Selected quad for the lemma: doctrine_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
doctrine_n church_n rome_n transubstantiation_n 3,421 5 11.4318 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A29091 The doctrine of the fathers and schools consider'd. Part the first concerning the articles of a trinity of divine persons, and the unity of God, in answer to the animadversions on the Dean of St. Paul's vindication of the doctrine of the holy and ever blessed Trinity ... / by J.B., AM, presbyter of the Church of England. J. B. (John Braddocke), 1556-1719. 1695 (1695) Wing B4100; ESTC R32576 124,476 190

There are 3 snippets containing the selected quad. | View original text

be_v not_o level_v against_o the_o fundamental_a truth_n of_o this_o article_n the_o true_a divinity_n of_o each_o single_a person_n and_o their_o real_a distinction_n but_o against_o the_o particular_a hypothesis_n of_o the_o school_n the_o singularity_n of_o the_o common_a divine_a essence_n these_o objection_n be_v of_o no_o force_n against_o the_o nicene_n hypothesis_n and_o therefore_o we_o meet_v not_o with_o they_o in_o the_o write_n of_o the_o ancient_n of_o the_o most_o learned_a defender_n of_o the_o orthodox_n faith_n against_o the_o arian_n the_o sophistry_n of_o those_o few_o socinian_n objection_n which_o remain_v appear_v no_o less_o evident_a to_o i_o and_o i_o doubt_v not_o by_o god_n grace_n to_o be_v able_a to_o make_v they_o appear_v so_o to_o any_o unprejudiced_a reader_n that_o be_v i_o doubt_v not_o by_o god_n assistance_n satisfactory_o to_o any_o unbiased_a person_n to_o reconcile_v the_o nicene_n hypothesis_n and_o the_o article_n of_o the_o unity_n of_o god_n i_o be_v full_o persuade_v that_o i_o can_v clear_o answer_v all_o the_o socinian_n harangue_n of_o nonsense_n and_o contradiction_n which_o they_o so_o confident_o charge_v upon_o this_o article_n of_o the_o trinity_n and_o thereby_o reduce_v the_o debate_n to_o this_o single_a question_n whether_o the_o article_n be_v reveal_v or_o not_o the_o article_n of_o the_o trinity_n will_v still_o be_v a_o mystery_n that_o be_v it_o will_v still_o be_v unfathomable_a to_o we_o why_o there_o be_v a_o trinity_n of_o divine_a person_n neither_o more_o nor_o few_o how_o god_n a_o immaterial_a spirit_n can_v generate_v or_o beget_v a_o son_n why_o but_o one_o son_n why_o the_o holy_a spirit_n be_v not_o also_o a_o son_n wherein_o his_o procession_n differ_v from_o filiation_n the_o oeconomy_n also_o of_o the_o divine_a person_n will_v be_v a_o mystery_n how_o father_n son_n and_o holy_a ghost_n concur_v to_o the_o creation_n of_o the_o world_n in_o what_o manner_n they_o joint_o act_v in_o the_o natural_a kingdom_n of_o providence_n how_o they_o will_v govern_v after_o the_o surrender_n of_o the_o mediatorial_n kingdom_n of_o the_o son_n of_o god_n in_o these_o and_o the_o like_a question_n do_v the_o ancient_a father_n place_n the_o mystery_n of_o this_o sacred_a article_n in_o these_o the_o nicene_n hypothesis_n that_o i_o mean_v which_o i_o propose_v as_o the_o nicene_n hypothesis_n still_o place_v a_o unsearchable_a mystery_n the_o schoolman_n can_v decide_v you_o these_o with_o the_o great_a ease_n if_o you_o believe_v they_o with_o the_o great_a exactness_n but_o then_o instead_o of_o these_o which_o they_o pretend_v to_o solve_v they_o have_v give_v we_o many_o other_o ten_o time_n more_o difficult_a these_o mystery_n claim_v express_v revelation_n for_o their_o foundation_n viz._n that_o god_n have_v a_o only_o beget_v son_n and_o a_o bless_a spirit_n proceed_v from_o he_o that_o god_n the_o father_n make_v the_o world_n that_o the_o son_n lay_v the_o foundation_n of_o the_o earth_n that_o the_o spirit_n move_v upon_o the_o face_n of_o the_o water_n at_o the_o creation_n for_o these_o we_o have_v the_o authority_n of_o the_o ancient_a father_n these_o be_v manifest_o difficulty_n only_o in_o the_o modus_fw-la we_o can_v indeed_o tell_v how_o they_o can_v be_v nor_o can_v the_o socinian_o prove_v that_o they_o can_v be_v and_o i_o hope_v these_o great_a adorer_n of_o reason_n the_o socinian_o will_v esteem_v god_n word_n a_o sufficient_a proof_n for_o a_o article_n of_o faith_n against_o which_o they_o have_v no_o solid_a objection_n at_o least_o i_o presume_v they_o will_v pardon_v the_o orthodox_n if_o they_o take_v not_o the_o mysteriousness_n of_o a_o article_n for_o a_o objection_n against_o the_o truth_n of_o it_o but_o this_o will_v be_v more_o proper_a when_o i_o have_v finish_v my_o second_o part_n which_o relate_v to_o the_o article_n of_o the_o unity_n of_o god_n which_o if_o god_n grant_v life_n and_o health_n and_o ability_n shall_v be_v perform_v with_o all_o convenient_a speed_n to_o god_n the_o father_n almighty_n and_o his_o eternal_a son_n and_o ever_o bless_a spirit_n be_v all_o honour_n praise_n glory_n dominion_n and_o power_n now_o henceforth_o and_o for_o evermore_o amen_n finis_fw-la book_n print_v for_o and_o be_v to_o be_v sell_v by_o william_n rogers_n archbishop_z tillotson_n sermon_n and_o discourse_n in_o 4_o vol._n 8_o vo_z discourse_v against_o transubstantiation_n 8o._o alone_o price_n 3_o d._n stitch_v persuasive_a to_o frequent_a communion_n in_o the_o sacrament_n of_o the_o lord_n supper_n 8_o vo_z stitch_a 3_o d._n in_o 12o._o bind_v 6_o d._n sermon_n concern_v the_o divinity_n of_o our_o b._n saviour_n 8_o vo_z six_o sermon_n i._o of_o steadfastness_n in_o religion_n ii_o of_o family-religion_n iii_o iu._n v._o of_o the_o education_n of_o child_n vi_o of_o the_o advantage_n of_o a_o early_a piety_n in_o 8_o vo_z price_n 3_o s._n in_o 12o._o 1_o s._n 6_o d._n bishop_n of_o worcester_n doctrine_n and_o practice_n of_o the_o church_n of_o rome_n true_o represent_v etc._n etc._n 4_o to_o doctrine_n of_o the_o trinity_n and_o transubstantiation_n compare_v in_o two_o part_n 4_o to_z bishop_n of_o norwich_n two_o sermon_n of_o the_o wisdom_n and_o goodness_n of_o providence_n before_o the_o queen_n at_o whitehall_n 4_o to_z sermon_n preach_v at_o st._n andrews_n holborn_n on_o gal._n 6.7_o of_o religious_a melancholy_n a_o sermon_n preach_v before_o the_o queen_n at_o whitehall_n 4_o to_z of_o the_o immortality_n of_o the_o soul_n preach_v before_o the_o king_n and_o queen_n at_o whitehall_n on_o palm-sunday_n 4_o to_z dr._n sherlock_n dean_n of_o st._n paul_n answer_n to_o a_o discourse_n entitle_v papist_n protest_v against_o protestant_a popery_n 2_o d._n edit_n 4_o to_z answer_v to_o the_o amicable_a accommodation_n of_o the_o difference_n between_o the_o representer_n and_o the_o answerer_n 4_o to_z sermon_n at_o the_o funeral_n of_o the_o reverend_n dr._n calamy_n 4_o to_z vindication_n of_o some_o protestant_a principle_n of_o church-unity_n and_o catholic_n communion_n etc._n etc._n 4_o to_o preservative_n against_o popery_n in_o 2_o part_n with_o the_o vindication_n 4o._o discourse_n concern_v the_o nature_n unity_n and_o communion_n of_o the_o catholic_n church_n first_o part._n 4_o to_o sermon_n before_o the_o lord_n mayor_n november_n 4._o 1688._o 4_o to_o vindication_n of_o the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o trinity_n 3_o d._n edit_n 4_o to_z case_n of_o allegiance_n to_o sovereign_a power_n state_v etc._n etc._n 4_o to_o vindication_n of_o the_o case_n of_o allegiance_n etc._n etc._n 4_o to_o fast-sermon_n before_o the_o queen_n at_o whitehall_n june_n 17._o 4_o to_o practical_a discourse_n concern_v death_n in_o octavo_n eight_o edition_n price_n 3_o s._n in_o twelves_o price_n 2_o s._n practical_a discourse_n concern_v judgement_n three_o edit_n 8_o vo_z sermon_n before_o the_o house_n of_o commons_o jan._n 30._o 1692_o 4_o to_o sermon_n preach_v before_o the_o queen_n feb._n 12._o 1692_o 4_o to_o the_o charity_n of_o lend_v without_o usury_n in_o a_o sermon_n before_o the_o lord_n mayor_n on_o easter_n tuesday_n 1692_o 4_o to_o sermon_n at_o the_o temple_n church_n may_v 29_o 1692_o 4_o to_o sermon_n preach_v before_o the_o queen_n june_n 26._o 1692._o 4_o to_o sermon_n preach_v at_o the_o funeral_n of_o the_o reverend_n dr._n meggot_n late_a dean_n of_o winchester_n dec_n 10._o 1692_o 4_o to_o a_o discourse_n concern_v the_o divine_a providence_n 2_o d._n edit_n 4_o to_z apology_n for_o write_v against_o socinian_o 4_o to_z a_o sermon_n at_o the_o temple_n church_n decem._n 30._o 1694._o upon_o the_o sad_a occasion_n of_o the_o death_n of_o our_o gracious_a queen_n 4_o to_z dr._n claget_n sermon_n in_o two_o volume_n octavo_fw-la dr._n wake_v we_o sermon_n and_o discourse_n on_o several_a occasion_n 8_o vo_z mr_n elis_n necessity_n of_o serious_a consideration_n and_o speedy_a repentance_n 8o._o folly_n of_o atheism_n demonstrate_v to_o the_o capacity_n of_o the_o most_o unlearned_a reader_n 8_o vo_z a_o short_a scripture-catechism_n 12o._o a_o defence_n of_o the_o dean_n of_o st._n paul_n apology_n for_o write_v against_o the_o socinian_o 4_o to_z a_o defence_n of_o dr._n sherlock_n notion_n of_o a_o trinity_n in_o unity_n 4_o to_z mr._n wilson_n discourse_n of_o religion_n show_v its_o truth_n and_o reality_n or_o the_o suitableness_n of_o religion_n to_o human_a nature_n 8_o vo_z discourse_v of_o the_o resurrection_n show_v the_o import_n and_o certainty_n of_o it_o 8_o vo_z mr._n blackali_n sermon_n at_o brentwood_n in_o essex_n october_n 7._o 1693_o at_o the_o visitation_n of_o henry_n lord_n bishop_n of_o london_n 4_o to_z a_o sermon_n upon_o the_o resurrection_n preach_v before_o the_o right_n honourable_a the_o lord_n mayor_n and_o court_n of_o alderman_n at_o st._n bridget_n church_n on_o monday_n in_o easter-week_n april_n 9_o 1694._o 4_o to_o a_o commentary_n on_o the_o five_o book_n of_o moses_n with_o a_o dissertation_n concern_v the_o author_n or_o writer_n of_o the_o say_a book_n and_o a_o general_n argument_n to_o each_o of_o they_o by_o richard_n lord_z bishop_n of_o bath_n and_o wells_n in_o two_o volume_n 8_o vo_z mousoleum_fw-la a_o funeral_n poem_n on_o our_o late_a gracious_a sovereign_a queen_n mary_n of_o bless_a memory_n a_o elegy_n on_o his_o grace_n john_n late_a lord_n archbishop_n of_o canterbury_n both_o by_o n_n tate_n mr._n dryden_n translation_n of_o c._n a._n du_fw-fr fresnoy_n art_n of_o paint_v with_o a_o original_a preface_n contain_v a_o parallel_n betwixt_o paint_v and_o poetry_n etc._n etc._n
that_o the_o term_n three_o intelligent_a person_n be_v adequate_o and_o convertible_o predicate_v of_o god_n for_o whatever_o be_v adequate_o and_o convertible_o predicate_v of_o any_o term_n may_v in_o all_o proposition_n be_v put_v in_o the_o place_n of_o that_o term_n according_a to_o which_o rule_n we_o may_v say_v that_o three_o intelligent_a person_n send_v his_o son_n give_v his_o only_a beget_v son_n that_o our_o saviour_n be_v the_o son_n of_o three_o intelligent_a person_n bless_a be_v three_o intelligent_a person_n even_o the_o father_n of_o our_o lord_n jesus_n christ_n there_o need_v no_o word_n to_o expose_v or_o confute_v these_o exposition_n be_v this_o the_o person_n who_o call_v so_o loud_a for_o a_o decretum_fw-la oxoniense_n for_o a_o theological_a censure_n from_o both_o the_o university_n be_v this_o the_o person_n who_o be_v to_o vindicate_v the_o reputation_n of_o the_o church_n of_o england_n to_o foreigner_n be_v this_o the_o man_n who_o be_v to_o warn_v we_o that_o our_o religion_n our_o old_a religion_n lie_v at_o stake_n if_o it_o do_v it_o be_v from_o such_o heterodox_n expounder_n of_o it_o as_o himself_o to_o conclude_v this_o proposition_n viz._n god_n be_v the_o father_n which_o the_o animadverter_n with_o so_o much_o ignorance_n of_o the_o receive_a language_n of_o the_o church_n and_o in_o the_o consequence_n blasphemy_n charge_n with_o absurdity_n and_o illogicalness_n be_v in_o the_o judgement_n of_o the_o great_a man_n as_o to_o this_o controversy_n next_o to_o the_o divine_o inspire_a writer_n who_o the_o church_n ever_o enjoy_v the_o learned_a athanasius_n 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d the_o most_o sacred_a and_o venerable_a article_n of_o the_o church_n of_o god_n but_o this_o belong_v to_o my_o second_o part_n concern_v the_o unity_n of_o god_n errata_fw-la page_n 9_o l_o 6._o f._n sive_fw-la r._n sine_fw-la p._n 11._o l._n 10._o f._n by_o it_o r._n by_o itself_o l._n 29._o r._n praeter_fw-la p._n 15._o l._n 25._o r._n 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d p._n 18._o l._n 27._o f._n part_n of_o r._n co-part_n with_o p._n 42._o l._n 23._o r._n 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d ibid._n marg._n r._n denominari_fw-la p._n 44._o l._n 15._o after_o prius_fw-la &_o posterius_fw-la add_v in_o the_o divine_a nature_n p._n 46._o l._n 15._o r._n principle_n p._n 47._o l._n 15._o f._n such_o r._n each_o p_o 48._o l._n 9_o r._n judicarunt_fw-la p._n 71._o l._n penult_n r._n according_a p._n 73._o l._n 23._o f._n personallity_n r._n personal_o p._n 88_o l._n 29._o r._n vindicate_v p_o 92._o l._n 2._o f._n sense_n in_o r_o of_o p._n 98._o l_o 13._o r_o dicunt_fw-la and_o place_v the_o quotation_n after_o the_o follow_a sentence_n p._n 109._o l._n penult_n f._n these_o r._n three_o p._n 110._o l._n 28._o f._n as_o one_o r._n in_o one_o p._n 114_o l._n 7._o f._n but_o therefore_o r._n so_o that_o p._n 116._o l._n 17._o r._n 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d p._n 120._o l._n 5._o f._n apostasit_fw-la r._n hypostasis_fw-la p._n 129._o l._n 21._o r._n 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d l._n 25._o 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d p._n 137._o l._n 27._o r._n praeter_fw-la p._n 148._o l._n 24_o r._n believe_v p._n 153._o l._n 8._o r._n hypothesis_n p._n 155._o l._n 21._o f._n assent_n to_o r._n assert_v p_o 163._o l._n 4._o r._n subsistit_fw-la l_o 5._o gignit_fw-la l._n 9_o seipsam_fw-la the_o same_o mistake_n in_o some_o other_o place_n l._n 23._o 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d p._n 165._o l._n 21._o r._n subsistit_fw-la there_o be_v some_o other_o literal_a mistake_n as_o logick_n for_o logic_n hypostasis_n for_o hypostasis_fw-la and_o several_a mispointing_n which_o will_v not_o much_o disturb_v a_o judicious_a reader_n and_o the_o animadverter_n if_o he_o please_v may_v correct_v they_o himself_o if_o this_o book_n do_v not_o find_v he_o other_o employment_n the_o page_n be_v mistake_v from_o 132_o to_o 137._o index_n a_o preface_n to_o the_o reader_n concern_v tritheism_n charge_v etc._n etc._n i._n a_o introduction_n by_o way_n of_o letter_n to_o the_o animadverter_n page_z 1_o the_o socinian_n historian_n encomium_n on_o the_o animadversion_n etc._n etc._n ibid._n the_o animadverter_n treatment_n of_o the_o dean_n of_o st._n paul_n 2_o the_o hypothesis_n of_o three_o infinite_a mind_n and_o three_o modes_n compare_v 4_o my_o design_n and_o surprise_v in_o four_o particular_n ibid._n the_o faith_n of_o the_o church_n as_o to_o several_a extrascriptural_a term_n and_o several_a scriptural_a expression_n 5_o the_o design_n of_o my_o first_o part_n to_o state_n the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o trinity_n the_o reason_n of_o my_o proceed_n by_o way_n of_o animadversion_n on_o the_o animadverter_n 6_o the_o design_n of_o my_o second_o part_n to_o state_n the_o article_n of_o the_o unity_n of_o god_n ibid._n chap._n i._n n._n 1._o the_o absolute_a necessity_n of_o the_o scholastic_a term_n their_o usefulness_n at_o this_o time_n 8_o n._n 2._o whether_o accident_n be_v distinct_a being_n from_o substance_n 9_o n._n 3_o 4._o of_o substance_n and_o accident_n 10_o n._n 5_o 6._o of_o the_o nature_n of_o modes_n of_o the_o reason_n of_o invent_v modes_n the_o animadverter_n mistake_n n._n 7._o of_o modal_n difference_n 13_o n._n 8._o of_o the_o animadverter_n definition_n of_o essence_n 14_o n._n 9_o whether_o existence_n be_v a_o mode_n 15_o n._n 10._o of_o subsistence_n of_o the_o animadverter_n addition_n to_o the_o common_a definition_n of_o subsistence_n 16_o whether_o the_o human_a nature_n of_o christ_n be_v bare_o a_o adjunct_n to_o the_o word_n 18_o n._n 11._o of_o one_o singular_a existence_n of_o the_o trinity_n 19_o n._n 12_o 13._o more_o consideration_n about_o subsistence_n 20_o n._n 14._o of_o modal_n composition_n of_o the_o reduction_n of_o modes_n whether_o a_o divine_a person_n be_v compound_v 21_o n._n 15._o whether_o thing_n formal_o different_a be_v affirmable_a of_o one_o another_o 25_o chap._n ii_o n._n 1._o of_o the_o debate_n betwixt_o the_o reverend_a dean_n and_o the_o animadverter_n concern_v self-consciousness_n and_o mutual-consciousness_n 27_o n._n 2._o whether_o personality_n be_v the_o principle_n of_o action_n n._n 3._o whether_o the_o human_a nature_n of_o christ_n be_v a_o person_n and_o of_o some_o of_o the_o subtlety_n of_o the_o school_n relate_v to_o the_o incarnation_n 28_o n._n 4._o whether_o the_o soul_n of_o man_n be_v a_o person_n and_o of_o the_o illustration_n of_o the_o incarnation_n from_o this_o similitude_n whether_o christ_n be_v a_o compound_n hypostasis_fw-la 30_o n._n 5._o whether_o the_o soul_n can_v be_v a_o part_n and_o person_n both_o 33_o n._n 6._o whether_o the_o 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d and_o man_n be_v unum_n per_fw-la accidens_fw-la or_o unum_n per_fw-la se_fw-la 34_o n._n 7._o whether_o the_o soul_n be_v the_o same_o person_n with_o the_o man_n and_o whether_o the_o word_n be_v the_o same_o person_n with_o whole_a christ_n how_o a_o whole_a and_o compound_v be_v or_o person_n differ_v 36_o n._n 9_o a_o retortion_n of_o the_o argument_n against_o the_o socinian_o and_o the_o animadverter_n 40_o n._n 10._o what_o denominate_v any_o be_v a_o distinct_a person_n 41_o chap._n iii_o n._n 1._o of_o a_o prius_fw-la and_o posterius_fw-la in_o the_o trinity_n 44_o n._n 2._o whether_o self-consciousness_n be_v a_o personal_a act_n 46_o n._n 3_o 4._o whether_o to_o be_v a_o person_n be_v a_o relative_n attribute_n in_o this_o mystery_n 47_o n._n 5._o why_o we_o believe_v three_o divine_a person_n and_o no_o more_o 52_o n._n 6._o of_o the_o singularity_n or_o plurality_n of_o the_o predication_n of_o any_o attribute_n concern_v the_o divine_a person_n of_o the_o distinction_n of_o personal_n and_o essential_a predicate_v of_o the_o distinction_n of_o noun_n substantive_n and_o noun_n adjective_n in_o relation_n to_o this_o mystery_n of_o the_o distinction_n of_o absolute_a and_o relative_n predicate_v in_o relation_n to_o this_o mystery_n st._n augustin_n axiom_n of_o quicquid_fw-la ad_fw-la se_fw-la deus_fw-la etc._n etc._n confute_v of_o st._n augustin_n opinion_n in_o this_o article_n a_o character_n of_o the_o schoolman_n by_o mr._n dodwell_n the_o answer_n to_o a_o arian_n objection_n of_o the_o true_a rule_n of_o singular_a and_o plural_a predication_n in_o the_o trinity_n that_o the_o article_n of_o the_o unity_n of_o god_n and_o the_o unity_n of_o the_o trinity_n be_v distinct_a article_n 55_o chap._n iu_o n._n 1._o of_o orthodox_n form_n of_o speech_n in_o relation_n to_o this_o mystery_n 65_o n._n 2._o whether_o three_o person_n in_o god_n 67_o n._n 3._o of_o the_o reason_n of_o use_v extrascriptural_a term_n in_o this_o controversy_n of_o the_o schoolmen_n principle_n 69_o n._n 4._o of_o the_o import_n of_o this_o phrase_n of_o three_o infinite_a mind_n why_o this_o phrase_n so_o rare_a of_o the_o phrase_n of_o one_o infinite_a mind_n in_o relation_n to_o the_o
trinity_n genebrard_n justify_v the_o phrase_n of_o three_o infinite_a mind_n of_o the_o phrase_n of_o three_o go_n 70_o n._n 5_o 6._o whether_o god_n and_o infinite_a mind_n be_v term_n equipollent_a 72_o n._n 7._o of_o the_o animadverter_n answer_n to_o the_o objection_n of_o polytheism_n from_o the_o assertion_n of_o three_o divine_a person_n three_o relative_n not_o one_o simple_a be_v under_o three_o relation_n 73_o n._n 10._o whether_o the_o ternary_a number_n belong_v only_o to_o the_o personality_n 78_o n._n 11._o whether_o the_o divine_a nature_n sustain_v three_o modes_n of_o subsistence_n 79_o n._n 12._o of_o the_o phrase_n of_o three_o substance_n n._n 13._o whether_o two_o substance_n necessary_o differ_v in_o substance_n of_o bellarmin_n orthodoxness_n in_o relation_n to_o this_o controversy_n 80_o n._n 16._o whether_o one_o infinite_a mind_n can_v be_v three_o infinite_a mind_n in_o what_o sense_n the_o trinity_n one_o god_n 82_o n._n 18._o of_o the_o god_n of_o the_o heathen_n and_o jew_n in_o what_o sense_n god_n three_o person_n 83_o n._n 19_o in_o what_o sense_n the_o father_n be_v the_o only_a true_a god_n 85_o n._n 20._o of_o the_o father_n be_v the_o fountain_n of_o the_o deity_n 86_o chap._n v._o n._n 1._o whether_o the_o ancient_n believe_v the_o divine_a person_n to_o be_v intelligent_a being_n 89_o n._n 2._o how_o the_o son_n be_v the_o wisdom_n of_o the_o father_n of_o the_o particle_n of_o in_o this_o mystery_n god_n of_o god_n whether_o three_o person_n infer_v three_o god_n 90_o n._n 3._o whether_o the_o same_o wisdom_n can_v be_v both_o unbegotten_a and_o beget_v 92_o n._n 4._o of_o the_o distinction_n of_o the_o divine_a person_n 95_o chap._n vi_o n._n 1._o of_o a_o double_a care_n in_o mysterious_a article_n what_o be_v fundamental_a in_o this_o mystery_n three_o hypothesis_n concern_v the_o trinity_n in_o what_o sense_n i_o affirm_v the_o universality_n of_o the_o common_a divine_a essence_n of_o the_o blasphemy_n of_o the_o modern_a socinian_o compare_v with_o the_o ancient_a socinian_o of_o the_o antiquity_n of_o both_o part_n of_o my_o hypothesis_n 96_o n._n 2._o petavius_n and_o dr._n cudworth_n assertion_n that_o a_o specific_a unity_n of_o the_o trinity_n be_v the_o dogma_fw-la of_o the_o nicene_n father_n consider_v as_o to_o its_o historical_a truth_n and_o vindicate_v from_o the_o animadverter_n exception_n 102_o n._n 10._o the_o same_o discuss_v problematical_o betwixt_o the_o animadverter_n and_o myself_o 118_o n._n 12._o how_o far_o a_o specific_a unity_n be_v notional_a 119_o n._n 13._o whether_o a_o specific_a unity_n imply_v a_o multiplication_n in_o the_o several_a individual_n lombard_n the_o first_o who_o deny_v that_o the_o divine_a person_n differ_v in_o number_n two_o corollary_n one_a that_o a_o numerical_a unity_n and_o a_o specific_a unity_n be_v not_o according_a to_o the_o philosophy_n of_o the_o ancient_n inconsistent_a two_o that_o it_o be_v no_o such_o paradox_n in_o the_o ancient_a father_n to_o deny_v that_o three_o human_a person_n ought_v to_o be_v call_v three_o man_n as_o it_o be_v common_o esteem_v 121_o n._n 16._o the_o principle_n of_o individuation_n according_a to_o the_o schoolman_n 128_o n._n 17._o the_o opinion_n of_o philoponus_n and_o the_o tritheit_n heretic_n 129_o n._n 18._o how_o far_o a_o multiplication_n of_o the_o divine_a nature_n may_v be_v allow_v 130_o n._n 20._o whether_o the_o term_n deus_fw-mi be_v a_o terminus_n communis_fw-la 131_o n._n 21._o the_o divine_a attribute_n not_o modes_n 132_o n._n 22._o of_o the_o animadverter_n definition_n of_o the_o nature_n of_o god_n 138_o chap._n vii_o n._n 1._o scripture_n the_o only_a rule_n of_o faith_n 139_o n._n 2._o the_o unity_n of_o god_n a_o article_n of_o natural_a riligion_n heb._n 1.3.141_o not_o the_o warrant_n of_o three_o hypostasis_n 142_o what_o three_o personality_n be_v of_o the_o subtlety_n of_o the_o school_n in_o relation_n to_o three_o subsistence_n of_o the_o sense_n of_o 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 143_o the_o trinity_n one_o suppositum_fw-la to_o cajetan_n 217._o the_o godhead_n sustain_v not_o the_o mode_n of_o subsistence_n 218._o of_o personal_a act_n according_a to_o the_o schoolman_n 219_o n._n 3._o a_o deity_n diversify_v whether_o the_o personality_n be_v modes_n 223_o n._n 4._o whether_o modes_n in_o god_n modes_n according_a to_o the_o new_a and_o old_a philosophy_n 150_o n._n 6._o three_o modes_n not_o sufficient_a to_o explain_v the_o trinity_n the_o principal_a inquiry_n in_o this_o mystery_n what_o the_o three_o person_n be_v 155_o n._n 10._o of_o real_a and_o modal_n distinction_n whether_o the_o divine_a person_n differ_v modally_n 159_o n._n 11._o whether_o personality_n be_v a_o personal_a property_n 161_o n._n 15._o three_o kind_n of_o sabellianism_n confusion_n of_o person_n contraction_n of_o the_o deity_n to_o the_o single_a person_n of_o the_o father_n the_o compound_v of_o the_o trinity_n 163_o n._n 18._o rufinus_n acknowledge_v trinitatem_fw-la in_o rebus_fw-la 167_o n._n 19_o boetius_fw-la for_o the_o universality_n of_o the_o common_a divine_a essence_n n._n 20._o peter_n lombard_n 168_o n._n 21._o thomas_n aquinas_n n._n 22._o of_o a_o relative_n subsistence_n and_o a_o subsist_v relation_n the_o conclusion_n contain_v a_o summary_n account_v of_o the_o whole_a 170_o a_o answer_n to_o the_o animadversion_n upon_o the_o vindication_n of_o the_o trinity_n etc._n etc._n by_o way_n of_o letter_n to_o the_o animadverter_n sir_n i_o make_v bold_a to_o follow_v your_o own_o example_n and_o offer_v the_o follow_a paper_n to_o your_o admirer_n yourself_o and_o the_o late_a socinian_n historian_n and_o considerer_n this_o last_o person_n have_v give_v we_o his_o judgement_n 13._o consideration_n of_o the_o explication_n of_o the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o trinity_n etc._n etc._n p._n 12_o 13._o that_o you_o be_v the_o only_a writer_n since_o the_o revival_n of_o these_o controversy_n who_o have_v indeed_o understand_v what_o the_o church_n mean_v by_o a_o trinity_n in_o unity_n that_o your_o explication_n be_v a_o true_a and_o orthodox_n explication_n of_o what_o the_o church_n intend_v to_o say_v that_o your_o design_n be_v only_o to_o declare_v and_o explain_v the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o trinity_n that_o be_v to_o notify_v in_o what_o sense_n and_o manner_n it_o be_v hold_v by_o the_o church_n in_o reference_n to_o such_o design_n we_o this_o great_a author_n and_o his_o party_n the_o english_a socinian_n must_v say_v that_o his_o performance_n be_v a_o accurate_a and_o learned_a work_n thus_o this_o socinian_n historian_n like_o a_o second_o celsus_n pretend_v to_o know_v all_o the_o poor_a orthodox_n be_v able_a to_o say_v in_o defence_n of_o the_o totter_a and_o fall_v ark_n 20._o ibid._n p._n 20._o as_o he_o blasphemous_o call_v the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o sacred_a trinity_n you_o you_o sir_n have_v without_o question_n lay_v down_o the_o very_a explication_n of_o the_o school_n 4._o ibid._n p._n 4._o the_o doctrine_n or_o explication_n general_o receive_v in_o university_n which_o he_o doubt_v not_o will_v be_v approve_v by_o most_o of_o the_o chair_n of_o our_o european_a university_n or_o school_n of_o learning_n you_o very_o have_v acquit_v yourself_o like_o a_o man_n of_o learning_n and_o wit._n all_o must_v bow_v before_o you_o but_o his_o own_o great_a self_n in_o your_o person_n he_o slay_v his_o ten_o thousand_o when_o goliath_n be_v defeat_v the_o philistine_n must_v fly_v this_o euge_fw-la conclude_v that_o pamphlet_n 35._o ibid._n p._n 35._o and_o indeed_o he_o this_o considerer_n and_o all_o other_o that_o have_v labour_v in_o this_o controversy_n may_v surcease_v their_o pain_n henceforth_o and_o leave_v what_o they_o have_v already_o say_v to_o the_o judgement_n and_o conscience_n of_o all_o considerate_a and_o sincere_a men._n how_o much_o you_o be_v a_o admirer_n of_o your_o own_o performance_n may_v be_v more_o than_o surmise_a from_o several_a passage_n in_o your_o book_n and_o especial_o from_o your_o scornful_a treat_v of_o your_o reverend_n and_o learned_a antagonist_n in_o your_o preface_n you_o tell_v we_o that_o you_o neither_o reverence_n nor_o fear_v he_o and_o in_o the_o same_o preface_n you_o charge_v he_o iii_o p._n iii_o with_o defy_v the_o church_n with_o so_o bold_a a_o front_n ii_o p._n ii_o with_o be_v so_o very_o rude_a scandalous_a and_o provoke_v iu._n p._n iu._n that_o it_o be_v impossible_a for_o the_o tongue_n or_o pen_n of_o man_n to_o reply_v any_o thing_n so_o severe_o upon_o he_o which_o the_o foulness_n of_o his_o expression_n will_v not_o abundant_o warrant_v both_o the_o speak_n and_o write_v of_o and_o in_o the_o same_o page_n with_o peculiar_a modesty_n you_o call_v his_o vindication_n stuff_n if_o his_o stuff_n shall_v live_v so_o long_o nay_o not_o content_a with_o this_o censure_n upon_o his_o own_o person_n you_o add_v in_o the_o same_o place_n concern_v the_o governor_n of_o