Selected quad for the lemma: doctrine_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
doctrine_n prove_v scripture_n tradition_n 3,537 5 9.6681 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A42569 The catalogue of all the discourses published against popery, during the reign of King James II by the members of the Church of England, and by the non-conformists with the names of the authors of them. Gee, Edward, 1657-1730. 1689 (1689) Wing G454; ESTC R10194 16,688 38

There are 3 snippets containing the selected quad. | View original text

pius_n creed_n no_o article_n of_o the_o christian_a faith._n by_o the_o same_o author_n 185._o some_o dialogue_n between_o mr._n g._n and_o other_o with_o reflection_n on_o a_o book_n call_v pax_fw-la vobis_fw-la by_o mr._n linford_n 186._o a_o dialogue_n between_o two_o protestant_n in_o answer_n to_o a_o popish_a catechism_n call_v a_o short_a catechism_n against_o all_o sectary_n by_o mr._n rawlett_n late_a preacher_n at_o newcastle_n upon_o tine_n 187._o the_o plausible_a argument_n of_o the_o romish_a priest_n answer_v by_o a_o english_a protestant_n by_o dr._n comber_n precentor_n of_o york_n 188._o a_o historical_a relation_n of_o several_a great_a and_o learned_a romanist_n that_o have_v embrace_v the_o protestant_a religion_n by_o ignotus_fw-la 189._o a_o pacifick_n discourse_n of_o the_o cause_n and_o remedy_n of_o the_o difference_n about_o religion_n which_o distract_v the_o peace_n of_o christendom_n by_o dr._n thomas_n smith_n 190._o a_o answer_n to_o a_o discourse_n concern_v the_o celibacy_n of_o the_o clergy_n print_a at_o oxford_n by_o mr._n tully_n 191._o a_o request_n to_o roman_a catholic_n to_o answer_v the_o query_n upon_o these_o their_o follow_a tenet_n i._n their_o divine_a service_n in_o a_o unknown_a tongue_n ii_o their_o taking_n away_o the_o cup_n from_o the_o people_n iii_o their_o withhold_a the_o scripture_n from_o the_o lay_v iv_o the_o adoration_n of_o image_n etc._n etc._n by_o mr._n gourdon_n of_o scotland_n 192._o the_o judgement_n of_o private_a discretion_n in_o matter_n of_o religion_n defend_v in_o a_o sermon_n at_o st._n paul_n covent-garden_n by_o mr._n kidder_n 193._o a_o plain_a defence_n of_o the_o protestant_a religion_n fit_v to_o the_o mean_a capacity_n be_v a_o full_a confutation_n of_o the_o net_n for_o the_o fisher_n of_o men._n by_o mr._n h._n author_n of_o the_o missionary_n art_n etc._n etc._n 194._o the_o protestant_n and_o popish_a way_n of_o interpret_n scripture_n impartial_o compare_v in_o answer_n to_o pax_fw-la vobis_fw-la etc._n etc._n by_o dr._n grove_n 195._o some_o query_n to_o protestant_n answer_v and_o a_o explication_n of_o the_o roman_a catholick_n belief_n in_o four_o great_a point_n consider_v i._o concern_v their_o church_n ii_o their_o worship_n iii_o justification_n iu._n civil_a government_n by_o mr_n altham_n 196._o a_o brief_a account_n of_o the_o first_o rise_v of_o the_o name_n protestant_n etc._n etc._n by_o ignotus_fw-la 197._o the_o protestant_a resolve_v or_o a_o discourse_n show_v the_o unreasonableness_n of_o his_o turn_a roman_n catholic_n for_o salvation_n by_o mr._n ellys_n 198._o two_o short_a discourse_n against_o the_o romanist_n by_o mr._n dodwell_n history-professour_n at_o oxford_n 199._o a_o letter_n to_o a_o lady_n furnish_v she_o with_o scripture-testimony_n against_o the_o principal_a point_n and_o doctrine_n of_o popery_n by_o ignotus_fw-la 200._o a_o treatise_n of_o tradition_n in_o two_o part_n by_o dr._n whitby_n 201._o the_o judgement_n of_o archbishop_n cranmer_n concern_v the_o people_n right_a to_o and_o discreet_a use_n of_o the_o holy_a scripture_n publish_a with_o a_o preface_n by_o mr._n gee_o 202._o a_o letter_n of_o enquiry_n to_o the_o reverend_a father_n of_o the_o society_n of_o jesus_n write_a in_o the_o person_n of_o a_o dissatisfied_a roman_a catholic_n by_o j._n taylor_n gent._n 203._o a_o answer_n to_o a_o book_n print_v at_o oxford_n called_z pietas_n romana_n &_o parisiensus_fw-la by_o mr._n harrington_n of_o oxford_n have_v thus_o give_v a_o just_a catalogue_n of_o all_o the_o book_n that_o have_v come_v to_o my_o knowledge_n i_o will_v end_v with_o give_v the_o list_n of_o the_o tract_n write_v upon_o the_o excellent_a design_n of_o the_o clergy_n of_o this_o city_n of_o consider_v all_o the_o place_n of_o scripture_n which_o papist_n cite_v for_o their_o several_a doctrine_n 204._o popery_n not_o found_v on_o scripture_n or_o the_o text_n which_o papist_n cite_v out_o of_o the_o bible_n for_o the_o proof_n of_o the_o point_n of_o their_o religion_n examine_v and_o show_v to_o be_v allege_v without_o ground_n the_o introduction_n by_o dr._n tenison_n 205._o the_o text_n which_o papist_n cite_v out_o of_o the_o bible_n for_o the_o proof_n of_o their_o doctrine_n concern_v the_o obsuscurity_n of_o the_o holy_a scripture_n examine_v by_o dr._n fowler_n 206._o the_o text_n examine_v which_o papist_n cite_v out_o of_o the_o bible_n for_o the_o proof_n of_o their_o doctrine_n concern_v the_o insufficiency_n of_o scripture_n and_o necessity_n of_o tradition_n by_o mr._n williams_n 207._o the_o text_n examine_v which_o papist_n cite_v out_o of_o the_o bible_n to_o prove_v the_o supremacy_n of_o st._n peter_n and_o the_o pope_n over_o the_o whole_a church_n part_n i._o by_o dr._n patrick_n 208._o the_o second_o part_n of_o the_o text_n examine_v which_o papist_n cite_v out_o of_o the_o bible_n to_o prove_v the_o supremacy_n of_o st._n peter_n etc._n etc._n by_o dr._n patrick_n 209._o the_o text_n examine_v which_o papist_n cite_v out_o of_o the_o bible_n for_o the_o proof_n of_o their_o doctrine_n of_o infallibility_n by_o mr._n tully_n 210._o the_o text_n examine_v etc._n etc._n concern_v the_o worship_n of_o angel_n and_o saint_n depart_v part_n i._o by_o dr._n freeman_n 211._o the_o text_n examine_v etc._n etc._n concern_v the_o worship_n of_o angel_n etc._n etc._n part_v ii_o by_o dr._n freeman_n 212._o the_o text_n examine_v etc._n etc._n concern_v the_o worship_n of_o image_n and_o relic_n by_o mr._n gee_o 213._o the_o text_n examine_v etc._n etc._n concern_v seven_o sacrament_n and_o the_o efficacy_n of_o they_o part_n i._o concern_v the_o sacrament_n of_o confirmation_n and_o penance_n by_o mr._n gee_o 214._o the_o text_n examine_v etc._n etc._n concern_v seven_o sacrament_n etc._n etc._n part_v ii_o concern_v the_o sacrament_n of_o order_n matrimony_n and_o extreme_a unction_n and_o their_o efficacy_n by_o mr._n gee_o 215._o the_o text_n examine_v etc._n etc._n concern_v the_o sacrifice_n of_o the_o mass_n part_n i._o by_o mr._n kidder_n 216._o the_o text_n examine_v etc._n etc._n concern_v the_o sacrifice_n of_o the_o mass_n part_n ii_o by_o mr._n kidder_n 217._o the_o text_n examine_v etc._n etc._n concern_v transubstantiation_n by_o mr._n williams_n 218._o the_o text_n examine_v etc._n etc._n concern_v auricular_a confession_n by_o mr._n linford_n 219._o the_o text_n examine_v etc._n etc._n concern_v satisfaction_n part_n i._o by_o mr._n gascarth_n rector_n of_o allhallows_n barkin_n 220._o the_o text_n examine_v etc._n etc._n concern_v satisfaction_n part_n ii_o by_o mr._n gascarth_n 221._o the_o text_n examine_v etc._n etc._n concern_v purgatory_n part_n i._o by_o mr._n brampston_n lecturer_n of_o st._n martin_n ludgate_n 222._o the_o text_n examine_v etc._n etc._n concern_v purgatory_n part_n ii_o by_o mr._n brampston_n 223._o the_o text_n examine_v etc._n etc._n concern_v prayer_n in_o a_o unknown_a tongue_n part_n i._o by_o dr._n scott_n 224._o the_o text_n examine_v etc._n etc._n concern_v prayer_n etc._n etc._n part_v ii_o by_o dr._n scott_n 225._o the_o text_n examine_v etc._n etc._n concern_v the_o celibacy_n of_o priest_n and_o vow_n of_o continence_n part_n i._o by_o mr._n payne_n 226._o the_o text_n examine_v etc._n etc._n concern_v the_o celibacy_n of_o priest_n etc._n etc._n part_v ii_o by_o mr._n payne_n 227._o the_o text_n examine_v etc._n etc._n concern_v the_o visibility_n of_o the_o church_n by_o mr._n resbury_n 228._o the_o text_n examine_v which_o papist_n cite_v out_o of_o the_o bible_n for_o the_o proof_n of_o their_o doctrine_n of_o merit_n by_o mr._n linford_n there_o will_v be_v publish_v two_o table_n to_o the_o whole_a set_a of_o these_o several_a text_n by_o mr._n chiswel_o the_o publisher_n of_o they_o have_v now_o dispatch_v the_o catalogue_n of_o the_o several_a book_n publish_v against_o popery_n by_o the_o member_n of_o the_o church_n of_o england_n i_o must_v according_a to_o my_o design_n pass_v now_o to_o those_o publish_v by_o our_o nonconformist_a brethren_n against_o popery_n during_o king_n james_n the_o second_v reign_v which_o according_a to_o my_o best_a information_n be_v these_o ●●●…_n transubstantiation_n a_o peculiar_a article_n of_o the_o roman_n catholic_n faith_n which_o be_v never_o own_a by_o the_o ancient_a church_n or_o any_o of_o the_o reform_a church_n in_o answer_n to_o a_o late_a discourse_n call_v reason_n for_o abrogate_a the_o test._n by_o mr._n goodwin_n of_o london_n ●●●…_n a_o plain_a representation_n of_o transubstantiation_n as_o it_o be_v receive_v in_o the_o church_n of_o rome_n with_o the_o sandy_a foundation_n it_o be_v build_v upon_o and_o the_o argument_n that_o do_v clear_o evert_n and_o overturn_v it_o by_o mr._n pendleberry_n of_o lancashire_n these_o be_v all_o i_o find_v write_v by_o the_o nonconformist_n except_o we_o must_v reckon_v among_o they_o the_o book_n write_v by_o the_o late_a henry_n care_n whether_o he_o be_v a_o member_n of_o the_o church_n of_o england_n or_o a_o dissenter_n i_o can_v tell_v however_o i_o be_o sure_a neither_o party_n ought_v to_o be_v ashamed_a of_o the_o book_n which_o do_v very_o well_o deserve_v a_o place_n in_o this_o catalogue_n and_o be_v call_v a_o modest_a enquiry_n whether_o st._n peter_n be_v ever_o at_o rome_n and_o bishop_n of_o that_o church_n by_o mr._n h._n care._n i_o need_v not_o here_o to_o beg_v our_o nonconformist_a brethren_n pardon_n for_o this_o slender_n account_v of_o their_o write_n against_o popery_n during_o the_o reign_n of_o king_n james_n the_o second_o because_o i_o have_v use_v great_a diligence_n to_o attain_v a_o exact_a account_n of_o they_o however_o if_o there_o be_v any_o discourse_n write_v by_o they_o but_o omit_v in_o this_o catalogue_n or_o if_o any_o of_o those_o in_o the_o catalogue_n who_o author_n name_v i_o can_v not_o recover_v do_v belong_v to_o they_o if_o either_o the_o author_n or_o any_o friend_n for_o they_o will_v be_v please_v to_o send_v the_o title_n of_o the_o book_n with_o the_o author_n name_n to_o mr._n r._n baldwin_n the_o publisher_n of_o this_o catalogue_n they_o shall_v be_v insert_v into_o the_o next_o edition_n of_o this_o catalogue_n if_o it_o have_v one_o and_o the_o same_o request_n be_v make_v to_o the_o member_n of_o the_o church_n of_o england_n the_o end_n
the_o church_n of_o rome_n in_o the_o article_n of_o the_o invocation_n of_o saint_n and_o worship_n of_o image_n by_o dr._n sherlock_n 21._o a_o answer_n to_o the_o amicable_a accommodation_n of_o the_o difference_n between_o the_o representer_n and_o the_o answerer_n by_o dr._n sherlock_n 22._o a_o view_n of_o the_o whole_a controversy_n between_o the_o representer_n and_o the_o answerer_n with_o a_o answer_n to_o the_o representer_n last_o reply_n by_o dr._n clagett_n 23._o a_o catechism_n true_o represent_v the_o doctrine_n and_o practice_n of_o the_o church_n of_o rome_n with_o a_o answer_n to_o they_o by_o mr._n williams_n after_o this_o the_o author_n of_o a_o papist_n misrepresent_v and_o represent_v be_v please_v to_o venture_v on_o in_o a_o second_o part_n to_o the_o same_o strain_n which_o he_o publish_v under_o the_o title_n of_o the_o catholic_n representer_n and_o weekly_a in_o single_a sheet_n the_o answer_n to_o which_o be_v these_o 24._o the_o papist_n represent_v and_o not_o misrepresent_v be_v in_o answer_n to_o the_o first_o sheet_n of_o the_o second_o part_n of_o the_o papist_n misrepresent_v and_o represent_v and_o for_o a_o further_a vindication_n of_o the_o catechism_n true_o represent_v the_o doctrine_n and_o practice_n of_o the_o church_n of_o rome_n by_o mr._n williams_n 25._o the_o papist_n represent_v and_o not_o misrepresent_v be_v in_o answer_n to_o the_o second_o sheet_n of_o the_o second_o part_n of_o the_o papist_n misrepresent_v and_o represent_v in_o the_o point_n of_o their_o pray_v to_o the_o cross_n by_o mr._n williams_n 26._o transubstantiation_n no_o doctrine_n of_o the_o primitive_a father_n be_v a_o defence_n of_o the_o dublin_n letter_n in_o answer_n to_o the_o three_o chapter_n of_o the_o second_o part_n of_o the_o papist_n etc._n etc._n by_o mr._n patrick_n preacher_n at_o the_o charterhouse_n 27._o wholesome_a advice_n from_o the_o bless_a virgin_n to_o her_o indiscreet_a worshipper_n translate_v from_o the_o french_a and_o publish_v with_o a_o ingenious_a preface_n by_o j._n taylor_n gent._n 28._o a_o letter_n to_o the_o mis-representer_n of_o papist_n in_o answer_n to_o the_o four_o sheet_n of_o the_o second_o part_n of_o the_o papist_n etc._n etc._n by_o mr._n james_n taylor_n 29._o the_o papist_n represent_v and_o not_o misrepresent_v be_v in_o answer_n to_o the_o five_o and_o six_o chapter_n of_o the_o second_o part_n of_o the_o papist_n etc._n etc._n as_o far_o as_o concern_v pray_v to_o image_n and_o the_o cross_n by_o mr._n williams_n 30._o the_o people_n right_a to_o read_v the_o holy_a scripture_n assert_v in_o answer_n to_o the_o six_o seven_o eight_o nine_o and_o ten_o chapter_n of_o the_o second_o part_n of_o the_o papist_n etc._n etc._n by_o dr._n stratford_n upon_o the_o publish_n of_o the_o two_o paper_n say_v to_o be_v write_v by_o king_n charles_n the_o second_o in_o favour_n of_o popery_n and_o find_v in_o his_o strong_a box_n by_o the_o late_a king_n and_o the_o other_o paper_n write_v by_o the_o late_a duchess_n of_o york_n there_o be_v a_o answer_n write_v to_o the_o argue_v part_n of_o they_o with_o all_o the_o decency_n and_o respect_n that_o be_v due_a to_o the_o name_n which_o the_o paper_n bear_v 31._o a_o answer_n to_o some_o paper_n late_o print_v concern_v the_o authority_n of_o the_o catholic_n church_n in_o matter_n of_o faith_n and_o the_o reformation_n of_o the_o church_n of_o england_n by_o dr._n stillingfleet_n dean_n of_o st._n paul_n 32._o a_o vindication_n of_o the_o answer_n to_o some_o late_a paper_n concern_v the_o unity_n and_o authority_n of_o the_o catholic_n church_n and_o the_o reformation_n of_o the_o church_n of_o england_n by_o dr._n stillingfleet_n 33._o the_o difference_n betwixt_o the_o protestant_n and_o socinian_n method_n in_o answer_n to_o a_o book_n write_v by_o a_o romanist_n and_o entitle_v the_o protestant_n plea_n for_o a_o socinian_n by_o dr._n tenison_n 34._o a_o discourse_n concern_v a_o judge_n of_o controversy_n in_o matter_n of_o religion_n by_o dr._n sherlock_n 35._o a_o answer_n to_o a_o late_a dialogue_n between_o a_o new_a catholic_n convert_n and_o a_o protestant_n by_o dr._n sherlock_n 36._o a_o second_o dialogue_n between_o a_o new_a catholic_n convert_n and_o a_o protestant_n show_v why_o he_o can_v believe_v the_o doctrine_n of_o transubstantiation_n though_o he_o do_v firm_o believe_v the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o trinity_n by_o mr._n kidder_n rector_n of_o st._n martin_n outwich_n 37._o the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o trinity_n and_o transubstantiation_n compare_v as_o to_o scripture_n reason_n and_o tradition_n in_o a_o new_a dialogue_n between_o a_o protestant_n and_o a_o papist_n part_n i._o by_o dr._n stillingfleet_n 38._o the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o trinity_n and_o transubstantiation_n compare_v etc._n etc._n part_v ii_o by_o dr._n stillingfleet_n 39_o a_o exposition_n of_o the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o church_n of_o england_n in_o the_o several_a article_n propose_v by_o the_o bishop_n of_o condom_n in_o his_o exposition_n of_o the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o catholic_n faith._n by_o mr._n wake_v preacher_n to_o the_o honourable_a society_n of_o grey_n inn._n 40._o a_o answer_n to_o the_o bishop_n of_o condom_n exposition_n etc._n etc._n with_o reflection_n upon_o his_o pastoral_a letter_n by_o mr._n gilbert_n minister_n of_o peterburgh_n 41._o a_o defence_n of_o the_o exposition_n of_o the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o church_n of_o england_n against_o the_o exception_n of_o the_o bishop_n of_o condom_n and_o his_o vindicator_n by_o mr._n wake_n 42._o a_o second_o defence_n of_o the_o exposition_n of_o the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o church_n of_o england_n against_o the_o new_a exception_n of_o mounseur_fw-fr de_fw-fr meaux_n and_o his_o vindicator_n part._n i._o in_o which_o the_o account_n that_o have_v be_v give_v of_o the_o bishop_n of_o meaux_n exposition_n be_v full_o vindicate_v the_o distinction_n of_o old_a and_o new_a popery_n historical_o assert_v and_o the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o church_n of_o rome_n in_o point_n of_o image-worship_n more_o particular_o consider_v by_o mr._n wake_n 43._o a_o answer_n to_o the_o representer_n reflection_n upon_o the_o state_n and_o view_n of_o the_o controversy_n with_o a_o reply_n to_o the_o vindicator_n full_a answer_n show_v that_o the_o vindicator_n of_o the_o bishop_n of_o meaux_n have_v utter_o ruin_v the_o new_a design_n of_o expound_v and_o represent_v popery_n by_o dr._n clagett_n 44._o a_o second_o defence_n of_o the_o exposition_n of_o the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o church_n of_o england_n against_o the_o new_a exception_n of_o mounseur_fw-fr de_fw-fr meaux_n and_o his_o vindicator_n part_n ii_o in_o which_o the_o romish_a doctrine_n concern_v the_o nature_n and_o object_n of_o religious_a worship_n of_o the_o invocation_n of_o saint_n and_o worship_n of_o image_n and_o relic_n be_v consider_v and_o the_o charge_n of_o idolatry_n make_v good_a against_o those_o of_o the_o church_n of_o rome_n upon_o the_o account_n of_o they_o by_o mr._n wake_n 45._o a_o apologetical_a vindication_n of_o the_o church_n of_o england_n in_o answer_n to_o those_o who_o reproach_n she_o with_o the_o english_a heresy_n and_o schism_n or_o suspect_v she_o not_o to_o be_v a_o catholic_n church_n upon_o their_o account_n by_o dr._n hicks_n dean_n of_o worcester_n 46._o veteres_n vindicati_fw-la in_o a_o expostulatory_a letter_n to_o mr._n sclater_n of_o putney_n upon_o his_o consensus_fw-la veterum_fw-la wherein_o the_o absurdity_n of_o his_o method_n and_o the_o weakness_n of_o his_o reason_n be_v show_v his_o false_a aspersion_n upon_o the_o church_n of_o england_n be_v wipe_v off_o and_o her_o faith_n concern_v the_o eucharist_n prove_v to_o be_v that_o of_o the_o primitive_a church_n together_o with_o animadversion_n upon_o dean_n boileau_n french_a translation_n of_o and_o remark_n upon_o bertram_n by_o mr._n gee_o rector_n of_o st._n benedict_n paul_n wharff_n about_o the_o time_n of_o the_o publish_n of_o the_o abovementioned_a discourse_n some_o of_o the_o romish_a priest_n be_v for_o change_v the_o method_n of_o manage_v the_o controversy_n betwixt_o the_o church_n of_o england_n and_o the_o church_n of_o rome_n for_o leave_v off_o write_n and_o set_v answer_n in_o print_n which_o they_o be_v now_o grow_v sick_a of_o and_o for_o betake_v themselves_o to_o verbal_a conference_n hope_v for_o more_o success_n by_o their_o tongue_n than_o by_o their_o pen_n mr._n peter_n gooden_o a_o secular_a priest_n be_v please_v to_o single_a out_o himself_o for_o such_o purpose_n but_o for_o his_o fitness_n or_o ability_n no_o body_n can_v find_v any_o except_o this_o may_v be_v reckon_v one_o that_o though_o he_o be_v master_n of_o very_o little_a or_o no_o learning_n at_o all_o yet_o he_o want_v not_o the_o gift_n of_o assurance_n to_o encounter_v the_o very_o learn_a man_n among_o we_o on_o february_n the_o 21_o st_o 1686_o he_o have_v a_o conference_n with_o dr._n clagett_n about_o
of_o quality_n by_o mr._n pelling_a 157._o a_o three_o letter_n to_o a_o person_n of_o quality_n be_v a_o vindication_n of_o the_o former_a in_o answer_n to_o a_o late_a pamplet_n entitle_v a_o discourse_n of_o the_o use_n of_o image_n by_o mr._n pelling_a 158._o a_o discourse_n concern_v the_o second_o council_n of_o nice_a which_o first_o introduce_v and_o establish_v image-worship_n in_o the_o christian_a church_n anno_fw-la dom._n 787._o by_o dr._n comber_n preceptor_n of_o york_n 159._o a_o discourse_n concern_v transubstantiation_n and_o idolatry_n be_v a_o answer_n to_o the_o bishop_n of_o oxford_n plea_n relate_v to_o those_o two_o point_n by_o dr._n g._n burnet_n 160._o a_o discourse_n concern_v the_o nature_n of_o idolatry_n in_o which_o a_o late_a author_n viz._n the_o bishop_n of_o oxford_n true_a and_o only_a notion_n of_o idolatry_n be_v consider_v and_o confute_v by_o mr._n wake_n concern_v the_o validity_n and_o canonicalness_n of_o the_o order_n of_o the_o church_n of_o england_n and_o the_o uncertainty_n of_o those_o of_o the_o church_n of_o rome_n we_o have_v have_v these_o follow_a tract_n write_v 161._o a_o vindication_n of_o the_o ordination_n of_o the_o church_n of_o england_n in_o which_o it_o be_v demonstrate_v that_o all_o the_o essential_o of_o ordination_n according_a to_o the_o practice_n of_o the_o primitive_a and_o greek_a church_n be_v still_o retain_v in_o our_o church_n in_o answer_n to_o a_o paper_n write_v by_o one_o of_o the_o church_n of_o rome_n to_o prove_v the_o nullity_n of_o our_o order_n and_o give_v to_o a_o person_n of_o quality_n by_o dr._n burnet_n nominate_v bishop_n of_o salisbury_n 162._o concio_fw-la ad_fw-la clerum_fw-la habita_fw-la coram_fw-la academia_n cantabrigiensi_fw-la jun._n 11o._o 1687_o etc._n etc._n ubi_fw-la vindicatur_fw-la vera_fw-la &_o valida_fw-la cleri_fw-la anglicani_n ineunte_fw-la reformatione_fw-la ordinatio_fw-la cui_fw-la accessit_fw-la concio_fw-la habita_fw-la jul._n 3o._o 1987._o de_fw-la canonicâ_fw-la cleri_fw-la anglicani_n ordinatione_fw-la latin_a reddita_fw-la &_o aucta_fw-la annexum_fw-la est_fw-la instrumentum_fw-la consecrationis_fw-la matth._n parker_n archiep._n cantuar._n by_o mr._n thomas_n brown_n fellow_n of_o st._n john_n john_n s_o college_n cambridge_n 163._o a_o short_a defence_n of_o the_o order_n of_o the_o church_n of_o england_n as_o by_o law_n establish_v against_o some_o scatter_a objection_n of_o mr._n webster_n of_o linne_n by_o mr._n milbourn_n minister_n of_o yarmouth_n 164._o a_o plain_a answer_n to_o a_o popish_a priest_n question_v the_o order_n of_o the_o church_n of_o england_n draw_v up_o for_o the_o satisfaction_n of_o his_o parishioner_n to_o which_o be_v annex_v in_o the_o second_o edition_n a_o answer_n to_o the_o oxford_n animadverter_n reflection_n by_o mr._n a._n seller_n 165._o a_o defence_n of_o the_o ordination_n and_o ministry_n of_o the_o church_n of_o england_n in_o answer_n to_o the_o scandal_n raise_v or_o revive_v against_o she_o in_o several_a late_a pamphlet_n and_o particular_o in_o one_o entitle_v the_o church_n of_o england_n true_o represent_v etc._n etc._n by_o mr._n whitfield_n f._n of_o k._n c._n cam._n 166._o the_o validity_n of_o the_o order_n of_o the_o church_n of_o england_n make_v out_o against_o the_o objection_n of_o the_o papist_n in_o several_a letter_n to_o a_o gentleman_n of_o norwich_n that_o desire_a satisfaction_n therein_o by_o dr._n prideaux_n prebendary_a of_o norwich_n 167._o roman_n catholic_n uncertain_a whether_o there_o be_v any_o true_a priest_n or_o sacrament_n in_o the_o church_n of_o rome_n evince_v by_o a_o argument_n urge_v and_o maintain_v upon_o their_o own_o principle_n against_o mr._n edw._n goodal_n of_o prescott_n in_o lancashire_n by_o mr._n marsden_n vicar_n of_o walton_n in_o lancashire_n about_o michaelmas_n 1687_o one_o of_o the_o jesuit_n of_o the_o savoy_n father_n pulton_n be_v for_o signalize_a himself_o in_o a_o conference_n with_o dr._n tenison_n the_o minister_n of_o that_o parish_n wherein_o this_o jesuit_n be_v seduce_v a_o ignorant_a young_a youth_n one_o will_v have_v think_v that_o the_o ill_a success_n which_o mr._n peter_n gooden_o the_o secular_a priest_n meet_v with_o at_o the_o conference_n at_o the_o dean_n of_o st._n paul_n when_o the_o gentleman_n for_o who_o sake_n it_o be_v declare_v himself_o satisfy_v and_o settle_v in_o the_o church_n of_o england_n may_v have_v caution_v father_n pulton_n from_o any_o further_a attempt_n of_o this_o nature_n but_o some_o man_n can_v no_o more_o see_v their_o own_o ignorance_n than_o their_o own_o fault_n a_o conference_n be_v hold_v and_o be_v the_o occasion_n of_o these_o follow_a book_n 168._o a_o true_a account_n of_o a_o conference_n hold_v about_o religion_n at_o london_n sept._n 29_o 1687_o between_o a._n pulton_n jesuit_n and_o thomas_n tenison_n d._n d._n by_o dr._n tenison_n 169._o mr._n pulton_n consider_v in_o his_o sincerity_n reason_v authority_n or_o a_o just_a answer_n to_o what_o he_o have_v hitherto_o publish_v in_o his_o true_a account_n his_o true_a and_o full_a account_n of_o a_o conference_n etc._n etc._n his_o remark_n and_o in_o they_o his_o pretend_a confutation_n of_o what_o he_o call_v dr._n t.'s_n rule_n of_o faith._n by_o dr._n tenison_n 170._o the_o vindication_n of_o a._n crassener_n schoolmaster_n of_o long-acre_n from_o the_o aspersion_n of_o a._n pulton_n jesuit_n and_o schoolmaster_n in_o the_o savoy_n by_o mr._n cressener_n 171._o the_o pamphlet_n entitle_v speculum_fw-la ecclesiasticum_fw-la or_o a_o ecclesiastical_a prospective-glass_n consider_v in_o its_o false_a reason_n and_o quotation_n there_o be_v add_v by_o way_n of_o preface_n two_o further_a answer_n the_o first_o to_o the_o defender_n of_o the_o speculum_fw-la the_o second_o to_o the_o half-sheet_n against_o the_o six_o conference_n by_o mr._n wharton_n 172._o a_o answer_n to_o the_o letter_n of_o the_o catholic_n soldier_n in_o a_o letter_n from_o c._n d._n to_o a._n b._n the_o examiner_n of_o his_o speculum_fw-la by_o dr._n tenison_n 173._o the_o missionary_n art_n discover_v or_o a_o account_n of_o their_o way_n of_o insinuation_n their_o artifices_fw-la and_o several_a method_n of_o which_o they_o serve_v themselves_o in_o make_v convert_v with_o a_o letter_n to_o mr._n pulton_n challenge_v he_o to_o make_v good_a his_o charge_n of_o disloyalty_n against_o protestant_n and_o a_o historical_a preface_n contain_v a_o account_n of_o their_o introduce_v the_o heathen_a god_n in_o their_o procession_n and_o other_o particular_n relate_v to_o the_o several_a chapter_n of_o this_o treatise_n by_o mr._n h._n a_o divine_a of_o the_o church_n of_o england_n 174._o a_o preservative_n against_o popery_n be_v some_o plain_a direction_n to_o unlearned_a protestant_n how_o to_o dispute_v with_o romish_a priest_n part_n i._o by_o dr._n sherlock_n 175._o the_o second_o part_n of_o the_o preservative_n against_o popery_n show_v how_o contrary_a popery_n be_v to_o the_o true_a end_n of_o the_o christian_a religion_n fit_v for_o the_o instruction_n of_o unlearned_a protestant_n by_o dr._n sherlock_n these_o two_o last_o book_n give_v very_o great_a distaste_n to_o the_o romish_a priest_n as_o one_o may_v reasonable_o gather_v from_o the_o strange_a answer_n that_o be_v make_v to_o they_o by_o mr._n sabran_n a_o jesuit_n who_o procure_v thereby_o a_o antagonist_n for_o himself_o that_o he_o will_v always_o be_v famous_a for_o who_o make_v he_o this_o follow_a reply_n 176._o a_o defence_n of_o dr._n sherlock_n preservative_n against_o popery_n in_o reply_n to_o a_o jesuit_n answer_v wherein_o the_o r._n father_n reason_n be_v full_o confute_v by_o w._n giles_n a_o protestant_a footman_n 177._o a_o vindication_n of_o both_o part_n of_o the_o preservative_n against_o popery_n in_o answer_n to_o the_o cavil_n of_o lewis_n sabran_n jesuit_n by_o dr._n sherlock_n 178._o the_o enthusiasm_n of_o the_o church_n of_o rome_n demonstrate_v in_o some_o observation_n upon_o the_o life_n of_o ignatius_n loyala_n founder_n of_o the_o jesuit_n order_n by_o mr._n wharton_n 179._o purgatory_n prove_v by_o miracle_n collect_v out_o of_o roman-catholick_n author_n with_o some_o remarkable_a history_n relate_v to_o british_a english_a and_o irish_a saint_n publish_a with_o a_o ingenious_a preface_n concern_v miracle_n by_o mr._n sam._n johnson_n 180._o a_o four_o letter_n to_o a_o person_n of_o quality_n be_v a_o historical_a account_n of_o the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o sacrament_n from_o the_o primitive_a time_n to_o the_o council_n of_o trent_n show_v the_o novelty_n of_o transubstantiation_n by_o mr._n pelling_a 181._o thirty_o plain_n but_o sound_v reason_n why_o protestant_n differ_v from_o popery_n by_o ignotus_fw-la 182._o a_o discourse_n wherein_o be_v hold_v forth_o the_o opposition_n of_o the_o doctrine_n worship_n and_o practice_n of_o the_o roman_a church_n to_o the_o nature_n design_n and_o character_n of_o the_o christian_a faith._n by_o dr._n g._n burnet_n 183._o pope_n pius_n creed_n with_o comment_n by_o mr._n altham_n 184._o the_o additional_a article_n in_o pope_n