of Gods presence which knoweledge the Scripture calleth knowledge by the spirite and face to face 16 Faith which is onely historicall breedeth though by an accident despair and the grieuousnes of Gods iudgement 17 Temporary faith breedeth a certaine ioy but not a quiet conscience because it ariseth not from the true cause as also it maketh shew of confession and some shew of good woorkes but that only for a season 18 Faith of miracles doth obtain of God those miracles whereof it is conceiued 19 By faith only applying to euery one the promise of grace we obtaine and receiue righteousnes before God and the participation or communion of Christ with al his benefits 20 As before this faith cannot goe true conuersion and the beginning of true obedience according to all the commaundementes of God so can they not but needes accompanie the same OF THE CREEDE OR SYMBOLE OF THE APOSTLES AFter we haue intreated of FAITH Why the creede is called a symbole it directly followeth now that we speake of the sum of those things which are to bee beleeued which we cal the Symbole of the Apostles or the Apostolick Symbole The especial Questions here are 1 What a Symbole is 2 What are the parts of the Apostolique Symbole 1 WHAT A SYMBOLE IS THis woorde Symbole is deriued from a greeke woorde which signifieth either a common collation of diuerse men to the making of a banquet or a signe token and marcke whereby a man is discerned froÌ„ others Such as is the militarie signe whereby fellowes are desciphered from enimies The Symbole so termed in the Church is a breefe and summarie forme of christian doctrine or a briefe summe or confession of the points of Christian religion or Euangelical doctrine Nowe it is called by the name of Symbole because it is as a token or profession whereby the Church with her members is discerned from all her enimies and from al other sects Some say that this briefe summe of Euangelical doctrine was called a Symbole for that this doctrine was collated as it were and imparted by the Apostles and euery one of them did bestow some part thereof but that cannot be proued But if you wil deriue it thence this reason also nothing absurde may be rendered thereof for that the Articles of faith are the squire and rule whereunto the faith and doctrine of al Orthodox or right beleeuing Christians ought to agree and be conferred This Symbole is called Apostolique 1. Because it conteineth the summe of the Apostolique doctrine which the Catechumens were enforced to hold and professe 2. Because the Apostles deliuered that summe of doctrine to their Scholers and Disciples which the Church afterwardes held as receiued from them This selfesame Symbole is called also Catholick because there is but one faith of al Christians Question Were there not new Symboles made as Athanasius Symbole the Symbole of Nice of Ephesus of Chalcedon Aunswere These are not other from this Apostolique Symbole but certaine words are added as an explication of this by reason of heretiques by whom because of the shortnes thereof this was depraued There is no change either of the matter or of the Doctrine but onely of the forme of declaring it as easily appeareth by comparing them together 2 What are the parts of the Apostolicke Symbole or Creed THe principall parts thereof are three 1 Of the Father and our creation 2 Of the Sonne and our redemption 3 Of the holy ghost and our sanctification that is of the workes of our Creation Redemption and Sanctification How our Creâ—tioÌ„ RedemptioÌ„ Sanctification are ech appropriated to some one person of the Trinitie and yet all three persons haue their ioint working in them Obiection Vnto the father is ascribed the creation of heauen and earth vnto the Sonne the redemption of mankind vnto the holy ghost sanctification Therefore the Sonne and the holy ghost did not create heauen and earth neither did the Father and the holy ghost redeeme mankinde neither do the Father the Sonne sanctifie the faithfull Answere It is a fallacie grounding vpon that which is affirmed but in respect as if it were simply affirmed For the creation is giuen to the Father redemption to the Sonne sanctification to the holy ghost not as they are simply an operation or woork for so should other persons be excluded from it but in respect for the order and manner of woorking which is peculiar and proper to euerie of them in producing and bringing forth the same externall woorke A more open declaration hereof may be this The woorkes of our creation redemption sanctification are the operations of the Godhead outwardly that is externall operations which God worketh on his creatures and they are vndiuided that is common to the three persons which they by common wil and power woork in the creatures by reason of that one and the same essence and nature of the Godhead which they haue For the Scripture attributeth the Creation not onely to the father but to the Sonne also and the holy ghost Ioh. 1.3 Al things were made by it Gen. 1. The spirit of the Lord moued vpon the waters Mat. 1.20 That which is conceaued in her is of the holy Ghost Likewise our redemption is attributed to the father and the holy Ghost Iohn 3. God sent his Sonne into the woorlde that the world might be saued by him Tit. 3. Hee saued vs by the renewing of the holie ghost which he shed on vs abundantly And sanctification both to the father and to the sonne Gal. 4.6 God hath sent the spirit of his sonne into your harts crying Abba Father 1. Thess 5.23 The very god of peace sanctifie you throughout 1. Cor. 1.30 Christ is made sanctification vnto vs. Eph. 5.26 Christ sanctifieth the Church Al the persons therefore create redeem sanctifie Neuerthelesse yet in respect of that order of woorking which is betweene them Creation is ascribed vnto the father Because hee is the fountaine as of the Diuinitie of the Sonne and the holie Ghost so also of those diuine operations which hee woorketh and perfourmeth by the Sonne and the holie Ghost Redemption is ascribed vnto the Sonne because hee is that person which executeth the fathers will concerning the redeeming of mankinde and dooth immediatly perfourme the woorke of our redemption For the Sonne onely was sent into flesh and hath paied the ransome or price for our sinnes not the father nor the spirit To the holy ghost is ascribed sanctification because he doth immediatly sanctifie vs. For the father createth but mediatly by the Sonne and the holy Ghost The Son from the father and the holy Ghost from the father and the sonne The father and the holy ghost redeeme vs but mediatly by the sonne But the son immediatly from the father by the holy ghost The father and the son sanctifie vs but mediatly by the holy ghost but the holy Ghost immediatly from the father and the sonne The workes of the trinitie external
communicated to the Sonne and the holy Ghost and receiued of the Sonne and the holy GHOST Iohn 5.26 The father likewise hath giuen to the Sonne to haue life in himselfe Neither dooth it followe The person is begotten therefore the Essence is begotten For that which is affirmed truely of a thing respectiue is not necessarily to bee affirmed of a thing absolute in his owne nature For although euerie father hath a Sonne yet not euerie thing of which it maie bee truely affirmed that it is a father maie bee said to haue a Sonne Albeit then the person of the Sonne is begotten yet whatsoeuer is the Sonne is not begotten The persons distinguished by their outward works extended vnto the creatures Another difference of the persons is in the order of their outwarde actions which they exercise towardes the creatures in them and by them The Father woorcketh createth sanctifieth of himselfe by the Sonne and the holie Ghost Hee sendeth them and is not sent The Sonne woorketh from the Father by the holie Ghost hee is sent of the Father hee sendeth the holy Ghost The holie Ghost woorketh and is sent from both His working is said to bee from another who woorketh anothers will and pleasure going before his owne accompanieng and following it not in time but in the order of woorking The persons therefore differ not in the woorkes themselues but in the manner onelie and order of working The work is not distinct the manner of working is distinct The father is called the first person because the Deity is communicated vnto him from none The Sonne the second person because the Deity is communicated vnto him from the Father The holie Ghost the third because the essence of the father and the son is communicated vnto him from the father and the son Now the first and last are here said not as in degree or dignity or time but onely in order of existing and working This eight question together with the former shall be more at large explicated in the Articles of the sonne and the holy Ghost 9 Wherefore this doctrine is to be held and maintained in the Church THis doctrine of the Trinity is to be learned and held in the Church 1. In respect of the glorie of God The doctrine of the Trinity to be tuaght in the Church 1 In respect of Gods glory 2 In regard of our saluation that God maie be discerned and distinguished from Idoles For God will not bee matched with Idols but will haue himselfe to bee woorshipped and celebrated and therefore knowen and agnised for such a one as he hath declared himselfe to bee 2. In regard of our owne saluation and comfort No man is saued who knoweth not the father and the father is not knowen without the sonne 1. Iohn 2.23 Whosoeuer denieth the sonne the same hath not the father Againe no man is freed and saued from sinne and death without beleeuing the Mediatour Christ But no man reposeth trust and confidence in the sonne when as yet he is not knowen vnto him Therefore we must first know the sonne and then for the son we must know the father that we may beleeue in him Likewise no man is sanctified and saued by the holy Ghost who knoweth not the holy Ghost For he who receiueth not the holy Ghost is not saued But no man receiueth him whom hee knoweth not Therefore who knoweth him not is not saued That no mā receiueth him whom he knoweth not is proued by those words of Christ Iohn 14.17 The spirite of truth the world cannot receiue because it seeth him not neither knoweth him Ioh. 3.5 Except a man bee borne againe of water and the spirit he cannot enter into the kingdome of heauen Hence it manifestly appeareth that they which wil be saued must necessarily know the father the sonne and the holy ghost And they must knowe that the sonne and the holy ghost are distinct from the father but yet cōsubstantial with the father equal in perfections honor worship therefore the same true God which is the father For except God be known of vs to be such as he hath declared himselfe to be he doth not communicate himselfe to vs neither may wee looke or hope for euerlasting life from him And what he hath shewed himselfe to be wee haue heard namely that he is the eternall Father coeternall Sonne and coeternall holie Ghost But among al points there is none more sharply oppugned by the aduersaries of the truth than this doctrine of the three persons in one godhead especially since the son of god was manifested in the flesh It is not harde to espie the causes of this strife for that indeede no part of Doctrine is more vnknowen and vnsearchable to mans reason as also for that the diuell in hatred of God and men attempteth with horrible fury to darken and extinguish the glory of the Sonne of God incarnate Certaine obiections against the Trinitie aunswered 1 Obiection One Essence is not three persons Iehoua is one essence Therefore he is not three persons Answere One finite essence is not three persons But God is infinite Obiection 2. That which hath a beginning is not eternall But the sonne and the holy Ghost haue a beginning Therefore they are not eternall Aunswere That which hath a beginning of essence and time is not eternal But the sonne and the holy ghost haue onely a beginning of person or order or maner of beeing and so the Scripture teacheth Christ both to bee Iehoua and to haue a beginning namelie as touching his manner of being He gaue vnto the sonne to haue life in himselfe Obiection 3. Our vnity with God is a consent But the vnity of the son with the father is like to ours Therefore it is the vnitie not of essence but of consent which the sonne hath with the father Answere The conclusion of this reason hath more in it than was in the former propositions For the conclusion is general of al kind of vnitie whereas the Minor was particular of the vnity of consent For there is another vnitie of the Sonne with the Father namelie of essence Obiect 4. In whome the whole Deitie is besides him there it no other in whome the whole Deitie is But the whole Deity is in the father Therefore not in another Aunswere The Maior is false because the same Deity which is in the Father is whole also in the Sonne and whole in the holy Ghost Obiection 5. The diuine essence is not begotten But the Sonne is begotten Therefore he is not the diuine Essence Answer Where al be particulars nothing can be concluded And the first proposition or Maior cannot bee expounded vniuersallie For it is false That whatsoeuer is the diuine Essence is not begotten Obiection 6. Where are distinct operations at leastwise internall there also are distinct essences But the internal operations of the father and the sonne and the holy Ghost are distinct Therefore also their essences are
writing by S. Paul himselfe So Paul saith of the Lordes supper 1. Cor. 11.23 I haue receiued of the Lord that which also J haue deliuered vnto you But this tradition after the Euangelistes himselfe also hath set downe in writing The Iesuites cite the saying of Paul 2. Thes 3.6 Withdraw your selues frō euery brother that walketh inordinately and not after the tradition which hee receiued of vs. But a little after in the same chapter hee describeth what tradition he meaneth as it is manifest to him that looketh on the place And yet will they thence prooue that many thinges are to bee beleeued which can not bee proued by anie testimonie of Scripture The like impudencies they shewe in another testimony taken out of Luke Act. 16.14 They deliuered them the decrees to keep ordained of the Apostles Elders which were at Jerusalem When a little before Cap. 15.23 he witnesseth that those decrees were set downe in letters written by the Apostles But wee are to keepe and hold the notes and marcks before set downe First in respect of Gods glorie that enimies may be discerned from Sonnes Secondly In respect of our own saluation that we may ioine our selues to the true Church For there are three sorts of men 1 They who openly professe and declare themselues to be enimies 2 Hypocrits 3 The company of the Elect chosen 4 Why the Church is called holy and Catholicke THE Church is called Holy The church holy in respect of Christs holinesse imputed and their own begun Catholique in respect of place and time 1 Because Christes sanctification is imputed vnto it 2 Because al his members haue begunne al the parts of obedience It is called Catholicke 1 In respect of places because it is spread through the whole world For there is one Vniuersall Church of all places degrees of life neither is it tied to a certaine place kingdome or to certain succession 2 In respect of times Because there is but one true Church of all times which also is at all times so Catholicke as that it is dispersed through the whol world nether is at any time tied to any certain place Jt is not called Catholicke because it possesseth many kingdomes For Catholicke is a title giuen vnto the Church in the Apostles time for before time the Church was limited within narrowe bondes Nowe that there is but one Church of al times and ages from the beginning of the world vnto the end it is out of doubt For 1 It is manifested that the Church hath euer been Neither can Abrahams daies be obiected as if before he was called there had beene no worship of the true God in his familie and himselfe had beene after his calling alone without anie others For before his calling he held the foundations and grounds of Doctrine of the true God though it were darkned with superstitions mingled therewith Againe Melchisedec liued at the same time who was the Priest of the most high God and therefore neither was Abraham after his calling alone but there were others besides him worshippers of the true God whose priest was Melchisedec 2 That the Church as it hath beene euer so shall also continue euer appeareth by these testimonies Isay 59.21 My woordes shall not depart out of thy mouth nor out of the mouth of thy seed Ier. 33.20 If the night and day may bee chaunged then shall my couenant also be changed Mat. 28.20 I am with you alway vntill the end of the world Moreouer Christ was euer and euer shal be King Head and Priest of the Church Wherefore the Church was euer and euer shall be And hence also it is manifest That the Church of both testaments is one and the same that which is confirmed also by the article folowing For Christ is the sanctifier of his Church who is common to men of both testaments Hither appertaineth the Question of the authoritie of the Church Which I omit In this we wil consider here onely that opinion or saying The church doth not erre How the church may bee saide not to erre Which is true after this sort First the whole doth not erre though some members thereof doe er Secondly it doth not erre Vniuersally although in some pointes of Doctrine it may Thirdly It erreth not in the foundation 5 In what the Church differeth from the common-weal 7 Differences betweene the Church and common-weale THE Church differeth from the common-weal 1. Because common-weales are distinct and kingdomes of the world in diuerse places and times The Church is alwaies one and the same at all times and with all men 2. The kingdomes and states of the world haue many Heads or one chiefe Heade and many other inferiour Heades besides and that on earth The Church hath but one and that in heauen 3. The common-wealth is gouerned by certaine lawes made for the maintenance of outwarde peace and tranquillity The Church is ruled by the Holy Ghost the worde of God 4. The common-wealth or ciuill state requireth outward obedience onely The Church requireth both as well inwarde obedience as outwarde 5. In ciuill states and common-weales there is power and libertie to make new lawes positiue by the authoritie of the magistrate the violating of which lawes bindeth mens consciences and deserueth corporal punishmentes The Church is tied to the woorde of God vnto which it is not lawfull to adde ought or to detract ought from it 6. The ciuill state hath corporall power where-with it is armed against the obstinate disobedient For he may and ought by force to curb these and to punish them by the sword The Church punisheth by denouncing of Gods wrath out of the worde of God 7. Jn the Church are alwaies some Elect Holie but not alwaies in the common-wealth 6 Whence ariseth the difference of the Church from the rest of mankinde THE cause of the difference is the Election of God Election putteth the difference betweene the Church and others Act. 14.16 Jn times past god suffered all the Gentiles to walke in their owne waies Rom. 9.18 God hath mercie on whom he will and whom he will he hardeneth Ioh. 6.37 Al that the Father giueth me shal come to me Rom. 8.29.30 Those which hee knew before he also predestinate to be made like to the Image of his Sonne and whom he predestinate them also he called By these wordes we are also taught that the promise of grace is generall in respect of the Elect or beleeuers God verilie would haue all to be saued and that Rom. 11.7 1 Jn respect that he loueth the saluation of all But the Elect only haue attained to that saluation 2 In respect that he inuiteth al to saluation But the rest haue beene hardened The Efficient cause then of this difference is the Election of God willing to gather vnto himselfe a Church in earth Secondly the Sonne is a mediate executour of this will and purpose The holy ghost immediate Thirdly The
distinct Answere The Maior is true of finit persons but not of infinite Obiect 7. The diuine Essence is incarnate The three persons are the diuine Essence Therefore the three persons are incarnate Aunswere Here also are meere particulars whereof nothing can be concluded For the Maior speaketh not of the Diuine Essence generally but particularly as it is the Sonne Obiection 8. The Sonne is Mediatour vnto Iehoua But the Sonne is Iehoua Therefore hee is Mediatour to himselfe Aunswere Here also are meere particulars and therefore nothing concluded For not all that is Iehoua is Mediator Obiect 9. Christ hath a head aboue him Therefore hee is inferiour to GOD and by a consequent hee is not of one and the same essence with GOD. Aunswere Hee hath indeede a Head but that first in respect of his Mediatourshippe secondly in respect of his manhoode Obiection 10. This is saith Christ life euerlasting that they do know thee to bee the onelie verie God Therefore the Sonne and the holie Ghost are not true God Aunswere In this place is opposed not the father to the son and the holy ghost but God to Idoles and creatures Moreouer the particle onelie dooth not belong to the subiect thee but to the predicate God which the greeke Article sheweth Obiection 11. Iehoua is the Trinity The father is Iehoua Therefore he is the trinity Aunswere Iehoua is not taken for the same but varieth in this Syllogisme For Iehoua in the Maior is meant of all three persons in the Minor of one only Reply The father is Iehoua one in number Therefore the father is the Trinitie Heere those diuerse manners of beeing are of no force Aunswere He is one in number of essence not of persons Obiection 12. Where are three one there are four But in god are three one namelie three persons and one essence Therfore there are four in God Aunswere Where there are three and one reallie distinct there are foure But in God the persons are not really distinct from the essence for the three persons of the Diuinity are one and the same essence Obiection 13. The same works are atributed to the Father and the Sonne and the holy Ghost in the Scripture Aunswere This hindereth not the distinction of persons For mo persons may concurre to one action the distinct order of woorking beeing obserued Obiection 14. Christ saith Iohn 14. He that seeth me seeth the father Aunswere Christ meaneth not hereby that he is the father but that he sheweth and resembleth the person wisedome omnipotency goodnes and wil of the father in his doctrine and woorkes as it is saide The Sonne which is in the bosome of the father hee hath shewed Againe Who is the inuisible image of GOD. And as himselfe addeth here The father in mee and I in the father Obiection 15. The wisedome and power of the father are not distinct persons from the father but are the father himselfe as also mercie goodnesse chastitie trueth and other properties of God But the Sonne and the holie Ghost are the wisedome and power of GOD Therefore they are not persons distinct from the father but the father himselfe wise and powerful Aunswere There is an ambiguity in the woordes wisedome and power which in the Maior signifie the wisedome and power whereby not only the father but the Sonne also and holy Ghost is wise and forcible or effectuall that is the common nature or essence of the father and the Sonne and the holy Ghost But in the Minor they signifie the persons of the Sonne and the holy Ghost the Son beeing called the wisedome and the holy Ghost the power of GOD because by them the Deitie sheweth foorth and declareth the wisedome and power thereof OF CREATION NEXT vnto the Doctrine concerning God the Doctrine of the woorkes of GOD is most fitly placed as we see to be done also in the Creede The woorks of God are of two sortes Generall and Speciall The general are diuided into the works 1. Of creation the works whereof are read in Genesis to haue bin accomplished in 6. daies are by daily increase furthered and multiplied in the world 2. Of preseruation whereby God still susteineth the heauens and earth and the things that in them are that they fal not to ruine and decay 3. Of administration whereby through his immense and great wisdome he administreth and gouerneth all things These two latter are comprehended vnder the name of his prouidence And therefore next vnto creation is annexed the place concerning Gods prouidence The Special woorkes of GOD are those which are wrought in the Church and company of his elect and chosen to iustifie sanctifie and glorifie them and are either works of Reparation or restoring whereby hee repaireth al things which for the sinne of man are subiect to corruption or of perfection and accomplishment whereby hee bringeth all things to their certaine appointed end The principall questions of creation are these 1 Whether the world were created of God 2 How it was created 3 For what cause it was created 1 WHETHER THE WORLD WERE CREATED OF GOD. THE name of the world is diuerslie vsed in the Scripture 1. It signifieth the vniuersal frame of all thinges namelie Heauen and Earth and al thinges which are them visible and inuisible besides God himselfe 2. Woorldlie concupiscences 3. All mankind 4. The wicked or those that are not regenerate in the world 5. The elect Here we consider it in the first sense To create signifieth 1 to ordaine or constitute as the latines vsed it creare Consulem to create a Consul 2 To make something of nothing without any motion with a becke or woorde only So is it taken in this place 3 The continuating of creation or creation continued Which is the prouidence of God That the worlde hath not beene from euerlasting but had when it seemed best to the creatour according to his eternal counsel and wil a beginning once and was created of that only true God who hath manifested himselfe in the Church that he is the eternal Father and Sonne and Holy Ghost we know First by testimonies of holy scripture as by the whole historie of the creation set downe by Moses Likewise out of other testimonies of Scripture verie many Psalm 33 6.9 By the woorde of the Lorde were the heauens made and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth Ps 104.113.124.136.146 Isay 44. Act. 4. 17. He spake and it was doone he commaunded and it stood or was created There are other places also in the Psalmes where more largely and amply the wonderfull woorkes of God and the principall partes of the woorlde created by God are proposed to be considered of vs that through the consideration thereof wee may learne to put our trust and confidence in God For to this purpose did the Lord himselfe propose vnto Iob his marueilous and incomprehensible woorkes conspicuous in heauen Iob. 38. 39. and earth other thinges also
is set downe at the right hande of the father there is no cause why wee should doubt at all of our saluation he shall keepe it safe for vs and at length most assuredly and certainly bestow it vpon vs. Ioh 10.28 No man shal pluck my sheep out of my hand And cap. 17.24 I will that they which thou hast giuen me be with me euen where I am FROM THENCE SHAL HE COME TO IVDGE THE QVICKE AND THE DEAD IN this Article three common places fal in one and meet together which are diuerse in themselues namely of Christes second comming of the ende of the woorlde and of the last iudgement Of these places we wil speake iointly as which are linked betweene themselues yet so that the chiefe of them is that of the lâ—st iudgement For to little purpose were it for vs to think of christs second comming except we did furder coÌ„sider to what end he should come I beleue in christ who shall come to iudge the quick and the dead that is I beleeue 1. That at the second comming of Christ shall follow the renuing of heauen and earth 2. That the selfesame Christ shall come who for vs was borne suffered and rose againe 3. That he shall come gloriouslie to deliuer his church whereof J am a member 4. That hee shal come to abiect and cast awaie the wicked By these wee receiue great and sound comfort also and consolation For seeing there shal be a renouation or renuing of heauen and earth we haue a confidence and trust that our state also shal be at length other and better than it now is seeing christ shall come wee shall haue a fauourable iudge for he shal come to iudge who hath merited righteousnesse for vs who is our Brother Redeemer Patron and Defender seeing hee shal come gloriousâ—â—e he shal also giue a iust sentence and iudgement and shal bee mighty enough to deliuer vs seeing hee shall come to deliuer his church great cause why we should cheerefully expect him seeing he shall abiect and cast awaie the wicked into euerlasting tormentes let vs suffer patientlie their tyrannie To conclude seeing he shall deliuer the godlie and cast awaie the wicked hee wil also either deliuer or cast away vs and therefore it is necessarie that wee repent and bee thankefull in this life and flie fleshely securitie that we maie bee in the number of them whome hee shall deliuer The chiefe Questions of the last iudgement 1 Whether there shall be any iudgement 2 What that iudgement is 3 Who shal be iudge 4 Whence and whither he shal come to iudge 5 How he shal come 6 Whom he shal iudge 7 What shal be the sentence and execution of this iudgement 8 For what causes this iudgement shal bee 9 When it shal be 10 Why god wil haue vs certaine of the last iudgement 11 Why he would not haue vs certaine of the time 12 Wherefore God differreth that iudgement 13 Whether it is to be wished for 1 WHETHER THERE SHALL BEE ANIE IVDGEMENT THIS Question is necessarie For the Scripture also hath foretold that there shal come in the later times â—ockers who shal account this Article for a fable The last iudgement cannot indeede be demonstrated out of Philosophy but neither is there any thing in Philosophie against it But the whole certainty thereof is grounded on diuine Prophecies or of the doctrine of the church For although the Philosopher perhaps woulde say somewhat as seeing a litle through a mist as That it is not likely that man was born to this miserie yet by reason that man hath lost the knoweledge of the righteousnesse goodnesse truth of God we caÌ„not know out of philosophy that any iudgement shal be muchlesse with what circumstances it shall be The arguments which Philosophy yeeldeth are forcible indeed in themselues but are not made knowen but in diuinity and therefore the argumentes themselues are onely made forcible of strength in diuinity Wherefore we wil draw reasons proofs out of diuinity or the doctrine of the gospel by which it may appear that there is a last iudgement The first proof is drawn from expresse plaine testimonies of sacred Scripture As out of the prophecy of Dan. Likewise out of the prophecy of Enoch alleadged by the Apostle Iude vers 14. 15. Behold the Lord coÌ„meth with thousands of his saints To giue iudgement against all men Moreouer out of the sermons of Christ especiallie in Mat. 24. vers 25. Likewise out of the sermons of the Apostles Acts. 17.31 He hath appointed a daie in the which he wil iudge the world in righteousnes by that man whom he hath appointed 1. Thes 4.16 The lord himselfe shal descend froÌ„ heauen with a shout with the voice of the Archangel with the trumpet of god Neither is the certainty of the last iudgemeÌ„t apparaÌ„t only by these the like plain testimonies of Scripture but is deduced also out of other places by good consequence hence are made those forcible argumeÌ„ts which the Philosophers saw but by a glims The second proofe is drawen from the ende whereunto mankind was created God necessarily obtaineth his end but to this end did he create mankind that man shoulde bee the image of God and the euerlasting temple of God wherein he should be worshipped to whom he would communicate himselfe perfect wisedome righteousnesse and goodnesse and would impart his blessednesse This blessednesse is a part of Gods Image but this the Diuell hath destroied Therefore God shall restore it who is mightier than the Diuell And although the end for which man was created is hindered diuerse waies in this life yet god will at some time obtaine it Wherefore it is not onlie as the Philosophers reason likelie and probable that man was not made for thâ—se miseries but it is also most certaine that the most excellent of all creatures was made to a better ende Wherefore there must needs be at length a change By this argument is confirmed also the happinesse of our bodies According to that of Saint Paul 1. Cor. 6.19 Know you not that your bodie is the temple of the holy ghost which is in you The third proofe is taken from the iustice goodnesse and trueth of God which requireth that it maie go ful well with the good with the euil ful il Philosophy knoweth not that god is so iust good and true that he will haue the righteous to enioy full and perfect blessednesse But this commeth not to passe in this life nay rather it goeth well with the euill and wicked in this life Therefore there must remaine an other life wherein this shall bee The holie Scripture vseth this argument as in Saint Paul 2. Thess 1.6 Jt is a righteous thing with God to recompence tribulation to them that trouble you And Luk. 16.25 Remember that thou in thy life-time receiuedst thy pleasures and likewise Lazarus pains nowe therefore is he comforted and thou art tormented
cup is the new testament Or the couenant as both the * Berith greeke and * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hebrue word admitteth Now it is called the new couenant that is renewed or to speake it in a woord fulfilled And this new couenant is our reconciliation with God the communion and participation of Christ and all his benefites by faith in the sacrifice of Christ now fulfilled finished without any obseruation of the ceremonies of the old Passeouer The supper is called the new couenaÌ„t because it is a signe and a seale of this couenant signing and sealing vnto vs our reconciliation with God and our coniunction with Christ which is wrought by faith Now in calling the supper the new couenant first he comprehendeth both the promise and the condition which is expressed in the promise namelie faith and repentance Whereof also it foloweth that the supper was for this cause also instituted that it might bee a bond to bind vs to lead a christian life Secondly hee maketh an opposition betweene the new couenant and that couenant which was the Passeouer together with the rites thereof For the supper signified Christ offered The Passeouer signified Christ who should bee offered There is notwithstanding no small similitude and agreeing of both For both signifie our reconciliation with God and coniunction with Christ Jâ— my bloud which is shed for you for remission of sinnes The shedding of Christs bloud is the merite for which beeing apprehended of vs by faith we receiue remission of sinnes For as often as yee shall eate The supper therefore is often to be iterated and celebrated 1. Because of the woordes of the institution 2. In respect of the ende and purpose of the institution because it must bee done in remembranuce of Christ Shewe the Lordes death That is beleeue that Christ died and that for you and then professe it also publiquely before all Till hee come Therefore it must bee obserued vnto the worlds end neither is any other externall forme to be looked for vntill the day of iudgement The words of the institution which haue beene hitherto expounded may be made more plaine and cleare by these wordes of the Apostle The cup of blessing which we blesse is it not the communion of the bloude of Christ The bread which wee breake is it not the communion of the bodie of Christ The cup of blessing that is the cup of thankesgiuing which is receiued namely to this end that wee may yeeld thankes to Christ for his death and passion The communion of the bodie likewise the communion of the bloud is to be made through faith partaker of Christ and all his benefites the same spirit being in vs which is in Christ and woorking the same in vs which he worketh in Christ Bread and wine is the communion that is it is the signe of our communion with Christ Now our communion as the Apostle briefly declareth consisteth in this that wee who are manie are one bodie Whence it is most easie to collect that this communion is not a corporall eating For it is wrought onely by faith and the holy Ghost Christ is the heade and wee the members and all wee who are members haue also a communion of all Christs benefites Therefore the heade is common the benefites common and so the members also common among themselues wherefore their loue and dilection is common and mutual We vnderstand nowe what is the true meaning of the words of the institution especiallie of those about which is greatest coÌ„trouersy which are these This is my body that is to repeat in few wordes the true sense of them This bread broken of me and giuen to you is a signe of my bodie for your sakes rent and deliuered vnto death and a certaine seale of your coniunction with me so that he who beleeueth and eateth this bread doth truelie and reallie after a sort eat my bodie This our iudgement and interpretation or Christs rather is most true and vnto the truth of the Gospell most agreeable Here especially resistâ—unce is made and the greatest controuersie is about the word or vnderstanding of the word For our aduersaries vnderstand those wordes so as tâ—ey maintaine thereof to folow that Christes bodie is present and eaten corporallie But in the meane season they consider not that those wordes are sacramentallie to bee taken or that the speech is sacramental and therefore is not to be taken as proper and simple as it shoulde bee if thence were gathered that the bread is changed into Christs bodie Now to the signe here is attributed the name of the thing signified both for the coniunction which the thing signified hath in the right vse of the supper with the signe and also for the proportion which the signe hath with the thing signified Come wee now to those arguments whereby wee may confirme our interpretation and opinion to bee true The arguments which wee will vse are of three sorts such as are wont to bee also in like controuersies 1. Some are taken from the nature of the thing or subiect that is by vnderstanding the speech as the thing it selfe doth beare and suffer 2. Some are drawen from an analogie of the articles of our faith or from a conference of places or parts of christian doctrine for the holy spirite is the spirite of truth 3. Some are taken from other like places of scripture where the same thing is deliuered in such words as are manifest and whereof there is no controuersie The first sort of Arguments which are taken from the nature of the sacraments THE verie manner and forme of speaking yeeldeth vs a firme and strong argument Breade is the bodie of Christ but bread is not in it owne proper substance his bodie for by reason hereof haue they inuented consubstantiation therefore it is a figuratiue speeche euen such a one as is vsual vnto sacraments and is declared in the institution 2 Sacraments confirme exhibit promise seale no other thing than the woorde doth In the woorde is promised no corporal eating Therefore neither is anie such thing confirmed by the sacrament 3 In all sacraments when the names or properties of the things are attributed vnto the signes there is not signified the corporal presence of the thing but first a similitude of the things with their signes then a coniunction and vnion of the things with their signes in the right vse but in this sacrament Christ attributeth the name of the thing which is his bodie to the signe therefore there is not thereby signified a corporal presence of his bodie 4 The communion of Christ which is promised in his woorde and sacraments is not corporal but the communion of Christ which is giuen in the supper is the same with that which is giuen in the word and in all sacraments therefore the communion of Christ in the supper is spiritual 5 There is one and the same signification of all the Sacraments of the old and new testament
to haue ascended from a lower place into an higher and to remaine in heauen vntill hee come to iudgement Nowe that some except That Christ dooth descend from heauen as oft as the supper is administred it is already refuted 4 We take not awaie the doctrine of the properties of christs humanitie Answere They altogether take it away For they wil haue his humane nature to be such as is not seene nor felt nor limited in place Reply But christ did put off these infirmities reteined the essential properties Answere But these are verie essential properties which being taken away the verity also and truth of his humane nature is taken awaie Austine saith Take awaie from bodies their spaces and they shall be no where 5 We abolish not the Doctrine concerning the communicating of properties of both natures Aunswere Yea but they endeuour it For they apply those properties of his diuine nature which are affirmed of the whole person in the concrete to both natures J wil be with you to the ende of the world This they vnderstand of both natures which is all one as if when it is said Christ God and man was circumcised one should thus conclude Therefore the godhead of Christ was circumcised as wel as his flesh Replie This onelie wee adde That those Articles belong to them Aunswere After this sort all sectes may shift off all testimonies of Scriptures But they belong hither and that by a double right 1. Because they are written of the bodie of Christ But the body of Christ belongeth to the supper Therefoâ—e these Articles also belong hither For they shew how Christs bodie is to be eaâ—en 2 They belong hither because no Article of faith is at variaunce with another So belongeth hither also the Doctrine of iustification because in the â—upper no other iustice or righteousnes must bee sought for but by the bloud of Christ 6 The manner how we eate it is not to bee defined Answere They commit a double fault in so saying 1. When they denie that the maner is to be defined and so contradict and gain saie the Scripture which defineth it and sheweth that it is spiritual that there is wrought an vnion with Christ by faith through the holy Ghost 2. They themselues define the manner as it clearly appeareth by their writings 7 The saieng of Durandus is true We heare the woords we perceiue the motions we know not the manner we beleeue the presence Aunswere Durandus maketh nought either for you or against vs or for himselfe because he was a Papist And againe if his saying be rightly vnderstoode we may admit it We heare the words This is my bodie not that we eate with our mouth the bodie of Christ in the breade Wee perceiue the motions that is we perceiue the bread to enter into our mouth not the bodie of Christ We know not the maner that is not perfectly to wit after what maner the holy Ghost is eueriewhere whole in Christ and in al the Saints and how he vniteth vs in Christ We beleeue the presence namely such as is the eating and as is the vnion of the members and the head 8 We teach this onelie That the bodie and bloud of christ is trulie substantiallie and naturallie exhibited Aunswere Wee grant that we eat the true bodie of Christ So then is their disputation vaine and friuolous First Because they confesse that wee are made partakers of the true bodie of christ and that wee must not question of the manner For this wee graunt Secondly Because the reasons and refutations which they bring are of no weight or moment Certaine reasons whereby is proued That the bodie of Christ is not present either in or vnder or at the bread of the Lords Supper neither is corporallie eaten Vnder With Jn or At the Bread 1 BEcause hee tooke a true humane nature Whereunto wee ad also that wee cannot eate him otherwise than his disciples did in the first Supper 2. He truely ascended out of earth into heauen 3. Such is our eating of him as his abiding is in vs. 4. All the Saints of the old and new Testament haue the same vnion with Christ 5 Christ onely is able to offer himselfe vnto his Father Now it is necessarie in the vse of the Supper to craue of God remission of sinnes Wherefore if he bee present at the bread we must craue of him and so wee offer the bread But in the New testament it is not lawfull to direct our prayer to any certaine place 6. The blessings which are promised vnto the godly onely are spirituall Vnto these and other fore alleaged reasons commeth the consent of the auncient Fathers Ambrose Athanasius Austine Basil Bede Bertram Chrysostome ClemeÌ„s Alexandrinus the councell of Nice Ciprian Cyrill Denis Gelasius Gregorie the Great Gregorie Nazianzene Hezichius Hierom Hilarie Irenaeus Justine Leo Macharius Origen Procopius Gaza Tertullian and so forth THE SECOND APPENDIX OR ADDITION Arguments whereby the opinion of Vbiquitaries is refelled and the truth of sound doctrine confirmed THE FIRST ARGVMENT THE Marcionites and Manichees imagined that Christ had not a true and solid bodie but onely made shew of the shape of a bodie so that hee seemed onely to haue flesh and bones whereas indeed hee had them not And further that the verie incarnation and al the motions and operations of christ did but only seeme so in outward appearaÌ„ce whereas in the truth of the thing there was no such thing done Now the opinion of Vbiquitie and of the reall communicating of the properties of both natures doth raise againe from Hel that phantasticall dotarie and frensie of those heretiques Therefore it is no lesse to bee abandoned and banished out of the church to Hell than that heresie of the Manichees That this opinion of Vbiquitie doth giue life againe to the former wee proue The Vbiquitaries are of opinion and so teach That all the properties of the Godhead were presently from the verie point of Christs conception reallie effused from the Godhead of the woorde into the humane nature which christ tooke Hence these absurdities will folow 1. Christ shall not be truely borne of the Virgine if as touching the nature of his humanitie he was truely and essentiallie without the wombe of his mother before hee was borne and after hee was borne hee remained no lesse truely and substantiallie as touching his humanitie in that selfe-same wombe than before 2. Christ was not truely weake in his humane nature and subiect to passions if hee were then also as touching the same nature partaker of the Diuine maiestie and omnipotencie 3. Hee was not truely dead if also in the time of his death as touching his soule and bodie hee were essentiallie present euerie where together with his Godhead For the soul being euerie where present could not be really separated in distance of places from the bodie which also should be euerie where present and so neither could the body die but onely
selfesame particle betokeneth a certaintie or confirmation of our faith whereby we trust that we shal be heard Wherefore Amen signifieth 1. So be it and sure and certaine be that which wee desire and let God condiscend and aunswere vnto our request 2. So God being not vnmindful of his promise truly and certainly heare vs. FINIS ¶ A TABLE OF THE COMMON PLACES AND PRINCIPALL QVESTIONS HANDLED IN THIS SVMME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION THE PREAMBLE A THREEFOLD order or three parts of the study of Diuinity 2 Of a Catechism or Catechising doctrine What a Catechisme is 2 In the Primitiue Church two sorts of Catechumeny 3 Catechising as the Doctrine of Baptisme of laying on of hands euer hath beene vsed in the Church and the reasons why still it ought 3. 4 Of the holy Scriptures Two opinions of religion but one alone true 5 What the holy Scripture teacheth or how Christian religion is diuided 6. 7 True religion ought to bee discerned from others and why 8 The difference of the true Doctrine of the Scriptures from others 10 The difference of true Doctrine from Philosophy 11 Certain notes whereby the tru church is distinguished from others 12 Whence it may appeare that this religion was once deliuered from god which is contained in the Scriptures 12 The authority of the Scriptures dooth not depend of the Church with reasons for proofe aunsweres to the contrarie obiections 13. 14. 15. 16. 17 Reasons for proofe of the certaintie truth of the holy Scriptures 20. 21 The difference betweene the prophecies of the heathen and them contained in the holy Scriptures 23 The spirit of Christ a sufficient witnesse of his Doctrine 27 No doctrin besides the holy Scripture is to be receiued into the church and the reasons why with answers to the contrary obiections 28. 29. 30 The obseruing of the Lords day left arbitrary to the Church 36 How controuersies doubtfull places are to be decided 46 Of the true comfort of the Godly The way to attaine to this comfort and the parts thereof 53 Why the knowledge of our misery deliuery and thankfulnesse is necessary to this comfort 55. 56. 57 THE FIRST PART OF THE MISERY OF MAN HOWE a man commeth to the knowledge of his misery 60 Of Sinne. Whether sin be or whence it appeareth to be in vs. 63 What sinne is 65 How many kinds of sin there are 67 Of Orginall sinne Whether there be Original sinne 6◠What Originall sinne is 68 Whether the souls of the children bee deriued from the souls of the Parents 71 What Actuall sinne is 78 Raigning sinne 78 Sinne not raigning or veniall 79 Sinne against the conscience not against the conscience 86 Sinne pardonable vnpardonable 87 Sin of itselfe sin by an accident 94 The workes of the regenerate vnregenerate differ seuen maner of waies 98 What are the causes of Sinne. 99 What are the effects of sinne 115 Of the creation of man What man was created of God 124 For what man was created 125 Of the image of God in man What the image of God in man is 128 How far foorth the image of God was lost how far it remaineth 130 How it is repaired in vs. 131 How the image of God is in Christ and how in vs. 132 Of the first sinne What that first sinne of Adam Eue was 134 What were the causes of the first sinne 135 What are the effects of the first sin 135 Why GOD permitted the first sin 136 Of free-will The causes of diuers controuersies risen about free-will 138 Of the word Liberty 140 What is the Liberty of will 141 What is like or common and what is different in the liberty of will which is in God in Angels and men 144 Whether there be any liberty in vs what it is 157 There are foure degrees of freewill 159 Of euils of punishment Of the euils of punishment 192. Howe many kinds of afflictions there be 194 What be the causes of them 198 What are the comforts that are to be opposed against them 200 THE SECOND PART OF MANS DELIVERY WHAT mans deliuery is 226 Whether any deliuery might bee wrought after the fall 227 Whether deliuerie bee necessarie and certaine 231 What manner of deliuerie this is 231 By what meanes mans deliuery may be wrought 233 Of the Mediatour What a Mediatour is 238 For what cause a Mediatour is necessarie 239 What is the office of a Mediator 241 What maner of Mediatour ours ought to be 243 Who is may be that Mediator 250 That there is but one Mediatour 252 Of the couenant What a couenaunt is 253 Howe a couenaunt may bee made betweene God and men 255 whether there be but one couenāt 255 In what the old and new couenaunt agree and in what they differ 256 Of the Gospel What the Gospel is 159 Whether the Gospel hath bin alwaies knowen 261 Howe the Gospell differeth from the Law 264 What are the proper effectes of the Gospel 267 Whence the trueth certainty of the Gospel may appeare 267 Of faith The necessitie of the true doctrine of faith 268 What faith is in general 270 What are the kinds of faith 272 How those kindes differ 275 How faith hope differ agree 278 What are the causes of faith 276 What are the effects of faith 280 Vnto whom faith is giuen 281 Conclusions comprising the summe of faith 285 Of the Creede or Symbole of the Apostles VVhat a Symbole is 287 What are the parts of the Apostolick Symbole 288 The first part of the Creede of God the Father Creatour The sense and meaning of the words I beleeue in God the father Almighty Creatour 291 Of God VVhether there be a God 294 VVho and what God is 301 An explication of the description of God deliuered by the church 305 VVhence it may appeare that there is but one God 336 VVhat these woordes Essence Person Trinity betoken and signifie 340 VVhat difference betweene Essence and Person 341 VVhether these names are to bee vsed in the church 345 How many persons there be of the Diuinity or Godhead 347 How the three persons of the godhead are distinguished 349 VVherefore this doctrine is to be held and maintained in the church 351 Of Creation VVhether the woorld were created of God 355 How God made the world 362 For what cause god created the world 367 Of Angels VVhat good Angels are 369 Of euil spirits or Angels 375 Of Gods prouidence Errors concerning Gods prouidence 379 Whether there bee any prouidence of God 380 VVhat the prouidence of God is 385 A confutation of certaine Sophismes or cauils which are wont to be obiected against the prouidence of God moouing and gouerning all and euery particular whether good or bad great or smal most iustly 405 VVhy the knowledge of this doctrine concerning Gods prouidence is necessarie 426 The second part of the Creed of God the redeemer VVhat is signified by the word Iesus 430