And the corruptions of their Worship and Doctrine were such that a very small proportion of common sense with but an overly looking on the New Testament discovered them Nor had they any other varnish to colour them by but the Authority and Traditions of the Church But when some studious men began to read the Ancient Fathers and Councils though there was then a great mixture of Sophisticated stuff that went under the Ancient names and was joyned to their true works which Criticks have since discovered to be spurious they found a vast difference between the first Five Ages of the Christian Church in which Piety and Learning prevailed and the last Ten Ages in which Ignorance had buried all their former Learning only a little misguided Devotion was retained for Six of these Ages and in the last Four the restless Ambition and Usurpation of the Popes was supported by the seeming holiness of the begging Friers and the false Counterfeits of Learning which were among the Canonists School-men and Casuists So that it was incredible to see how men notwithstanding all the opposition the Princes every-where made to the progress of these reputed new Opinions and the great advantages by which the Church of Rome both held and drew many into their Interests were generally inclined to these Doctrines Those of the Clergy who at first Preached them were of the begging Orders of Friers who having fewer engagements on them from their Interests were freer to discover and follow the truth And the austere Discipline they had been trained under did prepare them to encounter those difficulties that lay in their way And the Laity that had long lookt on their Pastors with an evil eye did receive these Opinions very easily which did both discover the Impostures with which the world had been abused and shewed a plain and simple way to the Kingdom of Heaven by putting the Scriptures into their hands and such other Instructions about Religion as were sincere and genuine The Clergy who at first despised these new Preachers were at length much Allarmed when they saw all people running after them and râ—ceiving their Doctrines As these things did spread much in Germany Switzerland and the Netherlands so their Books came over into England where there was much matter already prepared to be wrought on not only by the prejudices they had conceived against the corrupt Clergy but by the Opinions of the Lollards which had been now in England since the days of Wickliff for about 150 years Between which Opinions and the Doctrines of the Reformers there was great Affinity and therefore to give the better vent to the Books that came out of Germany many of them were translated into the English-Tongue and were very much read and applauded This quickned the proceedings against the Lollards and the enquiry became so severe that great numbers were brought into the Toils of the Bishops and their Commissaries If a man had spoken but a light word against any of the Constitutions of the Church he was seized on by the Bishop's Officers and if any taught their Children the Lord's Prayer the Ten Commandments and the Apostle's Creed in the Vulgar Tongue that was crime enough to bring them to the Stake As it did Six men and a woman at Coventry in the Passion-week 1519. being the 4 th of April Longland Bishop of Lincoln was very cruel to all that were suspected of Heresie in his Diocess several of them abjured and some were Burnt But all that did not produce what they designed by it The Clergy did not correct their own faults and their cruelty was looked on as an evidence of Guilt and of a weak Cause so that the method they took wrought only on peoples fears and made them more cautious and reserved but did not at all remove the Cause nor work either on their reasons or affections Upon all this the King to get himself a name and to have a lasting Interest with the Clergy thought it not enough to assist them with his Authority but would needs turn their Champion and write against Luther in defence of the Seven Sacraments This Book was magnified by the Clergy as the most Learned Work that ever the Sun saw and he was compared to King Solomon and to all the Christian Emperours that had ever been And it was the chief subject of flattery for many years besides the glorious Title of Defender of the Faith which the Pope bestowed on him for it And it must be acknowledged that considering the Age and that it was the Work of a King it did deserve some Commendation But Luther was not at all daunted at it but rather valued himself upon it that so great a King had entred the lists with him and answered his Book And he replied not without a large mixture of Acrimony for which he was generally blamed as forgetting that great respect that is due to the Persons of Soveraign Princes But all would not do These Opinions still gained more footing and William Tindal made a Translation of the New Testament in English to which he added some short Glosses This was printed in Antwerp and sent over into England in the year 1526. Against which there was a Prohibition published by every Bishop in his Diocess Bearing that some of Luthers followers had erroneously Translated the New Testament and had corrupted the Word of God both by a false Translation and by Heretical Glosses Therefore they required all Incumbents to charge all within their Parishes that had any of these to bring them in to the Vicar-General within 30 days after that premonition under the pains of Excommunication and incurring the suspition of Heresie There were also many other Books Prohibited at that time most of them written by Tindal And Sir Thomas More who was a man celebrated for Vertue and Learning undertook the answering of some of those but before he went about it he would needs have the Bishops Licence for keeping and reading them He wrote according to the way of the Age with much bitterness and though he had been no Friend to the Monks and a great declaimer against the Ignorance of the Clergy and had been ill used by the Cardinal yet he was one of the bitterest Enemies of the new Preachers not without great cruelty when he came into Power though he was otherwise a very good-natured man So violently did the Roman Clergy hurry all their Friends into those excesses of Fire and Sword When the Party became so considerable that it was known there were Societies of them not only in London but in both the Universities then the Cardinal was constrained to act His contempt of the Clergy was looked on as that which gave encouragement to the Hereticks When reports were brought to Court of a company that were in Cambridge Bilney Latimer and others that read and propagated Luther's Book and Opinions some Bishops moved in the year 1523. that there might be a Visitation appointed
works of the same we shall not only obtain everlasting life but also we shall deserve remission or mitigation of these present pains and afflictions in this World according to the saying of St. Paul Si nos ipsi judicaremus non judicaremur a Domino Zacharias Convertimini ad me ego convertar ad vos Esajas â—8 frange esurienti panem tuum c. tunc eris velut hortus irriguus Haec sunt inculcanda ecclesiis ut exercitentur ad bene operandum in his ipsis operibus exerceant confirment fidem petentes expectantes a Deo mitigationem praesentium calamitatum The Sacrament of the Altar FOurthly as touching the Sacrament of the Altar We will that all Bishops and Preachers shall instruct and teach our people committed by us unto their spiritual charge that they ought and must constantly believe that under the form and figure of bread and wine which we there presently do see and perceive by our outward senses is verily substantially and really contained and comprehended the very selfe-same body and blood of our Saviour Jesus Christ which was born of the Virgin Mary and suffered upon the cross for our Redemption and that under the same form and figure of bread and wine the very selfe-same body and blood of Christ is corporally really and in the very substance exhibited distributed and received of all them which receive the said Sacrament and that therefore the said Sacrament is to be used with all due reverence and honour and that every man ought first to prove and examine himself and religiously to try and search his own Conscience before he shall receive the same according to the saying of St. Paul Quisquis ederit panem hunc aut biberit de poculo domini indigne reus erit corporis sanguinis domini probet autem seipsum homo sic de pane illo edat de poculo illo bibat nam qui edit aut bibit indâ—gne judicium sibiipsi manducat bâ—bit non dijudicans corpus domini Iustification FIfthly As touching the order and cause of our Justification we will that all Bishops and Preachers shall instruct and teach our people committed by us unto their spiritual charge that this word Justification signifieth remission of our sins and our acceptation or reconciliation into the grace and favour of God that is to say our perfect renovation in Christ. Item That sinners attain this Justification by Contrition and Faith joyned with Charity after such sort and manner as we before mentioned and declared not as though our Contrition or Faith or any works proceeding thereof can worthily merit or deserve to attain the said Justification for the only mercy and grace of the Father promised freely unto us for his Sons sake Jesus Christ and the merits of his blood and his passion be the only sufficient and worthy causes thereof and yet that notwithstanding to the attaining of the said Justification God requireth to be in us not only inward Contrition perfect Faith and Charity certain hope and confidence with all other spiritual graces and motions which as we said before must necessarily concur in remission of our sins that is to say our Justification but also he requireth and commandeth us that after we be justified we must also have good works of charity and obedience towards God in the observing and fulfilling outwardly of his Laws and Commandments for although acceptation to everlasting life be conjoyned with Justification yet our good works be necessarily required to the attaining of everlasting Life and we being justified be necessarily bound and it is our necessary duty to do good works according to the saying of St. Paul debitores sumus non carni ut secundum carnem vivamus nam si secundum carnem vixerimus moriemur sin autem spiritu facta corporis mortificaverimus vivemus etenim quicunque spiritu dei ducuntur hi sunt filii dei and Christ saith si vis ad vitam ingredi serva mandata and St. Paul saith de malis operibus qui talia agunt Regnum dei non possidebunt Wherefore we will that all Bishops and Preachers shall instruct and teach our people committed by us unto their spiritual charge and God necessarily requireth of us to do good works commanded by him and that not only outward and civil works but also the inward spiritual motions and graces of the Holy Ghost that is to say to dread and fear God to love God to have firm confidence and trust in God to invocate and call upon God to have patience in all adversities to hate sin and to have certain purpose and will not to sin again and such other like motions and vertues for Christ saith Nisi abundaverit justitia vestra plusquam scribarum Pharisaeorum non intrabitis in regnum caelorum that is to say we must not only do outward civil good works but also we must have these foresaid inward spiritual motions consenting and agreeable to the Law of God Of Images AS touching Images truth it is that the same have been used in the old Testament and also for the greater abuses of them sometime destroyed and put down and in the new Testament they have been also allowed as good Authors do declare wherefore we will that all Bishops and Preachers shall instruct and teach our people committed by us to their spiritual charge how they ought and may use them And First that this may be attributed unto them that they be representers of vertue and good example and that they also be by occasion the kindlers and firers of mens minds and make men often remember and lament their sins and offences especially the Images of Christ and our Lady and that therefore it is meet that they should stand in the Churches and none otherwise to be esteemed And to the intent the rude people should not from henceforth take such superstition as in time past it is thought that the same hath used to do we will that our Bishops and Preachers diligently shall teach them and according to this Doctrine reform their abuses for else there might fortune Idolatry to ensue which God forbid And as for Censing of them and kneeling and offering unto them with other like worshippings although the same hath entred by devotion and fallen to custome yet the people ought to be diligently taught that they in no ways do it nor think it meet to be done to the same Images but only to be done to God and in his honour although it be done before the Images whether it be of Christ of the Cross or of our Lady or of any other Saint besides Of Honouring of Saints AS touching the honouring of Saints we will that all Bishops and Preachers shall instruct and teach our people committed by us unto their spiritual charge that Saints now being with Christ in Heaven be to be honoured of Christian people in Earth but not with that confidence and honour which
THE Historie of the REFORMATION of the CHURCH of ENGLAND LONDON Printed for Ric Chiswell Whitehall May 23. 1679. THis Book entituled The History of the Reformation of the Church of ENGLAND having been perused and approved by Persons of eminent Quality and several Divines of great Piety and Learning who have recommended it as a Work very fit to be made publick as well for the Usefulness of the Matter as for the Industry and Integrity the Author hath used in compiling of it the Honourable Mr. SECRETARY COVENTRY doth therefore allow it to be Printed and Published IO. COOKE THE HISTORY OF THE REFORMATION OF THE Church of England The First Part OF THE Progress made in it during the Reign OF K. Henry the VIII By GILBERT BVRNET LONDON Printed by T. H. for Richard Chiswell at the Rose and Crown in St. Paul's Church-yard MDCLXXIX TO THE KING SIR THE first step that was made in the Reformation of this Church was the restoring to your Royal Ancestors the Rights of the Crown and an entire Dominion over all their Subjects of which they had been disseised by the craft and violence of an unjust Pretender to whom the Clergy though your Majesties Progenitors had enriched them by a bounty no less profuse than ill-managed did not only adhere but drew with them the Laity over whose Consciences they had gained so absolute an Authority that our Kings were to expect no Obedience from their people but what the Popes were pleased to allow It is true the Nobler part of the Nation did frequently in Parliament assert the Regal Prerogatives against those Papal invasions yet these were but faint endeavours for an ill-executed Law is but an unequal match to a Principle strongly infused into the Consciences of the people But how different was this from the teaching of Christ and his Apostles They forbad men to use all those Arts by which the Papacy grew up and yet subsists They exhorted them to obey Magistrates when they knew it would cost them their Lives They were for setting up a Kingdom not of this World nor to be attained but by a holy and peaceable Religion If this might every-where take place Princes would find Government both easie and secure It would raise in their Subjects the truest courage and unite them with the firmest charity It would draw from them Obedience to the Laws and Reverence to the persons of their Kings If the Standards of Justice and Charity which the Gospel gives of doing as we would be done by and loving our Neighbours as our selves were made the measures of mens actions how steadily would Societies be governed and how exactly would Princes be obeyed The design of the Reformation was to restore Christianity to what it was at first and to purge it of those Corruptions with which it was over-run in the later and darker Ages GREAT SIR This work was carryed on by a slow and unsteady Progress under King Henry the VIII it advanced in a fuller and freer course under the short but blessed Reign of King Edward was Sealed with the blood of many Martyrs under Queen Mary was brought to a full settlement in the happy and glorious days of Queen Elizabeth was defended by the learned Pen of King Iames but the established frame of it under which it had so long flourished was overthrown with your Majesties blessed Father who fell with it and honoured it by his unexempled Suffering for it and was again restored to its former beauty and order by your Majesties happy Return What remains to compleat and perpetuate this Blessing the composing of our differences at home the establishing a closer correspondence with the Reformed Churches abroad the securing us from the restless and wicked practices of that Party who hoped so lately to have been at the end of their designs and that which can only entitle us to a Blessing from God the Reforming of our manners and lives as our Ancestors did our Doctrine and Worship All this is reserved for your Majesty that it may appear that your Royal Title of Defender of the Faith is no empty sound but the real strength and Glory of your Crown For attaining these ends it will be of great use to trace the steps of our first Reformers for if the land-marks they set be observed we can hardly go out of the way This was my chief design in the following sheets which I now most humbly offer to your Majesty hoping that as you were graciously pleased to command that I should have free access to all Records for composing them so you will not deny your Royal Patronage to the History of that Work which God grant your Majesty may live to raise to its perfection and to compleat in your Reign the Glory of all your Titles This is a part of the most earnest as well as the daily Prayers of May it please Your Sacred Majesty Your Majesties most Loyal most Faithful and most devoted Subject and Servant G. BVRNET THE CONTENTS OF THIS VOLUME BOOK I. A Summary View of King Henry the Eighths Reign till the Process of his Divorce was begun in which the State of England chiefly as it related to Religion is opened Page 1. BOOK II. Of the Process of Divorce between King Henry and Queen Katherine and of what passed from the 19th to the 25th year of his Reign in which he was declared Supream Head of the Church of England Page 34. BOOK III. Of the other Transactions about Religion and Reformation during the rest of the Reign of King Henry the 8th Page 179. COLLECTION OF RECORDS c. Ad Librum Primum Page 3. Ad Librum Secundum Page 9. Ad Librum Tertium Page 131. An Appendix concerning the Errors and Falsehoods in Sanders's Book of the English Schism Page 273. ADDENDA Page 305. ERRATA in the Historical part PAge 12. Line 6. Margent for 15. read 1st p. 49. l. 19. for chiefly r. clearly p. 54. l. 15. for 10. r. 13. p. 103. l. 32. Abisha r. Abishag p. 109. l. 47. had r. has p. 115. l. 10. having r. had p. 126. l. 9. before officiate r. did p. 151. l. 31. speak r. spake p. 173. l. 31. dele a. p. 186. l. 25. Pachon r. Pachom p. 198. l. 8. co r. to p. 203. l. 41. then r. that p. 205. l. 20. being her last words r. her last words being p. 235. l. 44. that so r. so that p. 239. l. 33. was r. is p. 259. l. 42. As r. All. p. 264. l. 15. down r. out p. 275. l. 5. no r. on p. 283. l. 49. in that r. that in l. 51. the great charges of r. of the great charges p. 284. l. 21. person r. prison p. 327. l. 31. desertion r. discovery p. 333. Marginal Note resentments r. preâ—erments Informers r. Reformers p. 344. l. 22. before he r. that p. 369. l. 5. utrumque r. utcumque Some Literal faults and mistakes in the Punctuation the Reader will more easily Correct THE
of whom some perhaps were damn'd Souls and others were never in being These arts being detected and withal their great Viciousness in some places and in all their great abuse of the Christian Religion made it seem unfit they should be continued But it was their dependence on the See of Rome which as the state of things then was made it necessary that they should be supprest New Foundations might have done well and the scantness of those considering the number and wealth of those which were suppressed is one of the great blemishes of that Reign But it was in vain to endeavour to amend the old ones Their numbers were so great their Riches and Interests in the Nation so considerable that a Prince of Ordinary mettal would not have attempted such a design much less have compleated it in Five years time With these fell the Superstition of Images Reliques and the Redemption of Souls out of Purgatory And those Extravagant Addresses to Saints that are in the Roman Offices were thrown out only an Ora pro nobis was kept up and even that was left to the liberty of Priests to leave it out of the Litanies as they saw cause These were great preparations for a Reformation But it went further and two things were done upon which a greater Change was reasonably to be expected The Scriptures were Translated into the English tongue and set up in all Churches and every one was admitted to read them and they alone were declared the Rule of Faith This could not but open the eyes of the Nation who finding a profound silence in these writings about many things and a direct opposition to other things that were still retained must needs conclude even without deep Speculations or nice Disputing that many things that were still in the Church had no ground in Scripture and some of the rest were directly contrary to it This Cranmer knew well would have such an operation and therefore made it his chief business to set it forward which in Conclusion he happily effected Another thing was also established which opened the way to all that followed That every National Church was a Compleat Body within it self so that the Church of England with the Authority and Concurrence of their Head and King might examine and Reform all Errors and Corruptions whether in Doctrine or Worship All the Provincial Councils in the ancient Church were so many Precedents for this who condemned Heresies and Reformed abuses as the occasion required And yet these being all but parts of one Empire there was less reason for their doing it without staying for a General Council which depended upon the pleasure of one man the Roman Emperor than could be pretended when Europe was divided into so many Kingdoms By which a common Concurrence of all these Churches was a thing scarce to be expected and therefore this Church must be in a very ill Condition if there could be no endeavours for a Reformation till all the rest were brought together The Grounds of the new-Covenant between God and man in Christ were also truly stated and the terms on which Salvation was to be hoped for were faithfully opened according to the New-Testament And this being in the strict notion of the word the Gospel and the glad tidings preached through our Blessed Lord and Saviour it must be confessed that there was a great Progress made when the Nation was well instructed about it though there was still an alloy of other Corruptions embasing the Purity of the Faith And indeed in the whole progress of these changes the Kings design seemed to have been to terrifie the Court of Rome and cudgel the Pope into a Compliance with what he desired for in his heart he continued addicted to some of the most extravagant Opinions of that Church such as Transubstantiation and the other Corruptions in the Mass so that he was to his lives end more Papist than Protestant There are two Prejudices which men have generally drunk in against that time The one is from the Kings great Enormities both in his personal Deportment and Government which make many think no good could be done by so ill a man and so cruel a Prince I am not to defend him nor to lessen his faults The vastness and irregularity of his Expence procured many heavy Exactions and twice extorted a publick Discharge of his debts embased the Coin with other Irregularities His proud and impatient Spirit occasioned many cruel proceedings The taking so many lives only for denying his Supremacy particularly Fisher's and More 's the one being extreme old and the other one of the Glories of his Nation for Probity and Learning The taking advantage from some Eruptions in the North to break the Indempnity he had before proclaimed to those in the Rebellion even though they could not be proved Guilty of those second disorders His extreme Severity to all Cardinal Pool's Family his cruel using first Cromwel and afterwards the Duke of Norfolk and his Son besides his un-exampled Proceedings against some of his Wives and that which was worst of all The laying a Precedent for the subversion of Iustice and oppressing the clearest Innocence by attaining men without hearing them These are such remarkable blemishes that as no man of ingenuity can go about the whitening them so the poor Reformers drunk so deep of that bitter cup that it very ill becomes any of their followers to endeavour to give fair Colours to those red and bloody Characters with which so much of his Reign is stained Yet after all this sad enumeration it was no new nor unusual thing in the methods of Gods Providence to employ Princes who had great mixtures of very gross faults to do signal things for his Service Not to mention David and Solomon whose sins were expiated with a severe Repentance it was the bloody Cyrus that sent back the Iews to their Land and gave them leave to re-build their Temple Constantine the Great is by some of his Enemies charged with many blemishes both in his Life and Government Clovis of France under whom that Nation received the Christian Faith was a monster of Cruelty and Perfidiousness as even Gregory of Tours represents him who lived near his time and nevertheless makes a Saint of him Charles the Great whom some also make a Saint both put away his wife for a very slight cause and is said to have lived in most unnatural lusts with his own Daughter Irene whom the Church of Rome magnifies as the Restorer of their Religion in the East did both contrary to the Impressions of Nature and of her Sex put out her own Sons eyes of which he died soon after with many other execrable things And whatever Reproaches those of the Church of Rome cast on the Reformation upon the account of this Kings faults may be easily turned back on their Popes who have never failed to court and extol Princes that served their ends how gross and scandalous soever their
This as it was fatal to the Counts of Tholouse who were great Princes in the South of France and first fell under the Censures so it was terrible to all other Princes who thereupon to save themselves delivered up their Subjects to the Mercy of the Ecclesiastical Courts Burning was the death they made choice of because Witches Vizards and Sodomites had been so executed Therefore to make Heresie appear a terrible thing this was thought the most proper punishment of it It had also a resemblance of everlasting Burning to which they adjudged their Souls as well as their bodies were condemned to the â—ire but with this signal difference that they could find no such effectual way to oblige God to execute their sentence as they contrived against the Civil Magistrate But however they confidently gave it out that by vertue of that Promise of our Saviours Whose sins ye bind on Earth they are bound in Heaven their Decrees were ratified in Heaven And it not being easie to disprove what they said people believed the one as they saw the other Sentence executed So that whatever they condemned as Heresie was looked on as the worst thing in in the world There was no occasion for the execution of this Law in England till the days of Wickliffe And the favour he had from some great men stopt the Proceedings against him But in the 5th year of King Richard the Second a Bill passed in the House of Lords and was assented to by the King and published for an Act of Parliament though the Bill was never sent to the House of Commons By this pretended Law it appears Wickliff's followers were then very numerous that they had a certain habit and did Preach in many places both in Churches Church-yards and Markets without Licence from the Ordinary and did preach several Doctrines both against the Faith and the Laws of the Land as had been proved before the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury the other Bishops Prelats Doctors of Divinity and of the Civil and Canon-Law and others of the Clergy That they would not submit to the admonitions nor Censures of the Church but by their subtile ingenious words did draw the people to follow them and defend them by strong hand and in great routs Therefore it was Ordained that upon the Bishops certifying into the Chancery the names of such Preachers and their Abettors the Chancellour should issue forth Commissions to the Sheriffs and others the Kings Ministers to hold them in Arrest and strong Prison till they should justify them according to the Law and reason of Holy Church From the gentleness of which law it may appear that England was not then so tame as to bear the severity of those cruel laws which were setled and put in execution in other Kingdoms The Custome at that time was to engross Copies of all the Acts of Parliament and to send them with a Writ under the great Seal to the Sheriffs to make them be proclaimed within their jurisdictions And Iohn Braibrook Bishop of London then Lord Chancellour sent this with the other Acts of that Parliament to be proclaimed The Writ bears date the 26th of May 5 to Reg. But in the next Parliament that was held in the 6th year of that Kings Reign the Commons preferred a Bill reciting the former Act and constantly affirmed that they had never assented to it and therefore desired it might be declared to be void for they Protested it was never their intent to be Iustified and to bind themselves and their Successors to the Prelats more than their Ancestors had done in times past To which the King gave the Royal Assent as it is in the Records of Parliament But in the Proclamation of the Acts of that Parliament this Act was suppressed so that the former Act was still looked on as a good law and is Printed in the Book of Statutes Such pious frauds were always practised by the Popish Clergy and were indeed necessary for the supporting the Credit of that Church When Richard the 2d was deposed and the Crown usurped by Henry the 4th then he in gratitude to the Clergy that assisted him in his coming to the Crown granted them a law to their hearts content in the 2 d. year of his Reign The Preamble bears That some had a new Faith about the Sacraments of the Church and the Authority of the same and did Preach without Authority gathered Conventicles taught Schools wrote Books against the Catholick Faith with many other heinous aggravations Upon which the Prelats and Clergy and the Commons of the Realm prayed the King to provide a sufficient remedy to so great an evil Therefore the King by the assent of the States and other discreet men of the Realm being in the said Parliament did Ordain That none should Preach without Licence except persons Priviledged That none should Preach any Doctrine contrary to the Catholick Faith or the Determination of the Holy Church and that none should favour and abett them nor keep their Books but deliver them to the Diocesan of the place within 40 days after the Proclamation of that Statute And that if any Persons were defamed or suspected of doing against that Ordinance then the Ordinary might Arrest them and keep them in his Prison till they were Canonically purged of the Articles laid against them or did abjure them according to the Laws of the Church Provided always that the proceedings against them were publickly and judicially done and ended within three Months after they had been so Arrested and if they were Convict the Diocesan or his Commissaries might keep them in Prison as long as to his discretion shall seem expedient and might Fine them as should seem competent to him certifying the Fine into the Kings Exchequer and if any being Convict did refuse to abjure or after Abjuration did fall into Relapse then he was to be left to the Secular Court according to the Holy Canons And the Majors Sheriffs or Bayliffs were to be personally present at the passing the Sentence when they should be required by the Diocesan or his Commissaries and after the Sentence they were to receive them and them before the People in a high place do to be Brent By this Statute the Sheriffs or other Officers were immediatly to proceed to the Burning of Hereticks without any Writ or Warrant from the King But it seems the Kings Learned Council advised him to issue out a Writ De Haeretico comburendo upon what grounds of Law I cannot tell For in the same year when William Sartre who was the first that was put to death upon the account of Heresie was judged Relapse by Thomas Arundel Arch-Bishop of Canterbury in a Convocation of his Province and thereupon was degraded from Priesthood and left to Secular Power a Writ was issued out to Burn him which in the Writ is called The Customary Punishment relating it as like to the Customs that were beyond
Sea But this Writ was not necessary by the Law and therefore it seems these Writs were not Enrolled For in the whole Reign of King Henry the 8 th I have not been able to find any of these Writs in the Rolls But by Warham's Register I see the Common course of the Law was to certifie into the Chancery the Conviction of an Heretick upon which the Writ was issued out if the King did not send a Pardon Thus it went on all the Reign of Henry the 4 th But in the beginning of his Sons Reign there was a Conspiracy as was pretended by Sir Iohn Oldcastle and some others against the King and the Clergy upon which many were put in Prison and 29 were both attainted of Treason and condemned of Heresie so they were both Hanged and Burnt But as a Writer that lived in the following Age says Certain affirmed that these were but feigned causes surmised of the Spiritualty more of displeasure than truth That Conspiracy whether real or pretended produced a severe Act against those Hereticks who were then best known by the name of Lollards By which Act all Officers of State Judges Justices of the Peace Majors Sheriffs and Bayliffs were to be Sworn when they took their Imployments to use their whole Power and Diligence to destroy all Heresies and Errors called Lollardies and to assist the Ordinaries and their Commissaries in their proceedings against them and that the Lollards should forfeit all the Lands they held in Fee-Simple and their Goods and Chattels to the King The Clergy according to the Genius of that Religion having their Authority fortified with such severe Laws were now more cruel and insolent than ever And if any man denied them any part of that respect or of those advantages to which they pretended he was presently brought under the suspition of Heresie and vexed with Imprisonments and Articles were brought against him Upon which great complaints followed And the Judges to correct this granted Habeas Corpus upon their Imprisonments and examined the Warrants and either Bailed or Discharged the Prisoners as they saw cause For though the Decrees of the Church had made many things Heresie so that the Clergy had much matter to work upon yet when Offenders against them in other things could not be charged with any formal Heresie then by consequences they studied to fasten it on them but were sometimes over-ruled by the Judges Thus when one Keyser who was Excommunicated by Thomas Bourchier Arch-Bishop of Canterbury at the Suit of another said openly that That Sentence was not to be feared for though the Arch-Bishop or his Commissary had Excommunicated him yet he was not Excommunicated before God he was upon this Committed by the Arch-Bishop's Warrant as one justly suspected of Heresie but the Judges upon his moving for an Habeas Corpus granted it and the Prisoner being brought to the Bar with the Warrant for his Imprisonment they found the matter contained in it was not within the Statute and first Bailed him and after that they Discharged him One Warner of London having said That he was not bound to pay Tithes to his Curate was also imprisoned by Edward Vaughan at the command of the Bishop of London but he escaped out of Prison and brought his Action of false Imprisonment against Vaughan Whereupon Vaughan pleading the Statute of Henry the 4 th and that his Opinion was an Heresie against the Determination of the Catholick Faith the Court of the Common-Pleas judged That the words were not within the Statute and that his Opinion was an Error but no Heresie So that the Judges looking on themselves as the Interpreters of the Law thought That even in the case of Heresie they had Authority to declare what was Heresie by the Law and what not But what opposition the Clergy made to this I do not know I hope the Reader will easily excuse this Digression it being so material to the History that is to follow I shall next set down what I find in the Records about the proceedings against Hereticks in the beginning of this Reign On the 2 d. of May in the year 1611. Six Men and Four Women most of them being of Tenterden appeared before Arch-Bishop Warham in his Mannor of Knall and abjured the following Errors 1 st That in the Sacrament of the Altar is not the Body of Christ but Material Bread 2 dly That the Sacraments of Baptism and Confirmation are not necessary nor profitable for mens Souls 3 dly That Confession of Sins ought not to be made to a Priest 4 thly That there is no more Power given by God to a Priest than to a Layman 5 thly That the Solemnization of Matrimony is not profitable nor necessary for the well of mans Soul 6 thly That the Sacrament of Extreme Unction is not profitable nor necessary for mans Soul 7 thly That Pilgrimages to holy and devout Places be not profitable neither Meritorious for mans Soul 8 thly That Images of Saints be not to be worshipped 9 thly That a man should pray to no Saint but only to God 10 thly That holy water and holy bread be not the better after the Benediction made by the Priest than before And as they abjured these Opinions so they were made to Swear That they should discover all whom they knew to hold these Errors or who were suspected of them or that did keep any private Conventicles or were Fautors or Comforters of them that published such Doctrins Two other men of Tenterden did that day in the Afternoon abjure most of these Opinions The Court sate again the 5 th of May and the Arch-Bishop enjoyned them Penance to wear the Badg of a Fagot in Flames on their Cloaths during their lives or till they were dispensed with for it and that in the Procession both at the Cathedral of Canterbury and at their own Parish Churches they should carry a Fagot on their shoulders which was looked on as a publick Confession that they deserved Burning That same day another of Tenterdon abjured the same Doctrines On the 15 th of May the Court sate at Lambeth where 4 Men and one Woman abjured On the 19 th Four Men more abjured On the 3 d. of Iune a Man and a Woman abjured Another Woman the 26 th of Iuly Another Man the 29 th of Iuly Two Women on the 2 d. of August A Man on the 3 d. and a Woman on the 8 th of August Three Men on the 16 th of August And three Men and a Woman on the 3 d. of Sept. In these Abjurations some were put to abjure more some fewer of the former Doctrines and in some of their Abjurations Two Articles more were added 1 st That the Images of the Crucifix of our Lady and other Saints ought not to be worshipped because they were made with mens hands and were but Stocks and Stones 2 dly That Money and Labour spent in Pilgrimages was all in vain All these Persons
St. Austin who do plainly deliver the Tradition of the Church about the obligation of those Laws and answer the objections that were made either from Abraam's Marrying his Sister or from Iacob's Marrying two Sisters or the Law in Deuteronomy for the Brothers Marrying his Brothers Wife if he died without Children They observed that the same Doctrine was also taught by the Fathers and Doctors in the latter Ages d Anselm held it and pleads much for Marrying in remote Degrees and answer the Objection from the Decision in the Case of the Daughters of Zelophehad Hugo Cardinalis Radulphus Flaviacenfis and Rupertus Tuitiensis do agree that these Precepts are Moral and of perpetual obligation as also Hugo de Sto. Victore Hildebert Bishop of Mans being consulted in a Case of the same nature with what is now controverted plainly Determines That a man may not Marry his Brothers Wife and by many Authorities shewes That by no means it can be allowed And Ivo Carnotensis being desired to give his Opinion in a Case of the same circumstanceâ— of a Kings Marrying his Brothers Wife says Such a Marriage is null as inconsistent with the Law of God and that the King was not to be admitted to the Communion of the Church till he put away his Wife since there was no Dispencing with the Law of God and no Sacrifice could be offered for those that continued willingly in sin Passages also to the same purpose are in other places of his Epistles From these Doctors and Fathers the Inquiry descended to the Schoolmen who had with more niceness and subtlety examined things They do all agree in asserting the obligation of these Levitical Prohibitions Thomas Aquinas does it in many places and confirmes it with many Arguments Altisiodorensis says they are Moral Laws and part of the Law of Nature Petrus de Palude is of the â—ame mind and says that a mans Marrying his Brothers Wife was a Dispensation granted by God but could not be now allowed because it was contrary to the Law of Nature St. Antonine of Florence Ioannes de Turre Cremata Ioannes de Tabia Iacobus de Lausania and Astexanus were also cited for the same Opinion And those who wrote against Wickliffe namely Wydeford Cotton and Waldensis charged him with Heresie for denying that those Prohibitions did oblige Christians And asserted that they were Moral Laws which obliged all Mankind And the Books of Waldensis were approved by P. Martin the First There were also many Quotations brought out of Petrus de Tarantasia Durandus Stephanus Brulifer Richardus de Media Villa Guido Briancon Gerson Paulus Ritius and many others to confirm the same Opinion who did all unanimously assert That those Laws in Leviticus are parts of the Law of Nature which oblige all Mankind and that Marriages contracted in these Degrees are null and void All the Canonists were also of the same mind Ioannes Andreas Ioannes de Imola Abbas Panormitanus Mattheus Neru Vincentius Innocentius and Ostiensis all Concluded that these Laws were still in force and could not be Dispenced with There was also a great deal alledged to prove that a Marriage is compleated by the Marriage-Contract though it be never Consummated Many Authorities were brought to prove that Adonijah could not Marry Abishag because she was his Fathers Wife though never known by him And by the Law of Moses a woman espoused to a man if she admitted another to her Bed was to be stoned as an Adulteress from whence it appears that the validity of Marriage is from the mutual Covenant And though Ioseph never knew the Blessed Virgin yet he was so much her Husband by the Espousals that he could not put her away but by a Bill of Divorce and was afterwards called her Husband and Christs Father Affinity had been also defined by all writers a Relation arising out of Marriage and since Marriage was a Sacrament of the Church its Essence could only consist in the Contract and therefore as a man in Orders has the Character though he never Consecrated any Sacrament So Marriage is compleat though its effect never follow And it was shewed that the Canonists had only brought in the Consummation of Marriage as essential to it by Ecclesiastical Law But that as Adam and Eve were perfectly Married before they knew one another so Marriage was compleat upon the Contract and what followed was only an effect done in the right of the Marriage And there was a great deal of filthy stuff brought together of the different Opinions of the Canonists concerning Consummation to what Degree it must go to shew that it could not be essential to the Marriage Conâ—ract which in modesty were suppressed Both Hildebert of Mans Ivo Carnotensis and Hugo de Sto. Victore had delivered this Opinion and proved it out of St. Chrysostome Ambrose Austin and Isidore Pope Nicolas and the Council of Tribur defined that Marriage was compleated by the Consent and the Benediction From all which they Concluded that although it could not be proved that Prince Arthur knew the Queen yet that she being once lawfully Married to him the King could not afterwards Marry her It was also said that violent presumptions were sufficient in the Opinion of the Canonists to prove Consummation Formal proofs could not be expected and for Persons that were of Age and in good health to be in Bed together was in all Trials about Consummation all that the Cononists sought for And yet this was not all in this Case for it appeared that upon her Husbands death she was kept with great care by some Ladies who did think her with Child and she never said any thing against it And in the Petition offered to the Pope in her name repeated in the Bull that was procured for the Second Marriage it is said she was perhaps known by Prince Arthur and in the Breve it is plainly said she was known by Prince Arthur and though the Queen offered to purge her self by Oath that Prince Arthur never knew her it was proved by many Authorities out of the Canon-Law That a Partie's Oath ought not to be taken when there were violent presumptions to the contrary As for the validity of the Popes Dispensation it was said That though the Schoolmen and Canonists did generally raise the Popes Power very high and stretch it as far as it was possible yet they all agreed that it could not reach the Kings Case Upon this received Maxime That only the Laws of the Church are subject to the Pope and may be dispenced with by him but that Laws of God are above him and that he cannot dispence with them in any case This Aquinas delivers in many places of his Works Petrus de Palude says The Pope cannot dispence with Marriage in these Degrees because it is against Nature But Ioannes de Turre Cremata reports a singular Case which fell out when he was a
places cited from the New Testament As for that of Herod both Iosephus and Eusebius witness that his Brother Philip was alive when he took his wife and so his sin was Adultery and not Incest We must also think that the Incestous Person in Corinth took his Fathers Wife when he was yet living otherwise if he had been dead St. Paul could not say it was a Fornication not named among the Gentiles for we not only find both among the Persians and other Nations the Marriage of Step-Mothers allowed but even among the Iews Adonijah desired Abisha in Marriage who had been his Fathers Concubine From all which they concluded that the Laws about the Degrees of Marriage were only Judiciary Precepts and so there was no other obligation on Christians to obey them than what flowed from the Laws of the Church with which the Pope might dispense They also said that the Law in Leviticus of not taking the Brothers wife must be understood of not taking her while he was alive for after he was dead by another Law a man might marry his Brothers wife They also pleaded that the Popes Power of Dispensing did reach further than the Laws of the Church even to the Law of God for he daily Dispensed with the Breaking of Oaths and Vows though that was expresly contrary to the Second Commandment and though the Fifth Command Thou shalt do no Murther be against Killing yet the Pope Dispensed with the putting Thieves to death and in some cases where the reason of the Commandment does not at all times hold he is the only judge according to Summa Angelica They Concluded the Popes Power of Dispensing was as necessary as his Power of Expounding the Scriptures and since there was a Question made concerning the obligation of these Levitical Prohibitions whether they were Moral and did oblige Christians or not the Pope must be the only Judge There were also some late Presidents found one of P. Martin who in the case of a mans having Marryed his own Sister who had lived long with her upon a Consultation with Divines and Lawyers Confirmed it to prevent the Scandal which the dissolving of it would have given Upon which St. Antonin of Florence says that since the thing was dispensed with it was to be refered to the judgment of God and not to be condemned The Pope had granted this Dispensation upon a very weighty Consideration to keep peace between two great Crowns it had now stood above Twenty years it would therefore raise an high scandal to bring it under debate besides that it would do much hurt and bring the Titles to most Crowns into Controversie But they Concluded that whatever Informalities or Nullities were pretended to be in the Bulls or Breves the Pope was the only competent judge of it and that it was too high a presumption for inferior Prelates to take upon them to examine or discuss it But to these Arguments it was Answered by the writers for the Kings cause that it was strange to see men who pretended to be such Enemies to all Heretical Novelties yet be guilty of that which Catholick Doctors hold to be the foundation of all Heresie which was the setting up of private senses of Scripture and Reasonings from them against the Doctrine and Tradition of the Church It was fully made out that the Fathers and Doctors of the Church did universally agree in this that the Levitical Prohibitions of the Degrees of Marriage are Moral and do oblige all Christians Against this Authority Cajetan was the first that presumed to write opposing his private conceits to the Tradition of the Church which is the same thing for which Luther and his followers are so severely Condemned May it not then be justly said of such men that they plead much for Tradition when it makes for them but reject it when it is against them Therefore all these exceptions are overthrown with this one Maxime of Catholick Doctrine That they are Novelties against the constant Tradition of the Christian Church in all Ages But if the force of them be also examined they will be found as weak as they are New That before the Law these degrees were not observed proves only that they are not evidently contrary to the Common sense of all men But as there are some Moral Precepts which have that natural evidence in them that all men must discern it so there are others that are drawn from publick inconvenience and dishonesty which are also parts of the Law of nature These Prohibitions are not of the first but of the second sort since the Immorality of them appears in this that the Familiarities and freedoms among near Relations are such that if an horror were not struck in men at conjunctures in these degrees Families would be much defiled This is the Foundation of the Prohibitions of Marriages in these degrees Therefore it is not strange if men did not apprehend it before God made a Law concerning it Therefore all examples before the Law show only the thing is not so evident as to be easily collected by the light of Nature And for the story of Iudah and Tamar there is so much wickedness in all the parts of it that it will be very hard to make a President out of any part of it As for the Provision about Marrying the Brothers wiâ—e that only proves the ground of the Law is not of its own Nature Immutable but may be Dispensed with by God in some cases And all these Moral Laws that are founded on publick conveniency and honesty are Dispensable by God in some cases but because Moses did it by Divine Revelation it does not follow that the Pope can do it by his Ordinary Authority For that about Herod it is not clear from Iosephus that Philip was alive when Herod Marryed his Wife For all that Iosephus says is that she separated from her Husband when he was yet alive and divorced her self from him But he does not say that he lived still after she Marryed his Brother And by the Law of Divorce Marriage was at an end and broken by it as much as if the Party had been dead So that in that case she might have Marryed any other Therefore Herods sin in taking her was from the Relation of having been his Brothers Wife And for the Incestuous person in Corinth it is as certain that though some few Instances of a King of Syria and some others may be brought of Sons Marrying their Step-Mothers yet these things were generally ill looked on even where they were practised by some Princes who made their Pleasure their Law Nor could the Laws of Leviticus be understood of not Marrying the Brothers wife when he was alive for it was not Lawful to take any mans Wife from him living Therefore that cannot be the meaning And all those Prohibitions of Marriage in other degrees excluding those Marriages simply whether during the life or after the death of
conferr'd Grace That Consecrations and Benedictions used by the Church were good That it was good and profitable to set up the Images of Christ and the Saints in the Churches and to adorn them and burn Candles before them and that Kings were not obliged to give their people the Scriptures in a vulgar tongue By these Articles it may be easily Collected what were the Doctrines then preach'd by the Reformers There was yet no dispute about the presence of Christ in the Sacrament which was first called in question by Frith for the Books of Zuinglius and Oecolampadius came later into England and hitherto they had only seen Luthers works with those written by his followers But in the year 1532. there was another memorable instance of the Clergies cruelty against the dead bodies of those whom they suspected of Heresie The Common style of all Wills and Testaments at that time was First I bequeath my Soul to Almighty God and to our Lady St. Mary and to all the Saints in Heaven but one William Tracie of Worcestershire dying left a Will of a far different strain for he bequeathed his Soul only to God through Jesus Christ to whose intercession alone he trusted without the help of any other Saint therefore he left no part of his goods to have any pray for his Soul This being brought to the Bishop of Londons Court he was condemned as an Heretick and an order was sent to Parker Chancellor of Worcester to raise his Body The Officious Chancellor went beyond his order and burn't the Body but the Record bears that though he might by the Warrant he had raise the body according to the Law of the Church yet he had no Authority to burn it So two years after Tracies heirs sued him for it and he was turn'd out of his Office of Chancellor and fined in 400 Pound There is another Instance of the Cruelty of the Clergy this year One Thomas Harding of Buckinghamshire an Ancient man who had abjured in the year 1506. was now observed to go often into woods and was seen sometimes reading Upon which his house was search'd and some parcels of the New Testament in English were found in it So he was carryed before Longland Bishop of Lincoln who as he was a cruel Persecutor so being the Kings Confessor acted with the more Authority This Aged man was judged a Relapse and sent to Chesham where he lived to be burn't which was Executed on Corpus Christi Eve At this time there was an Indulgence of 40 dayes pardon proclaimed to all that carryed a Faggot to the burning of an Heretick So dextrously did the Clergy endeavor to infect the Laity with their own cruel Spirit and that wrought upon this occasion a signal effect for as the fire was kindled one flung a Faggot at the old mans head which dash't out his brains In the year 1533. it was thought fit by some signal evidence to convince the World that the King did not design to change the establish'd Religion though he had then proceeded far in his breach with Rome and the crafty Bishop of Winchester Gardiner as he complyed with the King in his second Marriage and separation from Rome so being an inveterate Enemy to the Reformation and in his heart addicted to the Court of Rome did by this argument often prevail with the King to punish the Hereticks That it would most effectually justifie his other proceedings and convince the World that he was still a good Catholick King which at several times drew the King to what he desired And at this time the steps the King had made in his Separation from the Pope had given such heart to the new Preachers that they grew bolder and more publick in their Assemblies Iohn Frith as he was an excellent Schollar which was so taken notice of some years before that he was put in the list of those whom the Cardinal intended to bring from Cambridge and put in his Colledge at Oxford so he had offended them by several writings and by a discourse which he wrote against the Corporal presence of Christ in the Sacrament had provoked the King who continued to his death to believe that firmly The substance of his Arguments was that Christ in the Sacrament gave eternal life but the receiving the bare Sacrament did not give eternal life since many took it to their damnation therefore Christs presence there was only felt by Faith This he further proved by the Fathers before Christ who did eat the same spiritual food and drink of the Rock which was Christ according to St. Paul since then they and we communicate in the same thing and it was certain that they did not eat Christs Flesh Corporally but fed by Faith on a Messias to come as Christians do on a Messias already come therefore we now do only communicate by Faith He also insisted much on the signification of the word Sacrament from whence he concluded that the Elements must be the Mystical Signs of Christs Body and Blood for if they were truly the Flesh and Blood of Christ they should not be Sacraments he concluded that the ends of the Sacrament were these three by a visible action to knit the Society of Christians together in one body to be a means of conveighing Grace upon our due participating of them and to be Remembrances to stir up men to bless â—od for that unspeakable love which in the death of Christ appeared to mankind To all these ends the Corporal presence of Christ availed nothing they being sufficiently answered by a Mystical presence yet he drew no other Conclusion from these Premisses but that the belief of the Corporal presence in the Sacrament was no necessary Article of our Faith This either flowed from his not having yet arrived at a sure perswasion in the matter or that he chose in that modest style to encounter an opinion of which the World was so fond that to have opposed it in down-right words would have given prejudices against all that he could say Frith upon a long conversation with one upon this Subject was desired to set down the heads of it in writing which he did The Paper went about and was by a false Brother conveyed to Sr. Thomas More 's hands who set himself to answer it in his ordinary style treating Frith with great contempt calling him alwayes the young man Frith was in Prison before he saw Mores Book yet he wrote a reply to it which I do not find was then published but a Copy of it was brought afterwards to Cranmer who acknowledged when he wrote his Apology against Gardiner that he had received great light in that matter from Friths Books and drew most of his Arguments out of it It was afterwards Printed with his works Anno 1573. and by it may appear how much Truth is Stronger than Error For though More wrote with as much Wit and Eloquence as any man
in that Age did and Frith wrote plainly without any Art yet there is so great a difference between their Books that whoever compares them will clearly perceive the one to be the Ingenious defender of an ill cause and the other a simple asserter of Truth Frith wrote with all the disadvantage that was possible being then in the Jayl where he could have no Books but some Notes he might have collected formerly he was also so loaded with Irons that he could scarce sit with any ease He began with confirming what he had delivered about the Fathers before Christ their feeding on his Body in the same manner that Christians do since his death This he proved from Scripture and several places of St. Austins works he proved also from Scripture that after the Consecration the Elements were still Bread and Wine and were so called both by our Saviour and his Apostles that our Senses shew they are not changed in their Natures and that they are still subject to Corruption which can no way be said of the body of Christ. He proved that the eating of Christs Flesh in the 6th of St. Iohn cannot be applyed to the Sacrament since the wicked receive it who yet do not eat the Flesh of Christ otherwise they should have eternal life He shewed also that the Sacrament coming in the room of the Jewish Paschal Lamb we must understand Christs words This is my Body in the same sense in which it was said that the Lamb was the Lords Passover He confirmed this by many passages cited out of Tertullian Athanasius Chrysostome Ambrose Ierome Austin Fulgentius Eusebius and some later Writers as Beda Bertram and Druthmar who did all assert that the Elements retained their former Natures and were only the Mysteries Signs and Figures of the Body and Blood of Christ. But Gelasius's words seemed so remarkable that they could not but determine the Controversie especially considering he was Bishop of Rome he therefore writing against the Eutichians who thought the humane nature of Christ was changed into the Divine says that as the Elements of Bread and Wine being Consecrated to be the Sacraments of the Body and Blood of Christ did not cease to be Bread and Wine in Substance but continued in their own proper natures so the humane nature of Christ continued still though it was united to the Divine nature this was a manifest Indication of the belief of the Church in that Age and ought to weigh more than a hundred high Rhetorical Expressions He brought likewise several testimonies out of the Fathers to shew that they knew nothing of the Consequences that follow Transubstantiation of a Body being in more places at once or being in a place after the manner of a Spirit or of the worship to be given to the Sacrament Upon this he digresses and says that the German Divines believed a Corporal presence yet since that was only an Opinion that rested in their minds and did not carry along with it any Corruption of the worship or Idolatrous practise it was to be born with and the peace of the Church was not to be broken for it but the case of the Church of Rome was very different which had set up gross Idolatry building it upon this Doctrine Thus I have given a short Abstract of Friths Book which I thought fit the rather to do because it was the first Book that was written on this Subject in England by any of the Reformers And from hence it may appear upon what solid and weighty reasons they then began to shake the received Opinion of Transubstantiation and with how much learning this Controversie was managed by him who first undertook it One thing was singular in Friths Opinion that he thought there should be no contest made about the manner of Christs presence in the Sacrament for what-ever Opinion men held in Speculation if it went not to a practical error which was the Adoration of it for that was Idolatry in his Opinion there were no disputes to be made about it therefore he was much against all heats between the Lutherans and Zuinglians for he thought in such a matter that was wholly speculative every man might hold his own Opinion without making a breach of the Unity of the Church about it He was apprehended in May 1533. and kept in Prison till the 20th of Iune and then he was brought before the Bishop of London Gardiner and Longland sitting with him They objected to him his Opinions about the Sacrament and Purgatory he answered that for the first he did not find Transubstantiation in the Scriptures nor in any approved Authors and therefore he would not admit any thing as an Article of Faith without clear and certain grounds for he did not think the Authority of the Church reached so far They argued with him upon some passages out of St. Austin and St. Chrysostome to which he answered by opposing other places of the same Fathers and shew'd how they were to be reconciled to themselves when it came to a Conclusion these words are set down in the Register as his Confession Frith thinketh and judgeth that the natural Body of Christ is not in the Sacrament of the Altar but in one place only at once Item he saith that neither part is a necessary Article of our Faith whether the natural Body be there in the Sacrament or not As for Purgatory he said a man consisted of two parts his Body and Soul his Body was purged by sickness and other pains and at last by death and was not by their own Doctrine sent to Purgatory And for the Soul it was purged through the word of God received by Faith So his Confession was written down in these words Item Frith thinketh and judgeth that there is no Purgatory for the Soul after that it is departed from the Body and as he thinketh herein so hath he said written and defended howbeit he thinketh neither part to be an Article of Faith necessarily to be believed under pain of Damnation The Bishops with the Doctors that stood about them took much pains to make him change but he told them that he could not be induced to believe that these were Articles of Faith And when they threatned to proceed to a Final Sentence he seemed not moved with it but said Let judgment be done in righteousness The Bishops though none of them were guilty of great tenderness yet seem'd to pity him much and the Bishop of London professed he gave Sentence with great grief of heart In the end he was judged an Obstinate Heretick and was delivered to the Secular Power there is one clause in this Sentence which is not in many others therefore I shall set it down Most earnestly requiring in the Bowels of our Lord Jesus Christ that this Execution and punishment worthily to be done upon thee may be so moderate that the rigor thereof be not too extreme nor yet the gentleness too much
Preheminence of the See of Rome flowed only from the Laws of men so there was now good cause to repeal these for the Pope as was said in the Council of Basil was only Vicar of the Church and not of Christ so he was accountable to the Church The Council of Constance and the Divines of Paris had according to the Doctrine of the Ancient Church declared the Pope to be subject to a General Council which many Popes in former Ages had confessed And all that the Pope can claim even by the Canon-Law is only to call and preside in a General Council but not to overrule it or have a Negative vote in it The Power of Councils did not extend to Princes Dominions or Secular Matters but only to points of Faith which they were to declare and to Condemn Hereticks nor were their Decrees Laws till they were Enacted by Princes Upon this he enlarged much to show that though a Council did proceed against a King with which they then Threatned the King that their Sentence was of no force as being without their Sphere The determination of Councils ought to be well considered and examined by the Scriptures and in matters indifferent men ought to be left to their freedom he taxed the severity of Victors Proceedings against the Churches of the East about the day of Easter And concluded that as a Member of the Body is not cut off except a Gangrene comes in it so no part of the Church ought to be cut off but upon a great and inevitable cause And he very largely showed with what moderation and charity the Church should proceed even against those that held errors And the Standard of the Councils definitions should only be taken from the Scriptures and not from mens Traditions He said some General Councils had been rejected by others and it was a tender point how much ought to be deferred to a Council some Decrees of Councils were not at all obeyed The Divines of Paris held that a Council could not make a new Article of Faith that was not in the Scriptures And as all Gods Promises to the people of Israel had this condition implyed within them If they kept his Commandments so he thought the Promises to the Christian Church had this condition in them If they kept the Faith Therefore he had much doubting in himself as to General Councils and he thought that only the word of God was the Rule of Faith which ought to take place in all Controversies of Religion The Scriptures were called Canonical as being the only Rules of the Faith of Christians and these by appointment of the Ancient Councils were only to be read in the Churches The Fathers SS Ambrose Ierome and Austin did in many things differ from one another but always appealed to the Scriptures as the common and certain standard And he cited some remarkable passage out of St. Austin to show what difference he put between the Scriptures and all the other Writings even of the best and holiest Fathers But when all the Fathers agreed in the Exposition of any place of Scripture he acknowledged he looked on that as flowing from the Spirit of God and it was a most dangerous thing to be wise in our own Conceit Therefore he thought Councils ought to found their decisions on the word of God and those expositions of it that had been agreed on by the Doctors of the Church Then he discoursed very largely what a person a Judge ought to be he must not be Partial nor a Judge in his own Cause nor so much as sit on the Bench when it is tryed lest his presence should over-awe others Things also done upon a common error cannot bind when the error upon which they were done comes to be discovered and all human Laws ought to be changed when a publick visible inconvenience follows them From which he concluded that the Pope being a Party and having already passed his Sentence in things which ought to be examined by a General Council could not be a Judge nor sit in it Princes also who upon a common mistake thinking the Pope Head of the Church had sworn to him finding that this was done upon a false ground may pull their Neck out of his Yoke as every man may make his escape out of the hands of a Robber And the Court of Rome was so corrupt that a Pope though he mean't well as Hadrian did yet could never bring any good design to an issue the Cardinals and the rest of that Court being so engaged to maintain their Corruptions These were the Heads of that Discourse which it seems he gave them in writing after he had delivered it but he promised to entertain them with another Discourse of the Power the Bishops of the Christian Church have in their Sees and of the Power of a Christian Prince to make them do their duty but that I could never see and I am afraid it is lost All this I thought necessary to open to show the State of the Court and the Principles that the several Parties in it went upon when the Reformation was first brought under Consideration in the third Period of this Kings Reign to which I am now advanced The end of the Second Book EFFIGIES VERA REVERENDISSIMI D. THOMAE CRANMERI ARCHIEPISCOPI CANTUARIâ—NSIS HHolbein pinxit Natus 1489 Iuly 2. Consecratus 1533 Mar. 30. Martyrio Coronatus 1556 Mar. 21. 〈…〉 THE HISTORY OF THE REFORMATION OF THE Church of England BOOK III. Of the other Transactions about Religion and Reformation during the rest of the Reign of King Henry the 8th THe King having passed through the Traverses and tossings of his Sute of Divorce and having with the concurrence both of his Clergy and Parliament brought about what he had projected seem'd now at ease in his own Dominions But though matters were carryed in Publick Assemblies smoothly and successfully yet there were many secret discontents which being fomented both by the Pope and the Emperors Agents wrought him great trouble so that the rest of his life was full of vexation and disquiet All that were zealously addicted to that which they called the Old Religion did conclude that what-ever firmness the King expressed to it now was either pretended out of Policy for avoiding the Inconveniences which the fears of a Change might produce or though he really intended to perform what he professed yet the Interests in which he must embarque with the Princess of Germany against the Pope and the Emperor together with the Power that the Queen had over him and the credit Cranmer and Cromâ—ell had with him would prevail on him to change some things in Religion And they look'd on these things as so complicated together that the change of any one must needs make way for change in more since that struck at the Authority of the Church and left people at liberty to dispute the Articles of Faith This they thought was a Gate opened to Heresie
Sermon a Priest coming to have killed him was taken with the weapon in his hand but when the people were rushing furiously on him Wishart got him in his Arms and saved him from their rage for he said he had done no harm only they saw what they might look for He became a little after this more than ordinary serious and apprehensive of his end he was seen sometimes to rise in the night and spend the greatest part of it in Prayer and he often warned his hearers that his Sufferings were at hand but that few should suffer after him and that the Light of true Religion should be spread over the whole Land He went to a great many places where his Sermons were well received and came last to Lothian where he found a greater neglect of the Gospel than in other parts for which he threatned them That Strangers should chace them from their dwellings and possess them He was Lodged in a Gentleman of Qualities house Cockburn of Ormeston when in the night the house was beset by some horsemen who were sent by the Cardinals means to take him The Earl of Bothwel that had the chief Jurisdiction in the County was with them who promising that no hurt should be done him he caused the Gate to be opened saying The Blessed Will of God be done When he presented himself to the Earl of Bothwel he desired to be proceeded with according to Law for he said he feared less to die openly than to be Murdered in secret The Earl promised upon his honour that no harm should be done him and for some time seemed resolved to have made his words good but the Queen Mother and Cardinal in end prevailed with him to put Wishart in their hands and they sent him to St. Andrews where it was agreed to make a Sacrifice of him Upon this the Cardinal called a meeting of the Bishops to St. Andrews against the 27th of February to destroy him with the more Ceremony but the Arch-Bishop of Glasgow moved that there should be a Warrant procured from the Lord Governour for their proceedings To this the Cardinal consented thinking the Governour was then so linked to their Interests that he would deny them nothing but the Governor bearing in his heart a secret love to Religion and being plainly dealt with by a Noble Gentleman of his name 〈…〉 Preston who laid before him the just and terrible Judgments of God he might look for if he suffered poor Innocents to be so Murdered at the appetite of the Clergy sent the Cardinal word not to proceed till he himself came and that he would not consent to his death till the cause was well examined and that if the Cardinal proceeded against him his blood should be required at his hands But the Cardinal resolved to go on at his peril for he apprehended if he delayed it there might be either a Legal or a violent rescue made so he ordered a mock Citation of Wishart to appear who being brought the next day to the abbey-Abbey-Church the Process was opened with a Sermon in which the Preacher delivered a great deal of good Doctrine concerning the Scriptures being the only Touchstone by which Heresie was to be tryed After Sermon the Prisoner was brought to the Bar he first fell down on his knees and after a short Prayer he stood up and gave a long account of his Sermons That he had Preached nothing but what was contained in the ten Commandments the Apostles Creed and the Lords Prayer but was interrupted with reproachful words and required to answer plainly to the Articles obâ—ected to him Upon which he appealed to an indifferent Judge he desired to be tryed by the word of God and before my Lord Governor whose Prisoner he was but the Indictment being read he confessing and offering to justifie most of the Articles objected against him was Judged an obstinate Heretick and Condemned to be burnt All the next night he spent in Prayer In the Morning two â—riers came to Confess him but he said he would have nothing to do with them yet if he could he would gladly speak with the Learned man that Preached the day before So he being sent to him after much Conference he asked him if he would receive the Sacrament Wishart answered he would most gladly do it if he might have it as Christ had instituted it under both kinds but the Cardinal would not suâ—fer the Sacrament to be given him And so breakfast being broughâ— he discoursed to those that were present of the death of Christ and the ends of the Sacrament and then having blessed and consecrated the Elements he took the Sacrament himself and gave it to those that were with him That being done he would taste no other thing but retired to his Devotion Two hours after the Executioners came and put on him a Coat of black Linning full of bags of Powder and carryed him out to the place of Execution which was before the Cardinals Castle He spake a little to the people desiring them not to be offended at the good word of God for the sufferings that followed it it was the true Gospel of Christ that he had Preached and for which with a most glad heart and mind he now offered up his Life The Cardinal was set in state in a great Window of his Castle looking on this sad Spectacle When Wishart was tyed to the Stake he cryed aloud O Saviour of the World have Mercy upon me â—ather of Heaven I recommend my Spirit into thy Holy hands So the Executioners kindled the fire but one perceiving after some time that he was yet alive encouraged him to call still on God to whom he answered The flame hath scorched my body yet hath it not daunted my Spirit but he who from yonder high place looking up to the Cardinal beholdâ—th us with such pride shall within few days lie in the same as ignominiously as now he is seen proudly to rest himself The Executioner drawing the Cord that was about his neck straiter sâ—opt his breath so that he could speak no more and his body was soon consumed by the fire Thus died this eminent servant and witnâ—ss of Christ on whose Sufferings I have enlarged the more because they proved so fatal to the interests of the Popish Clergy for not any one thing hastned forward the Reformation more than this did and since he had both his Education and Ordination in England a full account of him seems no impertinent Digression The Clergy rejoyced much at his death and thought according to the constant Maxime of all Persecutors that they should live more at ease now when Wishart was out of the way They magnified the Cardinal for proceeding so vigorously without or rather against the Governorâ— Orders But the people did universally look on him as a Martyr and believed an extraordinary measure of Gods Spirit had rested on him since besides great innocency and purity of Life his predictions came so oft to
these seven are found in Authors and Scriptures altho they be not found by the name of seven I say This word Sacrament is attributed to the seven and that the seven Sacraments are found in the ancient Authors To the fifth I say first as before that this word Sacramentum is not applied or attributed in Holy Scripture to any of the seven but only to Matrimony But it is attributed in Scripture and ancient Authors to many other things besides these Howbeit taking this word Sacramentum for a sensible sign of the invisible Grace of God given unto Christian People as the Schoolmen and many late Writers take it I think that these seven commonly called Sacraments are to be called only and most properly Sacraments This word Sacrament may well be attributed to the seven and so it is found in old Authors saving that I do not read expresly in old Doctors Pennance to be under the name of a Sacrament unless it be in Chrysostome in the Exposition ad Hebrae Homil. 20. sect 1. cap. 10. in principio In quinto praeter Herfordens Roffens Dayium Oglethorpum Menevens Coxum putant omnes nomen Sacramenti praecipue his septem convenire Symons addit The seven Sacraments specially confer Grace Eboracens Curren Tresham Symons aiunt septem Sacramenta inveniri apud veteres quanquam Curren Symons mox videntur iterum negare In the fifth The Bishops of Hereford and St. David Dr. Day Dr. Cox say That this word Sacrament in the old Authors is not attributed unto the seven only and ought not to be attributed The Bishop of Carlile alledging Waldensis Doctors Curren Edgworth Symons Tresham say That it is and may be attributed And Dr. Curren and Mr. Symmons seem to vary against themselves each in their own Answers for Dr. Curren saith That this word Sacrament is attributed unto the seven in the old Doctors and yet he cannot find that it is attributed unto Pennance Dr. Symons saith That the old Authors account them by the number of seven and yet he saith That they be not found there by the name of seven 6. Question Whether the determinate number of seven Sacraments be a Doctrine either of the Scripture or of the old Authors and so to be taught Answers THe determinate number of seven Sacraments is no Doctrine of the Scripture nor of the old Authors To the sixth The Scripture maketh no mention of the Sacraments determined to seven precisely but the Scripture maketh mention of seven Sacraments which be used in Christ's Church and grounded partly in Scripture and no more be in use of the said Church but seven so grounded and some of the ancient Doctors make mention of seven and of no more than seven as used in Christ's Church so grounded wherefore a Doctrine may be had of seven Sacraments precisely used in Christ's Church and grounded in Scripture To the sixth I think it be a Doctrine set forth by the ancient Fathers one from another taking their matter and ground out of Scripture as they understood it tho Scripture for all that doth not give unto all the seven the special names by which now they are called nor yet openly call them by the name of Sacrament except only as is before-said the Sacrament of Matrimony Albeit the seven Sacraments be in effect found both in the Scripture and in the old Authors and may therefore be so taught yet I have not read this precise and determinate number of seven Sacraments neither in the Scripture nor in the ancient Writers By what is here before-said I think it doth well appear that both the Scripture of God and holy Expositors of the same would have the seven Sacraments both taught and in due form exhibited to all Christian People as it shall also better appear by what followeth In Scriptura tantum unum ex istis septem Sacramentum vocari invenio nimirum Matrimonium apud veteres reperiuntur omnia haec septem a nullo tamen quod sciam nomine 7. Sacramentorum celebrari nisi quod Eras. ait 7. a veteribus recenseri August loquens de Sacramentis ad Januarium Ep. 118. ait numerum septenarium tribui Ecclesiae proprie instar universitatis Item objectum fuisse Husso in Concilio Constantienti quod infideliter senserit de 7. Sacramentis De perfectione Num. Septenarii vide August lib. 1. de Civ cap. 31. This determinate number of seven Sacraments is no Doctrine of Scripture nor of the old Authors nor ought not to be taught as such a determinate number by Scripture and old Authors Neither the Scripture nor the ancient Authors do recite the determinate number of the seven Sacraments but the Doctrine of the seven Sacraments is grounded in Scripture and taught by the ancient Authors albeit not altogether Septenarius Sacramentorum numerus Doctrina est recentium Theologorum quam illi partim ex Scriptura partim ex veterum scriptis argute in sacrum hunc ut aiunt numerum collegerunt I think as I find by old Authors the ancient Church used all these seven Sacraments and so I think it good to be taught The determinate number of seven Sacraments is not taught in any one Process of the Scripture nor of any one of the old Authors of purpose speaking of them altogether or in one Process as far as I can remember albeit they all seven be there and there spoken of in Scripture manifestly and so have the old Authors left them in sundry places of their Writings and so it ought to be taught Forasmuch as the Scripture teacheth these seven and sheweth special Graces given by the same the which are not so given by others called Sacraments the old Authors perceiving the special Graces have accounted them in a certain number and so have been used by Doctors to be called seven and without inconvenience may so be taught I say The determinate number of seven is not expresly mentioned in the Scripture like as the determinate number of the seven Petitions of the Prayer is not expresly mentioned and as I think the seven Petitions to have their ground in Scripture even so do I think of the seven Sacraments to be grounded in Scripture To the sixth I say as before That the old Authors call each of these seven Sacraments but be it I cannot remember that ever I read the determinate precise and express number of seven Sacraments in any of the ancient Authors nor in Scripture Howbeit we may find in Scripture and the old Authors also mention made and the doctrine of each of these seven commonly called Sacraments The determinate number of seven is a Doctrine to be taught for every one of them be contained in Scripture tho they have not the number of seven set forth there no more than the Petitions of the Pater Noster be called seven nor the Articles of the Creed
correspondence with the King fell to the ground with her but he may well cite Cochleus an Author of the same honesty with himself from whose writings we may with the like security make a judgment of Forreign Matters as we may upon Sanders's testimony believe the account he gives of English Affairs 90. He tells us among other things done by the King and picks it out as the only instance he mentions of the King's Injunctions that the People should be taught in Churches the Lord's Prayer the Ave the Creed and the Ten Commandments in English It seems this Author thought the giving these Elements of Religion to the People in the vulgar Tongue a very heinous Crime when this is singled out from all the rest 91. That being done he says there was next a Book published called Articles appointed by the King's Majesty which were the six Articles This shews that he either had no information of English Affairs or was sleeping when he wrote this for the Six Articles were not published soon after the Injunctions as he makes it by the same Parliament and Convocation but three years after by another Parliament They were never put in a Book nor published in the King's Name they were Enacted in Parliament and are neither more nor less than 25 lines in the first Impression of that Act so far short come they of a Book 92. He reckons up very defectively the differences between the Church of Rome and the Doctrine set forth by the King's Authority but in one point he shews his ordinary wit for in the sixth particular he says He retained the Sacrament of Order but appointed a new Form of Consecrating of Bishops This he put in out of malice that he might annul the Ordinations of that time but the thing is false for except that the Bishops instead of their Oaths of Obedience to the Pope which they formerly swore did not swear to the King there was no other change made and that to be sure is no part of the Form of Consecration 93. He resolved once to speak what he thought was Truth tho it be treasonable and impious and says Upon these changes many in Lincolnshire and the Northern parts did rise for Religion and the Faith of Christ. This was indeed the motive by which their Seditious Priests misled them yet he is mistaken in the time for it was not after the six Articles were published but almost three years before it Nor was it for the Faith of Christ which teaches us to be humble subject and obedient but because the King was removing some of the corruptions of that Faith which their false Teachers did impiously call the Faith of Christ. 94. He says The King did promise most faithfully that all these things of which they complained should be amended This is so evidently false that it is plain Sanders resolved dextrously to avoid the speaking of any sort of Truth for the King did fully and formally tell them he would not be directed nor counselled by them in these Points they complained of and did only offer them an Amnesty for what was past 95. Then he reckons up 32 that died for the defence of the Faith They were attainted of Treason for being in actual Rebellion against the King and thus it appears that Rebellion was the Faith in his sense and himself died for it or rather in it having been starved to death in a Wood to which he fled after one of his rebellious Attempts on his Soveraign in which he was the Pope's Nuncio 96. He says The King killed the Earl of Kildare and five of his Uncles By this strange way of expressing a legal Attainder and the execution of a Sentence for manifest Treason and Rebellion he would insinuate on the Reader a fancy that one of Bonner's cruel fits had taken the King and that he had killed those with his own hand The Lord Herbert has fully opened that part of the History from the Records that he saw and shews that a more resolved Rebellion could not be than that was of which the Earl of Kildare and his Uncles were guilty But because they sent to the Pope and Emperor for assistance the Earl desiring to hold the Kingdom of Ireland of the Pope since the King by his Heresie had fallen from his Right to it Sanders must needs have a great kindness for their memory who thus suffered for his Faith 97. He says Queen Iane Seimour being in hard labour of Prince Edward the King ordered her Body to be so opened by Surgeons that she died soon after All this is false for she had a good Delivery as many Original Letters written by her Council that have been since printed do shew but she died two days after of a distemper incident to her Sex 98. He sets down some Passages of Cardinal Pole's Heroical Constancy which being proved by no Evidence and not being told by any other Writer whom I ever saw are to be lookt on as the flourishes of the Poet to set off his Hero 99. He would perswade the World that the Marquess of Exceter the Lord Montacute and the rest that suffered at that time died because they were believed to dislike the King 's wicked Proceedings and that the Countess of Sarum was beheaded on this single account that she was the Mother of such a Son and was sincerely addicted to the Catholick Faith and that she was condemned because she wrote to her Son and for wearing in her Breast the Picture of the five Wounds of Christ. The Marquess of Exceter pretended he was well satisfied with the King's Proceedings and was Lord Stewart when the Lords Darcy and Hussie were tried and he gave judgment against them But it being discovered that he and other Persons approved of Cardinal Pole's proceedings who endeavoured to engage all Christian Princes in a League against the King pursuant to which they had expressed themselves on several occasions resolved when a fit opportunity offered it self to rebel it was no wonder if the King proceeded against them according to Law And for the Countess of Sarum tho the legality of that Sentence passed against her cannot be defended yet she had given great offence not only by her correspondence with her Son but by the Bulls she had received from Rome and by her opposing the King's Injunctions hindring all her Tenants to read the New Testament or any other Books set out by the King's order And for the Picture which was found among her Cloaths it having been the Standard of the Rebellion and the Arms of England being found on the other side of it there was just ground to suspect an ill design in it 100. He says The Images which the King destroyed were by many wonderful Works of God recommended to the Devotion of the Nation All the wonder in these Works was the knavery of some jugling Impostors and the simplicity of a credulous multitude of