still and had its Patrons and Abettors Ebion and Cerinthus two of the wretchedest Hereticks of the Primitive Times And after them Apollinarius is said to countenance and defend it which doubtless made the Antient Fathers declare themselves fully in it as a dangerous Point it seemed to confirm the Jews in their Incredulity and might occasion others to make question of our Saviour's coming in the Flesh Hence Irenaeus Justin Martyr Tertullian and Eusebius Men of Note in the Primitive Times affirm that never any of the Patriarchs before Moses's Law observed the Sabbath which question less they must have done had that Law been moral and dictated by the Light of Nature He cites also Epiphanius and Theodoret on Ezech. 20. Procopius on Gen. 2. Damascen and our venerable Bede concurring with the former Fathers All talk saith he that the Observation of the Jewish Sabbath vanished utterly c I might mention other Authors to the same purpose But to proceed my Brethren because one of my Arguments against the precise seventh-Seventh-day Sabbath will be to prove it a Sign or Shadow of that Rest Believers enter into when they first close with Christ I shall say no more now by way of Explanation of my Text but proceed to those Points of Doctrine that arise herefrom Doct. 1. That it is not the Duty of believing Gentiles under the Dispensation of the Gospel The Doctrines raised to keep the Seventh Day as a Sabbath to the Lord. Doct. 2. That it is a dangerous thing for any to plead for and keep the seventh day so i◠to lay the same stress on the observation thereof as on a purely natural or simply mora◠Precept These two Propositions I purpose God assisting to prosecute and confirm in this method First I shall lay down several Explanatory Propositions Secondly Give many Arguments to prove th◠truth of the first Proposition Thirdly I shall taking in the second Proposition endeavour to prove that the observing the seventh day Sabbath so as to lay the same stre◠on it as on a natural and simply moral Precept ◠a dangerous thing Fourthly I shall prove that all Believers 〈◊〉 oblig'd to observe the first day of the week free from secular business in religious Worship as the time in season only under the Gospel-dispensation Fifthly I shall endeavour to answer all the main Objections brought by our Opponents against the Observation of the first day of the week To begin First Proposition premised Let it be considered that the Apostles perceiving the weakness of the Jews who believ'd in Christ to take them off gradually from Jewish Observation of days and other legal Rites and Ordinances did admit of the Practice of some of them for a time till they were better instructed in the Truth as it is in Jesus the nature of the new Creation and the change of the whole Law viz. the utter abolishing of all things Ceremonial or that were Signs and Shadows of things to come and the removing the ministration of all Moral Precepts from Moses as Lawgiver into the hand of Christ as Mediator in which capacity he had all Power delegated to him in Heaven and Earth as our only Lord and Lawgiver Mat. 28. 18 19 20. Thou seest Brother how many thousands of the Jews there are which believe and they are all zealous of the Law Acts 21. 20. Hence Paul complied with them to purify himself and to shave his Head v. 24. and on the like account in compliance with their weakness he circumcised Timothy I might from hence by the way note that had we such a Passage that Paul kept one Jewish Sabbath as we have here of his circumcising Timothy I suppose our Brethren would make no small advantage of it that it is our Duty from thence to keep it but that might have been on the same account and no better ground than it would be for us to plead for Circumcision and be circumcised as Tillam Skip and Cooly were as I am informed who called themselves the Ministers of the Circumcision But to proceed Upon the same reason perhaps the Jewish Rites Days and typical or shadowy Ordinances might and were called by their former and antient names as well as for distinction sake for tho those legal Ordinances were dead yet as our Annotators observe they were not then deadly if look'd upon as indifferent things however God was pleased they being his own appointments to vouchsafe them a gradual and decent funeral Second Proposition But nevertheless after they had been better instructed into the truth of the Gospel and the change or end of the Law they were more plainly dealt with I mean he more fully and clearly informed them and shewed them the great danger if they observed those legal Rites Days and Ordinances especially when he saw they laid such stress upon them as to make them necessary to eternal Life as a Rule of Obedience Hence the Apostle says I Paul testify unto you that if ye be circumcised Christ shall profit you nothing Gal. 5. 1. And why if circumcised because it was a shadow and the keeping up the shadow was a virtual denying that the Substance was come and besides they were thereby bound to keep the whole Law Such was the natural tendency of observing one Legal Rite or Precept as given by Moses it being in that Ministration a Covenant of Works and he that kept one was obliged to keep all and he that broke one was guilty of all 1. And if so why might not Paul have told them the same thing and danger if they kept the legal Sabbath which led them according to the Tenor of it and in the strictest observance to perfect Obedience which is implyed in those words Thou shalt not think thy own thoughts nor speak thy own words 2. Or provided they made it necessary in order to a holy Life in point of Obedience as a pure moral Precept even of the same nature with the first Commandment viz. Thou shalt have no other Gods but me or the second Thou shalt not make to thy self any graven Image c. or the third or fifth or any of the rest I speak not of what is simply moral in the fourth Commandment but of that precise seventh day I say may not their danger be as great if thus they look'd upon those Jewish Sabbaths as if circumcised because then if they kept them not it necessarily must follow it would exclude them the Kingdom of Heaven as all other immoral Acts or actual breach of pure moral Precepts would do 3. Because Paul tells them that those Sabbaths were a Shadow or Sign so far as Circumcision was as I have and shall further make appear and so hereby unwarily they would deny that Christ was come to give us Rest and we do not yet cease working for Life in order to enter into Rest which was held forth as the Tenor of that Ministration of the Moral Law by Moses and particularly in their
all Work which God created and made These are the words which contain what is call'd the Institution and Command of the Sabbath to Adam in Paradise Tillam and others make a great noise of the Sabbath instituted in Paradise and given to Adam to keep but Brethren I must tell you that the Learned strangely differ among themselves who would have the Antiquity of the Sabbath thus early some of them affirming it was given to Adam in Innocency others say not till he fell One speaks thus Mr. Geo. Walker's Doctrine of the holy Sabbath p. 10. And for the time when God first instituted the Sabbath I conceiv'd it to have been not in the state of Innocency but after Mans Fall immediately and yet upon the seventh day wherein God rested These are his very words From hence I observe he believ'd Adam did not stand in his Innocency one day and this he endeavours to prove and others as well as he Men of great Learning and Wisdom Let me cite here one more * See Mr. Warren's Jewish Sabbath antiquated I shall propose saith he and endeavour to prove a counter Position namely that it seems more consonant to Scripture tho at the beginning yet after the Fall in Man's corrupt and vitiated state the probation whereof depends much tho not altogether upon the decision of that often canvassed Question whether our first Parents sinned the same day on which they were created Others not of less note and Learning say That the Sabbath did not commence till Israel came into the Wilderness and at the fall of Manna Mr. Primrose in his Treatise of the Sabbath in his Preface it appeareth not at all that God gave any Commandment to Adam either before or after his Fall binding him or his Progeny to the keeping of any such day whatsoever as to a thing moral and necessary neither is there any trace of such a Commandment to be found till the coming of the Israelites to the Wilderness and that God assign'd to them the seventh day of the week P. 20. as a particular point of Ecclesiastical Government whereof he prescrib'd unto them all the particular Rites Now my Brethren I shall shew you 1. What is said by those who affirm it was given to Adam in Innocency whose Arguments seem to me of no weight at all 2. I shall take notice what is said by those learned Men who deny it was given to Adam in Innocency and affirm it was not given as a Command till Israel came into the Wilderness To begin with those who affirm God gave it to Adam before his Fall in Paradise or in his state of Innocency 1. They ground it upon what Moses saith in Gen. 2. because it is there mention'd as the day on which God rested from all his Works 2. Because God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it Owen on the Sabbath p. 42 c. Dr. Owen after he had shew'd that some Jews and Rabbins affirm the Sabbath did not begin till the Israelites came into the Wilderness tho some of them differ'd in their Opinions about its Commencement comes to tell us P. 55. That the Opinion of the Institution of the Sabbath from the beginning of the World is founded principally on a double Testimony First From the Old Testament Gen. 2. 1 2 3. because Moses saith God blessed the seventh day P. 62. and sanctified it not saith he that God kept it holy himself nor that he purified it and made it inherently holy which the nature of the day is not capable of nor that he celebrated that which in it self was holy but that he set it apart to sacred use Secondly The Testimony to the same purpose saith he taken out of the New Testament is in Heb. 4. 3 4. For we which believe do enter into Rest as he said As I have sworn in my Wrath if they shall enter into my Rest altho the Works were finished from the Foundation of the World For he speaketh in a certain place on this wise And God did rest the Seventh Day from all his Works Now saith the Doctor the Works and the finishing of them did not at all belong to the Apostle's Discourse but only as they denoted the beginning of the Seventh-day Sabbath for it is the several Rests of God alone that he is enquiring after But to pass by what the Doctor saith 1. Let this be considered that in this place only of all Paul's Writings mention is made of the Seventh-day but not one word here intimating that 't was our duty to observe that Day under the Gospel which had it been the Christian Sabbath no doubt he would have given some hint of at this turn 2. By the manner of his Words and Expressions comparing these two Verses together it seems the Sabbath did not commence from the beginning of the world for tho God rested on the Seventh-day and might then set it apart yet he might give no Command to keep it till after-times when Sabbath-day Service or Worship was appointed This I rather think from these words Altho the Works were finished from the Foundation of the World yet the Day as Man's Duty was not given till long after for as our Annotators observe Paul alludes to Exod. 31. 17. For he speaks in a certain place on his wise c. Thus having given you the Proofs of those who assert the Sabbath was given to Man in Inâ—ocency I shall now give you the Reasons urg'd â—y others who affirm it was not given till Israel came into the Wilderness Their Arguments are of two sorts 1. Many of them affirm that Moses wrote â—ere in Gen. 2. by a Prolepsis or way of anticiâ—ation 2. Others do not so much assert that but â—low it might be set apart in the design of God from his finishing his Work and yet afâ—â—rm it was not given to any to keep till Israel's â—oming into the Wilderness when God was aâ—out to form them into an Ecclesiastical and Poâ—itical Church-State and appointed them Laws and Ordinances particularly the Worship Duties and Sacrifices they were to discharge on their Sabbath-day And indeed it may seem unreasonable to believe that the wise God shall give a Sabbath not only for Rest but for Divine Worship before he appointed those Duâ—â—es of Worship he would have them to perâ—orm on that day which were essentially neâ—essary for all to know as well as the special â—recise Day it self 1. But to begin with the first Argument that Moses wrote those words in his History by way of Prolepsis or Anticipation and so to be â—ead as it were in a Parenthesis that is Moses being the first Man that wrote by Revelation or Inspiration and having before he began to write received the Command of the Seventh-day Sabbath and the reason of its Institution coming to write of the Time when God finished his Work put in this concerning the Sabbath by way of Anticipation saying God blessed the
for a Man to marry his own Sister Answ 1. Where all Uncleanness and Lusts of Concupiscence and Fornication are forbid there a Man is forbid to marry his own Sister 2. Is not this sort of Incest forbidden and condemned 1 Cor. 5. 1. where the incestuous Person is condemned for marrying his Father's Wife If it be unlawful for a Man to marry his Brother's Wife or his Father's Wife it is unlawful to marry his own Sister because nearer of kin 3. All manner of Incest is forbid to believing Gentiles in Acts 15. 29. this was one of those things contain'd in the Law that is given forth anew to believing Gentiles The Holy Ghost inspir'd the Apostles to write to the Gentiles to abstain from Blood Meats offered to Idols things strangled and from Fornication now Incest is by Paul call'd Fornication 1 Cor. 5. 1. I hear there is Fornication amongst you c. Tho in strict speaking say our late Annotators by Fornication we mean Uncleanness of single Persons yet by this word often in Scripture is understood all species of Uncleanness Nor is it probable that the Holy Ghost refers to the Uncleanness of single Persons in Acts 15. but to somewhat more doubtful and therefore I conceive all sorts of Incest in this place are forbidden 4. If any should say How can they know it was unlawful for a Man to marry his own Sister I answer 'T is not only known as I have shew'd by the New Testament and forbid there but also by the very Light of Nature for such Fornication 1 Cor. 5. 1. saith Paul is not so much as once nam'd among the Gentiles that is among the more civiliz'd Heathens who had no other Law than the Light of Nature which teaches Men to abhor such a Marriage For doth the Light of Nature teach a Man that it is a shame to wear long Hair and not teach him it is a shame to marry his own Sister 5. Moreover tho I said the whole Moral Law is transfer'd from Moses as a Lawgiver to Christ as Mediator yet the Old Testament and the Law as written by Moses as well as the Prophets are of great use in many respects 2 Tim. 3. 16. All Scripture is profitable for Doctrine for Reproof for Correction and Instruction in Righteousness c. Sixthly The Seventh-day Sabbath proved to be a sign of the Covenant of Works The Morality of the fourth Commandment consists not in the observation of the precise seventh Day because that day was a sign or shadow of something to come I did at first prove in opening my Text that the weekly Jewish Sabbath is comprehended in those days the false Brethren taught the Galatians to observe Gal. 4. 10. and gave many Arguments to evince that tho there is one day in seven by a positive Law perpetually to be kept Col. 2. 16. yet the old Jewish seventh day from the Creation and under the Covenant of Works was a shadow of things to come But I shall add here something out of an approved Author further to confirm this That Sabbath Warren on the Sab. against Tillam p. 106 107 c. saith he and the particular seventh day which the Jews observed was certainly of a shadowy nature being instituted at first with reference to Christ as all other Shadows were having a Type after fix'd to it And of this we may safely expound that forementioned Text Col. 2. 16. Let no man judg you in Meats or in Drinks or in respect of an holy day or New Moons or Sabbaths which were shadows of things to come but the Body is of Christ The only question is whether their weekly Sabbath was here intended Some are jealous lest in pressing it so far it should prove prejudicial to our weekly Christian Sabbath but this is a mere causless Jealousy For let us ponder the scope and design of the place and it will appear that the Apostles design is not to level Christian Days and Duties but such as the Jews observ'd and would have introduced with Circumcision 'T is apparent that in all those three places Rom. 14. 5 6. Gal. 4. 10 11. Col. 2. 16. he crys down the Ordinances of the Law or Old Testament not the Institutions of the Gospel Look what the Jewish false Teachers cry'd up St. Paul cried down So as to argue from hence against all difference of days under the Gospel is evidently to stretch the Text beyond the Scope but to urge it against all Jewish holy days their weekly Sabbath and all is not to force it For 1. The Apostle seems to speak distinctly and distributively enumerating the several sorts of days in observation among the Jews Holy-days New-Moons Sabbaths and the gradation from yearly Holy-days to monthly New-Moons and from them to weekly Sabbaths is visible enough to such as are not blinded with Prejudice Mr. Shepherd speaks much to the same purpose Sheph. on the Sabb. Part 2. The plural term Sabbaths is usually put for the singular the Sabbath or seventh day Thes 20. p. 204. now under dispute Yea I cannot find any one Text in all the New Testament where it is applied in the same number to any other day or Sabbath but the old Seventh-day Sabbath * Mat. 12. 15. Mark 1. 21. cap. 2. 24. cap. 3. 2. Luk. 4. 31. cap. 13. 10. Act. 13. 14. Seven or eight times the same word as is here set down in the plural number is used for the old weekly Sabbath and not so much as once for any yearly Sabbath therefore in all reason that precise weekly Sabbath must be here I will not say included only but principally intended Even in the Old Testament wherever New Moons and Sabbaths are coupled together unless the Phrase be figurative as in Isa 66. 23. the Jews weekly Sabbath is denoted by it as appears by those Scriptures cited in the Margin †2 Kings 4. 23. 1 Chron. 23. 31. ch 8. 13. ch 31. 3. Neh. 10. 33. Ezek. 45. 17. Amos 8. 5. in most of which their annual Sabbaths are excepted and distinguished by another name scil Feasts to which answers the word Holy-days in this place Col. 2. 16. For indeed the word in the Original signifies a Feast or Festival-day Thus let Scripture expound Scripture and Truth will be Truth in spite of Error take the whole Sentence together Holy-days New-Moons Sabbaths and if it be an Old Testament Phrase it always implies the old Seventh-day Sabbath or take the word Sabbaths singly by it self and if it be a New Testament Term as 't is like it is it ever signifies the same seventh day unless when put for week which here it cannot be The Conclusion then is undeniable that the Jews Seventh-day Sabbath was a shadowy Sabbath Dr. Owen also repeats what some learned Men say upon this place Col. 2. 16. Let no Man judg you in Meats or Drinks or in respect of an Holy-day or the New-Moon
to these the most judicious pious and zealous Ministers and Martyrs of Christ who have liv'd and dy'd within the compass of these sixteen hundred years and most if not all of them will tell you that they never owned your Saturday Sabbath they liv'd without it dy'd without it and are I doubt not gone to Heaven without it Besides how many faithful Witnesses of late years has the Lord raised up to bear Testimony against it of whom I suppose the greatest part are yet alive tho some are fallen asleep In a word how many precious and gracious and pious Christians are yet upon the Earth Men and Women redeem'd from the Earth and crucified to the World of whom the World is not worthy who look upon your Sabbath as a Cypher can freely labor and travel upon it buy and sell upon it and this after accurate Inquiry about it and to this day their Consciences never reproach them their Hearts never smote them for it What will you say Are all these Hypocrites unrenewed unsanctified ones this were to condemn the Generation of God's Children and canonize your self with your few misled Associates for the only Saints in Christendom which I would hope you dare not do tho I know * Meaning Tillam you dare as much as another Well the Adversary is brought to this Dilemma either God has no People in the World but such as are of his Perswasion or his moral and immutable Laws are not written in their Hearts or the Saturday Sabbath is none of those Laws Thus this Author If the Law of the Seventh-day Sabbath be written in the Hearts of Believers some one Man or another can produce some one Believer that was by the Law written in his Heart convinc'd of it without reading Moses's Law or any Book or Books compiled by Men about the Sabbath But no Man can produce any such Believer that will or can say this therefore it is not written in the Hearts of Believers Thus it appears that it is not the Duty of Gentile Believers to keep the seventh Day from the Law of God written in the Hearts of God's new Covenant Children which was the sixth and last part of the general Argument first proposed The last thing in speaking to the Seventh-day Sabbath I promised to do The dangerous Consequences of the Sabbatarian Principles was to shew you that as some hold and maintain it it is a dangerous Error 1. Is not that dangerous which caused Paul to fear he had bestowed on the Persons he speaks of Labor in vain Was it not because they observ'd Jewish Days laying stress on those things 2. Is not that a dangerous Error that leads Men to ratify or sign the Covenant of Works which binds them to keep the whole Law This I have proved is the natural tendency of this Practice Owen on the Sabb. p. 149. and the same thing Dr. Owen you have heard positively affirms also 3. Is not that dangerous that magnifies the first Creation Work above Redemption It magnifies Creation-work above Redemption or the new Creation Work when God began to create the new Heavens and new Earth which refers to the Gospel or new Creation What saith the Lord the old Heavens and old Earth shall be remembered no more that is in a day kept to that end for otherwise sure the great Works of the first Creation ought not to be forgot but the new Creation excelling the old the new Day must be kept in remembrance thereof and not the old day 4. Is not that a dangerous Error that tends It eclipses the Glory of Christ as the necessary Consequence of it to eclipse the Glory of Christ as the only Lord Head and Lawgiver to his Church and that gives part of this Honour to Moses 5. Is not that dangerous that tends to intangle and bring into Bondage and under legal Terror poor weak Christians as some who have kept the Seventh-day Sabbath have confessed till God open'd their Eyes they fearing they broke the Sabbath in some way or another for indeed no Man can perfectly keep it any more than he can keep the whole Law as has been hinted I was always in a trembling state saith one so long as I kept it c. or to that purpose Brethren it is not to be thought what Bondage it brought the zealous Jews under they not knowing when they had answered the strict observance of that day and if they brake it they must die without Mercy as the poor Man that gathered Sticks on that day they were not to speak their own words c. How should they know when they did this On Mat. 12. 2. p. 361. Nay live and sin not They would not Mr. Trap saith spit nor ease themselves on that day which is hard to believe tho some were superstitiously zealous 't is true yet others who were piously zealous by means of the strictness of the Precept continually were in fear and bondage And sad it is for any to be entangled again thereby 6. Is not that a dangerous thing Jewish Sabbath genders to Bondage that by the necessary consequence of it leads men to observe other Legal Rites and Ceremonies as not to eat Swines-flesh nor wear a Garment of Linen and Woolen nor mar the corner of their Beards Nay some of the chief of them formerly were led to Circumcision and to worse than that also I saw a Book published many years ago by two of them in which they called themselves the Ministers of the Circumcision That these things are the necessary Consequences of their Notion about their Sabbath appears because they go to Moses for it as the Law was in his hand and believe many other things that were meer Judicial Laws to be in force now They are for Moses's Law with the Statutes and Judgments and have declared that that Law is in force to stone to death such as break the Sabbath And no marvel for if that Sabbath be in force the Punishment is in force also Nay they believe I hear that a rebellious Son ought to be put to death 7. Is not that Error dangerous It renders all that keep it not guilty of horrid Immorality and of an evil Nature the necessary Consequence whereof renders all that keep not that precise Seventh-day as the Sabbath nor can be convinced 't is their Duty to observe it to be guilty of Immorality i. e. in breaking a moral Precept in the very Letter of it nay one of the Precepts of the first Table For it must be thus if the morality of the fourth Commandment lies in the observation of the precise seventh-Seventh-day Sabbath and it must be as great an Evil to violate it as 't is to have another God or to bow down to a graven Image or to swear or profane the holy Name of God or commit actual Adultery Murder c. and thus their Doctrin renders all true Christians to be guilty of a most
gross Immorality who do not observe the precise Seventh-day Nay the like Consequences attend their Notion who through ignorance and an over-heated Zeal have also asserted the same Morality to consist in the observance of the first Day of the Week as is evident by what some Ministers in their Parish-Churches did formerly affirm One in Oxfordshire said That to do any servile Work on the Lord's Day is as great a Sin as to kill a Man Another in a Sermon in Norfolk See Dr. White on the Sab. said To make a Feast or Wedding-dinner on the Lord's Day is as great a Sin as for a Father to take a Knife and cut his own Child's Throat A Sabbatarian also I am told did lately say having a Child to put out an Apprentice he knew not any that kept the Sabbath whose Trade he liked and to place him with one that would cause him to work on that Day was as bad as Adultery or Theft or to that effect Another lately told us that we in not keeping the Sabbath or fourth Command broke all the rest or words to the same purpose 8. And from hence also which is the plain and necessary Consequence of their Principle either such must perish who live and die in a palpable violation of this pretended simple moral Precept without any sorrow or repentance or else that Men may be saved who live and die under the guilt of immoral Evil in the grossest sense For tho it is granted that a true Christian may be guilty in some sense of an Immoral Evil and who is not yet if a moral Precept be broke in the Letter of it or in the grossest sense as he that commits actual Adultery or Murder can such be saved living and dying in those Sins without any true sight of the Evil of them or Repentance for them nay that do not only live in the literal breach of this moral Precept as they call it but teach men so to do Object But they do it ignorantly Answ Ignorance of any Human Law tho the breach of it be death will not excuse any Man because the Law is published or they may know it So ignorance cannot excuse a man that breaks any Precept of the Moral Law of God 9. This Notion and Principle of theirs seems not only to admit of such Consequences naturally to attend it but they indeed express themselves very directly on this occasion even to shut out of the Kingdom of Heaven all that keep not the Seventh-day Sabbath or at least such who teach men to break it See what Mr. Soarsby saith New Testament Sab. p. 54 55. viz. The Decalogue in the New Testament is abundantly confirmed by many places in the Gospel which establish the Authority of the Law and Commandments of God to Christians both Jews and Gentiles Our Lord came not to destroy the Law but to fulfil it Some men saith he affirm contrary to both They who teach and do these Commandments shall be great in the Kingdom of Heaven but such as break the least and teach men so to do shall be least in it that is have no part in it for unless Christians keep them better than the Scribes there is no entering into Heaven Mat. 5. 20. The Summary of the two Tables are the great Commandments on which hang all the Law and the Prophets The doing of these as written and read in the Law is the way to Eternal Life Luke 10. 26 27. Again he saith It is not the Hearer of the Law that shall be justified amongst the Romans as well as the Jews c. Two things note here 1. He takes it for granted that the precise Seventh-day Sabbath is one part of the Moral Law and so his design is as I conceive to shew that such as violate this Sabbath and teach men so to do have no part in Heaven 2. He says The doing of these is the way to Eternal Life mistaking the purport of our Saviour's words to the young Man who spake to him as one under the Covenant of Works to discover his Ignorance of the way to Heaven which is by Christ alone not by doing those Commands as written and read in the Law 't is not do but believe c. Is not this Man ignorant of the way to Eternal Life did our Lord come to ratify the Decalogue for us to keep and fulfil in our own Persons thereby to be justified and saved Here is not one word of the Righteousness of Christ No no but that Righteousness that must exceed the Righteousness of the Scribes is our own inherent Righteousness only True we say a sincere inherent Righteousness we must have for a meetness for Eternal Life but that is not our title to it or the way to it but the Righteousness and Merits of Christ alone Doth he not establish the Covenant of Works and Justification by the Law What Popish Doctrin is worse Also in a printed Paper given one Lord's Day at the Door * Of our Meeting-house Pag. 1 2. by some Sabbatarian you have these words Christ died to procure Grace to enable men to fulfil this Law Rom. 8. 3. not that 't is fulfilled in us that is in our head i. e. by Christ in our Nature for us but in us that is by us O woful stuff Besides doth Christ help us to fulfil the whole Law perfectly If so 't is by the Law thus fulfilled that we are justified and then also 't is not by the Obedience of one Man that we are made Righteous Rom. 5. Do not these men Rom. 10. 3. like the Jews go about to establish their own Righteousness Moreover their Doctrin renders all that keep not or violate their Sabbath to be guilty of the breach of the whole Law which they affirm this is one Point of i. e. a simple moral Precept and not the least Command neither I fear with these men Now my Brethren how are these young Men and others blinded who out of mistaken Zeal strive to bring in a Jewish Rite or the observation of the old Legal Sabbath in promoting of which Error they disperse such pernicious Books and Pamphlets as tend directly to establish the Covenant of Works to the utter destroying the Doctrin of the Gospel and the free Grace of God in our Justification by the Obedience of Christ alone and to the palpable hazard and perdition of their own and other Peoples Souls These Persons seek to sacrifice all that is truly valuable to the blind observation of a Day that obliges them to keep the whole Law 10. That the natural Consequence of their Principle and Practice P. 405 406. Their Principle tends to harden the Jews as Reverend Dr. Owen shews tends to the great scandal of the Christian Religion and to the hardening of the Jews in their Infidelity is apparent to all For the Introduction of any part of the old Mosaical System of Ordinances is a tacit denial of Christ's being