evils And these though hell repines doth he work and witnes by the miserable cryes of men As it is said 2 Cor. 10.4 The weapons of our warfare are not carnall but mighty through God to the pulling down of the strong holds casting down imaginations and every high thing that exalteth it self against the knowledge of God and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ And having in a readinesse to revenge all disobedience when your obedience is fulfilled As therefore the basenes of the vessell detracts nothing from the worth of the wares it containeth so our meane and infant expression of the doctrine may not so far be slighted as than it should derogate one whit from the weight of those motives which invite you to an ardent study of Divinity But whiles I meditate with my self that I am to take a view of some of those motives in this rehearfall Preface I am sensibly so overwhelmed with an infinite masse of matter of main importance that scarcely can I resolve whence to make an entrance But seeing that some of them must come into consideration The necessity of Catechismal instruction is pressed from these motives 1. Gods command we will put that foremost which ought to rule all our actions and indeavours namely the serious will of God expressed in apparent commands For now we which are citizens of the Church have conference together and know for certain that the books of the Prophets and Apostles are most infallible declarations of the mind and will of God And in them here and there are certain precepts delivered and rehearsed which injoyn men a diligent search and knowledg of the doctrine contained in those books Such is the precept of the Decalogue touching the Sabbath Such is that speech of our Saviour Luke 10.41 One thing is necessary The knowledge of this wisdom saith he is eternall life This David commendeth as frequently in other places so in the first Psalme which he writeth as an Epitomie of it for that it is a companion of true blessednes But these have not satisfied our man-loving heavenly Father that is solicitous of our salvation He addeth further peculiar precepts touching that summe of doctrine that is to be published to all especially the youth namely the doctrine of Catechismall instruction Deut. 4.9 Teach them thy sons Deut. 6.6 7. These words shall be in thine heart Thou shalt teach them diligently unto thy children c. And thou shalt binde them for a signe upon thine hand and they shall be as frontlets between thine eyes Here doe we heare Parents and those to whom the charge of Parents is committed commanded that they care to teach or see taught the youth the youth commanded that they learne and both are commanded that they daily inculcate rehearse and meditate on this doctrine This doctrine would the Lord have both to be delivered unto children and also to be in our view continually And its apparent that brevity and plainnes are required which what else they but a Catechisme or summe of doctrine neither prolixe nor obscure So Saint Paul 2. Tim. 1.13 Hold fast the forme of sound words which thou hast heard of mee in faith and love which is in Christ Jesus In this precept of using and holding his Catechisme we heare the definition of ours The forme of sound words of Câ—â—echismâ—l instructâ—oâ— described 1 More largely The Apostle meaning a draught or plat-forme of sound positions concerning each point of doctrine methodically and briefly comprised as if it were painted before the eye together with a kinde and maner of teaching and expression as is both proper plain and agreeable with the stile of the Prophets and Apostles Therefore doth he name sound words delivered by him concerning faith and love in Christ i.e. in the knowledge of Christ as in sundry places he reduceth all piety to faith and love A Catechisme then is a summe of doctrine delivered by the Prophets and Apostles concerning faith and love in Christ 2 More briefly two wayes Or is a summe of doctrine of Christianity briefly methodically and plainly couched together For it is not for us to invent opinions but of necessity we must referre our selves as it is Esay 8.20 to the Law and the Testimony And there must be added an exposition which may be both a manifestation of the parts and method and an interpretation of words and phrases This reason if there were no more is of efficacy to them that are not of prophane minds to excite them to the study of this sacred doctrine For to such the command of God is a cause of all causes though nothing more be added But when as God is so indulgent to our weaknes as to declare unto us the causes of this command needs must we weigh them wtih reverence Now God avoucheth that therefore must we learn this doctrine because by the knowledge thereof 2. Motive our salvation and not any other way will he convert and save all that by age are of understanding and are to be made heires of eternall life Marvelous confidently is that spoken of Saint Paul Rom. 1.16 The Gospel is the power of God to salvation c. And 1 Cor. 1.18 The preaching of the Crosse is to them that perish foolishnesse but unto us which are saved it is the power of God And Ver. 21. It pleased God by the fool shnesse of preaching to save them that beleeve But this opinion howsoever it be delivered and confirmed by divers and weighty testimonies of the holy Spirit is oppugned by the utmost endeavours of Sathan Against the Zwenckfâ—â—dians touching the point of the â—fficacy of the Spirit by the ministiy of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For the Father of lyes seeing how the Paradox of the foolishnesse of preaching the Crosse of Christ doth not a little pierce the minds of men snatcheth an occasion of suborning fanaticall minded men who cry out that the worke of the ministry is nothing lesse than the means of converting men but that God communicates himself to us immediately and that wee Ministers make our voice an Idoll They babble forth many wonderfull words carrying with them indeed a shew of special illumination but heare and consider I pray upon what foundation they relye and how they oppose their wisedome to the divine The omnipotent God say they doth not at all need that voice ministry reading meditation to convert men Therefore he useth not this instrument neither is a necessity of labour in learning it to be imposed upon those that are to be saved Now say I to you young men Is there any one among you so weak and childish in judgment that doth not perceive such a one to be hissed at that would so argue God can by his omnipotency easily bring to passe that one without bookes teachers study should become skilfull in all learning and doctrine as the Apostles and others of the Primitive Church spake with tongues
That the Law and Gospel are the two onely parts of Christian doctrine proved by 4. reasons THE parts of the doctrine of the Church are two the Law and the Gospel in both which the summe of the whole Scriptures is contained The Law is tearmed the Decalogue and the Gospel is the doctrine touching Christ our Mediatour and the free remission of sinnes through faith This division of Church doctrine is clearly demonstrated to be sufficient by these evident arguments 1. All doctrine comprised in sacred writ concerneth either the nature of God or his will or his workes or sinne which is the proper worke of men and divels But of all these we are taught either in the Law or in the Gospel or in both Wherefore the Law and the Gospel are the chiefe generall heads which comprehend all the doctrine of the Scripture 2. Christ himselfe maketh this division of that doctrine which he commandeth to be preached in his name saying So it is written and so it behooved Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead the third day and that in his name should be preached repentance and remission of sins Now the whole summe of all this is delivered in the Law and the Gospel 3. The writings of the Prophets and Apostles doe containe in them the old and new Testament or covenants between God and man Therefore it must needs be that in them is declared what God promiseth and what hee doth unto us to wit his favour remission of sinnes his holy Spirit righteousnesse and life everlasting as also what he requireth of us that is to say Faith and Obedience And these are the things which are taught in the Law and Gospel 4. Christ is the foundation and ground of the whole Scripture and the doctrine of the Law and Gospel is necessary to conduct us to the knowledge of Christ and of his benefits For the Law is our Schoolmaster unto Christ Gal. 3.24 constraining us to flee unto him and shewing us what that justice is which Christ hath recovered and restored unto us The Gospel of purpose amply treateth of the person of Christ his office and benefits Therefore all Scripture and heavenly doctrine is comprehended in the Law and the Gospel 3. Differences of the Law Gospel The maine differences of these two parts of Christian doctrine consist in three things In the matter it selfe In the subject or matter and kind of doctrine which they diliver because the Law is a doctrine prescribing unto men what is to be done and prohibiting whatsoever ought to be left undone whereas the Gospel is a preaching of free remission of sinnes by and through Christ In the manner of revealing In the manner of their revealing because the Law is knowne by nature the Gospel is revealed from above In their promises In their promises because the Law promiseth life with condition of perfect obedience the Gospel promiseth the same life on condition of our stedfast faith in Christ and the inchoation or beginning of new obedience unto God But hereof more shall be spoken hereafter in his due place 3 Wherein the doctrine of the Church differeth from the doctrine of other Sects and from Philosophy also and why these differences are to be retained THE differences betweene the doctrine of Gods Church and other Religions 4 Differences betweene Church-doctrine and other Religions are foure In their Authors GOD is the author of the doctrine of the Church from whom it was delivered by the ministry of the Prophets and Apostles other Sects are sprung from men and have been invented by men through the suggestion of Sathan In their testimonies of confirmation The doctrine of the Church alone hath divine testimonies firme and infallible such as quiet consciences and convince all other Sects of errour In teaching and not teaching aright the whole Law In the Church the entire and uncorrupt Law of GOD is perfectly retained and kept as for other Sects and Religions they maime and corrupt the Law of GOD. For they utterly reject the doctrine of the first Table concerning the true knowledge and worship of GOD either framing unto themselves another God besides that GOD who by his word and workes hath revealed himselfe unto his Church or seeking to know God but not by and in his Son or worshipping GOD otherwise than hee hath commanded in his word They are also altogether ignorant of the inward and spirituall obedience of the second Table That little good and truth which they have is a part of the commandements of the second Table concerning externall discipline and civill duties towards men In preaching not preaching aright the whole Gospel The Gospel of Christ is wholly taught and rightly understood in the Church onely other Sects are either cleane ignorant of it and despise it as the Ethnickes Philosophers Jewes and Turkes or they doe patch some little part of it out of the doctrine of the Apostles unto their owne errours of which part yet they neither know not perceive the use as the Arrians Papists Anabaptists and all other Heretickes of whom some maintaine errours concerning the person others concerning the office of our Mediatour These maine discords doe prove that the doctrine of the Church alone is zealously to be followed and kept and the Religion and doctrine of other Sects repugnant to the truth warily to be prevented and avoided according as it is said in Scripture BEWARE of false Prophets and FLY Idols The case holdeth not alike in Philosophy For true Philosophy howsoever it vary much from the doctrine of the Church yet it impugneth it not it is no lye as are the false doctrines of other Sects but it is absolute truth and as it were a certaine bright-shining ray of Gods divine wisdome fixed in mans understanding at the creation For it is a doctrine treating of God and his creatures The nature of Philosophy with the lawfull and fruitfull use thereof and other things good and profitable unto mankind compiled by wise and grave men through the light of Nature and grounded on principles in their own nature plaine and evident Whence it followeth that it is a thing not only lawfull but profitable also for Christans to imploy their labour and travell in the studies of Philosophy whereas contrariwise we may not busie our wits in the doctrine of other Sects but detest them all as untruths and lies coined by the Divel Notwithstanding between Philosophy the doctrine of the Church there is great difference especially consisting in these points 3 Differences between Philosophy and Church-doctrine In their grinciples They disagree in their principles For Philosophy in her principles is meerly naturall founded and built on things naturally knowne unto every man but the doctrine of the Church although it contain many things depending on nature yet the chiefest part thereof I meane the Gospel so far surpasseth the reach and capacity of nature
fallacies and condemneth their Idols and other vices then any other Sect which rather either tolerate and winke at or patronize and defend them The world hateth me because I testifie of it that the workes thereof are evill John 5.17 John 15.19 If ye were of the world the world would love her owne Gods marvellous preservation thereof The marvellous protection and wonderfull preservation of this doctrine against the furies of Sathan and other enemies of the Church For whereas no Religion is more dangerously at all times without intermission assailed by Tyrants and Heretikes then this of the Church and God notwithstanding hath hitherto wonderfully protected it against the cankred rancour and malice of enemies and the very gates of Hell insomuch as it alone hath persisted invincible whereas other Religions either not at all or slenderly assailed have speedily perished and suddenly fallen to the ground hence we conclude that the doctrine of the Church is approved of God cared for and secured by him Punishments of the enemies of it The punishments of the enemies For without doubt that Religion is allowed and advanced by God whose adversaries God punisheth for oppugning and withstanding it But histories both old and new have registred and recorded the dreadfull and heavie punishments inflicted by God on them who resisted the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles Therefore God countenanceth and authoriseth that doctrine Now although the wicked sometimes flourish in this world and the Church lieth trodden under foot yet the end and event testifieth yea and Scripture teacheth that this is a worke of Gods providence and no casualty or accident neither is God therefore more pleased with them or displeased with his Church For the Church is alwaies preserved even amidst her persecutions and is at length delivered whereas the short felicity of Tyrants and wicked Imps hath a most dolefull and eternall destruction following it Neither is thereby the force of this proofe weakned because that all the persecutors of the Church are not in tragicall manner punished in this life as were Antiochus Herod and the rest For whiles God doth take vengeance on most of them in this life he doth sufficiently shew what hee would have to be thought of the rest of their complices verily that they are his enemies whom without they repent he will plunge into eternall plagues the beginning and feeling of the which is desperation in which all the enemies of Christian Reâ—igion end their dayes 2 Object Not for this cause yea they who are not oppressed with any other calamities of this life To conclude that it may be manifest that they are not only for other transgressions punished of God God doth so often denounce in his word that such shall be the ends of his enemies Ans Yea for this cause and that for this very cause because they go about to extinguish the people and true worship of God Yea furthermore they are not a few from whom while they lie in torments their conscience wresteth out this confession that they have drawne these miseries upon themselves by persecuting the godly as from Antiochus Epiphanes and Julian the Apostata And since that all the adversaries of the Church in their calamities and death are destitute of comfort it is manifest that they suffer as the enemies of God and therefore are far from true Religion Now that which the wicked alone doe there is no doubt but that is in the number of their sins for which they suffer punishment Wherefore the overthrowes of the enemies of the Church are no obscure testimony of the wrath of God against them even as God himselfe saith of Pharaoh To the same purpose have I stirred thee up that I might shew my power in thee Exod. 9. Rom. 9. and that my Name might be declared throughout all the earth Confession and constancy of Martyrs The testimony and constancy of Martyrs who sealing this doctrine with their bloud do shew in the very midst of most exquisite torments that they do so think indeed as they taught and are firmly perswaded in their hearts of the truth of that doctrine which they have professed and that they draw that comfort out of it which they did preach unto others to wit that for Christs sake they are truly the sons of God and that God careth for them in the houre and point of death God therefore sustaining them by this lively comfort thereby witnesseth that he affecteth the doctrine of the Church for which they suffer The piety of the writers and professors therof The true prety and holinesse of those who wrote the holy Scriptures and made open profession of the doctrine comprised therein For that Religion is most sacred divine which maketh men holy and acceptable unto God But the Patriarchs Prophets Apostles and others who heretofore have and now doe earnestly imbrace this doctrine farre exceed men of other Religions in true vertue and integrity as by the conference and comparison will appeare Wherefore it accordeth with reason that the doctrine of the Church rather then of any other Religion whatsoever is true and divine Their plaine dealing in detecting vices Their ingenuity and plain dealing in opening faults committed either by them or theirs whom the holy Ghost hath used in committing this doctrine to writing The testimony of the holâ— Ghost The testimony of the holy Ghost by whose in spiration the Scriptures were written the testimony I say of the holy Ghost in the hearts of them which beleeve that is to say a full faith and firm perswasion that the holy Scripture is the word of God that God according unto the tenour of this Scripture will be mercifull and good unto us which faith there followeth joyfulnesse resting on God and calling on his name with assured hope of obtaining both other good things which according to the prescript of this word we beg of him and even eternall life it selfe For this assent and assurance this lively consolation of the godly testeth neither on the testimony of man nor any other creature but it is the proper effect of the holy Ghost which effect how it is enflamed and strengthened by the same spirit through the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles read heard and meditated all the godly in a lively and certain feeling of their hearts have experience By this testimony of the holy Ghost all that are converted unto Christ have the certainty of heavenly doctrine mainly confirmed and surely sealed up in their hearts And this argument as it is proper unto the regenerate so it forceth their hearts alone not onely to credit the truth and authority of the holy Scripture but also perswadeth them to give an absolute assent thereunto and rest settled thereon All the other testimonies before alledged are common to those that are not converted unto Christ whom they also convict and stop the mouths of them that contradict this doctrine But of themselves they neither
day Likewise Galat. 5. â— Stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free Now if againe they reply that the office of Bishops is above the civill power 2 Instance The higher power doth more binde 1 Answer and therefore hath greater force than that to binde men to obey first wee grant that more obedience is due unto the superiour power then to the inferiour as long as it commandeth nothing contrary to Gods word As long therefore as the Ministers propound the word of God unto the Church and for avoiding of offence command such things to be observed as appertain to decency and order they do not now offend against them but against God whosoever obey them not But if they require their lawes concerning things different to be observed with putting an opinion of necessity in them and of the worship of God and doe make them necessary when there is no danger of offence to ensue because this charge is contrary to the word of God no obedience is due unto it Further we confesse that greater obedience is due unto the superiour power in those things in which it is superiour that is in which God would have other powers to obey it But the Ministeriall power is superiour unto the Civill in those things in which it is superiour that is which are of God delivered commanded and committed unto the Ministers that by them they may be declared unto the Church But In matters indifferent concerning which nothing is either commanded or forbidden of God the civill power is superiour by reason of the authority which God in these matters hath given unto the civill Magistrate and not to the Ministers of the Church 8 Object Fathers and Councels are cited But against this they returne againe That wee also doe alledge the testimonies of Councels and Fathers in confirming the doctrine of the Church which were but in vaine for us to doe if their sentences had not the force and authority of Ecclesiasticall doctrine But we never bring nor receive the testimonies of the ancient Church with that mind Answer as if without the authority of the holy Scripture they were sufficient for confirmation of any points of doctrine Neither yet is there regard had of them in vaine 2. Uses of the testimonies of Fathers in points of doctrine For 1. They which are rightly minded after they are instructed by the voice of the Scriptures concerning the truth are yet more confirmed by the Church as by a testimony of lower degree 2. They which attribute more authority unto them then they should or abuse their sayings against the truth are very well refuted by the testimony of them whom they have made their Judges Also they say 9 Object Traditions are order 1 Cor. 14. That order and decency in the Church is necessary by the commandement of God according as it is said Let all things be done comely and in order For God is not the authour of confusion Now the order and discipline of the Church doth a great part consist in traditions Ecclesiasticall wherefore they conclude that by the violating of these mens consciences are wounded Answ Of meere particulars there is no concluding A double liberty of the Church in matters of order and God offended But as God commandeth some order to be appointed and kept in the Church so hath he given a double liberty in it unto his Church To appoint it That it be arbitrary for the Church to appoint as may be most commodious for it what order shall be in every place and at every time observed To keep or not to keep it being appointed so it be without offence That also after any thing is certainly ordained it may be kept or not kept without hurt of conscience both of the whole Church and of every one of the godly if there be no danger of offence For it is necessary that ever a difference be put betwixt the commandements of God by the observing whereof God is worshipped and offended by the breaking of them and those things which God hath left to men to appoint neither is worshipped or offended as himselfe pronounceth either by the altering or omitting of them so long as there is no cause or danger of offence 1 Cor. 14.40 Galat. 5.1 Col. 2.16 And the same Apostle who commandeth all things to be done comely and in order willeth us to stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free and that we should be condemned of no man in meat or drinke or in respect of a holy-day Wherefore not they who without contempt of divine things or wantonnesse or danger of offence doe something otherwise in these things then is appointed but they rather offend against the commandement of God concerning keeping order who either would have no order in the Church or trouble that which is well appointed These men find fault also with the obscurity of the holy Scripture 10 Object Obscure things do not suffice without interpretation 1 Pet. 3.16 which they prove both by examples of hard places of Scripture and also out of Peter where it is said That there are some things hard to be understood in the Epistles of Paul And therefore sith that things darkly spoken without they be expounded cannot suffice to perfect and wholesome doctrine they urge that the interpretation of the Church also is necessary to be received with the Scripture But here above all things they injure the holy Ghost ascribing darknesse and obscurity unto him Answer The Minor is false if they respect the ground who of purpose endeavoured to apply himself in simplicity of speech to the capacity of the common people and the rudest For those things which appertaine to the ground of doctrine which is necessary to be known of all as are the articles of our Beliefe and the ten Commandements they are so plainly recited so often repeated so plentifully expounded in the Scriptures that they are open and easie to any but to him who will not learne even as the 119. Psalme teacheth where the word of the Lord is called a lanterne to our feet and a light to our pathes Againe the entrance into thy word sheweth light and giveth understanding to the simple The word of the Prophet is called a light shining in a darke place To which ye doe well that yee take heed as unto a light that shineth in a darke place untill the day dawne and the day-starre arise in your heart 2 Pet. 1.19 And Solomon affirmeth that hee writeth to give the simple sharpnesse of wit and to the child Prov. 1.4 20. knowledge and discretion Againe that wisedome cryeth without and uttereth her voice in the streets Paul also saith that Christ sent him to preach the Gospel 1 Corinth 1.17 1 Instance The ground of doctrine is unknowne to many Answ Yea to the reprobate 2 Cor. 4.3 Isa 65.2 Rom. 10.21 Psal 36.3 Mat. 11.25 not
imparted by the Apostles and every one of them did bestow some part thereof but that cannot be proved This reason may be rendred thereof more probable that it was called a Symbole for that the Articles of faith are the square and rule whereunto the faith and doctrine of all orthodox or right beleeving Christians ought to agree and be conferred The Symbole is called Apostolick Two reasons why the Creed is called Apostolick Because it containeth the summe of the Apostolick doctrine which the Catechumenes were enforced to hold and professe Because the Apostles delivered that summe of doctrine to their Schollers and Disciples which the Church afterwards held as received from them This selfe same Symbole is called also Catholick because there is but one faith of all Christians Why it is called Catholick An answer to a question moved touching other Creeds Here some demand a reason Why after the Apostles Creed other Creeds as the Creed of the Councell of Nice Ephesus and Chalcedon with Athanasius his Creed were compiled and received in the Church Answ These Creeds properly are not others that is quite different in substance from the Apostolick Symbole but are onely a repetition and more ample declaration of this in all which certain words are added as an explication thereof by reason of Hereticks by whom because of the shortnesse thereof this was depraved there is no change either of the matter or of the doctrine but only of the form of declaring it as easily appeareth by comparing them together Other important and weighty causes there were which might compell the Bishops and Doctors of ancient Churches to compose and draw out these briefe compendious formes of confession especially the Church then increasing Four causes why other Creeds were made and received in the Church and heresies growing with and in the Church For instance in few That all both young and old might with more ease bear in minde the main and entire foundation of Christianity comprised in briefe That all might alwayes have in their sight and view the confession of their faith and consolation reaped thence knowing what that doctrine is for which persecution is to be sustained So God in times past made a short summary abstract of his law and promises that all might have it as a rule of life and ground of consolation obvious to their eyes That the faithfull might have a peculiar badge and cognisan whereby to be distinguished both then and in all future ages from infidels and hereticks which with wily glosing sophismes corrupt the writings of the Prophets and Apostles for which very cause also these Confessions were intituled Symboles 4. That there might be some perpetuall rule extant in publike plain briefe and easie to be known whereby to examine all manner of doctrine and interpretation of Scripture to approve and ratifie whatsoever accordeth therewith and refuse and disanull the contrary The Apostolick Creed preferred above other Creeds because 1. The phrase of it is most proper 2. The time most ancient 3. The copy most authenticall Notwithstanding the Apostles Creed far surpasseth the rest in authority 1. Because for the most part it literally consisteth of the proper words and phrases of Scripture 2. Because it is of greater antiquity then other Creeds and was delivered first unto the Church by the Apostles themselves or by their disciples and schollers and since them successively from hand to hand transferred unto us their posterity 3. Because it is the fountaine and originall draught even an authenticall rule of direction to other Creeds which for illustration of this to prevent the fraudulent sleights and forged corruption of hereticks have in universall and generall Synods or Councels been published and authorised by the whole joint-consent of the Church The certainty of this Creed dependeth not on the authority and arbitrement of men or definitive sentence of Councels but on the perpetuall concordance of holy Scripture with them and of the whole Church since the Apostles time retaining and holding fast the Apostles doctrine and testifying to all posterity that they received this doctrine at the Apostles mouthes and the mouthes of their hearers which consent is obvious to any man that daigneth to view it with both eyes and weigh it considerately For certain it is that no Congregation of Angels nor conventicle of men hath any power of instituting new lawes touching the worship of God or new Articles of faith binding the conscience for this is a work proper unto God Neither may we beleeve God for the testimony of the Church but the Church for the testimony of God This doctrine touching the causes and authority of divers Creeds is borrowed out of Ursinus Admonit Neustad de Concordia Burgens written Anno Dom. 1581. where young Divines may if they list reade a large discourse touching the truth and authority of Ecclesiasticall Writers learnedly discussed from 117. page unto the 142. page of the said Tract a briefe Type and Table whereof I have here decyphered THE TABLE The writings touching the doctrine of the Church are 1. Divine that is inspired immediately by God into the hearts of the Prophets and Apostles such as are the Canonicall books of the old and new Testament These alone are simply in their sentences and words full of divine inâ—piration and worthy credit and therefore are the sole rule of tryall unto all others 2. Ecclesiasticall that is written by the Doctors of the Church these are 1. Publick to wit written in the common name of the whole Church which again are subdivided into writings 1. Catholick I meane Creeds and Confessions written in the name and with the full consent of the whole orthodox right beleeving Church received and allowed by the authority thereof such as are The Apostles Creed The Creeds of the Councels of Nice ConstaÌ„tinople Chalcedon Athanasius his Creed 2. Particular namely the Confessions of certain Churches and Councels as divers Catechismes and the Augustanâ— Confession 2. Private that is written in the name and by the advice of some one private man or more as Common places Commentaries and such like ON THE 8. SABBATH Quest 24. Into how many parts is the Creed divided Answ Into three parts The first is of God the eternall Father and our Creation The second of God the Son and our Redemption The third of God the holy Ghost and our Sanctification The Explication THe principall parts of the Apostolick Creed are three 1. Of God the Father and our Creation 2. Of God the Son and our Redemption 3. Of God the holy Ghost and our Sanctification that is of the works of our Creation Redemption and Sanctification Ob. 1. Unto the Father is ascribed the Creation of heaven and earth unto the Son the Redemption of mankind unto the holy Ghost Sanctification Therefore the Son and the holy Ghost did not create heaven and earth How our Creation Redemption Sanctification are each appropriated to some one person of the
Ghost whereof none repent and therefore it is not forgiven neither in this life nor in the life to come The other deniall is speciall and particular 2. Speciall which is the deniall of weaklings and is committed either through errour not voluntarily neither purposed or through feare of affliction when as not withstanding there remaineth still in the heart an inclination and griefe detesting that weaknesse and deniall and some purpose also to struggle out of it and to obey God by applying unto himselfe the promise of grace and by giving himselfe unto repentance Into this deniall may the Elect and Regenerate fall but they get out of it againe and returne unto the confession of the truth in this life as it is shewed and exemplified in Peter Matth. 26. thrice denying his Master through infirmity but at length repenting Dissembling of the truth Dissimulation or dissembling and hiding of the truth when as Gods glory and our neighbours safety requireth a confession of the truth which then requireth it when false opinions concerning God and his will or word or concerning the Church seeme to be confirmed and strengthened by our silence in the minds of men or when those things remaine secret and hidden which God will have knowne and manifest for the maintenance of his glory against the reproaches of the wicked for the convincing of the obstinate and for the instructing of those which are desirous to learn or lastly when our silence maketh us suspected to be approvers and abetters of the wicked So did the parents of the blind man dissemble and those chiefe Rulers also who would not confesse Christ for feare of the Jewes John 9.22 12.42 43. lest they should be cast out of the Synagogue Untimoly confession An unseasonable and untimely confession that is whereby without any advancing of Gods glory and without the furtherance of any ones safety and without any necessity of discharging his calling or duty there is stirred up either a derision and evill entertainment of the truth or the fiercenesse and cruelty of the enemies against the godly Such a confession whereas it doth rather darken then set forth the glory of God and rather hindereth then furthereth the safety of the Church swerveth plainly from the scope and end of true and lawfull confession and therefore is not a right using but an abusing of Gods Name Therefore Christ for biddeth it Give not that which is holy to dogges And Paul Matth. 7.6 Titus 3.10 Object 1 Pet. 3.15 Reject him that is an heretick after once or twice admonition c. Neither doth that crosse this which is said Be ready alwayes to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meeknesse and reverence For Peter willeth us to be alwayes in a readinesse or furnished to make answer concerning the summe and grounds of Christian doctrine and to repulse all slanders and cavils whereby the doctrine of the Gospel is traduced and defamed by the adversaries thereof yet so as that it is not necessary to utter and expound to every one but unto all those which require a reason and an account of our faith thereby either to learne it or know it or to judge of it But whom we see once to scoffe at the true doctrine which hath been expounded and confirmed unto them sufficiently if they againe require a reason and account of our faith we are not to make further answer For so Christ himselfe after he had sufficiently confessed and confirmed his doctrine by testimonies answereth nothing unto the High-Priest and Pilate touching the false witnesses And himselfe rendereth a reason of his silence If I shall tell you you will not beleeve me Matth. 26.63 and 27.14 Another reason is given by Esaiah He was oppressed and was afflicted and did not open his mouth that is because Christ knew he was to suffer according to his Fathers will after his cause was sufficiently defended he is not carefull of delivering his person from injuries contumelies and punishments for he knew that this obedience did tend to his fathers glory But contrariwise when the High-Priest adjureth him he confesseth himselfe to be Christ because then his silence would have given suspicion of contempt of the Name of God whereby he was adjured Object We doe not perceive who are swine and dogges wherefore we are to render a reason of our faith to all without putting any difference Answ Christ doth not call all wicked men swine or dogs but those only who contemne and make a mock of the doctrine confirmed which they have heard and which hath been expounded unto them 2. Christ willeth us not to judge of dogs and swine by the secrets of their hearts but by their present words and deeds If againe it be replyed In matters of difficulty and such as are hard to be judged except there be delivered some certaine and exact rule to judge and deale mens consciences are left wavering and in doubt But if also we are to judge of the outward shew of swine and dogs it is hard to pronounce who are to accounted for swine and dogs Therefore mens consciences are left in doubt unto whom and when confession must be made The Minor is false for Christ will have none to be counted for dogs and swine but such as shew manifest stubbornnesse and obstinacy in their words and deeds of whom it is no hard thing to judge out of the word of God And further the holy Ghost is promised unto all that aske him by whom their judgements and actions may be directed that they erre not And lastly seeing in this life we attaine not unto the perfection of Gods law neither in other things neither in this point they who joyne the desire of Gods direction with an earnest care of Gods glory and love of their neighbour may and ought to be certaine and assured either that their counsels are so ruled by the holy Ghost that they erre not or if they erre that yet their error is pardoned and forgiven them And this certainly sufficeth for the retaining of a good conscience If lastly it be objected that Tyrants and many Magistrates which persecute the Church are swine and dogges and therefore we according to Christs commandement are not to make answer unto them if they demand our Religion We answer that this reason is a fallacy of the accident For if the Magistrate demand our Religion or any other by their commission and in their name we are necessarily to make answer of our confession unto them both in respect of their office whereunto we owe obedience and also in respect of Gods glory according as it is said of Christ Marke 8 3â— Whosoever shall be ashamed of me and of my words among this adulterous and sinfull generation Matth. 10. Luke 12. of him shall the Sonne of man be ashamed also when he cometh in the glory of his Father with
dead after they are consumed by wormes by the power of God which notwithstanding they beleeve But what we beleeve and determine concerning God must not be measured by the shallow capacitie of humane reason from which the nature of God is most distant but rather according to his divine will revealed in his word Now these testifie that the true and eternall God is but one in number and essence 1 Cor. 8.4 Deut. 6.4 Heare O Israel the Lord our God is one Lord to wit in essence For the name Jehovah in Hebrew is from being and properly signifieth essence or being Hee is also three in persons Father Son and holy Ghost Hebr. 12.2 For Christ who is the author and finisher of our faith being willing that in the New Testament all the Gentiles should by a new sacrament be consecrated into one faith and worship of one true God commanded all to be baptised in the Name of the Father Son and holy Ghost as it were in the name and faith of one true God consisting of these three hypostases or persons For the Father is expresly called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or divine person Heb. 1.3 Now such as is the Father such is the Son and such is the holy Ghost Article 4. Neither are we baptised but in the Name of the divine hypostasis or person the Son then is a divine hypostasis also and so is the holy Ghost And these three divine hypostases are one and the eternall God S. John did more cleerly expresse this mysterie of the Trinitie in unitie saying There are three that beare record in heaven the Father the Word and the holy Ghost 1 John 5.7 and these three are one He calls the Son the Word usually Now by these three witnesses in Heaven he understands either three Gods or three divine persons But not three Gods for God is one therefore the three divine persons are understood And he sayes that these three are one either in essence or in personalitie but not in personalitie for so they could not be three therefore in essence And for this cause he teacheth that these three are one God in their will and consent of witnessing It may be easily proved that this mysterie of the faith was not altogether unknowne to the Fathers of the Old Testament but not so cleerly manifest to all of them as now And it is no wonder seeing the full revelation both of this and of other mysteries were reserved for the ministry of the Son of God manifested in the flesh John 1.18 as the finisher of our faith by Johns testimony No man hath seen God at any time the onely begotten Son which is in the bosome of the Father he hath declared him What the enemies of the blessed Trinitie out of humane reason or out of Scripture maliciously depraved use to dispute against this doctrine shall be explained in the progresse of our disputation 4. Neither confounding As the Noetian Sabellian Patrispassian Hereticks did who as they held but one God so they would acknowledge but one person sometime of the Father sometime of the Son sometime of the holy Ghost using this reason for a principle at this day common to Jewes Mahumetans and Hereticks That of one individuall nature there can be but one hypostasis or person which indeed is true of a finite and created individuall nature but of the divine infinite uncreated nature it is false as divine Oracles doe evince 5. Nor dividing the essence As the Tritheits doe and have done multiplying the essence of God with the divine persons against Scripture ARTICLE III. 6. For there is one person of the Father another of the Son another of the holy Ghost 7. But the divinitie of the Father Son and holy Ghost is one the glory equall the majesty co-eternall The Declaration 6. FOr there is one The distinction of the persons that one is not the other but the Father is one the Son another and the holy Ghost another is evidently taught in Scripture John 5.32 There is another who beareth witnesse of mee and who sent mee even the Father he it is that hath testified of mee John 14.26 But the Comforter which is the holy Ghost whom the Father will send in my Name John 14.16 I will pray the Father and he shall give you another Comforter But how the persons are distinguished it followes in the eighth Article 7. But of the Father and of the Son Here the consubstantialitie and co-equalitie of the divine persons is asserted against Arians and Photinians according to Scripture John 10.30 I and my Father are one to wit in the divine essence and therefore in strength and power but in respect of the humane nature the Father and Son are not one John 5.7 And these three are one to wit in respect of the divinitie and therefore in the unitie of will and testimonie So we are baptised not in the names of three but in the name as of one true God John 5.18 and Joh. 10.33 The Jewes understood that Christ made himselfe equall with God but he did not equall himselfe with God in his humane nature for so they might truly have said that he had blasphemed but in the glory of his divinitie and divine operations John 16.15 All things that the Father hath are mine therefore that one and co-eternall majesty of the divinitie which the Father hath is also the Sons and likewise the holy Ghosts For the Father and Son neither are nor were from eternitie without the holy Ghost therefore of the three there is one divinitie an equall glory and co-eternall majestie ARTICLE IV. 8. Such as the Father is such is the Son and such is the holy Ghost the Father uncreate the Son uncreate and the holy Ghost uncreate the Father immense the Son immense and the holy Ghost immense the Father eternall the Son eternall and the holy Ghost eternall 9. And yet not three eternalls but one eternall as there are not three uncreated nor three incomprehensible but one uncreated and one incomprehensible The Declaration 8. SUch as the Father Here is declared the co-equalitie and consubstantialitie of the divine persons by the identitie of Gods essentiall attributes because as the Father so the Son and holy Ghost is uncreated immense eternall Of the Father no man doubts The Son is also uncreated because hee was in the beginning of the creation and he was God and all things were made by him John 1.1 3. and nothing was made without him which was made He is also immense Hebr. 1.2 because he makes his aboad with the Father and dwells in the hearts of all the faithfull John 14.23 Ephes 3.17 And He is with us alwaies even to the end of the world Likewise eternall Mat. 28.20 because before the foundation of the mountaines were laid before the hills he was borne Prov. 8.25 John 1.1 And he is Alpha and Omega the beginning and ending the first and the last Revel 1.8
not only is still unknowne to the wiseest and most sharp-witted of men Angels in part ignorant of the Gospel till they were informed by the word of Christ unlesse they be taught by the voice of the Church and efficacy of the Spirit but also in a great part was unknown to the Angels themselves before it was disclosed by the Son from the secret bosome of his eternall Father Which to unfold and praise if men and Angels should bend all the strength of wit and eloquence 1 Pet 1.12 yet were they never able to speak of it according to the due compasse and worth of the thing Whiles therefore I think with my self how much I might sinke under this charge I had rather it were committed to another who at least might somewhat better and more successively undergoe the same But when I well weigh the nature of mine office I perceive I ought with all cheerefulnesse both to help forward your salvation and obey God that calls me to so honourable an imployment especially he promising mee assistance with which whosoever are assisted may despaire in nothing for God will be effectuall by weak and abject meanes according to that of the Psalmist Out of the mouthes of babes and sucklings hast thou ordained strength Psal 8.2 The word there used signifieth a child which beginneth to understand and speak There are that are commonly called children not onely in regard of age but also in regard of ability of understanding Two sorts of children or performance of any action Infants though such in age are sufficient witnesses of the divine goodnesse and providence being cleare evidences of Gods presence in the wonderfull propagation conservation and education of humane off-spring Humane off-spring an argument a gainst Atheists denying God abundantly confuting Divels and all Atheists that deny either God to be God or to be such a God as hee hath said himselfe 〈…〉 Our Saviour interpreteth that saying of the Psalmist of confession Acts 17.27 28 29. Mat. 21.16 In which kind it agreeth unto us all who do meditate or speak any thing concerning God For we are all infants in understanding and utterance In some kind wee are all infants touching all matters divine In this life we attain but some small beginnings of those things as the Emperour Gratian in his confession to Ambrose piously and truely writes We speak saith hee of God not what we ought but what we are able yea the Prophets and the Apostles themselves confesse the same thing 1 Cor. 13.9 For we know in part and we prophesie in part but when that which is perfect is come then that which is in part shall be done away And in v. 12. Now we see through a glasse darkely but then face to face But notwithstanding the beginnings wee learne are small and also the voice of the ministery be proportioned to our capacity therein God himself speaking with us as with babes and permitteth us like babes to speak to him yet so would the Lord have the doctrine touching himselfe to be known No hope of life to come but by knowing the things revealed concerning God as that he gives us no hope of another life by any other means Yea those beginnings whatsoever they are doe with so great a distance surpasse all humane wisedome that there is no comparison between it and them for these rudimennts which to reason are hidden wisdome are both necessary and sufficient to everlasting salvation Let us therefore not onely acknowledge our infancy but desire also to be of the number of sucking babes For as the babe growes not to ripenesse of man-hood unlesse he be fed with the mothers milk or convenient food so we likewise that we may not fail of our hoped perfection 1 Pet. 1.1 2. ought not to refuse the milk of the Word whereby we are nourished and suckled to eternall life This is that spirituall infancy well pleasing to the Lord as Christ witnesseth rebuking the Pharisees disdain of the childrens cry in the Temple Hosanna to the Son of David These are those infants in whose voice the Lord will be effectuall By whose mouthes as the Psalmist addeth hee perfecteth strength Psal 8.2 Mollerus upon the 8. Psal v. 2. A description of the kingdom of Christ or as they translate who weigh the originall foundeth a kingdome Hee speaketh of the strength or kingdome which is seen in this life called the kingdome of Christ which is the Son of God instituting and preserving of a ministery thereby gathering a Church quickning beleevers by the sound of the Gospel and sanctifying them by the holy Spirit to eternall life defending the Church in this life against the kingdome of the Divell and after this life raising them up holy to eternall life that in them may reign the Godhead evidently and not covertly by the ministery The foundation of Christs kingdome is Christ and how many waies That which is the foundation of this kingdome St. Paul declares 1 Cor. 3.11 Other foundation can no man lay than that is laid which is Jesus Christ Christ is the foundation first in his proper person Because all the members of his kingdom namely the Saints being conjoyned and inserted into him doth he carry about him keeping and holding them together as the foundation doth the other parts of the building as the vine doth its branches Then again by his doctrine For as good laws are the sinews of a politicall-kingdom so this kingdom is gathered kept and governed by the doctrine concerning Christ And as without a foundation the building cannot consist Phil. 3.8 so unlesse we hold to Christ and what he is and what he hath done for us whatsoever else may seem to be piety or comfort it 's fading it 's 〈…〉 nothing This foundation is laid in the mouths of infants when they beleeving this same doctrine upon their hearing of it do by the incitement of the holy Spirit learne and imbrace the same and thereby are ingraffed and grow into one with Christ In this businesse of maine importance God useth our infancy to illustrate his glory The greatnes of the work Why God useth weake means for the conversion of them and weaknes of the instrument plainly proving that so great a matter is not effected or dependent by and on our but Gods effectuall power Also to the end it might blunt the insolencie of his adversaries when as their lofty power is subdued under our weaknes and our seeming folly evinceth that nothing is more foolish than their wisdom As it is said In silence and hope shall be your strength For the Son of God destroyeth the works of the Divel snatching from him them that beleeve remitting their sin and taking it away and beginning in them eternall life defending the Church accusing and laying open the malice of the enemies repressing and punishing them both in this present life and at the full deliverance of the Church from all
teaching 1 Cor. 3.2 thus he saith I have fed you with milk and not with meat for hitherto ye were not able to beare it nor yet now are ye able 5. Motive that alwaies in the Church there hath bin such a summe of doctrine for ye are yet carnall From the first beginning of the Church there hath bin extant in it some such ground of doctrine well known publikely and for it's briefnesse and plainnesse easie to be understood reserved for posterity As together with the increase of mankind God himself proceeded on with his own mouth to deliver more summary doctrines either of the law as he began in these words If thou doest well Gen. 4.7 shalt thou not be accepted Or of the Gospel as at first in these words The seed of the woman shall bruise the Serpents head Gen. 3.15 Likewise after both the promise and the Decalogue was repeated to Abraham At last the Creeds and such summary doctrines as were dispersed here and there in the writings of the Apostles were fitted into a meet form of Confession to be divine informations for all degrees of age And indeed this our accustomed manner of instructing which we call Catechisme hath bin anciently used both in the Jewish and in the Apostolicall Church as doth appeare by the Apostle Paul Rom. 2.18 where he calleth the Jewes those that from their tender yeares had bin instructed or catechised out of the law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. And Gal. 6.6 Let him that is taught in the word or catechised in the word communicate to him that instructeth or catechiseth in all good things So Luke 1.4 That thou mightest know the certainty of those things wherein thou hast bin instructed or câ—â—â—â—hised Because these testimonies are to be preferred before all other I dâ—edâ—u recite the example of the Church that was in the ensuing times next after the Apostles being a thing publikly known by histories I rather adde this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That if the now present Church surviving hath till now kept this forme of instruction brought into the world with so long continuance 6. Motive the dangers and heresies of the last times not by mans device but by the divine providence then in this doting old age of the world wherin the Church doth daily more and more languish thicker darknes day by day over-cloudeth it we had need for to sharpen all our diligence of preserving and propagating this doctrine rather than any whit to grow remisse For this is the age of which our Saviour speaketh Mat. 24.23 Then if any man shall say unto you Lo here is Christ or there beleeve it not for there shall arise false Christs and false Prophets and shall shew great signes and wonders insomuch as if it were possible they shall deceive the very Elect. And largely doth Saint Paul speak of this matter 1 Tim. 4. and 2 Tim. 3. These predictions of the calamities of these last times were written not only for our consolation and confirmation but also for exhortation of us to arme our selves to watch against and prevent errours for so our Saviour begins that his prophecie Take heed that no man deceive you We thinke it necessary therefore that not only they that come into the place of teaching Mat. 24.3 but also all that love their owne salvation should have fixed in their hearts the sound positions concerning every part of christian religion and on the other side to the utmost that every man is able to be well fenced against the contrary errors and that all they to whom the office of instructing and governing is committed should with great care teach or cause to be taught those that are committed to their charge unless they as curats negligent unfaithfull in their duty had rather answer for their perdition And indeed the desire of your parents in this respect is to be commended that they will have the summe of godlines to be propounded to and inculcated into you not only at home and in the Church but also in the schools For they well perceived what great ignorance ensued and how great an hint opportunity was given to the Divel of detaining men in that ignorance when once the primitive custome of the Church of hearing and teaching the Catechists was lost and in the room thereof succeeded that silly and foolish dumb shew of Popish confirmation And they now see that the same things or worse than these are now to be feared unlesse God out of his singular mercy looke upon us than the which danger as scarce any thing can bring greater heavines to all godly persons so contrariwise it 's not easie to finde out any thing that may be more desirable and pleasant unto all pious Parents than if they can certainly promise themselves that their children and nephewes shall a while live after them in the same light of divine truth which now is lighted up amongst us Wherefore if we are not without naturall affection 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 1.31 and cruell against those which love us more than themselves let us endeavour to our power that by our negligence we do not destroy their hope nor crosse their prayers But that together with them we may shew our selves thankfull unto God who collecting to himself a perpetual Church out of the dregs of this world hath by the bringing back againe of the sunne of heavenly doctrine so dispelled the dirs ass of the kingdom of Antichrist that any man that will not wilfully in â—his eyes and eares and oppose the known truth may behold and diserne them stripped naked of those divel-deceits which were those faire outsides of which they vauntingly bragged 7 Motive the benefit if we do the punishment if we doe not study this doctrine If we doe these things the Sonne of God will conserve and augment those gifts that he hath bestowed upon us according to his promise To him that hath i. to him that desireth to goe on forward shall be given If we doe contrariwise then will follow upon us that which is threatned in the contrary sentence following from him that hath not shall be taken that which he hath Mat. 25.29 And indeed how the Lord will not endure the contempt of the Gospel revealed both the divine word of God and the continuall history of the world doth proclaim Isa 5.24 Because they have cast away the law of the Lord of hosts despised the word of the holy One of Israel therefore is the anger of the Lord kindled against his people and he hath stretched forth his hand against them and hath smitten them And Amos 5.11 He threatens Behold the daies come saith the Lord God that I will send a famine in the Land not a famine of bread not a thirst for water but of hearing the word of God And they shall wander from sea to sea and from the North even to the East they shall runne
to other men if indeed we neglect it we both make our Religion to be suspected shall undergo greater punishment for our negligence ignorance Neither would the Lord have the care keeping of the doctrine of Religion committed to us Scholars chiefly only for our own cause but others For the Learned themselves understanding the termes and method of the doctrine of Religion it is expected they should instruct and interpret unto others Seeing therefore Religion is to be taught in the Schooles as unto children to the end that it may be rightly taught Catechisme is necessary Neither indeed can this age learne unlesse brevity be used Nor can the parts of a discipline be dextrously and with due proportion of agreement between them be handled either by teachers or learners unlesse they first conceive in their mindes some short summ of the same For both these respects is it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that we read such oft repetitions in the holy Scriptures of brief summes of things As Repent and beleeve the Gospel He that shall beleeve and be baptized shall be saved War you a good warfare keeping faith and a good conscience And seeing that it is said Colos 3.16 Let the word of Christ dwell in you plenteously in all wisedome Explications must be added aggreeable to the speeches of the Prophets and the Apostles Neither is a Catechisme any thing else but a briefe explication of such speeches But because the little book called Melanchthons Examen is of that nature which I propound to you and the Authour hath comprised with great fidelity dexterity the heads of Christian Religion under an apt and perspicuous stile of words as also it is of no small consequence that a like form of Catechisme should be extant in sundry Churches stir up your selves to learn and conceive that these wretched papers of ours are swadling-bands wherein Christ will be found swadled up You see many are the things which doe commend these Swathels unto you and seriously exhort you to the imbracing of them by which I humbly beseech you to delight in them as the commandement of God your own salvation the duty we owe to posterity the example of the more reformed Church your condition of life your present age your desires and hope imminent dangers and the rewards and punishments to be expected from God But however our admonitions may be necessary yet of none effect we well know without the suggestions of the holy Spirit Therefore turning our selves unto God let us give thanks to him that his will was we should be born in this light of the Gospel and pray that wee may be taught and governed of him CERTAIN PREAMBLES on that Catechisme of Christian Religion which is delivered and taught in the Churches and Schooles throughout the Dominions of the County Palatine THe Preambles or preparatory Prefaces to this Catechisme are partly Generall concerning the whole Doctrine of the Church and partly Speciall concerning Catechisme alone The Generall Prefaces touching the Doctrine of the Church are seven 1 What and what manner of doctrine the doctrine of the Church is 2 What are the parts thereof and what the differences of each part 3 Wherein it differeth from the doctrine of other Sects and from Philosophie also and why these differences are to be retained 4 Whence it may appeare that it alone came from God 5 By what testimonies the certainty thereof is confirmed 6 For what cause no other doctrine besides is to be received in the Church 7 How manifold is the course of teaching and learning this doctrine 1 What and what manner of doctrine the doctrine of the Church is THE doctrine of the Church is the entire and uncorrupt doctrine of the Law and Gospel touching the true God The definition of the doctrine of the Church and his will workes and worship which doctrine is revealed by God himselfe comprised in the writings of the Prophets and Apostles and confirmed by sundry miracles and divine testimonies by which the Holy-Ghost worketh powerfully in the hearts of Gods chosen and collecteth unto himselfe out of mankinde an everlasting Church in which he may be glorified both in this life and in the life to come This doctrine is the chiefe and speciall note of the true Church which God will have eminent in the world and severed from the rest of mankinde according unto these sayings of Scripture Fly Idols Come out from amongst them and separate your selves If there come any unto you and bring not THIS DOCTRINE 1 John 5.21 2 Cor. 6.17 2 John 10. Esay 52.11 Rev. 18.4 bid him not God speed Be yee holy touch no uncleane thing yee that beare the vessels of the Lord. Goe out of her my people that yee receive not of her plagues Now God will have this separation made 1. His glory For his owne glory For as hee will not have himselfe coupled with Idols and Divels So hee will have his truth severed from falshood and lyes 2. Reasons why God will have his Church distinguished from other Sects and his houshold separated from the enemies of the Church that is from the children of Sathan It were contumelious so to thinke of God as that he will have such children as persecute him 2 Cor 6.15 It were blasphemy to make God the author of impious doctrine and patron of the blasphemous For What concord hath Christ with Belial 2. The salvation of his Elect. The consolation and salvation of his Elect. For it is necessary that the Church be visibly beheld in this world that the Elect dispersed throughout all mankind may know to what society they are to joine themselves and being gathered unto the Church may lay hold on this sound comfort That they are of that company which is acceptable and pleasing unto God and hath the promises of everlasting life For God will that all which are to be saved be gathered unto the Church in this life because without the Church there is no salvation 3. Notes whereby the Church is distinguished from other Sects How the Church is knowne and what are her badges and markes whereby shee is distinguished from other Sects is at large discoursed of in the tract of the Church The notes are three 1. Purity of doctrine 2. The right use of the Sacraments 3. Obedience towards God in every point of doctrine whether of faith or of manners Object Yea but oftentimes great vices abound in the Church also Answ I confesse indeed many times great vices over-grow the whole body of the Church but they are not patronised or maintained as falleth out in other Sects nay the true Church is the first her selfe that reprehendeth and condemneth them before any other In the Church faults are committed but with present reproofe and speedy reformation As long as this remaineth so long remaineth the Church 2 What are the parts of the doctrine of the Church and what the differences of each part
as we neither reject nor contemne the testimony of the true Church so we doubt not but their opinion is pestilent and detestable who do often say that the holy Scriptures have not their authority else-where then from the word of the Church 1 Reason The reproach of God For first wicked is it and blasphemous to say that the authority of Gods Word dependeth of the testimony of man And if it be so that the chiefest cause why we beleeve that the Scriptures were delivered from heaven be the witnesse of the Church who seeth not that hereby the authority of a mans voice is made greater then the voice of God For he that yeeldeth his testimony unto another so that he is the only or the chiefe cause why credence is given unto the other out of all doubt greater credit is given unto him then unto the other who receiveth his testimony Wherefore it is a speech most unworthy the majesty of God that the voice of God speaking in his holy Book is not acknowledged except it be confirmed by the witnesse of men 2 Reason Our comfort Faith is grounded on approved witnesse therefore not on mans Secondarily whereas the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles doth preach of so great matters as the certaine knowledge whereof is so greatly desired of all who are well disposed and the conflicts of doubtfulnesse in all mens minds are so great what full assurance of our faith can there be what sure consolation against assaults or temptations if that that voice on which our confidence relieth be no otherwise knowne unto us to be indeed the voice of God but because men say so in whom we see so much ignorance errour and vanity to be that no man scarcely especially in matters of some weight doth attribute much unto their word except other reason concurre with it 3 Reason The confutation of our enemies Thirdly the truth of God and Christian Religion is plainly exposed unto the mocks and scoffes of the wicked if we going about to stop their mouths doe therefore only desire that we should be credited that our Religion is from God because our selves say so For if they be by no other confutation repressed they will with no lesse shew of truth deny it then we affirme it 4 Reason Witnesses Last of all the Scripture it selfe in many places is against this opinion and doth challenge a far higher authority unto it selfe then which hangeth upon mens words For so saith Christ himselfe I receive not the record of man signifying thereby John 5. that his doctrine stood not no not on John Baptists testimony although yet he did alledge it but as of lesse account that he might omit nothing by which men might be moved to beleeve Therefore he addeth But I say these things that you may beleeve I have a greater witnesse then the witnesse of John And if Christ now being humbled said these things of himselfe then surely shall they be no lesse true of him being in glory and sitting in his Throne Paul saith 1 Cor. 2. My word and my preaching stood not in entising speech of mans wisdome but in plaine evidence of spirit and of power that your faith should not be in the wisdome of men but in the power of God If so be then our faith must not rest no not upon reasons wisely framed by men much lesse shall it depend on the bare word of men Ephes 2. The Church her selfe is said to be built upon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles If then the confidence and confession of the Church stayeth on the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles as on the foundation the certainty of Scripture cannot hang on the Churches witnesse for so should not the Church be upheld by the testimony of the Prophets and Apostles but by her owne And it is said 1 John 5. If we receive the witnesse of men the witnesse of God is greater If it be greater then the authority of it hangeth not on the record of man but we are to give more credence unto God witnessing the Prophets and Apostles writings to be indeed his voice then unto the Church affirming the same 1 Object That they are true the Church alone doth witnesse Ans The Minor is false Now that it is said of the contrary That by the Churches record alone it doth appeare unto us that the sacred bookes which wee have were written by the Prophets and Apostles whose names they beare in their fore-head and that even unto us they are come uncorrupt this we grant not For God far more certainly testifieth both in Scripture and in the hearts of his Saints that no feigned or forged thing is in these books then it can be by the Church and all the creatures of the world confirmed They therefore who stand upon the Churches testimony alone in this point shew that themselves have not as yet felt or understood the chiefest testimony 2 Object The discerning of books Ans The Minor is false 1 The working of the holy Ghost Furthermore they say That the bookes authenticke or as they terme them Canonicall of both Testaments are discerned from the Apocryphall by the Churches judgement and therefore that the authority of holy Canon doth depend on the Churches wisdome But that this difference of the bookes is not determined by the Churches judgement but being imprinted into the bookes themselves by the Spirit of God is onely acknowledged and approved by the Church this is easily to be understood if the causes of this difference be considered For either in these which are called Apocryphall the force and majesty of the heavenly Spirit doth lesse evidently appeare in the weight and vehemency of word and matter then in others of which it is cleere that they are the heavenly Oracles 2 The certainty of Authors set down in writing by the divine instinct that they might be the rule of our faith or it cannot be determined neither out of these bookes themselves nor out of others which are Canonicall that they were written either by the Prophets or Apostles because either they were not opened by those whom God by certain testimonies hath warranted unto us to be endued with a Propheticall spirit or themselves doe not shew any certain Authours of them or by their form of speech or other reasons it may be gathered that they were not left of them whose names they beare Now as touching either this evidence of spirit or certainty of the authours we build not our judgement on the testimony of the Church but of the bookes themselves And therefore not for the Churches judgement only do we judge some books to be Canonicall and the foundation and rule of our faith and do therefore accept of the doctrine of other some because they agree with the Canonicall but rather for the very cause of this difference which we find in the bookes themselves 3 Object The Church is more
time after it and are Novices in respect thereof Whereas then undoubtedly the ancientest Religion is most true for men received the first Religion that ever was immediately from God it followeth that the doctrine of the Church alone is true and divine Miracles The miracles whereby God from the beginning of the world confirmed the truth of this doctrine such as the Divell is not able to imitate in deed nay not to resemble in shew I meane The raising of the dead the standing still or going backe of the Sun Luke 7. Josh 10.13 2 Kin. 20. Exod. 14. 2 Kin. 2. Gen. 18. the dividing of the sea and rivers the making of the barren fruitfull and such like which miracles whereas they are the workes of God alone wrought for the confirmation of the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles and God cannot give testimony unto a lye do powerfully evince that this doctrine is most true and proceedeth from God For albeit mention is made also of some miracles of the Heathen 1 Object Others also have miracles Ans It is not true and it is said of Antichrist and false prophets that they shall worke signes and great wonders so that the very elect themselves if it were possible should be seduced yet these neither in number not in greatnesse are equall unto the miracles of the Church and by the end for which they are done it may easily be discerned that they are not wrought by any divine power Wherefore there is a double difference especially by which true miracles are severed from false For first Those miracles which are vaunted of by the enemies of the Church are such as without changing course and order of nature They differ 1 In the substance may be done by the sleights and jugglings of men or Divels and seem therefore to others to be miracles because they perceive not the causes of them and the means wherby they are wrought Furthermore they have this as their chiefe end that they confirme Idols superstitions 2 In the ends manifest errours and mischiefes But the miracles with which God hath set forth his Church are workes either besides or contrary unto the course of nature and second causes and therefore not wrought but by the power of God The which that it might be the more manifest God hath wrought many miracles for the confirming of his truth whose very shew the divel is never able to imitate or resemble as the aforesaid miracles raising of the dead to stay or call backe the course of the Sunne to make fruitlesse and barren women fruit full But specially the miracles of God are distinguished by their ends from the divellish and feigned For they confirme nothing but that which is agreeing with those things which aforetime were revealed by God and that in respect of the glory of the true God of godlinesse and holinesse and the salvation of men And therefore it is said of the miracles of Antichrist 2 Thesâ—â— That his coming shall be by the working of Sathan with all power and signes and lying wonders and in all deceivablenesse of unrighteousnesse among them that perish c. Now 2 Object They are doubtfull if any be so bold as to call in question whether or no the miracles which are reported in the Scriptures were done so indeed he is out of all question of very great impudency Ans The Antecedent is false For hee may after the same manner give the lye to all both sacred and profane histories But let us first understand that as other parts of the holy story so especially the miracles are recited as things not wrought in a corner but done in the publike face of the Church and mankind In vaine should the Prophets and Apostles have endevoured to get credit unto their doctrine by miracles which men had never seen Furthermore the doctrine which they brought was strange unto the judgement of reason and contrary to the affections of men and therefore their miracles except they had been most manifest would never have found credit Also it cleerly appeareth both in the miracles themselves and in the doctrine which is confirmed by them that they who writ them sought not their own glory or other commodities of this life but only the glory of God and mens salvation To these arguments agreeth not only the testimony of the Church but the confession also of the very enemies of Christ who surely if by any meanes they could would have denied and suppressed even those things that were true and knowne much lesse would they have confirmed by their testimony ought that had been forged or obscure Oracles The Oracles and Prophecies of things to come verified by their events of which sort many are found in the books of either Testament whose heavenly fountaine and head-spring is evidently demonstrated in that it is the property of God alone to utter true Oracles Consent in the parts of doctrine The consent of each part of the doctrine of the Church For that doctrine which is contrary unto it selfe is neither true nor of God sith that truth consorteth with truth and God contradicteth not himselfe But the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles alone except all other Religions manifoldly jarre discord and mutinize within themselves even in their very foundation and chiefe points Wherefore the doctrine of the Church alone is true and divine Enemies confession Luke 4.41 The confession of very enemies Because the Divell himselfe is enforced to cry out Thou art the Christ the Sonne of God and other enemies are constrained to confesse that this our doctrine is true for whatsoever goodnesse and truth they have in their Religions the selfe-same hath our Religion and that more cleerly and soundly disciphered and they may easily be convicted to have stollen it from our Religion and intermingled it with their owne forgeries as indeed it is the custome of the Divell through Apish imitation of God to mingle some truth with his manifold falshoods that thereby he may the more cunningly and easily deceive men Whence it ariseth that these things which other Sects have agreeable with our doctrine cannot therefore be refelled because they have borrowed them of us but those things which are contrary to our doctrine are at the first on set overthrown because they are the inventions of men Sathan and wicked mens hatred thereof The hatred of Satan and his instruments exercised against this doctrine For certainly that doctrine is true and divine which all the wicked yea and Satan himselfe with joynt conspiracy despite and endevour to abolish For Truth hatcheth hatred and John 8.44 The Divell is a lyar from the beginning and abode not in the truth But Satan and the world oppugne not nor hate more eagerly any doctrine then the doctrine of the Church because forsooth it accuseth them more sharply and handleth them more rigorously it oftner calleth their cavils into tryall sifreth and discovereth their
Sciences so in the study of Divinity wee hardly and slowly conceive the grounds thereof nay all our knowledge is confuse and imperfect unlesse every part of the whole doctrine be delivered by the Professors and Readers and conceived by the Auditors and Hearers in some method and order Orderly delivery thereof in publick That the Students of Divinity may hereafter plainly and orderly deliver unto their auditory a briefe summe of this whole doctrine necessary it is that they themselves first carry in their understanding a complete frame as it were and perfect body thereof Invention and judgement of the interpretation of Scripture It is farther necessary to the finding out and judging of the true and naturall interpretation of Scripture which whereas it ought to square with faith that is to say to impeach no point of this heavenly doctrine of necessity the Interpreter must have an absolute knowledge of the main grounds and foundation thereof Examination of controversies in the Church It is needfull for the increase of judgement in Ecclesiasticall controversies which are divers difficult and dangerous lest perhaps otherwise we be carried head-long from truth into errour 3 Reading and meditation The third course of the study of Divinity is the reading and diligent meditation of the Scripture or holy Writ And this is the highest degree of the study of Divinity for which Catechisme and Common places are learned to wit that we may come furnished to the reading understanding and propounding of the holy Scripture For Catechisme and Common places as they are taken out of the Scripture and are directed by the Scripture as by their rule so againe they conduct and lead us as it were by the hand unto the Scripture Catechisme pertaineth unto the first part of the study of Divinity whereof it followeth that we presently discourse The Speciall Preambles touching CATECHISME THE Speciall Prefaces touching CATECHISME are these five which follow 1 What Catechising or Catechisme is 2 Whether it hath bin alwaies practised and of the originall thereof in the Church 3 What are the chiefe points thereof 4 The reasons why it is necessary 5 What is the scope and end thereof 1 What Catechisme is THE Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 cometh from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as also 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is derived from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The significations of the word Catechisme both these words signifie in their common and largest sense to resound to instruct by word of mouth and to rehearse another mans sayings But properly to teach the rudiments and elements of any doctrine whatsoever and more properly in Church phrase to deliver the first principles of Christian Religion in which sense we read it used Luke 1.4 Acts 18.25 Gal. 6.6 c. So then this word Catechisme signifieth in a generall and common sense the first briefe and A B C Lecture in whatsoever doctrine delivered by word of mouth But as the Church useth it it signifieth an institution of the ruder sort in the elements of Christian doctrine Wherefore Catechisme is a briefe and plaine exposition and a rehearsall of Christian doctrine The definition of Catechisme framed for the capacity of the ruder sort select and gathered out of the writings of the Prophets and Apostles and drawne into certaine questions and answers Or Catechisme is a briefe summe of the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles delivered by mouth unto the simple and ignorant and exacted or required againe at their hands What the Catechumeni in the Primitive Church were and how many sorts of them 1 Ancient Converts Catechumeni in the Primitive Church were those who learned the Catechisme that is to say such as were now of the Church and were instructed in the principles and beginnings of Christian Religion Of the Catechumeni there were two sorts Some of good yeares and ripe age who of Jewes and Gentiles became Christians but were not yet baptised These were first instructed in the Catechisme and afterwards baptised and admitted to the Lords supper Such a Catechumene was Augustine when of a Manichee hee became a Christian Austen and hee whiles hee was yet but a Catechumene wrote many bookes before hee was baptised of Ambrose Ambrose Such a Catechumene was Ambrose when hee was chosen Bishop of Millaine the urgent necessity of the state of that Church so requiring for suppressing the pestilent heresie wherewith the Arrians had infected it Otherwise Paul forbiddeth a Novice or Catechumene to be chosen Bishop For the Neophiti or Novices were those Catechumeni who as yet were not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Tim. 3.6 or very lately were baptised so called from the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Enlish New-plants that is to say New-beginners and Punies of the Church Other Catechumeni there were little impes borne in the Church 2 Young children of Christian parents the children of Christians These eft soones after their birth as being members of the Church were baptised and after they were growne a little elder they were instructed in the Catechisme which when they had learned they were confirmed by laying on of hands and so dismissed out of the companie of the Catechumeni so that it was lawfull for them thence forward to draw neer with the elder sort unto the Lords Supper Of the Catechumeni you may see more in Eusebius tenth book of Ecclesiasticall history Euseb hist Ecclesiast lib. 10. cap. 4. Catechists and fourth chapter not far from the end They also were called Catechists who taught the Catechisme and were the instructers of the Catechumeni 2. Of the Originall of Catechisme and of the perpetuall use thereof in the Church AS of the whole ministery of the mysteries of Christianity so must we conceive of the originall of Catechisme The practice of catechising exereised in the time of both the Old and New Testament Gen. 17.7 that it was ordained of God and hath been of perpetuall continuance in the Church For whereas God since the beginning hath been the God not onely of the aged but of younglings also according to the forme of his Covenant made with Abraham I will be thy God and the God of thy seed he hath instituted and appointed that both of them after the exten◠and reach of their capacity be severally instructed in the doctrine of salvation First the elder by the publike voice of the Ministery then the younger by catechising at home and in schooles Concerning the instruction of the elder sort the case is cleere and out of doubt Touching the catechising of children in the Jewish Church In the time of the Old Testament there are expresse commands every where extant in holy Scripture In the 12. and 13. of Exodus God commandeth that children and the whole family should be taught the originall and use of the Passover In the fourth of Deuteronomie God chargeth Parents that they rehearse
When lust hath conceived it bringeth forth sin Jam. 1.15 and sin when it is finiâ—â—ed bringeth forth death Here say they James saith that there is one sin finished when as the will upon deliberation consenteth to evill lust another not finished when a man sinneth without deliberation and to sin finished he ascribeth that it bringeth forth death We answer that the consequence of this is not oâ— force because that a property which belongeth to divers kinds when it is ascribed to one kind it followeth not thereof that it is to be removed from the other Actuall sin is an effect of Originall sin and a cause of death which though purchased by Originall yet is aggravated by Actuall For S. James distinguisheth the kinds or degrees of sins Originall and Actuall and saith that death followeth after Actuall not as if death did not follow after Originall but because that actuall is a middle between Originall sin and death as a cause of this and an effect of that and doth aggravate death or punishment which already was purchased by Originall sin Neither doth he chiefly speak of the degrees of punishments but of the cause and originall of them to be sought in the corruption of our owne nature Object 8. It is said Jam. 3.2 In many things we sin all Hence our adversaries will prove That the sins of the just are Veniall because they fall either into few sins or into no mortall sins To this as also to most of that which hath gone before we answer that the sins of the just who by faith retain or receive righteousnesse are Veniall not of their owne nature but by grace Gods justice is not at variance with his mercy though it judge the least sin worthy of eternall death Object 9. God is not cruell but mercifull nâ—â—â—her light in his love but constant Wherefore he doth not for every light sin judge a man worthy of eternall punishments Answ But they imagine that the judgement of God concerning sinne is at variance with his mercy which two are not at variance but do very well agree For God is in such wise mercifull as he is also just Now the justice of God requireth that hee judge all even the least offence and contempt of his majesty worthy of eternall damnation This judgement against every sin the mercy and constancy of Gods love doth not take away but for the shewing and declaring thereof it is sufficient that hee rejoyceth not at the destruction of them that perish and that for testimony thereof he inviteth all to repentance and forgiveth them who repent their sins which by themselves were worthy of everlasting death that is hee punisheth them and causeth satisfaction for them not in the sinners but in his owne Son sent to take flesh by punishment answering and satisfying his justice Object 10. It is said Mat. 5.19 Whosoever shall break one of these least commandements and teach men so he shall be called the least in the Kingdome of Heaven This they interpret after this sort That he who both by sin and teaching doth against the Law is fallen from the Kingdome of God and not he who in teaching subscribeth to the Law although sometimes he doth a little contrary to that he teacheth But the opposition or contrariety which Christ addeth But whosoever shall observe and teach them the same shall be called great in the Kingdome of God doth shew that Christ in the former part of the speech doth understand those who breake that is violate the Law which they teach so that the meaning is Although one teach well and yet violate one of these commandements which the Pharisees terme the least that is of the commandements of the Decalogue hee shall find these commandements so not to be the least but the greatest as himselfe thereby shall become the least that is in no place in the Kingdome of God Albeit it be granted unto them that in the words of Christ to teach so is the same that to teach contrary to the Law yet can it not at all be gathered thence that they alone shall be the least in the Kingdome of God who by teaching and sinning break the Law and not they also who by sinning only and not teaching Christ calleth them the least not as in his owne judgement but as in the judgement of the Pharisees and so he imitateth them in thus speaking transgresse it The first reason is in the very words of Christ because he calleth those commandements the least by a figure of speech called Imitation which are the greatest and the breach whereof whether it be committed in deed or in doctrine or in both God judgeth worthy the shutting out of his Kingdome even by our adversaries confession that is the whole Decalogue which the Pharisees did set behind their traditions The second reason is in the words which Christ addeth For I say unto you Except your righteousnes exceed the righteousnes of the Scribes and Pharisees ye shall not enter into the Kingdome of heaven In these words Christ sheweth that a far other righteousnesse is required by the Law of God then the Pharisees thought of and that those sins also are so great that they shut men out of the Kingdome of heaven which the Pharisees accounted either for light or no sins as to be angry with thy brother unadvisedly to say unto him Racha or foole to be troubled with an evill affection or desire of revenge for even these things also he saith are to be avoided if we will avoid hell fire and be the children of our heavenly Father Therefore he saith Whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her Mat. 5.28 hath committed adultery with her already in his heart And Whosoever hateth his brother is a man-slayer and yee know that no man-slayer hath eternall life abiding in him 1 John 3.15 And therefore not they only which commit the greater sins but they also who commit the lesser cannot escape everlasting death but by the satisfaction of Christ imputed to them But as our adversaries accuse this sentence of too much rigour Sin made veniall unto the repentant by grace for the intercession and satisfaction of Christ That all sinnes are by themselves of their owne nature Mortall that is deserve eternall death so also the other sentence That sins are made Veniall to those that repent which of their owne nature are Mortall they reprehend as too gentle and repugnant to Gods justice because to call that Veniall which is Mortall is contrary to truth and justice But the answer is ready That God if we respect the nature of sin adjudgeth all sin worthy of everlasting death and giveth pardon to none but of free grace for the intercession and satisfaction of his Son our Mediatour The third division of sin THere is sin against the conscience and sin not against the conscience Sin against the conscience Sin against the conscience is when a man knowing
motions even of wicked wils are raised and ruled by the will of God and many of these disagree from the law of God and are sinnes God seemeth to bee made the causer of sinnes The answer is That it is a Paralogisme of the Accident For they disagree from the law not as they are ordained by or proceed from the will of God for thus farre they agree very well with the justice and law of God but as they are done by men or Divels and that by reason of this defect because either they doe not know the will of God when they doe it or are not moved by the sight and knowledge thereof to doe it that is they doe it not to that end that they may obey God who wil so have it For whatsoever is done to this end it disagreeeth not from the law seeing the law doth not but with this condition either command or forbid any thing if God hath not commanded a man to doe otherwise So doth the Law of God forbid to kill any man except whom God had commanded any to kill Whosoever then killeth a man God not commanding it he out of doubt doth sin and offendeth against the Law Neither doth God dissent from himselfe or his Law when he wil have some thing done either by his revealed or secret will otherwise then according to the generall rule prescribed by himselfe in the law For he hath such ends and causes of all his purposes as that they cannot but most exactly agree with his nature and justice Object 5. Liberty which is guided of another cannot be an image of that liberty which dependeth on no other which is in God But the liberty of mans will is the image of the liberty which is in God Therefore the liberty of mans will dependeth not or is not guided by the will of God Wee deny the Major For seeing that every thing which is like is not the same with that unto which it is like to conceive in some sort the liberty of God it is enough that reasonable creatures doe worke upon deliberation and free election of wil albeit this election in the creatures is both guided by themselves and others in God by no other then by his owne divine wisedome The image of a thing is not the thing it selfe and the inequality of degrees taketh not away the image as neither the likenesse and similitude of some parts taketh away the dissimilitude of others Wherefore the liberty of reasonable creatures both is governed of God and is notwithstanding a certain image of the liberty which is in God because it chuseth things once known unto it by her own and free or voluntary motion For as of other faculties or properties so also of liberty it is impossible that the degrees should be equall in God and his creatures whereas all things are infinite in God and finite in his creatures Seeing therefore wisdome righteousnesse and strength in the creatures is the image of the unmeasurable wisdome righteousnesse and power which is in God a portion also of liberty agreeable and competent for the creatures may be the image of liberty which is in God Object 6. If the creature cannot but do that which God will have done and cannot doe what God will not have done the will hath no active force but is wholly passive especially in our conversion which is the work of God Likewise there is no use of lawes doctrine discipline exhortation threatnings punishments examples promises and lastly of our study and endeavour We deny the consequence The will is not idle or meer passive when God worketh by it no more then the sun rain and such like instruments of Gods operation We deny the consequence because the first or principall cause being put the second or instrumentall cause is not thereby taken away For as God lightneth the world and doth quicken the earth bringeth forth corn nourisheth living creatures and yet are not the instruments of Gods working idle as the sun the rain the earth husbandmen and food So God converteth men ruleth their purposes wils and actions that is teacheth and moveth them to approve and chuse what he will by lawes by magistrates by doctrines by rewards by punishments and lastly by their owne will all which he useth as instruments not as if he could not without these enlighten the minde with notions and incline the will but because it so seemeth good to him to exercise his power by these If they reply that that would necessarily come to passe so which is done and even without them and therefore they are in vain used Wee deny the Antecedent Albeit God was able to have wrought what he would without the will yet because he will work by the will the working of the wil is not in vain For although God were able to move mens wils without these and if hee had so decreed to doe men doubtlesse should doe without these what now they do being moved by these yet whereas God hath once so decreed the effects as he hath also appointed their second instrumentall and impulsive causes that verily shall be done which God will have done but yet not without middle and second causes by whose means and working coming between and interposed God will bring his purposes and decrees to passe Luke 11.13 He will give his holy Spirit to those who ask him Whom he hath predestinated Rom 8.30 them hath hee also called If they reply again Although it be granted that these are not in vain in those in whom God will shew his force and be effectuall by them yet in others who are not moved by them there is no use of them Ans 1. Although there were no use yet because that it is not known unto us whom God will move or not move wee are to labour in teaching and urging all and to commit the event and fruit of our labour to God Preach the word be instant in season c. 2 Tim 4 3â— Ezek. 3.19 If thou warn the wicked and he turn not from his wickednesse he shall die in his iniquity but thou hast delivered thy soul Ans 2. The consequence followeth not from the denyall of one particular to the denyall of the generall or from an unsufficient ennumeration For although many obey not teaching and admonition neither are moved with rewards and punishments yet this use is great that by this means their naughtinesse and stubbornesse is opened and so the justice of God made more manifest in their punishment John 15.24 If I had not done works among them which none other man did they had not had sin Rom. 1.19 20. God hath shewed it unto them to the intent that they might be without excuse Wee are to God the sweet savour of Christ in them that are saved and in them who perish Repl. 2 Cor. 2.15 Externall discipline is called the righteousnesse of the flesh Therefore it dependeth on mans will The consequence
that the regenerate neither perfectly nor continually can obey God and that Reasons to prove the former doctrine as the beginning so the continuance of our conversion dependeth of God is confirmed besides these testimonies by evident reasons as 1. We receive all good things from God much more then these good things which are the greatest of all Jam. 1.17 that is our conformity with God and perseverance therein 2. Nothing can be done besides the eternall decree of God but the good works which the converted doe Ephes 2.10 God from everlasting did decree We are his workmanship created in Christ Jesus unto good workes which God hath ordained that wee should walke in them Jer. 1.5 Before I formed thee in the wombe I knew thee and before thou camest out of the womb I sanctified thee Wherefore they are able to doe neither more nor lesse of such workes then God hath decreed to worke in them by his Spirit 3. The gifts of the holy Spirit are not in the will and power of men but in the power of the Spirit who dispenseth them All these things worketh even the selfe same Spirit distributing to every man severally as he will 2 Cor. 12.11 Ephes 4.7 2 Thes 3.2 Vnto every one of us is given grace according to the measure of the gift of Christ All men have not faith Now perseverance in true godlinesse and a will and desire to persevere and the craving of the confirmation strengthening and aide of the holy Spirit are no lesse the gift of the holy Spirit then regeneration it selfe and faith and conversion as hath been shewed before Wherefore to persevere in faith and conversion is no more in our power then to beleeve and be converted 4. In whose power and arbitrement our perseverance is be is the preservation of our safety But God and not we is the author and preserver of safety John 10.28 No man shall plucke my sheep out of my hand Therefore our perseverance is not in our owne power and arbitrement but in Gods 5. As our conversion so also our perseverance is the free gift of God that is As God findeth no cause in us why to convert us so neither findeth he cause in us whereby he should be moved to keep us being converted that wee doe not defect or fall For neither is there cause in us why he should more keep us from falling away then our Parents in Paradise neither is the chiefe cause in the Saints themselves why God should defend some rather then some against temptations and sins as Samuel and Josaphat rather then Sampson and David But if to persevere were in our power or not to persevere then the cause of this diversity should be in us Wherefore perseverance in godlinesse and abstaining from sin is not to be ascribed to our selves but to the mercy of God But against the former sentence to wit that even the best workes of the Saints in this life are not perfectly good and therefore are not able to stand in the judgement of God and to please God but by the imputation of Christs satisfaction the Papists oppose themselves Object 1. The Workes of Christ and the holy Spirit say they cannot be impure and not please God The good workes of the regenerate Christ worketh in them by his Spirit Wherefore it is necessary and must needs be that they are pure and perfect and please God even as they are considered in themselves For God cannot condemne his owne workes although he examine them according to the rigour of his judgment The good workâ— of the regenerate are not perfect so long as themselves who work joyntly with the spirit are not perfect We answer to the Major The workes of God are pure and worthy no reprehension as the workes of God and such as God worketh but not as they are depraved by the creature neither are they alwayes pure which are not the workes of God only but the creatures also For these as they are of God are voide of all fault but as they are done by the creatures they are good also and without reprehension if the creature by which God worketh them be perfectly conformable to the will of God but impure and unperfect and according to the sentence of the Law subject to damnation if the creature by which God worketh them be corrupt and vicious that is depraved by the not knowing of God and by averting from God Object 2. God cannot condemne the members of his Son There is no condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus Rom. 8.1 The regenerate are the members of Christ Therefore even as they are considered of themselves they and their workes cannot be condemned in the judgment of God Answ There is more in the conclusion then in the premisses The imperfections of the regenerate and their workes are blotted out and pardoned in Christ For this only followeth that the Saints cannot be condemned but this cometh in respect of Christ his satisfaction imputed to them not in respect of their owne obedience which pleaseth God not because it perfectly agreeth with the Law but because the defects and faults which cleave unto it are pardoned through Christ Object 3. Christ in judgment will render unto every one according to his workes But the severity of Gods justice doth not render good according to workes which are not perfectly good Wherefore the workes of Saints are so perfect as that they cannot be condemned in the judgement of God We answer unto the Major The justice of God doth not render good but according unto perfect workes if hee judge legally according to the covenant of perfect obedience towards the law But he rendreth good also according to the imperfect workes How Christ will render unto every one according to his workes and such as deserve damnation except the sin that cleaveth unto them be pardoned when as he judgeth according to the Gospel that is not according to the covenant of workes or our owne obedience which should satisfie the law but according to the covenant of faith or of the righteousnesse of Christ applied unto us by faith and yet according to workes as according to the tokens or testimonies of faith from which they proceed and which they as effects thereof doe shew to be in men Object 4. The Scripture in many places ascribeth perfection of good workes to Saints even in this life and saith that they are perfect and did walke with their whole and perfect heart before God I have sought thee with my whole heart Psal 119.10 Psal 119.2 Genes 6.9 2 Chro. 15.17 Matth. 5.48 In what sense the Scripture sometimes ascribes perfection of works to the regenerate in this life And in the same Psalme Blessed are they that keepe his testimonies and seeke him with their whole heart Noah was a just and upright man in his time The heart of Asa was perfect in all his dayes Be ye perfect as your Father
appeareth out of these sayings Abraham saw my day John 8.56 John 14.6 John 10.7 Ephes 1.22 â—ebr 13 8. What the Gospel 〈◊〉 and was glad No man cometh to the Father but by mee I am the doore c. God hath appointed him over all things to be the head to the Church Jesus Christ yesterday to day c. Now The Gospel is the doctrine revealed in Paradise from heaven by the Son of God the Mediatour presently after the fall of mankinde into sin and death wherein freedome from sin death and from the curse and wrath of God that is remission of sinnes salvation and life everlasting by and for the same his Sons sake our Mediatour is of the free grace of God promised and preached to all that beleeve in the Sonne of God and imbrace repentance by which doctrine the holy Ghost doth forcibly worke in the hearts of the faithfull kindling in them faith repentance and the beginning of everlasting life Or out of the 18 19 and 20 Questions of the Catechisme such a definition of the Gospel is framed The Gospel is a doctrine which God first made known in Paradise and afterwards spread it abroad by the Patriarks and Prophets shadowed it by sacrifices and other ceremonies of the law and lastly accomplished it by his onely begotten Son teaching that the Son of God even our Lord Jesus Christ is made of God unto us wisdome righteousnesse sanctification and redemption that is to say a perfect Mediatour satisfying for the sin of mankinde and restoring righteousnesse and life everlasting to all them who by a true faith are engraffed into him and doe imbrace his benefits This definition all the summes which are in Scripture delivered of the Gospel John 6.70 doe confirme as This is the will of him that sent me that every man that seeth the Son and beleeveth in him should have everlasting life and I will raise him up at the last day â—â—ke 24 47. John 1.17 Through his Name was repentance and remission of sins to be preached to all nations The law was given by Moses but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ By these and the like testimonies of Scripture it is manifest that both the Law and the Gospel preacheth repentance and that the instrument whereby God doth work in us repentance or true conversion is properly the Gospel But this order in proceeding must be observed First the Law is to be proposed that thence we may know our misery What order is to be observed in teaching the Law and Gospel Then that we may not despair after our misery is known unto us the Gospel is to be taught which both giveth us a certain hope of returning into Gods promised favour by Christ our Mediatour and sheweth unto us the manner how we are to repent Thirdly that after we attain unto our delivery we wex not carelesse and wanton the Law is to be taught again that it may be the levell square and rule of our life and actions 2. Whether the Gospel hath been alwayes known in the Church or whether it be any new doctrine The perpetuall continuance of the Gospel proved The Gospel sometimes signifieth the doctrine of the promise of grace and of remission of sins freely to be given for the sacrifice of the Messias as yet not manifested in the flesh and sometimes the doctrine of the Messias already exhibited In the latter sense and signification the Gospel hath not been of perpetuall continuance but began with the new Testament In the former meaning it hath alwayes been extant in the Church for presently after mans fall it was manifested in Paradise to our first parents and afterwards spread abroad and expounded by the Patriarks and Prophets and finally at length consummated and absolved by Christ both in the fulfilling or full performance as also in a more cleer declaration of those things which had before time been promised in the old Testament This is confirmed By testimonies of Peter Paul and Christ himselfe Acts 10 43. 1 Pet. 1.10 Rom. 1.2 John 5.46 By the records of the Apostles as of Peter To whom also give all the Prophets witnesse that through his name all that beleâ—ve in him shall receive remission of sins Of the which salvation the Prophets enquired and searched Likewise of Paul which Gospel he had promised afore by his Prophets in the holy Scriptures Of Christ himself also saying Had yee beleeved Moses ye would have beleeved me for he wrote of me By all the prophecies of the Messias The same is manifested by all the promises and prophecies which speak of the Messias This is therefore diligently to be marked because God will have us know that there was and is from the beginning of the world unto the end one onely doctrine and way of salvation which is by Christ Jesus Christ yesterday and to day the same also is for ever Heb. 13.8 Joh. 14 6. 5.46 I am the Way the Truth and the Life no man cometh to the Father but by me Moses wrote of me How say you wrote Moses of Christ 1. Because hee recounteth the promises concerning the Messias Why Moses is said to write of Christ Gen. 12.3 Deut. 10.15 Num. 24.17 Gen 49.10 In thy seed shall all nations be blessed God shall raise up a Prophet c. A Star shall rise out of Jacob. The Scepter shall not depart from Judah untill Shiloh come 2. Because hee restraineth these promises concerning the Messias unto a certain family of which the Messias was to be born and to which afterwards the promise of the Messias was more and more renewed and revealed 3. The whole Leviticall priesthood and the whole ceremoniall worship as the sacrifices the oblations the altar the temple and other things which Moses described had a respect and were referred unto Christ yea the kingdome also and the kings were a type of Christ and of his kingdome Wherefore Moses wrote very many things of Christ Object 1. But Paul saith that The Gospel was promised by the Prophets Rom. 1.2 And Peter that The Prophets prophesied of the grace which should come unto us 2 Pet. 1.10 Wherefore the Gospel hath not been alwayes Answ Wee accept of the whole reason as true of the Gospel understood and taken in the second signification above rehearsed that is of the doctrine of the promise of grace fulfilled by Christ exhibited in the flesh and of the evidence of this doctrine for in former ancient times the Gospel indeed was not but was promised onely by the Prophets to wit How the Gospel is said to have been promised unto the Fathers 1. As concerning the fulfilling of those things which in the old Testament were fore-told of the Messias 2. In respect of the more manifest knowledge of the promise of grace 3. In respect of a more large powring out of the gifts of the holy Ghost that is the Gospel then was not the doctrine of
the punishments of the wicked which they suffer besides the torments of conscience for the events of all times constrained men to confesse that their sins are punished with grievous punishments in this life and contrariwise the lot and end of the good to be more pleasant Wherefore there is a mind or understanding power which discerneth honest things from dishonest judge of mankind punishing the wicked and defending the good And that this may not be ascribed to the wisdom or severity of Magistrates or other men this withstandeth and hindreth 1. For that it must needs be that this naturall instinct whereby men judge that offenders are justly punished must proceed from some minde which is enemy to wickednesse 2. For that oftentimes by marvellous and unexpected and unlooked for means they are drawn to the justice and punishment of the Magistrates whose sins before had been privie or who seemed to have been able by their own power or subtilty easily to escape their hands and that especially for that many who through either the negligence or white-liverdnesse of Magistrates are not punished by them yet run into calamities and have allotted unto them ruefull ends And when transgressions and sins increase too much by their impunity whole nations and common-wealths with horrible and manifest examples of Gods wrath perish as the world in the deluge Sodom by fire cast from heaven Pharaoh in the red sea the Jewes and many flourishing kingdoms by most lamentable overthrowes That these things cannot come to passe by chance neither any other way then by the judgement and power of him who is Lord of mankind and nature both Gods comminations and threatnings and the conscience of every one and the order of justice whereby these follow and ensue upon impiety and the very hugenesse weight and greatnesse of things doth convince Wherefore it is said The righteous shall rejoyce when he seeth the vengeance Psal 58.9 10. he shall wash his foot-steps in the bloud of the ungodly Psalm 9.16 So that a man shall say Verily there is a reward for the righteous doubtlesse there is a God that judgeth the earth The Lord is known to execute judgement Now albeit the wicked flourish often for a while and the godly are oppressed yet neverthelesse examples which are fewer in number doe not weaken the generall rule unto which most events agree But if it were so that fewer of the wicked did suffer punishment yet those self same examples though but a few would testifie that God is and that he is displeased with the offences of others also who seem to be lesse punished But this is not true no not of any of them that they are not punished in this life for all those who are not before the end of this life converted to God if punishment do not sooner overtake them yet at length they die in despaire which punishment is more grievous then all the evils either corporall or spirituall and is the beginning and testimony of everlasting punishment Now in that this punishment is not sufficient it doth therein agree with all even the most tragicall cases of the wicked and therefore we are taught by the doctrine of the Church that Gods leâ—ity which he doth not seldome use in this life towards the wicked and his severity which he seemeth to shew towards the godly doth not at all weaken his divine providence and justice but rather declareth his goodnesse whiles by deferring of punishment he inviteth the wicked to repentance and by exercising the godly with chastisements and crosses he perfecteth their salvation and also it confirmeth the certainty of judgment after this life wherein perfect satisfaction shall be made by the wicked to Gods justice Common-weales wisely ordered A body politick wisely ordered by good and wholesome laws could not be decyphered unto mens understanding but by some intelligent mind approving this kind of order and because the divell with the whole rabble and rout of wicked ones pursue with deadly hatred these societies with their discipline it must needs bee God that hath thus long protected and defended it Prov. 8.15 By me kings reigne and princes decreee justice Heroicall and noble instinct of minde Heroicall instincts that is wisdome and excellent vertue in undertaking and atchieving those works which surpasse the common capacity of mans nature such as is the felicity and happinesse of noble artificers and governours in searching or polishing arts and in finding out devices and counsels likewise the couragiousnesse of minde in performing the actions of vertue and in managing matters such as was in Achilles Alexander Archimedes Plato and others All these give evidence that there is some superiour cause which stirreth up these motions and inclinations Moses said of Joshua The Lord himselfe will goe before thee Deut. 31.8 Ezra 1.1 Jude 14.19 hee will be with thee The Lord stirred up the spirit of Cyrus The spirit of the Lord came upon him Certain and evident fore-tellings of events Certain and cleer significations of future events which neither by humane sight or perceivablenesse neither by naturall causes or signs could have been fore-known as the prophecies of the deluge of the posterity of Abraham of the coming of the Messias c. are necessarily known by his revelation alone who hath both mankind and the nature of all things so in his own power that nothing can be done but through his motion Now this is God only as himself alledgeth this as his work alone for proof of his divinity against all forged and fained gods Shew the things that are to come hereafter that wee may know that you are gods Isa 41.13 Ezek. 12.21 That thing which I have spoken shall be done saith the Lord. The ends of all things The ends and uses of things have not their being by chance or from a nature brutish and only endued with sense but from some nature which is wise and omnipotent which is God alone Now all things are most providently ordained to their ends and those also certaine The constant order of efficient causes The order of causes and effects is finite and it cannot be that the processe and race of efficient causes should be of an endlesse and infinite extent Wherefore there must be some first and principall cause which may either mediatly or immediatly produce and move the rest on which also other causes may depend for in every finite order there is some beginning and principall 2. Who and what God is We must acknowledge God to be such as himselfe hath manifested himself to be WHen it is demanded who is the true God wee are to hold most firmly and surely that he alone is the true God who even from the beginning of mankinde did not only manifest himselfe in the nature of things but by the steps and prints of his divinity shining therein but especially in the Church by his word delivered and other famous testimonies of miracles deliveries
Person no separate thing from the essence That the persons are not any thing separated from the essence which is common unto them nor the essence is any fourth thing separate from the three persons but each of them are the very selfe same whole essence of the Divinity But the difference is this that the persons are each distinct from the other but the essence is common to them three And that the person is no other thing subsisting or other substance then the essence may be understood in some sort by the example of a man One and the same man or one and the same substance is a father and a man or a son and a man and yet the manhood or to be a man is one thing the fatherhood or to be a father another but there is not one subsistent which is the father and another subsistent which is a man but one and the same subsistent is both because both manhood and fatherhood is in him manhood absolutely fatherhood respectively as in regard of his son What reference essence hath unto person Of the word Essence also it is further to be noted that God or the Deity or divine essence is not in respect of the persons the same which the matter in respect of the effect because God is unchangeable neither is compounded of matter and form Therefore we cannot say well Three persons are or consist of one essence Neither is it as the whole in respect of the parts because God is indivisible Wherefore it is not well said that the person is a part of the essence or the essence consisteth of three persons for every person is the whole divine essence one and the same Neither is it as the generall to the speciall because essence is not the generall to the three persons nor person a speciall to essence But God is a more common name because the essence of the Deity is common to the three persons and therefore may be affirmed of each of them But these names Father Son and holy Ghost are more strict because the persons are indeed distinct and cannot be affirmed the one of the other Therefore it is well said God or the divine Essence is the Father is the Son is the holy Ghost Likewise The three persons are one God or in one God Again They are one and the same essence nature divinity wisdome c. They are of one and the same essence nature divinity c. Yet it cannot be well said They are of one God because there is no one of these persons but is whole and perfect God Wherefore the divine essence is in respect of the persons as a thing after a rare and singular manner communicated in respect of those things unto which it is common For neither is there the like example of community in any created things For a generall is a certain thing common to many specials and a generall and speciall to many individuals but yet so that they are affirmed of those many plurally not singularly as that the father and the son or this father and son are two living creatures two men But we may not speak after this sort of God and the divine persons as to say The Father and the Son are two Gods two Spirits two Omnipotents c. Because there is but one God one Spirit one Omnipotent c. Wherefore that affirmation The Father is God the Son is God the holy Ghost is God is a true affirmation affirming that which is more common of a thing which is more restrict that is affirming the essence of the individuall which hath in some sort an analogy and proportion only with the speciall affirmed of his individuall but it is not at all the same nor of the same kind What the Trinity is By the name of Trinity are understood the three Persons distinct in one essence of the Deity by three manners of being or subsisting Now Trinity and Triplicity as also Trinall and Triple differ That is said to be Triple which is comprehended of three essences or is distinct by three essences Trinall is that which in essence is but one and most simple but hath three manners of being of subsisting God therefore is not triple because there are not more essences but Trinall because he being one according to his essence is three according to his persons 5. Whether these names are to be used in the Church HEreticks of ancient carped at these termes because they occurre not in Scripture But wee imitate aright the manner of speech which was usuall in the ancient and purer Church and by their authority and example retain these names 1. Because though they are not found extant in so many syllables yet phrases and speeches of neer affinity and likelihood yea and sometimes words and terms of the same signification which these are are read in Scripture For instance that of the Lords own mouth I am that I am Again I am hath sent mee unto you Again Exod. 3. â—â— it cannot be denied but that the word Jehovah answereth to that wee call essence So the word Hypostasis is used to signifie a Person in the Epistle to the Hebrewes Who being the engraved form of his person Heb. 1.2 Neither doth the Church in any other sense call the persons the Trinity then as John saith that There are three which bear record in heaven the Father the Word and the holy Ghost 2. Because the course of interpretation requireth that the words of Scripture be expounded to the learned by such words as being more usuall in other languages or matters and doctrines are more easie for them to understand and paveth and maketh plain a way unto them for the understanding of the speech and phrase of Scripture Otherwise if no words were to be used but such as are extant in the Scriptures all interpretation should be taken away It is lawfull therefore that the Church invent and use words and phrases of speech whereby they may significantly expresse the sense of Scripture and their owne meaning 3. Because the sleights and sophisms of Hereticks which for the most part they go about to cloak and cover with the words of the holy Scripture are more easily espyed and taken heed of if the same things be expounded in divers words and those especially short perspicuous and significant For it cometh to passe that by reason of the pithinesse and plainnesse of these terms Hereticks are dismantled and can no longer shroud their sinister constructions and apparent corruptions Neverthelesse if there were a consent and agreement on the things wee should easily come to an agreement about the words for we detest contention brawling about words Neither is the Church at controversie with other Gentiles and Hereticks about bare terms but of this main substantiall doctrine That the eternall Father and the Son and the holy Ghost are one God and yet neither is the Father the Son or the holy Ghost nor the holy Ghost the
Father or the Son c. Now were it not that Hereticks cannot away with this doctrine they would easily admit of the phrases of speech But they therefore abandon the terms because they abhor the things and doctrine intimated and signified by them Hence we easily answer this their objection Obj. Words not extant in Scripture are not to be used in the Church But these names namely Essence Person and Trinity occurre not in Scripture therefore they may not be used in the Church Ans We expound the Major thus That which is not in Scripture neither concerning the bare words nor concerning the sense is be omitted But the names themselves of Essence Person and Trinity as concerning the things lively insinuated by them are extant in Scripture as hath been proved Again Terms not extant in Scripture are to be omitted if by sparing them the substance of the things themselves be not endangered But the drift and purpose of hereticks is no other but with the terms to abolish or at least deprave the doctrine of the Church Therefore they are to be retained to prevent their attempts Repl. But they breed contentions Answ This happeneth by accident by reason of contentious hereticks 6. How many persons there be of the Divinity or God-head Three persons are one God and one God is three persons IN one divine Essence are subsisting three Persons and those truly distinct one from another by their properties namely the Father the Son and the holy Ghost each of which three persons notwithstanding are one and the same God eternall infinite and most perfect in himselfe And these persons are consubstantiall co-eternall without any confounding of their properties and respects as also without any disparagement or inequality between them And That there are three persons each of which are that one true God Creatour of all things is proved 1. By testimonies of Scripture which are taken partly out of the old Testament and partly out of the new The old Testament yeeldeth us many testimonies Gen. 1.2 3. Exod. 3.2 The Spirit of the Lord moved upon the waters Then God said Let there be light The Lord is said to have appeared unto Moses in a flame of fire out of the midst of a bush Acts 7.30 Steven calleth him The Angel of the Lord which is Christ the Son of God even that Angel of the great counsell The Spirit of the Lord God is upon me Isa 61.1 therefore hath he anointed me he hath sent mee to preach good tidings unto the poor to binde up the broken hearted Here the Spirit is discerned both from him that anointeth and from him that is anointed Hee is discerned also by his gifts because hee saith Upon mee that is dwelling in me sanctifying mee Therefore these be three diverse persons subsisting But yet there are both moe and more cleer testimonies in the new Testament Mat. 28.19 Teach all nations baptising them in the Name of the Father and the Son and the holy Ghost The Comforter which is the holy Ghost John 14.26 John 15.27 whom the Father will send in my name When the Comforter shall come whom I will send unto you from the Father even the Spirit of truth which proceedeth of the Father The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ 2 Cor. 13.13 and the love of God and the communion of the holy Ghost be with you all In this saying of the Apostle invocation is joyned with an application and distinction of the three persons By grace he meaneth the benefits of Christ by love the acceptation whereby God for his Sons sake doth receive us into favour by the communion of the holy Ghost his gifts which are common unto the godly There are three in heaven which beare record God saved us by the washing of the new birth 1 John 5.7 Tâ—t 3.5 6. and by the renewing of the holy Ghost which he shed on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour Here he maketh three authours of our salvation Ephes 2.18 Gal. 4.6 Through him wee have an entrance unto the Father by one Spirit God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into our hearts Therefore it is one Spirit which the Father and the Son sendeth 2. The same is proved by those places of Scripture which give unto these three the Father the Son and the holy Ghost the name of Jehovah and the true God In like manner those places wherein those things which are spoken of Jehovah in the old Testament are in the new referred expresly and most plainly to the Son and the holy Ghost 3. Those places which attribute the same whole divine essence to the three and shew that the Son is the proper Son of the Father most truly begotten of him and the holy Ghost is the Spirit of the Father and the Son and that so proper and peculiar as that he is and proceedeth of God which is the Father and the Son The Son therefore and holy Ghost have the same and that whole essence of the Deity which the Father hath the Son hath it communicated of the Father by being born of him and the holy Ghost of the Father and the Son by proceeding from them 4. Those places which give unto the three the same attributes or properties and perfections of the divine nature namely eternity immensity omnipotency c. 5. Those places which attribute to the three the same effects or works proper unto the Deity namely creation preservation and government of the world as also miracles and the salvation of the Church 6. Those places which yeeld to the three equall honour and worship and such as agreeth to the true God alone By this consent therefore of the old and new Testament it is confirmed that one God is three persons truly distinct and those three persons are one God By this also we understand that it is truely said that the Father is other from the Son and the holy Ghost and the holy Ghost other from both but not truly that the Father is another thing from the Son and the Son another thing and the holy Ghost another thing for to be another thing betokeneth a diversity of essence to be other a diverse manner of existing or a distinction of persons Now the three distinct persons have not a diverse Deity but one and the same in number It followeth that we should demonstrate of each severall person of the Deity that they are true Subsistents against Samosatenus and Servetus that they are distinct against Arrius Eunomius and Macedonius lastly that they are of the same and not of only like essence against the same hereticks But of the person of the Father there is no controversie and these scruples and doubts touching the persons of the Son and holy Ghost shall more conveniently hereafter in their proper place be cleared 7. How the three persons of the God-head are distinguished HEre we are first to observe and consider Attributes common to
this doctrine of the three persons in one God-head especially since the Son of God was manifested in the flesh It is not hard to espy the causes of this strife for that indeed no part of doctrine is more unknown and unsearchable to mans reason as also for that the divell in hatred of God and men attempteth with horrible fury to darken and extinguish the glory of the Sonne of God incarnate The objections of hereticks against the doctrine of the Trinity Look the generall and speciall rules solutions of sophismes forged against the Deity of the Son of God 1. ONe essence is not three persons because that one should be three implyeth a contradiction Jehovah is one essence Therefore not three persons Answ The Major is true of a created and finite essence which cannot be one and the same and whole substance of three persons But it cometh short of truth when it is averred of the infinite individuall and most simple essence of the Deity Repl. A most simple essence cannot be the essence of three persons The essence of God is as you grant a most simple essence Therefore it cannot be three persons Ans This Major holdeth true in such an essence part of which instituteth another person or which is multiplied according to the number of the persons produced thence but it faileth in such an essence as is the same and whole entire in each person For the exceeding simplicity of this kind of essence is no may impeached by the multitude and distinction of persons Object 2. Where there are three and one there are four distinct things But in God are three persons and one essence Therefore there are four distinct things in God which to grant is absurd Answ Where there are three and one really distinct there are foure But in God the persons are not really distinct from the essence for the three persons of the Divinity are one and the same divine essence but they differ from it and from one another mutually only by order and manner of subsisting Object 3. It is Sabellius his heresie to entitle one substance with three names The opinion of the Trinity giveth one substance three names Therefore it is Sabellius his heresie Ans In this Syllogisme are foure terms by reason of the ambiguity of the word Substance for either the word Substance signifieth in the Major a person and in the Minor an essence or else one of the premisses or propositions is false Object 4. He who is the whole Deity besides him there is no other in whom the whole Deity likewise is But the Father is the whole Deity Therefore it is not in another Ans The Major is false because the same Deity which is whole in the Father is whole also in the Son and whole in the holy Ghost by reason of the infinity of the divine essence whereof there is neither more nor lesse in each person then in two or the whole three Object 5. Where are distinct operations at leastwise internall there are also distinct essences But the internall operations of the Father Son and holy Ghost are distinct Therefore also their essences are distinct Answ The Major is true of persons which have a finite essence but false of divine and infinite Object 6. The divine essence is incarnate The three persons are the divine essence Therefore the three persons are incarnate Which conclusion being false it followeth that some one of the premisses was false Ans Here are meer particular propositions and therefore nothing can be concluded for the major speaketh not of the divine essence generally nor can be expounded universally because the divine essence was incarnate in the person only of the Son Object 7. Jehovah or true God is the Trinity The Father is Jehovah Therefore he is the Trinity that is the whole three persons Answ Here also the Major cannot be understood universally for not whatsoever is Jehovah is also the Trinity So that of meer particulars nothing followeth Object 8. No abstract name signifieth a substance Trinity is an abstract name Therefore it signifieth no substance But God is a substance therefore the Trinity signifieth not God Answ The Major is meerly false For these words Deity and Humanity are abstracts and signifie the substance and nature of God or man OF GOD THE FATHER Quest 26. What beleevest thou when thou saist ON THE 9. SABBATH I beleeve in God the Father Almighty maker of heaven and earth Ans I beleeve the everlasting Father of our Lord Jesus Christ who hath made of nothing heaven and earth with all that are in them a Gen. chap. 1. Exod. 20.11 Job 33.4 ch 38. ch 39. Acts 4.24 14.15 Psal 33.6 Isa 45.7 who likewise upholdeth and governeth the same by his eternall counsell and providence b Psa 104.2 3. 115.3 Mat 1â— 29 Ephes 1.11 Hâ—b 1.3 to be my God and my Father for Christs sake c Joh. 1.12 Rom. 8.15 Gal. 4.5 6 7. Ephes 1.5 and therefore I doe trust in him and so relye on him that I may not doubt but he will provide all things necessary both for my soule and body d Psâ—lm 55.23 Matth 6.26 Luke 12.22 And further whatsoever evils hee sendeth on mee in this troublesome life he will turn them to my safety e Rom. 8.28 seeing both he is able to do it as being God almighty f Rom. 10.12 8.38 39. and willing to doe it as being a bountifull Father g Isa 49.4 Matth. 6.32 33. 7.7 8 9 10 11. The Explication I beleeve One thing to beleeve God another thing to beleeve in God I Beleeve in God We are to observe in this place that it is one thing to beleeve God another thing to beleeve in God For that sheweth a faith of knowledge or historicall faith this declareth true faith or confidence For to say I beleeve God if we speak properly is I beleeve there is a God and hee such a one according to whatsoever is ascribed unto him as he hath manifested himselfe in his word to wit that he is a spirituall essence almighty c. everlasting Father Son and holy Ghost I beleeve in God is I beleeve that he is my God that is I am perswaded that whatsoever God is and is said to be hee is all that and referreth it all to my safety for his Sons sake that is to resolve that he is such a one towards me In God The name of God is here taken essentially for God the Father Son In God The word God in the Creâ—d is meant essentially to all three persons not personally to one The Father Esa 9.6 Why the first person of the Trinity is called Father Ephes 1.5 6. and holy Ghost because these words I beleeve with the particle in are referred after the same manner and meaning to the whole three persons of the Deity for it is as well said I beleeve in the Son and I beleeve
damnation and the judgment of the great day And elsewhere also they themselves complain that Christ came to torment them before their time The causes why God permitted them to fall Furthermore God permitteth them to fall into this wickednesse not onely thereby to shew his wrath against sin in their everlasting paines but also to punish by them in this life the wicked and also to chastise or try and exercise with temptations the elect Mat. 25.41 1 Sam. 16.14 23. Psal 78.9 For fire is said to be prepared for them from everlasting The evill spirit of God came upon Saul and vexed him He cast upon the Egyptians the fiercenesse of his anger indignation and wrath and vexation by the sending out of evill Angels But Job 1.12 Job is delivered to be afflicted of Sathan for the tryall of his constancie Sathan hath desired to winnow you as wheat Luke 22.31 1 Thess 2.17 2. Cor. 12.7 Wee would have come unto you but Sathan hindered us Lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of revelations there was given unto me a prick in the flesh the messenger of Sathan to buffet me because I should not be exalted out of measure 2 Thess 3.5 Lest the tempter had tempted you in any sort and that our labour had been in vain And Christ himself is tempted of Satan Mat. 4.3 6 9. and therefore verily he is called the tempter for that he solliciteth and inciteth men to sin and to revolt from God both by offering outward occasion of sins as also by stirring up the cogitations and inward motions of the will and heart ON THE 10. SABBATH Quest 27. What is the Providence of God Answ The almighty power of God every where present a Isa 29.15 16. Jer. 23.23 24. Ezek. 8.12 Act. 17.25 27. whereby he doth as it were with his hand uphold and govern heaven and earth with all the creatures therein b Heb. 1.3 So that those things which grow in the earth as likewise rain and drought fruitfulnesse and barrennesse c Jer. 5.24 Acts 14.17 meat and drink d Acts 14.17 health and sicknesse e John 9.3 riches and poverty f Pro 22.2 in a word all things come not rashly or by chance but by his fatherly counsell and will g Pro. 16.33 Matth. 10.29 The Explication The reason of the connexion of the two places of Creation and Providence Providence and creation one and the same thing but diverse in consideration THe doctrine which treateth of Gods providence is joyned with the place which treateth of the creation because the providence that is the preservation and government of things created doth not differ from the creation in the thing it self for that there is but one and the same will or power or action of God whereby things both begin to be and continue but they differ in consideration only For the omnipotent will of God is called creation in respect of the beginning when things by the force and power of his will took their being it is called providence as by the self-same power things are preserved Wherefore Providence is the continuance and accomplishment of creation or creation it selfe continuated and perpetuated For we may not imagine that the creation of the world is like to the building of a ship which the Ship-wright as soon as hee hath finished it committeth to the government of some Pilot but wee must hold this as a grounded truth that as nothing had ever been except God had created them so neither could they retaine and keep their being neither their force of working neither the very operation it selfe or motion no not the space of one moment or minute of time if God did not preserve and move them effectually And therefore the Scripture it selfe often joyneth the preservation and continuall administration of things with their creation and from hence reasoneth for Gods providence And God is called Jehovah God is called Jehovah 1. For giving 2. For maintaining the being of his creatures not only because hee once gave to every thing both small and great their being but also because hee maintaineth it in all and moveth them so as that he not only seeth what is done in all things but also causeth and inclineth them to do that which he from everlasting would every of them to doe And by this his providence hee governeth administreth ruleth and preserveth all things that they be not brought to confusion Wee cannot therefore have a full and perfect knowledge of the creation except we joyn with it the doctrine of providence Touching providence these three things are principally questioned 1. Whether there be any Providence 2. What Providence is 3. Why the knowledge thereof is necessary THe two former of these are discussed here under this twenty seventh Question of the Catechism the third is resolved in the twenty eighth Question immediatly following 1. Whether there be any providence of God Philosophers errours concerning Gods providence COncerning this point of doctrine three diverse erroneous opinions are found amongst Philosophers 1. The Epicures will have either no providence at all or onely of those things which are and are done in the lower parts of the world 2. The Stoicks have devised in stead of providence an absolute necessity and order of all things being in the very nature of things wherunto not only all other things but God himself also is subject which necessity they called destiny 3. The Peripateticks did imagine that God indeed doth behold and understand all things but yet doth not order and rule all things but moveth the celestiall motions and doth by them send down by way of influence some power and vertue unto the lower parts of nature but the operations themselves or motions depend of the matter and of the wils of men that is they will have the providence of God to be a prescience or fore-knowledge of God in all things but not a will decreeing causing and ruling all things The opinion of the Church touching providence Contrarily the Church teacheth out of the word of God That nothing is extant and cometh to passe in the whole world but by the certain and definite though yet most free and most good counsell and purpose of God There are two sorts of arguments and proofs whereby is confirmed Two proofes of providence that there is a providence of God Testimony of Scripure and force of argument Scripture Testimonies of Scripture are these Hee giveth to all life and breath and all things Acts 17.25 28. In him we live and move and have our being Are not two sparrows sold for a farthing Mat. 10.29 30. and one of them shall not fall to the ground without your Father Yea Ephes 1.11 and all the hairs of your head are numbred God worketh all things after the counsell of his own will Like to these are found infinite testimonies in
it by an order changeable some by an unchangeable order and therefore in respect of some it is contingent and in respect of some necessary For as the originals or causes of contingency in things are that liberty which is in the will of God and Angels and Men and the mutable nature of the matter of the elements together with the readinesse or inclination thereof to divers motions and formes so the cause of absolute necessity in God is the very unchangeable nature of God but the cause of that necessity which is only by consequent is the divine providence or decree coming between those things which are in their owne nature mutable and also the nature of things created which is framed and ordained of God to certaine effects and yet subject to the most free will and government of God either according or besides or contrary to this order which himselfe hath made In respect therefore of second causes some things are necessary which are done by causes alwaies working after one sort as the motion of the Sun the burning of any matter put into the fire if it be capable of burning some things are contingent which have causes working contingently that is apt and fit to produce or to forbeare producing divers and contrary effects as the blasts of windes the locall motions of living creatures the actions of mens wils But in respect of the first cause that is of the will of God all things which are or are done in Gods externall or outward workes are partly necessary partly contingent Necessary as even those things which have second causes most changeable as that the bones of Christ on the Crosse were not broken by the Souldiers by reason of the unchangeablenesse or the decree and providence of God Contingent by reason of the liberty of his eternall and unchangeable decree and the execution thereof even those things which as concerning their own nature have second causes most unchangeable as the motion of the Sun and shadowes If therefore by contingency they meane the changeablenesse of effects What contingency is denied which they have by the natures of second causes or by the power and liberty of God it doth not follow that things are contingent because of that necessity which they have by the providence of God For this doth not take away but preserveth rather the nature order and manner of working in second causes ordained by God But if by contingency they meane the changeablenesse of second causes and effects so floating and wavering that they are not ruled and governed by Gods providence any such contingency the Scripture doth not admit or approve Whether the motions of a creature are contingent or necessary Hereby we also understand When it is demanded concerning the motions and effects of creatures whether they are to be termed necessary or contingent that some verily are more rightly and properly called contingent than necessary though both contingent and necessary are wrought by divine providence For they are rather to be called such as they are of their own nature and by the nature of their neerest causes than as they are in respect of Gods providence which is a cause more removed and farther off And nothing is more either certain or manifest than that according to the nature of second causes some things should be changeable some unchangeable yet by the power of God though all things in the creatures may be changed they are made notwithstanding unchangeable because of the certainty of his decree and divine providence So likewise we answer concerning fortune and chance What fortune and chance is denied For if by these names be understood such causes or events by accident as have no cause which is proper and by it selfe a cause they ought to be far abandoned from the Church of Christ But if wee understand thereby a cause which is by it selfe a cause and proper though unknowne to our senses and reason or such causes by accident which have notwithstanding some secret proper cause adjoyned nothing hindereth in respect of second causes which are causes by accident and in respect of our judgment whereby we attain not to the proper and that which is by it selfe the cause of these events that to be or to be a thing fortuning or done by chance which in respect of Gods providence cometh to passe by his most accurate and unchangeable counsell and decree according to those sayings Mat. 10.29 Pro. 16.33 One Sparrow shall not fall on the ground without your Father And The lot is cast into the lap c. The fifth Sophisme of the inutility or unprofitablenesse of means God is effectuall in working by means which himself hath freely ordained THat which shall be unchangeably and necessarily by the will and providence of God in vain to the furthering or hindering of that are means applyed as the use of the ministery the magistrates lawes exhortations promises threatnings punishments prayer our study and endeavours But all things are done by the decree of God unchangeably neither can they which work by the providence of God work otherwise then they doe Therefore all those means are vain and fruitlesse Answ It is not necessary that the first and principall cause being put the second and instrumentall cause should be removed and taken away In vain are second causes and means applyed if God had determined to execute his decrees without means neither had commanded us to use them But seeing God hath decreed by those means in some to work faith and conversion some to bridle and keep under means and some to leave excuselesse and hath for that cause commanded us to use them they are not in vain used and applyed yea when there cometh no profit by these yet they profit to this that they leave the wicked without excuse As therefore the Sun doth not in vain daily rise and set neither are the fields in vain sowed and watered with the rain neither bodies in vain with food refreshed though God createth light and darknesse bringeth forth the corn out of the earth and is the life and length of our dayes so neither are men in vain taught or do study to conform their life unto doctrine though all available actions and events proceed only from God for God from everlasting decreed as the ends so the means also and prescribed them unto us whereby it seemed good to him to bring us unto them Wherefore we using those means doe well Three causes why we must use means and obtain profitable and fruitfull events but if wee neglect them either by our fault we deprive our selves or others of those blessings offered by God or if God even in this contempt of his word have mercy on us or others yet our conscience accuseth us of open and grievous sin Wherefore we must use means 1. That wee may obey God therein who both hath decreed ends and ordained means to those ends and prescribed them unto us neither tempt
because hee is the Sonne of God by nature but because he was borne after a singular manner namely of a Virgin conceived by the holy Ghost But this reason is not sufficient 1. Because if he be not a Sonne of the substance of the Father but either by creation or by adoption or by conformation with God either from the wombe as in Christ conceived by the holy Ghost or afterwards as in other men hee shall not be the onely begotten For so are others also the sons of God both Angels and Men though not in that degree of gifts yet in the maner of generation Wherefore it remaineth that he be the only begotten Son by nature after which maner no other is the Son of God 2. Because for that which he is here said the only begotten he is other-where said to be the proper Son of God And he is the proper Son who is of the substance of his Father hee that is of another substance is no proper Son John 5.18 Rom. 8.32 3. He is said to be such a Son of the Lord as who is also himselfe the Lord which as it is manifest by other places of both Testaments so it is said of John Baptist that he shall goe before Christ who is called of the Angel Gabriel The Son of the most High and the Lord God of the children of Israel Mat. 3.3 Luke 1.35 6â— whose hearts John Baptist shall turne unto him and should goe before his face And of Zachary hee is called the most High whose Prophet and Fore-runner John Baptist should be whose way hee should prepare and unto whose people he should give knowledge of salvation NOw let us returne unto those Orders and Classes of arguments and reasons whereby we prove the eternall subsistence of Christ 6. Classe The wisedome of God is a subsistent or person and Christ is that wisedome Prov. 8.22 Vnto the sixth Classe are referred those testimonies which testifie Christ to be the wisedome of God The argument is this The wisedome of God is eternall and subsisting before Jesus was borne But the Son is that wisedome of God Therefare the Son is eternall and subsisting before Jesus born of the Virgin The Major of this reason Solomon confirmeth in the place afore-signified where he ascribeth those things to wisdome which fall not into any but which is subsisting living and working as That it subsisted in God before things were created That it was begotten c. The Minor we prove 1. Because Solomon saith That that wisdome was begotten of God And To be begotten when it is spoken of such a nature as is intelligent in understanding is nothing else than to be a son For although it be truth there is made an exhortation there to the study of heavenly doctrine yet notwithstanding the name of Wisedome to be doubly there used and a transition to be made from the doctrine which is the wisdom or light created in the minds of men that thereby authority might be gotten to this wisdome with them to the uncreated Wisdom that is to God himself the author and fountain of the other those things which are there attributed unto it do manifestly convince 2. Christ the Son of God is called Wisdom and the person which teacheth us Wisdome Therefore said the Wisdom of God I will send them Prophets and Apostles Luke 11.49 1 Cor. 1.24 But unto them which are called we preach Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God 3. The same proper functions are attributed by Solomon to wisdom Wisd 7. 8. 9. 10. which else-where are attributed to the Word and are more at large declared in the book of Wisdome To the seventh Classe belong those Scriptures which speake of the office of the Mediatour The argument is this The Mediatour 7. Classe without whose merit and present efficacy there could be no friendship or amity joyned between God and sinfull men The Mediatour hath alwaies bin must needs have been alwaies in the Church from the very beginning of the world This proposition those things confirme which have been before spoken of the Mediatour and his office But the Sonne of God onely not the Father nor the holy Ghost is that Mediatour by and for whom the faithfull also of the old Church were reconciled unto God Therefore the Sonne of God was subsisting from the very beginning of the world The old Church might have been received into favour for Christ to come but by him it could not except he was then being for there can be no efficacy or force of him that is not Whence it is necessarily proved that Christ was before his incarnation for there cannot be friendship between God and men without a Mediatour now existing or being But in the old Testament there was friendship between God and men that is Beleevers Therefore either he or some other was Mediatour of that Church there was no other but he only 1 Tim. 2.5 because there is but one Mediatour between God and man the man Christ Jesus But that there cannot be any amity between God and men without a Mediatour now already being shall also appeare by that which followeth For it is the office and function of the Mediatour not only by deprecation or intreaty or sacrifice to appease and pacifie the Father but also to conferre and bestow all the benefits which he obtaineth by his power and efficacy upon beleevers to make the will of God known to men to institute a ministery to collect gather Matth. 11.17 and preserve the Church and that wholly No man hath knowne the Father but the Sonne and he to whom the Sonne will reveale him Therefore neither did Adam know God but by the Sonne and by a consequent the Sonne existed at that time Hitherto are referred the testimonies not only which speake of Christs merit to come Ephes 1.22 2.20 but of his efficacy also and power Hee hath made all things subject under his feet and hath appointed him over all things to be the head of the Church Yee are built upon the fundation of the Apostles and Prophets Jesus Christ himselfe being the chiefe corner-stone Christ therefore is the foundation head upholder and governour of the Church and therefore also he was before the Church was I am the way the truth John 14.6 10.28 1.4 9. and the life I give unto them eternall life In it was life and the life was the light of men That was the true light which lighteneth every man that cometh into the World Through him we have both an entrance unto the Father by one spirit Ephes 2.11 4.11 1. Pet. 1.11 Hee gave some to be Apostles and some Prophets and some Evangelists and some Pastours and Teachers The spirit of Christ is said to have been in the Prophets fore-telling the sufferings that should come unto Christ Hebr. 3.5 6. Moses verily was faithfull in all his house as a
very God and eternall life Christ which is God over all blessed for ever Therefore the Son is that one and the same God or that selfe-same divine essence which is God 3. Whose essence is distinct their spirit is not one in essence which proceedeth of both and is proper unto both but is either of a diverse essence or compound whether he be of a part or of the whole essence of them of whom he proceedeth But one and the same is the Spirit of the Father and the Son proceeding of both proper unto both and by him both work effectually Gal. 46. God hath sent the Spirit of his Son into our hearts Therefore the Father and the Son are one essence and the same God Otherwise each essence should have his proper spirit and diverse 4. Vnto whom the eternall Father communicateth the same essence which himselfe hath and that whole hee is of the same essence with him Vnto the eternall Son the eternall Father communicateth his essence the same and whole Therefore the Sonne is of the same essence with the Father The Minor is proved because Christ is the onely begotten and proper Sonne of the Father begotten therefore of the essence of the Father But the divine Essence or God-head by reason of the immensity and great simplenesse thereof can neither be multiplied nor divided Therefore the Father communicateth the same and that whole unto the Son Wherefore as in respect that it is the whole essence of the God-head which is commmunicated unto him of the Father hee is co-equall with the Father so in respect that it is the same which the Father hath and retaineth hee is co-essentiall and consubstantiall with the Father Certaine generall heads of those reasons wherewith Heretickes both old and new oppugne this Doctrine That there is both an equall and one and the same God-head of the Father and the Son and also of the holy Ghost with Rules whereby answer may be easily and soundly made unto their objections 1. THe Heretickes build on most false principles and grounds such as this is If the Father begot one of his substance he could also have begotten moe and the Son also might beget another 1. Rule or moe sons For answer this Rule is to be held Wee are to judge of God according to his owne word not according to Hereticall braines and he is to be acknowledged such as he revealeth himselfe in his word as being the eternall Father with the only begotten Son and the holy Ghost For God hath so revealed himselfe that he begot the Son and that one Son only Therefore wee ought to rest here and not to imagine false conceits of our owne 2. They reason out of naturall principles or grounds which are such as are true in things created and finite but false in God who is an essence infinite as Three cannot be one Three persons really distinct cannot be one essence An infinite person cannot beget an infinite person That which begetteth and that which is begotten are not one and the same essence Likewise He that communicateth his whole essence to another doth not himselfe remaine the same which he was To this we answer by another Rule 2. Rule Those principles which are true of a finite nature are foolishly and impiously translated to the infinite essence of God And arguments of this sort are refuted not by a simple deniall of them but by distinguishing between natures capable and uncapable of those principles whereon they ground 3. Of the properties of the humane nature in Christ they inferre the inequality and diversity of his God-head As Christ suffered died c. Therefore he is not God The Rule whereby we answer to this 3. Râ—el is Those things which are proper to the humane nature are not to be drawn to the divine nature For Christ died not as God but as man 4. They confound the office of the Mediatour with the nature or person that is they goe from the office to the nature As Christ is sent of the Father Therefore he is inferiour to the Father 4. Rule The Rule to answer this is The inequality of office doth not inferre inequality of nature or persons Or as Cyril saith The sending and obedience take not away the equality of power or essence So the Father is said to be greater than the Son not in nature or God-head but in manifestation For not the Father but the Son was made base and miserable in the humane nature assumed Where then Christ saith that his Father is greater than he it is meant in respect of his humane nature and in respect of his office of the Mediatourship 5. They exclude and shut out the Son and the holy Ghost from those things which are attributed unto the Father as the fountain of all divine operations As The Son saith that his workes are the workes of the Father Therefore hee is not authour of them neither doth hee those works of his own power but only is the instrument whereby God the Father doth them The Rule and Answer hereto is 5. Rule Those things which are ascribed unto the Father as fountain are not removed from the Son or the holy Ghost to whom they are communicated that they may have them their owne and proper For the Son worketh likewise and in like manner Vnto whom the Father likewise did give to have life in himselfe 6. They detract those things from the Son and the holy Ghost 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 John 5.26 whereby the Divinity in the person of the Father is discerned from creatures or false gods To which this Rule answereth 6 Rule As often as in Scripture one person of the God-head is opposed to creatures or false gods and is discerned from them the other persons are not excluded from the God-head but onely those things are excluded against which the comparison is made Or The divine properties operations and honour are so attributed to one of the persons as that notwithstanding they are not taken away from the other persons of the God-head but onely from creatures Againe A superlative or exclusive speech used of one person doth not exclude the other persons of the God-head but creatures and feigned gods unto whom the true God either in one or in moe persons is opposed John 10.25 The Father is greater then all that is then all creatures not then the Son or the holy Ghost I give eternall life unto them that is no creature doth give it For both the Father also and the holy Ghost doe quicken and give life The Father onely knoweth the day of judgment that is no creature That they may know thee to be the onely very God Mat. 24.26 John 17.3 here the Son is not excluded from true Deity but Idols and false gods to which God the Father is opposed 7. They wrest the phrase of Scripture to another sense as 1 Cor. 15.24 7. Rule The Son shall deliver up
concurre unto one person because they being united doe make one person or one subsistent incommunicable not sustained in another or of another The Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost are not united in person or personall properties because they have these not the same but distinct By this which hath been said it is manifest that the Union in nature and naturall perfections is an equality of properties and nature but the personall union is when two unlike natures are coupled so that each retaineth his naturall properties and operations whole and distinct but yet have both one and the same subsistence wholly or it is the joyning of two natures different in properties to constitute the substance of one individuall or person that is such a connexion or knitting of them together as they are one individuall subsisting by it selfe or the substance of one individuall But that in Christ the Vnion of the flesh with the Word is not essentiall Why the union of the flesh with the Word cannot be essentiall made in the nature or any essentiall property of the God head is shewed by these reasons 1. Of the God-head and flesh assumed there ariseth not any third Essence but each is and abideth an Essence so perfect and whole as neither especially the Divine as being in it selfe a person and simply void of all change cometh into the composition or compounding as we properly take this word of the other 2. If the Union of the flesh with the word were essentiall it would follow that the humanity once assumed and taken was equalled with the God-head in essentiall properties so by a consequent to be made of the same nature and essence with the Word So Vigilius sheweth Lib 4. The ancient heresies into which they fall who maintaine an Essentiall Union that the Eutychians held two substances to be in Christ of the same nature Wherefore they who will have the essentiall properties of the God-head to be really communicated and common with the flesh so that the flesh should truly and really be and be called omnipotent omniscient and whatsoever else the God-head is they indeed howsoever in words they mightily stand against it hold this Union to be made in essential properties and in nature and both with Eutyches and Swenckfield they confound both natures and take away the difference between the creature and the Creatour and also with Nestorius they frame and make two persons and so bring in a quaternity For albeit they say that they in their confusion or as themselves call it with their Master Swenckfield deifying and majesticall exaltation of the flesh doe retaine the substance of the flesh yet two substances having really the same and like perfections are two subsistents or persons of one nature as are two men and whatsoever other individuals of the same kind or nature Lastly with Sabellius and the Patripassians they incarnate the whole Trinity For there is one and the same essence in number of the divine person and the same essentiall properties Wherefore that which is united and equalled with one of these three according to essence must needs be also united and equalled with the rest Wherefore the Union of both natures in Christ is personall or according to the subsistence proper unto the Word both natures keeping and retaining in that Union their properties whole and unconfounded For the Word did not by uniting humane nature unto it make the same God-head or God and omnipotent immense and infinite but it took the manhood which retaineth still the properties belonging unto it and so did joyn and knit it unto it selfe as to be one person with it and the substance of one Christ Neither is it absurd that a thing which neither is made or is one with another in kind neither any Homogeneall part thereof should yet exist in the same subsistence with it or should subsist in it self wherwith it is united For a graffe hath his subsisting in a tree of another nature or kind The same is the subsistence both of the sprig ingraffed of the tree sustaining the sprig that is they are one and the same individuall tree yet have they and so doe reaine natures in properties most diverse The like reason is there in the two natures of Christ both subsisting in or of the same person of the Son Object The humane nature is united with the Word in person but not in nature Therefore the person is divorced and sundered from the nature Againe The person onely of the Sonne is united with the humane nature Therefore not the divine nature it selfe of the Word Answ In both these arguments is a fallacy from that which is no cause as if it were a cause and both offend in this for that they who so reason against the maintainers of true doctrine and men sound in faith either know not or are not willing to distinguish between these two phrases of speech To be united in nature and to be united to or with a nature when notwithstanding the difference is very great and most familiar and knowne unto the Schoolemen For To be united in nature is to be equalled that is to be made one essence or nature with another To be united to or with a nature is to be coupled and joyned therewith to one subsistence or personality Wherefore the flesh is united to or with the Word not in nature or in essentiall properties that is it is not made with the Word one essence neither made equall unto it in omnipotency wisdome and nature for so should the whole Trinity be incarnate Yet it is united to the omnipotencie wisdome nature and essence of God not simply but of God the Word Now this is nothing else than the flesh to be united to the person of the Sonne or to the Word in person which person is the very divine nature or essence omnipotent wise and whatsoever else is proper to the God-head But albeit the flesh taken or assumed is truly united both to the person and to the nature of the Word For the person is not any severall thing or really differing from the essence but is the essence it selfe yet is it well said that the flesh is united to the Word in person onely and likewise that the person onely of the Word is incarnate The reasons hereof are 1. Because not the Father nor the holy Ghost were incarnate but the Sonne onely 2. Because the first and neerest terme of this union is the person only of the Word assuming and taking the flesh but not the God-head For the person onely is proper unto the Word the essence of the God-head is common to him and the same with the Father and the holy Ghost This is plainly taught by the sixth Toletan Councell Concil Tolet. 6. cap. 1. in these words in these words The Sonne onely took the humanity in singularity of person not in the unity of divine nature that is in that which is proper unto the
Why God would have us certaine of the last judgement 11. Why he would not have us certain of the time 12. Why God deferreth that judgement 13. Whether it is to be wished for 1. Whether there shall be any judgement THis Question is necessary For the Scripture also hath fore-told that there shall come in the later times mockers who shall account this Article for a fable Where is the promise of his coming For since the Fathers dyed 2 Pet. 3.4 all things continue alike from the beginning of the Creation The last judgement cannot indeed be demonstrated out of Philosophy but neither is there any thing in Philosophy against it But the whole certainty thereof is grounded on divine Prophecies The certainty of the last judgement is not to be sought in Philosophy but in Divinity or on the Doctrine of the Church For although the Philosopher perhaps would say somewhat as seeing a little through a mist as That it should goe well with the good and ill with the evill and That it is not likely that man was born to this misery yet by reason that man hath lost the knowledge of the righteousnesse goodnesse and truth of God wee cannot know out of Philosophy that any judgement shall be much lesse with what circumstances it shall be The arguments which Philosophy yieldeth are forcible indeed in themselves but are not made knowne but in Divinity and therefore the arguments themselves are only made forcible and of strength in Divinity Wherefore wee will draw reasons and proofes out of Divinity or the Doctrine of the Gospel by which it may appeare that there is a last judgement Six proofes of the last judgement The first proofe is drawne from expresse and plaine testimonies of sacred Scriptures As out of the Prophecy of Daniel As I beheld in visions by night behold Dan. 7.13 one like the Sonne of Man came in the clouds of heaven and approached unto the Ancient of dayes and they brought him before him And hee gave him dominion and honour and a kingdome that all people nations and languages should serve him his dominion is an everlasting dominion which shall never be taken away and his kingdome shall never be destroyed And againe a little before The Ancient of dayes did sit whose garment was white as snow and the haire of his head like the pure wooll Vers 9 10. his throne was like the fiery flame and his wheeles as burning fire A fiery flame issued and came forth before him thousands ministred unto him and ten thousands stood before him the judgement was set and the books opened The beast was slaine and his body destroyed and given to the burning fire Likewise out of the prophecy of Enoch alledged by the Apostle Jude Jude 14 15. Behold the Lord cometh with thousands of his Saints to give judgement against all men Moreover out of the sermons of Christ especially in Mat. 24.25 Likewise out of the sermons of the Apostles Acts 19 31. 1 Thess 4.16 He hath appointed a day in the which he will judge the world in righteousnes by that man whom he hath appointed whereof he hath given assurance to all men in that hee hath raised him from the dead The Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout and with the voice of the Arch angel and with the trumpet of God It is appointed unto men that they shall once die Heb. 9.27 and after that cometh the judgement And I saw a great white throne Rev. 20.11 12. and one sate on it c. And I saw the dead both great and small stand before God and the books were opened and another book was opened which is the book of life and the dead were judged of those things which were written in the books according to their workes Neither is the certainty of the last Judgement apparent only by these and the like plaine testimonies of Scripture but is deduced also out of other places by good consequence and hence are made those forcible arguments which the Philosophers saw but by a glimpse The second proof is drawn from the end whereunto mankinde was created God necessarily obtaineth his end but to this end did he create mankinde that man should be the image of God and the everlasting temple of God wherein he should be worshipped to whom he would communicate himselfe perfect wisedome righteousnesse and goodnesse and would impart his blessednesse which whereas it is now performed unto us and seeing it cannot be that God should create so most excellent a creature to perpetuall misery wee necessarily inferre that there shall be a change For God will obtaine his end and will not suffer the temple of the holy Ghost to be utterly consumed of rottennesse This blessednesse is a part of Gods image according to which man was made but this the Divel hath destroyed therefore God shall restore it who is mightier than the Divel And although the end for which man was created is hindered divers waies in this life yet God will at some time obtain it Wherefore it is not only as the Philosphers reason likely and probable that man was not made for these miseries but it is also most certain that the most excellent of all creatures was made to a better end Wherefore there must needs be at length a change By this argument is confirmed the happinesse of our bodies according to that of Saint Paul Know you not that your body is the temple of the holy Ghost 1 Cor. 6.19 which is in you The third proof is taken from the justice goodnesse and truth of God which requireth that it may goe full well with the good and with the evill full ill Philosophy knoweth not that God is so just good and true that hee will have the righteous to enjoy full and perfect blessednesse But this cometh not to passe in this life nay rather it goeth well with the wicked and evill in this life Therefore there must remaine another life wherein this shall be The holy Scripture useth this argument as in S. Paul 2 Thess 1.4 6. It is a righteous thing with God to recompence tribulation to them that trouble you Remember that thou in thy life time receivedst thy pleasure and likewise Lazarus paines Luke 16.25 now therefore is he comforted and thou art tormented The fourth is taken from Gods decree whereby he ordained and purposed with himselfe from everlasting to raise the dead Wherefore God being unchangeable will not cancell and revoke this his decree A register and copy thereof we reade in Ezekiel and presidents or examples we have Enoch Chap. 3. â— Elias and Christ The fifth is taken from Gods omnipotency whereby he is able to effectuate and accomplish things contrary to reason This argument Christ useth against the Pharisees Mat. 22.29 Ye erre not knowing the Scripture nor the power of God The sixth is taken from the glory of God sith God created man
Church is 1. Visible or Militant which in this world fighteth under Christs Banner against the world the flesh and the Divell This Militant Church is either visible or invisible The visible Church is a company among men imbracing and professing the true and uncorrupt Doctrine of the Law and the Gospel and using the Sacraments aright according to Christs institution and professing obedience unto the Doctrine in which company are many unregenerated or hypocrites consenting notwithstanding and agreeing to the Doctrine in which also the Son of God is forcible to regenerate some by the vertue of his Spirit unto everlasting life Or it is a company of such as consent in the Doctrine they professe wherein notwithstanding are many dead and unregenerate members Mat. 7.21 13.21 42. Not every one that saith unto me Lord Lord shall enter into the Kingdome of heaven Hither pertain the parables of the Seed and the Tares likewise of the Net gathering both good and bad Fish The invisible Church is a company of those which are elected to eternall life 2. Invisible in whom a new life is begun here by the holy Ghost and is perfected in the life to come This Church as long as it warfareth and sojourneth on earth alwayes lieth hid in the visible Church It is otherwise called the Church of the Saints They which are in this invisible Church never perish therefore neither are any Hypocrites therein but the Elect only John 10.28 2 Tim. 2.19 Why it is called invisible of whom it is said No man shall pluck my sheep out of mine hands The foundation of the Lord remaineth sure and hath this seale The Lord knoweth who are is It is called invisible not that the men therein are invisible but because their faith and godlinesse is invisible neither is known of any but of themselves in whom it is and because we are not able certainly to distinguish or discerne in the visible Church the true godly from the Hypocrites Moreover both these parts of the true Church both visible and invisible are either universall or particular The universall visible Church The universall visible Church is the company of all those which professe the Doctrine wheresoever in the world they be The particular visible Church The particular visible is also a company of those which professe the doctrine but in some certaine place The visible Church is universall in respect of the profession of one faith in Christ and of one Doctrine and worship But it is particular in respect of place and habitation The universall invisible and of diversity of rites and customes So also the invisible Church is universall as all the Elect in whatsoever place they be and whatsoever time they lived have one faith againe it is particular as either in this or that place they have the same faith Now all particular Churches are parts of the universall and the visible are parts of the universall Church visible as also the invisible are parts of the universall Church invisible And of this personall visible Church doth the Article or Creed speak properly I beleeve the holy Catholike Church For besides that the universall invisible Church is Catholike it is also nobilitated with this title that it is Holy Further in this is the true communion of Saints between Christ and all his members What difference between the visible and invisible Church Rom. 8.30 There is almost the same difference betweene the visible and invisible Church which is between the whole and part For the invisible lieth hid in the visible as a part in the whole Which appeareth out of this place of Paul Whom the Lord predestinated them also he called This calling whereby the Lord calleth us is of two sorts inward and outward The inward Saint Paul saith was wrought according to the purpose of saving men and the Elect are called by both Hypocrites are called onely by the outward calling And in respect of this outward calling is the Church called visible and the Church of the called where are Hypocrites also But the invisible is called the Company or Church of the Elect and Chosen Object 1. If the whole be visible the part also is visible Answ That part also is visible as concerning men elected or as they are men and as they professe the Doctrine of the visible Church but it is not visible as concerning the godlinesse or faith of men or as concerning faith and repentance in men Object 2. They which are in the Church perish not as the definition of the Church affirmeth Many Hypocrites are in the Church Therefore either Hypocrites shall not perish or it is false that they which are in the Church perish not Answ They which are in the invisible Church perish not and of this was our definition But the Minor proposition speaketh of the visible Church in which are many Hypocrites Object 3. Where the invisible Church is not neither is the visible In the time of Popery was not the invisible Therefore there was not the visible Ans I deny the Minor For there also were remnants that is there were alwayes some mingled with those dregs who held the foundation some more purely some lesse In summe The Church was oppressed but not extingnished The Church of the Old Testament and the New There is also another division of the Church into the Church of the Old Testament and of the New The Church of the Old Testament is a company or congregation imbracing the Doctrine of Moses and the Prophets and making profession that they will imbrace in Jury the Mosaicall Ceremonies and keep them and as well in Jury as also out of Jury imbrace the things signified by those Ceremonies that is beleeving the Messias which was to be exhibited The Church of the New Testament hath not these differences because all beleeve in the Messias already exhibited This Church is a company imbracing the Doctrine of the Gospel using the Sacraments instituted by Jesus Christ and beleeving in him being exhibited the true Messias 3. what are the tokens and marks of the Church Profession of the true doctrine THe marks of the true Church are Profession of the true uncorrupt and rightly understood Doctrine of the Law and Gospel that is of the Doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles There concurre withall oftentimes errours but yet notwithstanding this mark is sure if the foundation be kept albeit stubble be builded thereon yet so that those errours of stubble be not maintained The right use of the Sacraments The right and lawfull use of the Sacraments For amongst other ends of the Sacraments this is one that this company of Gods Church may be discerned from all Sect and Hereticks Profession of obedience to the doctrine Mat. 28.19 20. Profession of obedience to the Doctrine or Ministery These three marks of the Church are contained in those words of Christ Go and teach all Nations baptizing them in the name of
justifying faith The summe of all is If the word justified in this text of James be understood properly of justification before God then the name of faith there signifieth a dead faith If faith be taken for true justifying faith then the ambiguity rests in the word justified Object 9. That which is not required unto justification is not necessary to be done but it is necessary that good works be done Therefore they are required to justification Ans The Major is false because there may be many ends of one thing Though good works are not required to justification yet they are required in token of thankfulnesse and to the setting forth of Gods glory As it is said Let your light so shine before men that they may see your good works Mat. 5.16 and glorifie your Father which is in heaven For this cause good works are necessary to be done More causes of them shall hereafter in the doctrine of mans thankfulnesse be alledged and declared Obj. 10. It is said that Phinees work and deed was imputed unto him for righteousnesse Therefore good works justifie Psal 106.31 Ans This is a mis-construing of the phrase used in the place alledged For the meaning of it is that God approved of this work but not that he was justified by that work Gal. 2.16 Psal 143.2 For by the works of the law flall no flesh be justified in his sight Object 11. Ten crownes are part of an hundred crownes in payment of a debt Therefore good works may be some part of our justice before God Ans There is a dissimilitude in these examples For 1. Ten crowns are a whole part of an hundred crowns and being ten times multiplyed make up the whole summe of the debt but our workes are not a whole and perfect part but an imperfect part of the obedience we owe and being multiplyed an hundred thousand times yet never make any perfect obedience 2. Ten Crownes may be accepted by the Creditour for a part of the debt due unto him because there may be some hope of payment of the rest but good works are not accepted by God as a part of our justice because there is no hope of full payment to be made by us and all imperfection or defect is condemned by the law Object 12. The justice or righteousnesse which Christ brought is eternall Dan. 9.24 Osianders arguments against imputed righteousnesse For the Messias as Daniel saith bringeth everlasting righteousnesse But imputed righteousnesse is not eternall Therefore imputed righteousnesse is not given by Christ. Ans We deny the Minor for imputed justice is eternall 1. By perpetuall continuation of imputation in this life 2. By perfection of that justice which is begun in us For both that righteousnesse which is imputed unto us and that which is begun in us is the righteousnesse of Christ and both of them shall be eternall For we shall be acceptable and pleasing unto God for ever through his Son Christ Therefore imputation also shall be continued or rather shall be changed into our owne justice and righteousnesse Repl. Where sin is not there is no place for remission or imputation In the life to come sin shall not be Therefore there shall be no place there for remission or imputation Ans We grant the whole reason if it be conceived aright In the life to come shall not be remission of any sin then present yet there shall be a remission of sins past inasmuch as the remission which was once granted in this life shall continue and endure for ever that is our sins which were long since forgiven us in this life shall never be imputed to us againe And moreover that conformity which we shall have with God in the life to come shall be an effect of this imputation Object 13. The Lord is our righteousnesse Therefore we are not justified by imputed righteousnesse Jerem. 23.6 but God himself essentially dwelling in us is our righteousnesse Ans In this saying of Jeremie the effect is put for the cause The Lord is our justice or righteousnesse that is our Justifier even as Christ is said to be made unto us of God wisedome righteousnesse sanctification and redemption that is a Teacher of wisdome a Justifier a Sanctifier and Redeemer 1 Cor. 1.30 That justice which is God himself is not in us because so God should be an accident to his creature and become justice in man For justice and vertue are things created in us not the essence of God Osiander who objecteth this doth not discerne the cause from the effect that is uncreated justice from created justice As we live not or are wise by the essence of God for this is all one as to say that we are as wise as God so also we are not just by the essence of God Wherefore nothing is more impious than to say that the essentiall justice of the Creatour is the justice of the creatures for thereof would follow that we have the justice of God yea the very essence of God OF THE SACRAMENTS Quest 65. Seeing then that onely faith maketh us partakers of Christ and his benefits ON THE 25. SABBATH whence doth it proceed Answ From the holy Ghost a Ephes 2.8 6.23 John 3.5 Phil. 1.29 who kindleth it in our hearts by the preaching of the Gospel and confirmeth it by the use of the Sacraments b Mat. 28.19 20 1 Pet. 1.22 23. The Explication THis Question pointeth out unto us the coherence and connexion of the doctrine of Faith and the Sacraments For Faith whereon the former immediate discourse hath insisted is ordinarily wrought in us of the holy Ghost by the Ecclesiasticall Ministery whereof there are two parts the Word and Sacraments The holy Ghost by the Word kindleth faith in us and fostereth strengtheneth and sealeth it unto us when it is once kindled by the Sacraments For the Word and Gospel is as a Charter or Letter Patent the Sacraments are as seales thereunto annexed For whatsoever is promised us in the Word of the obtaining of our salvation by Christ the same the Sacraments as signes and seales annexed unto the Word as it were unto a Charter or Letters Patents confirme unto us more and more thereby to help and relieve our infirmity It remaineth therefore that we now proceed to intreate of the Sacraments the signet of faith adjoyned to the Word and Gospel Object It is said that the Spirit and the Word work faith in us and the Sacraments nourish it being wrought How then differ these three one from another Answ Very much Three differences between the Spirit and the Word and Sacraments in working faith in us 1. The holy Ghost worketh and confirmeth faith in us as the efficient cause thereof the Word and Sacraments as instrumentall causes 2. The holy Ghost also can work faith in us without them and the Word and Sacraments without the holy Ghost can work nothing 3. The holy Ghost
covenant not to the impeachment of the Church or them that communicate with them but of themselves for they procure unto themselves damnation Neverthelesse it is the duty of the Church to observe diligently what manner of men it admitteth and the Minister of the Church is there excused where excommunication is not authorised yet so that hee give not willingly the Sacrament to the abusers thereof but be instant in warning and reproving them and wish them to take heed of and avoid their abuses For Matth. 5.6 Blessed are they that hunger and thirst after righteousnesse But the sin shall lie on others even on them who commit the abuse and on them who wink with both their eyes thereat OF THE PASSEOVER SEeing it is aforesaid that the Lords Supper succeeded the Passeover it shall not be impertinent to declare here in brief the doctrine of the Passeover The Questions concerning the Passeover are these 1. What it was 2. What were the ends and uses thereof 3. What are the allegories or resemblances of the rites of the Paschall lamb 4. Whether it be now abrogated and what succeeded in place thereof 1. What the Passeover was THe Passeover was a solemn eating of a Lamb enjoyned the Israelites by God that this ceremony being yeerly performed throughout every house might be a memoriall unto them of their deliverance out of Egypt but should especially signifie unto the faithfull their sparituall freedome from sin and death by Christ which was to be sacrificed or slain on the crosse and to be eaten by faith Or It was a Sacrament of the ancient Church which by Gods commandemeâ—t was to be celebrated with the yeerly slaying and eating in every family of the Jewes a lambe of a yeer old to be a remembrance unto hem of the benefits of their delivery out of Egypt and a seale of the promise of grace touching remission of sins for the sacrifice of the Messias Pascha the Greek word cometh from the Hebrew Pesach a Passeover derived of Pasach which signifieth To passe over This Sacrament and whole solemnity had his name from the passing over of the Angel who seeing the bloud of the Lamb on the Israelites upper door-posts passed over and spared their first-born when he slew all the first-born of the Egyptians The history of the institution of the Passeover is extant Exod. 12. God commanded that the killing of the Lamb should be executed with certain and divers ceremonies The rites and ceremonies of the passeover For A lamb of a yeer old a male without blemish was to be separated from the flocke the tenth day of the first moneth called Nisan or Abib according to the number of the families for every houshold a lamb and was to be slain four dayes after that is the fourteenth day at even and the posts and lintels or upper cheeks of the doors of their houses were to be sprinkled with his bloud then was hee to be rosted and eaten whole and in haste with unleavened bread and sowre herbs and they that did eat it stood with their loins girt their shooes on their feet and their staves in their hands Exod. 12 11 23. Of this ceremony saith God It is the Lords Passeover The bloud shall be a token for you upon the houses where ye are that when I see the bloud I may passe over you This feast God would have to be yeerly that is once every yeer seven whole dayes celebrated with great solemnity Exod. 12.14 15. And this day shall be unto you as a remembrance and ye shall keep it an holy feast unto the Lord throughout your generations yee shall keep it an holy ordinance for ever Seven dayes shall yee eat unleavened bread c. Look Exod. 23.15 Levit. 15.5 Deut. 16.1 2. What the ends and uses of the Passeover were FIve ends of the institution of the passeover are specified Exod. 12. To be a confirmation of the promise of the Angels passeover and of the saving of the Israelites first-born That the bloud of the lamb sprinkled on the posts might be a signe of the Angel-which should passe over the Israelites and save their first-born as it is said ver 13. And the bloud shall be a token for you upon the houses where you are that when I see the bloud I may passe over you This end after the first performance of the rite and execution of the passeover ceased forthwith although the analogie thereof remain for ever For God both heretofore spared and now spareth the faithfull for Christs bloud shed that is for it remitteth their sins as in the second end is declared To be a type of Christ That it might be a figure of the Messias his sacrifice to come or a sign of the deliverance to be performed by Christ and of Gods grace towards his Church this was the principall end of the yeerly passeover Exod. 12.45 John 19.36 This is thus proved It is said Ye shall not break a bone thereof This figure John saith was then fulfilled when Christs bones were not broken on the crosse therefore the lamb was a type of Christ and of his sacrifice Againe Christ our passeover is sacrificed for us 1 Cor. 5.7 Therefore the paschall lamb signified Christ and the sacrificing thereof represented the sacrificing of Christ Besides the Church understood the significations of other sacrifices that they were types of the sacrifices of the Messias for the Fathers of the old Church were not so brutish as to hope for remission of sins by the bloud of buls much more therefore did they by faith behold the Messias and his sacrifice in the Paschall lamb Finally John calleth Christ The Lamb of God Revel 13.8 and the Lamb which was slain from the beginning of the world to wit because he was prefigured by that lamb which was slain to be the passeover For a remembrance of their delivery out of Egypt Exod. 12.15 Deut 16.3 To be a memoriall of the first passeover and of the delivery out of Egypt For God would that the memory of so great a benefit should be preserved among his people lest their posterity should wexe unthankfull Seven dayes shalt thou eat unleavened bread even the bread of tribulation for thou camest out of the land of Egypt in haste that thou mayest remember the day when thou camest out of the land of Egypt all the dayes of thy life To be an occasion of publick concourse to praise God for this benefit Exod. 12.16 That it might be a bond of publick assemblies and maintenance of ecclesiasticall Ministery In the first day shall be an holy assembly To distinguish Israel from other people Exod. 12.43 48. That it might be a Sacrament whereby to distinguish Gods people from other nations No stranger shall eat thereof But if a stranger dwell with thee and will observe the passeover of the Lord let him circumcise all the males that belong unto him and then let
doe the Saints judge and account of their owne righteousnesse and merit Because they are none of ours but are wrought by God in us Phil. 2.13 1 Cor. 4.7 If wee doe any good works they are not ours but are belonging to God only who worketh them in us by his Spirit It is God which worketh in you both the will and the deed even of his good pleasure What hast thou which thou hast not received We are evill trees if then we doe any good that must needs come from God only It is God which freely maketh us good trees and which worketh good fruits in us as it is said Wee are his workmanship Ephes 2.10 created in Christ Jesus unto good workes which hee hath prepared that wee should walke in them If then we performe any good it is the gift of God and not our merit Mat. 20.16 Is it not lawfull for mee to doe as I will with mine owne Hee must needs be very impudent who having received of gift an hundred florens of a rich man thinketh that he deserveth a thousand moe by receiving of those hundred whereas rather he is by this gift received bound to the rich man and not the rich man to him Because God is not bound to reward any No creature which doth even the most perfect works can thereby merit ought at Gods hand or binde God unto him to give any thing of debt and according to order of justice The reason hereof doth the Apostle yield Who hath given him first We deserve no more our preservation than wee deserved our creation He did owe nothing unto us when he created us so neither now doth hee owe us our preservation neither is he bound to give us any thing but hee did and doth both of his owne free will and meere loving kindnesse Hee receiveth no benefits at our hands Wee can bestow no benefits upon our Creatour Now where there is no benefit there is no merit For a merit presupposeth a benefit received Because there is no proportion between our works and Gods rewards There is no proportion between our works which are utterly imperfect and the excellency of those great blessings and benefits which the Father giveth us freely in his Sonne Lest we should glory in our selves Hee that rejoyceth let him rejoyce in the Lord. But if wee merit by our workes remission of our sins man should have in himself whereof to rejoyce neither should the glory be given to God If Abraham were justified by his workes 1 Cor. 1.13 Rom. 4 2. hee hath wherein to rejoyce but not with God Because we are justified ere we doe them Rom. 9.11 2 13. We are just before we doe good works For ere Esau and Jacob were borne and when they had neither done good nor evill that the purpose of God might remain according to election not by workes but by him that calleth it was said unto her The Elder shall serve the younger As it is written I have loved Jacob and have hated Esau Wherefore we are not then justified before God when we doe good works but we then doe good works when we are justified Because all our good works are due Our good works are all due for all creatures owe unto their Creator worship and thanks-giving so that although we should never sin yet can we not sufficiently declare and shew forth our thankfulnesse whereof we are indebted Luke 17.10 When yee have done all those things which are commanded you say We are unprofitable servants we have done that which was our duty to doe The opinion of merit weakneth consolation Gaâ— 3 40. Rom. â— 16 8. The opinion of merit and justification by works impaireth Christian consolation disquieteth the conscience and causeth men to doubt and despaire of their salvation For when they heare the voice of the Law sounding in their eares Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things and withall consider their owne imperfection they are forthwith convicted in conscience that they never performed all things therein exacted Wherefore they are constrained to waver alwaies uncertain and to dread the curse But faith giveth sure consolation and comfort because it relieth on the promise which is certaine The inheritance is by faith that it might come by grace and the promise might be sure to all the seed Because then Christ had died in vaine Gal. 2.21 If wee should obtaine righteousnesse by our own works the promises should be made void For in Abraham shall all the Nations be blessed And Christ also should have died in vain Because then we should be otherwise justified thâ—n the Fathers of the old Church John 14.6 1 Tim. 2.5 Ephes 4.5 Heb. 13.8 Acts 4.12 There should not be one and the same reason and cause of our salvation if this doctrine of the merit of works should be admitted Abraham and the Thiefe on the Crosse should have been otherwise justified then we are justified But there is but one way leading to salvation I am the way the truth and the life There is one Mediatour between God and men There is one Lord one Faith one Baptisme Jesus Christ yesterday and to day the same is also for ever There is given no other name under heaven whereby we must be saved Therefore we shall not be saved by good works or for our good works Because then Christ were not a perfect Saviour Christ should not give us full and perfect salvation and so neither should he be a perfect Saviour if some thing were as yet required of us whereby we should be made just For look how much of our merit were added unto his so much should be detracted and subducted from his merit But Christ is our perfect Saviour For as Paul witnesseth God with his glorious grace hath made us accepted in his beloved Ephel 1.6 7. and 2.8 1 John 1.7 Acts 2.12 By whom we have redemption through his bloud even the forgivenesse of sins according to his rich grace By grace ye are saved through faith and that not of your selves it is the gift of God The bloud of Jesus Christ purgeth us from all sin There is no salvation in any other Object God calleth those blessings which hee promiseth to them that doe good works rewards and meed Now meed presupposeth merit Therefore good works doe merit before God Ans Amongst creatures sometimes it doth but never with God because no creature can merit at Gods hands seeing God oweth nought unto any creature But they are called the rewards or meed of our works in respect of God forasmuch as he recompenceth most fully those things which we doe neither yet is that recompence due For there can come no commodity unto God by us and therefore God is not bound no not to make the least recompence For he standeth no waies in need of our works and unto whom they can adde or bring nothing at all of him doubtlesse we
graven Images differ or are distinguished in matter or meaning for the first teacheth who is to be worshipped namely the alone true God the second sheweth how God is to be worshipped namely not by the inventions of men the first forbiddeth any other god besides the true God alone to be worshipped the second prohibiteth any other worship of that only true God then himselfe hath commanded Therefore they are diverse and distinct Commandements So of the contrary the Commandements touching concupiscence which some divide into the ninth and tenth that it is in sense and meaning but one Commandement both themselves are witnesses as often as in their Expositions and Paraphrases hereon they joyne this their ninth and tenth together and Paul also teacheth the same doctrine when he speaketh of all concupiscence as of one Commandement Rom. 7.7 I had not knowne lust to be sin except the Law had said Thou shalt not lust Wherefore the two first Commandements before specified are two divers Commandements and this last imagined by some to be two is but one Commandement But if therefore yet the tenth Commandement must be cut in two diverse Commandements because it distinctly maketh mention of divers things not to be coveted or lusted after namely our neighbours house and our neighbours wife it shall thereof follow that so many Commandements must be numbred as there are recited kinds of things in every Commandement 2. Doubtlesse those Commandements are divers and not the same which are distinguished of Moses by diverse periods or sentences and verses and those no whit different in themselves but one Commandement which are comprised of Moses in one period or verse But Moses hath distinguished the first Commandement which proceedeth Of not having strange gods from the second which is Of not making Idols in divers verses and periods Therefore they are distinct Commandements Contrariwise Moses hath not distinguished the Commandement touching the coveting of our neighbours house and wife by severall periods but hath comprehended it in one period or sentence therefore there is but one Commandement concerning concupiscence 3. Questionlesse Moses retained one and the same order of the Commandements both in Exodus and Deuteronomy But he transposeth in those places the words of the tenth Commandement touching the coveting of our neighbours wife for in Exodus is placed first Thou shalt not covet thy neighbours house and then followeth Thou shalt not covet thy neighbours wife but in Deuteronomy these words are foremost Thou shalt not covet thy neighbours wife and these follow Thou shalt not covet thy neighbours house Therefore these two members are parts of one Commandement else there can no ninth Commandement be assigned and the Adversary must needs say that Moses in one of these places confoundeth the ninth Commandement with the tenth and substituteth a part of the tenth in place of the ninth which absurdity Moses may by no meanes be accused of By this transposing therefore and displacing of the words the holy Ghoft doth sufficiently declare that he would have all to be but one Commandement whatsoever is read in the tenth Commandement joyntly comprehended and contained in one period or sentence 4. There is very great and weighty authority whereby this distinction of the Commandements is confirmed For thus doe the ancient Writers of the Jews Josephus and Philo a Ioseph l. 3. Antiq Iud. Philo in exâ—osit Decalog distinguish the first and second Commandement and knit up in one the tenth Commandement which our Adversaries divide into two In like sort doe the Greek Ecclesiasticall Writers divide the Decalogue as Athanasius Origen Gregory Nazianzene Chrysostome Zonaras and Nicephorus b Athanas in Syâ—ops script l. 2. Orig. l. 3. sup â—xod â—om 8. Greg. Naz. iâ— Carm. Chrys sive Aut. opti pers in Mat. 49. Zoâ— Tom 1. histor Ni ceph hist Eccles And unto this opinion and sentence subscribe also the Latin Ecclesiasticall Writers as Jerome Ambrose Sulpitius Severus and Austin c Hier. in cap. 6. ad c phe Aâ—â—bros in â—und loc ad Eph Sulp Sâ—ver lib. 1. hist sacrat Aug. l. quaest vet â—oâ— Toâ—t quaeâ—â— 7. l. 2. quaest sup Exod câ—p 7.1 Therefore this distinction of the Decalogue was of ancient reputed best and so received in the Greeke and Latine Churche We have therefore restored not changed or altered the Decalogue Now whereas Josephus Philo and some Greek Writers attribute to each Table five Commandements this maketh nothing against us For howsoever they so do yet herein they all agree that the words and clauses touching the worshipping of one God and not having any graven Image are two distinct Commandements and the clause touching Concupiscence maketh not two but one Commandement Likewise we finde another division in Augustine d August Epist 119. ad â—aâ— car cap. 11. quaest sup Exod cap. 7. which reckoneth onely three Commandements in the first Table and seven in the second But the Allegory of the Trinity whereon Augustine groundeth this reason is too weak a proofe for confirmation thereof Howbeit this we must observe that if the doctrine and purpose of the Decalogue touching the true God and his true worship be no way impeached but reserved whole and entire we ought not to maintaine any bitter contention about the reckoning or account of the Commandements in their Tables The third division of the Decalogue In'o the immediate and mediate worship of God 3. The Decalogue is divided according to the things themselves which are commanded or forbidden in the Decalogue into the immediate and mediate worship of God Generally in the Decalogue is commanded the worship of God that which is contrary to Gods worship is forbidden The worship of God is either immediate when Morall workes are immediatly performed unto God or mediate when Morall workes are performed unto our neighbour in respect of God The immediate worship is contained in the first Table and is either internall or externall The internall consisteth in this partly that we worship the true God and that that be performed unto the true God which is commanded in the first Commandement partly that the manner or forme of worship be right and lawfull whether it be internall worship or externall This forme which is to be observed in Gods worship is taught in the second commandement The externall worship is either private or publique The private containeth the private Morall works of every one which are alwaies to be of every man in particular performed as touching the confession of God in our words and works and this private worship is delivered in the third Commandement The publique worship consisteth in sanctifying of the Sabbath and is delivered in the fourth Commandement The mediate worship of God which containeth our duties towards men or our neighbours is delivered in the second Table and this likewise either externall or internall The mediate externall worship consisteth partly in the duties of superiours towards their inferiours and so of the contrary
Christ sheweth that even then also the name of God is sworne by when heaven and earth is named because there is no part of the world no creature wherein God hath not engraven some worke of his glory And when men sweare by heaven and earth Why we are said to sweare by God when we sweare by creatures in the sight and hearing of the framer of them both the religion of the oath is not in the creatures by whom they sweare but God himselfe onely is called to record and for a witnesse by the citing of these symboles and badges of his glory Neither doth God stick in the words but respecteth the mind of him that sweareth neither doth the honour or dishonour of Gods name consist so much in the naked and bare letters and syllables as in the sentence and meaning of those signes and symboles like as Christ also teacheth the same in expresse words Matthew 23. Mat 23.16 17. c. which words are to be conferred with this place which now we have expounded The meaning of S. James in the place alledged out of his Epistle is also all one with the meaning of Christ already expressed Repl. But Christ saith Sweare not at all And James saith Nor by any other oath Therefore all oathes are forbidden amongst Christians Answ Here is a fallacy of Composition namely a mis-joyning of words in this clause or sentence which are not to be joyned together For that particle at all is referred to the diverse formes of rash swearing which the Pharisees averred to be lawfull not to the very word of swearing it selfe as if he should say Sweare not falsly or rashly at all to wit neither directly nor indirectly So saith S. James nor by any other oath to wit rash or false by naming of certaine kinds whereof he sheweth that all such like are forbidden Else should Christ himselfe offend against his owne commandement Mat. 5.37 whereas he here saith Let your communication be Yea Yea and Nay Nay and yet else-where oftentimes in his most grave and reverend speech and doctrine useth this asseveration Verily Verily I say unto you Likewise else should James condemne Paul who by an oath tooke God to witnesse unto his soule and the holy Ghost should contradict himselfe in condemning all manner of oathes by James and commending an oath by another Apostle as a ready remedy profitable and necessary for the preservation of humane society to determine and end all strifes and controversies from which in this frailty mans life cannot be free Repl. 2. The permission of oathes in Scripture and the examples of such as have taken them concerne publique oathes onely that is such as are given and taken in some publique behalfe Therefore at least private oathes such as passe betweene private men are wholly forbidden Esay 65.16 Jer. 4.2 Ans 1. We deny the Antecedent because this restraint is not only not found specified in these grants and examples in Scripture but farther also can have no places in either of them as the view and scanning of the places doth prove 2. There are manifest examples of a private oath as of Jacob and Laban Boos Abdias Abigail and David 3. The same is proved also by the end of an oath for the end thereof which is the confirming of faith and truth and the deciding of debates belongeth privately also to all Christians and therefore so doth an oath it self also whereby we confirme and establish faith and truth 4. Of what things we are to sweare or what oathes are lawfull and what oathes are unlawfull Lawfull oathes THose oathes onely are lawfull which disagree not with Gods word and which are taken of things true certainely knowne lawfull possible weighty necessary profitable and worthy of such and so great a confirmation that is such as require a confirmation by oath for the glory of God and safety of our neighbour Of these only must we sweare Unlawful oathes Vnlawfull oathes are such as are contrary to Gods word and are taken of things either false or uncertaine or unlawfull or impossible or light and frivolous Of such things we may not sweare For he that sweareth of things that are false maketh God witnesse of a lie He that sweareth of uncertaine things sweareth with an evill conscience and with a contempt of God when as he dareth to make God a witnesse of that thing which he knoweth not whether it be a truth or a lie and he that so sweareth it is all one to him whether he make God witnesse of a lie or of a truth and withall he desireth that either God will beare witnesse to a lie or if he will not be accounted the witnesse of a lie that then he will punish him that sweareth He that sweareth of unlawfull things maketh God both a favourer and an approver of that which he hath forbidden in his law and so he maketh God contrary to himselfe because he desireth God to punish him if he doe that which God commandeth or if he doe not that which God hath forbidden and furthermore either he hath a purpose to doe against Gods commandement or if he swear in earnest he alledgeth God for a witnesse of a lie He that sweareth of impossible things either is mad or mocketh and derideth God and Men seeing he cannot have an earnest purpose of performing that which he sweareth or sweareth hypocritically and so sweareth of a lie namely he sweareth that he will doe that which neither he will doe neither shall at all be done He that sweareth lightly sheweth no reverence that he hath of God and he that doth easily sweare doth easily also forsweare But the principall and chiefe cause of an oath ought to be 1. The glory of God Two principall causes to be respected in swearing 2. The safety and welfare as well private as publike of our neighbours Object Of uncertaine things we may not sweare Things to come such as those are which men promise to performe are uncertaine Therefore we must not sweare of things to come Ans We must not indeed sweare of the event as which is not at all in our power but of our owne present will of doing either now or hereafter that which is just and lawfull and of the present and future binding of our selves to it whereof every man may and ought to be certaine And so sware Abraham Isaac Abimelech David Jonathan Booz and others binding themselves to a future performance of certaine duties 5. Whether all oathes are to be kept OAthes conceived or made rightly of things lawfull true certaine weighty and possible are necessarily to be kept For if once thou hast acknowledged and testified thy selfe to be justly bound to keep thy promise and hast called God to record hereof when as afterwards thou wittingly and willingly breakest thine oath thou doest violate and breake a just bond and doest either accuse God the witnesse and maintainer of this bond of vanity and lightnesse or
the law condemned us and the Spirit of regeneration bending and inclining our hearts not to an hatred of the law wherewith they first did burn but to the study and desire of obedience and righteousnesse Therefore he addeth Rom. 7.4 That â—ee should be unto another who is raised up from the dead that yee should bring forth fruit unto God Againe Wee are delivered from the law being dead unto it Rom. 7.6 wherein wee were holden that wee should serve in newnesse of spirit and not in the oldnesse of the letter In the other place this is the Apostles meaning I through the law to wit which accuseth us of sin and terrifieth the consciences of men am dead to the law that is cease to seek for righteousnesse in the law and begin to seek for it in Christ For this is it which he addeth I am crucified with Christ namely by the participation of Christs merit and the mortification of sin that I might live to God according to the will of God expressed in the law For hee liveth to God who obeyeth God and honoureth him through his obedience But this the doctrine of the law doth not work in nature now corrupted except we passe from the law to Christ by faith that he may live in us and we in him that is that he may be effectuall in us through the working of his holy Spirit 1. By suggesting and speaking comfort in our hearts of the remission of our sins then by making us like unto himselfe by regeneration that the law may no longer condemne us and cause wrath but we may delight in the law of God concerning the inner man Rom. 7. So then we are delivered from the law and die to the law so Christ liveth in us that we begin to delight in the law and to order our life according to the prescript thereof For Christ doth not restore any other righteousnesse or any other image of God in us by his Spirit than which was created in our nature darkned and eclipsed by sin and described in the law neither is there another spirit authour of Gods law and worker of our conformity with God in our nature uncorrupted and restored Object 11. I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel not according to the covenant that I made with their Fathers Jerem. 31.31 Here they say That God promiseth not to renew ehe old covenant which is the law but to make a new which is the Gospel Wherefore not the law but the Gospel only is to be taught in the Church of Christ But it is manifest that the new covenant is not diverse from the old as touching the substantiall but only as touching the accidentall parts or conditions and circumstances thereof For although the old shadowes and dark types are taken away and a most cleere doctrine of the prophecies and figures fulfilled by Christ hath succeeded and the grace of the holy Ghost is shed more plentifully on men in the New Testament than in the Old yet notwithstanding there was one and the same manner and way both of obtaining salvation and of Gods spirituall worship in times past that now is Unto this beare witnesse the words themselves of the Prophet Jeremy Jerem. 31.33 I will write in their hearts my law hee saith not another law but the same which in times past I gave them Jerem. 31.34 I will be their God and they shall be my people I will forgive their iniquity and will remember their sins no more For these conditions of the covenant are found as well in the Old as in the New The difference only is that these are not the proper benefits of the law but of the Gospel which two parts of the Old and New Testament the Prophet here opposeth one to the other calling the law the old covenant and the Gospel the new covenant as being the principall part of the covenant and therefore he ascribeth these blessings to the new covenant because thereon dependeth whatsoever grace of Christ befell unto the old Church and therein are those blessings more fully manifested and exhibited by Christ which were also promised and granted in the old for Christ If then God will write the law which was first written in tables of stone in the hearts of men in his new covenant he doth not abolish but establish the law by the preaching of the Gospel whereby the hearts of men are regenerated that they may begin to obey the law and therefore he delivering here a difference between the law and the Gospel doth so substitute the new covenant to the old as that he saith that that part of the covenant which is the Morall law must be retained and written in our hearts Now if they urge these words which the Prophet addeth They shall teach no more every man his neighbour for they shall all know me That hereby they may conclude Jerem. 31.34 That men are not in the New testament to be willed to know God for that they shall of themselves know and obey him they erre too grosly going about to remove the instrumentall cause by reason that the effect in the N. Testament is greater and more plentifull for that men may know God and of their own accord obey him the holy Ghost worketh by the doctrine of the law and the Gospel Neither doth it follow that they are not bound neither are to be urged by incitements of exhortation because they doe their duty of themselves For binding and exhorting is a far other thing than constraining Wherefore in two respects hath the law place in instructing the regenerate namely that they may learne of the law the will of God and may also by the law be more and more incited willingly to obey God Object 12. The law is not necessary unto salvation Therefore it is not to be taught in the Church Ans This reason is a fallacy reasoning that not to be simply so which is not in some respect so For albeit the law is not necessary to this that wee should through our obedience to it be saved yet it is necessary unto other things as hath been taught already in the doctrine concerning the use of the law Object 13. In Christ are hid all the treasures of wisedome and knowledge Againe Col. 2.3.10 John 1.16 Yee are complete in him Of his fulnesse have all wee received Therefore wee must not goe back from Christ to Moses and there is no need of the law in the Church of Christ. Answ This reason deceiveth by inferring a false consequent because it proceedeth from the putting of the whole to the deniall of a part The whole wisedome and knowledge that is the doctrine of Christ delivered by him unto us is sufficient and necessary for the Church but a part of that doctrine is the Morall law also because Christ commandeth not Faith onely but Repentance also and amendment of life to be preached in his Name and hee himselfe delivered
neighbour is 614. Justification The signification of the word 384. How we are justified by grace how by Christs merit how by faith 385. Three causes why faith onely justifieth 386. Foure reasons of our maintenance of this doctrine against Papists ibid. Ten causes why we cannot be justified by works 387. That this doctrine doth not make men either carelesse or profane 389.390 With what difference faith and works are required in them that are to be justified 390. Vide Faith Works K KEy What the power of the Keyes of Gods Kingdome is and why called a key 481.482 Two parts of the power of these keyes 483. To whom the power of these keyes is committed 485. How the power of the keyes differeth from the civill power 488.489 Kill How the Letter is said to kill 23. King Christians are Kings 237. Kingdome What Christs kingdome is 233. what is the kingdome of Christians 237. Foure differences between Christs kingdome and ours 237. How the kingdome of heaven is opened 480. 481. The power of the keyes of this kingdome and what those keyes are 481. 482. Of Gods universall and speciall kingdome 634. The parts of Gods kingdome ibid. c. How manifold ibid. Who is king and head in this kingdome 635. Of the Citizens and Laws of this kingdome 635. 636. Its enemies and laws 636. How it is said to come ibid. Why we are to desire that it might come 637. L LAW The differences betweene the Law and the Gospel are two pag. 2. What it requireth of us 36. A distinction of Law and faith 38. Why the love of our neighbour is called the second commandement 38. What it is to examine our selves by the law and how we do apply the curse of the law to our selves 39. What the law is in generall 516. Its parts 517. How far abrogated and not abrogated by Christ 519. 520. 522. By faith the Law is three waies established 523. In what the Morall law differeth from the Gospell 523. 524. A difference between civill and ecclesiasticall laws 544. Foure uses of the ceremoniall law 617. Two of the Judiciall and Morall law ibid. Seven uses of the Morall law in nature restored 618. Why we are to desire the perfect fulfilling of the law by us in this life ibid. c. How the law is the Letter and how the Gospel is the Spirit 621. Christ in himselfe fulfilled the law two waies 621. And in us two waies ibid. The law is said to increase sin two waies ibid. Letter What is meant by the word Letter in holy Writ 23. How the Letter is said to kill ibid. Liberality What. 608. The affinity between liberality and parsimony 609. Life Eternall life what 375. Who giveth it 376. To whom for what cause how 377 When. 378. Whether in this life we may be assured of everlasting life 378. Lord. Why Christ is called Lord why Our Lord and how many waies 268. 269. Lost Five meanes by which the Spirit is lost 346. Love Why the love of God is called the first and greatest commandement in the law 37. The law and feare of God how they differ 537. Lust What. 602. Three kinds of it 602. 603. Lying What with distinctions 611. M MAgicke What. 534. Magistrates Foure duties which they owe. 592. Man What maner of creature he was made by God pag. 40. The end of his creation ibid. What the image of God is in man 42. How far forth lost and how repaired in man 43. 44. It was necessary that man should have free power either to stand or fall 71. No other creature could sat is fie for man but man 113. How the parts of mans body are attributed to God 152. Marriage What. 613. Its causes 604. Eight conditions of lawfull marriage 604. Whether it be a thing indifferent or no. 605. The duties of married persons ibidem Masse The originall of the word 456. 457. the difference betweene the Lords Supper and it 456. 457. 458. Nine causes for which the Masse is to be abolished 460. Meanes It must be used for three causes 217. Mediatour Our Mediatour must be very man pag. 114. 115. He must be very God 116. Reasons 116. 117. Eight reasons why the Sonne not the Father nor the holy Ghost should be Mediatour 118. 119. What a Mediator is and what need man hath of one 120. The office of a Mediatour 121. What our Mediatour doth for us with the benefit of his Mediatourship 122. Three things in the person of a Mediatour 123. There can be but one Mediatour 123. Christ Mediatour according to both natures 229. Whether there be two natures in Christ our Mediatour 273. The office and properties of Christs Mediatourship 285. 286. 287. Member What it is to be a member of Christ 243. Mercy Arguments of the mercy of God in preserving his creatures 163. Merits No good work of the creature meriteth reward 217. The efficacy of Christs merits performeth three things unto us 223. Whether our good works can merit 514. 515. Ministers Ministry What. 587. It s end degrees and duties 587. 588. Vnto whom it is to be committed 588. Miracles How true miracles are discerned from false 9. Misery Why the knowledge of our misery is necessary 34. Whence knowne 36. It s name and nature ibid. Known two waies 39. Modesty What. 594. Murther Why internall murther is forbidden 596. N NAme Foure significations of distinctions of Gods name 556. The parts and vertues of the right and lawful usage of the name of God 558. What the name of God signifieth 632. Nature Whence the wickednesse of mans nature ariseth 45. Why Nature cannot throughly shew what God is 150. Whether there be two natures in Christ our Mediatour 273. The truth of Christs humane nature proved 273. Sin is not of the nature of mans flesh but an accident only thereof 275. The union of the two natures in Christ 278. A rule touching the properties of both natures in Christ 281. 282. c. Whether Christ suffered according to both natures 293. Neighbour Why the love of our neighbour is called the second commandement 39. O OAthes Vide. Swearing pag. 569. c. Whether all oaths are to be kept 573. why the Israelites kept their oath made with the Gibeonites 574. Omnipotency Three things signified by Gods omnipotency 159. Two differences betweene the Church of God and Philosophy in conceiving of Gods omnipotency ibid. Order A double liberty of the Church in matter of order 18. There is order in the most disordered things 208. P PArents Foure reasons why parents rather then other Governours are to bee obeyed 590. Foure duties of Parents 591. Passeover What it was 467. 468. Its ends and uses 468. 469. Passion Vide Suffering What we beleeve concerning Christs passion 290. What is meant by the name of Christs passion 291. Three differences betweene Christs passion and mens sufferings 292. The causes impellent of Christs passion 294. the ends of it ibidem Passions Humane passions attributed to God for two reasons
be repugnant to wit The Word inhabiteth in the flesh and the Word is without the flesh which indeed are not repugnant by reason of the most simple immensity of the Word as is shewed The Argument of our Adversary directly concluding is this Where the Word is united to the flesh there it is not out of the flesh because the union is the inhabitation but the Word is every-where united to the flesh therefore it is no-where without the flesh But the Minor Proposition hath this ignoration of the Elenchus and trusts to a false definition for we will not yeeld him that the union is such an inhabitation as he fancies wherefore we deny the Major for wheresoever the Word is he inhabits all in the flesh and all without the narrownesse of the flesh filling heaven and earth with the immensity of his essence XXIV Especially because according to this opinion we must determine that the whole Word seeing he cannot be divided into parts in his whole personality and in the whole plenitude of the deity is in innumerable places without his humanity which were truly to draw in sunder through many places that most intrinsecall and altogether indistant union The Animadversion You sing over againe the same song To place the whole Word in his whole personality and in the whole fulnesse of the deity in innumerable places without his owne flesh is to distract in sunder the indistant union of the natures but to do this is a wicked thing therefore so must that We againe deny the Major for the union remaines indistant even when the whole Word without the narrownesse of the flesh fills all other things because by his most simple immensity neither all nor halfe of him seeing he is individed departs or is absent from his flesh neither is he pulled away or separated by any distance of place but he subsists so all within it that he is also all-present every-where without it whereas not another but the same and entire Word is within the flesh which is without it And this argument of pulling asunder the natures is very silly for it flowes from a false imagination that the Word existing without the flesh remaines not united to the flesh which is both most false and impossible for if it were any-where absent from its flesh it were not immense and if in any part onely it remained in the flesh it should be divided Therefore to feigne any distance betweene the natures is truly to feigne a Word having dimensions which our Adversary by cleering of himselfe sufficiently sheweth Some orthodox men untie this knot by distinguishing the personality and deity of the Word confessing that to be no-where out of his flesh seeing there is one personality of both but this they make all to exist within and without the flesh in that the essence of the Word is simply infinite But lest our Adversaries should cavill that so we do not make the personality equally infinite with the essence of the Word therefore we will wave this distinction We know that the personality and divinity of the Word differ not subjectively but onely in some respect when as then both are equally immense and most simple by the same reason it must necessarily follow that both subsist wholly in their flesh and wholly without the flesh and with the Father and holy Ghost fill heaven and earth XXV In the meane time out of our doctrine there doth not follow such a shutting up of the Word into the nature assumed as makes the person of the Word lose his infinity or become finite but from bence rather is inferred this perpetuall immanency inhabitation and incarnation we speake of which elevates the finite humanity into the infinite personality of the Son of God and consequently it makes that the Word is never absent from its flesh never distant from it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and never subsisteth without it but that without distance as Damascen saith it is united with it and remaineth with it above all locality of this created world ineffably and still present The Animadversion Here he perceives that out of his immanency or inhabitation necessarily followes the inclusion and finity of the Word therefore he denies the sequell but in vaine for thus he is convinced What is so immanent in the finite flesh that it existeth no-where without it that must necessarily be shut up within the dimensions of the flesh and be finite as the flesh is finite But the Word is thus immanent in the flesh it is therefore shut up within the finite dimensions of the flesh which is absurd The Major is most true our Adversaries Minor is absurd there followes then an absurd conclusion He saith that the perpetuall immanency followes out of his doctrine rather but this is to beg the matter in question to inferre an immanency out of an immanency He saith A prodigious speech that the immanency elevateth the finite humanity into the infinite personality of the Son of God If he understood this Teratologie of the union of the flesh with the infinite hypostasis of the flesh retaining the properties thereof no orthodox man would reject it but the stile of truth is plaine whereas that of a lye is intricate such as this is For he doth not meane this of the union as he saith but of an ubiquitary diffusion of the flesh with the Word which orthodox Divines simply deny for the flesh can no more cast off her finity and dimensions then she can her very nature no not in the union it selfe Now if remaining finite she is elevated into an infinity that is is made infinite then sure it must be both at once finite and infinite quantitative and without quantity flesh and no flesh and what is this but to fancy an Vtopian Chimera Againe he saith by meanes of this immanency the Word is never absent no-where distant from his flesh but indeed this is effected not by the immanency which he feignes but by his most simple immensity for by this it is that the Word is all the same in his flesh and every-where without all He saith that by the meanes of this immanency the Word never subsisteth without the flesh but inseparably is united to it But againe he ascribes a false effect to an untrue cause and admits ignorationem elenchi for the inhabitation of the Word in the flesh which he by an ambiguous terme will rather call an immanency is not his inclusion or confining within the flesh that is within the dimensions of the flesh neither do these two To be without the flesh and To remaine inseparably united to the flesh destroy one another as was shewed but now Yet if both be not true together concerning the Word neither can he be immense nor can he be God Lastly in that he saith the flesh united to the Word or the Word to the flesh remaineth so above all locality of this created world it is either a vaine Teratologie or a false opinion
and in the obedience of faith by the grace of the holy Ghost On the other side what sort of men he hath appointed to condemne to wit such as are not converted Infidels strangers from Christ both which is taught in the Gospell So many good men chiefly Politicians judge of this Article neither do they think it fitting to wade deeper into this Controversie especially seeing it seemes to ascribe all the meanes of salvation fully to God to Christ and to grace And truly here should be no question if the Authors meant onely this that by this Article is explained the popular doctrine of the qualities of those that shall be saved or damned But because in the Conference they professe Coll. Hag. p. 84. That this Article containes the doctrine of predestination to salvation but deny that the qualities of those that shall be saved to wit faith and perseverance proceed from predestination as from their fountaine but contend that these are in order before predestination or election and not obscurely they make them depend upon mans will whence necessarily God must be robbed of the full glory of our salvation man must be puffed up with pride our Christian comfort in life and death must be undermined free justification and the assurance of salvation must be denied whatsoever they pretend in their garnished speeches to the contrary Therefore this Article cannot be simply approved of and it is full of equivocations and dangerous swelling phrases under which Pelagianisme is under-hand brought into the Church which fraud that it might appeare the lesse they purposely abstaine from the word predestination Now in Austines time the Pelagian Heresie was thus 1. That Adams sin hutted no man but himselfe and that man is not borne now in a worse condition then he was created 2. That Christ was seene and died to expiate all sins committed by imitation of Adam 3. That salvation in Christ is so proposed to all men that whosoever will beleeve and be baptised may be saved 4. That God fore-knew before the foundation of the world who were to beleeve and doe good works and who were to continue in the Faith being assisted by grace and that he predestinated for his kingdome whom he fore-saw being freely called would beleeve above others and would be worthy of their calling and should die an happie â—eath 5. That the grace of God was given to all men according to their merit for the better using of their free-will 6. And that in this life so much is given that man may if he will be free from all sin Against this Heresie Hierome and Austine disputed at large and Austine retracted three whole Chapters Tom. 7. in opusculis 1. Concerning originall sin 2. Of grace and the cause of predestination 3. Of the perfection of righteousnesse Pelagius in the Synod of Palestina being condemned did so farre revoke his errour that he wished Anathema to him that thinks or sayes Apud Augustin de grat Christi cap. 2. that the grace of God by which Christ came into this world to save sinners is not necessary not onely every houre or every moment but also to every one of our actions and who goe about to take this away they shall be punished eternally Who would not cleere Pelagius in this case but under the buskin of this word grace he deluded the Palestine Bishops as Austine sheweth he left behinde him two disciples Caelestius and Julianus young men of a sharpe wit and with whom Austine in Africa had much adoe At last this infection flew over the Mediterrane-sea into Sicilie and Marsiles in France not all of it but onely so much as concerned the point of grace and predestination and the death of Christ the Asserters of which were called Semi-pelagians and the remainders of the Pelagians of which points there are extant the Epistles of Prosper Aquitanicus and of Hilarius Arelatensis to Austine whose learned Answer contained in two Books of the predestination of the Saints and of the good of perseverance and in a third concerning correction and grace To which Answer if the Authors of these Articles at this day would stand as they may and should stand for it is altogether S. Pauls doctrine the matter had beene decided ere this For indeed Arminius with his followers have at this day re-assumed the cause of the Marsilians and Syracusians but somewhat more handsomly dressed Neither could he be ignorant of this and therefore he used but little ingenuity in his tergiversation when he wrote in the Articles That he acknowledgeth neither Semi-pelagianisme objected against him nor nine nor five nor foure inches of it But to returne to the Article in it there be divers equivocations as shall appeare 1. The first lofty phrase lieth hid in Gods immutable Decree According to Scripture that is Gods immutable Decree which absolutely is not changed nor by the creatures can be changed for so God pronounceth himselfe immutable and his counsell immutable Mal. 3.6 Isaiah 46.10 I am God and change not My counsell shall stand and I will do all that I have decreed But they understand that God by an immutable Decree indeed hath decreed to save beleevers in regard of the species that is none but beleevers but not by a decree altogether immutable in respect of the individuals to wit of this or that beleever but under a condition if this or that beleever do not cause a change For they thinke as appeares by the fifth Article that they who beleeve to day may be unbeleevers to morrow and againe of unbeleevers may come to beleeve consequently therefore they thinke that God to day may decree not to save which yesterday by his immutable decree he appointed to save and that againe he can decree to save them still changing their condition If this be to give to God an immutable decree let themselves judge sure Jam. 1.17 no shadow can be more changeable then such a decree which the Scripture denieth The Authors Decreti Holland pag. 5. place such a decree in God Mat. 11.21 23.37 denying That any by God are invited to salvation to whom he hath not altogether decreed to give salvation for this being granted we must say that God had altogether decreed to give salvation to the Cities of Judea and Galilee whom Christ by preaching invited to salvation but seeing they beleeved not they were not saved therefore either he before did â—ot decree to save them or afterward he changed his decree 2. The second â—â—â—â—ing phrase and that the chiefest the foundation of the rest containing the â—â—â—â—â—e of the whole cause and difference of both parts is in the word appointed This according to the Scripture signifieth to us that God not onely from eternity appoâ—â—â—ed to save them who in time beleeve and persevere and are saved but also to elect them in Christ and to predestinate them to salvation and decreed to bestow on them qualities requisite to salvation to wit faith
is his eternall counsell in saving us before others for from this fountaine flowes the outward calling and inward also to faith in Christ of all those who shall be saved Hence flow faith and repentance justification obedience and perseverance in faith yea our whole salvation and glorification which the Scripture perspicuously teacheth and confirmes in these and such like sayings Whom he predestinated Rom. 8.30 Rom. 11.7 Act. 13.46 Eph. 1.3 c. them he called whom he called them he justified whom he justified them also he glorified Also Election hath obtained the rest waxed hard Also So many as were ordained to salvation beleeved Also He elected us in Christ before the foundations of the world that we might be holy and blamelesse before him in love whom he hath predestimated unto adoption by Jesus Christ De bono persev c. 14. Praesat ad Rom. to the praise of his glorious grace c. Austin confirmes the same saying This predestination of the Saints is nothing else but a preparation of Gods bounties by which they are most assuredly freed who are freed Luther also very emphatically confirmes the same in these words Both flow and have their originall from Gods eternall predestination to wit who shall beleeve who shall not beleeve who shall be absolved from sin who not that all this may be out of our power and onely in the hand of God that we are justified That this fountaine therefore must chiefly be knowne by Divines and by all who will be strengthened in faith and comfort and that it is to be perspicuously and soberly taught in Schooles and Churches who will doubt and that specially for two causes 1. For the glory of God that knowing the meanes and causes of salvation and the qualities of those that are to be saved and salvation it self not to depend from us but from Gods good pleasure alone we may ascribe our salvation not to our selves but wholly to Gods mercie 2. For our consolation that being assured that our faith perseverance and salvation depend not from our owne strength or free-will but that they are grounded on Gods eternall and immutable counsell we may be confident that the same is certaine and immoveable and in this confidence 2 Pet. 1.9 we may studie to make our election and vocation sure to us by continuali prayers and good works ordained by God for this end But this Article doth altogether foule and obstruct this most cleere fountaine with the dirt of equivocation for it denieth see the Conference that our faith and perseverance proceed from the fountain of eternall election as the effect from the first cause and it ascribeth both these in shew to Gods grace but indeed to mans will because it makes mans will the mistresse of Gods resistible grace it makes mans free-will stronger and more powerfull then Gods grace which can be resisted and makes the whole difference of those that are to be damned and saved depend on mens wills by which meanes it is plain that the glory of mans salvation cannot be wholly ascribed to God but he is of necessitie robbed of it Hence it utterly overthrowes both the certaintie of faith grace justification perseverance and indeed of our whole salvation and consequently of our onely comfort in life and death For who doth not understand that the assurance of grace justification perseverance salvation and our whole comfort in life and death can no waies consist with resistible grace and with mans will resisting or able to resist as it were with two principles either repuguant to each other or changing every houre Hence it is apparent what we are to judge of tolerance for who can say that an Article so equivocall and so captious with dangerous high tragicall straines is tolerable Who wittingly and willingly would buy or eat sugar mixt with poyson Who will account that a benefit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to have the apple of contentions flung into our Churches which will afford matter of perpetuall strife Will Physicians endure in their Schooles that Empericks adulterate or deny their doctrine of diseases Can Mathematicians endure the false delineations of Mechanicks introducing for example into a quadrangle a false sine for a true one and so overthrowing the grounds of their science Much lesse should equivocall doctrines be tolerated in the Church which using the pretext of grace Prosper Epist ad August deny grace by which the originall of salvation is placed in man mans will is preferred to Gods will therfore one is helped because he wills it but doth not will because he is helped Men are made beleeve that they who are originally evill receive the beginning of their goodnesse not from God but from themselves and 't is taught that God is pleased by other means then by those which he himself hath given And so much of the equivocations of the first Article but how that is rightly to be understood filled up and formed is explained * Cothurno 2º above ARTICLE II. Therefore Jesus Christ the Saviour of the world dyed for all and singular and so far that he hath obtained reconciliation and remission of sins for all by his death but on this condition that no man can really enjoy the said remission of sins except the faithfull man and this is according to the Gospel John 3.16 God so loved the world that he gave his onely begotten Son that whosoever beleeveth in him might not perish but have life eternall And 1 John 2.2 And he is the propitiation for our sins and not for ours alone but for the sins of the whole world The Examination THis is no new matter which the Remonstrants handle in this Article for of old the Semipelagians in Marsiles and Syracusa held the same in these words Our Lord Jesus Christ dyed for all mankind Prosper Epist ad August and no man at all is exempted from the redemption of his bloud although his mind hath been quite averse all his life from him because the mysterie of mercy belongs to all men by which therefore many are not renewed because they are fore-knowne that they account it needlesse to be renewed Therefore so far as concernes God life eternall is prepared for all but as for mans liberty of will it is received by them who of their owne accord shall beleeve God and shall receive the help of grace by the merit of their faith By this Article although in shew they amplified Gods grace and mans redemption yet in effect they minced both giving to God an indifferent grace to Christ the merit of redemption but to free-will the efficacie of both And while they would overthrow the doctrine of Predestination which Austin did maintaine out of the Apostle they did indeed shake the whole Gospel in ascribing the cause of faith and perseverance and consequently of mans salvation to God and Christ indifferently but to mans wit and free-will determinately which what it is they that are taught by God
agnise the mercy and grace of God and yeeld thanks unto him for the same The summe therefore of all is that though the satisfaction of Christ our Mediator for our sins is most perfect yet all are not delivered by it but they only who beleeve the Gospel and do apply the merit of Christ by a true faith unto themselves Object 1. Grace exceedeth the sinne of Adam If therefore for the sin of Adam all men are cast away much more by the grace of Christ all and not beleevers onely shall be saved Answer to the antecedent Grace exceedeth and is above sin in respect of the sufficiency of the satisfaction not in respect of the application thereof Wherefore that all are not saved through the satisfaction or obedience of Christ the fault thereof sticketh in men themselves and is to be ascribed unto the unbeleevers who imbrace not the grace of Christ offered but like ungratefull men reject it Object 2. Whomsoever Christ hath fully satisfied for they are to be received of God into favour for so doth the justice of God require But Christ hath fully satisfied for all the sins of all men Therefore all men are to be received of God into favour or if this be not done God shall be unjust or somewhat is derogated from Christs merit Answ The Major proposition being understood simply and without any limitation is false All are received into favour for whom Christ hath satisfied with this condition if they apply the satisfation of Christ unto themselves by faith This condition is expresly added John 3.10 So God loved the world that hee gave his Sonne that whosoever beleeveth in him should not perish but might have everlasting life Object 3. Adam by one sinne made all subject to condemnation but Christ doth justifie onely some The force therefore of Adams sin is greater to condemne then of Christs satisfaction to save Answ The force of Christs satisfaction is seen not in the multitude of them who are saved but in the greatnesse of the benefit We deny the consequence of this argument because the force excellency and efficacy of Christs satisfaction is not to be esteemed by the multitude or number of those men who are thereby saved but by the greatnesse of the benefit it selfe For it is a greater work to deliver and save even one from everlasting death then to make all men by one sin guilty of everlasting death for be it that Christ should save even but one man yet it was necessary 1. That he should pay in a finite time a punishment in greatnesse and value infinite not onely for that one sin of Adam but for other infinite sins which follow it of which every one also deserves infinite punishment It was required also 2. That he should purge and take away not only that originall and birth-sin but also infinite others 3. And should restore in him a perfect conformity with God Wherefore the grace of Christ in saving even one man doth in infinite manner exceed the sin of Adam Ans 2. Again that the force of that efficacy which is in Christs merit and benefit passeth not through all men as the strength of Adams sin passed through all his posterity the fault hereof is in men who do not as much apply unto themselves by a true faith Christs merit as they do apply unto themselves the sin of Adam both by being born in it and consenting unto it and fostering it Now the reason why all men do not beleeve nor apply this Christs benefit unto themselves is a question of higher and deeper speculation impertinent to this place This may suffice for answer herein Rom 9.28 God hath mercy on whom he will and whom he will he hardeneth And he will so shew his mercy that hee will also exercise his justice Quest 21. What is true faith Answ It is not only a certain knowledge whereby I surely assent to all things which God hath revealed unto us in his word a James 2.19 but also an assured trust b Heb. 11.1 7. Rom. 4.18 19 20 21. 10.10 Ephes 3.12 Hebr. 4.6 James 1.6 kindled in my heart by the holy Ghost c Gal. 5.22 Matth. 16.17 2 Cor. 4.13 Joh. 6.29 Eph. 2.8 Act. 16.14 Phil. 1.19 through the Gospel d Rom. 1.16 10.17 1 Cor. 1.21 Act. 10.44 16.14 whereby I make my repose in God being assuredly resolved that remission of sins everlasting righteousnesse and life is given not to others only but to me also e Rom. 1.17 5.1 Gal. 3.11 2.16 and that freely through the mercy of God for the merit of Christ alone f Eph. 2.8 Rom. 3.24 5.19 Luke 1.77 78. The Explication THe doctrine of Faith followeth 1. Because faith is the means whereby we are made partakers of the Mediatour 2. Because without faith the preaching of the Gospel profiteth and availeth nothing The Questions touching Faith are 1. What faith is in generall 2. How many kindes of faith there are in Scripture 3. How faith differeth from hope 4. What are the efficient causes of justifying faith 5. What are the effects of it 6. To whom it is given 1. What faith is in generall THe word fides or faith according to Cicero's derivation Whence faith hath his name Cic. Offic. 1. receiveth his appellation and name from the Gerund fiendo which signifieth doing because that which is covenanted is performed and is defined by him to be The assurance and truth of contracts and whatsoever kind of composition yea the very foundation of justice The generall nature of faith as it is extended unto all things It is commonly defined to be A certain or grounded knowledge of propositions or conclusions to which we assent on authority of the assertion of true witnesses whom wee may not except against or doubt of whether it be God or Angels or man or experience The generall nature of faith as it concerneth onely divine things and is taught in Scripture But whereas in the most generall distinction of faith there is one kind of faith in divine matters another in humane the question here is what Theologicall faith or faith in divine things is Wherefore we must give a more strict difinition of faith taken in generall which notwithstanding must be such as that it comprise all the specials of faith delivered in Scripture In generall therefore The divers acceptations and uses of the name of faith whatsoever faith is mentioned in Scripture it is A certain knowledge firmly yeelding assent to all things which are delivered in the sacred Scriptures of God his will works and grace whereunto we condescend even because God himselfe doth affirme it Or it is to yeeld assent to every word of God delivered to the Church either in the law or in the Gospel for that it is the asseveration or avouching of God himselfe Oftentimes faith is taken for the very doctrine of the Church or those things
whereby wee are out of Gods word informed and instructed unto faith or assent and beleefe as when wee use to say The Christian faith the Apostolike faith Oftentimes it is used for the fulfilling of ancient promises or the things themselves which are beleeved as Before faith came we were kept under the law and shut up unto the faith which should afterward be revealed Gal. 3.23 How faith differeth from all other kindes of knowledge Furthermore albeit there be also other certain notices whereunto we firmly give assent as understanding or apprehension of principles science sapience art prudence for the assent coming unto the notice doth confirme and perfect it so that what knowledge of a thing it had without assent it is imperfect and unprofitable yet none of those are that faith especially the Theologicall such as a little before is described for to those notices or apprehensions we do assent either because they are naturally engraffed in our minds or for that they bring demonstrance or some other true and certain proofs But the Theologicall assent or faith is not neither ariseth it out of the instinct of nature neither out of sense or experience neither out of demonstrations or reasons borrowed from Philosophy but cometh and dependeth of a peculiar and supernaturall revelation or divine testimony That therefore which is added in the former description for the asseveration of God himselfe distinguisheth Theologicall faith from all other knowledges even the most certain And this generall definition of Theologicall faith is necessary that wee may not think that out of Philosophy or such principles as are naturally known to all are to be drawn reasons or arguments sound and sufficient to confirme the articles of our faith but may know that the word of God and those good and necessary consequences and arguments which are framed out of it are a supernaturall light and more certain then all though most exact and exquisite demonstrances either Naturall or Mathematicall of Philosophers 2. How many kinds of faith there are in Scripture FOur sorts of faith are found rehearsed in Scripture 1. Historicall 2. Temporary 3. Working miracles 4. Justifying or saving faith The difference of these kinds one from the other appeareth out of their definitions Historicall faith is to know and think all those things to be true which are manifested from above What historicall faith is either by voice or by visions or by oracles or by any other manner of revelation and are taught in the books of the Prophets and Apostles and thus to be perswaded of them for the asseveration and testimony of God himselfe It is called historicall because it is a bare knowledge of such things as God is said to have done to do or that he will do hereafter of this faith these testimonies of holy Scripture make mention 1 Cor. 13.2 If I have all faith so that I could remove mountains c. Which saying notwithstanding may be construed of all the sorts of faith James 2.19 justifying faith only excepted The divels beleeve and tremble for the divell knoweth exactly both what things are written in the word and also what are not written because hee is a spirit witty quick and learned hee is present and seeth whatsoever things are done in the Church and also through long experience hath known the doctrine of the Church to be true Acts 8.13 Simon Magus beleeved to wit that the doctrine was true which the Apostle Peter propounded but he had not a justifying faith Temporary faith is to assent unto the doctrine of the Church together with profession and joy therein What temporall faith is though not true and unfained that is to say not springing from a lively sense of the grace of God towards them but of some other cause whatsoever therefore it endureth but for a time and in the instant of affliction vanisheth Or It is to assent unto the heavenly doctrine which is delivered by the Prophets and Apostles to professe it to glory therein and to rejoyce in the knowledge thereof for a time not for the application of the promise to themselves to wit not for any feeling in their hearts of Gods grace towards them but for other causes and therefore without any true conversion and finall perseverance in the profession of this doctrine This definition is drawn from the parable and words of Christ He that receiveth seed in the stony ground is he which heareth the word and incontinently with joy receiveth it yet hath hee not root in himselfe and dureth but a season Mat. 13.20 21. for as soon as tribulation or persecution cometh c. The causes of this kind of joy are in a manner infinite and diverse in divers persons yet all of them temporary at whose fading such faith also as is grounded on them flitteth and vanisheth Hypocrites rejoyce at the hearing of the Gospel Temporary faith is led in a string with the commodities of the world and with them doth live and die either because it is a new doctrine in their ears or because it seemeth to sooth and flatter their affections whilest it disburdeneth them of mens traditions as doth the doctrine of Christian liberty of justification c. or because they haunt a licentious custome of sinning or hunt after profits and commodities whether publike or private as riches honour glory c. which then appeareth when the crosse overtaketh them For then because they have no root they are parched and wasted with the heat thereof Thus hypocrites rejoyce they rejoyce not as true beleevers I mean on a sense and feeling of Gods grace working in them and on an application unto themselves of the blessings offered in the word which one thing only in the faithfull is the cause that they are rapt with exceeding true and perfect joy and the removing of this cause sufficeth to make faith temporary The difference of temporall and historicall faith This time serving faith differeth from historicall only in that joy which accompanieth it and not the other for the historicall faith hath a bare and naked knowledge only but temporary faith besides this knowledge rejoyceth therein for time-serving men receive the word with joy whereas divels beleeve historically and yet are hereon touched with no joy but rather tremble they I say joy not in that knowledge they have but wish it were quite extinguished Nay farther they professe not themselves to be followers of that doctrine though they know it to be true but horribly persecute and maliciously oppugne the same Notwithstanding in men historicall faith is sometimes coupled with profession and sometimes also severed from it for oftentimes men professe for I know not what causes that religion and truth which in heart they hate many also which are resolved and know assuredly the verity of Christian doctrine notwithstanding oppose themselves and set their faces against it and these are they which sin against the holy Ghost Object Yea but the