who receaue both the old and new Testament but interpreted according to Mahomets Alcaron and also by all Heretiks who seek to fill their books not oÌ„ly with words of Scripture but sayth Vincent Lyrin with thousands of testimonies thousands of examples thousands of authorityes out of the Law the Psalmes the Prophets the Apostles which expounded after a new and ill manner would thereby throw downe soules from the tower of Catholike fayth to the pit of wicked heresy being as our Sauiour sayth of them false Prophets or teachers who vnder the garments of sheep that is sayth Vincent Lyrin the wordes of the Prophets and Apostles are rauenous VVolues infesting the fold of the Church and deuouring the flocke of Christ and saying Christ is heere or there that is as Origen expounded it in this or that text of Scripture who thus transfiguring themselues into the shew of Apostles or preachers of Christ do labour to transfer the people into another Ghospell who depraue the Scripture to their owne and others destruction And by the wordes of the Law sayth S. Ambrose impugne the Law and do frame a false sense of the wordes of the Law that they may confirme their owne peruerse opinions by the authority of the Law Against al whome we may note the wordes of S. Hilary saying That Heresy is about the vnderstanding not the text of Scripture the sense not the words is the sinne And of S. Hierome That the Ghospell is not in the wordes but the sense of scripture not in the outward rine but in the inward marrow not in the leaues of wordes but in the root of the sense SVBDIV. 2. Who haue authority to make the Interpretation of Scripture SEcondly this sense and meaning of scripture because it is not facil and easy to be knowne to all by reason of the great obscurity in the wordes the great fecundity in the sense and the great profundity in the mysteries or articles belieued which cannot by euery one nor by any one without the assistance of the same spirit which penned it be vnderstood therfore is necessary some authentical certain and infallible authority for the true vnderstanding of this authenticall certaine and infallible sense of scripture This authority because it is in the Catholike Church chiefly in the Pastours and Prelates of the same for the better gouernement of it in true doctrine vpon whom God hath bestowed the infallible assistance of his holy spirit as is afterward proued therfore their authority is necessary for the finding out the true and certaine sense of scripture Whensoeuer therfore the chiefe Pastour or Pastours of the Church vsing the meanes for it appointed of which in the next proposition do either ex Cathedra or in a Councell confirmed approued or by a generall consent propose deliuer and declare any sense or exposition of scripture as true and to be belieued as an article of faith in any controuersy against heretikes then is that sense to be receaued for their authority as authenticall certaine and infallible From whence ensues that though in matters of Philosophy and reason we must rather attend what is said theÌ„ by whome it is said and respect rather the force then the authority of the person who sayes it yet in matters of faith we must first respect them who preach and the authority and commission of their person and by it iudge of their doctrine preached For if the person be lawfully sent if he haue lawfull commission if he be a lawfull pastour not deuided by heresy or schisme from the whole body then the people are to attend to him and for his commission to receaue his doctrine but if he want mission commissioÌ„ if he teach of himselfe and his owne authority if he produce the doctrine not of the Church-proposition but of his owne inuention let him teach what he wil proue it how he wil he is not to be heard nor belieued by the common and vulgar people to whom it belonges to be obedient subiect to the authority of their Pastour not to iudge of the verity of his doctrine more then in generall whether it be consonant or dissonant from the vniuersally receaued doctrine of the Church for they are to obey their Pastours to remaine in the same rule in the faith first deliuered in that which they heard from the beginning to auoid profane nouelties of words not to receiue any other Ghospel or doctrine but that which they learned and receaued from the beginning leauing the particulars to the testimony of others either equal to their pastour in function or superiour to him in authority Which point is to be noted against the Manichees of old and the Protestants of late who respect not the authority of the Preacher but the force of his reason attend not to the commission of the Pastour who he is that teacheth but to the plausibility of his doctrine what it is and how far it is pleasing to their priuat spirit disposition or iudgment SVBDIV. 3. What meanes are to be vsed to make this Interpretation and of foure Rules of infallible interpreting of scripture Thirdly The meanes which are to be obserued vsed and followed by these Pastours or Prelats for the securing vs of this true sense of scripture are these 1. The rule of faith that is the Catholike and vniuersally receiued doctrine of faith and piety which was deliuered by the Apostles receiued by posterity 2. The generall practise or obseruatioÌ„ custome or tradition of the whole Church in pointes where the doctrine is not certaine 3. The auncient exposition or consent of the holy fathers and doctours of the primitiue Church where the former do not appeare 4. The decrees and definitions of the Councels either generall or prouincial approued by generall and the conformity to them in all expositions doubtfull Thâ—se are as so many rules or conducts according to which the certaine and authenticall sense of scripture is by the Pastours of gods Church to be squared and guided First that the rule of fayth is to be presupposed obserued and followed in the finding out the true sense of scripture is proued 1. This rule of Fayth is by S. Paul who often doth mention it called sometymes a rule which bringeth peace VVho haue followed this rule peace be on them Sometimes a rule in which they are to remaine to auoid dissentions Let vs remaine in the same rule that we may iudge the same Sometymes his rule which he deliuered to them and by which they are to increase in fayth Your fayth increasing according to our rule Sometymes a reason of Fayth according to which is giuen the guift of prophesy or interpretation of scripture Donations or prophesy according to the rule of Fayth And in effect it is no other but the doctrine they receaued the fayth preached through the whole world the disposition
heare him alwayes loue him alwayes assist him alwayes comfort him that no feare doubt wauering or perturbation did or could euer enter into his will or vnderstanding yea that all that time of his passion his soule had the perfect vision and fruition of God and only his sensible partes endured those paines and torments of the crosse Tenthly As for his descending into hell they derogate from it and dishonour him in that they affirme he descended either only to the graue in body or also to the lower hell in soule to suffer the paines of it either before his death on the crosse or after it in hell but not to haue freed the Patriarchs from Limbus by the presence of his soule there We honour it in belieuing that he descended in soule further then to the graue to which he only descended in body but not so far as to suffer the paines of hell in soule but only to the Limbus patrum where he gaue the Patriarches there detained present liberty fruition of eternall hapinesse afterwards carried them with him to the place of glory and so triumphed ouer hell led aptiuity Ccaptiue Eleuenthly From his resurrection and ascension they derogate and dishonour him both by denying him the subtility or penetration of his body wherby he was able to passe through either the stone of the sepulcher at his resurrection or the dores of the house at his entrance to his disciples or the hardnesse of the heauens at his ascension all which they wil haue either dissolued or opened or diuided We honour attribut more dignity to the same belieuing that by the gift of subtility or penetratioÌ„ his body did pierce passe through the stone the dores and the heauens at his resurrection and ascension as it did also his Mothers wombe at his natiuity with out any diuision dissolution or detriment to the nature of either the one or the other in which also he shewed his subtility and consequently his impassibility or immortality Twefthly From his adoration and inuocation by vs as he is now in heauen they derogate and dishonour him in affirming that as man he is not to be adored or inuocated by vs. We honour him as man so far that we bow downe at the name of Iesus praying to him with the blind man the Cananean saying Sonne of Dauid haue mercy on vs And fall down with the Sages the womeÌ„ adore him In al which and many more as they by their priuate spirit the doctrine of it do derogate take from Christ his honour his power his goodnesse his beatitude his knowledge his sanctity his certainty of saluation his adoration and the vertue and power of his passion redemption resurrection ascension so do we in our Catholike doctrine attribute to same due honour and dignity so both in our doctrine practise giue more honour praise power and glory to God and to Iesus Christ then they do either in doctrine or practise Thirdly For the Saints and blessed soules in heauen they dishonour them and take from them 1. Their state of beatitude affirming as Luther and Caluin do that they yet sleepe and neither know what we do nor yet enioy any present glory and beatitude till the day of Iudgment 2. Their perfection of Sanctity in affirming as Caluin doth both of Angels and Saints that their obedience is imperfect that their iustice is defectiue and doth not satisfy God that their works require pardon and that in them is folly vanity and frailty 3. Their power of doing miracles by the gift of God which Beza Piscator Vrsinus and Perkins â—hould to be a vertue proper only to God not communicated to any creature man or Saint 4. Their difference and degree or honour affirming that all are equall in glory beatitude and reward and that no lawrels or crownes of accidentall beatitude are due to Martyrs Confessours or Virgins 5. Their respect and esteeme with God denying that God doth either apply in any sort their merits to vs or doth help and respect vs for their prayers 6. Their knowledge of vs and our affaires on earth denying that they heare vnderstand or know vs or any thing we do heere on earth 7. Their charity towardes vs affirming they neither at our intercessious sollicite or pray to God for vs nor offer vp any petitions and miseries of ours to God 8. Their honour and inuocation by vs denying it to be lawfull to worship them to honour theÌ„ to inuocate them or so much as saith Luther to imitate and follow their example 9. The custody and â—uition of Angels ouer vs and their hierarchies and orders in heauen denying or at least doubting of the custody of our Angell guardian the difference of al Hierarchies and orders among Angels In al which we and our doctrine on the contrary do attribute to them perfect and present beatitude in their soules complete obedience in their performing the will of God vpright Sanctity in all their actions extraordinary power in working miracles notable difference of degrees of glory eminent knowledge in vnderstanding our prayers excellent charity in making intercession for vs and due honour and veneration in giuing them adoration inuocation and imitation befitting both the Saints for their prayers for vs and the Angels for their custody of vs. Fourthly For the word of God they abuse it take 1. From iâ— one first and principall part of it to wit all the vnwritten word or which is diuine vnwritten tradition 2. From the written word they chop and cut off from the old Testament fourteene peeces or partes and some of them from the new Testament seauen whole bookes from the Canon of scripture 3. For the translation of scripture they reiect the ancient and follow euery nation euery congregation and euery person a new translation which best pleases them therby leaue no certainty of the verity of any 4. For the sense of scripture they contemne that which the spirit of God did inspire to the ancient Fathers Councels Church and follow that which euery mans priuate spirit suggests and therby follow not the meaning of the spirit of God but that of their owne spirit 5. For their faith grounded vpon scripture they belieue only those points which their spirit finds in that part translation and sense which they chose and therby make an vncertaine imperfect mained kind of faith and religion 6. For their Iudge and meanes to try which is scripture and which is true sense of it they admit not any infallible Iudgment either of Church or of CouÌ„cels or of Pastours but leaue to euery man to choose himself what he will belieue to iudge and follow whom he pleases in his beliefe wherby they can haue neither any vnity in faith not any certainty of scripture of scripture sense We in our doctrine do admit for the word of
of beliefe And the Formall motiue or meanes that is reuelation of God is the formall finall and last resolution why we belieue infallibly such verityes to be true So that if one aske by what we are before prepared and disposed to belieue the truth it is by the credible testimonies if by what we are directed guided to know the truth it is by the Churches propositiō if by what we are assisted and enabled to assent infallibly to this truth it is by the habit of Faith if for what and why we doe actually formally and finally assent belieue the same truth it is for the reuelation of God As therefore the Samaritans at the first were prepared by the womans relation who told them that surely it was the Messias who had told her all that she had done to thinke it probable that he might be the Messias and the woman was as it were a proponent or propounding cause to them of him Many of the Samaritans belieued in him for the word of the woman giuing testimony that he told me all thinges whatsoeuer I haue done But afterwards hauing heard and conuersed with our Sauiour himselfe for two dayes they now sayd Not for thy saying O woman do we belieue for our selues haue heard and do know that this is the Sauiour of the world indeed So all Christians are first prepared by credible testimonies directed by Church authority to the knowledge and certainty of that truth but afterwards when the diuine reuelation it selfe as the word of our Sauiour is made knowne to them then do they now formally and finally not for the testimonies of credibility or Church proposition but for the diuine reuelation it self giue firme and infallible assent and beliefe to the verityes or articles of fayth And thus Catholike fayth is that which is for probable testimonies accepted as credible by Church proposed as infallible by an infused habit effected as supernaturall by diuine verity reuealed as truth infallible and necessary to be belieued This fayth is that which is the beginning and ground of iustification the way and gate to saluation vpō which the Church of Christ is founded and is as the life and soule of it which maketh vs members and partes of Christs Church we being by it and Baptisme inserted into his mystical body which maketh vs certainly infallibly belieue either expresly or implicitè all whatsoeuer articles of sayth God hath reuealed to his Church by his Apostles which is a necessary meane instrument or dispositiō to our iustification and saluation without which none are iustified and by which informed with charity all are iustifyed which is one entire fayth in all faithfull who for one motiue and by one proponent cause do belieue all one doctrine which being one and entire belieue as they ought eyther all articles of fayth explicitè or implicitè or none at all which by refusing to assent to any one article in which is questioned the ground of all is by infidelity lost to all and to conclude which distinguisheth a Catholike from an Heretike in that whosoeuer hath this fayth is a Catholike and whosoeuer wants it or looses it is an Infidell or Heretike and so out of state of grace and saluation And thus much for the order and manner of Gods working of fayth by these meanes in vs. Secondly for the necessity and efficacy of these meanes though all and euery one in particuler be ordinarily necessary to true and diuine supernaturall faith the credible testimonies as exteriour motiues to conuince our Vnderstanding that it may prudently accept of this faith as credible and worthy of beliefe the motion of grace and habit of fayth as interiour assistants that the Will may not resist but piously incline to consent determine the Vnderstāding to assent and that the Vnderstanding may obediently yeild assent to the misteries of fayth the materiall obiects as those which we are to belieue and the formall as that why we are to belieue all which are absolutly necessary to make fayth credible free and supernaturall and without them all faith is but humane false or fained yet in respect of vs and of our certainty of beliefe a proponent cause and that infallible which can be no other but the Churches authority is most important and necessary And first that a proponent cause is needfull all grant because faith being by hearing and hearing by the word of Christ some preacher or teacher is necessary to propose and teach vs what is to be belieued by vs for as fayth depends not vpon reason but vpon authority that of God affirming this or that to be true and commanding it to be belieued so this authority thus affirming this verity must be made knowne to vs by some directing or proponent meanes or els we cannot come to the knowledge of it 2. That this directing and proponent cause must be infallible so that it cannot erre it selfe nor propose to vs an errour or falshood to be belieued for a truth is proued for since God requires of vs a certainty infallibility of fayth and this our certainty must be had by some direction and proposition by which it is proposed made knowne to vs what we are certainly to belieue it must needes follow that this Proponent cause must be certaine and infallible or els our fayth directed and guided by it cannot be certaine Thence it followes that they who admit a proponent cause as the Protestants do their church and yet do admit it to be fallible and subiect to errour as all of them do their Church cannot haue any certaine and infallible fayth at all as wanting a necessary certaine and infallible meanes to propose and teach them this certaine and infallible fayth which is confirmed by S. Augustine who sayth That if Gods prouidence rule and gouerne humane matters we may not despaire but that there is a certaine authority appointed by the same God vpon which staying our selues as vpon a sure step we may be lifted vp to God Thirdly this certaine infallible proponent or directing cause is Church-authority which Church that it may infallibly direct vs we securely rely vpon it first Iesus Christ selected and made it not only his inheritance Which he hath chosen Or his house which he builded and gouerned Or his Temple of which himselfe is Priest but also his dearest spouse VVhich he espoused to himselfe alone in fayth and truth As a Virgin pure and vnspotted without corruption Yea as his owne body And one body with him VVhich as head he nourisheth cherisheth and sanctifieth making her glorious without spot And which he hath purchased with his pretious bloud Secondly he priuiledged it first with his owne presence promising to be with it all dayes euen to the consūmation of the world Next with the presence of the Holy Ghost The spirit of truth
all and because they haue none they affirme that none are now wrought or if any be wrought that they are false feygned or diabolicall For Holinesse of life they confesse it to be so far from them that as Luther confesseth Men are dayly worse being possessed now with seauen Diuells more then before yea with whole troupes of Diuells and are more couetous crafty cruell and wicked then when they were Papists And the like is confessed by Caluin Musculus and others cyted by Becanus and the Protestants Apology If we seeke for Vniuersality they are ashamed to stile themselues by the name Catholike which is vniuersall but by the name of Protestant or for distinction of Protestants by the name Lutheran Caluinist or the like Vniuersality of place they cannot challenge because their doctrine neuer extended out of the limits of a few Northern countryes in Europe nor euer entred Africa Asia or America Vniuersality of tyme they cannot chalenge because their Church had its first being but about an hundred yeares agoe and this so apparently that we can nominate the yeare when the authour who the place where the opinions what the mantainers and abetters by whome this doctrine had first being in the world and the opposers who at first did yet continue to gainsay it so as they disclaime expresly from this marke not only denying it to be any marke of the Church but also confessing that their Church was according to some of them seauen hundred to others a thousand to others twelue hundred to others foureteene hundred yeares euer from Christ as before is proued either not at all or altogether latent and inuisible If we seeke for Succession of Ordination from the Apostles they either beg it from the Romā Church which they account Antichristian or els take vp a new one at their owne handes and are Prelates and Pastours of their owne creation and for want of ordinary vocation from Christ are content with an extraordniary of their owne inuention By which and much more for breuity omitted is euident that all testimonyes of credibility sufficient to make their doctrine seeme probable and worthy of credit are wanting to them and their Church 2. That the Protestants want the two externalll meanes of fayth which is church-Church-infallible proposition by which they should be assured confirmed in the certainty of their diuine reuelation mysteries reuealed in the certainty of their spirit and motions by it and in the certainty of their Scripture and meaning of it is proued because whether we take the Church Authoritatiue for the chiefe Pastours and Prelates by whose authority it is gouerned or Representatiue for the general Councels in which the whole body in the assembly of Bishops is represented or Collectiue for the whole multitude of all faythfull belieuers through the whole world dispersed Take it I say in which of these senses you will in all which it is the true Church of God and of infallible authority yet in none of these doe the Protestants receaue any infallible direction or confirmation frō it For if we respect their Pastours and Prelates they are not directed by them or obedient in fayth to them but by the liberty and priuiledge of their spirit euery priuate person hath authority to censure and iudge them If we respect generall Councells they disclaime all as before is proued or if they approue any it is so farre as their Decrees do agree with the fancy of their spirit to which they subiect them and so longe as they are pleased to obserue what is commāded by them in which they will be free without obligation to obey them If we respect the whole body of the Church they in their generall Tenents doe generally hould that it may erre and faile in doctrine and fayth and for practise do boldly affirme that for many ages it hath fallen and failed not only in doctrine of Idolatry superstition and heresy but also in very extancy and being of a Church as hauing beene inuisible not extant but dead buried and corrupted for so many ages togeather as in the first part is proued and thus they cut off al infallible authority of Church proposition which more then the other meanes they do in plaine tearmes expresly reiect and condemne 3. That the Protestants want the first internall means of Faith that is a pious disposition or inclination to belieue what is proposed by the Church as reuealed by God is proued because as a pious inclination of the will moued by the grace of God doth apply and determine the Vnderstanding of a willing and well disposed person either to labour and seeke out such motiues testimonies as do make the truth of Religion seeme probable or to assent to such as are already proposed vnto it so the obstinate disposition of a willful Protestant doth refuse to giue any credit or beliefe to any reasons though neuer so euident or to any definition of the Church though euery way most certaine but resolues with out amendement to persist in his preiudicate opinion notwithstanding any reason or authority to the contrary By which his obstinacy 1. He fals into heresy by willfully following his owne opinion which he chooses and carelesly contēning the authority of the Church in that it defines 2. He looseth his fayth which he receaued in Baptisme fals into infidelity partaking with Heretikes 3. He belieues no articles of fayth to which he assentes though truly firmly and for the testimony of God by any diuine and Catholike fayth which depends vpon an infallible meane that is Church proposing authority but by humane fayth wholy relying and lastly resoluing his beliefe eyther vpon the authority of some deceauing maister or vpon the testimony of some wrested Scripture or vpon the euidency of some deluding notes and markes or vpon the seeming apparency of his owne spirit and conceit 4. He separates himselfe from the vnion of the body of Christ from the benefit of the merits of his passion from the communion of his Saints both in earth and heauen and from all participation of hope of glory in Gods Kingdome to come so remaines as a dead member cut from the body as a dry bough deuided from the tree as a darke glimse of light separated from the Sunne as a small streame stopped from the current of the fountaine all which as they do presently decay and dry or come to nothing so he 4. That the Protestants want the two internall meanes and help of Fayth that is the infused and permanent guift of fayth inherent in the Vnderstanding and both enabling and illuminating it to the producing of the act of diuine supernaturall fayth is proued Because Protestants who hold that Fayth doth iustify and that Iustification is not by any inherent guif and quality but by the extrinsecall fauour of God not imputing our sinnes vnto vs
must needs by consequence hould so for the most part do hould that there are no infused and permanent guiftes or habits of fayth which concurre or help to our Iustification but that all is wrought by the motion of a transeunt spirit which motiō as it worketh according to them in them by it selfe only wholy all internall good workes without any cooperatiō of man or mans freewill so it is only a motion which worketh in whome it will when it will and how it will al and whatsoeuer it wil in man to his iustification and saluation by which it is euident that as in all their opinions they are neyther constant nor permanent but are wafted with euery wind of new doctrine and so fly from the beliefe of one thing to another so they are not guided by any permanent guift or quality but by certaine flashes motions of an vncertaine spirit which leads them from one vncertainty to another and so leaues them in al vncertaine 5. That the Protestants want the first of the eternall meanes or helps of Fayth that is the materiall obiects or articles of beliefe which are to be belieued as reuealed by Christ vnto the Apostles and by the Apostles left to their Successours and by them to vs and posterity is proued 1. Because they belieue many thinges as obiects of Fayth which are not reuealed eyther in Scripture or Traditions of which are many instances giuen in the former parte so do they not belieue many articles which are reuealed both in Scripture and Tradition for which cause they reiect all tradition and in it many mysteries of fayth which the Apostles left only by Tradition and refuse many partes of Scripture and that chiefly because they containe many points of doctrine which they will not belieue 2. Because as they admit many points of doctrine into the number of their articles of fayth which the ancient Church condemned for heresies as contrary to Apostolicall doctrine witnesse the ancient condemned heresies of Heluidius Vigilantius Arius Iouinian and others by them reuiued so they cōdemne many pointes of doctrine as erroneous superstitious or idolatrous which the ancient Church receaued for articles of Fayth as agreable to Apostolicall tradition witnesse all the poyntes of doctrine which the Magdeburgenses and others before cyted condemne as errours and staines in the ancient Fathers in euery age since Christ in both which they erre in the materiall obiects of Fayth as well in receauing condemned heresies for Apostolicall verities as in cōdemning receaued Apostolicall verities reuealed by Christ for erroneous heresyes 3. Because as they admit speciall Fayth only whose obiect is only their remission of sinnes and iustification for diuine Fayth by which they are iustified so all other fayth by which they belieue for example the B. Trinity Incarnation Passion and Resurrection and Ascension of Christ with the rest of the articles of faith vsually belieued they acknowledge for no other but for a general Faith common as well to the damned and Diuells as to them which faith in the Diuel and damned as it is no voluntary and free act proceeding from a pious disposition of the Will nor a diuine and supernaturall worke depending vpon any authority of God reuealing but a meere naturall and necessary act of knowledge◠conuincing their vnderstāding eyther by force of experience or by euidence of reason or by apparent and euident notes of credibility or by some manifestly knowne testimonies of God of the verity of that which they belieue and tremble at so in the same manner their Faith of the same articles by their owne confession is not diuine but a meere humane fayth grounded vpon some generall receaued opinion or vpon some meere human authority and so what they conceaue of the generall articles of faith they do not receaue them as any articles of doctrine and supernaturall fayth but as generall receaued positions humane coniectures and their owne selfe-seeming and chosen opinions 6. That the Protestants want all diuine Reuelation for which as the formall cause and the finall resolution they should belieue al which is by God reuealed is proued 1. Because what they belieue they belieue not for that it was reuealed to the Apostles by the Holy Ghost eyther at Pentecost when it did visibly teach and confirme them or in successe of tyme when vpon occasion as at the conuersion of Gentils it did reueale to them all the mysteries euer after to be belieued which Reuelation made to the Apostles is the formall cause of fayth nor yet for that it is proposed to them by Church infallible authority as a condition necessary to know what is reuealed but for that it is reuealed to them a new by their owne priuate spirit from which they receaue all their directions and certainty both what is reuealed why it is reuealed and also by what meanes it is reuealed 2. Because the meanes by which Christ doth manifest and declare vnto vs his diuine reuelations they eyther plainely reiect or wholy subiect to their priuate spirit for the authority of traditions by which part of the diuine reuelations are deliuered to vs and the Proposition of the Church by which we are secured of the certainty of them they reiect and deny The authority of the Scripture which is an other meane by which God hath reuealed his truth and which they chalenge as the only means both of knowledge certainty of diuine reuelations they wholy subiect to their priuate spirit by which they are assured which is true Canon which is true edition which true trāslation which true sense of it And so for diuine reuelation they haue neyther any at all nor yet any meanes to know or attaine vnto it And thus much of the Protestants want of all the necessary helps meanes by which true and diuine supernaturall Catholike fayth is produced conserued and increased in the soule of euery faithfull belieuer and member of Christs holy body and Church How the Catholikes and Protestants differ in these six meanes and how the Protestants make their priuate spirit the only meanes of all SECT IIII. THE fourth consideration is to reflect vpon the aduantage which we Catholiks haue against the Protestāts and the difference that is betweene vs and them in these meanes of Fayth and how that the Protestants do substitute one only deluding and deceitfull meanes that is this their priuate Spirit in place of all the six former meanes of fayth And first for the materiall obiect they professe to belieue 1. only the doctrine which is reuealed in scripture 2. that only which is reuealed in that one parte of Scripture which they are pleased to accept as Scripture by their spirit 3. that only in that part of Scripture which is according to their precōceaued opinion so interpreted by their spirit so that Scripture alone and that not in whole but in part and that part of Scripture as it is
miserable That it cannot be meanes of the integrity and perfection of Faith SECT IIII. THIRDLY Faith as it is one and certaine so it must be entire and Catholicke that is the doctrine of it must both in all points be wholy and entirely belieued also by all persons be vniuersally and Catholikly professed It must be in all and euery point completely belieued because euery point by God reuealed and by the Church proposed to vs is of equall verity certainty and necessity of beliefe Therefore as the keeping of all the Commandmēts doth oblige all and the breaking of any one is a transgression of the Law so the belieuing of all articles of faith either actually and expresly as the learned doe or virtually and implicite as the vnlearned do who expresly belieuing the principall and most necessary to be expresly knowne do in not doubting or oppugning the rest virtually belieue al the rest in that they belieue them as the Church doth teach them doth in like manner oblige all and the voluntary doubting or misbelieuing of any one is an heresy against fayth and doth violate the integrity which should be in Fayth of which the fundamentall reason is because all articles of fayth are belieued for one and the same infallible motiue and reason that is for the reuelation of God made knowne by infallible proposition of the Church of which whosoeuer denies the authority in one point infringes the infallibility of the same in all points for if the reuelation of God or proposition of Church may faile in one it may faile in all so can giue no certainty of any Out of which followes that an Heretikes who obstinatly misbelieues one article reuealed and proposed is intensiuè no lesse an Infidell that is as destitute of any diuine fayth as is ◠Pagan who belieues not any one Christian article at all because what he belieues in any he belieues not vpon a right true and solid motiue of beliefe that is the reuelation of God and proposition by Church which if he did he would for the same belieue also the rest It must likewise be Catholikly and vniuersally belieued that is what was by the first faythfull the Apostles others in the first ages belieued must also be by the succeeding faythfull in the next ages likewise belieued and what is in most places and Countryes and hath been by the most faythfull in most Countryes generally belieued the same must also by others likewise faythfull in other Countryes be generally belieued By which Catholik beliefe of the same doctrine in all or the most places persons and tymes is made one Catholike Church among all persons in all places and all tymes But that this Protestant priuate spirit cannot produce any such one and the same fayth either entire and whole in euery point or Catholicke and generall in all persons places and tymes that it cannot incline all persons in all tymes and places to belieue all points of one entire Catholike fayth is proued First because it is neither one in all persons neither hath any lincke or combination of any vnity to combine in one all persons as neither proposing to all persons all articles of fayth by one the same motiue nor combining all persons dispersed in tyme and place in one lincke of one Fayth for it is singular seuerall priuate and proper in euery one without any subordination or connexion among any as is apparent by the former instāces of Luther Zuinglius Caluin Rotman Osiander Illyricus Quintinus Seruetus Blandrata and others who all as so many ruptures out of one Riuer hauing broke the bankes of Catholike vnity did at seuerall tymes and places diuide themselues into seuerall currents of opposition and runne al a course contrary one to another without meanes or hope of euer meeting or reuniting againe Secondly because it is a spirit of separation diuision and disunion in that whomesoeuer it possesses it doth separate them as disioynted members from the vnion of Gods holy Church the spouse and body of Christ and doth diuide and cut them into seuerall peeces and mammocks of sects schismes and heresyes For as euery one receaues a new part or portion of this new spirit he chooses to himselfe a new opinion of doctrine labours to erect and set vp a new Conuenticle of new belieuers and makes himselfe the head or follower of a new sect or heresy and so all sect-maisters or Heretikes who in all ages from Christ downewardes haue separated themselues from his Church and erected a new fayth and Synagogue haue had their origen and beginning from this spirit haue made their progresse and proceeding by this spirit and haue ended themselues and their dolefull and desperate presumption in the obstinacy of this spirit In all which the scope and marke they aymed at was thereby to free themselues from all order and subiection thereby to arrogate to themselues all authority and dominion thereby to exercise what liberty they best affected and to belieue and teach what doctrine they most fancied and best fitted their conceit humour Thirdly because this spirit is inuisible insensible inperceptible and vnable to be knowne or vnderstood as they graunt by others or any saue only they who imagine they are possessed with it And as it is inuisible and vnknowne so it is composed of an inuisible and vnknowne company meeting in inuisible and vnknowne congregations ministring inuisible and vnknowne Sacraments making an inuisible and vnknowne Church consisting of inuisible and vnknowne both Pastors who preached and people who heard the doctrine of it for many ages togeather of which they can assigne neither tyme when nor place where nor people who were taught by them can produce no acts or monuments no recordes or registers either of people who belieued professed this their faith or of Princes who did honour and defend it or of persecutours who did oppose and persecute it or of any men women or children who were baptized and liued or dyed in it They can nominate no Citty or Country no Priest or Prelate no Prince or Potentate no Confessour or Martyr who belieued professed honoured and defended in paper or pulpit by word or sword the fayth of this spirit and why Because the directour is a spirit inuisible which compasseth a Church of persons insensible who preach a doctrine incredible and performe actions not memorable All which is nothing els but an inuinsible argument of an impossible fiction inuented in the idle braines of braine-sicke spirits to disguise the nouelty of a new new deuised Religion And this is all the integrity or vniuersality of Fayth that this priuate spirit can effect or affoard That it cannot be a meanes of Fayth which is got by hearing SECT V. FOVRTLY This Faith which is thus one and certaine thus entire and Catholicke is also ordinarily by one and the same way and meanes imparted vnto vs that is by Hearing this hearing proceeds from Preaching
it is Iudas damnation as the hauing of it is Iames his sauation Iudas therfore and that which I say of Iudas I say of all the reprobate is as much obliged vnder paine of his damnation to belieue as an article of his faith that he shal be saued as Iames or any elect is But whatsoeuer Iudas and all the reprobate or infidels are bound to belieue as an article of faith necessary to their saluation as wel as Iames and the elect must needs be true and that certainly and infallibly true whethersoeuer they do belieue it or no Therefore it must needs be true that as well Iudas and all the reprobate shal be saued as Iames and the elect The fundamental reason of which is this All diuine Faith of which kind and that the most chiefe the Protestants will haue this their Speciall Faith to be depends vpon diuine reuelation frō God this reuelation supposeth truth in the obiect or thing reuealed the obiect of truth or thing reuealed is aeterna veritatis and true in it selfe before it be belieued and so true whether it be belieued or no. The obiect therefore of this speciall faith which euery one as well reprobate as elect is bound vnder paine of his damnation to belieue and which is the remission of his owne sinnes his Iustification and saluation is and must be aeternae veritatis is and must be true before it be belieued is and must be true whether it be belieued or no and so it is and must be true that euery man as well reprobate as elect hath remission of sins iustification and saluation it is was eternally true before it was belieued and so is true whether it be belieued or no and so that his sinnes are remitted he iustified and saued whether he belieue or no. And as there cannot be giuen an instance in any other article of faith necessary to saluation in which this reason which indeed is the ground of all faith doth not conuince that the article is true whethersoeuer it be belieued or no so no reason nor answer in any reason according to the same ground of true faith can be giuen why it should not hold good also in this act and obiect of this Special Faith which if it be diuine faith must participat of the nature essence of all diuine faith Therefore it must follow that either this speciall faith is no diuine faith but an illusion and phantasy or if it be diuine that this absurd absurdity must follow vpon it that man may be saued without any faith and that all shal be saued whether they haue any faith or none Which is yet confirmed further by these two parities the one diuine the other humane the former thus As the Resurrection of euery man being an article of faith which euery one is bound to belieue is true that is euery man shall ryse againe whethersoeuer he do beleeue it or no so the Iustification and saluation of euery man being likewise an article which euery one is bound to belieue or else is damned is likewise true that is he is iustified or saued whethersoeuer he do belieue or no. The reason of both is because remission of sins iustification or saluation of euery one being as well an obiect article of ones faith as the Resurrection of euery one is they are both presuposed as true to faith not composed and made true by faith so both alike eternally true both alike true antecedent and before the act of faith and so both true whether they be belieued or no. The later thus As King Charles for example whome God preserue is right and lawfull King of England whether he be by all subiects for such belieued and receaued or no and the obligation that al subiects haue so to acknowledge receaue him vnder paine of treason doth suppose him to be their true King for else it were not truly treason to refuse him so all articles of faith and amongst the rest this of proper saluation are true whether they be belieued or no and the obligation that euery one hath to belieue them and so this vnder paine of damnation doth suppose them and this to be true for else could none vnder paine of damnation be bound to belieue either them or this of his Saluation Therefore as King Charles his title and right of being King supposing that all are bound vnder paine of treason to receaue him is good whethersoeuer euery one of his subiects do belieue it and so receaue him or no so the truth of euery mans saluation supposing euery one is bound vnder paine of damnation to belieue it as true is certaine and infallibly true whethersoeuer euery one do so belieue it or no and so shall be iustifyed and saued whether they belieue or no. Which absurdity as it is most absurd so the Protestant principle of sole and speciall fayth out of which it necessarily followes must needes be absurd and false The same absurdity may be inferred and is seconded by other like absurd positions of some particuler Protestants as by that position of Zuinglius who maintained that Theseus Hercules Socrates and Aristides all Pagans are equally with Peter and Paul in heauen by that of some of M. Fox his martyrs who as himselfe recordes of them taught that euen a Mahometan Turke or Sarazen may be saued if he trust in God liue well by that of Puccius in Germany of Syr William Hickman and some of his fellowes in Lincolnshire heere in in England which is also too common in the simple peoples mouths that all men at the last shal be saued and that God will suffer none to be damned whome he created All which as absurd do inferre and second the former absurdity Fifthly it followeth that a man is iustified by a fayth which is in it selfe 1. False 2. Contradictory 3. Sinnefull 4. Rash 5. Presumptuous 6. Preiudicious to all Hope Charity and good life and 7. Iniurious to Christ as he is a Redeemer a Law-giuer a Iudge a Priest and also doth make him ignorant sinnefull damned as shal be proued by euery one of these heades in particuler And first that this Speciall Fayth is a fayth not true but false is proued thus First because a true fayth is of thinges reuealed by God in scripture or tradition and proposed by the Church in practise or definition but that either so many of so contrary religions as Lutherans Caluinists Anabaptists Familists Arians or that any one in any one of these professions is predestinated iustified glorified as they all belieue is neither reuealed in any Scripture or Tradition from God nor confirmed in any practise or declaration of holy Church therefore not a true but a false fayth 2. A true Fayth cannot perswade and propose beliefes doctrines which are contrary and condemne one another but this speciall fayth persuades a beliefe doctrine and certainty of saluation which is contrary and
according to the order and proportion of the whole that as the necessity and conueniency of the whole body doth require so the operation and function of the part is accommodated and applied and so all the parts and members of the Church being by one spirit combined and vnited togeather as members of one body and in vnity of one hody do euery one belieue as they are directed by the head and do proceed in all with subordination to the head and worke in all for the vse and benefit of the whole suffer for the defence of the whole and so by a communion both with themselues and with the whole do all labour for the whole conserue the whole and keep still an vnion and communion with the whole and are directed according to the faith the rule the reason and the Iudgment or direction of the whole body or Church of Christ As long therfore as euery member and his spirit hath this direction subordination and vnion with the whole body of the Church and the spirit of it so long doth it prooced in order and vnity and so farre it is agreable to the spirit of God directing his holy spouse the Church but when this spirit doth beginne to be singular of it selfe to deuise a new doctrine to teach otherwise then the rule of faith hath prescribed or to assume the authority of a new maister When it deuides it selfe from the spirit of Gods Church and doth oppose it selfe against it or extoll it selfe aboue it when it will not be subiect and subordinate to it but doth erect a Cathedra of authority of its own or an opinion of doctrine of its owne against it then it is an euident signe that it is not a spirit of vnity and concord but of dissention and diuision so not an inspiration of God to be imbraced but a suggestion of sathan to be reiected Out of which rule may be obserued the difference betweene a Catholicke and a Protestant spirit in expounding of scripture and withall the weaknesse or rather impertinency of the Protestant obiections for their manner of interpretation of scripture by this their spirit For first we distinguish betweene them who without offence lawfully may expound and who by authority haue warrant infallibly to expound holy scripture Of the former sorts are all faythfull Christians who hauing vnderstanding sufficient and a pious intention do with humility beginne and according to the rule of fayth proceed in seeking out the right sense of Scripture and so none who are thus able and thus proceed are barred from either reading or expounding to their own coÌ„fort the Holy Scripture as our aduersaries do falsely calumniate vs. Of the later sort are the Pastours and Prelates of the Church who hauing lawfull ordination and succession and continuing in vnity and subordination do either deliuer the sense of Scripture as it is taught by holy Church or els confirme and explicate any doctrine of fayth when they are collected in a generall Councell And these thus vsing the lawfull meanes and obseruing the vsuall rule of fayth haue authenticall warrant by the infallible assistance of the holy Ghost that they cannot erre in deliuering any sense of scripture as a ground of fayth and beliefe The Protestants doe giue not only liberty but also authority to all not only Pastours and Prelates but also Artificers and common people as well vnlearned as learned to frame to themselues such a firme assent to this or that seeming to them infallibly true sense of holy Scripture euery one according to his owne preiudicate conceit or priuate spirit that thereupon they dare aduenture the certainty of their Fayth and the hope of their saluation Secondly we make a difference betweene a sense of scripture produced in the Schooles to proue or confirme a schoole question a sense declared ex Cathedra to ground an article of faith or betweene a preachers conceit deliuered in the pulpit to exhort to good life and manners and a doctrine proposed by the Church as reuealed by God necessary to be belieued In which for the former we giue a liberty to any preacher to frame out of his own coÌ„ceit any sense which not being opposit to true fayth may moue the auditory to piety good life but for the later we confine the ranging liberty of the wit and inuention euen of the Doctours Pastours in Gods Church prescribe as fayth Vincentius Lyrin that They teach that which is deliuered to them not which is inuented by them that which they receaued not that which they deuised that which is of publike tradition not of priuate vsurpation that of which they are not authours but keepers not beginners but followers not leaders but lead In which cunningly caruing faythfully placing wisely adorning like another Beezeler the pretious pearles of diuine fayth by adding splendour grace and beauty they are to illustrate more clearely that which was belieued more obscurely and to deliuer to posterity more fully explicated that which by their forefathers being not vnderstood was with reuerence belieued Alwayes so teaching that which they learned that they teach after a new maÌ„ner but not a new doctrine That is as afterward he sayth That they interprete the diuine Canon according to the tradition of the whole Church and the rules of Catholike fayth that is Vniuersality Antiquity and Consent and if any part do rebell against the whole or nouelty oppose antiquity or if dissent of a few controule the consent of all or the most then mâ—st they preferre the integrity of the whole before the corruption of a part the veneration of antiquity before prophanation of nouelty and the generality of a Councell before the temerity of a few The Protestants giue a liberty by the priuiledge of their spirit to euery not only Preacher but priuate person to expound the most difficult and important places of Scripture namely of the Apocalyps S. Pauls Epistles not only for the schooles in scholasticall questions or in pulpit for exhortations to good life but in deepest articles greatest controuersies of Fayth euery one as his spirit shall suggest and thereupon they direct them to ground their fayth the saluation of their owne soule and of many others who rely vpon them Whereby as sayth Vincentius Lyrinensis They make it a solemne practise to delight in prophane nouelties and to loath all decrees of antiquity and by making ostentation of a false opinion of knowledge do make shipwracke of all fayth Thirdly the Spirit of a Catholike will not presume to expound any text of scripture contrary to that sense which either the rule of fayth or the practise of the Church or the decree of a Councell or the consent of Fathers hath receaued as true and authenticall but in al will receaue follow that which is determined and decreed in theÌ„ The ProtestaÌ„t spirit will censure reiect and condemne any sense though neuer
these six meanes of Faith Of credible testimonies Of the pious disposition of the habit of Fayth Of the materiall obiect Of the formal obiect Of the proponeÌ„t cause (y) Rom. 10 17. Infallibility Aug. de vtil credendi Which is church proposition (a) Psal 32 12 (b) Matt. 28 1.20.20 (c) 1. Cor. 13.16.17.19 (d) Cant. 4.8 Ioan. 3.19 (e) Ose 2. (f) 2. Cor. 11.2 (g) Rom. 12.5 Eph. 4.4 (i) Ephes 5.25.29 (k) Act. 20.28 (l) Mat. 28.20 (m) Ioan. 14.16 (n) Esa 59.21 (o) Ioan. 14.16 (p) Ioan. 16 13. (q) Matt. 16 18. (r) 1. Cor. 4.21 (s) 1. Cor. 5.3 (t) Act. 15.28 (u) 1. Tim. 3 15. (w) Matt. 16.18 (x) Matt. 15 15. (y) Luc. 10.16 (z) Matt. 13 2. (a) Luc. 10.16 (b) Matt. 18 17. (c) Mar. 16.16 The church that is the pastours of it (d) Ephe. 4.11 (e) Ier. 3.15 (f) Rom. 10. (g) Rom. 10.14 Church propositioÌ„ coÌ„firmed by Fathers Iren. lib. 3. cap. 4. Aug. lib. 1. cont CrescoÌ„ cap. 33. Luth. de anti Eccl. tom 7. fol. 562. Ger. 2. part 10.40 The Protestants want all the meanes of faith Externall Eternall Internall Protestants want credible testimonies which are such as either may 1. Confirme Pagans these are (h) Valentia tom 3. dis 1 q. 1. art 4. pag. 87. c. In respect of Christ Of ChristiaÌ„ doctrine Of holy Scripture Of ChristiaÌ„ Professours 2. Or may confirme Catholikes such as are Aug. lib. cont epist Funda cap. 4. Consent Authority Succession Name Catholike (*) Aug. de vnit Eccl. c. 7. tom 7. Concione 2. in Psalm 30.12 3. Or may reduce Heretiks such as are Vnity Sanctity vniuersality Succession Protestants want testimonies of credibility 1. To conuert Pagans 2. To conuince Heretikes As vnity with the primitiue Church Or among themselues Sanctity of doctrine Of miracle (n) Luth. conc 2. Domin 1. Aduentus (o) Becan de fide cap. 6. num 4. Vniuersality Of name Catholike Of place Of tyme. Succession of Ordination And Vocation Protestants want church-Church-infallible proposition in that they Disobey their Pastours Disclaime generall Councels And condemn their whole Church of errour Protestants want a pious disposition of the Will By obstinacy by which They fal into heresy Loose their fayth Belieue no truth by any diuine Fayth Separate themselues froÌ„ Christ Protestants want an infused guift of Fayth Protestants want the material obiects or articles of Fayth because they belieue not Traditions nor many partes of Scripture in which they are reuealed Nor many articles belieued by ancient Church and Fathers Not any article by diuine fayth Protestants want the formall obiect of faith or diuine reuelation As not depending vpon the reuelations made to the Apostles but to them selues by their priuat spirit Catholikes aduantage of the Protestants â— In the materiall obiect belieued as belieuing not only what is reuealed in scripture interpreted by their owne spirit But what is reuealed or declared in Scripture Tradition Councells Church-practise Fathers 2. In the formall obiect which we make not sense reasoÌ„ or the priuate spirit But reuelation Ancient General Continued Infallible 3. In the internall assistance of grace Protestants depend only vpon a motion of priuate spirit We vpon a permanent guift seuerall helps of Grace 4. In the credible testimonies they haue none We haue Vnity with the ancient Church With one head VVith our selues Sanctity of doctrine Sanctity of life Of miracleâ— Vniuersaliry of name Of place Of tyme. Succession of Ordination and Doctrine Exampls of Martyrs CoÌ„fessours Doctours Virgins 5. In the infallible proponeÌ„t cause they haue none at all We haue infallible Church authority The priuate spirit might as well be chalenged by Catholikes as Protestants 2. Cor. 11. â—â— About the necessity of the spirit Catholikes Protestants agree Differ 1. in the name 2. In the vniuersality of it 3. In the maÌ„ner of operation of it 4. In the permanency of it 5. In the effect of it what Catholiks assigne What Protestants assigne In respect of the obiect In respect of the subiect â—alu 4. Inst. 17.2 in the French editioÌ„ The priuate spirit not to be belieued The reason The effect of it (a) Act. 20.29.3 (b) 2. Pet. 2.1 (c) v. 2. (d) v. 10. (e) v. 14. (f) v. 19. (g) v. 18. (h) v. 20. (i) v. 21. (k) 2. Pet. 3 16. ReasoÌ„s why it cannot be belieued (a) 1. Cor. 2 12. (b) 1. Cor. 2.11 (c) 7. Cor. â—·12 (d) 1. Reg. 16.14 (e) Ioan. 15.16 (f) 2. Paral. 18.22 1. Tim. 4.1 (g) Es 11.2 (h) Es 19.14 How by what rule spirits are to be tryed Catholikes rule (1) 1. Cor. 12 4.11.13 (2) Ioan. 14 16.26 (3) 1. Cor. 12 2. Protestants rule Cal. in 1. Ioa. 4. v. 1. Who are to try spirits according to Catholikes According to Protestants ConclusioÌ„ (a) Matt. 24 4.5 (b) 2. Pet. 2.1 (c) Ib. v. 2. (d) 2. Pet. 2.10 (e) Ib. v. 14. (f) Ib. v. 19. (g) 2. Pet. 3.16 (h) Ibid. (i) Act. 20.30 The second proof out of S. Peter The scripture is to be interpreted by the same spirit by which it was penned (4) Ephes 4. Chrys hom de spir sanct adorando Clem. ep 5. Cal. in CoÌ„m in hunc locum Bellar. l. 3. c. 6. de interpr verbi Dei Inference ConclusioÌ„ The third proofe out of S. Paul The guift of interpreting scripture is gratia gratis data It is not coÌ„mon to all faythfull Inferences Matth. 7.22 ConclusioÌ„ 4. Proofe out of Ezechiel By whom is described The spirit The persoÌ„s The effects The punishmeÌ„t of it The spirit of false Prophets and Protestants compared Hierem. 29.8 The persoÌ„s The effects Inferences Women seducers Hier. epitom 1. epist. ad Câ—esiph ConclusioÌ„ The fifth proof out of Iob. Eliu the Busite his priuate spirit Eliu the Protestants spirit alike 3. Reg. 22.23 The sixth proofe out of S. Paul admonishing Who is an Heretike Sanct. lib. 2. mor. c. 7. n. 1. Aug. ep 162. Qui sententiam suam quaÌ„uis falsaÌ„ peruersaÌ„ nulla pertinaci animo sitate defeÌ„dunt praeser tim inquam non audaciâ presumptionis pepererunt sed à seductis in errorem lapsis parentibus acceperunt quaerunt auteÌ„ cauta solicitudine veritatem corrigi parati cum inuenerint nequaquaÌ„ sunt inter haereticos deputandi Aug. l. 18. de ciuit Dei c. 51. Qui in ecclesia Dei morbiduÌ„ aliquod prauumque sapiunt si correpti vt sanum rectuÌ„que sapiaÌ„t resistunt coÌ„tumaciter suaque pestifera mortifera dogmata emeÌ„dare noluÌ„t sed defensare persistuÌ„t haeretici fiuÌ„t foras exeuntes habentur in exerceÌ„tibus inimicis Aug. l. 4. de Bapt. cont Donat. c. 16. Why an heretike is to be auoided Tert. de prescript cap. 6. quia in quo damnatur sibi clegit Conclusion The 7. and last proofe out of diuers places of Script (a) Prou. 3.5 7. (b) Iob. 12.15 (c) Prou. 14.12 (d) Is 5.21 (e) Deut. 12.9 (f) Rom. 1.22 (g) Rom. 2.8 (h) Thes 1.8
interpretation 3. What meanes are to be vsed by these interpreters to make this interpretation and of 4. rules of infallible interpreting of Scripture Sect. 2. That the priuate Spirit cannot haue this infallible authority and be this infallible meanes is proued Subd 1. By reasons drawne from the nature of the Holy Scripture which is to be expounded 2. By reasons drawne from the priuate spirit which should expound it CHAP. VI. THE Priuate Spirits authority to iudge of Controuersies of fayth confuted by reasons drawne from the nature of a Iudge of Fayth Sect. 1. The properties of a Iudge of Fayth Sect. 2. The whole body of the Church cannot be this Iudge Sect. 3. Secular Princes cannot be this Iudge Sect. 4. Lay-people cannot be this Iudge Sect. 5. The Scripture cannot be this Iudge Sect. 6. Bishops and Prelates of the true Church are this Iudge Sect. 7. The priuate spirit cannot be this Iudge CHAP. VII THE priuate spirits authority to iudge of Controuersies of faith confuted by reasons drawne from the nature and certainty of Fayth Sect. 1. The properties of Fayth with the priuate spirits māner of proceeding Sect. 2. The priuate Spirit cannot be a meanes of Vnity in fayth Sect. 3. Nor a meanes of the certainty of Fayth Sect. 4. Nor a meanes of the integrity and perfection of faith Sect. 5. Nor a meanes of fayth which is got by hearing Sect. 6. Nor a meanes of Fayth which requires credible testimonies Sect. 7. Nor a meanes of Fayth which obligeth all to belieue accept of it CHAP. VIII THE priuate spirits authority to iudge of Fayth confuted by circular absurdities following vpō it against Fayth Sect. 1. Of the nature of a Circle the difference of Circles Sect. 2. The Catholikes cleared from the obiected Circle agaynst their doctrine Sect. 3. The Protestants diuers manners of Circles Subd 1. Their Circle betweene the scripture the spirit 2. Between the spirit and Fayth 3. Between election vnderstanding of scripture 4. Between the Spirit of euery priuate man of a generall Councell CHAP. IX THE priuate Spirits Authority to iudge of Controuersies of Fayth confuted by doctrinall absurdities following vpon it against Fayth Sect. 1. Idolatry and heresy compared and of 4. heads and origens of all late Heresies proceeding of the priuate Spirit Sect. 2. Of absurdities which follow vpon the 1. head Of contempt of all Church-authority and relying vpon the priuate Spirit Sect. 3. Of absurdities which follow vpon the 2. head Of sole Fayth Subdiu 1. Agaynst man making him as iust and more certaine of saluation then Christ. 2. Agaynst Fayth making it false contradictory sinnefull rash presumptuous and preiudicious to charity c. 3. Against Christ to whome it is iniurious as a Redeemer Phisitian Lawgiuer Iudge Priest and makes him ignorant sinnefull damned for the tyme. Sect. 4. Of absurdities which follow vpon the 3. head that is Of Concupiscence being originall sinne Subdiu 1. Eight diuers absurdities which follow vpon it 2. The difference between a iust Catholicke and Protestant Sect. 5. Of absurdities which follow vpon the 4. head that is Of absolute predestination to damnation Subdiu 1. Absurdities against man leading to carelesnesse despayre of saluation and inability to be saued 2. Absurdities against God making him the Authour of sinne 3. A Sinner 4. The only Sinner 5. A Lyer and dissembler 6. A Tyrant most cruell 7. A Deuill 8. Obseruations vpon the former doctrine Sect. 6. Of absurdities which follow against Fayth and the Creed Subdiu 1. In generall destroying all Fayth 2. In particular against all the 12. articles of the Creed Sect. 7. Of absurdities agaynst Prayer and the Pater Noster Subdiu 1. In generall making all prayer needlesse or hopelesse 2. In particular opposing all the 7. petitions of the Pater Noster Sect. 8. Of absurdities against the obseruation of all lawes and chiefly the Ten Commaundements Subdiu 1 In generall how all lawes are made impossible and not obliging 2. In particular how many wayes the Protestant dostrine encourageth to the breach of all lawes and to all lewdenesse of life 3. To what vices in particular the same leads chiefly to Slouth Lust Cruelty and Pride 4. Bad life 1. In the common people 2. In the Ministers 3. In the first reformers of protestāt Religiō confessed to be an effect of this doctrine Sect. 9. The conclusion comparing the priuate spirits doctrine with the Catholike Churches doctrine whether leads to the greater honour of God CHAP. X. THE Protestants Obiections and proofes taken out of Scripture for the defence of their priuate Spirits authority to interprete Scripture and iudge of Controuersie are proposed and answered Sect. 1. Of certaine obseruations profitable for the solution of obiections Sect. 2. The obiections for the priuate Spirits authority answered Sect. 3. More obiections proposed and answered CERTAINE CONSIDERATIONS OF SIX MEANES NECESSARY TO ATTAINE FAITH All wanting in the Protestants and suppressed by their doctrine of the Priuate Spirit CHAP. I. Of these six meanes which they be SECT 1. THOVGH according to S. Hierome Haereses ad originem reuocare refut are est To reduce heresies to their origen is to refute them that is to shew not only the tyme when they did begin but also the head or foūtaine from whence they did spring is a sufficient proofe both of their nouelty and falsity so to haue shewed the Priuate Spirit to haue beene the origen Mother which hath begot all late heresyes which as a brood of such a Damme haue descended from her which in the first Part is fully performed is a sufficient proofe that the same heresyes are degenerate from all diuine Verity and are as so many poisoned streames descended from an infected fountaine And though all Sect-maisters who disclaime delude the vsual receaued grounds of Christian religiō such as are Scripture Tradition Church Councels Sea Apostolike and Fathers and appeale euery man to his owne Priuate Spirit do make this their Spirit the origē of their fayth which also in the former part is I hope sufficiently and copiously conuinced that the chiefe and prime Protestants before cited haue done might suffice to conuince their doctrine of falsity for that it is descended frō a Mother of such impiety Though I say this that hath beene thus proued might be a sufficient motiue to breed a dislike of this Priuate Spirit and of the doctrine springing from it yet because that out of it all sorts and sects of heresyes especially lately engendred haue issued as so many vipers out of a dunghill and because the confutation of it is the confutation of all heresies in their origen and as it were a brusing of all late nouell opinions in the head or a strangling of them togeather wiih their Mother in her wombe for to proue the fountaine to be poisoned is to proue the streame to be infected and to conuince the Mother of adultery is to proue the child liable
expounded by their priuate spirit containes all the articles of their fayth We Catholiks do professe to belieue first al that which haue been wrot by the Apostles or Prophets in holy Scripture that in the whole bookes of Scripture as anciently they were by a Councell of Carthage S. Augustine others receaued all in that sense as it was by ancient Church expounded 2. all that which hath been by the same Apostls deliuered to posterity by word of mouth and tradition 3. all that which hath beene declared to vs out of Scripture or Tradition by definition of generall Councells 4. all that which by continuance of practise hath beene by holy Church euer reuealed 5. all that which by vnanimous consent of holy and learned Doctours Fathers and Saints hath beene belieued in this we differ and haue the aduantage for the articles we belieue Secondly for the formall obiect of finall resolution of Fayth they belieue what they belieue eyther for that their sense doth so perceaue it or for that their reason doth so persuade it or for that their priuate spirit doth so suggest it and so they make their sense or their reason or their owne priuate spirit and phantasie the formall motiue and finall resolution of their Fayth We belieue what we do belieue for that God hath reuealed it and that not a new and to some one in particuler but anciently to the Apostles and by them generally to all their successours and by successiō to vs so that our doctrine and our beliefe of it is grounded not vpon any our owne sense our owne reason our owne priuate conceit all most fallible and most subiect to illusion and deceit but vpon Gods diuine reuelation as he is the prime verity and verity it selfe and that not newly but of ancient euer since Christ reuealed that not personal made to me or one alone but Apostolical first reuealed to the Apostles themselues that not priuate to euery one seuerally but generall to all faithfull vniuersally that not interrupted at certaine tymes by fits and to certaine persons made knowne but continued by succession at all times by all faithfull and in all places receaued that not fallible without ground subiect to priuate illusion but most infallibly grounded vpon diuine reuelation and Church proposition subiect neither to be deceaued nor yet do deceaue and in this we differ and haue the aduantage for the meanes of Fayth eternall Thirdly for the inward assistance of Gods grace and the cooperation of it they challenge only certayne motions or flashes of a fickle spirit which whether it be by illumination or illusion whether of grace or nature whether supernaturall of God sensuall of nature or diabolicall of Sathan they haue no meanes to discerne or ground to be certaine and by it as dust by a whirle wind they are carryed vp and downe in a round without freedome reason or operation of their owne to what fancy and conceit it violently wheels and forces them We are assisted and enabled by the diuine guift of an internall and permanent spirit or habit of faith which infused into vs and alwayes remayning in vs is at any instant ready with vs and the cooperation of grace in vs to worke both a pious inclination of the will to dispose it without obstinacy obediently to consent and also an actuall assent of the vnderstanding illuminating and enabling it firmely to assent to what is reuealed and proposed Also we admit and receaue besides this habituall Grace other actuall and diuers motions of grace and of it some either excitant first to excite moue vs or adiuuant to assist vs being moued some either operant which workes in vs without vs and our cooperation or cooperant which workes in vs togeather with vs and our cooperation with it some either sufficient by which we are enabled to be conuerted or efficient by which we are actually conuerted And in this we differ from them and haue the aduantage for the meanes of faith internall both for the will and vnderstanding Fourthly for the credible testimonies and motiues of persuasion which may in reason persuade any man prudently to accept any religion as worthy of credit They haue not any which may either induce any which was neuer of it nor reduce any which are fallen from it or establish any who are entred into it that their faith doctrine and religion is credible as is before proued We haue many those forcible reasons perswasions and credibilities which may in prudence persuade any Pagan neuer admitted to it or Heretike reuolted from it or Catholike setled in it that our faith doctrine religion and Church may and ought prudently to be accepted is credible and worthy of beliefe We haue Vnity with the ancient and primitiue Church with the learned and holy Doctours and Fathers with the holy Saints and Martyrs whose faith and life we professe to imbrace imitate We haue Vnity with one head our chiefe Bishop and Pastour whose definitiue sentence doth resolue our doubts doth decide our controuersies doth end our contentions in faith and manners We haue Vnity of faith among our selues all of vs though distant in place though different in manners though contending for temporall state or dominion yet liuing and agreeing in obedience to one spirituall Superiour in vnity of one faith in conformity of one seruice sacraments and ceremonies We haue Sanctity and Holynesse both of doctrine which giues holy precepts and rules to auoid sinne for the loue of God feare of hel to seeke perfection by mortification internall supressing our selfe-will selfe-loue and selfe-conceit and externall taming our passions affections with pennance of fasting watching discipline and the like And also of Good life by frequent exercise of prayer meditation contemplation by dayly practise of pennance of patience in persecution by perfect resignation to holy Obedience Pouerty Chastity We haue Miracles those frequent apparent of prophesying curing of all diseases raising dead dispossessing of Diuels the like all wrought in confirmation either of our faith or sanctity all for the conuersion of Pagans and Heretikes of which in all ages tymes we haue many memorable of most nations now Christian conuerted to our Religion We haue Vniuersality not only of Name by retayning the title of Catholikes by which we are vsually distinguished from al sects no sect doth vsurpe it to distinguish them one from another but also of Place as being generally dispersed in all the parts of the world Europe Asia Africa America and also of Tyme as being reputed the old Religion and being indeed so old as haue byn yeares since Christ his Apostles who institued and imbraced it We haue continued Succession and Ordination of Prelates and Bishops manifestly orderly deduced
without interruption of persons or chang of doctrine by a perfect enumeration of successours Apostles and Apostolical Seas vntill this present tyme these our present Prelates Patriarches and Popes We haue the rare examples of millions of Martyrs Confessours Virgins who haue with their bloud life defended and honoured our confessed Faith Doctrine the strange punishments of persecuting Pagans Iews Heretikes who haue with their sword and cruelty opposed and persecuted it In all which we differ from them and haue the aduantage of them in credible motiues 5. For infallible proponent cause as they do not require or assigne any yea as before do expresly reiect all chiefly the true that is Church authority so they cannot produce any which either can be a proponent cause or if it could is yet either infallible or so much as credible for them selues and their Religion For their scripture is not to them a proponent but if it were true scripture a reuealing cause because in it is reuealed truth of which reuelatiō there is need of a proponent cause to declare which is scripture which is among many the true sense of it Their priuate spirit which yet they make their proponent cause is so farre from being either infallible or credible that it is not only most fallible and subiect to deceaue yea and actually doth deceaue and hath deceaued so many but also most incredible without any apparence of probability eyther to them who haue it or to others who follow it that it can be true or direct and declare any truth at all We haue a proponent cause so certaine and infallible which is Church authority that it hath for the infallibility of it the predictions of Prophets the promises of Christ the declaration of the Apostls the confirmation of miracles the approbation of holy Fathers the practise of all antiquity what not all to proue the verity and infallibility of it in directing and declaring to vs what and why we are to belieue And in this proponent cause also we differ and that principally from the Protestants and so haue the aduantage prerogatiue ouer them in the externall meanes and so in all the meanes required to fayth For the priuate spirit in particuler if it were a sole necessary ground meanes of fayth as the Protestants without ground suppose it if euery Christiā lawfully might necessarily ought to rely vpon it which yet none can for the certainty of his Fayth Religion if it were a secure ground to build vpon and a certaine meanes as it is not to attaine to true fayth and saluation yet with as great reason yea with more probability might we Catholikes both chalenge it rely vpon it then the Protestants may or cā And 1. for the certainty of the spirit that they haue infallibly the spirit of God more then we what can they chalēge for it more then we What certainty can they claime more then we If they alleadge their bare word say they haue it we can alleadge ours and say also we haue it If they alleadge Scripture say they haue it for them we also can alledge the same and say we haue it for vs yea and had it before them for that they had what they haue of it from vs. If they alleadge they haue the true sense of Scripture for them and their priuate spirit we can alleage we haue the same and the same meanes to attaine it as they many of vs haue as great learning and knowledge in tongues as they as great a care and desire of truth as they as diligent paines and industry as they as feruent prayer and deuotion to find and obtaine it as they If they alleadge the sense and feeling of this spirit within them we can alleadge and feele as much sensible deuotion and more spirituall as many inspiratiōs illuminations these more certain as great promptnes and readines to obey Gods motions that with more humility then they yea in all these we haue and can alleadge more then they 1. The conformity in iudgement with the ancient Fathers Councels and Church with whome we agree 2. The direction and authority of our holy Mother the spouse of Christ our Church which we obey 3. The subordination and vnion of our selues with our Pastours Superiours of the Church to whome we are subiect subordinate And all this haue we more then they all making vs more certaine then they all better grounded then they So that we may confidently say with the Apostle In quo quis audet audeo ego VVhat they dare we dare what they can we can what they may chalenge for the probability of their spirit we can may chalenge the same yea more then they plus ego with more reason and probability vpon better safety security In the certainty therfore of this spirit if it be secure we are equall with them yea many degrees aboue them Secondly For the necessity of hauing the true spirit of God in vs and the efficacy or effect of the operation of it with vs we Catholikes are so far from denying either that we hould a necessity and that absolute of both affirming that as a principle of our faith that no person whatsoeuer cā truly and duly belieue any article of faith much lesse al nor do any one worke auailable to saluation much lesse saue his soule without the special presence assistāce of the grace or spirit of God in him In as much therfore as concerns the necessary being and working of this spirit of grace of God in vs in some thinges we and the Protestantes agree in other we differ We agree 1. In that both of vs graunt and require an operation and assistance of this spirit of God not only to true faith but also to good life 2. In that both of vs do graunt require this operatiō to be so necessary in euery one that neither right faith nor vpright life can be attained or performed but by it that as the prime principal cause and agent 3. In that both of vs do graunt require this necessary and operating spirit to be so priuate particuliar internall in euery one that it hath an effectual operation or cooperation in him that so effectual that to it is attributed the effect of our conuersion saluation And thus farre we agree Thirdly We differ frō them in these 1. In the name vsual manner of appellation for we cal it the grace of God which as before is of diuers sortes some gratis giuen as the guift of languages cures c. some iustifying as Faith Hope Charity some actuall as excitant adiuuant operant cooperant sufficient effectual the rest before mentioned They call it the spirit or priuate spirit or motion of God as inspiring and working whatsoeuer good is wrought in them 2. We
differ in the extension of it for we affirme this grace to be extended offered and giuen sufficiently though not effectually to all so that all and euery one of reason haue sufficient meanes and ability to know God by Faith and to loue him by Charity so far as is needfull for their saluation They affirme their spirit to be restrayned offered and giuen only to the elect faithfull whome they make all one and that all others neither haue nor can haue it but are by the absolut will and decree of God debarred from it therby made incapable of it 3. We differ in the manner of operation of it for we affirme that grace doth worke or cooperate with vs and we with it so that the grace of God and our Free-will as two concurring causes though Grace the more principall do ioyntly effect and produce euery good worke of Faith Hope or Charity or the rest in vs whereby our good works haue of grace that they are diuine supernaturall and of our selues that they are voluntary and free of both that they are meritorious of more grace present in vs and of glory in heauen to come to vs. They doe attribute so much to the worke of their spirit in them that they take away all cooperation of our free-will in vs wherby they make man as dead without all action or operation to any spirituall and good workes make the spirit soâ—e whole worker of all in man Fourthly We differ in the nature and permanency of this grace or spirit for we acknowledge grace to be an inherent quality permanent guift infused into our soule which doth enlighten enable our vnderstanding to giue assent by faith to the diuine mysteries proposed and inspire our will to be sorrowfull by contrition for our sins committed which guift once infused is not so permanent perpetuall but that the habit of Charity is lost by mortall sinne against Charity the habit of Hope by desperation against hope the habit of faith by infidelity against faith They or many of theÌ„ deny all infused guifts of faith hope charity or the rest admit only a transeunt motion or operatioÌ„ of the spirit which working in man without mans cooperation when what how and in whome it pleaseth is neuer totally or finally lost after it be receaued doth make a man alwayes faythfull and beloued of God and doth giue that vertue to all his workes though neuer so bad that they make them gratefull and acceptable to him so that according to them no worke of a faithfull man though neuer so bad can make any enmity betweene God him God neither imputing it as an offence to him nor man incurring the displeasure of God for it Fiftly We differ in the effect and operation assigned to it for we assigne the function and office for example Of the guift of faith to be the eleuation enabling of our Vnderstanding to giue assent to what is reuealed by God deliuered in scripture or tradition and proposed by Church authority Of the guift of hope to be the inflammation of the soule to loue God as our chiefest end to desire him as our greatest Good to hope for him as our good absent and to delight in him as our good present Of the guift of charity or grace to be the forgiuenes of our sinnes the sanctification of our soule adoption to be the sonnes of God title and right to the kingdome of heauen and a valew dignity of merit to our good workes They assigne to their priuate spirit a double effect the one of proposing the obiect the other of working in the subiect In respect of the obiect it proposeth to them what they are to belieue and why they are to beleeue it and how they are to know both In respect of the subiect it workes in them say they a firme and infallible assurance of all the former thinges belieued so that they stand sure and certaine not only of the Scripture the sense of it and of their doctrine and verity of it but also of their spirit that it is of the Lord and of their saluation that it is as due to them as it is to vse Caluins owne words due to Christ and that they can no more loose heauen then can Christ nor be no more damned then can Christ In which they attribute to their priuate spirit all the reason of credibility exteriour and all the operation interiour both in the will and vnderstanding which they haue of the certainty of all their faith and saluation By all which is apparent that as they made it the sole ground foundation which is in the former part at large proued on which their faith is built so they make it the sole meanes as is here proued and the totall cause materiall formall finall and efficient both exteriourly reuealing proposing and persuading and interiourly working or rather deluding them in the obstinacy rather then certainty of their supposed faith And this priuate spirit and this effect of it is that which they rest vpon and that which in this second Part we intend by the assistance of Gods grace to confute and disproue THE PRIVATE SPIRITS INTERPRETATION OF HOLY SCRIPTVRE Deciding of controuersies iudging of mysteries of Fayth coÌ„futed by holy Scripture CHAP. II. Out of 1. S. Iohn 4. 1. S. Paul 1. Tim. 4.11 Act. 20.30 2. S. Pet. 2. describing this Spirit SECT I. THE holy Ghost in holy Writ borh foreseeing and also forshewing to vs the abuse of this priuate spirit the better to forewarne vs of it to arme vs against it doth not only in generall as it doth many other abuses but euen in particuler and as it were on set purpose both plainely decipher and describe it also fully confute and condemne it Out of it therefore we will draw our first arguments of confutation and by it conuince of falsity this deceitfull and deceauing spirit And first to begin with the new Testament for the more full instruction of our selues and the plainer confutation of this spirit I will for one proofe conioine in one argument the testimonies of the chiefest Apostles that is of S. Iohn S. Peter and S. Paul First S. Iohn 1. epist chap. 4 v. 1. doth plainely giue admonitions against this spirit 1 Belieue not euery spirit 2 but try the spirits if they be of God Secondly both S. Iohn and S. Paul doe giue the reasons why we should not belieue but try these spirits S. Iohn v. 2. Because many false spirits are gone out into the world S. Paul 1. Tim. 4.11 Because in the last tymes certaine shall depart from the fayth attending to spirits of errour and doctrine of Diuells Againe 2. Cor. 11.14 For that Satan himselfe doth transfigure himselfe into an Angell of light that is doth make shew of workes of piety iustice and deuotion thereby to allure men by opinioÌ„
punishment it brings with it is woe to the foolish Prophets v. 3. woe to them that sow cushions and make pillowes I will destroy the wall and accomplish my indignation in it my hand shall be vpon the Prophets in the councell of my people shall they not be and in the Scripture of the house of Israell they shall not be written neither shall they enter into the land of Israell v. 9. They shall diuine no more and I will deliuer my people out of their hands v. 21.23 Loe heere is described the nature the authour the effect and the punishment of this spirit In all which if we compare spirit with spirit person with person effect with effect and punishment with punishement we shall find the priuate spirit of the Protestants properly described in this false spirit of the false Prophets This false spirit of the false Prophets was a spirit of their owne a spirit of their owne hart that is of their owne inuention according to their fancy because as sayth the Prophet Hieremy They did falsely prophecy to you in my name and I sent them not sayth our Lord. The priuate spirit of the Protestants is a spirit of euery mans owne and his owne hart euery one hath his owne spirit and that priuate and singular to himselfe Euery one sayth his spirit is of the Lord whereas our Lord hath not sent either them or their spirit These false Prophets were some men some women all Prophetes of Israell v. 1. Daughters of my people v. 17. all reputed among the faythfull children of God and yet false Prophetes and false Prophetesses were they both The Protestants who chalenge this spirit are all Prophets that is interpreters of the word of God they are in their opinion all faithfull elect children of God all endued with this spirit which is giuen to all common to al men women by it euery one of them doth prophecy and interprete Scripture The fruits and effects of this spirit were Blindenesse Vanity Lying and Deceit by which they in hypocrisy made faire shew of piety but within wanted temper of good morter of true piety to daw be their wall and with flattery layd soft cushiōs of hopefull promisses vnder the elbowes of euery mans humour to please their fancy and all to catch soules and deceaue Gods people v. 10.18 The Protestants spirit which vaunts so much of knowledge verity sincerity and piety what is it but a trappe baited with so many faire baites to catch so many soules Their Church what is it but a wall without temper or morter of the true spirit or word of God to vphould it from falling and erring Their doctrine what is it but cushions and pillowes of faire promises of certainty of truth and saluation deceauing all who belieue it Killing or denouncing damnation to them who dye not and Viuificating or assuring saluation to them who liue not Their Preachers or Prophetes what are they but as their blind vaine lying and deceitfull spirit by which they are guided that is men most blind in errours of doctrine most vaine in ostētation of truth most lying in falsely accusing others and most deceitfull in shifts euasions against manifest truth Lastly as the punishment which fell vpon these Prophets their blind lying vaine deceitfull spirit was not only a woe and a curse of Gods indignation against them a diuision dissolution of the wall among themselues but also a separation of them from the councell of Gods people from the house of Israel and from entrance into the land of promise so the punishment which fals vpon this spirit them who are deluded by it is no lesse then a dissolution of all vnity in Religion a separation from the Church of God from the body of Christ from the society of Saints from the vnity of whose spirit by the singularity of this their priuate spirit as they are separated in this life so by incurring the woe indignation of God against them as well as the former Prophets they must needs be diuided from him and his kingdome in the next life And this is the fruit of this spirit in all Prophets and professours of it and the end and punishment of them who are conducted by it Out of which it followes 1. That as this priuate spirit was in the old Prophets so it is in these new Preachers interpreters of the word of God as in them it inuented new and false prophecies and predictions so in these it deuiseth new and false errours in fayth and vaine and deceitfull expositions of scripture 2. That as in them it was a spirit of blindenesse lyes vanity and deceit by which many were lead into dangerous and damnable errours fell into great and grieuous punishments so in these Preachers and interpreters it hath the same effect and brings vpon them the like punishments 3. That as then before Christ this spirit possessed and seduced both men and women prophets prophetesses so now euer since Christ it hath done the same as S. Hierome notes of the tymes before him Simon Magus had his Helene Nicolaus his troupes of women Marcion his Minion sent before him to Rome Montanus his Prisca Priscilla Ptolomeus his Flora Apelles his Philomela Arius the Emperours sister Donatus his rich Sucilla Elpidus his Agape and Priscilianus his Galla all prophetesses of like spirit with the prophets all hands and helpers to diuulge their heresies So in these our later dayes euery new maister had his mistris and euery Preacher his partner all participant of the same spirit thus had Dulcinus his Margaret Luther his Catherine Caluin his Ideletta Buraea Beza his Candida and euery new Doctour as Carolostadius Oecolampadius Bucerus Martyr Sanctius and who not euery one his sister and yoake-fellow in the spirit of the Lord. Out of all which I conclude argue thus That spirit cannot be a fit interpreter of scripture nor a sufficient iudge of controuersyes which is a spirit of euery one 's owne hart a spirit blind lying vaine and deceitfull a spirit seducing men women a spirit which separates from the society of the faythfull and infers a woe and indignation of God But such is the priuate spirit which in the old Law seduced false Prophets and in the new Law deludeth the false Preachers as holy Scripture of the former experience of the later doe both testify Therfore this priuate spirit cannot be a sufficient iudge of Fayth a fit interpreter of holy Scripture Out of Iob 32. declaring in Eliu his friends spirit the manner of proceeding of this priuate spirit SECT V. A Fifth proofe is out of Iob 32. The patience of Iob hauing beene tryed in the losse of his cattle his family his children and in the vexation of his body vpbraiding by his wife was after all this assaulted by his friends These sayth the Glosse represent the fashions of Heretikes
who vnder the shew of aduising vse the arte of seducing for which Iob before he began to dispute with them sayd he would shew them to be Fabricatores mendacij cultores falsorum dogmatum 13.4 Framers of lies and worshipers of false opinions Of these three of them being conuinced by the speaches of Iob and made silent therby the fourth Eliu the Busite a young man of a more feruent spirit the sonne of Ram that is Excelsus or Proud a new maister riseth vp angry against Iob because he sayd he was iust before God v. 2. against his friends because they could not answere Iob with reason v. 3.5 And beginning first to commend himselfe and his silence Because I was young I was affraid to speake and then to condemne his elders saying That the ouldest are not the wisest neither doe the old wen vnderstand iudgment And lastly to shew of what race he is come and to our purpose he sayes As I see the spirit is in man and the inspiration of the omnipotent doth giue vnderstanding v. 8. and I also will answere my part and will shew my knowledge for I am full of wordes and the spirit of my belly streyneth me behould my belly is as new wine without a vent which breaketh new vessels I will speake and take breath a little I will open my lippes and will answere v. 18.19.20 God hath made me as he hath made thee chap. 33. v. 6. Heare yee wise mē my words and yee learned harken to me cap. 34. v. 2. Heere is a description of a new spirit and of one full of it a Caluinist or Puritan in the highest degree he hath the spirit of God the inspiration of the Omnipotent vnderstanding aboue others his belly is full of the spirit and words seeking vent as wine out of a new vessell he will speake talke and answere that which his Auncestours and wise men could not he hath reason which they had not he is inspired by the Omnipotent which they are not he is inspired that Iob is vniust because he sayd He was iust before God v. 2. that the ancients are destitute of wisedome and iudgment of the spirit of God of all truth verity that he hath the spirit of truth and that all truth is to be learned of him this spirit in a hoat Puritan sayth as Sedechias the false Prophet who had a lying spirit in his mouth sayd to Micheas the true Prophet Hath the spirit of the Lord left me and hath it spoken to thee No sure for the spirit of God hath forsaken the whole Church to which yet it was promised by Christ so that it hath erred is fallen and become Antichristian but the spirit is certainly in me it infallibly teaches me truth tels me the meaning of scripture assures me of saluation it cannot depart from me and my mouth the mouth of my seed for euer thus sayth the Caluinist out of his spirit as this Eliu and Sedechias sayd out of theirs Out of which I argue thus That spirit which is the same with the spirit of these false Prophets who were so seduced and armed by it against the Saintes and Prophets of God cannot be a fit spirit to interprete Scripture iudge of doctrin and to make a sole ground of beliefe but such is the priuate spirit now and alwayes hath beene in all former Heretiks and false Prophets therefore it cannot be a fit iudge of controuersies and an infallible interpreter of Scriptures Out of Tit. 3.10 shewing the spirit of an Hereticke SECT VI. THE sixth proofe is taken out of an admonition giuen by S. Paul against Heretikes Tit. 3.10 in these wordes A man that is an Heretike after the first and second admonition auoid knowing that he that is such an one is subuerted sinneth being condemned by his owne iudgement In which wordes we are to note First who is an Heretike that is to be auoided 2. The reason why he is to be auoided First therfore as Heresy is a voluntary errour in the vnderstanding against some verity of Fayth obstinatly defended by him who hath once belieued so an Heretike is he who hauing once professed the Christian fayth doth erre in some article of it doth with obstinacy defend his errour for which is requisite 1. That he haue receaued the Christian fayth at least in Baptisme by professing it 2. That he erre in some point or points of fayth not in al for then he is an Apostata 3. That he be obstinate in his opinion or errour of which sort are not they who according to S. Augustine defend their opinions though false and peruerse with no stubborne stomack or obstinate hart especially if it be such as themselues by bold presumption broached not but receaued it of their deceaued parents and doe seeke the truth warily and carefully being ready to be reformed if they find it such These are not to be reputed among obstinate Heretikes But those according to the same S. Augustine Who in the Church of God haue any crazed and peruerse opinion if being admonished to be of a sound and right opinion they resist obstinatly and will not amend their pestiferous opinions but persist in the defence of them are thereby become Heretikes going forth out of the Church and are counted for enemies that exercise vs. Againe He i◠an Heretike that when the doctrine of the Catholike fayth is made plaine and manifest to him had rather resist it and chose that which himselfe held According to whome and the Doctours of our tyme he is sayd to be obstinate in heresy who willing witting doth maintaine any thing against the Catholike Church or which is all one who knowes and reflectes that his opinion is contrary to the sentence of the Catholike Church and yet neglecting the authority of the Church which proposeth it for true doth persist in his opinion And this is an Heretike who after admonition being growne thus obstinate is to be auoyded reiected and refuted Secondly the reason why we are to auoyd an Heretike is because that such an one sinneth in obstinacy and is subuerted without hope of amendement being condemned by his owne iudgement 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is sayth Tertullian Because he chose that for which he is damned by willfully adherring to his owne opinion and conceit where the origen of his sinne subuersion and condemnation is his prefering his owne selfe-seeming conceit before the determination of the whole Church of God which is proper to those who rely vpon their owne spirit and prefer it before all euen the whole Church of God Out of which it followes first that the origen of all heresies is a mans owne proper and priuate conceit which he preferring before the iudgement of the whole Church chooseth to follow his owne opinion rather then the determination of the Church And out of this I argue thus All who rely and build vpon
S. Augustine affirme the Bishops of Palestine to haue expounded that of Rom. 5. in whome all sinned of originall sinne deriued from Adam by propagation not imitation only By this same practise of the Church praying for the conuersion of Infidels and perseuerance of the faythfull did he proue against the same Pelagians grace of predestination and perseuerance By the same practise did he reconcile those places of Scripture of eating all that is set before vs and of not eating with sinners And to omit many other by the same practise of the Church not rebaptizing them baptized by Heretikes did he refuse to adhere to S. Cyprian and his opinion and confuted him and all the Bishops of Africa Cappadocia Bythinia and the rest who maintained the contrary And to conclude by this practise which he had learned publikly Eusebius did also alleadge Iustinus Miltiades Tatian Clemens Irenaeus Meliton and others against Artemon The same that did these Fathers did also the generall Councels The first Councell of Nice by the testimonyes which they had from the Fathers witnes Athanasius did decree against Arius The Councell of Ephesus following the confessions of the Fathers sayth it selfe and alleadging sayth Vincent Lyr. in particuler Most of the East and VVest Doctours as Maisters Confessours witnesses Iudges held their doctrine followed their counsell belieued their testimony obeyed their iudgment and so pronounced their sentence of fayth against Nestorius The Councell of Calcedon following sayth it selfe the holy Fathers the faith of the Fathers the exposition of the Fathers doth determine what is pious and Catholike fayth against Eutiches The sixth generall Councell witnesse both the letters of Pope Agatho and the Synode it selfe doth produce the testimonyes of Fathers for the exposition of scripture and thereby condemned the Monothelites The seauenth generall Councell and the second of Nice doth the same witnesse the letters of Pope Adrian against the Image-breakers And the Councell of Vienna witnesse the letters of Pope Clement in their definitions So that all antiquity whether in priuate disputations or in publike definitions hath alwayes vsed the testimony of Fathers as a meane in declaring the authenticall sense of scripture against Heretikes The fourth and most infallible meane of expounding the Scripture is a Councell either generall or prouinciall confirmed by a generall in which whatsoeuer is not obiter by the way nor as a proofe only but on set purose and as a conclusion or definition deliuered and defined that is without all question or examination to be receaued as a certaine infallible and authenticall sense of scripture Which to omit all testimonies before cyted for the authority of Councels is proued by the practise of the faythfull in all Councels for in the Nicen Councell were many places of scriptures for proofe of the consubstantiality of Christ produced and discussed and the Orthodoxe Fathers vrged and pressed diuers Texts of the same The Arians answered and interpreted them and vrged likwise many against the same The conclusion was the Fathers of the Councell preuailed and concluded both the doctrine of Christs diuinity the sense of the places of Scripture alleadged for it This definition was to all posterity so forcible that though the Arians vsed all force of temporall power which afterward was wholy for them though they summoned as Athanasius saith aboue ten Coūcels or Conuenticles against that one though they sought in a Councell at Hierusalem to restore their Bishops deposed and in a Councell at Antioch to bring in a new forme of faith couched in words not vnlike to the Nicene forme and in a Councell at Smirna did affirme craftily the Sonne to haue beene before his mother and before all times and not a creature like to others though in the Councell at Ariminum they deceaued many Catholicke Bishops and cunningly obtruded 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 like substance for the same substance which in greek differed only in a letter though they sent Legates into Italy France and al places with faire shewes and promises of vnion of subscribing and of submitting themselues but cunningly and disemblingly as the Protestants did at the first and chiefly Melanchton Bucer about Transubstantiation yet to all posterity and succeeding ages those places of scripture haue euer beene receaued and beleiued in that sense which the Councell then interpreted and vrged them so that that Councel hath beene a rule euer since for the exposition of them to all faithfull and true belieuers in Christ In like manner in the Councell of Ephesus hauing discussed diuers places before controuerted whether they were spoken of the natures or persons of Christ resolued that they were to be vnderstood of plurality of natures not persons in Christ And though Nestorius the eloquent Patriarch of Constantinople and many Bishops with him withstood the Councell and though Theodoret the most learned Catholicke Bishop of that age long opposed S. Cyrill about the same yet the authority of the Councell so far preuailed both then and euer since that all faithfull euer after haue alwayes receaued expounded them in the same sense as true and condemned the contrary as false And the like might be produced of other places for the humanity of Christ against the Manichees and Apollinarists For his two natures against the Eutichians and Monothelites For the holy Ghost against the Macedonians Eunomians And so for transubstantiation against Berengarius and the Sacramentaries which for breuity are omitted And thus much of these foure rules or meanes to wit 1. The rule of Faith 2. The practise of the Church 3. The consent of Fathers and 4. The decrees of Councels by which the Pastours and Prelates of Gods Church are to be directed and vpon which we may infallibly rely for any true certaine authenticall infallible sense of scripture There be other helps which are good and profitable as the consideration of the antecedents and consequences of places the conference of one place with another the obseruation of Scripture-phrases and the skill examination of the originall texts but because they are neither certaine nor infallible but only probable yea often doubtfull and somtimes deceitfull nor yet proper and peculiar to Christians but cōmon to Iewes Pagans Heretiks and all sortes and also not to our purpose for the present therfore we will omit them and shew that the priuate spirit which the Protestants most insist vpon and which we vndertake to confute neither is nor can be any certaine and infallible meanes of interpreting scripture as they do both in doctrine and pactise mantaine That the priuate spirit cannot haue this infallible authority and be this infallible meanes SECT II. THESE being supposed for the finding out the authority certaine and meanes necessary for true interpretation of holy scripture it remaines to be proued that the priuate spirit of euery particular man neither hath in it any certainty or authority nor yet
and the Parlament ordaines all which are against vnity and certainty of al faith and religioÌ„ Lastly it would follow that for 300. years after Christ wheÌ„ the Emperours were pagan and not Christian either pagans must be iudges and deciders of the true sense of scripture and of all controuersies of faith or that there was for that time no iudge of them at al also when Princes become hereticks as Constantius and Valens did or Apostata's as Iulian did that either true Christians should be obliged to obey and follow Pagans Apostata's as iudges and vmpiers of their faith or else that they by falling into heresy or apostacy should loose their regall power and authority and subiects should be freed from their duty and obedience to them None of which our Protestants will admit as being indeed too too absurd The Lay-people cannet be this Iudge SECT IIII. FOVRTHLY that this infallible authority is not in the lay people and priuate persons of the Church is proued 1. Because they want knowledge and vnderstanding to discusse and penetrate either the articles which are belieued or the meanes for which they are to be belieued as being for the most part men simple and vnlearned for which cause they were neuer admitted to any Councels as Arbitrators or Iudges of faith but alwaies directed by their Pastours in their obedience to faith 2. Because they haue no warrant or commission giuen them for this end either expressed in any Scripture or approued by any Tradition or practise of the Church or mentioned by any testimony of Fathers or Councels therfore are not to assume or exercise it till they proue it 3. Because of al sortes they are the most fallible vncertaine and vnconstant in their opinions and practises and therfore are left alwayes to be ruled ordered as the people are in the temporall common-wealth not to rule and gouerne as Magistrates and Iudges 4. Because it would follow that all should be Iudges Pastours to determine none should be subiects to obey or sheepe to be fed that the Church gouernment should be Democraticall of people which of all is the worst that euery maÌ„ should haue a religion of his owne without any vnion with any or subordination to any that the people should preach and minister Sacraments as well as Priests or Prelates should excommunicate censure and punish one another as well as Bishops make decrees for faith and manners as wel as Councels In respect of all which inconueniences and absurdities which are so many testimonies against this authority of the people our Sauiour did speake to the people in parables and without parables he did not speake to them but to the Apostles and Pastours he gaue knowledge of the mysteries of the kingdome of heauen To the people he spake of things easy and publicke as their sins and vices vertues good life but to the Apostles and that separated from the people of his death resurrection the holy Ghost the day of iudgment and such like mysteries With the people he did conuerse before his death not after his resurrection he manifested not himselfe to all the people but to the Apostles as Pastours and witnesses preordained of God he appeared after his resurrectioÌ„ did eate and drinke with them and commaunded them only not the vulgar sort to preach to the people To the people it is said Obey your Prelats be subiect to them but to the Pastours take heed to the whole flocke wherin the holy Ghost hath placed you Bishops to rule the Church of God To the people it is said suffer the cockle to grow but to the Pastours take away the euil one from among your selues To the people it is said do that which they the Pastours say but to the Pastours He who heareth you heareth me and he that knoweth God heareth vs. By heaâ—ing of them is knowne which is the spirit of truth which of errour Of the people it is said How shall they belieue him whome they haue not heard how shall they heare without a preacher But of the Pastours How shall they preach vnlesse they be sent All which conuince that our Sauiour intended to make the people not Pastours but sheep not rulers but subiects not iudges to commaund but seruants to obey in matters of faith and religion The Scripture cannot be this Iudge SECT V. FIFTLY That the scripture cannot be this iudge to determyne and end al controuersies is proued 1. Because this scripture in respect of vs requires a iudge it selfe to determine and assure vs which is true Canon true originall text true translation true sense the rest as before therefore to vs it cannot be a iudge 2. Because all or the greatest difficulties all or the maynest questions and all oâ— the hoatest contentioÌ„s which haue passed either among Catholike Doctours or betweene Catholicks and Hereticks are about the scripture and the sense of it none of which scripture it selfe could euer yet end and decide without some other iudge and vmpier plainly to pronounce sentence in the cause and immediatly vnder punishment to oblige the parties to belieue and obey the sentence 3. Because the scripture is mute dumbe vnable to speake heare or pronounce sentence and is apt not only to be lost alteted and corrupted as de facto it hath beene but also to be drawne wrested and interpreted to contrary senses and opinions by any sort of interpreters in any cause and question as the lamentable practise of so many hundred of heresies hereticks in all ages doth witnesse 4. Because the scripture in it selfe is neither cleare and euident nor doth euidently and expresly containe and declare all the senses of it selfe all the mysteries of beliefe all the questions of controuersies all doubtes in diuinity many things being both now by Protestants and Catholicks belieued and hauing beene by all faithfull in all ages practised which neither for practise were grouÌ„ded vpoÌ„ only scripture nor for the doctrine of theÌ„ are expressed in any scripture 5. Because many haue beene conuerted to faith without any reading or knowledge of scripture many controuersies haue beene decided without any sentence of scripture many faithfull haue liued in the world and beene directed in their faith before any writing of scripture As for example all in the old Law for 3000. yeares before Moyses all in the new law for a good time after the sending of the holy Ghost dispersion of the Apostles and many nations after Christ for 200. years who witnesse Irenaeus neuer did see nor heare of the bible and many thousands of saints and soules who did neuer see read heare or vnderstand any Scripture at all and yet did liue holily in earth and do raigne gloriously in heauen 6. In the scripture are two things the letter and the sense as the body the soule The letter according to S. Augustine doth kill that
of one point with another The first ground of all they make Gods free and irrespectiue election or predestination of some to his grace and saluation his like reiection condemnation of others to damnation 2. To these elect and only to them God giues true fayth and certaine assurance of their saluation 3. To these faythfull only to them he giues the infallible assistance of this his priuate spirit 4. To this spirit and only to it he giues the true and certaine vnderstanding of the holy Scipture the sense of it So that 1. Election 2. Fayth 3. The spirit 4. Vnderstanding of Scripture is as a chaine of many lincks whereof all are so connected euery one with another as he that hath one hath all and he that wantes one wantes all For say they the vnderstanding of scripture is giuen only to them and to all them who haue the spirit the spirit is giuen only to them and to all them who haue fayth Fayth is giuen only to them and to all them who are elect and so all and only the elect are faithfull all and only the faithfull haue the spirit all and only they that haue the spirit vnderstand Scripture And so à primo ad vltimum all ōly the elect must haue true fayth spirit and vnderstanding of Scripture In which election is the mother and foundation the vnderstāding of Scripture the fruit top of al their perfection This is the connexion of their doctrine concerning their faith and saluation Now as cōcerning the knowledge infallible assurance of all these which according to their groundes euery one of them must haue of himselfe to wit that he is elect faithfull and hath the true spirit of God the right vnderstanding of scripture As concerning I say the assurance of all these and the meanes of this assurance whereupon depends their saluation if any shall demand of them whereupon they ground this their certainty and assurance of all these that is their election fayth spirit scripture-sense which are inseparable and infallibly according to them ensuing one vpon another it will appeare by their answere that they haue no groundes at all but that they runne in a round and Circle rowling and wheeling from one ground or principle to another and from that to the former backe againe without any firme or setled groūd and resolution whereon to stay themselues and their fayth whereupon they skip forward and backward from one to another that is from the scripture to the spirit and from the spirit to the scripture againe from the spirit to fayth from faith to the spirit againe from faith to election and from election to fayth againe and so from election to scripture againe and from scripture to election backe againe For aske a Protestant how and by what meanes he vnderstands the Scripture He answers by the spirit And aske him how and by what meanes he knowes that he hath the true spirit He answers by Scripture And so knowes the scripture by the spirit and the spirit by scripture Againe aske him how and by what meanes he is assured of his faith He answers by his spirit and scripture but how is he sure of his spirit and scripture by his fayth backe againe Further aske him how and by what meanes he is assured of his election He answers by his fayth his spirit or the scripture and yet his election is the ground of his fayth spirit and vnderstanding of scripture So that 1. The scripture proues the spirit and the spirit the scripture 2. The spirit proues his fayth and his fayth the spirit 3. His faith proues his election and his election is the ground of his fayth with it of his spirit and knowledge of scripture also So that as many linckes as are in their chaine so many Circles and circular proofes are made by them and all in vaine and to no purpose at all as shall be shewed And first of their first circular proofe betweene the scripture and the spirit it shal be plainely proued that they fall directly and headlong into Aristotles proper and so much condemned Circle prouing the scripture by the spirit and the spirit by the scripture againe in one and the same kind of cause to one and the same person and by one sole and whole manner of proofe In all which we haue before cleared our selues and our doctrine from the obiected Circle against vs. For which we may obserue two principles of Protestant doctrine the one that the scripture only is the rule and meanes to come to the knowledge of the certainty of all thinges to be belieued wherupon they reiect all Tradition vnwritten word of God and rely only vpon the written word for the sole and complete rule of fayth The other that this written word is to be interpreted and vnderstood only by the spirit of the Lord which as it is particuler and priuate in euery man so euery man must be directed by his priuate spirit in the vnderstanding and interpreting of the scripture and in the collecting out of it what he is to belieue wherupō they reiect all authority of Church Councels or Fathers and make only the priuate spirit the Rule and Iudge of interpreting scripture as in the first part is at large proued Which being supposed it will euidently appeare how the Protestants runne this Circle betweene this priuate spirit and scripture For aske a Protestant how he knowes infallibly which is scripture and which is true sense of it He answeres by the internal testimony of the priuate spirit assuring him it is so Aske him how he infallibly knowes this his internall testimony of his spirit is the testimony of the holy Ghost He answers by the scripture assuring him it is so for my sheep heare my voice Aske him againe how he knowes infallibly this is scripture and this the true meaning of this scripture He runnes backe to the testimony of his spirit And againe how he knowes that this his testimony of his spirit is the spirit of God He returnes to the scripture againe Thus he wheeles in a round betweene scripture and spirit prouing the scripture by the spirit and the spirit by the scripture an vnknowne spirit by an vnknowne scripture and an vnknowne scripture by an vnknowne spirit one vnknowne by another as vnknowne And if Aristotle did hould it an absurd demonstration proof to proue the Conclusion by the premises and the premises againe by the conclusion in the same manner of proofe which was as he reasons as much as to proue A by B and againe B by A. which is either idem per seipsum or ignotum per aequè ig notum And if S. Augustine did count it absurd for the Manichees to proue their Fundamental Epistle to be Canonicall because Manes held it to be so and Manes to be a Prophet or Apostle because his Fundamētall Epistle did affirme him to be so wherein he
same absurd doctrine Secondly the same absurdity is inferred out of another of the Protestants vsually receaued position of doctrine which is That euery man shall be saued by only Fayth and that by a speciall Fayth by which he is bound infallibly to belieue that he shal be saued if he wil be saued out of which their receaued doctrine I reason thus Whatsoeuer euery man in particuler is bound to belieue as an article of Fayth necessary to his saluation that is true certaine whether he do belieue it or no. But euery man in particular is bound to belieue as an article of his faith necessary to his saluation according to the Protestants that he shal be saued Ergo That euery man in particuler shal be saued is true certaine according to the Protestants doctrine whether he belieue it or no. The Maior proposition is true and not deniable in any diuinity because all articles or points of Fayth which all are bound to belieue as necessary to saluation and vnder paine of damnation are most certainly true aeternae veritatis antecedenter and before they be actually belieued whether they be belieued or not by them who ought to belieue them For so that there is a blessed Trinity of three persons one God an Incarnation of the Sonne of God a Resurrection of the body and the like is certainely true in it selfe though the Arians Nestorians and other Heretikes doe not belieue it which yet they are bound to belieue as necessary to saluation Therefore if euery man be bound in like manner to belieue his owne saluation as certainly and as neccessarily as he is bound to belieue the B. Trinity Incarnation Resurrection that as an article of his fayth it followeth that his saluation is as certainly true as his Resurrection whether soeuer he do belieue or not belieue either or both of them and so it is inferred that he shal be saued as well as ryse againe though he do not belieue it which is confirmed because the obiect of Fayth or thing to be belieued hath in it eternall verity before the act of mans Fayth doe conceaue or belieue it and therefore is belieued because it is and before was true but is not made true because it is now belieued fayth not making but supposing his obiect which as it houlds true in the verity of the Resurrection Incarnatiō Trinity and others point of fayth which are belieued because they are true are true whether they be belieued or not so it must hould true in the verity of euery mans saluation if it be a point of euery mans fayth For if the certainty of his owne saluation be the obiect of euery mans fayth which he ought to belieue then the same certainty or obiect is true before it be belieued and so it is true that he shal be saued before he do belieue and true it is whether he so belieue or no. The Minor Proposition or subsumption that according to the Protestants euery mā is to belieue his owne Iustificatiō and Saluation is so certaine that it is their common receaued doctrine that Only Fayth doth iustify that this Only Fayth is a Speciall Faith that this Speciall Fayth hath for his only obiect which it belieues remission of his sins his Iustificatiō saluation by Christ that this beliefe is a diuine fayth a sauing fayth as certaine a fayth as that by which we belieue that there is a God a Iesus Christ a heauen or hel so certaine that it admits no doubt or vncertainty but includes an infallible assured confidence of the promises of God to vs of our saluation Thus sayth Caluin that Iustifying Faith is a certaine knowledge of Gods fauour to vs that euery one must vndoubtedly be sure that God is mercifull vnto him Beza that Fayth is not to belieue in God or in the word of God which Fayth the Diuells haue but a firme perswasion of our election in Christ A certainty by which we are more certaine then of any thing that life euerlasting is due to vs. Luther that Fayth is a constant firme perswasion without doubt or wauering of Gods grace good will due to vs so certaine that it is aboue all other certainty Bucer that Fayth is nothing but a certaine perswasion of our saluation of Christ The Confession of Auspurge of Saxony Luther Lobecius Pareus Whitaker Reynoldes Perkins That a man is iustifyed by belieuing and that without wauering or feare of his owne infirmity that his sinnes ere forgiuen that he is iust and shal be saued Yea sayth Iewell he must be so certaine as if Christ was present and so told him sayth Pareus as certaine as that Christ dyed for the remission of our sinnes sayth Luther and Zuinglius as certaine as he is of Christs saluatiō yea so certaine that except Christ be damned he cannot be damned Whereupon they all hould that the obiect of Iustifying Fayth is not to belieue that Christ is God and Man was borne dyed and rose for vs nor to belieue the Scripture and the word of God in it which is a generall or historicall Fayth and common to the reprobate the Diuells but to belieue that himselfe hath his sinnes pardoned him is iust and shal be saued and that God is mercifull to him doth account him iust and will saue him the certainty assurance of which doth iustify him before God All which may be seene in the Authors owne wordes in D. Smiths Collation This is that speciall Fayth by which alone Protestants hould that euery man is iustifyed saued and without which euery one is damned Therefore this Faith is necessary to saluation necessitate medij and as a thing so necessary doth oblige euery one in particuler vnder paine of damnation to haue it because by it all are saued and without it all are damned Therefore true is the Minor Proposition that as according to the Protestants this faith alone is necessary for euery one to saluation so euery one is bound to haue and so to beleeue it vpon paine of the losse of his saluation Vpon which premises which in the first moode and figure inferre the Conclusion followes that according to this protestant position of Iustification Saluation by only speciall Faith that euery one whethersoeuer he belieue or no whether he be faithful or infidel elect or reprobate must be saued Which absurdityas it is most absurd so is the same more fully illustrated and deduced out of the same principle after this manner Speciall Faith or infallible assurance of saluation is necessary to saluatiō as well to Iudas a reprobat as to Iames an elect and as Iames is saued by it so is Iudas damned for want of it according to the Protestants therefore vnder paine of his damnation Iudas is as well bound to haue it as Iames is because it being a necessary meane to saluation the want of
condemneth one another as the fayth and saluation of the Lutherans Caluinists Anabaptists and the rest in number aboue 100. which are all opposit in fayth all condemne one another and yet are all sure of their saluation by this fayth Ergo it cannot be true Secondly that this fayth is contrary or contradictory in it selfe is proued thus That certainty of Fayth is contradictory which belieueth a fayth and doctrine contrary or contradictory but by this certainty of Fayth the Lutherans Caluinists Libertines Anabaptists Trinitarians and the rest do belieue fayth and religions contrary and contradictory as is manifest by the former instances Ergo. Againe that fayth is contradictory which doth make the same man belieue cōtradictories but this speciall fayth makes men belieue contradictories as that it doth make him iust and doth not mak him iust Ergo. That it maks a man iust they affirme because by it a man is iustified that it makes not a man iust is proued because by it he belieues that he is iust therefore he is iust before he belieues it in the same manner as God is God before he is belieued to be God Or thus A man is iust before he belieue because his iustice is the obiect of his fayth and so presupposed to fayth and yet he is not iust before he belieue because this iustice is the effect of his fayth by which he is iustified and so is after fayth but to be iust and not iust both before he belieue is cōtradictory Ergo. Againe that is contradictory which is good and not good which doth make a man iust and not iust but this speciall fayth is good because it iustifyes and not good because it is a sin and that mortall Ergo. Againe it makes a man iust because by it he is iustified not iust because by it he is made sinfull it being a sinne as euery good worke is in their grounds Againe this fayth doth alone iustify and doth not alone iustify alone iustify because Caluin and all Protestants affirme it it alone doth not iustify because the same Caluin affirmes that Baptisme is a signe of remission of sinnes past and to come which remission of sinnes to come dependes vpon the memory of Baptisme past and so not vpon fayth only Againe this fayth according to them being a worke of man wholy infected with original sinne is a sinne and so maketh a man sinnefull this fayth doth iustify and so is a good worke but to make a man sinnefull and iust are contrary or contradictory Ergo. Againe it affirmes that euery good worke euen the least of the best person is a sinne so there are no good workes but all sinnes and it affirmes that fayth cannot be without good workes and so there are good workes but to affirme that there are good works and that there are no good workes are contradictory Ergo. Thirdly that this faith is a sinne and makes a man sinfull is proued thus Euery good worke euen the best worke of the best man according to them is a sinne because it proceeds from a fountaine corrupted with sinne but this faith which iustifieth is such a good worke which consequently is a sinne therfore it maketh a man sinne and so a man is saued from sinne by a worke which is sinne made iust by an act which is iniust adopted the sonne of God by a worke which offendes God and is made partaker of heauen by an act which deserues hell Fourthly That this faith is temerarious is proued thus That is rashly and lightly belieued which is belieued without any authority of scripture which according to them is the only meanes of beliefe but there is no Scripture that assures for example that either Caluin Knox or Tindall is predestinated hath his sinnes forgiuen him and shal be glorified in heauen which yet they belieue say they more certainly by this speciall faith then they do the diuinity birth death resurrection or ascension of Christ which they belieue onely by an historical faith therfore they rashly and without ground do belieue it Which is confirmed because to belieue things they see men haue sense to belieue morall or mathematicall conclusions they haue reason and demonstration and to belieue articles of faith they haue reuelation of God in scripture but to belieue euery one that his predestination iustification glorification is certaine to him is made knowne neither by experience of sense nor by euidence of reason nor by reuelation of scripture or any way else therefore it is rashly without ground belieued Fiftly That this only speciall faith is presumptuous is proued thus As that is desperation which will not hope for saluation by grace so that is presumption both the extreames of hope which will hope for it without good works good life obseruance of the Commandements and merits to which life eternall is promised but only and speciall faith excludes all good works all merit all obseruance of the commandements as any meanes of saluation and as not possible to be done 2. It is great presumption to expect so great and eternall a reward kingdome and felicity without any labour and paines for it without any promise or warrant of it and that without any doubt or feare of the obtaining it all contrary to expresse scripture which wish vs with feare and trembling to worke our saluation Not to be without feare of sinne forgiuen And assures vs that no man knowes whether he be worthy of loue or hatred And all contrary to the practise of all saints who haue vsed such continuance and feruour of prayer such rigour and austerity of penance such retirement and forsaking of the world all to obtaine and purchase it at Gods hands Which yet this speciall faith will obtaine by only assuring and securing a man most certainly of it without either condition of works and good life without any works of penance or satisfaction or without any doubt or feare of loosing it or failing in it Sixtly That this only faith destroyes all hope Charity prayer and good works is proued thus No man can hope for that which he hath no man prayes and makes suit for that which he hath and cannot loose no man labours to practise that which he deems impossible to performe But this faith assures them of their predestination that they are predestinate and cannot be damned assures them of Gods fauour that they haue remission of sinnes and iustification and cannot loose it and assures them of glorification that they shall enioy heauen and saluation which is as due to them as to Christ and can no more faile them then it can faile Christ where is then any place for hope It assures thē that good works and the keeping of the law is impossible that pennance and satisfaction is fruitlesse yea derogating from the merit of Christ that all merit by grace or hope of reward for our good deeds is excluded That such a
exercise vertue or to auoide vice In vaine is all penance or mortification to bridle his concupiscence or passion In vaine are all exhortations to piety and deuotion and all disswasions from sinne and iniquity because man hath no freedome of will nor power ability to do either the one or the other or the one rather then the other but all necessarily must be done as God hath appointed and doth worke it It followes that no lawes or precepts of God or man to bid or forbid can be iust No tribunals of Princes or Prelates to punish offenders and reward well-doers can be vpright because they are imposed on them who haue no liberty to do or not do them and leaue neither possibility nor obligation to be performed by man It followes that there can be no vertue in doing well or vice in doing ill no iust iugment in rewarding of good or in punishing of bad no crowne of glory in heauen for iust actions or torment of paine in hell for vniust because in man is no indifferency liberty or freedome to do the one rather then the other but is necessitated by the will of God to do that to which he is ordeined It followes that no contracts of marriage which require a free consent without feare or force can be valid No temptation to sinne against which is no power or liberty can be auoided No lawes against malefactours for any crimes because they are not in their power not to do them can be executed That no difference remaines betweene a man and a beast for where is no free election there is no will where is no will there is no reason where no reason there is no difference betweene a man a beast why therfore are sins prohibited lawes established sermons preached more to men then to beasts sith men haue no more liberty to do or not do to obey or not obey them then beasts Why are actions of lust killing and murdering punished in men not in beasts sith men haue no more freedome to absteine from them then beasts Why is man rather commanded to absteine from concupiscence then the fier is from burning Why more from swearing then the sunne froÌ„ shining Why more from lying and stealing then the sea from ebbing and flowing Why is he commanded to loue God aboue all more then to touch heauen with his fingar to keepe the sabboth from working more then to keepe his yeares from increasing Why not to sinne rather then not to be sicke sith to the one he hath no more power or ability liberty or freedome then to the other Which doctrine how high it blocketh vp the way to all vertue and piety and how wide it openeth the gappe to all vice and liberty shall after be shewed How contrary it is to al authority of holy scripture how iniurious to God preiudicious to man I leaue to be seen in other authours how forcible the coÌ„mon consent of all sortes of people is against it S. Austine shal witnesse who sayes that the sheepheards in the mountaines the Poets on the stages the people in the market the learned in the libraries the maisters in the schooles the Prelates in the pulpits and all mankind in the whole world do blase out the freedome of mans will which is so certaine that saith he if there be sinne there must be freedome because sinne is so voluntary as that it is no sinne if it be not voluntary How euidently euen by common sense and experience it is to be proued I will referre him who will deny it to Scotus his sensible demonstration who with blowes not reasons with cudgels not arguments would haue it proued to him till he confesse he hath liberty and freedome to cease from beating him And how little credit is to be giuen to the teachers of this doctrine in other high pointes of faith aboue reason who so grosly faile in this so manifest both to reason and sense I will referre to the iudgment of the indifferent reader and so passe from the absurdities of this Protestant Predestination touching man to the same as they concerne God and his goodnes SVBDIV. 2. Protestant doctrine of Predestination makes God the authour of sinne HOW iniurious blasphemous this doctrine of Gods absolute Predestination to sinne and damnation is to God and how much it doth derogate from his nature goodnesse and iustice shall by these ensuing sequels and absurdities appeare in that it makes God 1. The authour of sinne 2. Sinfull 3. Only sinfull 4. A lying and dissembling sinner 5. A most cruell tyrant 6. Not a God but the very diuel himselfe All which shal appeare as euidently deduced out of the former doctrine so that if it be true which many of them teach that as we belieue scripture so we must belieue consequences euidently deduced out of it both as points of faith so in like manner as they belieue the former doctrine of Gods absolute and irrespectiue decree of mans Predestination to damnation and sinne they must also belieue these consequences euidently deduced out of the same first That God is made by this doctrine the authour of sinne and not only as the Manichees made him a bad God the authour of bad nor as Florimus did make him the good God the authour of a bad substance but as Simon Magus did make him the authour of al bad actions and wicked works is proued 1. Because God according to the defenders of this doctrine doth by his absolut and irrespâ—ctiue as M. Montague calles it Will predestinate men to eternall damnation 2. Because God by a secret motion doth compell and necessitate the same men to all sinnes that therby he may haue an occassion to condemne and punish them 3. Because God doth commaunde vrge incite the diuell to tempt and induce them to sinne 4. Because that therfore God is the authour of all sinnes which are by these men commited 5. Because God not content with this cruelty doth diuers wayes delude men in shew exteriourly calling and offering his grace but interiourly denying and detaining them from grace 6. Because God for that end to damne them depriues them of freewill that they cannot repent and of all benefits of the merits of Christ and of grace that they can haue no meanes to be saued 7. Because God neuer frees them from originall sinne into which he had cast them but leaues it in them to corrupt al their actions make them sinfull 8. Because God for these sinnes made them vnable to keepe any the least commandement 9. Because from these sinnes God neuer frees them but only couers the sinne imputes the person iust and so saues all the elect All which reasons are positions in expresse words affirmed especially by Caluin cited at large by Becanus by Luther Melancthon Sanctius Martyr Beza VVhitaker Perkins and other prime Protestants cited in their owne words by Doctour Smith and are confessed by
all the Commandements or any of them is impossible 10. That no humane lawes do oblige in conscience to their performance 11. That the Sacraments chiefly Baptisme are seales and signes of predestination to glory of remission of sinnes and perseuerance in Gods fauour and that in Baptisme are forgiuen sinnes past and to come 12. That man by reason of Gods decree and originall sinne hath no liberty or freedome of will to do or auoid bad workes 13. That God hath ordained and predestinated vpon his meere will and pleasure without any cause giuen or so much as forseene all who are damned both to damnation and to sinne All which positions as they are auerred by the learned Protestants and preached to the people so they do ouerthrow all the articles of the Creed all the petitions of the Pater noster and all the precepts of the Ten Commandments and leade to all loosenesse and dissolution of life as shal be shewed SVBDIV. 1. In generall dectroying all fayth AND first that these Positions do quite ouerthrow take away all diuine and supernaturall fayth which is the first foundation and corner-stone of our spirituall building the first preparation to life and iustification the first root of all true vertue and good workes the first gate by which God enters into our soule the first light which shines in our vnderstanding the first true seruice which we offer to God and the first step by which we beginne to walke our iourney to heauen that this doctrine doth quite ouerthrow this fayth and all the articles of the Creed proposed in it is proued 1. Because they distinguish three sortes of fayth 1. Historicall of thinges reuealed and related in scripture and proposed by the Apostles in the Creed such as are the Trinity Incarnation Passion Resurrection and Ascension of Christ with all other articles which all Christians vsually belieue 2. Generall of promises in generall and all graces promised by Christ to all as the sending of the Holy Ghost the coming to iudgment the raysing of the dead and the like which are generall for all 3. Speciall of the promise made to euery man in particuler of his predestination iustification and saluation by which euery one is made infallibly certaine that his sinnes are forgiuen him and that he shal be saued Whereas I say they make these three sortes of Fayth the first and second of these Faithes to wit Historicall and Generall by which they belieue the articles of the Creed promises of God in general they affirme to be faigned not true fayth a shadow of Fayth not a real iustifying faith a Fayth which is common to the reprobate and damned euen to the Diuels themselues and only the third or Special fayth they assigne to be the true diuine and supernaturall iustifying fayth which hath for his obiect the speciall mercy of God to them in particuler applyed the certainty of remission of their sinnes assuredly past and security of their saluation infallibly to come by which they doe as much or more assuredly belieue their iustification and saluation then they do the B. Trinity Incarnation or the rest of the articles of Fayth Now if this speciall fayth be the only true diuine supernaturall and sauing fayth by it is belieued only one article of the Creed that not truly as shall appeare to wit Remission of sinnes and the Historicall and Generall fayth by which the rest of the articles are belieued be only a shadow of Fayth a fayth of the damned and Diuells then we haue no diuine and supernaturall fayth of the rest of the articles but belieue them only by a Faith which is a fained faith a shadow and no more a guift of God then the fayth of the damned and the Diuells in hell Therefore all true â—nd diuine beliefe of the articles of the Creed is by this special doctrine of speciall Fayth quite abolished and taken away from all Christians and nothing but a shadow of Fayth a fained and diabolicall faith left to them and so by one position of theirs is cut off all diuine fayth or beliefe of all the articles of the Creed Secondly whiles they deny all authority of Tradition Church Councels and Fathers and will belieue nothing but what they themselues find in Scripture and that as their priuate spirit interprets it While they make their spirit the iudge of all fayth all controuersies of fayth what is to be receaued or reiected belieued or condemned While I say they doe thus they may by the vertue of this spirit call in question the authority and credit of the Creed it selfe with the authours of it as not to be found in Scripture and the particuler articles they may either reiect as counterfeit intruded or els expound and interpret them as their spirit shal lead them Thus Luther and Caluin following Erasmus for Erasmus is sayd to haue layd the egge which Luther hatched to haue insinuated that which Luther assured to haue doubted of that which Luther downe right denyed made doubt of the authority of the Creed whether it was made by the Apostles or not And the Seruetians in Transiluania witnesse Canisius admit it but so farre as it agrees with the word of God interpreted no doubt by their spirit Thus did Beza by his spirit affirme that part of the sixt article he descended into hell to haue been thrust into the Creed Thus Caluin and Zuinglius following likewise Erasmus by their spirit affirmed that part of the tenth article the Communion of Saints to haue beene intruded into this Creed out of some other Creed and not to haue beene found in the ancient Creeds Thus Luther by his spirit changed in his Germane Creed the word Catholike Church into Christian Church And Beza reiected the same word Catholike as most vaine and wicked And thus by their Glosses and expositions vpon many articles as not pleasing their tast they wrest diuers as shall appeare from their natiue proper sense for example he descended into hell that is he descended into the graue so make a new Creed in sense and meaning agreable to their spirit and the doctrine of it Of which who will haue a full view let him read Andr. Iur. his Nullus and Nemo and Fitzsimons vpon the Masse where their many absurd glosses and expositions are at large discouered and confuted SVBDIV. 2. In particuler against all the twelue Articles of the Creed THIRDL Y because by this doctrine and these Doctours are oppugned in particuler all the mysteries of fayth in euery article of the Creed which by this briefe enumeration of euery one shal be made manifest And first in the first article attributed to S. Peter I follow the diuision of S. S. Augustine and Doctour Kellison is oppugned 1. The faith and beliefe of all the articles in generall in the word Credo by all who hould that it is
only a shadow a faigned diabolicall Fayth not a true diuine and supernaturall Fayth tending to iustification by which euery Christian belieues these articles 2. Is oppugned the vnity of God Deum by Caluin who houldes that the Sonne hath an essence distinct from the Father By Beza and Stegius who hould that the essence is diuided into three persons 3. By Luther who houldes that the Diuinity is threefold 4. By Melancthon who houldes that there are three Diuinities or essences in God By Sanctius who entitles his booke De tribus Eloim of three Gods 5. By the Tritheits in Polonia who expresly hould there are three Gods and three Eternalls 6. Is oppugned the God-head it selfe and his mercy and goodnesse 1. By all those who make God the authour willer commander and worker of sinne and damnation because so is his will and pleasure Who make him a sinner a great sinner the only sinner Who make him a lier a dissembler a tyrant and transforme him into a very deuill himselfe as is before proued and deduced 2. By those who make the diuinity of God passible as with Eutiches the auncient condemned hereticke Luther and Iacobus Andreas do 3. By those who affirme the diuinity to haue beene not only a mediatour betweene God and man as Caluin and Beza did but also to haue beene obediēt to God as Melancton and after him many Lutherans Tigurins also did And further to haue exercised the office of a Priest offering sacrifice to God as Iewell did affirme All which opinions do make many Diuinities in God one inferiour to another because where one is a mediatour is obedient doth offer sacrifice to another there must be a subordination subiection and distinction there one must be inferiour and distinct from the other and so there must be many distinct Diuinities and these inferiour one to another which is contrary to the nature of diuinity God-head 4. Is oppugned the person of the Father and with him the whole B. Trinity by Luther who affirmes that the diuinity is as well three and of three sorts as are the three persons that the word Trinity is an humane inuention a word which sounds coldly and is not to be vsed but insteed of it the word God and did therupon thrust out of his Letanies that prayer Holy Trinity one God haue mercy on vs. And did leaue out of his Germane bible those words of S. Iohn alleadged by Athanasius Cyprian Fulgentius to proue he blessed Trinity against the Arrians There are three which giue testimony in heauen the father the word and the holy ghost and these three are one To all which also Caluin subscribes who not only affirmes that the prayer Holy Trinity one God haue mercy on vs doth displease him as sauouring of barbarisme but also wrests all those places by which the Fathers out of the old and new Testament did proue against Iews and Arrians the diuinity of Christ to a contrary sense and meaning as the Lutherās in diuers bookes on set purpose against him haue conuinced And Danaeus his successor after Beza followes him who affirmes that the same word Trinity and the same prayer Holy Trinity haue mercy on vs is a foolish and dangerous prayer All which are directly contrary to the auncient orthodox and Catholicke doctrine of the B. Trinity three persons and one God 5. In the same first article is oppugned the omnipotency of God almighty by Beza VVhitaker others who affirme 1. That God cannot place one body in two places by replication or other wayes that is Christs body in heauen and on the altar at the same time 2. That God cannot place two bodies in one place by penetration one of another that is that Christs body with the stone of the sepulcher at his resurrection with the dores of the house at the entring to his disciples and with the solidity of the heauens at his ascensiō could not be togeather in one place but the stone dores or heauen were diuided opened or resolued into some liquid matter 3. That God cannot draw a camell or a cable-rope as it is said in the Ghospell though a needles eye 4. That God hath no absolute power to do any more then he hath already done 5. That the position of the archangell Gabriel Any word is not impossible with God is not generally to be belieued nor vniuersally to be admitted Al which if they be true that is if the diuinity be passible be a mediatour be a priest and be three and distinct as the person are if God be the authour and worker of all sinne and euill if the word Trinity and the prayer Holy Trinity haue mercy on vs be to be left out as barbarous foolish and dangerous if God cannot place one body in two places or two bodies in one place cannot draw a cable-rope through a needles eyes can do no more then he hath done then is the Deity the vnity the Trinity the goodnes and the omnipotēcy of God all which are by this first article belieued by this doctrine and these Doctours oppugned and so the Fayth of the first article reiected Secondly in the second article attributed to S. Iohn is oppugned the worke of the whole Trinity the Creation of heauen and earth 1. By Caluin who will haue only the Father properly to be creatour of heauen and earth as to whome alone the name of God by excellency is due and the Sonne to be the Vicar of the Father and to haue the second degree of honour after him 2. By Stenberge Seruetus Blandrata Somarus Francus others cyted by Kellison who deny the Diuinity of the holy Ghost as the third person in the Trinity and admit only a vertue from the father which they call the holy Ghost But if the father be only God if the sonne be inferiour as his vicar and second to him if the holy Ghost be only the vertue of the father not a person distinct from him then is only the father and not the sonne and the holy Ghost with the whole Trinity the creatour of heauen and earth Wherby the second article is oppugned Thirdly In the third article attributed to S. Iames the greater is oppugned the diuinity of the sonne second person Iesus Christ his only sonne our Lord. 1. By Luther who detested the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or consubstātiall signifying the sonne to be of the same substance with the father and made the diuinity of the sonne passible with Eutiches as I haue shewed before 2. By Caluin Beza and Whitaker who admit Christ to be sonne of the father but not to be God of the father or of the essence of the father or God of God as the Nicene Creed expresseth but God of himselfe and withall affirmes that the father doth not continually eternally beget the sonne 3. By Caluin Beza others before cited who make Christ as
occasion must be 3. That by no sinne he can fall from Fayth or grace or loose heauen for if all sinne be ineuitably determined then it shall infallibly be wrought by God as he hath determined And if euery actiō in man be a sinne then impossible it is to be freed from it so hopelesse is the praying for that end And if no sinne can hurt a faythfull Christian nor hinder him of heauen or depriue him of grace then in vaine needlesse is all prayer to be freed from temptation to sinne which can neither hurt nor hinder any faythfull person from heauen In vaine therfore and to no end or benefit is the saying of this sixth petition Lead vs not into temptation Eightly how can any man with confidence say the seauenth petition Deliuer vs from euill Vnderstanding it of the paines and punishments of sinne or impediments of good thinges to be inflicted either in this life or in the next who belieues that no temporall punishment either in this or the next life remaines to be endured after the guilt of sin be remitted and that all paine or miserie inflicted by the Diuell or man is from God the Diuell and man being only instruments and that forced necessitated to it For where no punishment remaines as due either in Purgatory which they belieue not or in this life in which only fayth satisfyes and remits Where also the ineuitable decree and hand of God doth will and worke all punishment in body or goods and where all things do fall out infallible as God hath disposed there all prayer to preuent punishments for sinnes or to remoue impediments of good thinges is both needlesse because as well without as with prayer the euent must fall as God hath disposed and also fruitlesse because by it no punishment of sinne or impediment of good thinges ordained by God can be preuented To what end or with what confidence therfore can any who belieues the former doctrine say these petitions of the Pater noster sith by vertue of it all prayer in generall and this of the Pater noster in particuler is made either needlesse as of things which are certaine to succeed without it or hopelesse as of things which are impossible to haue any effect by it And thus is shewed how the Protestant doctrine is opposite to all Hope and doth make frustrate all manner of prayer by which we come with any confidence to obtaine at Gods handes any benefit for vs or remoue any euill from vs. Of absurdities against the obseruation of all lawes and chiefly of the ten Commandements SECT VIII SVBDIV. 1. In generall how all lawes are made impossible and not obliging WE haue shewed how the Protestant doctrine ouerthroweth the articles of the Creed and the petitions of the Pater noster and in them all certainty of fayth all exercise of hope by making of prayer it remaines that we shew how it likewise frustrates all precepts lawes which tend to good life by bidding good and forbidding euill and among them in particuler the Decalogue of the ten Commandements and thereby openeth the gappe and looseth the reines to all liberty of sinne and loosenesse of life to the ruine of Charity For which we may note 1. That lawes which euer haue beene at all tymes among al nations vsed as the chiefe meanes to withdraw men from euill and to prepare them to good by punishing the one and rewarding the other haue alwayes by wise men beene esteemed of that dignity and necessity that according to Pindarus they are the inuention and guift of God according to Chrysippus that they are very God himselfe who giues them the Queene of all actions diuine and humane According to Aristotle they are the rule of iustice and iniustice which we must apply to all actions and by which all businesses and persons are ruled the measure by which we must square what we are to do and what to omit the Prince whome we ought to obey and the Captaine whome it is fit to follow According to Tully they are the establishing of right the suppression of wrong According to Demosthenes the sinewes of the Citty and the strength of it against the wicked Without which sayth Plato a commō-wealth is not a cōmon-wealth And according to which if men did not liue they would nothing differ from beasts 2. These lawes are some naturall of reason and a mans conscience some positiue diuine of God which were established either by Moyses in the old law and were either morall ceremoniall or iudiciall or by Christ and his Apostles in the new law and are yet of fayth and Sacraments Charity or good life some humane which are either Canonicall of the Church or Ciuill for all nations or particuler of seuerall countryes all which being iust promulgated and knowne do oblige and that in conscience vnder sinne to the performance of them 3. Among these lawes the chiefest and most in force are the Decalogue or the ten Commandments which being lawes morall of good manners and agreable to naturall reasons are not with the ceremoniall and iudiciall law which were giuen only for that tyme and estate of the law of Moyses abrogated but stand still in force and oblige all men and nations to the performance 4. In these ten Commandements we are commanded to performe our duty to God in the first table and to our Neighbour in the second table To God first honour in our hart by adoring one not many Gods in the first Commandement 2. Reuerence in word in not prophaning his name by vaine swearing in the second 3. Obedience in fact by keeping his Sabboth and Festiuall day in the third 4. To our Neighbour we are to giue by affirmatiue precept honour to our Parents and Superiours in the fourth and by negatiue precept to auoid al wrongs done to our Neighbour 1. By exteriour fact either to his own selfe by killing in the fifth or to his second selfe his wife by adultery in the sixth or to his goods by stealing in the seauenth 2. In word by false witnesse in the eight 3. In hart by vnlawful desiring either his wife by concupiscence in the ninth or his goodes by auarice in the tenth Commandment Which Decalogue of ten Commandments doth oblige to performance not only Christians who professe the name fayth of Christ but also all sortes of men or women endewed with reason whether Iewes Turkes Pagans or whomesoeuer Now that the Protestants by their doctrine do abrogate all these lawes not only of Church or Common-wealth but also of God of Nature of the ten Commandments and whatsoeuer leaue man obliged to the performance of none but by the liberty of their Ghospell freed from all as hauing it in their free choice whether they wil keep or break any Commandement of God Church or King and that they do thereby draw backe from the practise of any vertue
He may reason and practise thus No good works are meritorious none are necessary none are possible all euen the best being sins and that mortall as infected with originall sinne and defectiue from the law Ergo in vaine do I labour to do good works which are impossible in vaine do I labour to serue and please God by them sith al are sinnes and that mortall Why therfore shall I do rather good workes then bad Why liue I piously rather then wickedly Why do I iustice rather then iniustice make restitution rather then commit rapine Vse praying rather then swearing frequent Sermons rather then Tauerns because neither the one nor the other deserue reward or are pleasing to God and both the one and the other are damnable sinnes and deserue hell but neither are imputed as sinnes but both couered by the Iustice of Christ apprehended by my faith Fourthly He may reason and practise thus Only faith doth iustify iustifying doth infallibly make me as certaine of remission of my sinnes as I am of Christs death and therby certaine of my perdestination and election for none are truly faithfull and iustified but the elect and certaine also of my perseuerance and glorification for faith once had cannot be lost What then need I to feare either for seruil feare any punishment of hell because I am sure of heauen or for filiall feare any offence of God because I am sure that he imputes no sinne or offence to me and that neither he will forsake me nor I can fall from him or for reuerentiall feare any Maiesty and goodnesse of God who wil not be offended for that which is wild wrought by himselfe And because his lawes or precepts are aboue my power and as impossible do not oblige in conscience what need I to make any conscience of any sinne either past or committed or to come and in danger to be committed because I am sure that none shal be imputed that none can take from me Gods grace and fauour that all by faith are couered and that my Baptisme was to me a signe and seale of remissioÌ„ of al sinnes past and to come What need I either contrition or sorrow either pennance or satisfaction either fasting or good workes either prayer or preaching because I am sure that all satisfaction is made for me by Christ that any sinne of myne is impossible that also my prayer penance are sinnes that my sinnes are already forgiuen that I am certainly the sonne of God and so certaine to continue and to come to heauen Fiftly He may reason and practise thus I haue no free-will or liberty either of contradiction to do or not to do or of specification to do good or bad but am by the decree and will of God necessitated to do what I do what God hath ordeined me to do Ergo vnreasonable is God who hath imposed vpon me precepts which I haue no power or freedome to performe vniust is God who punishes me for doing that which he wils me to do in which I haue no freedome of wil to the contrary Impious are magistrats and iudges who punish me for that which God wils coÌ„mands compels me to do Impossible is all vertue and vice in me which can be no more vertue or vice in me then in a beast if I want freedome of will foolish am I who labour to do that which I haue no power or liberty to do In vaine do either lawes terrify me or superiours admonish me or preachers exhoâ—r me to that which I haue no power liberty or freedome to omit or commit to choose or refuse All which followes vpon the want of my freewill and ability to do good Sixtly He may reason and practise thus God hath decreed appointed and predestinated of his owne meere wi without any respect to me or my demerit whether I shal be damned or saued the one or other as he hath appointed In vaine therefore am I solicitous or do I labour for either sith without my care or labour that must be which God hath appointed and not my labour can alter further oâ— hinder either Againe God doth will command and worke as the principall agent all sinne which is wrought in me why shal I therfore detest that which God wils or auoid that which God commands or not do that which God wils commands and works in me Againe if I be an elect God giues all meanes so certaine of saluation that I cannot reiect them if I be reprobate he denies me all meanes necessary either of the merits of Christ offered for me or of grace and faith sâ—fficient for me In vaine therefore is all my labour because if God hath prepared for me meanes effectuall they wil be applied as they are decreed without me if not they will not be obteined by me and my care let therfore all care of heauen or hell be left to God and his ordination and let vs liue merrily fare daintily spend freely feed our sense and appetit fully and leaue all care or cogitation of heauen or hell to Gods decree and ordinance which according to his will not our care will haue the effect which he hath appointed This follows in reason and thus in reason may any one inferre and reason supposing he belieue the aforesaid false principles SVBDIV. 3. To what vices the Protestant doctrine leads SEAVENTHLY For vices in particular how euery one doth receiue life grouth nourishment and encouragement by this their doctrine how men may be whetted and animated to the free exercise of the same vices by vertue of it may by these reasons appeare 1. Slouth which saith the wiseman teaches many euils and is the stepdame saith S. Bernard of vertue the mother of sinne and the root and nurse saith S. Chrisostome of desperation is by this doctrine nourished For who will labour who assures himselfe that his labours works and sufferings haue neither any reward nor make any satisfaction but that they deserue hell and eternall punishment and that by them he can no more please God performe his will or fulfill his commandements then he can reach the starres or leape ouer the seas and that he hath no freedome or liberty of wil but must do as by God he is appointed and compelled and that only faith and apprehension of the iustice of Christ will suffice to his iustification and saluation Secondly Chastity which is commended in scripture as deseruing immortall praise by God man as of more worth then all weight as the fruit of the spirit and as that which maks pages or followers of the lambe Christ Iesus is indeed according to S. Cyprian the ornament of noblemen the nobility of meane men the beauty of the deformed the comfort of the sorrowfull the augmentour of beatitude honour of religion the diminisher of vices the multiplier of vertue and the spouse of the omnipotent
bragge with thy good works and scripture yet scripture is a seruant to Christ therefore it moues me nothing Rely thou vpon the seruant I will rely vpon the Maister and Lord of Scripture to him I yield and I know that he will not lye nor lead me into errour I will rather adhere to him then for all scripture to be altered a hairs breadth from my opinion 3. For the ten Commandements That therefore the ten Commandments do not belong to vs Christians but only to Iewes which is proued out of the Text speaking to them whome it brought out of Aegypt who were Iewes not Christians VVe will not admit that any the least precept of Moyses be imposed vpon vs. Therefore looke that Moyses withall his law be sent packing in malam rem with a mischiefe that thou be not moued with any terrour of him but hould him suspected for an heretick cursed and damned and worse then the Pope or the Diuell 4. Therfore to conclude vp all for sinne he sayth That true and right Saints must be subiect to great and heinous sinnes and to continue such as they may not be ashamed to pray Forgiue vs our sinnes That if it be true grace let it bring true not feined sinne God saues not feined sinners be a sinner and sinne stoutly but be more strong in fayth and reioyce in Christ It sufficeth vs to know the Lambe from him no sinne can draw vs though we sinne commit fornication or murder a thousand tymes in one day That a Christian is so rich that though he would yet he cannot be damned by any so great sinnes except he will not belieue for no sinnes can damne him â—ut infidelity And that himselfe did confesse to his Ghostly Father D. Staupitius not sins of women but solid and horrible heinous offences This was the doctrine accordingly the practise of this Saint Prophet Elias Euangelist Angel and light of the world the singular eminent euer-admired organ of the holy Ghost endewed with so great piety gifts and such a Doctour and interpreter of scripture as was not in the world since the Apostles as before he is by his followers extolled All which sayings of Luther are in these words cited by Gaspar Scioppius who was a long time a follower and professour of Luthers doctrine Secondly For his malice and enuy not only against the Pope and Catholiks which was implacable but also against the Sacramentaries his brethren fellow reformers whose part our english Protestants follow he is so farre charged by the Zuinglians with breach of all Christian charity towards them that he not only cals them hereticks damnable and execrable fectaries alienated from the Church of Christ whom he curses all concord with them and refuses to haue any familiarity by word or writing or speâ—ch with them or any of them for euer but also saith they are insatanized supersatanized and persatanized in whose mouth sathan is infused perfused and transfused For which saith Zuinglius of him Sathan doth endeauour wholy to possesse him And say the Tigurins his booke is full of Diuels immodest railings anger and rage And say our english ProtestaÌ„ts he doth breake all Christian modesty and is far beyond the bounds of Charity 3. For his pride and vaine insulting ouer all sorts of Princes prelates and opposers of him it is apparent not only by his intemperate writings against Henry the 8. of England and all the princes of Germany but also by the plaine accusation of his owne brethren 1. By the Tigurins who expresly conâ—emne him for pertinacy too much insolency 2. By Oecoâ—â—mpadius who accuseth him of being puffed vp with pride and arrogancy that he is in danger to be seduced by Sathan 3 By Conradus Regius who laies to his charge such pride by which he doth extoll himselfe in his writings that God for it tooke froÌ„ him his true spirit and in place of it gaue him a proud angry and lying spirit And to confirme all this he was so arrogant and impudent that beyond all ciuility he arrogantly auouches of himselfe that he is such a one as the world hath not had these many ages That himselfe is the only mortall man whom Satan foresaw to be hurtfull to him That Since the Apostles time no Doctour or writer hath so excellently and cleerly confirmed instructed and comforted the consciences of the secular states as I haue done by the singular grace of God This certainly I know that neither Austine nor Ambrose who are yet in this matter the best are equall to me heerein That The Ghospell is so copiously preached by vs that truly in the Apostles time it was not so cleare Wherupon euen Caluin himselfe charges him to be subiect to great vices and wishes that he had beene more carefull in acknowledging them And himselfe confesseth of himselfe that his profession is not of manners but doctrine wishing that he were remoued from the office of preaching because his manners and life did not answer to his profession Which may suffice for a conuincing example to shew what fruit this new doctrine and priuat spirit brought forth in the first founder of it For Caluin Beza Zuinglius and others the chiefe supporters of this doctrine new Religion it might suffice to shew their life disposition for manners to remember that they were most of them if not all either Religious men tyed by vow to Pouerty Obedience and Chastity or els at the least Priests in holy Orders obliged to Chastity and yet euery one of them by the liberty of their Ghospell offered vp as the first fruits of it themselues by execrable apostacy to all lust and sensuality in incestuous copulation either with like professed Nunnes or other women subuerted and enticed by them Wherupon as Luther an Augustine Frier began the dance so his schollers Bucer a Dominican Peâ—er Martyr a Canon regular Bernardinus Ochinus a Franciscan followed ioyned themselues with professed Nunnes and with them Oecolampadius a Brigittan Monke Pelican and Spanberge Franciscans Knox a Frier Zuinglius and Caluin Priests Carolostadius an Arch-deacon Gebardus an Archbishop of Colen and Vergerius a Cardinall chose for their mates other women In like manner in England Cranmer and Sands of Canterbury Yorke both Priests and Archbishops Hooper of Worcester Barlow of Chicester Downhan of Westchester Scory of Hereford Barkely of Bath and Wels Couerdale of Excester all Bishops Bale in Ireland Bucer at Câ—mbridge and Martyr at Oxford with infinit more all Monkes and Religious did al of them plante and disperse the new Ghospells doctrine through England by apostating from their vowed chastity to sensuall copulation vnder the title of mariage with wantons like themselues This in generall I say may suffice to discerne the fruit of this new Ghospell what it brought forth for sanctity and holinesse of life and by what bellowes
interpreted by Prophecy was not doctrine or mysteries of faith but either exhortation to piety for edification and consolation or of things secret as future euents or vnknowne faults or facts done by which the secrets of the heart of the infidell or idiot was made knowne and he conuinced and iudged of all therfore it makes nothing for doctrine of faith and interpretation of scripture 4. This manner of Prophecy howsoeuer and of whatsoeuer it was it was not independent and of it selfe free to interprete what and how it will but so that the rest doe iudge that the spirits of Prophets be subiect to the Prophets And so euery priuate spirit must be subiect to the iudgment of the Church and the Churches spirit Fourthly they obiect those places where it is said that All thy Childrē are taught of our Lord Al shal be docible of God Your selues haue learned of God I will giue my law in their bowels and I will write it in their heart All shall know me from the least to the greatest If any will do his will who sent me he shall vnderstand of the doctrine whether it be of God My sheepe do heare my voice do follow me Yow haue no need that any do teach you but as his vnction teacheth you of all things All these places I say do not either ioyntly altogether or particularly any one mention any priuiledge that euery one hath by the instinct of his owne priuate spirit to interprete holy scripture to decide deep mysteries of faith and to iudge of all controuersies of diuinity which is the point auerred by the Protestants denied by vs and in controuersy betweene both 2. In them is affirmed only that God will giue his inward guift of grace to all sort of persons so sufficiently that they may know him his truth and the true way to saluation and by the same may obserue his Commandements and come to be saued In which yet is neither excluded but rather supposed as precedent and an exteriour proponent cause the ordinary meanes of preaching by Pastours and of instruction by them and subordination to them But yet is not giuen to any one any power or priuiledge to preferre his owne spirit before the spirit of the whole Church or to censure the doctrine which is once adiudged by the same which among the rest this Protestant priuate spirit doth assume to it selfe For which we may note that it is one thing to haue faith sufficient for saluation another to haue the guift of infallible interpretatiō of scripture The former is a guift general to all the faythful though they be as yet little ones who only sucke milke though they be as yet carnal not spiritual thogh they be ignorant of many things and haue many thinges wanting to the perfection of their faith Yet they be sealed with the spirit of the promise the pledge of our inheritance haue the spirit of God dwelling in them and so haue the literall verity of all the former places verifyed in them The later is a guift peculiar and proper only to them who by place and function are spirituall and perfect haue their senses exercised to the discerning of good and euill And haue the guift of discerning of spirits and interpreting of speaches And these are they who as tryers and discerners of fayth interpreters of Scripture and haue the guift and power infallible to direct others in the doctrine of fayth who are ex officio the Pastours and Prelates of Gods Church and are as Bishops to rule to feed the flocke of Christ to exhort and reproue with all authority to controule rebuke them sharply that they may be sound in the fayth and to denounce to certaine not to teach otherwise And all by that power which God hath giuen them to edification and to reuenge all disobedience and to bring into captiuity al vnderstanding to the obedience of Christ This is the office of the Prelates and Bishops of Gods Church 3. This inward guift of grace or vnction of the Holy Ghost is only an efficient internall and cooperant cause and so necessary to mooue the vnderstanding and will to assent to that which as certaine is proposed but this iudge or interpreter must be an exteriour proponent cause which must deliuer to vs this sense as certaine which being proposed grace doth enable vs to belieue Now all these and such like places are meant of the interiour guift of grace which is necessary but not ordinarily sufficient without a precedent exteriour and proponent cause which is this infallible Interpreter of holy Scripture in Pastours of the Church Fifthly to those places where it is commanded not to belieue euery spirit but to proue the spirits if they be of God and to proue all thinges and hould that which is good is answered 1. That all and euery person of the body of the holy Church is not directed to make this tryall but only the chiefe that is the Pastours and Prelates as when a man is willed to discerne and see not euery member and part of the body is directed so to do but the chiefe members as the head which is to iudge and the eye to see to whose function it is proper and belonges or as when an Vniuersity is directed to examine and iudge of such a booke and doctrine not euery student but the chiefe Doctours of that faculty are so directed and willed so that not euery person and vnlearned party in the Church is to make this tryall of spirits but only Pastours and Prelates to whose function it is peculiar and proper to iudge and decide all such like questions and doubts 2. This tryall and iudgment is to be made not of questions doctrine already decided and determined by the authority of the Church but of such as are yet doubtfull and vndecided For that which is once determined by the generall consent of the Church or Councell is not againe to be examined and iudged by any priuate mans spirit for so the Decrees of Coūcells were both vaine endlesse that therfore is to be tryed which is not before both tryed and iudged and that by those who haue both ability and authority to do it which makes nothing for this priuate spirit which will both try what is before by any Councell iudged and will by euery simple vnlearned person try and iudge it Sixthly to that of 1. Cor. 2.15 The spirituall man iudgeth all thinges and himselfe is iudged of none It is answered that S. Paul to confound the Corinthians who standing vpon their humane worldly wisedome contemned his vnlearned manner of instruction affirmes that they being men sensuall can iudge only of sensuall thinges but he being spirituall and perfect in diuine wisedome can iudge both of things sensuall and spirituall and
the truth and not to make himselfe and his priuate spirit iudge of the grounds of truth or of the truth which is to be found in theÌ„ And this is all that can be inferred out of these places this may suffice for the solution of all such argumnets or obiections as are made out of Scripture by the Protestants for the establishing of this priuate spirits power and authority to interprete Scripture and to iudge of al controuersies of Fayth FINIS A TABLE OF THE PRINCIPALL MATTERS handled in this Booke A S. Ambrose his commendations pag. 58. His authority against the priuate Spirit pag. 59. Angells apparitions pag. 74. Difficulties about them pag. 81. Apostles their authority to iudge of Fayth pag. 166. Their power deriued from Christ pag. 167. Their successors power to iudge of Faith pag. 168. The foundation of Fayth pag. 390. Apparitions of God or Angells in what places to what persons pag. 75. ApparitioÌ„s of Diuels in diuers shaps of beastes of men of Angells of Christ of the B. Trinity ibid. 140. Of soules in Limbo Purgatory Hell and Heauen pag. 77.78 Difficulties to know which be apparitions of God Angells Diuells soules pag. 79. ApparitioÌ„s of SathaÌ„ inward by suggestions pag. 98. By imaginary illusions pag. 102. By exteriour visions pag. 104. S. Augustine commeÌ„ded against the priuate spirit pag. 61. For the profundity of holy Scripture and authority of Fathers pag. 64. For necessity of Fayth pag. 182. agaynst Circles pag. 210. B BIshops and Priests their office pag. 153. Their authority to iudge of Religion pag. 162. Their Tribunal power in the old Law the beginning progres end pag. 162. In the law of Christ pag. 165. What their authority is pag. 166. Their authority proued by scripture pag. 168. How for it extends ibid. Their authority for euer pag. 168. In all Councells pag. 170. C CAluin his saying against the priuate spirit pag. 36.64 His Circle between the spirit of euery man a Councell pag. 215. His doctrine of the doctrine of saluation pag. 234.239 Of saluation of Infants without Baptisme pag. 235. Of Christs sinne and despaire on the Crosse pag. 257. Of the B. Trinity pag. 304 Of Christs Diuinity pag. 305. Of Christs descent into Hell pag. 308. Of his AscensioÌ„ pag. 3â—0 Of beatitude before the day of Iudgment pag. 311. Cases of Conscience for feare of sinne in vaine according to Protestant doctrine pag. 26â— Catholikes aduaÌ„tage aboue Protestants pag. 24. In the habit of faith p. 15. In the credible testimonies of Vnity Sanctity Vniuersality Succession Miracles Examples pag. 27. In the infallible Church-authority pag. 28. Catholikes belieue all Reuelations ancient generall infallible pag. 25. Catholikes may challenge all which the Protestants may pag. 28. Yea the priuate spirit pag 29. DiffereÌ„ce between iust Catholikes Protestants pag. 266. Good life-confessed in the auncient and late Catholikes in the people and the Clergy pag. 347. Catholike and Protestant doctrine compared in giuing more honour to God to Christ to Saints Angells Scripture Sacraments to Church Fayth Good workes c. pag. 350. Christ by Protestant doctrine no generall Redeemer pag. 248. No perfect Redeemer from sin his suffering of Hell paynes due to sin pag. 249. No Sauiour from sinne Sathan sensuality the curse of the Law or from Hell pag. 250. No perfect Phisitian pag. 251. No law giuer 252. An vniust iudge 253. No Priest or offerer of Sacrifice 254. Made ignorant 256. Sinfull suffering hell paines pag 257. Christian AsseÌ„blies in the Primitiue Church in what manner they were for that tyme. pag. 382. Church-authority necessary to fayth pag. 10. infallible 11. proued by Scripture pag. 16. Church selected priuiledged armed established c. obligeth p. 12. It consists of Pastors Ibid. Is proued by Fathers reason Ibid. Necessary to expound Scripture pag. 125. Church-practice A rule to confute heretikes pag. 125. Church-prâ—position and scripture-authority no circle pag. â—02 Vpon Church falling failing froÌ„ faith what absurdities do follow vz. That all ancieÌ„t Concels Doctors were AntichristiaÌ„ That Prophesies are false pag. 231. That Turkes Iewes Gentils haue a more credible Church then Christians pag. 230. Church-practice a meanes to interpret Scripture iudge of Doctrine pag. 125. Church of Christ a Congregation of great sinners pag. 26â— Circle what it is pag. 198. Difference betweene a lawfull vnlawfull Circle pag. 199. And betweene a Circle as obiected against Catholikes and Protestants pag. 200 Catholikes Circle cleared as being partiall in diuers kinds of causes and to diuers sorts of persons pag. 202. Protestants Circle between the Scripture and the Spirit pag. 206. Betweene the Spirit Fayth 210. Betweene Election and Scripture 212. Betweene the Spirit of euery person and of a Councell pag. 215. ProtestaÌ„ts Circle vnto the same kind of cause and that totally pag. 208. Absurdities that follow vpon it pag. 212. Councells 3. of the Iewes in Christs tyme. pag. 164. How the holy Ghost assisted or fayled in them pag. 164. Councells a meanes to interpret Scripture 128. Councells haue byn a meanes to iudge of Fayth pag. 171. Concupiscence made originall sinne and what followes thereon pag. 227. D DIuells Apparitions of them pag. 75. Difficulties to know them pag. 80. Signes to know the motions of them 83. Their subtility 95.97 Their deluding of Heretickes auncient moderne pag. 95. Their tempting to sin to vertue 99. Examples of their apparitions to Heretickes pag. 100. By imagination visibility pag. 10â— F FAyth Six meanes to Fayth pag. 3. Materiall formall obiect proposition Ibid. Credible Testimonies pious disposition habit pag. 4. Reuelation to the Apostles Ibid. Necessity of a proponent cause Ibid. Credible Testimonies pag 4.7 192. Fayth requires a pious disposition supernaturall frees an infused habit permanent not perpetuall pag. 6 The order of these helpes vz. credible Testimony Church-proposition grace actuall infused habit reuelation pag. 7.8 The Resolution of Faith dispositiuè deriuatiué effâ—ctiuè formaliter pag. 8. Shewed by the Samaritan womaÌ„ and Christ pag. 9. The helpes to Fayth external eternall internall pa. 14. Wanting in Protestants 15. Fayth depends vpon authority pag. 117. Faith required to know scripture the sense of it p. 118.120 The rule of Fayth pag. 146. Fayth one pag. 183. Certaine 187. By preachinâ— and hearing 190. By credible testimonies 192. Obligeth to acceptance 194. Speciall Fayth how certaine in Protestants 185. Fayth is of eternall verity and presupposeth the obiect pag. 228. Cannot staÌ„d with certainty of saluatioÌ„ 233.240 vide Sole fayth Fayth by hearing preaching and mission pag. 190. Sole Fayth a Protestant Principle the effect of it pag. 227. Sequells of Iustification by sole Fayth p. 222. makes Protestants more certaine of their saluation then was Christ 233 Makes Protestants as iust as Christ 234. makes all men to be saued 235. Is not grounded vpon Gods word 233. Is false contradictory sinnfull rash presumptuous preiudicious to Hope Charity and Good