Selected quad for the lemma: doctrine_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
doctrine_n	believe_v	scripture_n	tradition_n	2,560	5	9.2943	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A61606	A sermon preached November V, 1673, at St. Margarets Westminst by Edward Stillingfleet ...	Stillingfleet, Edward, 1635-1699.	1674 (1674)	Wing S5645; ESTC R7707	26,239	53

did it because they that are in the flesh cannot please God which is in effect sending all married persons to Hell This was one part of the pretended mortification of false Teachers about Marriage the other was about Meats S. Paul knew no such holiness in one sort of Meat above another as though men could fast their bellies full of one but the least taste of the other destroyed it What a pleasant thing it is to account that fasting which the unmortified Epicures of old accounted their most delicious feasting viz. Fish and Wine This is not doing so much as the Pharisees did for they appeared unto men to fast but in the Church of Rome they cannot be said to do that unless fasting and eating be the same thing But may not the Church call not eating prohibited meat fasting No doubt it may as well as call that no bread which we see and taste and handle to be bread However I cannot understand but if their Church had so pleased the eating Flesh and abstaining from Fish might have been called fasting and so they might have made one entire Fast of a whole years eating and notwithstanding all the pretence of fasting and mortification in that Church I cannot see that any man is bound by the Laws of it to keep one true fast all the dayes of his life But if all the mortification required lyes only in a distinction of meats the false Apostles went beyond them in it for they utterly forbid some sorts saying touch not taste not handle not and not meerly to shew their obedience to the commands of the Church but that they might not gratifie the desires of the flesh and therefore the Apostle saith these things had on that account a shew of wisdom in them being in all probability taken from the severe precepts of the Pythagorean Philosophy which makes him bid them Beware lest they were spoiled through Philosophy and vain deceit after the tradition of men and the principles of the world and not after Christ. For if this sort of mortification were a thing so pleasing to God the Heathen principles were more agreeable to his nature than the doctrine of Christianity This only requires the subduing our inward lusts and in order to that to keep the body in subjection but in the mysteries of the Heaten Religion far greater severities were to be undergone in order to their participation of them And the hardships were so great in some of their initiations especially those of Mithras that some dyed before they could pass through them and yet for any to be admitted without them was present death to them They were to make confession of their sins shave their heads change their habits lye upon the bare ground fast for several dayes and when they eat it was to be only of some certain meats these and many other severities they were to go through in order to the purifying their souls as they thought and bringing them to the state they were in before they came into the body Some part of these hardships the Pythagoreans took into their Philosophy and from them the Colossians began to be infected with them but S. Paul calls them only vain deceits the commandments and doctrines of men things that made a fair shew but he looks upon them as corruptions of the doctrine of Christ. Yet afterwards the Montanists and Encratitae and others were much stricter and more frequent in these fasts and abstinence than the Catholick Christians but the Church thought fit to condemn them as corrupters of Christianity By all which we see how apt men are to be deceived by false Teachers when they pretend to so much Mortification above what Christianity requires from them 3. They pretended to know the mind of Christ better than the Apostles did they pretended that they had conversed familiarly with Christ upon earth and understood his meaning better than the Apostles did And therefore their Disciples in the Church of Corinth were neither for Paul nor Apollos nor Cephas but they were only for Christ and gave out that from him they understood that what he had said concerning the Resurrection was only to be understood of the state of Regeneration which doctrine it seems had gotten great footing in the Church of Corinth by their means They reported that the Apostles understood only some common and ordinary things but the deeper and more hidden mysteries were only made known to them which makes S. Paul in his Epistles to those Churches which they had corrupted speak so often of his understanding the mysteries of God But we speak the wisdom of God in a mysterie even the hidden wisdom which God ordained before the world to our glory having made known unto us the mysterie of his will whereby ye may understand my knowledge in the mysterie of Christ. The true Apostles declared that they kept back nothing of the counsel of God but delivered it openly and plainly to make all men see and understand what that mysterie was the false Apostles pretended that the Doctrine and Writings of the Apostles did not contain all the great mysteries of the Gospel but they were received from Christs own mouth and conveyed to others by a secret and oral tradition The things written by the Evangelists they could not deny to be true but they were dark and obscure and could not be understood but by the help of their Oral Tradition and upon this principle Cerinthus Basilides Valentinus and Marcion went as appears by Irenaeus For when they saw they could never make good their Doctrines by the writings of the New Testament they sought to blast the reputation of these and set up the Authority of an Oral Tradition above them Men do not use to pick quarrels with their Friends and therefore when we find any charging the Scripture with obscurity and imperfection we have reason to believe they hope for no comfort from it 4. They made use of the most subtle and crafty methods of deceiving To this end they were very busie and active watching every opportunity therefore S. Paul charges them with sleight and cunning craftiness lying in wait to deceive i.e. with using all the arts and tricks of deceivers as 1. By deep dissimulation and disguising themselves not appearing at first to be what they really are nor letting them understand what their true doctrine and design is If any of those they hope to gain object any thing against them how do they pity their ignorance and revile their Teachers that did so foully misrepresent their Doctrines to them Alas for them poor men they neither understand us nor our Religion They have taken up things upon trust their prejudice will not suffer them to examine things as they are Have you not been told thus and thus concerning us and not one word of it is true Never trust such men more come be perswaded by us and then you shall be truly

who were foretold by the Prophets that should come for the redemption of his People for many shall come in my Name saying I am Christ and shall deceive many Not as though they pretended to be sent by Christ but that they would assume to themselves the Dignity and Authority of the true Messias and of this sort there were many that arose among the Jews such as Theudas Jonathas Barchochebas and many others But besides these there were false Prophets some of which did openly oppose Christianity such as that Bar-Jesus mentioned in the Acts but there were others who pretended to own Christianity and to prophesie in the Name of Christ whom S. Peter calls false Teachers and whom S. Paul describes by the same character that our Saviour here doth But I know that after my departing shall grievous Wolves enter in among you not sparing the flock also of your own selves shall men arise speaking perverse things to draw disciples after them whom he elsewhere sets forth by their Sheeps clothing when he saith that by good words and fair speeches they deceive the hearts of the simple whom he calls false Apostles deceitful workers transforming themselves into the Apostles of Christ which carryed so fair a shew and appearance among the people that S. Paul was very full of jealousie and apprehension concerning them lest they should by degrees draw away his Disciples from the simplicity of the Gospel of Christ. For I am jealous over you saith he with godly jealousie but I fear lest by any means as the Serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. It may seem strange that after the Apostles had with so much care and diligence planted the Gospel of Christ in several Churches they should express so much fear as they did and especially S. Paul of their being so soon corrupted by these false Teachers as he doth not only of the Corinthians but of the Galatians too I marvel saith he that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ. And O foolish Galatians who hath bewitched you that you should not obey the truth and of the Ephesians That we henceforth be no more Children tossed to and fro and carryed about with every wind of doctrine by the sleight of men and cunning craftiness whereby they lye in wait to deceive and of the Colossians Beware lest any man spoil you through Philosophy and vain deceit after the tradition of men after the rudiments of the world and not after Christ. And Let no man beguile you of your reward in a voluntary humility and worshipping of Angels and of the Hebrews Be not carried about with diverse and strange doctrines But we shall see this great Caution delivered here first by our Saviour and afterwards by his Apostles was no more than necessary if we consider under what pretences they came and what Arts and Methods these false Teachers used to delude and seduce the people 1. They pretended to the same infallible Spirit which the Apostles had And this may be the reason why our Saviour doth not here call them false Teachers but false Prophets For Prophecy in its proper notion doth not relate to future events but to divine Inspiration So S. Chrysostom saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is the same with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Prophet saith he is the same with Gods interpreter so the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is used in Greek Authors as in the Author of the Book de Mundo 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is rendered by Apuleius effari caeteris and Festus saith that the Latines called those Prophets which were oraculorum interpretes and so the Hebrew words are taken in the same sense without any relation to foretelling things to come So Moses is said to be a God to Pharaoh and Aaron thy Brother shall be thy Prophet i. e. thy interpreter Abraham is called a Prophet and the Patriarchs are all called Prophets in regard that Divine Revelations were more common before the written Law but the reason why the name of Prophecy came to be restrained to the prediction of things to come was because future events lying most out of the reach of mens knowledge the fore-telling of these was looked upon as the greatest evidence of divine inspiration But in the New Testament prophesying is often taken for the gift of interpreting the hard places of the Old Testament as Themistius calls one that interpreted the hard places in Aristotle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thence Prophesying is reckoned among the spiritual gifts and so these false Prophets were not men who pretended to fore-tell future events but to the assistance of an infallible Spirit in giving the sense of Scripture and by this pretence they transformed themselves into the Apostles of Christ giving out that they enjoyed equal priviledges with them whereby three things may be observed which deserve our consideration 1. That nothing is more easie than for false Teachers to pretend to an infallible Spirit such whom our Saviour and his Apostles did warn men especially against pretended to be Prophets and Apostles and to know the mind of Christ better than they who truly had the assistance of the Holy Ghost Some think the bare pretence to Infallibility ought in such a divided state of the Christian world to be entertained as the best expedient to end Controversies and that Church which doth alone challenge it ought on that account to be submitted to as though the most confident pretenders were to be soonest believed so they will be do what we can by the weakest sort of mankind but by none who have and use their judgements If bare pretences were sufficient Simon Magus did bid the fairest to be Head of the Church for he pretended to be Gods Vicar upon earth or the divine Power sent down from Heaven which none of the Apostles pretended to Why then did not the Christian Church submit to Montanus his Paraclete when no other Christians pretended to such an immediate inspiration as he did And certainly Prisca and Maximilla were better Oracles than a Crucifix was to a late Pope If there be any thing beyond a bare pretence to an infallible Spirit we desire to see better arguments for it than the false Apostles could produce for theirs if there be nothing but a bare pretence we must leave the Pope and Quakers to dispute it out 2. That the pretence to Divine Inspiration is very dangerous to the Christian Church For we see what mischief it did in the Apostolical times when there was a true infallible Spirit in the Apostles of Christ to discover and confute it yet notwithstanding all the care and diligence of the Apostles many were seduced by it For those who have the least ground do commonly use the greatest confidence and denounce Hell