Selected quad for the lemma: doctrine_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
doctrine_n	believe_v	faith_n	justification_n	2,510	5	8.9827	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A39279	A defence of the Thirty nine articles of the Church of England written in Latin by J. Ellis ... now done into English ; to which are added the Lambeth Articles ; together with the judgment of Bishop Andrews, Dr. Overall, and other eminent and learned men upon them.; Articulorum XXXIX Ecclesiae Anglicanae defensio. English	Ellis, John, 1599?-1665.; Andrewes, Lancelot, 1555-1626.; Overall, John, 1560-1619.; Church of England. Thirty-nine Articles.	1700 (1700)	Wing E587; ESTC R1641	74,086	146

A DEFENCE OF THE Thirty Nine Articles OF THE Church of England Written in Latin by J. Ellis S. T. D. Now done into English To which are added the Lambeth Articles Together with the Judgment of Bishop Andrews Dr. Overall and other Eminent and Learned Men upon Them London Printed for H. Bonwicke T. Goodwin M. Wotton S. Manship and B. Tooke 1700. Advertisement to the READER THE Credit and favourable Reception that this Book of Dr. Ellis's has met with amongst Men of Letters is a sufficient Apology for giving it a new Birth and making its Use of a larger Extent It was Published in Latin in the Year 1660. Reprinted in 1694. And because both Impressions are now quite sold off it became necessary either to give it a new Edition or a new Language The latter as being of more general Use was chosen And therefore I have endeavoured to make the Author speak as good English as a Sententious and Argumentative Stile would easily bear without too much wresting and wandring from the Sense It is something wonderful to observe how ignorant many People are of the very Articles of that Religion which they have all along professed themselves to be Members of As if it were enough to be of the Church of England without having any tolerable System of its Doctrine much less knowing how to defend them against the Cavils of ou● Enemies Whereas we are not afraid to encourage Men to have re●urse to those Articles of our Religion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 we own we must stand or fall The bold and during Attempts of Men of res●ss Spirits in this Age make it highly necessary for every Christian to consider well and examine what it is he believes and what Foundation his Faith stands upon that he may be ready always to give an Answer to them that ask him a Reason of the Hope that is in him and may be able by sound Doctrine to convince the Gainsayers To which purpose this short Defence of the Articles of the Church of England is presented in an English Dress for the greater Advantage and more general use of all Readers Wherein may be found though short and succinct yet very clear and strong Arguments and such I am perswaded as will not fail to work upon all well-disposed and ingenuous Minds I have not thought fit to interpose except in One or Two Places where the Obscurity of the Subject or the Author's Sense seemed to require it and there too I have set a distinguishing Mark. And now if the Whole shall in any Measure contribute to remove Mens Doubts or instruct their Minds to confirm their Faith or reform their Manners here is a glorious End and there needs no further Apology to be made Sutton-Court Nov. 11. 1699. J. L. A DEFENCE OF THE Thirty Nine Articles OF THE Church of England ARTIC I. Of Faith in the Holy Trinity THERE is but One Living and True God everlasting without Body Parts or Passions Of infinite Power Wisdom and Goodness the Maker and Preserver of all things both visible and invisible And in the Unity of this Godhead there are Three Persons of One Substance Power and Eternity The Father the Son and the Holy Ghost Obj. 1. Against which it is objected 1. That there are Gods many aceording to the Apostie 1 Cor. 8. 5. Ans● 1. The Apostle says not that there are many Gods with respect to their Essence but either with Relation to the Error of some that say the Planets are Gods or else according to some certain Similitude as Magistrates are sometimes called so Obj. 2. The Phrases of Time past and Time to come are spoken of God and therefore he is not Eternal Answ. Such Words are spoken of God not as tho' he had any Variation thro' them but because his Eternity does comprehend all Times Obj. 3. The Scriptures testifie that God has Hands and Eyes c. and therefore he is not Incorporcal Answ. Such Parts are not attributed to God as really such but by way of Similitude and upon the account of his Actings as the Action of the Eye is to see from whence it is that the Eye when 't is spoken of God means his Power of Seeing not after a sensible but intellectual manner and the like is to be said of all other Parts of the Body Obj. 4. It is said Gen. 6. 6. that God repented and elsewhere that he was subject to ●other Passions Answ. Repentance is indeed attributed to God as if he were affected as Men are because he acts sometimes after the manner of one that repents but this is spoken not as to any Affection in God but as to the Effect of the thing And the like is to be said of other Passions Obj. 5. The Angels are not reckoned up by Moses among the Works of the Creation Answ. We do not read in Genesis the very Words of the Creation of Angels yet this is to be understood there both Chap. 1. ver 1. and Chap. 2. ver 1. They are the heavenly Host and the Apostle to the Colossians Chap. 1. 16 17. expresly affirms That God is the Creator of all things Visible and Invisible Obj. 6. 〈◊〉 It is objected That the Doctrine of the Holy Trinity is not true but rather contradicts it self because there is but One God therefore not Three but there would be Three Gods if the Father was God the Son God and the Holy Ghost God Now when we speak of a Person we mean these Two things the Essence and the manner of Subsisting Answ. From a Trinity of Persons in created Beings is rightly inferred a threefold Essence but not so in Divine Beings If we name a Person of the Holy Trinity we mean a Nature or Essence that is common to more Persons than One But created things because they are finite their Substances or Persons must be separate So Socrates Plato and Aristotle although by a common Nature and Reason they are called Men yet are not One but Three Men And because in Divine Persons the Being or Essence is infinite therefore Three Persons subsisting in it although they they be truly Three yet are but One God Obj. 7. The Doctrine of a Trinity of Persons does infer a Composition in God Where there is Essence and Person there is a Composition either from a general or a particular Nature And where there are these Two there there is a Compos●n But in God there is both because his Essence is one thing and his Person another Answ. There is not in God a Conjunction of an universal and particular Nature since God is the most simple Essence Nature and Suppositum tho' two things do not make a Composition in God as it does in created Beings in which Nature is one absolute thing and the Suppositum another whereas in God the Suppositum has a relative Nature and a Relation does not compound but distinguish more especially in God where the Relation does not really differ from its Foundation Where there

Jewish Commonwealth and these do not bind Christians but there are others which have the nature of common Justice and a natural Law and are the Explications and Determinations of the moral one and the observation of them is likewise injoyned in the New Testament But these do bind every one to observe them Obj. 9. The moral Law is not made for a Righteous Man 1 Tim. 1. 9. Answ. The Law as to its Punishments whereof it threatens a great many is not made for a Righteous Man to Condemnation altho' it be made as to its Rules for Observation A just Man even for the love of Justice conforms himself to that Law and then the threatnings of the Law signifie nothing to him Consequently then this can be nothing to wilful Libertines that the Just are not bound by any Christian Laws ART VIII Of the Three Creeds THE Three Creeds Nice Creed Athanasius's Creed and that which is commonly called the Apostle's Creed ought thoroughly to be received and believed for they may be proved by most certain Warrants of Holy Scripture Obj. 1. This Article seems to be imperfect because it makes no mention of the Ephesian Chalcedonian and Constantinopolitan Creeds which were wont to be approved of by the Church Answ. This Article mentions the chief Creeds not exclusively to others as if they might not be true likewise and it was not necessary to mention All. Obj. 2. The Inventions of Men are not to be obtruded upon the Church nor to be received as necessary to be believed but the foregoing Creeds as such and are proposed to our Faith as if they were the W●d of God Answ. The aforesaid Creeds were indeed composed and methodized by Men but yet they are not the meer Fancies of Men contrary to the Holy Scriptures which the Argument supposes but the Doctrine contained in them is conformable to the Word of God Neither do we receive them with an equal degree of Faith with the Holy Scripture but we give them the next place to That and reverence them as the chief Monuments of Faith Obj. 3. To omit others that Sentence in Athanasius's Creed seems to be too severe where he speaks of the Confession of Faith That except every one do keep it whole and undefiled without doubt he shall perish everlastingly What shall we then say of those that labour under an invincible Ignorance How shall they believe on him of whom they have not heard says St. Paul Rom. 10. 14 If then Men want the Means of Knowledge and the Tidings of this Doctrine has in no sort come to them it is plain they are not to be blamed and that they are free from Damnation for God obliges no one to Impossibilities Answ. Athanasius means chiefly those to whom the Catholick Faith has been propounded and explained who have all the means requisite for the knowledge of the Truth As to others who of them will be saved God himself will in an extraordinary manner enlighten their Understandings that they may perceive what things are necessary to Salvation ART IX Of Original Sin ORiginal Sin stands not in the following of Adam as the Pelagians do vainly talk but it is the Fault and Corruption of the Nature of every Man that naturally is ingendered of the Off-spring of Adam whereby Man is very far gone from Original Righteousness and is of his own Nature inclined to Evil so that the Fleth lusteth always contrary to the Spirit And therefore in every Person born into this World it deserves God's Wrath and Damnation And this Infection of Nature does remain yea in them that are Regenerated whereby the Lust of the Flesh called in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which some do expound the Wisdom some Sensuality some the Affection some the Desire of the Flesh is not subject to the Law of God And altho' there is no Condemnation for them that believe and are Baptized yet the Apostle does confess that Concupiscence and Lust has of it self the nature of Sin Against which it is Objected Obj. 1. That God does not punish the same Sin twice but he has ●ready punished Adam's Sin in Adam and therefore will not punish it in us Ans. Adam's Sin was not Numerically but Specifically One and that inclusive of the whole Species As he sinned so have we likewise sinned in him and we are justly punished in our selves Obj. 2. It is plain there is no such thing as Original Sin because the Son shall not bear the Iniquity of the Father says the Prophet Ezek. 18. 20. Answ. The Son does not bear the Personal Sins of his Father but the Sin of the first Man was a stain of the whole Nature when therefore any one is punished for the Sin of Adam he is punished for his own Obj. 3. Sin is a voluntary thing but Original Sin is not so in Infants Ans. Original Sin is voluntary in All nay even in Infants too for our Wills were in the Will of Adam as in the Principle of Mankind in him we willed and desired Evil. Obj. 4. An Accident of one Individual is not transferred to the whole Species but the Sin of Adam was only an Accident of one Individual Ans. Adam inasmuch as he was the Principle of Human Nature was to be look'd upon here as an universal Cause Obj. 5. The Children of Holy Men are Holy 1 Cor. 7. 14. therefore they are not born in Sin Ans. The Children of Holy Men are not so Holy as to be free from Original Sin but they are called so in regard of a Communion with the Church by reason of that Covenant Gen. 17. 7. I will be a God to Thee and to thy Seed They are therefore Holy with a relative and not with any inherent Holiness so also they are Innocent in respect to those Sins which are committed against Knowledge Obj. 6. In Baptism we receive a perfect Remission of Sins therefore Original Sin is wholly taken away and so remains not in the Regenerate Ans. Remission of Sin takes away Sin as to its Imputation not as to its Being for Mortification is but imperfect in this Life so in Baptism Sin is taken away but not so much the Sin it self as the Sting of it that it may not hurt us Obj. 7. Things absolutely disagreeing do not meet in the same Subject but Sin and Righteousness are of that sort therefore since there is Righteousness in the Regenerate there can be no Sin there Answ. Sin and Righteousness cannot be in the same Subject in the highest but yet easily in lower degrees Obj. 8. Concupiscence or a proneness to Evil is distinguished from Sin as the Cause is from the Effect Jam. 1. 15. and therefore is not of it self to be accounted Sin Answ. Concupiscence is distinguished from Actual Sin and from an external Act already compleated but in the mean time it has of it self the nature of a Sin because of it self it is not subjected to the Law of God And it is this

Rebellion of the Powers of our Souls that disposes us to all manner of Sins ART X. Of Free-Will THE Condition of Man after the Fall of Adam is such that he cannot turn and prepare himself by his own natural Strength and Good Works to Faith and calling upon God Wherefore we have no Power to do Good Works pleasant and acceptable to God without the Grace of God by Christ preventing us that we may have a Good Will and working with us when we have that Good Will Against this Doctrine it is Objected Obj. 1. That God commands Men to turn to him and to believe in him Zach. 1. 3. Mark 1. 15. and in many other places to perform all Works of Piety Therefore this they can do otherwise it would be commanded to no purpose Answ. From a Precept to an Ability to perform it we can draw no Argument We can indeed do Offices of Piety and that only when we are acted and excited to them God gives what he Commands and helps what he has given without Him we cannot be good and without our selves he will not make us so Obj. 2. It is tyrannical to punish any one for not doing what he could not so much as Will or Desire Answ. He would be indeed a Tyrant that should command such things to be done as are not in Mens Power But God made Man with Abilities to fulfil his Commands And then God requires of Man Obedience to his I aw not by setting himself upon the exact fulfilling of it by his own feeble Strength but upon considering the impossibility of the thing with respect to the Powers of Nature to betake himself to Christ through whom the Faithful are able to do all things Obj. 3. If Man had not a Free-Will he would Sin necessarily and then ought not to be punished and so all Use of Exhortations Reproofs and all endeavour after Good Works would be taken away Answ. A Man without the help of Grace sins necessarily whosoever is under this necessity it is his Fault for he has drawn this necessity of sinning upon himself and therefore is justly punished by God And then as for the Use of Exhortations that is not taken away with those that have the sufficient Assistance of God The Precepts which cannot be performed by the strength of Nature are useful in this respect that they put us in mind of our Weakness invite us to an earnest endeavour to pray and so lead us to Christ who is wont to assist the weak And these are the efficacious means that God together with his Grace makes use of in Man's Conversion that what is impossible to Nature may in this way become very easie Obj. 4. Men are called Labourers Mat. 20. 8. and Labourers together with God in the business of Salvation 1 Cor. 3. 9. Answ. Men do indeed co-operate with God by Grace not by their own Strength and therefore they are said to co-operate in respect of assisting and not of preventing Grace ART XI Of the Justification of Man by Faith WE are accounted Righteous before God only for the Merit of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ by Faith and not for our own Works or Deservings wherefore that we are justified by Faith only is a most wholsome Doctrine and very full of Comfort as more largely is expressed in the Homily of Justification Obj. 1. In this Article there seems to be a Contradiction when it is said we are accounted Righteous only for the Merit of Christ but afterward it is said this is done by Faith Answ. Here is no Contradiction at all We are only accounted Righteous by the Merit of Christ as by an impellent Cause yet this is done likewise by Faith as by an instrumental Cause whereby we obtain that Merit Obj. 2. By Justification we are restored to that State from which by the Sin of Adam we were fallen Rom. 5. 19. Since therefore we lost inherent Righteousness by Adam's Fall we recover it again by Justification Answ. We are restored by the Righteousness of Christ and partly by inherent Righteousness too The one as the most perfect is imputed for perfect Righteousness Rom. 4. But the other is too weak for us to be able to stand before God Esa. 64. 6. In the afore-cited place Rom. 5. the Word as does not determine the manner or the quality but the original Author of Righteousness Obj. 3. It is said Rom. 8. 24. By Hope we are saved Answ. By Hope is there meant Trust and so it falls in with Faith Even by Hope we are said to be saved because we are not actually possessed of Salvation but by Hope not that we are justified by any peculiar Vertue of Hope Obj. 4. Many Sins were forgiven Mary Magdalen because she loved much says the Text Luke 7. 47. therefore by Love she was Justified Answ. The Particle because does not denote any forcible cause of Justification but only a significative one for Love is a sign of Justification and is the fruit and companion of Faith but yet it has not an equal share with it in the Act of Justification Here is no Consequence her Sins were forgiven because she loved therefore Love is the cause of Forgiveness So neither does this follow A Man lives because he walks therefore walking is the cause of Life ART XII Of Good Works ALbeit that Good Works which are the fruits of Faith and follow after Justification cannot put away our Sins and endure the severity of God's Judgments yet are they pleasing and acceptable to God in Christ and do spring out necessarily of a true and lively Faith insomuch that by them a lively Faith may be as evidently known as a Tree discerned by the Fruit. Obj. 1. Many Men believe the Articles of Faith to be true that do yet lead wicked Lives therefore Good Works are not always the Fruit of Faith Answ. Such Men as always live wickedly have not justifying Faith but only the empty Profession of it Obj. 2. The Integrity of Job is described Chap. 1. 2. David asks to be judged according to his Righteousness n●y and boasts of it too Psal. 7. 8. And then we read of Zachartah and Elizabeth that they were both Righteous before God Luke 1. 6. It seems then that their Works would bear the Judgment of God Answ. A partial Perfection which is Sincerity is attributed to the Godly but not an absolute one such as is called a gradual Perfection as if they could be able to stand the severe Trial of Divine Judgment Job says he could not do so Chap. 9. 2 3. It is one thing to speak of the Righteousness of a Cause and another of a Personal Rightcousness in respect of which latter David himself confesses that he could not bear the Judgment of God Psal. 130. 3. 143. 2. Obj. 3. St. James concludes Chap. 2. 24. That a Man is justified by Works and not by Faith only Answ. St. James speaks of Justification or the proof of Justification