Selected quad for the lemma: doctrine_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
doctrine_n body_n bread_n transubstantiation_n 2,166 5 10.9952 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A31454 A preparation for martyrdom a discourse about the cause, the temper, the assistances and rewards of a martyr of Jesus Christ : in a dialogue betwixt a minister, and a gentlemanhis [sic] parishioner. Cawdrey, Zachary, 1616-1684. 1681 (1681) Wing C1648; ESTC R8822 35,036 47

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

the loosness of the Doctrines that indulge both their Lusts Ambition and Cruelties But besides the Popish Princes make use of the Popes Authority sometimes for quelling their Rebellious Popish Subjects sometimes to palliate their incestuous Marriages sometimes for fleecing of their Clergy whom they have suffered first to sleece their People sometimes for confiscating the Estates of whole Orders as of the Knights Templers and seizing the Revenues of Monasteries and Abbeys wherein the Pope always is a sharer and sometimes to countenance by his Bulls their Invading and Usurping others Kingdoms But I will proceed there are abundance of other Popish errours for opposal of which a Christian may warrantably suffer such is that Schismatical Doctrine that there is no Salvation but to those that are of the Romish Communion such also is their praying to Saints and Angels and worshipping Images such also is their Doctrine of Merit Purgatory Pardons and Indulgencies But no one Doctrine is fuller of errours and absurdities than their Doctrine of Transubstantiation for denial of which many thousand precious Servants of God here in England and other where have suffered death And how can any assent to the Doctrine of Transubstantiation as the Doctrine of the Gospel who understand the meaning of it Which is that the substance of the Bread and Wine in the Sacrament is turned into the very substance of the Body and Blood of our Blessed Saviour which then the Priest offers up to God as a propitiation for the sins of the Quick and Dead Which absurd Doctrine First is contrary to our Sences of both Seeing Feeling Smelling and Tasting and consequently takes away the credit of all Gods true Miracles for still we see and feel and taste and smell Bread and Wine nay If my Sences may be deceived What security have I that I read in the Scriptures these words This is my Body next it contradicts our Reason that our Saviours Body should be in so many hundred places at once as there are Masses Celebrated at the same time in all parts of the world Nay and as many Bodies of Christ in the same Church Chancel or Parlor as there are Minute and small separated Pieces and Particles of the Species of Bread and Wine for so the litter Romanists teach that every piece broken off is an entire Body of Christ Though the first Inventers of Transubstantiation in the 9th Century and so onward for almost three hundred Years taught that the whole Loaf Consecrated was turned into one Body of Christ part of which Holy Body was broken off when part of the appearances of the Consecrated Elements was broken off from the rest as the Learned Doctor Burnet well observes in his Fast Sermon Decemb. 22. 1680. page 22. And it is a Doctrine contrary to Scripture also which affirms Christ's Body to be in Heaven and is also opposite to the very design of Christ's Institution of that Sacrament as the Scriptures give us an account of it For Christ's declared intention of that institution was to bring his Death to our remembrance thereby and to shew the Lords Death till he came and by that remembrance of it to stir up in us the same Affections and Resolutions and the Exercise of the same Graces which would have been sit for a pious believing Penitent to have taken up and exercised If he had stood by Christs Cross when he suffered and seen the wounds made in his most precious body to redeem us from the curse due to our sins namely Sorrow and Humiliation for sin Faith in Gods Mercy in Jesus Christ devout love and thankfulness to him that redeemed us with his Death with solemn renewal of our Baptismal vow to live to him and his Glory who bought us with the price of his Sons Blood and by receiving of that Symbol of the Unity of Christs mystical Body for we being many are one Bread and one Body we protest our Unity and Love to and with all the members of Christ Now How contrary the Doctrine of Transubstantiation and its appendages are to this institution of Christ and the design of it will easily appear to any that considers it Besides what reason have we to think that God would put it into the power of an ignorant or wicked Priest to work with four words speaking such a Miracle as the like is not Recorded in Scripture Namely to turn a multitude of little Wafers into so many Bodies of Christ and at the same time to deceive four of our Sences which no true Miracle ever did Nay observe there never was a Miracle mentioned in Scripture to be wrought to bring a matter of Fact to remembrance as the design of the Sacrament is remembrance except we will call a Lot a Miracle But observe yet further what an horrid thing the Papists suppose of our Saviour himself namely that he at his last Supper did Crucify and Break his own Body nay break it into twelve several Bodies supposing the Communicants were so many and that many hours before his Crucifiers did nail it to the Cross Parish You have sufficently convinced me that I ought to bear Testimony even unto the Death against the errours and Idolatry of the Masse and Transubstantiation therein pretended and I hope if it should be my Lot in a Popish Countrey to meet in the Streets their Breaden Idol I should by the Grace of God not fall down and Worship it though I knew the Idolatrous Rabble would beat out my Brains Indeed I think I ought if I have the warning of their Sacred Tingtang to turn out of the way of their unbloody Sacrifice their Holy Host as they call it not out of fear but because I will not Provoke the Idolaters to make a Bloody Sacrifice of me and so draw the Guilt of innocent Blood upon their own Heads Minist You say well for we are not to provoke Persecutors to sin though we must couragiously suffer rather than comply to their sin and Idolatry There is one other Popish Principle that we ought to bear testimony against even unto sufferings and it is this That the Church hath a power to impose upon mens Consciences what she pleaseth and her Children are bound to obey her not from the Evidence of the expediency or necessity of the thing commanded but from the Authority forsooth of the Church commanding which is a Usurping upon the Prerogative of God himself to whom alone it belongs to command indisputable obedience I may indeed for peace sake or for fear of wrath comply to the commands which to me bona side seem neither necessary nor expedient provided they do not appear sinful But for the Church to command obedience blind obedience meerly pro imperio is to seat it self in the place of God And indeed this is the master vein of Popery running through not only the main Body of Papists but also every religious Order and Society amongst them To whom it is as sacred to obey what their Church