or repugnant to the Kings Prerogative as now a new head of the Church or to the laws of God By which means without one single voice of the Clergy all former Ecclesiasticall Lawes might be abrogated 4. An authority was allowed to the King to represse and correct all such errours Heresies abuses and enormities whatsoever they were which by any manner of spirituall Jurisdiction might lawfully be repressed c. any forreign Lawes or any thing to the Contrary notwithstanding 5. All manner of Jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall was by Parliament ackowledged to belong to the King as Head of the Church So that no Bishop had any Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction but by under and from the King 6. Supreme Power of dispensing with any Ecclesiastical Constitutions is ascribed to the King and Parliament as recognised Supreme Head of the Church and the Archbishop is made only the Kings Delegate So that in case he should refuse two other Bishops might be named to grant such Dispensations And after all the King and his court of Chancery are made the last Judge what things in such Dispensations are repugnant to Scriptures what not 7. Though the King did not personally himself exercise the power of the Keys yet this right he claimed that no Clergy man being a member of the English Church should exercise it in his Dominions in any cause or over any person without the leave and appointment of him the Supreme head Nor any refuse to exercise it whensoever he should require 8. It was moreover enacted that no speaking doing or holding against any spiritual Lawes made by the See of Rome which be repugnant to the Lawes of the Realme should be deemed heresies As also that whosoever should teach contrary to the determinations which since the year 1540 were or afterwards should be set forth by the King should be deemed and treated as a Heretick So that the King and Parliament are hereby constituted Judges of Heresy 9. In the dayes of King Edward the sixt an Act is made in which the King and Parliament Authorise Bishops c. by vertue of their Act to take informations concerning the not useing the Forme of Common Prayer then prescribed and to punish the same by Excommunication c. 10. There were also appointed six Prelates and six others nominated by the King by the same authority to frame a new forme of Consecration of Bishops c. 17. Hereby it is apparent that a Jurisdiction purely Spiritual was communicated to or assumed by King Henry the eighth this he further shewed by many practises For besides Jurisdiction as if he had the Key of divine knowledge given him by Christ he set forth Books of instructions in Catholick doctrine by his own authority declaring them hereticks that taught otherwise The labour indeed and we may say drudgery of composing those books as also of executing other spiritual functions was left either wholly or in part to the Clergy but when they had done he perused them and and made what additions and alterations he pleased in them and without remanding them to the Bishops caused them to be printed The Book with his Interlinings and Changes is still ex-tant 18. Indeed it was only spiritual Jurisdiction that he by his new Title of Head of the Church sought to deprive the Pope of for he feared not his pretended temporal Power which in those dayes the world was little troubled withal For he stood in need of a power to justify his Divorce and to dispense with the horrible Sacriledge designed by him He was unwilling to be looked on by his Subjects as a Heathen and a Publican and therefore to prevent this danger he devested the Pope and assumed to himself the power of Excommunication also that is not the execution of it but the disposing of of it by Delegation to the Arch-bishop who should execute it according to his will and directions only 19. A further irrefragable proofe that it was a power purely Spiritual which that King challenged by his new Title is taken from the Declaration of Stephen Gardiner Bishop of Winchester the contriver of the Oath as we find it recorded by Calvin himself For saith he when Stephen Gardiner was upon the Kings affairs at Ratisbon he there taking occasion to expound the meaning of that Title of Supream head of the English Church given to King Henry the eighth taught that the King had such a power that he might appoint and prescribe new Ordinances of the Church even matters concerning Faith and Doctrine and abolish old As tamely that the King might forbid the marriage of Priests and might take away the use of the Chalice in the Sacrament of the Lords Supper and in such things might appoint what he lâ—ft A Title thus interpreted the same Calvin vehemently inveighs against calling Gardiner and worthily an impestour and Archbishop Cranmer with his fellowes inconsiderate persons who make Kings too spirituall as if beside theirs there were no Ecclesiasticall Government and Jurisdiction 20. As for his Son King Edward the sixth the same Title with the plenitude of power was given him which he likewise as very a child as he was executed for he by his Authority made Ecclesiastical Lawes to be new reformed Church service and Administration of Sacraments to be changed and new Instructions in matter of Religion to be published quite contrary to what the foregoing Head though his Father had decreed to be Christian Doctrine And the reason was the same because new Sacriledge was to be committed by the Protectour for which he was loath to be excommunicated 21. His elder sister succeeding repealed and renounced this Jurisdiction and restored it to the Church But her younger sister repealed her repealings and took it again when it was in as high language yea higher confer'd on her by Parliament And there was a greater necessity for it than her Brother had For her Mothers Marriage was declared Null by the Pope and consequently her right to the Crown 22. And that this was the design intention of the Parliament in the first year of her Raign when they renewed the Title of her Supremacy in Church matters though they blushed to call a Woman Head of the Church may sufficiently be collected from a Speech yet extant and made in that Parliament upon that occasion by the then Lord Chancelour Nicholas Heath For arguing very strongly against the said Title and the Authority imported by it he takes it for granted that by giving the Queen such a Title they must forsake and fly from the Sea of Rome the inconveniencies of which he desires may be better considered In the next place he recommends to their Advice what this Supremacy is For sayes he if it consist in Temporal Government what further Authority can this House give her then she hath already by right of Inheritance and by the appointment of God without their Gift c. But if the Supremacy doth consist in
Spiritual Government then it would be considered what the spiritual Government is and in what points it doth chiefly remain I find sayes he in the Gospels that when Christ gave to St. Peter the Supreme Government of the Church he said to him Tibi dabo claves Regni coelorum c. That is I will give thee the keyes of the Kingdom of Heaven and whatsoever thou shalt bind on Earth c. Now if you mean to give to the Queen that Authority which our Lord gave to St. Peter if you will say Nos tibi dabimus claves Regni coelorum c. We will give to your Majesty the keyes of the Kingdom of Heaven I pray you shew your Commission by which you are authorised to make such a Gift Again for the same purpose Our Lord said to St. Peter Pasce c. Pasce c. Pasce c. Feed my sheep Feed my sheep Feed my lambs As likewise Tu aliquando conversus confirma fratres When thou art converted confirm thy Brethren Now if you mean to say so much to the Queen let us see your Commission and withall consider whether her person being a Woman be in a capacity to receive and execute such an Authority since St. Paul forbids a Woman to teach in the Church Thus argued the said Lord Chancelour proceeding in the same manner upon other branches of spirituall Government and concludes That without a mature consideration of all these premises their honours shall never be able to shew their faces before their Enemies in this matter 23. But notwithstanding all this the Lords c. proceeded to frame an Act without any distinct explication whether it was a Temporal or Spirituall Authority which they gave the Queen Or rather they framed it with such clauses as that the most obvious sence of it imported that it was an Authority purely spiritual that they invested her withall and most certain it is that if she had executed such an Authority she might have justified her so doing by that Act. 24. However after that Parliament was ended but before the first year of her Raign was expired such considerations as the Lord Chancelour had formerly in vain represented had so great an influence upon the Queen that she was obliged by an Admonition prefixed to her Injunctions to declare that which the Parliament would not that it was not her intent by vertue of that Act to challenge Authority and power of Ministry of Divine Offices in the Church but only to have Soveraignty and rule over all manner of persons born within her Realmes of what State either Ecclesiastical or Temporall soever they be Which explication of hers was confirmed four years after by Parliament yet without changing the foregoing Act or any clauses in it 25. And consequently she left ordering of matters purely Spiritual to Bishops c. Expresly renouncing it For as for the power of Excommunication having again taken it from the Pope she did not fear it from any of her Bishops 26. In the times succeeding after her what qualifications were made and declared by three Kings touching spiritual Jurisdiction shall be shewed afterward They had not any such interests nor such fears as the three foregoing Princes had and therefore look'd with a more indifferent eye upon the matter Without repealing lawes or changing the Exteriour Forme of the oath of Supremacy they esteemed it sufficient to qualifie it by moderate interpretations as shall be shewed 27. As for the other Oath of Allegiance the compiler whereof was King James the most sad and horrible occasion of it is but too well known the intention of it is obvious and the sence plain So that it did not stand in need of such a Multiplicity of Acts of Parliament with many clauses to shew the extention of it Excepting one party scarce any except against it and were it not for some few incommodious expressions and phrases nothing pertaining to the substance and design of the Oath it would freely and generally be admitted and taken notwithstanding the foresaid parties condemning it who take that advantage to decry the substance of the Oath from which they have an aversion in as much as Fidelity is promised thereby SECT V. That the Oath of Supremacy as it lies and according to the sence of the first Law giver cannot lawfully and sincerely be taken by any Christian. 28. IT is a truth from the beginning acknowledged by the Fathers of the Church that all Kings are truly Supream Governours over the persons of all their Subjects and in all causes even Ecâ—lesiastical wherein their civil authority is mixed Constitutions of Synods however they may oblige in conscience and be imposed under spirituall censures yet are not lawes in any Kingdom that is they they are not commanded nor the transgression of them punishable in external Courts by outward punishments as Attachments Imprisonment c. further then supream Civil Governours do allow 29. This is a right due to all Kings though Heathens Hereticks c So that Kings by being converted to Christianity or Catholick Religion have not any new Jurisdiction added or their former enlarged thereby They do not thereby become Pastours of Souls but sheep of lawfull pastours And it is not a new Authority but a new duty that by their conversion accrews to them obliging them to promote true Religion by the exercise of their Civil Authority and Sword And subjects are bound to acknowledge and submit to this Authority of theirs that is not alwayes to do what Princes in Ecclesiasticall matters shall command but however not to resist in case their inward Beliefs be contrary to theirs but patiently to suffer whatsoever violence shall be offerâ—d them 30. Such a submission therefore to Kingly authority may when just occasion is be lawfully required by Kings from all their Subjects yea a profession thereof by oaths But such an one was not the Oath of Supremacy when it was first contrived and imposed For there an authority in many causes purely spirituall was by our Princes challenged as hath been shewed Therefore if we consider that Oath as now imposed on Subjects infinitely differing from their Princes beliefe and Judgment both in Point of doctrine and discipline it is not imaginable how it can be taken in such a sense as was first meant by any congregations no not even by that which is of the Kings own Religion 31. The Oath consists of two parts one Affirmative and the other Negative The Affirmative clause obliges all the Kings Subjects though never so much differing in their beliefs to swear an acknowledgment that the King is the only supreme Head and Governour of his Realme as well in all Spiritual or Ecclesiastical things or causes as Temporal And the Negative to deny that any forraign Prince Prelate c. hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction Power Superiority Preeminence or Authority Ecclesiastical or Spiritual within this Realme and to renounce all such 32. These two Recognitions if the
and accordingly in many particulars practised it to the which several clauses also both in this and following Statutes seem as if they gave warrant yet the Parliament by the said Provizo laid a ground how they might in future and better times shew how they meant no such thing The words are these PROVIDED alwayes that this Act nor any thing or things therein contained shall be hereafter interpreted or expounded that your grace your Nobles and Subjects intend by the same to decline or vary from the Congregation of Christs Church in any things concerning the very Articles of the Catholick Faith of Christendom or in any other things declared by holy Scripture and the word of God necessary for your and their Salvation but only to make an ordinance by policies necessary and convenient to repress vice and for good conservation of this Realm in peace unity and tranquillity from rapine and spoil insuing much the old ancient customes of this Realm in that behalfe Not minding to seek for any reliefes succours or remedies for any worldly things and humane lawes in any case of necessity but within this Realm at the hands of your Highness your Heirs and Successors Kings of this Realm which have and ought to have an imperial power and authority in the same and not obliged in any worldly causes to any other Superiour By this Proviso never repealed the Parliaments Ordinance is declared to be meerly Political that the Kings Independence on forraign power is in worldly things and humane lawes he being in worldly causes not obliged to any other Superiour 50. Thus far of the sence in which both the most judicious among the English Protestants have declared and have been authorised to declare what power it is that by the Oath is deferred to the Kings of England and renounced to be in any forraign Prince or Prelate to wit a civil Political power wheresoever it can be exercised in any causes Ecclesiastical c. Against this there is not extant a contradictory Testimony of any one Protestant Writer So that the Protestant Subjects of England do intend and judging that they have unquestiónable grounds to judge this only to be the sence of the Oath in this sence only do they take it and require it to be taken by others SECT VII In what sence the Oathes of Supremacy and Allegiance seem to be taken by Presbyterians Independents c. 51. IT is a wonderfull Mystery how it should come to pass that our English Prebyterians c. should especially now of late with so much willingness and greediness themselves swallow these Oaths and so clamorously not without threatning urge the imposing them upon others Is it because the Oath of Supremacy has so peculiar a conformity to their principles and that of Allegiance to their practises or that they are so ready and pressing to disclaim and condemn all that themselves have done these last twenty years 52. First for ther Doctrinal principles I do not find that any of those Sects of late in England in peaceable times have publickly declared in what sence they allowed his Majesty to have a supreme Jurisdicton in causes Ecclesiastical or Spiritaul as to themselves But as to the oppression and destruction of poor Roman Catholicks they have alwayes shew'd too great a willingness to exalt the Kings Authority and to draw out and sharpen his sword far more then himself was willing I do not find that any of them have busied themselves as a world of Protestants and Catholicks have with making discourses upon the Oathes Their silence in this point wherein they are doubtless much concern'd one way or other is surely very argumentative 53. Who ever knew or heard to flow from the tongue or drop from the pen of a Presbyterian so Christian a positon as is sincerely avouched both by English Protestants and the generall body of Roman Catholicks viz. That even in case a Christian or Heathen Prince should make use of his civil power to persecute truth that power ought not upon any pretences to be actively resisted by violence or force of armes but though they cannot approve they must at least patiently suffer the effects of his misused Authority leaving the judgment to God only How unknown at least how unreceived such a Doctrine has hitherto been among their Brethren abroad will but too manifestly appear in a volume entitled Dangerous positions collected by Archbishop Bancroft out of severall books written by Calvinisticall preachers What judgment their patriarch Calvin made of King Henry the eighths new Title of the Head of the Church we have seen before And what an exception terrible to Princes the French Calvinistical Church hath made in their confession of Faith speaking of Obedience due to the supreme Magistrate appears at least every Sunday in all their hands in print Where they acknowledge such obedience due to them except the Law of God and religion be interested or to use their own expression mogennant que l'empire de Dieu demeure en son entire that is upon condition that Gods Soveraignty remain undiminished Which clause what it means their so many and so long convinced Rebellions do expound 54. And as for their practices in England and Scotland it were to be wished they could be forgotten especially all that has hapned the last twenty years And it may suffiice only in gross to take notice that the most efficacious Engin for begining the late war and engaging their party in the prosecution of it was a publick declaration that their design was to root out Popish Doctrines favoured by the King and Bishops to abolish publick Formes of Church-service and to destroy Episcopacy and Church Government root and branch which had been established in England by the universal authority of the whole Kingdom 55. These things considered is it not a great Mystery that such persons of such perswasions should be so zealous to take and impose generally either of these Oaths To think that they do knowingly directly and formally forswear themselves and force others to do so would be uncharitable Therefore an Evasion they have to secure themselves in their own opinions from perjury How little they deferr to Kings in their own Ecclesiastical matters and Government yea how they declare that none must be excepted from their consistories and Synodical Jurisdictions even externally coercive is evident both in Scoâ—land and elsewhere And it is observable that in the form of an Oath lately contrived in Scotland the word Ecclesiastical is studiously left out How comes it then to pass that they can in England swear that the King is supreme Head and Governour in all causes Ecclesiastical or spirituall Who can reconcile these things together in such a sence 56. Surely it will be extremely difficult if not impossible to imagine any colourable Evasion or pretext for cousening themselves except it be this That both the Oaths were made only against Roman Catholicks acknowledging the Pope to be supreme
Protestants know that the first invention of this Oath was to explore the consciences of Catholicks and to tempt them to Schisme by renouncing the Spiritual Authority of the head of Gods Church which under perill of damnation they cannot do They would not perhaps find so great difficulty without swearing only to say That the King alone is the supreme Governour in all matters Ecclesiastical within his Dominions c. when they are obliged to say this to persons that acknowledge with them such power to be only Civill But an Oath to Catholicks is a thing so dreadful that they dare not call God to witnesse that they sincerely swear an acknowledgement that the Pope has not nor ought to have any Superiority Ecclesiastical or Spiritual unlesse it might be permitted them at the same time in the same breath to signify that this is intended of Civil Kingly Authority in Ecclesiastical causes They tremble to swear in a phrase at the best ambiguous or rather not ambiguous but formally contradictory to Catholick Doctrine for all the words that they pronounce and of their acknowledgment whereof they make God a witnesse are such as they are perswaded to be manifestly erroneous Now God is called a witnesse to what men say in an oath not to what they think unless they think as they say 80. But moreover there is another consideration that is more than sufficient to make the taking of this oath inconsistent with Catholick Religion and that is the difference that King James Bishop Andrews c. put between the two oathes of Supremacy and Allegiance in regard of their End and intention For sayes King James The Oath of Allegiance was not framed against Roman Catholicks in general but only to make a separation between Catholicks of a peaceable disposition in all other things good Subjects and such Roman Catholicks as maintained the Rebellious Maxims of the Powder-traitours But as for the Oath of Supremacy the intention of the continuation of it was to the end to discover who were Roman Catholichs and who Protestants So that whosoever takes that Oath is presumed by King James c. to declare that he is no Catholick Bishop Andrews has the like expression but withall he discovers the usesessness of that oath For saies he what needs any oath at all to detect who are Roman Catholicks For they refuse to be present at the Protestants Church service they will not come to our Sermons they dare not receive the Eucharist with us c. So that without any oath you may easily know who are Roman Catholicks 81. Lastly the principal proof by which Protestants demonstrate that by the Oathes no other Authority or Supremacy is given to our Princes but civil only which is the 37 Article of the English Church though it be sufficient to clear the Affirmative part of the oath yet not so for the Negative concerning the Popes spiritual Jurisdiction Yea in the same place it is expresly excluded For the words following in the same Article do apparently give and require a very uncatholick sence of that Negative Clause for there is expressely affirmed The Bishop of Rome hath not any Jurisdiction in this Kingdom Now since both King James Bishop Andrews and the thirty seventh Article even in the very same places where they speak of Kingly and papal power do as the former rightly state the Kingly and leave the Papal Spiritual power indifinitely excluded their intention appears to have been to declare against and require an abrenunciation of a Catholick point of faith 82. Upon these grounds Catholicks dare not but refuse to take the Oath of Supremacy Perhaps by the new unlawful art of Casuistry some of them might think they could find evasions but generally such is the tendernesse of their consciences that they dare not think it lawful to make advantage of Casuistry in a Solemn Oath Very likely Protestants will call them nicely scrupulous foolish or improvident for this their tendernesse of conscience But sure they will not suspect them disloyal who attribute as much Authority to the King as themselves do and if it were permitted them to confirm this by a clear Oath in their own language they would not yield to them in the fullnesse of the expression If hereafter they are resolved not to grant them any ease from their pressures if a harmlesse scrupulosity in Catholicks shall bear those penalties which direct rebellion in others escapes If to satisfy the passion of not very good Subjects those that are truly loyal shall be treated as Rebells and their religion only punished indeed however that will not be acknowledged by those that punish it all that remains for Catholicks to say is Dominus judicabit fines terrae SECT IX Vpon what grounds some Catholicks make scruple to take the Oath of Allegiane 83. NExt followes the Oath of Allegiance framed by K. James upon the greatest provocation and an attentat the most execrable the most abhorred by the whole body of Catholicks both at home and abroad and the most scandalous to Christian Religion that ever was This oath affords also matter of wonder to Protestants Why Catholicks who acknowledge the Kings supreme civil authority should make any scruple to take it since it was never meant against such 84. But they may impute only to themselves the cause of such a refusal for by some incommodious phrases unnecessarily thrust into it they have frighted many from taking it and as if they had conspired with that one too well known party which alone gave occasion for the framing it they have given them advantage for those unnecessary phrases sake to fix upon all the Refusers a scandalous however unjust imputation as if they approved these abominable principles from which flowed that more abominable Attentat which deservedly wrung extreme severity from a Prince the most element that ever this Nation formerly had enjoyed 85. In the following Reflexions therefore upon this Oath justice requires that we should divide between the innocent and the guilty between those that not in this Kingdom only have made that Principle of Disloyalty their distinctive Charter and those that are ready to renounce that Principle if they might be allowed to renounce it by any other though more Emphatical expressions 86. As touching the former unhappy party it is observable that at the first publishing of the Oath there were in every line and almost particle of it pointed out by them a several Heresie All which Heresies are now at last vanished excepting only one which is that by which there is enjoyned a renouncing of that so bruited Article of Faith touching the Popes power of deposing Princes not for Heresie only but almost any other fault that shall be esteemed sufficient to deserve it 87. This pretended Article of Faith is by such new De-fide-men grounded either upon the Actions of certain Popes since Pope Gregory the seventh which both for their own sakes and ours it is to be
Subjects to resist the execution of such a sentence all which must together with them be killed or murthered before it can have its full effect 111. In the next place touching the Offer made by the same persons who without renouncing the position of the Popes deposing power will however swear future Allegiance to the King and his Successours notwithstanding any past or coming sentence of Deprivation in what age do they hope to find in England a King that will be so simple and so over good-natured as to believe them or rely upon such a Promise especially considering what passed little above fifty years since Is that Oath to be believed which they that take it do know to be unlawful and consequently to be ipso facto null and invalid so that it must be repented of and must not be kept For either they must swear that assoon as ever they shall have taken their rectifyed Oath the Kings of England will have this particular priviledge annexed to their Empire that they shall never deserve let their religion or practises be what they will that the Pope should exercise his just authority of deposing them that they alone will be out of danger to the worlds end of being denounced No-Catholicks or Rebells to the See Apostolick And this none can swear without the spirit of prophecy which they will hardly perswade the State here to believe to be in them Or else they will swear that though the Pope never so justly and necessarily exercising his lawful authority should command the Deposition of any of our Kings and absolve all their Subjects from their Allegiance yet they against their duty conscience and Religion will disobey such his lawful authority and continue in Allegiance to him to whom in such circumstances an Article of their Faith obliges them to believe that no Allegiance is due but rather utmost hostility Now who will believe such an Oath as this Or rather will they not be esteemed for such an oaths sake resolved to be disloyal both to God and man After this manner argues the great Master in the Deposing Doctrine Suarez writing upon this very Clause of this Oath 112. I would to God I could have delivered my conscience on this subject without danger of incensing or contristating any person But in the present conjuncture of affairs after so many years proof of the constant fidelity of Catholicks to his Majesty it being necessary that the State should be assured that such fidelity proceeded from a principle of Catholick Religion unalterable to discourse upon such a subject with a complying softnesse and tendernesse to any party that is without a free hearty sincere and confident renouncing of a false principle of disloyalty maintained but by a very few but imputed to and punished in the general body of English Catholicks would have been to betray the cause of Catholicks in general and to justify the suspicion that Protestants have formerly had against our Religion 113. There is another sort of loyal well meaning Catholicks who have no scruple at all to renounce this pretended Article of Faith nor to make any the most strict professions of their Allegiance but in this Oath meet with some Expressions and adventitious phrases nothing pertinent to the substance which they out of tendernesse of conscience cannot swear to For first they seem to professe a Declaration of a point of Faith which a particular Christian cannot presume to do Again they cannot say that Position of the Popes deposing power is Heretical any other ill names they will be content to give it but they dare not swear it is Heretical because the contrary is not evidently in Scripture neither has it been condemned by the Church 114. For the former Protestants perhaps will account it a needlesse scrupulosity since those which framed the Oath never intended that any one that takes it should seem to make himself a judge and decider of a point of faith but only to signify his acknowledgment touching it Besides say they this is the ordinary stile by which a Profession is made abroad of the condemning and renouncing of any erroneous propositions which are by Parliaments and Courts declared to be impious seditious c. Not that each Doctour or whole faculties take upon them an Authority Conciliary to propose doctrines to the church but only to testify their judgment concerning them 115. But the second difficulty will not so easily be cleared which is the profession of detesting such a position as Heretical Because catholicks know that it cannot be called Heretical according to the notion of that term universally received among them and what notion Protestants have of that word does not appear by any publick Declaration of theirs how then can catholicks by Oath protest a detestation of that position as Heretical since if they understand it in their own sence they should swear that which they know to be false and if in any other unknown sence they shall swear they know not what Besides they should by Oath testify that all Popes that have exercised and all writers that have maintained such a deposing power are to be esteemed Hereticks persons fit to be excluded from Catholick communion And what Catholick alive will presume to say this ¶ 116. Such is the case of afflicted Catholicks touching these two Oathes their tendernesse about phrases hath hitherto been either interpreted or at least treated as professed disloyalty But their hope now at last is that his Majesty according to his most gloriously element dispositon and the whole State so miraculously renewed will with a compassionate eye look upon and read their most secret thoughts touching this matter Though their abilities and number be inconsiderable yet Justice even to a single person ought not to be esteemed so They are not unwilling nay they are desirous to be obliged to make protestations of their unalterable Fidelity Obedience and peaceable submission to the State and if none other besides themselves shall be esteemed to deserved to be obliged hereto by Oathes they are contended to endure such a mortification and they beseech God that his Majesty may never have just ground to suspect any others for then they are sure that without any Oaths at all he may be most secure 117. If any Oath of Supremacy shall be still accounted necessary they only beg that they may not seem to renounce the Supreme spiritual jurisdiction of him whom they acknowledge for the Head of Gods Church or at least that for refusing to renounce this and suffering for such a refusal they may be acknowledged to suffer purely for their religion without the least imputation of Disloyalty to his Majesty which they will never be guilty of whether they swear against it or no. 118. That which they deprecate in the Oath of Allegiance is that which God himself requires that it may not be ambiguous dificult to be interpreted nor charged with expressions which if they were absent would not prejudice the
They are not carnal not externally coactive by attachments imprisonments banishments executions c. but far more powerful as being Spiritual binding and imprisoning in invisible chains banishing from the Communion of Saints delivering up to Satan c. It is a zeal to this Jurisdiction a Jurisdiction greater then any that the Angels injoy that forbids Catholicks to enervate it by adjoyning thereto with an opinion of making it stronger a carnal authority as knowing that Popes were never so powerful over mâ—ns souls as when they despised worldly advantages By hearkning to flattering Caâ—â—nists or Schoolmen who invested them with Temporal power Popes never gained any so much as temporal commodity to themselves but infinitely prejudiced their spiritual being often looked upon by Princes not as Fathers but as c. So that the Parliament of Paris in their censure did very justly say That such doctrines rendred the dignity of the Pope odious 137. This is that which Catholicks have been taught by Gods word by tradition by Counsels c. this they are ready with or without Oathes to professe and which God willing neither oathes nor lawes nor humane power shall force them to dâ—ny If this renders them obnoxious to the penalties of lawes as ill subjects yet it cannot make them ill subjects if this renders them disloyal subjects there is not a loyal subject in France Germany c. if humane tribunals condemn them God will in his time acquit them 138. In a word to demonstrate how little they deserve the imputation of being not most perfectly good Subjects Roman Catholicks are ready to subscribe to such a profession and oath of Loyalty as whosoever takes it will give all the security of Fidelity that honour conscience religion and the hope of eternal happinesse or fear of eternal damnation can lay upon a soul that is By Oath to protest not only an indispensable obedience and non-resistance in all things to his Majesty and his successours of what religion soever they be but also a firm perswasion or belief that it is absolutely unlawful upon any pretence or motive whatsoever either of ascribing to any other an undue power or even of defending religion for subjects actively and with armes or violence to oppose his Majesty By the same Oath they will oblige themselves to discover all secret plots or conspiracies against his Majesty or the State This Oath they will promise to keep inviolably from the obligation of whiâ—h no commands or perswasions of any person whatsover spiritual or temporal no private interpretations of Gods word no supposals of divine inspirations shall or ought to free them And lastly both in this and all other promises they will sincerely professe a detestation of the abominable doctrine of mental reservation and of the lawfulness of breaking faith given to Hereticks 139. If this will not serve to approve the loyalty of Roman Catholicks if there be no possibility of conjuring down the furious Calvinistical spiâ—it among us but that it must be suffered both in Protestant Churches to preach down Prelacy and Ecclesiastical Government and in the State to embitter lawes for their own advantage only to the prejudice both of Protestants and all other good subjects what will become of the reputation of the English Nation in forreign Countries It is too well known how strangely we are fallen of late in esteem abroad the dismal effects produced in this Kingdom by that ill spirit have been though unjustly imputed to the whole Kingdom English men have been looked upon as enemies both to God and their Kings as persons ready to admit any frenzies in religion the horriblest cruelties against their princes 140. But blessed be God his divine Providence hath wrought miracles to restore our reputation again which was almost forfeited All the world almost is now satisfied that the generality of Englishmen are the best Subjects in the world to the best of princes and therefore it is to be hoped that the Presbyterian spirit will not now that it is so well known be permitted to have that influence as to imprint again upon us this peculiar character That England is the only Nation in which pure religion is most pretended to and the way to make that challenge good is by the malignity of one faction to make the most sacred bonds of Religion snares and engins of unlawful passions where a just and peaceable Government is designed and the way to it is by unlawful however legal means to make peace impossible where oathes are framed against disloyalty which are ruinous only to good subjects and advantageous to the disloyal where loyalty and duty are only excluded from rewards or even INDEMNITY where lawes are made against crimes and the penalties of those lawes are insupportable only to those that are free and are known ever to have been free from any suspition of such crimes and are commodities and rewards only to the Nocent where persons of approved fidelity are condemned as traytors and both Jurors Witnesses Judges for the most part are Presbyterians very incompetent and unindifferent parties in such matters and especially against such accused persons Lastly where the only proof of tenderness of conscience is to sear their consciences and of no intention to disturb the publick peace is to take oathes with an intention yea an obligation in conscience to break them and openly to profess both by words and known practises that peace shall never be setled till the whole frame of the Kingdom both for Religion and government shall be first broken in pieces and then new moulded for their own only advantage And after all this if Rebellion and desolation follow we will wonder forsooth what demerit God can find in us to punish and how it could be possiblé that a desolation should happen in a Kingdom where piety justice and his sacred Majesties safety have been so well provided for 141. If among all Religions and Sects now swarming in this Kingdom there shall yet be any English Protestants that are still implacable against Catholicks only it will be more suitable to English dispositions which heretofore have been above all other Nations esteemed frank and sincere to discover their intentions clearly let them therefore say We will only destroy that Religion which all our forefathers professed which through all Christendom abounds most with learning civility and loyalty which gave to Protestancy our Baptisme Bishops Churches Estates and whatsoever affords us an advantageous appearance above all other Sects the professours of which only will assist us in the maintaining our priviledges against sacriledge and professed prophaness which will indispensably concur with us in preserving his Majesties person and prerogatives from the attempts and usurpations of all others these are the only persons we will destroy And because a publick promise is made of liberty to tender consciences we will annul or interpret it so as that only those shall have no right to it that dare not swear an ambiguous