9. p. 208. of the house haunted with spirits and cleared by the Preist saying Masse in it To conclude therefore this passage concerning the miracles most of them done in Affrica at the memorial of S. Stephâ—n reported by S. Austin in his foresaid booke de ciu Dei it is yet further to be obserued that the same are also acknowledged and recorded by Euodius of whom thus writeth S. Austin at (m) Lib. 22 de ciu Dei c. 8. and after the engl trans p. 888. Vzaly neare Vtica haue many miracles bâ—ne wrought by power of the said martyr Stephen where Bishop Euodius erected his memorial long before this of ours The same Euodius did accordingly publish a special treatise in 2. bookes de miraculis Protomartyris Stephani extant in S. Austins workes Tom. 10. Also Sigebert Gâ—mblacensis 500. yeares since in l. de illust (n) Cap. 15. Eccles script maketh mention of this Euodius and of his treatise of S. Stephans miracles and the Century writers say from (o) Cent. 5. c. 10. col 1137. Trithemius there is a booke of Euodius extant of the miracles done in Affricke by the reâ—iques of S. Stephen of which miracles mencion is also made by S. (p) Tom. 10. de diuers ser 51. Austin elswhere by (q) In script Eccles in Luciano c. 46. in Auito c. 47. in Orosio c. 39. Bede l. Rerract in act Apost c. 5. 8. et in l. de tempor ratione Nicep hist l. 14. c. 9. Genadius Bede and Nicephorus A truth so cleare that Hospinian confesseth that (r) De Templis p. 301. Austin telleth many true miracles done by the signe of the Crosse the deuil put to flight de ciu Dei l. 22. c. 8. Yea he further saith (s) Pag. 138. hither b long those other true miracles which other Fathers mention as also Austin de ciu Dei l. 22. c. 8. And wheras Duraeus obiecteth these foresaid miracles D. Whitaker denyeth not but confesseth saying (t) Reply to Duraeus p. 886. I do not thinke these miracles vaine and therfore not forged which are affirmed to haue bene done at the monuments of the martyrs Moreouer our aduersaries them selues haue in such like respect not forborne to translate and publish in english S. Austines foresaid booke of miracles In further confirmation of al which I might yet ad sundry other miracles mencioned by S. Austin in sundry (u) Tom. 1. l. 1. Retract c. 13. post med tom 7. de vnit Eccles c. 19. ante med Tom. 1. l. 9. confes c. 7. Tom. 9. in Ioan. tract 120. circ med other of his writinges as also by (x) Orat. in mamant Naz. orat in Cipri Chrisost l. contra Gentiles Amb. ser de S. Geruas et Protas Hier. cont Vigilan ep ad Eustochium and in vita Hilarion Sulpt in vita Martini and see Cent. 5. c. 13. from col 1478. til 1493. cent 4. c. 13. froÌ„ col 1433. til col 1456. S. Basil S. Gregory Nazianzen S. Chrisostome S. Ambrose S. Hierome Sulpitius and the Century writers against al which if any yet vnsatisfyed shal oppose his owne bare vnwarranted denyal we leaue that man as much more worthy of contempt then further reply And thus much breifly concerning such miracles collected from S. Austin as do clearly conuince what religion it was whether Catholicke or Protestant which was by him professed and by miracles thus confirmed Concerning such sayinges of S. Austin as are vsually obiected by our aduersaries against his former Catholicke doctrines confessed for such by Protestantes and confirmed by miracles CHAPTER 19. Such places are answeared as are vrged against the Canonical Scriptures against Traditions and the authority of Councels SECTION 1. AGainst the booke of Machabees M. Moulin obiecteth that S. Austin saith (a) Defence p. 152. The booke of Machabees is receiued not vnprofitably of the Church if men read it soberly M. Moulin in the same place geueth the answeare him selfe which in substance is that S. Austin said this as in respect of Razes killing himselfe whose example the Donatistes of indiscret zeale followed in reguard wherof S. Austin required this sobriety explaning further there and elswhere (b) Tom. 2. ep 61. post med which Moulin omitteth that The Scripture of the Machabees haith touching Razes death tould how it was done but not commended it as though it were to be done And in the booke of Iudges (c) Cap. 16.30 is reported the like of Sampson whom yet the Apostle (d) Hebrewes 11.32 and Aug. de ciu Dei l. 1. c. 21. commendeth Wheras M. Carthwright (e) In Hookers Eccles pol. l. 2. sec 7. p. 118. 119. obiecteth against vnwritten traditions certaine obscure sayinges of S. Austin and other Fathers M. Hooker forbeareth not in our so cleare a case by his special explication and answeare to explaine and cleare them to our handes D. Fulke (e) In Hookers Eccles pol. l. 2. sec 7. p. 118. 119. obiecteth against the authority of Councels that S. Austin teacheth that (f) Answeare to a counterf Cath. p. 89. And Aug. tom 7. de Bapt. cont Don. l. 2. c. 3. post med general Councels themselues may be often amended the former by the later when by some experience of thinges that is opened which before was shut and that knowen which before was vnknowen But his meaning here is onely concerning matters of fact or at most but concerning such pointes of faith as were by former Councels not erroneously determined but onely left vndefyned and afterwardes resolued vpon by later Councels for S. Austins wordes of Amendment argue him not to speake of faith seeing faith or heresy is not properly said to be amended but of matters of fact which are subiect to amendment A truth yet more euident in that this amendment is here said to come to passe by the experience of thinges vnto which experience not doctrine of faith but matters of fact be properly subiâ—ct M. Iewel obiecteth (g) Reply art 4. p. 272. the testimony of S. Austin concerning Constantine the great vndertaking the iudgement of Bishops and their cause vpon appeale made to him in that behalfe but M. (h) 2. Reply part 2. p. 163. Carthwright answeareth hereto in our behalfe that Austin saith that the Emperour was driuen by the Donatistes importunity who made no end of appealing vnto him to geue sentence in that matter for the which also he was to craue pardon of the Bishops To which purpose also S. Austin and Optatus haue (i) See before c. chapter 4. sec 6. formerly made their seueral answeares Such places are answeared as are obiected from S. Austin against Baptisme by women in case of necessity And against the real presence SECTION 2. MAister Carthwright obiecteth against Baptisme by women the 4. (k) Can. 100. Carthage Councel saying (l) In Whitguiftes def tract 9. c. 5. p. 523. Let not a woman presume to Baptise But his answeare is geuen him by
that is is lawful to vse and worship the Images of Christ and his Sainctes p. 168. Chapter 15. Concerning Christian fastes as abstinence from certaine meates vpon certaine dayes as also concerning vowed chastity and monastical life Section 1. S. Austin teacheth that prescribed dayes of fasting and abstinence from certaine meates are lawful p. 173. Section 2. S. Austin teacheth that the vow of chastity is lawful p. 177. Section 3. S. Austin teacheth that it is lawful to vow the state of monastical or religious life p. 180. Chapter 16. Concerning Antichrist vsury and permission of stewes Section 1. Concerning Antichrist his comming at the end of the world And of Enoch and Elias their comming as then to resist him p. 187. Section 2. S. Austin teacheth vsury to be vnlawful p. 192. Section 3. S. Austin teacheth that stewes may be permitted for the auoiding of greater euil p. 194. Chapter 17. Concerning Ceremonies Section 1. S. Austin teacheth sundry holy ceremonies now vsed in the Catholicke Church in the administration of the Sacraments p. 198. Section 2. S. Austin teacheth sundry ceremonies concerning praier now vsed in the Roman Church p. 204. Chapter 18. Concerning miracles reported by S. Austin and making in further proofe and confirmation of our Catholicke religion by him formerly tauhgt Section 1. S. Austin reporteth seueral miracles in proofe of inuocation of Sainctes p. 213. Section 2. S. Austin reporteth seueral miracles in proofe of the honouring of Sainctes reliques p. 216. Section 3. S. Austin reporteth some miracles in proofe of the signe of the Crosse and of pilgrimage to the holy land p. 218. Section 4. S. Austin reporteth certaine miracles in proofe of the sacrifice of Christes body of Altars and of penetration of bodies p. 220. Section 5. S. Austin reporteth some miracles to be wrought by holy oyle p. 223. Section 6. A further confirmation of these foresaid miracles reported by S. Austin in proofe of our Catholicke Church p. 224. Chapter 19. Concerning such sayinges of S. Austin as are vsually obiected by our aduersaries against his former Catholicke doctrines confessed for such by Protestants and confirmed by miracles Section 1. Such places are answeared as are vrged against the Canonical Scriptures against Traditions and the authority of Councels p. 231. Section 2. Such places are answeared as are obiected from S. Austin against Baptisme by women in case of necessity and against the real presence p. 234. Section 3. Such places are answeared as are vrged from S. Austin against inuocation of Sainctes Images and reliques p. 242 Section 4. Such places are answeared as are vrged from S. Austin against Purgatory p. 246. Section 5. Such places are answeared as are vrged from S. Austin against iustification by workes freewil and merit of workes p. 248. Section 6. Such places are answeared as are obiected from S. Austin concerning vowes miracles and Ceremonies p. 250. Section 7. A further answeare in general to al such obiections as are vrged from S. Austin or other of the Fathers p. 254. Chapter 20. Concerning the doctrine religion of the oâ—her Fathers in general also of those who liued in the age of S. Austin And that it was the same with the doctrine and religion here formerly taught by S. Austin and at this day taught by the Catholicke Roman Church Section 1. The Fathers in general and who liued in the age of S. Austin confessedly taught the same doctrine with him concerning Christ being our mediator only according to his humanity concerning the sacred Scriptures and Traditions p. 264. Section 2. The Fathers in general are confessed to teach the Primacy Ecclesiastical of S. Peter and the Bishops of Rome As also to deny supreme Ecclesiastical gouernment to temporal Princes and that the Pope is not Antichrist p. 267. Section 3. The Fathers in general are confessed to teach our Catholicke doctrines concerning the Sacrament of Baptisme p. 273. Section 4. The Fathers in general are confessed for our Catholicke doctrines concerning the Sacraments of confirmation Orders and Extreame vnction p. 276. Section 5. The Fathers in genâ—ral are confessed for our Catholike doctrines concerning Confession Satisfaction and Pardons p. 278. Section 6. The Fathers in general are confâ—ssed for our Catholicke doctrines concerning real presence the preseruation of the Sacrament and receiuing fasting and Christ p. 283. Section 7. The Fathers in general are confessed concerning our Catholicke doctrines of the sacrifice of Christes body and bloud in the Eucharist As also that the same was propitiatory euen for the soules departed and of mingling water with wine in the Chalice and of Altars p. 289. Section 8. The Fathers in general are confessed for our Catholicke doctrines concerning Prayer for the dead Purgatory and Lymbus Patrum p. 295. Section 9. The Fathers in general are confessed for our Catholicke doctrines of inuocation of Sainctes of our reuerent vse of Images Reliques the Crosse p. 297. Section 10. The Farhers in general are confessed for our Catholicke doctrines concerning free wil and merit of workes p. 302. Section 11. The Fathers in general are confessed for our Catholicke doctrines concerning vowes the single life of Preistes Monachisme prescribed fastes and Ceremonies p. 305. Section 12. The Fathers in general are confessed by Protestants not onely for particular points of faith but ioyntly at once for many or most of them together p. 313. Section 13. That the Fathers who liued next before and after the times of S. Austin agreed with him in the Catholicke Roman faith p. 322. The conclusion of the whole booke 335. A TABLE OF THE PRINCIPAL POINTES contained in this booke A ABsolution geuen by imposition of hands enioyned penance 119. Abstinence from certaine meates prescribed 175. Amen and Alleluia anciently vsed 206. Ancient way to be followed Pref. p. 31. Angels and Archangels are different Orders 25. They are present at the sacrifice of the Masse 95. Answeare in general to such obiections as are vrged from Fathers 254. Antichrist one man 187. 272. He shal come from the Iewes 188. Not before the vtter ruine of the Roman Empyre 188. 271. He is to continue but 3. yeares and a halfe 272. 189. Altars anciently vsed for sacrifice 290. Altars consecrated with the signe of the Crosse and oyle 110. Miracles wrought therat 221. S. Austin him selfe a Monke before the Pref. to the King and 183. Sundry his writinges reiected by Prot. are defended Pref. p. 23. Him selfe commended by Fathers and Prot. 3. The age wherin he liued likewise commended 5. Prot. chalenge S. Austin to be of their religion 5. B BAptisme taketh away al sinnes 68. 273. Children dying without it are not saued 71. 274. Laye persons in case of necessity may baptise 72. 275. Obiections against it answeared 234. Ceremonies of Baptisme aunciently vsed 73. 275. Bigami hindred from holy Orders 135. Bishops haue ciuil Iurisdiction 123. their blessing 125. The Pelagians impugning it reproued 127. They are in dâ—grees aboue Preistes 126. They onely consecrate Virgins and
three I do once more in answeare therto explaine that the Councel vnder those fiue bookes of Salamon comprehendeth also the other two bookes of Wisdome and Ecclesiasticus both which as S. Austin further explaineth (q) De doctrina Christiana l. 2. c. 8. circa med were said to be Salamons in reguard of a certaine resemblance of stile But the truth hereof is so clearly defended by the Carthage Councel and S. Austin that our aduersary Mathaeus (r) Tract tripart theol p. 46. Hoe confesseth and reproueth the Carthage Councel in these wordes The Councel of Carthage haith decreed for Canonical al the bookes of the old Testament excepting the third and fourth of Esdras the third of Machabees c. I ad that the Councel of Carthage ought not to haue Canonized more bookes because it had not authority c. To which the French Prot. Poliander addeth saying (s) In his refutation p. 44. To come now to the error of some Councels the Councels of Carthage and Florence haue enrouled for Canonical bookes and as diuinely inspired c. The bookes of Tobie Iudith Wisdome Ecclesiasticus and the Machabees c. And the Popes Innocentius and Gelasius haue reckned these bookes among the Canonical c. And to be breife S. Austin is so clearly ours in this waightiest point concerning the number of the sacred scriptures that he with the foresaid Councel is therefore sharply reprehended by (t) Hist sacram part 1. p. 160. Lub de principiis Christ dog l. 1. c. 4. p. 8. Hip. in method theol l. 1. p. 46. Bucer in his scrirpta Anglicana p. 713. Zanch. de sacra Script p 32 33. Field of the Church l. 4. c. 23. p. 246. 247. Reynoldes in his conclusions annexed to his conference conclus 2. p. 699. 700. Hospinian Lubbertus Hiperius Bucer Zanchius D. Field and D. Raynoldes S. Austin teacheth that one text of Scripture may haue diuerse true senses SECTION 3. DIrectly contrary to (a) Confut. of Purgat p. 151. Willet in his sinopsis p. 26. D. Fulke and D. Willet S Austin teacheth with vs that one text of Scripture may haue diuerse true senses saying (b) Tom. 1. l. 12. confes c. 31. initio when one saith this meant the Scripture which I do another saith yea that which I do I thinke I speake more religiously in saying why not both if both be true and if a third and fourth c. why not al which in diuerse other places he so often repeateth and confirmeth that sundry (c) The diuines of Geneua in their propositions and principles c. c. 52. p. 149. Zanchius de Scriptura p. 422. 424. 425. Aretius loc com loc 59. p 187. 177. The author of Catholicke Traditions p. 86. 112. Bilson in his suruey p. 418. Prot. authors do assent to his iudgement therein Now this truth supposed it fully preuenteth our aduersaries vsual euasion in many pointes of controuersy as for example where we alledge the Fathers expounding some texts of Scripture in behalfe of Purgatory Prot. do commonly obiect the same or some other Father vpon occation of other applicatioÌ„ vnderstaÌ„ding thereby the tribulation of this life so opposing this against the other which exposition the said Fathers neuer intended but admitted both the said senses And the like instance might be geuen of our aduersaries like euasion in other pointes of doctrine as namely in the further exposition of Tu es Petrus et super hanc Petram c. Hoc est corpus meum c. and sundry such like Now this is so certainly S. Austines doctrine that the Prot. (d) In the ministers defene for refusal of subscription part 1. p. 61. Hutton accordingly alledgeth and confesseth the forecyted saying of S. Austin to this purpose S. Austin teacheth that besides the sacred Scriptures the TraditioÌ„s of the Church are to be receiued and beleeued as also that al hereticks do insist only vpon the Scriptures SECTION 4. COncerning the question whether the Scriptures do containe al needful pointes of faith and saluation not onely by general direction to (e) Hebrewes 13.17 Obey our Prelates (f) Math. 18.17 Heare the Church hould (g) 2. Thes 2.15 the Traditions c. which we graunt and in which sense the Fathers do often commend the Scriptures perfection but also so particularly as that there should be no neede of any vnwritten Traditions which we deny Protestants affirme S. Austin disputing against Ciprians error of rebaptizing (h) Tom. 7. de Baptismo contra Don. l. 5. c. 23. ante med saith The Apostles commaunded nothing herein but the custome which was opposed against Ciprian is to be beleeued to haue proceeded from their tradition as many thinges be which the vniuersal Church houldeth and are therfore wel beleeued to haue beene commaunded by the Apostles although they be not found writen And speaking of the Baptisme of Infants he (i) Tom. 3. de Gen. lit l. 10. c. 23. prope finem auoucheth that it were Not at al to be beleeued if it were not an Apostolical Tradition Againe (k) Tom. 2. ep 118. ad Ianuar. c. 1. Those thinges which we obserue not written but deliuered which are kept al ouer the world ar to be vnderstod to be obserued as decreed either by the Apostles the selues or general Councels And so likewise (l) Tom. 3. de doctrina Cristiana l. 4. c. 21. prope initium And in concil Carthag 3. can 24. The mixture of water with wine in the Chalice he confirmeth from Tradition which his sayinges are so euident for Apostolicke Traditions that M. (m) In Whirguiftes defence p. 103. Carthwright answearing thereto saith To allow S. Austines saying is to bring in Popery againe Adding (n) Ibidem in Carthwrightes his 2. â—eply part 1. p 84. 85. 86. further that If S. Austines iudgement be a good iudgement then there be some thinges commaunded of God which are not in the Scriptures and thereupon no sufficient doctrine contained in the Scriptures Lastly whereas M. Carthwright and others do vsually (o) In Hookers Eccles pol. l. 3. sec 7. p. 118. obiect against vnwritten Traditions certaine obscure and by vs often answeared sayinges of S. Austin and other Fathers our learned aduersarie M. (p) Ibipem p. 119. Hooker forbeareth not in our so cleare a cause by his special explication and answeare to explaine and cleare them to our handes so that al further answeare I deeme ouer tedious and vnworthy I wil now conclude this point with but remembring how peculiar S. Austin maketh it vnto heretickes to insist vpon onely Scripture To which end he induceth the Arian hereticke saying then to Catholickes as Protestants Puritans Brounistes Anabaptiistes c. do now say to vs If (q) Tom. 6. contra Maximinum l. 1. prope init prope finem you bring any thing from the Scriptures c. it is necessary that we heare it but these words
Chemnitius who therupon obserueth inferreth (h) Examen part 1. fol. 80. And see Snecanus in method descript p. 429. 430. 432. that In this sort Austin de natura et gratia applyeth the sentences of Hillary Ambrose Chrisostome Hierome which Pelagius had alledged in confirmation of his error according to the Analogy of faith adding a fit interpretation Now according to this obseruation and practise of S. Austin al. our aduersaries mistaken obiectionâ— from him are againe at once determined by the confessed contrary doctrine in the next Chapters alledged from the other Fathers that seuerally liued in the same age with S. Austin and in the other ages next before and after him As also according to both these foresaid rules may easily be auoyded that pretended necessity of childrens receiuing the Eucharist vnder paine of damnation wherwith S. Austin is by D. (i) Answeare to a counterf Catholicke p. 87. Fulke and many others so often and so seriously mischarged For hereto it may be answeared that in S. Austines opinion children in Baptisme receiued the effect of the other Sacrament without which vertual communicating he thought them not saued otherwise that he did not thinke their Sacramental receiuing of the Eucharist necessary appeareth first in that he taught before that in Baptisme was a plenaâ—â— remission of al sinnes Secondly in that our aduersaries cannot alledge any his saying affirming directly to to the point that a Baptised childe dying before his communicating is damned Thirdly in that S. Austin teacheth that (k) Serm. ad Infantes apud Bedam in 1. Cor. 10. And see Tom. 7. l. 1 de pec mer. et rem c. 19. and tom 5. de ciuit Dei l. 21. c. 16. and after the english transl p. 856. none ought any wayes to doubt but that euery one of the faithful is made partaker of the body bloud of our Lord when he is made in Baptisme a member of Christ and that he is not estranged from the fellowship of that bread and Chalice although before he eate that bread and drinke the Chalice he depart out of this world being in the vnity of the body of Christ This point is so cleare in S. Austin as that the (l) Cent. 5. c. â— col 604. Centuristes do in particular free him from this impution As for S. Austines communicating to Infants but without al opinion of the necessity before supposed we graunt his doctrine therof A doctrine likewise houlden good not onely by S. Ciprian who recyteth a (m) Serm. de lapsis circ med memorable miracle concurring therwith and one in his owne presence But also Musculus who maketh true and (n) Loc. com e. de caena Dom. p. 34â— direct answeare to those wordes of S. Paul Let a man proue him selfe and alledgeth (o) Ibid. p. 341. the auncient Churches iudgement and practise in proofe therof A doctrine also stil defended (p) Lib. ep Oecolam et Suing p 305. 329. by the Bohemians The third obseruation is that according to our aduersaries owne (q) Chemnitius examen part 1. fol. 80. Snecanus method de script p. 290. Bancroftes suruey p. 336. Humfrey in Iesuit part 2. rat 5. p. 501. rat 2. p. 129. and see S. Basil ep 64. rule we do discerne the Fathers sayinges by them vttered in heat or feruor of disputation from those other which they write dogmatically for that in the first kind the Fathers being more attent and busied how to conuince and ouercome then alwayes precisely obseruant or circumspect of their manner of speaking which they neuer doubted would be vnderstood otherwise then according to the Catholicke receiued sense euen as next here before S. Austin expounded and excused S. Chrisostome their meaning may the more colourably be mistaken In which respect such their obiected sayinges as namely those commonly vrged against freewil and merit of workes taken from S. Austins disputation with the Pelagians who enhabled these as auaileable without grace are not houlden so conuincing or fit for argument which few obseruations thus propounded being but duly obserued by the studious and indifferent reader wil suffice to deliuer him from the doubtful laborinth of al vprising obiected difficulties And thus much breifly in answeare to al the obiections pretended from S. Austin wherein our aduersaries most colourable endeauour is but to make him no further contrary to vs then confessedly therein he should be contrary to him selfe which is nothing he being in very deede so plaine in our behalfe and so far from Luthers new erected doctrine that one of Luthers scholers blushed not to say (r) Alberus contra Carolastadianos l. 7. And see the like in Musculus in praefat in libel Ger. de diaboli tyrannide And Hospin hist sacram part 1. fol. 346. I doubt not but if that Austin were non liuing he would not be 〈◊〉 to prâ—feâ—â—e him selfe Luthers scholler Concerning the doctrine and religiâ—a of the other Fathers in general and also of those who liued in the age of S. Austin And that it was the same with the doctrine religioÌ„ here formerly taught by S. Austin and at this day taught by the Catholicke Roman Church CHAPTER 20. The Fathers in general who liued in the age of S. Austin confessedly taught the same doctrine with him coÌ„cerning Christ being our mediator only according to his humanity concerning the sacred Scriptures traditions SECTION 1. HAuing thus hitherto entreated of the religion professed by S. Austin to whom aboue al the Fathers Protestants do vsually make their bouldest claime aâ— pretending him to make most for them and against vs Hereby I hope sufficiently appeareth what is to be expected in this kind from the other Fathers for if D. Boyes doth acknowledge that (a) Exposition of the dominic epist the winter part p. 253. and see before c. 1. the most indifferent for both parties among the Fathers is Austin who yet standeth so aduerse against them as we haue formerly seene by al the premisses much more aduerse then in al probability are the other Fathers And for so much as the further explanation of the other Fathers iudgements yealdeth a yet further strong proofe of S. Austires (b) See before in the pref to the learned aduersary professed like consenting religion and that in reguard of my enioyned and affected breuity I haue not opportunity to demonstrate the same from the other Fathers owne alledgedged sayinges at large I wil now therefore onely ad as in ful satisfaction of al reasonable readers a breife recytal of our learned aduersaries them selues charging and reprouing the Fathers indefinitly or els sundry of them at once charging also diuerse of those who liued in S. Austins age with their knowen confessed iudgements practise in particular of our Catholicke faith First then in proofe of our Sauiours office of mediatorship onely according to his haman nature Caluin him selfe denying it yet saith of the Fathers (c) Instit l. 2.
the fast of Lent the vnmarried life of Preistes Baptisme of laye persons in case of necessity the manner of sacrifycing c. Whitaker answearing therto iustifyeth the same saying (d) De Eccles controu 2. 9. 5. p. 299. wheras Bellarmine alledgeth certaine testimonies from Caluin and the Century writers as noting certaine errors of the auncient Fathers which were common to them with the Papistes as namely freewil merit Limbus Inuocation of Sainctes the vnmarried life of Preistes satisfaction and certaine other such like c. before mencioned by Bellarmine I answeare therto that it is true which Caluin and the Century writers haue written that in many thinges the auncient Church erred as in Limbus freewil merit of workes and in the residue of those other before recyted Agreeably hereunto also acknowledgeth (e) Nouum testam praefat ad Principem Condensem Beza of the times of Ciprian Austin and Chrisostome that euen then Satan did laye the first foundation in Greece of inuocation of the deade wherto some Bishops of cheifest note were so far from opposing them selues c. that they did not only not expresse the opeÌ„ superstitions arising but also nourished them c. Hence those opinions of freewil c. affirming presently after that the knowledge of prouidence freewil faith and free iustification was as then almost oppressed with the commentaries of the Grecian Bishops c. At the same time inuocation of the deade preuailed and the foolish opinion of single life which shamful errors being openly defended the multitude also of Ceremonies increased c. and the Monkes in Aegipt and Syria c. almost al admired as Angels prayers also for the deade begun then to be vsed more freely and the Platonical question concerning Purgatory fire c. This acknowledgment of Beza is so certaine that the Protestant (f) Asinus Auis sec 43. p. 60. Holderus purposly preuenteth al extenuation or excuse therof M. (g) In Apoc. in c. 14. p. 382. Brightman hauing named S. Athanasius Basil Chrisostome Ambrose Hiâ—rome Augustine c. auoucheth further that they were in words condemning Idolatry but indeed establishing it by inuocatioÌ„ of Saincts worshiping of Reliques such other like wicked superstitions affirming yet further that no more pure doctrine can be drawen out of their writinges then any profitable notion be gathered by the beating of the waues In like sort M. Napier recordeth that (h) Vpon the reuelation p. 361. The Bishops staf the Archbishos cloake or pale c. Item their holy water their Chrismes in Baptisme the shauing of their heades their golden and siluer vessels in the Church their Albes and Corporals of linnen for the Altar their consecration of the Altar the obseruation of dayes c. the fasting in Lent from flesh the choice of meates the pretended chastity of the Cleargy the celebration of Masses in memory of Martyrs the adoration of the Crosse were al instituted and deuised and arose about the 313. yeare of Christ together with the style of Primacy vsurped by the Roman Bishop The (i) Ib. p. 362. supper of the Lord was then degenerate and turned ouer to the Masse to be celebrated for deade men c. and mixed with water In the (k) Ib. p. 363. 20. Articles of the first Councel of Nice are superstitious rytes euen the obseruation of dayes to wit of peace or indulgence and superstitious penances c. Thâ—se and diuerse other abuses and superstitious rites creeped in in the outward visible face of the Church in Siluester the first his dayes The Century writers in their fift Century being that age wherin S. Austin flourished affirme that as theÌ„ (l) 〈◊〉 dedic euery where Monasteries and Celles of Eremites were builded and that they had for their praisers Austin Chrisostome and others most excellent men Hence also the cheife articles of faith of free remission of sinnes by faith in Christ began to be obscured and defyled c. The doctrine also of good workes was diuersly corrupted c. They attributed saluation to them with reproch and iniury to the merit of Christ c. The light also of true inuocation began to be obscure c. Afterwardes also because ouermuch should be challenged to the merits and worship of deade men in this age also rise vp the worship of Reliques c. running to peeces of Sainctes as they were commonly thought Therefore these cheife heades being adulterated it is easy to conceaue that in the other parts also of heauenly doctrine sincerity was many wayes corrupted c. The Roman Bishops not onely greedily but also impudently sowed the seedes of their Primacy or eminency aboue other Churches of the world c. Rome formerly the head mistres of the world is becom the seat of Antichrist c. more particularly they charg the Fathers of this age as erring in our Catholicke doctrines of (m) Cap. 4. col 500. freewil of (n) Col. 504. Iustification of good (o) Col. 506. workes of (p) Col. 510. prayer of human (q) Col. 513. Traditions of (r) Col. 513. virginity of (s) Col. 513. Penance of (t) Col. 515. Baptisme of the Lords (u) Col. 517. supper of (x) Col. 518. marriage of the (y) Col. 520. Church of the place of (z) Col. 520. soules and of the (a) Col. 523. Canonical bookes In al which they recyte and reiect their particular sayinges And the like also might be seene vnder the titles of (b) Cap. 7. col 774. Primacy of (c) c. 6. col 684. Lent of (d) Col. 697. Reliques and their translation of (e) Col. 700. Monkes of (f) Col. 714. Heremites and the Ceremonies (g) Col. 727. of Baptisme In so much that Osiander auoucheth that (h) Cent. 5. l. 1. c. 1. p. 1. Most diuines of this Century did no litle diuert from the purity of Apostolical doctrine vnto human opinions and Traditions c. In this Century Antichristianisme was conceiued in the braine of Ambitious Bishops c. So confessedly auncient are both the foresaid rites and doctrines of our Catholicke religion from the abounding testimonies of the Centuristes Osiander Caluin Beza Whitaker Brightman and Napier And here it may be wel obserued that the foresaid Protestants reiecting the Fathers thus in general for agreeing with Catholickes in al the foresaid points of faith that this preuenteth and confuteth D. Mortons vsual euasion throughout his Appeale in pretending that the Fathers held these pointes but in other manner then we Catholickes now do as though the Fathers agreed with vs in wordes tearmes and differed from vs in meaning Ad now lastly hereunto that in reguard of our foresaid sympathie with the Fathers in matters of faith and religion that D. Whitaker further auoucheth (i) â—ontra Duraeum l. 6. p. 4â—3 The Popish religion to be a patched couerlet of the Fathers errors sowed together And