resembled to the two great pillars of brasse call'd Booz and Iachin supporting the gates of the Temple of Salomon wherefore these two points are sett at their full length solidly founded and fairely polished by a cleer smoothing and explication of the seeming hardenes of those proposalls which were taken as a hard saying coming euen out of CHRIST'S own mouth but if rightly vnderstood following this Author 's faire exposition they will be acknowleged as our Sauiour himself attested of them Verba quae ego locutus sum vobis Spiritus vita sunt The words that I haue spoke vnto you they are Spirit and they are life And can there be imagined a greater Blessing next to the Beatifical Vision then the Reall Participation of the Body and Blood of our Divine Sauiour IESVS-CHRIST Me thinks that which would haue bin the wish of all zealous Christians if it had not bin the free guift and gratification of God is this Reall Partaking euen in this life of this blessed cōmunication by which we may glory with S. Peter that by this precious promise we are made partakers of the Diuine Nature And surely I haue not seen any worke vpon this designe wherein these two corner-stones of the Catholique Church haue a more solid foundation or that affords a more easy comprehension of these two sublime mysteries By this motiue I haue bin perswaded to passe into my Country this forrein commodity which like a delicate wine of the same place may loose somewhat of the natural Spirit quicknes by the transport yet I may presume that it retaineth all these healthfull and cordiall qualities it had in the natiue production And hauing heretofore presented my Country in their seuerall seasons Spring-Flowers and other Summer-Fruits as the Parfumes of Poesy and the Reflection of Morality now in this winter of my age I transport to my nation this Riper and more wholesome fruit the feeding whereon contrary to the effect denounced against the forbidden fruite may produce life euerlasting Vpon which hope I may summon my Country in that call of our Lord IESVS commanded to be written by S. Iohn He that hath eares to heare let him heare what the Spirit saith to the Churches for that with greife I say it the reproach of the Prophet Esay may be so truly applied to our Nation Behold you kindle a fire and compasse your selues about with sparkes and walke in the light of your fire and in the sparkes that you haue kindled The strange diuersity of Sects and Severall professions of Religion doth too euidently appropriate this reproach of the Prophet wherefor the rest of my life shall be assigned to sollicite God for the blessing of the Primitiue Christians vpon our so deuided Country to be Cor Vnum and Via Vna One Hart One Way This Vnity was the most feruent prayer we find that our Sauiour euer made to his Father for his Church left vpon earth that they may be One as we are One. In order to some contribution to this Blessed Vnion I haue made this present to my Country and with great sense of Hart for whose Good Happinesse the Syncerity of my zeale is such that I perswade my self I may expresse it in S. Paul's offer for his Conuerts Ego autem libentissimè impendam Superimpendar ipse pro animabus vestris I most gladly will bestow and will my selfe moreouer be bestow'd for your soules And now giue me leaue to closevp this address to my Country in the words of our Lord IESVS which S. Iohn hear'd directed to the Bishop of Ephesus Remember from whence thou art fallen and repent and doe thy first workes For which blessed resipiscence shall be zealously offer'd all the days of my life the best of all the Religious offices and priuate deuotions of DEARE COVNTREYMEN Your most humbly deuoted seruant W A. MONTAGV Permis d' imprimer fait ce 12. Auril 1672. DE LA REYNIE AN EXPOSITION OF THE DOCTRINE OF THE CATHOLIQVE CHVRCH VPON THE POINTS OF Controversie AFTER more then a whole Age's contestation with those of the Pretended-Reformed Religion the matters vpon which they have grounded their breach may be conceiued sufficiently explayned and their minds disposed to a right vnderstanding of the Catholique Churche's Perswasions so that it seemes we can doe nothing better then propose them sincerely and distinguish them from those which have bin wrongfully imputed for in effect I haue observed in diuers occurrencyes that the auersion those persons expresse for the most part of our Doctrines is deriued from the false ideas that they haue figured of our tenents and most commonly drawn from certain expressions which offend them so much as resting at first sight vpon them they neuer passe forward to the enquiry of the grounds of the matter Whereupon I haue conceiued nothing could be more vsefull then to explaine to them what the Church hath defined in the Councel of Trent touching those points which remoue them the most from our Communion I will not therefore stay vpon what they commonly obiect to our priuate Doctors or vpon those matters which are neither inioyned nor vniuersally accepted since all parties agree and Mr Daille him'self that it is vnreasonable to impute the perswasions of particular persons vnto a whole body and he goes further confessing that one ought not to make a separation but vpon Articles Authentically established and whereof all sorts of persons are obliged vnto the Beleefe obseruation I will not therefore fix vpon any but the decrees of the Councel of Trent since it is there the Church speakes Decisiuely of the matters in question and what I shall offer to facilitate the right vnderstanding of those Decisions is approued by the same Church and shall appear manifestly conformable to the Doctrine of that holy Councel This explication of Doctrine will produce two good effects the first that diuers disputes will entierly vanish by reason they will be discerned as grounded meerly vpō wrong explications of our Beleefe the second the disputes remaining will not appear euen according to the principles of the Pretended-Reformers so capitall as they at first sight haue sought to qualify them and that euen by their owne principles they contein nothing that offendeth the grounds of Faith And to begin with these Fundamētall articles of Christian Faith the Pretended-Reformes must needs confess that they are beleeued and professed in the Catholique Church If they state them in the beleefe of adoring one single God Father Sonne and Holy Ghost and the confiding in God only by his sonne incarnate crucified and raysed from the dead for us they are conuinced by their own conscience that we protest the same Doctrine and if they will add the other Articles contayned in the Apostles Creed they doubt as little of our professing them intierly without exception and doe not question our hauing a pure and right vnderstanding of them Mons
r Daillé hath writt a treatise intitled Faith grounded vpon the scripture wherein after having exposed all the articles of Faith professed by the Pretended-Reformed Church he Saith that They are without contest the Church of Rome professeth the beleife of them and true it is that they hold not all our opinions but that we hold all their beleefs Wherefore this Minister cannot deny our beleeuing all the principall articles of Christian Religion vnless he will destroy his own Faith But had not Mons r Daillé graunted this the matter proues it self since all the world knowes that we profess the beleife of all those articles which the Caluinists call Fundamentalls so that an ingenuous syncerity would allow vs without dispute this Assertion that we haue not waued or declined any of the Essential perswasions The Pretended-Reformers discerning the aduantages we may draw from this concession seeke to disapoint vs by alledging that we destroy those articles by asserting others which are inconsistent with them This is what they labour to euince by consequences they inferr from our doctrines but the same M r Daillé whome I produce to them not so much to conuīce them by the testimony of one of their most learned Ministers as in regard that what he saith being euident in it self teacheth them what they ought to beleiue of those sorts of consequences supposing that ill ones might be deriued from our Doctrine This is what he saith in his letter to Mons r de Monglat vpon the occasion of his Apologie Although the opinion of the Lutherans in point of the Eucharist inferres according to vs as well as that of Rome the destrūction of the humanity of CHRIST JESVS yet that consequence cannot be obiected to them without calumnie considering that they doe formally reiect it There is nothing more Essentiall to Christian Religion then the verity of the Humane Nature of JESVS-CHRIST and yet notwithstanding the Lutherans hold a doctrine from which is inferr'd a destruction of this Essentiall verity by consequences the Pretended-Reformers account euident they haue not scrupuled to offer them their communion in respect that their opinion hath no poyson in it as M r Daillé attesteth in his Apologie and their Nationall Synod held at Charenton in 1631 admits the Lutherans to their Communion vpon this ground that they agree in the principles and fundamentall points of their Religion It is therefore a maxime constantly established amōgst them that we ought not in this matter to consider the consequences which may be drawne from a Doctrine but simply what the party maintaineth and what he stateth who professeth it So that when by consequences they pretend to deduct from our Doctrine that we can not sufficiently acknowledg the souueraine glory due to God nor the quality of Saviour and Mediator in CHRIST JESVS nor the infinite dignity of Sacrifice nor the superaboundant plenitude of his merits we may easily defeate those consequences by this short answer which M r Daillé himself furnishes vs with by saying that the Catholique Church disclaiming them they can not be imputed to vs without calumny But I will vndertake further and clear to the Pretended-Reformers by the single explication of our Doctrine that so farr it is from ouerthrowing the Fundamentall articles of Faith either directly or by any just consequence that quite contrary our Doctrine hath established them in a manner so solide so euident that without palpable injustice the aduantage of a right vnderstanding them can not admit a question And to begin with the adoration due to God the Catholique Church teacheth that it consists principally in beleiuing that he is the Creator Lord of all things and in adhering to him with all the powers of our soule by faith hope and loue as to him who alone can conferr our Eternall happinesse by com̄unication of the infinite Good which is himself This interior adoration which we render to G'od in spirit and in truth hath its exterior markes of which the principall is Sacrifice which can not be offered but to God alone by reason the homage of Sacrifice is established in order to a publike confession a solemne protestatiō of the soueraingnity of God and of our absolute dependance on him The same Church teacheth that Religiōs Worship ought to terminate in God as being the necessary end and obiect thereof and if the honour she renders to the Blessed Virgin and the Saints may be termed an Act of Religion it is upon the ground that it relateth necessarily vnto God Before I explaine further in what this honour consisteth it will be vsefull to obserue that the Pretended-Reformers being press'd by the power of euident truth begin to acknowledg that the practise of praying to Saints and honoring their reliques was established in the Church euen in the fourth Century M. Daillé making this acknowledgment in the booke he writt against the Latine Church touching the obiect of Religious Worship accuseth S. Basile S. Ambrose S. Hierome S. John Chrysostome S. Augustin and diuers other great lights of Antiquity which did shine in that age and aboue all the rest S. Gregory Nazianzen who is styled the Deuine as a note of his excellency he taxeth all these with hauing changed in this point the doctrine of the preceding ages But surely it will seeme very improbable that M. Daillé should have better vnderstood the sentiments of the three first ages then those who did as it were inherite their doctrine immediately vpon their death and it is by so much the lesse to be beleiued by reason that the fathers of the fourth age were so farre from perceauing any introduction of new doctrines in this Act of Religion that this Minister himself citeth expresse texts by which they shew clearly that they pretended in praying to Saints to follow the example of their Predecessors But not to examin any longer the iudgments of three primitiue ages I rest satisfyed with the graunt of M. Daillé who yealds to vs so many eminent Doctors who did instruct and discipline the Church in the fourth Age. For though it is an easy matter twelue hundred years after their death to taint them by way of scorne with the title of a Sect calling them Reliquarists as persons who honored Reliques I will hope that those of his Communion will beare more respect to those eminent personages they will not presume at least to object that theyr praying to Saints and honoring their Reliques rendred them guilty of Idolatry or that they ouerthrew the confidence that Christians are to haue in IESVS-CHRIST and we may hope that hence forward they will forbeare those reproaches when they consider they can not apply them to vs without laying the same imputation vpon so many excellent persons whose Doctrine Sanctity they professe to reuerence But since it is my worke to exhibite here our Beleif rather then produce the Mantainers of it we must persue the explication of it The Catholique Church teaching the
with CHRIST IESVS which is not to be found any where else It is easy for them to vnderstand that his Body is giuen vs to assure vs that we partake in his Sacrifice and in his Death They distinguish cleerly these two manners necessary to vnite vs to CHRIST IESVS the one is by taking his proper Flesh the other by receauing his Spirit the first thereof is granted vs as a pledge and security of the second but by reason things can not be explicated in the opinions held by our Aduersaries though on the other side they can not disauowe them we can not choose but conclude that their Error hath cast them into a manifest Contradiction I haue often wondred why they did not deliuer and explaine their Doctrine in a more familiar and simple manner Why haue they not persisted in saying without so many artifices that CHRIST IESVS hauing shed his blood for vs had represented to vs this effusion by giuing vs two distinct signes of his Body and his Blood and that he had bin pleased to giue to these two signes the names of the thing it self and that these sacred Symbols were pledges and securities of our partaking the fruite of his death and that we were nourished spiritually by the virtue of his Body and Blood after hauing strayned so hard to proue that the signes receaue the name of the thing it self and that for this reason the signe of the Body may be call'd the Body the whole frame of this Doctrine did oblige them naturally to settle and rest there And to render these signes efficatious it would serue sufficiently to haue the grace of our Redemption annexed to them or rather according to their principles that it were confirmed to vs in them They needed not to haue troubled themselues so much as they haue done to gett vs to conceaue that we receaue the very Body of our Sauiour to this end only viz to assure vs that we partake of the Grace of his Death These Pretended-Reformers did content themselues with hauing in the water of Baptisme a signe of the Blood which cleanseth vs and they neuer thought of saying that we receaue the Substance it self of our Sauiour's Blood to ascertaine us that the virtue thereof is therein diffused vpon vs. If they had argued and concluded so in the matter of the Eucharist their Doctrine would haue bin easier and lesse incombered with Contradictions But they who inuent and innouate can not say all they haue a minde to they encounter apparent verities and establish'd maximes which disapoint them and oblige them to restrayne their own conceptions The Arians would haue wisht not to haue bin obliged to qualify our Sauiour with the name of God and his only Sonne The Nestorians did admit but with great constraint a kinde of Unity of Persons in CHRIST JESVS which we finde in their writings The Pelagians who denyed Originall sin would as willingly haue reiected the ministring the Sacramēt of Baptisme to Infants in order to the remission of sin by which meanes they would haue bin deliuered from that argument the Catholiques drew from this practise to proue Originall sin But as I come from obseruing they who finde a thing firmely established haue not the boldnes or rather impudence to ouerthrow all at once Let the Caluinists auowe ingenuously the truth they would haue bin very willing to haue acknowleged in the Eucharist the Body of IESVS-CHRIST meerly Figuratiuely and the partaking only of his spirit in effect setting a side those big words of partaking of his proper Substance and many others which import a Reall Presence and doe but intricate perplexe them It would haue suted better to their mindes not to haue confessed any other Communion with CHRIST JESVS in the Lord's-Supper then such an one as is imparted in Preaching the Word and in Baptisme without telling vs as they doe that in the Eucharist CHRIST is receaued Intierly and elsewhere only in Part. But though this was their wish and inclination yet the powerfulnes of the termes resisted their profession of it our Sauiour hauing affirmed so positiuely of the Eucharist This is my Body This is my Blood which he never said of any other thing nor in any other occasion And what appearence of rendring that common to all the actions of a Christian which his expresse word hath annexed specially to one particular Sacrament Besides the whole order of the diuine counsels the connexion of the holy mysteries of the doctrine and intention of CHRIST IESVS in his last supper the words themselues which he vsed and the impression they naturally make in the minds of the faithfull all these suggest nothing but images and notions of Reality and for this reason our Aduersaries haue bin faine to finde out some words the sound whereof at least might raise some confused idea of this Reality When a man fastens himself either intirely vnto Faith as the Catholiques doe or absolutely rest on humane Reason as the Infidels doe one may establish firme consequences and make as it were an vniforme draught or designe of Doctrine but when one will frame a compound of them both together one is driuen to say somewhat more then he would willingly doe and in the persuite to fall into opinions the apparent Contradictions whereof manifestly discouer their Falsities This is the case of the Pretended-Reformers and God hath permitted their deluding themselues in this manner to facilitate their returne to the Vnity of the Catholique doctrine For since their own experience conuinceth them that they must speake as we doe to speake the language of truth ought they not to iudge they must thinke as we doe to vnderstand it right If they obserue in their own beleefe some things that can haue no sense but in ours is not this sufficient to conuince them that the Truth is not intire compleate but in our Church And those loose parts of Catholique doctrine which are scattered here and there in their Catechisme but would as one may say faine be reunited to their whole body ought not they perswade them to seeke in the Com̄union of the Church the full intire explication of the Mysterie of the Eucharist They would certainly be brought to it did not humane reasonings trouble perplex their Faith which is too much adhering to their senses But now after hauing represented to them what benefit they may draw from the exposition of their Doctrine let vs proceed and end the explaining of our own Since it was convenient as hath bin obserued before that our senses should discerne nothing in this mystery of Faith it was requisit there should be no alteratiō as to their obiect in the Bread Wine of the Eucharist Whereupon by reason that the same species continue as our obiect and we feele the same effects in the Sacrament as were sensible before the Consecration we ought not to wonder if some times and in some certain sense it is express'd by the
of deputation which were drawn vp agreed vpon at the Synode of Vitré in the year 1617. to be obserued by the Prouinces when they were to send deputies to the Nationall Synode is yet more positiue it runns in these termes We promise before God to submit to all that shall be concluded and resolved in your holy Assembly and to obey execute it with all our power being perswaded as we are that God will preside in it and conduct you by his holy Spirit into all truth and equity by the rule of his Word Here the point is not the receauâ—ng of the resolution of a Synode after hauing discern'd that it hath ordain'd according to the Scripture but here is a submission made unto it euen before the assembling of it and this is done by reason they are perswaded that the holy spirit will preside in it If this perswasion be grounded vpon a humane presumption can one in conscience promise before God to submitt to all which shall be resolued and concluded and to obey execute it to the utmost of ones power And if this perswasion be grounded vpon an assured beleef of that assistance the holy Ghost affordeth the Church in her Finall ordinances the Catholiques themselues require no more of them Thus the proceedings of our Aduersariers doe manifest that they concurr with vs in the necessity of a Supreme Authority without which there can neuer be a Finall decision of any doubt in Religion and although when they cast of the yoke of Obedience they denied that the faithfull were obliged to resigne their iudgment vp to that of the Church yet the necessity of settling some order among themselues hath forced them in processe of time to acknowledg what their first engagement had moued them to contradict Nay they haue gone much farther in the National Synode held at Sainte Foy in the year 1578. There was some ouerture made of a reconcilement with the Lutherans by means of a forme of profession of Faith general and common to all the Churches which was proposed to be concerted and drawn vp The Churches of this Kingdome were inuited to depute vnto an Assembly to be held for that purpose virtuous persons approued and authorised by all the forenamed Churches with an ample Procuration TO TREAT AGREE VPON AND DECIDE ALL POINTS OF DOCTRINE and other matters concerning the vnion Vpon this proposition the resolution of the Synode of Sainte Foy was agreed vpon in these termes The National Synode of this Kingdome after having giuen God thanks for such an ouerture and commended the care and diligence as well as the good counsels of the fore-mentioned persons conuoked APPROVING THE REMEDIES THEY HAVE SVGGESTED viz principally that of framing a new Confession of Faith and giuing power to some certaine persons to compose it hath ordained that in case the copie of that aboue-named Confession of Faith shall be sent time enough it shall be examined in euery Prouinciall Synode or after some other manner according to the conueniency of each Prouince and in the mean time hath deputed four Ministers the best experienced in affairs of that nature to whome expresse order hath bin giuen to render themselves vpon the places and at the day with letters and ample Procurations of all the Ministers and ancient Deputies of the Prouinces of this Kingdome together with those of the Viscount of Turene to doe all things aboue mentioned and euen in case that MEANS COVLD NOT BE FOVND TO EXAMINE THE SAYD CONFESSION BY ALL THE PROVINCES it is referr'd to their prudence and sound iudgment to agree and CONCLVDE all the points which shall be brought into deliberation as well FOR THE DOCTRINE as for any other matter concerning the benefit vnion and quiet of all the Churches This in fine is the result of that feigned tendernesse of Conscience in the Ministers of the Pretended-Reformed Religion How often haue they reproached to us as a weakenesse that Submission we professe to the iudgment and Decrees of the Church which is say they but a company of men subiect to Error and yet they being assembled themselues in a Body at a Nationall Synode which represented all the Pretended-Reformed Churches of France haue nor scrupuled to leaue their Faith to the Arbitration of four persons with so Absolute a Resignation of their Iudgments that they transferr'd vpon them a full power to change the very Confession it self which they propose euen to this day to all Christian people as a Confession of Faith which containeth nothing but the pure Word of God and for which in presenting it to our Kings they haue said that an infinite number of people were ready to shed their blood I leaue the prudent Reader to make his reflections vpon the Decree of this Synode and will conclude in few words my explication of the perswasions tenents of the Catholique Church The sonne of God hauing bin pleased that his Church should remaine one and be solidly built vpon this Vnity hath instituted founded the Primacy of S t Peter to maintaine and cement it whereupoÌ„we acknowledgethe same Primacy in the Successors of the Prince of the Apostles vnto whome vpon that title we owe that Submission Obedience which the holy Councells Fathers haue taught and inioyn'd the faithfull As for those points which are so vsually disputed in the Schooles although the Ministers doe coÌ„tinually alledge them to asperse and render that Authority odious it is to little purpose to mention them in this discourse since they are not points of Catholique Faith It is sufficient here to confesse a Head established by God which will freely be accorded by all such as affect Vnion Concord of Christian Fraternity Ecclesiasticall Vnanimity And certaine it is that if the Founders of the Pretended Reformation had loued Vnity in the Church they would neuer haue abolished Episcopall Gouernement which we finde established by IESVS-CHRIST himself and which we see impower'd authorised euen in the dayes of the Apostles nor would they haue despised the Authority of S. Peter's seate which hath so solid a foundation in the Ghospel and so euident a continuation in Ecclesiasticall Tradition they would rather haue zealously maintain'd Episcopall Iurisdiction which setleth preserueth Vnion in particular Churches and the Primacy of S. Peter's Chaire which is the common center of all Catholique VnioÌ„ This is the exposition of the Catholique Doctrine wherein to tye my self to what is most important in it I haue declined some questions which the Pretended-Reformers themselues doe not account a legitimate motiue for a Breach or Separation and I may hope that those of their Communion who shall examine fairely with Christian equity all the parts and consequences of this Treatise will by the reading thereof be better disposed to accept and acquiescevnto those proofs vpoÌ„ which the Faith of the Church is established and will at least auowe that many of our Controuersies may be decided by a
syncere explication of our perswasions and that our Doctrine is Holy and that euen by their own principles none of the Articles of our Beleef ouerthrow the Foundations of our Eternall Beatitude If any one shall conceaue it requisite to reply to this Treatise I must desire him to consider that to aduance any thing towards his intent he must not attempt to refute the Doctrine it containeth since my designe was to Propose it only without Supporting it by any Proofs and if in some passages I haue touched part of the grounds reasons which establish it the reason was because the knowledg of the principall grounds of a Doctrine doth often beare a part necessary for its explication It would be also a great digression from the designe of this Treatise to dicusse the different ways methodes motiues and arguments which the Catholique Diuines make use of to establish or illustrate the Doctrine of the Councel of Trent and the various consequences particular Doctors haue deduced from them To vrge any thing solide against this Treatise and that cometh home to the point it must either be proued by some acts which the Church hath engaged herselfe to receaue that her Faith is not here faithfully deliuered or be shewed that this explanation leaueth all the Aduersaries Obiections in their full force or in fine it must be exposed directly wherein this Doctrine subuerteth the Grounds and Foundation of Faith FINIS Io. 18. v. 38. Io 19. v. 12. Io. 12. v. 43. Ps. 118. v 85 86. Io. 16. 13. Mat. 28. v 20. Jo 6. v. 61. Jo. 6. v. 64 2. Pet. 1. v. 4. Apoc. 2. Esay 50 v 11. Act. 4. Y. 32. Io. 17. 11. 21. 2. Cor. 12. v. 15. Apoc. 2. 5. Designe of this Treatise Apol. c. 6. Those of the Pretended-Reformed Religion confesse that the Catholique Church professeth all the Fundamentall Articles of Christian Religion All Religious worship endeth in God alone Inuocation of Saints Rom. Catech p. 3. tit de cultu Inuoc sanct p. 4. tit quis sit orandus Sess. 25. dec de Inuoc c. Lib. 8. de Ciu. c. 27. Tract 28. in Joan. serm 27. de verbis Apostoli CoÌ„c Trid. sess 22. c. 3. Images and Reliques Conc. Trid. sess 25. decr de Inuoc c. Gal. 2. Pontific Rom. de Benedict Imag. CoÌ„c Trid. Sess. 25. dec de Inuoc c. 1. Pet. 2. Iustification Conc. Trid. Sess. 6. cap. 9. ibid. c. 8. Gal. â— 17. Iac. 3. 2. Merits of good workes Concil Trid. Sess. 6. c. 16. CoÌ„c Trid. sess 6. c. 16. Sess. 14. c. 8. Phil. 4. 7. Phil. 2. 12. ibid. 13. Satisfactions Purgatory Indulgences Sess. 25. decr de Indulg Parum me mouent quae in veterum scriptis de Satisfactione passim occurrunt video quidem eorum nonnullos dicam simpliciter omnes ferè quorum libriextant aut in hac parte lapsos esse aut nimis asperè ac durè locutos Calu. Inst. l. 3. cap. 4. The Sacraments Baptisme Confirmation Act. 8. 15. 17. Pennance and Sacramentall Confession Math. 18. 18. Io. 20. 23. Extreame-Vnction Iac. 5. 14. 15. Sess. 14. c. 2 de sac Extr Vnct. Marriage Math. 19. 5. â—ph 5. 32. Holy Orders 1. Tim. 4. 2. Tim. 1. Cor. faitl 35. Doctrine the Church touching the reall presence of the Body and Blood of IESVS-CHRIST in the Blessed Sacrament the manner wherein the Church vnderstands these words this is my Body Math. 26. Luke 22. 〈…〉 uit 6. 30 Leuit. 17. 11 Math. 26. 28. Luke 13. 12. Io. 4. 50. Math. 9. 2. Explication of the words doe this in remembraÌ„ce of me Luke 22. 19. 1. Cor. 11. 24 1. Cor. 11. 26. Habac. 2. 4. Exposition of the Caluinists doctrine about the Reallity Cat. Dim 53. Conf. of faith art 36. Cat. Dim 52. Dim 53. Dim 52. Dim 52. Of Transubstannation Adoration and in what sense the Eucharist is said to be a Signe Sacrifice of the Masse Hebr. 9. 24 Sess. 22. c. 1. The Epistle to the Hebrews Hebr. 10. 5 Hebr. 9. 24 Hebr. 9. 26. Hebr. 7. 25. Heb. 5. 7. Reflection vpon the preceding doctrine Communion vnder both kindes The written vnwritten Word 2. Thess. 2. 14. The Church's Authority Act. 15. 2â— Act. 16. 4. CoÌ„c Trid. seff 4. The opinion of those of the Pretended Reformed Religion concernig the Authority of the church The Authority of the holy see of Rome and of Episcopacy Conclusion of the Treatise
AN EXPOSITION OF THE DOCTRINE OF THE CATHOLIQUE CHURCH IN THE POINTS OF CONTROVERSIE with those of the Pretended Reformation By JAMES BENIGNVS BOSSÜET Counseller in the King's Counsels Bishop and Lord of Condom Tutor to his Royall Hyghnesse the Dolphin of France Translated into English by W. M. PRINTED AT PARIS By VINCENT DU MOUTIER Mont S. Hilaire at the signe of the Looking glasse M.DC.LXXII With Approbation and Permission APPROBATION Of my Lord Arch-Bishop and Duke of Reimes the first Peer of France and of other Lords Bishops WE haue reade the Treatise intituled An Exposition of the Doctrine of the Catholique Church in points of Controuersie composed by IAMES BENIGNVS BOSSÜET Bishop Lord of Condom Tutor to his Royall Hyghesse the Dolphin and after hauing examined it with as much application as the importance of the matter required we haue iudged the Doctrine conformable to the Catholique Apostolique and Roman Faith Which moues vs to propose it vnder that notion to the persons God hath committed to our charge and as we assure our selues that those of the Catholique Communion will be edified by it so we may hope that those of the Pretended-Reformed Religion who shall peruse this worke with attention may receaue from it clearings and disabuses very conducing to guide them into the way of Saluation CHARLES MAVRICE LE TELLIER Arch-Bishop Duke of Reimes CHARLES DE ROSMADEC Arch-Bishop of Tours FELIX Bishop Earle of Chalons DE GRIGNAN Bishop of Vsez D. DE LIGNY Bishop of Meaux NICOLAS Bishop of Luson GABRIEL Bishop of Autun MARC Bishop of Tarbe ARMAND IOHN Bishop of Beziers STEPHEN Bishop Prince of Grenoble IVLIVS Bishop of Tule TO MY DEAR COVNTRYMEN OF ENGLAND Cognoscetis Veritatem Veritas liberabit vos Jo. 8. v. 32. Yee shall know the Truth and the Truth shall sett you free TRVTH is so much the Center of the Spirit of Man as it pretends to moue towards it euen in all the digressions Deuiations it makes from it For euen most of our Errors Delusions passe themselues vpon vs vnder the notion of Truth The Spirit of Falsity disguiseth himself into the Apparēce of an Angel of Light to haue the easier accesse Did not Pilate himself seeme desirous to know Truth when he inquired of our Sauiour what Truth was But most inquier like him as soone as menaced with this terror if you receaue it you are no freind to Caesar you incurre the displeasure of the State and the Penalty of the Laws they decline the further persute of Truth and shrinke into that weakenes which our Sauiour reproached to his timorous inquirers they lou'd the Glory before Men more then the Glory before God Others there are who seeme frighted as the children of Israël were with the misreports of the inhahitants of the land of Chanaan which were falsely represented to them as Gyants and Monsters for so their Pretending Explorators disguise to them the Roman-Catholique Religion vnder the Forged figures of Idolatry or Superstitiō to diuert an inquiry into the true state and constitution of it But as when Iosuah shew'd the children of Israël a true and sensible parcel of the fruits of that earth they were disabused and inflamed with a desire to partake of the blessed fertility of the land of promise so Godbe praised there are many who vpon an equal ingenuous view of the true and natural state of Catholique Doctrine are disabused and protest against the false reporters as the Psalmist did in reiection of vaine inuentions of the Heathens Narrauerunt mihi iniqui Fabulationes sed non vt lex tua Omnia mandata tua Veritas Vniust men make their own storys but what they say is not like thy law All thy commandements are Truth Here is therefore a true naturall parcel of the fruits of that land of promise the Church of CHRIST to which this blessed promise was made that it should be led into all Truth and that CHRIST IESVS the founder of it would remaine with it vnto the end of the world This promise can not be verified in any Church which hath had a notorious deficiency and interruption for many ages which marke of inconformity to CHRIST'S figure and description of the True Church is euident in all the Pretended-Reformations But the designe of this Author was only a short easy exposure of such Catholique Doctrines as the beleefe thereof is fully sufficient to render the professor an intire Orthodox Catholique so that this short Treatise may be call'd rather a Factum of the case then Pleading of the cause since it doth but singly expose the matter of Fact in all our Beleefs whithout any Arguing against the opposite Opinions Whereupon I may not improperly say this is a true picture by the life of Catholique Religion which designeth only a iust and natural representation of it not a character that raiseth beautifyeth the figure it exposeth And in conformity to this profession the pious and prudent Author declareth in the close of this discourse that it was designed only for a Faithfull Manifest in the name of the Catholique Church the vtility whereof was expected in the disabusing all ingenuous Readers in those misreported Doctrines which are wrongfully imputed to her And God hath bless'd this pious proposall so as to recommend it very notoriously by the satisfaction which is profess'd to haue bin receaued by one of the most considerable persons of this age for the honour of his Birth and eminency of all sorts of Merit he hath acknowleged much of his cleer full information of the Catholique Doctrines as receaued from this excellent discourse And surely I haue not seen any edition of this nature as may be more aptly call'd a Mapp of Catholique Religion for all the lesser Controuersies are marked out in very smale points touches but the two Capital seates are distinguish'd by some larger markes which represent them so you will find the Reall Presence of CHRIST in the Sacrament of the Eucharist and the Sacrifice of the Masse as being the Capitall seates of our Controuersies extended in a much larger figure then the other questions and the drawing these two figures at their full length with their true features was the most requisit application by reason they are the most aspersed disfigured by the Maligners of the Church And these two Articles rightly understood as they are profess'd and explain'd in this Treatise may promise the remoue of the greatest difficultyes which most frequently auert many ingenuous candid Protestants from entring into an equal impartial inquiry concerning the seeming difficultyes of these two points namely this of the Reall Presence of CHRIST'S Body and Blood in the Blessed Sacrament of the Eucharist as pretending it s not being cleerly explained and likewise the Controuersy about the Sacrifice of the Masse as not appearing euidently specified in holy Scripture Me thinks these two may not be improperly
desires by a speciall reuelation or be it that God reueileth to them that secret in his diuine essence wherein all truths are comprehended so that the Church vpon these different manners hath not determined by which of them God is pleased to make this communication to his Saints But by what means soeuer this knowledge is imparted it is very certain that it is farr from ascribing to the creature any of the diuine perfections as the Idolaters did since it doth not permit our attributing euen to the greatest Saints any degree of excellence which is not deriued from God nor acceptablenesse in his eyes but as deriued from their virtues nor any virtue but what is the free guift of Grace nor any information of humane passages but such as God is pleased to communicate nor any capacity to assist vs but only by their prayers nor in fine any felicity but by a perfect submission and conformity to the diuine pleasure It is therefore most certain that vpon penetration into our interior sentiments directed to the Saints it will be euident that we doe not raise them aboue the condition of Creatures and from this ground one ought to be possess'd of the true nature of that honour and reuerence which is intended by our exterior demonstrations the apparent religious offices being appointed to testify the interior sentiments of our minds But by reason that the honour which the Church offers to Saints appeareth most notoriously before their Images and their holy Reliques it is requisite to explaine the Churches syncere doctrine in this Religious Act. In point of Images the Councel of Trent forbids expressely to beleeue any Diuinity or power in them for which we ought to reuerence them or to sue for any fauor or to place any confidence in them and ordains that all the honour should relate to the Originalls they represent All these words of the Councel are so many characters which serue to distinguish vs from Idolaters since we are so farr from beleeuing with them any Diuinity residing in the Images as we attribute no virtue to them but this of exciting in vs the remembrance of their originalls Vpon this it is that the honour we render to Images is grounded for example can one deny that the figure of IESVS-CHRIST crucified when we behold it doth not excite a more liuely remembrance of him who loued vs so as to deliuer himself vp to death for vs As long as the present Image possessing our eyes entertains so pretious a notion in our minds we are moued to expresse by some exterior markes the feruor and extent of our gratitude and we declare by our humiliation before the Image how profound our submission is respectiue to the Original Wherefore speaking strictly according to the style of the Church when we render any honour to the Image of an Apostle or Martyr our ayme is not so much to honour the Image as the Apostle or Martyr in presence of the Image To this purpose the Roman Pontificall declareth and the Councell of Trent expresseth the same intent when it saith that the honour we render to Images is so referr'd to the Originalls that by the means of the Images we kisse and before which we kneele we adore CHRIST IESVS and honour those Saints which they represent to vs. In fine we cleerly discerne in what Spirit the Church honoureth Images by the honour it renders the holy Crosse or the booke of the Gospel All the world sees cleerly that before the Crosse the Church adoreth him who did beare our sinn's vpon that wood and that when her children bow their heads before the bookes of the Gospel when they stand vp in respect at theyr passing by them and kisse them reuerently all this honour terminateth in the Eternall Verity which is exposed to vs by that Instrument There must then be very little equity in calling Idolatry that Religious sentiment which moueth vs to vncouer and bow our heads before the Images of the Crosse in reflection vpon him who was crucyfi'd for our sakes and one must be starke blinde not to discerne the extreame difference between those who confided in Idols vpon this opinion that some Diuinity or some virtue was at is were fastned vnto them and them who professe as we doe that they intend not to make any vse of Images but simply to raise their spirit vp to heaven with the intent of honouring CHRIST IESVS or his Saints and in them God himself who is the author of all grace and Sanctification Vnder the same notion the honour we pay to Reliques is to be apprehended following the stepps of the primitiue Ages and if our Aduersaries did reflect that we consider the bodies of Saints as hauing bin victimes to God either by Martyrdome or Pennance they would not conceiue that the honour we render them vpon this motiue can depart or remoue vs from that we owe to God himself And we may say in generall that if they would comprehend in what manner the affection we beare to some one body extendeth without deuiding it self to his children to his freinds and successiuely by degrees to all that represents that person to all that remains of him or any thing that receiueth the memory of him if they did comprehend that our honouring makes such a progress since in effect our honouring is nothing else but loue mixt with feare and respect in fine if they did comprehend that all the exterior worship of the Catholique Church riseth and springeth in God himself and that it reuerts thither they would neuer suspect that those Religious acts which God alone doth animate could provoke his iealousy They would perceiue the quite contrary and find that if God as iealous as he is of the loue of men doth not account that we deuide between him and the Creature when we loue our Neighbour for his sake the same God as iealous as he is of the duties of his seruants doth not conceiue them to share or part the worship which they owe to him alone when from the motiue of the dutys they owe him they honour those who haue bin honoured by himself Yet true it is that as the sensible markes of reuerence are not all of absolute necessity the Church without any alteration in the Doctrine may haue extended more or lesse those exterior practises suting to the diuersity of times places and other occurrencies not intending that her children should be seruilly subiected to visible matters but only that they might be excited and as it were aduertised by their means to apply themselfs to God to offer him in spirit and truth that reasonable and due seruice he expecteth from his creatures It may easily be discerned by this Doctrine with how much truth I have asserted that a great part of our Controversies would vanish by an only right vnderstanding of termes if these were discussed with Charity and if our Aduersaries did consider calmely the precedent explications
which comprehend the expresse Doctrine of the Councel of Trent they would forbeare to obiect to vs that we injure the Mediation of CHRIST IESVS and that we inuoke Saints adore Images in a manner peculiar to God himself It is granted by reason that in some sense Inuocation Adoration and the name of Mediator are competent only to God and CHRIST JESVS that it is easy by a perverse vse of those termes to traduce our Doctrine and render it odious but if they are ingenuously receiued in that sense we haue exhibited these obiections loose all their force and if there remayne in the minds of the Pretended Reformers any lesse important difficultyes naturall equity and syncerity will oblige them to auowe themselues satisfy'd in the principall exceptions Besides this there is nothing more vniust then to charge the Church with the stating of all piety in this devotion to Saints since as we haue already euinced the Councel of Trent iudgeth it sufficient to informe and teach Catholiques that this practise is Good Vsefull without advancing it further so that the Churches intent is to condemn such as reiect this practise either by Contempt or Misconstruction and the Church is obliged to condemn them by reason that she ought not to indure the condemning of salutary and usefull practises nor that a Doctrine which all Antiquity hath authorised should be reiected by the Nouellists Doctors The matter of iustification will manifest yet a greater light how many difficulties may be avoyded by a syncere exposition of our opinions Those who are never so little acquainted with the history of the Pretended Reformation can not be ignorant that those who were the first Authors of it did propose this Article to all the world as the principall and as it were the most essentiall ground of their separation so that this seemes the most necessary point to be rightly understood First we beleeve that our sinns are forgiuen freely by the divine mercy for JESVS-CHRIST'S sake these are the expresse termes of the Councel of Trent which addeth further that we are said to be iustified freely because none of those things which precede our iustification either our faith or our works can merit this grace And by reason the holy scripture explains to us the remission of our sinns expressing it some times by saying that God couers them and others that he takes them quite away and effaceth them by the grace of the holy Ghost which renders vs new creatures we conceiue that we are to combine all these expressions to forme a compleate Idea or notion of the iustification of a sinner we doe therefore beleeue that our sinns are not only couered but intirely effaced by the blood of CHRIST IESVS and by the grace by which we are regenerated and this perswasion is so farr from detracting from that image we ought to frame of the merit of that blood as quite contrary it indeareth and eleuateth the value of it for by this meanes the righteousnes of Christ is not simply imputed but actually imparted to the faithfull by the operation of the holy Ghost in so much as they are not only imputed but euen rendered righteous by the grace of Christ. If our righteousnes were only in the sight of man it would not be the operation of the holy Ghost it must then be iustice euen before God since it is God himself who produceth it in vs by an effusion of his charity vpon our harts It is notwithstanding but too true that the flesh lusteth against the spirit and the spirit against the flesh and we all offend in many things Wherefore albeit our righteousnes be a true one by the infusion of Charity yet is it no perfect one by reason of the combat between it our concupiscence so that the sighing and sorrowing of a soule repenting her sinns performes the most necessary duty of Christian righteousnes which obligeth vs to confesse with S. Augustin that our righteousnes in this life consists rather in the remission of our sinns then in the perfection of our virtues Wherefore as to the point of Merit imputed to our workes the Catholique Church teacheth that Eternall life ought to be proposed to the children of God both as a Grace mercifully promised by the meanes of our Sauior IESVS CHRIST and as a Reward which is faithfully rendred to their good workes and to their deserts in virtue of that promise these are the expresse termes of the Councel of Trent but least the pride of humane nature should be flattered by the opinion of a persuming Merit the same Councel determineth that all the worth and value of Christian good workes is deriued from that sanctifying grace which is freely conferr'd vpon vs in the name of CHRIST JESVS and that is an effect of the continuall influence of that diuine head vpon his depending members True it is indeed that the exhortations the promises the menaces and reproaches of the Gospel doe declare sufficiently that we are to worke our saluation by the motion actings of our own wills concurring with the Grace of God which assists vs but it is a fixt principle that free will can performe nothing in order to Eternall beatitude but by the same degrees it is moued and eleuated by the holy Ghost Whereupon the Church knowing that it is the holy spirit which worketh in vs by his Grace all the good we doe she ought to rest perswaded that the good workes of the faithfull are very acceptable to God of great estimation in his sight and she doth rightfully vse the terme of Merit concurrently with all Christian Antiquity cheefly to signify the value dignity of our workes which we performe by the motion of his Grace But by reason all their sanctity is deriued from God who workes them in vs the same Church hath receiued from the Councel of Trent as the Doctrine of the Catholique Faith this saying of S. August that God crowns his own Gifts when he crowns the Merits of his seruants We intreate all such as loue truth peace to be pleased to read the whole context of the Councel of Trent's words that they once be disabused and deliuered from those wrong impressions which are suggested to them of our Docctrine Notwithstanding we discerne cleerly say the fathers of that Councel that the holy scriptures esteeme so much Good woorks that IESVS-CHRIST himself promiseth that a cupp of cold water giuen a poor body shall not want its reward and that the Apostle declareth that a moment of light payne suffered in this world shall produce an Eternall weight of glory yet God forbid that a Christian should trust glory in himself and not in our Lord whose goodness towards Man is so aboundant that he allowes his own Guifts to them to be accounted their Merits This Doctrine is spread through the whole Councel which teacheth in an other session that we who are not sufficient to doe
perfection of the new man Their diuine institution is extant in the holy scripture either by the expresse words of CHRIST who established them or by that Grace which by testimony of the same scripture is annexed vnto them and inferreth necessarily God's ordayning them By reason that infants can not supply their own want of Baptisme by the acts of Faith Hope and Charity nor by their vows desire of receauing this Sacrament we beleeue that if they doe not actually receaue it they haue no part of communication of the Grace of our Redemption and consequently dying in Adam they haue no part in JESVS-CHRIST It is fitt to obserue here that the Lutherans concurr with the Catholique Church in holding the absolute necessity of Baptisme for Infants and withall wonder that any one hath presumed to deny a truth which no one before Caluin had euer dared to call in question so deeply was it imprinted in the minds of all the faithful Notwithstanding this the Pretended-Reformers make no scruple willfully to lett their children dye as the Infidels doe without bearing any marke of Christianity and depriued of all the grace that belongs to it if the death of the child happen before the day of their Congregation The imposition of hands practised by the Apostles in order to the confirming fortifying the faithfull against persecutions deriuing the principall efficacy from the internall descent of the holy Ghost the infusion of his guifts ought not to haue bin reiected by our Aduersaries vpon this pretext that the holy spirit doth no longer descend visibly vpon vs no more then it is by all the Christian Churches who haue religiously continued it euer since the Apostles and make vse also of the holy Chrisme to demonstrate the virtue of that Sacrament by a more expresse and sensible representation of the interiour Vnction of the holy spirit We beleeue CHRIST IESVS hath bin pleased to ordaine that those who haue subiected themselues to the Authority of the Chruch by their Baptisme and after this engagement haue transgressed the lawes of the Gospel should be bound to vndergoe the iudgment of the same Church at the tribunal of Pennance where she doth exercise the power conferr'd vpon her to remitt or to reteyn sinns The termes of the commission granted to the Churches Ministers to absolue sinns are so large and general that without great temerity the power can not be restreyned only vnto publick and notorious offences and when they pronounce Absolution in the name of CHRIST JESVS since they doe but follow the expresse termes of their commission the sentence is reputed as giuen by CHRIST himself in whose place they are appointed as Iudges It is this inuisible High-Priest who absolueth interiourly the Penitent whilst the Priest exerciseth the exteriour ministery This Penitentiall iudicature being so necessary a curbe for our licentiousnesse so aboundant a spring of pious and prudent aduises so sensible a consolation to soules afflicted for their sinns when Absolution is not only declared to them in generall termes as the Protestant Ministers doe practise but giuen them in particular and the Penitent effectualy absolued by the commission of CHRIST IESVS vpon a perfect examination and a right vnderstanding of the case we can not possibly beleeue that our Adversaries can contemplate so many good consequences without resenting their losse and feeling some shame of such an abusiue Reformation which hath abrogated so holy so beneficial a practise The holy Ghost hauing annexed vnto Extreame-Vnction by the testimony of S. Iames an expresse promise of remission of sinns and ease vnto the sick party there is nothing wanting vnto this most holy ceremony towards the cōstituting it a true Sacrament We must only obserue that according to the Doctrine of the Councel of Trent the sick are more releeued in respect of their soules then their bodyes and the spiritual benefit is alwayes the principal ayme obiect of the new law it is that also we ought absolutely to expect from this holy Vnction supposing we are rightly disposed for it whereas our corporal eases and releifs in our infirmitys are afforded vs only as relating to our eternal health according to the secret and hidden dispositions of Diuine Prouidence and the seueral degrees of preparation and faith which are already acting in the soules of the faithful When we shall seriously cōsider that IESVS-CHRIST hath induced a new forme into the state of Marriage reducing this holy society vnto two persons immutably indissolubly vnited when we shall reflect that this inseparable coniunction is made the signe of his Eternall vnion with his Church we shall find little difficulty to comprehend that the Marriage of the faithfull is accompanied with the Grace of the holy Spirit we will easily praise the Diuine goodnes which hath bin pleased to sanctify in this manner the spring and deriuation of our birth The imposition of hands which the Ministers of holy matters receaue being accompanied with so present and actual a virtue of the holy Ghost and so intire an infusion of Grace is duly reckoned in the number of the Sacraments and we must confesse that our Aduersaries doe not absolutely exclude the Consecration of Ministers but they reiect it only from the number of the Sacraments which are common to the whole Church We are now at last come to the question of the Eucharist or Blessed Sacrament wherein it will be requisite to explaine more amply our Doctrine and yet not passing farr beyond the bounds which we haue prescribed to our selues The reall presence of the Body and Blood of our Lord in this Sacramēt is solidy established by the words of the institution which we vnderstand litterally and there is no more reason to aske vs why we tye our selues to the proper litterall sence then to question a traueller why he followeth the great high-way It is their part that resort to figuratiue senses and choose such by-paths to shew a reason of this their deuiation As for vs who perceaue nothing in the words which CHRIST IESVS vsed for the institution of this Mystery that obligeth vs to take them in a figuratiue sense we conceaue this reason sufficient to settle and determine our receauing them in their proper and litterall signification But we find our selues yet more strictly tyed vnto it when we considerately examine the intention of the sonne of God in this mystery which I will explaine in the cleerest and easiest termes I can possibly and by such principles as I conceaue our Aduersaries can not disagree in I say then that these words of our Sauiour Take and eate this is my Body giuen for you shew vs that as the ancient Iews did not simply vnite themselues in spirit vnto the immolation or killing of the victimes which were offered for them but did effectually eate of the Sacrificed flesh which was a signe
this solemne Com̄emoration IESVS-CHRIST hath ordained vs to make doth exclude the Reall presence of his Flesh that the contrary is euident that this tender reflexion he would haue vs make at the holy table on him as offered vp for vs is grounded vpon his Flesh's being Really receaued since in effect it is not possible for vs to forget that he hath giuen his Body vp in sacrifice for vs when we finde that he continueth still to giue vs dayly that victime for our orall manducation Shall Christians vpon pretence of celebrating in the Supper the Memory of our Sauiour's Passion retrench from this pious Commemoration that part which is the most affectiue and most efficacious therein Ought they not consider that CHRIST IESVS doth not command that we should barely remember him but that we should remember him by feeding on his Flesh and Blood Lett vs reflect vpon the consequence and powerfulnes of the words Christ saith not simply as the Pretending Reformers seeme to vnderstand him that the Bread and the Wine of the Eucharist should be a Memorial of his Body and Blood but the telleth vs that in doing what he prescribed that is in taking his Body and his Blood we should be Mindful of him And can there be any thing in effect more powerful to produce in vs the remembrance of it If children reflect so tenderly vpon their father and his kindenes when they approach the tombe where his body is enclosed how powerfully ought our loue and memory to be excited and indeared when we possesse vnder those sacred couerings and vnder that mystical tombe the Flesh it self of our Sauiour immolated for vs that liuing and life-giuing Flesh and this Blood still warme by the feruor of his loue and full of spirit and grace If our Aduersaries persist to alledge that he who commandeth vs to remember him doth not giue us his proper Substance we may desire them to agree amongst themselues They professe not to deny the Reall communication of the proper Substance of the sonne of God in the Blessed Sacrament if their profession be serious if their Doctrine be not a meere delusion they must needs auowe with vs that Remembrance doth not exclude all manner of Presence but only that which moueth the senses and so their answer is the same with ours since when we affirme that IESVS-CHRIST is present we accord at the same time that he is not existing in a sensible manner And if we are ask'd the reason we beleeuing as we doe that there is nothing to satisfy our senses in this mystery why we doe not grant that it is sufficient CHRIST IESVS should be present in it by our Faith we may very easily answer cleare this equivocal demande It is one thing to say that the son̄e of God is present to vs by Faith and an other to say that we know by Faith that he is present The first manner of speaking imports only a Moral presence the second doth signify a very Reall one because our Faith is most certaine and this Reall presence known by our Faith sufficeth to worke in the iust who liueth by Faith all the effects which I haue specified But to defeate at once all the equiuocations vnder which the Caluinists couer their opinions in this point and to discouer at the same time how neere they approach to vs although I haue vndertaken only to deliuer and explicate the Doctrine of the Catholique Church it will not be amisse here to insert theirs Their Doctrine is deuided into two partys or sects the one speaks only of the Figure of the Body and Blood the other of nothing but the Reality of them both we shall examine in their due orders each one of these different parties In the first place they alledge that this great miracle of the Reall presence which we admit is no way needful that it sufficeth for our saluation that IESVS-CHRIST dyed for vs that this Sacrifice is sufficiently apply'd by our Faith and this application is fully certified by the word of God they and further that if this word ought to be cloath'd with sensible signes the giuing vs simple and bare Symboles such as water in Baptisme would haue bin sufficiēt without the necessity of drawing down from heauen the Body and Blood of CHRIST IESVS Nothing seemes more easy then after this manner to explicate the Sacrament of the Lord's-Supper and yet our Aduersaries themselues haue not iudged that they ought to rest and acquiesce in this exposition They know that the like imaginations haue drawn the Socinians to deny the miracle of the Incarnation Those Heretiques alledge that God could haue saued vs without going so farre about he had nothing to doe but forgiue our sinns he could haue instructed vs sufficiently both in point of Doctrine and Manners by the Words and by the Example of a man fill'd with the holy Ghost without being obliged for that effect to make a God of him But the Caluinists as well as we haue discern'd the weakenesse of this argument which is euident first by reason that it is not our part to deny or assure the mysteries of Religion according to our own iudgment of their being vsefull or vnnecessary for our saluation God alone is possess'd of the secret and our part is the rendring them profitable and beneficiall to vs by beleeuing them such as God promiseth them and in receauing his graces and fauours in the same manner as he bestoweth them Secondly without entring into this question whether it was possible for God to saue vs by any other meanes then the Incarnation and Death of his sonne and embroyling vs in that vselesse dispute which the Pretending Reformers debate so teadiously in their schooles it sufficeth to haue learnt by the holy scriptures that the sonne of God hath bin pleased to demonstrate his loue by effects which to vs are incomprehensible This loue was the motiue of that so Reall vnion by which he made himself Man This loue perswaded him to immolate and offer vp for vs his body as Really as he assumed it All these designes are consequent to one an other and this infinite loue holds the same height throughout all the strayns motions thereof So that when he shall be pleased to bring each single child of his by vniting himself to him particularly to tast and partake the goodnesse which he hath express'd to all in generall he will find meanes to accomplish his will by things as powerfull and efficacious as those which he hath already fulfill'd for our saluation We ought not therefore to wonder at his giuing vnto euery one of vs the Reall Substance of his Flesh and Blood He intends by it to imprint in our harts this verity that it was for our sakes that he assumed them and offered them vp in Sacrifice This preceding goodnes renders all the sequence easy to be beleeued the order of his mysteries disposeth vs to credit all this and his expresse
celebrating the Memory and applying the Virtue of that Oblation Whereby the same Church professeth that all the merit of the Redemption of mankind is annexed to the Death of the son̄e of God certainly by all that hath bin already said it ought to haue bin vnderstood that when we say to God in the celebration of the divine Mysteries We offer you this holy host we doe not pretend by this oblation to make or present to God a new payement of the price of our Saluation but to employ towards him the merits of IESVS CHRIST there present and the infinite price he hath at once pay'd for our Redemption vpon the Crosse. The Professors of the Pretended-Reformed Religion doe not beleeue that they offend CHRIST IESVS in offring him to God as present by their Faith as in case they did beleeue he were truly and Really present what repugnance could they haue to offer him as being Effectually present So that to argue ingenuously the dispute in faire dealing ought to be reduced singly to his being Present This supposed all the false images and conceptions the Pretended-Reformers frame to themselues about the Sacrifice we offer ought to be effaced they should in iustice acknowledge fairely that the Catholiques pretend not to frame for themselues a new Propitiation to appease God againe as if he were not sufficiently reconciled by the Sacrifice of the Crosse or in order to make some new supplement to the price of our Saluation as if it were imperfect All these imaginations haue no admission into our Doctrine by reason that all this is intended by way of Intercession and Application in that manner I come from deliuering explaining After this cleer explication those great obiections drawn out of the Epistle to the Hebrews which our Aduersaries seeke to enforce so much against vs will appear weake vnreasonable that it is in vaine they strayne themselues to proue by the meaning of the Apostle that we nullify the Sacrifice of the Crosse but as the most certain proof that can be had that two Doctrines are not opposite to one an other is to discouer in the expounding them that no proposition of the one is Contradictory to the proposalls of the other I conceaue my self inuited in this occasion to expose in short the Doctrine of the Epistle to the Hebrews The Apostle designed in this Epistle the teaching vs that a sinner could not escape from death other wayes then by subrogating in his place one that should dy for him that while men did supply in their stead but the Bloodshed of Beasts their Sacrifices had no other operation but the making a publick profession that they had deserued to dy and that by reason the divine Iustice could not be satisfied with so disproportionate an exchange those Bloody Victimes were euery day offer'd and repeated which was a certain proofe of the insufficiency of that exchange and subrogation but that since CHRIST IESVS had bin pleased to dy for sinners God being fully satisfyed by the voluntary substitution of so worthy a person could no more require the price of our ransome from whence the Apostle concludes that we ought not only to cease from offring any other Victime after CHRIST IESVS but that CHRIST himself was to be offer'd vp to death but one single time Let the Reader then who is sollicitous of his Saluation and is a freind to truth recolect seriously what we haue deliuered of the manner wherein CHRIST IESVS offereth himself to God for vs in the Eucharist and I am confident he will not find in it any propositions contrary to those of the Apostle which I come from delivering or any that infirme his proofes so the most can be vrged against vs is his Silence But such as will consider the wise distributions God maketh of his secrets in the many and seuerall bookes of his Scripture would not surely restraine vs to receaue from the single Epistle to the Hebrews all our instruction concerning a matter which did not necessarily relate to the subiect of that Epistle since the Apostle intendeth in it to explaine the perfection of the Sacrifice of the Crosse and not the different meanes God hath giuen vs to apply it vnto our selues And to preuent all Equiuocall sense if we take the word offer as it is vnderstood in this Epistle in that sense which implyeth the Actual death of the Victime we confesse aloud that IESVS-CHRIST is no longer offer'd so neither in the Eucharist nor any where else But as this same word hath a larger signification in other places of Scripture where it is often said that one Offereth to God what one presenteth before him the Church which doth not frame her language her doctrine by the single Epistle to the Hebrews but by the whole body of the Scriptures doth not scruple to affirme that CHRIST JESVS offereth himself to God in all places where he appeareth for our sakes before him and consequently that he offereth himself vp in the Eucharist according to the expression of the holy Fathers of the Church Now to conceaue that this man̄er wherein CHRIST IESVS presenteth himself to God can at all detract from the Sacrifice of the Crosse is what can not possibly be inferr'd vnlesse one will ouerthrow the whole Scripture and especially that Epistle which they seeke so much to straine against vs. For by the same reason we ought to conclude that when CHRIST IESVS vowed himself to God entring into the world to substitute himself instead of those Victimes which were not pleasing to him that he iniured the action by which he deuow'd himself vpō the Crosse and so when he continueth to appeare for vs before God he detracteth from the Oblation in which he appeared once by the Immolation of himself and that not ceasing to intercede for vs he accuseth that Intercession of Insufficiency which he made at his Death with so many teares and so great cryes Would not all these inferences be ridiculous We must therefore vnderstand that CHRIST IESVS who did offer vp himself once to become the humble Victime of the Diuine iustice doth continue still offering himself for vs that the infinite perfection of the Sacrifice of the Crosse consisteth in this that whatsoeuer preceded it as well as what follows it are intirely relating vnto it that as what preceded was its Preparation so what doth follow is its Consummation and Application that true it is the payment of the price of our ransome is not reiterated by reason it was fully discharged the first time but what Applieth that Redemption is incessantly continued repeated and in fine we must know to distinguish those acts which are reiterated as being imperfect from such as are perpetuated as being perfect necessary We coniure the followers of the Pretended-Reformed Religion to make some little reflection vpon what I haue said concerning the Eucharist The doctrine of the Reall Presence hath bin
preuent all scandal They haue concluded by this regulation that both kindes were not essentiall to the Communion by the institution of CHRIST for otherwise they would haue bin bound absolutely to refuse the Sacrament to such as were not able to receaue it compleat and not to giue it them in a manner contrary to that CHRIST JESVS had commanded and in that case their disability would haue sufficiently excused them But our Aduersaries haue conceaued that such a rigour would be excessiue if they did not allow at least one of the Species to such as were not capable to receaue the other and since this condescendence hath no ground in the Scripture they must needs confesse with vs that the words whereby CHRIST IESVS hath proposed to vs the two Species are liable to some interpretation and that the right vnderstanding of them ought to be declared by the Authority of the Church But it might seeme that this Article of their Discipline which is of the Synode of Poytiers held 1560 had bin reformed by the Synode of Vertueil assembled in the year 1567 where it is said that the company is not of opinion the Bread should be giuen to those who would not receaue the Cupp These two Synodes neuerthelesse are not at all opposite to one another that of Vertueil speaketh of those who Will not receaue the Cupp and that of Poytiers of such as Can not take it And indeed notwithstanding the Synode of Vertueil that Article remaineth in their Discipline nay more hath bin approued by a Synode later then that of Vertueil namely by the Synode of Rochelle in 1571 where the Article was renewed and putt into that state which it now remaineth in But supposing the Synodes of the Pretended-Reformers had differr'd varied in their opinions that would serue only to manifest that the matter in question is not a point of Faith but of that kind which the Church may order dispose of according to their own principles There remaineth now nothing but to expose what the Catholiques hold touching the Word of God concerning the Authority of the Church CHRIST IESVS hauing lay'd the foundation of his Church vpon the Preaching of his Disciples the Vnwritten Word was the first guide rule of Christianity when the writings of the New Testament were adioyned to them the former Word did not for all that loose its Authority which causeth vs to accept with the same veneration all that was taught by the Apostles be it by writing or by word of mouth according to what S. Paul himself hath expresly inioyned And the certain proofe that a Doctrine comes from the Apostles is its being accepted and embraced by all Christian Churches whilst its beginning can not be pointed mark'd out We can not choose but receaue all that is establish'd in this manner with the submission due to the Diuine Authority and we are confident that such persons of the Pretended-Reformed Religion as are not very obstinate haue the same perswasion in the bottome of their harts it being impossible to beleeue that a Doctrine setled and receaued from the beginning of the Church can flow from any other spring then that of the Apostles Wherefore our Adversaries ought not to wonder that we being zealously carefull to inherit all that our Fathers haue left vs doe conserue the Deposite of Tradition as well as that of the Scriptures The Church being ordained by God to be the Depositary of the Scripture of Tradition we receaue from her hands the Canonicall Scriptures and we beleeue whateuer our Aduersaries say that it is principally the Church's Authority that determineth vs to reuerence as Diuine writt the song of Salomon which hath so few sensible markes of Propheticall inspiration and likewise the Epistle of S. Iames which Luther reiected and that of S. Iude which might be suspected by reason of some Apocriphall bookes cited in it in fine there can be no motiue but that Authority to perswade the receauing the whole body of the holy Scriptures which Christians accept as Diuine euen before the reading hath wrougt any feeling of the Spirit of God in those bookes Being then inseparably bound as we are to the Authority of the Church by meanes of the Scriptures which we receaue from her hand we are taught also by her Tradition and by the help of Tradition the true sense of the Scriptures So that the Church professeth to say nothing meerly of her self and likewise that she inventeth nothing new in her Doctrine that she doth but follow and declare the Diuine Reuelation by the interiour direction of the holy spirit which is giuen her for her Teacher That the holy Ghost expresseth himself by the Church the dispute raised about the Ceremonies of the Law euen in the time of the Apostles doth euidence and their Acts haue directed all succeeding ages by the manner that first contest was decided by what Authority all following differences are to be determined so that whensoeuer any dispute happens to deuide the faithfull the Church will interpose her Authority and the Pastours assembled will say after the Apostles It hath seemed good to the Holy Spirit and vs. And when the Church hath pronounced and determined her children will be taught not to examine a new the Articles resolued vpon but that they are bound to accept with all submission the Church's Decisions And in this methode we follow S. Paul and Silas who deliuered to the faithfull the first iudgment of the Apostles and were so farr from allowing a new discussion of what had bin decided as they trauell'd through the townes teaching to obserue the ordinances of the Apostles In this manner the children of God acquiesce in the iudgment of the Church beleeuing that by her mouth they hear the Oracle of the Holy Ghost and it is vpon the ground of this perswasion that after hauing profess'd in the Creed I beleeue in the Holy Ghost we ioine next to it The Holy Catholique Church by which protestation we oblige our selues to acknowledge an Infallible and Perpetuall Verity in the Catholique Church since the same Church which we beleeue perseuering throughout all ages would cease to be a Church if it left to teach the Truth reuealed by God so that such as apprehend least she should abuse her power by introducing Falsities haue little Faith in him by whose hand she is held and conducted And if our Aduersaries would consider discusse these matters in a fairer and more humane manner they would be forced to auowe that the Catholique Church is so farre from affecting to render herself Mistresse of her Faith as her Aduersaries charge her that quite contrary she hath laboured with all her power to binde her self and to exclude all means of In̄ouation since she doth not only submitt to the holy Scriptures but to banish for euer all Arbitrary interpretatiōs which would make the conceipts of men passe for Scripture declareth herself obliged
to vnderstand them in what relateth to Faith or Manners conformably to the sense of the holy Fathers from which she professeth neuer to depart declaring by all her Councells and by all her Professions of Faith already published that she admitteth no point of Doctrine which is not conformable to the Tradition of all preceeding ages Moreouer if our Aduersaries will examine their Consciences they will discerne that the name of the Church hath more authority ouer their minds then they dare auowe in their disputes and I am perswaded there is not any one prudent iudicious man amongst them who finding himself alone in his perswasion how euident soeuer it might seeme to him that would not be frightned with that Singularity so manifest it is that men haue need in these matters to be supported in their opinions by the Authority of some Society that is of the same iudgment And for this reason God who hath created vs and knoweth what is most proper for vs hath ordained for our benefit that all particular subiects should render obedience to his Church the Authority whereof is of all others vndoubtedly the best established not only by the testimony which God himself renders in proofe of it in the holy Scriptures but likewise by the euidencies of his Diuine protection which is manifested no lesse in the most inuiolable perpetuall subsistence then it was in the miraculous establishment thereof This Soueraigne Authority of the Church is so necessary to regulate the differences which arise vpon points of Faith and the right vnderstanding of the Scripture that our Aduersaries themselues after hauing discredited decryed it as an insupportable Tyranny haue bin at last necessitated to authorise establish it amongst themselues When those who are call'd Independants maintained openly that euery indiuiduall of the faithfull ought to follow the light of his conscience without being obliged to submitt his iudgment to any body or Ecclesiasticall assembly and that vpon this ground they refused to subiect themselues to Synodes that of Charenton held 1644. censured this Doctrine vpon the same reasons and in regard of the same inconueniences which moued vs to reject it That Synode obserueth in the first place that the Error of the Independants consisteth in their holding that euery single Church ought to gouerne it self by her own lawes without dependance vpon any person in Ecclesiasticall affairs and without any obligation to conforme to the Authority of Conferences and Synodes in point of their conduct regulation And in order thereunto the same Synode determineth that this Sect is as preiudiciall to the State as to the Church that it setteth open a dore to all sorts of irregularities and extrauagancies that it cutts off all means of applying any remedy and if it tooke place there might be as many Religions inuented as there are particular parishes or assemblies These last words shew cleerly that it was principally in point of Faith that this Synode intended to establish a Dependance since the great est inconuenience it obserues the faithfull would be lyable to by this independency is that there might be as many Religions formed and professed as there are parishes It followeth then of necessity by the Doctrine of this Synode that euery particular Church and much more euery priuate person ought to Depend in what belongs to Faith vpon a Superiour Authority which resides in some Assembly or Body of men to which Authority all the Faithfull subiect their priuate iudgments for the independants doe not refuse to submit vnto the Word of God in that sense they conceaue they ought to vnderstand it nor to accept the Decision of Synodes when after they haue examined them they conclude them reasonable and fitt to be obserued what they refuse to yeald vnto is to resigne vp their priuate iudgment vnto that of an Assembly vpon this ground which our Aduersaries haue lai'd for them viz that all Assemblies euen that of the Vniuersall Church is a company of Men subiect to Error vnto which consequently a Christian ought not to subiect his iudgment since he oweth his resignation but to God alone It is from this pretension of the Independants that all those inconueniences are inferr'd which the Synode of Charenton hath so well obserued for what profession soeuer be made to submit vnto the Word of God if euery one thinketh he hath right to vnderstand it according to his own iudgment though it be contrary to the sense of the Church declared in a Finall decree this pretension will open the way to all sorts of extrauagancies and exclude all means of applying any remedy since the Decision of the Church is no restraint to such as doe not conceaue themselues bound to submit vnto it and in fine it will open the way to frame as many Religions not only as there are parishes but euen as there are priuate heads For precaution against these incōueniencies from whence would ensue the ruyne of Christian Religion the Synode of Charenton is forced to constitute a Dependance in Ecclesiasticall matters and euen in points of Faith But this their designed Deference will neuer retrench those pernicious consequences they haue proposed to themselues the preuenting vnlesse they settle conformably to vs this maxime that euery particular Church and much more each single person ought to beleeue himself obliged to submit his priuate iudgment vnto the Authority of the Church And so we see likewise in the fifth chapter of the Discipline of the Pretended-Reformed Religion tit of Consistories art 31. that desiring to prescribe an expedient to determine the debates which might arise vpon any point of Doctrine or Discipline they decreed first that the Consistory shall endeauor to appease all without noise and with all the sweetnes of the Word of God and after hauing sett and rank'd the Consistory the Conference and the Prouinciall Synode as so many distinct degrees of Iurisdiction coming at last to the Nationall Synode aboue which there is no Authority amongst them they speake of it in these termes There it is that the Entier Finall resolution shall be taken according to the Word of God to which if they refuse to acquiesce in euery point and with a direct renouncing of their Errors they shall be cutt off from the Church Is it not then euident that the Pretended-Reformers doe not attribute the Authority of this Finall iudgment to the Word of God taken alone by it self and without dependance on the Authority of the Church since the Word hauing bin employ'd and consulted in the first conclusions they haue made vpō it they doe neuerthelesse admit an Apeale from it It is the Word as interpreted by the Soueraigne tribunal of the Church that frameth this last and Finall resolution vnto which whosoeuer refuseth to acquiesce from point to point though he boasteth his being authorised by the Word of God is no longer reputed but as a profane abuser and Corrupter thereof But the forme of those Letters
vtility of Prayer to Saints aduiseth vs to pray in the same spirit of charity and according to that order of fraternall society which moues vs to request the succors of our bretheren liuing vpon the earth and the Catechisme of the Councel of Trent concludeth of this doctrine that if the quality of Mediator which the holy Scripture attributeth to CHRIST IESVS did receiue any preiudice by the intercession of Saints who reigne with God almighty that it would haue the same diminution by the offices and mediations of the faithfull who are liuing with us This Catechisme informeth vs clearly of the extreame difference between the manner of our imploring the succour of God that of our solliciting the contributions of the Saints for thus it says We pray to God either to giue vs good things or to deliuer vs from ill but by reason the Saints are more acceptable to him then we our selfs we request of them their protection sue to them they would obteyn for vs these things we stand in need of And hence it is that we vse two kinds of prayer very different since when we address to God the proper style is HAVE PITTY ON VS BEPLEASED TO HARKEN TO VS but we account it sufficient when we recurr to Saints to beseech them to PRAY FOR VS Whereby we must vnderstand that in what termes soeuer the prayers we offer to Saints are styled the intention of the Church of the Supplicants reduceth them alwayes vnto this forme as the same Catechisme confirmeth in the processe of that discourse But it will not be amisse to consider the words themselfs of the Councel which intending to prescribe to the Bishops in what manner they should speake of the inuocacation of Saints obligeth them to teach that the Saints who reigne with CHRIST IESVS offer to God their prayers for men that it is good and vsefull to inuoke them by way of supplication and to haue recourse to their succours assistances to obtayne of God his benefits through his Sonne our Lord CHRIST IESVS who alone is our Sauiour Redeemer And in order to this declaration the Councel condemneth those who teach a contrary doctrine whereby it is euident that to inuoke the Saints according to the intent of this Councel is to resort to their prayers for the obteyning the blessings and benefits of God by CHRIST IESVS And in truth what we obteyne by the interuention of Saints we acquire only by CHRIST IESVS and in his name since the Saintsthemselfs intercede but by CHRIST IESVS and obteyne their graunts but in his name This is the Faith of the Catholique Church wh ch the Councel of Trent hath cleerly explained in few words after which euidence we cannot conceaue how it can be obiected that we depart remoue our selfs from CHRIST IESVS when we supplicate his members which are also ours his children who are our brothers and his Saints who are our first fruits to ioyne their prayers to ours offering them both to our common Master in the name of our common Mediator The same Councel explaines cleerly in few words the meaning of the Church when it offers to God the holy sacrifice to honor the memory of the Saints That honor we render them in the act of Sacrifice consists in mentioning their names as of the faithfull seruants of God in the prayers we addresse to him thankes-giuings and prayses for the victories they haue obteyned and in humbly mouing his condescending in our fauor by their Intercessions S. Augustin hath declared 1200 years past that none ought to conceiue the Sacrifice as offered to the holy Martyrs although by the custome in practise euen in those tymes vniuersally by the Church the Sacrifice was offered vpon their holy bodies vnto their memories that is to be vnderstood before the places wherein their pretious Reliques were conserued and the same father sayth further that commemoration was made of the Martyrs at the holy table at the celebration of the Sacrifice not intending to pray for them as we doe for other dead but rather in order to their praying for vs. I alledge the perswasion of this holy Bishop by reason the Councel of Trent vseth almost the same words to instruct the faithfull that the Church offers not the Sacrifice vnto the Saints but to God alone who hath crown'd them and that the Priest doth not adresse himself to S. Peter or S. Paul saying I OFFER VNTO YOV THIS SACRIFICE but praysing God for their victories he implores their assistance to the end that they whose Commemoration we celebrate vpon Earth may be moued to pray for vs in Heauen This is the manner wherein we honour the Saints to obteyne graces and benefits from God by their Mediation and the cheifest of those fauors we hope to procure is that of being inabled for their imitation to which we are excited by contemplation of their admirable precedents and by the honour we pay in the presence of God to their blessed memories Whosoeuer shall rightly consider the doctrine we haue proposed will be forced to auowe that as we substract from God none of the perfections peculiar to his infinite essence so we doe not ascribe to Creatures any of those properties or operations the which can not sort but with God alone which doth so absolutely distinguish us from Idolaters that we can not conceiue vpon what ground they lay that imputation And when the Pretended Reformers obiect that in our addressing our prayer to Saints and in honouring them as if they were present all ouer the earth we attribute to them a kind of Immensity or at least the knowledge of the secret of harts which appears reserued singly to God by so many testimonies of the Scripture in this obiection they doe not apprehend our doctrine right for in fine abstracting from the ground we may haue to attribute to the Saints some certain degree of knowledge of such occurrencies as passe amongst vs or euen of our secret thoughts it is euident that it is no eleuation of the creature transcending its condition to affirme that it hath some notion of things by the light which God infuseth by his communication The example of the Prophets attests this clearly God hauing vouchsafed to discouer to them future euents although they seeme to be reserued much more specially to the Omniscience of God But besides this neuer any Catholique conceiued that the Saints by themselues did discerne our wants nor euen the desires for which we addresse particular prayers The Church is content to teach concurrently with all Antiquity that such prayers are very beneficiall to those who practise them whether the Saints apprehend them by the ministery commerce of Angels which according to the profession of the Church know what passeth amongst vs as being appointed by God's order as ministring spirits to concurre in the worke of our Saluation or be it that God himself acquainteth them with our