Quality soever though King Duke c. they be Excommunicated and deprived of all their Secular Honour and Dignity And in the Bull of Pope Martin the 5th read and approved in that Council All Professors of the Christian and Catholick Faith the Emperor Kings Dukes c. are required to expel all Hereticks out of their Kingdoms and Provinces according to the Canon Sicut ait c. That is the abovesaid Canon of the 3d Lateran Council The Council of Trent The Emperors Kings Dukes c. and all Temporal Lords of what Title soever who shall grant a place for Duelling among Christians within their Lands should for that Cause be deprived of the Dominion of the City Castle or Place in which they permitted the Duel to be 4. The Church of Rome doth exempt the Clergy from Temporal Jurisdiction So The 3 d General Lateran Council Because some Laicks do compel Ecclesiastical Persons and also Bishops themselves to appear before their Judgment-seat We do therefore decree that such be separated from the Communion of the Faithful who shall presume from henceforward so to do The 4 th General Council of Lateran Some Laicks do too much usurp upon Divine Right when they do compel Ecclesiastical Persons holding nothing Temporal from them to take an Oath of Allegiance to them But because according to the Apostle the Servant doth stand or fall to his own Master We do forbid by the Authority of the Sacred Council That such Clerks be compelled to take this kind of Oath to Secular Persons See further the Bull of Pope Leo the 10 th read in the 5 th General Council of Lateran And the Council of Trent which doth ratify all Canons made in their favour The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. The King hath chief power 1. The Pope hath Power over Kings to Excommunicate Depose c. 2. The King hath power over all persons 2. Ecclesiastical persons are exempted from Secular Jurisdiction 3. The Bishop of Rome hath no power in the Kings Dominions And the power he challengeth is usurpation 3. The Bishop of Rome is the Universal Pastor 4. The King is not to be resisted 4. The Pope can give power to resist Sovereign Princes and can absolve Subjects from their Allegiance As the Opposition in this matter is evident betwixt Church and Church so we look upon the one to be no less the Doctrine of the Church of Rome than the other is the Doctrine of the Church of England For 1. It 's notoriously manifest That the Church of Rome hath both owned such Principles and proceeded according to those Principles in Excommunicating and Deposing Kings in limiting their Jurisdiction and Absolving Subjects from their Allegiance 2. It is manifest That the several branches of Authority fore-recited and claimed by that Church are grounded upon the Canons of what they call General Councils And that all in the Communion of that Church are bound to own and receive these Principles is evident since they are decreed by the same Councils and after the same manner as the Doctrine of Transubstantiation it self and so are equally to be received with it by all the Members of that Church Thus far I have traced the Disagreement between the Church of England and Rome according to the order observed in the 39 Articles and I might proceed to shew the Opposition between them in many other points such as the sufficiency of Attrition with Absolution the necessity of Auricular Confession the Adoration of the Cross the Images made of God and the Trinity the Guardianship ascribed to Angels and Saints over Places Professions c. The Pilgrimages to Images and Relicks the Miracles pretended to be wrought by them The Religious states of Life and their Vows of Poverty and Obedience Their particular Ceremonies in the Mass and Baptism their Limbus's c. But this will be too tedious and indeed somewhat unnecessary considering how evident it has been already made not to say with some clearness demonstrated that there is an irreconcilable difference between the two Churches about those points to use our Authors words wherein the very life of Popery consists and the whole System of that Religion is founded And as now I may leave it to his skill to try whether he can with a Dictum factum patch up a Cassandrian Peace presently between them So I shall leave it to the Readers Judgment even those he calls the unwary Readers of Books whether we have left us nothing but the name and shadow of a Protestant Church of England as he affirms or whether the Doctrine of the Protestants be any where to be found if not in the Church of England And for this purpose I shall present the Reader with the sum of what has been said upon this Argument A brief Scheme of the Difference betwixt the Doctrine of the Church of England and the Church of Rome as set forth in the foregoing Treatise Sufficiency of Scripture The Church of England teacheth THe Holy Scripture containeth all things necessary to Salvation so that whatsoever is not read therein nor may be proved thereby is not to be required of any man that it should be received as an Article of Faith or be thought requisite or necessary to Salvation p. 15. The Church of Rome holdeth THe Holy Scripture doth not contain all saving Truth but there are certain Traditions not written which the Church is to have recourse to for it as well as the written Books And such Traditions are to be received and regarded with the like Piety and Reverence as the Books of the Old and New Testament Canonical Books The Church of England teacheth No Books are to be received as Canonical but Genesis c. that is the 39 Books of the Old Testament and the New. And as for the 13 Books commonly called Apocrypha tho the Church doth read them for Example of Life and Instruction of Manners yet She doth not apply them to establish any Doctrine The Church of Rome holdeth The Books commonly called Apocrypha viz. Tobias c. are as Canonical and as truly the Word of God as the five Books of Moses c. And whosoever doth not so receive them is accursed Scripture in a known Tongue The Church of England teacheth There is in Scripture whatsoever is meet for all ages and sorts of Men and so the Books of it ought to be much in their Hands Eyes and Hearts And none are Enemies to the reading of it but such as are ignorant or ungodly that would wish the People still to continue in blindness and ignorance of God p. 15. The Church of Rome holdeth If the Scripture be permitted to be read every where in the Vulgar Tongue more prejudice than benefit doth redound from it And therefore it 's fit that the People be deprived altogether of it nor so much as suffered to have Summaries or Historical Abridgments of it Church Authority
and absolve their Subjects from Allegiance and exempt the Clergy from their Jurisdiction p. 67 70. Lastly The Church of Rome doth hold all things delivered defined and declared by the sacred Canons and General Councils and especially that of Trent c. And that this is the true Catholick Faith out of which none can be saved Creed of Pius IVth FINIS BOOKS lately Printed for Richard Chiswell THE Pillar and Ground of Truth A Treatise shewing that the Roman Church falsly claims to be That Church and the Pillar of That Truth mentioned by S. Paul in his first Epistle to Timothy Chap. 3. Vers. 15. 4 to The Peoples Right to read the Holy Scripture Asserted 4 to A Short Summary of the principal Controversies between the Church of England and the Church of Rome being a Vindication of several Protestant Doctrines in Answer to a Late Pamphlet Intituled Protestancy destitute of Scripture Proofs 4 to Two Discourses Of Purgatory and Prayers for the Dead An Answer to a Late Pamphlet Intituled The Judgment and Doctrine of the Clergy of the Church of England concerning one Special Branch of the King's Prerogative viz. In dispensing with the Penal Laws 4 to The Notes of the Church as laid down by Cardinal Bellarmin examined and confuted 4 to Preparation for Death Being a Letter sent to a young Gentlewoman in France in a dangerous Distemper of which she died The Difference between the Church of England and the Church of Rome in opposition to a late Book Intituled An Agreement between the Church of England and Church of Rome A PRIVATE PRAYER to be used in Difficult Times A True Account of a Conference held about Religion at London Sept. 29. 1687. between A. Pulton Jesuit and Tho. Tennison D. D. as also of that which led to it and followed after it 4 to The Vindication of A. Cressener Schoolmaster in Long-Acre from the Aspersions of A. Pulton Jesuit Schoolmaster in the Savoy together with some Account of his Discourse with Mr. Meredith A Discourse shewing that Protestants are on the safer Side notwithstanding the uncharitable Judgment of their Adversaries and that Their Religion is the surest Way to Heaven 4 to Six Conferences concerning the Eucharist wherein is shewed that the Doctrine of Transubstantiation overthrows the Proofs of Christian Religion A Discourse concerning the Pretended Sacrament of Extreme Vnction with an Account of the occasions and beginnings of it in the Western Church In three Parts With a Letter to the Vindicator of the Bishop of Condom Preface to the Agreement Page 1 Preface Page 2. Page 3. Page 6b Preface Page 16 18 30 31. De Concll l. 1. c. 7. Page 22 c. Preface Page 42 43 44. Page 44. Page 36 37. Page 42. Preface Page 2. A Papist Misrepres and Represented Introduct Agreement p. 2. Page 2. Ecclesiae Angl. Basis Impostura Luxemb 1619. Apology for the Protestants done out of French into English 1681. Part 4. Cap. 3. p. 135 150. Sess. 6. Can. 10 11 12 c. Art. 6. Art. 20. Sess 4. decret de Canon Script Council Trent Sess. 22. Cap. 5. Sess. 4. Decretum de edit usu Sacr. Libr. Regula 4. Azorius Instit. Mor. l. 8. cap. 26. ff Quaeritur ff Quaeres ART 7. Sess. 25. de invocat Catech. Trid. par 4. cap. 5. ff 8. ART 9. Sess. 36. Anno 1439. Sess. 5. ART 11. Sess. 6. cap. 7. Can. 11. Cap. 16. Can. 9. ART 12. Sess. 6. Cap. 16. Can 32. Annot. in 2 Tim. 4. 8. 1 Cor. 3. 8. and Hebr. 6. 10. ART 13. See Bishop Vshers Answer to a Challange Chap. 11. Sess. 6. Cap. 7. ART 14. Pars 2 de Sacram paenit ff 77. Luke 11 Ver. 35. 2 Cor. 8. 14. Annot. on 2 Cor. 2. 10. ART 15. Sess. 6. Can. 23. Annot. on Mar. 3. 34. ART 19. Orat. Archiep. Spalat Par. 1. de 9. Art. Symb. ff 11. N. 1. Rubrick Of Ceremonies why some be abolished c. Sess. 22. Cap. 5. Ibid. Can. 7. Sess. 7. Can. 2. Par. 2. Cap. 4. de Euchar. ff 81. N. 2. Sess. 13. init Par. 1. de 9. Artic. Symb. ff 18. On Matth. 16. 18. ART 20. Sess. 13. Sess. 21. Cap. 1. Ibid Cap. 2. Cap. 21. ART 21. Sess. 11. Bulla resump Decretum de resum Conc. Sess. 21. init cap. 1. Rhem. Annot. Joh. 16. 13. On Acts 16. 28. ART 22. Sess. 25. Decret de Purgat Sess. 6. Can. 30. Sess. 22. Can. 3. On Mat. 16. 19. Can. 11. Can. 3. Sess. 16. Sess. 21. Cap. 9. Sess. 25. Decret de Indulg Sess. 25. de Invocat Sess. 25. de Invocat Par. 4. Cap. 5. ff 8. ART 23. ART 24. ART 25. See the Homily of Common Prayer and the Sacraments Rubrick after the Com. Service Sess. 7. Can. 1. Can. 8. Sess. 22. Cap. 6. Can. 8. ART 28. Can. 1. Sess. 13. Cap. 1. and Can. 1. Cap. 4. and Can. 2. Can. 4. Can. 6. Can. 8. ART 29. ART 30. Sess. 21. Cap. 3. Cap. 2. Can. 1. Can. 2. Can. 3. ART 31. Sess. 2. Cap. 2. Can. 1. Can. 3. Can. 4. ART 32. Cap. 21. Can. 6. Sess. 24. Can. 6. Can. 9. ART 34. Sess. 4. Decret de Canon Script Sess. 14. Cap. 1. Sess. 22. Cap. 2. and 5. Can. 9. Par. 2. Cap. 7. ff 14. Cap. 4 ff 81. ART 35. ART 36. Sess. 23. Cap. 1. Catechis par 2. cap. 9. ff 11 12. On Joh. 10. 1. Erastus Senior Preface Anno. 1662. A Paper in the Vindication of Ordination c. Anno 1677. ART 37. On 5 th Commandment Sess. 19. Cap. 27. Can. 3. de Haereticis Sess. 3. Sess. 17. Sess. ult Decret de Reform Cap. 12. Cap. 14. Can. 43. Sess. 9. Sess. 25. De Reform Cap. 20. Agreement Preface Ibid.
Ancient and most other Churches in viz. Episcopacy and a Liturgy and it had been to the like purpose if he had also shewed their Agreement in the great Doctrines of Christian Religion And yet even here he fails again for he that concludes In a word the Agreement between the English Clergy and the Romanist about the immediate Divine Right of Episcopacy is so full c. doth before acknowledg that Ordination by Presbyters is granted in the Church of Rome to be valid and regular and that all those that hold the Supreme Jurisdiction of the Pope over the whole Catholick Church visible do hold the Divine Right of Bishops to be but mediate mediante Papa So that he is gone from an Agreement of Churches to an Agreement between Persons from a full Agreement in Opinion to an Agreement in Government and Worship from Worship to some parts of Worship from Demonstrations to Inferences and framed Propositions of his own from an Agreement at last to a Disagreement And now we may look back with some comfort to his bold offer and clear demonstration at the beginning when he saith The Author hath with some clearness demonstrated the Agreement of Opinion between the Church of England Men and the Church of Rome to be so exact and full that if the Government should so design it were but dictum factum according to their Doctrine and a Cassandrian Peace might be patch'd up presently with Rome He advances as if he were a kind of Plenipotentiary but it may be suspected he that has this way of Demonstration is not like to be very fortunate in the Negotiation Thus much shall suffice for our Author's way of Demonstration and his Attempt to shew the Agreement between the Church of England and Church of Rome leaving a fuller Answer to some of his particular Discourses to an abler Pen. But yet there remains another part toward a just state of the Controversy and that is as he well observed to let the World know how far these Churches differ as well as wherein they are agreed But that was a Province he had no mind to Prosecute as being tho more to the purpose yet not so much to his design For certainly he that will demonstrate the Agreement to be full and exact must either suppose there is no Difference or if there be that the Difference is not considerable enough to hinder the Agreement But if there be a Difference and the Difference in points Diametrically opposite and irreconcilable it is to no purpose to shew their Agreement were it so to be full and exact in others And that this is the case and the Disagreement far greater than the Agreement I shall endeavour to prove and that not from an Author or two or far-fetched Consequences and forced Interpretations and dubious Expressions but from sufficient Authorities and the avowed Principles of both Churches Such are the 39 Articles the Catechism the Homilies and Liturgy of the Church of England Such again are the Councils more especially the Council of Trent the Catechism ad Parochos the Rhemists Annotations the Missal and Breviaries according to which and the like a Papist Represented as the Mode of speaking has been of late doth believe In order to which I shall premise 1. That there are some Articles which both Churches do in express Terms agree in called by our Author the great Doctrines of Religion viz. Art. 1. of the Holy Trinity and so how Socinians can subscribe the Articles of the Church of England as this Author affirms I understand not Art. 2. of the Word or Son of God Art. 3. of the going down of Christ into Hell Art. 4. of the Resurrection of Christ Art. 5. of the Holy Ghost Art. 7. of the Old Testament Art. 8. of the Three Creeds Art. 12. of good Works Art. 16. of Sin after Baptism Art. 18. of obtaining eternal Salvation only by the Name of Christ Art. 23. of Ministring in the Congregation Art. 26. of the unworthiness of Ministers Art. 27. of Baptism Art. 33. of Excommunicate Persons Art. 38. of Christian mens goods Art. 39. of a Christian mans Oath Against these the Jesuit Johan Roberti hath little or nothing to object in his small Tract purposely written in Opposition to our Articles But of these Articles it is to be observed there are some which each party differs as much from the other in when they come to explain themselves as if there had been no agreement in Terms Thus it happens in Articles 3 d 7 th and 15 th as shall afterwards in part be shewed 2. There are other Articles wherein both Churches do agree in the Sence tho they differ in Terms or that are not so much Controversies between Church and Church as between private Doctors in each Church Of this Opinion is a Learned Forreigner of the Reformed Religion about the matter contained in Articles the 10 th and 17 th of Free will and of Predestination and Election Of the former he saith The difference that our Adversaries will object between them and us upon this point of Free-will is only imaginary and a meer cavil Of the latter he concludes Since we agree in the Fundamentals of this Doctrine as we have already set forth and that our Dissent is but with a few of their Doctors it would not be very hard I should think to find out such a bias of Temperament drawn from the Word of God in proposing of these Opinions and in Terms so proportioned to their Sublimity as all humble and moderate Spirits would find sufficient for their Satisfaction 3. There are other Points which are matter of Liberty and left undetermined in the Church of England And so She doth receive into her Communion as well those that deny as affirm But on the contrary the Church of Rome hath determined several Points of this Nature to be Matters of Faith and anathematized those that do not so receive them Thus they are accursed by the Council of Trent that say We are formally justified by the Righteousness of Christ the only formal cause of our Justification being the Justice of God as it s there declared cap. 8. or that we are justified by the alone Imputation of Christ's Righteousness Or that shall say Justifying Faith is nothing else than a trust or confidence in the Divine Mercy forgiving Sins for Christs sake c. In which and the like unless the Church of England will curse those whom She doth bless and cast out of her Communion such as She receives into it She can no more be reconciled to the Church of Rome than in those other Points that for the matter of them are held and declared by her self to be false and erroneous 4. There are Articles which the two Churches do in whole or in part so differ in that the Doctrine of the Church of England cannot be the Doctrine of the Church of Rome nor the Doctrine
of the Church of Rome be the Doctrine of the Church of England Such are most if not all of these following Articles viz. Art. 6. of the sufficiency of the Holy Scriptures for Salvation Art. 9. of Original Sin Art. 11. of the Justification of Man Art. 13. of works before Justification Art. 14. of works of Supererogation Art. 15. of Christ alone without Sin Art. 19. of the Church Art. 20. of the Authority of the Church Art. 21. of the Authority of General Councils Art. 22. of Purgatory Art. 24. of speaking in the Congregation in such a Tongue as the People understandeth Art. 25. of the Sacraments Art. 28. of the Lords Supper Art. 29. of the wicked which eat not the Body of Christ Art. 30. of both Kinds Art. 31. of the Oblation of Christ upon the Cross Art. 32. of the Marriage of Priests Art. 34. of the Tradition of the Church Art. 35. of the Homilies Art. 36. of the Consecration of Bishops and Ministers Art. 37. of the Civil Magistrates These besides several others which our Articles do not expresly mention but are commonly the received Principles of our Church are the Inconcileable Points and which all the Wit and Charity in the World can no more thoroughly reconcile than Light and Darkness How far this is true and demonstrated to be so in the following Sheets I shall leave to the Consideration of every intelligent Reader In which I have proceeded with care and impartiality from Point to Point laying down first the Doctrine of each Church from unquestionable Authorities for my own Justification and then for the ease of the Reader I have summ'd it up and set each in Opposition to the other From all which I doubt not but whatever Friendship may be maintained betwixt the Members of both Churches as we are Fellow-Subjects yet it will be evident that there is no possibility of Agreement between them in Matters of Religion or of making One Church of what are so manifestly Two. It 's upon the last sort I am now to proceed and the first of which in order is the sixth Article of the Church of England The Difference between the Church of England and Rome The Sixth Article of the Church of England Of the sufficiency of the Holy Scripture for Salvation Holy Scripture containeth all things necessary to Salvation so that whatsoever is not read therein nor may be proved thereby is not to be required of any man that it should be believed as an Article of the Faith or be thought requisite or necessary to Salvation In the name of the Holy Scripture we do understand those Canonical Books of the Old and New Testament of whole Authority was never any doubt in the Church The Names and Number of the Canonical Books Genesis c. And the other Books as Hierom saith the Church doth read for example of Life and instruction of Manners but yet doth not apply them to establish any Doctrine Such are these following The third Book of Esdras The fourth Book of Esdras The Book of Tobias The Book of Judith The rest of Hester And the fourteen Books commonly called Apocrypha All the Books of the New Testament as they are commonly received we do receive and account them Canonical The Twentieth Article of the Church of England Of the Authority of the Church Although the Church be a Witness and a keeper of Holy Writ yet as it ought not to decree any thing against the same so besides the same ought it not to enforce any thing to be believed for necessity of Salvation Homily the first Or an Exhortation to the Reading and Knowledg of Holy Scripture There is in the Scripture whatsoever is meet for all ages and sorts of men These Books ought therefore to be much in our hands in our Eyes in our Ears in our Mouths but most of all in our Hearts Homily second Or an Exhortation c. Surely none be Enemies to the reading of God's Word but such as either be so ignorant that they know not how wholesome a thing it is or else be so Sick that they hate the most comfortable Medicine should heal them or so ungodly that they would wish the People still to continue in blindness and ignorance of God. The Church of Rome The Council of Trent The holy and general Synod of Trent considering that all saving Truth and Instruction of manners is contained in Books written and Traditions not written which received from the mouth of Christ himself by the Apostles or from the Apostles the Holy Spirit dictating delivering as it were from hand to hand have come even to us following the examples of the Orthodox Fathers doth receive and regard with the like Affection of Piety and Reverence all the Books of the Old and New Testament as also those unwritten Traditions pertaining to Faith and Manners dictated by Christ as it were by word of mouth or by the Holy Ghost and preserved by a continual Succession in the Catholick Church and hath thought fit to add the Index of the Sacred Books to this Decree lest it should be doubted which they are that are received by the sacred Synod They are these following The five Books of Moses Joshua Judges Ruth four Books of Kings two of Chronicles one of Esdras two of Esdras called Nehemias Tobias Judith Hesther Job the Psalms Proverbs Ecclesiastes Canticles Wisdom Ecclesiasticus Isaias Jeremias with Baruch Ezekiel Daniel the twelve lesser Prophets the two Books of Maccabees The New Testament viz. the four Evangelists c. And if any one shall not receive those whole Books with all their Parts for Sacred and Canonical according as they are wont to be read in the Catholick Church and are contained in the ancient Vulgar Latin Edition or shall knowingly and wittingly contemn the foresaid Traditions let him be accursed So that the Church of Rome hath added to the Canon of Scripture truly and properly so called six whole Books viz. Tobit Ecclesiasticus Wisdom Judith the first and second of the Maccabees together with certain other pieces of Baruch Esther and Daniel Mystical Benedictions Lights Incensings Garments and many other such like things are of Apostolical Discipline and Tradition The Ceremonies used in Baptism were without controversie instituted by the Apostles such as Salt Spittle Exorcisms Wax-candles Catechism Par. 2. cap. 2. § 59 60 65 c. See below Articles 19th and 34th of the Church of England Furthermore for the restraining all wanton Wits the Synod doth decree that no one depending on his own Wisdom in matters of Faith and Manners belonging to the Edification of Christian Doctrine wresting the Scriptures to his own sense dare to interpret the Holy Scripture contrary to the sense which Holy Mother Church hath held and doth hold to whom it belongs to judg of the sense and Interpretation of the Holy Scriptures or against the Unanimous consent of the Fathers altho such Iterpretations should never be published The Index
of Prohibited Books with the Rules made by the Fathers of the Tridentine Synod approved by the Authority of Pius IV. Anno 1564. Seeing it is manifest by experience if the Holy Bible be permitted to be read every where without difference in the Vulgar Tongue that more prejudice than benefit doth redound from thence through the rashness of men let it therefore be at the pleasure of the Bishop or Inquisitor that with the advice of the Parish-Priest or Confessor they may grant the reading of the Bible translated by Catholick Authors to such as they shall understand will by such reading receive no prejudice but an increase of Faith and Piety which License let them have in writing But whosoever shall without such License presume to read or have such Bibles he may not have the Absolution of his Sins before he has returned them to the Ordinary The same Index being enlarged by Sixtus V. and reviewed and published by order of Clement VIII Anno 1595. there is added the following Observation about the foresaid Rule It is to be considered about the above written fourth Rule of Pope Pius IV. that there is no new power given by this Impression and Edition to the Bishops or Inquisitors or Superiors of Regulars of granting a License to buy read or keep the Bible published in the Vulgar Tongue seeing the power of granting such Licenses of reading or keeping Vulgar Bibles or any parts of them hath been taken away by the command and use of the Holy Roman Church and the whole Inquisition as also all Summaries and Historical Compendiums of the said Bibles and Books of Holy Scripture written in any Vulgar Tongue which truly is inviolable to be observed So that the power of granting such Licenses and the Liberty of reading the Scripture in the Vulgar Tongue is wholly taken away and accordingly we are told it is so ordered by the General Inquisition of Spain From all which we may observe The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. Holy Scripture containeth all things necessary to Salvation 1. All saving Truth is in Books written and Traditions unwritten 2. Whatsoever is not read in Scripture nor may be proved thereby is not to be required of any Man to be believed as an Article of Faith or be thought requisite or necessary to Salvation 2. The Church doth receive and regard unwritten Traditions with the like Piety Reverence as the Books of the Old and New Testament And if any one shal knowingly contemn those Traditions he is accursed 3. In the name of the Holy Scripture is understood those Canonical Books of the Old and New Testament of whose Authority was never any doubt in the Church And the other the Apochrypha the Church doth not apply to establish any Doctrine 3. The Books of Scripture are the five Books of Moses c. Tobias Judith Wisdom Ecclesiasticus Baruch the two Books of Maccabees c. And if any one shall not receive these whole Books with all their parts for Canonical he is accursed 4. The Scripture were intended for and are to be read by all 4. The Scriptures ought not to be read by the Vulgar 5. The Scriptures are useful for all 5. If the Bible is permitted to be read by all more prejudice than benefit doth arise from it 6. The Church is a Witness and Keeper of Holy Writ 6. It belongs to the Mother Church of Rome to judg of the Sense and Interpretation of Scripture The 7 th Article of the Church of England Of the Old Testament The Old Testament is not contrary to the New for both in the Old and New Testament everlasting life is offered to mankind by Christ who is the only Mediator between God and Man being both God and Man. The Council of Trent The Saints reigning with Christ do offer Prayers to God for Men and it is good and profitable to invoke them The most Holy Mother of God by her Intercession doth reconcile God to Sinners She is the Mother of Mercy and Advocatress of the Faithful The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome Christ is the only Mediator between God and Man. The Virgin Mary and Saints are Mediators in Heaven See more Article 22. The 9 th Article of the Church of England Of Original or Birth Sin. Original Sin standeth not in the following of Adam as the Pelagians do vainly talk but it is the fault and corruption of the nature of every Man that naturally is ingendred of the Off-spring of Adam c. The Church of Rome The Council of Basil. We do define and declare c. the Doctrine that declares the glorious Virgin Mary to have been always free from Original and Actual Sin Holy and Immaculate is to be approved retained and embraced by all Catholicks as pious and consonant to Ecclesiastical Worship the Catholick Faith Right Reason and Holy Scripture and that for the future it shall be lawful for none to Preach or Teach the contrary The Council of Trent This Holy Synod doth declare That it is not its Intention to comprehend in this Decree concerning Original sin the blessed and Immaculate Virgin Mary the Mother of God but that the Constitutions of Pope Xystus IV. of happy memory are to be observed under the Penalties therein contained which it doth inforce Of the Sense of these two Councils in this matter see Joh. Baptistae de Lezana Apol. pro immacul Concept cap. 13. The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome Original Sin is the fault and corruption of the nature of every person naturally ingendred of the Off-spring of Adam So that none is excepted but our B. Saviour The Virgin Mary was free from Original and Actual Sin. The 11 th Article of the Church of England Of the Justification of Man. We are accounted Righteous before God only for the Merit of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ by Faith and not for our own Works and deservings Wherefore that we are justified by Faith only is a most wholesome Doctrine and very full of comfort as is more largely express'd in the homily of Justification The first part of the Homily of Salvation Because all Men be Sinners and therefore can no Man by his own Acts Words and Deeds seem they never so good be justified and made righteous before God but every Man is constrained to seek for another Righteousness or Justification to be received at Gods own Hands that is to say the forgiveness of his Sins And this Justification or Righteousness the forgiveness of our Sins which we so receive of Gods Mercy and Christs Merits embraced by Faith is taken accepted and allowed of God for our perfect and full Justification Faith doth not shut out Repentance Hope Love Dread and the Fear of God to be joyned with Faith in every Man that is justified but it shutteth them out from the office of justifying that is meritously as
prophane and defile the Churches where they are used 4. Whosoever shall say That they are incitements of impiety is accursed See Articles 6 th and 34 th The Church of Rome hath erred in matters of Faith. The 2d part Of the Homily concerning the Holy Ghost If ye will compare the Notes of a true Church with the Church of Rome as it is presently and hath been for the space of Nine hundred years and odd you shall well perceive the state thereof to be so far wide from the nature of the true Church that nothing can be more Where is then the Holy-Ghost which they do so stoutly claim to themselves Where is now the Spirit of truth that will not suffer them in any wise to err c. It is but a vain brag and nothing else The Church of Rome The Council of Trent The Holy Synod delivering that sound and sincere Doctrine which the Catholick Church being taught by Jesus Christ himself and the Apostles and by the Holy Spirit suggesting all Truth from day to day to her hath retained and will preserve to the end of the World doth straightly charge all the faithful of Christ that they dare not after this believe or teach otherwise concerning the holy Eucharist than is explained and defined in this Decree The Catechism The Church cannot err in delivering the Discipline of Faith and Manners The Rhemists Annotations By this Promise we are assured That no Heresies or other wicked attempts can prevail against the Church builded upon Peter which the Fathers call Peter's See and the Roman Church The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. The Church of Rome hath erred in matters of Faith. 1. The Church of Rome cannot err in matters of Faith. 2. The pretence of the Church of Rome to Infallibility is nothing but a vain brag 2. The Church of Rome is guided by the Holy Spirit from day to day and cannot err The 20 th Article of the Church of England Of the Authority of the Church It is not lawful for the Church to ordain any thing that is contrary to God's Word written c. wherefore although the Church be a witness and keeper of Holy Writ yet as it ought not to decree any thing against the same so besides the same ought it not to enforce any thing to be believed for necessity of Salvation The Church of Rome The Council of Constance Altho Christ hath instituted and did Administer the Sacrament of the Eucharist in Bread and Wine yet this nowithstanding the Authority of the sacred Canons and the approved custom of the Church is to be preserved that it be not received after Supper c. And likewise that altho the Sacrament was received in both kinds in the Primitive Church yet the custom is reasonably introduced that the Laicks receive in one kind c. And we do command that no Presbyter doth communicate the People in both The Council of Trent This Holy Synod being taught by the Holy Spirit doth declare and teach That Lay-men are obliged by no Divine Precept to receive in both kinds and that Communion in one is sufficient for Salvation Furthermore she declares That this power hath always been in the Church that in dispensing the Sacraments the substance of them being preserved she might appoint and change those things which she doth judg more expedient for the profit of the Receivers and the reverence of the Sacrament c. Wherefore Holy Mother Church acknowledging avowing this her Authority c. for weighty and just causes doth decree That the Eucharist be communicated in one kind 1. General Council of Lateran We do altogether forbid Presbyters Deacons and Monks to contract Matrimony and we do determine that Marriages so contracted be disjoyned The Creed of Pius 4th In which it 's declared That the Church of Rome is the Mother and Mistriss of all other Churches That the Pope is Successor of St. Peter and Vicar of Christ. That in the Mass is a real Transubstantiation of the Elements into the Body and Blood of Christ c. And that all things professed in that Creed are the Catholick Faith Out of which no man can be saved The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. Saith that it is not lawful for the Church to ordain any thing contrary to God's written Word 1. The Church of Rome hath ordained things contrary to God's written Word as in requiring the Sacrament to be administred in one kind in forbidding and disannulling the Marriage of Priests 2. The Church ought not to enforce any thing besides the written Word to be believed for necessity of Salvation 2. The Church of Rome doth require things at least besides the Word to be believed as necessary to Salvation As that the Pope is vicar of Christ and St. Peter's Successor that there are properly and truly Seven Sacraments instituted by Christ c The 21. Article of the Church of England Of the Authority of General Councils General Councils may not be gathered together without the commandment and will of Princes And when they be gathered together forasmuch as they be an Assembly of Men whereof all be not governed with the Spirit and Word of God they may err and sometime have erred in things pertaining unto God. Wherefore things ordained by them as necessary to Salvation have neither strength nor Authority unless it may be declared that they be taken out of Holy Scripture The Church of Rome Council of Trent It belongs to the Popes to call and direct General Councils The Holy Vniversal and General Synod of Trent lawfully gathered together in the Holy Ghost taught by the Holy Spirit which is a Spirit of Wisdom and Vnderstanding c. doth declare and teach The Rhemists Annot. To teach all Truth and preserve in Truth and from Error the Holy-Ghost is promised and performed only to the Church and the chief Governor and General Councils thereof The Rhemists Annot. The Holy Councils lawfully kept c. have ever the assistance of God's Spirit and therefore cannot err in their Sentences and Determinations concerning the same because the Holy-Ghost cannot err from whom as you see here jointly with the Council the Resolution proceedeth The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. General Councils may not be gathered without the Command and Will of Princes 1. It belongs to the Pope to call General Councils 2. General Councils have erred and may err 2. General Councils called by the Pope cannot err The 22. Article of the Church of England Of Purgatory The Romish Doctrine concerning Purgatory Pardons Worshipping and Adoration as well of Images as of Relicks and also Invocation of Saints is a fond Thing vainly invented and grounded upon no warranty of Scripture but rather repugnant to the Word of God. § 1. Purgatory THE Romish Doctrine concerning Purgatory is a fond thing vainly
invented and grounded upon no warranty of Scripture c. 3d part Of the Homily concerning Prayer If we will cleane only unto the Word of God then we must needs grant that we have no Commandment to pray for them that are departed out of this World. For the Scripture doth acknowledg but two places after this Life The one proper to the Elect and blessed of God the other to the Reprobate There is no place for Repentance nor yet for Satisfaction As the Scripture teacheth us let us think that the Soul of Man passing out of the Body goeth straightways to Heaven or else to Hell whereof the one needeth no Prayer the other is without Redemption The Church of Rome The Council of Trent Seeing it hath been lately taught in this Vniversal Synod from Scripture c. That there is a Purgatory and that the Souls there detained are helped by the Suffrages of the Faithful but most of all by the acceptable Sacrifice of the Altar the Holy Synod doth command the Bishops that they take diligent care that the sound Doctrine concerning Purgatory be believed taught c. If any one shall say That the fault is so remitted to every penitent Sinner that there remains no guilt to be paid for in Purgatory before there be an entrance granted into the Kingdom of Heaven let him be accursed If any one shall say that the Sacrifice of the Mass ought not to be offered for the Dead c. let him be accursed The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. The Romish Doctrine concerning Purgatory is a fond thing vainly invented 1. The Doctrine of Purgatory is necessary to be believed and whosoever doth not believe it is accursed 2. It 's grounded upon no warranty of Scripture but rather is repugnant to it 2. It 's taught from Scripture § 2. Pardons THE Romish Doctrine concerning Pardons is a fond thing vainly invented c. The Church of Rome Rhemists Annotations To restore Offenders to the Churches Sacraments and Communion of the Faithful to pardon also either all or part of the Penance enjoyned or what Debts soever Man oweth to God or the Church for the satisfaction of his Sins forgiven is called Indulgence 1. General Council of Lateran We do grant Remission of their Sins to whosoever do go to Jerusalem and shall efficaciously afford their help to oppose the Infidels 4. General Council of Lateran The Catholicks that having taken upon them the Character of the Cross shall address themselves to the destruction of Hereticks enjoy that Indulgence and are armed with the same priviledg which is granted to those that go to the relief of the Holy Land. The Council of Constance The Holy Synod doth grant to every one that goes in the appointed Procession an hundred days of Indulgence c. And to those that once a Day say devoutly a Pater Noster and Ave-Maria for the safety of the Emperor 40 Days of Indulgence in the accustomed form of the Church The Council of Trent Indulgences are the heavenly Treasures of the Church Seeing the power of Indulgences hath been granted by Christ to the Church this Holy Synod doth teach That the use of them is very wholesome to Christian People and doth command that they be retained in the Church and doth condemn them by an Anathema that affirm them to be unprofitable or deny that the Church hath a power to grant them The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. The Romish Doctrine concerning Indulgence is grounded upon no warrant of Scripture 1. The Power of Indulgences was granted by Christ. 2. It 's a fond thing and vainly invented 2. They are wholsome to Christian People and whosoever shall affirm them to be unprofitable is accursed § 3. Of Images and Relicks THE Romish Doctrine concerning the Adoration as well of Images as of Relicks is a fond thing vainly invented c. 2d part Of the Homily against Idolatry Images and Image worship were in the Primitive Church which was most pure and uncorrupt abhorred and detested as abominable and contrary to all true Christian Religion 3d part Of the Homily against Images c. Let such as fall down before Images of Saints know and confess that they exhibit that honour to dead Stocks and Stones which the Saints themselves Peter Paul and Barnabas would not be given to them when alive c. In this they pass the folly and wickedness of the Gentiles that they honour and worship the Relicks and the Bones of our Saints which prove that they be mortal men and dead and therefore no Gods to be worshipped which the Gentiles would never confess of their Gods for very shame but the Relicks we must kiss and offer to especially on Relicks Sunday The Church of Rome The Council of Trent The Holy Synod doth command all Bishops and others whose office it is to teach That they instruct the Faithful according to the use of the Catholick and Apostolick Church received from the first times of the Christian Religion concerning the honour of Relicks and the lawful use of Images The Synod doth decree That the Images of Christ the Virgin Mother of God and other Saints are to be had and retained especially in Churches and that due Honour and Veneration be given to them c. and when we kiss them uncover the Head and fall down before them we do adore Christ and venerate the Saints whose Similitude they bear They are altogether to be condemned and the Church doth condemn them that do deny the Bodies of the Saints and Martyrs are to be venerated by the Faithful and that affirm that Veneration and Honour is not due to their Relicks or are unprofitably honoured c. Whosoever shall teach or think any thing contrary to those Decrees let him be accursed The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. Image-worship was abhorred in the Primitive Church 1. Image-worship was received from the first Times of Christianity 2. The Romish Doctrine of worshipping Images and Relicks is a fond thing c. 2. The Relicks of the Saints are to be venerated such as affirm they are not profitably honoured are to be condemned 3. It 's grounded upon no Scripture but is repugnant thereto 3. Whosoever shall teach or think they are not to be venerated is accursed § 4. Invocation of Saints INvocation of Saints is a fond thing vainly invented and grounded upon no warranty of Scripture c. 2d part Of the Homily concerning Prayer There are certain Conditions most requisite to be found in every one that must be called upon which if not found our Prayer doth avail us nothing As 1. That he to whom we pray be able to help us 2. That he will. 3. That he hear our Prayer 4. That he understand better than we our selves what we lack If these things be to be found in any other saving only in God then may
The Church of England teacheth The Church tho a Witness and Keeper of the Holy Writ yet ought not to decree any thing against the same nor to enforce any thing besides the same to be believed for necessity of Salvation p. 37. The Church of Rome holdeth It belongs to the Church of Rome to judg of the Sence of the Scripture and it 's in her Power to forbid receiving the Sacrament in both kinds tho Christ so instituted and delivered it The Fallibility of the Church The Church of England teacheth As the Church of Jerusalem Alexandria and Antioch have erred So also the Church of Rome hath erred not only in their Living and manner of Ceremonies but also in matters of Faith So that their claim of Infallibility is but a vain brag and nothing else p. 31 35. The Church of Rome holdeth The Church of Rome cannot err being taught by the Holy Spirit suggesting all Truth from day to day General Councils The Church of England teacheth General Councils may not be gathered together without the Commandment and will of Princes And when gathered may err and sometimes have erred in things pertaining to God p. 39. The Church of Rome holdeth It belongs to the Pope to call and direct General Councils and being so gathered they have ever the assistance of Gods Spirit and so cannot err Christ the only Mediator The Church of England teacheth Christ is the only Mediator between God and Man being both God and Man in whom alone the Conditions requisite in an object of Worship are to be found whence it followeth that we must call neither upon Angel nor Saint but solely upon him as our Mediator And to make them Intercessors to God is after the Gentiles Idolatrous usage p. 19 41 46. The Church of Rome holdeth There are other Mediators of Intercession in Heaven besides Christ such as Angels and Saints and more especially the Virgin Mary who is the Mother of Mercy and Advocatress of the Faithful and it is good and profitable to invoke them and to have recourse to their prayers aid and help And those that deny they are to be invocated or affirm the Invocation of them is Idolatry are accursed Original Sin. The Church of England teacheth Original Sin is the Corruption of the nature of every man naturally ingendred of the off-spring of Adam And all offend in many things Christ only excepted p. 20 30. The Church of Rome holdeth The blessed Virgin is not comprehended in the decree of Original Sin and never sinned so much as Venially in all her Life Images The Church of England teacheth Image-worship was abhorred in the Primitive Church as abominable and contrary to all true Christian Religion And to fall down before Images c. is to give that honour to Stocks and Stones which the Saints themselves refused when alive p. 44. The Church of Rome holdeth The Images of Christ the Virgin Mary and other Saints are to have due honour given to them by kissing them uncovering the head falling down before them lighting up Candles to them c. by which Christ is adored and the Saints are venerated Relicks The Church of England teacheth To worship and honour the Relicks of Saints is to pass the folly and wickedness of the Gentiles The Romish Doctrine concerning Worshipping and Adoration of Images and Relicks is a fond thing grounded upon no warranty of Scripture but rather repugnant to it p. 44. The Church of Rome holdeth The Relicks of the Saints are to be venerated And all that hold the contrary are accursed Purgatory The Church of England teacheth There are two places only in the other World the one proper to the elect and the blessed of God the other to the reprobate And the souls of men passing out of the body go to Heaven or Hell. And the Romish Doctrine concerning Purgatory is a fond thing vainly invented and grounded upon no Warranty of Scripture but rather repugnant to it p. 41. The Church of Rome holdeth There is a Purgatory or place of Torment in which the Souls of good Persons not sufficiently purged have their Sins expiated and they thereby are prepared for the Kingdom of Heaven And the Souls there detained are helped by the Masses Prayers Alms and other good Works of the Living And if any one shall say there is not such a place or that there remains no guilt to be expiated by penitent Persons in Purgatory or that those that are there are not helped by Masses c. he is accursed Merits The Church of England teacheth The good works are pleasing unto God yet to put any confidence in them as by merit and deserving of them to purchase to our selves or others remission of Sin and everlasting Life is meer Blasphemy and great derogation to the blood-shedding of our Saviour Jesus Christ p. 24 25. The Church of Rome holdeth Justified Persons truly deserve eternal Life and the good Works of such are truly and properly Meritorious and are fully worthy of Eternal Life And whosoever thinketh otherwise is Accursed Supererogation The Church of England teacheth Works of Supererogation or such as are over and above God's Commandment cannot be taught without arrogancy and impiety and it 's an ungodly practice to make sale of them and to perswade the people that thereby the Sins of other men might have satisfaction made for 〈◊〉 p. 27 28. The Church of Rome holdeth There are Works of Supererogation which are done more than Precept and a Person endued with Divine Grace may satisfie for another and pay in the name of another what is due to God and the value of such Works is to be so disposed of for that purpose by such as Christ hath made dispensers of his Treasures Indulgences The Church of England teacheth The Romish Doctrine concerning Pardons is a fond thing vainly invented and grounded upon no warranty of Scripture but is rather repugnant to it p. 41 42. The Church of Rome holdeth The Church hath a power from Christ to pardon Offenders and whatever Debts here or hereafter in Purgatory a man oweth to God for the satisfaction of his Sins may be remitted by the Indulgence of the Church and whosoever saith that the Church hath no such Power or that such Indulgences are unprofitable is Accursed Prayers in a known Tongue The Church of England teacheth It 's a thing plainly repugnant to the word of God and the Custom of the Primitive Church to have publick Prayers in the Church or to minister the Sacraments in a Tongue not understood of the People p. 49. The Church of Rome holdeth It 's fittest every where to have the Mass Celebrated in Latin or a Tongue not understood by the People and it 's for that reason so injoyned And whosoever saith it ought to be otherwise is Accursed Sacraments The Church of England teacheth There are only Two Sacraments Ordained of Christ viz. Baptism and the Supper of the Lord and the other Five commonly called Sacraments in the
THE DIFFERENCE Between the CHURCH of ENGLAND AND THE Church of Rome IN Opposition to a late BOOK INTITULED An Agreement between the Church of England and Church of Rome The Second Edition LONDON Printed for Ric. Chiswell at the Rose and Crow n in St. Paul's Church-Yard MDCLXXXVII Imprimatur October 6th 1687. H. MAVRICE THE DIFFERENCE Between the CHURCH of ENGLAND AND THE CHURCH of ROME THE Author of a Book newly published called The Agreement between the Church of England and Church of Rome saith There has been of late a great cry That the Clergy of the Church of England are now the chief if not the only Opposers of Popery and Defenders of the Protestant Religion And therefore to put a Check to the insulting talk of our Clergy who would be thought the only Champions against Popery 't is become necessary in the present Juncture to emit such an Essay as this To shew an Agreement between the Church of England and Rome and that the Controversy lies only between the Church of Rome and the Protestant Dissenter This I confess is an Expedient of Expedients and as it 's necessary for the relief of those who are so successfully beaten out of their late Pleas of Misrepresentation that they sullenly declare Vntil that be yielded they 'l not dispute So it may be necessary in this present Juncture for the charming that Adder which has yet been deaf to all the Arguments of Flattery Interest and Fear and to put an end to that Answering Replying Rejoyning and Sur-rejoyning which for some Months he saith both sides have been employ'd in For if there be an Agreement in Opinion between both Churches there will be no further occasion for Disputing between them and if the only Opposers of Popery the Clergy of the Church of England are convinced of it there will be no further Disputing nor Opposition Since those between whom the Controversy then only lies viz. the Church of Rome and Protestant Dissenter are it seems upon terms of mutual Cessation But now left those of the Church of England that after all the Complaints made against them for Misrepresentation will not grant any such thing properly and in a strict sence and 't is likely not in any sence should be as obstinate and hard to be convinced in this case Therefore to put it out of dispute if he be to be credited he has with some clearness demonstrated the Agreement of Opinion between the Church of England and Rome to be exact and full And if Demonstration and clearness of Demonstration will not do it nothing will. But it 's some mens way to talk most of Infallibility Self-evidence and clearness of Demonstration when they are farthest from it and I began presently to suspect our Author's credit when I found him to shift his Ground as if he did distrust his own Demonstrations As for instance 1. He had no sooner began to demonstrate this exact and full Agreement of Opinion but by way of Prevention he declares He would not incumber his Discourse with a Catalogue of Agreements in the great Doctrines of Christian Religion and Matters of Opinion but would confine himself to Matters of Government and Worship which chiefly concerns mens Practices How demonstrate the Agreement of Opinion and yet forbear medling with Matters of Opinion to undertake it and then to except the thing he undertakes And then to confine himself to Matters of Government and Worship as if there were not as much Reason to shew an Agreement in Doctrine as Practices or that Matters of Government and Worship were not also Matters of Doctrine 2. When he seems to come to the Point he confines himself to viz. Government and Worship yet he fails again for it 's only in some parts of Worship which he ventures to say that the Agreement will be found exact and full As one sensible that tho there is nothing in the Liturgy and Prayers of the Church of England which he instances in as to the matter of them but what every Christian may allow and so what the Pope may as well as he saith did approve yet that their Missal and Breviary contain such Prayers to the Saints and for Souls departed c. as can be by no other Figure made to agree with the Worship and Prayers used in the Church of England than one part of a Contradiction can be reconciled to the other 3. It 's further worthy of our Observation That the Agreement he pretends to prove is not from the avowed Doctrine of either Church but by some Quotations he produces from two or three particular Authors on the part of the Church of England and from such as on their own side are rejected by the governing part of their Church So for instance he saith of the Church of England They are the avowed Principles of some of the Clergy and late Writers And when he undertakes for the Romish Church he tells us That a great if not the greatest part grant to the Pope but a Primacy for the sake of Catholick Concord c. For Proof of which he appeals to the Councils of Constance and Basil and the Priviledges of the Gallican Church And yet the Acts of those Councils were reprobated in succeeding Councils and so far as concerns this case were utterly disallowed as Bellarmin saith And of what little Authority the Gallick Priviledges have been accounted at Rome there needs no more evidence than the case of De Marca as it 's represented by this Author So that let his Quotations which he pretends to be very just in be admitted yet his Argument from thence for an exact and full Agreement as to this matter amounts to this only Some of the Church of England are for a Primacy for Concord-sake and some of the Church of Rome are for no more therefore the Agreement betwixt the Church of England and Rome is very exact and full in those points And if this be his way of Demonstration it might to as good purpose be shewed That there is also in several Points this kind of Agreement between those that he saith the Controversy only lies between viz. the Church of Rome and the Protestant Dissenter 4. When he offers at a Demonstration from these particular Authors he attempts not to prove it so much from what they say as from what he himself infers from it So much he acknowledges for when he had charged Dr. Sherlock to have found out a Divine Institution for the Popes Primacy This being so gross as he could not father it upon him but he should soon be detected he brings himself off with this This I confess the Doctor doth not expresly carry any further than the Combinations of a National Church and Primacy that is he says no such thing 5. When he doth find out some things in which the Churches are agreed they are such things as the Church of England agrees with the
say The Sacrifice of the Mass is not Propitiatory and that it profits him that takes it only and that it ought not to be offered for the living and dead for Sins Punishments Satisfactions and other Necessities let him be Accursed If any one shall say That by the Sacrifice of the Mass there is Blasphemy offered to the Sacrifice of Christ upon the Cross or that thereby any thing is derogated from him let him be accursed The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. The offering of Christ as a Propitiation was but once 1. In the Mass there is a Propitiatory Sacrifice offered daily 2. To say that the Priest offers for the living and the dead in the Mass is blasphemous Fables and dangerous Deceits 2. Whoever denies that Christ is offered for the living and dead or shall say Christ and his Sacrifice is thereby blasphemed is Accursed The 32. Article of the Church of England Of the Marriage of Priests Bishops Priests and Deacons are not commanded by God's Law either to vow the estate of single Life or to abstain from Marriage therefore it is lawful also for them as for all other Christian Men to Marry at their own Discretion as they shall judy the same to serve better to Godliness 2 d. Part of the Homily of Good Works This Pharifascal and Papistical levell of Man's feigned Religion in Monastical Vows which although it were before God most abominable and contrary to God's Commandments and Christ's pure Religion yet it was praised to be a most Godly Life and the highest State of Perfection The Church of Rome 1. General Council of Lateran We do altogether forbid Presbyters Deacons and Monks to have Concubines or to contract Matrimony and according to the Definitions of Sacred Canons we do decree that Marriages so contracted be separated and that the Persons ought to be brought to Penance The 2. General Council of Lateran We do decree that they who being in the Order of Sub-deacon and above have Married Wives and had Concubines shall not have an Ecclesiastical Benefice for seeing they are the Temple of God c. it is a shameful thing that they should serve Beds and Vncleannesses The Council of Trent If any one shall say That Matrimony confirmed not consummated is not dissolved by the solemn profession of Religion of either Party let him be accursed If any one shall say That Clerks in Holy Orders or Regulars having solemnly professed Chastity may contract Matrimony and that so contracted it is valid notwithstanding an Ecclesiastical Law and Vow c. And that all may contract Matrimony who perceive they have not the gift of Chastity though they have vowed it let him be accursed The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. The Marriage of Priests is lawful 1. Priests ought not to Marry and if they Marry are to be separated 2. The Marriage of Priests may serve to godliness 2. The Marriage of Priests is a defiling the Temple of God. 3. To Vow against Marriage especially upon the account of Perfection and Purity is a feigned Religion and contrary to God's Commandment 3. Vows against Marriage do oblige though the Persons have not the Gift of Continency The 34. Article of the Church of England Of the Traditions of the Church It is not necessary that Traditions and Ceremonies be in all places one of utterly like for at all times they have been diverse and may be changed according to the diversity of Countries Times and Mens Manners so that nothing be ordained against God's Word Every particular or national Church hath Authority to ordain change and abolish Ceremonies or Rites of the Church ordained only by Man's Authority so that all things be done to edifying 2 d Part of the Sermon of Good Works Let us rehearse other kind of Papistical Superstitions and Abuses as of Beads Lady-Psalters Rosaries Purgatory Masses Stations and Jubilees feigned Relicks and hallowed Beads Bread Water Candles c. See before Article 6 and 9. The Council of Trent The Holy Synod doth receive and regard with the like affection of Piety and Reverence the Old and New-Testament and also those unwritten Traditions dictated as it were by word of Mouth by Christ and preserved by continual Succession in the Church The matter and form of Extream Vnction Mass for the Dead The pronouncing the Mass sometimes with a loud at other times with a low Voice Mystical Benedictions Lights Incensings Garments and many other such like things are from Apostolical Discipline and Tradition If any one shall say that the Rite of the Roman Church of saying some part of the Canon of the Mass in a low Voice is to be condemned let him be accursed The Catechism of Trent The Shaving of the Head like a Crown is from Apostolical Tradition None of the Rites in the Mass are useless and vain The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. It is not necessary that Ceremonies ordained by Man's Authority be in all places alike and such may be changed 1. Unwritten Traditions are equally to be regarded as Scripture such are Lights Incensings Shaving the Head c. and so to be every where and always retained 2. Lights and other Ceremonies of the Romish Church are superstitious and abuses 2. None of the Ceremonies used in the Mass as Lights and Incensings are useless and vain The 35. Article of the Church of England Of Homilies The homilies contain a Godly and wholesome Doctrine c. The Homilies charge the Church of Rome with Error Superstition Idolatry and Usurpation The 36. Article of the Church of England Of Consecration of Bishops and Ministers The Book of Consecration of Arch-Bishops and Bishops and ordering of Priests and Deacons lately set forth in the Time of Edward the Sixth and confirmed at the same Time by Authority of Parliament doth contain all things necessary to such Consecration and Divering And therefore whosoever are consecrated or ordered according to the Rites of that Book or hereafter shall be consecrated or ordered according to the same Rites We decree all such to be rightly orderly and lawfully consecrated and ordered The Church of Rome Council of Trent A Sacrifice and Priesthood are so conjoyned by the Ordinance of God that both have existed in every Law. From the very beginning of the Church there were the Names of the following Orders the lesser viz. Acolythi Exorcists Readers and Door-keepers The greater and sacred viz. the Subdeacon Deacon and Priest. Rhemists Annotations Whosoever taketh upon him to Preach without lawful sending to Minister Sacraments and is not Canonically ordered of a true Catholick Bishop to be a Curate of Souls c. he is a Thief and a Murderer So came in all Hereticks and all that succeed them in Room and Doctrine It 's the common Opinion of the Members of the Romish Church of our Nation that our