be Mr. Le Clerc publish'd those Letters which I have undertaken to answer the Two First of them in his Sentimens de Theologiens de Hollande sur l' Histoire Critique c. the Rest in the Defence of the Sentiments Who is the Author of these Letters whether Mr. Le Clerc himself or as he pretends a Friend of his whom he calls Mr. N. signifies little to the Controversie it self and therefore I do not think it worth while to enquire And as to the Author's Design in writing these Tracts whether they were writ by way of Enquiry only or out of a Design to undermine the Authority of the Scriptures I shall not take upon me to Determine but shall leave that to the Searcher of Hearts Charity that believes all things prompts me to believe the Author's solemn Protestation which he makes b Eng. Ed. p. 38. French p. 229. that he disowns the ill Consequences which some have drawn from his Principles and his Arguments for the Christian Religion which are contain'd in the Last Letter incourage me to persist in that Christian Perswasion However when I found the Author earnestly desirous c Fr. p. 245. Eng. p. 51. that some body would fairly answer him and indeavour to give further Light to this Matter and withall was sensible that he has laid down several Assertions which tend to lessen the Authority and Credit of the Sacred Writers and that Ill men have made use of them to this purpose as 't is their constant Method to run away with any thing that seems to favour their side but to overlook what makes against them all these Considerations perswaded me to Vndertake a particular Examination of all those Passages in these Letters that reflect upon the Holy Pen-men or their Writings I know Mr. Simon has made a brief Answer to all the Material Objections of this Author the Substance of which is inserted in the Fourth Letter together with Mr. N's Reply But I must freely profess I am not at all satisfied with Mr. Simon 's Performance and his Answers seem to have been drawn up in Hast without a thorow Examination of the Force of the Objections Perhaps Mr. Simon is not so well vers'd in the Subtilties of Reasoning as he is in the Nicities of Criticism And indeed Both his Answers to Mr. Le Clerc discover as much where he spends most of his time in Railing against the Protestants which might much better have been imployed in Vindicacating his own Principles from his Adversaries Objections or Defending those Common Truths in which the Generality both of Protestants and Papists agree tho neither he nor his Adversaries seem to have any great regard for them But this is the usual Fault of such Zealots as Mr. Simon hath of late discover'd himself to be that they are more concern'd for the particular Opinions of their own Party than for the Fundamental Articles of our Common Christianity and therefore they very often advance such Arguments in Defence of their own particular Doctrines which if they are pursued further undermine the Foundation of Christianity it self or it may be of Religion in General Of which Mr. Simon himself is an Instance who has taken a great deal of Pains to weaken the Authority of the Scripture Text on purpose to set up the Certainty of Tradition in its place But I believe another Reason may be assign'd of Mr. Simon 's Fierceness against the Protestants and that is because he lives in a Country where Heresy now-adays is reckon'd a greater Crime than Infidelity and 't is less dangerous to be thought no Christian than no Catholick And consequently it more nearly concern'd Mr. Simon to clear himself from the Suspicion of Heresy than to prove himself a good Christian tho perhaps in the Judgment of the World he stands in need of an Apology in that respect as much as in the other And perhaps he could not take a better Method to atone for his Disrespect towards the Scriptures and to regain the Favour of his Superiours whose Displeasure he has felt upon that Account than by crying up in Opposition to them the Infallibility of Tradition and the Authority of the Church and Inveighing against the Protestants with a great deal of Bitterness and Virulency And since Mr. Simon 's Answer gives so little satisfaction to the Difficulties which this Author has started concerning the Inspiration of the Scriptures I thought it might be an useful thing to examine the Substance of these Letters over again and Vindicate the holy Writings from this Author's Objections I must leave it to the Reader to judge of the Performance All I shall say for my self is That I have manag'd the Dispute with all the Calmness and Freedom from Passion which becomes an Impartial Searcher after Truth and in that respect I hope I have fully satisfied the Desire of my Antagonist d Fr. p. 245. Eng. p. 51. I have kept my self close to his main Design which is not to question the Veracity of the Holy Writers or the Truth of the Doctrine or Matters of Fact which they deliver but only to propose some Doubts and Questions How far they were Inspir'd either with the Matter or Words which they writ So that in this Discourse men must not expect I should handle all the Arguments for the Truth of the Scriptures and the Christian Religion which are proper to be alledg'd a-against Atheists and Infidels This as 't is forreign to the present Design so it has been done so Often and so Fully by several Learned men and amongst others by this very Author in his Fifth Letter that nothing more need or can be said upon this Subject And if men will still shut their eyes against all Conviction we must e'en despair of doing any good upon them and can only say to them in the words of the Apostle He that is ignorant let him be ignorant and If our Gospel be hid 't is hid to them that are lost whose minds the God of this world hath blinded However to do what Service I am able to the Cause of Religion and to make this Discourse as useful as I can I have ventur'd to go a little beyond the Bounds which my Adversary hath set me and have indeavour'd briefly to explain the Nature and Design of the Prophetical Writings where I have discours'd upon some things not commonly treated of the Explaining of which I hope may tend to Illustrate that noble part of the Scripture and remove some Prejudices against the Authority of the Prophets which have been greedily entertain'd by such persons as are apt to be unreasonably Suspicious and Jealous of being Impos'd upon and because there have been False Prophets think 't is impossible there should be True ones If I have been guilty of any Mistakes I hope the Reader will the more easily pardon them when he considers the Niceness of the Subject and that it has never yet been purposely treated of by any
which were not so The Reasons which Confute this Opinion of our Author concerning the Collection of the Canon of the Old Testament I thought fit to represent all together when I was upon this Subject tho I am sensible that 't is only the first of these Considerations which can be inferr'd as a Corollary from what has been said concerning the Early Date of the Old Testament Canon What I have hitherto said concerning the Authority and Antiquity of the Old Testament Canon I cannot call Absolutely Certain or Demonstrative but I may safely say thus much that it carries in it a greater Degree of Probability than any thing the Adversaries of the Canon have advanc'd to the Contrary So that tho we should grant what our Author says d Fr. p. 276. Eng. p. 102. That there is no proof at all that Esdras and the Great Sanhedrim of that time among whom were Haggai Zachary and Malachi Compil'd the Canon yet still 't is probable 't was made by those that were so near their time that they knew what their Sentiments were in this Matter and made this Collection accordingly But if this Proof be not thought Satisfactory I should think any Christian ought to acquiesce in the Judgement of our Saviour and 't is plain he lookt upon the Jewish Canon which was Undoubtedly the same in his time which is now received in the Protestant Churches I say he lookt upon it as a Collection of Holy Writings design'd by God for the Instruction of his Church and the Rule the Jews were to have recourse to when they would inform themselves what was the Will of God He bids them e Jâ—h 5.39 Search the Scriptures without distinguishing as our Author does f Fr. p. 277 279 285. Eng p. 10â— 106 116. the Truly Inspir'd Books from those which are not so for in them saith he ye think and so far ye are in the right that ye have Eternal Life 'T is strange our Saviour should not correct this Mistake of theirs if some of the Books they had such a great Veneration for favour'd such Dangerous Doctrines as our Author thinks the Book of Ecclesiastes does g Fr. p. 272. Eng. p. 96. and contain'd Expressions very like Blasphemies as he is pleas'd to speak concerning the Book of Job h Fr. p. 275. Eng. p. 101. For if this were true 't was certainly very dangerous for Men to Search or be too much Conversant in these Books especially since they came Recommended under the Character of a Divine Inspiration 'T is strange our Saviour i Luk. 24.44 should prove the Passion and Resurrection of the Messias not only out of Moses and the Prophets but also out of the Psalms by which our Author k Fr. p. 277. Eng. p. 123. understands those Writings which the Jews call Chetubim if these Books be of so little Authority as he would perswade us they are Mr. N. would fain Evade the Force of this Argument taken from our Saviours Authority by telling us l Fr. p. 278. Eng. p. 104 105. that Christ never design'd to Criticize upon the Sacred Books or to Correct those Errors of the Jews which were of small Importance But since our Saviour Criticiz'd so far upon the Sacred Books as to Confute the false Glosses m Matt. 5. c. 23. which the Scribes and Pharisees had made upon them and to Reject the Traditions n c. 15.1 which they had Equall'd to the Word of God and in some Cases Prefer'd before it it seems as necessary for him to have distinguisht between the True Scriptures and those Books which were Undeservedly esteem'd such Especially if these Latter advance Doctrines that do not well agree with the Former as our Author o Fr. p. 272 c. Eng p. 95 c. indeavours to prove concerning several places of the Proverbs Ecclesiastes and Job for then the Admitting the Authority of such Writings is of as Ill Consequence as the Receiving the Traditions of the Pharisees could be Nay with his leave I think it an Error of more dangerous Consequence to Equal a Book that is not Inspir'd when it contains False Doctrine with one that is truly Divine than to Equal such Traditions as the Pharisees held with an Inspir'd Writing Because a Tradition will probably in time be forgotten and so lose all its Authority which we see has been the Fate of most of the Pharisaical Traditions whereas a Book that has once been generally Reputed of Divine Authority 't is likely will maintain that Character for ever For its very Character will make Men careful to preserve it and the Older it grows the Stronger will the Plea of Prescription be for its Divine Original and Consequently the More will be Impos'd upon by it as we see hath Actually happen'd in the Case we are now speaking of if our Author's Opinion be true For the whole Christian and Jewish Church hath time out of mind lookt upon the Books contain'd in the Jewish Canon to be Inspir'd and have upon all Occasions appeal'd to their Authority as such From whence it appears that our Saviours taking notice of this Error if it had been one would have been much more beneficial to after Ages than his Confuting an Unwritten Tradition could be But further we find the Apostles Judgment does evidently concur with our Saviours in this matter St. Paul says a Rom. 3.2 that the Jews were intrusted b 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with the Oracles of God but surely he would have told us that they were not True to their Trust if he had thought they had mix'd Prophane Books with the Sacred ones But that Text of the same Apostle c 2 Tim. 3.16 All Scripture is given by Inspiration of God is so clear a Proof of the Apostles Judgment in this matter that 't will admit of no Evasion For the Apostle tells Timothy in the foregoing Verse that from a child he had known the Scriptures by which he must mean the Body of Writings which the Jews look'd upon as such for in that Religion he had been Educated by the Care of his mother who was a Jewess d Act. 16.1 Then it follows in this verse All Scripture is given by Inspiration of God where the Apostle certainly understands the word Scripture in the same sense which he took it in the Verse before viz. for that Collection of Writings which the Jews received as the Word of God But pray let us hear our Authors Paraphrase e Eng. p. 192. Fr. p. 270. upon these two Verses It is as if he had said to Timothy that he ought to keep close as he had done hitherto to the Study of the Old Testament which would instruct him sufficiently in the way of Salvation by joyning thereunto Faith in Christ Jesus because all Scripture Inspired AS IS A GREAT PART OF THE OLD TESTAMENT Is profitable for Instruction I think I may appeal to any Indifferent Man
God's Providence in their Minds p. 133 3 To foretell the times of the Messias p. 136 Why his Coming revealed so often and so particularly p. 137 By what Steps and Degrees God revel'd this Mystery p. 141 Some Prophecies more directly pointing to the Messias than others p. 145 Concerning the Literal and Mystical sense of Prophecies how reasonable to allow this Double Sense p. 146 An Instance of both these Senses in that Famous Prophecy Is 7.10 c. which is at large Exlain'd p. 149 The same proved by other Instances p. 151 There are Evident Marks whereby to discover a Mystical Sense wherever 't is involv'd under a Literal One p. 152 The reasons why Prophecies are written in such a Style as contains a Mystical Sense under a Literal One p. 155 Two Rules laid down as the Foundation of Mystical Interpretations p. 161 A Recapitulation of what has been said in this Chapter p. 163 CHAP. IV. Wherein some Difficulties are Resolv'd relating to the Prophets themselves or their Writings p. 167 Two Difficulties proposed the First concerning the Obscurity of Prophecies the Second concerning the Marks whereby to distinguish True Prophets from False Ibid The First Answer'd by proving these two things 1 That the Prophecies were not so much design'd to gratify Men's Curiosity in discovering to them what should come to pass hereafter as to Convince them when the things foretold were come to pass that 't was the Lord's doing p. 170 Dan. 12.4 and Revelat. 22.10 Explain'd p. 171 2 Assertion The fulfilling of Prophecies if deliver'd plainly inconsistent with the Freedom of Humane Actions p. 174 Three Rules laid down for the Clearing of Second Difficulty 1 Rule A Prophets endeavouring to Seduce Men to Idolatry a certain Sign of a False Prophet p. 183 2 Rule The Prophets usually when they first entred upon their Office gave such a Sign of their Mission that a little time would discover whether they were sent from God or not the fulfilling of which Sign establisht their Authority for the Future p. 185 3 Rule Three Criteria made use of to judge of a Prophet if he gave no Sign viz. Purity of Doctrine Holiness of Life and Agreement with other Prophets p. 188 CHAP. V. Concerning the Inspiration of the Canonical Books of the Old Testament in General and of the Historical and Poetical Books in Particular p. 139 Mr. N.'s Objections Proposed p. 194 Concerning the time when the Canon of the Old Testament was Compiled Several Reasons assign'd why it must have been Compiled in Ezra's time or not long after p. 195 To suppose it Compiled so Early adds great weight to it's Authority p. 199 The Canon doth not consist of all the Fragments of the Ancient Jewish Books which were Extant when that was made as Mr. N. supposes p. 201 Our Saviour approved the Canon of the Old Testament as it stood and was received by the Jews in his time p. 205 So did the Apostles 2. Tim. 3.16 Vindicated from the Gloss which Grotius and Mr. N. put upon it p. 209 The Jewish Division of the Old Testament into the Law Prophets and Chetubim does not favor Mr. N. p. 214 That Division proved not to be Ancient p. 216 Grotius's Authority in this Controversy consider'd p. 211 Concerning the Authority of the Historical Writings of the Old Testament 'T is probable they were Composed by Prophets p. 220 A passage in Josephus to that purpose clear'd from the Exceptions of Monsieur Huetius p. 223 The Book of Esther Vindicated from Mr. N.'s Objections p. 226 A Vindication of the Book of Job Why writ with so much Elegancy p. 228 An account of those passages in it which savour of Impatience p. 230 What Opinion Job maintain'd in the Dispute betwixt him and his Friends p. 233 In what sense this Book is Inspir'd p. 236 What excellent Uses may be made of this Book p. 239 The Divine Authority of the Book of Psalms proved p. 240 They made up the greatest part of the Publick Service first of the Jewish and afterward of the Christian Church in the Primitive times p. 242 An Answer to the Grand Objection taken from the Imprecations which are to be found in several of the Psalms consisting of Three Particulars viz. 1 Several of those Expressions do not really import so much as they seem to do p. 246 2 Most of them are rather Predictions than Imprecations p. 247 3 'T is lawful in several Cases to Pray against our Enemies This proved in four Instances p. 250 A Caution against Misunderstanding some Expressions in the Psalms p. 260 The Divine Authority of the Book of Proverbs asserted p. 261 M. N. guilty of a manifest Error p. 262 The Proverbs being Moral Instructions no Argument that they are not Inspir'd p. 264 In what respect this Book exeeeds the Moral Writings of the Heathen Philosophers p. 267 Mr. N's Objections against some particular Passages in this Book Answer'd p. 269 Concerning the Collection of Proverbs ascribed to Agur and an Answer to Mr. N's Objections against them p. 271 The Design of Ecclesiastes and of the Canticles explained and Vindicated from Mr. N's Objections p. 279 The CONCLUSION p. 281 ERRATA THat which most disturbs the sense is pag. 48. lin 20. where in stead of do not reach this Case by the Laws of Christ read the Laws of Christ do not reach this Case P. 26. in the Mar. for p. 11. 12. r. p. 17. p. 50. in the Mar. for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 121. l. 26. for ther'e 's r. there 's p. 123. l. 26. for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 145. Marg. for v. Cels r. c. Cels p. 160. l. 20. del likewise p. 212. Mar. put a comma after citatur p. 250. l. 18. for ef r of p. 259. l. 20. for of notorious r. of his notorious p. 262 l. 23. for sebject r. subject CHAPTER I. General Considerations concerning the Inspiration of the Writings of the New Testament I Do not dislike our Author's a French Edit p. 222. English p. 13 Division of the Scripture-Writings into Prophecies Histories and Doctrines and I do so far agree with him as to grant that all the Holy Books have not an equal degree of Inspiration but have more or less of it according as the matters they contain are more or less Adequate to the Writers Understanding and Capacities For I cannot but think that God made use of their Natural Talents as far as they could be subservient to his designs the Reasons of which Opinion I shall have occasion hereafter to mention But yet notwithstanding my agreement with him thus far I must desire leave not to follow his Method because I think 't will contribute much to the Clearness and Strength of the following Discourse if I treat of the Inspiration of the New-Testament-Writings in General in the first place For in this Method we begin with what is most Known and Certain
Apostles thought of their own Writings and what Authority they challeng'd as due to them Irenaeus one of the Greatest men of the Church in that Age sufficiently shews the Sense of the Christians of his own time concerning the Authority of these Writings The Hereticks against whom he writes pretended that their Opinions came originally from the Apostles and that whatever the Apostles might say to the contrary in their Writings yet they taught those very things by word of mouth which these Hereticks since maintain'd In answer to this Irenaeus does not only confute their Pretences by shewing that there was Clear and Undoubted Tradition for the Catholick Faith which in those early Times could easily be trac'd up to the very Apostles g Iren. l. 3. c. 3. but likewise proves that 't is in vain to set up Oral Tradition in Opposition to the Writings of the Apostles h Ibid. l. 3. c. 1. because the very same Gospel which they at first preach'd they afterwards by the Will of God committed to Writing to be the Foundation and Pillar of our Faith In pursuance of which Testimony we may further observe that the very Arts which those Hereticks used either to Undermine or Evade the Authority of the Apostolical Writings plainly shew their Authority was look'd upon as Sacred and Decisive in the Christian Church The Writers of the same Age do fully bear witness to the Canon of the New Testament The Learned Mr. Dodwell has observ'd i Dissert in Irenaeum l. n. 40 41. that St. Paul's Epistles were generally known and received in the Church soonest of any of the New Testament Writings and accordingly besides the Testimony which St. Peter gives them which we have already mention'd we we may observe that Ignatius the earliest Writer of the second Age is very industrious in imitating St. Paul's Style and using his Expressions as if he had a mind his Readers should take notice that he had studied his Epistles The Authority indeed of the Epistle to the Hebrews hath been call'd in question because the Author 's not having set his Name to it has given occasion to doubt whether it were S. Paul's or not But as this Epistle must be of Apostolical Authority being older than Clemens Romanus who plainly alludes to it in two places of his Epistle to the Corinthians k N. 17 36. so the style the way of Arguing and the Genius of the work discover it to be S. Paul's but S. Peter puts an end to the dispute for the saying which he quotes in his second Epistle as S. Paul's is certainly taken out of the Epistle to the Hebrews l 2 Pet. 3.15 compar'd with Hebr. 10.37 The first Epistle of S. Peter is quoted by S. Polycarp who writ just after Ignatius's death About the same time certain Pious Men Travell'd from place to place on purpose to communicate the Writings of the Gospels as Eusebius informs us m 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 H. E. l. 3. c. 37. which he to be sure understood of the Four Gospels now extant which only were reckon'd Authentick in his time And 't is plain they were esteem'd so in the Middle of the Second Age because Justin Martyr quotes them generally whenever he has occasion to mention any thing belonging to the History of our Saviour But in Irenaeus's time their Authority was settled beyond all dispute for he says positively n Iren. l. 3. c. 11. that there are Four Gospels neither more nor less And indeed the Authenticalness of Four Gospels seems to be owing to St. John himself who made them into one Complete Code as I observed before o p. 11. 12. The same Iraeneus gives a large Testimony to the Revelations and often quotes the first Epistle of S. John p ap Euseb H. E. l. 3. c. 18. l. 5. c. 8. I thought it not improper to give this brief Account of the Testimonies which are given by the earliest Christian Writers to the most considerable Books of the New Testament to shew how good a Foundation there is for the Authority of the New-Testament Canon and how little ground there is for Mr. Hobb's Insinuation to the contrary who tell us q Leviathan part 3. c. 33. that the Writings of the Apostles were not received nor acknowledged as such by the Church till the Council of Laodicca which was held in the Year 364. recommended them to Christians As if all Christians did not agree in acknowledging such particular Books for the Writings of the Apostles till they were Recommended to them as he speaks and Enumerated by a Council Which has as little truth in it as what he says just afterward that at the time of this Council all the Copies of the New Testament were in the hands of Ecclesiasticks which if it be not a downright and wilful falsity in him is such a piece of ignorance as a grosser cannot be found in all the Kingdom of Darkness which he has described I find Men generally agree in believing Mr. Hobbs to be the Author of the Leviathan and several other ill Books and I fear too many have a great deference for their Authority tho the Parliament which according to him hath a juster right to declare what Books or Doctrines are to be received than a Council hath not yet given us a Catalogue of his Writings or Recommended them to the World neither of which could be true if this Argument of his be good But to return I don't pretend to have Collected all that can be alledged to prove the Antiquity of the New-Testament-Canon nor will I go farther upon a Subject that is already undertaken by that Learned Person who will shortly Publish an Elaborate Collection of all the Various Readings of the New Testament from whom the World may expect full satisfaction as to this matter However I can't but just take notice that 't is no prejudice to the Divine Authority of the N. Testament as our Author intimates a Fr. p. 266. Eng. p. 85. that some Books are received into it whose Authors are not certainly known and therefore as he argues of whose Inspiration we can't be certain He instances in the Epistle to the Hebrews But there is sufficient proof that S. Paul was the Author of that Epistle as I have shewed already And as to the whole New-Testament Canon 't was certainly the design of those that Compiled it only to gather together the Writings of the Apostles or of such as writ by their direction as the Ancients tell us S. Mark did by S. Peter's b Clem. Alex. ap Eus H.E. l. 2. c. 15. S. Luke by S. Paul's c Iren ap eund l. 5. c. 8. Grot. in Luc. 21.34 1 Cor. 11.23 24 25. comparâ—d with Luk. 22.19 20. So that the only reason why some Books were doubted of was because it did not clearly appear whether they were Writ by Apostles or not and assoon as that point was cleared
sure his Disciples would never pretend to know more then their Master Having thus considered the Cases in which the Apostles spake or writ without Inspiration I proceed in the II. Place to shew that Excepting those Cases the Apostles writ and spake by the particular Assistance and Direction of the Spirit Our Author confines the Infallibility of their Preaching and Writing to those things which they Learn'd from Christ or related as spoken by him p Fr. p. 256 257. Eng. p. 69 70. But as to the Arguments which they fram'd upon those Principles and the Consequences they deduc'd from the Old Testament here he supposes them to have used only their own Memory and Judgment tho he grants these Discourses of theirs are to be received because there 's nothing in them but what is conformable to the Doctrine of Christ and to right Reason and nothing that can lead us into the Belief of what is false or contrary to Piety q En. p. 112 131 135. Fr. p. 282 283. 224 227. This as exactly as I can gather is all the Authority he allows the Sermons and Writings of the Apostles and this indeed is as much Authority as can be given to any Humane Discourse and tho it does not exclude all possibility yet it excludes all likelyhood of error But as we look upon the Apostles to have been somewhat more than Sound Divines or Men that very well understood the Doctrine which they were to teach others so their Discourses and Writings have been always esteem'd of an higher Rank than any Religious Treatises purely Humane which however solid and true they may be are to be judged of by these Writings and are no further true than they agree with them The Scripture makes this the Characteristick of an Apostle whereby he was distinguisht from the other Inspir'd persons who were then in the Church viz. that he did not learn the Gospel in an Humane way r 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gal. 1.11 compar with ver 12. 1. v. 1 Cor. 2.10 but purely by Revelation S. Paul might have been sufficiently instructed in the Gospel by those who were Pillars in the Church ſ v. Gal. 2.6 9. so as to have been out of all likelyhood either of mistaking any part of it himself or leading others into error but we see this way of Instruction was not sufficient to advance him to the Dignity of the Apostolate and therefore Christ himself made a particular Revelation of the whole Gospel to him t v. Ubi supr 1 Cor. 11.23 Eph. 3.3 4. that he might not be Inferior in any respect to the chiefest Apostles And since the Gospel was communicated to him and the rest of the Apostles by Divine Revelation only that they might teach it to others whether by Word or Writing with the greater assurance and certainty and without any danger of error their Discourses which were design'd for the Instruction of the Church must be the effects of this supernatural habit of Christian Knowledge which God infus'd into their minds I have shewed in the former Chapter u P. 29. that the same Assistance accompanied the Apostles in their Writing which did in their Preaching and therefore shall now speak of these two indifferently and shew what kind of Authority the Apostles claim'd in either of them S. Paul says w 1 Cor. 2.10 that God has revealed the deep things and the Mysteries of the Gospel to the Apostles by the Spirit which probably were the same things Christ told his Disciples they were not able to bear while he was with them x John 16.12 Such was particularly the Doctrine of the Cross which S. Paul's Discourse chiefly relates to in that place y 1 Cor. 1.18 c c. 2.2 These things S. Paul says z Ib. ver 13. they spoke and taught others and that too in the Words which the Holy Ghost taught them Where the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 comprehends their style a Ver. 1. 4. as well as their Arguments and shews there 's a greater regard to be had to the style of the Apostles than our Author b v. loc supr citat p. 35. is willing to allow and even for that very Reason which he alledges as an Argument why 't is not dictated by the Spirit viz. because 't is plain and without any Affectation of Wit or Learning and conform'd to the style of the Old Testament For this style however Negligent and Careless our Author may think it c Fr. p. 233. En. p. 145. the Apostles used by the direction of the Holy Ghost as appears from this place It follows immediately Comparing Spiritual things with Spiritual where the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 may signify Explaining Illustrating d v. Grot. in locum i. e. proving one Divine Revelation by another the Revelations of the New Testament by those of the Old At last the Apostle concludes e Ib. ver 16. We have the mind of the Christ and therefore ye are to hearken to us and receive what we say tho in many things not agreeing with the Principles of Philosophy or Worldly Wisdom which the Apostle in the Verses before f 1 Cor. 1.20 c. c. 2.1 c. had undervalued in comparison of the Gospel In all which Discourse S. Paul plainly ascribes his and the rest of the Apostles Preaching to the Instructions the Holy Ghost gave them without making any restrictions and particularly that part of it which consisted in drawing Consequences and bringing Proofs from the Old Testament Again we find the same Apostle threatning those that despise his Advice as not despising man but God who gave the Apostles his holy Spirit g 1 Thes 4.8 that they might teach with uncontroulable Authority And I think we may fairly conclude from hence that St. Paul expected all his Precepts and Instructions should be submitted to not meerly as coming from one of the Governours of the Church but as having something more then Humane Authority and being derived from the Spirit of God For what he says in this place tho it immediately respect only those Advices which are contain'd in the foregoing part of the Chapter may by parity of Reason be applied to all other Apostolical injunctions for as the words are general and do not specify that the Apostle deliver'd these particular Rules by an extraordinary Revelation more than any others which he elsewhere gives so neither are the Advices such in their own Nature as require a greater degree of Inspiration to deliver them than the other Exhortations and Commands which are every where to be found in the Apostolical Writings From whence I conclude we ought to look upon those Writings as a Divine Rule of Faith and Practise and that he who despises or undervalues them despises not man but God who gave his holy Spirit to the Authors of them And how far our Author may be guilty of this fault
the whole College of Apostles agreed in came with greater Authority and Evidence of it's being God's Will than what was deliver'd by one Apostle only Just as we are more assur'd of the Truth of those Doctrines which are often repeated by different Writers in the Holy Scripture than of those which are only mention'd by one because the Authority of several Writers adds weight to the matter it self and the comparing them together prevents our mistaking the sense of the Scripture concerning it whereas what is but once mention'd is more liable to Ambiguities and the Sense of it more easily mistaken From what has been said I hope it appears that there is sufficient reason why Inspir'd persons should consult each other and that this is no prejudice to their Inspiration 2. The second Objection is ſ Fr p. 249. Eng p 58. That the Holy Ghost which the Apostles received on the day of Pentecost had not taught them all they ought to know so far was it from rendring them at first dash Infallibe so that St. Peter needed a Vision to learn that he ought not to scruple Preaching the Gospel to the Gentiles I do not know any body that ever yet maintain'd that the Spirit once for all instructed the Apostles in all things that were needful for the Discharge of their Office 'T is certain several things were reveal'd to them by Degrees and in proportion to the Exigences of the Church and this Author himself owns as much when he tells us t Fr. p. 252. Eng. p. 62. That the Apostles had MANY Immediate Revelations and DIVERS Heavenly Visions And as for the Descent of the Holy Ghost upon them in a visible manner on the day of Pentecost the chief Design of that was publickly to Authorize them to preach the Gospel and to Initiate them into the Body of Christ's Church which was then founded and to do this by more solemn Tokens of the Divine Presence among the first Professors than any other Institution could ever pretend to according to what the Baptist foretold u Matth. 3.11 and our Savior promis'd x Act. 1.5 that John indeed baptized or admitted Proselytes with the bare Ceremony of Water which had been a Rite made use of by the Jews long before upon such occasions but the Apostles should be Baptized or admitted into the Church with the Holy Ghost and with fire 3. The third Objection is that a Fr. p. 248. Eng. p. 57. When the Dispute arose whether the Gentiles that were Converted were to be Circumcised or not tho St. Paul and St. Barnabas were against this yet their Authority was not sufficient to put to silence the Judaizing Christians which was a sign they did not look upon them as Infallible To the same purpose he urges b Fr. p. 249. Eng. p. 58. The Believers that were of the Circumcision contending with St. Peter for going to men uncircumcised and conversing with them c Act. 11 2 3. To begin with the latter part of the Objection to the instance of St. Peter I answer that the Converts of the Circumcision were throughly perswaded that the Laws and Institutions of Moses were of perpetual Obligation and therefore 't is no wonder if at first they were surpriz'd to see any of them laid aside and a door open'd to let in the Gentiles to the same Privileges with the Jews and to take away that Discrimination which the Law makes between the Jews and the rest of the world d Exod. 19.5 6. Deut. 7.6 And since this Action of St. Peter's touch'd them so nearly in their Privileges and Prerogative or at least was contrary to the Traditions they had received from their Teachers and held as sacred as the Law it self * Matt. 15.2 Mat. 7.3 Joh. 18.28 't is no wonder they were not easily satisfied about it till they examin'd the reasons upon which St. Peter acted in this matter And the Apostles never laid so much stress upon their Infallibility as to require their Disciples to believe them upon their own word as Mr. N. himself e Fr. p. 283. Eng. p. 112. observes or without demanding a reason why they did so But if we should grant all this Objection contends for certainly 't is but a weak Argument that the Apostles were not Infallible because some new Converts f See Mr. Dodwel of Schism ch 19. sect 18 19. did not think so who 't is plain did not well understand the Principles of their own Religion and had not as yet intirely submitted to the Authority of the Apostles And by the same reason we may argue that our Saviour was not Infallible which yet Mr. N. himself looks upon g Fr. p. 257 260 281. Eng. p. 70 75 109. as a certain Truth because his Disciples seem not to be satisfied sometimes of the Truth of what he sayes h Matth. 16.22 and demand of him a reason i Matth 15.15 of those Doctrines of his that look'd like Paradoxes to them A great deal of what has been said will hold much stronger in the case of St. Paul and Barnabas k Act 15. for the admitting the Gentiles into the Church without Circumcision must needs be thought a great Violation of the Law of Moses by those that look'd upon it to be of perpetual Obligation in the Church of God To which may be added that St. Paul and Barnabas had not so clear and indisputable an Authority as the rest of the Apostles not being of the number of the Twelve whose Commission was so solemnly seal'd and ratified on the day of Pentecost And they who were of a different Perswasion from them would in all likelyhood lay hold of this Objection against their Authority as Men are willing to take advantage of any Exception to an Authority that is against them And accordingly we find in after times when the Judaizing Christians found St. Paul zealous in asserting the Liberties of the Gentile Converts and teaching men every where to Apostatize from Moses as they term'd it l 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Act. 21.21 that they did what they could to lessen his Authority and represented him as far Inferiour to the rest of the Apostles and therefore that no great stress was to be laid upon his Doctrine which forc'd him to vindicate himself and his Apostleship at large Galat. 1. and 2. Chapters 4. The fourth Objection is m Fr. p. 250. Eng. p. 60. St. Peter's Dissimulation at Antioch for which St. Paul reproved him as he tells us n Gal. 2.11 And here I agree with our Author that St. Peter acted contrary to his Judgment and dissembled his Opinion for he that had been warned by a Vision o Act. 10.28 that he should not call any man common or unclean and but just before had a great hand in making the Decree at the Synod of Jerusalem p Act. 15 7. whereby the Gentiles were made Members of the Church upon
Wonder or foretelling one Event which might come to pass by meer Chance should overthrow the Authority of so many more and greater Works For tho God doth suffer Impostors to work Strange Feats sometimes for the Trial of his people f Deut. 13.3 Matth 24.24 yet I doubt not but he always takes care that his own Works shall visibly exceed theirs both in Power in Gravity and in Vsefulness so that their Tricks shall appear as just nothing when compar'd with his Miracles as Aaron's Rod swallowed up those of the Magicians g Exod. 8.12 Or else God would allow too great an Authority to Impostors and make Miracles by themselves no Evidence of a Divine Mission since 't would be in some Cases impossible to distinguish True ones from Counterfeit And this I take to be a satisfactory Answer to that Question Whether God's permitting Evil Spirits and Seducers to shew Signs and Wonders does not evacuate the Authority of Miracles in general tho I grant there are other Marks h V. Orig. c. Cels l. 1. p. 53. l. 2. p. 90 91. Ed. Cant. Bp. Stillingfl Orig. sacr l. 2. c. 10. whereby to distinguish True Miracles from False which 't is not my Business at present to discourse of 2. 'T is reasonable to think that the Prophets when they first entred upon their Prophetick Office gave some Sign of their Mission either by working a Miracle or by revealing some Secret Remote or Future thing which was not within the Compass of Humane Knowledge and the Nature of which was such that a little time would quickly discover whether the Prophet spake True or not We may find footsteps in Scripture of these several ways being accounted the Marks of a Prophet We find the Pharisees demand a sign from Heaven i Matth. 16.1 Joh. 6.30 Matth. 12.38 of our Saviour such as Joshua k Jos 10.12 Samuel l 1 Sam. 12.18 Isaiah m Is 38.8 and Elias n 2 King 1.10 had wrought And the Samaritan Woman judg'd our Saviour to be the Christ because he told her all things that ever she did o John 4.29 This shews that in the common Opinion the Discovering of some Hidden thing and out of the ordinary reach of Humane Knowledge was esteem'd the Mark of a Prophet and the Messias being the Prophet the Jews at that time Expected the Woman concludes from thence that he who knew such Secrets must be the Messias And perhaps for this Reason the Jews who lookt upon our Saviour as a Pretender only to Prophecy demand of him the Discovery of a Mock-secret p Matth. 26.68 viz. Who it was that smote him when he was Blindfolded It appears from other places that the Prophets did commonly foretell something which should Shortly come to pass and the Accomplishment of this their Predidiction did establish their Authority for the Future and gave Credibility to those Prophecies of theirs whose Accomplishment was at a greater distance So the Man of God that Prophesied against the altar of Bethel q 1 Kings 13.1 2. beside his foretelling above 300. years before the Birth of that Prince that one of David's Family Josiah by name should Defile that Altar at the same time gave another Sign of his Mission that was presently to come to pass viz. that the Altar should be rent and the Ashes of it pour'd out r Ib. v. 3. The fulfilling of which was an Argument of his Veracity as to the other part of his Prophecy where the Event was at such a Distance that tho it should not Correspond with the Prophecy it could not at present be Disproved and therefore the bare Foretelling it did not bring along with it sufficient Evidence that the Prophet who spoke it was really sent from God In like manner 't is said of Samuel Å¿ 1 Sam. 3.19 20. c. 9.6 that all Israel knew him to be an Establisht Prophet of the Lord's when they saw that none of his Prophetick words fell to the ground So Ezekiel having deliver'd a Prediction adds t Ezek. 33.33 When this shall come to pass then they shall know that a Prophet has been among them as if he had said However Men may slight my Words now and value them no more than a Song u ver 32. which Men hearken to only to pass away the time yet the fulfilling of what I say will establish my Authority beyond Contradiction Which is an Argument that Men commonly suspended their Judgement concerning the Authority of a Prophet till they had Tried his Veracity by seeing whether some one Prophecy of his which he delivered as a Test of his Mission came to pass or no. 3. Tho Prophets usually gave a Sign in Testimony of their Mission yet Some Prophets did not who were therefore to be Tried by other Rules 'T is Recorded particularly of John Baptist that he did no Miracle x John 10.41 and yet the people counted him a Prophet y Matth. 21.26 which they would not have done if a Prophet had always given a Sign before he was accounted so and we see that even the Priests and Elders could not find any thing to Object against his Authority z Ibid ver 25. Now in such a Case I suppose they judged of a Prophet's Pretences by some of these following Tokens by the Holiness of his Life and Doctrine by the Agreement of what he said with the Predictions or discourses of other Prophets and especially if another Prophet of undoubted Authority bare witness to him according to that Maxime of the Jewish Masters a Maimonid Fundam Legis c. 10. Sect. 9. The Prophet of whom some other Vndoubted Prophet witnesseth that he is a Prophet is assuredly such All these Marks concurr'd in John Baptist his Office was plainly describ'd by Isaiah b Is 40.3 and both that and his Person by Malachi c Mal. 3.1 4.5 his Doctrine was Holy and his Life an exact Copy of what he taught so here was no room to suspect him a Counterfeit tho he gave no Sign to attest his Mission We may farther observe that the Prophets of the Old Testament insist upon these three things viz. Purity of Doctrine Holiness of Life and Agreement with other Prophets as the Tokens whereby they distinguisht themselves from the False Prophets They tell us there is as plain a difference between the Visions of True Prophets and the Dreams of False Ones as betwixt Chaff and Wheat d Jer. 23.28 which must be upon this account that the one sort tends to discourage Sin and set forth the terrible Consequences of it e Ibid. ver 29. whereas the other designs to sooth Men up in their Vices by Healing the Wounds of the Conscience Slightly saying Peace Peace f Jer. 6.14 and promising Men Prosperity without their Repentance and Amendment of Life To the same purpose Ezekiel says of the False Prophets that they Sow pillows to men's elbows