tempus Iudex vice Christi cogitatur Because due obedience is not exhibited to Christ's Vicar and the Chaire by our lords voice founded on S. Peter As in the old law schisms so in the new law heresies spring vp The Childrē of Israël fell into schisms when they fell away from their due Obedience to the Chaire of Moyses and Christians fall into heresies as oft as they rise against the Chaire of S. Peter coyning or following vnauthorised nouelties whereby Christian souls are misled into most desperate precipices of errours in regard whereof I haue been mou'd to write a Theology conform to the ancient Cycli and weights of the holy Churches sanctuary that is to set forth a whole body of Christian doctrine built vpon Scriptures Traditions Councils and Fathers which deserue to be prefer'd before Schollars of new Notions that is Christian people ought to adhere conforme their conciences to and rely their eternity rather on those then these which is the Counsell that the great S. Austin guies in his 2. Booke against Julian the Pelagian Bishop who had brocht new opinions to the preiudice of souls exhorting all Christians to regard rather the learning of the holy Fathers which flourished in the precedent ages and the constant and vniuersall practice of the Catholicke Church then the prophane nouelties vented and spred by the Pelagians Saying Hos antiquos Patres oportet vt Christiani populi vestris prophanis nouitatibus anteponant eisque potius quam vobis eligant adherere My lord herein lies the sole intent of these conceptions which I present you with and vnder your authority aduenture into publick view vnto aduantaging such as are piously sober d Secundum S. Aug. l. 14. de Trinit c. 1. munns Theologiae est pijs opitulari veritatem contra impios defendere and to defend the truth against such as are impiously wanton This is the ayme of my Theologicall discourses and the height of my desires is but this that they may be receiu'd into your Lordships protection which is ground warrantable enough to gaine them credit in regard of the high measure of knowledge which is extraordinary in you beseeming a well studied diuine as appears by your own writings which together with your other gifts of nature and grace renders you admired by all that know your Lordship aright Besides that which alone might embolden me to address these endeauors vnto your Lordship is your eminent nobility The best blood that is in any English subiect run's in your Lordships veins as euidence your paternall and maternall descents from the most renown'd and ancient Houses of Pembrock Northumberland and Derby Again your sundry noble allyances The lord Talbot that was Heire of Shrewsbury maryed your only Daughter a Lady of great vertue and Vere vidua A widow indeed hauing for aboue these 20. yeares continued in her widow hood notwithstanding her Ladyships youth person birth and great doury which made her the ambition of many noble Suitours Moreouer your Lordships onely and most hopefull son marryed to the most accomplished in honour obligingness sweetnes and piety the lady Elizabeth Daughter to Edward Lord Marquess of Worcester which brings forth also an alliance with the most illustrious House of Norfolke Arundell and Surrey Since I am fallen vpon your eminent Nobility has not your owne Lady much added thereto if your House were without an ample series of renowned progenitors might not your posterity haue a glorious Rise from her Ladyship whose eminent vertues haue rendered her memory blessed Nobilitas sola est atque vnica virtus Besides has not that gallant Person the lord Crauen her Ladyships Brother added something of greatnes to your posterity whose braue and gallant actiōs performed a broad in foraine parts haue gain'd much honour to his Country Moreouer the rising of that family is honorable the supream prouidence haueing brought it to the height of Eminence which it now happely enioyes as the same prouidence e Aug. l. 5. de Ciuit. Dei cap. 15. profitetur Deum terrenam gloriam excellentissimi Imperij cōcessisse bonis artibus Romanorum id est vt ipsemet interpretatur virtutibus quibus ad tantam gloriam nitebantur extended the Empyre of the ancient Romans in regard of Morall vertues which were eminent in your ladies Father and Mother the Raisers of it for as much as their zeale to the law of nature that is to do Iustice giuing to euery one what is euery on 's own and to shew mercy vnto the distressed feeding the hungry and cloathing the naked rendered them admired of such as knew them and according to holy Scriptures God exalted the Midwiues of the Hebrew women and made them houses Exod. 1. For their complyance to the law of nature in preseruing of innocent Babes which the Tyrant of Fgypt had commanded them to kill and since I am fallen vpon Gods merveilous rewarding of morall good works in confirmation of this truth I might produce conuincing examples in our own Country where very many in these times through a supream prouidence are aduanc'd to honours dignities and eminent offices that is God hath built them new Houses of nobility or encreased the glory of the old for preseruing loyalty to their king which is the law of nature written in their hearts they feared God and honoured his annoynted against the commandement of the Tyrant of England and therefore are exalted and truly vpon this score the supream prouidence hath built his Grace the Duke of Albermarle a more glorious House thē any subiect in the Christian world this day enioys in as much as through a happy managing of his loyalty he carries the name not onely of Paterpatriae but likewise of Pater Caesaris hauing preseru'd both Caesar and his Countries In consequence of the premises his Maties Catholick subjects that with the effusion of their blood and loss of their Estates haue cherefully performed that duty of nature in order to loyalty may hope that a speciall prouidence in good time will make for them Houses of Ease which shall be the daily prayer of MY LORD YOVR HONORS Most humble and most obedient Seruant GEO. LEYBVRN PREFACE TO THE COVNTRY-MISSIONARY SR Although these holy Characters so named because they describe and set forth the holy Mysteries of Christian Religion containe Theology but compendiously dressed vp neuertheless vvant noe Requisits either essentiall or necessary thereto being built on the foundation of holy Scriptures Traditions Councils and Fathers vvherin lies the consistency of true Theology vvhich as the pillar of fire led the Israëlits by night in their vvay to the land of promise so in as much as it carries the lights of the best Antiquity shevvs Christians their vvay thorovv the darke Mysteries of Christian faith as by night vnto an heauenly Inheritance prefigured in the land of promise that is God hath instituted this diuine science to direct Gouernours of souls in the pursuance of their pastorall function vvhich
Epis 55. affirm's That infidelity or false faith is inconsistent with the Church of Rome S. Austin Epis 66. auer's that our lord hath plac'd the doctrine of truth in the office and Chaire of the Roman Church and S. Bernard Epis 190. to Pope Innocentius against Abailardus writeth thus We must refer to your Apostle-ship all the scandalls and dangers which may happen in matters of faith for there defects in order to faith ought to be remedied where faith cannot faile for to what Other see was it euer said I haue pray'd for thee Peter that thy faith faile not Although Bishops of Rome that succeed in the Chaire of S. Peter may personally err as priuate Doctours neuertheless none euer did or shall err iudicially or definitiuely that is none of S. Peters successors haue or shall deuiat from the truth in their consistories Courts Councils consultations held concerning matters of faith Religion and generall manners because Christ's prayer I haue pray'd for thee Peter that thy faith faile not protects them Wherfore the ancient Fathers recur'd to Rome and applyed themselues to the Chaire of S. Peter in all matters of controuersy pertaining to Religion and faith namely S. Austin and the Bishops of Affricke vnto Innocentius the first and vnto Celestinus Epis 90 95. S. Chrysostome had recourse to the same Innocentius Epis 1. 2. S. Basil to the Pope in his tyme Epis 52. S. Hierom to Damasus Epis 5. 7 58. and S. Cyprian Epis ad Cornelium expresly affirm's that the cause of all schisms and heresies proceeds from want of obedience to the supream Pastour Nec aliunde saith he haereses obortae sunt aut nata sunt schismata quam inde quod vni Sacerdoti Dei non obtemperatur nec vnus in Ecclesia ad tempus Sacerdos ad tempus Iudex vice Christi cogitatur From disobeying of lawfull Pastours began the notorious schism of Core Dathan and Abyron who rose vp against Moyses and Aaron whome God had appoynted Chief Rulers ouer them and the rest of the Children of Israël puft vp with proud thoughts of their own abilities and conceipted worthiness they were troubled and grieu'd at the establishing of priesthood in the family of Aaron onely and therefore arrogated to themselues priestly function against the ordinance of God and to the vpholding of their schism coind a new Theology teaching that Moyses and Aaron tooke too much vpon them lifting themselues aboue the people of our lord saying all were alike holy and our lord with euery one of them alike after the same manner all schisms and heresies down from our Sauiour Christ till these dayes haue sprung vp against God's ordinance in euery age some one or other wanton schollar hath drawn Disciples and gathered Accomplices together against the supream Pastour that is the Bishop of Rome and our true Aaron as S. Bernard calleth him l. 2. de consid c. 8. pretending that he tak's too much authority vpon him lifting his own chaire aboue all others seeing that the spirit of God is with euery one of them to teach preach and administer the Sacraments without dependence of him Their intent and aime in rising thus against the supream Pastour of the Church is to persuade the vnlearned that the speciall priuiledges of Pasce oues meas confirma fratres tuos which Christ cōfer'd on S. Peter doe not descend on his successors alone in consequence of which they conceiue it needless to seek to the Bishop of Rome for Confirmation of their new opinions or to value any condemnation in order thereto that proceeds from that Apostolicall Chaire and as all wanton schollars which coyne new notions of Doctrine in order to the mysteries of Christian Religion seditiously rise against the supreame Pastour of the Church so they speake contemptuously of the schooles of orthodox Doctours in regard these be the supream Pastours chiefest consistery and the Churches sanctuary that keeps the Originall Cycli and weights of all Christian doctrine where with they weigh all coyns of new Theologies and such as are found too light are laid aside for the high Priest to condemne and anathematise lest the vnlearned learned be deluded thereby And indeed since the first erecting of scholes Cōnexae sunt saith the learned Canus scholae contemptio haeresum pestes contempt of scholes and heresies are inseperably connected together For example Luther afraid of the originall weights kept in the scholes of Orthodox Doctours sharpned his tongue against all the Vniuersities of those dayes which he called Lupanaria Antichristi the stews or Brodel houses of Antichrist and t' is common alike to all such as coyne or follow new opinions to haue an extream abhorrence from the scholes of Orthodox Doctours But woe to all such wanton schollars as goe out from the rest into seuerall sects for they perish in the contradiction of Core They are clouds without water carried about of winds Trees of Autumne without fruit raging waues of the sea foming out their owne shame and confusion wandring starres to whom is reseru'd the storm of darknes for euer Ep. Cath. Judae because they despise the scholes of Orthodox Doctours rise against the authority of their supream Pastour and cut out of their own braines vnauthorized Models of new sects and Religions As the Prince of darknes by diuine permission transforms himselfe into an Angel of light so he guideth the pencils of Ambitious schollars vnto setting forth false resemblances of true faith The extream wantonness of heady and high mynded Teachers by the crafty dealings of Satan has euen in our dayes turn'd Christianism into great disorder and confusion As the People of Rome through the delusions of Simon Magus were diuided in order to the true Selene some conceiuing her to appeare from one window some from an other and some from as many windowes as darted seeming resemblances of her so very many Christian people especially these of our own nation fince they haue let goe their hold of S. Peters Chaire that is since their falling away from the obedience due to the Church of Rome that first conuerted them to Christianism are of different iudgements as to the true faith deluded by the subtill sleights of new Teachers which according to the seuerall lustes of their high mynds haue diuided them into seuerall sects some be Lutherans some Caluinists some Protestants some Anabaptists some Independēts some fift-Monarke men some Quakers some Deists and some Atheists There are now as many faiths as wills whiles either faith is represented as new Teachers will or as they will so is interpreted and whereas according to one God one Lord and one baptism there is also but one faith men of these dayes are faln away from that which is the onely faith and begin to belieue that there is none at all confounded with the great variety of seeming faiths The ground wherof as t is afore intimated is in regard Non vnus in Ecclesia ad tempus Sacerdos ad
not the least sound that way teaching nothing that hath any relation to truth or antiquity In the pursuance of his ambition he makes proselytes of such as hauing their eares itching doe after their own lusts seek Masters of new notions * Scientia iuquit Apostolus Paulus inflat vbi charitas non aedificat quam sententiam frequeÌ„ter vsurpat S. Aug. As science without charity begetteth pride and pride Teachers of Nouelties so want of science without sobernes bringeth forth curiosity which maketh itching cares in order to new Masters The (c) Vincen. Lyrinen 2. p. tom 5. Bid. vit S. Patr. addresseth himselfe to Priests and Teachers in order to auoiding of Nouelties thus O Priest ô Doctor if the aiuine povver hath furnish'd thee vvith vvitt and abilities fit for exercise out out faithfully the precious stones of diuine doctrine deck and set them forth vvisely adde splendour grace and comliness but so teach vvhat thou hast learn'd that vvhile thou speak'st after a nevv method thou deliuer nothing of nevv doctrine singularity of one Doctour planteth a sect and the curiosity of many encreaseth it In the compleating of his ambition he doth not only equall but exceed the ambition * Volaterranus l. 15. Anthrop Erostratus inquit TeÌ„plum Diana Ephestae incendit nominis famae libidine of Erostratus that to perpetuate his name set on fire the Temple of Diana at Ephesus counted one of the seauen wonders of the world for the ambition of Erostratus destroyed one Temple only but the pride of a singular Teacher ruines * 2. Cor. 6. vos estis teÌ„plum Dei 1. Cor. 3. TempluÌ„ Dei estis Spiritus saÌ„ctus habitat in nobis as many temples as the Christians which by crafty dealings he seduceth and bringeth into errour euery Christian being a temple of the liuing God and the habitation of the holy Ghost and consequently as the God of Christians surpasseth in worthines Diana of the Ephesians and as a spirituall exceÌ„edeth a materiall temple so a destroyer of Christian soules goes beyond Erostratus in wickednes In like manner he exceedeth the Regicide * Ioan. Sarisburiensis polycratio Pausanias inquit cum Hermaclea percunctatus esset quò nam modò clarus euadere posset subito atqueÌ„ hic respondisset si occidisset aliquem virum clarum continuo Philippam interemit Pausanias that made his way to an euerlasting memoriall of a wicked enterprise thorow the Royall blood of Philip of Macedo which ambitiously he spilt for a singular Teacher murthereth as many * Secundum Bedam l. 3 in cap. 10. lucae quos Lucas appellat Reges matthaeus vocat iustos ipsi sunt ait ille Reges magni qui tentationuÌ„ suatum motibus non consentieÌ„do succumbere sed regendo praeesse nouernÌ„t kings as there are just men which he peruerteth and draweth from the truth Howeuer a singular Teacher will not profess openly the malice of his ambition as did Erostratus who affraid as it were to lose the renowning of his name himselfe diuulged his * Hier. l. con Heluidium cap. 8. mullo inquit prodente sacrilegium fertur ipse Erostratus in medium processisse clamitas sese incendium subiecisse sacrilegious crime for though a singular teacher is inwardly a rauenous wolfe yet outwardly for the most part he appeareth in sheep's clothing And indeed his ambition is a subtile inordinate desire of glory a secret poyson an occult plague author of crafty dealings and mother of hypocricy A singular Teacher neuer publisheth his wicked affection lest the effects therof might be therby obstructed he is like vnto a white tombe which appeares beautifull outward but within is full of filthines Howeuer that such teachers should rise euen of Christians Apostolicall prophecies giue euidence enough to beleiue so When S. Paul said 1. Cor. 11. There must be heresies euen among you he pointed at singularity of doctrine for the word heresy taken in the precise sense for a choosing and adhering vnto a peculiar opinion imports as much When the same Apostle said as is related Act. 20. I know of your own selues shall men rise speaking peruerse things to draw disciples after them he foretolde the ambition of a singular Teacher When S. Mathew said Beware of salse Prophets which come vnto you in sheeps clothing he hinted at the hypocrisy of singular Teachers which disguise their malice with a visard of outward sanctity and thereby craftily circunuent and bring into errour such as through weaknes or wauering in faith or through itching eares are giuen to nouelties (d) Vincen. Lirinen writeth of Origine that he might haue been of great authority if an exemplar life had been sufficient enough to haue made him so for he was a person of singular integrity purity learning industry c. but that gallant person saith he in regard he insolently abused the grace of God confiding in his own abilities and despising the simplicity of Christian Religion presumed that he knew more then all other men and interpreted holy Scriptures after a new mode deseru'd that the Church of God should say of him Non audies verba prophetaeillius thou shalt not hearken to the words of that Prophet Baronius in his Ecclesiasticall History An. 449. after he had said much of Eutiches the Heretick in order to his outward sanctity aduiseth the reader to learn from him that other Hereticks so comport themselues as if they breathed forth purity of faith and sanctity of manners The same Baronius writeth in his Eccles Hist An. 428. that the Arch-Heretick Nestorius with his sordide clothing pale face and lean body wherby he was counted a person of great abstinence and mortification drew many followers after him Again An. 411. of his Eccles History he relateth that Paulinus in an Epistle to S. Austin extolleth Pelagius the Heretick for great sanctity of life who notwithstanding as Baronius attesteth was a rauenous wolfe cloth'd in a Monasticall habit a new Proteus that according to place time and persons with whom he conuersed chang'd his discourse Moreouer Wicleff the first English heretick through his sordide clothing and affected humility bewitched and infected nany with his pernicious nouelties Vnder a false shew and disguise of outward holines singular Teachers in all times of the Christian Church haue spread their pernicious Doctrins as do plainly euidence the Ecclesiasticall Annals of each age respectiuely and indeed Origines Nestorius Pelagius Eutiches to say nothing of sundry others while they wantonly presumâ—d of their own witts and insolently despised the ancient plainess and lownes of Christian religion together with the generall practice therof affected outward piety thinking therby to get authority and credence to their new notions wanting ordinary Mission to preach them The actiuity of their own witts caused wantonnes wantonnes pride and pride a preferring themselues before all other Teachers of those daies yet though the end of such teachers be euill the end for which the supream
can sacro-sancta the Apostolicall sea did not receiue supremacy and preeminence from the Apostles but from our Sauiour himselfe and indeed Christ founded and built his Church vpon S. Peter Mat. 16. Thou art Peter and on this rock I vvill build my Church .... and J vvill giue vnto the the keys of the kingdome of heauen Again Christ praid especially for S. Peter and after his resurrection appointed him to feed all his sheepe and lambs Moreouer S. Peter as head and Prince of the other Apostles called the first Councill which was celebrated between the Ascention and Pentecost And in the second Council mentioned act 15. spoke first and decided the matter in debate Bishop of Rome as lawfull successour of S. Peter in suprem authority and there is not any except the Roman Church that hath published and planted the one holy apostolicall faith from the rising of the sun to the goeing down therof which denoteth its vniuersality an order to place there is not any except the Roman Church that can rockon pastours and Teachers in a continuall line of succession down from S. Peter to the present times which sheweth its vniuersality in order to time there is not any Church-Gouernour saue the Bishop of Rome to whose definitiue sentence of iudgment (x) S. Anaclete Epis 1. commanded that euery hard question should be referd to the sea Apostolick because saith he the Apostles so appointed by speciall command from Christ Wherefore Tertullian calleth the Pope king of the world and stiles Rome the Chief and Apostolicall seat whether saith he wee ought to recur in all doubtfull matters relating to faith Besids S. Austin that was a member of the African Church Epis 9. addressing himselfe to Pope Innocent in order to the Pelagians whom he impugned writeth thus ... that errour and impiety of the Pelagians the authority of the sea apostolick must anathematize Again the Council of Alexandria cals Pope Felix prophanarum haresium depositor the deposer of prophan heresies hard controuersies of faith haue been referred in all ages Furthermore it is essentiall to the true Church to begett children in Iesus-Christ through the Gospell 1. Cor. 4 that is to say to bring whole countries out of darkness of infidelity into the maruelous light of Christian faith which not any except the Roman Church hath performed Sectaries like partriges haue gathered children * Ieremiae cap. 17. perdix fouet seu congregat quae non peperit Vnde S. Aug. assimilat haereticos perdici which they haue not brought forth but the Roman Church hath begotten vnto Christ a world of children both in the primatiue times for the first 500. yeares and since For Germans Bauarians Vandals Polans Sweds Danes Noruegians Hungarians Normans English and sundry other Countryes since the yeare 600. were begotten in Iesus-Christ through the Gospell by Priests and Bishops of the Roman Church as plainly appears by the ancient and modern histories written of each people respectiuely And as touching our country of Englād that embraced the catholick faith through the preaching of S. Austin a Priest and Bishop of the Roman Church after its conuersion which happened in the reign of S. Ethelbert for near a thousand yeares continued obedient to the Bishop of Rome and constant in the profession of the catholick religion as do euidence our ancient Cronicles laws common laws ordinances Records foundations of Bishopricks Cathedrall Churches vniuersities colleges and hospitalls which remain monuments of these dayes to beare clear witnes of catholick religion wherfore it is a wonder how English Magistrats come to look with so enuious an eye vpon their catholick subiects as to persecute them for conforming their conscience to the full and constant profession of all their christian progenitours CHAR. XX. OF TRADITIONS THE CONTENTS Down from the Apostles to these times the true Church of God hath been directed and gouernd by the written and vnwritten word as by laws and customs doctrines necessary to saluation which the Apostles receiued either from the mouth of Christ or from the holy Ghost by inspiration were deliuered to the faithfull of those dayes partly in written and partly in vnritten traditions if the Churches authority and vnwritten traditions were laid a side scriptures would haue nothing of waight with them vnto euincing christian religion Answeres vnto seuerall obiections propounded against the Churches traditions TRaditions are vnwrtten doctrines deliuered by the mouth of Christ or his Apostles and committed vnto the keeping of the Church (a) 1. Cor. 11. as I haue deliuered vnto you saith S. Paul keep my precepts From this sacred Text Theophilact infers that both S. Paul and the other Apostles deliuered many things which they did not set down in writing called traditions not because they are not at all written but in regard there is no express mention thereof in the holy scriptures for t is certaine that the traditions receiued from the Apostles and deliuered as it were from hand to hand for sundry ages are now written as precepts of faith and generall manners necessary vnto saluation Though the whole scripture is giuen by inspiration of God and is profitable to teach to conuince to correct and to instruct in iustice 2. Tim. 3. Yet it is not the same thing to be a profitable guide in the way of iustce and saluation and to be the sole expedient necessary therunto for a head is both profitable and necessary to preserue a man aliue neuertheless it alone without the society and ministery of the body is not sufficient enough to continue him aliue likewise the Sacrament of Eucharist conduceth to the purchase of eternall blessedness yet cannot effect it without the help of baptism and faith and the Chapter set down expresly asserteth that euen the old scriptures instruct to saluation and notwithstanding the Apostle requireth of Timothy perseuerance in the doctrines which he had heard of him besides what he had learned from them wherin he had been versed from (b) By the particles from his infancy euidently appeares that the Apostle spoke of these scriptures which Timothy had learned in his youth that is he meant the old testament being the new scriptures were not written when Timothy was a youth Wherefore when the Apostle writ vnto him that all scripture is profitable c. he could not vnderstand the whole body thereof as some sectaries vnaduisedly interprete him translating whole for all And indeed when the Apostle writ that Epistle to Timothy the whole body of scripture was not composed S. Iohn had not then put forth his Gosple and his Apocallps he writ after the death of S. Paul him infancy again albeit the scriptures be a great light neuertheless they doe not giue light to all a en within the house of God whose written doctrines they are vnless they be put vpon the candlestick of the Churches definitions and vnwritten traditions for setting these aside scriptures are but a light shining in a dark place 2.
Pet. 10. in order to many diuine ordinances in regard they doe not shew plainly clearly and euidently all the mysterious precepts of Christian faith that require necessary obseruance wherefore it is an extream weakness to infer from the light of the written a negation of light in the vnwritten word of God as to instruction in iustice and saluation and indeed down from the begining of the Church christian religion hath in all times * Trid sess 4. cap. 1. declarat veritatem disciplinä Ecclesiae contineri in libris scriptis sine scripto traditionibus qua ex ipsius Christi ore ab Apostolic acceptae aut ab ipsis Apostolis Spiritu sancto dictāte quasi per manus traditae ad nos vsque peruenerūt huiusmodi traditionū contemptoros anathemati subiecit Sectarij vero communiter reijciuns eruditiones apostolicas affirmantes omnia qua sine dispendio sulutis possunt ignorari apertè contineri in scripturis been directed and gouerned by both of the said lights that is by the written and vnwritten word as by laws and customs which kind of gouerment is common alike to euery common wealth instituted aright That this double light (c) According to S. Irenaens p. 3. con haer c. 3. 4. Tertull. l. de coro militum cap. 3. S. Basil l. ad Amphilochium de Spiritu sancto cap. 29. S. Austin Epis ad Janua there is full parity between traditions ad scriptures warrantable authority being common alike to the one and the other Wherefore S. Chrys hom 4. in 2. ad Thess saith Est traditio nihil quaras amplius T' is tradition seeke no further of written and vnwritten Traditions is of necessary and perpetuall vse in the Church appeareth by the second Epistie to the Thesalonians where S. Paul enioyneth the keeping of both saying stand fast keepe the Traditions which you haue been taught either by word or our Epistle All the doctrines necessary to saluation which the Apostles receiued either from the mouth of Iesus-Christ or by inspiration of the holy Ghost they deliuered to the faithfull of those dayes partly in written and partly in vnwritten traditions which down from the primatiue Church to the present times haue passed as from hand to hand in a continuall line of priestly succession Moreouer it appeareth clearly by the second Chapter of S. Iohns canonicall Epistle that the Apostles thought it not expedient to set forth in writing all matters of christian religion necessary to saluation for he expresly saith although I had many things to write vnto you yet would I not write with paper and inck for I trust to come vnto you and speak mouth to mouth that your ioy may bee full which he repeateth in the end of his third canonicall Epistle saying I haue many things to write but I will not with ynck and pen write vnto thee and doubtless as Christ when he said to his Disciples Io. 16. I haue yet many things to say vnto you but ye cannot beare them now meant of many mysteries of faith distinct from those he had already taught them so S. Iohns meaning was that he had other doctrines of christian faith or manners to deliuer by word of mouth then those he had written with ynck and pen and truly the particles That your ioy may be full doe import as much being meant of spirituall ioy such as faithfull christians commonly receiue when they are instructed in things pertaining to iustice and saluation and it is not in reason probable that S. Iohn should vnderstand temperall ioy in order to wordly aduantages the intent of his Epistle being to stir vp a Mother and her son vnto a vertuous life in Iesus-Christ neither is it as to reason credible that so many things which S. Iohn purposely omitted to write were set down in writing either by himself afterward or by the other Apostles afore there being no scripture testimony wheron to ground those coniectures inuented meerly by the aduersaries of vnwritten traditions Besids it is plainly euident that sundry vnwritten doctrines of christian religion which are not contained expresly in any part of the new or old Testament are of necessary credence For example we must belieue with diuine faith the receiued catalogue or canon of both Testaments to be the true and vncorrupted word of God For otherwise those holy writings would haue nothing of weight with vs as theron to relie our saluation notwithstanding not any part of either Testament expresseth the receiued catalogue or canon for example we must belieue that the true sense of the written letter is a necessary and essentiall requisit to faith because in the sense that giueth life and not in the letter that bringeth death the true word of God consists but the true sense of the written letter that is to say how (d) The Caluinists in a publick disputation with the Antytrinitarians in the presence of Iohn the second elected king of Hungary engag'd to proue by scripture the mystery of the B. Trinity but failing in their engagement the king of a Caluinist became an Anti-trinitarian the written letter ought to be taken whether in a proper or figuratiue signification is not known but by the interpretation and tradition of the Church Again we must belieue that in one God there is a Trinity of diuine persons which be really distinct one from an other and no more yet not any writing of the Apostles or Euangelists (e) According to S. Chrys hom 4. operum imperf as in Heauen so in scripture God lies hid vnseen Wherefore as all men behold this corporall Heauen and not God that dwels within it so though many read the holy scriptures neuertheless they perceiue not the God of truth that lies hid in the inward seuse thereof expresly assertes a reall distinction or excludeth expresly a quaternity of persons and truly though S. Iohn saith in his canonicall Epistle cap. 4. that there be three which beare testimony in Heauen the Father the word and the holy Ghost neuertheless he doth not say expresly * Simplex affirmatio ternarij in aliquo non excludit vel negat ibi esse aliquod quartum cū in quaternario includatur ternarium qui asserit esse tres vbi sun◠quatuor non falsum dicit three only or that these three are really distinct one from an other for he addeth these three are one in so much that the great Sabellian heretick Praxeas taught that God was but one sole person that carried three distinct names in order to three seuerall effects naming him Father in as much as he createth all things son because be was borne of the Virgin Mary inuested with human nature and holy Ghost in regard he sanctifieth all creatures Wherfore if the Apostles had not deliuer'd to the faithfull of those days by word of mouth a reall distinction in God as to personality and a reall identity as to nature and substance and the Church
likwise defined that vnwritten Tradition the faithfull of these dayes might haue been * S. Basil dicit Sabellianismum esse queÌ„dam Iudaismum Sabellius voro qui omnibus hareticis impietate antecelluit eirca annum 260. haresim Trinitatis propagauit quod Prâ—xeas omniuÌ„ primus humo Romanae inuexit proximè accessit ad errorem Iudaeorum Sabellians or Iewes as for any clear speaking scripture to hinder them Again we belieue that the holy Ghost is not the son of God nor that his procession is generation taken in the proper sense notwithstanding without tradition and interpretation of the holy Church it cannot be proued sufficiently that is to say by express scripture-testimony nor matters it that the Euangelists doe name the second person of the blessed Trinity the only begotten son for hence it follows not by necessary consequence that the holy Ghost is no son for Salomon is styled the only begotten son Prouerb 4. Howeuer it plainly appeareth by the first booke of Paralipomenon or cronicles that he had many brothers yet he was named the only begotten son in regard he was beloued as if he had been the only begotten We must belieue that such (f) The Council of Nice hath defined that such as are baptized by hereticks must not be rebaptized And in regard the Donatists impugned this assertion which is grounded vpon tradition and the Churches definition they were counted hereticks and S. Aust I. de vtilitate credendi cap. 22. expresly affirms that the said assertion is not contained in any express scripture and indeed practice and tradition of the Church only was obiected against S. Cypri that asserted rebaptizing of such as were baptized by hereticks as appeares by his own Epistle ad Iubaian 74. ad Pompeium he conceiuing that he had scripture authority on his side left the Churches tradition and practice yet S. Austin in sundry places of his writings excuseth him from heresie because he was not obstinate in defending of his opinion neither did he break vnion with the Church Besid that controuersy rose before any generall Council defined validity of baptism conferred by Hereticks as are baptized by hereticks ought not to be baptized again wee must belieue that we are bound to keepe holy our lords day which is sunday and we must belieue that there is a necessary obligation to receiue the Apostles Creed yet for as much as none of all these doctrines be contained expresly in or can be deduced out of the holy scriptures by immodiate necessary and euident consequences they would haue nothing of weight with vs in the conuincing of our vnderstanding if the tradition and definition of the Church were laid a side Moreouer the Lutherans and Caluinists in regard they reject Church tradition adhering to the meer letter of scripture and their own interpretations thereof cannot as yet after frequent disputes euince against the Anabaptists that the SacrameÌ„t of Baptism ought to be administred vnto infants where they alledge the words of Christ set down Math. 19. suffer little children and forbid them not to come to me for of such is the kingdom of Heauen as also the practice of the Apostles that baptized whole housholds Act. 19. it is plainly euident that from neither of these testimonies they can as much as deduce by any necessary consequence what they assert as a doctrine of their faith namely that baptism ought to be applied to young children that want the vse of reason especially supposing (g) Caluin l. 4. insti c. 16. and the whole sect of Lutherans though they denyed baptism to be a requisit necessary to the saluation of children neuertheless in their conferences with Anabaptists ingeniously confessed that baptism might lawfully and indeed ought to be ministred vnto children what Lutherans and Caluinists hold as an other article of their reformed religion viz. that baptism is not absolutly necessary to saluation for as to the first testimony though by litle children Christ meant not such only as can goe and speake but also infants sucking their Mothers breasts neuertheless the words of Christ declare them only capable of blessedness without mentioning baptism at all Since then Lutherans and Caluinists doe teach that baptism is not an expedient absolutly necessary to blessedness they can infer nothing of moment and efficacy from these words of Christ to conuince the Anabaptists because the blessedness that is to say the kingdom of Heauen whereof Infants are declared capable may be obtained without baptisin according to Lutherans Caluinists and Anabaptists yet for as much as catholick faith teacheth absolute necessity of baptism out of S. Iohn Cap. 3. that except a man be borne againe of water he cannot enter into the kingdom of Heauen Catholicks can by a clear inference from the said words of Christ proue that Baptism ought euen of necessity to be administred to children because Christs words declare theÌ„ capable of the kingdom of Heauen and consequently of baptism that being an expedient absolutly necessary vnto the obtaining of it whosoeuer is capable of any end is likwise capable of the expedient or medium which is of absolute necessity in order to the purchasing of it As touching the latter scripture testimony though it containes a most pregnant coniecture or presumption that the Apostles when they baptized whole families baptised children with all neuertheless it is not sufficient enough to the grounding of an euident and necessary consequence vnto prouing that de facto they did so because experience sheweth that many whole housholds haue no children at all Wherefore it is cleare that neither of the scripture testimonyes do proue effectually the baptism of Infants laying aside the tradition and definition of the Church And truly Lutherans and Caluinists haue only meer coniectures and remote inferences drawn from the interpretation of their own priuat spirits which is the Mother of heresies to euince the foundamentall and essentiall doctrines of their reformed religion namly that faith alone iustifieth that there are but two Sacraments that no addresses of intercession ought to be made vnto Saints or prayers offered for the benefit of soules departed c. and it is a foundamentall article of Caluinism that the Sacrament of the Eucharist signifieth only the body of Christ being a meer figure thereof contrary wise it is a foundamentall article of Lutherans that the body of Christ is really contained in the Sacrament together with the substance of bread and though both Caluinists and Lutherans teach that the scriptures speake and propounde clearly doctrines of faith howeuer they haue not as yet reconciled that controuersy which notwithstanding the many conferences and disputes held about it continueth in debate Caluinists impute to the Lutherans an heresie or errour in faith for admitting and the Lutherans ascribe heresie vnto the Caluinists for denying the reall presence of Christs body and bloud in the Eucharist whereby appeareth plainly the necessity of Church tradition and interpretation for the deciding all hard
HOLY CHARACTERS CONTAINING A MISCELANY OF THEOLOCICALL DISCOVRSES THAT IS THEOLOGY Positiue Scholasticall Polemicall and Morall Built vpon the foundation of Scriptures Traditions Councils Fathers DEVIDED INTO TWO BOOKS Written by GEORGE LEYBVRN Doctor of Diuinity Bevvare lest there be any man that deceiue you through Philosophy and crafty handling according to the traditions of men according to the rudiments of the vvorld and not according to Christ Coloss 2. Of your selues shall men rise speaking peruerse thinges to dravv Disciples after them Act. 20. PRINTED AT DOWAY By BALTAZAR BELLIER An. 1662. With Priviledge TO THE RIGHT HONORABLE LORD PERCY HERBERT LORD POWYS OF POWYS c. MY LORD S. Clement in the eleuenth booke of Apostolicall constitutions writeth that Selene the great beauty of Rome in those dayes when she shewed her selfe from a high Tower vnto the people of that Citty Simon the Magician by sleight conueyances represented as many Selenes as were windowes in the same Tower Howeuer there was no more then one true Selene the rest being meer outward resemblances hauing nothing of inward substance contriu'd by naturall magicke vnto deluding the Eye-sight of the Beholders in like manner though true Theology is not diuided nor has many faces being the science of one God that shew's her selfe front the high Tower of one diuine faith which supports her neuertheless through the subtill dealings of Satan is represented with as many faces as there be new models of Christian doctrine that is as many or rather more then ages down from Christ till these dayes euery age respectiuely hauing coind new opinions in order to the mysteries of Christian Religion Heady and high-mynded schollars once they come to be blown vp with the actiuity of their own witt and thereby become inordinate a 2. Timoth. 3. erunt homines seipsos amantes louers of their own thoughts leaue the loue of truth As a troubled eye so the vnderstanding deluded with opinions which goe beyond the boundaries of nature cannot see the light of truth Mittit illis Deus operationem erroris quoniam charitatem veritatis recipere noluerunt 2. Thes 2. In regard heady schollars are carried on the wings of Pride and will not embrace the loue of truth the supream prouidence giues them vp to their heart's lust vnto vncleaness of errour that is God b Secundum S. Aug. l. 20. ciuit c. 19. Deus mittit quatenus diabolum facere ista permittit permitt's Satan to send them strong delusion vnto belieuing lies and taking pleasure therein which together with pertinacy so by degrees blind's them that they still encrease in madness till at lengh through faction sedition and schism they endeauour to ruine as it were all true Christian doctrine and Religion witness Nestorius Arius Pelagius Donatus and sundry other anciēt and modern schollars which vpon what designs of ambition c S. Austin l. de vtil cred c. 1. saith that he is an Heretick that for temporall interest either coineth or followeth new opinions and interest is needless to express through new coind Theologies haue laboured to turne the Church of God into vtter disorder and confusion As all rebellion is to ciuill so all schism is to ecclesiasticall gouernement dangerous and pernicious In the old law lest the people of God might be deceiu'd with false coyne and weights the originall Cycli and originall weights were conseru'd in the Sanctuary of the Temple and no money or weights allow'd which were not conform to the original's of the same Sanctuary Likewise that the same people might not be deluded with false coyns and weights of doctrine the chaire of Moyses by diuine dispensation was cloathed with infallibility The high Priest how wicked soeuer could not vtter wicked doctrine from Moyses chaire as appears euidently from Christs own words Mat. 23. The scribes and Pharises sit in Moyses Chaire c. From which sacred Text S. Austin l. 6. con Faus Manichae c. 29. infers thus In Cathedra Moysis mali sedentes bona dicere cogebantur Besides when God erected Moyses his Chaire Deutro 17. he promised that all definitions Decrees and decisions of matters in debate as comming from that seate should be of vndoubted truth Moreouer the children of Israël were bound to submit to the sentence of the high Priest the law condemning of pride and punishing with death those which disobeyed the commandement of the Priest that ministred to our lord and the Decree of the Judges In the new law lest Christians might be carried away with euery winde of doctrine S. Peter and his Chaire by diuine dispensation were invested into much better priuiledges then Moyses and his Chaire For our Sauiour tooke speciall care that S. Peter might not fall away from the true faith as does euidence his prayer Luc. 22. Oraui pro te Petre vt non deficiat fides tua I haue prayed for thee Peter that thy faith faile not and doubtless his prayer was effectuall according to the Apostle Hebrae 5. Exauditus est Christus pro sua reuerentia Our lord prouided for S. Peter that his faith might not faile to the end saith S. Leo ser 3. de Assumpt The head being made invincible the state of all the rest might be more sure that is the rest thereby might be strengthned and confirm'd in faith S. Peter according to S. Ambrose l. 9. Noui Testam 9.75 Tom 4. after his denying of Christ was constituted the supream Pastour of souls because it was said to him afore When thou art conuerted confirm thy Brethren neither was Christ's prayer offered in order to the person of S. Peter only but likewise in reference to his office according to the inter pretation of the best antiquity so that the effect of the same prayer will continue as long as the Church of Christ shall endure on Earth and indeed euen as Christ commaunds S. Peter to feed his sheepe Ioa. 21. soe he commaunds him to confirm his Brethren Luc. 22. but that saying of Christ Feed my sheep did not relate to the person of S. Peter onely according to all Orthodox Writers but also to the office of supream Pastour which was conferd vpon S. Peter with intent to continue it in his successours being of necessary vse in the Church wherfore Christ saying to S. Peter confirme thy Brethren ought to carrie the same interpretation and in earnest it were manifest weaknes to giue vnto the successors of Moyses greater prerogatiues as to power authority and infallibility in the gouernement of the Synagogue then to the Successors of S. Peter in the gouernement of the Church of Christ for this were to prefer the law of bondage before the law of grace In consequence of the premises the Roman faith of S. Peters successors cannot faile not to fall away from faith is a priuiledge proper to the Church of Rome that is to the Bishops of that seate as also plainly appears by the clear Testimonies of primitiue Fathers For example S. Cyprian
and offered at his last supper vnder the form's of bread and wine according to the Order of Melchisedech and that the Eucharist as it was instituted and celebrated was not only a Sacrament but also a sacrifice is plainly euidenced out of the words expressing the action that Christ vsed in the instituting and celebrating therof for example (c) The three Euangelists S. Mathew S. Mark and S. Luke express the words Christ vsed in the instituting and celebrating of the Eucharist in the present Tense for example IS GIVEN IS shed likewise S. Paul as to Christs body 1. Cor. 11. is broken Besides the French and Latin Bibles of Caluinists haue IS giuen for you IS shed for you But according to the Latin vulgar translation the particles giuen shed broken are expressed in the future Tence namely shall be giuen shall be shed shall be broken Howeuer Howeuer whether they be expounded in the present or future Tense it matters not since the sense is the same for although is giuen is shed carry the signification of the present Tense neuertheless the subsequent particles namely Do this in remembrance of me vntil our lord shall come to judge the quick and the dead 1. Cor. 11. imply the future Tense The Greek Church hath alwais vsed the future Tense in their Liturgies namely S. Iames. S. Clement S. Basil S. Chrysostome to proue that Christ offered the sacrifice of his body and blood when he was present with his Apostles at his last supper and indeed Christ himselfe paue euidence enough of this Catholick assertion by saying Hic Calix Sanguinis mei This Cup of my blood And the Latin Church vseth the future Tense shall be giuen shall be shed to shew plainly that Christ spoke not of his body and blood onely then at his last supper offered but of the same sacrifice that was to be offered for the future till he should come again to judge the quick and the dead This is my body which is giuen for you Luk 22. which S. Paul expresseth in other term's viz This is my body which is broken for you 1. Cor. 11. This is my blood of the new Testament which is shed for many Mar 14. This is my blood the new Testament that is shed for many vnto remission of Sins Math. 26. All which sentences import sacrificing since they containe the proper words of sacrifice as it is plainly deducible out of other euident Scripture-testimonies in consequence whereof the Eucharist instituted and celebrated by Christ in his last supper is not a Sacrament only but a sacrifice also Again the afore said Verbs namely to giue to break to shed are vttered in the present tense after the Greek Translation signifying that Christ did did not only offer sacrifice in a bloody manner on the Crosse but in an vnbloody also at his last supper (d) S. Luke cap. 22. expresseth the action that Christ vsed in the institution of the Eucharist as to his body vnder the elements of bread and wine in these words This is my body vvhich is giuen for you which S. Paul 1. Cor. 11. deliuers thus This is my body vvhich is broken for you and 1. Cor. 10. he saith The bread which we break is it not the participation of the body of our lord S. Chrysostome expounding this sacred Text demandes why S. Paul added to the words of the Euangelist vvhich vve break and answer's to his own question saying This is done in the Eucharist and not on the Cross vvhere no bone of him vvas broken Io. 19. According to S. Chrysostome as likewise Theodoret and Occumenius who were versed in the Greek tongue Christ suffered himselfe to be broken in the Eucharist vnder the form of bread vnto filling of all which he did not suffer to be done saith S. Chrysostome on the Cross vnto redeeming of all and indeed Calvin in his Commentary vpon the 11. Chapter set down noteth that the particles Is Broken signify is offered or is sacrificed whereby appear's that the Apostles intent and aime was to shew that Christs body was truly broken in the vnbloody oblation offered at his last supper for as much as the species of the consecrated bread were then truly broken Besides as the words of the action which Christ vsed in instituting and celebrating the Eucharist viz This is my body which is giuen for you This is my blood shed for many vnto remission of sins doe euidently import (e) The sacrifice of the Euchariste in as much as it appeaseth God rendereth him propitious and procureth diuine grace vnto remission of sin◠is truly a propitiotary sacrifice taken in the proper sense according to the ancient Fathers S. Gyprian S. Basil S. Chrysostome S. Ambrose S. Austin and the Council of Trent assertes this Catholick doctrine and addeth withall The sacrifice of the Eucharist according to Apostolicall tradition is not onely offeréd for sinnes pains satisfactions and other necessities but likevvisa for such as are dead in the state of grace and not sufficiently purged as yet a propitiatory sacrifice for blood to be shed is to be sacrificed for propitiation or pardon of sins so the words of precept which follow This is my body giuen for you namely doe this in remembrance of me That is in memory of my death and passion doe signify a commemoratiue sacrifice and consequently plainly demonstrate the Eucharist not to be a Sacrament only but (f) The ancient Fathers S. Cypr. Ep. 63. and Caeci Orig. in cap. 16. Mat. and others also compare the sacrifice Christ offered of his body and blood at his last supper vnto the sacrifice of the paschall Lambe and other sacrifices of the old law wherby appears that the sacrifice Christ offered at his last supper was a sacrifice taken in the proper sense wherfore S. Gregor Nyssen Ora. 1. de Resur saith expresly that Christ in celebrating the Euchariste at his last supper sacrificed himselfe before he was sacrificed vpon the Cross a sacrified also For otherwise it would not be a liuely and perfect commemoration or representation of the sacrifice offered on the Cross such as Christ requireth Luk. 22. for as a Sacrament cannot be perfectly represented but by an other Sacrament 〈◊〉 a sacrifice cannot be liuely represented but by another sacrifice there is necessarily required similitude and proportion between the thing that representeth and the thing represented for a man cannot represent an horse or an horse a man nor the saying of the Apostle 1. Cor. 11. as often as you shall eat of this bread and drink of this drink you shall shew the death of our Lord doth infirm the strength of this argument * Patres antiqui in tribus oecumenicis Concilijs puta Ephesino Calcedo Constantinop vt constat ex praefatione Ephesi sic interpretati sunt verbae Apostoli quotiescunque māducabitis mortem Domini annunciabitis For the true sense and meaning therof is that the sacrifice of the Eucharist which is
he carryed himselfe in his own hands while giuing his body he said This is my body But truly he had not done what no other could doe if he had carried in his hands a meer figure or sign of his body onely Again S. Cyril Hieros Catech. mysti affirmes that the wine is as truly chang'd into the blood of Christ as water was conuerted into wine in Cana-Galilaea Moreouer S. Cyprian ser de Domi. coena asserts that the bread Christ gaue vnto his Disciples is chang'd saith he not as to the form or figure that is as to the accidents thereof but as to the nature that is as to substance through the Omnipotent power of the worde that was made flesh plainly and euidently otherwise the mystery established vnto saluation might leade into errour and damnation since a thing deliuered in Tropes and figures is subiect vnto vncertainty and intricacies Again the words afore mentioned set down by three Euangelists and one Apostle importe the new Testament made by Christ himselfe the night before his passion and it is vncredible that a Testatour expecting death suddenly should say in express tearmes what he meaned not In regard whereof the ancient Fathers doe vnanimously declare that the cited words of institution vêªt videlicet This is my body This is the blood of the new Testament ought to be taken in their proper sense that no man according to reason might doubt of the â—â—all and substantiall presence of Christs reall and substantiall body and blood in the Sacrament of the Eucharist Christ the diuine Testatour expressing himselfe therein plainly and clearly Wherfore it is an infallible Article of christian faith that vnder the elements of bread and wine is contained Christs true reall and substantiall body and blood through a maruelous transubstantiation that is to say substantiall (h) Transsubstantiation signifies conuersion of one substance into an other conuersion of the bread into his body and the wine into his blood in vertue of the word that was made flesh which the word made that made all thinges of nothing Gen. 1. In vertue of the word that changed Lots wife into a piller of salt Gen. 19. that turned Moyses rod into a serpent Exod. 4. that conuerted the riuers and fountaines of Egypt into blood Exod. 7. that made wine of water Io. 2. that created man of the dust of the ground and breathed in his face breath of life Gen. 1. In vertue of the word that was God Io. 10. Wherfore since the omnipotency of the word can work such marueilous effects it is euidently plain that Christ who is this omnipotent word to wit the son of God can conuert bread into his flesh and wine into his blood and the diuine omnipotency as to transmutation of one created substance into an other in like manner created the Deuil did acknowledg when he said vnto Christ If thou be the son of God command that these stones may be made bread Mat. 4. Wherfore such as deny transubstantiation in the Sacrament of Christs body and blood as an action impossible are worse then Deuills and doe not consider the infinite power of God according to the innate vertue therof Besides if the nutritiue faculty of nature can turne bread into the substance of him that eateth it and change wine into the blood of him that drinketh it if art can make Iron of earth and glass of ashes why cannot God that is aboue nature and art conuert bread into Christs body and wine into his blood Christs body and blood being created substances Furthermore it is extream weakness in a Christian that ought in the mysteries of christian doctrine to be ruled by faith which is a conuiction of thinges not seen to think that he cannot receiue in the Sacrament with his corporall mouth the true reall and substantiall body and blood of Christ because he doth not see them for indeed he might as to reason think as well that there are not three persons in God and one substance two natures in Christ and one person or that there was neuer such a man as Salomon or any such as are called his great Grand-Fathers and Grand-mothers because he hath not seen them or to thinke he is not endued with an immortall soul which quickneth each part of his body because he cannot see it and t' is as great weakness to think that if all the belieuers had eaten of Christs reall body from the first age for 1662. it would haue been wasted and spent long agoe though it had been as big as a great mountaine for Christ's (i) T is no strange thing for the substance of Christs body to exist after an indiuisibie manner since according to true Philosophy the substance or essence of euery real thing hath an indiuisible existency body by diuine dispeÌ„sation is spiritually cloathed in the Sacrament being inuisible indiuisible and incorruptible and consequently deuested of outward extension in order to place and therfore not subiect to naturall alterations which doe accompany common bodies As Heate brightness of fire sweet odour of a rose doe not suffer prejudice for as much as they be communicated to many and as the pot of meale and vessel of oile did not faile or diminish though the widow of Sareptha and her family did eat thereof continually while the Heauens were shut froÌ„ rayning through the prayers of Elias 30. Regum so the body of Christ in the Sacrament is not wasted spent or prejudiced albeit that the whole Church doth dayly feed thereof Likewise t is extream weaknesse to think that Christ cannot be in * Chrys l. de Sacerd. ait qui Christus cum patro sursum sedet in illo ipso temporis momeÌ„to omnium manibus pertractatur Heauen and in the Sacrament at once in as much as one body is not capable according to Philosophy to possess two places together for God is not confined to Aristotles principles The diuine omnipotency transcend's Philosophy her Rules and all the works of nature God made all thinges of nothing contrarie to the maxime of Aristotle Nothing is made of nothing Furthermore in Christ are two natures and one sole person Christ was conceiued of the Virgin Mary without prejudice to her virginity and in the day of his Ascension penetrated the Heauens which are solid bodies without boring into them and other effects which vnto Philosophy are impossible to God are possible Howeuer one body and many places are not inconsistent together as to naturall Philosophy especially when a body is in many places after the manner of a spirituall substance deuested of outward extension in order to the places that containe it and so Christs body is in many consecrated Hosts at once or when one body is in one place with it's quantity extended outwardly thereunto and in another depriued therof at the same time and so Christs body is in Heauen and in the Sacrament together all which according to naturall Philosophy ought not to seem thinges
hereticall interpretations Howeuer an answer shall of Mr. Whits proofes To wit nor is it saith he infrequent among the pious when they name a Saint or Martyr to adde whose glory God increase Hereby Mr. white either means essentiall or accidentall glory if he vnderstand an increase of essentiall glory in order to the intensnes therof he teacheth an heresy for the Church of God ascribes such an increase of blessednes * Concil Flor. in dee vnionis desinit animas beatorū videre clarè Deum sicut◠est sed alian◠alia perfectius pro diuersitate meritorum Et definitum est sess 6. can 32. iustificatum bonis operibus augmētum gratiae mereri ita profit entur veteres Patres Et ratio distributiua iustitiae exigit vt plus merenti maior reddatur morces to the Saints own merits and not to the prayers of their friends according to that saying of the Apostle 2. Cor. 9. He that soweth sparingly reapes alsoe sparingly and he that soweth liberally shall reap also liberally and indeed it is the proprietie of distributiue iustice to better the reward in order to such as deserue better and God compenseth the merits of his faithfull according to destributiue iustice but if Mr. White vnderstand an increase of accidentall glory either in order to speciall reuelations of mysteries whereof the Saints were ignorant afore or in order to a greater measure of honour and reuerence from the faithfull aliue that makes nothing to his purpose and in that sense may be meant that saying (n) According to the Roman Catholick Church a Priest preparing himselfe to say Mass prayeth thus I vill say Muss and offer in saecrifice the body and blood of our lord Iesus Christ to the prayse of God and the vvhole triumphant Court Now if by praying soe he prayeth for the blessed he prayeth for God also being he promiseth therby to offer sacrifice to the praise of both in cosequence of which S. Paul likwise 1. Tim. 1. prayed for God when he said vnto the king of vvorlds immortall inuisible sole God be bonour and glory for euer and euer amen But were it not an extream madness to think that S. Paul by praying so conceiued that he might bring vnto God an encrease of glorie Howeuer Mr. White will needs haue the words of the prayers set down in the Roman lyturgie after the offertorie Receiue vvhat vve offer to the honour of thy Saints c. to proue it lawfull to pray for Saints that thereby they may find mercy and encrease of glory But S. Thomas 3. p. q. 71. art 8. in resp ad 1. obiec saith that when we celebrate the feasts of Saints their glory is not augmented by that solemnity but we receiue greate benefit thereby and euen so saith he when we giue praise to God we and not God receiue benefit thereby from the premises clearly appeares how vnaduisedly Mr. White in the 3. account of the midle state of souls alleageth S. Greg. to proue that the blessed receiue encrease of glory through the prayers of the faithfull liuing Sed mira sunt qua docet Albius noua sunt mira stupemus noua cauemus Aug. l. 3. con Iulia. Whose glory God encrease and after that sense Christians pray Glory be to the Father to the son and to the holy Ghost Amen CHAR. XXIJ. OF FOVNDAMENTALL AND NOT foundamentall Articles of faith T' Is a moderne distinction that was ingeniously contriu'd by (a) Marke Anthony de Dominis Arch-Bishop of Spalatto became an Apostate fled out of Italy into England in the Reign of king Iames of happy memory and taught that a Christian might be saued in any sect professing the foundamentall Articles of Christian faith as for example said he euery one may attaine vnto saluation either by adhering to S. Thomas doctrine or the doctrine of Scotus Marke Anthony de Dominis Arsh-Bishop of Spalatto and brought into the Protestant Church in order to the said Churches claim vnto as to foundamentall and disclaim from the Roman Church as to not foundamentall Articles of faith that is as to errours in order to such Articles of faith as may be denyed without hurt of faith and loss of saluation though sufficiently propounded in regard whereof they beare the name of not foundamentall * Protestātes communiter constituunt hocdiscrimen inter fundamentales non fundamentales quod scilicet damnabile sit ab illis dissentire cū sufficienter proponūtur non item dissentire à nō fundamentalibus dum sufficienter proponūtur vt vniuersalitatem amplitudinē suae Ecclesiae estendant as disinct frō foundamētals which cā not be reiected without incurring both loss of faith and saluation in consequence wherof Protestans of theses dayes commonly represent the Roman Church as a naturall body that is partly sound and partly vnsound infected with sundry soares and vlcers which is to say that although the Roman Church hath continued alwaies sound at heart hauing neuer deuiated from the true doctrin of Christ as to foundamentall requisits vnto saluation neuertheless she still retaines sundry errours in order to not foundamentall requisits which they pretend to haue purged away and therby make their Church to be the same with the Roman Church as to the sound part therof Marke Antony de Dominis saw a necessity of inuesting the Protestant Church with visible existence least it might appeare to haue perished afore and with perpetuall succession of Pastors and Teachers these being of necessary vse in the gouernment therof for as much as they be essentially required to the professing of faith preaching the diuine word instructing the illiterat and administring the Sacraments which functions could neuer haue been performed if the Church of God wherof these be necessary markes had been inuisible and therby destitute of Pastors for the work of the ministery wherfore to fit vnto the Protestant Church visible existence and a series of Pastors and Teachers in a continuall line of succession down from the Apostls he aduiced such as carried on the Protestant Reformation not to quitte all claim to the Roman Church without which visible existence and perpetuall succession of their Church had been impossible since no one society of Christian belieuers appeared vpon earth when the Protestant Reformation begun that was seperated from the Church of Rome Again he saw that by asserting the Romā Church to haue in all times reserued necessary requisits vnto saluation that is foundamentall Articles of faith it might seem as to reason consonant that the Protestants departure from it had been without cause and thereby they as to reason might be counted guilty * Secundum Aug. l. 1. con Epis Parm. cap. 4. schisma omnia scelera supergreditur of deadly schism for going out from and breaking vnity and communion with a Church wherin if they had continued they might haue attained vnto saluation therfore to escape this rock he aduiced again that Protestants should represent the Roman Church