which being also in Christ doth so really couple vs with him that we are one body with him and amongst our selues yea al of vs one new man in the same head Christ for in those two respects namely one of the spirit by whome the other of the head Eph. 2.14 to whome wee are ioyned Paule saide all the faithfull vvere one nevve man XVIII By the vnion vvith Christ the participation of the benefits of his death and resurrection is conueied vnto vs. Now of this communion with christ there followeth and dependeth the participation of his benefites and of saluation gotten and remaining for vs in his flesh and blood For as the branches can draw no nourishment from the vine nor the members from the head nor the liuely stones from the foundation vnlesse they be really ioyned with their foundation with their head with the tree with the vine abide in them so neither can we from Christ our head our foundation our tree our vine vnlesse wee bee truely grafted into him by the holy ghost and do abide in him beeing made flesh of his flesh and bone of his bone Wherfore they doe vs very great iniurie that say we therefore denie the true participation of his flesh and blood and that we affirme a participation only of his gifts and benefits because wee will not admit which wee cannot admit that the true bodie of Christ doth passe reallie through our mouth into our bodies As though it were not a true and an essentiall communion which is made by the holy ghost and by faith sith nothing can knitt more strictlie diuerse substances and natures into one then the holy ghost As we see in the incarnation of the sonne of God and in the creation of man being compounded of the soule and the bodie Surelye if that communion which is made by the onely spirit and by faith with the flesh and bloode of Christ were not able to saue vnlesse he should also passe through the mouth into our bodies Christ had prouided but slenderly for his church Therefore in receiuing of the gospell and in the profession of Baptisme he would haue the same communion to be made 1. Ioh. 1.3 1. Co. 12.13 as Iohn witnesseth of the first and the Apostle Paule of the second This therfore is our confession of the true communion with Christ in generall and therefore of the dispensation of saluation and life which is in Christ XIX Errors Wherefore we disallow their error which teach that remission of sinnes and saluation is communicated to men Opus operatum by the vvorke wrought as they call it without faith and without the true vniting with Christ Yea we condemne their blasphemie who labour to proue it may be done by works not commaunded of god but deuised by men and full of superstition idolatry and theirs also which setting nought by the ministerie of the worde doe teach that saluation is communicated aswell without as with the hearing of the word and receiuing of the Sacraments and much more those which affirme that al infants in their mothers wōbes aswell of faithfull parents as of infidells are made partakers of the benefite of Christ CHAP. XIII Of the gospell and of the abrogation of the lawe by the gospell SEing first the gospell and then the Sacraments Baptisme and the Lords Supper are the outward instrumentes whereby our redeemer the Lord Iesus Christ vseth to offer and bestowe the grace of redemption remission of sinnes vppon the worlde and to communicate himselfe vnto vs his elect and to incorporate vs likewise into himselfe so to make vs indeed partakers of that saluation and life which we haue in him Therefore wee haue purposed briefly and plainely to declare vnto Gods church what our faith is concerning the same I. The gospell what it is Concerning the gospell therefore according to the signification receiued and vsed in the church we beleeue that it is nothing else but the heauenly doctrine concerning Christ preached by Christ himselfe and the Apostles and contained in the bookes of the newe Testament bringing the best and most gladsome tidings to the world namely that mankinde is redeemed by the death of Iesus Christ the onely begotten sonne of God so that there is prepared for al men Mat. 3.2 if they repent beleeue in Iesus Christ a free remission of al their sinns saluation and eternall life Wherefore it is fitlie called of the Apostle Eph. 1.13 The Gospell of our saluation II. The gospell was promised by the Prophets but published by the Apostles For albeit that this misterie euen from the first beginning of the world was reuealed vnto the fathers and that the Prophetes spake of the same yet that which they preached was rather Euangelical promises and those reserued among the Iewes then the gospell it selfe which was to be published to all nations sith they foretold of a thing which was to come but did not declare the thing present or that was past Rom. 1.2 1. Pet. 1.10 as the Apostle teacheth to the Romaines and Peter in his first epistle III. Aswell the fathers were saued by faith which they had in the promises concerning Christ the redeemer as wee which beleeue in the gospell Meane while we doubt not but aswell the fathers Rom. 4.3 who beleeued in those Euangelicall promises of Christ which was to come and should bruise the serpents head were saued Heb. 1.10 as we also by our faith in the gospell telling vs that Christ is come and that he hath redeemed the world are saued as the Apostle both in other places and in the epistle to the Romaines doth largely teach vs concerning Abraham to the Hebrues concerning all the other so that it is a foule blasphemy to say that only earthly matters were promised to the fathers and that they receiued onely such and not heauēlie as remission of sinnes and eternall life For looke what the gospell is vnto vs properly receiued the same were the Euangelicall promises to them Rom. 1.16 namely the power of God to saluation vnto euerie beleeuer IV. The doctrine of the gospell touching the substance is most auncient and eternall Whereby wee knowe that the doctrine of the gospell touching the substance thereof is not new but most auncient and preached vnto the Fathers euen from the worlds creation so as Iohn not vnfitly called the gospell Apo. 14.6 an euerlasting gospell V. The parts of the gospell how many and what Furthermore there ar three especial points in the gospell which wee are called vppon to performe Repentance towardes God Faith in our Lord Iesus Christ Act. 20.21 Mar. 1.4 Mat. 28.10 and a care to obserue whatsoeuer Iesus Christ hath willed and commaunded VI. A declaration of the former opinion The Gospell therefore which setteth out vnto vs Christ with the whole fauour and mercy of God with the purging forgiuenes of sinnes and with the whole saluation and eternall life
to the rule of the holie scriptures and doe not varie from the vse and custome of the auncient church For there want no testimonies in the scriptures of contrition and likewise of confession of sinnes both before God and before our brother whome we offend and also before the whole congregation when it is expedient As also if any man ouerloaded with the burden of his sinnes and troubled with grieuous temptations doe priuately require counsaile or instruction or comfort either of a minister of the church or of any other brother who hath knowledge in the lawe of God we disallow it not Moreouer those Ecclesiasticall satisfactions whereof we reade in Tertullian Cyprian and others which consist onely herein that an assured testimonie of true repentance may be shewed to the whole congregation which they call to doe pennance wee cannot condemne it But we condemne the superstitions thereunto added the torments of consciences and vngodly opinions wherein appeareth to bee taken no benefite of the death and satisfaction of Iesus Christ the one and onely washer away of sinnes and perfect and full redeemer from all fault and punishment CHAP. XIX Of iustification I. They which haue true repentance haue also a liuely faith are ingrafted in Christ and iustified in him THe man that is contrite in heart Esay 66.2 loatheth his sinne from his heart and repēteth him of his whole misledd life Psal 32.6 Mat. 5.6 sighing vnto God for remission of his sinnes and hungring and thirsting for the true righteousnesse of Christ wee doe beleeue that as hee was by the holie spirite indued with this repentance towards God so also that hee is by the same spirite indued with a liuely faith in Christ and euen from the beginning was preordained to be ioyned vnto Christ as a member to the head therefore in him to obtaine remission of his sinnes and to be indued with his perfect righteousnesse and so to bee reputed truely righteous for Christ into whome he is ingrafted and to be absolued from all guilt as the Apostle saith Rom. 8.1 1. Cor. 1.30 There is no condemnation to them that are in Christ and Christ is made our righteousnesse II. He which through Christ into whom he is ingrafted is counted iust the same is also indued with inhaerent iustice Wee beleeue also that he which through Christ into whome he is ingrafted by the holy ghost is accompted iust and is truely iust hauing obtained forgiuenes of his sinnes in Christ and imputation of his iustice the same man forthwith is possessed of the gift of inhaerent iustice so that he is not onely perfectly and fully iust in Christ his head but hath also in himselfe true iustice whereby he is indeede made conformable vnto Christ although while we remaine in this flesh wee can neuer haue the same so perfected but that it is by our owne fault spotted and defiled with many corruptions of our sinnes Of which iustice Iohn saith 1 Ioh. 3.7 He which doth righteousnesse or iustice that is iust workes he is righteousse or iust For the Apostle doeth alwaies ioyne both these righteousnesses aswell to the Romaines as in other his epistles and teacheth they bee both bestowed on the faithfull through Christ Phil. 1.11 as he well prooueth to the Philippians And wee affirme that the later iustice the fruits whereof are made manifest to men is so sure a testimonie of the former that where the last is absent Iac. 2.21 c there we hold withall the Apostles that there is no place for the first So farre bee we from letting loose the raines to vngodly people by the doctrine of iustification by faith onely apprehending the remission of sinnes and imputation of the iustice of our Lord Iesus Christ III. Because this inhaerent righteousnesse is alwaies by our owne fault most vnperfect therefore we are iust before God onely by the righteousnesse of Christ Meane while we confesse that this inhaerēt righteousnesse is through our owne fault so imperfect in vs that wee are made iust before God and can be accounted for iust onely by that righteousnesse of Christ whereby our sinnes are not imputed not onely in the beginning of our conuersion when of wicked we are made godlie but euer after euen to the ende of our liues as Dauid saieth Psal 32.1 Rom. 4.7 Psal 143.2 and the Apostle alleadgeth Blessed are they whose wickednesse is forgiuen and againe In thy sight shall no man liuing be iustified Therefore wee conclude that our true iustification doeth consist in the onely remission of sinnes and imputation of Christs owne righteousnesse IV. By faith it is knowne whether a man be iustified in Christ and therefore it is saide that such a one is iustified by faith But because iustification is not without the knowledge and feeling and consequently the assent of him we speake of such as are of years of discretion who is iustified that feeling is the feeling of faith therefore we say that a man is then iustified by faith when he which is ingrafted into Christ perceiuing and feeling the same is persuaded that his sinnes are so forgiuen him by the onely mercie of God and for the only obedience satisfaction and sacrifice of Christ to whome he is ioyned that he is freed and deliuered from all faulte and punishment due vnto his sinnes yea is persuaded that the perfect righteousnes of Christ is so imputed vnto him that he knoweth eternall life to be euen due vnto him for the same in like sorte as it is due to Christ and consequently findeth the same to bee due of free grace and fauour not for his owne works V. A confirmation of the former opinion and what it is for a man to be sanctified First Rom. 4.8 5.19 to iustifie in the scriptures aswell in the old Testament as the new and especially with the Apostle when he handleth the same matter doth signifie to forgiue sinnes and so to absolue and acquite from all blame punishment and also to receiue into fauour and to pronounce a man iust and to accompt him for iust not such a one as is simplie vnrighteousse but such a one as by the obtaining forgiuenesse of his sinnes is no longer vnrighteousse Moreouer although God doe alwaies in Christ acknowledge for his and hath freely made acceptable to himselfe in his well beloued all those whome from the beginning he hath chosen in Christ as mēbers in their head to be his children yet because wee are not yet really in Christ vntill we are ingrafted and incorporated into him by the holy ghost which indeed we that are of yeares of discretion are not till we be indued with faith so that we acknowledge Christ to be our righteousnesse and imbrace him for such therfore the scriptures do teach that we are then iustified and that by faith in Christ without our owne workes when wee beleeue all this with true faith that is when wee are persuaded that
indeed such a magistrate is not in that behalfe the minister of God Wherefore if we must be subiect and obey the magistrate for conscience sake not for feare onely Rom. 13.5 then we conclude that where we cannot for conscience obeye him neither ought wee there for feare to obeye him In other matters Rom. 13.2 whoso resisteth the power we knovve that he resisteth God and shall receiue to himselfe damnation III. We must praye for all magistrats that vvhat there dueties are they may indeede performe and what the duetie of euerie magistrate is But seing the duty of euery free magistrate is to haue a diligēt care both in making lawes in giuing iudgement and also in punishing offences that their subiectes maye liue vertuouslie and after Gods lawes the summe wherof is that we should liue in this world Tit. 2.12 soberly therfore chastly and honestly and rightly therefore peaceably with our neighbours and godlilie towardes God and that no princes can performe this of themselues vnlesse God indue them with a knowledge of their duetie stirre them vp both to will and to performe therefore that which we do according to the Apostles precept Phil. 2.13 1. Tim. 2.2 the same wee teach others that they should also do namely that they must pray for all magistrats of what sorte soeuer that they maye both bee willing and able to performe that which is their duetie so may bring to passe that we may lead a quiet peaceable life in all honestie and godlinesse that is that wee may liue all friendly and in peace on with another that a publike honestie may be obserued and true pietie and religion preserued and encreased IV. It belongeth principally to a christian prince to take vppon him the care of christian religion And if he bee a christian and godlie magistrate wee beleeue that it chieflie belonges vnto him that besides the regard of the publike and politick good and profite of the publike and politick peace and honestie he should also take the peculiar care of christian religion sith the Lord hath made him the keeper of both the tables Ios 1.8 Deu. 13.2 c. and commaundeth him that as a prince he alwaies keep the law of God in his hands that he may punish aswell idolaters and blasphemors false Prophets and seducers as murtherers and adulterers and the same is aboundantly confirmed by examples of godlie kings in Israell and christian princes Constantine Valentinian Theodosius Iustinian others who not onely as priuate men but also as kings serued the Lord according to his commaundement euen as concerning their duetie and office Tō 2. ep 50. Saint Augustine most learnedly noted out of the second Psalme and declared it to Boniface V. The office of a godly prince concerning religion is two fold and wherein it chieflie consisteth Now sith the duetie of a godly prince that is a magistrate which hath a free power ouer any people and authoritie within his iurisdiction to institute and reforme religion is twofold which hee oweth to Christ and to the church in the cause of religion one about such things as belong vnto religion the other respecteth men which are in his iurisdiction and subiect vnto him for the first our beleefe is that he should diligently take heede that by the pure word of God rightly vnderstood and expounded by the verie word it selfe and according to the principles of faith that which they call the analogie or rule of faith religion may be instituted in his dominion or kingdome or where it is instituted may bee kept found and pure or where it is corrupted may be restored and reformed to the glory of God and saluation of his subiects For this we read hath beene commaunded of God and of Moyses and euer obserued of all godlie princes VI. A declaration of the former opinion by the parts We beleeue therefore the duetie of a godlie magistrate is first to knowe out of Gods word generally and according to the summe of the pointes of faith which is the true and christian religion and which is the apostolicall doctrine whereunto the church is to bee reformed that he may do or dare to do nothing onely by the iudgement of others but also vpon his owne sure knowledge Then this being thus knowne to haue a care that ministers which are meet men for the office not by his owne choise but according to the rule of Gods word may be chosen called and ordained Thirdlie to bring to passe that by them both the doctrine of saluation deliuered in the holie scriptures may be set forth expoūded and often beat vppon and also the sacraments according to Christs institution administred yea and the discipline ordained of Christ exercised Fourthly to haue a regard to this that schooles may be erected wherein aswell good artes and tongues may bee diligently taught as also the holie scriptures faithfully expounded and the studious may learne the summe of christiā wisedome Fiftly wherby ministers and teachers may be held in their duety and so true religion by them preserued in the church to do their best that priuate cōsultations yea and also prouinciall Synodes as is saide before may at least twise in the yeare be called Sixtly to carrie a speciall care to the goods of the church that they maye bee bestowed on the right that is on the true godly vses and that all necessarie things bee supplied to the church and to the ministers thereof VII A godly prince ought not to deale with all men of a diuerse religion after one manner But seing to say something brieflie of the other duetie of a prince concerning religion there be diuerse kinds of men which a prince may haue vnder his gouernement namely either meere infidells or such as indeede professe Christ but yet are also open idolaters or in manie things apostataes from the apostolicall church or in some article of the faith manifest heritikes or else erre vppon simplicitie or such as are rightly persuaded in all matters we doe certainly hold that a prince ought not to vse one kinde of measure towards all these sortes for some of them are to be loued cherished and honored some to bee winked at some not to be suffred other some to be quite cut off and none must bee permitted to blaspheme Christ or to worshipp idolls or retaine vngodlie ceremonies VIII All men must be subiect to the higher powers and all the higher powers must be subiect to Christ himselfe and to his word Lastlie we beleeue that euery soule that is Rom. 13.1 euerie man none except and therefore also euerie inferior power must bee subiect to the higher and greater power yea and that superior power also no lesse then the inferior and all other men must bee subiect to Christ the king of kings and Lord of all Lords Apo 17.14 1. Tim. 6.15 For it is Gods will that they should al kisse the Sonne and bowe their neckes vnder the yoake
commaundeth to be performed faithfully and prudently by the other faculties of the minde and instruments of the body Vpon the 19. chap. Of iustification Aphorisme 6. Whereas I so expounded that place concerning the faith of Abraham out of the 15 of Genesis and the 4. to the Rom. as I saide that that same thing was imputed vnto him for righteousnes which hee beleeued concerning Christ the promised seede I did it rather respecting the matter it selfe then the bare word of faith For I was not ignorāt that both Moses and Paule spake of the faith of Abraham that this faith was imputed to him for righteousnes seing the Apostle manifestly gathering a general doctrine from the example of Abraham adioyneth these wordes But to him that vvorketh not but beleeueth in him that instifieth the vngodlie his faith is counted for righteousnes that is hee is therefore accompted iust with God because he beleeueth in him which iustifieth the vngodlie by which place it most plainelie appeareth that from the true iustification of vs are excluded our owne works and that it is whollie ascribed to onely faith aswell touching the ende as touching the beginning But when the question is asked what cause there is why iustification should be attributed to faith and not to the works thereof it is wōt to be aunswered and that both well and truely because faith not the works thereof doth apprehend remission of sinnes and Christ our righteousnes For by it we are not iustified in respect that it is a worke but in respect that Christ is apprehēded by it by the righteousnes of whom alone being imputed vnto vs we are properlie reputed iust before God and this is that which some say how faith iustifieth not in respect of it selfe but in respect of the obiect which it taketh hold on Thus is it manifest that it is true which I saide how that was properlie imputed vnto Abraham for righteousnes for that hee beleeued God concerning Christ namelie that in him all nations should be blessed and therefore Abraham himselfe also Likewise in the last aphorisme Neither deo wee allow of those which set our iustificatiō in the only remission of sinnes denying the imputation of the iustice and obedience of Christ which we thinke to be repugnant to the Scriptures Esay 7. Achild is giuen vnto vs c Whatsoeuer therefore he did or hath it is wholly ours Rom. 5. As by one mans disobedience many were made sinners so by the obedience of one many shal bee made righteous The disobedience of Adam was the breaking of Gods commaundement therefore the obedience of Christ cōsisteth not onely in his death but also in his whole former keeping of the law Likewise the disobedience of Adam was whollie imputed to vs why not then also Christs whole obedience Also wee are two manner of wayes made sinners by Adams disobedience namelie by imputation of his transgression and by the reall deriuation of sinne that is of concupiscence into vs. Why then should we not thinke the same of Christ The vertue of his obedience to the commaundements of God the father is truely communicated vnto vs so that wee also begine to obey Gods law What lets then why wee may not say that his whole obedience is imputed vnto vs 1. Cor. 1. He is made vnto vs of God wisedome and righteousnes and sanctification and redēption Phil. 2. He became obedient vnto death for which humbling of himselfe and obedience euen vnto death God hath highlie exalted him and in him vs c. He hath deserued by his obedience eternall glorie for himselfe vs as al the schoolemen and fathers do teach Therefore his obedience also to the law is imputed vnto vs for righteousnes Gal. 4. He was made subiect to the law that hee might redeeme those vvhich were vnder the lavve Therefore he kept the law for vs and for our saluation The testimonies of the fathers and also of the learned men of this age for breuitie sake we ouerpasse To conclude we beleeue concerning Christ that as for vs men and for our saluation hee came downe from heauen and was incarnate so also for the same cause he kept the law and did all the other things Vppon the 25. chapter Aphor. 10. and 11.12 When I write this cōfession of saith I write euerie thing vppon a good conscience and as I beleeued so I spake freelie as the holie scriptures doe teach that wee ought to doe My faith is grounded simplie and principallie on the word of God and next somewhat vpon the common cōsent of the whole auncient catholicke church if it doe not gainsaye the holie Scriptures For I beleeue that the thinges which were decreed and receiued of the fathers by common consent of them all gathered together in the name of the Lord without anie contradiction of holie Scriptures that they also though they bee not of equall authoritie with the Scriptures come from the holie ghost Hereupon it is that the thinges which are of this sorte I neither will nor dare disprooue with a good conscience And what is more certaine out of the histories the councells and writings of all the fathers then that those orders of ministers of which wee spake were ordained and receiued in the church by common consent of all the whole christian common wealth And who om I that I should disprooue that which the whole church hath approoued Neither haue all the learned men of this age dared to disprooue the same as knowing both that the church might lawfullie doe so and that all those thinges were ordained and done vppon a godlie purpose and to excellent good endes for edification of Gods children For confirmation sake hereof I haue thought good here to insert that which Martin Bucer of godlie memorie a man both for life and learning most famous hath left written concerning those matters vpon the Epistle to the Ephesians The ministerie of the worde being performed by reading and rehearsing the diuine Scriptures by interpretation and exposition of the same and with exhortations takē there out and also by rehearsall and catechisme which is done by mutuall questions and aunswers of the yong beginner and the catechizer and also by holie conferences and deciding of the hard questions about religion according to this manifold dispensation of wholesome doctrine there are also manie dueties in this function For whatsoeuer belōgeth to the perfectest manner of teaching is with an especiall care to bee vsed in the ministerie of the doctrine of saluation because indeed it ought to be deliuered as a knowledge both of all other most diuine and of all most difficult namelie that he which is man should liue according to God Now they which do teach diligently the artes as they are contained in certen knowne books as if they meane to teach mathematicall principles out of Euclide first of all they will reade and rehearse the same booke by and by they will expound the seuerall words such as euerie one knowes
the gift of constancie in the faith the end is our glorious resurrectiō euen eternal life I say for this other principal foundation of christian religion what cā be said more plainly more largely thē that which hath bin in the councells of Africa determined out of the scriptures by Meliuitanus Arausicanus others against the Pelagians which were written by Augustine to say nothing of others in manie bookes against the same Pelagians Concerning the holy Catholike Church what is there needfull to bee knowne which hath not beene most plentifully and plainely set downe by Augustine aswell in other places as especially in his bookes against the Donatists euen out of he foundations of the holy scriptures But it is a matter of great moment to knowe what and where the true church of Christ is being out of the church there is no saluation and therefore it is an article of faith not of the least accompt About the points of the sacraments also if a man will cōtent himselfe with the simple truth what is more euident then the doctrine which the auncient fathers Iustine Ireneus Tertullian Cyprian and chieflie Augustine haue deliuered out of the scriptures and left vnto vs in their writings One saith Like as Iesus Christ being by the word of God made flesh had flesh and blood so also we haue learned that the foode hallowed by him by the word of prayer and thanks giuing is the flesh and blood of the same incarnate Iesus Christ euen according to those words of Christ This is my bodie But Christ that is the vvorde was made flesh without anie chaunging of it selfe into flesh but onely by a hypostaticall or personall vnion therefore neither is the bread made the body of Christ by any transubstantiation of it selfe into the body but onely by an vnion and that not a physicall or bodily or hypostaticall but onely a sacramētall vnion Also he saith by that foode namely of the blessed bread our blood and our body is nourished by a certaine chaunging of it selfe namely into Christ therefore that chaunge which is made in the supper is not of the bread into Christs body nor of Christ into vs but of vs into Christ by reason of our ingrafting as also wee reade in Augustine that Christ should say speaking of the receiuing of the Eucharist I shal not be chaunged into thee but thou shalt be chaunged into me The same man saith vnto this the foode of the Eucharist none is to bee admitted but they that beleeue that our doctrine is true being washed with the water of regeneration vnto remission of their sinnes so liuing as Christ hath taught them Therfore no infidells and heretikes nor they which haue not receiued the baptisme of Christ not they which liue in such apparent sinne and wickednes that they giue no notice to the church of their amendment are to bee admitted to the supper Another of them saieth the eucharist consisteth of two matters an earthly and an heauenly The bread though it be sanctified yet he calleth it an earthly matter why so because it comes from the earth it existeth on earth and is eaten with an earthly mouth the body of Christ he calleth a heauenly matter not because the substāce of it is out of heauen but partly because it is taken into vnitie of the person of the word and partly because it is in heauen endued with heauenly qualities For although in the hypostasie which is the very word it bee euerie where yet in the owne proper essence it is only in heauen and not on earth Whereupon it also followeth that it is not eaten either by earthly men or by the teeth of an earthly body but onely of those men who being borne from aboue do carrie the image of heauenly men eate it in a heauenly manner namely in soule spirite And yet notwithstanding the very bodies also of the faithful while they eate onely an earthly matter they also participate of a heauenlie matter to their glorious resurrection are nourished by it as the same author in that place very learnedly expoundeth I think that by this which I haue spoken out of the creede concerning foure principal partes of christian doctrine your Hon. can well gather such is your piety learning wisedome what is to be concluded concerning the whole body The summe is this that those bee the true churches of Christ and therefore called of vs the truely defensed citties of Christs kingdom which professing generally the sacred scriptures and specially the catechisme in all places receiued doe so reuerence the auncient church and auncient fathers hauing therefore friendshipp and communion with them being now in heauen that neither in their opinions nor yet in their expositions of the holy scriptures they will easily decline from them but onely then whenas they bee forced to dissent both by manifest wordes of the holy scriptures and also by testimonies and consequences beyond all doubt necessary drawne from the principles of faith This surely was counted for a notorious fault in Nestorius and it is written to bee the cause of his vile heresie that contemning the fathers and trusting vpon his owne witt he expounded the holy scriptures after his owne braine What speake I of Nestorius yea that the same contempt of the fathers and some confidence of their owne witts and their owne learning did cause diuers more besides otherwaies verie notable men to fall into sundrie heresies I could easilie shewe out of the Ecclesiasticall histories and councells if the breuitie of an epistle would suffer me For whence I pray was it that after that most holy councell at Nice so many heretikes forth with arose of whome some oppugned the true and euerlasting deity of Christ others his true and perfect humanitie others the true vniting of both the natures in one and the same person others the true distinctiō of their natures their proprieties hence surely that contēning the determinations of the fathers in the Nicene councell and their expositions vpon the holy scriptures and trusting confidently to their owne witts and puffed vp with humane knowledge and eloquence they dared euery one to expound yea indeed to depraue wrest the holy scriptures and foundations of the faith according to their owne fansies Hereunto pertaineth that which Vigilius left written in his first booke of the causes of heresies against Eutyches but they blow forth saieth he these smoakes of vaine accusations chieflie because they are euen sicke of the infirmity of ignorance or disease of contention and whilst they are gogged on with a fond conceite of minde they despise the rules of faith deliuered of old by the fathers onely for this cause to bring in their owne conceited opinions of innouations into the church Thus saith Vigilius This that I say is confirmed by the dispositions imitations and wordes of the sound fathers on the other side who expounding the scriptures and the foundations of christian faith
election of the Saintes by free gift For as the calling vnto Christ and iustification in Christ is wholie of free gift Eph. 2.9 Tit. 3.5 and not of our owne vvorkes so likewise we vnderstand that the whole praedestination of Saintes is freelie giuen Eph. 1.4 Rom. 9.11 1. Cor. 1.31 because it is wrought in Christ and for Christ is put in execution that no man might glorie in himselfe but he vvhich glorieth should glorie in the Lord. V. We are pradestinate not onely to the ende but also to the meanes Whereuppon wee also beleeue sith God hath chosen vs in Christ that wee might bee faithfull holie vnblameable in his sight that wee are praedestinated not onely to the ende that is to eternall life and glorie but also to the meanes by which wee attaine vnto the ende and chieflie vnto faith whereby wee are ingrafted into Christ and to regeneration and true repentance 2. Cor. 5.17 Gal. 6.15 Mat. 5.16 whereby being made new creatures in Christ we might liue holilie to his glory and edification of our neighbour VI. They bee not elect neither can they bee saued vvhich are neuer grafted into Christ by his spirite and true faith They therefore are shamefully deceiued to their owne destruction which perswade themselues they are elect Tit. 1.16 Eph. 2.10 and therefore shall be saued although they bee not grafted into Christ by faith nor repent them of their sinns nor regard the will of God or to doe anie good workes For they separate that which god will haue ioyned together VII Euerie one ought stedfastlie to beleeue he is â—lect in Christ yet we may be more assured by the feeling of our faith in Christ Hence it is manifest although no man in generall ought to exempt himselfe out of the number of the elect sith the Scripture doeth not so but rather stedfastlie to trust that when he is called to Christ he is called according to the eternall decree and election of God 2. Cor. 13.5 yet if any man will be more assured of his certaine election he must runne to his faith and the witnes of his conscience whether he perceiue that he truely beleeueth in Christ and whether he carrie a sincere loue towards god and his neighbour Yea if he finde himselfe herein not altogether soundlie and throughlie setled yet let him not desparre but desire of god that he will helpe his vnbeleefe hoping that he may in time be better assured Mat. 9.24 VIII The causes why the doctrine of predestination is deliuered in the Scriptures For neither is the doctrine of the eternall free and vnchangeable predestination deliuered in the holie scriptures that we should neglect Christ or despaire of saluation or with securitie let loose the raines to our concupiscence or growe insolent but contrariewise for these especiall causes Act. 4.12 2. Tim. 2.19 First that wee may knowe that without Christ none can be saued sith the foundation of our whole saluation was fastened and laide in him before the world was made Then that in time of our temptations wee which beleeue in Christ should strengthen our selues by the certainetie of our saluation Rom. 8. and so neither dispaire nor distrust knowing the same to be certaine and sure in the eternall decree of god Thirdlie that thereby wee might be stirred vp to the studie of faith in Christ of holinesse and of good works Eph. 1.4 2.10 sith we are chosen that we should be faithfull and holie and blamelesse in his sight and walke in good works Lastlie that wee growe not proude if we trust in Christ and liue godlie in Christ and that he which glorieth may glorie in the Lord 1. Cor. 1.13 sith god through his grace did from the beginning decree in Christ that we should be such CHAP. IV. Of the omnipotencie and will of God I. So is god omnipotent that he is able to doe more then he will doe VVE beleeue that God is so omnipotent that he not onely hath done doeth whatsoeuer he would will but also he is able to will and to doe infinite works which he wil not following also herein the doctrine of Iohn who said Mat. 3.9 God is able of these stones to raise vp children vnro Abraham which yet he would not doe and also the opinion of the Apostle who writt Ro. 9.15.18 that God will haue mercie on whom he vvill whenas he could haue mercie on all and he will harden not all Turt con Prax. as hee could but those vvhome he vvill so that it is verie impious to conclude anie thing to haue beene done to bee done or shall bee done of the onely omnipotencie of God wherein his will is not also reuealed II. Jt infringeth not the omnipotencie of god that certaine things can not be done by him Where the Apostle writeth that god can not denie himselfe we holde that there is no iniurie done against the omnipotencie of God if a maÌ„ say there are manie thinges which cannot bee done by god namely such thinges as are repugnant to the nature of god and do implie a contradiction III. A confirmation of the former assertion For he being the chiefest good he can neither be made euill nor can doe ill and beeing trueth it felfe he cannot lie being iustice it selfe he cannot doe vniustlie beeing life it selfe how should he die Finallie being onely one god and that vncreated and eternall subsisting only in three persons we beleeue and confesse that he can not so take anie creature to himselfe to make the same 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 consubstantiall to himselfe and wholie such as he himselfe is or constitute a fourth person and wee are perswaded that nothing is drawne or taken away from the omnipotencie of god by this confession yea surely whatsoeuer is alreadie done it cannot be that the same should not haue bin done so that it is certaine that what so implieth a contradiction the same cannot bee done by God who is the especiall trueth it self For by this reason euen the omnipotencie of God whereby they were done should be apparentlie denied IV. The will of god to be searched for onely in the holie scriptures Furthermore sith the counsells of god are infinite and secret which he reuealeth not to the Angells themselues wee hold Mar. 13.32 that when there is anie question concerning the will of God the same is not to bee sought for in anie other place then in the holie scriptures wheras whatsoeuer thinges were necessarie to our saluation Ioh. 15.15 17.29 god hath plentifullie and perspicuouslie laide open vnto vs and whatsoeuer he would haue vs to doe he hath of his singular goodnesse reuealed vnto vs by his spirite CHAP. V. Of the creation of the worlde of Angells and of mans first estate I. All things were made by god Gen. 1. 2. and that exceeding good WE beleeue that God the Father Col. 1.16 by the
laid vp in him requireth onely these three things First that being touched with an earnest griefe of our whole life ledd amisse wee might desire from our heart to haue our mindes and so all our affections chaunged renued into the obedience of the diuine will and that we might earnestly pray and doe our best endeuour that it might be so Secondlie that imbracing Christ by a true faith withall his treasures wee might beleeue firmely and without any wauering that all our sinnes are for euer pardoned of the fauour and mercie of god through Christ alone and we receiued into grace made the children of God and heires of euerlasting life Lastly that beeing thus perswaded of the free and eternall saluation through Iesus Christ wee should thence foreward labour by all meanes to obserue whatsoeuer Christ hath commaunded to the glorie of God and profite of our neighbour so as faith do euermore accompanie vs to the ende whereby we beleeue that howsoeuer in this new obedience we err or do offend yet for Christs sake it shall not be imputed to vs but contrariewise by the perfect obedience iustice and holinesse of christ imputed vnto vs our imperfect obedience shal be perfected and shal be taken and reputed for most perfect in the sight of God And to three thinges are all the preceptes of christ referred namely that renouncing all vngodlines worldly desires wee should liue in this world in respect of our selues soberlie in respect of our neighbour iustly in respect of God godlie Tit. 2.12 looking for that blessed hope and the comming of the glorie of the great God This wee beleeue to bee the summe of those thinges which christ requireth of vs in the doctrine of the gospell and therefore that they bee true gospellers and christians indeede that bende their whole studie and care hereunto VII Jn what thinges especially the Gospell differeth from the Law And nowe of that which is alreadie saide it appeareth that we do not confound the Law with the Gospell For albeit wee confesse that God is author aswel of the Law as of the gospell and that of it selfe it is as well holie iust Exo. 20 and good as the gospell Rom. 7.12 yet we hold that ther is no smale difference betwixt them both not onely because the Lawe was deliuered to the Israelites alone and the gospell pertaineth to al people and nations and also not onely because that was for a time and to continue but till christ and the gospell is euerlasting and also not onely because that was deliuered by Moses and declared by the Prophets and the gospell was brought by christ and published to the whole world by the Apostles But indeed and most especially for these causes First because the matter of the law is onely commandementes with irreuocable curses thereunto ioyned if they bee broken neuer so little It hath also promises not onely of earthlie but also of heauenly blessings but al of them with the condition of perfect obedience and none merely free But the gospell is properly a happie message setting before vs gratis christ the redeemer forgiuing sinnes and sauing vs yea and requiring nothing at our handes for the obtaining of life euerlasting but a true faith in christ which faith cannot bee without true repentance nor without a care to doe the will of God that is to liue so berly iustly and godly as is aboue declared Moreouer because the law did not performe that which it required nether had it power whereby to saue therefore was vnsufficient and a killing letter the minister of wrath and death more prouoking then taking away sin But the Gospell what it requireth the same it performeth and therefore whatsoeuer it offereth the same also it truely imparteth vnto vs For as much as the holy ghost is by it powerful in the elect at the preaching of the Gospell stirring vp in them that true faith wherby they apprehend christ offred and with him eternall life For faith is by hearing of the Gospell Rom. 10.17 but obedience is not by hearing of the Lawe because the holie spirite giueth no man strength to the hearing of the Lawe by which hee might obserue the same as he stirreth vp faith in the elect to the hearing of the gospell For which cause as the Lawe is called a killing letter so is the Gospell called a quickning spirite and therefore is a true and forcible instrument to saluation vnto euerie beleeuer Whereon also followeth the third difference namely that the Law was not written in their hearts but remained written onely in tables and therfore did not chaunge men But the Gospell is written by the holie ghost in the hearts of the elect therefore it chaungeth and renueth them 2. Cor. 3.18 because it is the instrument of the holie ghost to sanctifie and to saue vs. VIII The Law of Moses is partly taken away and partly not taken away by the Gospell Of this which we haue said it also plainelie appeareth what our faith is of the abrogation of the law by the gospell First wee beleeue that in the gospell so farre forth as it declareth all things which in the old Testament did figuratiuely foreshew of Christ to bee fullfilled in this Iesus as is saide before in the 11. chapter we are taught that the law of Moses concerning cerimonies sacrifices and all Moses outward worship are simply abrogated according to that saying of the Apostle Heb. 9.10 Ioh. 1.17 that all these things vvere inioyned vntill the time of reformation and that The Law was giuen by Moses but the trueth came by Jesus Christ Moreouer so farre forth as the gospell is the instrument of the holy spirit whereby we are ingrafted and vnited to Christ made partakers of redēption and saluation as is said before in the 12. chapter So far also we confesse that the morall law touching the cursse against the transgressors is abrogated by the gospell of Christ according to that of the Apostle Rom. 8.1 There is no condēnation to them that are in Iesus Christ where of this is a token that they walke not after the flesh but after the spirit But now so farre forth as the doctrine of the Gospell requireth our repentance and the holinesse of life and that we liue soberly righteously and godly therein it taketh not away the law concerning māners for it is wholy consonant and agreeable with the doctrine of the gospel of eschewing vices and following vertue Lastlye in as much as Christ in his gospel did not take away the politicke lawes of the nations which were not contrarie to the law of nature Therefore wee thinke it lawfull and free for any gouernors to bringe among their subiectes such politick lawes as were deliuered to the people of Israell and by the same then which none are more iust to rule and gouerne the people Therefore they do exceeding great iniurie to the Gospell of Christ that saye it troubleth or
as the sacramentall signe whenas the matter of the sacrament is that which the signe that is obiect to our senses makes to come into our thought not to fall into our hands or mouth neither those likewise which do consider nothing in the sacraments but what they see with their eyes or which will haue them onely tokens or badges by which we are discerned from other people or bare signes and not the instrumeÌ„ts of the holy ghost by which he worketh mightily in vs and confirmeth vs in the communion of Christ And we condemne them which institute new sacraments other then them which Christ instituted and those which tye the grace of God and the things signified by the sacraments to the sacraments so that euerie one which receiueth the signe should be said euer to receiue truely the thing it selfe CHAP. XV. Of Baptisme BEsides that which we haue spoken of the sacraments in generall we also especially beleeue and confesse of Baptisme thus I. Baptisme what it is and vvhat are the effects of it Baptisme Mâ—t. 28 1â— first is a sacrament of the new couenant wherewith all men which either hauing professed true repentance of their finnes doe also professe faith in Iesus Christ and so in God the father Cor. 7.14 the sonne and the holie ghost or at least are beleeued to appertaine vnto the couenant Act. 19.5 1. Cor. 6.19 through the faith of their parents but especially they which truely doe belong vnto the couenant as beeing now incorporated into Christ are sealed by him that they should be no longer their owne men but his by whome they are called into the societie of the couenant and consequently into one bodie with him and all the Saintes and into participation of all spiritual heauenly good things Eph. 1.12 Eph. 5.26 Apoc. 5 Tit. 3.5 Rom. 6.4 Mar. 1.4 and are cleansed by this Baptisme as the water of regeneration from al their sinns by vertue of Christs blood and buried into the death with Christ that as he rose froÌ„ death by the fauour of the Father so wee should walke in newnesse of life whereupon it hath bin vsually called the sacrament of repentaÌ„ce for the remission of sinnes the sacrament of faith the seale of the couenant the water of regeneration the washing away of sinnes the sacrament of new life II. The vertue of Baptisme takes place only in the elect and they onely are baptized vvith water and with the holy ghost But though all these things are said of baptisme and are truely attributed vnto it as to the holy ghostes instrument to worke these things and that therefore all which are baptized are truely said to be made and to be such sacramentally yet we beleeue that it is not indeed and really performed but only in the elect which are indued with Christs spirit sith they onely doe beleeue rightly and do truely belong vnto Christ and to his misticall body And therefore that all are baptized indeede with water but the elect onely with the spirit and all doe receiue the signe but not all are made partakers of the thing signified offred by baptisme but onely the elect III. Of what parts the whole sacrament of Baptisme consisteth And we beleeue that vnto the making of the whole sacrament of Baptisme those two thinges are sufficient which Christ instituted namely the simple element of water wherewith the parties are washed either by dipping in or by sprinkling vpon and that forme of words wherewith Christ taught them to baptize that is In the name of the father the sonne and the holy ghost nether did the Apostles as we are perswaded vse any forme of words or added any thing else vnto the water IV. The yong infants of the faithfull are to bee baptized We beleeue with the whole ancieÌ„t church that vnto the sacrament of Baptisme are to be admitted not onely they that are of discretion which hauing professed repentaunce of their sinnes doe also professe faith in Christ but also the yong children of such sith they are to bee accompted to belong to the couenant 1. Cor. 7.14 as the Apostle saieth The children of the faithfull are holie especially seing God hath no where altered that commandement which he gaue to Abraham for the marking of all with the figne of the couenant euen the children of the faithfull Mat. 19.14 nay he said Suffer litle children to come vnto me for of such is the kingdome of heauen V. How farre forth Baptisme is necessarie in the Church and how needfull to euery one to saluation Wee beleeue that Baptisme is altogether necessarie in the church as a sacrament instituted of Christ and which the church cannot be without so that where it is not vsed if it may bee vsed there wee acknowledge no church And we thinke it so necessarie vnto euerie one to saluation that yet notwithstanding if one dye not washed with the water for defect or want of a minister and not vpon contempt we beleeue he is not therefore coÌ„demned or wrapped in eternall destruction For the children of the faithfull are therefore saued because they are holy and vnder the couenant of God and men growen are saued because they beleeue in Christ with a true faith which indeed can suffer no contempt of the commaundements of Christ VI. Baptisme once rightly receiued ought not to be taken againe Furthermore we beleeue that as circumcision was done onely once in the flesh so the Baptisme of water which succeeded circumcision Col. 2. being once rightlie and lawfully receiued ought not againe to be repeated VVee say that it is rightly and lawfully administred when first the doctrine of the gospell concerning the true God Christ and his office goeth before according to Christs institution and then the parties are baptized with water and that of a lawfull minister in the name of the father the sonne the holie ghost Rom. 6.4 For Christ also once died and was buried and wee are baptized into his death and are buried with him by Baptisme Act. 19.5 neither doe wee reade that the Apostles euer did rebaptize anie except those which Paule did baptize who had not bin rightlie baptized VII The vertue of Baptisme is perpetuall Now although wee come but once to the sacrament of baptisme yet wee hold that the matter of this sacrament and the vertue thereof is perpetuall which vertue is nothing else but the verie planting into Christ and so the participation of his benefites the washing away of sinnes and regeneration which dailie more and more is made perfect by the holie ghost For the Apostle saith Eph. 5.26.27 that he cleanseth the church by washing of vvater through the worde that he might make it vnto himselfe a glorious church without spott or wrinkle 1. Ioh. 1.7 And his blood cleÌ„seth daily froÌ„ all sinne And therfore we thinke beleeue that the faithful being content with once receiuing of the sacrament ought daily to bee occupied in
first the pure doctrine of the gospell is preached heard and allowed of and that so allowed of that there is no place nor hearing for the contrary Ioh. 10.4.5 For these both are properties of the flocke or sheepe of Christ namely to heare the voyce of their shepheard and to reiect the straungers voyce in those also where the Sacraments instituted of Christ as much as in them lieth are lawfully 1. Cor. 11.20 that is according to Christs owne institution administred and receiued and so where other Sacraments deuised by men are not allowed of in those lastlie where the discipline of Christ taketh place that is where a care is taken through loue that both priuately and publickely Mat. 18.19 Tit. 1.8 by admonitions corrections and when need requireth by excommunications the commandements of Christ may bee obserued and so that men may liue soberly iustly and godlie to the glorie of God edification of their neighbours For wheresoeuer vngodlinesse and all loosenesse of life is in publike practise and open offences are not reprooued according to the discipline of Christ there we beleeue that it is possble that manie good and godlie men may be but we beleeue this is not a godlie christian congregation the Lord himself saying Ioh. 13.35 in this men shall know that yee are my disciples if yee loue one another but what loue can there be where no care is taken that according to Christs doctrine brethren which offend may be corrected may repent may be gained vnto the Lord and saued VI. By vvhat manner of succession of Byshops it may be shewed that some church is Apostolicall So we acknowledge that from a perpetuall succession of byshops in some church I say not any manner of succession but such a one as hath had ioyned also vnto it a continuance of the Apostles doctrine it maye rightly bee shewed that that church is Apostolicall such a one as was once the church of Rome the succession of the byshops thereof euen to the time of Ireneus Tertullian Cyprian and some other So that they were wont not without reason to appeale vnto it and cite before it and such other of the fathers the heritickes of their times But indeed as we do acknowledge and confesse with Tertullian and other of the fathers that those churches are to be acknowledged to be truely Apostolicall in which the Apostles doctrine with the discipline of Christ and lawfull administration of the Sacraments is kept pure though the same haue not beene planted by the Apostles nor haue had a perpetuall succession of byshops euen from the Apostles time So againe the churches which were planted and watered by the Apostles although they can shewe a succession of Byshops continuall and without interruption yet if with the succession of byshops they can not also shewe a continuance of the doctrine of Christ and his Apostles we wil graunt that they haue bin christian and Apostolical churches but now we cannot acknowledge them for such For as the hood as the Prouerb saith makes not the monke but his godly and holy life so neither do byshops but the doctrine of Christ and christian religion make the church of Christ VII Not by any manner of consent but by consent in Christs doctrine some churches may be shewed to be true and christian churches For thus wee knowe that it can neuer bee prooued that wheresoeuer there is a full agreement among themselues there are the true churches of God sith both in the Iewish sinagogues and in the turkish congregations and long since in the conuenticles of the Arrians and Donatists there hath euer bene an especiall agreement but wee hold it may bee prooued onely by that consent which is in the pure doctrine of Christ and in true pietie For where the Apostle saieth 1. Cor. 1.10 I beseech you brethren by the name of our Lord Iesus Christ that yee all speake one thing and that there bee no dissentions among yee but be yee knitt together in one minde and in one iudgement hee meaneth in that Lord Iesus Christ by whose name he intreated them VIII The churches bee not taken away by euery dissention that ariseth in them But by the waye we are not so vniust to denie those to bee christian churches wherein there is not alwaies a full consent and agreement of all things For as euerie agreement doth not make a church so euerie dissention doth not dissolue the same so long as the foūdation which is Christ true God and true mā the true and perfect Sauiour be kept sound firme and so long as there is a full agreement in the summe of the Apostles doctrine which is deliuered in their creede IX A confirmation of the former opinion For as the reprobate hypocrites by their being in the churches do not hinder but that they still remaine true churches so neither the dissentions which are raised in the churches by the vngodlie or which through frailtie or ignorance doe spring among the Saints themselues can extinguish the same which verie thing the Apostle teacheth whenas speaking of the ministers of the true churches he saith that vpon the same foundation some do build gold siluer and pretious stones other wood stubble haye and to the Philippians hauing declared the summe of christian doctrine and exhorted all men that who so had profited therein should persist in it afterwards he addeth and if any be otherwise minded God shall reueale the same vnto them if we abide in the same vvhereunto vvee are come For else if we should denie there to bee anie true church where contentions about religion are stirred vp then was there no church at Corinth in Paules time where there were not onely diuisions verie rife one saying I am of Paule another of Cephas another of Apollo but also maruailous controuersies rose concerning religion Nor yet in Gallatia because immediatly after those churches were passing well planted by Paule there sprang vp in them seducers and heresies lastly neither yet could there be said to be any churches in the East or in the West because they were neuer voide of contentions not only betweene the catholicks and the heretikes such as arose from the catholicks but also euen among the godly fathers themselues as the histories doe plentifully make mention in so much that for these dissentions and sects the christians were wōt to bee skoffed at in the theaters and stages among the infidells as also at this day wee are all derided for the same cause among the Turkes and Iewes But as in the primitiue church by those contentions of the christians it was no consequence that therefore they were not the people of God so neither at this time by ours can any man prooue it iustlie against vs but that indeede the contrarie may rather be concluded because it is the propertie of good wheat that is of the gospell wherby Gods people are gathered into his church that where it is sowen
Iohn himselfe but by some one of Iohns disciples who expounded not vnto thē the true doctrine concerning God and therefore baptized them not rightlie But all the fathers doe hold beyond all controuersie that they which are not rightly baptized into Iesus Christ as the naturall Sonne of God mediatour and so also into his father and the spirite of them both the same must bee rightlie baptized And therefore those twelue were not as being not baptized rebaptized but as being not rightlie baptized Paule did baptize them with true baptisme first teaching them the true doctrine of the trinitie which also Iohn had preached vnto them And thus much of the authoritie of the fathers from whome either in their assertions or in their expositions of Scriptures especiallie where they all for the most part doe agree I dare not decline for my cōscience sake vnlesse I be cōstrained by most apparant reasons Thus I freelie cōfesse to the whole church of Christ The reason also besids the authoritie of the fathers brought as we saw before euen by the fathers out of the verie text confirmeth me in the same opinion This reason is partly gathered out of those words which these Ephesians being asked by Paule whether they had receiued the holie ghost that is the gifts of the holie ghost aunswered saying that they had not so much as heard whether there bee that is whether that holie ghost bee existent whome Paule would haue to bee the author of those gifts so farre from thē it was that they should haue receiued him and his gifts and partlie it is gathered out of the wordes which Paule vsed concerning the doctrine and baptisme of Iohn saying Iohn verily baptized with the baptisme of repentance saying vnto the people that they should beleeue in him which should come after him that is in Christ Iesus as if he had said you haue not rightlie beleeued in Christ such as he is the sonne of God God seing yee know not his spirite The conclusion followed that therefore they although they were baptised by I knowe not whome into Iohns baptisme yet were not rightlie baptized seing they were not instructed in the doctrin of the person of Christ in whome they ought to beleeue namelie that he was not onelie man and the Messias but also the sonne of God God from whome also from the father proceedeth the holie ghost and consequentlie not in the doctrine of god the father the sonne and the holie ghost in the name of all which baptisme is to be giuen And therefore that they ought to learne the true doctrine concerning the father sonne and holie ghost and resting therein to receiue lawfull baptisme that afterwardes by laying on of hands they might receiue the gifts of this holy spirite which Luke teacheth to bee afterwardes done saying but vvhen they heard it namely those twelue Ephesians what whē they heard euen when they perceiued Paules doctrine concerning true faith in Christ the sonne of God and so in his father and the holie ghost which faith Iohn had also preached and wherein they resting were baptized c. This is the interpretation of the fathers namelie that those twelue were not rightlie instructed in the doctrin of god the father the sonne holie ghost and so neither rightlie baptized and it may be confirmed both by the kindred and cuntrie of those twelue and also by the cause for which Paule letting alone al the rest peculiarly asked them whether they haue receiued the holie ghost since they beleeued By kinde they were Iewes as appeareth by Iohns baptisme vnto which they saide they were baptized and they were baptized by a Iewe. But the Iewes for the most part neuer rightlie held the doctrine of the three persons subsisting in one essence And therefore these 12 Iewes also though they graunted Iesus to bee the true Messias yet they seemed to acknowledge but onely two persons the person of God the father and the person of the Messias euen as the most thought a bare mā but yet such a one as in whome God the father dwelt but that they were altogether ignorāt that the holie ghost was an existing thing the giuer of those graces they are conuinced by their owne words But surely there was some cause why Paule comming into Ephesus where were manie of Christs disciples asked this question of the 12 Iewes onely Surelie it is to bee thought by their aunswer that the Apostle either by their owne talke or by telling of some other of the brethren perceiued that these twelue did not thinke aright concerning the holie ghost Finallie this was the Apostles argument whereby he would prooue by their owne aūswere that they were not baptized with the true baptisme of Iohn Whosoeuer hath bin baptized with the true baptisme of Iohn he hath also heard his doctrine concerning god the father the sonne the holy ghost and hath professed the same and consequently hath knowne also the holy ghost This proposition is not expressed but the proofe of it the Apostle bringeth in the 4. verse saying Iohn baptized c. that is Iohn preached not onely repentance but also faith in Christ namely that he is not onely man the Messias but also the sonne of God God from whome as also from the father proceedeth the holie ghost and that hee shall baptize in the holie ghost and therefore all which desire to bee saued must also beleeue in him as the true Sauiour But you haue not heard this doctrine nor professed it therfore haue not truely beleeued in Christ such as he is For yee your selues say yee haue not so much as heard whether there bee an holie ghost namelie when yee were baptized Therefore c. So consequentlie it remaineth that professing this doctrine and faith yee nowe receiue lawfull baptisme and afterward by the laying on of handes those giftes of the holie ghost This is the declaratiō of the argument according to the exposition of the fathers but Luke as the Prophets and Euāgelists vse to doe cōprehended the whole summe in few words And I praye what absurditie can followe hereō or what iniurie is done to the Apostles narration is the heresie of the Donatiftes Anabaptists maintained nothing lesse For they rebaptize such as are rightlie baptized the Apostle baptizeth them which had not beene rightly baptized as hauing not heard nor professed the true doctrine concerning God he tooke care they should be rightlie baptized And such when they come into the catholicke church we speake of them that bee of yeares of discretion all the fathers teach they must be baptized with true baptisme instructing them first in the doctrine concerning God Christ their Sauiour Touching the text it selfe it is no whitt wrested That their aunswer But wee haue not so much as heard whether there be an holie ghost cā not bee vnderstood of the giftes of the holie ghost it appeareth by Paules demaund following being asked with an admiration Vnto what were yee then
baptized For no mā is baptized vnto the giftes of the holie ghost but vnto the holie ghost it selfe as also vnto the father and the sonne And the Apostles held it for certaine beyond all doubt that whosoeuer were baptized either of Iohn his true disciples or of Christs disciples they were surelie baptized with instruction of the true doctrine of the holie ghost also according to Christs institution Hereupon was that admiratiō Vnto what were ye then baptized They answered him vnto Iohns baptisme For Paule thought this could not stād together that they should bee baptized with Iohns lawfull baptisme and yet should not knowe nay not so much as heare whether there were and whether there did exist an holie ghost whom Iohn both knewe and preached vnto all that came to his baptisme neither did he preach Christ without this holie ghost For he said that he baptized in water but Christ Iesus should baptize in the holie ghost Hereupon was it that meaning to cōuince them that they were not baptized of Iohn nor of his true disciples he added saying Iohn indeed c. This truely or verely is an aduersatiue particle wherby he would shew how it could not agree with the lawfull baptisme of Iohn that they said they had not so much as heard namelie when they were baptized whether there be an holie ghost or no Sith Iohn baptized none without mentioning the same And to this truely here expressed doeth a but closelie vnderstood make aunswer so that the argumēt is such as before we set downe Iohn indeed baptized c as though he had said Iohn preached both repentance and faith in Iesus Christ such as he is namely the sonne of god from whome as also from the father proceedeth the holy ghost and who baptizeth in the holie ghost and into the confession of this doctrine he baptizeth men The minor was to be added which Luke expressed not because it is contained in the twelues owne confession but vvee haue not so much as heard c. what is plainer then this text That therefore which followeth in the fift verse But when they heard it c is Lukes owne words shewing truelie and brieflie what followed vpon Paules argumentation But when they heard c namely these 12 whē they heard what what it is truelie to beleeue in Christ that he baptized men according to the confession of this doctrine concerning Christ his father and the holie ghost and that Christ alone as the onely Sauiour baptized men into the holie ghost when they heard I saye these things not onely with the eares of their bodies but also of their mindes and so beleeued and confessed the same They vvere baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus that is into Iesus as he is called and described in the Scriptures not onelie man but also the sonne of God God from whome as also from the father proceedeth the holie ghost and therefore as a true and onelie Sauiour baptizeth vs with his holy spirite Add this also that by the new interpretation there is admitted in a little narration no smale Battologie or superfluitie of words For when Paule said Iohn verily baptized vvith the baptisme of repentance saying vnto the people that they should beleeue in him which should come after him that is in Christ Iesus to what ende should the Apostles haue added this concerning thē whom Iohn baptized but whē they heard namely that companie or those men were baptized For who could not vnderstand by the wordes going before if Iohn baptized they therefore which had heard professed his doctrine concerning repentance and faith in Christ were by Iohn baptized To conclude if I should allow that interpretation I see not what Paule could els proue by this whole narration but that those Ephesians had beene rightlie baptized and therefore that nothing else remained but that by laying on of hands they might receiue the holy ghost But this conclusion I doe not thinke to agree with that which goeth before it but to bee needelesse I haue to my power declared the exposition of the fathers vpon this place and that modestlie and without preiudice to anie to no other end but that I may by such reasons as I am able declare vnto the brethren which perhaps haue tooke offence at that particle in my confession That Paule did baptize those twelue againe vvhich had not bin rightly baptized that I did not put those words rashlie in my confession By the way as I said we condemne no other mens interpretation And this also I freely professe that my cōscience is such that I cannot be easily drawne to dissent frō the auncient fathers either in their assertions or in their interpretations of scriptures Vnlesse I be cōuinced enforced by manifest testimonies of holy scriptures by necessary consequences plaine demonstrations For so doeth my conscience rest and in this setled stay of minde I desire to die And therefore I humbly desire of all the brethren that if in this behalfe my opinion be not altogeather as theirs is they will by no meanes take offēce especially seeing that in all the principall points of Christian faith we haue a sound agreement Vpon the 16. chapter The 9. aphorisme The place of the 1. to the Corinth 6. beeing diligently marked as also we noted before in the 15. chap. and 14. Apho. may well decide the controversie about the wicked mens Eating that is the Hypocrites and of the sacramentall eating We say that hypocrites doe not eate the tru body of Christ sith they are void of faith namely they eare it not truely and indeede sith it is not indeede eaten but onely by true faith which they want but onely sacramentally that is they eate indeede the sacrament and the signe it felfe The Adversaries say also that hypocrites doe eate the true body of Christ onely sacramentally but by this word they meane that they receiue not onely the sacrament that is the signe but all the thing it selfe though not vnto salvation If they mean this in the same sence that the Apostle doth when he said The Corinthians were all sanctified iustified c. namely that by receiuing baptisme the sacrament of true Regeneration and sanctification they were reckoned to haue receiued the thing also sith the very sacrament hindred not but they might also be pertakers of the true sanctification although all of them did not indeede obtaine the same by reason of their hypocriticall faith thē doubtlesse I see not but such a manner of speaking may be well allowed so it be declared as it ought after the Apostles meaning This I only alleadge that the brethren may bethinke them of some good meanes of agreement that so great an offence and scandale may be rooted out of the Church We must all stand before Christs Tribunall seate Vpon the 16. chap. Apho. 10. Here should a subdistinction haue beene added of the godly because some doe come worthely some vnworthely yea one and the