briefly all those which while they are performed as by the Servants of men they that doe then are not impeached for being the servants of God That is to say the workes of labour but not the workes of sinne for to the first they are obliged by the law of nations but the second are forbidden them by the Law of God not nakedly forbidden as their labour on the Sabaoth is but directly and immediatly forbidden them for it i◠cleare that all the other commandements being indifferently imposed without either specification or exception of any person whatsoever respect not any more one than another and therefore hold all men under an equall obligation and so was it altogether convenient because they are no lesse the secret lawes of nature than the revealed Lawes of God and no lesse written with the finger of God in the fleshly tables of the heart than in the tables of stone all of them forbidding those things that by their property and nature or as the Schoolemen say exsuogenere are evill but the commandement that forbiddeth servile workes on the Sabaoth is of a different sort first because the servant is touching the matter which it forbiddeth labour wholly subject to another mans command secondly because the commandement forbiddeth not the servant to worke but onely forbiddeth the Master his servants worke thirdly because the thing it selfe namely servants labour is not evill materially and exsuogenere as the matters of the other negative commandements are but only circumstantially because it s done upon such a day for idolatry blasphemy dishonouring of Parents murther adultery theft false testimony coveting of that is other mens which are the matter of other commandements are evill in their owne nature and therefore forbidden because they are evill in their owne nature But to labour on the Sabaoth is not by nature evill but therefore evill because it is forbidden So that the native ilnesse in the other causeth the prohibition but the prohibition in this causeth the evill for laboring on the seventh day if God had not forbiddē it had not bin evil at al no more than to labour on the sixt as not being interdicted by any law of nature as the matters of all the other commandements are for although the secret instinct of nature teacheth all men that sometime is to bee withdrawne from their bodily labours and to be dedicated to the honour of God which even the prophanest Gentiles amidst all the blind superstition and darkenesse wherewith they were covered in some sort did appointing set times to be spent in sacrifice and devotion to their idols which they tooke for their Gods yet to observe one day in the number of seven as a certaine day of that number and namely the seventh in the ranke or a whole day by the revolution of the Sunne and with that severe exactnesse of restraining all worke as was injoyned to the Iewes is but meerely ceremoniall brought in by positive Law and is not of the law of nature For had that forme of keeping Sabaoth bin a law of nature then had it obliged the Gentiles as well as the Iewes seeing they participate both equall in the Exod. 31. 13. Ezek. 20. 12. 30. same nature yet it did not so but was given to the Israelites to bee a speciall marke of their separation from the Gentiles and of their particular participation to God neither shall wee finde either in the writings of Heathen men whereof some were in their kinde very religious that any of them had ever any sense of it or in the records of Moses that it was ever observed by any of the holy Patriarchs before it was pronounced in mount Sinai But if it had beene a law of nature her selfe and so had obliged all the Patriarchs and as large as nature her selfe and so obliged all the Gentiles and had it not beene as durable as nature too and so obliged us Christians also Certainely it had for if that precise vacation and sanctification of the Sabaoth day had consisted by the law of nature then must it have beene by the decree of all Divines immutable and consequently right grievous should the sinne of Christians be which now prophane that day with ordinary labours and chiefly theirs which first translated the celebration of that day being the seventh to the first day of the weeke who yet are certainly supposed to be none other than the Apostles of our Saviour To turne to the point and clearely to determine it the master only is accountable unto God for the servants worke done on the Sabaoth but for what worke Namely for all the workes of labour but not for the workes of sin and how for the workes of labour Namely if hee doe them not absolutely of his owne election but respectively as of obedience to his masters command for touching labours servants are directly obliged to their masters But touching sinnes themselves are obliged immediatly to God Therefore those they may doe because their master commands them these they may not doe although commanded because God forbids them The servants then may not in any case sinne at the commandement of any Master on earth because hee hath received immediatly a direct commandement to the contrary from his Master in heaven For it is better to obey God than man And there is no proportion betwixt the duties which they owe as servants to their masters according to the flesh which they owe as Children to the father of spirits or betwixt the obligation wherein they stand to men who have power but over their bodies in limited cases and that for a season And that infinite obligation wherein they stand to him that is both creator and preserver and redeemer and ludge of body and soule sinne therefore they may not if their Masters command them because God hath forbidden them nor only forbidden I say but forbidden it them but labour they may if their masters command them because God hath no way forbidden them that God hath indeede forbidden the Masters exacting that worke on the Sabaoth but hee hath not forbiddē the servants execution of that work if it be demanded or exacted he hath restrained the master from commanding it but hee hath not restrained the servants from obeying if it bee commanded for although I acknowledge the servants worke on the Sabaoth to imply sinne yet I say it is not the servants fault And albeit I confesse the commandement of God be transgressed and God disobeyed by such workes on the Sabaoth yet it is not the servant that transgresseth the commandement it is not he that disobeyeth God For the question is not the passive sense whether God bee displeased with these workes but of the active who displeaseth him The thing is confessed but the person is questioned Confessed that is that there is sinne committed in that worke but questioned whose sinne it is For worke having relation both to the Master and to the servant to the Masters commanding and to
THE DOCTRINE OF THE SABBATH VINDICATED In a confutation of a treatise of the Sabbath written by M. Edward Breerwood against M. Nic. Byfield wherein these five things are maintained First that the fourth Commandement is given to the servant and not to the master onely Secondly that the fourth Commandement is morall Thirdly that our owne light workes as well as gainefull and toilesome are forbidden on the Sabbath Fourthly that the Lords day is of divine Institution Fifthly that the Sabbath was instituted from the beginning By the industrie of an unworthy labourer in Gods Vineyard RICHARD BYFIELD Pastor in Long Ditton in Surrey Verily I say unto you till heaven and earth passe one jot or one title shall in no wise passe from the Law till all be fulfilled Matth. 5. 18. LONDON Imprinted by Felix Kyngston for Philemon Stephens and Christopher Meredith at the golden Lyon in Pauls Church-yard 1631. To all that loue the LORD IESVS in sincerity DEare Christian bought with a price most happy in this that thou art not thine owne for thy sake I have undertaken to answer this Treatise to thee doe I Dedicate it who mayest of right challenge all that I am or can Thou whether noble wise mightie learned unlearned weake or meane neare or farre off art interessed in all that maketh for the Truth and in all that is done against it Paul Apollo Cephas are thine 1. Cor. 3. all thine for thou art Christs and Christ is Gods In the broaching of Heresies thou art wounded in the making of schismes thou art racked in every lie thou art layed at nothing commeth against a painefull Minister but reacheth to thy heart through his sides nothing from a laborious Minister but aymeth at thy setling stablishing comforting perfecting Wert thou the meanest that ever lived who can thinke this too much for thee seeing God withholds not himselfe as a Father his Sonne as a Redeemer and Brother his Spirit as sanctifier Comforter and the Spirit of Sonne-ship in thy heart and thy very body also hee ownes as his Temple For a recompence bee inlarged give thy selfe to God receive nothing against but all that is for the Truth Let the reproaches wherewith Christ and his Ministers are reproached fall on thee owne the Ministers gifts and labours as thine reigne but not without them be honourable but not when they are despised When I first received this booke intituled A learned Treatise of the Sabbaoth a little before November last though I was utterly ignorant of any such controuersie to haue passed betweene my Brother and Master Edward Breerwood and had not yet cast mine eye on the base language of the reply in the end of that Treatise yet the very noveltie and dangerous vilenesse of the Doctrine without any reference to things personall strucke me My spirit was stirred in me when I saw the whole right of the Law for the time of Gods worship alleviated the consequence whereof must needs be this the whole kingdome wholy given to Atheisme and prophanenesse The zeale of Gods glory and thy good began to eate upon me I throw my selfe into the open field that thou mayest be nourished I resolved what I was or am or may be should be Christ strengthning mee Gods and thine that God the Lord of Heaven might have his Royaltie untouched man his dutie laid out Superiors directed to stand for God and Men in the things of God and Inferiors be Gods while mens and mens in and for God Now knowing that there are none but are flesh as well as spirit and that the unregenerate part will catch at the most excellent truths to sucke thereout advantage to it selfe by tearing a sunder things inseparably united and taking to things hand over head in a wrong application fearing thy miscarriage I could not but advertise thee a little in that part that concernes thy duty The superiour or master may conceite his power intrenched upon the inferiour or servant may suppose some unwarranted liberty granted him all may thinke of an over-rigid construction of the unchangeable precept This Dâ—spute yeelds none of those neither prejudice to the master nor occasion of liberty to the servant nor other then a received and allowed sense to the never-failing law as will appeare to him that thorowly peruseth it But for prevention of over-hasty conceits in all behold thy way-markes before thou reade or receive any thought to fore-stall thee take what I set here before thee which hath beene seene and heard and allowed and received Blessed be Gods holy Name and I doubt not but shall be maugre the malice of contradicting spirits For I admonish thee of no other things then what are already received in the printed Bookes of Mr. Nich. Byfield Consider I say what that Master of Assemblies hath left in his writings as stakes to bound out the way of both master and servant superiour and inferiour in running the race of this fourth commandement and as goades to quicken thy heart in the embracing of that divine Law For the Doctrine of the Sabbath he thus explaineth himselfe in two places First God hath provided by his unchangeable law that one day in seven servants shall rest from their labour M. Byf. on 1 Pet. 2. 18. pag. 723. Secondly Servants must shew their feare of God in their callings by carefulnesse to doe Gods service as well as their masters not onely by spending the Sabbath in the duties of religion but in redeeming the time in the weeke dayes as may bee without hinderance of their worke or offence to their masters to imploy themselves in prayer reading conference c. And the reason is because as servants must doe their masters worke as they are servants so they stand bound in the common obligation to do Gods service as they are men and no man but is subject to the law of God who hath given all his commandements to servants as well as to masters Byf. in 1 Pet. 2. 18. pag. 734. For the servant he layeth downe these godly and savory limitations as Caveats First the subjection of servants is of Divine institution to which God hath bound them by the fift Commandement and so is a morall and perpetuall ordinance in 1 Pet. 2. 18. p. 721. Secondly no faults in Superiors can free inferiors from their subjection in matter or manner in 1 Pet. 2. p. 742. Thirdly if the matter bee onely inexpedient and unmeete thou must obey in Col. 3. 23. p. 130. Fourthly thou must bee sure that it bee sinne that thou refusest if thou must needs doubt it is better to doubt and obey than doubt and disobey Id. ibid. Fiftly thou must in unlawfull things yeeld to obey by sufferings Id. ibid. Sixtly the servant must avoide inquisitivenesse the servant knoweth not what his master doth Ioh. 15. 15. in 1 Pet. 2. p. 735. For the master he giveth these heavenly admonitions First the master must give account of all hee doth to God though he be not bound to doe
so to inferiors in 1 Pet. 2. p. 737. Secondly good masters not onely license but teach their servants to keepe Gods Sabbath and worship him Commandement 4. Gen. 18. 19. in 1 Pet. 2. p. 736. Thirdly masters doe not onely wickedly in restraining their servants from the meanes of their salvation or comfort but doe foolishly also in hindering them of that meanes that should make them good servants in 1 Pet. 2. p. 725. Fourthly they may not make their servants breake Gods Sabbath to satisfie their wils in Col. 3. 23. p. 130. In these Aphorismes that faithfull servant of Iesus Christ being dead yet speaketh unto which let me adde a word or two that thou mightest on all hands be leftready to duty in this behalfe Remember if thou be a servant that in workes of holinesse mercy and necessitie the masters power is to be obeyed in subjection to his commands for in those is he under God for God and over thee Then it is thy praise to follow Isa 41. 2. him in the lawfull use of his power at his foote Lastly the well-ordered houshold of that worthily praised Centurion should be the platforme for families that intend their welbeing When hee bad his servant goe he went and come he came and doe this and he did it if thou bee a master and hadst such servants wouldest thou couldest thou serve Ier. 43. 9. thy selfe of them I am perswaded there is not the most covetous and prophane Atheist but hee hath so much sense of a deitie and so much conscience yeelding and heart giving and relenting that he would sometimes in a moode proclayme to his houshold the Lords libertie Is it so indeede my prayer shall bee for thee that of this deede thou mayest never repent and pollute Gods Name with those wretched Israelites lest it should hasten desolation on thy house and name thy repentance may bee farre better bestowed upon the remainder of other sinnes against other the Holy Lawes of God To which worke I leave thee and all others that know that Repentance towards God and Faith towards the Lord Iesus is that which summeth up Christianitie among those that follow the Truth in Love the Lord answere us all with strength in our soules that alwayes we may labor fervently one for another in prayers that wee may stand perfect and compleat in all the will of God So prayeth Yours in the Lord RICHARD BYFIELD THE CONTENTS OF THE BOOKE THE PREFACE THE Preface of this Confutation sheweth The illiteratenesse and vanitie of the Title pag. 1 2 3. The abusiue application of holy Texts to such a Treatise p. 4. The state of the Question opposed by Mr. Breerewood pag. 5. CHAP. I. The first Chapter deliuers The plaine sense of the words of the fourth Commandement which concerne the persons to whom it is giuen page 6. Seuen reasons from the Commandement it selfe to auouch that exposition page 7. 8. Two texts in the old Testament to confirme it viz. Ier. 17. 20. Exod. 34. 21. page 9. The Infirmenesse of Mr. Breerwoods Collection page 9 10. An argument taken out of Gal. 5. 3. to prooue our exposition pag. 10. A grosse absurditie and wicked against the soules of inferiours arising from the contrary doctrine of our aduersary page 10. The singularitie and Noueltie of this opinion page 10. CHAP. II. Containeth Two things that make Precepts parallel and equally obliging page 11 12. A distinction to cleare this page 12. Another argument to prooue that the fourth Commandement is giuen to seruants taken out of the Rom. 3. 19. Many arguments to prooue that the stranger-Moabite eating the Passeouer sinned though he were inuited page 13 14. Instances proouing that a commandement in forme of words giuen of and not to one may yet be sinned against by him of whom it is so giuen page 13 14. A retortion of M. Breerwoods argument page 14 15. CHAP. III. Sheweth The weakenesse of that instance of the Precept of a Prince applyed to confirme his exposition page 15. The greatnesse of the Seruants sinne that neglects attendance on Christ vpon the Sabbath vnder the similitude of a Prince gathered out of Aquinas page 16. How commandements that are priuiledges binde the priuiledged and therefore if the commandement were of seruants and not to them yet it obligeth them page 16 17. A further proofe that the fourth Commandement is giuen to Seruants also page 17 18. CHAP. IIII. Prooueth that the fourth Commandement is giuen to Children out of Lev. 23. 3. and 19 3. and therefore to Seruants page 19 20. CHAP. V. Sheweth Our Aduersaries vnsound Reasoning from the Text in Deut. 5. page 22 23. The meaning of that text page 23. Many passages in his vnfolding the place in Deut. 5. lyable to just exceptions page 24 25 26 27. CHAP. VI. Deliuereth The difference betweene the Oxes and the Seruants subjection to the fourth Commandement page 28. Two arguments drawne thence to prooue that the Commandement obligeth Seruants page 28 29. Further proofes hereof page 29 30. A Rule to know when Precepts that are alike for forme of words yet doe not oblige alike page 30. CHAP. VII Sheweth That the Seruant working on the Sabbath at his Masters commandement sinneth though the wrought Oxe sinne not p. 31 32. The Horridnesse of that position that the Seruant and the Oxe or Asse are alike subject to their Masters page 32 33. Three Rules that guide Subjects in obedience to their Superiours page 33 34. CHAP. VIII Deliuereth the examination of our Aduersaries explication of that distinction of the matter and forme of sinne page 35 36. The Infirmenesse of his Reasoning from thence page 36. CHAP. IX Sheweth further What clause of the Commandement bindeth seruants as seruants page 37 38. Another argument drawne from the Texts Exod. 20. 1 20 21. and 35. 1 2. page 38. The exposition of the Commandement by Thomas Aquinas page 38 39 40. CHAP. X. Sheweth the weakenesse of the aduersaries reason taken from the wisedome and equitie of God page 41 42. Diuers vnsound passages let fall in laying down that Reason pag. 42. In speciall the falsehood of this that the Seruants are voide of power and libertie to obey Gods Commandement on the Sabbath if their Master bid them worke page 42 43. CHAP. XI Cleareth our Doctrine from vnjust aspersions and prooueth that it occasioneth No Disobedience to Masters page 44 45. No hard vsage to the Seruant page 45 46. No breach of the Law of Nations where many things about the Law of Nations page 46 47. Chargeth our Aduersaries Doctrine to produce these three euils page 47 48. Confirmeth further our Doctrine page 48 49. CHAP. XII Sheweth How our Aduersaries Reason from Gods goodnesse is faultie for forme and matter page 50 51 52 53. That his Doctrine casteth into mischiefes and Inconueniences page 54. CHAP. XIII Sheweth the abuse of that place in Neh. 13. which is vnfolded and maketh for vs A justification of our English translation and the
15. God doth prescribe which hath not the reason and nature of a benefit simply but of a duty and office that is from the Empire of God And afterwards explaining himselfe he addeth I say simply a benefit for God requires no duty of his creature which is not in the thing it selfe a benefit but that is simply a benefit in which no nature of a duty towards God doth shew it selfe Now follow this Rule and who sees not that this precept Thy servant shall doe no worke on the Sabbath hath in it chiefly the nature of office and duty the servant oweth to God as well as the master even the observation of the Sabbath to God though in a second place here is a matter of fatherly indulgence God graciously tendring the servants as he doth also the very bruite beast for whose ease he mercifully provides that day Now Master Publisher if you have any mind to put questions you shall have leave if you please to aske as many more CHAP. 4. Breerwood Pag. 7. NOw that that clause of the Commandement touching servants was not given to the sevants themselves but to their masters in whose power and disposition they are the text and tenour of the commandement doth clearly import for marke it well and answere me to whom is this speech directed Neither thy sonne nor thy daughter shall doe any worke on the Sabaoth day is it not to the Parents For can this manner of speech thy sonne thy daughter be rightly directed to any other than the parent and is not by the same reason the clause that next followeth neither shall thy man servant nor thy maid-servant doe any worke on the Sabaoth day directed to the Masters of such servants Seeing that phrase of speech thy man-servant thy maidservant cannot rightly bee used to any other It is therefore as cleare as the Sunne even to meane understandings if they will give but meane attendance to the tenour of Gods commandements rather than the fond interpretations and depravations of men that that clause of the commandement touching servants cessation from working on the Sabaoth is not given to servants themselves but to their masters concerning them Answer First this proofe is sufficiently overthrowne by all the former arguments yet I adde This precept is directed to the parents restraining the use of their power to interrupt and injoyning the use of their power to preserve the sanctification of the day and to the sonne and daughter also not to worke at the houshold worke for saith God g Levit. 23. 3. The seventh day is the Sabbath of rest and holy convocation yee shall doe no worke therein it is the Sabbath of the Lord in all your dwellings Who are these charged in the word yee Who but yee that stand bound to come to the holy convocations yee that constitute families therefore yee children as well as yee parents Secondly and to free all that subscribe to this truth from feare of so much as any private interpretation and to cast it bee commanded nor intreated licence would serve their turne but to the masters whose desire of gaine by the servants labour might stand betwixt the Sabaoth and the servants rest and to make an end with the Text with the last words of it what is it that the Lord for these reasons commanded was it barely to keepe and observe the Sabaoth as it is in the vulgar English Latine and Greeke translations No they are all short it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to make a day of rest Deut. 5. 15. Now to make it to bee so importeth not onely to observe it himselfe but to cause others also to observe it which is evidently the property of masters and governours wherefore seeing both the commandement touching servants rest from labour on the Sabaoth day and reasons added by Moses to perswade that point and draw their mindes to obsequiousnesse are evidently directed to the Masters and not neither of both to the servants themselves I take it out of all question as cleare as the Sunshine at midday that if servants by their masters command doe any worke on the Sabaoth the sinne is not theirs who as touching their bodily labour are meerely subject to their Masters power but it is their masters sinne For their sinne it is that transgresse the law they transgresse the law who are obliged by it they are obliged by it to whom it was given and imposed and given it was as I have plentifully proved onely to Masters Answer First your first way of confirming your exposition was by instance then you goe on to proofes from texts whereof the first taken out of the commandement was taken off in the former Chapter this is your second proofe built on the text in Deu. 5. And here because you flaunt it out in many words and in many of them glance at things as if they made to your purpose besides the maine of your argument I thus reply first to your reason drawne from the text secondly to some chiefe passages in the venting of it The substance of the reasoning is this in briefe Moses applyeth the precept of servants rest to the masters that were slaves in Egypt but now ransomed and set in the estate of freemen that they should allow their servants rest and make the Sabbath a resting day therefore the commandement thou shalt not doe any worke is given onely to the masters It is applyed to the masters therefore given to them were a right consequence but therefore to them onely is fallacious for more is in the consequent than was in the Antecedent and if you put the word only into the Antecedent then both the propositions are false For in Levit. 19. 3. as above was specified Moses applyeth it to children And the argument is yet unsolid for it stands thus Moses applieth it in his expositions onely to masters therefore it was given onely to masters for applications are according to severall occasions but not alwaies extended to the utmost breadth of the precept and yet in all this Moses fidelitie no way impeached inasmuch as he faithfully applieth where it most needeth as occasion serveth keeping the bounds of truth These consequents from this place as you expound it may be gathered therefore that reason binds not servants or this therefore the master sinnes most ungratefully that will disturbe his servants rest or this therefore it is given chiefly to the masters as those that must not onely keepe but make a Sabbath all which wee yeeld but the mind that once is big of a new fancy maketh all that it feedeth upon nourish that fancy Secondly the truth is the Lord by Moses pleades in those words the reason of the right that hee hath to command thy servant rest who is his freeman by vertue of that redemption the servant as well as the master called into the liberty of his holy people as appeareth in the Preface to the Decalogue Exod. 20. and in Exod.
Sabbath day And the whole reason applied to the Sabbaths rest for servants sounds no lesse than this Remember when thou wast in Egypt the Egyptians made thee a slave and mard the Sabbath day now I have set thee free thou shalt free thy servant that day and make the Sabbath day Moses reasons are evidently directed to the masters not to the servants therefore the servant working at the masters command sinneth not What reasoning is this the master is by arguments peâ—swaded to make a day of rest therefore the servant must worke if the master bid him or therefore hee is not commanded to make a holy rest to his servant Who as touching bodily labour are meerely subject to their masters power This meerely in this place must needes exclude Gods power over the servant that he may not lawfully command him in any thing that respects the use of bodily labour but onely his master which wicked ground laid it will follow that the Lord may not command the master to let his servant rest but onely intreat or perswade but the Lord speakes pro imperio as a Lord and Emperor thy servant shall rest This meerely takes in all time so that the master may require their worke and not allow them any time for solemne worship now it is certaine that no man hath power to sell himselfe to any in such a manner no more than he hath to sell himselfe from God and to the divell for take away time from solemne worship and that falls to the ground nothing can bee done in an instant take away solemne worship and you are without God Ier. 10. 25 and without him under the power of Satan Act. 26. 18. This meerely in a word taketh away all bounds maketh the servants bondage and the masters power infinite Now Plato saith well l Servitus libertas infinita nullisque cancellis circumscripta summum est malum quod si modo quodaÌ„modo definiatur summum bonum Optimo illa modo constat servitus quae Deo paret Plat. tom 3. Epist 8. Servitude and liberty that is infinite and circumscribed with nolimitte is the chiefest evill but if some way it be defined by measure it is a chief good that servitude stands in the best forme which obeyeth God And Doct. Ames m Ames de conscientia lib. 5. c. 23. worthily in his Cases of Conscience it is the generall office of masters neither to exercise nor to imagine it is permitted them any absolute empire over their servants but a limited dominion the account whereof they must render to God as the common master of themselves and their servants Ephes 6. 9. Col. 4. 1. CHAP. VI. Breerwood Pag 11. OR if notwithstanding all these evidences you will still contend that the prohibition touching bodily labour on the Sabaoth is directly imposed on the servants themselves see whether you bring not the Oxe and the Asse and other cattle also under the obligation of this commandement whose worke is immediatly after that of servants prohibited and precisely under the same forme of words whose labours yet on the Sabaoth I hope you will not say to be in them sins and transgressions of Gods law Answer First No we doe not it is imposed on servants yet not on oxe or asse for the servant is forbidden labour because hee can labour without thee and so hee is capable properly of commandement to rest but the Oxe is not forbidden labour but to bee laboured and wrought for hee cannot worke without thee and is not capable of the commandement The servant is therefore forbidden labour even in his masters worke that hee might bee vacant to holy duties n Otio non otioso Zanch. in 4. praecep not so the Oxe The servant is forbidden to bee wrought by his master because now hee must acknowledge another master in whose service he is this day commanded to worke with whom there is no respect of persons and this end the servants obedience to his masters unlawfull commandement of worke that day would crosse no man can serve two masters Moreover doth God take care for Oxen No doubt it was written for the servants sake that he might not attend to guide the Oxes labour and that mercy due to the Oxe might call for more to man Zanchy is expresse that the commandement was given to the servant hee saith o Neminem vult excludi a sanctificatione Sabbati quia tam servi quam domini tam silii quà m parentes tam advenae quám indigenae obstricti Deo sunt natique â—d ejâ—s cultum De jumentis alia est ratio non enim jubentur quiâ—scere à laboribus ut possint vacare cultui divino sicut homines Id. ibid. God would have no man excluded from the sanctification of the Sabbath because aswell servants as masters sonnes as parents strangers as home-borne are bound to God and borne to his worship touching beasts there is another reason c. Secondly the Oxe is forbidden to bee wrought that they might have no snare to draw them to worke and may a servant worke at his masters command how great a snare would this bee to the master who naturally and such a master as will require his servant to worke on that day is not far from his pure naturals loveth profit more than his soule and feares a penny losse where he thinks it might bee gained more than the breach of a precept that God threatens with the curse and hell Hee will bee ready not onely to say with Rebecca p Gen. 27. 13. On me be the curse my sonne only doe as Ibid but in another tone Sirrah the sinne and curse is mine go you about your worke you shall not answer for my faults how comes on you this new religion now therefore I conclude against you thus he that forbade the strangers worke and the cattels that all examples and occasions might be remooved that might entise to evill it cannot bee that hee would leave sonne daughter man and maid in the family free to the master that they should and must obey him in his unlawfull commands Thirdly and to requite you out of the Text. In the same forme of words that the Oxe and Asse is prohibited the stranger within the gate of another is also forbidden work and is it not given to the stranger q It is partly understood of the strangers within the Covenant those saith Zanchy without controversie were commanded so to sanctifie the Sabbath even as other Iewes Zanch. in â— praecep aswell as of yet I hope you wil not say it is given to the oxe If you say it is not given to the stranger I vrge you thus The stranger is there meant partly of the stranger which being a Iew is with thee for the time as a guest r Dr. Williams of the Church l. 2 c. 8. and can this that he is a guest free him from the bond of this Law or if the Iew within whose
not bound to obey and thus being a freeman by your former doctrine the commandement is in force upon him and hee sinneth if he worke at his masters command this day Thirdly and as these grounds are wicked which you interlace your argument withall and therefore do not strengthen but weaken your reason so where your ground is good your consequence is naught This is indeed true which you say that the master hath over his servant a coactive and corrective power But what a miserable consequence is this Masters have a coactive power therfore there is no wisdom justice or equitie in the Almighty to give a coÌ„mandement to a servant in obeying whereof he is lyable to the stripes of a wicked master Nay God requires servants to undergoe wrongfull buffetings patiently 1 Pet. 2. 18 19. and yet hee is wise and just and equall in so doing CHAP. XI Breerwood Pag 15. IT was therefore much more agreeable both to the wisdome and justice of Almighty God to impose the commandement rather on the Masters than on the servants for thereby was prâ—vented the disobedience of servants to their masters and the punishment that might attend on that and the breach of the law of nations all which the other had occasioned and yet the masters were in no sort wronged for their servants remained in their power no lesse on the Sabaoth than the other sixe common daies only the Lord did qualifie and determine the act or execution of that power on the Sabaoth day namely to command their servants cessation from bodily labour and instead of that to exâ—rcise themselves in spirituall workes of holinesse it was I say to establish the commandement in such forme more agreeable to the wisdome and justice of God Answer First in this continuance of your former reason partly you charge our doctrine and partly you cleare your owne First you charge ours as occasioning servants disobedience to their masters and servants punishment by their masters and the breach of the Law of nations but yours as you say prevents all this Wee affirme that the giving of the commandement of the Sabbath to servants as well as to masters though to masters as those that should preserve this Law if those under them would violate it occasioneth none of these three evils First it occasioneth not any disobedience to masters for at the most it giveth but power to the servant submissely to refuse the unlawfull command of his master and not to cast off subjection to his authoritie to the first he is not bound and therefore is not disobedient when hee obeyeth not but on the contrary if he should yeeld to doe the thing that is unlawfull he is a man pleaser And to the second he yeelds himselfe in his submisse refusall and acknowledgeth his power to the full when he gives up himselfe that day to bee commanded by him in things pertaining to the worship of God in which thing alone God hath allowed the master the acting or execution of his power over his servant for that day The reason hereof your selfe suggests when you say the servant remaines in his masters power no lesse this day than any other but to other and better ends unto which ends viz. respecting the worship of God you confesse the masters power for the time is determined in respect of the execution thereof And who seeth not then that if the execution of their power bee bounded the servant is not to fulfill the boundlesse and unlawfull puttings forth of that power here it is enough to be a patient meerely and by no meanes an agent So then the servant remaineth no lesse in the masters power but to higher ends but more free to Gods service while the master may not call him off by unjust exactions And so farre is this from occasioning any disobedience that it occasioneth and properly effecteth in the servants heart a conscionable and produceth in his life an entire and singlehearted obedience to his master as to the Lord. Inasmuch as they are hereby brought to the house of God where they learn all duty to God and man though their master should bee wicked and so returne to their masters fruitful faithfull and conscionable serving them not with eye-service but with all uprightnesse to which the feare of God will bind them But the unfaithfull to God will be unfaithfull to man Oh the wisedome of God that provides for particular men and societies by this his Law better than they could or would for themselves Secondly this occasioneth not any punishment wilfully incurred if then it come it may patiently yea joyfully be borne for this is thanke-worthy with God q 1 Pet. 2. 18. 19. But we see by experience that as religious observing the duties of the Sabbath maketh one faithfull in his Calling all the weeke and as fideliâ—ie is in it selfe amiable and to the master profitable so many evill and covetous masters will willingly chuse such servants give them willingly that liberty on the Sabbath which themselves care not for nor feare sinfully to forgoe Moreover if any master should bestow blowes on his servant for going to Church when his master on the Sabbath commands him to the works of his calling this very precept requireth the Magistrate to relieve the servant against the injury of a wicked master when it giveth the Magistrate charge to see the Sabbath kept by all within his gate and the supreme Magistrate to punish the inferiour Magistrates neglects or injust impositions as wee see in Nehemiah who contended with the Nobles for prophaning the Sabbath by unjust impositions of worke upon inferiours And so you see also the justice and equity of God in providing for the servant both in soule and body Thirdly for the Law of Nations if you take it stricktly and properly it is simply and universally a positive Law as saith Iohn de Salas r Ius gentium est simpliciter universè jus positivuÌ„ Ioh. de Salas tract de leg q. 91. disp 2. sect 3. and is thus described by Zuarez it is the common Law of all Nations not by instinct of nature alone but constituted and ordained by their use Å¿ Et jus coÌ„mune omnium gentium non instinctu solius naturae sed usu earum constituâ—um Zuarez de leg l. 2. c. 19. It is that which al Nations wel-ordered do use for use requiring and humane necessities Nations of men have ordained to themselves certaine Rites or Lawes Of this sort of Lawes these examples are reckoned up by Isidore t Ius Gentium est sedium occupatio aedificatio munitio bella captivitates servitutes postliminia foedera pacis induciae legatorum non violandorum religio coÌ„nubia inter alienigenas probibita Isid Orig. l. 5. c. 6. first possessions or the taking up of our abodes secondly building thirdly munition fourthly warres fifthly captivity sixthly servitude seventhly recovery of possessions lost or alienated unlawfully eighthly covenants of peace ninthly truces tenthly the
care not to violate embassadours eleventhly marriages forbidden with them of another Nation Now that the imposing of this commandement of the Sabbath on servants also should occasion the breach of the Law of Nations is a meere pretence for the Law of Nations could never charge servants with such a subjection as should crosse and cast out the worship of God so that the servant should be so obliged to his master that of conscience and necessity the servant of a wicked master must bee left in a condition wherein he should never have power to frequent the solemne worship of God as will of necessity follow if he be alwayes absolutely as you teach his masters Shew me whether ever the Nations generally nay ever any one Nation well ordered gave such a Law If no such Law ordained it is no way of the Law of Nations if not ordained it is much more absonant from Natures instinct I say such a thing could never possibly be found among the Nations of men it is so abhorring to Nature but if men could so farre and so universally degenerate yet this without all controversie determines this case u Ius Gentium quum sit positivum non potest derogare juri naturae Ioh. de Salas tract de leg q. 91. disp 2. sect 5. the Law of Nations being a positive Law and humane though brought in by the custome of Nations cannot nor must derogate from a Law of Nature Now the Law of Nature binds all men even servants as servants to serve God solemnely on the times he shall call for their homage from them indispensably as on this day he doth and to this end to be vacant and free from bodily labours that are servile for that time The Decalogue is the Law of Nature it chargeth servants in the fourth and fifth Commandements the duties there required servants stand bound unto and to them first as the rules of the Law of Nature to other duties after under and in reference to them if any such be agreed upon and constituted by the Nations but if Nations should constitute any thing against any duty in the ten Commandements it is not a Law for that is no Law which is not just x Ius non est quod non est justum rectum non lex sed faex non lex sed labes non lex sed lis and right it is perversenesse no Law it is not Law but lees but strife but a destroyer but error but tiranny any thing rather than Law as all the learned conclude If you or any can shew such a Law or rather lees of Nations blessed be God in his wisedome justice and equity for ever who by his eternall Law freeth poore servants from such tyrannous exact on Secondly as our doctrine is wine that comes of the pure grape so yours is the poyson of Dragons pressed from the vine of Sodome for I affirme that it produceth all the former evils For this That the servant is left even the Sabbath day also meerely in his masters power to be obedient to his commands for servile works first it would occasion rebellion in the servant through bitternesse of soule arising from an unsupportable burden secondly and so from thence just punishment on the servant if the masters strength can reach them to inflict it or from superiour Magistrates and thirdly evert the Law of Nations by striking at the life of Religion and Societies in the first and fundamentall society viz. a family and in one of the most necessary props of that society viz. master and servant From this likewise it will follow that God shall be neglected by the servant through neglect of holinesse and that the servant of an unjust master shall no way be provided for in respect of his refreshing no not so well as the oxe or asse for God will be the avenger of that injustice his poore creature being mercilesly used but for this God you say provides that the servant must of conscience obey and so Gods justice wisedome goodnesse and the ends of giving the commandement in regard of the servant shall bee impeached and wholly frustrate Thirdly and lastly you overthrow your owne Tenet for if the execution of that power be bounded for that day as you rightly teach how is the servant to obey the unjust usage of their power For if hee have no power to command the servant may refuse to obey and must both because in this respect the servant is made a freeman and so under the obligation of Gods command by your owne confession and y Quisque ex tharitate propria tenetur non amittere libertatem sine gravi causa Ioh. de Sal. tract de leg q. 91. disp 2. Sect. 5. because every one of charity to himselfe is bound not to lose his liberty without some weighty cause but to enjoy and use it rather where he may be free z 1 Cor. 7. 21. and because the power the master in this case takes he usurpeth nor is it of God but is turned directly against him I say therefore if the masters power be determined the servant is freed but if he have power how is it notwithstanding herein determined Againe if the master must not only discharge the servant of worke but in stead thereof charge him to the exercises of holinesse the servant must needs in obeying his masters sinfull command of working flee off from his charge and power to charge him at that time of his so labouring in the duties of holinesse seeing no man can doe two things chiefly of this nature at once CHAP. 12. Breerwood Pag. 15 16 17. ANd was it not also to his goodnesse and compassion For say that the commandement touching servants vacation was given to themselves not to their Masters should not thereby poore servants to whom every where else the law of God appeareth milde and pittifull be intangled with inextricable perplexity For suppose his master injoyne him some worke on the Sabaoth day covetous masters may soone doe it especially if they thinke that precept touching their servants cessation not to touch them or else they may bee ignorant of the law of God as Christians and Jewes may happily serve Pagans Admit I say some Master commands his servant to work on the Sabaoth what should the servant doe should he worke God hath forbidden him should he not worke His master hath commanded him for the law of God is set at strife with the law of nations and that poore servant like the Sailor betweene Sylla and Charybdit standeth perplexed and afflicted in the midst betweene stripes and sinne for he must of necessity either disobey Gods commandement which is sinne or his Masters which is attended with stripes Besides it is absurd that the law of God should restraine the servant from obeying his Master and yet not restraine the Master from commanding his servant unlawfull things As it is also another absurdity that that day which by the law given
commandement which you cite doth properly signifie Thirdly all thy worke as opposed to workes of sanctification that is of piety and mercy properly though they bee not servile worke properly so called or mechanicall as the study and exercise of the Liberall Arts for these concerne naturall and civill things and looke not immediatly to the worship of God nor the unavoidable necessities of man It is apparant then that servile workes or workes of ministry about our callings and so servants worke is in a speciall manner prohibited Now then take your owne argument The worke permitted on the sixe daies is prohibited the seventh the in sense with the middle word with which it is the selfe same in sound If the first then it is opposed to all that dutie of the Sabbath which consists in the immediate honour of God done with the full complacency of hart therein and the honorable mention of it in our words and discourse as is cleare in the Text to him that duly weigheth it Now say Is not the servants conteined in this word thy pleasure as that which is no duty of Gods worship publike or private If the second then it is not al that is forbidden and so your argument fals but rather concernes as many learned and conscionable Divines deliver our works of recreation or sports which we finde out though at other times lawfull which take off the heart from holy duties for God hath found us another recreation chiefely on that day if any will be merry let him sing Psalmes as in Ps 92. The Title compared with the Psalme would have the Sabbaths duties our delight Fourthly Now whereas you lay this for a ground that the election of mans will is the proper forme of actuall sin I wonder how you should so mistake but that Divinity was not your covenanted Wife but only your Concubine which for a turne you use and in the use you ravish Ataxy or irregularity is the proper forme of sinne actuall be the Ataxy in thoughts in desires in deeds or in words Moreover election of the will is an act and good and therefore by no meanes the forme of sinne and if you say you speake not of election but this election namely the unruly and inordinate election tell me is the election or the unrulinesse the forme of sinne unrulinesse doubtlesse which informeth both the election that is sinnefull and the action that is sinfull And whereas you say that outward unlawfull actions are but expressions of sinne and not sinne properly if they bee unlawfull actions they bee sinnefull actions properly so called for you yeelded before according to the truth of Scripture and reason pag. 12. that sinne formally is nothing else but unlawfulnesse unlesse you will say that sinne formally is not sinne properly A proper position For your reason whereby you would maintaine this that sinne hath her residence and inhesion in the soule it selfe and passeth forth of it the actions outward carry onely the tincture of sinne therefore they are not sinne I reply If they carry the tincture of sinne then are they sinnefull Againe are they died with sinne and yet hath sinne no inhesion nor residence in them This is strange and for the residence of sinne it is not in the soule alone a Peccat um est in â—bjecto occasion â—liter in intellectu originaliter in voluntate formaliter in membris quoad usum Saint Paul saith the law of sinne is in our members Rom. 7. 23. and wee know sinne commeth by propagation but the soule is not propagated only the body commeth and is traduced from the parents I would know where in this propagation sinne hath its inhesion and whether an unfitnesse and perversenesse fighting with the rightnesse and aptnesse God approveth bee not traduced and doe not naturally sticke in the very bodily faculties And when you say sinne only consisteth in the exorbitancy of the will it is most false sounder philosophy refelleth this for Aristotle b Arist lib. 3. Ethic. c. 1. excuseth not from a fault the things that are offended in or done amisse against ones will through ignorance and Divinity teacheth that errors in judgement and ignorances c Ignorantia excâ—sat non a toto sed à tanto when it is of things which of dutie wee should know are sinnes that the want of originall righteousnesse and the defects of graces are sinne And Thomas d saith that so is every habit and Act deprived of due order The habit also of sinne is first in the understanding because all sinne commeth from error which is in the understanding consider it also in its absolute act without working with the will so sinne is firstin it Vpon such rotten props what building can bee reared Yet let us take notice of your reasoning for further satisfaction to all and the utter subversion of this new learning It stands thus The minister of another mans sinne being but the minister of anothers exorbitant will no further sinneth than his owne will concurreth thereunto The servant doing his masters worke on the Sabbath not of election but in obedience to his master is but the minister of anothers exorbitant will and his owne will no way concurreth therewith therfore so doing hee sinneth not instrument in the workes of his Master and conferreth also will I answere he conferreth will indeede if hee be a good servant by reason of the obligation of obedience wherein he standeth to his master but yet not absolute but conditionall will not the selfe election but only the obedience an yeelding of his will and th 〈…〉 onely as it is his masters worke not as it is his masters sinne for the worke on the Sabaoth hauing sinne annexed to it and so being a sinnefull worke the servant and the mastster must divide it betwixt them the worke is the servants and the sinne is the masters for the servant doth but his duty in obeying his masters commandemet but the master transgresseth his in disobeying Gods commandement touching his servants ceasing from that labour Answer First why should we feare to say the eye beholding vanitie sinneth and so of the tongue loose to blaspheme slander and lye For first they move irregularly secondly they are the weapons of sin thirdly in them sin is finished to the bringing forth of death both on body and soule fourthly these are the sinnes of both body and soule and not of either apart fifthly the sinne is made greater by the outward acting in respect of the extent thereof it having now invaded the body and not onely possessed the soule so that there is filthinesse of flesh aswell as of the spirit 2 Cor. 7. 1. and in respect of the dammage it bringeth to others either by way of scandall and offence or by some reall discommodity as slaughter defamation with the like sixthly and hence it is that certaine punishments are rightly inflicted for the outward acting of some sinne which never could have place for
Saviours ascension Gods people hath alwayes in all ages without any gaine-saying used to come together ken of which was the point of the Apostles doctrine I especially remembred you of That God I say which commanded and that doctrine which instructed servants to disobey their Masters and by depriving them of their service caused their hindrance The Apostle knew full well this was not the way to propagate the Gospell and enlarge the kingdome of Christ he knew it was Christian meekenes and obedience and humility and patience that must doe it and therefore hee commandeth Christian servants to give their masters all honour to obey them in all things and to please them in al things that so their masters seeing them more serviceable and profitable servants and withall more vertuous than others were might sooner be drawne to like of the religion that made them such whereas the contrary would have bin manifestly a scandall and grievous impeachment to the propagation of the Gospell and defamed it for a doctrine of contumacy and disobedience and for a seminary as it were of disturbance and sedition of families and common-wealths And not onely alienated the affections of masters from their Christian servants but inflamed all men with indignation and hatred against the Christian religion and the Professors of it Such therefore evidently is the importance and intendment of the Apostles doctrine as unpartiall men whom prejudice or selfe conceipt leads not away may soone discerne very farre differing from this doctrine of yours Touching which point of the Apostles instruction given to servants for this effectuall and generall obedience you will not reply I hope as some have done that at first indeede it was permitted for the good of the Church lest the increase of it and proceeding of the Gospell should be hindred by offence given to the Gentiles For would that have beene permitted if it had beene unlawfull Or could the Church of God bee increased by the sinnes of men His Church increased by that whereby himselfe was dishonoured Or would the Apostles have permitted men to sinne as now Iesuites do for the good of the Church nay exhorted and commanded to it who had himselfe expresly taught that wee must not doe evill that good may come of it No neither of both can bee because either of both were a staine and derogation to the righteousnesse of God the intention therefore of the Apostles was simple without all trickes of policie to teach servants all exact and entire obedience to their masters touching all workes that belong to the dutie of servants namely that were in themselves honest and lawfull without excepting of any day Answer First here you would prove your Tenet for servants obedience to their masters commands for worke on the Lords day even worke prohibited to bee more agreeable to the Apostles Doctrine than the contrary and to this end you alledge Texts to prove their obedience in al things to all masters at all times and thence conclude the answerablenesse of yours the unanswerablenesse of ours thereunto First object that you bring no proofe of Scripture to confirme this your universall obedience at all times viz. on the Sabbath day though you should have done it especially the doctrine of the Commandement touching cessation of worke lying so fully upon the servant If you reply that there is no exception of time I answer there is exception of obedience to unlawfull commands and such are workes otherwise lawfull enjoyned to bee done on the Sabbath and so we have equivalent exceptions to that of time Your ground therefore which you lay and say it is founded on Apostolike truth namely that Apostles permit servants no point of libertie but command them obedience without exception of master of labour or of time we thus impugne The Apostles Doctrine touching servants obedience doth admit of three limitations by themselves expressed First it must be an obedience in the Lord n 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Scholia that is according to the will of the Lord in all things in which godlinesse may not be overthrowne in all things provided that we admit of nothing against the Lord. If the masters covenant should crosse the covenant of the servant as he is a man and Christian to his God it is sinfull in the making if such should be made and worse in the keeping and alwayes voide ipso facto The ground of this limitation is this that all authoritie and superioritie is derived from God and subordinate to him therefore the command of an inferior power binds not to obedience when it is contrary to the precept of the superior power as Durand o Durand lib. 2. distinct 39. quaest 5. well noteth That therefore of Gregorie touching wives must bee held touching servants for ever p Sic placeat uxor voluntati conjugis ut non displiceat voluntati conditoris Let the wife so please the will of her husband that she doe not displease the Will of her Creator This limitation excepts the servants labour in servile worke on the Sabbath or Lords day Secondly it must bee an obedience wherein they abide with God in their service that is in the observation of the Commandements of God saith the ordinarie Glosse q Glossa interlin and saith Lyra r 1 Cor. 7. 20 24 Lyra. as farre as pertaines to those things which are not repugnant to the state of Faith thus also your doctrine is plainely condemned for God hath provided by his unchangeable Law that one day in seven the servants shall rest from their labour and with their master attend on God with whom there is neither master nor servant Thirdly yea but the master commands him to worke then otherwise indeede he ought not Nay the Apostles doctrine hath yet a third limitation That they be not the servants of men Vpon which place saith Chrysostome ſ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chrysost tom 3. in 1 Cor. 7. 23. pag. 362. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ibid. pag. 363. There are bounds set of God to servants and how farre they ought to keepe them this is also ordered by Law and they may not passe over them for when the master enjoyneth none of those things which are displeasing to God and disallowed hee ought to follow and obey but beyond this by no meanes for thus the servant is a free man And if thou yeeld any further although thou were free thou art become a slave This therefore he intimates saying bee yee not the servants of men And not farre after he briefly expounds it thus t Obey not men that command absurd things yea neither yeeld to their owne selves Are not these Commandements of the masters for servile worke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 absurd and without place and footing in Gods Word are they not of things displeasing to God These these are the servants limits beyond which if hee passe hee is the servant of men even of mens humours and a very slave because hee
hath rejected the freedome of a freeman to God and Righteousnesse Could you see none of these limitations to restraine your boundlesse glosse Againe the Apostles Doctrine admits of this limitation That the commandment of the master bee of things possible as well as lawfull and therefore Abrahams servant putteth the doubt Gen. 24. 5. What if she will not come And is in that case set free Yea it admits also of another limitation That it bee of things though in their nature lawfull yet not exceeding so farre the strength of nature that the servant so doing shall manifestly ruine his body as to toyle night and day to toyle all dayes and not have a day in the weeke to take breath Now tell me doth not the law of Nature bound the master in respect of time And as it hath these limitations so it hath this distinction servants owe to their masters subjection and obedience obedience is limited to their lawfull command with the like subjection reacheth to submission to their wrongfull and unjust corrections and usage as in 1 Pet. 2. 18 19. Bee subject to your masters for conscience towards God endure griefe suffering wrongfully Even where the servant may not obey he must be subject Secondly having thus cleared the Apostles doctrine let us see what you say to prove your Tenet agreeable ours disagreeable thereto First you take hold of the words in all things to conclude the servants yeelding to the masters exacting of labour that day to be no sinne for then say you he would not command them to obey in all things but would have excepted that I answer by the same reason you may conclude the servants yeelding to the master in any other unlawfull commands to be no sinne because he is commanded to obey in all things without exception of that particular But if you say that is excepted in the former limitations so say I that this is also as hath beene proved Obedience of subjection the servant oweth to his master in unjust dealings with him and the Apostles perswading servants of those dayes to such things sheweth that masters did wrongfully binde and buffet for well doing n 1 Pet. 2. 19. Tel me was it for working or truth and fidelitie and not for pietie and the worship of God And therefore may not I say with better probabilitie than you have spoken that it was for intermission of labour on the times of the holy assemblies Will any correct their servants for performing the duties of the secōd Table or the secret duties of the first It must needs be then that that wel◠doing was publike worship of God for which chiefly Heathen masters buffetted Christian servants And thus your very Texts have implyedly this particular in them that servants should not doe ill or leave the doing well for the frowardnesse of the master and not obey unlawfull commands but beare wrongfull stripes for thereunto are they called for piety the duties of Gods worship submit to the stripe rather thā quit the service of God Now in that you say it cannot be that the Gentiles that did not beleeve should respect religion so as not to exact their servants worke I answer they certainely did in that point of the Sabbath through a speciall providence of God and the inclination of soule to this law of nature which is in part written in the harts of all men for S. Austine x De illis sanè Iudaeis cum loqueretur ait cùm interim usque eò sceleratissim◠gentis consuetudo convaluit ut per omnes jam terras recepta sit victi victoribus leges dederunt Mirabatur haec dicens quod divinitus agcretur ignorans subjecit planè sententiam quia significaret quid de illorum sacramentorum ratione sentiret ait enim illi tamen causas ritus sui noverunt major pars populi facit quod cur faciat ignorat August De Civit. Dei lib. 6. cap. 11. tels as much who relating the saying of Seneca concerning the Iewes and the Sabbath hath these words truely when he speaketh of those Iewes he saith When in the meane while the custome of that most wicked nation hath so farre prevailed that now through all lands it is received the conquered give lawes to the conquerors Speaking these things he wondred being ignorant what was wrought of God he set downe plainly his opiniō in which he might signifie what he thought concerning the reason of their Sacraments for he saith but they know the causes of their rites and the greater part of the people doth that which they know not why they doe it See how the Sabbath had prevailed among all Heathen In Seneca's dayes who lived in the time of the Apostle Paul but what is that to the Lords day Yea thence easily you may gather how they could well afford one day in a weeke to worship and Saint Austine in the same place saith that though Seneca reproved the Iewes for losing a seventh part of their time in keeping Sabbath yet would not mention the Christians to reproove their rites in any kinde lest hee should either praise them against the received custome of his Countrey or reprove them against his owne heart Note it was saith this Father a speciall worke of God that the Sabbath should have that prevalencie amongst Heathens And for the Christians rites of worship he could not speake of them but in prayse unlesse he should have gone against his conscience and therefore silently passeth them over But secondly you affirme that their withdrawing of their obedience would have caused the name and doctrine of God to bee blasphemed I answer their modest and humble refusall of the worke would adorne the doctrine and not dishonor it and if they should forsake the assemblies they forsake their God and religion the Heathen well knew it who were so observant in their superstition It may seeme by the Apostles rules given to servants and wives that more of them were converted than of masters and husbands and the assemblies of the Lords day more constantly frequented of all that had given up their names to Christ Now as the rendering a reason of the hope that was in them to the Magistrate performed with meeknesse and feare honoured God and his Doctrine so the rendering of an account how they worshipped God on the day of assemblies viz the Lords day as may appeare by the Apologie of Iustin Martyr for them who in that Apologie renders a reason of their worship of God and of the day spent wholly in that worship What the Apostle saith upon the Christians readinesse thus to give a reason of his hope may rightly be applyed to the Christian servants readinesse to yeeld himselfe wholly to God that day and to render the reason thereof with meekenesse and feare And who is that will harme you if you doe that which is good 1 Pet. 3. But this submissive withdrawing you tearme by the odious name of disobedience very