Selected quad for the lemma: doctrine_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
doctrine_n	church_n	true_a	visible_a	8,362	5	9.3033	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A77763	A plea for Mr Strong's church-members; shewing they ought not implicitely to submit to his unnecessary and doubtful rules, although for it he threaten to debar them from the Lords Table, or to leave them altogether. / By Thomas Bakewell.	Bakewell, Thomas, b. 1618 or 19.	1650 (1650)	Wing B536; Thomason E610_6; ESTC R206336	7,343	11

A PLEA FOR Mr Strong 's Church-Members Shewing they ought not implicitely to submit to his unnecessary and doubtful Rules Although for it he threaten to debar them from the Lords Table or to leave them altogether By Thomas Bakewell 1 COR. 15.58 Therefore my beloved Brethren be ye stedfast unmoveable alwayes abounding in the work of the Lord forasmuch as you know that your labour is not in vain in the Lord. LONDON Printed for Iohn Dallom and are to be sold at his shop in black Fryers neer Carter-lane 1650. A Plea for Mr Strong 's Church-Members Shewing they ought not implicitely to submit to his unnecessary and doubtful Rules although for it he threaten to debar them from the Lords Table or leave them altogether THe Cause moving me to speak my thoughts of those Rules was this A friend in that Parish told me that M. Strong had imposed some doubtful Rules on his own examined and approved Communicants to subscribe and till they do it he is resolved to debar them all from the Lords Table if not wholly forsake them although their Consciences be not satisfied touching the lawfulness of it hereupon I wrote my opinion of those Rules intended for Mr Strong But another told me it was in vain for some Ministers had written to him about it to whom he will give no answer nor yet dispence the Ordinance as if he were the Lord of Gods Ordinances to dispence or refuse at his pleasure yea to his own approved Communicants and also having the Pastoral charge over them But is this to feed the Lambs of Christ and as a Nurse to impart if it were possible his own Soul for the Babes in Christ or as a faithful Steward to feed the Lords family to monopolize Gods Ordinance he being but an Embassador or Messenger of it from Christ to them Or is this to have the tongue of the learned to speak in season to the weary Soul to impose such penalties on the Conscience unsatisfied Now for their satisfaction I thought good to publish my thoughts of those Rules The first Rule Christ hath instituted particular Churches under the Gospel and it 's the duty of Saints to gather themselves into such Societies To these two Propositions I would know of him what Churches those be into which the Saints are not yet admitted and into which it is the Saints duty to gather themselves Is there any Churches without Saints or into which the Saints are not yet admitted Only it is their duty to gather themselves into such Societies This kind of reasoning is much like as if he had said Christ hath instituted Bodies without Members and its the Members duty to gather themselves into those Bodies or Christ hath instituted Trees without Branches and it is the Branches duty to gather themselves into those Trees Therefore I demand again what be those Churches into which the Saints must gather themselves I hope you will not call your self the Church one man cannot be a Congregation into which the Saints should be gathered nor the Church to which they should be added The Embassador of Christ should beseech men to be reconciled to God not to himself as false Prophets draw Disciples to themselves Acts 20.30 To the other Proposition what be those Saints without the Church whose duty it is to gather themselves into it Do you mean some among the Turks miraculously wrought upon with true saving grace that they should hasten themselves into the visible Church If so why do you not go amongst them and seek for such and bring them in to make known the mind of God unto them As for baptized Christians they need no gathering into the Church they are children of Zion Psal 149.2 It shall be said this and that man was born in her Psal 87.5 The Christian Church shall travel and bring forth more children to God then the Jewish Church did Isai 54.1 And all her children do seal their admission into the Universal visible Church at their Baptism which comprehends all particular Churches which are but as branches and members of it this Universal Church was instituted by Jesus Christ into which all Ministers both extraordinary and ordinary are placed 1 Cor. 12 18. and into which all Christians sealed their admittance at their Baptism both those children that are born of baptized parents and also those converted from Heathens and Infidels without these are all added to that one Universal Church Acts 2.45 47. Not to Peters or Pauls-Church or any one single Congregation for then in case of removal to another they would need again to be baptized their Ministers again to be ordained yea as often as they remove into other Churches but Baptism signifies ingrafting into Christ and the new birth But as a man can be born but once and the sience ingrafred but once so a Member can be but once admitted into the visible Church which is already done and sealed at their Baptism The second Rule Churches instituted by Christ are to be a company of visible Saints united into one Body by mutual consent to enjoy a constant communion among themselves partaking in all Ordinances according to Gods Order for the edification of one another Ans It is true that those of age who are real Members of Christ and also have sealed the Covenant of Grace and their admission into the visible Church at their Baptism those I grant are true Saints yet sometimes no more visible then those 7000. who had not bowed the knee to Baal Gods people are called hidden ones Psal 83.3 They have that white stone and that new Name written which no man knows but he that receives it Rev. 2.17 Again the best cannot enjoy a constant communion there was a breach between Paul and Barnabas Acts 15.39 And for partaking in all Ordinances we know sometimes those that believe in Christ are cast out Joh. 9.34 and the incestuous man partaking in all Ordinances 1 Cor. 5.1 2. and the Churches of Asia had left their first love and had a name to live and was dead and held the doctrine of Baalam and of the Nicholaitans and suffered Jesebel to seduce the servants of God and yet still they are true Churches Again suppose they had none of those open abominations yet they might have hypocrites which are uncapable of the fore-mentioned priviledges yet all those are visible Members till they are discovered and judicially cast out Again many of the members may be infants which may have true grace as Iohn and Ieremiah had yet not capable of communion or of publike enjoyment of the Ordinances yet members having sealed their admission by Baptism to the parents profession which is the only form of all Christian Churches The third Rule Saints are only such who being of age do profess faith in Christ and yield obedience unto Christ according to the Rule of Faith and Life taught by Christ and his Apostles and of such only should particular Churches consist and of their children