euidently proued against this their Article that the Church of Rome in euery age as they haue before declared assisting and directing the Christian Britans here and concurring and agreeing with them ineuery point and article of Religion neither did nor could be said to haue erred in matters of faith And this these Protestants expressely confesse when they generally acknowledge as all Antiquities doe that there was then no materiall or essentiall difference in matters of faith betweene the Christian Britains except some Pelagian heretiks among them and Sainct Augustine with his company being sent from the Church of Rome the Pope then being a greate S. Gregory the most learned and holy Pope that euer was by these mens Testimony Gregorius magnus omnium PoÌ„tificum Romanorum Balaeus l. 2. de Act. Rom. Pontif. in Gregorio Mâ—gâ—â—o doctrina vita praestantissimus And therefore by them and all holy writers stiled Gregory the greate And wherein soeuer any difference though ceremoniall obseruing of Easter any ceremony about the ministering of Baptisme or giuing holy Orders was betweene the Roman Church and the Britains all writers both Catholiks and ProtestaÌ„ts proue the Roman Church professed the truth And the Britains were in the errour and so they freely and publikely in their first meeting coÌ„fessed as Sainct Bede and our Protestants themselues Bed hist Eccles l. 2. c. 2. with others acknowledge Tum Britones confitentur quidem intellexisse se veram esse viam iustitiae quam praedicaret Augustinus and this was inuincibly proued vnto them both by vnanswearably humane arguments and diuine testimony and miracle And they afterward generally corrected and conformed themselues to the Romane Church in all things formerly questioned betweene them as all Antiquaries Brittish English Forreine domesticall Catholiks and Protestants agree neuer contending about any question moued by Protestants against the present Roman Church but both the Romane Church then and our Britains as the whole Christian world also iointly agreing in euery article against this new Protestant Religion And this is manifestly proued particularly already in all articles yet examined and so will be in all that followe Therefore it is manifestly false by all testimonies auncient later forreine domesticall Catholikes and Protestants euen in their publike decrees and Confessions that which this Article so desperately hath deliuered The Church of Rome hath erred in matters of faith and the contradictory that it hath not so erred nor shall at any time so erre is euidently true by all witnesses This will be yet more euidently manifested in the two next following examinations and others THE VIII CHAPTER The 20. Article thus examined and in whatsoeuer contrary to the Church of Romè thus condemned THEIR 20. and next article intituled of the authority of the Church is this It is noâ— lawfull â—or the Church to ordaine any thinge contrary to Gods word written neither may it so expound one place of â—cripture that it be repugnant to another Wherefore â—lthough the Church be a witnesse and a keeper of holy â—rit yet as it ought not to decree any thing against the â—ame so besides the same ought it not to enforce any â—hing to be beleeued for necessity of saluation In this article no thing needeth other answeare or confutation then is made before in their article of Scriptures and traditions where the pretended sole necessity of the written Scriptures heretikely insinuated is most plainely confuted both by the Apostolike doctrine and practise of this age and otherwise And the supreame power and authority which here they giue vnto the Church to be a witnesse and keeper of holy writ and the cheifest expositour thereof and as their common glosse â—â— this article is the Church hath authority to Iudge and determine in controuersies of faith doth vtterly disable and condemne those Protestants to haue any colour or pretence to hold the truth in any one article they maintaine against the Roman Church either concerning Scriptures Church or anâ— thing else for the Church which onely was and â— visible as they haue described the true Church before hath in all and euery article condemned aâ— such Protestant Innouation And for these men to say as they haue done â—â— their 19. Article that the Church is a congregatiâ— of faithfull men in which the pure word of God â— preached and the Sacraments be duely ministred anâ— to make it an article of faith as they doe in theâ— publike profession of the Creede that this Church one holy and Catholike doth so continue for 〈◊〉 without interruption or corruption in ministriâ— Sacraments and preaching doctrine and the things are in their censure should onely be take from the written word and Scriptures It is vnpoâ—sible in such proceedings that the Church shoâ— ordaine any thing contrary to Gods word writteâ— or so expound on place of Scripture that it be repugnant to an other For otherwise it should neither be one holie or Catholike but diuers different vnholy particular no pillar of truth but a forge of falsehood no howse of God no spouse of Christ no saluation to be had or hoped for in any Iudgment Catholike or Protestant but in the true Church of Christ To this the Apostolike men of this age giue Ignat. epist ad Philadelp Ephes Trall Magn. Antiochen Ignat. ep ad Philadelp euident testimony Sainct Ignatius doth make the Iudgment of the Church both supreame and certaine and receauing penitents and saith Christ hath firmely builded his Church vpon a hile by spirituall building without help of mans hands against which the floods dashing and windes puffing could not ouerthrowe it nor any spirituall wickednesses shall euer be able to doe it but they shall be weakened by the power of our Lord Iesus Christ. Iesus Christus secundum propriam voluntatem suam firmauit Ecclesiam super Petram adificatione spirituali citra humanarum manuam operam in quam collisa flumina venti non potuerunt eam subuertere nec id valcant vnquam spirituales nequitiae sed infirmentur virtute Domini nostri Iesu Christi And saith plainely as there is but one flesh and blood of Christ shedd for our sinnes one Euchariste one Altare one Priestly order one God the Father one God the sonne one holy Ghost so there is but one preaching and one faith and one baptisme and one Church which with their sweate and labours the holy Apostles haue founded in the blood of Christ from the one end of the earch to the other vnapraedicatio fides vna vnum baptisma vna Ecclesia quam suis sudoribus laboribus fundarunt sancti Apostoli à finibus terrae vsque ad fines in sanguine Christi Sainct Clement Câ—em Rom. Const Apost l. 1. c. 1. saith the Catholike Church is the plantation of God and his chosen vineyard which cannot be digged vp or destroied Dei plantatio est Catholica Ecclesia vinea eius electa So that no other can be planted or chosen by
be true nor the liberty therein allowed lawfull but wantonly licentious and damnable THE XXV CHAPTER Tbe 33. 34. Articles examined an in whatsoeuer repugnant to the doctrine of the Church of Rome thus condemned THeir 33. next article intituled of excommunicate persons how they are to be auoided containeth nothing contrarie to the doctrine or practise of the Church of Rome as is manifest in these the verie words thereof That person which by open denuntiation of the Church is rightly cut of from the vnity of the Church and excommunicate ought to be taken of the whole multitude of the faithfull as an heathen and publican vntill he be openly reconciled by pennance and receaued into the Church by a Iudge that hath authority thereto Therefore I passe it ouer and come to the next 34. article intituled Of the traditions of the Church and followeth in these words It is not necessary that traditions and ceremonies be in all places one or vterly like for at all times they haue beene diuers chaunged according to the diuersity of contries times and mens manners So that nothing be ordained against Gods word Whosoeuer through his priuate Iudgment willingly and purposely doth openly breake the traditions and ceremonies of the Church which be not repugnant to the word of God and be ordained and approued by common authority ought to be rebuked openly that others may feare to doe the like as he that offendeth against the common order of the Church and hurteth the authority of the magistrate and woundeth the consciences of the weake brethren Hitherto this article seemeth to haue litle or no opposition to the Church of Rome but it may be passed ouer with silence The rest of it immediatelie thus followeth Euery particular and nationall Church hath authority to ordaine chaunge and abolish ceremonies orrites of the Church ordained onely by mans authority So that all things be done to edifying This clause is euidentlie false and prophane in itselfe for making euery particular Church many thousands such being in the world to be supreame iudge sentencer not onely to ordaine chaūge abolish ceremonies and rites of the vniuersall Catholike Church but to haue ouerruling authority to decree and commaund what is fit or fittest for edification taketh away all possible hope of edification and bringeth most certaine destruction confusion and desolation by making so many thousands of Supreame Iudges in these doubts as there be particular Churches which is a thinge most foolish and irreligious to affirme and vnpossible to be acted Further it is directly opposite repugnant to their owne 19. and 20. articles before of the Church and authoritie thereof In the 19. article they teach that all particular Churches euen the cheifest haue erred not onely in their liuing manner of ceremonies but also in matters of faith Therefore by these Protestants wee may neither admit so many or any one such erring false Iudge in such things Neither by their doctrine may wee stand to the censure of any particular nationall Church but onely of the one Catholike militant Church of Christ which as it is euer by that article of our Creede I beleeue the holy Catholike Artic. 19. Church holy and vnspotted from errour so by these men in the same article it is thus assigned to be our onely true Iudge in these affaires The visible Churcb of Christ is a congregation of faithfull men in the which the pure word of God is preached and the Sacramēts be dayly ministred according to Christs ordināce in all those things that of necessity are requisite to the same And in their next article of the same one onely Church thus they decree in these words of the authority of the Church The Church hath power to decrecrites or ceremonies and authority in Controuersies of faith And their best writers haue published with their common and best allowance this sentence in this Question The primatiue Councels haue condemned Couell Mod. exam p. 65. them as heretikes onely for being stiffely obstinate in this kinde of denying the ceremonies of the Church They exemplifie thus in Aerius Aerius Feild l. 3. cap. 29 pag. 138. Couel exam pag. condemned the custome of the Church For this his rash and inconfiderate boldnesse in cōdemnig the vniuersall Church of Christ was iustly condemned The custome ceremonie and tradition which this heretike denied and was therefore by these men iustlie condemned was as they confesse naming the deade at the altare and offering the sacrifice of Eucharist for them This is but a ceremony by them because they contend it is not contained is scripture nor may be proued thereby as they likewise haue pretended for all other things which their Articles before haue reiected both in Sacraments and other doctrines and customes which I haue proued against them and doe leaue them as alterable ceremonies vpon that feeble and vaine pretence Vnder this pretence they haue taken away all our Missals or orders of holie Masse vsed in all Churches with their religious ceremonie from the Apostles time as I haue proued before So they haue done by all rituals and ceremonials about the ministring the Communion Booke and Booke of Consecrat of King Edu 6. Franc. Mason and the Prot. of their consecrat in Mat. Parker Prot. art 36 infra Stat. in parlamento an 2. Eduardi 6. holy Sacraments and brought in their places the childish and womanlie deuises of a named communion booke by yong King Eduard 6. and Queene Elizabeth and an other named and stiled by them The forme and manner of making and consecrating Bishops Preists and Deacons quite omitting all other orders euer vsed in all Churches from Christs time and these fashions neuer vsed before by their owne cōfession by anie Christian Britans Saxōs French or others in this Kingdome or all the world but to vse their owne words in these articles lately set fourth in the time of Eduard the sixt and confirmed at the same time by authority of Parlament the second yeare of the aforenamed King Edward He then being about eleuen yeares old a farre to yonge censurer Iudge and condemner of all Churches with their holie vniuersallie receaued ceremonies to bring in so straunge and childish an Innouation We are assured by the Apostolike men of this first age and others that euen from the Apostles there were manie particular ceremonies deliuered to be immutably vsed in all Churches Thus S. Clement and S. Dionisius the Areopagite Clem. Rom. Apost const lib. 8. cap. 29. Dion Areop Ecclesiastic Hierarc c. 2. with diuers others deliuer of hallowing oyle and water to heale diseases driue away deuils and and like effects settinge downe the verie manner how to sanctifie them Domine Deus Sabaoth Deus virtutum qui dedisti aquam ad bibendum oleum ad exhilarandum faciem in exultationem laetitiae ipse etiam nunc sanctifica per Christum hanc aquā oleum ex nomine eius qui obtulit tribue
his councell King Iames Prot. Lords Bish. Doct. in Confer at HaÌ„pt Court p. 13. 18. 35. 36 10. 11 Couell ag the plea. of the Innoc. p. 104. Barlow Serm. before the K. Sept. 21 an 1607. part 3. cap. 2. Protestant Bishops and best learned Doctors assembled in publike confereÌ„ce haue left thus concluded The particular and personall absolution from sinne after confesson is apostolicall and a very Godly ordinance That baptisme is to be ministred by priuate persons in time of necessity is an holy Tradition Bishops and Archbishops be diuine ordinations confirmation iâ— an apostolicall traditioÌ„ And in their publike Rituall their communion booke they testifie that confirmation was a Tradition of the Apostles hath an externall signe also vsed by them and giueth grace which by the 25. Article of their religion maketh â— Communion booke of Engl. Protest Titul Confirmation §. Almighty Prot. of Religion art 25. a Sacrament So that to insist onely vpon these graunted Traditions not contained in Scripture by these Protestants and yet so necessary to saluation as they by their greatest allowance and authority deliuer wee may not say as this Article doth Holy Scripture containeth all things necessary for saluation These men also deliuer vnto vs with greate approbation Articul 6. supr makinge the Author of that worke and for the same a Bishop certaine sure rules to knowe such true Thraditions by in these words Rules by which wee may Iudge which are true and Indubitate Feild Books of the Church l. 4. pag. 242. August l. 4. contr Donat. c. 23. Traditions The first rule is deliuered by Sainct Augustine Quod vniuersa tenet Ecclesia nec Conciliâ—â— Institutum sed semper retentum est non nisi authoritate apostolica traditum rectissimè creditur Whatsoeuer the whole Church holdeth not ordained by Councels but beinge euer holden it is most rightly belieued to haue beene deliuered by Apostolike authority The second Feild supr l. 4 c. 21. p. 242. c. 5. pag. 202. Kinge Iames and Confer at Hampton Couel def oâ— Hooker Ormer pict pap p. 184 Down l. 2. Antichr pag. 105. Sutcliffe Subuers pag. 57. rule is whatsoeuer all or the most famous and renowned in all ages haue constantly deliuered as receaued from them that went before them no man contradictinge or doubting of it may be thought to be an Apostolicall Tradition The third rule is the constat Testimony of the Pastors of an Apostolike Church successiuely deliuered Amongst Apostolike Churches the Church of Rome is more specially to be obeyed reuerenced and respected The Church of Rome is our mother Church it was a rule to all both in doctrine and ceremonies when it was in her florishinge and best estate The Church of Rome was the cheife and onely Church It was a note of a good ChristiaÌ„ to cleane vnto the Romane Apostolicall Church Euery Church ought to haue respect to the Church of Rome for her eminent principality And our English Protestant antiquaries and Diuines haue generally giuen their allowance that the Church of Rome both in this and the next age when Britayne did receaue the most pure Religion of Christ from thence was most holy and vnspotted free from all error Therefore whatsoeuer wee doe or may bringe in generall or particular for vnwritten traditions either from this so renowned Apostolike Church in this time from the whole Church or the most famous and renowned in this age beinge our Protestants owne allowed rules and to be denied by none must needs be euidence and testimony vndeniable in this and all others their questioned Articles Frst I exemplifie in the Apostles Creede stiled by our Protestants before a sundry comprehension of the cheife heads of Christian Religion Protest supr Ruffin in exposit Symboli alij a rule of the Churches faith This was deliuered by the Apostles by tradition not by Scripture but before the Scriptures of the new Testament werâ— written as both they and the auncient Fathers by â— common consent of the whole Church of Christ are witnesses And the same consent of Christ Church with these our Protestants in these their Articles so conclude of Sainct Athanasius and the Art 8. of prot Religion Nicen Creede in these words The three Creeds Nicen Creede Athanasius Creede and that which is commonly called the Apostles Creede ought throughly to bâ— receaued beleeued And so generally they obserue although the reason which they immediatly yeelâ— thereof for they may be proued by most certaine warrants of holy Scripture is childish and impertinentâ— for being confessed that the Apostles Creede waâ— deliuered onely by tradition of the Apostles and by that authoritie receaued before the Scriptures either receaued or written this Creede could not possibly be receaued by the written warrant of Scriptures but vnwritten tradition and warrant of thâ— Apostles And although the Nicen and S. Athanasius Creeds were written longe after this time yâ— they were both written receaued in the Churcâ— before the Scriptures were generally allowed anâ— receaued as both the auncent Fathers and Protestants haue acknowledged before and it is testifie by the publike warranted Protestant glosse vpoâ— Prot. Glosse by authority of Church of Engl. in Art 8. these their Articles that very many both old anâ— late writers euen whole sects and professionâ— namely to vse their owne words Ebionites Trâ—theits Antitrinitarians Apollinarians Arians Mâ—nichies Nestorians Origenians Familists and Anâ—baptists with others are Aduersaries vnto and deniers that these Creeds may be proued by holâ— Scripture Much more doe they and many other both Catholiks and Protestants themselues deny that all and singular their articles necessary to saluation may so be proued And to come to the holy and happy Apostolike writers and Saincts which liued and wrote in this first age and first hundred of yeares to wit S. Linus Sainct Clement Sainct Denys the Areopagite S. Martial Sainct Ignatius Sainct Policarpus or any other of whom any worke is extant I shall make it S. Ignat. epist ad Smyrn Theod. dialo Euseb l. 3. c. 31. Hieraâ— lib. de vir Illust S. Bern. Serm. 7. in ps 9. Marc. Michal Carnoten lib. de vir illustr Dion Carth. ad l. Areop de diuin nom Sint Sin lib. 2. Ignat. ep ad S. Ioh. 1. 2. ad B. Mar. Virg. B. Mar. epist ad Ignat. S. Ignat. epist ad Smyrnen Euseb hist l. 3. ca. 33. â— Chrisost orat de traÌ„sl S. Ignatij Foelix Rom. ep ad Zenon Imperat synod S. Constant Theodoret. Immutabil dialog 1. euident that in euery Article in this Protestant Religion contained in their booke of the Articles thereof they dissented from these Protestants and they and the Apostolike Church then vniuersally agreed in and professed the same doctrine which the present Roman Church doth at this day in all points This will plainely appeare in euery Article hereafter and therefore in this place I will onely cite Sainct Ignatius as a sufficient pawne or pledge
to Christâ— resurrection as the cheifest of all dayes Post Sabbatum Epistol ad Magnesianos epist ad Trallian omnis Christi amator Dominicum celebret diem resurrectioni consecratam Dominicae Reginam principem omnium dierum in qua vita nostra exorta est per Christum mors deuicta as all Christians now also doe The feast of Easter was also chauÌ„ged with other solemnities and they were accompted as cursed persecutors of Christ and his Apostles which obserued otherwise or kept any festiuity oâ— the Iewes although before commaunded in Scriptures Si quis cum Iudaeis celebrat Pascha aut Symbolâ— Epist ad Philadelphenses festiuitatis corum recipit particeps est eorum qui Dominum occiderunt Apostolos eius He proueth plainely that both the principall feasts and fasts also oâ— the Church as Lent and others were then in vse by this authority of Tradition Festiuitates ne dehonestetis Epistol ad Philippen quadragesimale iciunium ne spernatis contineâ— enim imitationem conuersationis Dominicae Post Passionis Doâ—â—â—iâ—ae hebdomadam ieiunare quartis sextis 〈…〉 negligatis Si quiâ— Dominicam diem ieiunarit â—ic Christi interfector est He often there remembreth the perpetuall virginity of the Blessed Virgin Mâ—ry Mariae Virginitas admitanduâ— ille partus Virginem esse quae parit The forme and manner of offering the holy Sacrifice of Christs body and blood of consecrating Bishops Preists and other Clergy men of ministringe so many Sacraments as he hath remembred the publike Church seruice to which he bindeth all the order of receauing peniâ—ents the custome and limitation of their vsed fâ—sts and whatsoeuer almost appertaining to the holy vse and exercise of Christian Religion in that Apostolike age was knowne and practized by this blessed disciple and all Apostolike men which was deliuered and vsed onely by tradition and so descended to later ages and posterities no Scripture prescribing Christians any such requisite instruction in so necessary and essentiall parts of Religion or the true practise and profession thereof to which all true Christians vnder paine and daunger of euerlasting damnation were bound And as Sainct Ignatius so also testifie the other holy and Apostolike writers of this age as I shall most clearely proue and cite them in euery particular article questioned by these Teachers For this present it will be more then needfull to remember what they write hereof in generall termes Sainct Denis the Areopagite conuerted by Sainct Paul the Apostle writinge of Christian necessary doctrines saith plainely that the Apostles deliuered some of them by tradition onely without writinge as they did some by writinge partim scriptis partim non scriptis suis institutionibus ex Sacrosanctis legibâ— Dionysius Areopag l. Eccles Hierarc c. 1. nobis tradiderunt And proueth that in this Apostolike time the ChristiaÌ„ mysteries were neither communicated by writing nor word for their greate reuerence but to holy and perfect Christians Vide â—â— Sancta Sanctorum enunties sed reuereberis ea patius quae occulti Dei sunt cognitiâ—ne mentis â—nimi â— honore habebis ac preteo ita tamen vt ea minus perfectis non tradas cum ijs folis qui Sancti erunt cuâ— Sancta illustratione pro sacrarum rerum dignitate communices And setteth downe expressely That thâ— Apostolike Church then did not permit Cateâ—hâ—mens Energumens or penitents to be present at the the holy misteries Catechumenâ—s Energâ—menos Cap. 5. quique in poenitentia sunt Sanctae Hiererchiae mos paâ—itur quidem audire sacram psalmorum modulationem diuinamque sacrarum Scripturarum recitationem aâ— sacra autem operae quae deinceps sequuntur at que mysteria spectanda non eos comiocat sed perfectos oculâ—â— eorum qui digni sunt And testifieth what greate Cap. care the Christians then had to conceale their ceremonies Sainct Timothy also as this holy writer proueth Dionys supr c. 1. S. Dionys l. de diuin nomin cap. 3. Clem. Rom. ep 1. 2. 3 4. 5. l Recog l. coÌ„stitut Apost Chris hom 49. in Matth. Euseb histor Eccl. Cedren Nicephor Callist hist l. 2. Epiphan in panar Ruffin praef in Clem. Bed in cap. S. Luc. Freculp Lerouien Chron. lib. 2. Synod Sext. in Trullo Ruffin praef translat oper S. Clement S. Proclus Patriarch Constant l. de tradit diuinae Liturg Nichol. Episcopus Methonen l. de vero Christi corp in Eucharist Marcus Ephes l. de corpore sang Christi Bessar l. de Sacr. Eucharist Manuscript Gallic antiq an D. in S. Clem. Manuscript Brit. antiquis Protest CollectioÌ„ of priuate prayers An. 1627. p. 147. 125. 107. 87. 35. Mat. Park antiquit Brit. pag. 47. was of this opinion and practise S. Hieroth eus also Tutor to Sainct Denis did write a booke of Christians holy traditions Hierotheus clarissimâ—s praeeeptor noster elementa Theologica magnacâ—m laâ—de collegerit And this before S. Denis write The Apostolike Traditions collected together and committed to writinge by Sainct Clement Successor to Sainct Peter at Rome as both he himselfe with other auncient and approued Authors Greeke and Latine and generall councels witnesse are so many that a short volume containeth them â—ot yet in all things condemne Protestant Reliâ—ioÌ„ not approuing it in any one Article wherein it â—ifferreth from Catholiks and the doctrine of the â—resent Roman Church as will be made euident â— the particular articles hereafter manifestly â—nowne and confessed by Ruffinus his translation â—nd testimony to haue bene then and from the beginninge contained in his workes and aggreable â—oth with the Apostolike doctrine of this age and â—ther confessed vnspotted times after as in the â—ourth hundred yeare of Christ wherein Ruffinus â—ued the Church of Rome at this time wherein â—ee now liue I will onely in this place exemplifie â— the publike liturgy Masse or Church sacrifice puâ—lished by him vnto the Church of Christ Greeks â—atines French and our old brittesh antiquities our Protestants theÌ„selues confesse That as Peter â—t Antioch S. Marke at Alexandria Sainct Iohn â—nd S. Andrew in Asia So Sainct Clement wrote â—nd published a forme of Masse and generally all Churches embraced it Omne sque vniuersae Ecâ—esiae vbicumque sint per eam quam Sanctus Cleâ—ens conscripsit liturgiam tradiderunt In this so old â— vniuersall so approued wee finde protection of â—e Angels Angelorum tutelas honor to all Saincts â—atriarks Prophets Apostles Martyrs Confesâ—ors c. Sanctis Patriarchis Prophetis Iustis Apoâ—olis Martyribus Confessoribus Sanctorum martyrum â—emoriam colamus Prayer for the faithfull deceased â—roijs qui in fide quieuerunt oremus The Ecclesiaâ—icall orders which I haue before remembred from â—ainct Ignatius That the holy sacrifice was offered â—r all Seruants of God Offerimus tibi pro omnibus â—ui à saeculo placuerunt tibi Wee finde virgins and liuers in professed chastity Pro virginibus castitâ— seruaÌ„tibus The sacrifice of
sine originali peccato fâ— esse Atque it a in primo momento cum viuere inâ—ret omnis peccati expers erat And saith that eâ— from her conception she was full of grace and hauing no place for any sinne Maria Virgo â—â— In Euang. de Annunt Mar. animaÌ„ plâ—na gratia concepta est Gratia Deiipsam â—â— boni abundantem facit Et ab omni malo liberat Dâ—cum ea est hoc est omne quod facit aut omittit diuiâ— est in eo a Deo perficitur ad haec tutatur eam â—fendit ab omni quod obnoxium incommodum esseâ— Antiquitat Glaston manuscrip tabul lign fixe Io. Capgrau in vit S. Iosephi ab Aramathia Guliel Malmesbur l. de anâ—iq coenob Glastonien test That from her conception she was full of grace whatsoeuer she did or omitted was holy and diâ— she was free from all thing illor sinfull Her hoâ— here in Britaine was so greate and timely that â—â— in 31. yâ—ares of the passion of Christ and 15. of the blâ— Virgins Assumption anno post Passionem Dominâ— cesimo primo ab Assumptione vero Virginis glorâ— quinto decimo S. Ioseph and his holy company by â— monition of the holy Angel Gabriel and diuine waâ— â—ilded here a Chapell vnto her honour It is accompted â—e first Church of Britaine dedicated miraculously by â—hrist in honour of his Mother The ChristiaÌ„ builders in â—eate deuotion watching and fastings and prayers â—ere serued God and the blessed Virgin and by the â—lpe of the blessed Virgin were releiued in their necesâ—ies Praedicti sancti per Archangelum Gabrielem in â—isione admoniti sunt Ecclesiam in honore sanctae Dei â—netricis perpetuae Virginis Mariae in loco caelitus â—â—onstrato coÌ„struere Qui diuinis admonitionibus obeâ—entes capellam consuminauerunt Et cum haec in hac â—ione prima fuerit Ecclesia ampliori eam dignitate â—â— filius insigniuit ipsain in honore suae matris dediâ—ndo Duodecim sancti praedicti in eodem loco Deo â—atae Virgini deuota exhibentes obsequia vigilijs ieâ—ijs orationibus vacantes eiusdem Virginis Dei â—etricis auxilio in necessitatibus suis refocillabantur â—hus haue our most auncient antiquities both by â—atholiks and Protestants testimonies The three next articles being thus intuled The â— of sinne after Baptisme the 17. of predestination and â—ection and 18. of obtaining eternall saluation onely â— the name of Christ doe not seeme in equall and â—orall construction euen as they expound themâ—lues to haue opposition to any Catholike doâ—rine but to haue beene receaued by them to conâ—mne newly risen vp heresies among them as liâ—rtines denyers of saluation to penitent sinners â—edestinaries not respecting to liue well vpon â—icked presumption of their predestination and â—ch as affirmed that euery man shall be saued Iew â—urke Pagan or whatsoeuer Infidell or heretike â—all be saued by the law or sect which he professeth that he be diligent to frame his life according to that law and the light of nature as is plainely registred â— set downe in those Articles THE VII CHAPTER The 19. Article examined and condemned by the same authority THEIR next and 19. Article intituled of â— Church is this The visible Church of Christ iâ— congregation of faithfull men in which the pure worâ— God is preached and the Sacraments be duely ministrâ— according to Christs ordinance in all those things thâ— necâ—ssity are requisite to the same As the Churâ— Hiâ—rusalem Alexandria and Antioche haue erred â— also the Church of Rome hath erred not onely in thâ— liuing and manner of ceremonies but also in matters â— faith Hitherto this article Whose definition â— description of the Church if wee should alloâ— wee are sufficiently instructed by that is said bâ—fore that the Protestants new congregation câ— not be this true visible Church of Christ eâ—â— from the truth in so many necessary and requiâ— things as hath beene proued in all Articles befoâ— wherein it opposeth the receaued doctrine of tâ— primatiue Apostolike age and the present Churâ— of Rome as the like demonstration shall be maâ— against them in all their contradictory Articâ— following in their due place And so is also and â—â— be most manifest that the present Roman Churâ— agreeing in all those Articles both already heâ— after to be examined with the vndoubted â—â— Church of the Apostles and this their age is â—â— must needs be the true Church of Christ Aâ— â—eir assertion in the second parte of this Article â—hat the Church of Rome hath erred not onely in their â—ing and manner of ceremonies but also in matters of â—ith is most euidently false and impudently slaunâ—erous And the open dore to infidelity For if all â—e commaunding Churches in the world Hieruâ—lem Nicen. Concil Can. Parlament â— of Queene Eliz. Parl. â— Iacob 1. Caroli Alexandria Antioche and Rome as they are â—t downe in the first greate Councell of Nice and â—proued by the Parlaments and Parlament Reâ—gions of Queene Elizabeth King Iames King â—harles haue erred in matters of faith as this Arâ—le affirmeth then all other Churches all being â—biect vnto them haue likewise erred And this â—w Protestant pretended Church not being then â—runge vp being noe congregation of faithfull â—en in that time nor any congregation or men at â— and so neither hauing the pure word of God â—eached nor Sacraments duely ministred nor any â—e point of doctrine yet preached or Sacrament â—nistred nor man to preach or minister any such â—uld not nor can possibly by their owne rule and â—dgment be the true visible Church or any â—ember peece or part thereof That true primaâ—e and Apostolike Church teaching by all Preists â—d Cleargy men it had both to the congregation â— faithfull men to vse these mens phrase conâ—rted and to others yet not Christians all those â—cessary articles hitherto examined contrary to â—otestant Religion when the onely want of any â—e of such necessary things by their owne definiâ—e sentence before taketh away the name and â—e to be the true Church at this present any â—e past or to come the preaching of the pure â—rd of God due ministring of the Sacraments in all things of necessity being one and the same â— all persons in all times and places And to be of any other minde quite crosseth wiâ— Christs Institution and the continuance and visiâ—lity of his Church which both that article of theâ— Creede I beleeue the holy Catholike Church and tâ— their article and confession of an euerduring visibâ— Church doth proue For if at any time after Chriâ— founding his Church either in this Apostolike â— any age after it had generally erred in matters â— faith that it retained not the name and truth of â— true Church there was then by this article no tâ— Church in the world For whosoeuer it was whâ— wee will dreame to haue beene the first finder oâ— of this generall errour and supposed Apostaâ— Martine
two little syluer vessels full of the bloody sweate of Christ duo vascâ—la alba argentea cruore Prophetae Iesu sudore perimpleta All histories agree that the body of S. Ioseph was there preserued with greate honour and reuerenced with greate resorte of pilgryms to that and other Reliks there vntill these times of desolation and those holy Reliks gaue that glorious denomination to the happy place of their preseruing to be stiled camiterium Sanctum tumulus Sanctorum Hieronyn cont vigilant ep 53. ad Riparium Defider Gennad in catalog cap. 53. willet Antilog pag 13. Wotton des of part pag. 9. perkins probl pag. 81. Iouas Aâ—elian l. 1. Sedul alij Hieronym sup and Ripar dehderium lib. aduers vâ—gilant cap. 2. the holy Church-yard graue of Saincts and the like Vigilantius is remembred in histories to haue beene the first man of note among Christians which denied or impugned this doctrine and for that as other his singular assertions condemned for an heretik so our Protestants thus confesse Vigilantius was condemned of heresie for deny all thereof He lyued in the fourth hundred of yeares the Church of Christ neuer hearing of this heresie before and S. Hierome then liuing and writing calleth him for such stramage dreames rather Dormitantius a sleepy drowsy fellowe then Vigilantius a waking watchfull maÌ„ Negat sepulchra veneranda damnat que Sanctorum vigilias Ex quo sit vt dormitantius potiùs quà m vigilantius vocari debeat He calleth him an vnhappy man to be bewayled with floods of teares a stinking mouth breather of most silthy rotonnesse a monster to be abandoned to the vthermost part of the world Os saetidum putorem spurcissimum proferens Portentum in terras vltimas deportandum The last exception which our Protestants in this Inuocation and honour of Saincts Article make against the doctrine of the Church of Rome is thus registred by them The Romish doctrine concerning inuoation of Saincts is a fonde thing vainely inuented and grounded vpon no warrantie of Scripture but rather repugnant to the worde of God This is confuted by that is said before of the holy Reliks and Images of Saincts For if they as is inuincibly proued by the doctrine and practise of this age may and ought to be reuerenced their happy and blessed soules and Angels in eternall Ioye blisse must needs challeÌ„dge such dutie from them that liue and prayers may be offered to such perfected in celestiall knowledge charitie and Concil gangren epist can 14. 15. 16. Socrat Histor l. 2. cap. 33. Sozom. Histor Eccl. l. 3 cap. 13. Epiphan Hier. 40. Nicephor Hist l. 9. cap. 16. Hieron contra vigilant neuer chaunging blessednes The first among Christians suspected to haue denyed this Catholike doctrine and practise of the church of Christ was Eustachius by some Eutactus a Bishop in Armenia disallowing the Churches of Martyrs loca Sanctorum martyrum vel Basilicas as he is charged in the councell of Gangra wherein he was condemned for that and other wicked assertions and by other antiquities Yet Sozomen Nicephorus and others write how he sought to cleare himselfe from accusations And to speake of certaine things Vigilantius was the first knowne and certainely proued impugner of the Inuocation of Saincts as of worship to their reliks before spoaken of and was condemned for such a monster as is already declared And Eustachius for Socrat. Supr l 2. cap. 33. his singular boldnes in such things was degraded and his errours coÌ„demned in publik Councel Concilium Gangris in Paphlagonia coaâ—lum gradu Episcopali dimouit eiusque dogmata anathemate damnauit Morton Apolog. part 1. pag. 227. 228. Perk. probl pag. 89. 93 Ormer pict pap pag. 26. 27. Middlet papista pag. 129. Ephrem Syrus lib. de laudibus Ioseph Patriarchae This is sufficiently proued by our Protestant writers themselues openly confessing all antiquitie taught Inuocation of saincts Therefore few testimonies of this first age will be needfull in a confessed doctrine and practise of all ages with faithfull people Lesse was the knowledge of the Saincts deceased before the Passion of Christ then after when they were by that happy redemption in glory And yet S. Ephrem produceth the holy Patriarke Ioseph praying to his mother Rachel deceased O Rachel Rachel mater mea exurge de pulâ—ere intuere Ioseph filium tuum Suscipe Rachel filium tuum Audi mater mea cordis mei gemitum amarumque â—iulatum S. Ignatius in this age is a worthie witnesse that not onely the liuing which were present at the Ignatius epist ad Trallianos Passion of Christ did know behold and see it but the Angels in heaueÌ„ the soules of theÌ„ that were vnder the earth which arose with their bodâ—es at the Resurrection of Christ did likewise the same Crueifixus mortuus est videntibus coelestibus terrenis ijs qui subterra detinebantur caelestibus quidem inspicientibus nimirum incorporeis naturis terrenis verò vt Iudaeis Romanis caeteris qui tunc temporis Crucifixo Domino aderant subterraneis autem ijs videlicet qui plurimi cum Domino resurrexerunt If a man on earth and in body might though Ignaâ— epist ad Trallian extraordinarily know the Angels and spirituall things with their orders in heauen as S. Ignatius witnesseth of himselfe haec noâ—eâ—im much more do they know the things on earth Angelicos ordines Archangelorum militiarumque coelestium discrimina virtutum dominationumque differentias thronorum potestatumque distantias principatum magnificentias Cherubim Seraphimque excellentias spiritus sublimitatem Domini Regnum incomparabilem Dei Patris Omnipotentis diuinitatem Haec cum nouerim And he plainely teacheth in an other place that Ignat. epist ad Heronem the Angels in heauen and not onely God know our affaires on earth and haue regard of them and so witnesseth to S. Hieron Praecipio tibi coram Deo qui est super omnia coram Christo praesente Spiritu Sancto coram ministrantibus legionibus 1. Timoth. 5. custodi depositum meum So S. Paule the Apostle wrote to S. Timothie Testor coram Deo Christo Iesu electis Angelis vt haec custodias Where both the Apostle S. Ignatius acknowledge both knowledge and care of mens actions on earth to be in the holy Angels as in God himselfe though with a difference of the Creatour and excellent creatures S. Hierotheus Master of S. Denis the Areopagite as he termeth him testifieth and hee approueth it that all loue not onely of God but Angels also hath this nature that Superiour things Dionisi Areopag l. diu nom cap. 4. haue care of the inferiour and those conforme themselues to the Superiour Amorem siue diuinum siue angelicum siue spiritualem siue vt ita dicam animalem fiue naturalem vim quandam coniungentem miscentemque intelligamus quae superiora quidem impellit vt
that latin which he deliuered at Rome in Fraunce and other westerne places These Bishops Preists and Deacons which were not Britans could not vse that brittish tongue in their seruice which they did not vnderstand and which neither they nor the Britans could write for them or others to reade And whosoeuer any man will say preached here first S. Peter S. Paul S. Symon S. Ioseph or any other they not vnderstanding the brittish language nor any man writing they could not possibly vse or deliuer the seruice of the Church in that language our old brittish manuscript mentioned before saith the Manuscrip Brit. antiq de prima Institutione Eccles officij Church seruice which S. Marke vsed was also here in vse in Scotijs ac Britannijs Cursum qui dicitur praesenti tempore Scotorum beatus Marcus decantauit It testifieth further that S. Germanus S. Lupus S. Patrik and others vsed this seruice here both in Britayne and Scotlands when our Protestants confesse there was no errour in Religion Ipsum cursum decant auerunt Beatus Lupus Beatus Germanus S. Patricius in Scotijs ac Britannijs ipsum cursum decantauit And after them S. Vuandilocus ad S. Gomogillus who had 3000. monkes in his Monastery and S. Columban in whose time this Authour liued with others sent with him into Fraunce vsed euery where in Ireland and Scotland as also Britaine Fraunce Germany and Italy the same publik Church seruice in the latin tonge Beatus Vuandilocus Beatus Columbanus partibus Galliarum destinati ipsum decantauerunt And he deriueth this Church seruice from S. Marke shewing where and by whome it was vsed And it was Gildas in prolog apud Fecknam orat public in 1. parliamento Elizabethae Reginae iustified in open parlament the first of Queene Elizabeth by Abbot Fecknam out of S. Gildas in the prologue of his booke now suppressed by our Protestants but then extant that the same publik Church seruice which was vsed here in Queene Maryes time and now in the Catholike Church was brought hither and publickly deliuered here in the latin tongue in the generall conuersion of Britaine in King Lucius his time And that Gildas Gildas l. de excid conquest Brit. which Protestants propose vnto vs diuers times citeth the old Church seruice of Britaine in the latin tongue And the old manuscript antiquities of Glastenbury william of Malmesbury Capgraue Guliel Malmesb manuscrip lib. de antiquit caenob glaston in collego S. Benedict Cantabrig Antiquitat glaston tabulis fix Capgrau in S. Ioseph S. patric Galfrid monum l. 4. histor Brit. cap. 20. vlt. Matth. Westin chron an 186. Matth. Westin an 187. Galfrid l. 5. cap. 1. and others proue as much and more then Doctour Fecknam cited from S. Gildas For they speaking of the Religious men which S. Damianus and S. Phaganus placed at Glastenbury to be successours in place and profession to S. Ioseph of Aramathia and his associates there do plainely deliuer that as in other things these professed the same Religion order Church seruice and manner of life which S. Ioseph and his companie did so also as they did they come often euery day together into the old Church to say their diuine office which they brought from Rome with them and deliuered here in memoriam primorum ex suis socijs 12. elegerunt S. Damianus Phaganus in praefata Insula Rege Lucio consentiente habitare fecerunt qui in diuersis locis sicut Anachoretae manserunt ibidem in eisdem lucis inquibus prima 12. primitùs habitarunt in vetustam tamen Ecclesiam ad diuina obsequia deuotiùs complenda crebrò conuenerunt quotidiè And this latin publik Church seruice being the very same which had beene vsed at Rome from the Apostles time not changed at that time as all Catholiks and Protestants agree was planted and deliuered here not onely by these legates of Pope Eleutherius but by himselfe with the rest which his legates did here confirme restauratis omnibus redierunt Antistites Romani quae fecerant à beatisssimo Papa coÌ„firmari impetrauerunt Confirmatione facta reuersi sunt in Britanniam compluribus alijs comitati And if any Protestant will haue the Kings confirmatioÌ„ needfull our holy King then S. Lucius likewise confirmed this as the rest Glorio sus Britonum Rex Lucius chartis munimentis omnia communiuit THE XIII CHAPTER The 25. Article intituled of the Sacraments thus examined and condemned in all things contrary to Catholike doctrine THEIR next the 25. Protestant Article is intituled of the Sacraments And thus beginneth Sacraments ordained by Christ be not onely bages or tokens of Christian mens profession but rather they be certaine sure witnesses and effectuall signes of grace and Gods good will towards vs by the which he doth worke inuisibly in vs and doth not onely quicken but also strengthen and confirme our faith in him Hitherto ther appeareth no difference betweene these Protestants in this article and Catholiks for they decreeing that Sacraments be effectuall signes of grace that is in all true proper manner of speach signes which doe effect cause worke grace otherwise they be not effectuall signes of grace and that God worketh in vs inuisibly by them is as much as Catholiks professe wheÌ„ they define a SacrameÌ„t Sacramentum est visibile signuÌ„ inuisibilis gratiae A SacrameÌ„t is a visible or externall signe of inuisible grace giuen thereby And these Protestants declare theÌ„selues so Protest art 27. 28. infra farre plainely in both those they accept for SacrameÌ„ts Baptisme the Eucharist called by them the Supper of the Lord. In the first they manifestly confesse it and approue and practise baptisme of Infants who borne by them also in originall sinne cannot possibly haue remission thereof and grace but by their baptisme not able to vnderstand or haue any act of faith or other vertue Yet theâ—â— Art 27. decree is The baptisme of young children is in any wise to be retained in the Church as most agreable with the institution of Christ. So they doe or ought to speake of their other Sacrament confessing it was in the primatiue Church ministred sometimes to infants The difference betweene vs in this article is in that which thus followeth There are two Sacraments ordained of Christ our Lord in the Ghospell that is to say baptisme and the supper of the Lord. Those fiue commonly called Sacraments that is to say Confirmation Pennance Order Matrimony and extreame Vnction are not to be compted for Sacraments of the Ghospell being such as haue growne partly of the corrupt following of the Apostles partly are states of life allowed in the scriptures but yet haue not like nature of Sacraments with baptisme and the Lords supper for that they haue not any visible signe or ceremony ordained of God Hitherto this Protestant â—rticle denying those fiue Sacraments which the Catholike Church receaueth for such with the â—wo former baptisme
receaued this Sacrament reserued when extreame vnction was ministred vnto them And one of their most auntient antiquities carrying with it our Protestants approbation doth witnesse that the primatiue Christian Britans did publikely â—â— Euery Masse worship and pray vnto Christ present in this Sacrament this hath our Protestants translation Hereof singe Gods seruants at euery Masse Agnus Dei qui tollis peccata mundi miserere nobis That is in our speach Thou lambe of God that takest away the sinnes of the world haue mercy vpon vs. And thus I end this their many braunched Article THE XIX CHAPTER The 26. and 27. Articles examined and Protestant doctrine in or by them condemned THeir next Article being the 26. by their numbring them is thus intituled Of the worthiâ—es of the ministers which hinder not the effect of the sacraments The whole Article followeth in these All though in the visible Church the euill be euer mingled with the good and sometime the euill haue cheife authoritie in the ministration of the worde and sacraments yet for asmuch as they do not the same in their owne name but in Christes and do minister by his commission and authoritie we may vse their ministerie both in hearing the word of God and in receiuing of the sacraments Neither is the effect of Christes ordinance taken away by their wikednesse nor the grace of Gods guifts diminished from such as by faith and rightly do receiue the sacraments ministred vnto them which be effectuall because of Christs institution 〈◊〉 promise allthough they be ministred by euill men Neuerthelesse it apperteyneth to the discipline of the Churche that inquirie be made of euill ministers and that they be accused by those that haue knowledge of their offences and finally being founde gyltie by 〈◊〉 Iudgment be deposed Hitherto this Article in which there it not any one proposition or sentence against the doctrine of the Romane Church and Catholike Religion but rather a graunte and confirmation thereof 〈◊〉 a renowncing of Protestant profession and proceedings in diuers particular poyntes and some most materiall As declaring that in the visible Church the euill be euer mingled with the good they confesse the Church to be euer and indeâ—ectible And so Luther Caluyn Cranmar King Henry 8. with his daughter Queene Elizabeth or whomsoeuer els they will or can make the first publisher or aduancer of their doctrine separating themselues and being separated and cutt of from that visible true Church which was then generally so held this their Protestant congregation and Religion takeing Originall being from thence cannot possibly be the true Church and Religion of Christ And in making the true Church euer visible they must needs make their association or prerended companie eúer inuisible and so nothing vntill these dayes and condemne those their brethren Protestants who knowing their new fraternitie was neuer vntill those late times haue mathematically framed in their Imagination a new straung chimericall Inuisible vnbeeable and vnpossible Church Agayne professing that Preists the Ministers of Sacraments do Minister them in Christes 〈◊〉 by his commisson and authoritie they sufficiently confesse that if Christ omnipotent could and did consecrate breade and wyne into his body and blood forgiue sinnes and giue grace in sacraments truely consecrated Preists haue that power and do the same And affirming The sacraments to bâ— effectuall because of Christes Institution and promise â—either is the effects of Christes ordinance takâ—n away nor the grace of Gods guists diminished by the wikednesse of ministers They proue what the Catholiks holde in these things and Protestants cammonly deny Their last clause of Discipline in the Church making but one true visible Church and their congregation being as before no part thereof depriueth them of all such discipline as they haue already spoyled themselues of the pure worde of God preached and Sacraments duely ministred vnseparable signes and properties of the true visible Church by their 19. Article and thereby want all things which by their owne confession are euer founde in and belonge vnto the Church of Christ The 27. Article intituled of baptisme hath no thing contrary to Catholik Religion But the last clause thereof is against their 6. Article before that nothing is to be beleeued as an Article of faith or to be thought requisite necessarie to saluation that is not read in nor may be proued by scriptures And in this place thus they decree The Baptisme-ef yong Prot. Articl 27. children is in any wise to be retayned in the Church as most agreable with the Institution of Christ In this whole Article before they make Baptisme in all requisite necessarie to Saluation So they do iâ— Protest communion Booke Tit. Baptisme Protest Conference at hampton Court. their communion booke in the administration thereof and in the reuewe of their Religion â—â— Hampton court thus they define That baptisme to be ministred by priuate parsons in tyme of necessitie is an holie tradition And so they vse in their common practise and Baptise Infants both by their ministers and others men and women especially my dwiues instructed how to Baptisme in time of Engl. Protest in feild Bookes of the Church pag. 239. and others necessitie Yet with publik consent and allowanâ—â— thus they write and publish Baptisme of Infants â—â— â—â—â—ed a Tradition because it is not expressely deliuered iâ— stripture that the Apostles did baptize Infants nor 〈◊〉 expresse precept there founde that they should so do Tâ—â—t the holy Fathers of the first age held Baptisme Supr in articul 6. of Infants for an vnwritten tradition I haue spoken before And S. Clement doth giue comâ—â—â—nd Clem. Rom. lâ—b 6. constit Apostolic cap. 15. Dionys Areopag Ecclesiast Hierarch cap. 7. concil mileuit cap. 2. Chrisostom homil de Adam Eua. Augustin cont Donat. l. 1. cap. 23. Epiphan Aug. alij de haeres Innocent 1. epist concil African cap. 77. concil Carthagin 5. cap. 6. Hect. Boeth Scot. hâ—st l. 9. Georg. Buchan Rer. scot l. 5. Reg. 52. holinsh hist of Scotland in Fâ—equard pag. 112. to haue it obserued Baptizate vestros pueâ—â—◠〈◊〉 S. Denys the Areopagite affirmeth it was so vsed Pueri qui necdum possunt intelligere diuiâ—â— sacri hapti smatis participes fiant And shewâ—â—gâ— how others answeare and promise for them 〈◊〉 prâ— ipsiâ— abrenunâ—iant sanctaquâ— ineunt faedera 〈◊〉 iâ— an holy tradition sanctam traditionem 〈◊〉 S. Chrisostome and others testifie generally in the whole Catholik Church in all places Praediâ—â—t Ecclesia Catholica vbique diffusa debere parâ—â—â—â—â— Baptizari prepter originalâ— peccatum And they were Nouatian Pelagian such condemned Hâ—retiks which at any time called this holy tradiâ—â—on and custome into question So it was here â—â— Britayne which though it was Mother and Noble longe time to pelagius the Archeretike wâ—o among other his damned Errours denyed the Baptisme of Infants yet it so much detested among tâ—â— rest this his obsurd Inuention that it
Dominus Sed tâ—rtium excellentem gradum honestatisin virginitate demonstrauit nobis perfectum per omnia similem angelicae dignitati And he thought the chaste life to be so fitte requisite for the more perfect seruing of God that euen princes then not onely clergy men embraced it to that holy end So he writeth of the Queene or Princesse Valeria though espoused how shee had professed virginitie by his preaching Virgo Valeria Sponsa Regis caelestis per meam praedicationem virginitateÌ„ mentis corporis Deo deuouerat And of King or Prince Stephen pro suauitate praemij futuri illectus copulam carnalium nuptiarum deuitauerit per meam praedicationem quatenus liberior Deo famulari possit S. Dionysius is most playne in this matter and Dionys Areopag Eccl. Hier. c. 6. ep ad Gain alibi setteth downe the very manner how chastitie was professed before the Bishops in that time and how that such in respect of others were cheifly called Therapentae cultores the perfect worshippers of God euen by the Apostles themselues Sancti praeceptores nostri diuinis eos appellationibus sunt prosecuti So both he and they must needs teach that Bishops Preists and Deacons euer conuersant about most sacred things were to liue in chastitie So we Sim. Metaphrast die 29. Iunij must needs say of Britayne first because we finde that S. Peter admitting onely men of chastitie to thes holie Orders as before did first consecrate our first Bishops Preists and Deacons here Apud Britannos Ecclesias constituit Episcoposque Praesbyteros Diaconos ordinauit Secondly if any were wanting after they were as before supplyed by S. Clement onely allowing such to those sacred offices Thirdly all those whose names be preserued to haue beene Bishops in or of this nation as S. Aristobulus S. Mansuetus S. Beatus S. Ioseph sonne of S. Ioseph of Aramathia which buryed Christ and some others by some writers are so remeÌ„bred by the Antiquities where we finde that there is not the least suspition but they continually liued in virginall or chastelife If this Aristobulus was the same which Metaphrastes Metaphrâ—st die 26. Iunij Mat. 8. Marc. 1. Luc. 4. Gulielm Eisengren centenar 1. part 1. dist 3. Petr. de Natal l. 11. Anton. Democh. l. 2. câ—nt Caluin Arn. Merman Theatr. conuers gent. in metensib Martyrolog Rom. Bed vsuard Molan die 9. Maij Guliel Eisengren centen 2. part 5. Annal. Helueth Antiquit Eccl. Constant Baron an in mart Rom. 9. Maij. Theater of great Britaine l. 6. Antiquitat Glaston manuscript writeth to haue beene Father in lawe to S. Peter the scripture wittnesseth his wife remayned in Iury so farre distant from him in Britayne if shee liued so long S. Mansuetus liued a collegiall life with onely Preists and clergy men no women with them and was consecrated by S. Peter the Apostle hauing before forsaken contrie kindred verie noble ex nobili prognatus familia men women and all for the loue of Christ S. Beatus of noble birth here in Btitayne both by Catholike Protestant Antiquaries forsooke all and went to Rome and there with an other Britan whose name is not perfectly remembred one calleth him Achates was consecrated and was so chaste that except when he preached he seldome or neuer saw women one or other liuing a solitary single Eremiticall life Of S. Ioseph sonne of S. Ioseph said in the oldest monuments and antiquities of that holie company to haue beene miraculously by Christ himselfe consecrated or at the least elected and designed a Bishop and the rest of that sacred company Preists Deacons or whatsoeuer it is most euident they liued and died in perpetuall chastitie in the Iland Aualan all Antiquaries Catholiks and Protestants confesse that King Aruiragus gaue the place onely to those holy men it was to them onely confirmed by the two next following Kings Marius and Goillus celles were made onely for Tab. fix Gul. Malmesbur l. de Aut. Caenobij Glaston Capgr Catal. Sanct. in S. Ioseph Aramath S. Patricio Iacob Genuen in ijsdem Ioh. Bal. l. de Script cent 1. in S. Ioseph Aramathien Ioh. Leland assertion Arthurij Godnyn Theater of great Brit. l. 6. Caius l. antiq accadem Cantabrigien Stowe Hist Romans Charta Regis Hen. 2 aliorum Reg. Socrat. Hist Ecâ—l l. 1. cap. 8. them there they liued alone they left no children or posteritie after them and the place of habitation was so desart and desolate when S. Damianus and Phaganus were sent hither by Pope Eleutherius in King Lucius his time the next age that their place of dwelling was become a denne for wylde beastes Caepit idem locus esse ferarum latibulum qui priùs fuerat habitatio Sanctorum Therefore we are enforced by the authorities of Scripture tradition the whole Church Geeke and Latin the Apostolike age and writers and all warrant in religion to conclude that the doctrine of this article is false that Bishops Preists and Deacons may lawfully marry at their owne discretion And verie vainely our Protestants singularily alledge for their defence from Socrates the historian that Paphnutius dissuaded the Fathers of the first Nicen councell not to decree that Bishops Preists and Deacons might not keepe companie with their wyues which they had marryed when they were lay men vt qui essent sacris initiati sicut Episcopi Presbiteri Diaconi cum vxoribus quas cum erant Laici in matrimonium duxissent minimè dormirent But it should suffice that they which were vnmarried when they were called to the clergie should according to the old tradition of the Church abstayne afterward from marriage vt qui in clerum ante ascripti erant quam duxissent vxores hi secundum veterem Ecclesiae traditionem deinceps à nuptijs seabstinerent For here the marriage of such men and this Article is plainely condemned by their owne Authour and the old Apostolike tradition in the Church And this is confirmed by aboue 200. Later Bishops Episc Grâ—â— 227. in can Trullen can 6. of the Greeke Church itselfe testifying it was the doctrine and tradition of the Apostles that among those of the cleargie none but Lectours and Singers might marrie and they accordingly decree that no Subdeacon Deacon or Preist may marrie and if he should he must be deposed Quoniam in Apostolicis Canoibus 〈◊〉 est torum qui non ductâ vxore in clerum promouentur solos lectores cantores vxorem posse ducere nos hoc seruantes decernimus vt deinceps nulli penitus Hypodiacono vel Diacono vel Presbytero post sui ordinationem coningium contrahere liceat Si autem hoc facere ausus fuerit deponatur And this is their vse and practise to thes dayes The other clause of Paphnutius opinion about Bishops Preists and Deacons married before their consecration not to be barred from such their former wiues married vnto them when they were lay men by any expresse lawe
it to himselfe though he punished with death as others often since then haue done the professours thereof yet both he and all or Rulers temporall since Kings or Queens haue retained in their stile of honour that title Defensor fidei defendour of the faith which the Pope gaue him for defending before his fall the Catholike faith against Martine Luther though they all except Queene Mary impugned it And our present K. Charles whome together with his Queene Mary God blesse with all good and happines in his late publike declaration to all his louing Subiects among whome his Catholiks be not in the lowest place of duty and desert to him though not in like degree of his fauour to theÌ„ thus and thus vehemently protesteth wee call God to recorde before whome we stand that it is and alwaies hath beene our harts desire to be found worthy of that title which we accompt the most glorious in all our Crowne DEFENDOVR OF THE FAITH But to defend the faith is not to reprint the articles of Religion established in the time of Queene Elizabeth and by a declaration before those articles to ty and restraine all opinions to the sense of those articles as he speaketh immediately before and to persecute Bishops Preists and Catholiks as he doth That title was giuen by the Pope to King HeÌ„ry for defence of the true faith longe before the articles of Queene Elizabeth or she was borne Longe before hee K. Edward 6. Queene Elizabeth King Iames and King Charles persecuted Catholiks their faith whereof by their stile they should be defendours longe before their religion or any of them I except King Henry the 8. to whome it was giuen receaued beeing The true faith Catholike and Apostolike which by that regall stile and title they should defend against these articles I haue aboundantly by the best testimonies proued in euery point for the two last following articles the 38. intituled of Christian mens goods which are common and the 39. the last of a Christian mans oath doe not containe any coÌ„trouersie with Catholikes but were ordained against new Sectaries among themselues I hope no Protestant Parlament will hereafter glory that their religion was almost 80. yeares old though it wanteth 10. of that number and so extraordinarily contend to persecute that which I haue proued to exceed it aboue 1500. yeares in time and truth which they ought to embrace and honour and not so maliciously or ignorantly not being the most religious nor learned diuines to persecute it FINIS A TABLE OF THE CHAPTERS Chap. 1. COncerning the first 5. Protestant Articles not differing from the Apostles Religion and the Romane Church pag. 1. Chap. 2. Examining their 6. Article about scriptures and traditions and condemning it by the Apostles and Apostolike men and doctrine of their age p. 2. Chap. 3. The 7. 8. 9. 10. Articles examined and wherein they differ from the present Roman Church condemned by this first Apostolike age p. 53. Chap. 4. The 11. Article of the Iustification of man examined and condemned by the Apostolike Fathers of this first age p. 60. Chap. 5. The 12. Article examined and in whatsoeuer differing from the present Romane Church condemned by the Apostolike age So of the 13. and 14. Articles p. 67. Chap. 6. The 15. 16. 17. 18. Articles so examined and wheresoeuer repugnant to the Roman Church likewise condemned p. 82. Chap. 7. The 19. Article examined and condemned by the same authoritie p. 88. Chap. 8. The 20. Article thus examined and in whatsoeuer contrarie to the Church of Rome thus condemned p. 99. Chap. 9. The 21. article so examined and condemned p. 109. Chap. 10. The 22. article thus likewise examined and condemned p. 141. Chap. 11. The 23. article examined p. 207. Chap. 12. The 24. article likewise examined and condemned by this first Apostolike age and writers therein p. 212. Chap. 13. The 25. article intituled of the Sacraments thus examined and condemned in all things contrarie to Catholike doctrine p. 222. Chap. 14. Pennance so called in this article and by Catholikes The Sacrament of Pennance was so iudged and vsed in this Apostolike age p. 228. Chap. 15. Holy Orders contrary to this article was vsed and held à Sacrament in this first age p. 233. Chap. 16. Matrimonie thus proued a Sacrament p. 242. Chap. 17. Extreame vnction thus proued to be a Sacrament p. 249. Chap. 18. The rest of this article repugnant to the Catholike faith likewise condemned p. 252. Chap. 19. The 26. and 27. articles examined and Protestant doctrine in or by them condemned p. 258. Chap. 20. The 28. article intituled of the supper of the Lord examined and condemned p. 262. Chap. 21. The 29. article intituled of the wicked which do not eate the bodie and blood of Christ in the vse of the Lords supper examined and condemned p. 276. Chap. 22. The 30. article intituled of both Kindes examined and where it is contrarie to the Romane Church condemned p. 284. Chap. 23. The 31. article being intituled of the one oblation of Christ finished vpon the Crosse thus examined and condemned p. 297. Chap. 24. The 32. article intituled of the marriage of Preists thus examined and condemned p. 315. Chap. 25. The 33. 34. articles examined and in whatsoeuer repugnant to the doctrine of the Church of Rome thus condemned p. 339. Chap. 26. The 35. 36. articles intituled of homilies and of consecration of Bishops and ministe◠〈…〉 examined and condemned 〈…〉 Chap. 27. The 37. article intituled of the ciuiâ—â— Magistratus thus examined and whatsoeuer against the Roman Church condemned p. 390.
for defence of the Catholike Faith and Iastlie by your Maiestie our last Queene MARIE by whom this land is blessed by a royall issue and as we hope shall in time be madâ— happie by restitution of the Catholike Religion ether in your owne oâ— your childrens dayes And the ratheâ— when England shall see by the Iudgement of the Apostles that the Catholike religioÌ„ aggreeth in all point with the religion taught deliuereâ— by the Apostles and first Apostolicalâ— preachers and that the Protestant religioÌ„ is discouÌ„tenaunced discarded condemned by them This shall appeare by this booke which I youâ— Maiesties most humble subiect aâ— old student in holie learning doe iâ— all dutifull manner present vnto youâ— wishing to your Gracious Maiestie and to our noble Souueraigne your deare Spouse a long and happie raigne in our great Brittainie such a temporall raigne amongst your subiectes as you may both raigne in heauen eternallie with God his Saintes and Angelles Your Maiesties most humble and deuoted subiect R. B. APPROBATIO CVm mihi constiterit ex testimonio fide digni S. Theol. Doctoris in hoc libro cui tituluâ— Apostolorum iudicium c. nihil inueniri Catholicae fidei aut bonis moribus contrarium sed multâ— quae ostendunt religionem Catholicorum esse Apostolicam haereticorum verò Apostaticam censuâ— vtiliter praelo committi posse Actum Duaci die 23. Iunij 1632. GEORGIVS COLVENERIVS S. Theol. Doctor Regius ordinariusque Professor Gollegiatâ— Ecclesiae S. Petri Praepositus Duaâ— censis Academiae Cancellarius librorum Censor THE FIRST CHAPTER CONCERNINGE THE FIRST 5. PROtestants Articles not differinge from the Apostles Religion and the Roman Church BEEINGE to enter into the Examen and comparison of the parlament protestant Articled Religion of England with the Religion of the present Church of Rome and â—e whole Christian world named Catholike â—or profession whereof the Catholiks of England â—y the protestants thereof haue longe tyme suffâ—red and still most constantly endure most bitter persecutions by the first knowne and confessed â—ue Christian Catholike Apostolike Religion â— the Apostles and that their happy age wee finde â—t in the first fiue Articles of this new Religion â—y difference or difficulty to be thus decided both â—atholicks and parlameÌ„tary protestants agreeing them all and they all beeing ordeyned by these proâ—tants against other Sectaries so soone within 4. â—ares of the beginning of Q. Elizabeth her Reigne reâ—eing old condemned heresies amongst them as their â—tories and registers remember and therefore it will â—re suffice onely to recite the Titles of these arâ—les to giue notice thereof The contents and title â— the first article are Of faith in the holy Trinity The second of the word or sonne of God which was made verymaÌ„ The 3. Of the going downe of Christ into hell The 4. Of the Resurrection of Christ The 5. Of the Holy Ghost The whole Article the Title being subiect to doubt is The holy Ghost proceeding from the Father and the sonne is of one substance Maiesty and glory with the Father and the Sonne very and eternall God Hitherto wee finde nothing against the doctrine of the Catholike Church Which noâ— vnlikely these men did rather to winnesome crediâ— at their entrance to be thought louers of truth then that they hated the enemies of these articles not yet suppressed among them THE SECOND CHAPTER Examining their 6. Article about Scriptures and traditions and condemning it by the Apostles and Apostolike men and doctrine of their age THEIR next sixt Article intituled of the sufficiency of the holy Scriptures for Saluation â— thus holy Scripture containeth all things necessary â— saluation Soe that what soeuer is not read therein nâ— may be proued thereby is not to be required of any maâ— that it should be beleeued as an article of faith or â— thought requisite or necessary to saluation By the naâ— of holy Scripture wee doe vnderstand those canonicâ— bookes of the old and new testament of whose authâ—rity was neuer any doubt in the Church And from tâ— number of those bookes which there they allowâ— to be canonicall They doe in expresse words aâ— tearmes reiect The booke of Tobias the booke of Iuditâ— the rest of the booke of Esther the booke of wisdomâ— Iesus the sonne of Sirach Baruch the Prophet the songe of the three children the story of Susanna of Bel and the Dragon the prayer of Manasses the first and second Bookes of the Machabees Concerning the new testament thus they adde all the bookes of the new testament as they are commonly receiued wee doe receiue and accompte them for canonicall This their Article is in their proceedings as the grounde worke and foundation whereupon their Religion is wholy framed and builded and yet so weake Feeble totteringe ruinous arid deceitefull that not any one true certaine and infallible point of doctrine as euery Article in true religion is can be framed vpoÌ„ it or from it so deduced by the expresse graunt of this article it selfe and of all English Protestants professed and sworne maintainers of it For whereas they sentence and define In the Art 6. supr name of holy Scripture wee doe vnderstand those canonicall bookes of the old and new testament of whose Field Booke of the Church lib. 4. cap. 5. wotton def of perk pa. 442. Couell ag Burg. pag. 60. def of Hooker pag. 31. 32. 33. proâ—â—st glosse on the 6. art Tho. Rogers ibid. authority was neuer any doubt in the Church They plainely make the Iudgment of the Church to be the highest tribunall in spirituall questions euen of the scriptures themselues And thus their best and cheife writers published by authority doe glosse and expound this article And of necessity so they must say except at their first entrance they will plainely confesse their religion and congregation their Church of England as they terme it to be erroneous or hereticall and to haue noe power or warrant at all to doubt deny or determine and propose what bookes be or be not Scriptures canonicall either of the old or new testament Or what one chapter or sentence in them is part or not part of such canonicall and vndoubted holy Scriptures for this power and prerogatiue being onely committed to the true Church by their Article and professors before if these men doubt or Iudge otherwise in this case then the true confessed Church hath hitherto done They can be noe part or members of that true Church And whatsoeuer is read or may be deduced from vntrue or doubted Scriptures cannot be possibly any certaine and vndoubted article of faith and religion For noe conclusion can be more certaine and vndoubted then the Maximes and authorities from which it is concluded but as the light of nature common law and vndeniable Maxime of true reasoning teacheth all men and all men truely acknowledge for a verity most certaine it euer followeth the weaker part euer erroneous doubtfull vncertaine or false if both or
Therefore I dare not say that the Parlament â—rotestants of England doe or by their religion â—ould professe that condemned errour which holâ—eth concupiscence without assent to be truely â—nne And all auncient expositors of holy Scripâ—re both of the Greeke and Latine Church doe â—pounde the Apostle in the place insinuated in â—is Article to speake of sinne onely materially â—ot properly when he termeth concupiscence by â—at name This is confessed by the professors of this â—rour before and the name of the Fathers are neeâ—lesse and too many to be cited in a confessed cauâ— And wee haue the Catholike doctrine in tâ— point deliuered and taught by Apostolike men â— this age Sainct Ignatius proueth that concupcence without assent defileth not cum nulla in vâ—â— Ignat. epist ad Ephes sit concupiscentia quae vos inquinet supplicium â—ferat profectò secundum Deum viuitis And Rabâ— Moses Hadarsan proueth the same for the true bâ— leeuing Iewes quod iam scriptum est ad te câ—cupi scentia Rabbi Mos Hadar ad ca. 4. Gen. peccati scilicet quod est figmentum malâ— iugiter concupiscens affectans tu dominabeâ— illius hoc est si volueris praeualebis aduersus eum Aâ— all the holy writers of this time affirme the samâ— when they teach that free will is in man sinâ— is not contradicted without it nor can be where â— when it doth not consent Which cannot possibâ— be in the first motions of concupiscence by coâ—mon experience Iudgment and agreement of aâ— arisinge both without and against the will and â— berty of man First Sainct Ignatius who hath so plainely testâ—fied before that concupiscence not consented vntâ— doth not defile and so cannot be sinne proueth alsâ— abseruationi proponitur vita mors obedientiae siâ—guli Ignat. epist â—d Magnesian qui hoc aut illud elegerint in eius quod inuâ—nerâ— locum abituri sunt fugiamus mortem eligamus vâ—tam That to sinne or not sinne to haue life â— death is in the power and will of Christians Aâ— againe most plainely that sinne is not without freâ— will Si quis piet ati studet Dei homo est si impiè agâ— diaboli est non td factus per naturam sed animi arbâ—trium 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sainct Clement disciple and Successor to Sainct â—eter the Apostle speaketh as plainely or rather â—ore both in Sainct Peters and his owne words â—pinion and all true beleeuers liberi sumus arbitrij Clem. Rom. epist 3. â—uia liberum est animo in quani velit partem declinare â—dicium suum quam probauerit eligere viam conâ—at euidenter inesse hominibus arbitrij libertatem And Recognit l. 3. â—ffirmeth plainely that they which should deny â—ree-will in man consequently should say that God could not iudge and condemne men for any â—inge termed sinnes all ciuill courts lawes and â—ustice should cease there should be no goodnesse â—o wickednesse no sinne no vertue nor God at all Quomodo Deus iudicat secundum veritatem vnumâ—uemque pro actibus suis si agere aliquid in potestate â—on habuit Hoc siteneatur conuulsa sunt omnia fruâ—ra â—rit studium sectandi meliora sed Iudices saeculi â—ustra legibus praesunt puniunt eos qui malè agunt â—on enim in sua potestate habuerunt vt non peccarent â— ana erunt Iura populorum quae malis actibus poenas â—atuunt miseri erunt qui seruant cum labore iustiâ—am beati verò illi qui in delicijs positi cum luxuria â—celere viuentes tyrannidem tenent Secundum haec erâ—o nec iustitia erit nec bonitas nec vlla virtus vt â—vis nec Deus Est ergo in potestate vniuscuiusque quia Lib. 4. â—beri arbitrij factus est homo vtrum nobis velit audire â—d vitaÌ„ an daemonibus ad interituÌ„ And defineth freeâ—ill to be an essentiall and vnseparable power of â—he soule of man to yeeld to whatsoeuer acts it â—ill Arbitrij potestas est sensus animae habens Lib. 3. Dionis Areopag Eccles Hierar cap. 2. l. de diu nom cap. 4. â—irtutem quam possit ad quos velit actus incliâ—ari Sainct Denis the Arepagite is plaine of the same â—pinion and calleth that which wee commonly terme freewill electiualibertas electiue liberty aâ— that man hath such power in himselfe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rab. Moses Hadars ad c. 4. Gen. Rab. Akiba in capitul patrum Philo. l. quod Deus sit immutabilis Rab. Moses Fil. Maim epistola adu Astrologos Ioseph Alb. fund tract 1. c. 9. Rab. Iudas in capitul pa. Clem. Rom. l. 3. Recognit los lib. 13. Antiq. c. 4. Epiph. l. 1. Tom. 1. cont haer c. 16. de pharisaeis Plutarch l. 1. de placitis Philosophorum cap. 27. Clem. Alex. l. 5 stromat part ante fâ—n 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This was the constant and receaued opinion â— doctrine both of Iewes and gentiles also for tâ— first their Rabbines Rabbi Moses Hadarsaâ— Rabbi Akiba Philo Rabbi Moses ben-Maimoâ— Iosephus Rabbi Iudas with others doe aboundanâ—ly proue it So doth Sainct Clement reciting the â—stimony of Simon Magus professor of the aduerâ— errour confessing it was the receaued doctrine â— the Iewes though he singularly denied it Simâ— Magus inquit ad Pâ—trum quoniam Hebraeis ista maâ—dantur velut rectè scientibus Deum opinantibâ— quod vnusquisque in suo arbitrio habeat agere â— de quibus iudicandus est mihi autem ab illis discrepâ— sententia Iosephus Sainct Epiphanius and others proâ— the same and put such Iewes as held otherwise iâ— the number of heretiks So Plutarch Clemens Alexandrinus and others proue of the Gentiles testâ—fying how Heraclitus was singular among them for the contrary errour Plato proued inuinciblâ— the truth of the Christian Catholike doctrine iâ— this point otherwise God should because of sinne which he possibly could not be Liberum autem arbitrium Plato per haec ostendit virtus autem non parâ— alterius dominio quam prout vnusquisque vel honorauerit vel despexerit erit eius particeps Eius qui elegerit culpae non potest in Deum causa conferri Deuâ— enim nunquam est causa malorum Thus generally and confidently the doctrine oâ— free will was receaued and professed in this first agâ— in the same manner as the present Roman Churcâ— â—w doth approuing and requiring also the necesâ—y of grace and not excluding it as the Pelagian â—retiks first did some hundreds of yeares after and â—t makinge mens actions meritorious but as they â—ere assisted by grace Nihil meritis vestris ascribaâ— Martial Epis ad Tolosan cap. 22. quasi non egentes Dei gratia quia sine Deo nihil poâ—tis facere And in this sense the Protestant Article of freeâ—ill receaueth this doctrine their writers admit â—in these Termes wee deny not that it is in the power Wotton
defence of Perk. pa. 67. 68. 65 88. 90. Couel def of Hooker p. 35. â— man to make choyce of life wee acknowledge that the â—ult is in euery maÌ„ that is not saued Wee say with Auâ—n both in words meaning that true Religion neither â—nies free will either to a good or badd life As S. Berâ—ard saith there is a threefold freedome from necessity â—om sinne from misery The first of nature the seconde â— grace the third of glory In the first from the bondage â— coaction the will is free in its owne nature and hath â—wer ouer it selfe That freedome by which the will of â—an is named free is the first And thereof wee dare say â—at the wicked want not the freedome of will Thus they write publish and approue with their â—uthority to be the doctrine and allowed opinion â—f English Protestants in this matter Our primaâ—ue Christian Britans of this first age could neither â—earne of their first Apostles and Fathers in Christ â—or professe any other doctrine or opinion in this â—oint for Sainct Peter being the first founder of â—heir Church and faith could deliuer no other in â—his matter to them then he had taught at Anâ—ioch and Rome and recommended to his two â—lorious Successors S. Ignatius and S. Clement in â—hose two highest Apostolike Sees And Sainct Clement either preached here in Britaine or as he expressely deliuereth by chaâ— Clem. Rom. epist 1. giuen and committed to him by Sainct Peter â— send learned Bishops into all these westerne pâ— where Sainct Peter had not ordained such befâ— And for Sainct Ioseph of Aramathia and his hâ— company who made free choyce and election â— the loue of Christ to forsake contry kindred â— all temporall goods and trauayle so many thâ—sands of myles into the end of the knowne woâ— to liue and dye there in such austerity and Sâ—ctity of life as they practized lyuing here they mâ— of necessity be professours as they were renowâ— Examplars in this businesse And that the Britâ— Tertul. l. de anima c 20. 21. l. 2. aduers Murc c. 5. 6. 8. de epiph ortat de constit cap. 2. then generally that were conuerted so professâ— with the whole Christian world Tertullian an â—deniable teacher of this doctrine in many places â—stifieth of it as of others before that all Apostoliâ— Churches Europe Asie and Afrike agreed theâ— in And it so continued euer in Britaine in suâ— manner that afterwards Pelagius the heretike â—tolled it to much and was therefore both by Bâ—tans and all other Catholiks condemned and dâ— tested for an heretike for so enabling it without â—sistance of grace All writers Catholike and Prâ—testants thus agreeing THE FOVRTH CHAPTER The 11. Article of the Iustification of man exâ—mined and condemned by the Apostolike Fathers of this first age THEIR next 11. Article is intituled of the iâ—stification of man and expressed in these words â—e are accompted righteous before God onely for the â—rit of our Lord and Sauiour Iesus Christ by faith â—d not for our owne workes or deseruings Wherefore â—at wee are iustified by faith onely is a most whole some â—ctrine and very full of comfort as more largely is exâ—ssed in the homily of Iustification This is the whole article and the doctrine thereâ— that wee are iustified by faith onely is before â—ndemned by Sainct Ignatius and the Apostolike S. Ignatius epist ad Ephes â—ctrine of this first age affirming that faith is â—ely the beginninge of mans perfection or iustice â—d charity doth perfect it without which a man â— not iustified Principium vitae fides finis eius chaâ—as haec autem duo quoties in vnum coeunt Dei hoâ—nem perficiunt He saith also that sinnes be taken way by almes and faith and not by faith onely â— this article speakes Eleemosina fide expiantur â—ccata And though a man be otherwise faithfull Ignat. epist ad Heron. â—steth liueth in virginity worketh wonders and â—ophecieth yet if he keepe not the constitutions â—f the Church he is to be esteemed as a wolfe â—mong sheepe Quicunque dixerit quippiam praeter ca â—uae constituta sunt tametsi fide dignus sit quamuis â—iunat quaÌ„uis in virginitate degat quamuis signaedat â—uamuis prophetet pro lupo illum habeas qui sub ouina â—elle exitium pestemque adfert ouibus All men agree â—ainct Ignatius was a true beleeuer yet writing to Ignat. epist ad Philadelp â—he Philadelphians he confesseth he was not thereâ—y sure of his saluation as Protestants say they are â—ut desired to be perfected by their prayers In Doâ—ino Iesu vinctus necdum perfectus sum sed precatio vestra ad Deum me perficiet vt id consequar ad quod vocatus sum He professeth that he beleeued in Christ as he ought to doe yet desired to be iustified by others prayers Iesus mihi pro Archiuis est qâ— nolle audire manifesta pernicies est Illibatum mihi â— archiuuÌ„ crux eius mors resurrectio eius fiâ— horum per quae cupio iustificari precationibus vestris True it is Sainct Ignatius citeth and approuâ— that saying of scripture Iustus ex fide viuit the iâ— man liueth by faith which the Protestants makeâ— a ground of their errour in this question but he â—ueth not that prerogatiue vnto it which they doâ— either to iustifie onely or at all but to be necessaâ— to iustification as all true Catholiks coÌ„fesse thâ— no man can be iustified without it neither doth â— meane the Protestants pretended presumptioâ— faith or such as is singular to any sect but the coâ—mon faith of the vniuersall Church of God yâ— in the same place ascribeth iustificatioÌ„ to constanâ— in goodnesse doing and suffering for the loue â— God and louinge him aboue our selues and aâ— other things Nihili pendo supplicia haec neque taâ— facio vitam meam vt eamplus amem quam Dominuâ— Quare paratum me offero igni feris gladijs cruci duâ— Epist ad Tarsenses modo ChristuÌ„ videam Saluatorem Deum meum qâ— propter me mortuus est obsâ—cro vos ego vinctus Chrâ—sti state in fide este constantes quia iustus ex fide viâ—â— estote immobiles quia Dominus habitare facit vnâ—â— moris in Domino That faith where there is but one preachinâ— thereof one Church founded by the Apostles in aâ— the world where the professours liue in one vnity haue one altare one sacrifice vna praedicatio vâ—na fides vnum baptisma vna Ecclesia quaâ— Epist ad Philadelph suis sudoribus laboribus fundarunt Sancti Apostoâ— Ã finibus terrae vsque ad fines in sanguine Christi vâ— oportet vt populum peculiarem gentem Sanctam omâ—ia perficere concordibus animis in Christo. Vna est caro â—omini nostri Iesu Christi vnus illius sanguis vnum â—tare omni Ecclesiae And yet the true vniuersall and â—atholike faith which all Protestants and partiâ—lar
sectaries doe want though it is so necessary â— saluation that no King Prince Prelate Potenâ—te or whosoeuer can be iustified and saued withâ—ut it yet of it selfe without hope charity and loue â—f God and our neighbour which bringeth all â—ood vnto vs and the keeping of Gods commaunâ—ements such faith neither saueth nor iustifieth â—emo erret nisi crediderit Iesum Christum in carne â—nuersatum crucem illius confessus fuerit pasâ—nem Epistol ad Smyrnen sanguinem quem effudit pro mundi salute â—n assequetur vitam aeternam siue Rex fuerit siue Saâ—dos siue princeps siue priuatus homo siue Dominus â—e seruus siue vir siue foemina Qui capit capiat qui â—dit audiat Locus dignitas diuitiae neminem efferant â—obilitas paupertas neminem deijciant Totum â—mque praecipuum est fides in Deum spes in â—ristum fruitio eorum quae expectamus bonorum â—aritas in Deum proximum Diliges enim Domiâ—m Deum tuum extoto corde tuo proximum tuum â—ut teipsum Et Dominus inquit haec est vita aeterna â— cognoscant te solum verum Deum quem misisti â—um Christum Et mandatum nouum do vobis vt diâ—atis vos mutuo In his duobus mandatis pendet tota â— Prophetae Sainct Clement teacheth the same â—ctrine assuring vs that Christ was so farre from â—ching that man is to be iustified onely by faith â—he lawe of the ghospell that he tyeth vs to more â—ct lawes and commaundements then vnder the â—e of Moyses Qui tunc homicidium interdixit nunc â—am iram tâ—nere concitatam qui tunc adulterium nunc prauam quoque cupiditatem lâ—gem naturalâ—m â—sustulit Clem. Rom. l. 6. constit Apost cap. 23. sed confirmauit Qui dixit diliges proxiâ— tuum idem in Euangelio ait renouandi gratia maâ—tum nouum do vobis vt diligatis inuicâ—m And â—ching the way and meanes how wee should â— made friends with God and so be iustified heâ—leth vs that this friendship is to be procured by â—uing well and obaying his will which is the laâ— all liuing men vt tendamus ad amicitiam Conditâ—amicitia Clem. Rom. l. 1. recognit autem efficitur benè viuendo volâ—â— eius obediendo quae voluntas omnium viuentium â— est The like hath Sainct Martiall vtterly condâ—ning all such presumption as is in the pretenâ— Protestant iustifying faith teaching and directâ— to obay the will of God in holy words and gâ— workes Vobis est testis scutator renum cordiuâ— eius S. Martial ep ad Tolosan cap. 17. obedientia nihil arroganter nihil superbè nihâ—â— merè praesumere sed tanquam pusillus grex Dei â— luntatem eius adimplere studete in verbis Sanctiâ— operibus honis Where wee euidently see that â— will of God is not fulfilled nor iustice wroughâ— onely faith but holy speaking and doing gâ— workes Sainct Denis the Areopagite saith that â— knew well and therein agreed with the diâ— Scriptures that euery one was to be rewarded â—cording to his worthinesse or deseruing Probè◠Dionys Areo. Eccl. Hierar cap. 12. scriptis diuinis assentiens vnumquemque praeâ— accepturum pro dignitate And addeth that euery shop or learned Preist being the Interpretor oâ— nine things doth learne from holy Scriptures â— euerlasting life and happenesse is with most â— measure giuen vnto men according to their dâ—â—ings and merits Diuinus Antistes interpres diuiâ—orum iudiciorum didicit à scriptis quae diuinitùs proâ—ita sunt clarissimam diuinamque vitam pro dignitate â—c meritis iustissimis lancibus tribui Sainct Polycarpe in his Epistle which Sainct Irenaeus l 3. c. 3. Euseb l. 3. hist c 36. Polycarp epist ad Philipp â—eneus Eusebius and others cite and approue doth â—istinguish faith and iustice in Christians and â—heweth that holy men that are saued obtayned â—lory by such distinct iustice and sufferings for Christ Hi omnes qui non in vacuum cucurrerunt sed in â—de iustitia ad debitum sibi locum cum Domino â—ui compassi sunt abierunt And this glory was â—ue vnto them for such iustice and sufferings Sainct Iustine in his publike Apologie for all Iustin Apol. 2 pro Christianis ad Anâ—on Pium Imper. post med Christians to the Emperour protesteth that all â—ood Christians euer from the beginning so held â—ued and practised that men were punished or reâ—arded according to the worth and dignity of their â—eeds and the Prophets before the Apostles so â—aught Hoc etiam explicamus nos supplicia poenas â—tque praemia pro dignitate actionum redditum iri à â—rophetis didicisse idque vere enuntiamus That this article of Catholike Religion was proâ—essed and practiezed here also it is euident being â—he vniuersall doctrine and profession of the whole Catholike Church as before appeareth And for â—hat this Kingdome being so remote a nation â—rom Hierusalem Rome Antioch and other cheife â—laces where Christian Religion then most floriâ—hed and those glories of the world whose authoâ—ities I haue cited and such others as then florished â—ust needs receaue their faith from them and â—hence and be of the same minde and opinion with â—hem herein And to examplifie onely in particular in thâ— which our Protestant antiquaries confesse to hâ— beene Christians of or in this nation in this agâ— Sainct Beatus a noble Britan Sainct Ioseph of â—romathia who buried Christ and his holy compâ—nions which conuersed with the Apostles and tâ— Speed Theater of greate Britaine li. 6. Pantal. de vir Illustrib German Antiquitat Glast tabulis affir Guliel Makn l. de antiq caen Glaston Cupgr in S. Ioseph Arom Apostolike Doctors remembred they thought â— faith onely to be it by which men were iustifiâ— as these Protestants hold but liued in most strict â— penitentiall life all their dayes in watchings fâ—stings and prayers so seruing God the blessâ— Virgin Mary with other Saincts and Angels Vâ—gilijs Ieiunijs orationibus vacantes Deo Beâ— Virgini deuota exhibentâ—s obsequia Their reuerenâ— which they vsed to the holy reliks which thâ— brought with them spoken of before and to tâ— crosse and other Christian Images ther building â— chappell in honour of the blessed Virgin Mary â— the admonishment of S. Gabriell the Archangeâ— Archangeli Gabrielis admonitu their poore chastâ— and obedient religious life foresaking all euâ— their wiues Sainct Ioseph bringing his wise iâ— Britaine as these antiquities say and leauing hâ— and all wordly comforts for the loue of Chrisâ— proue sufficiently vnto vs they were not of oâ— Protestant profession that onely faith did iustifâ— and that there was no Iustice merit or reward bâ— and for good workes holynesse and perfection â— lyuinge well THE V. CHAPTER The 12. Article examined and in whatsoeuer differing from the present Romane Church condemned by the Apostolike age So of the 13. and 14. Articles AND by
generall Councels as necessary vnto saluation hâ—â—e neither strength nor authority vnlesse it may be declared that they be taken out of holy Scriptures This is aboundantly before confuted where I entreated of their article of Scriptures So it is by that is deliuered in this Councell which they wholy and without any the least exception admit For in denyall of marriage vnto Cleargy men it hath done it by the old Apostolike tradition of the Church Can. 6. 7. secundum veterem Ecclesiae traditionem So they doe in the true gouernment of the Church by the Pope and Patriarkes Antiqua consuetudo Antiqua mores Mos antiquus Seruetur Seruentur Consuetudâ— obtinuit antiqua traditio Yet true gouernment of the Church is with them an essentiall property of the true Church vnseperable and so necessary to saluation So is the true Cleargy and consecration as also the holy Sacrifice Sacrament of the altar really containing the body of Christ yet by these men not to be declared by Scriptures they finding no such thing in them And these Protestants themselues with publike Protest of Engl. in feild libr. 4. of the Church pag. 228. allowance write Bishops assembled in a generall Councell haue authority to interpret Scriptures and by their authority to suppresse all them that gaine say such interpretation Therefore if there were question of truely interpreting Scripture Protestants must yeeld to generall Councels and not these to them particular Churches if the Protestant was such must of duty and necessity submit themselues to the vniuersall and Apostlike Catholike such as a generall Councell is as the first Nicen Councell in the Creede thereof which Protestants receaue doth declare it selfe and such generall Councels to be and so inflicteth censures Anathematizat Caâ—â—olica Symb. Niceâ— Ruffin lib. 1. hist c. 5. Soc. l. 1. hist c. 6. Apostolica Ecclesia Therefore wee are sure a generall Councell cannot erre in expounding Scriptures or any decree of faith That our Christian Britains were of this minde opinion and profâ—ssion their Bishops with longe and tedious labours present at the greate primitiue Councels of Arles Sardice Ariminum and others by all witnesses and with our King and Emperour at Nice in most probable Iudgment also Rome and the sacred Nicen Councell here then authentically receaued and embraced by all holy writers giue aboundant testimony THE X. CHAPTER The 22. Article thus likewise examined and condemned THE next article the 22. in number is intituled of Purgatory And is thus The Romish doctrine The doctrine of Purgatory prayer and other satisfaction for the true faithfull deceased practised in this first agâ— concerning Purgatory pardons worshipping and adoration aswell of Images as of reliques and also inuocation of Saincts is a fond thing vainely inuented and grounded vpon no warranty of Scripture but rather repâ—gnant to the word of God Much matter in few words many things peremptorily affirmed nothing proued All false and foolish also where as they would haue all thing grounded vpon warranty of Scripture so many times by theÌ„ affirmed and as often by me before confuted And to take their assertions in order beginning with their first about the Romish their phrase doctrine concerning Purgatory This is thus set downe in the Councels of Florence and Trent If men truely ponitent depart this life in the loue of God before they haue satisfied for their sinnes their soules are purged with the paines of Purgatory And that they may be releiued from such paines the suffrages of the saithfull aliue to wit sacrifice of Masse prayers and almes and other offices of piety which by the faithfull are vsed for other faithfull people according to the instituâ—â—ons Concil Flor. Concil Tâ—id Sessione 4. can 30. of the Church doe profit them Definimus si verè poenitentes in Dei charitate decesserint antequam dignis poenitentiae fructibus de commissis satisfeâ—eriâ—â— omissis eorum animas paenis Purgatorij purgari Et vt à poenis huiusmodi releuentur prodesse his viuorum fidelium suffragia Missarum scilicet sacrificio orationes eleemosynas pietatis officia quae à fidelibus proaijs fidelibus fieri consueuerunt secundum Ecclesiae institutae Nor is this the Romish onely but also the Greekish and Catholike doctrine of the Church of Christ So is affirmed by Gennadius their learned Patriarke in his defence of the recited Councell of Florence The doctrine of Purgatory prayer and Sacrifice Gâ—nad Schol. in defens CoÌ„cil Floraent def â— cap. 3. for the deade was a tradition of the Apostles That which the Laâ—â—nes call purgatorium purgatory they of the Greeke Church name catharterion a purging place They were onely Scismaticorum Sectatores followers of Scismatikes which denied it This is likewise confessed Relation of Relig. c. 53. 54. 55. by our English Protestants and knowne vnto all trauaylers either into the contries or writers of the Greekes Now let vs see whether it was the doctrine of the Apostolike age or noe The Greeke Patriarke hath before affirmed it So will our Protestants hereafter And the Apostolike men of this age affirme and proue it Sainct Clement saith his Master and predecessour Sainct Clem. Rom. Epist 1. Peter among other things did teach mortuos sepelire diligenter corum exequias peragere proque eis orâ—â—e eleemosynas dare To bury the deade and diligently performe their funerals and pray and giue almes for them He deliuereth further how in their publike Constitut Apost l. 8. c. 19. Church seruice and Sacrifice of that time among their prayers for other necessaries they prayed for the faithfull departed out of this world Pro ijs qui infide quieuerunt oremus And from Iames Alphaeus named the Brother of our Lord frater Domini he setteth downe the manner how the Deacon vsed publikely to giue warning in the time of the holy Sacrifice to pray for the soules of the faithfull deceased deliuering the very prayer commonly vsed in such cases directly proueing a place of Purgatory and prayer for the deliuery of the faithfull departed from thence with a remission of all punishment they had deserued and were to suffer vntill they were by such meanes freed thereof Pro defunctis qui in Christo requieuerunt L. 8. supr cap. 47. iuxt al. 40. 41. postquam Diaconus edixit orandum esse adiunget etiam haec oremus profratribus nostris qui in Christo requieuerunt vt Deus summae erga homines charitatis qui animam defuncti suscepit remittat ei omne peccatum voluntarium non voluntarium propitius illi factus collocet eam in regione piorum qui laxati sunt in sinu Abrahae Isaac Iacob cum omnibus qui à saeculo condito Deo placuerunt vnde fugit dolor maeror gemitus And againe ipse nunc respice hunc seruum tuum quem in aliam sortem elegisti assumpsisti condona ei si quid tum volens tum
buried Wee finde in the old antiquities of landaffe a Publike Charter of King Mauricus in S. Dubritâ—â—â— his time Manuscript antiq de primo statu Landauen Ecclesiae that it was the old custome and duty of Churches daily to pray for the soules of the benefactours deceased and all the faithfull departed out of this life oratione quotidiana Ecclesiastico seruitio pro anima â—â—â—us animabus parentum suorum Regum Principum Britanniae omnium fidelium defunctorum So is the charter of King Arthur to the schoole of Cambredge proremedio animarum antecessorum Chart. priuileg Reg. Arthuri apud Caium l. 1. antiquit Cantabrig pag. 60. 70. Caratoc hist M. S. de vita S. Gildel Probus l. 2. de vit S. Patricij Caius l. 1. sup p. 147. 148. l de vit SaÌ„ct Walliae in S. Iltuto vneorum Regum Britanniae Sainct Gildas our oldest writer and greate diuine did daily pray for the foule of his brother being slaine Orabat pro spiritu fratermp quotidie Sainct Patrike prayed for the dead orauit pro anima eius S. Iltutus appointed 50. of his schollers to pray for the soules of the deade continually Constituit quinquaginta fratres qui continuam animarum memoriam haberent And as I haue spoken before how the first Christians at Hierusalem had a particular Church founded and employed to that holy vse So our Christians Britans insisting in the same deuotion from the beginning had diuers such foundations and Churches especially to offer sacrifice and pray for the deade One of them was at london Ecclesiam Galfrid Monum hist Reg. Briton l. 12 c. 13. aedificauerunt in quo pro ipso Rege fidelibus defunctis diuina celebrantur obsequia And this is sufficient for this question The next exception which is taken by our Protestants The Catholike doctrine of pardons Indulgences in this article is against the Catholike doctrine about pardons or Indulgences saying as they haue done already of Purgatory that the Romish doctrine concerning pardons is a fonde thing vainely inuented and grounded vpon no warranty of Scripture but rather repugnant to the word of God The Councell of Trent setteth downe the Catholike doctrine in this point which these men call the Conc. Trid. seff 9. in decreto de Indulgentijs Romish doctrine that power of graunting indulgences was by Christ graunted to his Church and the Church in the most auncient times vsed it by so great warrant and therefore declareth the vse of Indulgences to be retajned in the Church as necessary for Christian people and allowed by the authority of holy Councels anathematizing them which affirme them to be vnprofitable or deny there is power in the Church to graunt them Cum potestas conferendi Indulgentias à Christo Ecclesiae concessa sit at que huiusmodi potestate diuiniâ—â—s tradita antiquissimis etiam temporibus illa vsa fuerit Sacrosancta Synodus indulgentiarum vsum Christiano populo maxime salutarem sacrorum conciliorum anthoritate probatum in Ecclesia retinendum esse docet praecipit eosque anathemate damnat qui aut inutiles esse asserunt veleas concedendi in Ecclesia potestatem esse negant The same holy CouÌ„cell with all good Catholiks as much coÌ„demneth abuses in pardons or IndulgeÌ„ces and as wisely preuenteth them as any enemy of Indulgences doth euer did or can desire That there this power of graunting pardons and Indulgences for remitting the temporall punishment due to sinne is first euident by that is said of the paines and punishment of purgatory before For no man will or can deny but if the Church hath power or meanes to remit paines to them that be deceased and out of the state of meriting in themselues much rather it hath such power and remedies for the liuing which by themselues may and doe merit and are in all respects parts and subiects of the militant Church of Christ Secondly whereas this Protestant article saith pardons haue no warranty of Scripture but rather repugnant to the word of God The Apostolike Fathers of this first age haue taught vs otherwise before euen of the paines of Purgatory And the Scripture is cleare both that Christ did graunt this power to his Church and the Church practized it in the Apostles time Of this power of remitting sinnes and their punishment Christ must needs meane when he said to S. Peter he would giue Matth. c. 16. vnto him the keyes of the Kingdome of heauen and whatsoeuer he should loose on earth should be loosed in heauen Tibi dabo claues regnicaelorum Et quodcumque solueris super terram erit solutum in caelis So when he said to all his Apostles Whatsoeuer Matth. 18. you shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heauen Quaecunque solueritis super terram erunt soluta in Ioh. cap. 20. coelo And againe whose sinnes you forgiue they are forgiuen vnto them Quorum remiseritis peccata remitiuntur ets And that wee may be assured these words and warrants of Christ did carry this construction and giue this power and not onely to the then present Apostles but their Successours and Rulers in his Church for euer first Sainct Paul who was not an Apostle Preist nor Christian then at the giuing of this cominission nor there present did thus expounde it and practise it For first excommunicating the wicked Corinthian which had committed 1. Cor. 5. sinne with his Fathers wife his mother in lawe a sinne both in Catholiks and Protestants Iudgment deseruing greate and longe pennance and punishment he soone after wrote vnto them againe to giue him pardon and indulgeÌ„ce for the punishment thereof donetis or condonetis cui donastis or condonastis ego ego donaui or condonaui in persona Christi S. Paul gaue pardon in the person of Christ and the Church of Corinth did the same by the 2. Cor. 2. same warrant and authority So the learned holy Fathers after expound it Primasius in c. 2. epist 2. ad Corinth Aug. l. 2. coÌ„tr epist parmen c. 11. Chrys Homil. 5. de verb. Isaiae vidi Dom. l. 3. de Sacerdoâ—io Euseb Emissen hom in dom 19. post Pentecost Hilar. can 18. in Matth. PaciaÌ„ epistol 1. ad Simpronian Nouatian Aug l. 50. homil hom 40 27. l. 20. ciuit cap. 9. Engl. prot Booke of Ordinat with the Churches approbation cui aliquid donastis Pro donaueritis ego Sicut vobiscum vindicaui ita vobiscum dono Nam Et ego quod donaui Non in mea persona sed Christi qui dixit quae solueritis in terra erunt soluta in coelo Si quid donaui propter vos Nâ— grauemini In persona Christi Quia personam gerimus Christi And both the Greeke and Latine Church euer from the beginning expound those words of Christ in the Ghospell before cited as I haue done And our Protestants themselues doe the like making those
sufficient for this Question The next Protestant exception in this article is concerning Images and is this The Romish doctrine The reuerent vse of holy Images thus proued concerning worship and adoration of images is a fond thinge vainely inuented and grounded vpon no warrant of Scripture but rather repugnant to the word of God The Councell of Trent for Catholiks thus deliuereth their doctrine and practise in this point which these men terme the Romish doctrine Imagines Christi Deiparae Virginis aliorum Sanctorum Concil Trid. Sess 9. in templis praesertim habendas retinendas eisque debitum honorem venerationem impertiendam non quòd credatur inesse aliqua in ijs diuinitas vel virtus propter quam sint colendae vel quòd ab eis sit aliquid petendum vel quòd fiducia in Imaginibus sit figenda veluti olim fiebat à gentibus quae in idolis spem suam collocabant Sed quoniam honos qui eis exhibetur refertur ad prototypa quae illae representant Ita vt per imagines quas osculamur coram quibus caput aperimus procumbimus Christum adoremus Sanctos quorum illae similitudinem gerunt veneremur Id quod conciliorum praesertim verò secundae Nicaenae Synodi decretis contra imaginum oppugnatores est sancitum That the Images of Christ The Mother of God and other Saincts are to be had and retained especially in Churches and due honour and reuerence is to be done vnto them not because wee may or doe beleeue there is any diuinity or vertue in them for which they are to be reuerenced or that any thing is or may be asked of them or trust placed in them as it was vsed of the gentils which placed their hope in Idols But because the honour which is done to them is referred to these whose Images they be and represent So that by the Images which wee kisse and before which wee put of our hats and knâ—ele downe wee adore Christ and worship the Saincts whose similitude they beare Which is defined in the decrees of Councels especially of the second Councell of Nice against the oppugners Concil Nic 2. of Images That Nicen generall Councell so defineth and testifieth it to be the doctrine of the Fathers and tradition of the Catholike Church in all the world Imaginis honor in prototypuÌ„ resultat qui adorat Imaginem in ea adorat quoque descriptum argumentum Sic enim Sanctorum nostrorum patrum obtinet disciplina vel traditio Catholicae Ecclesiae quae à finibus vsque ad fines Euangelium suscepit They say it was the faith of the Apostles Fathers and all true beleeuers in the world And doe anathematize all that alledge the sentences of holy Scripture against Idols against such sacred Images or call them Idols or say the Christians adore Images as Gods and those that wittingly communicate with them that hold opinion against such Images or abuse them Sancta Synodus exclamauit omnes sic credimus omnes idem sapimus omnes approbantes subscripsimus Haec est fides Apostolorum haec est fides patrum haec est fides orthodoâ—orum haec fides orbem terrarum confirmauit Credentes in vnum Deum in Trinitate laudatum venerandas Imagines amplexamur Qui secus agunt anathemate percelluntur Quicunque sententias sacrae Scripturae de Idolis contra venerandas Imagines adducunt anathema Qui venerandas Imagines Idola appellant Anathema Qui dicunt quòd Christiani Imaginès vt Deos adorent anathema Qui scientes communicant cum illis qui contra venerandas Imagines sentiunt aut eas dehonestant anathema And this being a generall Councell as our Protestants confesse and so by their owne allowance before the greatest authority in the Church of Christ doth expressely confute all preteÌ„ded obiections out of Scripture which Protestants now vse against holy Images being vrged by the I conoclasts Image breakers heretiks at that time And proueth that from the Apostles time the Catholike doctrine and vse of them had euer beene obserued in the Church And for this first Apostolike age Eusebius Sozomen Nicephorus and others testifie that the woman of phoenicia cured of her infirmity by our Sauiour in the Ghospell by touching the hemme of his garment did make Images of that miracle of Christ healing her and herselfe kneeling vnto him and that at the Image of our Sauiour there grew vp an herbe curinge all diseases to proue the allowance and reuerent vse of such for the Christians had that Image in greate reuerence and so it continued at Paneades in phoenicia vntill Iulian Euseb histor Eccl. l. 7. c. 17. Sozom. hist Eccl. l. 5. c. 20. Niceph. l. 10. c. 30. Synod Nicaen 2. the Apostata pulled it downe as he did other such Christian monuments and set vp his owne statua in the same place which was miraculously brokeÌ„ and ouerthrowne by God to make knowne his wickednesse therein And they were onely Pagan Idolaters which broke and prophaned the Image of Christ the Christians gathered the peeces together placed and reuerently preserued them in the Church Id temporis gentiles statuam Christi tanta câ—â— violentia trahebant vt eam confringerent At Christiani postea cius fragmentae cum collegissent in Ecclesia posuerunt vbi etiam adhuc custoditur Nicephorus and others write Statuam autem Christi Christiani tum iâ— Diacocinum Ecclesiae transtulerunt honoratiore locâ— positam cultu conuenienti prosecuti sunt locum â—â—â—que eum libenter frequentantes Imaginâ—m ipsam iâ—spectantes desiderium suum amorem ergastatuae ipsius archetypum primariumque exemplar declararunt Like is the history of our Sauiours holy Image miâ—â—culously Tabul Archiu ciuit Edessae apud Nicep l. 2. ca. 7. alios Euagr l. 4. c. 26 Damasc li. 4. de fid orth c. 17. Orthod c. 17. Const Porph. Imperat orat apud Metaphr 10. Aug. Monol Graecor cal septem Metaphrast 15. Nouemâ— in vit S. Alexiâ— Niceph. l. 2. c. 7. Conc. Nic. 2. Stephan 1. Pap. apud Adrian Pap. ep ad Corol. Mag. Tom. 3. Concil Tradit Eccâ— de S. Imagine Rom. Meth. in Tyberio Marian. Scot. in chronic an 39. Matth. Westmonast chron an graâ—iae 31. Ranulph hig Polychroâ— l. 4. c. 4. made by himselfe and sent to King Abgâ—â—us or Abagarus at Edessa in Syria kept and frequented with greate honour and reuerence as inuincible testimonies and authorities of antiquity proue Euagrius and others call it sanctissionam Imaginem diuinitus fabricatam The most holy Image made by God The Greeke Church keepeth a yearely feaste and solemnity of this holy Image on the 17. of the Calends of September The same I say of the holy Image of Christ made by himselfe in wipinge his face going to his passion with a linnen cloath deliuered to him by S. Veronica by some Bereuice as the traditioÌ„ of the Church of Christ Methodius Marianus Scotus Mattheus Westmonasteriensis and
in her armes whereof they say hee was deliuered a virgin And these nations though so remote had also the Images of the 12. Apostles as these and other Authors thus deliuer vnto vs There bee certayne pictures of the fashion and with the markes of the twelue Apostles and being demaunded what maner of men these twelue Apostles were they answeare they were greate Philosophers which liued vertuously and therefore they were made Angels in heauen That God which they doe the greatest honour vnto they paint with a body out of whose shoulders come three heades which looke one vppon an other which signifie as they say that all three haue but one will Which no maÌ„ can well doubt but that they are true memoryes though afterward misunderstood in longe tract of tymc of the holy Trinitie and Christian Religion preached there by some of the Apostles whose Images bee so longe honoured there and that was the maner in that first Apostolicke Arnulf Adam relat de locis sanct Beda libell de loc Sanctis Euseb hist Eccl. l. 7. c. 17 tyme in all places At Hierusalcm the Images of the 12. Apostles painted vppon the cloath made by our lady before remembred were honoured in the church in Ecclesia veneratur For Greece Eusebius is wittnesse that the Images of the Apostles namely of S. Peter and S. Paule were paynled as hee had seene them Apostolorum Imagines Pauli videlicet Petri in tabulis coloribus depictas asseruari vidimus And the Apostles by them so honoured Veteres adhunc modum honorare soliti fuerunt Nicephor hist Eccl. l. 6. c. 16. l. 2. c. 43. Petr. de Nat. l. 9. c. 79. The like or more amply hath Nichephorus others affirming that S. Luke Euangelist painted their Images as diuers others It is manifest in the historie of S. Syluester and Constantine that not onely the Images of S. Peter and S. Paule which appeared vnto Constantine but of the other Apostles were with reuerence kept and preserued at Rome amonge so many persecutions I need not to proceed to more particular places and examples when we haue both vnwritten and written tradition that euen from the tyme of Nicephor hist l. 2. c 43. the Apostles and Sainct Luke the Euangelist and others then makeinge and reuerently vseinge such sacred Images the same art and vse was from thence deduced into all the world Vnde in omnem dâ—inde habitabilem orbem tam venerandum pretiosumopus est illatum And this Christian manner and custome of makinge reuerencing and honouring holy Images in such sort as is before defined by the generall Councels and still vsed by Catholiks so auntient from the begynninge of Christianitie so generall in the whole Christian worlde was neuer disallowed or impugned by any man bearing the name of a Christian vntill about the yeare of Christ 494. Xenaias a prophane vnbaptized and Cedren in compendio Hist in Xenaia Persa sacrilegeous Persian vsurping Ecclesiasticall orders was the first which opposed against it and therefore is stiled in histories to be a man of an audacious and impudent mouth and placed in the Nicephorus hist Eccl. l. 16 c. 27. Synod Nic. 2 Ench. haeres in Xenaia Baron an 485. 486. 487. Spond ib. alij catalogue of damned Heretiks Xenaias primus ô audacem animum os impudens voeem illam euomuit Christi eorum qui illi placuere Imagines venerandas non esse The world hath scarcely seene a more desperate and wicked wretch then antiquities describe this man to haue beene they which haue since followed and follow hym at this tyme haue hardly hitherto gotten much better fame for their like proceedings doing therein onely as Iewes Turkes Tartars Pagans and onely heretiks for that condemned among Christians haue done and The Catholick doctrine and practise of reuerence to holy Relikes at this tyme where they ouer rule The next exception of our Protestants in this Article Against the doctrine practise of the Church of Rome and Catholiks is to vse their words concerning their worshippinge an adoration of Reliques termed by them as the others before a fonde thinge vainely inuented and grounded vpon no warrantie of scripture but rather repugnant to the worde of God The Councell of Trent for Catholiks thus defineth Conc. Trid. sess 9. in this matter Sanstorum Martyrum aliorum cum Christo viuentium sancta corpora quae viua membra fucrunt Christi Templum Spiritus Sancti à fidelibus veneranda esse Affirinantes Sanctorum reliquijs venerationem atque honorem non deberi vel eas aliaque sacra monumenta à fidelibus inutiliter honorari omnino damnandos esse prout iam pridem cos damnauit nuncetiani damnat Ecclesia The bodyes of holy Martyrs and others that lyue with Christ are to be reuerenced The Church doth now condemne as longe agoe it hath condemned those which affirme that reliks of Sainsts or that they and other sacred monuments ar vnprofitably honoured of the faithfull Now lett vs examine what was the doctrine and practise of the Apostles and Apostolike men in this first age in this question Moses Bar-cepha a Syrian many hundreds of yeares since and Iacobus Orrohaita before hym and by hym cited be wittnesses that the body and Reliks of the first man Adam a penitent and holy father after his fall Moses Barcepha Syr. Episc comm de Paradis part 1. c. 14. Iacob Arrohaita apud eund ib. were honorably preserued by his posteritie and in the time of the flood to keepe it from perishing No carryed it with him into the arke and left it to his children Noe arcam cum esset cum liberis suis conscensurus impendente diluuio secum in eam intulisse ossa Adami eaque deinde post diluuium arca egressum suis distribuisse And this was the manner and custome after the deludge vnto the time of Christ amonge the faithfull to preserue with honour and reuerence the bodyes and reliks of the holy Saincts of that Time And as the scripture 4. Reg. c. 13. wittnesseth of the deade body of Elisaeus restoring a mans deade body to life by touching his bones Quod cum tetigit ossa Elisaei reuixit homo steâ—it super pedes suos So we haue vnquestionable authorities both of Scripture and Fathers for the honour and reuerence of the bodies and reliks of the rest of the Prophets the Iewes themselues as the scripture testifieth adorning and reuerencing them Aedificatis sepulchra Prophetarum ornatis Matth. 23. monumenta iustorum S. Epiphanius and other noble wittnesses proue Epiph. l. de Prophet viâ—a interitu in Daniele that Daniel the Prophet was buryed and reuerenced with greate honour and his graue so continued renowned in his time Humatus est magnis honoribus Extat monumentum ipsius vsque ad hoc seculum nostrum in babylone cunctis notissimum The body of Idem supr in Ezechiele Ezechiel was so likewise
entered into Britaine which denied holy Vnction to be vsed in this Sacrament Negligant confirmationem habere olei sacri illinitionem And our English Protestants themselues by their owne most authorized and allowed proceedings haue doe condemne this their article doctrine in this point For first in the publike correctioÌ„ of their religion at Hampton court King Iames being present Conference at Hampton p. 10. 11. and consenting they thus decree Confirmation is an Apostolicall tradition That Confirmation deliuered by the Apostles is a SacrameÌ„t is proued before Secondly these Protestants confesse and decree that the order of Bishops hath euer beene in the Church from the Apostles time but these men not condemning all forrayne Protestants and in denying to Bishops onely power to make Preists and Clergy men leaue no act of Order peculiar and proper to them if they deny confirmation to be a Sacrament and by them onely to be ministred for all others are lawfully ministred by Priests noe Bishops And these our English ProtestaÌ„ts by the greatest power they haue haue set fourth and vse a publike forme and manner of ministring confirmation by them onely which they pretend to be Bishops among them In which they proue it in their proceedings and by the doctrine of this very article for supposing their opinion though false that holy Vnction is not necessary in this practise of Confirmation English Prot. Communion booke Titul ConfirmatioÌ„ Et tit Catechisme they requiring onely two things needfull to a Sacrament a visible signe or ceremony ordained of God and grace giuen thereby thus propose and practise both first they say and direct The Bishop shall lay his hand vpon euery childe seuerally And that in their Iudgment it is a signe and ceremony ordained Communion Booke supr §. alliuinghly of God and that grace is thereby giuen their pretended Bishops in ministring this to children thus proue wee make our humble supplications for these children vpon whom after the manner of the Apostles wee haue laide our hands to certifie them by this signe of thy fauour and gratious goodnesse towards them Therefore being a signe vsed by the Apostles giuing and certifying grace by this very article and their owne definition of a Sacrament before this of Confirmation must needs by their Religion be a Sacrament in the same degree as they allowe baptisme and the Eucharist to be This their communion booke is daily practized by them in all their Churches vsed both before and after these articles were ordained and at this present and supported and warranted with the greatest allowance their religion or any or point therein by their owne proceedings possibly can haue Queenes and Kings supremacy Parlaments Iniunctions Canons Conuocations publike approbation and practise of all their pretended Bishops or named Clergy men THE XII CHAPTER Pennance so called in this article and by Catholikes The Sacrament of Pennance was so iudged and vscd in this Apostolike age THâ— next SacrameÌ„t of the Catholike Church which this Protestant Article demeth to be such is the Sacrament of Pennance S. Ignatius in this Apostolike age giueth power vnto Pennance to bringe sinners both to the vnity of the militant Church on earth and inherite euerlasting life in heauen Obsecro vos quotquot poenitentia ducti redierint Ignat. epist ad Philadelph ad vnitatem Ecclesiae suscipite illos cum omni mansuetudine vt per bonitatem patientiam vestram resipiscentes ex diaboli laqueis digni iam Christo facti salutem consequantur aeternam in regno Christi And writeth how Christians were then bound to admonish and exhort sinners to pennance Oportet eos commonefacere ad poenitentiam cohortari si forte manus dent monitisque cedant S. Denis the Areopagite deliuereth the manner of penitents and pennance to haue beene then as the Catholiks now vse the penitent to kneele to the Preist and with sorrowe confesse his sinnes and the Preist by absolution to forgiue them and so iustifie the penitent sinner and greately reprehendeth one Demophilus for hindering it saying it was the order of discipline then Tu vt tuae literae indicant procedentem Dion epist aâ— Demophil ante med Sacerdoti impium vt ais peccatorem nâ—sâ—io quo pacto contra disciplinae ordinem astans calce abiecisti Adhuc cum ille quidem quod oportuit fateretur se ad peccatorum remedium quaerendum venisse tu non exhorruisti sed bonum Sacerdotem ausus es lacâ—rare conuitijs miserabilem eum dicens quòd poenitentem impium iustificasset S. Ignatius maketh it one of the IgnaÌ„t epist aâ— Heronem Sacraments ministred by Preists Baptizant sacrificant eligunt manus imponunt S. Clement setteth it downe for a tradition of S. Peter and the other Apostles to confesse all sinnes vnto the Pastours of their soules and to rceaue cure and remedy from them Si forte alicuius cor vel liuor vel infidâ—lâ—tas Clem. Rom. epâ—st â— vel aliquod malum ex his quae superius memorauimus latenter irrepserit non erubescat qui animae suae curam gerit confiteri haec huic qui praeest vt ab ipso per verbum Dei consilium salubre curetur And he addeth afterward from the mouth of S. Clem. Rom. sup epist 1. Peter Instruebat actus suae vitae omni hora custodire in omni loco Deum respicere firmiter scire cogitationes malas cordi suo aduenientes mox ad Christum allidere Sacerdotibus Domini manifestare S. Peters instruction was diligently to take knowledge euen of the euill cogitations of the hart and to confesse them to the Preists of God He saith in an other Constitut Apost l. 2. cap. 49. place that penance is like vnto baptisme Erit ei in locum lauachri impositio manuum He setteth downe the verie manner of enioyning penanc according to the qualitie of the sinnes committed dayes or weeks in fasting and penance Afflictum diebus Cap. 19. Ieiuniorum pro ratione peccati bebdomadas duas vel tres vel quinque vel septem dimitte dicens ei quaecumque conueniunt ad peccatorem corripiendum And he expoundeth those words of Christ in the ghospel of bynding and loosing of this Sacrament as others after him do Paenitentibus remissionem concedere oportet Cap. 21. Recognosce ô Episcope dignitatem tuam quod sicut ligandi potestatem accepisti sic etiam soluendi Obtinens igitur soluendi potestatem recognosce Pennancea Sacrament among the Britans tâ—ipsum secundum dignitatem loci tui in hac vita versare It was so generally a receaued truth here in Britaine that euen when our Protestant Antiquaries confesse our Christian Britans kept their first faith inuiolate the contrary was adiudged heresie and a King himselfe frequard summoned Hector Boeth l 9. Scotor Hist fol 179. Georg. Buch. l. 5. Rer. Scotir Reg. 52. and proceeded against for laughing at the Baptisme of
Infants and Confession of sinnes to Preists Notatus est aliquando risisse paruulorum Bap tisma peccatorumque ad Sacerdotis aurem confessionem Thus it is testified both by Catholike and Protestant Historians And our most auncient Brittish writers as S. hollinsh hist of Scut l pag. 112. Gildas speaking of this Sacrament the practise and vse thereof here in Britayne deduceth it from Christs words of bynding loosteing spokeÌ„ to S. Peter and the other Apostles Petro eiusque Successoribus Gild. l. de excid cap. 26. dicit Dominus tibi dabo claues Regni Coelorum Itemque omni sancto Sacerdoti promittitur quaecumque solueris superterram erunt soluta in caelis quaecumque ligaueris super terram erunt ligata in caelis Our learned Britan the old Archbishop of Orleance Ionas Aureliensis testifieth the auncient deuotion to this Sacrament was such that both Preists and penitents wept in the ministring thereof and giueth instance in S. Eustachius Ionas aurel in vit S. Eustachij cap. 1. so weeping when penitents confessed their sinnes vnto him that he caused them also to weepe Quoties illi aliquis ob recipiendam paenitentiam lapsus suos esset confessus ita flebat vt illum flere compelleret And this is so euident a truth that King Iames King Iames Confer at Hampton court with his Protestant Bishops and clergie in their publik examination of their Religion conclude this point in these words That the particular and personall absolution from sinne after consession is Apostolical and a very godly ordinance And this is no new thing in their Religion but a new approbation of their doctryne herein against their puritans for their communion booke elder then these Articles and at this time the most practicall and allowed Rule which they haue doth giue direction both for confession of syns and absolution from them in the very same words which Catholik Preist vse in this Sacrament The sikpersou Engl. Protest communion Booke Titul visitation of the Sike shall make a speciall confession if he feele his conscience troubled with any weightie matter After which confession the Preist shall absolue him after this sort Our Lord Iesus Christ who hath left power to his Church to absolue all sinners which truely repent and beleeue in him of his greate mercy forgiue thee thyne offences and by his authoritie committed to me I absolue thee from all thy syns in the name of the father and of the Sonne and of the holy ghost Amen Here is all which this Article requireth to a Sacrament a visible or externall signe or ceremonie as is Manifest and this ordeined of God both because this communion booke saith it was left by Christ the sonne of God to his Church so to befor euer as is Church shall be euer forgiuing sinnes and giueing grace which no visible or externall signe or ceremony but such as is ordained of God to such end and purpose can do This power is pretented to be giuen to euery minister among them when their Protestant Bishop maketh him by laying his hands vpon him saying these words receaue the holy ghoste whose Protest Booke of consecration Articul 36. inf sinnes thou forgiuest they are forgiuen and whose sinnes thou doest retayne they are retayned Thus hath the Protestant manner of consecration in their booke thereof approued in these Articles in as ample manner as any thing in their Religion And if their consecration were true and lawfull if they could not minister this as a Sacrament they could do nothing at all this being the power that is pretided to be be giuen vnto them at that time and nothing els in playne and expresse termes at the least in so manifest true meaning and construction THE XV. CHAPTER Holy Orders contrary to this Article was vsed and held à Sacrament in this first age AND by this sufficiently appeareth also that both by the doctrine practise and authoritie of this Apostolike age and their owne Protestant cheifest grownds and proceedings how vntruely this Article denyeth in the next place that holie Orders is a SacrameÌ„t for it is manifest before that both by the Apostostolik men of this time and their owne profession and confession it hath all things needfull to a Sacrament a visible externall signe or ceremonie ordained by God giuing grace and extraordinarie spirituall power and itselfe by that consecration also giueth grace in other Sacraments which cannot be ministred without it either by Catholike Religion or our Protestants practise and profession Noe terrene and earthly power may or can performe the duties and offices of that gratious and spirituall function This is the plaine and euident testimonie of the blessed Fathers of this time S. Clement euen in the words of the Apostles maketh preishood more excellent then the Regall power and dignitie for that he ruleth soules an this the bodies And is so farre from our Protestant courses in making holie preisthood treason that he maketh it an offence Clem. Rom. l. 2. constitut Apostol c. 2. deseruing greater punishment to do wrong to Preists then temporall Princes Si Reges inuadens supplicio dignus iudicatur quamuis filius vel amicus sit quantò magis qui Sacerdotibus insultat Quantò enim Sacerdotium Regno est excellentius cùm regendarum animarum officio praefit tanto grauiori supplicio punitur qui aduersus id aliquid temerè fecerit quam qui aduersus Regnum The like and more vrgent hath S. Ignatius Ignat. epist ad Smyrnen Honora Deum vt omnium Authorem Dominum Episcopum verò vt Principem Scaerdotum Imaginem Dei referentem Dei quidem propter Principatum Christi verò propter Sacerdotium Honorare oportet Regem neque enim Rege quisquam praestantior aut quisquam similis illi in rebus omnibus creatis neque Episcopo qui Deo consecratus est pro totius mundi salute quicquam maius in Ecclesia Sacerdotium est omnium bonorum quae in hominibus sunt apex qui aduersus illud facit non hominem Ignominia afficit sed Deum Christum Iesum primogenitum qui natura solus est summus Sacerdos And they ascribe this extraordinarie dignitie and excellencie of sacred preisthood to their supernaturall chaunge and grace bestowed miraculously vpon them in their consecration and by vertue of that holy Sacrament no other reason to be giuen of so wonderfull an alteration and preminencie as both the holy Fathers in the common construction of the Church of Christ and the light of nature assuer vs that men so lately and euer before their consecration were but as other men and now nothing externally chaunged should by Gods decree ordinance be eleuated vnto and endowed with so incomparable honour power grace and vnquestionable priuiledges onely the Sacramentall grace performeth it say these holy Fathers as it doth the like in the holy Eucharist and Baptisme Eadâ—m vis etiam Sacerdotem augustum
Preist is to offer Sacrifice and Minister other Sacraments and Deacons are to Minister vnto them in such holie mysteries and so must needs haue power giuen them accordingly in their consecration and this was so with the Apostles and Ignat. epistol ad Heronem Diaconum the first Preists and Deacons Sacâ—rdotes sunt Tâ— verò Diaconus Sacerdotum Minister Baptizanâ— sacrificant manus imponunt tu verò illis ministras vt Sanctus ille Stephanus Iacobo presbyteris qui Epistol ad Trallian erant Hierosolymis Oportet Diaconos mysteriorum Chtisti ministris per omnia placere nec enim ciborum potuum ministri sunt sed Ecclesiae Dei administratores Ipsi itaque tales sunt at vos reueremini illos vt Christum Iesum cuius vicarij sunt Episcopus Typum Dei Patris omnium gerit presbyteri verò sunt consessus quidam coniunctus Apostolorum chorus Sine his Ecclesia electa non est nullasine his Sanctoruâ— congregatio nulla Sanctorum electio Quid Sacerdotium aliud est quam sacer caetus consiliarij assessoreâ— Episcopi Quid verò Diaconi quà m imitatores Angelicarum virtutum quae purum inculpatum ministerium illi exhibent vt sanctus Stephanus beato Iacobo Timotheus â—nius Paulo Anacletus Clemens Petro Qui igitur his non obedit sine Deo prorsus impurus est Christum contemnit constitutionem eius imminuit S. Martial deliuereth plainely a cheife and principall cause of the honour and excellencie of this Sacrament of holie Orders because among other eminencies thereof Bishops and Preists offer and Deacon assist them therein the most holie sacrifice of Christs bodie and blood vpon an holie Altar the very same which the Iewes did by malice offer Martial epist ad Burdegal cap. 3. when they crucified Christ Sacerdotes honorabatis qui decipiebant vos sacrificijs suis qui mutis surdis statuis offerebant Nunc autem multò magis Sacerdotes Dei omnipotentis qui vitam vobis tribuunt in calice viuo pane honor are debetis Christi corpus sanguinem in vitam aeternam offerimus Quod Iudaei per Inuidiam immolauerunt putantes se nomen eius à terra abolere nos causa salutis nostrae in ara sanctificata proponimus scientes hoc solo remedio nobis vitam The Britanâ— here so held praestandam mortem effugandam hoc enim ipse Dominus noster iussit nos agere in sui commemoratioâ—em This was also the doctrine of our first Christian Gildas l. de excid conq Britan. c. 26. manuscript antiq de tit S. Patricij Capg in cod Giâ—ald Caâ—mb Britans Their Preists were consecrated to offer the heauenly Sacrifice at the holie Altar They conseâ—rated Christs bodie and blood with their mouthes â—roprio ore And of all the people in the world as â—heir Antiquities witnes they most honoured clearâ—ie men in such respects Ecclesiasticis viris longè â—agis quà m vllaÌ„ gentem honoreÌ„ deferentes Their Bishops were consecrated with holie Chrisme imposition in descript cambr c. 18. of hands and consecrating words in consecratione Pontificum capita eorum sacri Chrismatis infusione perungere cum Inuocatione sancti Spiritus manus impositione The hands of Preists were consecrated Gild. l. de excid Britan. in castigatione Cleri to offer and handle the blessed Sacrifice Benedictione initiantur Sacerdotum manus S. Paule in diuers places proueth it giueth grace so making it a true and proper holie Sacrament Noli negligere 1. Timoth. 4. gratiam quae in te est quae data est tibi cum impositione manuum presbyterij And admoneo te vt resuscites 2. Timoth. 1. gratiam Dei quae est in te per impositionem manuum mearum And Christ himselfe by his owne example and testimonie S. Iohn the Euangelist so recording affirmeth that the holie ghost and power to forgiue sins were giuen in this Sacramentall ceremonie Io 20. Accipe Spiritum fanctum quorum remiseritis peccata remittuntur eis And it is the witnesse of God that holie Orders is the worke of the holie ghost Dixit Spiritus sanctus Segregate mihi Saulum Act. 13. Barnabam in opus ad quod assumpsi eos Tunc iâ—iunantes orantes imponentesque eis manus dimiserunt illos It is confessed by the greatest Protestant authoritie in England of King Protestant Bishops K. Iames and his protest publike conference at hampton court Couell def of hooker p. 87. and others their best scollers in their publike examen of their Religion That this power of Orders giuen as they pretend by imposition of hands Iâ— diuinae Ordinationis and de iure diuino The ordinâ—â—ce of God and by his diuine lawe To these persons Gâ—â— imparted power ouer his mysticall bodie which is â—â— societie of soules and ouer that naturall which is himself Mod. exâ—minaâ— pag. 105. 155. def of hooker pag. which antiquitie doth call the making of Christ body The power of the ministry by blessing visâ—â— elements it maketh them inuisible grace giueth 87. 88. 91. daily the holy ghost it hath to dispose of that flesh which was giuen for the life of the world and that blood which was powred out to redeeme soules It is a power which neither Prince nor potentate King nor Caesar on earth can giue The Apostles did impart the same power to ordayne which was giuen to them And in their publikly authorized Rituall and Protest Booke of Consecrat in Order Bish. and Preists booke of consecration or making Protestant Bishops and Preists warranted by their parlaments in these very Articles and their generall practise in ordayning all their Church men it is diuers times and plainely confessed both by words and actions that the holy ghost grace and power to giue grace and forgiue sinnes is infallibly giuen Protest confat hampton Communion Booke Titul visitat of the sike by the externall signe or ceremony vsed therein And both their publike conference and examen of their Religion and the common booke of their Church seruice do proue and giue warrant from hence from their ministers to forgiue sinns by such power committed to them from God in their ordination Therefore if there be any ground or warrant for the Protestant Religion of England or any one point or article thereof though but such as they pretend for the proposers and authorizers thereof whether Protestant Prince parlament conuocation canons Articles the publik bookes and practise thereof or whatsoeuer els they can name in this kinde holie Orders and preisthood so vehemently persecuted by them is by their owne doctrine and Religion an holie Sacrament in such proper true sense and meaning as it is vsed in the Romane Church at this time and euer was They were the Messaliani or Massaliani Euchitae or Enthusiastae heretiks about the Damascen de haeresib hist tripart l. 7. Theod. l. 4 c 11.
greeke Origen hom 2. in leuitic Chrisostom l. 3. de Sacerdotio Cirill Alexandr l. 6. de adorat in spiritu victor Antioch ad c. 6. marci Ambros in missali Hier. ad c. 14. Oseae August Serm. 215. de tempor in Tract de rectitud cathol conuersat l. 2. de visitat Infirm c. 4. Innocent 1. epistol ad Decent Eug. cap. 8. Aug. l. de Haeres cap. 47. Gabriel Prat. Elench haeresum in Hierarchitis Epiph. haeres 67. Extreame vnction a Sacrament with the Britans Manuscript Brit. Antiquissimi Authoris and Latine Church doe thus expound this place deriue this Sacrament from thence and affirme it euer to haue beene so receaued in Christs Church and by him instituted proposed by S. Iames. sic roges dete pro te fieri sicut dixit Apostolus Iacobus immo per Apostolum suum Dominus ipsa videlicet olei sacrati delibutio intelligitur Spiritus sancti typicalis vnctio I need not to make repetitions of their testimonies this veritie being so generally receaued and practized in the first times of Christian Religion that about the yeare of Christ 279. it was commonly adiudged heresie to deny it and is so censured registred and condemned in the exploded heresies of the Hierarchite Heretiks dicebant extremae vnctionis Sacramentum à Deo institutum non esse Which being condemned for herefie in the whole Church of Christ must needs be so also adiudged in this Kingdome renowned then for true Christian Religion and the Catholike doctrine yet we want not particular testimonies hereof for our Protestants themselues commonly teaching that the Britans neuer chaunged any materiall point in Religion produce vnto vs a most auntient manuscript as they terme it written ab authore antiquissimo and as is euident in the same Antiquitie when there were yet many Pagans and Idolaters here in which commaunde and direction is giuen that all sick persons in daunger of death should both receaue the Sacrament of Christs holie bodie and this of extreame vnction sette downe by S. Iames the Apostle and the primatiue Fathers before Quotiens aliqua Infirmitas superuenerit corpus sanguinem Christi illi qui aegrotant accipiant oleum in nomine Domini à presbyteris humiliter petant inde corpus suum vngant vt quod scriptum est impleatur Infirmatur aliquis inducat Iacob 5. presbyteros Ecclesiae orent super cum vngentes eum oleo in nomine Domini oratio fidei saluabit infirmum alleuiabit eum Dominus et si in peccatis sit dimittentur ei Videtefratres quia qui infirmitatem habent ad Ecclesiam currant corporis sanitatem reâ—ipere peccatorum Indulgentiam merebuntur obtiâ—ere The Protestants of England euen the composers of these Articles cannot by their owne Religion be of other mind without grosse Ignorance and contradiction for defining a Sacrament as they haue done in this Article and in their most Protest commun booke Tit. catechisme warranted communion booke thus do define it by this word Sacrament I meane an outward and visible signe of an Inward and spirituall grace giuen vnto vs ordeyned by Christ himselfe as a meanes whereby we receaue the same and a pledge to assuer vs thereof They must needs graunt that S. Iames in expresse words in holie scripture their pretended Rule hath deliuered as much for this Sacrament as they require the outward visible signe the Preists prayer and vnction with oyle and remission of sinnes which cannot be without grace receaued by the same Thus I haue inuincibly proued by this first Apostolike age for the doctrine and practise of the Catholike Church and against this Protestant Article the whole compleat number of 7. Sacraments And yet if I had onely proued three Sacraments or any lesse number then seuen and greater then two I had sufficiently confuted this Article which onely alloweth two Baptisme and the Eucharist stiled by them the Supper of the Lord for such THE XVIII CHAPTER The rest of this Article repugnant to the Catholike faith likewise condemned THE remnant of this Article they deliuer in these words The Sacraments were not ordeyned of Christ to be gazed vpon or to be carryed aboute but that we should duely vse them And in such onely as worthyly receaue the same they haue a wholesome â—ffect or operation But they that receaue them vnworthily purchase to themselues damnation as Sainct Paule saith This is the whole content of this Article and in this last if these Protestants desire to speake properly as they should and would so be vnderstood there is very little or no difference betwene Catholiks and them For where they say that Sacraments haue a wholesome effect or operation in their worthie receauers this agreeth with the Catholike doctrine that Sacraments giue grace and worke ex opere operato which many Protestants denie And concerning the vnworthie receauing of them it is not a thing questioned What they meane by these wordes The Sacraments were not ordeyned of Christ to be gazed vppon or to be carryed about So speaking of Sacraments in the plurall number is a straunge speach excepting one Species of the Sacrament of Eucharist we reserue none nor carry any about for any respect nor can by their doctrine professing they consist in their ministration and receauing as is euident in Baptisme Confirmation Orders Confession and Absolution Matrimony and Extreame vnction What they meane by their words gazed vpon requireth a better glosse then they giue to vâ—derstande their meaning for to take the worde as it is commonly and properly vsed in our language earnestly or intensiuely to beholde if they forbid such gesture at Sacraments they forbid publik ministration of them which their practise alloweth warranteth and prescribeth by their greatest authoritie If they would haue this their termed gasing vpon or carrying about to be vnderstood any reâ—â—rence or reseruation the Romane Church vseth â—owards the blessed Sacrament of the Altare the question with them properly belongeth to their â—8 Article where they expressely speake against Transubstantiation or chaunge of breade and wine into the body and blood of Christ and his true and reall presence in those most sacred misteries which being vndeniably confuted as in that place it shall this errour is thereby clearely ouerthrowne For wheresoeuer Christ is or howsoeuer heis heis to be worshipped and adored with as greate dutie and reuerence as any Catholike giueth vnto him in this Sacrament In the meane tyme the Apostolike men of this first age do thus testifie S. Clement often testifying the reall and true presence of Christ in this most holie Sacrament setteth downe the deuotion and honour of all people then Bishops Preists Deacons Subdeacons Virgyns widowes married old and young to be as greate or greater then Catholiks now commonly vse vnto it When consecration is ended and the blessed Sacrament was shewed vnto the Christians present the Deacon vsed to say let vs aâ—tend or behold The Bishop or Preist
spared nâ—â— Princes themselues that followed him therein at all Antiquities tell vs in the case of King Frequard who being noted to haue laught at the Baptisme of Infants and confession of sinnes to Pâ—â—ists Notatus est aliquando risisse paruulorum â—â—ptisâ—um peccatorumque ad Sacerdotis aurem confesâ—â—â—â—â— was accused of pelagianisme cited condemned imprisoned and deposed So testifie both Catholik and Protestant Antiquaries THE XX. CHAPTER The 28. Article intituled of the supper of the Lord examined and condemned THEIR 28. Article being intituled of the 〈◊〉 supper is as followeth The supper of the Lorde is not onely a signe of the loue that Christians ought to haue among themselues on to an other but rather it is a Sacrament of our redemption by Christes death in so much that to such as rightly worthily and with faith receaue the same the bread which we breake is a partaking of the body of Christ and likewise the cuppe of blessing is a partaking of the blood of Christe Transubstantiation the chaunge of the substance of breadâ— and wine in the supper of the Lord cannot be proâ—ed by holy writ it is repugnant to the playne words of scripture ouerthroweth the nature of a Sacrament 〈◊〉 hath giuen occasion to many superstitions The body â—â— Christ is giuen taken and eaten in the supper 〈◊〉 after an heauenly and spirituall manner And tâ—â— meane whereby the bodie of Christ is receaued and 〈◊〉 in the supper is faith The Sacrament of the Lords supper was not by Christs ordinaunce reserued carryed about lifted vp or worshipped Hitherto this 28. Protestant Article In the first part thereof vntill we come to the woâ—â— Transubstantiation or the chaunge of the substance there is no apparant contradiction to the doctrine of the Catholik Church And if our Protestants secretly meane otherwise their Intention iâ— plainely expressed in that which followeth iâ— denying Transubstantiation or chaunge of the substance of breade and wyne Which I affirme with the Catholike Church and thus proue against this Article First by holy writ or scripture allthough that is not necessarie as is often made manifest against these men Where soeuer there is a chaunge or mutation of one thing into an other as in this case of breade into the body of Christ and this manifestly expressed and conteyned in holy writ and scripture there is transubstantiation or chaunge of breade by scripture into Christs body likewise of wyne into his blood This is euident by their owne exposition and transubstantiation in this place declaring it to be a chaunge of the substance of breade and wine But the holy writ and scripture in three Euangelists and S. Paule expressely proue that before Christ blessed and consecrated the breade and wine it was noe other but breade and wine and proue likewise euen from the testimonie of Christ himselfe that after his Matth. cap. 26. Marc. cap. 14. Luc. cap. 22. 2 Chorinth 11. blessing and omnipotent worde spoken it was now chaunged into his body and blood playnely saying this is my body which is giuen or shall be giuen for you and this is my blood which is shedd or shall be shedd for you Therefore by these Protestants exposition before there was and of necescessitie must be transubstantiation or chaunge of the substance of bread and wine Thus hath holie writ and scripture in all learned languadges Hebrue Greeke and Latin before consecration it was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 lechem 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 artos panis breade after consecration 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ghenijah 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sonâ—a corpus Christs body likewise of the wine chaunged into his blood this is the testimony of Christ S. Matthew S. Marke S. Luke and S. Paule in holie writte and scripture And S. Iohn is witnesse also Io cap. 6. that Christ had taught and promised this before And yet any one place of scripture in so playne words maketh a matter of faith out of doubt and vndeniable Nothing can be more playne then such an affirmatiue proposition of a Subiect present in the hands of Christ the speaker and in the sight and presence of the greatest witnesses his Apostles at his last supper in the greatest Sacrament Christ neuer interpreted himselfe otherwise That his Apostles so vnderstood him beleeued practized and left to others is euidently proued both by Scriptures and the antiquities of this age First S. Iohn in scripture speaketh in Christs words Io 6. that breade is made his bodie Panis quem ego dabâ— caro mea est pro mundi vita And were plaine and often in that his 6. Chapter And both Catholike and Protestant Antiquaries confesse that hee said Masse wherein this chaunge and transubstantiation is vsed and confirmed HOC EST CORPVS MEVM c. And assuers vs that the Altare on which he said Masse many yeares before the blessed Virgyn was preserued in a Church on mount Syon miraculously brought thither Ad occidentalem Guliel way Etonem presbyter l. Itinerar cap. Ioc. Sanct. mont Sinay Hakligis booke of Trauailes in eod Matth. cap. 26. partem Ecclesiae quae est in monte Sion est lapâ—â— rubens prae altari qui lapis portatus erat de monte Sinay per manus Angelorum super quem celebrabat S. Ioannes Euangelista coram Beatisima Virgine Maris Missam per multos Annos post ascensionem Domini Thus testifie holie pilgryms eye witnesses euen of this Kingdome so remote from Hierusalem S. Matthew in his ghospell saith in the words of Christ This is my bodie HOC EST CORPVS MEVM This is my blood HIC EST SANGVIS MEVS In his â—â—â—â—rgie or Masse deliuered to the Church and S. Matth. in missa Aethiopum which he vsed he directly teacheth transubstantiation and chaunge of breade and wine into Christs bodie and blood ô Amator hominum benedic sanctifica munda transfer panem in carnem tuam immaculatam vinum hoc in sanguinem tuum pretiosum And thus hee vsed all his life euen to his martyrdome at the holie Altare where he thus consecrated Christs bodie by chaunging breade Anonym antiquiss in vit S. Matth. edit per Frederic Naus Episcopum Viennen Breuiar Rom. 21. Sept. 1. Corinth 11. into it as the old historie of his life and death beaâ—â—â—h wittnes Cum misteria Domini celebrata fuissent missam suscepisset omnis Ecclesia retinuit se Sanctâ—â— Matthaus iuxta Altare vbi corpus fuerat Christi â—â—fectum illic martyrium expectauit S. Paule in holie scripture saith it was breade before benediction Accepit panem gratias agens and â—fter Christs consecrating words it was his bodie HOC EST CORPVS MEVM And promiseth there to deliuer by tradition what was to be beleeued and practised herein caetera cum venero disponam Which his most learned scholler S. Denys the Areopagite was most like to knowe who before hath testified it was Christs bodie and to be adored S. Marke hath assured vs in
secundum ordinem Melchisedech And they as manifestly testifie that this euer continuing Sacrifice vnder the formes of bread and wine should be the bodie and blood of the Messias offered by the Preists of his lawe Panis quem dat omnibus ipse Rabbi Moses Hadarsan com ps 39. est caro eius dum gustatur panis conuertitur in carnem erit hoc mirabile magnum An other saith sacrificium quod fiet ax vino solum Rabbi Cahana ad ca. 49. Gen. transmutabitur in substantiam sanguinis Messiae sed etiam conuertetur in substantiam corporis eius in sacrificio quod fiet ex pane non obstante quod album sit velut lae conuertetur substantia in substantiam corporis Messiae erit que in ipso sacrificio substantia sanguinis Ernnt item in sacrificio vini sanguis caro Messiae Rabbi Barac in Ecclesiast Rabb Iud. ad c 28. num Rabbi Sim. Bor. Ioan. l. Reuel Secret eadem crunt in pane Rabbi Iudas saith transmutabitur ex substantia panis cum sacrificabitur in substantiam corporis Messae qui discendit de coelis idem ipse erit sactificium An other writeth Messias erit placenta frumenti in terra And Rabbi Salomon witnesseth that generallie the Rabbinesse magistri nostri exposuerunt did so expounde these words in the 72. psalme Erit placenta frumenti interra in vertice montium And that this miraculous chaunge in this sacrifice should be made by the power of the sacrificing Preist words by Gods extraordinary assistance Tunc Deus misericordia implebitur virtute ingenti sanctorum verborum quae ab ore Sacerdotium manabunt illud Sacrificium quod in vnoquoque altari celebrabitur in corpus Messiae conuertetur And accordingly they deliuer how vnspotted the liues of our Preists should be which thus offer Christs body and blood in sacrifice Qualis debeat esse Sacerdotis Rabbi Nehumias epist arcanor vita hoc sacrificium pertractantis Dominus ipse insinuat cum de nostri temporis sacrificio consecrantis qualitate ita leuit 21. capite inquit sanctificabis eum quia Carnem Dei tui ipse â—st vel erit sacrificans This auncient Rabbines Testimonies being so plaine and pregnant for transubstantiation of bread and wine into the body and blood of the Messias in this holy Sacrifice as protestants haue confessed before and their words themselues so euident that no Catholike or Romane writer can set it downe in more manifest or expresse termes make also the contradictory of this Article a clearely and vndeniably true To take exception to those authorities would be grosse and foolish rashnesse for first as I haue proued already and shall hereafter they agree with the Apostolike doctrine of this first age and the vniuersall Church of Christ Secondlie if they had beene counterfaite being in Hebrewe and extant in the libraries of the Iewes they were most like to be counterfaite by them but this had beene to condemne themselues Noe Christian coulde inuent and place them in their libraries There could not be the least suspition of such Inuention for they were vulgarly published to the Christian world longe before the beginning of the Caluinian Sacramentarie Religion or other impugners of this most honorable Sacrifice and so receaued allowed and approued both by the greatest spirituall Petr. Gallot praefat in l. de Arcanis fid cath and temporall authoritie euen of the Emperour giuing both power meanes and allowance for the searching fourth publishing and receauing those antiquities And Rabbi Samuel Marochianus in his booke of the coming of the Messias de aduentu Messiae receaued Rabbi Samuel Morachian lib. de Aduentu Messiae c. 19. by all and doubted of by none doth inuincibly proue and demonstrate the same by manie Scriptures as the Iewes reade and allow them He proueth it from the 109. psalme and other Scriptures prouing that the sacrifice of the Messias in the forme of bread and mine and his Preisthood after the order of Melchisedech being to succeede the sacrifice and Preisthood of AaroÌ„ were promised to endure for euer and not to cease as those of Aaron were to cease and ceased when the euer during sacrifice and Preisthood of the Messias were instituted Attende quanta sit differentia inter sacrificium Psal 109. Aaron Iustiistius Domini Dixit Dominus Domino meo tu es Sacerdos in aeternum non adtempus sicut Aaron Item sacrificium Aaron fuerunt carnes sacrificium illius iusti Dominifuit panis vinum secundum ordinem Melchisedech In quibus verbis Dominus per Prophetam ostendit manifestè quoniam sacrificium Aaron finiretur quando inciperet sacrificium in pane vino aeternaliter duraturum eum Aaron noÌ„ sit data aeternitas in Sacerdotio ficuti Sacerdoti Christo He there proueth that if that promise of eternitie in Sacrifice and Preisthood haue beene made by God to Moyses which he made to the Messias or Christ the sacrifice and Preisthood of Moyses lawe had beene eternall as those of Christs be by that promise Si Deus dixisset nostro Moist sicut dixit per os Dauid Messiae siue Christo Tu venies Sacerdos in aeternum secuÌ„dum legem Myosi Aaron staret illa lex sed dixit tues Sacerdos in aeternum secundum ordinem Melchisedech This he proueth also from Moyses in the 26. chapter of Leuiticus that the Sacrifice of the Messias and his Preistood after the old Order of Melchisedech being established and published those of Aaron weÌ„re to end Ad hoc sonat verbum Moysi cum Leuit. ca. 26. dixit comedetis vetustissima veterum per quod intelligit sacrificium Melchisedech Et iterum nobis superuenientibus id est nouae legis sacrificio publicato vetera scilicet vestra proijcietis He proueth it from Rabbi Samuel supr c. 20. Leuiticus cap. 23. Exodus cap. 25. numeri cap. 21. Where the sacrifice in breade wine is set downe and prefigured He proueth it from Salomon his words which the Prouerb c. 9. Apostle vseth Hoc sacrificiuÌ„ vini cum aqua mixtum pâ—â—cherrimè aptè describit Salomon Propheta in libro prouerbiorum cap. 9. cum dicit Sapientia altissima communicauit sacrificium suum miscuit vinum suum parauit mensam Quis est paruulus veniat ad me insipientes comedent panâ—m meum bibent vinum meum temperatum aqua Quid mensa parata sapientiae altissimi nisi altare Quid panis viuum mixtum nisi sacrificium de pane vino de aqua quod sit in altari not abiliter dicit Panem suum vinum suum perid enim innuit hoc Sacrificium gratum esse Deo quod ad istud conuinium tam diuinum spirituale non vocauit patres nostros qui erant sapientes in lege qui erant occupati in sacrificio legis quod etiam carnale sacrificium Rabbi Samuel
the most auncient publike Church Masses or liturgies which Christians do or can alledge in their Religion bearing the names of the Apostles themselues and yet in euery one of them this most holie Sacrifice of Christs bodie and blood is quite contrarie to this article offered both for the quicke as is manifest and the deade also to haue remission of payne and gilt Fac Domine vt oblatio nostra accepta sit in propitiationem peccatorum nostrorum inrequiem animarum eorum qui ante nos dormierunt So S. Iames. Memento Domine famulorum famularumque Miss S. Iacob tuarum qui nos praecesserunt cum signo fidei dormiunt in somno pacis Ipsis Domine omnibus in Christo quiescentibus locum refrigerij pacis indulgeas deprecamur So S. Peter Animabus patrum Miss S. Petr. fratrum nostrorum qui antea in Christo fide dormierunt dona requiem Domine Deus noster horum omnium animabus Domine Deus noster dona requiem in sanctis tabernaculis tuis in regno tuo easque caelorum regno dignare So S. Marke Memento Domine Miss S. Marc. omnium fidelium dormientium in rectae fidei quiescentium So and much more S. Matthew Memento Miss S. Matt. Domine Seruorum tuorum quaecumque in vita deliquerunt ignosce Offerimus tibi rationabile hâ—c obseqnium pro fidelibus dormiâ—ntibus So S. Andrew and S. Chrisostome after him with the consent of the Fathers both of the greeke Latin Church testifying it was so decreed and left by the Apostles and practised by the Church of Christ Non Chrisostom Hom. 69. ad populum Antiochen temere ab Apostolis haec sancita fuerunt vt in tremendis mysterijs desunctorum agatur commemoratio Sciunt enim illis inde multum contingere lucrum vtilitatem multam Cum enim totius constiterit populus Sacerdotalis plenitudo tremendum proponatur sacrificium quomodo Deum non exorabimus pro his deprecantes And neque abs re is qui astat altari dum venerandâ— Oratione 41. in 1. Corinth peraguntur mysteria clamat pro omnibus qui in Christo dormierunt ijs qui pro ipsis celebrant memorias So in the Masses of S. Barnabas and S. Ambrose S. Basile the Syrians Mozarabes Gothes Muscouites Armenians and all Christians before thes times So it was in the old Masse vsed in Fraunce Hilduinus epist ad Loduic Imperat. Berno Augen Abb. Libell de reb ad missa spectant r. 2. Brytaâ—ne and all this west part of the world from the first receauing of Christianitie here as Hilduinus writing 800. yeares since with others proue the auncient copies thereof being then so old and worne that they were allmost consumed with age Cui adstipulari videntur antiquissimi nimia vetustate pene consumpti Missales libri continentes Missae ordinem more gallico qui ab initio receptae fidei vsus in hac occidentali plaga est habitus vsque quo tenorem quo nunc vtitur Romanum susceperit These our Missals so old 800. yeares since were no new Inuention THE XXIV CHAPTER The 32. Article intituled of the marriage of Preists thus examined and condemned THeir next 23. Article intituled of the marriage of Preists is thus Bishops Preists and Dcacons are not commaunded by Gods lawe either to vowe the estate of single life or to abstaine from marriage Therefore it is lawfull also for them as for all other Christian men to marry at their owne discretion as they shall Iudge the same to serue better to godlinesse This is their whole Article and making the only Scripture which they meane by Gods lawe to be the rule of Religion it is often confuted before And most false prophane and in many cases euen by their owne lawes and proceedings rebellious trayterous and tumultuous to say or write that no thinge is to be obeyed and performed but what is commaunded by Gods lawe or scripture and euery priuate carnall minister may Iudge herein at his owne discretion For by this Paradoxe all temporall and ciuill lawes of Princes not commaunded in scripture are voyde frustrate and not to be obeyed and such men and ministers against all publike rule and gouernment may Iudge censure doe and practise against all or any such lawes of his true and lawfull Soueraigne King though the wisest most Godly and potent in the world all common weales are layde open to manifest or rather certaine daunger and destruction And no law of England in particular is by this article to be obeyed except these ministers will interprete it to be commaunded by Gods laws And so all humane lawes doe cease and onely the lawe of God is in force and to be obeyed So wee must say of all Ecclesiasticall lawes also if they be not commaunded in the law of God all Courts Consistories and Tribunals must be taken away with their Iudges Rulers and Gouernours both ciuill and Ecclesiasticall except they can proue to these men that all their processes proceedings are commaunded in the lawe of God Againe by their owne Religion this Articles doctrine both for the reason it maketh and the conclusion it selfe is false for first in their 6. Article before intituled of testimony of holy scriptures for saluatioÌ„ They haue declared that things read in scriptures or to be proued thereby are articles of faith and requisite or necessary to saluation And so by these men it is allowed against this article that although it is not commaunded by Gods lawes or the Scripture that Bishops Preists and Deacons must vowe the state of single life or abstaine from Marriage yet if this is either reade in holy Scripture or can be proued thereby their Marriage is vnlawfull by their owne confession Queene Elizabeth her Iniunctions an 1. Regni eius Secondly the iniunctions of Queene Elizabeth nothing inferiour to these Articles doe forbid all their ministers to marry without their Bishops licence and allowance Therefore this article in their owne proceedings is vntrue to say they might lawfully marry at their owne discretion as all other Christian men might doe And as false it is that all other Christian men might lawfully Marry euen in these mens doctrine in this article For if the scripture Gods lawe did not commaunde Bishops Preists Deacons or any other to vowe the estate of single life or to abstaine from Marriage yet they which voluntarily doe make such vowes are commaunded by Gods lawe to keepe them redde altissmo vota Naum 1. psal 20. 60. 65. 115. Hier. 44. Psal 75. Is 19. tua Tihireddetur votâ—m Faciamus vota nostra quae vouimus Voueâ—e reddite Domino Vota vonebunt Domino soluent If a iust promise of man to man doth so stricktly binde by all lawes how much more obligatorie and binding is the promise and vowe of man to God The vowes of Chastitie Pouâ—rtie and Obedience in religious men neither Bishops Preists nor
ei vim sanandi depellendi morbum fugandi daemones expellendi insidias per Christum spem nostram And by Apostolike Alexander Pap. 1. epistol omnes orth authority commaunde those ceremonies especially of holy water to be perpetuallie vsed by Preists in all Churches aquam sale conspersam populis benedicimus vt ea cuncti aspersi sanctificentur purificentur Quod omnibus Sacerdotibus faciendum esse mandamus So auncient was this holie ceremonie of sanctifying water and salt so coÌ„tinuall generall and inuiolable which our Protestants themselues thus acknowledge Alexander Romanus aquam admixto Robert Barn l. de vit Pont. Roman in Alexandro 1. sale precibus benedicendam eamque in templo domi ad Satanam propellendum ad peccata tollenda seruari iussit So it was in hallowing the water of baptisme S. Clement and others deliuering the verie manner thereof deprecetur Sacerdos instante baptismo Et dicet Clem. const Apost l. 7. ca. 43 l. 8. c. 35. Aspice è Coelo sanctifica hanc aquam tribue gratiam vim qui baptizatur secundum mandatum Christi cum eo crucifixus commortuus consepultus consufutatus sit in adoptionem quae in eo fit vt mortuus quidem sit peccato viuat autem iustitiae There he deliuereth Cap. 42. also the forme and order of hallowing Chrisme to annoint the baptized Benedicitur oleum à Sacerdote in remissionem peccatorum There he deliuereth the abrenuntiation which was made before baptisme Abrenuntiatio sathanae Cap. 41. operibus eius pompis cultui Angelis machinationibus eius omnibus quae subipso sunt He deliuereth Cap. 23. ep 3. const Apost l. 3. c. 16. 10. Iustinus quaes 137. Missa S. Marci Clem. coÌ„st Apost l. 8. c. 12 Ciprianus ep 63. Miss S. Iacob Alexand. 1. ep 1. Iustin orat ad Ant. pium Ireneus l. 4. c. â—7 lib. 5. cap. 2 Dion Areop l. Eccl. Hier. c. 43. Clem. const Apost l. 3. c. 6. Ignat. epist ad Eph Iren. l 4 c. 20. c. 34. Euarist apud Burchar l. 1. cap. 27. Pius r. apud eund l. 5. c. 47 l. 3. c. 72. Tom. 1 conc c. Clem. can Apost 72. ep 2. the annointing of the baptized vnges oleo sancto caput eorum qui baptizantur siue viri sint siue mulieres It was Dominica Traditio the Tradition euen from Christ that in the chalice water should be mixed with the wine to be offered ne quid aliud fiat à nobis quà m quod pro nobis Dominus Priorfecerit vt calix qui in commemorationem eius offertur mixtus vino offeratur The Apostolike writers of this age assure vs there were altars and they consecrated to consecrate and offer vpon them the blessed and perpetuall sacrifice of Christs body and blood and how they were consecrated as now they are with holy oyle Diuini altaris consecrationem sanctissimorum mysteriorum lex sacratissimi vnguenti castissimis infusionibus perficit And deliuer the verie manner with incense and other ceremonies Pontifex vbi orationem sanctam super diuinum altare peregit ex ipso incensum adolere inchoans omnem plani ambitum circuit Demum ad sanctum altare iterum rediens psalmorum incipiens melos Qui verò ipsius ordinis praecipui sunt vnà cum Sacerdotibus sanctum panem benedictionis calicem sanctis altaribus imponunt So they write of chalices patens and veales hallowed vas aureum vel argenteum vel velum sanctificatum nemo amplius in suum vsum conuertat hoc enim fit contra ius contra leges So of the holie vestiments of Bishops Preists Deacons Subdeacons and others of the Cleargie Sacris induti vestimentis So our Protestants themselues Clem. ep 2. Anac ep 1. Robert Barnes l. de vit Pontif Rom. in Anacleâ—o confesse Anacletus Sacerdotem sacrificaturum ministros vestibus sacris indutos contestes custodes sibi adhibere ordinauit Episcopus verò vt plures ministros sibi in sacris faciendis adiungat I haue spoken of diuers others before and shall remember more in the 36. of consecration of Bishops and ministers hereafter And our auncient monuments are witnesses that as other nations so all the Churches of Britaine did in the Britans time receaue and followe these manners and ceremonies euen by authoritie of the Romane Church Omnes Britannicae Ecclesiae modum Manuscr an t in vit S. Dauidis Capgr Catal. in eodem regulam Romana authoritate acceperunt Therefore most certaine it is that euerie particular and nationall Church hath not against this article authority to ordaine chaunge and abolish such ceremonies or rites of the Churche as the Protestants of England haue done THE XXVI CHAPTER The 35. 36. articles intituled of homilies and of consecration of Bishops and ministers thus examined and condemned THeir next 35. article intituled of homilies doth onely receaue and allowe to be read in their Protestant Church 2. Bookes of homilies one set fourth in the time of King Eduard the sixt the other in the beginning of Queene Elizabeth her Reigne Of which the reader may easilie giue censure according to that is said and proued in the former articles for wherein soeuer either of those 2. bookes any homilie in them on anie part point or doctrine in anie one of them all doth differ from the first Apostolike Catholike true doctrine inuinciblie proued before those bookes homilies parcels or assertions of them are vtterlie to be reiected and renounced Which the verie times themselues of their publication the condemned erroneous dayes of that King and Queene and their Protestanâ— composers and publishers likewise condemned for their false teaching and writing doe manifest vnto vs. Their 36. article of Consecration of Bishops and ministers is thus The booke of consecration of Archbishops and Bishops and ordering of Preists and Deacons lately set for the in the time of Edward the sixt and confirmed at the same time by authoritie of parliament doth conteine all things necessary to such consecration and ordering neither hath it any thinge that of it selfe is superstitious or vngodly And therefore whosoeuer are consecrated or ordered according to the rites of that booke since the second yeare of the a forenamed King Edward vnto this time or here after shall be consecrated or ordered according to the same rites we decree all such to be rightly orderly and lawfully consecrated and and ordered Hitherto this article which in euery part thereof is fully confuted before in my Examination of their 23. Article intituled of ministring in the congregation Where I haue demonstratiuely proued that they neither haue any true lawfull Iurisdiction or ordination among them But to do a worke of Supererogation in this so much concerning the standing or ouerthâ—owe of our Protestants whole religion quite ouerthrowne by this one dispute if they haue no rightly orderly and lawfully consecrated Bishops Preists or Deacons I further thus
19. manner how Bishops should not suffer sinners to enter into the Church vntill they had done pennance as he should thinke fit and then to forgiue them Cum aliquem peccauisse cognoueris iube cum foras eijci ingressique pro eo rogent Tunc iubebis illum iuuare expendens an paeniteat dignus sit qui in Ecclesiam omnino recipiatur afflictum illum diebus ieiuniorum pro ratione peccati hebdomadas duas vel tres vel quinque vel septem dimitte Where the graunting of pardon and Indulgence more or lesse is referred to the Bishops iudgmeÌ„t and discretion And Cap. 21. further omnium curam habeat Episcopus Poenitentibus remissionem concedere oportet Recognosce ô Episcope dignitatem tuam quod sicut ligandi potestatem accepisti sic etiam soluendi Obtinens igitur soluendi potestatem recognosce teipsum secundum dignitatem loci tui in hac vita versare sciens quod de pluribus rebus ratio abs te requiretur Cui enim inquit depositum est Luc. 12. multum abundantius repetetur ab eo Nam peccati expers reperitur nemo excepto eo qui propter nos factus est homo Quoniam scriptum est nemo mundus à Iob 25. sâ—â—â—â—bus neque si vnum diem vixerit Where pardons and Indulgences are commaunded and the necessity of them among all men sinners deliuered He teacheth the like thus againe peccantem caâ—â—iga Lib. 2. Const Apost c. 21. Cap. 21. ieiunio afflictum remissione releua ingemiscentem recipe And leauing all to the Church to impose pennance to alter chaunge ease or giue pardon release and giue Indulgence of it he addeth nolite pro omni peccato eandem sententiam ferre Cap. 52. sed vnicuique propriam poenam statuite cum multa prudentia Alios minis subijcies alijs subsidijs pauperum alios ieiunijs affliges alios segrcgabis pro delicti magnitudine Diuersis delictis diuersas poenas imponatis Si poenitentem non receperis insidiatoribus trades Cap. 14. oblitus Dauid dicentis ne tradas bestijs animam confitentem tibi Si quis Episcopus aut presbyter cum qui à Psal 73. Can. Apost can 51. peccaco reuertitur non recipit sed reijcit deponitor eo quòd Christum offendat qui dixit ob vnum peccatorem qui resipiscat gaudium oboriri in coelo And Sainct Ignatius earnestly vrgeth to take Ignat. epist ad Philadelp mercy of and pardon penitent sinners and receaue them with all gentlenesse as a meanes to bring them from sinning to saluation Obsecro vos quot-quot paenitentia ducti redierint ad vnitatem Ecclesiae suscipite illos cum omni mansuetudine vt per bonitatem This doctrine of IndulgeÌ„ces vsed in Britaine from the first conuersion thereof to Christ Girald Cambren descriptione Cambr. cap. 18. patientiam vestram resipiscentes ex diaboli laqueis digni iam Christo facti salutem consequantur aeternam in regno Christi And to come home to this our owne contry of Britaine Giraldus Cambrensis an old learned Bishop and greate antiquary entreating of the first faith and Religion of the Britans de antiqua fidei fundatione Christianitatis amore deuotione saith they euer coÌ„tinued in the same among other customes and obseruances kept froâ— the time of their first conuersion their Churcheâ— had farre greater Immunities priuiledges or Indulgences then in other places Ecclesiae istorum longâ— maiorem quà m alibipacem habent These Indulgences here did farre exceede them which the Canons graunt Longè Canonum Indulgentiam excedente An euident argument they were more auncient then the Canons And being as hâ— teacheth without Innouation or chaunge eueâ— from the first conuersion of this Kingdome and the Apostles time Which our oldest antiquities warranted both by Catholike and Protestant historians and our Protestants themselues will thus proue vnto vs. They testifie with Antiquity that Io. Bal. l. 1. de vit Pont. Roman in Eleut Robert Barn in vit pont Rom. in eod Pope Eleutherius was bonus paterfamilias a good Steward of Gods Church And King Lucius entreated him to be ioyned to the Christian faith and Church which was then and had beene from the beginning Lucius Britanniae Rex Christiano caâ—â—i cum suis subditis adiungi à pontifice petijt per literas And hee so effected it that the BritaÌ„s were coÌ„firmed and strengthened in the doctrine which they had receaued from the Apostles and the whole Kingdome here professed it Eleutherius vt bonus paterfamilias effecit vt confirmatis consolidatis Britanâ—is in suscepta prius ab Apostolis doctrina totum illud regnum in eius fidei verbum iuraret And this Apostolike faith and doctrine was the same which this good Pope S. Eleutherius and the Romans then Bal. lib. de Script Brit. centur 1. in Eluana Meduino Godw. conu of Brit. and the Christian Britains here also professed as these Protestants and all Antiquaries agree saying that the first preachers to King Lucius were Apostolike men or instructed by them per Apostoliâ—os viros in Christo renati and our King sent for this Apostolike faith to Pope Eleutherius at Rome literiâ— suis Rex Lucius apud Eleutherium Pontificem egit vt apud Romanos Christianorum adscriberetur numero And the Apostolike Catholike faith which was Io. Bal. sup Io. Leland Assertion Arthurij Charta S. Pâ—tricij Antiq. Glastenien tab lign in membran affix Guliel Malmesbur l. de antiquitat Coenob Glasten Acta per legat Crapgr Catal. in S. Patricio Io. Leland in Arth. here at Rome and from thence sent and confirmed here in this question of Indulgences was the same which the present Roman Church now professeth For wee reade in the old Acts of those legates which S. Eleutherius sent hither recommended by these Protestants for authenticall as written by themselues Fugatius Damianus vt apud posteros clariora perdurarent membranis his dedâ—runt Acta per legatos inde ad nos peruenerunt and many other antiquities That thâ—se holy Legates procured 10. yeares of Indulgence for all visitours of that sacred place of Glastenbury Sancti Phaganus Deruianus perquisierunt ab Eleutherio Papa qui eos miserat decem annos Indulgentiae And these old Acts did testifie that the same holy Legates obtained 30. yeares of Indulgence for all Bishops that should with deuotion visit the chappell there builded in honour of S. Michael the Archangell Dicebat eadem scriptura quod venerandi Phaganus Deruianus perquisierant triginta annorum Indulgentiam omnibus Episcopis ipsum locum ob honorem beati Michaelis pia voluntate visâ— tantibus The old Manuscript antiquities of Glastenbury set downe the names of almost an hundred holy and auncient Bishops which had giuen Indulgences to that holy place Wee cannot but Iudge the like of other Churches and places whose monuments haue not beene so happily preserued And this is
and the most holy Sacrament of the altar Now I will proue by this Apostolike age the doctrine and practise thereof that these fiue are and then were vsed and receaued for Sacraments and first of Confirmation the first ConfirmatioÌ„ a true Sacrament Clem. Rom. Constitut Apost l. 2. c. 36. which these men name and deny S. Clement testifieth this to be a Sacrament miâ—istred by Bishops with holy oyle and giuing the â—oly Ghost and grace all that these men doe or can â—equire to a Sacrament Quid dicemus de Episcopo â—r quem Dominus in ordinatione Spiritum sanctum â—obis dedit Per quem consignati estis oleo exultationis â— chrismate sapientiae per quem filij lucis facti estis per quem Dominus illuminatione vestra Episcopi manus impositionem testimonio suo comprobans in singulis vestrûm suam sacram vocem emisit This he further declareth making a SacrameÌ„t needfull to Christian Clem. Rom. epist ad IuliuÌ„ Iulian. perfectioÌ„ except necessity hindereth giuing grace that Peter and all the Apostles so taught and practised and Christ so instituted Omnibus festinandum est sine mora renasci Deo demum consignari ab Episcopo id est septiformem gratiam Spiritus sancti percipere quia incertus est vniuscuiusque exitus vitae Quum autem regeneratus fuerit per aquam postmodum septiformi spiritus gratia ab Episcopo vt memoratum est confirmatus quia aliter perfectus esse Christianus nequaquam poterit nec sedem habere inter perfectos si non necessitate sed incuria aut voluntate reman serit vt a Beato Petro accepimus vt caeteri Apostoli praecipiente Domino docuâ—runt S. Denis the Areopagite saith that they which Dion Areop l. Hierarch Eccl. cap. 4. Prope fin In contemp were baptized were brought to the Bishop to be confirmed Ducunt ad Hierarcham is virum vnguento quod maximè diuinos efficit insignit And further thus sheweth the Sacramentall power of this holy Vnction Vnguenti illa quae perficiendi vim habet perfusio eum qui initiatus est suauitate odoris fragrantem facit And plainely calleth it a Sacrament comparing it in that respect euen with the Sacrament of the altar assuring vs that was the opinion and doctrine of his Masters in Religion the Apostles Finitimum L. Eccl. Hietar c. 6. alterum Sacramentum quod praeceptores nostri vnguenti mysterium nominant Est igitur â—â— In contempl quod dixi mysterium quod nunc à nobis laudatur eiâ—s ordinis atque potestatis quae vim habet perficiendi â—â— quae Pontificem attingunt Itaque ipsum diuini praeceptores nostri vt eiusdem ordinis efficacitaâ—â—â— cuius est Synaxeos Sacramentum ijsdem saepe figuris atque imaginibus mysticisque descriptionibus ac sanctis verbis descripserunt It is the constant opinion and testimony of the Fathers that the Church of Christ receaued and ministred this Sacrament for a true and properly named Sacrament both by Scriptures and tradition So both the Latine and Greeke Fathers expound that passage and practise of the Apostles S. Peter and S. Iohn in the acts of the Apostles giuing grace to those that were baptized by others not Bishops by imposition of hands Imponâ—bant Act. c. 8. manus super illos accipiebant Spiritum sanctum And doe thereby proue that Bishops onely may minister this Sacrament Cum Philippus Diaconus esset Ephip l. 1. To. 2. Contr. haer c. 21. contra Simon Aug. lib. 15. Trin. c. 26. Hieron Dial. aduers Lucif Tom. 2. c. 4. non habebat potestatem imponendi manus vt per hoc daret Spiritum sanctum So hath S. Augustine S. Hierome others prouing this Sacrament both by Scripture and tradition of the vniuersall Church from Christs time In actibus Apostolorum scriptum est Etiam si scripturae authoritas non subesset totius orbis in hanc partem consensus instar praecepti obtineret Non abnuo hanc esse Ecclesiarum consuetudinem vt ad Ambr. c. 7. de ijs qui init mysterijs S. Basil libr. de Spirit sancto c. 27. Greg. Naz. serm in Sanctum lauachrum Ambr. in cap. 6. ad Hebr. Primas in cap 6. ad Hebr. eos qui longè in minoribus vrbibus per Presbyteros Diaconos baptizati sunt Episcopus ad inuocationem sancti Spiritus manum impositurus excurrat This S. Hierome writeth in the name of all both Catholiks and others S. Ambrose sainct Basile sainct Gregory Nazianzen and others haue the like S. Ambrose Primasius with others expound those words in the 6. chapter to the Hebrewes impositionis quoque manum in the very same sense in these words Impositionem manuum appellat per quam plenissimè creditur accipi donum Spiritus sancti quod post baptismum ad confirmationem vnitatis in Ecclesia à Pontificibus fieri solet S. Cyprian and his fellow Cypr. epist 72. Bishops in Councell speaking in the name of the Church calleth it a Sacrament as baptisme is si Sacramento vtroque nascuntur Tertullian also doth number it with the other Sacraments euer vsed in the Church and giueth both a visible externall signe holy Vnction and internall Tertull. l. de resurrect carnis Et libr. de praescript haeretic grace giuen thereby vnto it Caro abluitur vt anima emaculetur caro vngitur vt anima consecretur Caro signatur vt anima muniatur caro manus impositione adumbratur vt anima spiritu illuminetur Caro corpore sanguine Christi vescitur vt anima de Deo saginetur To come to our Primatiue Christian Britans The ChristiaÌ„ Britans of this opinion and practise Giral Cambr. descr Cambr. c. 18. cum approb Prot. Dauâ—dis powelli Theol. prof ib. Golfrid monum histor Reg. Brit. lib. 12. c. â—8 their learned old antiquary and Bishop writeth of them that from their first conuersion they held this for a Sacrament giuing grace that holy Vnction by a Bishop was vsed in it and all our first Christians in Britaine honoured and affected this Sacrament more then any other nation did Episcopalem confirmationem Chrismatis qua gratia spiritus datur inunctionem prae alia gente totus populus magno pere petit This wee may easiely learne by the example of their King Cadwalladar which went to Rome to be confirmed by the Pope there Cadwalladrus abiectis mundialibue propter Deum regnumque perpetuum venit Romam à Sergio Papa confirmatus But wee need not stand vpon particular Theod. lib. de fabul haeret Lindan Dubitant Dial. 2. prateol Elen. l 12. in Nouatianis examples when wee haue a generall graunt before that all the Britans totus populus both by old and new Catholike and Protestant historians were so deuoted to this holy Sacrament And both Theodoret and others do proue that they were onely the Nouatian heretiks which by no antiquity euer
to be made by that councell if it be truely related nothing concerneth this article onely speaking of Marriage of such men after holie Orders taken and not when they were lay men Yet that citation of Sacrates in this poynt wanteth not suspition of vntruth For the same Socrates speaking vpon his owne certaine Socrat. Hist Eccl. l. 5. cap. 21. knowledge affirmeth it was the receaued custome in Thessalia Macedonia and other parts of the Greeke Church that if a clergie man kept companie with his wife that he had married when he was a lay man he was to be degraded Ipse in Thessalia consuetudinem iuualuisse noui vt ibi qui clericus sit si cum vxore quam eum esset Laicus ducebat post quam clericus factus sit dormierit clericatu abdieatus sit eadem consuetudo etiam Thessalonicae in â—acedonia in Hellade seruatur And saith that all the renowned Preists and Bishops also in the easte absteyne from such wiues Omnes illustres presbyteri in Oriente Episcopi etiam ab vxoribus abstinent And he confesseth that the absteyning of clergie Socrat. Hist Eccl. l. 1. c. 8. supr men from theâ—â— formerly married wiues when they were lay 〈◊〉 was so religious iust and necessarie in the Iudgement of the whole generall councell that they determined to make a decree and canon thereof visum erat Episcopis legem in Ecclesiam introducere vt qui essent sacris initiati sicut Episcopi Presbiteri Diaconi cum vxoribus quas cum erant Laici in matrimonium duxissent minimè dormirent And it seemeth by the Arabike Concil Niâ— can 78. Arabico copie of that councell that this or the equiualent lawe and decree was then made si vxorem duxit adhuc vxor viuit cum eo habitat debet imponi duplex panitentia Idem seruandum de Diacono And the third of those canons of this councell which both Catholiks and Protestants commonly receaue forbiddeth all Bishops Preists Deacons Concil Nic. can 3. and clergie men to dwell with any woman but their mother sister grandmother or Aunt sister to their father or mother Nisi fortè mater aut Soror aut auia aut amita aut matertera sit And the second councell of Arles held about the same time in the dayes of S. Syluester Pope and Constantine Emperour plainely forbiddeth all cohabitation or meeting with wiues married before vnder payne of excommunication Si quis de clericis à gradu Concil Arel 2. can 3. Diaconatus in solatio suo mulierem praeter auiam matrem sororem filiam neptem vel conuersam secum vxorem habere praesumpserit à communione alienaâ— habeatur Here the wife marryed before except conuersa professing chastitie as the husband now doth is forbidden his companie and he from her and most plainely in the canon before a married man is disabled to be a Preist except promising and professing chastitie Assumi ad Sacerdotium non potest in vinculo coniugij constitutus nisifuerit promissa conuersio In this councell our Archbishop Const Magn. epist Eccles Socrat. Hist Eccl. l. 1. c. 6. of London Restitutus was present and subscribed vnto it for this Kingdome which with Fraunce where this councell was kept Spayne Italy and other contries of the west presently receaued the Nicen councell Eusebius Caesariensis present at the councell of Euseb demonst Euang. l. 1. c. 9. Nice and writing after it is plaine that married men receauing holie Orders were bounde to chastitie Oportere dicit sermo diuiuus Episcopum vnius vxoris virum esse Veruntamen eos qui sacrati sint atque in Dei ministerio cultuque occupati continere deinceps seipsos à commercio vxoris decet And S. Epiphanius also a grecian and liuing at that time and writing in that age testifieth plainely that the holie Church of God where the canons were sincerely kept did admitt none to be eyther Bishop Preist Deacon or Subdeacon but such as absteyned from their wiues if marryed before or in single and chaste life And if it was otherwise vsed in any place wheresoeuer it was an abuse this being the custome of the Church directed by the holie ghost euer from the beginning that Ecclesiasticall men married or not married should euer liue in chastitie Adhuc viuentem liberos gignentem Epiph. Haeâ— 29. in compendiar vnius vxoris virum non suscipit sancta Dei Ecclesia sed eum qui se ab vna continuit aut in viduitate vixit Diaconum Presbiterum Episcopum Hypodiaconum maximè vbi sinceri sunt Canones Ecclesiastici At dices mihi omnino in quibusdam locis adhuc liberos gignere Presbyteros Diaconos Hypodiaconos At hoc non est iuxtae Canonem sed iuxta hominum mentem quaeper tempus elanguit Nam quod decentius est id semper Ecclesia per spiritum sanctum bene disposita videns statuit apparare vt cultus diuini indistracti Deo perficerentur And he maketh this a commaundement in scripture Si populo praecipit â— Cor. 7. Sanctus Apostolus dicens vt ad tempus vacent orationi quanto magis Sacerdoti idem praecipit vt indistractus sit inquam ad vacandum secundum Deum Sacerdotio quod in spiritualibus necessitatibus ac vsibus perficitur But if we should allowe which these holy Fathers both of the Greeke Latine Church would not doe that the chastity of Bishops Preists and Deacons is not commaunded in scriptures but that the scriptures onely commend it for the more perfect and better duly to execute those sacred functions as all both Catholiks and Protestants agree it is without question that the vniuersall Church of Christ hath euen by these Protestants most religiously decreed and commaunded Ecclesiasticall men to liue in chastity And they contradict and condemne themselues herein in their next article Prof. Artic. â—4 but one in these words whosoeuer through his priuate Iudgment willingly and purposely doth openly breake the traditions and ceremonies of the Church which be not repugnant to the word of God and be ordained and approued by common authority ought to be rebuked openly as hee that offendeth against the common order â—â— the Church Therefore the continent and chaste life and profession of the Cleargie being confessed by all both Catholiks and Protestants not to be repugnant to the word of God but most conformable vnto it And both commaunded generally receaued approued Couel Exam. p. 64. 65. 114. feild pag. 138. l. 3. cap. 29. Middleton Papiston p. 134. and practised not onely by all commaunding cheife Churches but through out the whole Catholike world must needs be maintained And our Protestants confessing this and with priuiledge writinge the auncient Fathers so receauing it from theÌ„ that went before them taught That vowes of chastitie and single life in Preists is to be obserued by tradition The doctrine taught in the article cannot