by which they hoped demanded and often obtayned the fruits of their requests Listen to S. Hierome listen to S. Gregory Nazianzen both which you produce to bewray their doubtfulnes S. Hieromes words are these Farewell O Paula and support with the help of thy prayers the feeble old age of thy worshiper These S. Gregory Nazianzens calling vpon S. Basil O Diuine and sacred head behold vs from aboue and the instigation of my flesh giuen me as an instruction from God eyther aswage with thy prayers or moue me to beare coragiously Did these men doubt Or S. Bernard who often assureth vs of Bern. serm 3. in vigil Nat. ser de B. Virg. quae incipit Signum magnum Bafil in 40. Mart. Cyp. lib. de habit Virg. Ruffin l. â— hist c. 33. the help of our B. Lady Or S. Basil exhorting vs to inuok the 40. Martyrs Whosoeuer is oppressed with any misery let him repayre to these and who soeuer reioyceth let him pray tothese the one that he may be freed from euill the other that he may perseuere in his prosperous courses Or S. Cyprian who requested the Virgins or Nuns of his time in whose coÌ„mendation he wrote to remember him after their departure when their Virginity should begin to be honoured Or Theodosius the Emperour who as Ruffinus witnesseth clad in sacke-cloath lay prostrate at the Tombes of the holy Apostles and Martyrs and craued help by the assured intercession of Saints Or any of those whome I recited before whose speaches cannot be eluded by any doubtfull florish or figure of Rethorike much lesse the suites they make vnto the Saints in heauen a PrudeÌ„ in hym 4. 8. 10. Casar-August August quaest 108. ser 18. de Sanct. to obtaine pardon for their sinnes b Noz or at in Athâ—n To be directed in the warfare and combate of this life c Bern. in vigil Petr. Paul To incline the hart of our Iudge in their behalfe d Prud. hym 2. in D. Lauren. To be sooner released the bonds of our mortality e Amb. or at â— in morte fratris Nazi ora in Basil To be receaued by them into the Tabernacles of blisse f August lib. medit cap. 24. Nazian in S. Cypri Ambros exhor ad virg Paul Nola. in Car ad Cytherium August lib. 22. de Ciuit. Dei cap. â— To bewafted by their prayers and merits to the hauen of perpetuall peace Such and many such like requestes they made which were no. wholy frustrate as the miracles wrought in accomplishing their desires giue testimony vnto vs. 7. S. Gregory Nazianzen writeth of a Virgin bewitched with diuelish charmes to be deflowred by her Louer who prayed to our Blessed Lady and was deliuered from his wicked inchantements S. Ambrose of S. Iulian who obtayned a sonne by the intercession of S. Laurence Paulinus of Martinian who escaped imminent danger of death by the help of Saint Felix Saint Augustine of Palladia who praying to S. Stephen was healed of a grieuous disease Of a blind woman who receiued her sight Of the daughter of one Bassus a Syrian restord to life And sundry other miracles wrought by the Reliques memory and inuocation of selfe-same happy and glorious Protomartyr 8. Which argueth M. Field of more then vnshamfastnes Field l. 3. c. 20. fol. 109. 110. Kemnitius exam p. 3. p. 211. of insolent malepartnes in slandering S. Augustine That he dareth not pronounce but inclineth to that opinion that the Saints doe not particulerly see know and intermeddle with humane thinges If Saint Augustines owne words here quoted cannot free him from so vile a reproach let Kemnitius M. Fieldes fellow Protestant be heard he alleadgeth S. Field loco citato Augustine inuocating S. Cyprian and blusheth not to adde These thinges Augustine without the warrant of Scripture yielding to tymes and custome Yet D. Field once downe the banke Whitgift in his defence against the reply of Cartwright of modesty slideth to the bottome of audacious impudency and immediatly writeth The Church of God neuer desined otherwise how soeuer Hierome in his passion agaynst Vigilantius seeme to say the contrary Not Hierome M. Field in his passion but your owne Sect-mates in their sober writinges shall conuince you of falshood and testify the same vvith him D. Couel in his exam pag. 120. Fulk in his Reioynder p. 5. 6. agaynst the Rhem. Test in 2. Petr. c. 1. sect 3. Kemn in exam p. 3. pag. 200. Sparkes p. 33. Cent. Cen. 3. Col. 83. c. 9. M. Whitgift late Archbishop of Canterbury Almost all the Bishops sayth he and writers of the Greeke Church and Latin also for the most part were spotted with Doctrines of Free-will of merit of inuocation of Saints and such like The same is auouched by D. Couell M. Fulke sayth I confesse that Ambrose Augustine and Hierome held Inuocation of Saintes to be lawfull And in another place In Nazianzen Basill and Chrysostom is mention of Inuocation of Saints Kemnitius the Lutheran before named Inuocation of Saintes quoth he at length about the yeare of our Lord 370. by Basil Nissen and Nazianzen began to be brought into the publike asseÌ„blyes of the Church D. Sparkes chargeth Origen or some other vnder his name With a grosse Popish prayer to Iob. The Centurists doe the like acknowledging moreouer this vniforme doctrine in many other who liued about the 300. yeares after Christ saying There are manifest steps of Inuocation of Saints in the Doctours of that auncient age And in the Centuries following they accuse Athanasius Basil Nazianzen Ambrose Prudentius Cent. Cen. 4. c. 4. Col. 296. 297. VVhitaker in his ans to the 4. reason of Comp. Ibid. in his ans to the 5. reason Epiphanius and Ephrem of the same errour Finally when blessed Campian vrged this approued custome of the ancient Fathers Whitaker answered The old and inueterate practise of inuocating Saints in prayers we little regard although this were an ancient custom yet it flowed from humane superstition not from Diuine authority And a little after speaking of Prudentius who florished within the 400. yeare after Christ he sayth Prudentius I graunt as a poet sometymes called vpon the Martyrs whose Acts he describeth in verse and the superstitious custome of praying to Saints had now taken deepe roote in the Church which as a Tyrant haled sometymes the holy Fathers into the same error 10. What thinke you now M. Field was S. Augustine was S. Ambrose were all these learned Fathers here cited and the whole Church which they guided of this beliefe or no that the Saints in heauen see and intermeddle with humane affayres Or were all these mirrours of wit learning and sanctity not only superstitiously as your Ghospellers tax them but foolishly sottish also as you would make them to call vpon such as they thought had no sense or feeling of their necessities Dare you auouch That Inuocation of Saints preuayled not in
of Christ and his Apostles began not a little to be darkened for many monstrous opinions are commonly found vttered by the Doctours Amongst which they reckon the liberty of Free-will saying there is almost no point of Doctrine which so soone began to be obscured as this of Free-will But by whom by the ancient Author who goeth vnder the name of Iustinus by S. Irenaeus to which end they censure him to wrest many sayings of the Prophets of Christ and S. Paul grosly deducing from thence Free-will not in workes only but also in fayth Likewise he admitteth Free-will in spirituall matters By S. Clement of Alexandria Of whom they testifie he doth euery where auouch Free-will that it may appeare not only all the Doctors of that age to haue beene couered with those mists but that they also were augmented in the succeeding ages Therefore in the third hundred yeare they adiudge Tertullian Origen S. Cyprian and Methodius guilty of the same errour taking the paines to quote the places and recite the words where they defend this Doctrine 15. After they goe foreward and set downe the agreeable consent of the Fathers of the foure huÌ„dred yeare condemning by name Lactantius Athanasius Basilius Nazianzenus Epiphanius Hieronymus and Gregorius Nissenus for maintayning with vs the liberty of Free will Citing as before their very words and pointing to the places where they affirme it Now that our English Protestants may not be thought to dissent from these forreners Doctour Humfrey sayth It cannot be denyed but that Irenaeus Clement and others containe in their writinges the opinion of Free-will D. Whitgift Almost all the Bishops of the Greek Church Latine also for the most part were spotted with the Doctrine VVhitgifâ— in his defeÌ„câ— against Cartwright pag. 453. D. Couelâ—iâ—â— exam p. â—â—0 Rabby Moyses Hardar in c. 4. Genes Rab. Akiba c. patrum according as Paulus Fabius iutepreteth his words Rab. Selomo cited by Petrus Galatinus li. 6. cap. 6â— de arcaniâ— Catho ver Fulke in his defence of the English translation pag. 320. of Free-will With the errour of Free-will saith Doctour Couell reiecting that as an errour which was generally maintayned in the flower of the Church 16. Furthermore when we conuince the same doctrine to haue flourished not only amongst Christians but also amongst the learned Iewes by the vncontrolable testimonies of the ancient Rabbins who liued either before or immediatly after the natiuity of Christ by Rabby Moyses Hardarsan Rabby Akyba Rabby Selomo cited by Petrus Galatinus and by many other M. Fulke will not sticke to discard them as the Centurists doe the Fathers saying The Iewish Rabbins Patrons of Free-will doe erre Finally when the like is vrged out of Plato Aristotle and the generall consent of all Philosophers Caluin and Melancthon distaste it the rather as springing from the rootes of Philosophicall Superstition Alas good Syrs what course should we take What proofes will serue your turne The Scriptures we produce Some you deny some you falsifie The Fathers They were couered you say with the mists of darknesse The Iewish Rabbins you professe they erred The learned Philosophers They sauour of superstition whom shall we bring What shall we vrge May experience may reasons take place Many are gathered out of the Fathers writings which I referre vnto the next Chapter there they shall be more commodiously rehearsed In the meane time I am to grapple a little with M. Field who finding not how to auoid the shame or hide the fault of this his Progenitors Luthers and Caluins heresie denieth them to teach any Field in his 3. Booke of the Church c. 17 f. 135 136. such absolute Necessity of things whereof we here accuse them and appeacheth Bellarmine of iniuring them both in laying it to their charge 17. But they who haue perused my former Treatises haue discouered I hope such fraudulent dealing detestable Sycophancie in this mans writings as they will little regard his desperate and headdy asseuerations For he that hath borrowed the Harlots face to excuse his Sectmats in things inexcusable he that will protest no variance after due examination betwixt the Lutherans Caluinists touching the matter of the Sacrament in which themselues and all the world doth witnesse A most Essentiall as Peter Field in his 3. Booke of the Church c. 42. f. 170. Pet. Mart in praeâ—at l. cont Step. Vinton Luthâ—in asser art 36. Caluin l. â— Inst. c. 2. 3. 5. Martyr accounteth it and Fundament alivariance what will he not auouch in matters more intricate and lesse palpable dissensions And yet this of which we now attach and he laboureth to free his chiefest Protestants is no small priuate or hidden fault It is so manifest in Luther as he saith Free-will is a faigned thing A vaine title c. Because all things fall out as the Article of Wicliffe condemned at Constance rightly teacheth of Absolute Necessity As manifest in Caluin For he hauing distinguished these two sorts of Liberty the one from Coaction the other from Necessity that he granteth this he resolutly denieth He disliketh also the word Liberum arbitrium in Latin and much more 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Greeke and disswadeth all men from the vse thereof He maruelleth this speach of his should seeme harsh to any man The will by Necessity is drawne or led to euill His reason is Because the will ordinance and decree of God is a Necessity of things Thus he 18. His schollers M. Fulke M. White and others conning of him their lesson repeate the same word by Fulke locis citatis VVhite in the way to the true Church §. 40. digr 42. p. 275. 276. word M. Fulke you haue heard in part already M. White handling this mater of purpose deliuereth it thus The nature of free-will stands not in freedome from all Necessity but from all externall Constraint c. but from Coaction only Immediatly after he mentioneth and reiecteth our opinion saying Others contrariwise dispute our will to befree not in this respect but because it is subordinate to no Necessity c. But such an absolute freedome there seemes not to be Then he confirmeth it by the authority of other Deuines misconstruing them to teach The will to be no otherwise free but from compulsion twice in one Page he giueth the same reason hereof as Caluin did Because Gods will saith he orders and determines all wills from which determination no Creature is free Againe Gods will is aboue ours and flowes into it and moues it and determines it Whereupon it followes that our will of infallible Necessity must needes â—e moued and determined for Gods will cannot be in Ibid. §. 40. pag. 275. vaine 19. Marke these words Our will of infallible Necessity must needs be moued and forget not that he taketh necessity for that which is free but from coaction only Wheron it ensueth that we are so Necessarily moued and determined by God as it is not in
Ignatius that men euen then in the next age after Christ began too studiously to loue and reuerence the state of Virginity 3. Concerning the preheminence and merit of Martyrdome they record the like howbeit M. Doctour Field with his wonted procacity outfacingly deposeth The Century writers reproue not the Fathers for any such errour as the Papistes do maynteyne touching the force of martyrdome c. Touching the merite satisfaction and expiation of sinnes which they fancy to be in the bloud of martyrs of which impiety the Father Ignatius in ep ad Antioch ad Herâ— ad Tarsen Field in his 3. book c. 21. fol. 1. â— Cent. 2. c. 4. Col. 64. Clem. in stroÌ„ Igna. in ep ad Smir. ad Antioch Polycar neuer thought Deale once sincerely M. Field I pray belie vs not gaynesay not that which is euident in the Centuristes We allow not any merit satisfaction or expiation of sinnes in the bloud of Martyrs but in the noble resolution of their mind and in the heroicall act of sheeding their blood And of this the Century-writers so vndoubtedly controule the auncient Fathers as he is past all shame who goeth about to deny it I will produce their sayinges and referre them to the iudgement of any not ouerpartiall sectary First chronicling the vnfitting speaches as they terme them because they fit not their errours with which the doctours of the first two hundred yeares garnish the resplendent crowne of Martyrdome thus they write They the Fathers of the next age after Christ beganne to thinke too honourably of Martyrdome in so much as they attribute vnto it a certaine expiation of sinnes For Clemens expresly sayth Martyrdome is a cleansing or expurgation of ossences with glory and Ignatius in diuers of his Epistles speaketh very daungerously of the merit of Martyrdome Then proceeding Cent. 3. c. 4. col 85. Tertul in Scorpiaco in Apologia in lib. de anima Origen Homil. 7. in lud Cypr. l. 2. epist. 6. to the Fathers of the third hundred yeares to Tertullian Origen and S. Cyprian All the Doctours say they of this age extoll Martyrdome beyond measure For Tertullian doth almost equall it with Baptisme Filth or dregs sayth he are washed away by Baptisme but spots are made white with Martyrdome And iÌ„n his Apology Who when it cometh to passe doth not long to suffer that he may purchase the grace of God that he may obteine all pardon from him by the satisfaction or recompense of his bloud for to this worke all sinnes are forgiuen And in his booke of the soule Yf thou diest for God thy bloud is the whole key of Paradise But Origen much more insolently then Tertullian preferreth Martyrdome before Baptisme and holdeth vs to be made more pure by that then by Baptisme Likewise that by Baptisme sinnes passed are scowred forth but by Martyrdome future are killed he sayth that Diuells cannot appeach the soules of Martyrs for so much as they are rinsed in their owne liquour clarified in their death washed in their bloud Cyprian also affirmeth immortality to be gayned by the bloud of Martyrs And in his booke of exhortation to Martyrdome he aduenturously teacheth Martyrdome to be a Baptisme greater in fauour more subly me in power in honour more precious then the Baptisme of regeneration In the Baptisme of water the remission of sinnes is receaued in that of bloud the Lawrell of vertues Hitherto the Centurists word by word who if they reprooue not the Fathers for the same errour which we maintaine if they assigne not to the excellency of martyrdome out of the Fathers writinges Merit Recompence Satisfaction Expiation Purging Cleansing forgiuenes of sinnes clarity whitenes immortality glory the laurell of vertues the key of Paradise which openeth the gates of heauen then let M. Feildes shameles wantones in denying be accounted hereafter well aduised sobernes in excusing these thinges 4. Other Protestant writers although they treate not of Martyrdome in particular yet of merit in particular they accuse the auncient Church Bullinger auoucheth Bulling vpon the Apoca. ser 87. fol. 270. Humfrey Ies part 2. pag. 530. Bell in his downe fall pag. 61. The doctrine of merit satisfaction and iustification of workes did incontinently after the Apostles time lay their first foundation Doctour Humfrey It may not be denied but that Irenaeus Clement and others haue in their writings the opinions of freewill and merit of workes Doctour Whitgift Almost all the Bishops of the Greke Church Latin also for the most part were spotted with doctrins of freewil of merit of inuocation of Saintes c. Some wraÌ„gler may cauill as Bell the Apostata doth that the merit which the primitiue Church allowed is not the same which we defend but the merit of impetration only as though merit were not a thing quite different from impetration 1. The begger doth impetrate he doth not merit his almes The hired seruant meriteth he doth not impetrate his wages 2. Merit ariseth from the worthines of desert impetration from the earnestnes only of request 3. That is grounded in some title of iustice or clayme of right this in meere prayers and supplications directly excluding the right of clayme 4. That hath intrinsecall reference to a due reward or payment presupposing a dignity in the worke this to a liberall gift without any respect to the value of the worke wherefore seeing S. Gregory Naziazen sayth that for good workes we may exact reward not as grace but as a plaine debt seeing the rest auow with Nazian ora 3. in hap him that we deserue heauen as the stipend or crowne of our workes they cannot be wrested to be vnderstood of impetration but of true and proper merit or else the Magdeburgian Protestants with their english Collegues were to blame in reprehending the Fathers for that kind of merite which for impetration no doubt they would neuer haue done 5. Neuertheles it is obiected that eternall life is the free ad Rom. 6. v. 23. 1. Io. 5. v. â—1 Abbot in his defence c. 5. very often gift of God imparted by grace bestowed vpon vs of mercy That it is proposed in scripture vnder the condition of an inheritance which befalleth to children without their desertes I graunt all this yet I find that as it is affirmed to be giuen by grace so also to be gotten by violence as it is called a free gift so a price or reward as a goale of mercy so a crowne of iustice as an inheritance belonging to children so a payment hire or wages purchased by workmen deserued of labourers Aug. ep 105. de correp gra c. 13. in enâ—h c. 107. lib. arb c. 8. 9. Therefore we ought not so to adhere to one text or manner of speach that we defeate the force of the others as Protestants are accustomed but we must allot to euery one the life and vigour of their natiue signification We allow therefore that our happy life is a
things spoken if to Luc. 10. v. 16. Matth. 18. v. 17. all be graunted the spirit of Prophesy If members must iudge of their heades and people examine their Pastours doctrine 10. In fine to rippe vp the bowells and breake the very sinewes of this answere in pieces the inward Spirit which moueth the Collatour in the exposition of Gods word may be caused three seuerall wayes 1. God may inspire it 2. The Diuell suggest it 3. The discourse of reason gather and collect it Now aread me this doubt you that ground your fayth hereon how do you know the perswasion you follow to be an inspiratioÌ„ 2. Cor. 1â— vers 14 from God a suggestion of Satan or a discourse of reason The Diuell may transfigure himselfe into an Angell of light many falshoods as the Philosopher teacheth may seeme more probable then truthes Diuers haue beene vndoubtedly perswaded that the spirit of God guided them aright when they were ignorantly missed by the spirit of deceit wherein if you belieue not me belieue a iudicious learned ProtestaÌ„t belieue M. Hooker a famous writer of your owne who hath published these wordes in print Such as are readiest to cite for one thing fiue hundred Hook in his 2. Book sess 7. fol â—18 sentences of holy Scriptur what warrant haue they that any one of theÌ„ doth meane the thing for which it is alleadged Is not their surest ground most commonly eyther some probable coniecture of their owne or the iudgment of others taking those Scriptures as they do which notwithstanding to meane otherwise then they take them it is not still altogeather impossible So that now and then they ground themselues on humane authority euen when they most pretend diuine Who could say more against the vanity of our Sectaries against their obstinate arrogancy in expounding the word by their owne priuate sense and iudgmeÌ„t for if amongst fiue hundred sentences they haue no warrant for one to meane the thing for which it is alledged Yf now and then they ground themselues on humane authority euen when they most pretend diuine by the pretence no doubt and direction of the spirit what notes doth he or his mates assigne what marks do they propose to discerne the Diuine spirit of God from the humane spirit of man or illusion of the Diuell 11. Marrie some Protestants prescribe the Analogie of Scripture That the spirit ought to be tried by Canon of holy writ which is nothing els then to allow the circle so often hissed out of schooles by the spirit to interpret the Scripture and by the Scripture to discerne the spirit Nothing els then to make a faire shew where no hope can be had of escape For either I vnderstand before the sense of the Scripture to which I iudge my spirit agreable or vnderstand it not Suppose I vnderstand it in vaine is the instruction of the spirit Suppose I know it not how shall I iudge of the conformity of my spirit to that which I do not my selfe conceaue Others therfore teach That the spirit needeth not the touch stone of Scripture but may by it self be descried as black from white light from darknesse If this be so why are we commaunded Not to trust euery Spirit when none can deceaue vs Why is it â— Ioan. 4. v. 1. IbideÌ„ sayd Trie the Spirits when they need no triall How falleth it out so many mistake the spirit of truth How is our sight so dimmed that we cannot perceaue the distinction of spirits the darke night from the clearest day 12. We for example beleeue with Protestants the Councell of Nice we beleeue the mystery of the holy Trinity the Incarnation of Christ and with the same spirit which they count erroneous we beleeue the CouÌ„cell of Lateran of Florence the Reall presence the Sacrifice of the masse neither can we see any difference in this our spirit Not we perchance but you the sharp-sighted eagles who soare so high as to gaze on the sunne you no doubt can bewray the different markes Aske then the Lutheran what cloudes of darknesse he discouereth in the spirit of defiance he hath with the Caluinist from the bright beames of light which ioyntly shine in poynts of their agreement he answereth None at all Aske the Caluinist what foggie mist he espieth in his spirit of variance from the Lutheran he answereth none at all Aske the diuine spirited Protestant Aske the Puritan the like question The Protestant contendeth that the spirit which causeth him to dissent from the Puritan is the spirit of light the illustration of the Holy Ghost The Puritan protesteth the same of his And wheras the one must needs be a Satanicall illusion sith it wholy crosseth and contradicteth the other who seeth not that the spirit of truth cannot by it self be discerned from the spirit of deceit no not by the grand-maisters themselues and boasters of the spirit 13. When our Ghospellers are thus beaten out of all their forts or strong holds of succour when they are conuinced that neither Scripture alone nor perusall of places nor examination of Greeke Hebrew fountains nor prayer to God with the direction of the priuate spirit can safely conduct them to the true knowledge and Rein. â— 2. diuis 2. p. 62. 〈◊〉 in act Col. Ratis ses 14. p. 1â—2 Vvhâ—taker desa Scrip. Controu 1. q 4. c 4. q. 5. â— 8. Ioan. â—o v. 17. 1. Cor. 2. v. 15. sense of Scripture will you heare their last and most desperate refuge Listen and learne to detest their fraud Albeit say they these former helpes be not alwayes effectuall to the reprobate or wicked sinner yet they are sufficient inough to the elect of God If the Lord sayth Reynolds take delight in vs he will bring vs to the food of life he will giue vs the bread of our soules and make vs learned in the Scriptures For it is written quoth Hunnius Whitaker My sheep heare my voyce and The spirituall man iudgeth all things O yee children of darknesse O yee enemyes of light How long will yee seeke these cloudy euasions How long will yee runne from one maze of obscurity into another As from search of Scripture to secret prayer from secret prayer to priuate spirit from priuate spirit to hidden grace And how shall I learne who is endued with this celestiall grace in whome God is pleased How shall I know the spirituall man or sheep of Christ Eccles 9. v. â— Salomon sayd No man can tell whether he be worthy of loue or hatred S. Paul I am guilty of nothing yet in this I am not iustified But thou more wise then Salomon more illuminated then 1. Cor. 4. v. 4. S. Paul describe me the markes shew me the badge and cognizance of Christ that I may see whether I am a sheep of his flocke or no. Thou sayst if I had a strong feruent fayth if I belieued aright I should be infallibly acertainted of
O Peter enioy thy primacy and rare preheminence glory in thy dignity graunted thee by Christ and be alwayes vigilant ouer his flocke Raigne O supreme Pastour raigne thou still as head vnder him as leader of his campe as Prince of his people and that which now thou canst not performe by thy self discharge at least by thy successor the Pope of Rome in whose care and vigilancy the exercise of thy function still continueth as the subsequent Treatise shall declare THE ELEVENTH CONTROVERSY VPHOLDETH The Popes Supremay against D. Bilson and D. Reynoldes CHAP. I. MASTER BILSON treading the sleps of his fore-father Caluin requireth Bils par 1. p. 10 4. of vs to proue three things before we install the Pope in his Pontificall Sea First You must shew saith he That Peter was Supreme Gouernour of all the Church Next that this dignity was not proper to Peters Person but common to Peters Successour c. Lastly you must shew which of Peters Chaires must haue Bilson ibi Peters Priuiledge that is why Rome rather then Antioch or as Caluin vrgeth rather then Ierusalem where Christ died Caluin l. 4. â—nst c. 6. § 21. and yielded vp as it were the visible head-ship of his Church I am content to obserue this method and satisfie him in these three points The first I haue already demonstrated in the precedent Treatise the second and third I am now to declare 2. Touching the second the wordes which Christ spake the reasons which moued him to impart a Supremacy to Peter do consequently conuince it be deuolued to his Successour The words of Christ are these Thou art Peter vpon this Rocke will I build my Church c. My Church Mat. 16. saith he not a patt or portion of his Church not that part only which florished in Peters daies but all his whole Church which euer was since Christ his time or euer shall be vntill the end of the world But this could not be Chrysost Demonstr quod Christus fit Deus Ioan 21. built vpon Peter in his owne person he being deceased so many yeares agoe therefore it must be builded vpon some other insteed of Peter and so as Iohn Chrysostome eloquently discourseth still continue In like manner when our Sauiour said to Peter Pasce oues meas Feede my Sheepe did he not command him to feed all his Sheepe did he not lay a charge vpon him which he should neuer forgoe Chiefly seeing the office of a Pastour is an ordinary and perpetuall office and as long as there are any Sheepe to be fed so long there ought to be some Pastour to feed them which because Peter performed not in his owne person these many hundred yeares there must needes be some other to execute it in his roome in respect of whom S. Peter may be still said to accomplish his duty and feed the Sheepe entrusted to his charge Whereupon Ieo sâ—r 2. de sua assumpt S. Leo writeth of Peter In whom the care of all Pastours with the custody of the Sheepe committed vnto him still perseuereth and whose worthy dignity in his vnworthy Successour faileth not In the Councell of Calcedon when an Epistle of Leo the Pope Concil Calcedon act 2. act 3. was read all the Fathers cried out that Peter spake by the mouth of Leo. And when sentence was pronounced against Dioscorus the Patriarch of Alexandria the whole Councell deliuered that Leo endued with the authority of Peter the Apostle deposed Dioscorus 3. Whereby it is euident that the Pastorall priuiledge granted to Peter was not restrayned to him but extended to others not giuen him as a priuate but as a publike person and therefore still to continue to them that succeed I presume you are not ignorant that a King being a publike person still continueth that he is said in the Law neuer to dy and the dignities granted to him are common to all the heyres and inheritours of Stow in his Chronicle in the yeare of our Lord 1521. pag. 865. his crowne As the thrice worthy Title of Defender of the Faith giuen to King Henry the eight by Leo the tenth Pope of that name for writing against Luther descended to king Edward passed to Queene Mary and Queene Elizabeth and now perseuereth in our most potent and dreadfull Soueraigne King Iames. The honour likewise M. Bilson enioyeth of being Prelate of the Garter is annexed to his Sea and deriued to him from his Predecessors The same is seene not only in Titles and Prerogatiues of honour but in priuiledges also of power imparted to Citties Dukedoms Common-wealths or publike Magistrates both Ecclesiasticall and Temporall who as they neuer faile so neither the honours dignities and prerogatiues they once enioy Such was the Primacy communicated vnto Peter not personall but publike Chrysolog in epist aâ— Eutyâ—h Read S. Aug. in Psal 44. vpon those words For thy Fathers Sonnes are born to thee that is For Apostls Bishops succeding in their roome not proper to him but common to his Successours in whom he euen now suruiueth speaketh and feedeth the Sheepe of Christ with the food of heauenly doctrine as S. Peter Chrysologus Bishop of Rauenna declareth writing thus in his daies Blessed Peter who liueth and gouerneth in his owne proper seat deliuereth the verity of faith to them that seeke it 4. The reasons which caused our blessed Redeemer to aduance Peter to this soueraigne dignity were all for the behoofe and benefit of the Church First to preuent schismes Secondly to appease dissensions Thirdly to settle it in peace Fourthly to endow it with a most perfect forme of a Common-wealth All which enforce that it was not a priuate grace annexed to Peters person but a publike priuiledge conueyed to his Successours For if these things be now as behoofull and necessary to the Church as then why should she not still enioy them Is Christ become lesse carefull of his Church then heretofore Or hath this faultlesse Virgin the pure Spouse of our Lord committed any fault by which she should be depriued of the benefit he bestowed vpon her If she be the same well ordered Campe how is she disappointed of her guide and Captaine If the same Ship how sayleth she without a Pilot If the same body how is she separated from her Head How is she become so prodigious a monster as to haue a visible body with an inuisible head because if none succeeded Peter the visible body of the Church hath had this long time no other then Christ Titus Liuius The Protestants will haue the church first gouerned by Christ alone next by the Apostles then by al Bishops after by Kings and Free stats wheÌ„ they were conuerted to the faith by Queen Elizabeth a woman by King Edward a Child Dan. 2. Luc. 1. her inuisible head 5. If none succeeded Peter the whole state of the Church is altered and changed changed from a Monarchy to Aristocracy from the administration of one
to the rule of many It was a Monarchy when Christ alone planted and founded it a Monarchy when Peter ruled it and is it now fallen to a more vnperfect forme of gouernment The Common-wealth of the Romans which flourished aboue all others was at last vtterly ruined by her manifold alterations by altering the sterne of regiment from Kings to ten Gouernours from them to Consuls from Consuls to Tribunes of souldiours from Tribunes to Dictatours from Dictatours to Trium-viri and could not our heauenly Law-maker preuent in his spirituall Common-wealth these great inconueniences Would he subiect his Church to such chops and changes to be gouerned first by one then by many after by more now by the Cleargy then by the Laity one while by Bishops then by Kings and Princes heere by Women there by Children whome you make heads and Gouernours of your Church Daniel prophesied that the God of Heauen would raise a kingdome which should neuer be dissolued and the Angell Gabriel foretould it should neuer haue end But neither the wordes of the Prophet nor voice of the Angell do you regard who rent and deuide the kingdome of Christs Church into as many seuerall Common-wealthes as there be seuerall Kinges seuerall Courts of Parlament seueral estates and manners of gouernement absolute and independant in the whole Christian World 6. The Synagogue of the lewes long triumphed in the lineall succession of her High Priests First in Aaron next in Eleazarus then in Phinees and in others after him vntill the end and abrogation of the Law and is it not meete the Church of Christ should glory in the like Being Heb. 8. v. 6 established in better promises and hauing greater necessity theÌ„ euer the Synagogue had For we find by experience many strifes contentions daily happen among the people of God who shal appease quiet theÌ„ The Bishops But how often do they arise among the Bishops themselues The Primates and Patriarches And what if they be also at variance as Flauianus and Dioscorus Cyrillus and Nestorius Euphemius and Petrus Mogus were The temporall Prince or Ciuill Magistrate But they ought not to intermedle with Ecclesiasticall affaires their factions may be more dangerous then any of the former To whome shall we then repaire To a Generall Councell But who shall sommon who shall order who shall direct and guide this Assembly What if they decline from the truth as the Councell of Ariminum the Councell of Milan the second Councell of Ephesus did who shall iudge their cause Who shall compose their dissentions vnles some one be appointed by the prouidence of God whose decree is iÌ„nuiolable and whose infallible censure all ought to obey Couell in his exam against the Plea of Innocents pag. 107. Cartwright in his second Reply part 1. pag. 582. 7. Otherwise as D. Couell our English Protestant affirmeth The Church of Christ should be in a farre worse case then the meanest Common-wealth nay almost then a denne of theeues if it were left destitute of meanes either to conuince heresyes or suppresse them A little before he sayth Authority which cannot be where all are equall must procure vnity and obedience And Cartwright This point of keeping peace in the Church is one of those which requireth as well a Pope ouer all Arch-bishops as one Arch-bishop ouer all Bishops in a Realme Melancthon pursueth the same reason The Bishop sayth Melanct. in Centu. Ep. Theol. Ep. 74. iuxta edit Bipont an Domini 1597. Luâ—h in lo. com Clas 1. cap. 37. p. 107. he of Rome is president ouer all Bishops and this Canonicall policy no wise man as I thinke doth or ought to disallow c. For the Monarchy of the Bishop of Rome is in my opinion profitable to this end that consens of Doctrine may be retained Which Luther his maister taught before him Whereas God would haue one Catholike Church throughout the whole world it is necessary to haue one people Yea and of this one people one Father ought to be chosen 8. Thus these Protestants depose against their own confederates and no maruell though some in so cleare light of Scripture in such a general consent of Councels 1. Cor. c. 12. vers 21. Io. 10. v. 16. Fathers and all antiquity should voluntarily approue a truth so manifest maruell no more approue it great maruell they remember not all the comparisons of S. Paul resembling the Church to a body in which the head Concil Nicen. can 6. Concil Brach. can 28. 23. Concil Constant apud Theod l. 5. Hist c. 9 Concil Lateran c. 5. Florent in Declarat fidei Conc. Chal. Act. 3. in relatione Sanctae Synodi ad B. PapaÌ„ Leonem 6. Synodus general cannot say to the feete as Christ might you are not necessary for me The prophesy recorded by S. Iohn There shal be one fold and one pastour Which as it was not verifyed in Christ his tyme so it cannot be now vnderstood only of him our inuisible Pastour but the flocke and fold being visible the Pastour whose office is ordinary and charge perpetuall must likewise be visible 9. What shall I adde the approbation of generall Councells Of the first Councell of Nice in Bithynia of the Councell of Brachara in Spaine of the Councell of Constantinople in Thracia of the Councells of Lateran and Florence in Italy especially of the Councell of Chalcedon in Asia one of the foure which our English Protestants allow where Pope Leo is called The vniuersall Arch-bishop The vniuersall Patriarch The Bishop of the vniuersall Church The Pope of the vniuersall Church Where the whole Councell tearmeth Leo The Interpreter of S. Peters voyce to all the world Where they acknowledge him their head and themselues his members Where they all confesse That the custody or keeping of the vineyard that is of the whole Church is committed by our Sauiour to Leo. Likewise the sixth Generall Synod confesseth that S. Peter was with them by his Successour Agatho and that S. Peter spake by Agatho his mouth 10. From the Councels I passe to the Fathers to S. Chrys l. 2. de Sacer. Hiero. Ep. ad Dam Hiero. ibid. Aug. in Psal cont part Donati de Vtilitate Cred. c. 17. Aug. in Epist. 162. Aug. lib. 1. con 2. Ep. Pela c. 1. ad Bonifa Prosper li. de ingrat Victor l. 2. de persecu Vandal Vincen in suo CoÌ„mo â—ustinian Ep. ad Io. quae habetur in Codice Iraen l. 3. cap. 3. Chrysostome Why did our Lord shed his bloud Truely to redeeme those sheep the care of which he committed both to Peter also to his Successours To S. Hierome writing to Damasus the Pope of Rome With the Successour of the Fisher-man and with the Disciple of the Crosse I speake I following none chiefe but Christ hold the fellow-ship of Communion with your Holynesse that is with Peters Chaire Vpon that Rocke I know the Church to be built Whosoeuer shall eate the Paschall Lambe out
in him Or if that work doth not hinder the free grace of iustification in Protestants conceit because it is the gift of God because it doth not iustify according to them as it is an actioÌ„ proceeding froÌ„ man but as it taketh hold and applyeth vnto them the iustice of Christ Why should our preparatiue workes any way preiudicate the freedome of that fauour as long as we acknowledg theÌ„ also the meer guift of the highest and not to dispose vs to the life of grace as they are achieued by our owne forces alone or flow from the drye and barren soyle of Nature but as they are made fertile by the water of the holy Ghost as they are eleuated and inspired by his viuificall motion For if the Beggar which is Cardinall Tolets example who of his owne accord Toleâ— in c. 3. ad Rom. stretcheth out his hand to receaue the offered almes doth not hinder the francke and liberall bestowing of the money much lesse should the cooperation of our freewill which not of our selues not of our owne endeauours but moued and strengthned by God yieldeth to his motions any way withstand his liberall donation and free guift of Iustice 17. In the last wing wherein the only hope of their victory remayneth such sentences of Scripture are ranged as flatly debarre the concurrence of workes from all kind of Iustice to wit By grace you are saued through fayth and that not of your selues for it is the guift of God not of workes that no man glory We account a man to be iustifyed by fayth without the Ephes 2. v. 8. Rom. 3. v. 28. Rom. 11. v. 6. Rom. 4. v. 2. workes of the law If by grace not now of workes otherwise grace now is not grace If Abraham were iustifyed by workes he hath glory but not with God with many others to the same purpose I answere that the Apostle excludeth indeed from the grace of iustification either first or second all workes which proceed from the vigour or strength of nature on which the Pelagians so much relyed Then he excludeth the good vse and exercise of freewil done without Christ to which the Semipelagians ascribed the dowry of grace Thirdly he excludeth the moral vertues performed by the Act. 15. v. 1. Aug. l 5. cont 2. ep Pelag. c. 7. in prâ—f ps 3â— ep 107. tract 50 de verb. Domini secundum Euang. Matth. Hier. l. â— com in c. 3. ad Gal. Prosper cont collat c. 22. Cent. 3. c. 4. Col. 80. ciâ—ant Orig. l. 8. in epist ad Rom. light of reason precepts of naturall Philosophy wherin the Gentils boasted and placed their happines Lastly he excludeth all works achieued by the sole notice of the Law both cerimoniall and morall in which the Iewes trusted so farre as they deemed themselues thereby only assured of Gods fauour and some of them vrged the necessity of circumcision the obseruation of their ceremonyes euen to Gentils conuerted vnto Christ of whome they auouched Vnles you be eireumcised you cannot be saued 18. Against these the Apostle so often inculcateth that neither circumcision prepuce nor any worke either of Iew or Gentill done by themselues or by the knowledge of the law without the grace of the Spirit inwardly mouing is able to saue them but he neuer excludeth the Sacraments of Baptisme or Pennance nor the works proceeding from the help of supernaturall grace to be dispositions to attaine the first true causes of increase in the second iustification whereof read S. Augustine S. Hierome and Prosper who interprete the Apostls meaning in the selfe same manner as I haue heere declared which interpretation the Century-writers haue also espyed and reproued in Origen engrossing these wordes in the Catalogue as they account them of his errours It is to be vnderstood that the workes which S. Paul reiecteth and so often reprehendeth are not the iustices which are commanded in the Law but those thinges in which they boast and glory who obserue the law according to the flesh or rites of sacrifices or obseruation of Sabaoths and new Monnes these and the like are the Concil Trid. sesl 6. Can. 1. Fulk in c. 2. Iacob sect 9. Fulk ibid. Vasq in 1. 2. disp 210. cap. 9. VVhitak l. 1. aduerf Duraeum VVhitak in his answere to M. CampiaÌ„ 8. reason â—ulke in c. 2. Iac. sect 9. Abbot in his defence c. 4. Ambr. in c. 3. 4. ad Rom. Chrys in c. 3. ad Gal. hom 7. in c. 3. ad Rom. Basil serm de humiâ—it Aug. l. 1. cont 2. ep Pelag. c. 21. l. 83. q. 76. Hesich in Leuit. l. 4. cap. 14. Hilar. cap. in Matth. August tract 49. in Ioan. workes by which he auoucheth no man may be saued Hitherto Origen quoted by the Magdeburgians To which purpose the Councell of Trent hath very diuinely decreed If any shall teach man may be iustifyed before God by his works which either by humane nature or by the doctrine of the Law are accomplished without the diuine grace of Iesus Christ let him be accursed According to this authentical exposition S. Paul and S. Iames are clearely discharged from that irreconciliable contradiction M. Fulke imagineth betweene them in our opinion for either S. Paul speaketh of the first iustification and S. Iames of the second which is not as he mistaketh another kind of iustification but the augmentation of the former or they both treate of the first and second also as Gabriel Vasquez thinketh most probable and the one excludeth workes wrought without the inward motion of grace from iustification the other acknowledgeth such workes to cooperate thereunto as proceed from grace which is no contradiction but the true and vndoubted position of our Catholike fayth 19. Although all the sentences of the Fathers which are stumbling blockes in our Reformers way be satisfyed in the same manner as these Texts of Scripture yet to ease the studious Reader from further trauaile I will particulerly set downe how the chiefest of them are to be vnderstood whome our Reformers oppose against vs concerning this point S. Ambrose S. Chrysostome S. Basil S. Augustine Hesichius and S. Hilary when they affirme vs iustifyed by fayth alone without any workes they mean without any workes eyther of our owne or of Moyses law done without grace Or they are to be interpreted of Fayth which is liuely indewed with Charity and accompanyed with other vertues So S. Augustine in his treatises vpon S. Iohn when he sayth Fayth is the soule of our soule Prosper S. Bernard and S. Augustine againe in the seauenth Chapter of his booke of predestination of Saints Prosp de voca gent. l. â— c. 8 9. Bernar ser 22 in cant Aug. de praedest Sanctor c. cap. 7. Leo serm de Epiphaâ— alibi Orig. in c. 3. ad Rom. Chrysost hom de fide lege nâ—turae Vasq in â— 2. disp 210. c. 9. are to be interpreted of fayth alone inchoatiuely S. Leo