2. 19. * This acception of the word Catholick can hardly be proved out of ancient Writers Ecclesia Catholica vocatur 1. Respectu Ecclesiae Veteris Testamenti 2. Respectu particularium Ecclesiaruâ— 2. Respectu Catholicâ— Fidei Gerh. loc common This word Catholick is not found in all the Bible yet the sense being there it may be retained the word is the same both in Latine and Greek and signifies General It is used 1. Unproperly and so it signifies as much as Orthodox in which sense sometimes the Fathers use it this is the Catholick Faith 2. Properly so it signifies universal and so it is here taken Putant multi Catholicam dictam Ecclesiam ut distingueretur ab Iudaeorum Synagogis terrae Canaan limitibus circumscriptis Sed parum id verisimile fit cum Apostolorum aetate non in Palaestina modò sed etiam extra illam religione fuerint Iudaei quin plures quà m in Palaestina Eoque magis sit verâ—simile Catholicae nomen opponi coepisse ut Ecclesia quae toto orbe obtineret distingueretur à conventiculis haereticorum sâ—hâ—smaticorum quales Novationarum postea Donatistarum Vossius de tribus Symbolis The Church is called Holy in three respects 1. In respect of the Righteousnesse and Holinesse of Christ imputed which may be termed Sanctitas imputata 2. In respect of those degrees of sanctification wherewith it is endowed in this life which may be termed Sanctitas inchoata 3. In respect of the Rule and Law by which it is directed to serve God in Holinesse and Righteousnesse which therefore may be termed Sanctitas imperata Dr. Chaloners Credo Ecclesiam sanctam Catholicam part 2. sect 1. Ubicunque Dei verbum syncere praedicari atque audiri ubi Sacramonta ex Christi instituto administrari videmus illic aliquam esse Dei Ecclesiam nullo modo ambigendum est quando ejus promissio fallere non potest Mat. 18. 10. Calvin Instit. lib. 4. c. 1. Symbola Ecclesiae dignoscendae verbi praedicationem Sacramentorumque observationem posuimus Nam haec nusquam esse possunt quin fructificent Dei benedictione prosperentur Non dico ubicunque praedicatur verbum illic fructum mox exoriri sed nullibi recipt statam habere sedem nisi ut suam efficaciam proferat Id. ibid. Si solus essem in toto orbe terrarum qui retiâ—erem verbum solus essem Ecclesia rectè judicarem de reliquo toto mundo quod non esset Ecclesia Luth. Loc. Commun Class 1 cap. 37. de Ecclesia Luthers holy pains preaching and writing was not a Novation but a Renovation not a planting of a new Religion but a renewing and replanting of the ancient Religion not an Institution but a Restitution of the truth of God not an Introduction but Reduction of the true and holy Religion Dr Taylor on Rom. 1. 18. Rev. 2. 3. Epistola Pauli ad Romanos est epistola Pauli in Romanos Faius Vide Poly. Vir. hist. Aâ—g l. 6. Shew me that man who before the Councel of Trent held all the points of your Faith as they are now taught and received in your Church Dr Featleys Case for the Spectacles c. 4. See more there Bishop Iewel in a Sermon at Pauls Crosse made a publick challenge to all the Papists in the world to produce but one clear and evident Testimony out of Scripture or any Father or other famous Writers within six hundred years after Christ for any one of the many Articles which the Romanists at this day maintain against us and upon good proof of any such allegation he promised to reconcile himself to Rome Papists call themselves Catholicks but falsly being both heretical in Doctrin and Idolatrous in worship a Catholick is a right beleever all true beleevers in the world make but one Catholick Church Lyford Papists call themselves Roman Catholicks Catholick is universal Roman particular that is of the whole world this of one City So the Roman Catholick is as much as to â—ay Particular universal that is noâ— Catholick Catholick Downs Defence of former Answers against the Reply of N. N. See more there The Mahometists at this day assume the name of Saracens as your men do the name of Catholicks as if they came from Sarah the free woman Abrahams true and lawful wife when in truth they took their first beginning fram Agar the bond woman Dr Featleys Case for the Spectacles Chap. 6. Ecclesia Catholica universalis est tota est per orbem diffusa ac dissemâ—nata est Rom ana pars solum est particularis est Romae Pomaeriis circumscripta Extra Catholicam salus omnino nulla extra Romanam servati multi servanâ—â— Crakanth Defens Eccles. Anglic. Ut Donatistae nullam Ecclesiam praeter Africanam ita Papistae nullam agnoscant Ecclesiam Catholicam praeter Romanam quà m absurdè Catholicam Romanam quasi dicas universalem particulâ—rem vocitant Down Diatrib de Antichristo part 1. l. 3. c. 6. * See Rev. 18. 4. 2 Chro. 11. 14. Hos. 4. 15. 1 Cor. 10. 14. 2 Cor. 6. 17 1 Tim 6. 3. 1 John 5. 21. Vide Stresonem in Act. 14. 48. Conc. 162. pag. 528 529. If any man fall away from that Church which is not Christ his Spouse he cannot be charged justly with Apostasie Nullus pudor est ad meliora transire It is no shame to change for the better we left not Bethel the house of God until it became Bethaven the house of iniquity Dr. Hampton on 1 John 2. 19. See more there Vireâ—us â—oc suasit suadeo etiam ut ab illa Ecclesia non solum abstineamus quae haeresibus idololatria polluta est conventus habeamus ubi possumâ—s in quibus duo aut tres congregentur in nomine Christi si plures non possint Novam tum Ecclesiam non colligimus sed veteri nos adjungimus Rivet Grotianae Discus Dialysis Sect. 5. Certè praecipuum communionis vinculum missa est quam nos ut maximum sacrilegium abominamur Calv. Instit. l. 4. c. 2. Nos dicimus Ecclesiam bano aut illam posse errare ut Ecclesiam Corinthiorum Galatarum Ephesiorum reliquas hujusmodi nec errare modò verumetiam obrui tandem erroribus desicere quod ipsa experientia in multis demonstravit Dicimus autem veram Christi Ecclesiam Catholicam quae est electorum tantùm errare non posse si errores mortiseros insanabiles intelligamus at in levioribus rebus posse errare â—empe qua non simpliciter absolutè ad Ecclesiam necessariae quaeque fundamentum non evertunt Whitak controvers 2. de Ecclesia quaest 4. cap. 1. 1 Tim. 6. 12. 2 Tim. 3. 17. Gen. 20. 1 Sam. 9. 9. Ezek. 3. 1. Ezek. 34. 2. 1 Pet. 5. 1. Luk. 12. 24. 1 Cor. 4. 1. 1 Cor. 11. 10. Revel 1. 20. Quid magis Ecclesiae curandum quam ut idoneus praesit Episcopus At in Ambrosio obstare visum quod B.
raised The first principles of heavenly Doctrine are named here a foundation because they are the first things which are known before which nothing can be known and because upon the knowledge of these things all other parts of heavenly knowledge do depend They must be so firmly laid and received at the first as they should never be questioned more not that Ministers may not preach again of Principles Those that deny Fundamentals must of necessity destroy Religion Perfection is building on the old foundation In no age since the Gospel dawned in the world were all fundamentals in Religion denied till now The Apostles are the foundation of the Church Ephes. 2. 20. Revel 21. 14. in three respects 1. Because they were the first which founded Churches and converted unbelievers to the faith 2. Because their doctrine which they received immediately from God by most undoubted revelation without mixture of errour or danger of being deceived is the Rule of Faith to all after-comers 3. Because they were Heads Guides and Pastors of the whole universal Church The Proposition or Observation which ariseth from these words thus opened may be this The Principles and Foundations of Christian Religion must be well laid Or thus Catechizing and instructing of the people in the Principles of Religion is a necessary Duty to be used The Apostle illustrates this by a comparison first from Schools secondly from building the foundation must be first laid The excellent definition of catechising which the Apostle here gives yeelds us two good proofs of its necessity 1. It is the Doctrine of the beginning of Christ by some rendred not unfitly for the sense which gives beginning in Christ. 2. It is a foundation which bears up all the building without this preaching is to no purpose which though it makes the least shew yet it is of greatest use it establisheth men and keeps them free from wavering 3. This course is most agreeable 1. To Art all Arts proceed from principles Physicians have their principles Lawyers their maxims Philosophers their chief sentences 2. To Nature which first forms the vital parts then the more remote 3. It is sutable to reason Principles are 1. Easiest in themselves 2. Facilitate other matters 3. Are the most necessary Doctrines of all the rest they bear up all the rest 4. Are of continual and constant use Principia sunt minima quantitate maxima virtute 4. Gods order and practice hath been still to lay principles things might easily passe from one to another at first they lived so long Cain and Abels sacrificing is an evidence of catechising before the Flood there was no Word written then therefore it is like their Fathers taught them It was practised by Abraham Gen. 18. 19. the fruit of which observe in his sonne Gen. 24. 63. and servant Gen. 12. 26. God himself writes a Catechism for the Jews describing a short compendium of Religion in the two Authentick Tables of the Law Hannah delivered Samuel to Eli his Instructor so soon as he was weaned Iehoiada taught the young King Iihoash David and Bathsheba practised it 2 Chron. 28. 8 9. Psal. 34. 11. Prov. 4. 4. 31. 1. and Salomon himself seems to give that precept out of the most experience of his own most excellent education Teach a childe the trade of his way and when he is old he shall not depart from it though himself scarce did so and Eccles. 12. 23. he draws all which he had said in his whole Book to two heads Fear God and keep his Commandments Catechizing was also practised by Christ and his Apostles Luke 2. 4. Acts 22. 3. Heb. 6. 1 2 3. Christ allowed of Hâ—sanna sung by children He begins with regeneration to Nicodemus and he drew the whole Law into two heads Matth. 22. 37. Iohn and Christ preacht Faith and Repentance and the Apostles after them Theophilus was catechized Luke 1. 4. Apollos Act. 18. 23. Timothy 1 Tim. 3. 15 2 Tim. 2. 2. The Apostle Paul commends to Timothies custody a patern of wholsome Doctrine which he cals A form of Doctrine Rom. 6. 17. and the Analogy of faith Rom. 12. 6. that is certain plain rules unto which all others must hold proportion The Magdeburgenses observe from these places and that Heb. 6. that there was Catechismus ab Apostolis traâ—itus that the Apostle drew the Doctrine of the Gospel into short heads for the instructing of the children of the Church This Duty principally belongs to Ministers their Office is set down under the name of catechizing Let him which is catechized make him that catechizeth partaker Gal. 6. 6. Ministers must plant and beget as well as increase and build up feed the Lambs as well as the Sheep they are compared to Nurses wise Stewards skilfull builders it must be performed by Housholders also Ephes. 6. 4. God chargeth Parents to perform this Duty Deut. 6. 6 7. Rehearse them continually whet them upon thy children often go over the same thing as a knife doth the whetstone They are bound to bring up their children in the nurture and information of the Lord Children were to be taught the meaning of the Passeover Exod. 12. 16. Masters of Families also must instruct their servants which are ungrounded as children Christ instructed his Apostles he taught them how to pray he being the Master of the Family and they his Family as appeareth because he did eat the Passeover together with them and the Law appoints that every family should celebrate that Feast together The reason why God specifieth not this point in the Masters duty is because if it be performed by the Father it shall be needlesse seeing it is done to the Masters hand but if the Father neglect it surely the Master which succeeds in the Fathers room and hath his Authority must see it done For as a Father in Israel was bound to see his own sonne circumcised so he was bound to see his servant circumcised and if to circumcise him sure he must as well make him as his childe to know what Circumcision meaned And what Christ did as a master of a Family that must every Master of family do seeing we must be followers of Christ every one in his place therefore every one must instruct his ignorant servants in the truths of Religion The Jews did use Catechizing Cyprian saith Optatus exercised it at Carthage and Origen at Alexandria Clemens Alexandrinus had his Poedagogus Lactantius and Calvin their Institutions Athanasius his Synopsis Augustine his Enchiridion his Books De Doctrina Christiana and De Catechizandis rudibus Catechizing is Institutio viva voce a kinde of familiar conference The Hebrew verb Chanach signifieth to instruct or train up even from childehood and to initiate or dedicate from which word holy Henoch had his name importing nurture in the fear of God The Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth to sound or
may be done or not But if thou beleevest answer me some Questions with which things the Philosopher being astonished answered I beleeve and giving him thanks that he had overcome him was not onely of the same judgement with the old man but also began to give counsell to others who were before enemies to the Christian Faith as well as himself to assent to the Christian Doctrine and added an Oath that he was not onely changed by a divine Deity but also by a certain unexpressible force was converted to the Christian Religion If Zanchy may be credited the perseverance of Saints in the Faith is a main part of the Gospel Vedelius in his Panacea Apostasiae bono constantium lapsorum praescripta l. 1. c. 3. shews that an Apostate breaks all the ten Commandments I wish that the Reformed Churches by their unhappy divisions fomented by the Boutefeus of Christendom the lesuites do not weaken themselves and accomplish their enemies great design It is observed by Chemnitius that in the year 1540. the Iesuites by the Intercession of Cardinal Contarenus did obtain from Paul the III that he would confirm that order by his Pontificial Authority who did ratifie it with this caution that onely threescore men should be of that Society But when afterward they observed that that order was more active then others in upholding the tottering Church of Rome he decreed in the year 1543. that this Society of the Iesuites should not be limited to any either terms of places or number of persons It is also observable what Campanella laies down in his discourse of the Spanish Monarchy It is manifest saith he that the King of Spain if he could subdue England with the Low-countreys would soon become Monarch of all Europe and a great part of the world Now nothing so much conduceth to overthrow the English as a dissension and discord stirred up amongst them and the Dutch and perpetually nourished which will soon saith he afford better occasions In Chap. 27. of the same Book he speaks much to the same purpose Parsons the English Jesuite in his Memorial for Reformation or a remembrance for them that shall live when Catholick Religion shall be restored unto England he would have the grand Charter burnt the municipal Laws abrogated and the Innes of Court converted to some other use that for Lawyers Then for Divines The Colledges in both the Vniversities should be onely in the power of six men who should have all the Lands Mannors Lordships Parsonages c. and what ever else belonged to Church or Cloister resigned into their hands That at the beginning no mans conscience be pressed for matters in Religion then that publick disputations between Papists and Protestants be held in both the Vniversities That for some years it will be more commodious for the publick and more liberty for the Preachers to have no Appropriation nor Obligation to any particular Benefice but Itinera mitto caetera M. Smiths Preface to Dailles Apology for the Reformed Churches translated by him He saith there he hath been told by the London Booksellers that at the least thirty thousand Popish Books have been printed here within these three last years Shall the Iesuitical and heretical party be so active for Popery for errour and shall not the Orthodox be as studious to hold fast and hold forth the Truth Let Magistrates make the interest of Christ his Truths his Worship his People their great interest let them discountenance gross errors and damnable heresies Let Ministers preach down pray down live down those abominable Doctrins now amongst us Let all the people of God study Fundamentals labour to be stablisht in the Truth and in their places oppose Falshood Libertinism and all horrid Blasphemies and pray earnestly to God that he would cause the false prophets and the unclean spirits to pass out of the Land Zech. 13. â— and I should yet hope though our case be very sad that God would continue his Gospel still amongst us in power and purity though by our sins we have forfeited so great a mercy Which blessing that it may be vouchsafed unto us though altogether unworthy shall be the prayer of Your true Christian Friend and hearty well-wisher Edward Leigh TO THE Christian and Candid READER READER DIvers have since the publishing of my Treatise of Divinity consisting of three Books exprest their good esteem thereof and withall have said that if the like were done upon the whole Body of Divinity it would be a very usefull and profitable work I have therefore inserted divers things into the former Treatises and also enlarged them so farre by the addition of other Subjects as to make a compleat Systeme or Body of Divinity I relate not here of the Covenant and Promises Asslictions or Martyrdoms because I have in my Books of Divine Promises and Saints Encouragements sufficiently discussed those several points Divines go different wayes in their handling of positive Divinity and give several Titles to their Books Some call their Work A Systeme of Divinity Others A Synopsis Others A Syntagma Others Common places Some The Mâ—rrow Some The Body of Divinity Others The Summe of Divinity There are Calvins Institutions Bullingers Decads Zanchies Works Gerhards Common places Ursins Summe of Divinity and some others that have more fully handled the Body of Divinity but there are few of our English Writers unlesse Master Perkins of old and Bishop Usher lately who have largely and fully written in English this way Some reduce all the Principles of Religion into more some to few Heads Some referre all to those four Heads 1. Quae Credenda What things are to be beleeved in the Creed 2. Quae Facienda What things are to be done in the Commandments 3. Quae Petenda What things are to be begged in the Lords Prayer 4. Quae Recipienda What things are to be received in the Sacraments The Creed Commandments the Lords Prayer and the Sacraments Though I do not punctually observe that method yet I handle all those four Subjects I speak of God and his Attribute Almighty in the second Book and handle all the Articles which concern Christ in the fifth Book where I treat of the Recovery of man by Christ and somewhat of the holy Ghost in the seventh Book where I handle the Benefits by Christ in Sanctification Sanctification of the Church and Communion of Saints I speak of in the seventh Book Of Forgivenesse of sins in the fifth Petition of the Lords Prayer and in the Doctrine of Iustification Of the Resurrection of the Body and Last Iudgement and Life Everlasting I treat in the last Book I handle the Commandments in the ninth Book The Lords Prayer and Sacraments among the Ordinances in the seventh Book I shall now particularize the several Subjects of each Book according to the method I observe First I treat of the Scriptures or Word of God the Divine Authority of both the Old and New Testament
vers 14. 1 Pet. 3. 15. Christians should be ready to give an answer to every man which doth ask them a reason of the hope which is in them the foundation is that which is first and surest laid and hath an influence into all the building Men should do all upon trial and solid conviction 1 Thess. 5. 21. 1 Ioh. 4. 1. The Papists would have the people take things upon trust they say those places concerne the Doctours of the Church not the people but compare the 20 and 21. vers in the Thessalonians and 1. vers with 6. in Iohn and we shall see the contrary This trial is profitable First Because truth then will have a greater force on the conscience Secondly This is the ground of constancie 2 Pet. 3. 17. Thirdly Hereby we shall be able to maintain the truth Matthew 11. 19. The Scriptures are fundamentum quo the fundamental writings which declare the salvation of Christians Iohn 5. 37. Christ fundamentum quod the fundamental means and cause which hath purchased and doth give it Iohn 4. 42. The person we must build on is Christ 1 Cor. 3. 11. He is called the foundation of foundations Isa. 28. The doctrinal foundation is the written Word of God which is not only the object and matter of our faith but the rule and reason of it Hold Christ as your Rock build on him the Scripture as your rule and the reason of your believing this is general there are some particulars First Some things are simply necessary It were a notable work for one to determine this how much knowledge were required of all Secondly Not absolutely necessary Some make the foundation too narrow some again too wide some say that if a man nean well and go on according to the light he hath though he know not Christ he shall be saved Others say that all are bound to know distinstly the Articles of the Creed Fundamental truths are all such points of Doctrine which are so plainly delivered in Scripture that whosoever doth not know or follow them shall be damned but he that doth know and follow these though erring in other things shall be saved All the principles of Religion are plain and easie delivered clearly in 1. Scripture they are to be a rule to judge of other Doctrines 2. They are very few say some reduced to two heads by Iohn Baptist Mark 1. 15. and by Paul 2 Tim. 1. 13. 3. In all principles necessary to salvation there hath been agreement among all the Churches of Christ Ephes. 4. 5. though they may differ in superstructures Quod ubique quod semper quod ab omnibus creditur Catholicam est Vincent Lyrin These Fundamentals said a Reverend Divine now with God are twelve three concerning God three concerning Man three concerning the Redeemer three concerning the means of attaining good by this Redeemer Concerning God 1. There is one God which is an Infinite Perfect and Spirituall Essence 2. This one God is distinguished into three Persons or manners of subsistence after an incomprehensible way which we believe but cannot perfectly understand The Father begetting the Son begotten and the holy Ghost proceeding 3. This one God the Father Sonne and holy Ghost is the Maker Preserver and Governour of all things by his Wisdom Power Justice Providence Concerning man 1. That he was made by God of a visible body and an immortal and spiritual soul both so perfect and good in their kindes that he was perfectly able to have attained eternal life for himself which was provided as a reward of his obedience 2. That being thus made he yielded to the temptations of the Devil and did voluntarily sin against God in eating of the Tree forbidden and so became a childe of wrath and heir of cursing an enemy to God and slave to the Devil utterly unable to escape eternal death which was provided as a recompence of his disobedience 3. That he doth propagate this his sinfulnesse and misery to all his posterity Concerning Christ. 1. That he is perfect God and perfect Man the second Person in the Trinity who took the Nature of man from the Virgin Mary and united it to himself in one personal Subsistence by an incomprehensible Union 2. That in mans Nature he did die and suffer in his Life and Death sufficient to satisfie Gods Justice which man had offended and to deserve for mankinde Remission of sins and Life everlasting and that in the same Nature he Rose again from the Dead and shall also Raise up all men to receive Judgement from him at the last Day according to their Deeds 3. That he is the only sufficient and perfect Redeemer and no other merit must be added unto this either in whole or part Lastly Concerning the Means of applying the Redeemer they are three 1. That all men shall not be saved by Christ but onely those that are brought to such a sight and feeling of their own sinfulnesse and misery that with sorrow of heart they do bewail their sins and renouncing all merits of their own or any creature cast themselves upon the mercies of God and the only merits of Jesus Christ which to do is to repent and believe and in this hope live holily all the remainder of their life 2. That no man is able thus to see his sinnes by his own power renounce himself and rest upon Christ but God must work it in whom he pleaseth by the cooperation of his Spirit regenerating and renewing them 3. That for the working of this Faith and Repentance and direction of them in a holy life he hath left in writing by the Prophets and Apostles infallibly guided to all truth by his Spirit all things necessary to be done or believed to salvation and hath continued these writings to his people in all ages Observe those places Act. 15. 11. 1 Tim. 1. 15. Let a man hold this that there was nothing but death in the world till Christ came and that he is come to save sinners Ioh. 17. 3. Secondly There are practical places 1 Cor. 6. 9. Titus 3. 8. Let us 1. See our selves dead without Christ and wholly trust in him 2. Let us be exemplary in our lives and conversations There are other Fundamentals which are only comparatively necessary that is expected from one man which is not expected from another and more from those that live in the Church Have these six Principles of the Apostle not only in your heads but hearts 1. That a man is dead in himself 2. That his remedy lies out of himself 3. Know the Doctrine of the Sacraments 4. The Word of God 5. Have some apprehension of the life to come 1. That there is a passage from death to life 2. That there is a fixed and irrevokable estate after this life 6. Hold the Doctrine of Faith so that Christ may live in you and you be delivered up into that forme of Doctrine lay hold on
then godlinesse and yet though carefull of keeping them they have not been able to preserve them from perpetual forgetfulnesse whereas on the other side these holy Writings hated of the most part and carelesly regarded of a number have notwithstanding as full a remembrance as they had the first day the Lord gave them unto the Church The Roman Empire for three hundred years set it self to persecute and extirpate this new Doctrine and in all these troubles the Church grew and inâ—â—cased mightily Acts 12. 1. Herod killed Iames with the sword yet v. 24. the Word grew and multiplied Calvin with all his Works since the time they were written scarce made so many Protestants in France as I have credibly heard it reported that the Massacre made in one night L. Falk reply about the Infallibility of the Church of Rome The Miracles wrought in the confirmation of Scripture differ much from the wonders wrought by the false Prophets Antichrist and Satan himself Mat. 10. 8. Mat. 24. 24. 2 Thes. 2. 11. Apoc. 13. 13 14 they are neither in number nor greatnesse comparable to these 1. They differ in Substance Divine Miracles are above the force of Nature as dividing of the red Sea the standing still of the Sunne the others seem wonderfull to those which are ignorant of the cause of them but are not true miracles simply above the ordinary course of nature but effected by the art and power of Satan or his instruments by natural causes though unknown to men and many times they are but vain delusions 2. They differ in the end those true miracles were wrought by the finger of God for the promoting of his glory and mans salvation these to seal up falshood and destroy men confirmed in Idolatry and Heathenism 2 Thes. 2. 9. See Deut. 13. 1 2 3. Those were not done in a corner or secretly but openly in the presence of great multitudes nay in the sight of the whole world by the evidence of which an unknown Doctrine before contrary to the nature and affections of men was believed Bainham said in the midst of the fire Ye Papists Behold ye look for miracles and here now ye may see a miracle for in this fire I feel no more pain then if I were in a bed of Down but it is to me as sweet as a bed of Roses The miracles done by our Saviour Christ and his Apostles received Testimony of the bitterest enemies they had 2. The Testimony 1. Of the Church and Saints of God in all ages 2. Of those which were out of the Church 1. Of the Church Both Ancient and Judaical And the present Christian Church 2. Of the Members of the Church 1. The Church of the Jews professed the Doctrine and received the Books of the Old Testament and testified of them that they were Divine which invincible constancy remaineth still in the Jews of these dayes who though they be bitter enemies to the Christian Religion do stifly maintain and preserve the Canon of the Old Testament pure and uncorrupt even in those places which do evidently confirm the truth of Christian Religion 2. The Christian Church hath also most faithfully preserved the Old Testament received from the Jews and the new delivered by the Apostles as a depositum and holy pledge of the Divine Will Col. 4. 16. 2. Of the Members of the Church the constant Testimony which so many worthy Martyrs by their bloud have given to the truth Rev. 6. 9. Four things are to be considered in this Argument 1. The Number which suffered for the same is numberlesse many millions that none can imagine it to arise from pride weaknesse or discontent More Christians were slain as hath been observed under the ten bloudy persecutions then Paschal Lambs were offered up under the State of the Old Testament 2. The Quality and condition of them which suffered noble and base learned and unlearned rich poor old young men women children those which were tender and dainty all these could not suffer out of vain-glory that stubbornly they might defend the opinion which they had taken up 3. The torments used were usual unusual speedy slow some hewed in pieces burnt with slow fire cast in to Lions given to be devoured by the teeth of wilde beasts some beheaded some drowned some stoned with stones 4. All this they endured constantly patiently with great joy even a chearfull heart and merry countenance singing Psalms in the midst of the fire so that the madnesse of the enemy was overcome by the patience of them which did suffer Luther reports of the Martyr St Agatha as she went to prisons and tortures she said she went to Banquets and Nuptials That Martyr Hawks lift up his hands above his head and clapt them together when he was in the fire as if he had been in a triumph So that their testimony was not only humane God enabling them so stoutly to die for the truth Phil. 1. 29. See the History of the Councel of Trent pag. 418. and Dr Taylors Sermon on Dan. 3. 22 23 24. stiled The Roman Fornace Martyrs of other Sects differ from the Martyrs of the true Church 1. They were fewer 2. They suffered not with joy of Conscience which the godly Martyrs did 3. They were punished for their errours discovered the Martyrs were burned for having any part of the Bible and the Bible sometime with them where the Inquisition reigns it is death to have any part of the Bible in the vulgar tongue The Gentiles also which were out of the pale of the Church did give testimony to sundry Stories and Examples in the Bible Suetonius and Tacitus speaks of the miracles of Christ Pliny of the miracles of Moses and of the wise mens Starre Macrobius of the slaughtering of the Infants Iosephus of the death of Herod the Poets of the Floud Plutark of the Dove which Noah sent out Iosephus a Jew saith in his time there was a monument of the pillar of Salt into which Lots wife was turned Of Sodoms destruction speaketh Sâ—rabo Diodorus Siculus Galen in his Book of Simples Pliny Solinus Polyst hist. Tacitus lib. ult Mela acknowledging that the remainders of Gods wrath are still to be seen there as the dead Lake the Fruit fair to the eye but falling to cinders and smoke in the hand The Oracles of the Sybillae were in greatest account among the Heathen and held as true of all men and if those be they which we have there is nothing which can more plainly set forth the birth of Christ his life and death Causabon makes it apparent that those prophecies of Sybil were counterfeited pieces and at first entertained by such as delighted in seeing the Christian Religion strengthned with forreign proofs Hereticks also prove the Scripture to be Divine for they quote that and therefore Luther cals the Bible Librum Haereticorum
a Candlestick doth a Candle Revel 2. 1. 4. To interpret the Scripture by the Scripture Since many things in Scripture are doubtfull and hard to be understood without an Interpreter Acts 8. 31. it doth belong to the Church to expound the same to interpret and give the sense Nehem. 8. 8 9. Luke 24. 27. provided that this exposition be by the Scriptures Some of the Papists say That the Church may condere articulos fidei facere Canonicum quo ad nos and though they talk of Councels and Fathers yet all is as the Pope concludes The testimony and tradition of the Church especially the Primitive Church is necessary to know that the Gospel of Matthew is divine Scripture by an historical and acquired faith to know this by a divine and infused faith besides the Authority of the Church the matter character and contents of every Book and comparing of it with other Scriptures do serve as an inward cause to produce the said infused faith Object We are sent to the Church to determine all Controversies 1 Cor. 11. 16. Sol. Controversies are either Dogmaticall concerning Faith or Rituall concerning true Order The Proposition is about these not the first Secondly From this fundamental truth that the Scripture is immediately from God the Basis indeed of all Religion 1 Cor. 15. the wickednesse of the Church of Rome is farther to be condemned which will not suffer the Scriptures to be read in their Churches but in an unknown tongue nor in private by the common people without special leave and certain cautions from their superiours Of old they would not suffer them to be read at all of late they are forced to give licences to some and they teach them that they should not make the Scripture judge of the Doctrine and Practice of the Church but the Doctrine and Practice of the Church must be the Interpreter and Judge of the meaning of the Scripture that is they must take the Scripture to mean none otherwise whatsoever it seem to say then what is agreeâ—ble to that which the Pope doth teach and practise There cannot be a surer sign of a bad cause then that it fears to be tried by the writings which it self cannot deny to be written by God for correction for reproof for instruction in righteousnesse Some Papists are more modest herein as Bellarmine lib. 2. de verb. Dei c. 15. Catholica Ecclesia statuit ne passim omnibus concedatur Scripturae lectio some more rigid as Huntly and Hosius The Papists object the obscurity of Scriptures as an argument to hinder Lay-men from reading them and account it a matter of profanation to allow men women and children and all promiscuously the use of the Vulgar Translation and think they will rather be hurt then benefited by them taking occasion of erring from them Hosius urgeth that Give not holy things to dogs Cast not pearls before Swine to prove the people must be barred from reading of the Scriptures It is Pope Innocents Glosse a Beast might not touch the Mount a Lay-man may not meddle with Scripture Lindan saith Nihil noxae inferretur in Ecclesiam salvo traditionis fundamento if there were no Bible and another Scriptura citius faciet Haereticum Lutheranum quam Catholicum Because we will have all proved by Scripture and make that the compleat Rule for what we believe or do in all Theological matters they call us Scripturarios Scripture-men and Atramentrarios Theologos and so to carry or read a Bible is matter of scoff we may stile them in Tertullians phrase Scripturarum Lucifugae and Traditionaries St Gregory who is blessed in their Church exhorteth a Lay-man to the serious study of the Scriptures that thereby he might learn the will of God alledging that the Scripture is the Epistle of God unto his creature Quid est autem Scriptura sacra nisi Epistola omnipotentis Dei ad Creaturam Greg. lib. 4 epist. 40. ad Theodorum mediâ—um Proving further That obscurity of Scripture is so frothy an argument for perswading any devout Christian not to reade it that it should rather incite them to greater Diligence therein and therefore he elegantly compâ—res the Scripture to a River wherein saith he there are as well shallow Fords for Lambs to wade in as depths and gulphs wherein the Elephant may swim Chrysostom held it a thing necessary for all men daily to read the Scriptures Audito quaeso saeculares comparate vobis Biblia animae pharmaca St Ierom did exhort divers women thereto and commended them for exercising themselves therein he writes to Laeta and Gaudentia and shews them how they should bring up their daughters Scripturas sacras tenebat memoriter Hieron de Paula in Epitaphio He commends the Husbandmen about Bethlem for being so perfect in the Scripture That they had the Psalms of David by heart and sang them as they followed the Plow Arator stivam tenens cantat Davidicum melos Epist. ad Demetriad The Apostle would not have commended this in Timothy 2 Tim. 3. 15. That from his childehood he knew the holy Scriptures nor noted it to the praise of his Grandmother and Mother that they had trained him up so if he had not known that the holy Scriptures are so plain that even a childe may be able to understand them What may we judge of the other easier books when the holy Ghost would have the Revelation the obscurest book of all the Scripture to be read Revel 1 3 The people took occasion of erring and blaspheming from the humiliation of Christ many abuse Preaching and the Sacraments 2. By this reason the Latine Bibles should not be suffered to be read publickly because many understanding Latine from the reading of them may take occasion of erring There is a greater reason to be had of Gods elect which are edified by reading of the Scripture then of those who wrest them Peter by this reason stirred up the faithfull to reade the Scriptures with greater devotion 2 Pet. 3. 14 15 16 17. 3. This is common both to the Ecclesiastical Persons and Laity to take occasion of erring and blaspheming from the Scripture If we peruse the Histories of times past we shall finde that learned and Ecclesiastical men did oftner fall into Heresies and Blasphemies from misunderstanding and wresting the Scriptures then any of the common sort of people who were often also by the learned drawn into Heresie The Papists are not afraid the people should be corrupted by reading their legends and lying fables by their Images which doe naturally teach Idolatry The Papists further object That the Hebrews did not permit young men to read part of Genesis Canticles Ezekiel We must know that the reading of those Scriptures non ablatam hominibus sed dilatam fuisse was not taken away from them but delayed only They permitted all men before thirty to read all other Chapters of holy Scripture and after thirty these
most unjust means extort money from Gojim that is the Gentiles Paulus Fagius in his Annotat. on Deut. 17. 17. Scripture Arguments are the chiefest to convince an unbeliever Christ by divers Arguments Iohn 5. labours to convince the Jews that he was the Messiah promised 1. Iohn bare witnesse of him vers 33. 2. His works bare witnesse of him verse 36. 3. The Father did bear witnesse of him vers 37. 4. He produceth the Testimony of the Scriptures vers 39. They are they which testifie of me Will you not believe Iohn my miracles my Word from Heaven then believe the written Word If we believe not the Testimomy of Scripture nothing will convince us though one rise from the dead nor Christ himself if he were here in the flesh and should preach unto us Ioh. 5. ult The Lord in executing of his Judgements commmonly observes proportion and retaliation Antichrist is the greatest opposite to Gods Law and Word he is called therefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Thess. 2. 8. The lawlesse one He is without Law above Law against Law He abuseth Scripture takes upon him to judâ—â— and interpret Scripture therefore it shall be his ruine 2 Thess. 2. 8. God shall destroy him with the Spirit of his mouth id est Verbo suo Beza God hath consecrated the Word to this purpose the end of it is not only to save but destroy being the savour of death to some and it is a fit instrument for such a work Antichrists strength is in mens consciences only this will pierce thither Heb. 4. 12. God useth the Word for the destruction of Antichrist these wayes 1. It discovers him his doctrine his errors 2. It hardens him 3. It condemneth him and passeth sentence against him CHAP. III. II. The Books of Scripture FRom the Divine â—lows the Canonical Authority of the Scripture The books of Scripture are called Canonical books say some from the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which word is used 2 Cor. 10. 13. Phil. 3. 16. Gal. 6. 16. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 mark the double Emphasis this notable Canon because they were put into the Canon by the Universal Church and acknowledged to be divinely inspired by it and also are made a perfect Canon or Rule of all Doctrine concerning Religion Credendorum agendorum of Faith and Manners of all things which are to be believed or done toward salvation But Cameron thinks it is not termed Canonical because it is a Rule for that book saith he is called Canonical which is put into the Catalogue which the Ancients called a Canon of those writings which are esteemed Divine Becanus saith They are called Canonical both because they contain a Rule which we ought to follow in faith and manners and because they are put into the Catalogue of Divine books The Conditions of a Canon are these 1. It must contain Truth or be an expresse Form and Image of Truth which is in the Divine minde 2. It must be commanded sanctified and confirmed by Divine Authority that it may be a Canon to us in the Church These books were sanctified either commonly all of both Testaments by the Testimony of the Spirit and Church and Canon it self or the books of the Old Testament were specially and singularly confirmed by Word Signs and Event as the Pentateuch but the Prophetical books and Hagiographa before their carrying into Babylon by extraordinary sign the Cloud and Veil in the Temple 1 King 8. 10. Levit. 16. 2. and Gods answer by Ephod Urim and Thummim Exod. 28. 30. after their carrying away into Babylon by singular testimonies of events The books of the New Testament are confirmed by the Son of God revealed in flesh by his sayings and deeds Heb. 1. 2. and by the powerful Ministry of the Apostles by Signs Vertues and Miracles Mark 16. 20. There is a three-fold Canon in the Church Divine Ecclesiasticall and False The Divine Canon is that which properly and by it self is called the Word of God immediately inspired of God into the Prophets and Apostles This according to the divers times of the Church is distinguished into the Old and New Testament 2 Cor. 3. 6 14. this is a common division of the sacred Bible among Christians as in the version of Tremellius and Iunius Testamenti veteris novi Biblia sacra and the Geneva gives that Title to their Bible La Bible qui est toute la Saincte Escriture du viâ—l noveau Testament Augustine thinks they are better called Vetus novum Instrumentum Heinsius Grotius Vetus novum Foedus Vide Grotii Annotat. in libros Evangelii A Covenant is an Agreement between two a Testament is the Declaration of the Will of one It is called in regard of the Form Convention and Agreement between God and man a Covenant in regard of the manner of confirming it a Testament For 1. In a Testament or last Will the Testators minde is declared so is the Will of God in his Word therefore it is called a Testimony often Psal. 19. and 119. 2. Here is a Testator Christ a Legacy eternal life Heirs the Elect a Writing the Scripture Seals the Sacraments 3. Because it is ratified by the death of Christ Heb. 9. 16 17. The Books of the Old Testament are the holy Scriptures given by God to the Church of the Jews shewing them what to believe and how God would be worshipped The New Testament containeth the books which treat of salvation already exhibited and Christ already come in the flesh All the books of the Old Testament were written originally in Hebrew because they were committed unto the Hebrews Rom. 3. 2. except what Daniel and Ezra wrote in the Chaldee The Jewish Church receiving them from God kept them and delivered them to Posterity Many grave Authors hold That the Hebrew was the first Tongue and Mother of all the rest and it may probably be collected from the names of our first Parents It was called Hebrew saith Erpenius not from Heber of the Posterity of Shem as Iosephus Ierom and others think when it is manifest that he rather spake Chaldee then Hebrew because Abraham the Patriarch which drew his original from him was a Chaldean but it was so called saith Erpenius as all the Rabbins Origen and others testifie from the Hebrews which people arose from Canaan It is honoured with the Title of the Holy Tongue saith the same Erpenius because the most holy God spoke it to his Prophets delivered his holy Will written in it to the Church and because it is very probable from the opinion of great men that holy men shall use it with God hereafter in Heaven Vide Buxtorfium de Linguae Hebraeae origine Antiquitate Sanctitate There are many Hebraisms also in the New Testament many words and phrases rather used according to the manner of the Hebrews then the Greeks by which it is manifest that the same Spirit was
Apostles wrote in Greek which wrote peculiarly to the Jews as Iâ—mes and Peter Matthaeum Hebraiâ—è scripsisse convenit inter antiquos Citat Irenâ—um Origenem Athanasium Epiphanium Chrysostomum Hieronymum Vossius de genere Christi dissertat Scripsit Hebraea lingua quia praecipuè Iudaeorum quos viva voce hactâ—nus docuisset haberet rationem Id. ibid. Vide Grotium in libros Evangel It was needfull that the Gospel should be written by many First for the certainty Secondly for the perfection of it Amongst all the Evangelists there is a general Agreement and a sp 〈…〉 rence they all agree in the main scope and subject Christ they dâ—â—â—â—r in 〈…〉 al Argument and Order All describe the life of Christ some more largely some more briefly some more loftily some more plainly yet because all were inspired by the same spirrit they all have equal Authority The difference of Evangelists in some smaller matters proveth their consent in the greater to be the voice of Truth for had they conspired all together to have deceived the world they would in all things have more fully agreed The Doctrine of the Covenant of Grace is more plainly expounded the will of God and way to Salvation more plentifully set down in the New Testament then ever it was in the dayes of Moses or the Prophets and in these books of the New Testament all things are so established as to continue to the end so that we must not look for any new Revelation All these Books we receive as Canonical because they are Divine for matter and form divinely inspired by God sanctified and given to the Church for their direction written by the Apostles or Apostolical men sweetly conâ—enting with other parts of holy Scripture and with themselves received alwayes by the greatest part of the Church of God They were written after the death of Christ by the direction of the holy Ghost the Apostles by lively voice first preached because it was needful that the Doctrine of the Gospel should by their preaching as also by signs and wonders be confirmed against the contradictions and cavils of the Jews and Gentiles and be allowed by the assent of believers generally before it was committed to writing that we might be assured of the certainty of those things which were written These Books are acknowledged Canonical both by us and the Papists so that touching this matter there is no controversie between us and them Among the confest writings of the Scriptures attested by all and not contradicted by any The four Gospels are first to be placed and then the Story of the Acts of the Apostles See Euseb. Eccles. Hist. lib. 3. cap. 3 4. and lib. 5. cap. 8. and lib. 6. cap. 18. The Epistles doubted of by some for a while were first the Epistle to the Hebrews the Epistle of Iames the second Epistle of Peter the second and third Epistles of Iohn the Epistle of Iude and the Revelation of which I shall treat more when I come to handle the Books of the New Testament particularly The Story of the woman taken in Adultery hath met with very much opposition See Gregories Preface to his Notes upon some passages of Scripture Crojus defends the truth of it Observat. in Nov. Testam c. 17. Vide Seldeni uxorem Ebraicam cap. 11. The Inscriptions and Titles prefixed before the Epistles are no part of holy Scripture written by the Apostles but added to the Epistles by some others The Subscriptions and Postscripts also of divers Books are false counterfeit and erroneous not written by the Apostles but added afterward by the Scribes which copied out the Epistles The Subscriptions of the later Epistle to Timothy and also to Titus are supposititious they are neither found in the Syriack nor in all Greek Copies nor yet in the vulgar Latine translation these additions were made some hundred years after the Apostles The Canonical Books of the New Testament are either Historical Doctrinal or Prophetical 1. Historical containing matters of fact the History of 1. Christ exhibited in the four Evangelists or Gospels as they are stiled by God himself Mark 1. 1. Matthew Mark Luke and Iohn called Gospels because they contain a message of joy and gladnesse They all treat of one subject Christ Jesus incarnate are most true Historians Luk. 1. 2. Ioh. 21. 24. 2. His Apostles in the Acts written by Luke thirty years after Christs Ascention so termed of the principal subject of the History though the acts of others not Apostles are there recorded 2. Dogmatical or Doctrinal such as were written by the Apostles for the instruction of the Church of God in faith and manners commonly called Epistles and that by warrant of the Scriptures 1 Thes. 5. 27. 2 Pet. 3. 1 16. because they were sent to them who had already received and professed the Gospel of Christ. The Apostles being oft times unable to instruct by their personal Presence supplied that by writing Epistles These are one and twenty written 1. By Paul 1. To whole Churches 1. Gentiles To the Romans To the Câ—ninthians To the Galatians To the Ephesians To the Philippians To the Colossians To the Thessalonians 2. Jews To the Hebrews 2. To particular Persons 1. Timothy 2. Titus 3. Philemon 2. Iames one 3. Peter two 4. Iohn three 5. Iude one 3. Prophetical wherein under certain resemblances the state of the Church of Christ till the end of the world from the time of Iohn the Evangelist is most truly and wonderfully described and receiveth its name Apocalyps of the Argument Beza Piscator Calvin Erasmus Grotius have done well on all the New Testament Of the Papists Iansenius hath done well on the Harmony of the Lutherans Chemnitius and Gerhard of the Protestants Calvin Maldonate and De Dieu Cameron Scultetus and Grotius have done well likewise on the Evangelists Matthew and Iohn were Apostles of the twelve Mark and Luke Evangelists Apostle is a name of Office or Dignity It notes one sent from another with command in special certain famous Embassadours of Christ. The Evangelists were Comites vicarii Apostolorum they accompanied the Apostles in preaching the Gospel and had curam vicariam omnium Ecclesiarum as the Apostles had curam principalem The Title Evangelist is taken 1. For such as wrote the Gospel 2. For such as taught the Gospel and these were of two sorts either such as had ordinary places and gifts or such whose places and gifts were extraordinary such Evangelists were Timothy and Titus Smectymn Answ. to an Humble Remonstrance Sect. 13. Matthew There was never any in the Church which doubted of its Authority Some say he wrote in Hebrew but that is uncertain as hath been already declared He interprets the Hebrew name Emanuel Chap. 1. 23. and those words Câ— 27. 46. therefore it is likely he wrote not in Hebrew for why should one that writeth in Hebrew interpret Hebrew words to such as
for leaving out that Title in our English Bibles for it is well known that that Title is not given by the holy Ghost but by the Scholiast who took it from Eusebius General is a meer English term and of no doubtfull signification Catholick is both Greek and by their saying of double and therefore doubtfull signification The Syriack Interpreter hath this Inscription of these Epistles as Tremellius sheweth Tres Epistolae trium Apostolorum ante quorum oculos Dominus noster se transformavit id est Iacobi Petri Ioannis For the Syrians doe not esteem the second of Peter nor the second and third of Iohn nor the Epistle of Iude Canonical The Apostles Iames Peter Iohn and Iude have publisht seven Epistles as mystical as succinct both short and long short in words long in sense and meaning Iames For the difference which seems to be between Iam. 2. 21 22. and Rom. 4. 2. and 3. 28. most likely this Book was doubted of in ancient times as Eusebius and Ierom witnesse But yet then also publickly allowed in many Churches and ever since received in all out of which for the same cause Luther and other of his followers since him would again reject it Erasmus assents to Luther and Musculus agrees with them both in his Comment upon the fourth of the Romans both they of the Romish and we of the Reformed Church with one consent admit this Epistle for Canonical Vide Polani Syntagma I light upon an old Dutch Testament of Luthers Translation saith Whiâ—akâ—r against Raynolds with his Preface wherein he writeth that Iames his Epistle is not so worthy as are the Epistles of St Peter and Paul but in respect of them a strawen Epistle his censure I mislike and himself I think afterwards seeing these words in a later Edition are left out It is no where found in Luthers Works that he called the Epistle of Iames Inanem stramineam Edmund Campian was convicted of falshood about that in England where when he had objected that he could finde no such thing at any time in the Books he produced Some in the Preface of the German Edition say that Luther wrote that it cannot contend in dignity with the Epistles of Paul and Peter but is strawy if it be compared with them Which judgement of Luther we approve not of and it is hence manifest that it was disliked by him because these words are found in no other Edition from the year 1526. Luthers disciples now hold that it is Canonical and Apostolical and they answer the Arguments of those that are opposite thereto as we may see in the Exposition of that Article concerning the Scripture by that most learned and diligent man Iohn Gerard. Gravitatem ac zelum Apostolicum per omnia prae se fâ—rt saith Walther We may reply against the Papists who often object this opinion of Luthers that Cajetan their Cardinal denieth the Epistle to the Hebrews to be Canonical yea which is farre worse he affirmeth that the Author thereof hath erred not only in words but in the sense and meaning of the Scriptures Nay Cajâ—tan saith Whitaker rejected Iames second of Peter and second and third of Iohn and Iude. It consists of five Chapters Paraeus Laurentius Brochmand and Mr Manton have done best on it First of Peter This Epistle is called in the Title Catholical because it is not written to any one person as that of Paul to Timothy Titus and Philemon noâ— to any one particular Church as those of Paul to the Romans Corinths but to the converted of the Jews dispersed here and there as appears by the inscription It consists of five Chapters Gerhard Laurentius Gomarus and Dr Ames have expounded both these Epistles Bifield hath interpreted part of the first Epistle Second of Peter Some in the Primitive Church doubted of its authority and the Syriack hath it not but the Church generally allowed it and many reasons may perswade that it is Apostolical and was written by Peter 1. Because the Author of it expresly calleth himself Simon Peter the Apostle of Jesus Christ. He wrote it in his old-age to confirm them in the Doctrine which before he had taught them 2. It s inscription is to the same Jews that the former viz. dispersed by the Roman Empire and converted to Christ whose Apostle Peter was 3. It shews an Apostolical spirit 4. It s style and composition is agreeable to the former Epistle 5. The Author of this Epistle witnesseth that he was a spectator of the Transfiguration in the Mount Chap. 1. vers 16. now Peter together with Iames and Iohn were present with Christ. 6. He makes mention of the Former Epistle Chap. 3. v. 1. 7. He cals Paul his dear Brother Chap. 3. v. 15. It consists of three Chapters First of Iohn consists of five Chapters Second and third of Iohn They were also in times past doubted of by some as Erasmus Cajetan but there are good reasons to prove them Canonical 1. Their Author cals himself an Elder so doth Peter 1 Pet. 5. 1. by which name an Ecclesiastical Office is often signified but here age rather now it is manifest that Iohn came to a greater age then the rest of the Apostles 2. The salutation is plainly Apostolical Grace mercy and peace 3. In sentences and words they agree with the first Epistle 4. The Fathers alledge them for Iohns and reckon them among the Canonical Books Each of these Epistles is but a Chapter Iude This Epistle also in times past was questioned by some but that it is Apostolical first the inscription shews the Author expresly cals him a servant of Christ and brother of Iames. 2. The matter it agreeth both for words and sentences with the second of Peter of which it contains as it were a brief summe and recapitulation That the writer of the Epistle doth not call himself an Apostle is of no moment to infringe the authority thereof for the judgement of the writer is free in that case that Title was specially used by Paul and Peter Iames and Iohn quit the same Title yea Paul in his Epistles to the Philippians Thessalonians and Philemon doth not call himself an Apostle and yet those Epistles were never doubted of It is but one Chapter Willet and Mr Perkins have done well on it Revelation It is called according to the Greek Apocalyps and according to the Latine Revelation that is a discovery or manifestation of things which before were hidden and secret for the common good of the Church Eusebius l. 3. c. 17. saith Domitian cast Iohn the Evangelist into a fornace of scalding Oyl but when he saw he came forth unhurt he banished him into the Isle Pathmos where he writ this Revelation This Book describeth the state of the Church from the time of Iohn the last of the Apostles untill Christs coming again and especially the proceedings pride and fall of
Babylon the great Whore with all the Kingdoms of Antichrist The subject of it is two-fold 1. The present state of the Church 2. The future state of it The things which are and the things which shall be hereafter Revel 1. 19. The three first Chapters of this Book contain seven several Epistles to the seven several Churches of Asia the other following Chapters are a Prophetical History of the Church of God from Christs Ascension to his second coming The holy Ghost foreseeing what labour Satan and his instruments would take to weaken and impair the credit and authority of this above all other Books wherein he prevailed so far as some true Churches called the truth and authority of it into question hath backed it with a number of confirmations more then are in any other Book of Scripture First The Author of it is set in the fore-front or face of it The Revelation of Iesus Christ Chap. 1. vers 1. who professeth himself to be the first and the last vers 11. so in the several Epistles to the Churches in several styles he challengeth them to be his Thus saith he 1. That holdeth the seven starres in his right hand 2. He which is first and last which was dead and is alive 3. Which hath the sharp two edged Sword 4. Which hath eyes like a flame of fire and his feet like brass 5. Which hath the seven Spirits of God and the seven stars 6. He who is holy and true who hath the key of David 7. He who is Amen the faithful and true witness the beginning of the creatures of God Secondly The Instrument or Pen-man his servant Iohn the Evangelist the Apostle the Divine who for the farther and more full authority of it repeateth his name at least thrice saying I Iohn Chap. 1. 9. and 21. 1 2. and 22. 8. wheâ—â—â—â— in the Gospel he never maketh mention of his name there he writes the History of Christ here he writes of himself and the Revelations declared to him Thirdly In the last Chapter are five testimonies heaped together vers 5 6 7 8. 1. Of the Angels 2. Of God himself the Lord of the holy Prophets 3. Of Jesus Christ Behold I come shortly 4. Of Iohn I Iohn heard and saw all these things 5. The Protestation of Jesus Christ v. 18. Fourthly The matter of the Book doth convince the Authority thereof seeing everywhere the Divinity of a Prophetical Spirit doth appear the words and sentences of other Prophets are there set down part of the Prophecies there delivered are in the sight of the world accomplished by which the truth and authority of the whole is undoubtedly proved there are extant many excellent Testimonies of Christ and his Divinity and our redemption by Christ. Fifthly The most ancient Fathers Greek and Latine ascribe this Book to Iohn the Apostle Theophylact Origen Chrysostome Tertullian Hilary Austin Ambrose Irenâ—us To deny then the truth of this Book is contrasolem obloqui to gainsay the shining of the Sun it self The Chiliasts abuse many testimonies out of this Book but those places have been cleared long ago by the learned as bearing another sense See Dr Raynolds Conf. with Hart c. 8. p. 406. Calvin being demanded his opinion what he thought of the Revelation answered ingeniously saith one He knew not at all what so obscure a writer meant Se penitus ignorare quid velit tam obscurus scriptor Cajetane at the end of his Exposition of Iude confesseth that he understandâ— not the literal sense of the Revelation and therefore Exponat saith he cui Deus concesserit It consists of two and twenty Chapters the best Expositors of it are Ribera Brightman Paraeus Cartwright Fulk Dent Forbes Mede Simonds Foord 1. The Scriptures written by Moses and the Prophets sufficiently prove that Christ is the Messiah that was to come The Old Testament may convince the Jews which deny the New Testament of this truth Iohn 5. 39. They that is those parts of Scripture written by Moses and the Prophets there were no other Scriptures then written The 53 of Isaiah is a large History of his sufferings We have also another Book or Testament more clearly witnessing of Christ The Gospel is the unsearchable riches of Christ Ephes. 3. 8. So much may suffice to have spoken concerning the Divine Canon the Ecclesiastical and false Canon follow CHAP. V. Of the Books called Apocrypha SOme Hereticks utterly abolisht the Divine Canon as the Swingfeldians and Libertines who contemned all Scriptures the Manichees and Marcionites refused all the Books of the Old Testament as the Jews do those of the New as if they had proceeded from the Devil Some diminish this Canon as the Sadduces who as Whitaker and others hold rejected all the other Prophets but Moses some inlarge it as the Papists who hold that divers other Books called by us Apocrypha i hidden do belong to the Old Testament and are of the same authority with the other before named and they adde also their traditions and unwritten Word equalling it with the Scripture both these are accursed Rev. 22. 18. But against the first we thus argue Whatsoever Scripture 1. Is divinely inspired 2. Christ commandeth to search 3. To which Christ and his Apostles appeal and confirm their Doctrine by it that is Canonical and of equal Authority with the New Testament But the holy Scripture of the Old Testament is divinely inspired 2 Tim. 3. 16. where he speaks even of the Books of the Old Testament as is gathered both from the universal all writing viz. holy in the 15 verse and from the circumstance of time because in the time of Timothies infancy little or nothing of the New Testament was published 2. Christ speaks not to the Scribes and Pharisees but to the people in general to search it Iohn 5. 39. this famous elogium being added That it gives testimony of him and that we may finde eternal life in it 3. Christ and his Apostles appeal to it and confirm their Doctrine by it Luke 24. 27. Rom. 3. 21. Acts 10. 43. and 17. 11. and 20. 43. and 26. 20. the New Testament gives testimony of the Old and Peter 2 Pet. 1. 19. of Pauls Epistles The Ecclesiastical Canon which is also called the second Canon followeth to which these Books belong Tobit Iudith first and second of the Maccabees Wisdom Ecclesiasticus Baruch Additions to Daniel and Esther for these neither contain truth perfectly in themselves nor are sanctified by God in the Church that they may be a Canon of faith and although abusively from custom they were called Canonical yet properly in the Church they are distinguished from the Canonical by the name of Apocryphal The false Canon is that which after the authority of the Apocrypha increased was constituted by humane opinion for the Papists as well as we reject for Apocryphal the third and fourth Book of Ezra the prayer of Manasses the third
Scripture were not inspired of God for as God is true so is his Word Ioh. 17. 17. sweetly agreeing with it self and every part with other these Books commend false things as true and approve things evil as right Iudith Chap. 9. v. 2. commends killing the Sichemites against Gen. 49. 6 7. 2 Maccab. 14 42. Razis is commended for killing himself the fact is not only related but commended also in these words nobly manfully and this commendation doth plainly shew that the Author thereof was not inspired of God When the Dâ—natists out of this Book urged that it was lawful for them to kill themselves as Razis did Augustine then was forced to acknowledge That the Authority of this Book was uncertain and questionable and proves it by the judgement of the Jewish Church Christ and the Christians Manifest Fables are told in some of them for true Histories as that of Toby Iudith Bel and the Dragon If any desire a particular confutation of the several Books of the Apocrypha I commend to his reading that learned Treatise of Dr Raynolds de libris Apocryphis who hath so exactly handled this subject that to write of it after him were to write Iliads after Homer or to draw a line after Apelles 5. The most ancient Fathers and Councels which lived the best and first five hundred years after Christ rejected the same Books which we doe Ierome on Matth. 23. saith concerning a Testimony cited out of the Apocrypha Hoc quoniam ex Scriptura nihil habet authoritatis eadem facilitate rejicitur qua profertur Because this hath no authority out of Scripture it may as easily be rejected as it is offered All that the Papists object for these Books in the general is That the third Councel at Carthage the Florentire Councel and that of Trent do approve the said Books to be Canonical as also Augustine and Innocentius To which it may be answered 1. That the Councel of Carthage was but a Provincial Councel and therefore it cannot binde the whole world Moreover in that Councel there are divers things which the Papists will not endure as in the 26 Canon there is a Decree that no Bishop shall be called chief or universal Bishop no not the Bishop of Rome how should the Papists binde us with the authority of that Councel with which they will not binde themselves 2. The Latine Fathers judged these Books fit to be read for example of life and instruction of manners but not for confirmation of faith or establishing any Doctrine 3. These Books are not Proto-canonical truly and properly Canonical inspired by God containing the immediate and unchangeable truth of God sanctified by him and given to the Church to be a perfect rule of sound doctrine and good life but Deutero-canonical or rather Ecclesiastical as they are styled In this sense Augustine and Innocentius are to be taken when they reckon these Books among the Canonicall 4. No Councel hath Authority to define what Books are Canonicall what not seeing Books truely Divine receive Authority from God himself and are to be esteemed of undoubted truth although all the world should bark against them These two Councels are of too late standing to oppose against the other ancient Councels which reject these Books The Councel of Trent was gathered and kept against all Civil and Ecclesiastical Right neither was there any forme of justice observed in it 1. It was not kept in a lawfull place for whereas it was intended against the Protestants and the Germans were the parties accused it ought to have been kept in Germany according to the request exhibited by the Body of the States of Germany assembled at Noremberg this equity was not observed the parties accused being called into Italy 2. In that Councel matters were concluded and the sentence passed the adversary not being heard speak nor so much as present for the Protestants might not be admitted to hearing neither could they obtain to propound their opinion in the Councel much lesse to avouch it by lawfull reasoning Sleidan fol. 29. and yet were condemned against Divine and Humane Law for they both forbid the condemning of any before he have lawfull liberty granted him to plead for himself 3. In that Councel the Accuser and Judge were the same for the Pope did accuse the Protestants of Heresie he did convocate the Councel he by his Delegates was President and Moderator in it and so together was Accuser Judge and Witnesse whereas the Reformation of the Pope was the thing in question Lastly All Councels ought to be free but in this Protestants might not propound their cause nor defend it neither might any thing be proposed but according to the minde of the Legates or otherwise then they approved no man had any voice in the Councel but such as were sworn to the Pope nothing was there determined which was not first concluded of at Rome by the Pope in the Colledge of Cardinals and sent from Rome to Trent whereupon this Proverb arose Spiritum Sanctum Roma per peram mitti Tridentum The holy Ghost came to Trent packt up in a Cloke-bag We hope therefore since the Apocrypha are justly rejected out of the Canon that hereafter they will neither have the honour to be bound with our Bibles nor read in our Churches The Apocrypha was never received by the Church of the Israelites before Christ his coming nor of the Apostolick and Primitive Church for more then three hundred years after as both Eusebius out of Origen and the Councel of Laodicea Can. 59. confirmed afterward by the sixth general Councel of Constantinople sheweth for the Greek Church and St Ierom for the Latine CHAP. VI. Of the Authentical Edition of the Scripture NOw we must enquire which is the Authentical Edition of holy Scriptures it being necessary that this heavenly truth committed to writing should be delivered in some form of words and in some language which may be understood Lawyers from whom the use of the word Authentick seemeth borrowed do call those instruments and writings Authentick which have a certain and just authority in themselves A Book or writing is Authentick either by Divine or humane institution those are by Divine Appointment and Institution authentical which have from God sufficient and absolute Authority to command and approve themselves worthy credit and faith in as much as God himself doth approve them by humane Institution such writings are held authentical which by the opinion and sentence of learned men in their several professions may be esteemed worthy credit and belief for themselves and for the truth in them There is a great diversity of Editions of holy Scripture all cannot be simply and perpetually Authentical in of and for themselves without reference unto another no more then many draughts of the same Lease or Deed or copy of one pardon can be Some amongst many are authentick whence the others are transcribed yea
there promised is happinesse It is a wonderful thing that all the particulars which the Canticles contain being taken from marriage are handled so sincerely that no blemish or spot can be found therein Therefore the Scriptures should be preached read and heard with holy affections and should be reverently mentioned The Jews in their Synagogues will not touch the Bible with unwashed hands they kiss it as often as they open and shut it they sit not on that seat where it is laid and if it fall on the ground they fast for a whole day The Turk writes upon the outside of his Alcorar Let no man touch this Book but he that is pure I would none might meddle with ours Alcoran signifieth but the Scripture you need not be afraid of the word but such as indeed are what other men do but think themselves 6. The Scripture is Perfect The perfection of the Scripture is considered two ways 1. In respect of the matter or the Books in which the holy doctrine was written all which as many as are useful to our salvation have been kept inviolable in the Church so that out of them one most perfect and absolute Canon of faith and life was made and this may be called the integrity of the Scripture 2. In respect of the form viz. Of the sense or meaning of these Canonical Books or of Divine truth comprehended in them which Books contain most fully and perfectly the whole truâ—h necessary and sufficient for the salvation of the Elect and therefore the Scriptures are to be esteemed a sole adequate total and perfect measure and rule both of faith and manners and this is the sufficiency of the Scriptures which is attributed to it in a twofold respect 1. Absolutely in it self and that in a threefold consideration 1. Of the principle for every principle whether of a thing or of knowledge ought to be perfect since demonstration and true conclusions are not deduced from that which is imperfect therefore it is necessary that the holy Scripture being the first onely immediate principle of all true doctrine should be most perfect 2. Of the subject for it hath all Essential parts matter and form and integral Law and Gospel and is wholly perfect Both 1. Absolutely because for the substance it either expresly or Analogically contains the doctrine concerning faith and manners which is communicable and profitable for us to know which may be proved also by induction that all necessary opinions of faith or precepts of life are to be found in the holy Scâ—ipture 2. Relatively because as it hath a perfection of the whole so of the parts in the whole that perfection is called essential this quantitative For all the Books are sufficient with an essential perfection although integrally they have not a sufficiency of the whole but onely their own yet so that at distinct times every part sufficed for their times but all the parts in the whole are but sufficient for us 3. In its effect and operation it makes men perfect 2 Tim. 3. 16 17. Rom. 15. 4. Iohn 2. ult 5. 39. 2. As opposed to unwritten Traditions all which it excludes by its sufficiency but we do not understand by Traditions generally a Doctrine delivered in Word and Writing but specially all Doctrine not written by Prophets or Apostles whether Dogmatical Historical or Ceremonial for a perfect reason of the primary opinions belonging to Faith and Manners is delivered in Scripture and those things which are out of beside or against the Scripture do not binde the Conscience 2. Historical the Sayings and Deeds of Christ and the Apostles are perfectly contained in the Scriptures as many as suffice us for our salvation Iohn 20. 30 31. Those things which are delivered out of Scripture are to be esteemed mans writings 3. Ceremonial or secondary opinions concerning Ecclesiastical Rites and Customs are for Essentials Substantials and Fundamentals generally contained in the word of God the accidentals accessaries and circumstantials are free and mutable If Traditions agree with the Scripture they are confirmed by it if they oppose it they are disproved by it The perfection of the Scriptures is not First Infinite and unlimitted That is an incommunicable property of God every thing which is from another as the efficient cause is thereby limitted both for the nature and qualities thereof Secondly we do not understand such a perfection as containeth all and singular such things as at any time have been by Divine inspiration revealed to holy men and by them delivered to the Church of what sort soever they were for all the Sermons of the Prophets of Christ and his Apostles are not set down in so many words as they used in the speaking of them for of twelve Apostles seven wrote nothing which yet preached and did many things neither are all the deeds of Christ and his Apostles written for that is contradicted Iohn 20. 30 31. and 21. 25. but we mean onely a Relative perfection which for some certain ends sake agreeth to the Scripture as to an instrument according to which it perfectly comprehendeth all things which have been are or shall be necessary for the salvation of the Church Thirdly The several Books of Scripture are indeed perfect for their own particular ends purposes and uses for which they were intended of the Lord but yet not any one Book is sufficient to the common end the whole Scripture is compleat in all the parts thereof one speaking of that which another doth wholly pass over in silence one clearly delivering what was intricâ—te in another Paul speaks much of Justification and Predestination in the Epistle to the Romans nothing of the Eucharist or Resurrection Fourthly Since God did reveal his will in writing those writings which by divine hand and providence were extant in the Church were so sufficient for the Church in that age that it needed not Tradition neither was it lawful for any humane wight to adde thereto or take therefrom but when God did reveal more unto it the former onely was not then sufficient without the latter Fifthly The holy Scripture doth sufficiently contain and deliver all doctrines which are necessary for us to eternal salvation both in respect of faith and good works and most of these it delivereth to us expresly and in so many words and the rest by good and necessary consequence The Baptism of Infants and the consubstantiality of the Father and of the Son are not in those words expressed in Scripture yet is the truth of both clearly taught in Scripture and by evident proof may thence be deduced That Article of Christs descent into Hell totidem verbis is not in the Scripture yet it may be deduced thence Acts. 2 27. Some Papists hold That we must not use the principles of Reason or Consequences in Divinity and require that what we prove be exprest in so many words in scripture These are opposed by Vedelius in
his Rationale Theologicum l 1. c. 3. 4 5. 8. and l. 2 c. 5. 6. and also by Daillè in his Book entituled Laâ—foy fondee sur les Sainctes Escritures 1 Partie He shews there That Christ and his Apostles and the Ancient Fathers in disputing against their Adversaries used consequences drawn from the scripture Mat. 12. 32. Acts 17. 2. 3. and 18 23. Acts 17. 3. opening and alledging St Luke there useth two words very proper for this subject the first signifies to open the other to put one thing neer another to shew that the Apostle proved his conclusions by the scriptures in clearing first the prophecies and in shewing the true sense and after in comparing them with the events the figures with the things and the shadows with the body where the light of the truths of the Gospel of it self shined forth Mat. 22. 29 31 32. He blames them for not having learned the Resurrection of the dead by this sentence of the scripture therefore they ought to have learned it Now the sentence which he alledgeth saith nothing formally and expresly of the Resurrection of the dead but infers it from what he had laid down Hic Dominum uti principiis rationis naturae adeo manifestum est ut ne Veronius quidem Magister Artis negandi negare illud possit Vedel Rat. Theol. l. â— c. 6. vide plura ibid. c. 5. The Ancient Fathers prove by consequences drawn from scripture that God the Father is without beginning against the Sabellians and that the Son is consubstantial with the Father against the Arrians that Christ hath two Natures against the Eutychians The Papists will not be able to prove their Purgatory and many other of their corrupt opinions by the express words of Scripture We shall now lay down some Propositions or Theoremes about the sufficiency of Scripture First In every Age of the Church the Lord hath revealed so much supernatural truth as was for that age necessary unto salvation his wayes he made known to Moses Psal. 103. 7. and his statutes to Israel Deut. 4. 6. Psal. 147. 20. Heb. 1. 1. Therefore that is an erroneous opinion that before the Law written men were saved by the Law of nature and in the time of the Law by the Law of Moses and since in the time of the Gospel by the Word of grace Secondly The substance of all things necessary to salvation ever since the fall of Adam hath been and is one and the same as the true Religion hath been one and unchangeable 1. The knowledge of God and Christ is the summe of all things necessary to salvation Ioh. 17. 3. Col. 2. 2. but this knowledge was ever necessary Ier. 9. 23. Act. 4. 12. the fathers indeed saw Christ more obscurely and aenigmatically we more clearly distinctly and perspicuously but yet they knew him and believed in him unto salvation as well as we Ioh. 8. 56. 2. The Covenant of grace which God made with man is an everlasting Covenant therein the Lord hath revealed himself to be one and unchangeable as in nature so in will Heb. 13. 8. Rom. 3. 29. shewing that as God is one in nature truth and constancy and that as well toward the Gentiles as toward the Jews so he would justifie both the Circumcision and Uncircumcision the Jew and the Gentile by one way of Religion that is to say through faith and belief in his Sonne Jesus Christ. 3. Christ and his Apostles professed and taught no new Religion but the same which the Scriptures of the Old Testament did before instruct Matth. 5. 17. Iohn 5. 39. Acts 10. 43. Luke 24. 25 26 27 44 45. Acts 18. 28. and 17. 7. and 26. 22. and 28. 23. Rom. 6. 26. Therefore the believing Jews and the converted Gentiles are stiled the children of faithfull Abraham being justified by Faith as Abraham was Whence we may conclude that before under and after the Law since the fall of Adam there was never but one true Catholick Religion or way to Heaven and happiness Thirdly The Word of God being uttered in old time sundry wayes was at length made known by writing the Lord stirring up and by his holy Spirit inspiring his servants to write his will and pleasure Fourthly So long as there was any truth in any Age necessary to be more fully and clearly known then was already revealed in the Books of Moses it pleased God to stirre up holy men whom he divinely inspired and sufficiently furnished to make the Truth known unto the Church thus after Moses during the time of the Law the Lord raised up Prophets who opened the perfect way of life unto the Church of the Old Testament more clearly then it was before manifested in the Books of Moses the Time and Age of the Church requiring the same The Church of the Jews in the several Ages thereof was sufficiently taught and instructed in all things necessary to Salvation by the writings of Moses and the Prophets which appears 1. In that our Saviour being asked of one What he should do that he might inherit eternal life answered What is written in the Law and Prophets How readest thou Luke 10. 25 26. and out of the Scripture he declared himself to be the Saviour of the world fore-told and promised Matth. 21. 44. and 26. 31. Luk 4. 21. and 24 25 26 27 44. Ioh. 3. 14. 2. The answer of Abraham to the rich man sending his friends to Moses and the Prophets sheweth that they sufficed to instruct the faithful Jews in all things necessary to Salvation Luk. 16. 29 30. by them they might learn how to obtain Life and escape Death when he saith Let them hear them he meaneth them only as that place is meant Mat. 17. 5. The Jews themselves acknowledged the sufficiency of those writings to lead them unto life and happiness Ioh. 5. 39. Fifthly The Prophets did expound the Law of God and speak more plainly precisely and distinctly touching the coming of the Messias then Moses did but the last full and clear Will of God touching the Salvation of man was not manifeâ—â—ed by them that was together and at once to be published and taught by the Messias who also at his coming did establish that order in the Church of God which was to continue therein for ever For 1. Christ was ordained of the Father to be the great Doctor of his Church a Prophet more excellent then the rest that were before him both in respect of his Person Office Manner of receiving his Doctrine and the excellency of the Doctrine which he delivered 2. This was well known not only among the Jews but also among the Samaritans insomuch that the woman of Samaria could say I know when the Messias is come he will tell us all things Joh. 4. 25. 3. The time wherein God spake unto us by his Sonne is called the last dayes or the last time Heb. 1. 2. 1 Pet. 1. 20. to note that
we are not hereafter to expect or look for any fuller or more clear Revelation of Divine Mysteries then that which was then delivered 4. Christ is called a Mediator of the New Testament or the New Covenant Heb. 9. 15. because all things are established by him as they ought to continue for ever for that which is old decayeth and is ready to vanish but that which is new abideth Heb. 8. 13. 5. It pleased the Lord in great wisdom to reveal the Covenant of grace to the Church that she might not despair but obscurely at the first that she might earnestly long for the coming of that Messiah who was to make known what he had heard and seen of the Father which dispensation was needful that the grace of God might not be contemned as haply it would have been if God had fully revealed and made known his bounty unto man before he had seen his misery and the necessity thereof Our Saviour Christ for substance of Doctrine necessary to Salvation taught nothing which was not before in some sort contained in the writings of Moses and the Prophets out of whom he confirmed his Doctrine but that which was in them more obscurely aenigmatically and briefly he explained more excellently fully and clearly the Apostles proved their Doctrine out of the Book of Moses and the Prophets Act. 17. 11. and 26. 22. Luke 24. 27. Rom. 1. 2. Act. 28. 23. Sixthly All things necessary in that manner as we have spoken were taught and inspired to the Apostles by our Saviour Christ and there were no new inspirations after their times nor are we to expect further hereafter which we prove 1. By places of Scripture Ioh. 14. 26. he that teacheth all things omitteth nothing Christ said all things to his Apostles as appears Iohn 15. 15. and 17. 8. Iohn 16. 13. 2. By reasons drawn from thence 1. The plentiful pouring forth of the Spirit was deferred till the glorifying of Christ he being glorified it was no longer to be delayed Christ being exalted on the right-hand of God obtained the Spirit promised and that was not according to measure and poured the same in such abundance as it could be poured forth and received by men so that was fulfilled which was fore-told by Ioel 2. 28. Acts 2. 33. Iohn 3. 34 35. Acts 2. 16 17. 2. The Scripture and the Prophecies of the Old Testament do teach and declare That all Divine Truth should fully and at once be manifested by the Messias who is the only Prophet high-Priest and King of his Church there is no other Revelation promised none other needful besides that which was made by him Isa. 11. 9. Act. 3. 23 24. Ioel 2. 23. Vide Mercerum in loc therefore the last inspiration was made to the Apostles and none other to be expected The Doctrine of the Law and the Prophets did suffice to Salvation yet it did send the Fathers to expect somewhat more perfect 1 Pet. 1. 10. but to the preaching of the Gospel nothing is to be added we are not sent to wait for any clearer vision 3. So long as any truth needful to be known was unrevealed or not plainly taught the Lord did stir up some Prophet or other to teach the same unto the Church therfore the Lord surceasing to speak since the publishing of the Gospel of Jesus Christ and the delivery of the same in writing is unto us a manifest token that the whole will of God is now brought to light and that no new Revelation is to be expected Our seventh Proposition is Christ and his Apostles were able to propound and teach by lively voice that Doctrine which pertains to perfection Iohn 1. 18. and 11. 11 32. Iohn 8. 26 and the Apostles perfectly taught all things which are or shall be necessary for the Church Acts 20. 27. Gal. 1. 7 8 9. The Doctrine of repentance and remission of sins in the name of Christ doth summarily contain all things necessarily to salvation Act. 5. 31. and 11. 11. but this Doctrine the Apostles preached Act. 13. 38 39. Luke 24. 47. The Word of God is not only Milk for Babes but strong Meat for men of ripe years 1 Cor. 3. 1 2. Heb. 5. 14. and 6. 1 2. therefore it containeth not only matter of preparation but of perfection Our eighth Proposition is The summe and substance of that heavenly Doctrine which was taught by the Prophets and Apostles was by them committed to writing the holy Ghost giving them a commandment and guiding their hands therein that they could not erre so that the Word preached and written by them is one in substance both in respect of matter which is the will and word of God and inward form viz. the Divine Truth immediatly inspired though different in the external form and manner of delivery Our ninth Proposition is That nothing is necessary to be known of Christian over and above that which is found in the Old Testament which is not clearly anâ— evidently contained in the Books of the Apostles and Evangelists Our last Proposition is that all things which have been are or shall be necessary to the salvation of the Church to the end of the world are perfectly contained in the writings of the Prophets and Apostles long since divinely inspired writteâ— and published and now received by the Church of God so that no new Reveltion or Tradition beside those inspired published and comprehended in the Scripture are necessary for the salvation of the Church There are three opinions 1. Of the Papists who altogether deny it 2. Of the Socinians which would have all things expresly contained in Scripture and if it be â—â—â— totidem verbis they reject it 3. Of the Orthodox who say it contains all things expresly or by consequence Crocius in his Antiweigelius cap. 1. Quaest. 8. shews that private Revelation Dreams Conferences with Angels are not to be desired and expected in matters â—â— faith the Canon of the Scripture being now compleat The Weigelians talk of â—â— Seculum Spiritus Sancti as God the Father had his time the time of the Lâ—â— Christ his time the time of the Gospel so say they the holy Ghost shall â—â—â— his time when there shall be higher dispensations and we shall be wiser then the Apostles See Mat. 24. 14. and 28. 20. 1 Cor. 11. 26. See Mr Gillesp. Miscel. c. 10. Some say the Scriptures are but for the training up of Christians during their â—â—nority as Grammar rules for boyes and are not able to acquaint the soul â—â— the highest discoveries of God and truth And most corruptly they serve themselâ—â—â— with that expression of the Apostle 1 Cor. 13. 11. This Glasse say they is â—â—â— Scriptures through which we see something of God indeed whilst we are â—â—â—â—dren in understanding but very obscurely and brokenly and therefore say theâ—â—â— if ye would discern of God clearly and see him as he is ye must break the Glasse and look quite beyond Scriptures
infallible ground there is none such of supernatural truth but the Scripture Because our Adversaries do contend for Traditions not written hotly and zealously against the total perfection of the Scripture that they might thrust upon us many points by their own confession not contained in Scripture and usurp to themselves irrefragable authority in the Church it shall not be amisse largely to consider of this matter And first to enquire of the signification of the words Greek and Latine which are translated Tradition and then to come to the matter which is controverted between us and the Papists The Greek word signifying Tradition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which in the New Testament is used onely in these places Matth. 15. 2 3 6. Mark 7. 3 5 8 9 13. 1 Cor. 11. 2. Gal. 1. 14. Colos 2. 8. 2 Thess. 2. 15. and 3. 6. and in the vulgar Latine is rendred Traditio Mat. 15. 2 3 6. Mark 7. 3 5 8 9 13. Gal. 1. 14. Col. 2. 6. 2 Thess. 2. 15. and 3. 6. and Praecepta 1 Cor. 11. 2. Whereto the Rhemists translation which seemeth to be but a bare translation of the Vulgar Latin doth wholly agree using the word Tradition every where excepting 1 Cor. 11. 2. where they use the word Pâ—ecepts but set in the margent the word Tradition Arias Montanus in his interlineal Translation doth render it Traditio Beza doth commonly express it by the word traditio In the English Geneva Bible we translate it by the word Instruction Tradition calling mens precepts Traditions the Apostles Doctrine Ordinances or Instructions not that we feared the word Tradition but because we would not have the simple deceived as though the unwritten verities of the Papists were thereby commended or as though we had some honourable conceit of them and what we did herein the signification of the word doth give us free liberty to do in our last English Translation we use the word Tradition as often as the Vulgar Latine or the Rhemists have done not that we were driven by fear or shame to alter what was done before but because we would cut off all occasion of carping at our Translation though never so unjust First We contend not about the name Tradition the word may lawfully be used if the sense affixed thereto be lawful 2. All Traditions unwritten are not simply condemned by us 3. The Apostles delivered by lively voice many observations dispensable and alterable according to the circumstances of time and persons appertaining to order and comelinesse only we say That they were not of the substance of Religion that they were not general concerning all Churches 4. We receive the number and names of the Authors of Books Divine and Canonical as delivered by tradition but the Divine Truth of those Books is in it self clear and evident unto us not depending on the Churches Authority The Books of Scripture have not their Authority quoad nos from the approbation of the Church but win credit of themselves and yield sufficient satisfaction to all men of their Divine Truth whence we judge the Church that receiveth them to be led by the Spirit of God yet the Number Authors and Integrity of the parts of those Books we receive as delivered by Tradition 5. The continued practice of such things as are neither expresly contained in Scripture nor the example of such practice expresly there delivered though the Grounds Reasons and cause of the necessity of such practice be there contained and the benefit and good that followeth of it we receive upon Tradition though the thing it self we receive not for Tradition Of this sort is the Baptism of Infants which may be named a Tradition because it is not expresly delivered in Scripture that the Apostles did baptize â—nfants nor any expresse precept there found that they should so do yet is not this so received by bare and naked Tradition but that we finde the Scripture to deliver unto us the ground of it Bellarmine and Maldonat both do confesse That the Baptism of Infants may be proved by the Scripture and therefore Maldonat concludes Nobis verò traditio non est Bellarmine as Whitaker shews contradicts himself for first he saith That the Baptism of Infants is an unwritten Tradition and after That the Catholicks can prove Baptism of Infants from the Scriptures To this head we may referre the observation of the Lords-day the precept whereof is not found in Scripture though the practice be And if for that cause any shall name it a Tradition we will not contend about the word if he grant withall that the example Apostolical hath the force of a Law as implying a common equity concerning us no lesse then it did them If any man shall call the summary comprehension of the chief heads of Christian Doctrine contained in the Creed commonly called The Apostles Creed a Tradition we will not contend about it For although every part thereof be contained in Scripture yet the orderly connexion and distinct explication of those principal Articles gathered into an Epitome wherein are implied and whence are inferred all Conclusions Theological is an Act humane not divine and in that sense may be called a Tradition But let it be noted withall that we admit it not to have that credit as now it hath to be the Rule of Faith for this is the priviledge of holy Scripture The Creed it self was gathered out of Scripture and is to be expounded by the Scripture therefore it is not given to be a perfect Canon of faith and manners By Tradition is noted 1. Whatsoever is delivered by men divinely inspired and immediately called whether it be by lively voice or by writing 2. In special it notes the word of God committed to writing 1 Cor. 15. 3. 3. It signifies Rites expresly contained in writing Act. 6. 14. 4. It betokens that which is not committed to writing but only delivered by lively voice of the Apostles 5. It signifieth that which is invented and delivered by men not immediately called In Scripture Tradition is taken 1. In good part for any Rite or Doctrine of God delivered to his Church either by word or writing whether it concern faith and good works or the external Government of the Church 2 Thess. 2. 15. 1 Cor. 11. 15. and 23. 2. In ill part it noteth the vain idle and unwarrantable inventions of men whether Doctrine or Rites Mat. 15. 3. Mar. 7. 8 9. When the Fathers speak reverently of Traditions by the word Tradition either they understand the holy Scripture which also is a Tradition it is a Doctrine left unto us Or by Traditions they understand observations touching Ecclesiastical policy Du Moulin Reasons confirming the sufficiency of Scripture against Popish Traditions 1. The whole Church is founded upon the Doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles which were not true if any Doctrine was necessary to Salvation not revealed by the Prophets and Apostles 2.
The Prophets and Christ and his Apostles condemn Traditions Isa. 29. 13. Mat. 15. 3 6. Col. 2. 8. Therefore they are not to be received Christ opposeth the Commandment and Scriptures to Traditions therefore he condemns Traditions not written If the Jews might not adde to the Books of Moses then much lesse may we adde to the Canon of Scripture so much increased since 3. Those things which proceed from the will of God only can be made known to us no other way but by the Revelation of the Scripture all Articles of Faith and Precepts of Manners concerning substance of Religion proceed from the will of God only Mat. 16. 17. 1 Cor. 2. 9 10 11. Gal. 1. 8. As in this place the Apostle would have nothing received besides that which he preached so 1 Cor. 4. 6. He will have nothing admitted above or more then that which is written See Act. 26. 22. Iohn 20. ult Whence it is manifest that all necessary things may be found in Scripture since full and perfect Faith ariseth from thence which eternal salvation followeth Bellarmine saith Iohn speaks only of the miracles of Christ that he wrote not all because those sufficed to perswade the world that Christ was the Son of God Those words indeed in ver 30. are to be understood of Christs miracles but those in ver 31. rather are to be generally interpreted for the History only of the miracles sufficeth not to obtain Faith or Life The Question betwixt the Papists and us is De ipsa Doctrina tradita non de tradendi modo touching the substance of the Doctrine delivered not of the manner of delivering it and of Doctrine delivered as the Word of God not of Rites and Ceremonies They maintain that there be doctrinal Traditions or Traditions containing Articles of Faith and substantial matters of Divine Worship and Religion not found in the holy Scriptures viz. Purgatory Invocation of Saints Adoration of Images Papal Monarchy Bellarmine and before him Peresius distinguisheth Traditions both from the Authors and the Matter From the Authors into Divine Apostolical and Ecclesiastical From the Matter into those which are concerning Faith and concerning Manners into perpetuall and temporall universall and particular necessary and free Divine Traditions that is Doctrines of Faith and of the Worship and service of God any of which we deny to be but what are comprized in the written Word of God Apostolick Traditions say they are such Ordinances as the Apostles prescribed for ceremony and usage in the Church as the observation of the memorial of the Nativity Death and Resurrection of Christ the alteration of the seventh day from the Jews Sabbath to the day of Christs Resurrection Ecclesiastical ancient Customs which by degrees through the Peoples consent obtained the force of a Law Traditions concerning Faith as the perpetuall Virginity of Mary the Mother of Christ and that there are onely four Gospels of Manners as the sign of the Crosse made in the Fore-head Fasts and Feastings to be observed on certain dayes Perpetual which are to be kept to the end of the World Temporal for a certain time as the observation of certain legal Ceremonies even to the full publishing of the Gospel Universal Traditions which are delivered to the whole Church to be kept as the observation of Easter Whit sontide and other great Feasts Particular which is delivered to one or more Churches as in the time of Augustine fasting on the Sabbath-day which was kept only at Rome Necessary Traditions which are delivered in the form of a Precept that Easter is to be celebrated on the Lords Day Free which are delivered in the form of a Councel as sprinkling of holy Water Object The Scripture is not perfect with a perfection of parts because many parts are either defective or excessive 1. Some labour with a defect as Genes 11. 12. a person is omitted in the Genealogy of Canaan which was the Sonne of Arphaxad but it is reckoned in Luke in Christs Genealogy not in the Old Testament therefore there is a defect Answ. Luke reckons it according to the vulgar opinion of the Jews Iunius in his Parallels would have the fault to be in the Septuagint whom Luke followed not approving of their errour but yielding to the time least the Gospel otherwise should have been prejudiced but Beza's opinion is rather to be approved of that this word is inserted from the Ignorance of those who undertook to correct this Text according to the Translation of the Seventy Interpreters For in an Ancient Manuscript which Beza followed this word Canaan was not to be found therefore he omitted it in his Translation and so hath our great English Bible Object There is something found in the Scripture against the Commandment of God Deut. 4. 2. therefore there is excess as well as defect for many Books which we believe to be Canonical are added Answ. He doth not forbid adding by Gods Command but from the will of man for God himself added afterward The Papists Arguments for Traditions answered Object Bellarmine saith Religion was preserved for two thousand years from Adam to Moses onely by Tradition therefore the Scripture is not simply necessary Ans. By the like reason I might argue That Religion was long preserved not only without the Pope of Rome but also without Baptism and the Lords Supper with the like Institutions therefore they are not simply necessary yet none of ours hold the Scriptures simply necessary 2. It is false that Religion was preserved all that while by ordinary Tradition only for the living voice of God sounded most perpetually in the Church and the Doctrine of Religion was conveyed successively from the Father to the Son which living voice of God by little and little ceasing writing afterward succeeded and hath the same necessity now which Gods living voice had before Object Whatsoever things are commended from Scripture are necessary but so are Traditions Ergò They are necessary Iohn 16. 12. I have yet many things to say unto you but ye cannot bear them now therefore say they the Lord spake many things which are not written Answ. 1. He saith not that he had many things to tell them which he had not taught them before but which they were not now so well capable of For it appeareth that he taught them that which they understood not and therefore they needed to be further taught of them by the holy Ghost which should not teach them any new thing that Christ had not taught but onely make them understand that which they had been taught of our Saviour Christ. 2. If the holy Ghost did teach them any thing which our Saviour Christ had not before spoke unto them of yet that makes nothing for Traditions seeing that which the holy Spirit taught them he taught them out of the Scriptures 3. If the holy Ghost should have taught the Apostles some things which neither
Christ had told them of nor the Scriptures had taught them yet this is rather against the Papists For that which the holy Ghost taught them they undoubtedly left in record unto the Church as being faithful stewards and revealing the whole counsel of God unto the people 4. It hath been the practice of Hereticks as Augustine affirmeth at all times to cover their dreams and phantasies with this sentence of our Saviour Christ. Lastly If it be asked What were those grave and great mysteries which the Apostles could not for their rudeness bear they are forsooth oyl and spittle in Baptism Candles light at noon dayes which was not in the darker time of the Law baptizing of Bels and such like gue-gaws as the grossest and carnallest men are fittest to receive Object 2 Thess 2. 15. Therefore Brethron stand fast and hold the Traditions which ye have been taught whether by word or our Epistle From these words say our Adversaries it appears that all things were not written Et nullum Papistae in Scripturis locum probabiliorem inveniunt saith Whitaker The Hereticks say the Rhemists on this place purposely guilefully and of ill conscience refrain in their Translations from the Ecclesiastical and most usual word Tradition evermore when it is taken in good part though it expresse most exactly the signification of the Greek word but when it soundeth in their fond phantasie against the Traditions of the Church as indeed in true sense it never doth there they use it most gladly Here therefore and in the like places that the Reader may not so easily like of Traditions unwritten commended by the Apostle they translate Instructions Constitutions Ordinances and what they can invent else to hide the Truth from the simple or unwary Reader whose Translations have none other end but to beguile such by Art and Conveyance Thus farre the Rhemists Paul taught the Thessalonians some things by word of mouth which he taught them not in his two Epistles which he wrote unto them therefore he taught some Doctrins which he wrote not as if that Paul wrote no more Epistles then these two whereby that which he taught not them in writing unto them he taught them by writing unto others Secondly How followeth this Argument Paul wrote not all the Doctrines of God unto the Thessalonians therefore they are not all written in the Prophetical and Evangelical writings whereas it is plainly testified that the Old Testament containeth a perfect Rule of the Doctrine of salvation the New being written for a Declaration of the fulfilling and further clearing of that in the Old Testament Thirdly It appeareth manifestly in the Acts what was the summe of that which Paul taught the Thessalonians by word of mouth For there it is witnessed that Paul taught out of the Scriptures that it behoved Christ to suffer and rise again from the dead and that Jesus was Christ this teaching then by word is there limited to the Scriptures of the Law and Prophets Neither ought it to seem strange that this was the summe of all which the Apostle taught at Thessalonica where he he tarried so small a while when amongst the Corinthians where he remained longest of any place and consequently taught most he sheweth that he taught nothing but Christ and him crucified Fourthly The Apostle himself in this very place calling vers 14. whatsoever he taught by word or wrote by the name of the Gospel doth declare evidently that he taught nothing but that which is contained in Scripture seeing the Apostle defineth the Gospel which he preached to be that which is contained in the Scriptures Fifthly That the Thessalonians had some part of Christian Doctrine delivered by word of mouth that is by the Apostles preaching at such time as he did write unto them and some part by his Epistles the Text enforceth us to grant But that the Church at this day or ever since the Testament was written had any Tradition by word of mouth necessary to salvation which was not contained in the Old and New Testament we will never grant The Papists do commonly abuse the name of Tradition which signifieth properly a delivery or a thing delivered for such a matter as is delivered onely by word of mouth and so received from hand to hand that is never put in writing but hath his credit without the holy Scripture of God as the Jews had their Cabala and the Scribes and the Pharisees their Traditions besides the Law of God For the justifying of our Translation it is true that we alter according to the circumstances of the place especially considering that the word Tradition which of it self is indifferent as well to that which is written as to that which is not written hath been of us and them appropriated to note forth onely unwritten Constitutions therefore we must needs avoid in such places as this the word Traditions though our last Translation useth it where the simple might be deceived to think that the Holy Ghoâ—t did ever commend any such to the Church which he would not have committed to writing in the holy Scriptures and in stead of the word so commonly taken although it do not necessarily signifie any such matter we doe use such words as doe truely expresse the Apostles meaning and the Greek word doth also signifie therefore we use these words Ordinances or Instructions Institutions or the Doctrine delivered all which being of one or near sense the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth signifie and the same doth Tradition signifie if it be rightly understood Object 1 Timothy 6. 20. O Timothy Keep that which is committed to thy trust By the name of pledge saith Bellarmine not the Scripture but the treasure of unwritten Doctrine is understood Depositum say the Rhemists is the whole Doctrine of Christianity being taught by the Apostles and delivered their Successors Answ. Though other learned men interpret this pledge or gage to be the gift of the Holy Ghost yet we willingly acknowledge that it is to be understood of the Doctrine of Christianity as that which hath best ground both by circumstance of this and conference of other places Whence we inferre That the Doctrine of truth is not the Churches Decrees but the Lords given to the Church to keep only wherewith the Title of a pledge cannot stand unlesse one may lay to pledge a thing in his own hands since in Popery the Church her self maketh the Doctrine which her self taketh to pledge Herein they handle it like a pledge that they lock it up fast where the people of God for whose use it is given to be kept cannot come unto it What had become of the Law of God if others had not been more faithful keepers of it then the Priests to whom the principal Copy thereof written with the finger of God himself was committed There are some points of faith not contained in the Scripture neither in the Old nor New
the person if it be publick in regard of the means is not forbidden for it is lawful for one man with Scripture Toti resistere mundo saith the Glosse of the Canon-Law the meaning of this place is That the Prophets were no Interpreters or Messengers of their own mindes but Gods The Catholicks hold saith Chamier meaning still by that Title the Protestants that the Scripture is to be interpreted by private labour and industry viz. of Augustine Ierom Chrysostom but not in a private sense that is in a sense arising from the brain of the Interpreter It is true saith Cartwright against the Rhemists that the Scriptures cannot be expounded of every private spirit nor which is more of any private spirit nor yet of all private spirits together but only of those which are inspired of God viz. the Prophets and Apostles which are here opposed unto private Interpretation And therefore it is evident That the Exposition of the Scripture ought not to be fetched from Ecclesiastical either Fathers or Councels which speak not by Inspiration but from the Scriptures themselves what he meaneth he declareth in the next verse where he sheweth the reason of his saying namely that it must be interpreted as it was written and by as high Authority Seeing therefore it was first spoken by holy men which spake as they were led by the holy Spirit and were inspired of God it followeth that it must be interpreted by the same Authority The Interpretation therefore that is brought out of the Apostles and Prophets is not private although it be avowed by one man only On the other side that Interpretation which is not brought from thence although it have the allowance of whole general Councels is but private This is a principal meaning of our Saviour Christ when he willeth that we should call no man Father or Master in the earth that is in matter of Doctrine we should depend upon the Authority of no man nor of all men in the earth but only upon Christ and upon God Our reasons by which we prove that the chiefest Judgment and Authority of interpreting Scriptures is to be given not to the Church but to the Scriptures themselves and the holy Ghost 1. That which only hath power to beget faith that only hath the chiefest Authority of interpreting Scripture and of determining all Controversies concerning Faith and Religion but the Scriptures onely and the Holy Ghost have this force Rom. 10. 17. The Holy Ghost onely can infuse saving Faith into our hearts which is called by the Schoolmen Infusa Fides The Faith which we have from the Church is acquired and sufficeth not to a certain perswasion 2. The Scriptures cannot be interpreted but by the same Spirit wherewith they were written that Spirit is found no where but in the Scripture whosoever have promises from God to understand the Scripture may interprett it but so have all the faithfull 3. Christ himself makes the Scripture a Judge Iohn 12. 48. and still appealed to it 4. Although the Fathers were men indued of God with excellent gifts and brought no small light to understanding of the Scriptures yet learned men in our dayes may give a right sense of sundry places thereof which the Fathers saw not yea against the which perhaps they consent Hath any man living read all the Fathers Nay have all the men living read them Nay Can they shew them Can they get them I had almost said Can they name them In the Exposition of those words Tu es Petrus super hanc petram almost every one of the Fathers at least the most part of them and the best expound it of Peters faith yet the Papists understand it non de fide sed de persona Petri. Here they disagree themselves from the Fathers Iohn 10. 16. by the title of one Shepheard Augustine Chrysostome Ierome Cyril Theodoret Theophylact Euthimius Rupertus Cyprian and other Fathers agree that Christ is theredesigned but Stapleton saith the Pope is there meant In the Division of the Law they go clean contrary to the greatest part of the Fathers for they divide the Commandments as we do but the Papists make the two first one and the tenth two 2. They have no father to countenance them in this but Augnstine Revet de Authoritate Patrum c. 5 6 7. There were no writings of the Fathers for a time many of them wrote 400 years after Christ but some 500 and 600 years after Christ what rule had they before that time of interpreting Scriptures The Fathers were given too much to allegorizing Cajetane therefore in the Preface of his Commentaries upon the Books of Moses saith That the exposition of the Scripture is not tied by God to the sense of the Fathers therefore he admonisheth his Readers not to take it ill if he sometime dissent from the stream of the Fathers 4. The Doctrine of the Church must be examined by the Scriptures Acts 17. 11. If Pauls doctrine much more may the decrees of the Pope Church Councels be examined by the Scriptures 5. The interpretation of the Scripture is a gift freely given by God for the edification of the Church Rom. 12. 6. 1 Cor. 12. 10. therefore it is not tied to a certain kinde of men but common to the faithful 6. The faithful are commanded diligently to try and examine every doctrine 1 Thess. 5. 21. 1 Iohn 4. 1. which cannot be altogether done without interpretation What means must be used in the interpretation of Scripture The end of the Scripture we heard was to direct the Church to all saving truth The means to be used for the attaining of that end by the Minister is diligent study and humble Prayer by the People attentive reading hearing prayer and meditating First the Teachers must pray earnestly to God for his spirit to inlighen them Mat. 7. 7 8 9. Rom. 15. The Scriptures are understood by that spirit that dictated them Secondly The Pastors and Teachers of the Church must diligently and painfully study the Scriptures giving themselves to read compare place with place Iohn 5. 39. Search the Scriptures it is a metaphor taken from such as search for Gold and Silver Oar in the earth who will search and sift and break every clod to finde out the gold Solomon useth the same metaphor Prov. 2. 4. and to this diligence in searching doth the Apostle exhort Timothy 1 Tim. 4. 13. This diligence of often exprest in Scripture in the Old Testament by the phrase of meditating in the word Iosh. 1. 8. Psal. 1. 2. Thirdly they must labour for a competent knowledge in the original tongues the Hebrew and Greek in which the Scripture was written that so they may consult with the Hebrew Text in the Old and the Greek in the New Testament and see with their own not anothers eyes as Gen. 3. 15. The Papists read it corruptly She shall break here the original soon determines the
constitution he can bear it without any disturbance and this hath a woe Woe to those that are strong to drink that have strong brains and bodies to carry their liquor away and never cry out with him Duos soles video 2. Actual either total and compleat when reason is fully intercepted and that is to be stark drunk to be a vivum cadaver as Chrysostome cals it well a breathing carkasse one cals them Ventri-dâ—mones belly-devils who like Dâ—genes could live in a barrel all their life time 2. Partial when a mans fancy is not wholly disturbed yet he is so farre tipled that both his fancy and judgement are darkned and the house runs round with him Means to avoid it 1. Shun the company of drunkards and all occasions 2. Cry to God to help you against this vice and consider the terrible threats against it 1 Cor. 6. 9. 3. Get thy sensual appetite mortified 4. Taste of Christs wine the sweetnesse of having Communion with him Ephes. 5. 18. CHAP. XVIII Of Envy Error Flattery Gluttony ENVY ENvy is a grief for the prosperity of others Est aegritudo suscepta propter alterius res secundas quae nihil noceant invidenti The first instances that we have of sinne are Adams pride and Cains envy Envy is the mother of strife they are often coupled Rom. 1. 29. 13. 13. 1 Cor. 3. 3. 2 Cor. 12. 20. Gal. 5. 20. Iam. 3. 14. Natural corruption doth most of all bewray it self by envy The Devil first envied us the favour of God and ever since we have envied one another The children of God are often surprized with it Numb 11. 29. Iohn 21. 20 21. It breaketh both Tables at once it beginneth in discontent with God and endeth in injury to man Macrobius l. 2. Sat. c. 2. saith acutely of Mutius a malevolous man being sadder then he was wont Aut Mutio nescio quid incommodi accessit aut nescio cui aliquid boni The Heathens when they saw an envious man sad they would demand whether harm had happened unto him or good unto his neighbour Aristotle cals it the Antagonist of the Fortunate Parum alicui est si ipse sit foelix nisi alter fuerit infoelix Livor semper lippus est saith Petrarch this humour is alwayes ill-sighted All blear-eyed men are offended and hurt with the light so envy is provoked at anothers good and honour The better the party envied is the better he behaveth himself the more bitter the envier doth grow against him and the more his hatred increaseth Saul had still a more violent spleen against David by how much he discovered more wisdom courage and the more the hearts of his servants were set upon him Who can stand before envy saith Salomon Prov. 27. 4. It is the rottennesse of the bones Pro. 14. 3. and so the justest of all vices because it bringeth with it its own vengeance Sed videt ingratos intabescitque videndo Successus hominum carpitque carpitur unà Suppliciumque suum est Ovid. Met. 11. Fab. 12. As the rust consumes iron so this vice the envious man Anacharsis cals it serram animae and Socrates Ulcus When Hercules had vanquished so many fierce monsters Comperit invidiam supremo fine domandam He grapled at last with envy as the worst Erasm. lib. 17. of his Epist. in an Epistle to Sir Thomas More saith of Conradus Goclenius Invidere quid sit ne per somnium quidem unquam intellexit tantus est ingenii candor The objectum quod of it is Good of any kinde true apparent honest profitable pleasant of minde body fortune fame vertue it self not excepted the objectum cui is generally any other man Superiour Inferiour Equal We envy a Superiour because we are not equalled to him an Inferiour least he should be equal to us an Equal because he is our equal Men of the same Trade or Profession envy each other Figulus figulo invidet Faber Fabro Death frees a man from it Extra omnem invidiae aleam Pascitur in vivis livor c. The chief cause of it is pride and inordinate love of a mans self the impulsive cause is manifold as if he be an enemy a corrival Hatred when one loaths and wisheth ill to another agrees with envy 1. In the subject alwayes he which envies another hates him but not on the contrary Secondly In the efficient cause which is pride and a blinde love of a mans self It differs from it First In the subject for hatred may be in one in whom envy is not Secondly In the objectum quod which in envy is only good but in hatred it may be evil Thirdly In the objectum cui which is larger in hatred then envy for we envy men only not God nor our selves but others but we may hate not only other men but our selves and other creatures yea God himself Error Error is to judge otherwise then the thing is taking truth for falshood or falshood for truth Usquequaque fidei venena non cessant spargere saith Augustine of his times In Gregory Nazianzens dayes there were six hundred errors in the Church Selat on 1 Cor. 11. 18 19. The Doctrine onely of the Trinity remains undefiled in Popery Obstinately to defend an error in things indifferent makes a man a Schismatick and in points necessary and fundamental an Heretick It is the greatest judgement in the world to be given over to error Revel 13. 8. Iudâ— v. 4. 2 Thes. 2. 11. All the primitive Fathers spend most of their zeal and painful writings against heresies and errors All the Primitive Churches to whom the Apostles wrote Epistles areexpresly warned either positively to stand fast in the truth to hold fast their profession or negatively to beware of and to avoid false teachers and not to be carried about with divers and strange Doctrines See Mr Gillesp. Misc. c. 11. 12. It is not difficult to enumerate those heresies which gave occasion for the introducing of every Article in the Creed Vide Sanfordum de Descensu Christi ad inferâ—s l. 4. p. 29 30. It was well concluded in the 39 Session of the Councel of Constance That every tenth year at the farthest there should be a general Councel held to reform such errors in the Church as probably in that time would arise Preservatives from error 1. Have a care to be established in the truths of God 2 Pet. 1. 12. specially the main truths of religion look to repentance faith daily examination Matth. 13. 45. Rom. 6. 17. Corrupt teachers beguile none but unstable souls 2. Get experimental knowledge Ephes. 3. 17. and mourn to see the truths of Christ corrupted Revel 11. 3. 3. Love not any sin 2 Tim. 2. 19. 4. Try the Spirits 1 Iohn 4. 1. Every man pretends to speak by the Spirit bring their Doctrine to the rule try to what end the Doctrine tends whether to exalt God and abase man Matth. 7.
in him and cry to him to be saved from the guilt power punishment of their sins shall be saved for therefore hath he ascended and is glorified that he might become a perfect Saviour to his Church If he had not entred into Glory by sufferings we should have had no benefit by his Glorification but because he did in this manner conveigh himself to Glory therefore is he become a Captain of our Salvation as the Author to the Hebrews speaketh Let us runne to him in all our fears doubts temptations weaknesses for doth not the Scripture tell that he hath received gifts for men even gifts to bestow upon men not to keep to himself alone but with a liberal hand to distribute unto men yea even to the rebellious that God might dwell among them Cleave to Christ rest on him stay upon him he should lose the glory of his glory the subordinate use of his glory if he did not save them from whom he did both so suffer and so enter into his glory Again Let all the Saints learn to adore admire honour love serve obey this glorious person this surpassing excellent person the Mediator God and Man even the man whom God hath so exalted let us see him by Faith as they by sight see him in Heaven that we may honour praise magnifie and exalt him as they do and obey him submit our selves to him in our measure as they Faith Faith must be our guide we see not Christ with this mortal eye we must see him by the eye of Faith I mean by a lively and full apprehension and perswasion of this his glorious being which the Scripture doth set forth before our eyes and if we unfeignedly and undoubtedly beleeve that he is such a one the great glory whereunto he is entred will make us to glorifie him highly to esteem of him devoutly to worship to bow the knees of our soul alwayes and of our body on fit seasons to him and to count it out happinesse to be subject unto a person so highly advanced by God This is the whole work of those immortal and blessed Spirits which are nigh unto him because their knowledge is more full and perfect too but the more we inform our selves of the excellency of Christ the more shall our souls stoop to him and the more shall we esteem it not our duty alone but our felicity to be at his command God is ascended our Lord Jesus is ascended with the joyful voice of all Saints and Angels which with a divine and heavenly musick entertain him there they sing All honour be unto the Lamb let our souls sing for ever let us cast our selves down before him let us exalt his great and glorious Name let our hearts tongues and lives confesse to him that he is the Lord of glory to whom all glory is to be given that by glorifying him we may glorifie the Father that sent him for He that honours not the Son doth not neither honour the Father Christ glorified hath not laid down any of his Offices First Because certain acts of Office are to be performed in Heaven Iohn 14. 2. Secondly Christ hath not yet given up his Kingdome to his Father 1 Cor. 15. 24. Thirdly It appears by enumeration of the several acts that Christ performs as Mediator in Heaven in reference to each of his Offices I. To his Prophetical so 1. He gives gifts to men furnisheth them with abilities for the Churches service Ephes. 4. 11 12. 2. He sends them forth and will uphold them Rev. 1. 16. the Witnesses shall prophesie till they have finisht their Testimony 3. He takes the measure of the truths taught Ezek 40. 3. his businesse is to resine doctrines 4. He concurs with his Messengers in their Ministery 2 Cor. 5. 12. 31. 2. Isa. 57. 18. Heb. 12. 24 25. 5. When ungodly men prevail against any the Lord raiseth up others in their spirit and power II. To his Priestly Office so 1. As a publick person he represents your persons Heb. 9. 24. See Exod. 28. 12 29. by this means you are made accepted Ephes. 1. 6. 2. You have a memorial Psal. 112. 6. God is alwayes mindful of you 2. The High-Priest was to sprinkle the bloud before the Mercy-seat Levit. 16. 15. Christ offers there the price of his own bloud whereby you obtain Mercy and have it continued for the bloud was carried into the holy place to abide alwayes before the Lord. 3. He hath taken possession for you as your Priest this gives actual right as the price paid a meritorious right 4. He is careful to receive your services Levit. 1. 1 2. to sanctifie them Exod. 28. 3. Revel 8. 3 4. and to offer them to his Father the smoke of the incense comes up out of the Angels hand III. To his Kingly Office Mat. 28. 18. Eph. 1. 21 22. 1. In his present dispensations 1. In protecting his people from danger Isa. 4. 5. Mic. 5. 5. 2. In preserving his Truths and Ordinances Rev. 14. 1 2. 3. By confounding his enemies 2. In his preparations for the time to come 1. He prepares Grace for his people Col. 3. 3. 1 Ioh. 5. 11. 2. Prepares Prayers for them Luk. 21. 31 32. 3. Prepares Glory for them 1 Cor. 2. 9. Ioh. 14. 2. Gods people should exercise Faith on Christ as glorified and in Office in Heaven 1. An act of perswasion that he takes care of them still 2. Of reliance for thy self and the Church 1 Ioh. 2. 1. Psal. 55. 22. 3. Look upon none but Christ Prov. 3. 5. 4. Quiet thy soul in trouble Psal. 127. 2. 5. Triumph over dangers The End of the fifth Book THE SIXTH BOOK OF THE CHVRCH The SPOUSE of CHRIST And Antichrist The great Enemy of CHRIST HAving handled the Work of Redemption in the Nature and Person of it I should now speak of the Application of it by the holy Ghost But because many Divines do treat of the Church after Christ I shall follow that Method and likewise speak somewhat of that great Adversary of Christ before I come to the Doctrine of the Application of Christ. CHAP. I. Of the Church of CHRIST THe principal matter required of our parts in the Apostles Creed is to believe things concerning God and the Church God is the first object of our Faith we must know and believe in him so farre as he is revealed in his Nature Properties and Works Malè vivitur si de Deo non benè creditur August de civit Dei lib. 5. cap. 10. After Articles concerning the several Persons in the Trinity followeth this I believe the holy Catholike Church This was added to the former saith August Enchirid. cap. 56. upon special consideration For the right order of a confession did require that after the Trinity the Church should be mentioned as the house after the owner the Temple after God and the City after the builder And he cannot have God for his Father which
hath not the Church for his Mother 1. The Act of Faith in these words tacitly implied I beleeve 2. The Object of this Faith the Church described by two Properties viâ— 1. Sanctity in that it is called Holy 2. Universality in that it is stiled Catholick Concerning the act of this Faith I beleeve though it be not prefixed to the beginning of this Article as neither to the rest which follow it yet it is to be understood the former I beleeve which precedes the Article of the holy Ghost communicating it self to this and the subsequent and that chiefly for two Reasons The one to teach us that the principal object of our Faith is God himself considered in Unity of Essence and Trinity of Persons and therefore to each of the Persons there is either a Beleeve prefixed or the particle in set before to shew that on them we are to build the certainty and assurance of our hope but as for these Articles of the Church The forgivenesse of sins The Resurrection of the body and the like they being creatures are but the secondary objects of our Faith not to be trusted upon immediately in themselves and therefore have not a Credo a Beleeve apart to themselves but prefixt to one of the Persons I beleeve in the holy Ghost The other to set out and divide by this means unto every of the Persons a special work Creation to the Father Redemption to the Sonne Sanctification to the holy Ghost Question is made What the words are which are to be supplied in this Article The holy Catholick Church whether I beleeve or I beleeve in I beleeve as is generally determined by the Orthodox Kahal in Hebrew ordinarily translated Ecclesia sometimes Synagoga is taken for an Assembly or Congregation and that sometimes in the evil part for an Assembly of wicked men as Gen. 49. 6. Psal. 2â— 5. sometimes in the good sense for an Assembly of men gathered together for a holy or civil use or end Nehem. 5. 13. 1 Sam. 17. 47. 1 Chron. 13. 2. Deut. 23. 1 2 3. Psal. 8. 22 23. Gnedah or Hedah ordinarily translated Synagoga doth also signifie an Assembly or Congregation gathered at set hours and places appointed Sometimes it notes a rebellious tumultuous and evil Assembly Psal. 106. 17 18. Numb 16. 48. and sometimes an orderly and lawful Congregation as Psal. 1. 5. Ier. 30. 20. Exod. 12. 19 47. Gnedah signifieth something more noble then Kahal as being the special Ecclesia in prophane Authours signifieth an Assembly of Citizens which by the voice of the Crier was called from their domestick affairs and the rest of the multitude to hear the sentence of the Senate so it is all one with Concio which is derived à Ciendo because all were called by publick Edict into the Assembly In the New Testament it is once taken for a disorderly and confused Assembly Act. 19. 32 39 40. But that one place excepted it is ever taken for a multitude or society with a disposition or relation to Religion And so it notes 1. The company of all the faithful Mat. 16. 18. Ephes. 1. 21 22. 4. 16. 5. 25 26. Col. 1. 18 24. Ephes. 5. 27 32. it is also taken indefinitely for every multitude and society of beleevers in Christ Act. 2. 47. Gal. 1. 13. 1 Cor. 15. 9. 12. 20. Act. 5. 11. 8. 1. 2. More particularly it signifieth any Assembly gathered together for the worship of God Act. 9. 31. 14. 23. 1 Cor. 11. 16. The Church in its primary signification may be defined A multitude or society of faithful men called out of all mankinde corrupted by the Ministery of the Word according to the good pleasure of God united as living members to Christ their Head and in him partaking of grace in this life and glory in the life to come to the praise of Gods wisdom power and riches of his mercy 1. It is a multitude 1 Cor. 10. 17. and that out of every Nation Language Tribe and People Apoc. 5. 9. 2. It is a society of men not of Angels Heb. 12. 22. See Ephes. 3. 10. L'Empereur in his Theses saith If the word Church be generally taken it is certain that the Angels also belong to it for the Church is the body of Christ Ephes. 1. 23. but Christ is the Head not only of men but also of Angels Col. 2. 10 18 19. They are our fellow-servants Revel 19. 10. and fellow-brethren Iob 1. 6. by Christ Ephes. 3. 15. 3. A society of the faithful called effectually and savingly out of the world or mankinde corrupted by the Gospel The Church is either Jewish or Christian the Christian either Primitive or Successive and they again in respect of Manners are Pure or Impure in respect of Worship Sound or Idololatrical in respect of Doctrine Orthodox or Heretical in respect of mutual Communion Catholick or Schismatical There are divers and glorious Elogies of this Church visible in the Scriptures it is called The City of God Heb. 12. 22. The heavenly Ierusalem there also Ierusalem which is from above Gal. 4. 26. The house of God the pillar and ground of truth 1 Tim. 3. 15. Christs sheepfold John 10. 16. The Spouse of Christ Cant. 4. 8. 2 Cor. 11. 2. Revel 21. 9. The body of Christ Eph. 1. 22 23. Col. 1. 18. The Church is Triumphant or Comprehensorum and Militant or Viatorum 1. Triumphant viz. that part of men who having overcome the flesh the world and the Devil now reign with God and Christ gloriously in Heaven 2. Militant viz. that part of men which yet conflict with those adversaties That distinction relies on the words of the Apostle Ephes. 3. 15. The Apostle speaks of the Triumphant Church 2 Tim. 4. â—6 7. Heb. 12. 23. Revel 7. 9. Hence their errour is refuted who think that the souls of the dead do sleep even to the Resurrection or who think that the souls of the godly and faithful till that time are excluded from the vision of God and heavenly glory See 2 Cor. 5. 6 7 8. Phil. 1. 23. Revel 14. 13. the Apostle speaks of the Militant Church 1 Tim. 6. 12. That which is spoken to one is understood of all Gal. 5. 17. 1 Pet. 2. 11. 1 Iohn 5. 4. Ephes. 6. 11 12. The Church is Militant either in deed or in shew only and profession those indeed belong to the Militant Church which are called according to purpose viz. the truly faithful and elect Those are the true members of the body of Christ who by faith are united to Christ and ingraffed in him who are partakers of the holy Ghost who draw grace and spiritual life from Christ Rom. 8. 9. Col. 2. 19. Ephes. 5. 25 26 27. but the wicked and hypocrites onely in name and profession belong to the Church for they have no true Communion with Christ they no more belong to the mystical body of Christ then a
true Church The profession of the Word and so the preaching of it in some sense or other is simply necessary that wheresoever it is it maketh the Church in which it is a Church To them who demand where our Church and Faith was before Luther we answer it was in the same place then wherein now it is Our Church was in the present Romish Church obscurely indistinctly confusedly in it not as an entire visible Church distinct from it nor as any natural or integral member of it in it as good corn in a field of tares Luther did not erect a new Church but refine a corrupt Church nor preach a new Faith or Doctrine never preacht before but purge the old Faith once delivered to the Saints from all new inventions and errours Rome hath departed from the Churches of God we have not first and willingly separated from the Church of Rome it hath apostatized from the true Faith she did once professe The Question may fitly be retorted on themselves Where was your Church Where was your Trent Doctrine and Articles of the Roman Creed received de fide before Luther First In regard of true Doctrine What heresies doth she hold about the Scripture about the Church about Grace Free-will Justification Secondly In regard of Worship which is the Apostacy or falling away spoken of by Paul to Timothy an admitting of Angel-worship Thirdly In regard of Government or Discipline Her errours are now so fundamental that we are commanded to come out of her and not to partake of her sins and we depart no farther from her then she hath done from God Their Apostacy is incurable in that they hold 1. That their Church cannot erre as Laodicea 2. That there is no visible Judge to correct errours but the Pope Therefore the Reformed Churches in England Scotland France Germany did justly separate from the Church of Rome The Church of Rome casts off all Christians and Churches from all hope of salvation who subject not themselves to their way therefore they are most schismaticall Causa non secessio facit schismaticum The cause say the Canonists not the separation makes a schismatick They who have given just and lawful occasion to others to separate themselves from their corruptions are the schismaticks and not they that took the occasion He is well no schismatick though in schism that is willing to joyn in communion with the true Church when it appears to be so to him as he is no Heretick though he holds heretical opinions who holds them not obstinately that is I suppose with desire to be informed if he be in the wrong My Lord Falklands Discourse of Infallibility For the Papists several Marks of a Church our Writers that oppose Bellarmine do answer him so fully and Dr Hampton so solidly in a Sermon of his on 1 Iohn 2. 19. treateth of this Argument that I shall say nothing of it See Dr Taylor on Rev. 12. p. 99. to 110. Those notes of Succession Continuance Visibility Unity are not proper agreeing only and alwayes to the Church therefore they are not certain and infallible Bellarmin de notis Ecclesiae cap. 3. maketh them in themselves to be but probable It is a Question An Ecclesia visibilis possit errare Whether the visible Church may erre The Papists deny it and urge Matth. 18. 17. Matth. 16. 18. 1 Tiâ— 3. 15. See the Rhemists on that place The Invisible Church which consists only of the elect and true beleevers cannot erre damnably Matth. 16. 16. The Visible Church whether virtual the Pope or Representative a general Councel may erre damnably See Revel 2. and 3. chap. If particular men may erre then also the Church which consists of such but the first is true 1 Cor. 13. 9. Psal. 25. 7. Heb. 5. â— Rom. 3. 4. Secondly This is the difference between the Militant and Triumphant Church that this is freed from sinne and errour but that is not for it prayeth continually Forgive us our trespasses The Church of Rome is incurable 1. Because she holds she cannot erre 2. If she should onely her self and the Pope must reform her CHAP. II. Of Pastours 1. THeir Names In the Old and New Testament he is called a man of God he is called in the Old Testament also A Servant of the Lord a Seer a Prophet a Priest a Watchman and a Shepherd In the New Testament they are called Prophets Ministers of God Pastors Teachers Elders Gods Stewards Titus 1. 7. Gods Embassadours Rev. 1. 13. Angels Revel 1. 2 3. Apostles Evangelists that men might regard them and they be put in minde of their duty He was to be of some years before he entred into that Function Our Saviour was thirty years before he entred into the Ministery Luk. 3. 23. See Numb 4. 3. Basil and Gregory saith Russinus Hist. l. 2. c. 9. spent thirteen years in searching forth the hidden sense of Scripture barely before they would make shew of their Profession There is an Office of the Ministery instituted by Christ in the Churches of the New Testament First The Lord hath expresly instituted such an Office 1 Cor. 12. 28. Ephes. 4. 11. This was one of his royal gifts in the day of his inauguration The Socinians say Cum adhuc nova inaudita esset Evangelii Doctrina c. The Apostles had a Call when the Gospel was newly published there needs not a Ministery now that the Gospel is generally taught and it is promised we shall be all taught of God if we should look for a Ministery where shall we finde it our Ministers were ordained by Bishops they by the Pope therefore their Calling is Antichristian That there is such an Institution of Christ and this to continue till the worlds end may be thus proved First There are some to whom the word of Reconciliation is committed and not to others 1 Cor. 5. 18. Ram. 10. 15. there is a peculiar Mission men cannot preach as the Embassadours of Christ unlesse sent Ioh. 20. 21. Gal. 1. 1. Secondly Because a special Authority is committed to such by vertue of their Office they have the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven Isa. 22. 22. Matth. 16. 19. There is a double power 1. Supream which belongs to Christ only Revel 3. 7. 2. Subordinate and delegated Ministers are the Embassadours of Christ and so are to be received as Christ himself We besâ—ech you in Christs stead and He that despiseth you despiseth me Thirdly There is a special trial that in order to such an imploiment they are to undergo 1 Tim. 3. 10. there is a trial required to the exercise of the meanest Office the Deacon Fourthly The Lord hath appointed them a reward for the performance of such in Office He hath ordained that those which preach the Gospel should live of the Gospel See Act. 6. 24. 1 Tim. 4. 15. Fifthly They are to give a special account for the souls of all
practised at Alexandria by Mark the Evangelist Christs meaning is not Luk. 22. 25 26. to make an equality among Ministers but to set a difference between Kings and the Ministers of the Word that none should invade the right of Princes under the pretence of their Ministery Doctor Hampton on that place See more there We confesse saith Bishop Davenant Determinat 42. that according to Christs appointment all the Apostles were equal in degree and power but we deny that that parity among the Ministers of the Gospel is here or any where established which they maintain who oppose the Episcopal Dignity For notwithstanding this command of Christ the twelve Apostles were superiour in Dignity and greater in Power then the twelve Disciples and the chief Pastours were appointed by the Apostles in the Church of Ephesus and Crete which had power of jurisdiction over the Presbyters of those Churches The Apostles had no superiority over the Disciples either of Ordination or Jurisdiction 2. The Question is concerning Officers of the same kinde and the instance is of Officers of different kinds amongst whom there may be superiority and inferiority as there is amongst us between Presbyters and Deacons The Apostles were superiour to Evangelists and Pastors but one Apostle had not superiority over another or one Evangelist over another Smectymn Answer to an Humble Remonstrance Sect. 13. Adde to this Armachanus Bishop Iewel Dr Whitaker and Saravia with others make Bishops and Presbyters the same order though different degrees Learned Divines both Protestants and Papists hold That Bishops and Presbyters differ rather in execution of some acts of their order appropriated to Bishops only then in their essential order A Bishop hath an eminency of degree in the same order but his ecclesiastical order is the same with the Presbyters or Priests D. Featley in a conference with Everard a Popish Priest There is saith Beza Episcopus Divinus Humanus Diabolicus by the divine Bishop he means the Bishop as he is taken in Scripture which is one and the same with a Presbyter By the humane Bishop he means the Bishop chosen by the Presbyters to be President over them and to rule with them by fixed Laws and Canons By the Diabolical Bishop he means a Bishop with sole power of Ordination and Jurisdiction lording it over Gods Heritage and governing by his own will and authority Smectymn Answ. to Humble Remonst Quer. about Episc. See M. Bains Dioc. Trial and Cartw. against Whitg M. Gillesp. Aarons Rod Blossom l. 2. cap. 11. and 3. and Gers. Buâ— and Mr Seld. Eâ—tych The Pope would be oecumenical Bishop and pleads that Monarchy is the best Government But Chamier Tom. 2. de Romano Pontifice lib. 9. cap. 8. though he acknowledge that Monarchy simply excels all other kinds of Government because all things created are governed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 viz. by God alone and so that they cannot be more wisely powerfully and profitably administered yet saith he this makes nothing for the Popes cause for in that saith he we do not consider Monarchy simply but described with its certain circumstances viz. of the Persons which rule or are ruled and the Government it self so that is to be judged the best kinde of Government which is most profitable to those who are governed There can be conceived but three forms of Government Episcopal most conformable to Monarchy Presbyterial to Aristocracy and Independent as they term it to Democracy Presbyterial is no elder then the Reformation in Geneva and Independent then New-England Episcopacy was either planted by the Apostles or their immediate Successors in the first and best ages of the Church D. Featleys Sac. nem It is a Question An Ecclesiae regimen sit Monarchicum aut Aristocraticum Whether the Government of the Church be Monarchical or Aristrocratical The Government of the Church in respect of its Head Christ is a Monarchy in respect of the Pastours that govern in common and with like authority amongst themselves it is an Aristocracy or the rule of the best men in respect that the people are not secluded but have their intrest in Church-matters it is a Democracy or popular estate Cartw. Reply in Defence of the Admonit p. 35. He saith the same on Ephes. 4. 5. Whitaker hath the like cont 4. de Rom. Pontif. q. 1. c. 1. Of Councels or Synods The name of Synod doth in in his primary and large acception agree to every Assembly so doth the name of Councel to every Assembly of consultation The former being derived from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is all one with coetus and imports the Assembly of any multitude which meeteth and cometh together The later being derived of Cilia whence also Supercilium imports the common or joynt intending or bending their eyes both of body and minde to the investigation of truth in that matter which is proposed in the Assembly But both these words being now drawn from those their large and primitive significations are by ecclesiastical Writers and use of speech restrained and appropriated to those Assemblies of ecclesiastical persons wherein they come together to consult of such matters as concern either the Faith or Discipline of the Church Dr Crakanth Vigilius Dormitans cap. 19. Coetus qui Ecclesia nomine ad decidendas controversias convocatur Synodus seu Concilium appellatur Wendelinus A Synod is an ecclesiastical meeting consisting of fit persons called by the Churches and sent as their Messengers to discover and determine of doubtfull cases either in Doctrine or Practice according to the truth Hookers Survey of Church-Discipline part 4. c. 3. If Councels had been simply necessary Christ or his Apostles at least would somewhere have commanded them to be celebrated which yet we reade no where done by them Besides the Church and Faith remained safe for three hundred years without a general Councel from the time of the Apostles even to the Synod of Nice For this is the difference between a Church and Commonwealth that a Commonwealth stands in need of humane Councel and cannot stand without it but the Church is governed and preserved by God and though a Councel conduce to its externall State yet the life and satiety of the Church doth not consist in it A Councel which represents the Universal Church as it is compounded of particular Churches is called Universal or Oecumenical The Councel which represents a particular Church as it consists in one Assembly is called a Presbytery or Ecclesiastical Senate When it represents a particular Church as it is constituted out of the consociation of many Assemblies it is called either a National Councel if Embassadours come from all Provinces into which the Nation is dispersed to that Ecclesiastical meeting or a Provincial Councel if the Churches send onely from one Province Deputies to the same Assembly The most famous lawful and Oecumenical Councels were those four The first Nicene Councel called by the Emperour Constantine the Great
against Arius who denied the Deity of Christ. The first Constantinopolitan Councel called by the Emperour Theodosius the elder against Macedonius who denied the Deity of the holy Ghost The first Ephesine Councel called by the Emperor Theodosius the younger against Nestorius who held that there were two Persons in Christ. Fourthly The Chalcedonian called by the Emperour Martian against Eutyches who held that the one Nature in Christ consisted of the Divine and Humane These Councels were celebrated within five hundred years after Christs birth Councels there have been called Ancient because lesse Modern and General because lesse Particular for the first was not till more then three hundred years after Christ nor to the largest appears it that ever any were summoned beyond the bounds of the ancient Roman Empire though Christianity were much far extended Rainold part 2. Plenariis Conciliis quorum est in Ecclesia saluberrima Authoritas Augustin epist. 118. cap. 3. That a Synod be general and lawful three things are necessarily and essentially required 1. The first which concerns the generality of it is That the Calling and Summons to the Councel be general and Oecumenical Quod omnes tangit ab omnibus approbari debet The lawfulnesse of Synods consists partly in their orderly assembling by lawful authority and partly in their orderly Government and proceedings when they are assembled Crakanth Vigil Dormit c. 19. The nature of Synods is all one when they be Provincial National or oecumenical and they only differ as greater or lesser Their power is not meerly consultatory and swasive but authoritative and to be submitted unto by those for whom their delegation is so farre as their acts are according to the Word of God In Synodo est authoritatis apex totius Ecclesiae unitas ordinis firmamentum Leyd profess de concil A few private men yea one man or woman may counsel advise or perswade M. Hudsons Vindicat. c. 7. It is a Question between us and the Papists Cujus sit congregare Concilia Who hath the power of calling a Councel The Papists generally say the Pope Vide Bellarm. de Concil lib. 1. cap. 12 13. We the Emperour and other Christian Princes The four first general Councels were called by four Emperours as was before mentioned The Pope of Rome out of his own Province hath no right nor authority of calling a Councel The true cause saith Doctor Ames why general Councels were called by the authority of the Emperour was because the Emperour alone not the Pope had universal power It is a Question between us and the Papists Quinam sunt ad concilium convocandi Who are to be called to a Councel The Papists hold only the Clergy may be of the Councel and of the Clergy only Bishops as Judges Men that are famous for wisdom holinesse of life and experience of things men that are inflamed with a zeal to God and to the salvation of men with the love of the truth and peace From Acts 15. 6. 23. it is manifest that not only the Apostles but also the Elders and the people likewise and the whole Church were present and had their voices in this Councel See Acts 16. 4. That famous Paphnutius was a Lay-man A general Councel represents the Universal therefore there ought to be present there some of all kinds and orders of men An Concilia possint errare Whether general Councels may erre Every Assembly which consists of members subject to errour may be seduced But General Councels are Assemblies consisting of members subject to errour for all men are so Rom. 3. 4. Secondly If the determination of General Councels were infallible all Christians were necessarily bound to stand unto them and to submit to their authority Thirdly If General Councels may contradict the one the other they may certainly erre The General Councel held at Laterane under Leo the tenth contradicteth the Councel of Constance in the point of the Councels superiority above the Pope Fourthly That which hath befallen some General Councels may befall any other unlesse they can alledge some special priviledges to the contrary See 1 Kin. 22. 12. Mat. 26. 65. Ioh. 11. 52. Mark 14. 64. Bellarmine saith they cannot erre if confirmed by the Pope De concil lib. 2. cap. 2 3 4 5. That General Councels though gathered and confirmed by the Pope may erre not only in fact as the Papists confesse but also in faith and manners Vide Whitaker controv 3. de Concil Quaest. 6. In eo Pontificii se praebent ridendos nam Papae confirmatio sequitur Concilii decreta non praecedit Cameron The Rhemists bring Iohn 16. 13. Luk. 1. 3. Some urge Matth. 18. 20. for this purpose None amongst them is like to Luke nay all of them gathered together are not like him he was an extraordinary instrument of the holy Ghost Iohn 16. 13. speaks not of the Church but of the Apostles but if it be applicable to the Church yet it belongs only to the Spouse of Christ not that she doth not sometimes erre also even in Doctrine but not deadly she shall not erre in things which are necessary to salvation See Cameron Miroth in loâ— If from this promise an infallibility of judging might be gathered it would agree not only to Bishops gathered together but severed neither only to the Pope of Rome as the Jesuites would have it but also to the Successours of the rest of the Apostles saith B. Davenant That place Mat. 18. 20. means any particular Assembly of the Saints Vide Calv. in loc Act. 15. 22. is also brought This Councel consisted of Apostles which had an extraordinary assistance and illumination of Gods Spirit there is not the like authority of other Councels Panormitan the great Popish Canonist and Lawyer saith Plus credendum est simplici Laico Scripturam proferenti quam toti simul Concilio There is another great controversie not so much as Whitaker hath well observed between us and the Papists as between the Papists themselves An Concilia sint supra Papam Whether Councels be above the Pope Many amongst them and those of great note prefer a General Councel before the Pope but others a Pope before the Councel If Peter himself saith Whitaker in the place before-quoted be sent to the Church as to a certain superiour judgement and tribunal and be commanded to bring the faults and offences of others to it then it follows that the Church is greater and superiour to Peter or any other in authority The Assumption saith he relies in expresse words of Scripture The consequence of the major is evident from the confession of the Adversaries For they say That a Church is represented in a Councel Secondly The Universal Church is called the mother of all the faithful and Christians Gal. 4. 26. The Pope is the Churches son if he be faithful But the son is not above his mother only God and his word is above the Church of God
Arch-bishops four thousand Bishops and five thousand Saints approved by the Church yet if they be compared to the Jesuites or to the weak and unperfect types of them the Franciscans it is no great matter that they have done Dr. Donnes Ignatius his Conclave A rich Merchant in Paris in meriment told the Friers of Saint Francis that they wore a Rope about their bodies but Saint Francis should once have been hanged but was redeemed by the Pope on this condition that all his life after he should wear a Rope but they in earnest got judgement against him that he should be hanged for it Doctor Taylors Romish Fornace The Monks and Friers are no where mentioned in Scripture unlesse Apoc. 9. 3. Locusts issued out of the bottomlesse pit they by their smoaky Tradiditions obscure the light of the Gospel To prove their Cardinals a Divine Ordinance they urge that place 1 Kings 2. Domini erunt Cardines terrae See Polyd. Virg. de Invent. rerum lib. 4. cap. 9. pag. 270. They consist for most part of personages nobly descended they are admitted to kisse the Popes mouth they onely elect the Pope and from them onely the Pope elected must be selected Saint Peter had no Cardinals about him A certain Friar wittily preached to the people at Lions in France when he said That the Hogonots so the Protestants are called in France did agree with the Church of Rome in all the Articles of Faith but that there was one wicked word Solùm Onely at the noise of which the warre was kindled for they Onely beleeved what the Rule of Faith hath from the holy Scriptures but the Romane Church required something more to be beleeved then what is contained in the Rule of Faith or holy Scriptures because the Authority of of the Church will have it so Junius de Eccles. cap. 17. de Eccles. Roman Corollaries from the Church and Antichrist First From the Church Christs great interest here below is the Church it is his Hephzibah his delight is in her it is as Shew-bread continually before him the people of God are his Segullah his peculiar treasure his jewels Mal. 3. 17. all the rest of the world being but as lumber in comparison for them the world stands The Church is the fulnesse of Christ Ephes. 1. 22. The great blessings are out of Sion The interest of Christ extends to all Churches where a people love the Lord Jesus in sincerity The Donatists would include the Church in their parts of Africk the Papists say they only are the Church Christs interest is not limited to any forms 2 Cor. 11. 28. None are true members of the invisible Church of Christ but only those which have the Spirit of Jesus Christ in them really holy and united to Christ the Head There is a great controversie about qualification of Church-members therefore Apollonius and Spanhemius have begun their Dispute with this Question Some say The members of every particular Church are obliged at their first admission to shew to the whole Congregation convincing signs of their Regeneration and true Grace Some urge that the Scripture in the description of a godly man rests not in the negative Rom. 8. 1. and that a bare profession is not enough or to say I know no evil by him or that he is not scandalous they urge 1 Thes. 1. 1. and 2 Thes. 1. 1. they say the Church is not only termed holy from the better part but the particular members are commended for holinesse 2 Thes. 1. 3. Phil. 1. 7. We are strict say they in taking a wife or servant enquire after them and are not satisfied that we hear no ill so a judgement of severity is to be used in admitting Church-members and because we may be deceived therein the more care is to be used Others say If they be willing to give up their names to Christ it is enough because the Church is a School there they are admitted Non quia docti but ut sint docti not because they are learned but because they are willing to learn Would you have Church-members real Saints crosse to the Texts the Floor and Drag-net or such as by the exactest scrutiny that can be made we may judge to be Saints really I desire your Texts for this D. Ames saith Falsum est internas virtutes à nobis requiri ut aliquis sit in Ecclesia quoad visibilem ejus statum Bellarm. Enerv. Tom. 2. l. 2. c. 1. Sect. 5. The Apostles at the first gathering of the Church of the New Testament never required any more then the profession of the faith of Christ in fundamentals and that they were willing for the time to come to walk in Gospel-rules Iohn Baptist received Publicans and sinners souldiers Scribes Pharisees when they confessed their sins and desired to be admitted into the faith of him whom Iohn preached See Act. 2. 41 47. Vide Calvin ad Mat. 3. Many a one that may have real grace yet out of bashfulnesse and because he hath but weak parts may not be able to evidence it to others and others who have greater gifts may carry it away when they are not inwardly wrought upon I suppose therefore those are to be received into Church communion which prosesse the faith of Christ and subject to the rules of the Gospel if they be freed from damnable errors and scandalous conversation Some conceive the gathering of Churches out of Churches to be unwarrantable and think it is confusion 1 Cor. 14. 33. Where is there say they any warrant from Moses and the Prophets or from Christ and his Apostles for any such thing though yet in their times many Church-members were as ignorant and prophane as now To be a member of the Church of Christ is a great priviledge the Communion of Saints is the only good fellowship The Communion of the Saints consists in three things First In the Communion of their Graces what Graces they have they have not only for their Salvation but in trust for the good of the body the members of the body should be helpful to one another Secondly In the use of Gods Ordinances this was the beauty of the primitive times Act. 2. 42. there was no such separation then Thirdly In the performance of all mutual Offices of love Serve one another in love Our Union with Christ is the ground of this Communion As all men are one in the first Adam so all the Saints are one in the second Adam This Union is wrought on Gods part outwardly by the Word and inwardly by the Spirit on mans part Outwardly by our profession Inwardly by faith Rom. 11. 20. By Communion of Saints is meant their common partaking in Christ their Head and all his Benefits and their mutuall interest one into another There is no such good fellowship in the world as in the Church of Christ. Secondly From Antichrist That the Popish Doctrine tends to the extream dishonour of Gods Word
I have shewed in my first Book of the Scriptures Secondly It tends to the extream dishonour of Christ 1. In making other Intercessours 2. In making each man his own Saviour by his own works 3. In feigning a Purgatory Thirdly It tends to the damnation of mens souls 1. In drawing them to put confidence in their own works 2. In making them content with lip-labour in stead of prayer 3. In mocking them with counterfeit confession 4. In teaching them to commit Idolatry 5. In teaching them the doctrine of venial sins and that these may be pardoned without either confession or contrition There is a double way of advancing Antichrist First In way of Worship and Superstition Some conceive that course was taken here formerly when there was so much cringing and bowing toward the Altar Secondly By publishing and maintaining the Doctrines of Popery the most refined Doctrines conditional Decrees Free-will Auxilium sufficiens omnibus ad salutem media scientia in God and Universal Redemption in Christs intention final Apostasie These are the Jesuites Doctrines Arminius had it from them Christians that have cast off Popery should be so farre from returning again to Babylon that they should pray for the destruction and utter ruine of that man of sinne and with confidence expect the accomplishment of the Prophecies in that kinde The End of the sixth Book THE SEVENTH BOOK OF OUR VNION And Communion WITH CHRIST And our Spiritual Benefits by him and some special Graces CHAP. I. Of our Union with Christ. HAving handled the work of Redemption in the Nature and Person of it Now I shall speak of the Application of it by the holy Ghost That is a special part of Gods Providence whereby those things which Jesus Christ hath purchased are by the operation of the holy Ghost made effectual to all those for whom they were appointed Four things are considerable in it 1. The foundation of it 2. The efficient cause or worker of it 3. The persons who shall be made partakers of it 4. The parts of this work 1. Union and conjunction with Christ. 2. Communion with him The ground work of it lies in three things 1. The donation of God the Father Iohn 6. 39. All that my Father hath given me shall come to me 2. The intendment of Christ in all the work he wrought Iohn 17. 19. For their sakes do I sanctifie my self that is separate my self to the work I undertook 3. The Fathers accepting it done for them as heartily as if they had done it in their own persons 2 Cor. 5. 19. 2. The efficient cause of it the holy Ghost that is the third Person in the Trinity who is equal to the Father and the Son The making of man was in some respect appropriated to the Father redeeming him to the Son the making it effectual and applying it was the work of the holy Ghost 14 15 and 16. Chapters of Iohn I will send the holy Ghost The Comforter he shall lead you into all truth Convince you of sinne righteousnesse and judgement There is no one branch of our partaking of Christ but what is totally ascribed to the holy Ghost The sending of the Gospel is by the holy Ghost they are the gifts and graces of the holy Ghost Faith Union with Christ and Communion with him in all his Offices are from the holy Ghost the Spirit teacheth governeth comforteth Reason Because no inferiour person could effect it Ephes. 1. 19 20. Thirdly The Persons to whom this work of application belongs or who shall be made partakers of Christ but the Decree of Election and Reprobation have been handled already There are a certain number whom God hath appointed to come to life by Christ the Spirit of God will make the means effectuall to all his Fourthly The parts of this work 1. Union and conjunction with Christ. 2. Communion with him 1 Ioh. 5. 12. I shall first speak of our Union with Christ. Christ is said to dwell and abide in us and we are said to be Christs to be partakers of Christ to be cloathed with Christ and abide in him The Spirit of God sets it out in five similitudes 1. Of food made one with the body Ioh. 6. 5 6. 2. Of Head and Members Ephes. 1. 22 23. 3. Of the foundation and building Ephes. 2. 20 21 22. 1 Pet. 2. 4 5 6. 4. Of the stock and branches Ioh. 15. 4 5 6 7. 5. Of the Husband and Wife Ephes. 5. 31 32. We must be one with Christ as we were one with the first Adam say some two wayes 1. Naturally as we bore his image 2. Voluntarily as we consented to his Covenant so with the second Adam 1. Naturally by receiving of his Spirit 2. Voluntarily consenting to his Covenant Though it is not easie to conceive how we can be said to have consented to his Covenant but as being in him and so his consent did include ours The Union begins on Christs part he layes hold on me by his Spirit Rom. 8. 9. Phil. 3. 12. Gal. 4. 5 6. 1 Iohn 4. 13. This Spirit works a principle of faith in us that layes hold on Christ and accepts him for our Head and Husband for ever Iohn 1. 12. Ephes. 3. 17. He will take Christ 1. With all his Offices for a Lord as well as a Saviour 2. With all his graces 3. With all his inconveniences Christ with poverty with disgrace with the stake There is a three-fold Union between Christ and a Believer 1. Mystical with Christ as a Head the fruit of that is intimacy 2. Moral with Christ as a patern or example 3. Judicial with Christ as a Surety whereby we are concerned in every act of Christs mediation the fruit of this is interest This Union between Christ and us is wrought by the Spirit Ephes. 4. 4. He unites God and us and us one with another He works it by the Ministery of the Word 1 Cor. 1. 9. Iohn 6. 44 45. and a religious use of the Seals 1 Cor. 12. 13. Rom. 6. 3 5. 1 Cor. 10. 16. Some make our Union with Christ to be only a relative Union others an essentiall personall Union as if we were Godded with God and Christed with Christ. I would not be too bold with those expressions of Nazianzen because I see they are abused 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 First There is more then a relative Union as that place 1 Cor. 6. 17. forcibly proves 2. These Reasons 1. This Union is set forth by similitudes which shew a real Union Iohn 15. 1. 1 Cor. 12. Head and Body 2. Because our Union with Christ is compared to the Mystery of the Trinity and is like to the Union of the Persons in the Divine Nature Ioh. 6. 57. 14. 20. 17. 21 22 23. We are one not in the same kinde or degree of Union nor in so high and glorious a manner 3. Because it is not a Union founded only in terms of Scripture but
Some say it was an eternal transaction before all time onely manifested to us by the Spirit There are four set periods of Justification First In Gods purpose which reacheth as far as the eternal transactions between God and Christ such as were set down in the Lambs book Secondly When Christ did in the name and stead of sinners perform that which was the matter of their justification but in neither of these periods was the soul translated out of the state of nature into the state of grace Thirdly Actually at that moment when we come to own Christ as a Saviour by beleeving Fourthly When the Spirit which translates the soul out of the state of nature into the state of grace makes it known to the soul. Others say there are five as it were periods or degrees of Justification 1. When the Lord passeth a sentence of Absolution on men at their first Conversion immediately upon their Union with Christ Act. 13. 38 39. 2. He that is justified fals into daily transgressions therefore there must be a daily imputation and application of the death of Christ Iohn 13. 10. 3. There is a high act of justification after great and eminent fals though there be not an intercision yet there is a sequestration such cannot then plead their right Davids sinne of adultery and murder made a great breach upon his justification therefore he prayes God Psal. 51. To purge him with hysop to apply anew the bloud of Christ. 4. There follows a certification a sentence passed in the soul concerning mans estate 1 Iohn 5. 9. Rom. 8. 33 34. 5. Justification is never perfected till the day of judgement Act. 3. 19. then sentence is passed in open Court before men and Angels Of preparatory Works to Justification The 13th Article of the Church of England saith Works done before the grace of Christ or Justification because they are not done as God hath commanded them we doubt not but they are sins Matth. 7. A corrupt tree brings forth corrupt fruit Heb. 11. Without faith it is impossible to please God Tit. 2. 9. To the defiled all things are defiled Whether these Works without faith merit ex congruo Potest homo nondum reconciliatus per opera poenitentiae impetrare mereri ex congruo gratiam justificationis Bellarm. l. 5. de grat lib. arbit c. 22. The Papists say one must dispose and sit himself by Alms and Repentance to partake of Christ this they call Meritum ex congruo and then say they one receives primam gratiam See 2 Cor. 3. 5. Rom. 9. 15 16. We confesse that God is not wont to infuse saving grace but into hearts fitted and prepared but he works these preparations by his own Spirit See B. Dav. Determ of Quaest. 34. Whether Works with faith deserve grace ex condigno We say not as Bellarmine chargeth us that the Works of the regenerate are simply sins but in a certain respect The Papists say after one is made a new-creature he can perform such Works as have an intrinsecal merit in them and then by their good Works they can satisfie for their smaller offences Secondly They have such a worth that God is tied say some of them by the debt of justice Others say by the debt of gratitude to bestow upon them everlasting glory Some say they deserve this ex natura operis Others say Tincta sanguine Christi being died with the bloud of Christ This is a damnable doctrine throws us off from the Head to hold justification by works Our good Works as they flow from the grace of Gods Spirit in us do not yet merit Heaven 1. From the condition of the Worker though we be never so much enabled yet we are in such a state and condition that we are bound to do more then we do or can do Luk. 17. 7. We cannot enter into Heaven unlesse we be made sons Come ye blessed of my Father and the more we have the Spirit enabling us to good the more we are bound to be thankful rather then to glory in our selves Againe we are sinners the worker being a servant sonne sinner cannot merit 2. From the condition of the work those works that merit Heaven must have an equality and commensuration as a just price to the thing bought but our works are not so Rom. 8. 18. those sufferings were the most glorious of all when Paul was whipt imprisoned ventured his life he doth not account these things considerable in respect of Heaven See Rom. 8. 18. Iam. 3. 2. 1 Ioh. 1. 8. Rom. 7. 24. 11. 35 36. Ephes. 2. 8. and D. Sâ—lat on Rom. 2. p. 118. to 185. They say The Protestants so cry up Justification by grace that they cry down all good works at least the reward of them we say there is a reward of mercy Psa. 62. lat end Bona opera non praecedunt justificandum sed sequuntur justificatum Aug. Bona opera suxt occultae praedestinationis indicia futurae foelicitatis praesagia Bernard de gratia libero arbitrio Extra statum justificationis nemo potest verè bona opena satis magnificè commendare Luther More hath been given in this Land within these threescore yeares to the building and increase of Hospitals of Colledges and other Schools of good learning and to such like workes as are truly charitable then were in any one hundred years during all the time and reign of Popery Dr. Willet confutes the calumny of the Romanists charging our Doctrine of justification by faith only as a great adversary to good Works For he proves that in the space of sixty years since the times of the Gospel 1000000lb lb hath been bestowed in the acts of piety and charity Whether we be justified by inherent or imputed righteousnesse We do not deny as the Papists falsly slander us all inherent righteousnesse 2 Cor. 5. 17. nor all justification before God by inherent righteousnesse 1 Kings 8. 32. But this we teach That this inherent righteousnesse is not that righteousnesse whereby any poor sinner in this life can be justified before Gods Tribunal for which he is pronounced to be innocent absolved from death and condemnation and adjudged unto eternal life The Church of Rome holdeth not this foundation viz. the Doctrine of Justification by Christ 1 Cor. 3. 11. 1. They deny justification by the imputation of Christs righteousnesse yea they scorn it and call it a putative righteousnesse 2. They hold justification by inherent righteousnesse that is by the works of the Law Gal. 5. 4. The Papists place the formal cause of justification in the insusion of inherent righteousnesse The opinion is built upon another opinion as rotten as it viz. perfection of inherent righteousnesse for if this be found to be imperfect as it will be alwayes in this life the credit of the other opinion is lost and that by consent of their own principles who teach that in justification men are made
particular man to be Antichrist but rather that Seat and State where the Pope sitteth or the Hierarchy the Head whereof the Pope is or the succession of Popes one after another The first in order to be prayed for are Saints the whole community of them Ephes. 6. 18. Ioh. 17. 9. Col. 2. 1 2. 2. Publick persons 1. Magistrates 1 Tim. 2. 12. Psal. 72. 1. 2. Ministers Eph. 6. 19. Act. 12. 5. 15. 40. Mat. 9. 38. 3. Those to whom we are more nearly related Rom. 9. 3. Philem. v. 16. Friends Husbands for Wives Parents for Children Masters for Servants the Minister for his people Ephes. 3. 14 16. 4. Strangers Gen. 18. 24. 5. Enemies Mat. 5. 44. Luke 23. 34. Now I shall shew who are not to be prayed for 1. All such as are dead Matth. 5. 35. 2 Sam. 12. 23. such prayers are vain and fruitlesse for Gods determinate judgement passeth on every one so soon as they die Bellarm. de Purgatorio lib. 2. cap. 18. saith It can neither adde any thing to the blisse of them that are in heaven nor take away any part of punishment from them that are in hell Moses in the Law prescribed no prayers no Sacrifices for the dead The Papists practise praying for the dead They pretend for this the fairest precedents of the Church and of the whole world The Heathens they say did it and the Jews did it and the Christians did it The Heathens prayed for an easie grave and a perpetual spring The Jews prayed that the soul of their dead might be in the garden of Eden that they might have their part in Paradise and in the world to come The Christians prayed for a joyful Resurrection for mercy at the day of Judgement for the hastening of the coming of Christ and the Kingdome of God but yet the prayers for the dead used in the Church of Rome are most plainly condemned because they are against the Doctrine and practices of all the world Ignorant and superstitious persons likewise among us if mention be made of any of their friends departed use presently to say The Lord be with his soul Gods peace be with him with the like If any reprove them for it they say What hurt is it It is hurt enough that there is no good in it it is vain and idle Mat. 12. 36. There is no commandment example of any good man or promise in all the Scripture to prayer for the dead 2. They which sin against the holy Ghost 1 Ioh. 5. 16. The fourth and last branch of prayer is imprecation against others which is a kind of prayer whereby judgement and vengeance is desired Expostulation may be used in prayer where there is no imprecation as well as when there is Ier. 14 8 9. Expostulation with God is a reasoning the case with him it is usual in the Psalms Psal. 6. 3. 22. 1 2. 75. 5. Psal. 79. 5 8 9 10 11 12 14. Psal. 90. 13 14 16 17. 37. 9 12. Psal. 44. 10 12 13 14 23. Psal. 77. 1 9 10. Reasons 1. Venting of our selves to God giveth ease Psal. 39. 2 3. 2. Complaints move both God and man 3. By using strength we get strength by discussing Gods waies our faith is confirmed Psal. 138. 3. Gods people differ from the wicked 1. In the rise of their expostulatiosn they are bottomed on faith they reserve to God all his glory The wicked question Gods providence 2. In their progresse the godly proceed in humble praier self-abasing the wicked are not sorrowful nor humbled in their hearts 3. In the successe they are confirmed in their principles of Gods excellencie are comforted the wicked are steeled in their Atheism and seared in their wickednesse No man must imprecate or pray against himself we have no warrant for it and it is against nature it self Ephes. 5. 29. Peter offended in this Matth. 26. 74. See Matth. 27. 25. The Jews were so fearful of uttering imprecations that when in their oaths they had occasion to use them they would either expresse them in general terms God do so to me and more also 2 Sam. 3. 35. or else leave them clean out and make the sentence imperfect as If I do this or If I do not that or If this be so and there stay Quest. Whether is it lawful and how far to pray against others There are divers Imprecations 69. 55. 109. Psal. 1. The Psalmist was not only a servant of God but a Prophet he did not with a private spirit fore-tell their destruction 2. He wisht that their evils might be destroyed not their persons Psal. 59. 11 13. 83. 15. We may rejoyce in vengeance upon the wicked Psal. 58. 11. as it is an act of Gods justice this is the proper and direct answer to all the imprecations of David O God to whom vengeance belongeth shew thy self the Israelites praised God for the overthrow of the wicked Revel 18. 20. 19. 10. We must 1. Pray for our enemies but against Gods enemies Psal. 35. 23. compared with 83. 12. See Numb 10. 35. Psal. 68. 1. 2. We may lawfully pray against their designs though not against their persons 2 Sam. 15. 31. that their secret councels and plots may be frustrated 3. We may pray against their persons indefinitely though not particularly as Psal. 129. 5. 4. We may pray against their persons in particular conditionally though not absolutely 1. We are to pray for their conversion and then if maliciously and wilfully they persist in their obstinacy in the second place for their confusion Psal. 83. 16 17. Hitherto of those several kinds of prayer which are comprized under request The next kinde is Thanksgiving We ought to render to the Lord the calves of our lips speaking good of his name Psal. 95. 1 2. Eph. 5. 20. 1 Tim. 2. 1. 1 Thess. 1. 18. Reasons 1. From God to whom thanks must be given he is the Author of benefits to us 1. Many 2. Great 3. Constant. 4. Free 1. Many So many limbs as we have about our bodies so many joynts as are in a limb so many veins sinews gristles and muscles as are requisite to the moving and using of every joynt so many benefits so many faculties as our souls are endued with of reason sense and vegetation so many benefits How many nights rest dayes quiet How many journeyes safety How many dangers escaped contents enjoyed 2. Great because we stand in great need of them and attain much good by them and can by no means attain them without God 3. Constant from the beginning to the end of our lives 4. Free 1. He gives meerly of his own accord to exercise his goodnesse without respect to any thing that we had done before to deserve or could do after to requite 2. All that God doth for and to us is that he may be glorisied Psal. 50. 15. ult it is Gods due he
eat the Bread and drink the wine which signifies the particular applying of Jesus Christ with all the benefits of his mediation to ones own soul. Whether Christ be corporally present with the symboles in the Eucharist Corpore de Christi lis est de sanguine lis est Lis est de modo non habitura modum Christ is ascended into heaven and he is contained there Acts 3. 21. till he come to Judgement therefore he is not there under the shape of bread and wine See Matth. 26. 11. Iohn 16. 7. Acts 3. 21. 2. All the circumstances about the first Institution of the Sacrament do declare that Christ was not bodily there especially Christ eating and drinking of it himself which Cloppenburg Peter du Moulin and D. Featley hold urging Matth. 26. 29. Mark 14. 25. for that purpose Those words say they necessarily imply that before he uttered them he had drunk of the Cup which he gave to them Aquinas also holds this and the Fathers likewise saith Peter du Moulin The nature of the action saith Peter du Moulin in the place last quoted required that Christ should communicate to shew the Communion he had with us as also he did partake of our Baptism Matth. 3. 16. from whence cometh the custome of the Church that the Pastor first communicates and the people afterwards When the publick Authority of this Land were for the Papists subscription was not urged upon such violent and bloudy terms unto any Articles of their Religion as unto that of the real presence D. Iack. Epist. to the Read For the same Christ was not visibly at the Table and spake and yet invisibly under the bread and wine he did not eat and drink himself The end of the Sacrament is a remembrance of Christs death Do this in remembrance of me and You shew forth his death till he come Now how can there be any remembring of him when he is present His corporal presence and eating is made unprofitable Iohn 6. though Christ said his flesh was meat indeed yet he did not mean that it should be eaten and and drunk corporally the flesh profiteth nothing but his words are Spirit and Life Our Union and Conjunction with Christ is inward and spiritual which consists in Faith and Love it is true we are united to his body but not after a bodily manner It is against reason and sense We believe Christ to be present spiritually in the hearts of the Communicants sacramentally in the Elements but not corporally Real is 1. Opposed to that which is imaginary and importeth as much as truely 2. To that which is meerly figurative and barely representative and importeth as much as effectually 3. To that which is spiritual and importeth as much as corporally or materially The presence of Christ in the Sacrament is reall in the two former acceptions of real but not in the last for he is truly there present and effectually though not carnally or locally Doctor Featleys Transubstantiation Exploded Really and corporally are not all one that which is spiritually present is really present unlesse we will say that a Spirit is nothing The bloud of Christ is really present in Baptism to the washing away of sinne Christ is really present to the faith of every true believer even out of the Sacrament Downs Defence against the Reply of M. N. We deny that Christ is so present in the Sacrament under the forms of bread and wine as that whosoever receive the Sacrament do truely receive Christ himself The Papists say Christs natural body is present we that the merit and vertue of his body broken upon the Cross and of his bloud shed upon the Cross is present to the believing soul in the Sacrament The body of the Sun is in heaven in its sphere locally and circumscriptively but the beams are on the earth And when the Sun beams shine into our house we say here 's the Sun though it be the beams not the body of the Sun So the Scripture saith of the Sacrament This is my body Christ ascended up into Heaven as for that exception he is visibly in heaven but invisibly here it answereth not those testimonies which prove he is so there that he is not here Mat. 28. 6. q. d. he could not be in both places at once an angelical argument Aquinas saith It is not possible by any miracle that the body of Christ should be locally in many places at once because it includeth a contradiction by making it not one for one is that which is not divided from it self It is impossible say the Papists according to the course of nature but not absolutely impossible by divine miracle it may be Consubstantiation overthroweth the grounds 1. Of reason the body of one and the same man cannot be present in many places all together but must needs remain in some definite and certain place 2. Religion because Christ was taken up into heaven there to abide till the end of the world It was above a hundred years before Transubstantiation They did adore Christ as co-existent with the bread which perhaps gave occasion to Averroes to say That Christians did adore their God and then eat him Averroes his resolution was Quandoquidem Christiani adorant quod comedunt sit anima mea cum Philosophis The quarrel between Luther and Zuinglius was about Christs presence in the Sacrament which Luther held to be by way of Consubstantiation which how it could be unlesse the body of Christ were every where Zuinglius and others could not conceive Luther being pressed therewith he and his followers not being able to avoid it maintained that also But how By reason of the hypostatical Union and Conjunction thereof with the word For the word being every where and the humane nature being no where severed from it How can it be say they but every where The humanity of Christ according to its Essence or natural Being is contained in one place but according to its subsistence or personal being may rightly be said to be every where Zanch. Misc. Iud. de Dissid Coen Dom. and D. Field lib. 3. c 35. of the Church The Papists constant Doctrine is That in worshipping the Sacrament they should give unto it Latriae cultum qui vero Deo debetur as the Councell of Trent hath determined that kinde of service which is due to the true God determining their worship in that very thing which the Priest doth hold betwixt his hands This is artolatry an idolatrous worship of the bread because they adoâ—e the host even as the very person of the Sonne of God It is true they conceive it not bread but the body of Christ yet that doth not free them from bread-worship for then if the Heathen did take his stone to be a God it did free him from idolatry Hence saith a Jesuite If the bread be not turned into the body of Christ we are the greatest
sensibus It may be questioned how far the Magistrate may use compulsory power for suppressing of Heresies and grosse errors 1. He must use no violent course till care be had of an information Tit. 3. 10. 2. In things indifferent and matters of lesse moment Christian toleration takes place Rom. 15. 14. Ephes. 4. 2. so far as it may stand with faith salva fidei compage Aug. 3. A grosse error kept secret comes not under the Magistrates cognizance Cogitationis poenam nemo patitur saith the Civil Law while it is kept in 4. Errors according to their different nature and degree meet with different punishments Ezra 7. 26. 5. Blasphemies Idolatry and grosse Heresies are to be put in the same rank with grosse breaches of the second Table because it is to be supposed they sin against the light of their consciences Tit. 3. 9 11. that therefore they are not punisht for their consciences but for going against their consciences Baals Prophets were slain 1 King 18. 18. See Exod. 21. 20. Levit. 24. 10. Magistrates ought not to plant or propagate Religion by Arms. The cruelty of the Spaniards upon the Indians is abhorred by all True Religion should be planted by true Doctrine Instruction Example but it may be defended by Arms. Mariana the Jesuite saith Princeps nihil statuat de Religione But the publick Magistrates chief care should be concerning God and the things of God Iob 31. 26 27 28. Ezra 7. 25 26 27. It is prophesied of the New Testament Isa. 44. 28. Isa. 49. 23. that Magistrates shall be nursing Fathers to the Church God promiseth Zac. 13. 2. to cause the Prophets and the unclean spirit to passe out of the Land See ver 3 4. They are Shepherds Isa. 44. 29. Fathers of their Country the Lords Servants Rom. 13. 3. Pollutions in Doctrine and Worship make way for the destruction of a State and the ruine of the Governours thereof Ezra 7. 23. Magistrates are Officers under Christ the Mediator therefore as Christs Officers they must not onely do his work but aim at his end They must serve God not onely as men but as Magistrates The connivance and toleration of Magistrates in things of Religion hath brought in the greatest judgements and cruellest persecutions The Christian Emperours connived at the Arrian Heresie and when they got head they more cruelly persecuted the Orthodox Christians then the Pagans or Turks Iulianus haereticis libertatem perditionis permisit Aug. in Epist. That is now stiled liberty of conscience The insurrection of the Arminians in the Netherlands and of the Anabaptists in Germany is sufficiently known Object This is to make the Magistrates judgement a rule in matters of Religion and will subject us to a continual change Answ. There is a threefold judgement in matters of Religion 1. Propheticum 2. Politicum a Magistrate must know how God will be worshipt 3. Privatae discretionis as a man must believe for himself so he must know for himself Object 2. This is to teach men to persecute the Saints Answ. Persecution is suffering for righteousnesse sake not for poysoning mens souls The Magistrate is not to determine matters of faith there is one rule for him and the people To the Law and to the Testimony Isa. 8. 20. But he ought to see that the rules of the Gospel be observed 1. None are to preach but Prophets 2. The spirits of the Prophets are subject to the Prophets 1 Cor. 14. 32. So much for Superiours authority The Superiours without Authority follow and their inferiours Which are either in Gifts Age. Duties of Inferiours are 1. To acknowledge their gift and reverence them for the same 2. To imitate them Duties of Superiours They must use their gifts for the good of others Rom. 15. 1. Thus much for Superiours and Inferiours in Gifts those in Age follow Duties of younger persons to those that are ancient 1. To conceive reverently of them and to carry our selves respectively toward them Levit. 19. 32. Duties of elder persons are To give a good example Tit. 2. 2. and by a wise and grave carriage to procure reverence to themselves The duty of Equals Is to live together sociably and comfortably not to exalt themselves above their fellows but in giving honour to go one before another Rom. 12. 10. CHAP. VII The sixth Commandment THou shalt not kill or Thou shalt do no murder THis Commandment respects the person of our neighbour requiring us to procure his welfare and safety both in soul and body and to avoid all kinde of cruelty and unmercifulnesse We are forbidden to do any violence injury or wrong to the body and life of our neighbour and commanded to defend maintain and cherish the same Knewstubs Lect. 6. on Exod. 20. See more there It enjoyns all such common duties as appertain to our selves and our neighbours in regard of their and our person The substance is Thou shalt by all good means procure and by no ill means hinder thine own or thy neighbours personal safety There is no lawful taking away of life but in these three cases 1. Of enemies to ones Countrey in a just warre by souldiers appointed to that end 2. By the Magistrate 3. By a private man in his own true and just defence This Commandment is set next to the former for two reasons 1. Because the Lord having in that established degrees amongst men and humane societies nothing is more necessary for the continuance and safeguard of humane societies then that the life of man be preserved 2. Because murder commonly comes from the breach of the fifth Commandment Cains murder came from a desire of superiority because he thought himself not so greatly favoured of God as Abel so Esau so Iosephs brethren And it is set before the other four because the greatest hurt and wrong that can be done to a man is touching his life Iob 2. 4. death taking away a mans being simply which other wrongs do not This Commandment and the rest following are all negatives and the Lord beginning here with the greatest trespasse that one man can possibly commit against another even murder proceedeth by degrees downward from a great offence to a lesser till he come to the least desire that is in mans heart to covet any thing that belongs to our neighbour and forbiddeth them all He forbids here the killing of a man not of a beast or plant as the Manichees understood it Vide August de civit Dei l. 1. c. 20. 21. and that appears from the Hebrew word for Ratsach agrees to man alone whereas Charag is used generally Our neighbour is the object of the second Table whose life is provided for all the interpretations of this Law are referred to man only yea it seems to be a repetition of the Law given Gen. 9. 6. This word sometimes comprehends all the causes and occasions of murder and all ill will conceiv'd against the
free gathering of Churches I would wish such to weigh well what M. Baxter hath in his Christian Concord pag. 34. to 4â— For the judgement of divers Reformed Divines holding the Pope to be Antichrist see Vigniers Preface to that excellent Book of his entituled Theatre De L'Antichrist and M. Prinns Canterburian Doom p. 277 278 279. if that be true which I heard from the Professour of Divinity in the University out of the Pulpit Bellarmine saith That since that Doctrine prevailed amongst us that the Pope was Antichrist that they have been of the losing hand I wonder then why some of our Divines should speak and write so warily that way I might adde divers things to that I speak there of the Iesuites and Monks The Dominicans come nearer us then the Fraciscans Friar Francis is highly commended by the Papists for three notable acts First For gathering Worms out of the way Secondly For calling all manner of beasts as Worms and Asses his Brethren Thirdly For taking lice off beggars and putting them on himself yea into his own bosom See Lewis Owens running Register his unmasking of all Popish Monks and Iesuites and also his Speculum Jesuiticum In the seventh Book I speak of Our Union with Christ and the special Benefits by him Adoption John 1. 12. Iustification Act. 13. 38 39. Sanctification 1 Thess. 4. 1. Col. 2. 13. Rom. 12. 9. to the end 1 Cor. 13. 4 5 6 7. Gal. 5. 22 23 24. Ephes. 6. 14. to 19. Philippians 4. 4. to the 9. In the eighth of the Ordinances where I shew the need of them for the ablest Christians here and maintain the several Ordinances For that of Baptism Why should the Priviledge of Infants under the Gospel be straighter then it was under the Law Or actual Faith be more required in all that are to be baptized then it was in those that were to be circumcised when Cirlumcision as well as our Baptism was a Sacrament of Admission into the Church and a Sign and Seal of the righteousnesse of Faith Rom. 4. 11. In the ninth Book I speak of the Decalogue where I acknowledge I have received much help from a Manuscript of M. Wheatleys for the four first Commandments and of M. Bals for the first See M. Caudries second part of the Sabbath In the last I treat of Glorification Mat. 25. 46. 2 Cor. 5. 10. See an excellent Sermon of Master Thomas Goodwins of this Argument stiled The Happinesse of the Saints in Glory on Rom. 8. 18. I have not only gone over the several Heads of Positive Divinity but I have likewise handled many if not most of the chief Controversies betwixt Us and the Papists the Arminians Socinians and also discussed several things about Church-Government to make it more full and generally usefull to settle men in the main Truths It is reported of David Paraeus That his labour was bestowed in polishing the body of Christian Doctrine collected by Zachary Ursine and that he desired not to die till he had finished that task but when he had concluded it he joyfully uttered these words Now Lord suffer thy servant to depart in peace because I have done that which I desired I have cause to bless God as for that good esteem which my other Labours have generally found amongst both learned and pious Christians so for enabling me to accomplish this great work Some may perhaps blame me for gleaning some notions from such as I hear as well as from the Authors I reade To that I might say Habes confitentem sed non reum I know no such guilt in it if I do make use sometimes of some special Observations I hear from the Pulpit though I hear often the same things from several persons Some hold that a mans Sermon is no longer his own when he hath preached it and I think the ears as well as the eyes are senses of Discipline Besides many Divines and some Rabbies though I had but harsh language from one Divine have acknowledged themselves beholding to me for my Labours therefore I hope none will grudge if I do likewise benefit my self and also others by my Collections in that kinde I pray God to guide us all in the truth and to preserve us from Apostasie in these declining dayes Thy hearty Well-willer EDWARD LEIGH Imprimatur Iune 15th 1653 EDMUND CALAMY PROLEGOMENA Hebrews VI. I. THe Apostle chides the Hebrews in the former Chapter for their ignorance and uncapablenesse of Divine Mysteries from vers 11. to the end He tels them they were dull of hearing and that their ignorance was affected they might for their time and means have been teachers and yet now they must be taught and which is strange the very principles of the word of God Here in the beginning of this Chapter he earnestly exhorts them to increase both in knowledge and obedience Leaving The Apostle alludes to men running a race they leave one place and go on forward we must leave the principles of Religion that is not stick there but passe on to a greater perfection The Apostle hath reference to the Schools of the Iews where he was trained up there were two sorts of Schollers 1. Punies or petties 2. Proficients Perfectists Six Principles are named as so many Heads and Common-places of the ancient Catechism not but that there were many other necessary principles yet they might be reduced to these 1. Two main duties that is 1. The Doctrine of Repentance from dead works that every man is dead in sinne by nature and therefore had need to repent 2. The Doctrine of Faith in God in his Nature as manifested in the Word and revealed in Christ. 2. Two means 1. The Doctrine of Baptisms by which in the Plural Number he means both the Sacraments and also the inward Baptism of Christ and that outward Baptism of Iohn that is to say of the Minister though some referre it to the set times of Baptism 2. The Imposition or laying on of hands that is by a Trope or borrowed speech the Ministery of the Church upon the which hands were laid not the Sacrament of Confirmation as à Laâ—ide expounds it So Cartwright in his Harmony See M. Gillespies Miscel. cap. 3. pag. 47 48. and M. Cartw. Rejoynd p. 278. 3. Two Benefits Resurrection of the dead that the same numerical body shall arise again that it dies not with the body and eternal judgement so called metonymically because in that Judgement sentence shall be given concerning their eternal state either in weal or woe Vide Grot. in Matth. 26. 45. Not laying again the foundations Three things are required in a foundation 1. That it be the first thing in the building 2. That it bear up all the other parts of the building 3. That it be firm and immoveable Simply and absolutely in respect of all times persons and things Christ only is the foundation upon which the spiritual building of the Church is
15 16. or to set up the dark wisdom and proud will of man as Free-will Universal Redemption the denying of Gods Decrees and Perseverance Sub laudibus naturae latent inimici gratiae Aug. 5. Beware of communion with false teachers Rom. 16. 17. Titus 3. 10. 2 epist. Iohn 10. 6. Make use of the Ministry Flattery Flattery is a speech fitted to the will and humors of others for our own advantage One may please others much and yet not flatter them when he seeks not his own advantage in it 1 Cor. 3. ult We flatter First When we ascribe to them good things which they have not Or Secondly Applaud their evils as goodnesse Or Thirdly Amplisie their good parts above their merit Or Fourthly Extenuate their evil more then is meet Isa. 5. 10. Flatterers are men that dwell at Placenza as the Italian saith Isa. 30. 10. They may well be called Caementarii Diaboli the Devils daubers Ezek. 13. 10. Dionysius the tyrant had flatterers about him who like dogs would lick up his spittle and commend it to him to be as sweet as nectar Diogenes compared flattering language to a silken halter which is soft because silken but strangling because a halter and saith As tyrants are the worst of all wild beasts so are flatterers of all tame None can be flattered by another till he first flatter himself Canutus King of England and Denmark well repressed a flatterer at Southampton who bare the King in hand that all things in the Realm were at his will and command He commanded that his chair should be set on the shore when the Sea began to flow and then in the presence of many said to the Sea as it flowed Thou art part of my dominion and the ground on which I sit is mine wherefore I charge thee that thou come not upon my Land neither that thou wet the cloathes or body of thy Lord but the Sea according to his usual course flowing did wet his feet then he said None was worthy the name of a King but he to whose command the earth and sea were subject and never after would be King Chalac in Hebrew signifies either blandus smooth or Mollis soft because the flatterer useth smooth and soft speeches or dividere to divide because in flatterers the tongue is divided from the heart See Prov. 27. 6. 29. 5. Open hostility is better then secret flattery An ungodly mans sins are acts of hostility his duties acts of flattery Psal. 78. 36. We should shut our ears to flattererâ— and rather seek to do what is commendable then to hear our own commendation Plus aliâ—â— de â—â— quam tu tibi credere noli Gluttony Gluttony is a sinne Isa. 56. 12. Amos 6. it is an immoderate delight in meats and drinks This was Dives his sinne one of the sins of Sâ—dom Fulnesse of bread and of the old world This sinne is committed five wayes Praeproperè Lautè Nimis Ardenter Studiosè Reasons 1. From the causes of it it ariseth from sensuality a brutish vice where by one metamorphoseth himself into a swine in disregarding the divine spiritual excellent supernatural good offered to his reason and by that alone to be conceived and placeth his happinesse in corporal delights and pleasures that tickle his senses Such a one that so feeds eats not to live but lives to eat and in that sense is said to serve his own belly and not the Lord. Secondly The effects of this vice are very bad 1. It hinders Mercy and Liberality to the poor Lazarus could not have the crums of the Rich mans Table either they have no heart to give or nothing to spare 2. It often overthrowes Estate He that loves Wine and Oyl shall not be rich 3. Oppresseth the heart and burieth all good Meditations and Affections for fat is alwayes senslesse 4. Draws men to the practice of Unjustice as 1 Sam. 21. 30. A Christian must take heed of all excesse in food 1 Cor. 9. 29. Reasons First A moderate Diet keeps the body healthful that we may glorifie God and have ability of strength to serve him Secondly Excesse of Diet will breed lusts and further the power of concupiscence in men Thirdly The Body is to be an Instrument of the Soule in all service to God glorifie God in Soul and Body much eating unfits and is sinfull Fourthly We must eat to the glory of God when we are hungry that hereby God may be glorified in our calling Fifthly It is Idolatry to minde the belly Phil. 3. 19. Rom. 16. 16. such belly-gods were the Monks and many of the Romans Sixthly It is a sin against the body the Apostle aggravates fornication from this consideration Seventhly It indisposeth to any spiritual duty Luke 21. 34. a full belly cannot study Impletus venter non vult studere libenter In Scripture a fat heart is as much as stupid and senslesse First Many like Iosephs master Potiphar take account of nothing but what they must eat and drink that they may be sure to fare well our feasts usually are turned meerly to an exercise of this vice Secondly All should exercise Temperance in Diet let a little content thee let the end of thy eating be strength and health not a pleasing of thy tooth the rich must inure themselves sometimes to a hard short meal that they may do more good to others Motives First Gluttony is a beastly sin yea it makes men worse then beasts for they can take delight in such things yet will not exceed Secondly It is an abuse of the creatures which are given to us for our good Thirdly Injurious to the poor CHAP. XIX Of Heresie Hypocrisie Idlenesse Impenitence Injustice Intemperance HERESIE I Dolatry was the prevailing sinne of the Old Testament and Heresie of the New It is a pertinacious defending of any thing which overthrows the Fundamentall Doctrine of faith contained in the Word of God An obstinate errour against the foundation Dr Halls Case of Consc. 5th Case It was a wilde fancy of the Weigelians That there is a time to come which they call Seculum Spiritus Sancti in which God shall by his Spirit reveal much more knowledge and light then was revealed by Christ and his Apostles in Scripture Mr Gillesp. Miscel. c. 10. The Gnosticks had their name propter excellentiam scientiae from profound knowledge and greater light They which pretended to know above all others yet were but a prophane sect as the Ancient Writers tell us The Socinians doctrine is as it were a filthy sink into which all the Heresies of former and later ages have emptied themselves They will receive no interpretation of Scripture nor article of faith unlesse it agree with reason Scriptura est norma recta ratio est judex all is ultimately resolved into reason Infaustus Socinus omnium Hareticorum audacissimus Rivet What doth Socinus think more highly of Christ then the Turks of Mahomet yea what doth he think