Of rayling and reviling 9. qu. VVhether beating and wounding though there be no killing be not forbidden here 10. qu. VVhy actuall murder is such an haynous sinne before God 11. qu. How diversly murder is committed 12. qu. Of the divers kinds of murder 13. qu. Magistrates are not guiltie of murder in putting malefactors to death Questions upon the seventh Commandement 1. QUest Of the order and negative propounding of this Commandement 2. qu. Whether the uncleane desire of the heart be forbidden in this precept 3. qu. Other acts of uncleannesse beside adulterie here forbidden 4. qu. Of the sinnes of unnaturall lust 5. qu. VVhy some kinde of uncleannesse is not forbidden by humane lawes 6. qu. Of the greatnesse of the sinne of adulterie 7. qu. Adulterie as well forbidden in the husband as in the wife 8. qu. VVhether adulterie be a more grievous sinne in the man or in the woman 9. qu. VVhether adulterie be now necessarily to be punished by death 10. qu. VVhether it be lawfull for the husband to kill his wife taken in adulterie 11. qu. Simple fornication whether a breach of this Commandement 12. qu. Spirituall fornication is not a breach of this precept 13. qu. Of the lawfulnesse and dignitie of mariage 14. qu. Of the espousals and contract of mariage with the difference and divers kinds thereof 15. qu. Of mariage consummate and the rites and orders therein to be observed 16. q. What conditions are required in lawfull mariage 17. qu. Of the ends of the institution of matrimonie 18. qu. Of the mutuall matrimoniall duties betweene man and wife 19. qu. VVhether mariage be left indifferent to all Questions upon the eighth Commandement 1. QUest Whether the stealing of men onely be forbidden in this precept 2. qu. Of the order and phrase used in this precept 3. qu. Of the generall heads of the things here prohibited 4. qu. Of Sacrilege 5. qu. Whether it bee lawfull to convert things consecrated to idolatrie to other uses sacred or prophane 6. qu. Of the sacrilege of spirituall things 7. qu. Of Simonie 8. qu. Of common theft with the divers kinds thereof 9. qu. Of the divers kinds of transactions and contracts 10. qu. Of the divers kinds of fraud and deceit used in contracts 11. qu. Of unlawfull and cosening trades 12. qu. How this precept is broken by procuring our neighbours hurt 13. qu. Of the abuse of mens goods and substance another generall transgression of this precept Questions upon the ninth Commandement 1. QUest What it is to answer a false testimonie 2. qu. Whether false testimonie in judgement be here onely forbidden 3. qu. How divers wayes a false testimonie is borne 4. qu. Who is to be counted our neighbour 5. qu. What conditions must concurre to convince one of falsehood 6. qu. Of the divers kinds of lies 7. qu. Some cases wherein the truth is not uttered and yet no lie committed 8. qu. How the truth may bee uttered and yet this Commandement broken 9. qu. Of the divers kinds of false testimonies 10. qu. Of a false testimonie in matters of religion 11. qu. Of falsehood and error in Arts. 12. qu. How falsehood is committed in judgement 13. qu. Of the danger of bearing false witnesse in judgement 14. qu. Of the detorting and wresting of words to another sense another kinde of false testimonie 15. qu. Of the violating of faith in leagues and covenants 16. qu. Whether are more grievous publike or private false witnesse bearing 17. qu. Of the divers kinds of private false testimonies 18. qu. Of a false testimonie which a man giveth of himselfe Questions upon the last Commandement 1. QUest The last precept whether two or one 2. qu. What manner of concupiscence is here forbidden and how this precept differeth from the former 3. qu. Whether involuntarie concupiscence having no consent of the will is here forbidden 4. qu. Why there is no precept to direct the inward passion of anger as