Selected quad for the lemma: doctrine_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
doctrine_n article_n church_n creed_n 2,425 5 10.1630 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A36107 A Discourse of toleration with some observations upon the late act of Parliament. 1691 (1691) Wing D1610; ESTC R15512 10,989 12

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

A DISCOURSE OF TOLERATION With some OBSERVATIONS UPON The late Act OF PARLIAMENT Printed in the Year 1691. Advertisement IT will appear upon the perusal of the following Discourse that the Author of it attending only to what he conceived to be the Sense of the Act for Toleration and not having recourse to the exact Words thereof has a little mistaken that Statute For he says That all those are excluded from the benefit of this Toleration who do not believe the Doctrine of the Trinity as it is believed and taught in the Church of England Now the Clauses in the Act concerning this matter are in Page 309 and Page 317. In the former 't is provided that Persons in Holy Orders or pretending to Holy Orders Preachers or Teachers in Dissenting Congregations shall be free from the Penalties of the Act for restraining Non-conformists from inhabiting in Corporations and of the Act of Uniformity Upon condition only of their taking the Oaths and declaring their approbation of and subscribing to the Articles of Religion mentioned in a Statute made 13th Eliz. viz. the 39 Articles except the 34th 35th and 36th and some words of the 20th In the other Clause 't is enacled that the benefit of the Act shall not extend to any Person that shall deny in his Preaching or Writing the Doctrine of the Blessed Trinity as it is declared in the aforesaid Articles of Religion So that none but publick Preachers c. are comprehended in these Restrictions All that are not so may believe what they please concerning the Trinity without being excluded from the benefit of this Act. And so indeed may Preachers too Only they must not teach publickly any thing contrary to those Articles which they are to subscribe and declare their Approbation not Belief of A learned Prelate of our Church Dr. Jer. Taylor in excuse for the many Divines of our Church who tho' they incline to the Arminian Opinions touching Free Will and Predestination yet subscribe to the 39 Articles which manifestly favour the contrary Doctrine viz. that of Calvin which is embraced by most sorts of Dissenters in some of his Writings tells us That those Articles were never designed as Declarations of Truths necessary to be believed but as Articles only of Peace which no Subscriber should oppose or preach against And that this is not only the Sense of one Doctor but indeed the general Sense of all the Church of England especially in the matter of the Trinity appears by her admitting us to both the Sacraments without requiring any Declaration of our Belief in that point so as it is explained in the Creed called Athanasius's or in the 39 Articles Now just what those Articles are by this Doctor lookt upon to be in respect to the Clergy of the Church of England such by this Act are they and particularly the Doctrine of the Trinity as it is explain'd in them made to the Dissenting Ministers Articles I mean of Peace and no more Thus it appears indeed that the Act does not as this Writer says exclude all Persons from the benefit of this Toleration who believe not the Trinity as 't is taught in the Church of England But nevertheless it must be confest that all his Reasonings hold good against the Act upon account of the restraint it lies upon Ministers in their preaching For if in a speculative point where all Parties pretend to have Scripture Authority and Reason on their side the Teachers of all Perswasions are obliged to subscribe to the Decisions and Explications of one only Party and not to teach or preach tho' both themselves and their Congregations may believe things contrary thereunto there seems still sufficient reason for this Writers Assertion That this Act of Toleration is not comprenensive enough And that it not being built upon the true Principle viz. That Liberty of Conscience is a Natural Right and that therefore Conscience ought not in any wise to be forced its Foundation is too narrow to support it and it cannot last long A Discourse of Toleration c. THE Gospel was at first planted and propagated by mild and gentle Methods Our Saviour did not send out his Disciples arm'd with Swords or Spears or any other Instruments of War Their Weapons were wholly Spiritual Charity and Humility Kindness and Condescention were the Arms which the first Preachers of Christianity made use of to conquer the World and bring it into Subjection to Christ By these means was the Christian Religion spread over the World And it overcame all Opposition by the irresistable force of Truth only And though the forward Zeal of after-Ages has prompted them to call in the Foreign assistance of Force and Power yet Experience shows That their Endeavours have very rarely been Crown'd with Success which we need not wonder at because it is very Natural that Religion should be preserved by the same means by which it was at first produc'd For my part I am so far from envying the Dissenters the Liberty they now enjoy or being angry with the Parliament for passing the late Act in their Favour that I think they have done us of the Church of England a Kindness in it as well as the Dissenters Since now we no longer lie under any Obligation of troubling or disquieting our Neighbours for Matters of Religion This Act cannot but calm all Minds that are truly dispos'd to Peace and still those peevish Animosities which were occasion'd by the Miscarriages of some few weak or passionate or interessed men whose over-hasty Zeal carried them beyond the true Rules of Conduct We all now know who it was set those weak men a-work and made Tools of them to do a business which they they never dream'd of But now they have seen their Error and repented And we hope that the good Nature of the Dissenters will not Father a persecuting Spirit upon our whole Church by reason of the Mistakes of some few unthinking men in it But methinks I could have wish'd that the Act had been more Comprehensive For I fear that it being built upon too narrow a Foundation it cannot last long Since by this Act several Persons are still liable to the Lash of the Law upon the account of their bare Opinion in matters of Religion For upon the same grounds that these are excepted succeeding Parliaments may think fit to except others whom they judge to hold Opinions equally false and dangerous and so more and more by degrees till at length the whole Toleration dwindles into nothing For if it be once allow'd That some persons may justly be punished for Mistakes in Judgment in such things as have no relation to Civil Affairs it will be very difficult to assign any good Reason why others should be wholly exempted from the Penalties of the Law and not be punished for holding false Opinions provided the Government shall at any time so think fit It seems a strange Paradox that men should contend for Liberty of Conscience