same unto diverse objects as First that part of his will which concerneth Angels is termed the law of Angels Secondly that which concerneth men I meane in their naturall duty towards God and their neighbour for man never received Law but that before his Redemption and those Lawes which relate to Redemption are not properly naturall but supernaturall Lawes is termed the Law of Nature i. e. humane or the Law of the rationall nature Thirdly that part of Gods will which concerneth naturall Agents is termed the Law of Nature 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the Law of the corporeall Nature Againe this second sort of Law which is the Law of humane or rationall Nature and is grounded upon the will of God concerning mankind is divided by Christ himselfe into two parts which he termes two Commandements Mat. 22.27 Which two are differenced by two different Objects and two different sorts of love required of us for the due performance of our different duties unto these two different Objects The first Commandement relates to God whom we must love above our selves and all that we call ours for God doth not allow any man to value either life limbe liberty or estate above himselfe Mat. 10.37 39. Luke 14.33 Marke 8.35 and of this nature are all the particular Commandements of the first Table which are comprehended under this generall and great Commandement the duties whereof are grounded upon a love exceeding the love of our selves The second Commandement relates unto our Neighbour whom wee are not obliged to love either above our selves or equally with our selves but onely like our selves so that the love of our selves in this second part of the Law of Nature is allowed the first place and wee may lawfully value our owne life limbs estates and liberties above our neighbours and preferre the indempnity of our selves before the indempnity of our neighbour in each of these severall respects when they chance to come in competition And therefore no Law either of God or man doth make homicide capitall no nor culpable where it is necessitated se defendendo And of this nature are all the particular Commandements of the second Table which Christs exposition comprehends under this second generall Commandement Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thy selfe the duties whereof are grounded upon a love not exceeding but inferiour unto the love of our selves Now the Kings Honour being grounded upon the fifth Commandement which they take pro concesse to be a Precept of the second Table and therefore grounded upon a love which must not exceed the love of our selves the people are obliged by the Law of God and Nature in all their duties towards the King in the first place to looke upon their owne safety and by consequence the Kings Honour is not a superiour but a subordinate end to salus populi so that the people may resist yea and kill the King also if they be necessitated se defendendo Argum. 2 A second Argument which they urge for a further confirmation of this is the instance of a Generall or Governour of a city who though his Commission be never so large extending to life liberty and estate yet if he shall contrary to his trust reposed in him for defence of that city turne the Canon against the city to destroy it may lawfully be resisted by the city and Souldiery and that by armes and violence as a traitour to his trust and therefore if the King shall breake the trust reposed in him by God the people may like this city and souldiery lawfully resist him as a a traitour to his trust and provide for their owne safety before his honour Argum. 3 Lastly they alledge out of Scripture severall instances of Kings that have beene resisted by the people in order to their owne safety wherein the actions of the people have beene sometimes expresly approved by God as in the deposition of Rehoboam from his dominion over the ten Tribes 1 King 12.24 And sometimes countenanced by holy men of God which themselves have been the principall actors therein as David in the defence of himselfe from the rage and fury of Saul 1 Sam. 22.1 2. and Chap. 23.7 8. And Elisha in his advise to the Elders to resist the messengers sent by King Jehoram to take away his head 2 King 6.32 and yet neither of them reproved by God for preferring their owne safety before their obedience to the Kings commands And therefore the Subjects may provide for and regard their owne safety rather then his Honour That Doctrine which I shall here premise as a ground for the solution of these Arguments and to evidence the preheminence of the Kings Honour above the peoples welfare is such a principle in Divinity as I presume will prima facie hazzard the repute of a Paradox being directly opposite to the opinions of all Christian Authors who write of the Morall Law who distinguishing the Ten Commandements into two Tables according to Christs rule Mat. 22.37 doe generally conclude the fift Commandement prescribing honour to parents to be a Commandement of the second Table which containeth our duty towards our neighbour as if Kings and parents related to their Subjects and children as neighbours and not as Gods And that the duties therefore to be performed to Kings and parents are grounded onely upon such a love which must not exceed the love of our selves which being granted for truth the Argument taken from the Law of Nature to prove the preheminence of the peoples welfare above the Kings Honour and thereby to legitimate the resistance of Kings as well as of any other men when the people doe judge their commands to be destructive to their owne safety and welfare is altogether unanswerable For Christ in that prementioned division of the Morall Law Mat. 22.37 makes but two objects of mans duty one superiour whom wee are obliged to love and respect above our selves and that is God another inferiour object whom wee are obliged to respect onely as our selves that is in the respect of the degrees of extension of our love equally to our selves for wee must have a regard unto our neighbour in his person and life chastity goods and good name as well as our owne but yet we are not obliged to an equality in reference to the degrees of the intension of our love to our neighbour in any of these particulars for we may and ought to love and respect our own life goods and good name above our neighbours so that every man is set in the middle betweene these two objects to the one hee lookes upward as an object above him to the other downeward as an object below him So that if Kings and parents relate to us only as neighbours and not as Gods for there is no other third object of mans duty then they are not our superiours but inferiours nor may we respect their persons goods or good name above our owne as things sacred but beneath and after our owne and so to
〈◊〉 i. e. reddendi aesari quae sunt Caesaris 2. For Kings more especially that they may truely understand the due limitation of this Commission and in what things God hath reserved the power entire to himselfe and to conscience his highest and most immediate deputy and substitute for direction of the Kings duty of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. reddendi Deo quae sunt Dei For as it is sacrilegious in Subjects to intrude upon the sacred Rights and Prerogatives of Kings and to act in any thing as Judges or Commanders without Commission from him so is it much more sacrilegious in Kings to intrude upon the more sacred Rights and Prerogatives of God and to act as Gods Lords and Masters over their Subjects in those matters whereunto their Commission from God doth not extend nor invest them with a right of power and dominion over their Subjects Now to give a direct answer to this Quaere it will be requisite to premise some distinctions concerning the object of Politicall Cognizance which is two-fold viz. Objectum per se Objectum per accidens 1. Objectum per se which is the direct and immediate Object of Politicall Cognizance consists in the Fundamentals and Essentials of Politick Government being such causes and matters wherein the King may lawfully exercise both his Legislative and Judiciarie power over all persons within his Dominions both Ecclesiasticall and Civill 2. Objectum per accidens which is the indirect and accidentall Object of Political Cognizance consists in the Contingentials of Politique Government being such causes and matters wherein the King may lawfully exercise both his Legislative and Judiciarie power over some persons of both sorts whether Ecclesiasticall or Civill but not over some of either sort although they be his native Subjects inhabiting within his owne Dominions The discussion of which two points manifesting what doth fall directly and what ex accidenti within the sphere of Politicall Cognizance will be a full and direct Solution of the former part of this Quaere from whence it will be easie to conclude what are extra-regalia and Metapoliticall matters The judgement whereof God hath reserved immediately to himselfe and conscience his immediate Deputy and Vicegerent in all humane affaires and wherein the King cannot exercise either his Legislative or Judiciarie power without guilt of sacrilegious intrusion which will be a direct and full answer to the latter part of this Quaere The point which our method presents unto our scrutiny in the first place is the Objectum per se of Politicall Cognizance which as we said consists in the Essentials and Fundamentals of Politick Government which are twofold viz. Nativa Praeternativa 1. The Native Fundamentals and Essentials of Politick Government are such causes and matters as were of Political Cognizance upon the first originall Institution of that Government when mans innate knowledge and native light of understanding was sufficient for the direction of his duty without the help of positive Lawes and Statutes and the native rectitude and inclination of mans will was sufficient to excite the performance of his duty without the help of any Judiciarie inducements either Compensatorie or Vindicative But for the more full and facile investigation and discovery of these Fundamentals and Essentials these two expedients are conducible 1. The consideration of the time when 2. Of the grounds whereupon Politick Government was first instituted by God 1. The time when Politick Government was first instituted was immediately upon mans first creation in the state of Innocency and under the old Covenant of Workes for Politick Government as we formerly manifested is a naturall blessing enabling man for the due performance of his naturall duties and grounded upon the fifth Commandement of the Morall Law prescribing honour to Parents which commenced upon mans first creation before Adams Apostasie by virtue of which law of Nature the Herauldrie of Sub Supra did then receive a being amongst men and Parents by virtue of that naturall law were invested with a power and dominion over their Children and Children obliged unto the duties of subjection and obedience to their Parents So that though Adams sinfull prevarication had never devested himselfe and his posterity of their native Prerogatives yet this graduall Herauldry of Sub Supra supereminencing Parents above their Children should have had its due and naturall influence upon mankind For even Christ himselfe although totally exempted from all manner of enormous guilt both actuall and originall yet was not exempted from this duty of subjection to his parents Luke 2.51 Whence it is manifest in the first place that the Native Fundamentals and Essentials are onely naturall duties consisting in the right use of those naturall blessings wherewith God did invest man upon his first creation before his Apostasie purposely to enable him for the exact and due performance of those duties which God required of him in the state of Innocency under the old Covenant of Workes And therefore as the duties which God did then require of man were partly Internall partly Externall so did he conferre upon man two sorts of naturall blessings correspondent unto these duties 1. Internall blessings which are bona animi or the blessings of the soule 2. Externall which are bona corporis fortunae the right use of which two sorts of naturall blessings is the very summe and substance of all the naturall duties expressed in the Decalogue or law of Nature which was the Rule of all humane actions before Adams Apostasie For the regulation of all Internall acts of the understanding and will which are the faculties of our soules was prescribed in the first and last precepts of that law of Nature And the regulation of all Externall actions concerning the body and those naturall creatures which God made for the use and service thereof was prescribed in the other eight And other duties then these were not at that time either knowne unto man or required of him by God so that no Politicall or Monarchicall power could possibly at that time be extended to any other matters but onely these naturall duties prescribed in the Decalogue A further restriction also of which power is prescribed in the second expedient conducing to the Investigation of the Native Essentials and Fundamentals of Politick Government which is the grounds whereupon it was instituted 2. The grounds of the institution of Politick Government are two viz. Primarie and Secondarie 1. The Primarie ground is the power of communicating a being and existence which indeed is the very ground whereupon the Holy Ghost doth demonstrate the Deity and prove the Lord alone to be God and to have the sole right of power and dominion over man because God alone doth communicate life and being and all things unto man Acts 17.24 For because it is he that made us and not we our selves therefore we must wholly devote our selves to his worship and service as his people and servants Psal
100.2 And the reason why the Holy Ghost prohibited the exhibition of any honour or reverence unto Idols is because they cannot give any being unto man nor frame any man in the womb Esay 44.24 so that the primarie and originall ground of Politick Government is the power to communicate a being and existence which power God delegated unto man immediately upon his first creation by that propagatorie benediction Crescite multiplicamini Gen. 1.28 From which fountaine did flow the other secondarie and immediate ground of Politick Government 2. The Secondarie ground is the graduall and distinctive Herauldry of Sub Supra above mentioned supereminencing one man above another For as God did ordaine parents to be his instruments in the communication of a being unto their children so did he likewise ordaine that children should be so farre forth subject and inferiour unto their parents from whom they doe derive their being as they doe depend upon their parents for the same For whereas God himselfe by way of creation did communicate unto Adam the entire being both of soule and body in both which respects Adam is stiled the sonne of God Luke 3. last so did he thereupon ordaine that Adam should be subject and obedient unto himselfe in all the actions and motions both of soule and body and whereas God did ordaine Adam and all his descendents to be Gods instruments by virtue of that propagatorie benediction in the communication of the corporeall part of being unto their children so did God likewise ordain the subjection and obedience of children unto their parents to be extended unto all the extrinsecall actions and motions of the body God reserving still the power and command over the intrinsecall acts of the soule of every man entire to himselfe because every soule doth still derive its being immediately from God and not from our parents Whence it is manifest in the second place that those Native Fundamentals and Essentials which are the proper and adaequate Object of Politicall Cognizance are only the Externall duties of the Morall law consisting in the right use of the Externall blessings of nature viz. bona corporis fortunae which are the onely blessings hereditarily descendable and communicable unto children from their parents For seeing all Politick Government is grounded upon paternall as a Policy is upon an Oeconomie which are not essentially but only circumstantially different both of them regulating the same duties and actions onely whereas an Oeconomy doth regulate the actions of one family a Policy doth regulate the actions of many families And seeing all paternall Government is grounded upon this Herauldry of Sub Supra established betweene Parents and Children by the fifth Commandement and this graduall and distinctive Herauldry upon the power to communicate a being and existence delegated unto parents by Gods propagatory benediction Gen. 1 28. which benediction reacheth onely the corporall and not the spirituall part of man It doth necessarily follow that no Politicall or Monarchicall power can be directly extended to any other matters but onely the corporeall and externall duties of the Morall Law Ob. If the communication of a being and existence were the ground of this Herauldry of Sub Supra then all children should be subject and inferiour unto their parents but Asa King of Judah was not subject to his grandmother Maacha but did depose her and yet was not reproved but commended for that act 2 Chron. 15.16 And so was Joash for the deposition of Athaliah his fathers mother 2 Chron. 23. and therefore the communication of a being cannot be the primarie ground either of that subordination or of the institution of Government Sol. All men as men and in their naturall capacity are inferiour and ought to be subject unto their parents but men as Kings and in their Politick capacity cannot be children unto any man nor have any father but God and therefore are stiled by the Holy Ghost the children of God Psal 82.6 I have said Ye are children of the most high and therefore in this sense they cannot be inferiour or subject unto any but God alone and so by consequence must be above their owne naturall parents in Rule Dominion and Power and in case of justice must not respect that naturall relation no more then Asa did respect it in his grandmother Maacha who in this Politick relation was not a Parent or Judge but a subject and child to her owne naturall grandchild and so was Athaliah to Joash And the Virgin Mary to her sonne Christ Jesus who rebuked his own mother when she presumed to command in matters above her sphere for a miraculous supply of the defect of wine Iohn 2 Woman what have I to do with thee He doth not here give her the stile of Mother but of Woman as if she had no relation of a parent and governour to him because that command or desire which she transmitted to him could not be performed by him as he was a man and her naturall sonne but onely as he was a God and so a spirituall father to his owne naturall mother And thus much briefly of the Native Fundamentals and Essentials of Politick Government the next point to be spoken of is the Preternative 2. The Preternative Fundamentals and Essentials of Politick Government are those matters which fell directly within the sphere of Politicall Cognizance upon the restitution of that Government when that blessing amongst others which are the ground and object thereof was renewed unto man by the mercy of God in Christ after Adams sinfull prevarication had devested both himselfe and his posterity of all those blessings wherewith God had inriched his created nature which blessings of nature were not renewed unto man in their native integrity and perfection but onely in such a measure as the wisdome of God saw most expedient to immind man of his owne infirmity and selfe-insufficiency whereby to occasion the application of himselfe to seeke for happinesse in the mercy of God in Christ and not in any naturall perfections worth or excellency of his owne For which purpose God was pleased to leave the understanding of man in statis suo restituto so much obnubilated that his naturall knowledge is not sufficient for direction of such naturall duties as are requisite to peace and unity the meanes to preserve humane society which is one of the ends of Politick Government which defect therefore in naturall knowledge God ordained to be supplied by the exercise of the Kings Legislative power in the composure of Lawes and Statutes for mans direction both in Ecclesiasticall and Civill affaires And for the same purpose did likewise leave the will of man so much depraved that his naturall inclination is not sufficient to excite him to the performance of such naturall duties as are requisite unto the preservation peace and unity of humane societies though hee did know and understand them but rather unto those opposite sins and transgressions which tend to the dissolution
preserve our owne may destroy theirs which Doctrine doth plainly legitimate rebellion by the Law of Nature And therefore to prevent both this and many other dangerous and damnable inferences which may be deduced from this fundamental errour placing this fift Commandement under a wrong genus of the Morall Law and thereby putting a wrong construction upon all the duties therein prescribed I shall endeavour to rectifie this Epidemicall errour by twelve Reasons or Arguments demonstrating this fift Commandement to be a Precept not of the second but of the first Table of the Morall Law Whereof The first foure doe conclude the Negative part that it is not a Precept of the second Table The latter eight the Affirmative part that it is a Precept of the first Table The Negative part that it is no Precept of the second Table appeares 1. By Saint Pauls exposition of that lesser Commandement whereby Christ divides the second Table from the first viz. Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thy selfe under which Commandement saith the Apostle are comprehended all the Precepts of the second Table relating to our neighbour and particularizing them mentions onely the last five Rom. 13.9 Ob. You will say though he specifie no other but the five last Precepts of the Decalogue yet he intimateth in that verse that some other Commandement is also comprehended in this saying Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thy selfe which other Commandement must needs be this of obedience to parents Sol. By other Commandement the Apostle doth not mean any of the other five which are specifically distinct from these five but other particular branches of these five Negative Commandements of the second Table each of which comprehends many particulars under them and that hee doth not thereby understand this fift Commandement which is an Affirmative Precept is manifest from the Reason alledged by the Apostle in the subsequent verse shewing why and how this love of our neighbour is the fulfilling of the Law of the second Table For saith he love worketh no ill to his neighbour therefore is love the fulfilling of the Law Ver. 10. Where you may observe that all the duties of the second Table relating to our neighbour are grounded primarily upon the Negative effects of our love which is the not doing ill to our neighbour for not our neighbour but our selves are the immediate object of the positive effects of our love and so the Precepts are all exprest by way of negation But the duties of the fift Commandement are of a different nature and consists primarily in the positive effects of our love and therefore this Precept is exprest by way of affirmation both in the Decalogue Exod. 20. and by Saint Paul in the first verse of this Chapter For first he commands us to submit our selves to higher Powers that is to perform and execute their commands when they are not contrary to Gods Precepts and this is the immediate and primary duty of this fift Commandement and in the next verse hee prohibits all resistance though their commands be such as we judge to be contrary to Gods Precepts and this is the consequentiall and secondarie duty of the same Commandement A second Reason why this fift Commandement cannot be a precept of the second Table is because such a Commandement would be superfluous in the second Table for if the honour and obedience due to Kings and parents were duties of the second Table then they should be grounded upon such a love as is inferiour unto and to be measured by the love of our selves and wee should yeeld our obedience and submission to their commands onely when we judged them to conduce unto our own good and benefit whereupon it would follow that the honour due to Kings and parents should be no other then what is due to our friend or servant or any other neighbour for nature teacheth us to obey and execute their commands when we conceive them to conduce unto our owne advantage and so this fift Commandement should be altogether superfluous And therefore cannot be a Precept of the second Table The third reason why this fift Commandement cannot be a Precept of the second Table is because God doth not permit us to accuse or testifie against our parents upon any occasion no not in case of Idolatry wherein wee were not to pity or spare any neighbour how neare and dear soever they were unto us whether it were brother childe wife or friend but were to accuse them and testifie against them and to execute the sentence of death upon them with our owne hands Deut. 13.6 7 8 9 10. yea if it were a whole city that were guilty of this sinne it was to be destroyed Ver. 15. Yet in this strict charge concerning Idolatrous neighbours of so neere relation the Text doth not mention any man or woman who hath the relation of a father or mother to us thereby differencing them from all neighbours whatsoever And Solomons exposition of this fift Commandement makes this more cleare and evident Eccles 10.20 where he extends the honour and reverence due to Kings unto the very thoughts and imaginations of the heart notwithstanding they were both Fooles Tyrants and Idolaters for when Solomon prohibited the cursing of the King yea even in the thought he was not ignorant that Saul had beene a Tyrant himselfe an Idolater and that his sonne Rehoboam who should succeed him was a Fool. But it was never prohibited to speake or think evill of any friend or neighbour who was guilty of these crimes nay we are commanded to accuse them of evill Ob. You will say What must men then thinke and beleeve manifest lies Must we neither say nor thinke that those Kings are evill and wicked which manifest themselves to be such in all their actions such as Jeroboam Ahab Manasses Nebuchadnezzar whom the Scriptures record for most infamous and notorious sinners and may not we speake or thinke that for which we have the warrant of Scripture Sol. Kings in reference to their duty towards God may be more wicked then any other men because they may offend in a double capacity 1. In their naturall as men and professores fidei by transgressing of Gods Commandements which doe oblige them equally as they do other men 2. In their Politick as Gods Deputies and propugnatores fidei by breach of that trust which God hath reposed in them for ruling and judging of the people committed to their care and protection according to Justice and Equity But in reference to their duty towards us though themselves may be wicked yet they cannot doe wicked things as I shewed in the last Chapter that is they cannot inflict any thing upon us but that which God hath decreed to fall upon us for our sinnes as the Holy Ghost testifieth of Pilates sentence against Christ Acts 4. so that the evill which they doe to us is just in respect of us though it be never so unjustly executed by them So that
the words of Solomon are to be understood onely of Kings in reference to the exercise of their power upon us which whether it be for good or hurt is still from God whose Deputies all Kings are and whose heart the Lord ruleth either for our benefit or prejudice Prov. 21.4 And therefore we may not thinke them evill or unjust to us for the Judgement is not theirs but Gods Prov. 26.29 who cannot be unjust And if we looke in Esay 3. you shall finde that God owneth all the grievous oppressions and violences which Tyrants exercise upon their Subjects for judgements and punishments sent upon that people or nation by his owne selfe and to demonstrate that all Kings act by his immediate direction he hath made the decrees and ordinances of Heathen Kings subservient to his glory and his peoples good not onely on accidenti by his providence but ex proposito in their owne purposes as is apparent in the decrees of Cyrus and Darius to build the Temple of God whom they knew not and of Nebuchadnezzar to honour his name all which three were meere Heathens The fourth and last Reason why this fift Commandement cannot be a Precept of the second Table is because it doth not enjoyne such a retaliation of love as every Commandement of the second Table doth for every Commandement of the second Table doth enjoyne our neighbour to returne the like respects and measure of love to us as we doe give to him but this fift Commandement doth not enjoyne our parents to honour and reverence us as we are bound thereby to honour and reverence them therefore it cannot be a Commandement of the second Table And if you doe observe it you shall finde this rule of Retaliation to be a perfect note of difference betweene the duties of the first and of the second Table for no duty of the first Table doth oblige God to returne the same respects to us which we are obliged to exhibite to him for wee are bound to worship him and love him above all and to expresse this love in every faculty both of soule and body but God is not obliged to worship us nor to love us after such a manner but our neighbour is obliged to returne the same measure of love to us which wee are bound to exhibite unto him either in his body goods or good name I confesse indeed that parents are engaged to performe duties to their children as well as children are to parents but those are onely such paternall duties of protection and provision as God himselfe is also obliged to performe unto his dutifull children by his Covenant for conferring blessings upon them when they truely honour him Deut. 28. and 29. for performance of the externall part of which Covenant God doth substitute Kings and parents as his instruments to convey these blessings unto Subjects and children but these duties are not so much as intimated in the fift Commandement but are enjoyned onely in that generall Covenant betweene God and his people who therefore doth make Kings and parents indulgent to subjects and children whereby to expresse his care for performance upon his part when Subjects and children are obedient unto God and his Deputies and thereby carefull to performe upon their part The Reasons concluding the Affirmative part that this fift Commandement is a Precept of the first Table are eight The first is grounded upon our Saviours answer to the young man Mat. 19.18 Marke 10.17 Luke 18.20 In all which places this Precept Honour thy father and thy mother is intended by Christ to enjoyne all the duties of the first Table of the Morall Law for God you know is often in Scripture stiled Father as in Mat. 6. wee finde him stiled Father twelve times but we never finde him stiled Neighbour in all the Scripture for to love God but in the same manner which wee are bound to love our neighbour that is like our selves were selfe Idolatry And besides our duty to God is oftentimes enjoyned in this very expression of Honour as 1 Sam. 2.30 where this word Honour importeth the whole duty of man towards God in which sense this word Honour is also used by our Saviour John 8.49 And therefore it is manifest seeing God is capable of the title of Father and that this expression of Honour may be properly extended to all the duties due unto God which are the duties of the first Table that this Precept of Honour thy father and mother may comprehend all the duties of the first Table and that it doth so in this place I doe prove thus Christ in his answer must needs mention all those duties which are necessary to salvation for else his rule were not perfect but the duties of the first Table are equally if not more necessary to life then the duties of the second Table and cannot be included in any other Precept which Christ reciteth in those Texts therefore all the duties of the first Table must necessarily be comprehended in this Precept Honour thy father and mother upon which premised grounds it doth necessarily follow that this fift Commandement is a Precept of the first Table For That Precept which comprehendeth all the duties of the first Table must needs be a Precept of the first Table but this very Precept comprehendeth all the duties of the first Table as the premises demonstrate ergo The second Reason is grounded upon the nature of God which is being and existence for in Exod. 3. he defineth himself by this expression I am and upon this ground both David Psal 1â—0 Isaiah Chap. 44. and Saint Paul Acts 17. proves the Lord alone to be God because no creature no not the Angels themselves are able to give a life or motion or being unto man but onely God whose essence life and being is and therefore communicable onely from him so that whatsoever hath a power to communicate a being doth supply the place of God but parents have a power to communicate a being unto their children ergo they relate unto their children as Gods and not as men and by consequence the duties performed by children unto parents must be duties of the first Table and so likewise the Precept which enjoynes them must be a Precept of the same Table The third Reason as likewise all the five following alledged by Saint Paul Rom. 13. for motives to perswade submission to higher Powers every one of which Reasons doe demonstrate Kings and Magistrates who are Politick parents to have the relation of Gods unto the people is taken from the Author of the Kings power and that is God Ver. 1. For there is no power but of God Though the men invested with that power be as unjust and wicked as Pilate whose power Christ himselfe acknowledged to flow from that sacred fountaine John 19.11 upon which ground the King in the exercise of his power is alwayes stiled the Minister of God Ver. 4. yea and oftentimes also a very God as Psal
which participateth are all of them Really and Essentiallie Identicall with the subject Which Jus Divivum is defined by God himselfe in that most absolute definition of himselfe given to Moses Exod. 3. in that transcendent expression I AM. And this Jus Divinum hath no place at al in Government which relateth Vniversallie to the creatures of God 2. Relative Divine Right is that which is grounded upon the perpetuall will of God concerning the world and the creatures therein And this Jus Divinum is twofold viz Creativum Preservativum Subdivision 1 1. Creatiue Divine Right is that which is grounded upon the will of God concerning the manifestation of his power in the Creation of the world and the creatures therein whereby he gave an Originall being to the whole Vniverse upon which ground he is most appositely termed by Aristotle Natura Naturans because he gave to every kind of Creature First such a Nature and being Secondly such a degree of Naturall excellence in that being Thirdlie such a Naturall understanding and will proportionable to that perfection and excellencie as was most conducent to his own glory And the creature which received all these from that Divine fountaine the will of God is upon that ground termed by Aristotle Natura Naturata whereof there are three severall kinds and degrees 1. Natura Naturata Angelica whose being is purely spirituall and celestiall and the perfections and excellencies proper unto Angels in that being are likewise spirituall and celestiall And therefore the understandings and wils of Angels doe reach unto Celestiall and spirituall matters viz. Those high and transcendent excellencies concerning God and Celestiall joyes the transcendant love and praises of God and other Celestiall blessings and duties whereof no other creature is capable in that nature and measure as Angels are although even Angels themselves are not capable of these things in their proper native and Infinite capacity as they are in God the Natura Naturante but onely in such a finite proportion of perfection and excellencie as is suitable to their created and finite yet most excellent and glorious nature But yet the understandings and wils of Angels are not so precisely limited to these Celestiall and spirituall matters which is their proper object but that they participate also of whatsoever either Intellectuall or Naturall Agents are capable and that also in a more eminent degree of perfection 2. Natura Naturata Intellectualis whose being is mixt viz. partly spirituall in relation to the Rationall soul and partly Naturall in relation to the humane body and accordingly the perfections of humane nature are partly Spirituall which are proper to the soul and partly naturall which are proper to the body And therefore they have both spiritual understandings and wils which are Essential to the rational soul and capable of spirituall and Celestiall objects and naturall knowledge and naturall Inclination whereby they judge of the objects which are proper unto natural Agents and that also more exactlie then the naturall Agents themselves are able to doe 3. Natura Naturata Naturalis Whose being is meerly naturall and accordingly their perfection is meerly Naturall and therefore their Analogicall understandings and wils are onely vers't in naturall objects for though there be three degrees of naturall agents viz. 1. Sensitive which is the most noble kind of all naturall Agents because they participate of sense and appetite which do most resemble the faculties of understanding and wil in man 2. Vegetative which is in the second degree of Excellencie because though they want sense and appetite yet they participate of some naturall light and inclination whereby they know and desire things which concern their vitall being nourishment augmentation 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 naturall which participate onely of a naturall light and inclination to direct and excite them unto their naturall and proper actions and motions yet none of them do ever reach unto any Celestiall or spirituall matters either in their knowledge or inclinations but onely unto naturall and corporeall objects Now this Jus Divinum Creativum in regard it concerneth the creatures onely in their Originall esse and Reception of a being cannot properlie claime any place in Government which concerneth the creatures onelie in their perpetuation and continuance 2. Preservatiue Divine Right is that which is grounded upon the will of God concerning the manifestation of his providence in the preservation of the world and the creatures therein and this Divine Right is that which doth properlie claime a place in Government and all the severall species thereof for the very nature and Essence of providence consists in the Government guidance and disposall of the creatures of God in their being actions and motions And this Jus Divinum is twofold Nativum Redemptivum Subdivision 2 1. Native Divine Right is that which is grounded upon the will of God concerning the Manifestation of his providence in the preservation and Government of the Creature in its Native Originall and created state of being And this againe is two-fold Gratiosum Vindicativum Subdivision 3 1. Gratious Divine Right is that which is grounded upon the wil of God concerning the manifestation of his native grace and favour unto the creature in the preservation thereof in its Native and happie state of being by the Regulation of its actions and motions according to the rule of those native Divine Lawes given unto each creature severally according to those severall degrees of parfection wherewith he had enabled them for the performance of their severall duties required by those Lawes And this Jus Divinum is two-fold Primitivum Derivativum Subdivision 4 1. Primitive Divine Right is that which is grounded upon the will of God concerning the manifestation of his Native Grace and Favour in the preservation of the creature in its native and happy state of being by an Immediate influence of his gratious providence in the Government and Regulation of all its actions and motions both Internall and externall And this Jus Divinum before the Apostasie of men and Angels did enjoy a place in the Government of all the creatures in the world but from the Epoche of their disobedience and Rebellion whereby their native state of happinesse was converted into an adventitious state of miserie this Jus Divinum retained a place onely in Gods gratious government of the persevering Angels who by their continuance in their native dutie and obedience to God did make a just returne of Gods native grace and favour unto them in their native Investiture with those Divine graces and blessings which did enable them unto the performance of those duties And therefore God doth still continue his native Grace and Favour unto these Angels by preserving and continuing them in their native state of happinesse and by his immediate guidance and Regulation of aâ—â—ther actions and motions according to the Rule of that native Divine law which they received from Gad at their first Creation 2.
Gilgal to make him King 1 Sam. 11.15 And David which all the men of Judah anointed King at Hebron 2 Sam. 2.4 And who afterwards was anointed King over Israel at Hebron by all the Tribes of Israel 2.5.3 And Solomon who was likewise anointed by the people 1 Chron. 29.22 And Jeroboam whom the people made King over Israel 1 Kings 12 20. And Vzziah whom the people of the land made King 2 Kin. 14.21 And Iehoahaz who though he was but the second sonne of Iosiah younger then Eliakim was made King by the people in his fathers stead 2 Chron. 23.20 And Christ whom the people intended to have made a King Ioh. 6. And it must needs be presupposed they had a power to do so otherwise their attempts had been ridiculous And to adde further weight to this Argument we find this act of the peoples in making and anointing of Kings to be mentioned sometimes with an expresse approbation thereof from God as upon Sauls Investiture 1 Sam. 11.14 And David received this honour from the people by the Lords expresse Command enjoyning David to go to Hebron there to be anointed King by the people 2 Sam. 2.2 And David himself called all the people to the anointing of King Solomon 1 Chron. 29. 2. The reason alledged for the ground of this opinion is that the honour and submission which Kings receive is Originally in the people for honor est in honorante non in honorato according to Aristotles principles and from them derived unto the King And therefore they do not conceive it just or reasonable that the people should be obliged to yeeld honour and submission and performe dutyes of obedience to any person but him whom themselves shall judge worthy of it And so attest their judgement of his worth by their election of him to be their King and Soveraign 3. To these we may adde Saint Peters testimony who termes Regality an Ordinance of men 1 Pet. 2.13 which were false if it did proceed from God and not from the people for then it were an ordinance of God and not of man And therefore though God be the Vniversal cause of Royal Power as he is of all things else yet the people must be the Immediate and particular cause Now from these gounds they deduce two damnable and detestable Inferences and Corollaries to justifie Rebellion and Dethronement of Kings 1. That though the King be Major singulis yet he is minor Vniversis and therefore that it is no Rebellion but duty in the people meaning the Major part to resist or depose the King where the people judge it necessary in relation to the defence of their own safety which according to their Doctrine is Suprema Lex 2. That the King doth receive and enjoy this honour onely by virtue of a stipulation or Covenant between himself and the people the sole ground whereof they conclude to be salus populi And therefore if the King doth violate this Covenant and break the trust reposed in him by the people by any acts which are destructive ad salutem populi whereof they presuppose the people to be the Judges that then the people are absolved from their Alleagance grounded upon that trust and Covenant and may lawfully provide for their own safety and welfare either by resistance deposition dethronement or any such meanes as themselves judge to be most conducent to their owne security Before I returne particular answers to these Instances and the reason alledged for the peoples right to confer this supremacy which doth preheminence the King above all others in the same society and is the ground of the Monarchs title to his Crown and the two damnable Inferences thence I will premise those grounds and reasons which enunciate the errour and absurdity of this opinion And thereupon frame answers to all that is or I suppose can be alledged for the support of that popular prerogative The Arguments declaring the errour and absurdity of this opinion are partly Instantial partly Rational The Instances of Scripture are of two sorts the first manifest the peoples disprobations not to be Authentick to Illegitimate the title of a lawful King or Monarch For the Books of Exodus and Numbers record ten several disprobations and murmurings of the people against Moses yet did not all these disannul Moses his Title For we see with what fearful judgements upon the people the Lord himself did Vindicate the same Exod. 32. Num. 12. and Ch. 14. and Ch. 16. And all the people of the land from Dan to Beersheba rejected David upon Absaloms conspiracy yet did not that nullifie Davids Right and title to the Crown for he was justly and truly King when he fled but with six hundred of his servants and the Lord did afterwards Vindicate his Right and title thereunto by a mighty destruction of his enemies 2 Sam. 18. Neither did the peoples disprobation of his just Power when the ten tribes forsook David and followed Sheba the sonne of Bichri unking David or Illegitimate his Right and title to the Kingdome of Israel For the Lord did quickly judge his cause by a suddaine vengeance upon that traitor 2 Sam. 20. The second sort of Instances manifest the peoples approbation and endeavours not to be Authentick or effectual to create a lawful title to the Crown for the golden Calf was honoured and received and proclaimed a God and guide in Moses stead by Aaron and all the Israelites Yet did not that popular election legitimate that Calfs power and title Exod. 32. Absalom was proclaimed King by all the thousands of Israel yet did not that act of the peoples legitimate Absaloms title to the Crown For the holy Ghost termeth it but a conspiracy when it was in the very height 2. Sam. 15.12 Sheba had ten Tribes for him when David had but one for him and yet was he never termed a King but a man of Belial 2 Sam. 20. Adonijah confesseth that although the faces of all Israel were set on him to make him King yet he never had any just Right or title to the Kingdome because the Lord had designed it for his Brother Solomon 1 Kings 2.15 2. The reasons evincing the errour and absurdity of this opinion are four 1. The first is taken from the nature of Monarchie to which this opinion is absolutely destructive For it is the very Essence of Monarchie that one man should enjoy the supremacy but if the supremacy be delegated to the King from the people and may be resumed by the people at pleasure upon their own judgements then the supremacy is absolutely and primarily in the people and but derivatively and secondarily in the King and by consequence all Government is virtually Democratical nay indeed every Government is properly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is generally acknowledged to be the worst kind of Government the end and conclusion whereof all Statists even the most zealous for Polarchy agree to be confusion and desolation 2. The second reason
excellency worth and goodnesse which God doth communicate unto men for the Regulation of their owne private affections and the exercise of a pious and vertuous life of which Honour every man in the Common-wealth is equally capable 2. Politicall Honour is that excellency worth and goodnesse which God doth communicate unto men for the Regulation of the externall actions of men in order to the preservation of society and the exercise of a peaceable and quiet life which is that Honour which the King doth receive from God and which doth supereminence him above all others in the same society and Common-wealth And this is also two fold viz. Primarius Secundarius 1. Primarie Honour is that excellency of power and authority which doth enable the King for execution of the duties of his Calling in the Rule and Government of his people and Subjects And this is two-fold viz. Legislativus Judiciarius 1. Legislative Honour is the power and authority to constitute and enact Lawes and Statutes for the Publike good and benefit of the Common-wealth And this againe is twofold viz. Ecclesiasticus Civilis 1. Ecclsiasticall Honour is the power and authority to enact Lawes and Statutes for the Regulation of mens words and actions in order to the externall performance of the duties of the first Table of the Morall Law according to the patterne exhibited by God in the frame and composure of the Ceremoniall Law instituted by God for that purpose 2. Civill Honour is the power and authority to enact Lawes and Statutes for the Regulation of mens words and actions in order to the externall performance of the duties of the second Table of the Morall Law according to the patterne exhibited by God himselfe in the frame and composure of the Judiciall Law Instituted by God likewise for that purpose 2. Judiciarie Honour is the power and authority to put all these Lawes in execution And this is two-fold Compensativus Vindicativus 1. Compensative Honour is the power to encourage and remunerate the integrity of pious and just men with titles of Honour and offices of state and the like according to the merits of their service and obedience which is the pastorall duty and office of Kings signified principally by their Scepter which is is called in Christs Govenment A Scepter of righteousnesse because of Christs Government over the Saints and Church triumphant wherein there is no use at all of the Sword but onely of the Scepter and by the exercise of his pastorall office to reward the faith and patience of the Saints Which passage I doe here insert to shew that the Scepter doth principally import the Pastorall and not the Imperiall and Magisteriall office of a King which relateth properly to his Militarie power 2. Vindicative Honour is the power to correct and punish the delinquences of disobedient and evill men which is the Magisteriall office and duty of Kings signified by their sword 2. Secondarie Honour which is a spece also of Politicall Honour is that Honourable and Magnificent maintenance which God hath assigned unto the King for support of his Royall power and dignity for as our lives Gen. 5.9 so our estates and fortunes are not ours but Gods For heaven and earth are his and all riches and honours come from him and he is Lord over all 1 Chron. 29.10 11 12. Psal 50.10 11. Psal 95.4 For a manifest of which Prerogative God in all his distributions reserved some part which he ordained to be sacred and holy unto himselfe as in that charter and grant made unto Adam in Innocency when there was no King or Priest but onely Adam himselfe the Lord in that grant reserved the Tree of Knowledge So that the law for honouring God with our substance Prov. 3.8 was an eternall law of nature and not any positive emergent law for before the Institution either of the Ceremoniall or Judiciall lawes of Moses This Prescript and Rule was observed by the Patriarchs as Cain and Abel both which did render unto the Lord a tribute out of their several possessions Gen. 4.3 4. And Abraham by this law paid Tythes to Melchisedec Gen. 14.20 And by the same law Jacob vowed unto the Lord the retribution of a Tenth of that which the Lord should give him Gen. 28. last as an acknowledgement that hee received it from God the Lord of all for Jacob had nothing of his owne at that time but a staffe Gen. 32.10 Now as God did delegate unto Kings a power over our persons in his ordinance for their Primarie honour of power and authority so did he likewise give them a power over our estates for support of that honour which is their Secondarie honour of Maintenance and Revenue which was the ground of Christs command to render a tribute of our goods unto Caesar Mat. 22.21 intimating that this temporall honour of tribute was by virtue of Gods delegation as due unto Caesar as the spirituall honour of praise and worship was unto God And upon the same ground Saint Paul commands to render custome and tribute to Kings not as a gift and favour but as a due and just debt Rom. 13.7 and gives this reason for it because they are Gods Ministers appointed to supply his place in Ruling and Judging us And seeing God hath transferred the greater power to Kings viz a power over our lives by putting the sword i. e. the Militia or Military power of the Common-wealth into his hands Rom. 13.4 the Apostle thence concludes their Investiture with the lesse viz a power over our estates Ver. 6. And this power was all the title which Christ had to that Asses-Colt which he sent his Disciples to fetch for his use Luke 19.30 for it appeares in the Text that Christ was not the proprietour of that colt yet he did not give order to his Disciples either to buy or hire or begge or borrow the colt of the owners but onely to tell any that profered to interrupt them that the Lord had need of him for it was a sufficient title to dispossesse the private owner that the publike Lord of all did command him and upon that answer the private owner did not resist the Disciples in taking him away Ver. 34. And the like power we see exercised by Pharaoh in that ordinance for storing up a fift part of all the Corne of Egypt for seven yeares together which law was enacted by Pharaoh upon the single Counsell of Joseph with the approbation onely of Pharaoh's servants or Councell and not by the generall consent of the people Gen. 41.34 Neither can we pretend this law to be Tyrannicall amd contrary to the law of God and Nature for it proceeded from the wisdome of God which in this businesse directed the mind of Joseph Gen. 45.57 Psal 105. Nor can any man imagine but the state and magnificence of Saul David Jeroboam and others who of private persons were advanced by God himself to Regall honour and dignity was supported by this meanes
and destruction thereof which defects in our naturall inclinations God ordained to be supplied by the exercise of a Judiciarie power whereby to excite us to the performance of these naturall duties either by the remuneration of our merits of obedience or the punishment of our crimes of disobedience unto the Lawes and Statutes composed for mans direction both in Ecclesiasticall and Civill affaires so that the exercise both of the Legislative and Judiciarie power of Kings were meere emergencies of mans Apostasie Before which time though Government was established amongst men by that law of nature yet in regard that Law whereupon this Government was founded was so principled in mens hearts that it was sufficient to direct all Politicall and Monarchicall duties and the naturall rectitude of their wills to excite the performance of them there was no occasion at all for the exercise either of the Legislative or Judiciarie power for direction of Politicall and Monarchicall duties or restraint of Politicall and Monarchicall exorbitances neither should there ever have beene any more occasion if man had persisted in that his native Innocency and integâ—â—â—y for any such direction or restraint then there was to direct the duties or restraine the exorbitancies of Christ himselfe whose innocency and integrity both in his nativity and conversation was parallel to Adams in his created and native state and condition the conformity of whose active obedience to authority in omnibus licitis and passive in illicit is neither was nor could be any way defective to the most exact rules and lawes of God and nature Whence it is manifest that though Magistrates in the state of Innocency were invested by the law of nature both with a Legislative and Judiciarie power in actu signato yet the actus exercitus or exercise thereof was a meere emergency of mans prevarication and Apostasie which did not occasion God to ordaine and institute any new sort of humane policy or any new lawes for direction of Politicall duties but onely to ordaine the actuall use and exercise of his Legislative power to supply and help the defects imperfections and infirmities of his understanding in the lawes of nature by the composure of Positive Lawes and Statutes and of his Judiciary power to correct and regulate the depravities of his will by remunerating the merits of his obedience and punishing the crimes of his disobedience to those Lawes and Statutes The result of all which is but briefly this that the Objectum per se or the direct and immediate Object of Politicall Cognizance consisting in the Fundamentals and Essentials of Politick Government is onely the externall duties prescribed in the Morall Law in reference unto which duties Kings both may and ought to exercise both their Legislative and Judiciary power over all persons within their Dominions whether Ecclesiasticall or Civill Ob. Some do object against this that Christ hath suffered for the sins of the whole world and therefore that no man ought to be punished for sinne for it would be a point of direct Injustice to require satisfaction of us for that for which our surety hath already paid and given plenary and perfect satisfaction to our Creditour so that the exercise of the vindicative part of Judiciary power in Magistrates inflicting punishment for offences must needs be unlawfull and destructive to the principles and priviledges of the Gospell of Christ Sol. I answer that the punishments inflicted by Magistrates are not intended for the satisfaction of Gods justice for our offences against God but for the instruction of our obedience in order to the publike peace for no temporary punishments or tortures how extremely inhumane and barbarous soever can possibly be satisfactory for the least sinne against the law of God whose merits in the court of Gods Justice are eternall death Neither doth any man suffer now in earth nor shall any man suffer hereafter in hell for any sinne against God and his law of nature but onely for sinnes against Christ and his law of the Gospell that is for infidelity despaire and want of charity or the love of Christ as I have already intimated in the Introduction So that the punishments inflicted by the Magistrate is not intended for satisfaction of any sinne committed against God for that satisfaction is peculiar to the sufferings of Christ but for prevention of future mischiefes either in the offender or others or both that men may live together in peace and unity following all godlinesse and honesty according to the commands of the Gospell and law of Christ which as I said before is not different from the Morall law given by God at the first creation in Essence for both of them enjoyne the same duties but onely in circumstance and the manner of performing these duties For whereas the law of God doth require an exact and legall performance according to the letter of the law the law of Christ doth require onely an equitable and Evangelicall performance according to the measure of our abilities And therefore whereas the offences against Gods law were determinable only in a Court of Justice and so punished according to the quality and merit of the trespasse the offences now against Christs law are determinable onely in a Court of Mercy and Equity and so punished according to the measure of our abilities and the mis-imployment of such talents and blessings as wee have received by Christ who hath renewed by his Spirit in every mans soule some of the obliterated characters of nature whereof they were deprived by Adams sinfull prevarication And according to this law of Christ are all the Nations and Kingdomes of the world now governed as well Heathen as Christian for all Government was by his Father transmitted unto him John 13.3 Phil. 2.10 11. so that now all Kings and Rulers as well Heathen as Christian are Christs Lieutenants and Deputies for what Solomon attributed to Christs power indefinitely in the consignation of Kings Prov. 8.15 By me Kings raigne David expresly extendeth to Heathens as well as Christians Psal 2.8 I will give thee the Heathen for thine inheritance And Saint John expresly affirmeth Jesus Christ to be Prince of all the Kings of the earth Apoc. 1.5 And therefore all Kings doe now order and decree all things in a Court of mercy and equity which looketh upon the abilities of the offender and not in a Court of Justice which looketh onely upon the quality of the offence For no Prince in the world whether Heathen or Christian doe punish Ideots and Mad-men for the same offences which sometimes are made capitall in men of understanding the reason is because these are capable of Reformation and to be made better by punishments the other not so and therefore though the offence be the same in both yet the punishment is not so whence it is manifest that the exercise of the Kings Judiciary power is not intended for satisfaction for sinne for which Christ died but meerely for restraint of such
power to prescribe Laws for to enforce the practise of such duties upon other persons to whom God hath not vouchsafed that understanding knowledge concerning these duties But now for a further illustration of the premises and to frame a more direct full and satisfactory answer to the Quaere concerning the due limitation and extent of the Kings power I will here set downe a briefe Analysis of the whole duty of man the regulation whereof is the very designe of that Power and Dominion which God hath either delegated unto the King or reserved unto himselfe and conscience touching humane affaires And from thence demonstrate 1. Unto what duties the Kings power doth properly and directly extend so that he may lawfully exercise the same over all persons within his Dominions whether Ecclesiasticall or Civill for the regulation of such duties 2. Unto what duties the Kings Power doth extend onely indirectly and per accidens so that he may lawfully exercise his power over some persons within his Dominions of both sorts but not over other some of either sort for the regulation of those duties 3. Unto what duties the Kings Power doth no way extend neither derectly nor indirectly so that he may not exercise the same over any person within his Dominions whether Ecclesiasticall or Civill for the regulation of those duties The duty of man is twofold 1. Naturall which is the duty of man quà homo rationalis and is expressed in the law of nature divided by Christ Mat. 22. into two parts or tables 1. Containes the duty of man towards God and consists in a love exceeding all selfe-love Ver. 37. And this duty is twofold 1. Internall consisting in the service and worship of God by the inward acts of the soule i. e. of the understanding will and affections of man and in a due returne of the bona animi which God hath conferted upon man And this part of mans duty is prescribed in the first Commandement 2. Externall which consists in honouring God by outward actions and in a due returne of those hona corporis fortuna which God hath conferred upon man And this is twofold 1. Originall and Primarie which is that honour worship and service which both Moses Deut. 6.13 and Christ Mat. 4.10 â—mits solely unto God And is twofold 1. Private consisting in personall honour and worship of God which is twofold 1. Corporall consisting in the outward gestures of the body Prescribed Commandement 2. 2. Vocall consisting in reverent speeches praises of God Prescribed Commandement 3. 2. Publick consisting in the practise of these duties at solemne times and in solemne assemblies Prescribed Commandement 4. 2. Representative and Secondarie which is the honour worship and service due unto Parents Kings and Magistrates as Gods Deputies and Lieutenants Prescribed Commandement 5. which I shall fully demonstrate in the next Chapter to be a Precept of the former Table of the Morall Law and that Kings and Parents in that capacity as Kings and Parents doe relate unto their children and Subjects as Gods and not as Neighbour 2. Containes the duty of man towards his neighbour and consists in a love inferiour unto the love of our selves And is twofold 1. Externall which consists in the performance of externall offices of love and restraint of externall injuries to our neighbour 1. In his owne person Commandement 6. 2. In his second selfe Commandement 7. 3. In his god's Commandement 8. 4. In his good name Commandement 9. 2. Internall consisting in the inward inclination and desire to perform these duties and in the restraint of all inward motions to the sinnes prohibited in these precepts Commandement 10. 2. Evangelicall which is the duty of man quà homo Christianus And is expressed in the Gospel or Law of Christ Which duty is twofold 1. Meerly Evangelicall which consists in the right use of Evangelicall and supernaturall blessings conferred upon particular men for the advancement of the Gospell of Christ as the power of working miracles of prophecying and the like mentioned by Saint Paul 1 Cor. 12. 2. Mixtly Evangelicall which consists in the right use of those naturall blessings which enable men for the performance of the law of nature And therefore these mixtly Evangelicall duties are the same in substance as I shewed before with naturall duties and are differenced after the same manner and regulated by the same precepts of the Moral Law but the difference consists as to our present purpose in the Object and terminus ad quem whereunto these Evangelicall duties do referre which is Christ the Redeemer whereas naturall duties do relate unto God the Creatour both as their object and erd Now from these premises I shall returne a direct answer to the Quaere concerning the extent and limitation of Regall power in three briefe Theses or Corollaries shewing 1. What are omnimodò Regalia 2. What are partìm Regalia and partim extra-regalia 3. What are omnimodò extra-regalia Onely by the way I shall premise another briefe praecognitum to facilitate the understanding of these ensuing Corollaries Note viz. That in regard the opinions of Heathens Jewes and Christians doe generally concenter in the due extent and limitation of Regall power in order to the duties of the second Table my present discourse shall onely referre unto the duties of the first Table of the Morall Law for two reasons 1. Because the people are most subject to offend in these duties and that two wayes 1. Through errour because these duties do most transcend their naturall reason 2. Through zeale because they conceive these duties most neerly to concerne their eternall and spirituall happinesse and welfare 2. Because Kings and Magistrates are or at least wise ought to be most diligent in the reformation and punishment of offences which immediately concerne God and Religion because the promotion of Gods honour worship and service is the principall part of the office and calling of Kings and Magistrates the direction of whose precipitate zeale in this point is the absolute designe of this Chapter The first Thesis declaring what are omnimodò Regalia is this Thesis 1. All Externall duties prescribed in the foure last precepts of the first Table of the Morall Law are directly and properly of Politicall Cognizance so that the King may lawfully exercise his Legislative power in the composure of Lawes and Statutes for direction of honour worship and service both to God and himselfe and that concerning both publike and private acts of honour and worship whether of the body or of the tongue and here the disposall and ordering of our estates i. e. the bona fortunae as well as bona corporis must be presupposed to be directly of the same cognizance and to pertaine to the same power For Solomon commands to honour the Lord with our substance Prov. 3.9 and God ordained parents and Kings to be his instruments in the impartment of these outward blessings of fortune as well as the blessings of the