Power and Assistance of God who is both the Framer and Controller of Nature or which is the same thing in effect by the Mediation and Ministry of good Spirits who always act obediently to his Will So that whether mediately or immediately it is God who is to be looked upon as the Original and Author of all those wonderful Things which were done by Jesus and his Disciples Now then Since God did interpose his Power to work such strange and stupenduous things for the Propagation and Confirmation of that Doctrine which was taught by Jesus and his Disciples This I think is a sufficient Demonstration that their Doctrine was certainly true For Who can imagine that God should make use of his extraordinary Power only to cheat and deceive the World into the Belief of a Lye I conclude therefore That the Primitive Christians had sufficient Reason to believe that it was revealed by God from Heaven that whosoever would believe on Jesus and receive and live according to his Religion should be made very happy in thenext Life this very thing being the grand Point of Doctrine which Jesus and his Disciples taught and preached to the World And if we are sure that the Primitive Christians had Reason sufficient to believe this from hence it follows That we have sufficient Reason to believe it also XX. But Jesus himself being long since ascended into Heaven and his Disciples who first preached the Gospel departed out of the World here I think it is necessary to enquire to whom or to what I must apply my self that amidst the several Parties in the World who all call themselves True and Orthodox Christians each condemning all others but themselves I may be truly and surely informed what is the true and genuine Religion or Doctrine of Jesus which I ought to receive and live according to in order to my future Happiness For if I do not this I must either reject the Doctrine of Jesus and so lose my future Happiness or else take it altogether upon Trust and by chance and then 't is odds but I light upon the wrong and must needs run a very great hazard And though he who is in a Mistake and cannot tell how to help it will doubtless find an easie Pardon from God yet he who falls into Errour for want of moderate Care and Diligence to find out the Truth has I think no pretence either to Pardon or so much as to Pity XXI The Roman Catholicks do tell me that I must apply my self to the Church This Church they define to be that Society of Persons who prosess Faith in Jesus Christ and live in Subjection to and Communion with the Pope or Bishop of Rome This Church they say is infallible and not only does not but cannot err in any Doctrine of Religion Go then say they to this Church and receive the Doctrine which she teaches and there you have certainly and infallibly the true and pure Doctrine of Jesus Christ But I cannot give my Assent to follow this their Direction because I find such great Difficulties in my way as I think are insuparable at least I am sure such as I am not able to overcome For First Although it may be a certain Truth that there shall always be a Church that is to say a Company of People some where or other professing the true Christian Religion as long as the World shall last yet what solid Proof can be brought that this particular Society of Men who live in Communion with the Pope or Bishop of Rome are alone the true Church and shall always keep and maintain amongst them the true and uncorrupt Doctrine of Jesus Christ This Matter being a Question of Revelation and positive Institution is uncapable of being proved by any Argument drawn from Natural Reason And as for the Texts of Scripture which they alledge it is even ridiculous to think that any sober and unprejudiced Person should be convinced by them as will evidently appear to any one who impartially reads what the Romish and Protestant Divines have written on this Controversie For there are none of those Texts but are fairly and naturally capable of another Interpretation and must be very much strained and wrested to make them countenance the Romish Doctrine Besides that the Divines of the Church of Rome do generally teach That no Man can be sure of the Authority or Sense of any Text of Scripture especially if it appear to be any way doubtful except he receives the Proposal and Interpretation thereof from this their Church which they say is infallible So that a Man must of necessity believe the Infallibility of their Church before he can any way be sure of the Credit or even of the Sense of those Texts of Scripture which they bring to prove it And then What need is there of Scripture-Arguments to prove a thing which must be acknowledged before the Arguments can have any force or even be as much as certainly understood And if they tell me that the Fathers and ancient Christian Writers do testifie thus much of the Church of Rome I can only say that the Protestant Divines who seem to me to be Men of as much Learning and Integrity as the Romish do declare that it is far otherwise Nor have I Skill enough in Language and Antiquity to take upon me to judge of this Dispute Neither do I understand by what Authority the Writings of those Persons who are acknowledged to have been subject to Errours should be obtruded on me as a Rule of my Faith or as a sufficient Argument to determine my Assent in so weighty a Matter Secondly Supposing but not granting that in the Church of Rome the true and pure Doctrine of Jesus Christ was preserved yet still it is granted that particular and private Men who live in the visible Communion of that Church may teach false and corrupt Doctrine Here then I demand How shall I certainly distinguish the Doctrine of the Church from the Opinions of private Men And how shall I certainly know what is the true Meaning of the Church's Doctrine They of the Church of Rome are not agreed who it is that has Authority to declare and expound the Doctrine of their Church whether it be the Pope or a General Council or neither alone but both together Or if they were unanimous in this Point yet how shall I know whether such a particular Person who possesses the Chair be a true and lawful Pope or such a particular Assembly a true and lawful General Council Or Suppose they could satisfie me in this Demand yet there is no Council now sitting nor if there were could I go to them or to the Pope to receive Instruction nor can the Pope or a Council be at leisure to satisfie the Demands of every private Enquirer How then can I be sure that this or that particular Person does both rightly understand and faithfully propose the Doctrine of the Church to me Especially since
there have been and still are eminent Members of the Church of Rome who have accused each other of corrupt Doctrine and even of Heresie it self But Thirdly and Lastly There do appear to me to be much stronger Arguments to prove that the Church of Rome has actually erred and corrupted the Doctrine of Jesus Christ in the Case of Transubstantiation and some other her Tenents than any that can be brought to prove her to be infallible And until I can be otherwise convinced I cannot but conclude That to follow the Guidance of the Roman Church is not the way to embrace the true and pure Doctrine of Jesus XXII Some there are who tell me that to find out the true and genuine Doctrine of Jesus I must have recourse to the Tradition of the Church And thus they set forth the Matter First They suppose that the true and genuine Doctrine of Jesus was undoubtedly taught by his Apostles and first Disciples Secondly That if any one did or should have gone about to spread any false or spurious Doctrine whilst these Apostles and Disciples were yet alive They who were sent on purpose by Jesus to preach his Doctrine and were owned and submitted to accordingly by all Christian Churches both could and would immediately convince all Churches of the falseness and spuriousness of such pretended Doctrine Thirdly That the Doctrine of Jesus being in all Churches publickly and constantly taught and preached every succeeding Age and Generation must needs know and could not possibly be ignorant what their Fathers and immediate Predecessors owned and taught as such Fourthly That therefore if at any time whatsoever any new or spurious Doctrine was or should be vented by any Person or Persons as the Doctrine of Jesus all Christians must presently know that this was none of his Doctrine because it was not taught them as such by their immediate Predecessors Fifthly That therefore it is impossible that any new and spurious Doctrine could ever be broached in the World as a part of the Doctrine of Jesus but it must needs meet with great Opposition For all Christians do maintain That it is a Sin to teach or knowingly to own any thing as the Doctrine of Jesus which is not really so Sixthly That however some Men out of Pride or Interest may own and contend for any such novel Doctrines yet it is impossible that any such Doctrine should ever come to be universally received by the whole Church except we could suppose either that the whole Church should joyn together to involve themselves and their Posterity for ever in a Sin or else that a few Men who first should vent an Opinion could so impose upon the whole World as to make them believe that what they all must know to be a new and upstart thing because they received it not from their Fathers and Predecessors was a part of the ancient Doctrine of Jesus which was all along from Hand to Hand delivered down to them Both which things are absurd to conceive or imagine And Lastly That no part of the Doctrine of Jesus once delivered could ever be obliterated or wholly forgot in the World because every Age of Christians from the very first who undoubtedly received the whole and entire Doctrine of Jesus knew themselves to be indispensably obliged both by God's Command and also by that Love and Charity which they owed to their Posterity to teach the same full and entire Doctrine which they received unto their Children and those who were to come after them Go therefore to the Church that is to the Church of Rome say the Papists to the Universal Church i. e. to all Christians say some Protestants and see what are the Doctrines which are and have been universally maintained of whose Beginning no other Account can be given but that Jesus and his Apostles taught them to the World And there you have the entire and uncorrupted Doctrine of Jesus But to this I answer That indeed where there is an universal or a very large and general Tradition concerning any thing and where from the nature of the thing it self it appears to be highly rational and probable that there is not or could not be any Errour or Mistake in the matter in such a Case as this no Man I think but an obstinate Sceptick will offer to withstand the Evidence of such a Tradition But let a Tradition be ever so general or even universal yet if it can be shewn that there is not only a possibility but also a fair likelihood and probability that there may be a mistake in the business then I think no Man can justly be blamed if he refuses or suspends his Assent until the Testimony of such a Tradition be cleared and vindicated from those rational Prejudices and Exceptions which may lie against it Now if it were so that all Errours and Mistakes did ever immediately appear in their perfect Form and full Growth at their very Beginning then it were most rational to conclude that all Men must needs take notice of their first Appearance and consequently that in all likelihood any such Error must needs meet with many more Opponents than Abettors But on the contrary it may well be supposed that Errours may have sprung up in the World from such small beginnings and by such slow and unperceivable degrees that after some Ages it may be impossible for a Man to discover them to be Errours except he has some other Rule besides Tradition to try them by viz. either the Rule of common Reason or some ancient and unaltered Writing As for Example It is not rational to conceive that in the first Ages of Christianity they who preached and writ popular Discourses might very innocently and to good purpose make use of Rhetorical Flights and Figurative Expressions to strike the Fancies and move the Affections of the People to Vertue and Piety And is it not likely enough That those who came after them might not only strive to imitate but also to out-do them in bolder Flights and more strained Schemes of Expression And is it not also probable enough That in long process of Time Ignorance generally overspreading the Face of the World and being joyned with a profound Veneration for those ancient Preachers and Writers might begin to interpret some of these Rhetorical and Figurative Expressions in a Literal and Logical Sence and then conceive that such their Interpretations were really and truly the ancient Doctrines delivered down to them Especially if we consider that there may have been some Men of great Power and Repute in the World who might have taken a pride and delight or whose Interest it might have been to amuze the People with mysterious Notions and Fancies and to keep them ignorant of the Truth And thus it appears to be not only possible but also probable enough That Errours and Mistakes as to the ancient Doctrine of Jesus might come to be generally received without any considerable or notorious Opposition
given to them or that such Opposition might soon be suppressed and over-ruled by the Power and Reputation of such prevailing Men. From all which I cannot but conclude That though the general Tradition or Testimony of the Church may be a good Help yet it may not always be a certain Rule to lead me to the entire and unaltered Doctrine of Jesus XXIII Other there are who tell me That to find out the true and entire Doctrine of Jesus I must apply my self to the holy Scripture that is to say to the Books commonly called the Old and the New Testament And because I look upon this to be the right Way I shall briefly and plainly deliver my Thoughts in relation to these Books And first of the New Testament That the New Testament as it was extant in the Greek Toegue has been ever universally owned by all Christians as containing a true though some deny it to be a full Account of the Life and Doctrine of Jesus is a thing so notorious and so universally acknowledged that I cannot find the least Ground or Reason to question it Now the History and Doctrine of Jesus being so well known unto the first Christians by the Preaching of the Apostles and Disciples and they being so ready upon all Occasions to lay down their Lives for the Truth of Christianity it cannot be imagined that ever they would so readily and universally receive and own such a Book if it had contained any thing in it which was dissonant from that Doctrine which they had received It is confessed indeed that some of those Books which make up the Volume of the New Testament that is to say the Epistle to the Hebrews that of St. James the Second of St. Peter that of St. Jude the Second and Third of St. John and the Revelations were not so soon and so universally received throughout the Christian Church as the rest of the Books were The Reason of which apparently was not That these Books contained any thing in them contrary to what was delivered it the other Books of the New Testament for he that reads the whole will plainly find that there is a very compleat Agreement between them the only seeming Discord of St. Paul's Justification by Faith and St. James's Justification by Works being exactly and fully reconciled by considering That St. Paul means no other Faith but such as worketh by Love Gal. 5. 6. and St. James no other Works but such as proceed from Faith Jam. 2. 22. But because it was not at first universally known who were the Authors of them Which abundantly shews the Care and Caution of the Christian Church in not being hasty to receive and admit any Books as authentick Records of their Doctrine without very good Warrant for so doing And therefore since these same Books were in a very little time after received and owned to be of equal Authority with the rest of the New Testament I cannot but from thence conclude That those Churches which at the first doubted concerning those Books did soon receive most full and ample Satisfaction in that matter from those who had before received them I conclude therefore That the Book of the New Testament as it was extant in the Primitive Times in the Greek Tongue did contain a true Account of the Doctrine of Jesus XXIV That innumerable Copies of the New Testament were in a very little time dispersed through all places where Christianity was planted That it has heen at different times and in very distant places translated into all or almost all Languages And that Copies both of the Original and many of the several Translations have been preserved with much Care in a great many distant Parts of the World is allowed by all and denied by none From whence I think we may gather First That where the Generality of the Greek Copies of the New Testament do agree in the very same Words there we have undoubtedly the true and authentick Words of the New Testament For although some Mistakes might creep into some Copies either through the Wickedness or Negligence of some particular Men yet where so many Copies of a Book have been so carefully preserved and in such distant Parts of the World it is not to be imagined that the self-same Errour in any Expression should ever be propagated through the Generality of them Secondly That where the Words or Expressions of divers Greek Copies do differ one from another yet if the Sense and Meaning be exactly the same in all or almost all there we have certainly the true Sense and Meaning of the New Testament For it is easie to apprehend that a Transcriber might by a small Mistake put one Word or Expression of the same Signification in stead of another But that the same Sense should be punctually preserved in all or almost all Copies is not to be imagined except it were the true Sense delivered from the Beginning Thirdly That if there may be found any different Readings in divers Copies of the New Testament which disagree in Sense as well as in Words which scarce ever happens in any thing which is accounted a material Point of Religion then it seems to be most fit and proper to admit of that Reading and Sense which best agrees with the Tenour of the whole with the ancientest and best esteemed Translations and with the evident Principles of sound Reason And if any place be so obscure as that none of these Ways will afford any Light into its Meaning then I think that no stress ought to be laid upon it in any necessary part of Religion XXV But some will demand How are we sure of the Sense and Meaning even of those places of the New Testament where there is no difference about the Words In Answar to this I have already shewn § 21. that we are not to follow the Guidance of the Church of Rome to know the true Doctrine of Jesus Nor therefore consequently to know the true Meaning of the New Testament in which his Doctrine is owned to be contained I have shewn also § 22. That though general Tradition may be a good Help yet may it not always be a certain Rule to lead one to the unaltered Doctrine of Jesus nor therefore consequently to the true and genuine Interpretation of the New Testament Since therefore there is no other way to be found I conclude That the New Testament is to be interpreted the same way that other Books are that is by considering the Sense and Property of the Words and Sentences and the ordinary Figures of Speech as they are commonly used in the same Book and in others written in the same Language and about the same time together with the Scope Drift Coherence and Occasion of the Discourse To which End every Man that is learned being bound to use his best Endeavour to know the Will of God as I have shewn § 14. is obliged according to the measure of his Learning to consult
Tribunal of God and yet be very justly condemned by the Magistrate Thus for instance If a Man has committed Theft or Murther and upon a sincere and hearty Repentance has obtained the Pardon of his Sins from God yet nevertheless if such a Person be accused and legally convicted of such Crimes before the Civil Magistrate He not only may but ought to put the Law of the Land in Execution agninst him though he believes him to be ever so penitent That it may be a Terrour unto others For if this ought not to be done every Malefactor by a pretence of Repentance which cannot certainly be discovered by any but God might escape the Lash of the Law By which Means all wicked Men would be encouraged to commit all sorts of Crimes Thus also when the Children of Israel were commanded by God to conquer the Land of Canaan we read how they sent Spies to make a Discovery of the Land that they might the more easily invade it Now it is most certain that these Spies did nothing but what they had God Almighty's Warrant for and yet if they had been taken by any of the Canaanitish Magistrates and legally convicted of their Design Who doubts but that it had been lawful for them to have punished them according to the Law of War and the Law of Nations For it is none of the Magistrates Business to enquire who keeps or transgresses the Laws of God for the Law of God extends to many Cases where the Magistrate's Authority has nothing to do but they who transgress the Laws of the Land and thereby disturb the Peace of the Common-wealth are upon a due Conviction to be punished by the Magistrate without any farther Enquiry it being his Business to do every thing which appears to be necessary for the Preservation of the Weal-Publick provided that he does nothing which is contrary to the known Laws of God who is the supreme King and Lord of all XXXVI But Fifthly it will be objected That whatever becomes of the civil Magistrate's Power yet this Doctrine which here is taught must certainly defeat and cancel all that Authority with which the Church is endowed and invested For though the civil Magistrate has no more to look after but only the Peace and Preservation of the Common-Wealth yet surely it is the Duty of the Church to take Cognizance of those things which are committed merely against the Law of God But how can the Church call any Man to an Account for any Sin or Transgression when a Man may plead for himself That he thought it was his Duty which Plea if really true and who but God can disprove it is sufficient according to this Doctrine to justifie him before God and consequently to indemnifie him from all Censures of the Church To this I answer That the Authority of the Church i. e. of a Christian Society is twofold viz. Either that Authority wherewith it is invested immediately by God or that which is conferred on it by the civil Laws and Constitutions of the Kingdom or Commonwealth The latter of these is a civil Authority though exercised by Ecclesiastical Persons because it is derived altogether from the civil Power And therefore the Consideration of it must be referred to what is but now said touching the civil Magistrate But as for that Authority which is given to the Church immediately by God it is evidently no more than this viz. An Authority to preach the Gospel and to perswade Men every where to receive it and an Authority to exclude those Men out of the Society that is out of the visible Communion of it who do not profess the true Christian Faith and live according to the Christian Law Other Authority than this does not appear to be given to the Church by God And nothing that I have said does in the least tend to abridge them any way as to the Exercise of this Power The Church may and ought to preach the Gospel and perswade men to embrace it And however any Man may be excused before God by invincible Ignorance yet he is not to be suffered in the visible Communion of the Church if he does not believe and live as a Christian XXXVII Sixthly it may be objected that I have several times in this Discourse made use of a Distinction which Distinction is nevertheless render'd altogether useless and impertinent by the main Design of the Discourse it self The Distinction is between necessary Matters of Religion and such as are not necessary which is referred to ◠26. and elsewhere But if no Man can be obliged in any Matter of Religion any farther than to do his best Endeavour from thence it must follow That all things are alike necessary in Religion For whatsoever is within a Man's Power according to this Doctrine is necessary for him and whatsoever is not within his Power is not necessary so that the very same thing may be necessary in Respect of one Man and not necessary in Respect of another which confounds the Distinction and renders it useless To this I answer That by things necessary I mean all such as it is a Sin for a Man to be ignorant of if the Knowledge of them be within his Power Such as are That Jesus is the Son of God That God is to be worshipped c. By things not necessary I mean Such as a Man is not obliged so much as to search after the lgnorance whereof shall not be accounted sinful before God although it might have been in a Man's Power to have known them Such are a great many curious Speculations which Divines do trouble themselves and the World with which they themselves do yet confess are not necessary to any Man's Salvation and consequently which a Man is no more obliged to trouble his Head with than with any Problems either in Geometry or Natural Philosophy XXXVIII Seventhly It may be objected That this Doctrine must needs encourage Men to continue in their Ignorance and not to take any Care or Pains to inform themselves concerning the Truth of Religion or any of the Duties of it For Why should a Man take any Pains to get more Knowledge which will it may be bring Trouble in the Practice of it when Ignorance is no manner of Bar to his Salvation For let him but live according to the Knowledge which he already has and God it seems requires no more from him To this I answer That for a Man to act according to the best of his Knowledge will not serve his turn except he has used his best Endeavour by all Means to know and understand the Will of God as perfectly as He can as I have shewn all Men are bound to do § 14. Which though it is a Comfort to those who are ignorant and cannot help it yet is no manner of Encouragement or Excuse for those whose Ignorance is their own Fault or Neglect XXXIX My Reason having thus brought me to embrace the Christian Religion
least that what I have here done may move some more able and Judicious Person to take the Work in hand and supply those Defects of which I have been guilty THE CONTINUATION OF A Gentleman's Religion Being the Second PART 1. THE Holy Scriptures being the only authentick Record that I am able to find of the Christian Religion I take it for granted that they do express Divine Matters really and truly as the things are in themselves And therefore I cannot but believe that all the Doctrin therein delivered is most-certainly true altho many times I am not able to understand the Design and. Meaning of some Expressions and Passages which do occur therein I think it indeed to be very proper that Men of any reasonable Learning and Prudence should modestly offer their Thoughts to the World in order to the explaining of such Places of the Scriptures as appear to be abstruse and difficult But he who speaks his own Words and not those of Scripture can therein only offer his own Apprehensions to which no Man can be obliged to subscribe any farther than as he is in his own Reason convinced of the Truth of them and their Consonancy with the Scriptures 2. I do not apprehend that an implicit Faith is due to the Church of Rome which challenges it Part 1. § 21. much less sure to any other Church which does not require it When therefore any Church much more when any private Men do offer me any Doctrin of Religion in their own Words I think I ought to consider First Whether what they say is intelligible For tho we may be obliged to believe such things as are above our Understanding to comprehend Part 1. § 33. yet it is impossible for any Man to give an explicit Assent to any Form of Words if he does not Know the meaning of them Secondly Whether it is agreeable to the self-evident Principles of Reason for If I apprehend it to be otherwise it is impossible for me to believe it Part 1. § 33. Nor must any Text of Scripture be interpreted above the Level of plain and self-evident Reason whatever the literal Sense may seem to be And Thirdly whether the Truth of it can be proved by any solid Argument either from Reason or Scripture for tho a Doctrin be both intelligible and possible yet still it may be false and therefore is not to be believed except it can be proved These Rules I have endeavoured strictly to observe in the Trial of those Doctrins which I am now about to propose and I desire my Reader carefully to make use of the same in the Examination of all that I shall offer unto him But here I must desire him to take notice that I do fuppose him to be well acquainted with the Holy Scriptures and also with the common Arguments upon which the several Parties of Christians do ground and maintain their Opinions And therefore for his Ease as well as my own I shall save my self the Labour of mentioning such Arguments and Places of Scripture as are usually brought to prove those Points which are generally acknowledged by all Christians and even in those Points which are controverted between different Parties I shall ordinarily think it enough to hint at some of those Texts and Arguments which are used on either side of which I can scarce suppose any Man to be ignorant that is but moderately acquainted with the Principles of Christianity and the several Parties that profess it 3. To believe what God makes known and to do what he commands is what all Men call Religion But things that are impossible 't is certain that God requires from no Man Part 1. § 14. When therefore Damnation is denounced in Scripture against those who receive not the Gospel it must needs be understood only of them in whose Power it was to have received it and not of such who are invincibly ignorant either for want of Capacity John 9. 41. or of the means of Knowledge Joh. 15. 22. But for a Man who has both the Capacity and Means of Knowledge through Negligence to continue in Ignorance of God's Will my Reason tells me is a very great Sin besides all those Places of Scripture which do require us diligently to seek after Knowledge 4. That there is a God is sufficiently to be proved from our own Reason and Observation But fully to comprehend his Nature or declare in all Points what he is is by all allowed to be impossible to us 5. That God never had a Beginning I think I have sufficiently concluded Part 1. § 6. And if the holy Scripture had not told me that he is from Everlasting to Everlasting yet my own Reason would have inferred that he is subject to no Decay nor ever shall have an Ending 6. The Nature of every Material Being seems necessarily to imply a Possibility of having its Parts disjoyned and separated one from another and consequently of being dissolved and destroyed And theresore I conclude that the eternal God does not consist of Matter and that Being which is intelligent and does not consist of any material Parts I call a Spirit And this is what I mean when I say that God is a Spirit As for those Expressions the Eyes of the Lord the Arm of the Lord and such like which do occur sometimes in Scripture and seem to imply Bodily Parts it is manifestly obvious that they must be purely metaphorical 7. Our Experience does sufficiently testifie that whatsoever is visible to us is ever material Since therefore God does not consist of Matter I conclude that he is invisible to Mortal Eyes as the Scripture positively declares him to be And all those Texts which seem to say that he has been seen by Man I think must of necessity be interpreted some other way viz. either 1. Of an Angel appearing in a glorious and majestatick manner Or 2. Of the eternal Son of God assuming a Bodily Appearance as after he took our Nature upon him Or 3. Of some visible and extraordinary Signs and Tokens that the invisible God was there present in an extraordinary Manner Or 4. Of those mystical and Hieroglyphical Representations which God has sometimes been pleased to make of himself not to the Senses but to the Imagination and Understanding of his Prophets in their extatick Dreams and Visions 8. Amongst all those things which I can conceive possible to be done i. e. to imply no Contradiction I can find nothing which to me appears more difficult than what God has already done in the Structure of the Universe And therefore I conclude that God can do whatsoever in its self is possible to be done which is what I mean when I say that he is Almighty Nor is there any one sure who will venture to say that God can do such things as imply a Contradiction either in themselves or to his own Nature and Attributes 9. That God who made all things should be ignorant of any thing appears to
seem but a slight and inconsiderable thing yet since our Saviour Christ has expressly appointed and commanded it and since his Apostles were always most careful to perform it insomuch that even they who had received the extraordinary Gift of the Holy Ghost from Heaven were yet required to be Baptized in order to become visible Members of the Church This Ceremony I think ought not to be left off or discontinued Altho whether it be performed by dipping the Body under the Water or by sprinkling the Water upon it to me seems to be altogether indifferent and to be regulated only by Prudence or the Custom of particular places For neither does the word Baptize signifie any more than to Wash which may be done either way nor does it appear that the Apostles dipped all those whom they baptized Moreover since sprinkling as well as dipping may sufficiently denote the washing and cleansing of the Soul from sin and since Baptism is not expressly in the Holy Scripture determined to either of these ways to the exclusion of the other I conclude that God has left the matter so far indifferent to us and to be ordered according to Prudence as the Circumstances of things and persons shall at any time direct And as long as the Substance and Design of his Command is carefully retained I see no necessity of being so very solicitous about a Circumstance of it except it could evidently be made appear that he had appointed and determined it 53. Since then Baptism is as the Entrance or Door of Admittance into the Church of Christ it will follow that all they and they only who are duly qualified to be Members of his Church are fit to have Baptism administred to them If any person has been brought up out of the Chucrh until he comes to years of understanding and knowledge he is then and only then qualified to be a Member of the Church when having repented of all his former sins he believes and owns that Jesus is the Christ the Son of God and consequently receives and professes that Faith and Doctrine which he has taught and authorized and obliges himself to live according to all those Laws and Rules which he has prescribed to us this being the very Condition which our Saviour indespensably requires from his Church and every Member of it according as they are capable of performing it But if a Child be born of Christian Parents or is so in the hands of Christian Guardians as that it is in their power to bring him up in the true Religion and they do promise and engage so to educate him such a Child as this even before he comes to any knowledge of things is yet qualified to be a Member of the Church of Christ upon the presumption that he will perform what God requires from him when he comes to be capable of it and so to continue if by Apostacy or wickedness he does not in process of time separate himself again from it For this beyond dispute was the case of In sants before the coming of Christ who at eight days old if Males were to be Circumcised and thereby admitted into the Church of God and within his Covenant if they were either the Sons or Servants born in the House of believing persons and who as well as their Parents are expressly said to enter into Covenant with God which is but another expression for becoming of his Church And no one surely will offer to say that the Case of Infants is made worse than it was by our Saviours coming into the World especially since he has expressly commanded that little Children should come unto him and not be forbidden for that of such is the Kingdom that is the Church of God I conclude therefore that not only adult persons who make a due profession of their Faith and Repentance but also such Infants as are in a way of being brought up in the Christian Religion are without any Obstacle to be admitted to Baptism 54. There are some passages in the New Testament which seem plainly to suggest to us that it was a constant Custom with the Apostles of Christ to lay their Hands upon all such as had been Baptized which laying on of Hands was undoubtedly accompanied with Prayer to God in order to their receiving the Gifts and Graces of the Holy Spirit of God But that this was a thing positively prescribed and commanded I do not find clearly proved And therefore altho I dare not hastily condemn those particular Churches where this same Custom is disused or intermitted yet since the Grace and Assistance of the Holy Ghost in order to the leading of a good life and obtaining eternal Happiness is for ever continued unto the Church as I have said Part 2. § 42. and therefore ought ever to be sought for altho the working of Miracles and speaking of all Languages without learning them be ceased from amongst us I cannot but conclude that the laying on of Hands upon persons that have been baptized together with Prayer to God for their growth and continuance in Grace which is commonly called Confirmation is a prudent and godly Custom and ever fit to be continued in the Church 55. As every particular Man whatsoever is obliged in his own private person to honour and worship God so the Church being a Society incorporated for the better serving of God is under an Obligation to do the same in her associated capacity that is to say to assemble together for his worship And because the whole Number of Christians which are dispersed over the Face of the Earth are not capable of meeting together in one place the Universal Church therefore lies under a necessity of subdividing it self into particular Churches and those again into particular Congregations according as they find to be most convenient for the pursuing that same end for which they are so incorporated Moreover since all these particular Churches and Congregations are still or ought to be but Parts and Members of that One Catholick Church which our Saviour Christ has appointed and founded it follows that none of them ought to constitute or act any thing amongst themselves which may give a just occasiou for the breaking of that Union and Concord which he designed and has commanded always to be maintained amongst them But on the contrary Matters ought every where so to be ordered as that if a Member of any one particular Church should travel into any other part of the World he may meet with nothing in any Christian Congregation where he comes which justly should be a hinderance to him from assembling or communicating with it 56. The particular acts to be performed in these Christian Assemblies are all such as tend to the Edification of the People in Virtue and Godliness which is the design of their Incorporation and consequently to the promoting of each mans eternal Salvation which is the end that every Christian is supposed to pursue All which are
reducible to these Two Heads viz. Devotion towards God which includes Confession of sins Prayer for all things necessary both for themselves and others and Praising of God as well for his own Excellency and Perfection as for his Love and Beneficence to all Mankind And 2. the Instruction of the People which are assembled which is to be done by Reading and Explaining the Holy Scriptures Catechizing Preaching c. But there is one act of Devotion towards God to be performed in such publick Assemblies which is commonly known by the name of the Sacrament of the Lords Supper or the Holy Communion of which it will be fit to say something more particularly because it is an Ordinance altogether of positive Institution as well as Baptism of which I have already spoken 57. As our Saviours Death and Passion which he underwent for the sins of the whole World should ever out of Gratitude be remembred by us in the most emphatical and affecting manner so except we have every one of us a share and interest in that Atonement which he thereby made to God for us we cannot by the Terms of the Gospel hope for eternal Salvation In order then to both these Ends he himself before his Death appointed it as a perpetual Ordinance for ever to be continued in his Church that Bread should be blessed broken and eaten and a Cup also blessed distributed and drank in such assemblies as should meet together in his Name not only as a Remembrance of his Sufferings for us which are thereby shewn forth and represented but also as the Communion that is to say the exhibition of his Body and Blood unto and the participation of them by all faithful and good Christians To say with the Roman Church that the Substance of Bread and Wine being blessed or consecrated in this Ordinance are transubstantiated or turned into the very real Substance of the Body and Blood of Christ so as that that very same Body of his which was crucified and that Blood which was shed are wholly and intirely received into the bodily Mouth and swallowed down by every Communicant does not only draw after it such monstrous Absurdities as no Man I think without renouncing his Reason can digest nor can be inferred from any passage of Scripture interpreted according to the Rules which I have laid down Part 1. § 25. and 33. But is also directly contrary even to the Letter as well as Meaning of the New Testament in which the Bread in this Holy Institution is plainly called Bread and by the same Rule the Wine must still remain Wine as to its natural substance even after the Blessing or Consecration of it As therefore I must needs conclude that the Body and Blood of Christ are not received by the Members of his Church after that manner which they of Rome do define so must it also follow that their Worshiping of the Host and pretended Sacrifice of Christ in the Mass together with their depriving the Laity of the Cup which besides other Absurdities do wholly depend upon the Doctrine of Transubstantiation are none other than meer human and unlawful Inventions and practices But since a Man may then be said truly to receive and partake of any thing tho at never so great a distance from him when he has a real Interest in it and enjoys the Benefit and Advantage of it as a Man may have an Estate and reap the Profits of it tho it lies in a far distant Country I do therefore conclude that the way whereby we do receive or communicate in the Body and Blood of Christ by this Ordinance is by being made Partakers of those Benefits which by the Crucifying of his Body and the shedding of his Blood do accrue to us and that whosoever eats of this Bread and drinks of this Cup in such a manner as Christ has appointed has thereby assuredly a share of those Benefits held forth and conveyed unto him 58. How often this Ordinance is to be practised and repeated in every Congregation is not expressly determined either by Christ or his Apostles and therefore can only be regulated by the Prudence of the Church it self But common Reason will tell us that it should be so often at least as may be sufficient to preserve a fresh and lively Remembrance of the Sufferings of our Saviour in the minds of the People this being one main End of its first Institution And so often therefore ought every Christian who is arrived to years of understanding for such only are capable of doing any thing in remembrance of another to come and be partakers of it For to contemn or neglect this Ordinance which Christ has appointed for such a peculiar End argues a great slight and disregard of his Death and Passion besides the Disobedience to his Command and therefore is justly to be looked on as a very great and heinous sin 59. As it is a great Affront and even a Mocking of God for a Man to draw near to him in any of his Ordinances without a sincere and well-meaning heart for which Reason Hypocrisy in Scripture is represented as most odious and the Prayer and Sacrifice of a wicked Man whilst he continues such is said to be an Abomination unto God so does he seem to resent such a Practice in no instance more than in this of the Holy Communion of which he who eats and drinks unworthily is expessly said by the Apostle to be quilty of the Body and Blood of Christ and to eat and drink damnation to himself Which Expressions altho they are differently interpreted by divers persons yet in whatever sense we take them they do abundantly shew that God is in a particular manner offended with those who any way profane this sacred Institution It therefore is the Duty and ought very much to be the concern of every Christian first to examin himself and to make the best trial and enquiry that he can whether he be truly sincere in his resolutions of serving and obeying God faithfully all his life-long for any person who is thus disposed and none other is ever acceptable to God And then with Devotion and Reverence suitable unto such Sincerity to come and eat of this Bread and drink of this Cup That as on the one side he may not neglect what Christ has commanded and required so on the other he may not incur the Penalty which is threatned to an unworthy Receiver 60. He that worships or prays to God by himself alone may do it as well by offering up only the inward Thoughts and Desires of his Mind which are clearly seen and known unto God as by expressing himself outwardly by Words which tho even in our private Devotions they may be very proper to keep our Minds intent upon what we are about yet are no way necessary to inform God of what we think or wish for But when a Society of Men do meet to joyn together in God's worship their Devotion must
of necessity be outwardly expressed in Words because there is no other way of keeping their Thoughts wherein their Worship does consist united and joyned together And since Words not understood are in effect the same with no Words at all I conclude that the Language wherein the Worship of any Church or Congregation is offered up to God must always be such as is well understood by the Assembly of the People who meet together Nor does even the Doctrine of Transubstantiation amaze me more than that the Church of Rome should own the 14th Chapter of St. Paul's first Epistle to the Corinthians to be the Word of God and yet have all their publick Services every where performed in the Latine Tongue only which is not now understood by the generality of any Nation in the World 61. As Peace and Vnity mutual Love and good Agreement amongst the Members of every Society together with Order and Decency in all that is transacted amongst them absolutely necessary to the being and continuance or at least to the well-being of the Society it self so are they carefully prescribed and inculcated by Christ and his Apostles as things to be always preserved and maintained in the Christian Church And as he who first occasions the violation of any of them is plainly guilty of a very great sin so in all Matters that are not particularly and clearly determined by God's Law we cannot propose a better and safer Rule to our selves than always to do that which tends most to the advancement and preservation of them 62. If some certain time be not determined for Christians to meet together for God's Worship which every Man may know of before it comes and accordingly prepare himself for it by laying aside for that time his worldly Business Disorder and Confusion which is the natural Consequence of Uncertainty must needs follow That one Day at least in seven was expressly required by God under the Mosaick Law to be sanctified and set a part for his Service is beyond dispute That the Observation of the Jewish Sabbath or the last Day of the Week is not required from the Christian Church to me seems very evident from St. Paul's reckoning it amongst the transitory Shadows of the old Law Col. 2. 17. But that we Christians ought not to be behind-hand with the Jews in setting apart a proportion of our time for God's Service I think will follow as well from the great Mercies which we have received from him for which we no less than they ought to shew and express our Thankfulness as also from that general Rule which our Saviour has given us that our Righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees And that accordingly one Day in seven namely the First Day of the Week which in Scripture is therefore called the Lord's Day Rev. 1. 10. has ever been so set apart for the Service of God in all Christian Churches I presume will be denied by none As also that the Reason of the Apostles making choice of this particular Day was in remembrance of our Saviour's glorious Resurrection which on that Day was performed and whereby their Faith in him which began to waver was confirmed and raised above all doubt or diffidence Now since no Reason can be given or so much as imagined why this Day should be changed for any other Day of the Week I do from what has been said conclude that the Lord's Day or First Day of the Week ought for ever to be kept holy in the Christian Church and particularly dedicated to the Service of God And where either the Church universal or any particular Church has set aside any other days to be kept holy in remembrance either of any of God's Mercies to us or of the Martyrdom of any of his chosen Saints who sealed the Truth of the Gospel with their Lives and transmitted it so confirmed down unto us or as Days of Fasting or Abstinence in order to humble our selves before God for our Sins since in all this there is nothing contrary to God's Law nor any thing but what may be well consistent with and serviceable to true Piety It will follow from what I have said § 61. That every Member of such a Church is obliged to keep and observe these same other Holy Days so far as no way to give Scandal disturb the Order or break the Peace of the Church which has established them 63. Order and Decency necessarily require that all the outward circumstances of Worship which God himself has not determined by his own Law should be so setled by the Church as that all Confusion and Unseemliness therein may as much as is possible be avoided But care on the other side ought ever to be taken that Modes and Ceremonies be not so multiplied as to become uneasy and burdensome or distract the Devotion of the People Now there being no such fixed and demonstrable Rules of Decency and Order but what will have a different relish with different Men according to their several Educations and Customs to which they may have been used it will be very difficult if not impossible for any Church so to regulate these external matters as to please every Mans Fancy and give disgust to none For what some may think to be but decent others may take to be too formal or pompous and what these may apprehend to be suitable to the Simplicity of Christianity another sort may look on as mean and jejune As therefore the Church in this case can do no more but act according to the best of her Prudence so since every Man cannot expect to have his particular Fancy in these things pleased and gratified It will evidently appear to be the Duty of each private Christian so far to comply with every such constitution of the Church where he dwells provided there be nothing in it which is sinful as not to break the Peace and Unity or disturb the Order of the Church on that account But if any Church shall offer to impose any Ceremonies or practices whatsoever which God has not prescribed and which therefore are in themselves indifferent not for Decency and Order but as things in themselves Holy or absolutely necessary to Salvation as some of old would have done by the Jewish Ceremonies with such Impositions as these no Christian ought at all to comply nor suffer his Religion or Conscience to be thus burthened But every Man must stand fast in that Liberty wherewith Christ has made us free tho at the same time he must be very careful not to pretend or use this Liberty as a Cloke of Maliciousness 64. Since different Opinions in matters of Religion are generally apt to beget Dissensions and Animosities between those who entertain them as our dayly Experience does abundantly testifie It ought to be the Church's and every private Christian's endeavour that all Men may become of one and the same Judgment or at least that there may be as few Differences amongst them as
and spend overmuch of his Time and Labour in getting a Living for himself and his Family 71. I have now gone through what I at first designed and have not that I know of omitted any one thing which I could judge to be a material or necessary part of Religion Altho I have on purpose endeavoured to avoid the use of some Words which do frequently occur in all or most Systems of Divinity that I have met with And the reason why I have so done is not that I find fault with the Words themselves but because I would have my Reader take notice that Religion does not consist in Terms of Art or forms of expression but in the belief and practice of such things as God has made known and requires from us And it is too common among Men to wrangle about Words before they have clearly fixed and agreed upon the meaning of them I have not for example made use of this Term Justification But yet I have endeavoured to shew upon what conditions a sinner obtains the Pardon of his sins and Mercy at the hand of God which is the same thing Nor have I said any thing of the nature or number of Sacraments But I have spoken what I thought might be necessary concerning Baptism the Holy Communion and those other things which the Church of Rome calls by that name And if once I am satisfied touching any thing how far God requires it from us and whether or no it be necessary to Salvation I cannot see why I should trouble my self much in enquiring whether such a thing may properly be called a Sacrament or not which to me seems no more but a dispute about the meaning of a Word True indeed it is that in the Doctrine of the Trinity which I have delivered Part 2. § 22. I have expressly made use of the Terms person substance c. because I could find none others so fit and proper to express my Thoughts Nor durst I venture in so sublime a matter to apply new Words to those things of which I can have but very imperfect and obscure Conceptions And having thus said all that I intend upon this occasion I freely submit the Whole to the Judgment and Censure of every Reader leaving him to that liberty which I my self always desire to enjoy and being ready to retract any thing that I have said whensoever I am convinced that I have been therein mistaken Books Printed for Richard Sare THe Fables of Esop with Morals and Reflections Folio Erasmus Colloquies in English 8o. Quevedo's Visions 8o. These 3 by Sir Roger L'Estrange The Genuine Epistles of St. Barnabas St. Ignatius St. Clement St. Polycarp the Shepherd of Hermas c. Translated and published in English 8o. A Practical Discourse concerning Swearing 8o. The Authority of Christian Princes over Ecclesiastical Synods in Answer to a Letter to a Convocation Man 8o. Sermons on several Occasions 4o. These by Dr. Wake Epictetus's Morals with Simplicius's Coment 8o. A Sermon Preached upon the Death of the Queen Both by Mr. George Stanhope The Doctrine of a God and Providence vindicated and asserted 8o. Discourses on several Divine Subjects 8o. These two by Thomas Gregory Lecturer of Fulham Dr. Gregory's Divine Antidote in Answer to an Heretical Pamphlet Entituled an End to the Socinian Controversy 8o. Essays upon several Moral Subjcts in two parts by Jeremy Collier M. A. 8o. Compleat Sets consisting of 8 Volumes of Letters writ by a Turkish Spy who lived 45 Years at Paris undiscovered giving an account of the Principal Affairs of Europe 12º Humane Prudence or the Art by which a man may raise himself and Fortune to Grandure 12o. Moral Maxims and Reflections written in French by the Duke of Rochfoucault now Englished 12o. Of the Art both of writing and judging of History with Reflections upon Ancient as well as Modern Historians By Father Le Moyne 12o. An Essay upon Reason by Sir George Mackenzie 12o. Death made comfortable or the way to dye well By John Kettlewel 12o. The Parson's Counsellor or the Law of Tyths By Sir Simon Degg 8o. The Unlawfulness of Bonds of Resignation 8o. Price 6 d. An Answer to all the Excuses and Pretences which Men ordinarily make for their not coming to the Holy Sacrament 8o. Price 3 d. by a Divine of the Church of England Remarks on a Book Entituled Prince Arthur an Heroick Poem by Mr. Denis 8o. FINIS AN APPENDIX TO A GENTLEMEN's RELIGION In which it is Proved That nothing contrary to our Reason can possibly be the Object of our Belief But that it is no just Exception against some of the Doctrines of Christianity that they are above our Reason LONDON Printed for R. Sare at Grays-Inn-Gate in Holbourn 1698. AN APPENDIX TO A Gentleman's Religion 1. HOW those Persons who take unto themselves the distinguishing Name of Vnitarians do dissent from the main Body of Christians of whatsoever Church or Perswasion touching the Doctrines of the Trinity and the Incarnation of our Saviour Christ is so well known that I need not here offer to open or explain in the Terms of the Controversie which is managed between them Now when in this Dispute the Vnitarians are prest with some passages of Scripture which seem very evidently to make against them besides other ways which they have to avoid the force of them they commonly have recourse to the nature of the thing controverted and press their Adversaries back again with this demand How such a thing can possibly be And when to this it is reply'd That there is evidently no Contradiction to sound Reason in the Doctrines themselves and that the Truth of them ought ot be believed upon the Authority of God who hath revealed them But that the manner of them is utterly above and altogether incomprehensible to our finite and narrow Understandings and therefore not to be enquired after In return to this there are some who maintain that if these Doctrines were not contrary to Reason yet this alone is a sufficient cause to reject them that they are confessedly above it For of that which is above our Reason say they we can form no true Conception or Idea and it is absurd or rather impossible for a Man to believe that which he cannot clearly and plainly so much as conceive or apprehend 2. For the right stating and clearing of this whole Controversie I have given such hints in the Gentleman's Religion Part 1. Sect. 33. Part 2. 22 23 37. as I thought to be most fit for Men of ordinary Capacity and most suitable to that brevity which I all along defigned But in this Appendix I shall address my self unto those who are of a more refined Understanding and accustomed to a more exact way of thinking and try if I can give them any satisfaction in a Matter which seems to be not a little perplexed perhaps by the overmuch Curiosity of some of both the contending Parties 3. That our Knowledge of things is