prinat spirit is condemned for example in the old law Numb 12. God was angry with Mary Moyses Sister and Aaron because they had detracted from Moyses she saying hath our lord spoken only by Moyses hath be not spoken also by vs and Ierem. 23. Heare not the words * S. Hieron ait falsos illos prophetas referre baereticos qui sequuntur spirituÌ„ suuÌ„ quia nequaquam inquit diuino instinctu sed proprio corde vaticinantur of the Prophets that prophesie vnto you and deceiue you they speak the visions of their own hearts and not out of the mouth of our lord and Ezech. 13. God saith thus woe vnto the foolish prophets that follow their own spirit yet say the lord saith it albeit I haue not spoken likewise in the new law this priuat spirit is condemned for in the primary age of the Church (f) Eusebius l. 3. hist Eccles cap. 12. attests that Cherintus besides his other prophane nouelties fained subtil delusions as reuealed vnto him by the ministery of Angels and according to the same Eusebius l. 5. cap. 15. Montanus and Maximilla were carried away with delusions of the like nature for among the reasons why they were cut of from the Church of God one was because they pretended vnto speciall reuelations and the Church declared that it was a thing contrary to the custom and practice down from the Apostles till those times that any particular person should presume to haue a priuat spirit reuealing vnto him matters pertaning to christian faith Cherintus was counted an Heretick for pretending vnto priuat reuelations in the spreading of sundry absurd doctrines and in as much as he asserted that Iesus-Christ was not come in the flesh Saint Ioan. Apostle Epis 1. cap. 4. writeth to the faithfull against him thus Dearly beloued belieue not euery spirit but trie the spirits whether they are of God for many false prophets are gon out into this world hereby you shall know the spirit of God euery spirit which confesseth that Iesus-Christ is come in the flesh is of God and euery spirit that confesseth not that Iesus-Christ is come in the flesh is not of God Yet althought the Apostle vsed that analogie in order to this true article of faith Iesus-Christ is come in the flesh as a certain signe to shew the falshood of Cherintus assertion neuertheless he did not mean to establish it for a generall rule to distinguish euery good from euery ill spirit or euery true from euery false doctrine for the Pelagians and sundry ancient sectaries are counted Hereticks both by Lutherans and Caluinists albeit they acknowleged the mistery of the Incarnation But the generall rule for the trying of spirits Saint Iohn clearly expresseth a very little after in his same Epistle saying Wee Apostles are of God he that knoweth God heareth vs he that is not of god heareth vs not hereby know we the spirit of truth and the spirit of errour In regard his first particular rule was not sufficient enough to discerne between euery true and false doctrine that is to say between all true and false Teachers therfore he addeth this generall rule viz. To heare or not to heare vs Apostles Gouernours of the Church alluding to Christs own words set down I uc 10. He that heareth you heareth me and he that despiseth you despiseth me Saint Iohn spoke in the person of all the Apostles and their successors in Church Gouerment with whom is deposited christian doctrine receiued from the mouth of Christ and truly it is very probable that no one of the other Apostles was aliue when Saint Iohn writ his Epistle yet what Christ promised Mat. 28. behold I am with you alwayes untill the end of the world remained then in him and euen now in the Prelats of the Church that succeed the Apostles in the administration therof wherby it is cleare that the office of supream Iudge of coÌ„trouersies in debate concerning faith and religion is proper to ecclesiasticall authoritie only howeuer in as much as no man can come vnto Christ except the Father which hath sent him draw him Ioa. 6. inward grace of the holy Ghost is necessarily required to belieue in and loue God aright vnto the obseruation of his ordinances and law of which is meant the prophesies Ierem. 31. I will put my law saith our lord in their inward parts and write it in their hearts and will be their God and they shall be my people Isa 50. and all thy children shall be taught of our lord to witt by inward grace which excludeth not outward Teachers for faith is by heareing and hearing importeth outward Teachers Moyses and the Prophets of those daies taught the people in as much as they declared vnto them outwardly the lawes of God affording nothing of inward help to the seeking of them but Christ truly God cloathed with human flesh taught by himselfe in our new law both outwardly preaching the doctrine of faith and inwardly instilling into the hearts of his people inward grace for the embracing of it and afterward before his ascention into heauen appointed outward visible Teachers and promised withall his own inward inuisible concurrence with them to the end of the world Wherfore doubtless the alledged scripturs will show only the maiority of Christ compared to Moyses and the Prophets in order to teaching matters of faith and religion together (g) According to holy scripture Io. 1. the law was giuen by Moyses but grace and truth came by Iesus-Christ The old law pointed at sin onely and made it known but the new law furnishes grace to fulfill it and purge out of our souls the leauen of sin with the plenteous measure of grace especially annexed to the new law in respect wherof it is stiled the law of grace neither is this necessity of outward Teachers excluded by the saying of Saint Paul 1. Cor. 2. he that is spirituall discerneth all things and he himselfe is iudged of noe man Ioa. 1. Eps cap. 2. ye need not that any man teach you but as his vnction teacheth you all things and it is true and is notlying and Saint Ioa. 1. Eps cap. 5. he that belieueth in the son of God hath the testimony of God in himselfe for as to the first text Saint Paul spoke of the spirituall man only that is to say of such beliuers as were perfect and knowing of christian doctrine and therby apt to discern false opinions and conceiue the high mysteries of faith declared by word of mouth or writing which is not to exclude outward Teachers and that this is the true meaning appeareth by the Apostle himselfe because he says in the very same Chapter set down We speak wisdom among them that are perfect and we speake wisdom in a mystery wherby he seâ—teth the spirituall maÌ„ against the naturall man that is versed only in the wisdom of the world or in the knowledge of naturall things and in the third Chapter of the same Epistle
the sinns of the whole world joynt and seperat comprehending euen children of one daies old and such as are hardened against him * Concil Valent 3. cap. 5. Christus Iesus Daeminus noster sicut nullus homo est fuit vel erit cuius naturae in illo assumpta nō fuerit Ita nullus est c. as there is none or hath been or euer shall be any whose human nature is not assumed in Christ so there is none or hath been or shall euer be any for whome Christ hath not suffered his passion in regard whereof he is called Sauiour of all though specially of those which by baptisme are buried with him into death that is which drink of the Cup of his passion for baptism was instituted by him as an essentiall requisite for the drinking thereof vnto iustification of life and the offering the Cup of his passion had been litle conducible to the end it was offered for if necessary meanes had not been prouided to profer it an end cannot be obtained without the application of helps conuenient and conform there to and as to this point of generall prouision Christ was wanting to none for such as are baptised in him and consequently buried with him by baptism into death of sin receiue the benefit of his passions Cup which if they shall constantly keep they cannot be depriued of eternall blessednes due to their holy perseuerance in sanctity through the merits of Christs death and all those * Secundum S. Aug. qui nunquam audiuit Euangelium Chricti habet gratiam qua possit vel praeceptū naturae implere vel qua possit implorare auxilium ad praeceptū naturae implendum vnde illud psal 83. benedictionē dabit Dominus qui lege dedit who are not baptised if they are come to the yeares of discretion do infallibly participate of Gods generall grace on the same scoare of Christs death sufficiently as to the obseruation of the commandements which if they shall faithfully keep and these are written in their hearts they must certainly enioye the benefit of baptism or some other aduantage equalling that as to iustification Touching (b) According to S. Prosper l. de voca Gent. c. 23. Young children born of vnbelieuing parents might receiue meet helpe in order to their saluation if the same parents should vse well the grace that Christ through his bitter passion hath procured for euery kind of people and nation being Christ offered the Cup of his passion for all men joint and seperat excluding none on his part from the possibility of drinking of it children who die before the vse of reason without baptism though they want thereby the benefit of generall redemption and consequently are depriued of full felicity neuertheless their misfortune must not be ascribed to the wanting of a generall Redeemer (c) The Apostle 2. Cor. 5. inferreth from Christs dying for all men that all were dead in Adam saying if one Christ be dead for all from whence t is euident that Christ dyed for all which were dead in Adam and indeed otherwise the Apostle had made a very weak inference and to noe purpose wherfore since according to the Apostle all men were dead in Adam without doubt Christ dyed for all men joynt and seperat and S. Austin after the same manner inferreth from the text set down that all men were dead in Adam because Christ dyed for all and l. 6. con Iulia c. 1. makes vse of the same argument to proue against Iulian and the Pelagians that all children were dead in Adam because one Christ dyed for all and this Catholick doctrine S. Austin inculcateth vrgeth and presseth against all opposers Hanc inquit doctrinam inculco impingo refercio recusanti so that our modern Teachers say vnaduisedly that S. Austin nouer taught that Christ gaue himselfe a propitiation was crucifyed or dyed for all men joynt and seperat besides S. Austin trac 31. in Joan. saith expresly that the Iewes which murthered Christ ought not to dispaire being Christ euen for them offered his prayer and a litle after Christ saith he considered his death as offered for and not as procured by them which doctrine S. Prosper confirms l. 2. de vocat gent. Christ hauing dyed for and to redeem all excluding none on his part it is to be imputed either to the negligence of their parents who if Christians let them die without baptism if infidels help them not as they might doe by embracing * Graetia implorandi diuinum uuxilium implēdi omnia praecepta naturae omnibus hominibus adultis gratis cōcessa est proinde nemo est cui ad fidem Christi aliquis non patent accessus vnde Io. 1. erat lux veraquae illuminat omnem bominem venientem in hunc mundum Gods generall grace that leads them to the marueilous light of Christian faith Again many times it is to be ascribed to naturall secundary causes which take Children out of this life before baptism can be administred to them howeuer God is not wanting in necessary requisits or meanes as to the full happines of those Infants which by naturall causes are preuented of the application of baptism because they do not suffer preiudice for want of sufficient expedients since Christ hath instituted baptism as a most sufficient remedy vnto blessednes in order to all men and infants are depriued of the fruit for as much only as the application of it is obstructed by certaine naturall causes which God did not dispose and ordaine to that end or purpose but for a generall good of the whole vniuers which God is not bound to hinder for he doth not inuert or obstruct the order of things settled from the creation of the world he is not only generall benefactour according to mercy but also a generall prouider according to prouidence he taketh not care of one creature so as to neglect his care of another or so to benefit one as to preiudice another for example if a man should cast himselfe willfully into a hot fiery furnace God to preserue him from burning should be obliged to hinder the innate actiuity of fire which is to burne and so to work miraculously aboue nature as he did in the hot furnace of Babilon which God is not bound to doe howeuer the premises giue euidence enough to beleiue that Christ is rightly named the Redeemer and Sauiour of all Besides as a king is truly a king soueraign lord and supream Gouernor of his people though they rebell against him and will not be gouerned so Christ is truly (d) The Apostle 1. Timoth. 4. calleth Christ the Sauiour of all men but specially of the faithfull where the particle specially giues euidence enough against our modern Teachers that Christ dyed for the Redemption of all men joynt and seperat which Catholick doctrine S. Iohn the Apostle cap. 2. clearly demonstrates saying that Christ Is the propitiation for our sins and not for ours
scripturae and comfort of the scripturs may haue hope Rom. 15. although they doe not define and iudge all matters of faith and religion yet they (l) The Apostle 2. Timot. 3. Saith that all scripture is giuen by inspiration from God and is profitable to teach argue correct and instruct in iustice That is according to the ancient Fathers to resiste conuince and condemne false doctrines Wherfore according to the same Apostle ad Tit. l. a Bishop must be vnreproueable embracing the faithfull word and sound doctrine that he may be able to exhort and conuince those which say against it conduce mainly therunto tending specially to christian instruction and erudition besides they stir vs vp to ioyne vertue with faith and with vertue knowledg and with knowledg temperance and with temperance patience and with patience godliness and with godliness loue 2. Epis 2. Pet. which is the consistency and plenitude of the law Scripturs are liud * S. Ambros Epis 19. vocat sacras scripturas fontes viuos qui saliunt in vitam aeternam fountains springing vp vnto euerlasting life but the keeping and dressing of them is cōmitted only to the Church of Christ that was the rock whence they sprāg it is the christian catholick Church taught of the holy Ghost that cōprehēdeth the bredth lenght depth and hight of these heauenly fountaines which is to say it is a speciall prerogatiue giuen to the Church of Christ to interpret infallibly and iuridically the holy scripturs (m) According to S. Hierom Epis ad Paulum S Chrys hom 40. in Ioa. S. Austin l. 4. de doct christ cap. 3. the hardness of holy scrpitures proceeds from the profoundnes copiousnes compendiousnes therof in consequence of which a right vnderstanding of sundry passages of necessary depends of tradition as well obserues S. Austiu l. de fide oper and S. Hierom in his scripture prologue ingeniously confesseth that he could not vnderstandand the holy Prophets Isaias Ieremy and Daniel again S. Irenaeus l. 3. cap. 7. Orig. in explic Epis ad Rom. and S. Austin l. de fide oper cap. 14. confess with one accorde that S. Paul is hard to be vnderstood and especially in regard he vseth frequent hyperboles which proceeded from the vehemency of the spirit that guided his pen. which profoundness of misteries plenteousness of senses shortness of sentences haue rendred obscure hard and intricate as plainly appeareth by the holy writers of the old law namely Isay Ieremy Ezechiel Daniel and of the new law Saint Paul especially according to the testimony of Saint Peter 2. Pet. 3. wherein he speaketh of his writings thus * S. Irenaue l. 3. cap. 7. scribens de Haereticis testatur Paulū hyperbolis vti frequenter propter impetu spiritus qui in ipso fuit Idē sentiūt Origines explicat Epistolae ad Rō Aug. de fide operibus cap. 14. 15. our Brother Paul in all his Epis mentioneth things in which Epistles some things are hard to be vnderstood which they that are vnlearned and vnstable wrest as they doe also others scripturs vnto their own perdition for further proofe of this catholick assertion may be alledged the perpetuall contention between one sectary and an other concerning the interpretation of scripture Texts in reference to controuersies of faith for example from the words This is my body Luc. 22. Lutherans doe argue the true and real presence of Christs body in the Sacrament together with the substance of bread contrariwise Caluinists infer a meer figure of Christs body Anabaptists deduce out of the commission Christ gaue vnto his Apostles Math. 18. goe and teach all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father c. That baptism ought not to be administrated but to such as are de facto apt to receiue instruction And the Arians misinterpreting that saying of Christ Io. * Apud S. Joan. dicit Christus Pater maior me est alibi ego Pater vnum sumus Posterior textus explicatur ab Arianis de vnitate consensus conformitate voluntatū My Father is greater then I denied his Godhead the holy scriptures are a great light of christian doctrine for they are the dictates of the holy Ghost yet not sufficient enough to let vs see the way to euerlasting life vnless they be set on the cādlestick of the * Vt luceat omnibus qui in domo sūt Mat. 5. Church it is not the same thing to be a light and to enlighten a light vnder a bushell is a light and shineth there howeuer it doth not giue light to all that are in the house but when it is put on the candlestick Math. 5. euen so the scripturs light put vnder a bushell that is vnder the interpretation of priuate wits continueth a shining light in it selfe neuertheless doth not enlighten vnto euerlasting life but when it is put on the candlestick of infallible authority proper to the Church of Christ Again the scripture is a booke written within and on the backside Apoc. 5. the outward writing is the letter that killeth the inward the spirit that giueth life 2. Cor. 3. as the soul quickneth the body (n) S. Austin ser 70. de tempore expounding the sacred Text Epis ad Cor. the letter killeth the spirit quikneth If saith he thou follow the true sense of scripture which is the spirit that giues life to the soule it will bring thee vnto saluation but if thou shalt neglect the true sense adhering to the outward letter presuming the true sense to be therein it will often tymes lead thee into errour And according to Tertul. l. de resur carnis Heresies spring vp in regard the scriptures are misinterpreted And he speaking of S. Pauls Epistles affirms that it ought not to seem a hard thing or any way strang that from thence errours should arise since heresies must be 1. Cor. 11. which notwithstanding would not be if the scriptures were interpreted aright Heresies must be not becaus God hath appointed that they should be but because he permitted that they might be and mans free will together with pride and malice makes them to be against Gods positiue will howeuer the supream prouidence from euil heresies draws good things soe the spirit or sense of the scriptures quickneth the letter but to come vnto the spirit of necessity there is required the opening of the booke which the Church onely can doe trusted with the key of authority that openeth it wherfore in as much as many men down from the begining of christianity to these times haue adhered rather to the letter then to the sense of scripture and thence cut out vnauthorized interpretations of their own many heresies haue sprung vp to the distruction of infinit souls wherof Christ prophesying said heresies must be He fore saw that euen of such as were incorporated into his Church would men rise * S. Cypri Epis 55. ad Cornelium Nec aliunde
is to crush heresies in the bud suppress schims preuent scandals and to preach the Gospell of Christ vnto saluation to euery one that belieueth To this intent and purpose I haue imployed my endeauors Hovveuer some may conceiue that the ayme of this Theology leuel's at M. r VVhites Theology because their foundations are as opposit as the ends of a Diameter are ouervvhart and cross this Theology being built on the diuine Dictates vvhich Christ left vnto his Apostles and their Successors in Church-Gouernement vnto the sauing of souls but his Theology contrarivvise is built on the Digbean Peripateticks vvhich heathen Philosophers left to their scholes vnto the exercising of mens vvits and as the foundations so the doctrines ex Diametro differ Yet I set them not dovvn because the principall heads thereof Jonas Thamon hath learnedly set forth and expressed to the life and vvhat of that kind hath issued from the excellent Latin pen of Dr. Pugh euidence his learning vertue and zeale against impious nouelties but that vvhich ought to haue fulnes of vveight vvith the good and vvise Belieuers in order to an abhorrence from Mr. VVites nevv notions is because a famous Vniuersity hath censured and the sea Apostolick condemned his Tenents Hovveuer the Cheif design of my vvriting these holy Characters is to benefit Missionaryes and if I may arriue to this I shall esteeme my selfe most happie vvho am Sr. Yr. most affectionate Brother and humble seruant GEO. LEYBVRN APPROBATIO LIber hic cui titulus Sacri Characteres c. Anglicè ab Exim viro D. GEORGIO LEYBVRNO S. Theologiae Doctore compositus nihil habet fidei aut moribus dissonum sed vndique spirat sanam doctrinam cum pietate coniunctam Quapropter magno cum fructu praeli beneficio diuulgabitur Datum Duaci die 23. Augusti 1662. MATTHIAS GERTMAN S. Th. Doctor Professor ac in vrbe Duacena librorum Visitator Censor APPROBATIO NOs in fra-scripti ingenti cum voluptate per legimus librum cui titulus Holy Characters c. ab Eximio Domino D. GEORGIO LEYBVRNO Sacrae Theologiae Doctore ac Collegij Anglo-Duaceni Praeside elaboratum in eo nihil inuenimus fidei vel boâ—â—is moribus diffonum quinimò ex firmis Sacrae Scripturae Conciliorum ac Sanctorum Patrum authoritatibus fidem orthodoxam dilucidè ostendit reiectis vanis speculationibus ac questionibus superfluis vocumque profanis novitatibus opinionibus falsi nominis scientiae quam quidam promittentes circa fidem exciderunt magno ingenij acumine stylo eleganti methodoque subtili ac nervosa profundè investiga tur clarè resolvitur ac clucidatur perspicuè adeo vt qui his duntaxat facâ—is Characteribus munitus fuerit abundè habeat quò Sectariorum ac Novatorum praestigias ex vano in Theologiâ philosophandi genere inductas detegat ac devitet populumque fidelem genuinam fidei Catholicae veritatem mira cum facilitate edoccat quapropter ad communem popularium nostrorum vtilitatem luce publica dignissimum censemus Duaci in Collegio Fratrum Minorum Recollectorum Anglorum hac 16. Augusti 1662. F. BERNARDVS A S. FRANCISCO S. Theol Lector F. IOANNES A S. CRVCE S. Theol. Lector APPROBATIO PErlegi librum cui titulus Holy Characters c. Anglicè ab Eximio D. ac M. nostro D. GEORGIO LEYBVRNO Sacrae Theologiae Doctore Collegij Pontificij Anglo-Duaceni Praeside conscriptum paruum quidèm mole sed virtute magnum vtpote qui omnia Catholicae fidei mysteria clarissimè enucleata praecipuasque quaestiones Orthodoxos inter vel manifestos vel occultos haereticos controucrsas solidissimè diremptas mirabili planè breuitate perspicuitate complectitur in eo vbique relucet singularis ab omnibus agnita Authoris eruditio Pietas in Sedem Apostolicam obseruantia qui memor se sapientibus insipientibus debitorem hoc in opere ita paruulis in Christo lac potum id est Christianae fidei rudimenta propinauit vt in eo nec maximi solidum cibum eruditas in quam Theologicarum controuersiarum veritates desiderarent In opere ea est sermonis claritas vt etiam infimos admittat ea materiei sublimitas vt etiam summos exerceat ea rerum varietas vt illud planè credam Controuertistis Praedicatoribus Confessarijs Catechistis Orthodoxis omnibus Heterodoxis Anglis vtilissimum nec vtilissimum tantum verumetiam hac tempestate Nouitatum auidissimâ paenè necessarium Quapropter opto vt quamprimùm fieri possit liber hic magno rei Catholicae commodo in lucem emittatur Datum Duaci in Collegio Anglorum die 23. Augusti 1662. IOANNES WARNERVS S. Theol. Professor A TABLE Of the Characters contained in the first Book CHar I. Of God pag. 1. Char. II. Of Adam p. 6. Char. III. Of Originall Sin p. 10. Char. IV. Of the Virgin Mary p. 16. Char. V. Of the son of the Virgin Mary p. 25. Char. VI. Of the name of IESVS p. 28. Char. VII Of the name of Christ p. 34. Char. VIII Of the Cross of Christ p. 39 Char. IX Of Adoring the Cross p. 45. Char. X. Of a Christian p. 55. Char. XI Of a Christian persecuted for Christs sake p. 61. Char. XII Of Christian faith p. 67. Char. XIII Of a wit-belieuer p. 74. Char. XIV Of a singular Doctor p. 78. Char. XV. Of Christian Hope p. 85. Char. XVI Of Christian charity towards God p. 89. Char. XVII Of Charity towards our Neighbour p. 94. Char. XVIII Of Gods Charity to Man p. 99. Char. XIX Of Gods Charity in laying his commandements on man p. 106. Char. XX. Of Predestination Or Election to the kingdom of Heauen p. 112. Char. XXI Of Reprobation p. 121. Char. XXII Of Christs Charity to man p. 127. Char. XXIII Of vertue is generall p. 254. Char. XXIV Of Wisdome p. 238. Char. XXV Of Iustice p. 243. Char. XXVI Of Temperance p. 252. Char. XXVII Of Fortitude p. 258. Char. XXVIII Of sin in generall p. 263. Char. XXIX Of Pride p. 274. Char. XXX Of Couetousnes p. 281. Char. XXXI Of Vsury p. 290. Char. XXXII Of Luxury p. 301. Char. XXXIII Of Envy p. 315. Char. XXXIV Of Anger p. 322. Char. XXXV Of Gluttony p. 326. Char. XXXVI Of Slothfullnes p. 331. Char. XXXVII Of a Missionary Priest p. 335. A TABLE Of the Characters contained in the second Booke Char. I. Of Sacrifice in generall pag. 1. Char. II. Of the Sacrifice of the Bucharist or Masse p. 9. Char. III. Of Melchisedech p. 37. Char. IV. Of Sacraments in generall p. 44. Char. V. Of Church-ceremonies p. 51. Char. VI. Of Baptisme p. 67. Char. VII Of Confirmation p. 85. Char. VIII Of the Euchariste p. 96. Char. IX Of Communion in both kinds p. 117. Char. X. Of Penance p. 134. Char. XI Of Contrition p. 144. Char. XXII Of Confession p. 156. Char. XIII Of Satisfaction p. 166. Char. XIV Of Indulgences p. 180. Char. XV. Of Purgatory p. 208.
not the least sound that way teaching nothing that hath any relation to truth or antiquity In the pursuance of his ambition he makes proselytes of such as hauing their eares itching doe after their own lusts seek Masters of new notions * Scientia iuquit Apostolus Paulus inflat vbi charitas non aedificat quam sententiam frequeÌ„ter vsurpat S. Aug. As science without charity begetteth pride and pride Teachers of Nouelties so want of science without sobernes bringeth forth curiosity which maketh itching cares in order to new Masters The (c) Vincen. Lyrinen 2. p. tom 5. Bid. vit S. Patr. addresseth himselfe to Priests and Teachers in order to auoiding of Nouelties thus O Priest ô Doctor if the aiuine povver hath furnish'd thee vvith vvitt and abilities fit for exercise out out faithfully the precious stones of diuine doctrine deck and set them forth vvisely adde splendour grace and comliness but so teach vvhat thou hast learn'd that vvhile thou speak'st after a nevv method thou deliuer nothing of nevv doctrine singularity of one Doctour planteth a sect and the curiosity of many encreaseth it In the compleating of his ambition he doth not only equall but exceed the ambition * Volaterranus l. 15. Anthrop Erostratus inquit TeÌ„plum Diana Ephestae incendit nominis famae libidine of Erostratus that to perpetuate his name set on fire the Temple of Diana at Ephesus counted one of the seauen wonders of the world for the ambition of Erostratus destroyed one Temple only but the pride of a singular Teacher ruines * 2. Cor. 6. vos estis teÌ„plum Dei 1. Cor. 3. TempluÌ„ Dei estis Spiritus saÌ„ctus habitat in nobis as many temples as the Christians which by crafty dealings he seduceth and bringeth into errour euery Christian being a temple of the liuing God and the habitation of the holy Ghost and consequently as the God of Christians surpasseth in worthines Diana of the Ephesians and as a spirituall exceÌ„edeth a materiall temple so a destroyer of Christian soules goes beyond Erostratus in wickednes In like manner he exceedeth the Regicide * Ioan. Sarisburiensis polycratio Pausanias inquit cum Hermaclea percunctatus esset quò nam modò clarus euadere posset subito atqueÌ„ hic respondisset si occidisset aliquem virum clarum continuo Philippam interemit Pausanias that made his way to an euerlasting memoriall of a wicked enterprise thorow the Royall blood of Philip of Macedo which ambitiously he spilt for a singular Teacher murthereth as many * Secundum Bedam l. 3 in cap. 10. lucae quos Lucas appellat Reges matthaeus vocat iustos ipsi sunt ait ille Reges magni qui tentationuÌ„ suatum motibus non consentieÌ„do succumbere sed regendo praeesse nouernÌ„t kings as there are just men which he peruerteth and draweth from the truth Howeuer a singular Teacher will not profess openly the malice of his ambition as did Erostratus who affraid as it were to lose the renowning of his name himselfe diuulged his * Hier. l. con Heluidium cap. 8. mullo inquit prodente sacrilegium fertur ipse Erostratus in medium processisse clamitas sese incendium subiecisse sacrilegious crime for though a singular teacher is inwardly a rauenous wolfe yet outwardly for the most part he appeareth in sheep's clothing And indeed his ambition is a subtile inordinate desire of glory a secret poyson an occult plague author of crafty dealings and mother of hypocricy A singular Teacher neuer publisheth his wicked affection lest the effects therof might be therby obstructed he is like vnto a white tombe which appeares beautifull outward but within is full of filthines Howeuer that such teachers should rise euen of Christians Apostolicall prophecies giue euidence enough to beleiue so When S. Paul said 1. Cor. 11. There must be heresies euen among you he pointed at singularity of doctrine for the word heresy taken in the precise sense for a choosing and adhering vnto a peculiar opinion imports as much When the same Apostle said as is related Act. 20. I know of your own selues shall men rise speaking peruerse things to draw disciples after them he foretolde the ambition of a singular Teacher When S. Mathew said Beware of salse Prophets which come vnto you in sheeps clothing he hinted at the hypocrisy of singular Teachers which disguise their malice with a visard of outward sanctity and thereby craftily circunuent and bring into errour such as through weaknes or wauering in faith or through itching eares are giuen to nouelties (d) Vincen. Lirinen writeth of Origine that he might haue been of great authority if an exemplar life had been sufficient enough to haue made him so for he was a person of singular integrity purity learning industry c. but that gallant person saith he in regard he insolently abused the grace of God confiding in his own abilities and despising the simplicity of Christian Religion presumed that he knew more then all other men and interpreted holy Scriptures after a new mode deseru'd that the Church of God should say of him Non audies verba prophetaeillius thou shalt not hearken to the words of that Prophet Baronius in his Ecclesiasticall History An. 449. after he had said much of Eutiches the Heretick in order to his outward sanctity aduiseth the reader to learn from him that other Hereticks so comport themselues as if they breathed forth purity of faith and sanctity of manners The same Baronius writeth in his Eccles Hist An. 428. that the Arch-Heretick Nestorius with his sordide clothing pale face and lean body wherby he was counted a person of great abstinence and mortification drew many followers after him Again An. 411. of his Eccles History he relateth that Paulinus in an Epistle to S. Austin extolleth Pelagius the Heretick for great sanctity of life who notwithstanding as Baronius attesteth was a rauenous wolfe cloth'd in a Monasticall habit a new Proteus that according to place time and persons with whom he conuersed chang'd his discourse Moreouer Wicleff the first English heretick through his sordide clothing and affected humility bewitched and infected nany with his pernicious nouelties Vnder a false shew and disguise of outward holines singular Teachers in all times of the Christian Church haue spread their pernicious Doctrins as do plainly euidence the Ecclesiasticall Annals of each age respectiuely and indeed Origines Nestorius Pelagius Eutiches to say nothing of sundry others while they wantonly presumâ—d of their own witts and insolently despised the ancient plainess and lownes of Christian religion together with the generall practice therof affected outward piety thinking therby to get authority and credence to their new notions wanting ordinary Mission to preach them The actiuity of their own witts caused wantonnes wantonnes pride and pride a preferring themselues before all other Teachers of those daies yet though the end of such teachers be euill the end for which the supream
wherby he is armed against his own lusts and wanton desires (b) Seneca compareth a wise man vnto the strongest army because a wise man indeed stands firm against pouerty slanders reproches ignominies and all manner of tribulations and made vndantedly valiant in all encounters with aduersity wherfore wisdome is an infinit treasure vnto such as lay hold on her for her counsell preserueth and her vnderstanding keepeth them as a pillar of a cloud led the Israëlits in their way by day and the pillar of fire gaue them light by night that they might goe both by day and night Exodus 13. soe wisdome is a guid vnto men which walk in prosperity as by day and a light vnto men that walke in aduersity as by night Wisdome is the schoolmistris of the knowledge of God the chooser out of his works the teacher of sobernes the giuer of holines and the doer of all things most profitable and acceptable in the sight of Heauen * Jacob 30. Sapientia desursum est whence she is descended Wherby is plainly evident that wisdome is not the same thing with science which taken precisely hath no bounds being common a like to each human knowledge besides many times * 1. Cor. 8. Scientia inflat science puffeth vp him that findeth it and deceiueth his judgment rendering him curious in superfluous things (c) Those which know profitable and not such as know many things are wise men indeed which haue nothing of profit Of this curiosity in order to science the Athenians were guilty who saith S. Luke Act. 17. gaue themselues to nothing else but to speak or to heare something of nouelty which is the mother of schism and heresy but in all times some wanton wits haue either begot or reuiued dangerous vnauthorised doctrins blown vp with their own science to the end they might be counted learned aboue the ordinary ranck of knowing men so that it is no strang thing that the present age should bring forth new Teachers and new hearers of prophane nouelties in consequence of the premisses noe man how knowing soeuer he seems is truly wise when (d) S. Austin in an Epistle to Dioscorus condemnes those schollars which rejoyce in knowing of Anoxagoras Anoxemenes Pithagoras Demosthenes to the end they may seem learned because there is nothing of solide doctrine and true erudition in them he seeketh out curiously things that haue nothing of profit or searcheth into hidden misteries which exceed his capacity for a wise man indeed thinketh with reuerence vppon what God hath commanded Eccles 32. in superfluous things search not and be not curious in many of his works for many things are shewed vnto thee aboue the capacity of men Furthermore true wisdom which is from aboue is pure Iacob 30. That is without vncleanes A wise man indeed (e) Ecclesiasticus cap. 3. saith that an heart which is wise and vnderstanding will abstaine from sin and shall prosper in the works of Iustice wherfore S. Bernard teacheth that those sind wisdome which are sorry for their sins purgeth out of his heart the leuen of sin casteth a way wickednes presseth down the lustes of curiosity of ambition of vain glory committeth not fornication with schism and heresy despiseth wordly pleasures (f) According to S. Austin l. de ciuit the intent and aime of true wisdome is to be where God is all in all things with an assured eternity and perfect peace and setteth his affection on things that are aboue and not on things which are on the earth true wisdome is peaceable Iacob 30. A wise man indeed hath nothing of strise in his heart is a louer of vnion established in the vnity of Christian schooles is gentle humble modest without leuity pride wantounes is full of obedience to the Churches lawes and ordinances and full of mercy and good fruits without hypocrisy Again a wise man indeed is wise in order to himselfe Prouerbs 90. if thou be wise thou shalt be wise for thy selfe The primitiue Christians were wise indeed to themselues which euery where bore in their bodies the mortifications of Christ IESUS for they suffered with great patience all manner of tribulations together with the spoiling of their goods for his sake that they might be glorified with him counting that the afflictions of this present time were not worthy of the glory to come through his merits and truly what shall it prosit a man though he did win the whole world and lose his own soul or What exchange shall a man giue for his soul Mat. 8. Wherfore such Christians as desert the Catholick Church to get worldly honours to heap vp earthly treasures preferring the world to the faith of Christ earth to Heauen flesh to the soul transitory pleasures to eternall blessednes * S. Bernard de consideratione Sic alloquitur Eugenium Papam quid prodest si vniuersum mundum lucreris te vnum perdens etsi sapiens alijs sis deest tibi sapientia si tibi non fueriâ— how wise soeuer they be to others are not wise to themselues for the wisdome of such men doth not descend from aboue but is earthly sensuall and deuilish Iacob 30. CHAR. XXV OF IVSTICE THE CONTENTS The things that are made equall are said to be adjusted from whence Iustice deriues its name the property of Justice is to render to euery one what is euery on 's own Iustice requireth of euery man worship and obediencein order to God exacteth loue kindnes respect honour and duty in order to man man in Iustice is bound to doe to his neighbour what he would his neighbour should doe vnto him Iustice exhorteth the faithfull aliue to shew pity vnto the faithfull departed apparitions of souls after their remouall out of their bodies asserted IVstice is a * Iustitia definitur virtus reddens vnicuique quod suâ—â— est Seu constaÌ„s perpetua voluntas in s suum vnicuique triâ— buens constant perpetuall inclination of the will to render vnto euery one what is euery on 's own That is to giue vnto God the things that are Gods and to giue vnto man the things which are mans as the immobility (a) According to Aristotle l. 2. de coelo the earth is equally poisd in the mids of the world in consequence whereof t is immoueable and indeed according to the holy Scripture terra in aeternum stat Eccles 1. that is the earth for euer stands firme without mouing at all of the earth is perceiued through an equall weighing of its parts in the center of the world so the firmnes and constancy of Iustice is establisht and perpetuated by an equall adjusting of debts vnto God and man which is the center thereof (b) Iustice is a morall vertue so named because of necessity it requires equallity and things are said to be adjusted which are of equall parts wherefore the great lawer Constantine defines us to be ars boni aqui and
that is to say such as are not mēbers of Christs Church haue no right to the mysticall meate and drink which is the reall body and blood of Christ 11. The corporall and linnen clothes that couer the Altar doe signify the linnen cloath that wrapped the sacred Body of Christ when he was laid in the sepulcher Io. 19. Furthermore besides the many religious visible ceremonies God commanded to be employed in exhibition of diuine worship during the continuance of the old law Exod. 29. Christ Authour of the new law instituted sundry ceremonies and rites which be of necessity namely washing with water in Baptism imposition of hands and anoynting with consecrated oyle in the Sacrament of Order c. Yea Christ himself practised visible ceremonies for he fell on his face and prayed Io. 26. lift vp his eyes and prayed Io. 11. lift vp his hands and blessed Luc. 24. Besides when he found in the Temple which is a sensible ceremonie too deputed vnto diuine worship those that sold oxen sheep and doues c. Io. 20. he was offended to see his Fathers howse made an howse of marchandice Hereby is euidently plain that Christ when in his conference with the Samaritan Woman Io. 4. said the hower cometh and now is when the true adorers shall adore the Father in spirit and truth he did not meane that he was come to take away sacrifice Sacraments prayers Churches and all other sensible ceremonies practised in the seruice of the new law but for as much as the cited Text is often tymes alledged by ancient and moderne sectaries especially against all visible rites of christian religion it will conduce greatly to vndeceiuing the deceiued in the sense and meaning therof if they consider duely that the Samaritans were Schismaticks as Luther and Zuinglius religious men both and Priests illegally and sacrilegiously marryed against the holy Canons and vowed chastity went out from the catholick Church in the time of Henry the eight king of England and began a schism in Germany likewise as Ballev Peter Martyr Martin Bucher c. Apostat-wedded-priests also in the reign of Edward the Sixt a childe began the schism in England countenanced and supported by Bishop Cranmer specially to which Henry the eight king Edwards Father had opened a doore only so a certain Priest of the Iews called Mansses to retain and enjoy an vnlawfull wife fell from the society of the faithfull Iewes at Hierusalem and broached schism in Samaria Besides as Luther and those other afore mentioned to establish their schisms leaped * Ioseph l. 11. Antiquit cap. 8. est propriū inquit Haereticis Schismaticis transilire capita antiquarum Ecclesiarum vt suam reddant Religionem antiquissimam ouer the heads of all christian Churches then and for many ages before establish't pretending that these were not agreeing with Christ and his Apostles in the essentialls of doctrine worship and gouernment and in consequence thereof made reformation the disguised end of their leape in like manner Manasses to render his schism plausible and taking with that people he leaped ouer the Prophet Moyses to Iacob the Patriarch and ouer the Temple in Ierusalem to the Temple of the Samaritans in Mount Garizim tying thereto the sacrifice of the Iews religion vpon pretence that the said Patriarch Iacob had therin adored long before the Temple of Salomon was built or the law giuen to obtain superiority in his schism he gaue the preeminence in Church-seruice to the place wherin he began it This was the true cause that moued the faithfull Iews to abstain from the company and conuersation of the Samaritans who maintained their adoring in Garizim to be more ancient then the worship of the Iews in Ierusalem In regard of this contention about the Temple in Ierusalem and the Temple in Garizim the Samaritan woman conceiuing Christ to be some Prophet for as much as he had reuealed vnto her the secret passages of her whole life propounded vnto him a Theologicall question touching the afore said controuersy on design to be informed to which of the two publick (e) According to holy scriptures by publick solemn adoration is meant proper sacrifice namely Joan. 12. and There vvere certain Gentils amongst them that came vp to adore at the feast And Act. 8. the Euneuch came vp to adore in Jerusalem in both these scripture-places by adoration which was publick and solemn is vnderstood proper sacrifice that was offered onely in Ierusalem but all other adorations outward and inward might be vsed in any whatsoeuer place besid's Ierusalem adoration or sacrifice was tyed and confined saying Our Fathers adored in this mountaine and ye say that in Ierusalem is the place where men ought to adore that is to offer sacrifice to which Christ replying (f) The Iews and Samaritans contended about the place of sacrifice and for as much as both of them were in fault therefore Christ form'd his answere in order to both Although the Iews sacrifice was the true sacrifice neuertheless it was vnprofitable being not able to procure sanctifying grace but the Samaritans sacrifice was erroneous for they were schismaticks and adored that is offered sacrifice where God would not haue had them that is they offered sacrifice out of Gods Temple in Ierusalem and therefore Christ said to the Samaritan woman Yee adore vvhat yee knovv not said woman belieue me the houre cometh when ye shall neither in this mountaine nor at Ierusalem adore the Father c. Wherby he for'told her that the adoration or sacrifice as to both the Temples should shortly cease and be disannulled and that the true sacrifice suddenly to be instituted in room therof should not be tyed to one place or nation but should be offered in all the parts of the world according to the Prophecy of Malachias cap. 10. and instructed her with all concerning this new sacrifice signifying that is should not be a gross and carnall adoration exhibited in and by the flesh and blood of goates sheepe oxen c. as afore but that it should be a clean adoration or sacrifice containing in it selfe spirit grace and life which the others wanted yea that it should be the verity it self wherof all former sacrifices were shadowes and figures only wherefore Christ told her that the new adorers should adore the Father in spirit that is to lay should offer to God a sacrifice giuing grace and life Christ did not inculcate adoration of God in spirit to condemne adoration vnder whatsoeuer sensible rites and ceremonies but to exclude the carnall adoration or sacrifice of the Iews that wanted spirit to giue life to the soul In like manner Christ did intimate adoration of God in verity to condemne the erroneous worship of the Samaritās who albeit they did adore the true God of Israel neuertheless being Schismaticks they did not adore him in verity because they adored him out of the communion and vnity of the faithfull Iews and in the mountaine of Garizim
preparation holy according to the interpretation of the ancient Fathers Furthermore though the faithfull of the new law do succeed in the Couenant established between Abraham and God Rom 9. The words whereof are these I will be God vnto thee and to thy seed after thee Gen. 17. neuertheless there cannot be alleadged any one Scripture-testimony to proue that the children of belieuing Parents be sanctified in vertue of the said Couenant for they are not Abrahams seed and heires in their Mothers wombe or as soon as they be born according to promise but after they be made sons of God by faith * Gal. 3. quicunque enim in Christo baptiz ati estis Christum induist is si autem vos Christi ergo semen Abrahae estis haeredes secuÌ„dum promissionem in Christ Iesus through baptism Gal. 3. Moreouer the Couenant was made on condition that euery man child should haue the foreskin of his flesh circumcised or otherwise cut of from the people of God Gen. 17. in consequence of which it is euident that euen in the old law the Male-sex descending from Abraham by corporall generation were not counted de facto indeed children of the Couenant without circumcision in like manner in the new law no man is Abrahams seed childe of the Couenant and Heir of blessednes according to promise that is not Christs afore by spirituall generation in baptism which is christian circumcision and the condition of promised blessednes Wherefore it is a weake imagination of modern sectaries to think that faithfull and holy Parents bring forth sanctified children Besides Isaac and Rebecca were most renouned for faith and holiness neuertheless not euen Caluinists will dare to say that their son Esau was sanctified in his mothers wombe Sithence the Sacrament of baptism is a requisite absolutly necessary vnto saluation according to the common and ordinary way instituted for the obtaining of it a christian woman conceiuing a child shall doe most prudently and christianly during the tyme of trauail to desire of God by dayly prayers and alms-deeds that the fruit of her womb may not be depriued of baptism and God whose power is not confined to Sacraments and whose mercy is aboue his other ordinary workes can be moued at the piety and deuotion of a belieuing Mother to vse a speciall priuiledge to bring the said child to the kingdom of Heauen though naturall causes doe obstruct the baptism therof howeuer Infants of what condition soeuer dying in their infancy vnbaptized with the guilt only of originall treason against the diuine majesty committed by their first Parent are but banisht the court of Heauen no sentence of sensible punishment passeth against them being their consent as to their own (f) According to S. Bernard cited by S. Tho. q. de malo ar 2. a man burnes in the fire of hell in regard of his own will onely But Originall sin is noe product of our own will will was not giuen to the treason so that their banishment is most milde and fauourable compared with the (g) According to S. Gregory Nazian Ora. 40. young babes which through misfortune are not baptis'd neither enjoy the glory of Heauen nor endure the pains of Hell which S. Austin l. de pec mer. remis c. 16. calleth mitissimam damnationem the mildest damnation and that no man may conceiue that S. Austin so nameth the condition of children that dye without Baptism as if he so named it in comparison of the torments those suffer which are punish'd with euerlasting sensible burnings in regard of their actuall personall sinnes â— 5. con Julia. cap. 8. affirmes expresly that his meaning is that children dying vnbaptised are not afflicted with so grieuous pains as that it were better they had neuer been born but Christ saith of the damned in Hell melius esset si natus non fuisset homo ille wherfore according to Christs own saying it were better neuer to be born then to dwell in Hell and hereby appear's that poena sensus sensible pain is not procured by originall sin and indeed the punishment a man incur's through originall sin is a priuation of beatificall vision onely according to S. Thomas in 2. dis 33. q. 12. ar 2. wherefore wheras S. Austin ser 14. de verbis Apostoli saith that children vnbaptis'd are on the left hand and goe into euerlasting fire doubtles he mean's not that they shall be tormented with the euerlasting burnings of Hell Besides perhaps S. Austin aggrauated the punishment of children vnbaptis'd in heat of dispute with the Pelagians that ascribed vnto them eternall felicity without the kingdom of Heauen Howeuer S. Austin in Enchir. ad Laur. cap. 47. ingeniously confesseth that he neither can nor dare define Qua qualis quanta set poena illa parvulorum sine baptismo morientium and names it onely mitâ—ssimam aut leuissimam poenam And doubtless though children that dye without baptism in as much as they be depriu'd of the clear sight of God suffer something of heauiness neuertheless it is not grieuous vnto them being they know that they are not depriu'd of heauenly blessedness in regard of any personall fault of their's again fince that heauiness or sorrow is not Poena sensus a sensible punishment there can be no outward cause thereof banishment of ill Angells and wicked men that haue by their own voluntary act engaged in a rebellion against God their soueraign lord In regard of the absolute necessary dependence that eternall life hath of baptism Christ out of a fauourable prouidence towards all mankinde so instituted this Sacrament that euen (h) According to Tertull. l. de Baptis c. 16. Lay-people can minister baptism lawfully when the necessity thereof vrgeth and cannot otherwise be supplyed which opinion S. Hierom assertes Dial. 1. adversus Lucif and truly the Apostles Ioan. 4. ministred the baptism of Christ while they were lay-men for they were made Priests at the last supper moreouer this doctrine is asserted as an Article of faith by the Council of Florence in the Decree of Pope Engenius priuate persons of what condition or sex soeuer vnclothed with authority by ordination or iurisdiction can both lawfully and validly exercise the administration therof in the occurrence of vrgent necessity occasioned through the absence of Pastors lawfully called therunto applying the true matter and true forme and employing also an intention conformable to Christ and his Church and albeit that setting aside the case of necessity baptism so administred is vnlawfull as to conscience in him that is the Minister therof neuertheless it is valid as to the essence of the Sacrament circumcision performed by vncircumscised Gentills was counted valid and the same reason makes for the validity of Baptism exercised by vnbaptized persons seeing there is parity between baptisme and circumcision as vnto necessary application But to proceed further as to the excellency of this Sacrament of Christ for so it is named properly and therfore
successoribus corum in officio sacerdotali As God in the old law took of his people to be Priests and Leuits that is constituted superiour and inferiour Ministers for the administring of diuine things in the Temple so in the new law he hath ordained diuers degrees or states of Ministers one more eminent then an other for example Bishops Priests Deacons and other Clergy men to (c) The Apostle saith Rom. 4. Let a man think of us as of the Ministers of Christ and the Dispensers of the Misteries of God that is of the Sacraments From whence the Council of Trent infers that it is in the Churches power to dispose appoint ordaine in the dispensing of Sacrament's what she shall think expedient for the benefit of those which receiue them and the greater reuerence of the same Sacraments so that no alteration be made as to the substance thereof dispense diuine Mysteries that is to say the Sacraments in the Church of Christ as concerning Bishops the scripture maketh mention of them as diuinely instituted Act. 20 rake heed vnto your selues and of all the flock wherof the holy Ghost hath made you Bishops to rule the Church of God and the name Bishop according to the consenting testimonies of all Interpreters and Fathers signifys an Ecclesiasticall person that by common vsage of speech is called a Bishop (d) According to the Apostles doctrine set down Act. 20 Bishops receiue their power of gouernment in Order to the Church from the holy Ghost wherfore they be Pastores Ecclesiae Pastors taken in the proper sense seing that Church-gouernment is proper to them Again according to the same Apostle 1. Timot. 3. 2 Bishop is cloth'd with power of iurisdiction aboue a meer Priest So that according to diuine right a Bishop is aboue a meer Priest as appears by the Council of Trent sess 21. c. 1. and indeed a Bisphop by vertue of his ordination and character hath power to confer the Sacraments of holy Order and Confirmation validly in consequence of which he is by diuine dispensation aboue a meer Priest because both his ordination and character haue institution from Christ nor matters it that a meer Priest by speciall priuiledge may be enabled to confer the Sacrament of Confirmation being his ordination and character gine him no such power which is a Church-gouernour invested with superiority ouer meer Priest's in respect both of ordination and iurisdiction Again the scripture nameth Priests as distinct from Bishops 1. Timoth. 5. against Priests receiue none accusation but vnder two or three witnesses where doubtless the Apostle meaneth Priest's as wanting Episcopall dignity and ordination both because Timothy exercised authority ouer them as also in regard that in the same Chapter he gaue a command to Timothy whom he had ordained a Bishop afore to cherish and feed those Priests for as much as they were vnder his charge and as substitutes administred the Sacraments vnto the faithfull of the Church vnder him which command cannot be meant in order to Bishops since these are not (e) Aerius made no difference between a Bishop and a Priest which errour wickless the first English Heretick espoused and after him Luther and is now an assertion generally taught by sectaries of these dayes near vnto this heresy is the opinion of certain singular schollars who teach that the ordination of a Bishop and a Priest is the same and although S. Hierom assert's that the primitiue Churches were gouerned by common Counsell of Priests neuertheless he neuer assert's parity between a Bishop and a meer Priest as to the power of iurisdictiou which is the matter in debate between catholick's and sectaries howeuer catholick Bishops confer with meer Priests and embrace their Counsels in the gouernment of their seuerall Churches respectiuely but from thence no man ought to infer equality between Bishops and meer Priests as to unrisdiction for a meer Priest cannot ordaine a Priest or confer the Sacrament of confirmation as meer Priests subject to the iurisdiction and committed to the care of an other Bishop Furthermore the scripture mentioneth Deacons 1. Timoth. 3. Deacons must be chast hauing the mistery of saith in pure conscience and the condition of their office doth euidence plainly enough their inferiority and subordination not only to Bishops but also to meer Priests and the Apostle Act. 6. declares also as much Likewise this catholick assertion doth appeare by the ecclesiasticall Hierarchy instituted by diuine ordination * Trid sess 23. can 6. definit esse in Ecclesia catholica Hieâ—â—rchiaÌ„ ordinatione diuina institutam quae constas ex Episcopis Prasbyteris ministris Et can 2. eiusdem sess dicit anathema negantibus esse in Ecclesia catholica prater Sacerdotium alios ordines majores minores per quos veluti per gradus tendatur in Sacerdotium to consist of Bishops Priests and Ministers Trid. sess 23. can 6. which manifest's a reall difference in the offices of each of them Howeuer the scripture sometimes doth call Bishops * Per impositioneÌ„ manuum Presbyterij S. Timoth. 4. Apostolus noÌ„ intelligit nomine presbyterij Officium dignitateÌ„ siue authoritatem presbyteri vel Sacerdotis sed catum vel collegium presbyteroruÌ„ sic tamen vt nomine presbyteroruÌ„ etiam Episcopos includat quod est iuxta consuetudinem scriptura liquet Apostolum ibi locutum fuisse de Episcopis de illis enim presbyteris loquitur quorum ille erat vnus Nam cap. 2. Epis 1. loquens de eadem ordinations Timothei ait per impositionem manuum mearum proinde ipse Paulus erat vnus ex Episcopis qui ordinauerunt Timotheum Deinde iuxta vetorem Ecclesia morem non simplices presbyteri sedsoli Episcopi manus imponebant Episcopo ordipando vt notut S. Chrysost 1. Concil Nicanum lege Lata sanciuit vt Episcopus non nisi à tribus Episcopis consecraretur ideo in ordinations Episcopi plures Episcopi manus imponunt ordinando vero presbytero vnus sufficit Episcopus by the name of Priests promiscuously for example in the Epistle to Titus the Apostle sayes I left Titus in Creet that be should ordaine Priests in euery Citty that is Bishops for so the Apostle in the same Chapter doth interpret his meaning adding after that appointment these words For a Bishop must be without fault vnreprouable where the particle for doth import a coniunction causatiue which doth euidence that the Apostle vnderstood by Priests Bishops But hence no man ought to infer full parity or equallity between a Bishop and a Priest since the distinction of Bishops from and the preeminence aboue Priests is by continuall vsage receiued and preserued in the catholick Church down from the Apostles to the present times And though euery Bishop is a Priest neuertheless euery Priest is not a Bishop as euery Cherubin and Seraphin in the celestiall Hierarchy is an Angell this name being common to all alike but euery
CHVRCH MILITANT THE CONTENTS God hath giuen to his Church on earth the keeping of all truth that we may not be as children wauering carryed about with euery wind of doctrine by diuine institution pastorall functiōs are of necessary and perpetuall vse in the Church vnto teaching christian faith and deciding controuersies pertaining thereto without being liable to errour God hath inuested Church-Gouernours with autority to make laws and ordinances and exacte obediēce vnto them the Church cannot lie hid priuat spirits haue nothing of power to interprete scriptures or to judge matters in debate concerning faith and religion the outward testimony of the Church is the ordinary expedient necessary to the receiuing of christian faith answeres to sundry obiections vrged by sectaries in fauour of a priuat reuealing spirit holy scriptures were neither primarily intended nor primaryly deliuered as supream Judges of controuersies in order to christian faith and religion profoundnes ' of mysteries plenteousnes and shortnes of sentences render the scriptures obscure and intricate to infer the Churches infallibility from the autority of scriptures and scriptutes infallible autority from the infallible testimony of the Church implies no circle of errour faith as to the assent thereof is resolued into the Church and not into the scriptures the four principall marks of the true Church taken joyntly agree with the Roman Church onely which is the one holy catholick and Apostolick Church that neuer deuiated from truth THe Church militant is the grownd and piller of truth 1. Tim. 3. as the foundation of an house supporteth and hindereth it from falling So the Church of God sustaineth and preserueth truth that is the doctrine of christian faith from perishing wherefore whosoeuer desireth to find out truth vnto saluation must seek it in the Church which is the certaine keeper and faithfull Guardian thereof the supream prouidence hauing put therein Some Apostles and some Prophets and some Euangelists and some Pastours and Teachers for the consummation of the Saints for the worke of the ministery and for the edification of the body of Christ vntill we all meet together in the vnity of faith and the knowledg of the son of God vnto a perfect man and vnto the measure of the age of the fulness of Christ that we henceforth be no more children wauering and carryed about with euery wind of doctrine by the wickednesse of men and crastines of Satan whereby they lie in waite to bring vs into errour Ephes 4. where the Apostle plainly asserteth pastorall function together with the office of teaching christian faith to be of necessary and perpetuall vse in the Church for the administring of Sacraments auoiding of errours and the confirming of such as shall wauer in religion and truly it cannot be conceiued as to reason probable that Christ coming into the world to be Gouernour of souls and to make vnto himselfe a glorious Church without spot or wrinckle Ephes 5. should not departing out of the world leaue necessary helps to preserue it in holynes (a) god instituted in the old law Deut. 17. à supream Tribunall consisting of Priests for the deciding of matters in debate in order to his people to the end that if inferiour Iudges should differ in iudgment or deuiate from the truth they might recur to the Council of Priests where one chief Iudge that is the high Priest was appointed to prouounce sentence and all others bound to giue obedience therto the law condemning those of pride which resisted or refused the high Priests decision in matters of controuersie again God so specially assisted the said Council with his spirit of truth that the high Priests sentence was infallible though himselfe might erre as a priuat person Wherefore Christ Mat. 23. commanded the people to doe what the Scribs and Pharisies said in regard they sate in the Chair of Moyses And S. Iohn cap. 11. ascribes not the truth of Caiphas prophesing that Christ ought to die for the safety of that nation vnto his speaking as of himselfe but to his speaking as high Priest of that same yeare which rendered him infallible in speaking in consequence of which seeing that God so directed the high Priest in the old law that he could not speake an vntruth from the Chair of Moyses it follows of necessity that Christ in his own new law of grace so specially assistes the high Priest his grand Vicar and supream head of the Church which he built on his beloued Apostle S. Peter that he cannot tell a lye from the Chair of the same S. Peter the first high Priest of the new law after Christ Wherefore the Churches supream Gouernour that succeds in that Chair cannot erre in his decrees that concerne matters of faith or generall manners notwithstanding that he were as wicked as Caiphas From hence plainly appear's the manifest weaknes of sundry sectaries which will haue the supream Priests sentence no longer to bind then hee pronounces sentence in conformity to the word of God for there is no warrantable authority saue that of the supream Pastours Tribunall which can assure vs of the diuine word for the scripture would not be belieued if it were not warranted from the infallible Chair of S. Peter Moreouer sundry sectaries say vnaduisedly that in the old law the sentence of the high Priests concerned only ciuill matters in debate and not controuersies pertaning to faith and religion for as to this point both the second book of paralipomenon and the 24. Chapter of Exodus giue clear euidence against them Besides God hath not vsed lese care in instituting the christrian Church established in a law of grace then in forming the Synagogue of the Iewes established in a law of bondage wherefore * Deus cum primum instituit Cathedrā Moysis in Deutro promisit omnes singulas eius definitiones fore veritatis infallibilis ideo Aug. l. 4. de doct chris ait Pharisaeos scribas id est Pōtisices Mosaicos iudicantes ex Cathedra Moysis non pot uisse malè definire quamuis mali essent quia ad bene definiendum cogebantur à Deo since this had diuine authority and assistance to interpret and teach the old law of Moyses as likewise to decide all controuersies concerning the Iewish religion Deut. 17. doubtless he hath not prouided in a lesser measure for the Church of Christ in order to teaching and interpreting the new law and determining all matters that might be in debate about christian religion Again Christ being about to leaue this Church in order to his visible presence for as many ages as the world shall endure was as prouident and carefull to preserue it pure from schism and heresy as was Moyses to preserue his when he was to absent himselfe from it for a shorter time but Moyses being to goe vp vnto Mount Sinai and there to abide forty dayes and forty nights onely constituted * Exod. 24. exspectate hic inquit Moyses donec reuertamur ad vos
re shall hind vppon earth shall be bound in Heauen which is meant of ecclesiasticall Censures the greatest of which is excommunication Again Act. 15. when the new christians referred their controuersie concerning circumcision and other ceremonies of the law of Moyses to the Apostles at Ierusalem sentence of iudgment was declared by one accord thus It seemed good to the holy Ghost and to vs to lay no more burthen vpon you then these necessary things c. Wherby it is cleare that the Apostles then the representatiue Church were inuested with authority to make ordinances (c) It appeares plainly by the sacred text Act. Jt seems good to the holy Ghost and to vs to lay no more burden vpon you then these that the Apostles had authority to commande and exact obedience to their ordinances For the particles it seems good to vs to lay no more burden Shew euidently that they were superiours inuested with authority to commande and exact obedience from the people who were bound to obey them But here is obseruable that as to the matter in debate mentioned in the Chapter set down viz. whether the conuerted Gentils were obliged to obserue the law of Moyses S. Peter in that Council cald to determine it was supream Iudge for t' is written that after much dispute Peter rose vp and as head of all spoke first and decided the controuersy in fauour of the said conuerted Gentils deliuering them from the bondage of the old law and all the multitude saith S. Hierom Tom. 2. Epis 89. Augus cap. 2. kept silence and into Peters sentence or definition the Apostles S. Iames and all the Priests past with one accorde and euer since the Popes of Rome as S. Peters lawfull successors haue had precedence and the deciding suffrage in all Councils which are of credit and authoritie in the Church of God and to oblige the faithfull in the obseruation of them for the words It seemed good to vs to lay no more burden vpon you doe signify the authority of superiours to commande inferiours and the obligation of inferiours to obey their superiours Thirdly that the Church is liuing visible and speaking which is the third propriety of this Iudg is clearly expressed Act. 20. take heed to your selues and the flock wherof the holy Ghost hath made you Bishops to rule the Church of god which he hath purchased with his own blood and Again Math. 5. (d) According to S. Aug. trac in 1. epis Ioan. those are blind which cannot fee so great a mountaine and shut their eyes against the clear light put on a candlestick which is the Church of God the Church is stiled a Citty that is set on a mountaine which cannot be bid but no man can conceiue how Bishops can gouerne a Church which they see not or how a Citty set on a high mountaine can lie hid Besids all the Church offices ioynt and seperate do declare it visible liuing ad speaking neither matters it that the Church is known by faith which is of things not seen for the Apostles when they conuersed with Christ vpon earth they both saw and belieued him to be Christ As the Apostles saw Christ to be aman and belieued him to be God soe wee doe see the Church to be a congregation of men outwardly professing the faith of Christ and doe belieue that it is directed by the infallible assistance of the holy Ghost and as it cannot be euinced that a man is inuisible because an inuisible soul gouerneth him soe neither can it be euinced that the Church is inuisible because the supernaturall gifts of the holy Ghost namly faith hope and charitie wherby the Church is gouerned and men made children therof be inuisible From the premises is euidently deducible (e) S. Austin li. 10. de doct christ disputing against such as pretended to the knowledge of holy scriptures by speciall reuelations dissuades euery man from so proud and dangerous a tentation as to presume that he is taught of God and not of men and this caueat he vrgeth by many examples that the priuate spirit which is to say the particular reuealing spirit wherby as many sectaries conceiue euery priuate belieuer is enabled to interpret scriptures and iudge all matters concerning faith and religion hath no good claime to the office of this suprem Iudge beeing neither seen nor heard to speak clearly nor known certainly to be infallible in what it reuealeth to each particular belieuer in priuat for it may prudently be doubted whether it be a good spirit or not since false ministers can transforme themselues into Apostles of Christ and Satan himselfe into an Angel of light 2. Cor. 11. in consequence of which no wise and iudicious man can rely his eternity on such a priuat reuealing spirit Again God according to his ordinary way doth not immediatly himselfe reueale verities of faith to euery one in particular or iudge himselfe between party and party from the begining of the creation down to these times his prouidence hath ordained men to declare his ordinances vnto men appointed men to teach men and constituted men suprem Iudges of men for the determining of all hard matters in debate concerning faith and religion In the law of nature Abraham was made Teacher of men I know speaking of Abraham that he will command his son and family after him that they keepe the way of our lord Gen. 18. In the written law Moyses was constituted to teach the people of God the diuine ordinances and to shew vnto them the way wherein they were to walke and the worke they were to doe Exod. 18. and Deut. 17. the Priests of the Leuits were deputed supreme Iudges of controuersies which might rise about religion also Malac. 2. it is written the Priests lips shall preserue knowledg and they shall seek the law from his mouth In our new law of grace the Apostles were sent into diuers parts of the world to preach christian religion Mar. vltime Act. 8. God appointed Saint Philip to teach the Eunuch of Ethiopia Act. 9. Christ sent Saul to be instructed of Ananias and Act. 10. Cornelius the Centurion was admonished by an Angel to repaire vnto Saint Peter that he might learn of him matters of câ—ristian faith wherfore Saint Paul says Rom. 10. Faith is by heating and hearing by the word of God and how shall they heare without a preacher because ordinarily God teacheth men by men the verities of faith and Gal. 1. the same Apostle doubted not to prefer the doctrine he preached before the doctrine of an Angel from Heauen that should preach otherwise and truly if it were lawfull for euery man to follow and adhere to his own priuate spirit there would rise almost as many contrary religions as there are men liuing vpon the earth and consequently in room of that peace that Christ hath promised to the Church nothing but disorder and confusion would happen wherfore both in the old and new law this
inquit haereses obortae sunt aut nata sūt schismata quam quod Sacerdoti Dei non obtemperatur nec vnus in Ecclesia ad tē pus Sacerdos Iudex vice Christi cogitatur teaching peruerse things to draw disciples after them wherby is euidenced that no priuat man is an infallible interpreter of holy scriptures neither can know certainly that scriptures are the word of God laying aside the Churches authority For example credence is not giuen to the canon or caralogue of scriptures because of scripture testimony which no where attestes that catalogue in so much that Luther and Caluin down from the begining of their defection to the departure out of the world contended about the number of canonicall scriptures and their adherents of these dayes respectiuely continue in the pursuance of the same dispute Moreouer there is greater reason that the christian faith should rely rather on the Church which * S. Cypri in trac de vnitate Ecclesiae adulterari inquit nō potest sponsae Christi incorrupta est pudicae is an infallible ground and piller of truth then of sole scriptures which are liable to mutations corruptions and false interpretations howeuer scriptures cōsidered in themselues precisely do chaleng equall authority with the Church the same diuine spirit that directeth the tongues of the supream pastours in speaking (o) God by his absolute and extrrordinary power can himselfe alone or by an Angel instruct men and reueale matters of faith and christian religion without the ministery of the Church And doubtless the Apostles had noe other master but God himselfe as to sundry mysteries of christian faith and Christ himselfe confesseth that S. Peter came to the knowledge of his diuine nature by reuelation from God the Father Caro Sanguic non reuelauit tibi sed Pater meus guided the pennes of the Apostles and Euangelists in writing and as the Church beareth witnesse of the scriptures infallible doctrine so the scriptures do witness the Churches infalible authority yet so as that faith in order to its acte of assent is resolued into the Church and not into the scriptures for noe man can prudently belieue any scripture to be the word of God if the Church that is the ground and piller of truth should not declare it for such howeuer Catholicks who doe infer the Churches infallibility from the testimony of scripture and the authority of scripture from the testimony of the Church are noe more guilty of committing (p) According to Euclide a mathematicall circle taken in the proper sense is the passing of one and the same line from and the repassing vnto the same point and by the same way a circle of errour then are Philosophers that assert mutuall causalities or doe argue from a cause its proper effect and from an effect its proper cause for example from the rising of the sun is proued the existence of the day and againe the existence of the day proueth the risiing of the sun wherin there is noe circle of errour which properly consisteth in the coming again of the same thing vnto the same thing from whence it came and by the same way it came but the way of one cause is not the way of an other cause nor the way of an effect is the way of the cause wherof it is the effect in like manner the way of the Church which is a cleare speaking Iudge is not the way of the scriptures which consiste in mute elements of characters and although we belieue that the Church is an infallible proposer of all matters pertaining to faith because of the scripture testimony neuertheless if the scriptures had borne noe witness therof there is euidence of credibility enough to induce vs prudently to belieue the Churches infallibility which euen before the writing of scriptures was beliued neither do we recur to scriptures to proue it (q) In disputs or conferences with such as deny holy scriptures motiues of credibility haue weight with them and that one which S. Austin vseth l. con Epis Faus cap. 4. seems of greattest moment Many things saith he keepe me fast in the bosom of the Catholick Church for example the vnanimous accord of people and nations authority confirmed by miracles .... by antiquity strengthned and the succession of Bishops dovvn from S. Peter the Apostle to vvhom our lord committed the feeding of his sheepe vnto the present Episcopacy but when we haue to doe with such as admit them and euen then we doe not alledge scriptures as the formall cause the Churches infallibility is known by for that is diuine reuelation but as witness of it only for we doe not belieue precisely that the Church is infallible because the scripturs do say it but in regard of many other motiues which do moue vs to giue our assent thereto neither was the church intended for the vse of the scriptures but scriptures for the vse of the Church besides no man without manifesting extream weakness can except against the mutuall testimony that Christ and S. Iohn Baptist gaue of one another or against the disciples of both who belieued their masters to be such as their masters reciprocally had declared theselues to bee The principall marks or tokens of the true Church * Quatuor illa signa dilucide constant ex sacra scriptura ex symbolis Apostolorum Nicae S. Athanasij expressè habentur in sym Constātinop cuius Patres voce apostolicam diuinitus addiderunt are foure set douwn in that Article of christian faith viz I belieue one holy catholick and apostolick Church Albeit that the true Church consisteth of many members yet it is but one body 1. Cor. 12. of Christ in vnity of faith and baptism One lord one faith one baptism Ep. 4. nor can Christ be an author of diuision that is a God of vnion Likwise it is holy for as much as it is the body of Christ that is the fountain of all holyness and enioyes a sacrifice and Sacraments which confer sanctity neither matters it that sundry members of his body are guilty of mortall transgressions For as such as profess any art are counted artificers though they doe not act according to the principalls or rules there-of so the said members in regard they put on Christ (r) According to S. Austin in psal 85. if all christians and true belieuers are baptized in Christ they haue put on Christ as the Apostle reacheth Gal. 3. and if they be made members of his body and say they are not holy they do an iniury to the head whose members are holy by Baptism and become the chosen people of God by faith are called holy although they doe not obserue the ordinances and lawes of either For example 1. Cor. 1. the Corinthians are said to be sanctified in Christ IESVS and holy neuertheless there were among them both the naturall and carnall men The true Church militant is (ſ) According to the Euangelist
can sacro-sancta the Apostolicall sea did not receiue supremacy and preeminence from the Apostles but from our Sauiour himselfe and indeed Christ founded and built his Church vpon S. Peter Mat. 16. Thou art Peter and on this rock I vvill build my Church .... and J vvill giue vnto the the keys of the kingdome of heauen Again Christ praid especially for S. Peter and after his resurrection appointed him to feed all his sheepe and lambs Moreouer S. Peter as head and Prince of the other Apostles called the first Councill which was celebrated between the Ascention and Pentecost And in the second Council mentioned act 15. spoke first and decided the matter in debate Bishop of Rome as lawfull successour of S. Peter in suprem authority and there is not any except the Roman Church that hath published and planted the one holy apostolicall faith from the rising of the sun to the goeing down therof which denoteth its vniuersality an order to place there is not any except the Roman Church that can rockon pastours and Teachers in a continuall line of succession down from S. Peter to the present times which sheweth its vniuersality in order to time there is not any Church-Gouernour saue the Bishop of Rome to whose definitiue sentence of iudgment (x) S. Anaclete Epis 1. commanded that euery hard question should be referd to the sea Apostolick because saith he the Apostles so appointed by speciall command from Christ Wherefore Tertullian calleth the Pope king of the world and stiles Rome the Chief and Apostolicall seat whether saith he wee ought to recur in all doubtfull matters relating to faith Besids S. Austin that was a member of the African Church Epis 9. addressing himselfe to Pope Innocent in order to the Pelagians whom he impugned writeth thus ... that errour and impiety of the Pelagians the authority of the sea apostolick must anathematize Again the Council of Alexandria cals Pope Felix prophanarum haresium depositor the deposer of prophan heresies hard controuersies of faith haue been referred in all ages Furthermore it is essentiall to the true Church to begett children in Iesus-Christ through the Gospell 1. Cor. 4 that is to say to bring whole countries out of darkness of infidelity into the maruelous light of Christian faith which not any except the Roman Church hath performed Sectaries like partriges haue gathered children * Ieremiae cap. 17. perdix fouet seu congregat quae non peperit Vnde S. Aug. assimilat haereticos perdici which they haue not brought forth but the Roman Church hath begotten vnto Christ a world of children both in the primatiue times for the first 500. yeares and since For Germans Bauarians Vandals Polans Sweds Danes Noruegians Hungarians Normans English and sundry other Countryes since the yeare 600. were begotten in Iesus-Christ through the Gospell by Priests and Bishops of the Roman Church as plainly appears by the ancient and modern histories written of each people respectiuely And as touching our country of Englād that embraced the catholick faith through the preaching of S. Austin a Priest and Bishop of the Roman Church after its conuersion which happened in the reign of S. Ethelbert for near a thousand yeares continued obedient to the Bishop of Rome and constant in the profession of the catholick religion as do euidence our ancient Cronicles laws common laws ordinances Records foundations of Bishopricks Cathedrall Churches vniuersities colleges and hospitalls which remain monuments of these dayes to beare clear witnes of catholick religion wherfore it is a wonder how English Magistrats come to look with so enuious an eye vpon their catholick subiects as to persecute them for conforming their conscience to the full and constant profession of all their christian progenitours CHAR. XX. OF TRADITIONS THE CONTENTS Down from the Apostles to these times the true Church of God hath been directed and gouernd by the written and vnwritten word as by laws and customs doctrines necessary to saluation which the Apostles receiued either from the mouth of Christ or from the holy Ghost by inspiration were deliuered to the faithfull of those dayes partly in written and partly in vnritten traditions if the Churches authority and vnwritten traditions were laid a side scriptures would haue nothing of waight with them vnto euincing christian religion Answeres vnto seuerall obiections propounded against the Churches traditions TRaditions are vnwrtten doctrines deliuered by the mouth of Christ or his Apostles and committed vnto the keeping of the Church (a) 1. Cor. 11. as I haue deliuered vnto you saith S. Paul keep my precepts From this sacred Text Theophilact infers that both S. Paul and the other Apostles deliuered many things which they did not set down in writing called traditions not because they are not at all written but in regard there is no express mention thereof in the holy scriptures for t is certaine that the traditions receiued from the Apostles and deliuered as it were from hand to hand for sundry ages are now written as precepts of faith and generall manners necessary vnto saluation Though the whole scripture is giuen by inspiration of God and is profitable to teach to conuince to correct and to instruct in iustice 2. Tim. 3. Yet it is not the same thing to be a profitable guide in the way of iustce and saluation and to be the sole expedient necessary therunto for a head is both profitable and necessary to preserue a man aliue neuertheless it alone without the society and ministery of the body is not sufficient enough to continue him aliue likewise the Sacrament of Eucharist conduceth to the purchase of eternall blessedness yet cannot effect it without the help of baptism and faith and the Chapter set down expresly asserteth that euen the old scriptures instruct to saluation and notwithstanding the Apostle requireth of Timothy perseuerance in the doctrines which he had heard of him besides what he had learned from them wherin he had been versed from (b) By the particles from his infancy euidently appeares that the Apostle spoke of these scriptures which Timothy had learned in his youth that is he meant the old testament being the new scriptures were not written when Timothy was a youth Wherefore when the Apostle writ vnto him that all scripture is profitable c. he could not vnderstand the whole body thereof as some sectaries vnaduisedly interprete him translating whole for all And indeed when the Apostle writ that Epistle to Timothy the whole body of scripture was not composed S. Iohn had not then put forth his Gosple and his Apocallps he writ after the death of S. Paul him infancy again albeit the scriptures be a great light neuertheless they doe not giue light to all a en within the house of God whose written doctrines they are vnless they be put vpon the candlestick of the Churches definitions and vnwritten traditions for setting these aside scriptures are but a light shining in a dark place 2.
Pet. 10. in order to many diuine ordinances in regard they doe not shew plainly clearly and euidently all the mysterious precepts of Christian faith that require necessary obseruance wherefore it is an extream weakness to infer from the light of the written a negation of light in the vnwritten word of God as to instruction in iustice and saluation and indeed down from the begining of the Church christian religion hath in all times * Trid sess 4. cap. 1. declarat veritatem disciplinä Ecclesiae contineri in libris scriptis sine scripto traditionibus qua ex ipsius Christi ore ab Apostolic acceptae aut ab ipsis Apostolis Spiritu sancto dictāte quasi per manus traditae ad nos vsque peruenerūt huiusmodi traditionū contemptoros anathemati subiecit Sectarij vero communiter reijciuns eruditiones apostolicas affirmantes omnia qua sine dispendio sulutis possunt ignorari apertè contineri in scripturis been directed and gouerned by both of the said lights that is by the written and vnwritten word as by laws and customs which kind of gouerment is common alike to euery common wealth instituted aright That this double light (c) According to S. Irenaens p. 3. con haer c. 3. 4. Tertull. l. de coro militum cap. 3. S. Basil l. ad Amphilochium de Spiritu sancto cap. 29. S. Austin Epis ad Janua there is full parity between traditions ad scriptures warrantable authority being common alike to the one and the other Wherefore S. Chrys hom 4. in 2. ad Thess saith Est traditio nihil quaras amplius T' is tradition seeke no further of written and vnwritten Traditions is of necessary and perpetuall vse in the Church appeareth by the second Epistie to the Thesalonians where S. Paul enioyneth the keeping of both saying stand fast keepe the Traditions which you haue been taught either by word or our Epistle All the doctrines necessary to saluation which the Apostles receiued either from the mouth of Iesus-Christ or by inspiration of the holy Ghost they deliuered to the faithfull of those dayes partly in written and partly in vnwritten traditions which down from the primatiue Church to the present times haue passed as from hand to hand in a continuall line of priestly succession Moreouer it appeareth clearly by the second Chapter of S. Iohns canonicall Epistle that the Apostles thought it not expedient to set forth in writing all matters of christian religion necessary to saluation for he expresly saith although I had many things to write vnto you yet would I not write with paper and inck for I trust to come vnto you and speak mouth to mouth that your ioy may bee full which he repeateth in the end of his third canonicall Epistle saying I haue many things to write but I will not with ynck and pen write vnto thee and doubtless as Christ when he said to his Disciples Io. 16. I haue yet many things to say vnto you but ye cannot beare them now meant of many mysteries of faith distinct from those he had already taught them so S. Iohns meaning was that he had other doctrines of christian faith or manners to deliuer by word of mouth then those he had written with ynck and pen and truly the particles That your ioy may be full doe import as much being meant of spirituall ioy such as faithfull christians commonly receiue when they are instructed in things pertaining to iustice and saluation and it is not in reason probable that S. Iohn should vnderstand temperall ioy in order to wordly aduantages the intent of his Epistle being to stir vp a Mother and her son vnto a vertuous life in Iesus-Christ neither is it as to reason credible that so many things which S. Iohn purposely omitted to write were set down in writing either by himself afterward or by the other Apostles afore there being no scripture testimony wheron to ground those coniectures inuented meerly by the aduersaries of vnwritten traditions Besids it is plainly euident that sundry vnwritten doctrines of christian religion which are not contained expresly in any part of the new or old Testament are of necessary credence For example we must belieue with diuine faith the receiued catalogue or canon of both Testaments to be the true and vncorrupted word of God For otherwise those holy writings would haue nothing of weight with vs as theron to relie our saluation notwithstanding not any part of either Testament expresseth the receiued catalogue or canon for example we must belieue that the true sense of the written letter is a necessary and essentiall requisit to faith because in the sense that giueth life and not in the letter that bringeth death the true word of God consists but the true sense of the written letter that is to say how (d) The Caluinists in a publick disputation with the Antytrinitarians in the presence of Iohn the second elected king of Hungary engag'd to proue by scripture the mystery of the B. Trinity but failing in their engagement the king of a Caluinist became an Anti-trinitarian the written letter ought to be taken whether in a proper or figuratiue signification is not known but by the interpretation and tradition of the Church Again we must belieue that in one God there is a Trinity of diuine persons which be really distinct one from an other and no more yet not any writing of the Apostles or Euangelists (e) According to S. Chrys hom 4. operum imperf as in Heauen so in scripture God lies hid vnseen Wherefore as all men behold this corporall Heauen and not God that dwels within it so though many read the holy scriptures neuertheless they perceiue not the God of truth that lies hid in the inward seuse thereof expresly assertes a reall distinction or excludeth expresly a quaternity of persons and truly though S. Iohn saith in his canonicall Epistle cap. 4. that there be three which beare testimony in Heauen the Father the word and the holy Ghost neuertheless he doth not say expresly * Simplex affirmatio ternarij in aliquo non excludit vel negat ibi esse aliquod quartum cū in quaternario includatur ternarium qui asserit esse tres vbi sun◠quatuor non falsum dicit three only or that these three are really distinct one from an other for he addeth these three are one in so much that the great Sabellian heretick Praxeas taught that God was but one sole person that carried three distinct names in order to three seuerall effects naming him Father in as much as he createth all things son because be was borne of the Virgin Mary inuested with human nature and holy Ghost in regard he sanctifieth all creatures Wherfore if the Apostles had not deliuer'd to the faithfull of those days by word of mouth a reall distinction in God as to personality and a reall identity as to nature and substance and the Church
likwise defined that vnwritten Tradition the faithfull of these dayes might haue been * S. Basil dicit Sabellianismum esse queÌ„dam Iudaismum Sabellius voro qui omnibus hareticis impietate antecelluit eirca annum 260. haresim Trinitatis propagauit quod Prâ—xeas omniuÌ„ primus humo Romanae inuexit proximè accessit ad errorem Iudaeorum Sabellians or Iewes as for any clear speaking scripture to hinder them Again we belieue that the holy Ghost is not the son of God nor that his procession is generation taken in the proper sense notwithstanding without tradition and interpretation of the holy Church it cannot be proued sufficiently that is to say by express scripture-testimony nor matters it that the Euangelists doe name the second person of the blessed Trinity the only begotten son for hence it follows not by necessary consequence that the holy Ghost is no son for Salomon is styled the only begotten son Prouerb 4. Howeuer it plainly appeareth by the first booke of Paralipomenon or cronicles that he had many brothers yet he was named the only begotten son in regard he was beloued as if he had been the only begotten We must belieue that such (f) The Council of Nice hath defined that such as are baptized by hereticks must not be rebaptized And in regard the Donatists impugned this assertion which is grounded vpon tradition and the Churches definition they were counted hereticks and S. Aust I. de vtilitate credendi cap. 22. expresly affirms that the said assertion is not contained in any express scripture and indeed practice and tradition of the Church only was obiected against S. Cypri that asserted rebaptizing of such as were baptized by hereticks as appeares by his own Epistle ad Iubaian 74. ad Pompeium he conceiuing that he had scripture authority on his side left the Churches tradition and practice yet S. Austin in sundry places of his writings excuseth him from heresie because he was not obstinate in defending of his opinion neither did he break vnion with the Church Besid that controuersy rose before any generall Council defined validity of baptism conferred by Hereticks as are baptized by hereticks ought not to be baptized again wee must belieue that we are bound to keepe holy our lords day which is sunday and we must belieue that there is a necessary obligation to receiue the Apostles Creed yet for as much as none of all these doctrines be contained expresly in or can be deduced out of the holy scriptures by immodiate necessary and euident consequences they would haue nothing of weight with vs in the conuincing of our vnderstanding if the tradition and definition of the Church were laid a side Moreouer the Lutherans and Caluinists in regard they reject Church tradition adhering to the meer letter of scripture and their own interpretations thereof cannot as yet after frequent disputes euince against the Anabaptists that the SacrameÌ„t of Baptism ought to be administred vnto infants where they alledge the words of Christ set down Math. 19. suffer little children and forbid them not to come to me for of such is the kingdom of Heauen as also the practice of the Apostles that baptized whole housholds Act. 19. it is plainly euident that from neither of these testimonies they can as much as deduce by any necessary consequence what they assert as a doctrine of their faith namely that baptism ought to be applied to young children that want the vse of reason especially supposing (g) Caluin l. 4. insti c. 16. and the whole sect of Lutherans though they denyed baptism to be a requisit necessary to the saluation of children neuertheless in their conferences with Anabaptists ingeniously confessed that baptism might lawfully and indeed ought to be ministred vnto children what Lutherans and Caluinists hold as an other article of their reformed religion viz. that baptism is not absolutly necessary to saluation for as to the first testimony though by litle children Christ meant not such only as can goe and speake but also infants sucking their Mothers breasts neuertheless the words of Christ declare them only capable of blessedness without mentioning baptism at all Since then Lutherans and Caluinists doe teach that baptism is not an expedient absolutly necessary to blessedness they can infer nothing of moment and efficacy from these words of Christ to conuince the Anabaptists because the blessedness that is to say the kingdom of Heauen whereof Infants are declared capable may be obtained without baptisin according to Lutherans Caluinists and Anabaptists yet for as much as catholick faith teacheth absolute necessity of baptism out of S. Iohn Cap. 3. that except a man be borne againe of water he cannot enter into the kingdom of Heauen Catholicks can by a clear inference from the said words of Christ proue that Baptism ought euen of necessity to be administred to children because Christs words declare theÌ„ capable of the kingdom of Heauen and consequently of baptism that being an expedient absolutly necessary vnto the obtaining of it whosoeuer is capable of any end is likwise capable of the expedient or medium which is of absolute necessity in order to the purchasing of it As touching the latter scripture testimony though it containes a most pregnant coniecture or presumption that the Apostles when they baptized whole families baptised children with all neuertheless it is not sufficient enough to the grounding of an euident and necessary consequence vnto prouing that de facto they did so because experience sheweth that many whole housholds haue no children at all Wherefore it is cleare that neither of the scripture testimonyes do proue effectually the baptism of Infants laying aside the tradition and definition of the Church And truly Lutherans and Caluinists haue only meer coniectures and remote inferences drawn from the interpretation of their own priuat spirits which is the Mother of heresies to euince the foundamentall and essentiall doctrines of their reformed religion namly that faith alone iustifieth that there are but two Sacraments that no addresses of intercession ought to be made vnto Saints or prayers offered for the benefit of soules departed c. and it is a foundamentall article of Caluinism that the Sacrament of the Eucharist signifieth only the body of Christ being a meer figure thereof contrary wise it is a foundamentall article of Lutherans that the body of Christ is really contained in the Sacrament together with the substance of bread and though both Caluinists and Lutherans teach that the scriptures speake and propounde clearly doctrines of faith howeuer they haue not as yet reconciled that controuersy which notwithstanding the many conferences and disputes held about it continueth in debate Caluinists impute to the Lutherans an heresie or errour in faith for admitting and the Lutherans ascribe heresie vnto the Caluinists for denying the reall presence of Christs body and bloud in the Eucharist whereby appeareth plainly the necessity of Church tradition and interpretation for the deciding all hard
controuersies in debate for as much as they relate to faith Furthermore God who is not an accepter of persons Rom. 15. who is not God of men only but of women also and who desireth to saue all of each sex doubtless instituted a remedy against originall sin in fauour of men and women for as much as the expiation thereof is absolutely necessary vnto saluation wherfore in regard circumcision was the remedy proper to men and could not be applied to women some other expedient was ordained for their cure and although no express mention thereof be made in any part of the old Testament neuertheless that God instituted a remedy for the deliuerance of women * Quod qualeue fuerit illud remedium à Deo institutum ad subueniēdum faeminis quae nascebantur in peccato originali nullibi explicatur in sacris litteris nec porest deduci ex illis from the guilt of originall sin the Iews belieued as an article of faith necessary to saluation and indeed so it was as appeareth from the necessity of it and from the prouidence God hath ouer both men and women and truly to auerre that God was defectiue then in necessary requisits to the saluation of women is a manifest blasphemy wherby it is clear that euen the Iews in the old law held vnwritten besides written tradition as necessary vnto saluation neither is the said unwritten tradition preiudiced by the reply of some sectaries saying that the oblation of women in the Temple according to the law of Moyses did free them of originall sin For that legall offring was common alike to women and men and Christ was both circumcised and offered in the Temple nor by recurring for this deliuerance vnto the circumcision of Parents there being not any passage in the whole Testament of the old law that carrieth the least sound that way or that hath relation to the deliuerance of women from originall sin in vertu of their parents circumcision besides S. Austin and other ancient Fathers expresly teach that baptism is to Christians as circumcision was to the Iewes but no Christian sectary will say that women are sanctified and consecrated to God through their parents baptism for if it were enough for the purging out of originall sin to baptise the male there would be no need at all to baptise the female sex hereby it is clear again that the Iews of the old law allowed and professed vnwritten besides written traditions as necessary to saluation From the premises appeareth that the word of God taken precisely comprehendeth both vnwritten and written traditions in consequence of which vnwritten traditions are not additions to the word of God they being a part therof Wherfore neither Moyses Deut. 4. saying to the people of Israel Ye shall adde nothing to the word which I speake to you neither shall ye take ought from it Nor S. Paul Gal. 1. saying to the Galatians though that we or an Angel from Heauen preach vnto you (h) According to S. Austin tom 7. con liter petiliani l. 3. cap. 6. and tom 9. trac 98. in Io. the particle praeterquam besids in the cited Text imports the particle contra against or contrary so that the meaning is that nothing must be preached against or contrary to the holy scripture And truly this explication appears euidently by the Apostles arguing against those that asserted Iudaism to be consistent with christianism which assertion because it was contrary to the law of Christ the Apostle added the curse set down in the same sentence of the Text. Moreouer the Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the Latin Interpreter translateth praeterquam is vsed by the Apostle for contra not only in the Epistle alledged ad Gal. but also Rom. 4. besids what we haue preached vnto you let him be accursed condemne vnwritten traditions as sectaries do calumniate the Catholick Church besides sectaries very vnhandsomly and weakly do infer from these two scripture testimonies that no doctrines of faith ought to be receiued saue such as be contained expresly in or by euident consequence deduced from the written word of God for neither of both doe mention the written word of God The word says Moyses which I speake vnto you and that we haue preached vnto you says the Apostle but if it were granted vnto them what they cannot proue viz that Moyses then spoke what he had written afore notwithstanding they could not ouerthrow therby vnwritten traditions vnless they could proue which they can neuer doe that they be additions destructiue of or contrary to the written word of God for such additions only he meant and excluded by the cited scriptures and indeed if S. Paul had meant otherwise he should haue cursed S. Iohn the Euangelist that many yeares after his martyrdome writ reuelations which S. Paul had not preached to the Galatians likwise the Anathema had touched S. Paul himselfe that deliuered sundry passages in the acts of the Apostles which happened after his preaching to the Galatians Howeuer catholicks doe not deny but that traditions which are the vnwritten word be contained implicitly in the written word of God that is to say as in a generall principle from whence they are deducible and the whole word of God is contained in scriptutes yea in this sole Article of the Apostles Creed I belieue in the holy Catholick Church in as much as all the matters pertaining to faith and generall manners and not clearly expressed in holy scriptures are contained expresly in the doctrine of the Church which the scriptures commend vnto vs as infallible and indeed the whole word of God is expounded vnto vs in Christs command Math. 18. If he refuse to heare the Church let him be vnto thee as an heathen man and publican in regard wherof ancient Fathers do auerre all doctrines of faith to be contained in scriptures that is as in a generall principle from whence they can be deduced CHAR. XXJ. OF THE CHVRCH TRIVMPHANT THE CONTENTS Souls that remoue out of their earthly habitations cleansd from all vncleanes are instantly translated into Heauen the clear sight of God wherein consisteth heauenly beatitude is not deferd till the generall Resurrection though the office of mediation aduocation and intercession is proper to Christ alone as to the noblest manner therof neuertheless according to the Catholick Church all the Saints mediate and intercede in the sight of God for the faithfull on earth in subordination to Christ the Church of god does not nor neuer did teach that the faithfull on earth ought to mediate and intercede for the blessed in Heauen S. Paul did not mediate or intercede for Onesiphorus that he might obtaine mercy after his soule was beatifyed the ancient Liturgies of the Church approue not of prayers vnto helping of the blessed THe Church triumphant is a holy Congregation of blessed Saints reigning with Iesus-Christ innocēt souls not liable to any guilt of sin as soon (a) 2. Cor. 5. we know
deadly schism caused by themselues that departed from and not by Catholicks that abided in her In euery ciuill state such as dissobey not such as obey authority such as abrogate not such as conserue the ancient lawes and ordinances such as reject not such as keep the setled customes therof bear the infimous brand to all posterity of being the men that rent and diuided the common wealth but Protestants haue dissobeyed not obeyed abrogated not preserued reiected not obserued the authority lawes and Customes of the Roman Church hauing by their own power only vnder a specious colour of reformation introduced nouell doctrines lawes and rites contrary to the vsage and practice therof wherfore they of necessity bear the guilt of deadly schism and not Catholicks that haue altered nothing Besides Protestants went out of the Roman Church without cause for at the time of their departure the Roman Church retained all requisits necessary vnto saluation for then was there no Christian Church vpon earth Seperated from her so that when the Protestants reformation begun the Roman Church or none was the true Church of God in consequence of which their departure was without cause * Aug. l. 3. de baptis con Donat. c. 2. in fine ait si Ecclesia Romanae sit verae Dei Ecclesia in qua salus haberi potest non habent Donatista sua pracisionis aliquam defonsionem sed exeundo communionem Ecclesiae relinquâ—â—do in quae poteraÌ„t saluari irrucrunt in sacrilegium schismatis For whosoeuer goeth out from a Church wherin he might attaine to saluation goes out without cause and commits sacriledge of damnable schism as the great Doctour S. Austin teacheth in his third book of baptism against the Donatists Moreouer this asserted truth appeares euidently by the foundamentall doctrines of Protestant Religion which are as opposite to the faith of the Roman Church as the ends of a Diameter are ouerwhart and cross For example Protestants commonly teach that good works proceeding from diuine grace can neither iustify nor merit saluation these being prerogatiues of faith only in regard wherof it beares the name of iustifying faith but all ancient and modern Pastors and Doctours of the Roman Church assert that good workes exercised in and by diuine grace doe bring vnto iustification of life and that they are in order to merit causes of euerlasting saluation as wicked workes in order to demerit are causes of perpetuall damnation Protestants commonly teach that the sacrifice of Mass wherin Catholick Priests offer the body and blood of Christ for the liuing and dead is a blasphemous tale and a daÌ„gerous deuise Protestants coÌ„monly teach that confirmation Penance Order Extream-vnction and Matrimony want requisits necessary to an Euangelicall Sacrament Protestants commonly teach that the doctrines of Purgatory Indulgences religious veneration of holy Reliks pertaining vnto and inuocation of Saints are idle fancies and trifles crept into the Church without warrantable authority of scripture testimony Protestants commonly teach sundry other doctrines as foundamentall requisits to their religion clean contrary to the faith of the Roman Church as is manifestly demonstrated in the Characters concerning the outward Sacrifice of Masse Confirmation Penance Order Extrem-vnction Matrimony Purgatory Indulgences and Adoration From the premises is inferred that the Protestant Reformation cannot borrow of the Roman Church visible existence together with continuall succession of Pastors vnto perpetuating that Church in foundamentall Articles of faith vnto excusing from schism Howeuer it cannot be denyed but that Protestants can shew clearly that the whole body of doctrines foundamentall to Protestanism hath been asserted by sundry learned men that liu'd in sundry ages respectiuely long before their reformation began namly Simon Magus taught that faith alone was an expedient sufficient vnto saluation as witnesseth S. Irenaeus and rejected good works as vnnecessary therto as doth attest Clemens Romanus Manichaeus despised the Sacrifice of Masse spoiling Christs Church of all outward sacrifice as witnesses S. Austin Nouatus impugned the Sacraments of Confirmation Eucharist Extrem-vnction and Matrimony as S. Cyprian affirmeth Vigilantius detested the inuocation of Saints and the veneration of their Reliques and likewise single life of Priests as S. Hierom relateth Iulian the Apostat had in detestation the cross of Christ and demolished his statue as Eusebius writeth Aerius condemned prayers and sacrifices offered for the souls departed as S. Austin and S. Epiphanius auerre But that which is exacted of the Protestants is to shew from the first age for 1500. yeares a setled company of Christians and the place country town or village where they liued that taught and preached the whole body of their foundamentall doctrines it is not enough to produce the example of such as at different tymes and in different places agreed with them in two or three of their Articles for that is not sufficient vnto constituting a society of true belieuers because so Turkes and Iewes might be lifted for Protestants these agreeing with them as to sundry Articles namely they deny the Popes supremacy transubstantiation inuocation of Saints and the sacrifice of the Masse Again the fore named sectaries themselues were destitute of visible existence and perpetuall succession and consequently could not deriue either of both vnto the Protestant Church Besides Simon Magus Manichaeus Nouatus Vigilantius c. bear the infamous brand of being condemned Hereticks before the ProtestaÌ„ts reformation begun Howeuer some Protestants there be that endeuour to proue their visible existeÌ„ce in a long line of succession from the Albigenses but vnaduisedly first because this seed of sectaries knowes not to deriue the Genealogy of their own Religion down from the Apostles which is the question in debate wherin satisfaction is expected secondly the Albigenses are condemned Hereticks that taught doctrine impious and blasphemous for example they asserted a good and an euill God denyed originall sin reiected baptism and impugned the resurrection of bodyes By the premises plainly appeareth that Mark Antony de Dominis Bishop of Spalatto his distinction between foundamentall and not foundamentall Articles of faith carrieth nothing of weight with it t' is like a specious building that wantes a good foundation to support it And truly it is as impossible an enterprise to proue the visible existence and perpetuall succession of Protestant Pastours from the Roman Church as it is for Caluinists to shew that the true Church of God laid hid for sundry ages inuisible without perishing which is impossible also for the markes of a liu'd Church are professing of faith preaching of the diuine word instructing of the illiterate and administring of the Sacraments which functions can noe more be executed in a Church that is inuisible then in a Church that is perished FINIS Laus Deo eiusque Matri Sanctissimae omnibus Sanctis Omnia Sanctae Romanae Ecclesiae subiecta sunt
sacrifice vnder the forms of bread and wine wherin consist's the similitude of Melchisedechs sacrifice Again to deny that Christ instituted and appointed Priest's as his substitutes to offer euen to the end of the world the sacrifice that himselfe celebrated at his last supper were to deny Christ to be a Priest for euer there being no other meanes to establish his eternall Priesthood then by the sacrifice of Priest's instituted by and substituted vnder him Priesthood being but a power or faculty * Hebrae 5. omnis Sacerdos Pontisex est institutus vt offerat dona sacrificia to offer sacrifice which Christ sitting at the right hand of his diuine Father cannot do in his own person sacrifice taken in the proper sense for an outward visible act of supream worship as of necessity it must be taken wherby plainly followeth that whosoeuer does take away Christ his power to sacrifice does destroy his Priesthood also or render it vnprofitable and vseless and to allow Christ improper spirituall and metaphoricall sacrifice only is not enough to make good his Priesthood as to the order of Melchisedech who offered outward sensible sacrifice of bread and wine Neither can Christ in respect of spirituall sacrifice only be counted more a Priest then euery faithfull man or woman that offereth to God contrition of a penitent heart which is an insensible spirituall sacrifice Psalmo 50. Furthermore Melchisedech in meeting Abraham as he returned from the victory ouer the kings and blessing him is a mysterious representation of Christ who meeteth and blesseth his faithfull seruants returning to their Country of Paradise whence their first parent Adam was eiected with the spoiles of the deuill that eiected him lastly Melchisedeck in taking (e) Abraham payd Tithes to Melchisedech as a duty or homage and not for his own person onely but euen for Leui then vnborn and consequently for the whole Priesthood of Leui's stock acknowledging thereby Melchisedech to be Priest and his superior and of all the leuiticall order payment of tithes is a naturall duty which is done to Priests that thereby they may receiue both honour and liuelihood Iacob vowed to pay tithes Gen 28. Moses appointed them Leuit. 27. num 18. and the ancient Fathers proue them to be due to the Church Pastours Namely S. Cyprian Epis 66. S. Hierom. Epis 1 7. S. Austin ser 1 â—â— de Tempore tithe of Abraham is a type of Christ also who can in equity exact as tithe seruice and obedience of all reasonable creatures whom he hath deliuered out of captiuity by the merit of his death and passion CHAR. IV. OF SACRAMENTS THE CONTENTS The Sacraments of the new law by diuine institution are enabled to produce inward grace vnto iustification of life ex opere operato that is through their own outward sensible working They be soueraign remedies against all kinds of spirituall infirmities the Catholick Church the shop that keepeth the medicinall Sacraments Christ the diuine Apoâ—â—ecary no sinner ought to despaire of sâ—luation while he abideth in a shop of sauing remedies which is the catholick Church SAcraments taken in a large generall sense be outward visible ceremonies employed in corporall creatures or elements wherby men as birds of one feather flock together and * Aug. l. 9. Con. FaustuÌ„ cap 11. in nulla inquit religione homines colligantur inter se sine consortio SacramentoruÌ„ id est sine aliquibus caerâ—monijs sensibilibus Et S. Chrysos hom 83. ideo ait Deum nobis dedisse intelligibilia sub sensibilibus quia constamus anima corpore si vero essemus incorporei incorporea etâ—am dedisset dona id est Sacramenta vnite in the profession of some one Religion true or false the worship of a thing that is indeed or counted a God depending necessarily therof Pagans worshipped the sensible elements (a) Through human weaknes and the crafty dealing of the Deuil certaine people haue been brought to that height of madnes as to think and worship for Gods and godesses the four elements namely fire aire water and earth as likewise other parts of the vniuers especially such as conduced to the generation of any thing From hence the vitall spirit was called the God Iupiter fire the God Vulcan aire the godess Pallas and the earth the godess Ceres of their ceremonies ascribing a diuinity euen to the meanest creatures Iews worshipped the true God vnder corporall creatures wherin they vsed their ceremonies but the multitude therof being numerous difficult and greiuous made their Religion a yoke of bondage The society of christian people are deliuered from the Pagans Idolatry and the Iew 's seruitude being called vnto the liberty wherwith Christ hath made them free to serue and worship one true God vnder * Aug. l. 38. c. 9. ae doc Chris l. 19. con Faus cap. 13. Sacramenta inquit mutata sunt facta sunt faciliora pauciora salubriorae a few ceremonies most proper for an agreable exercise both of body and soul being sensible things most cleane in reference to the body and most precious in order to the soul to wit seuen Sacraments (b) The decree of Pope Eugenius set down in the end of the Councill of Florence asserteth seuen Sacraments which catholick assertion the Council of Trent hath defin'd sess 7. can 10. and Caluin l. 4. instit c. 19. confesseth that the opinion of seuen Sacraments is grounded in antiquity and was vniuersally approu'd mysteriously figured in the seuen pillars wisdome hewed out in the building of her howse Prouerb 1. that is which Christ the eternall wisdome hewed (c) According to S. John the Euangelist cap. 19. When the souldiers savv that Jesus vvas dead one of them vvith a speare pearced his side and fortvvith came there out blood and vvater wherby are signifyed mystically all the Sacraments though two especially namely Baptism which openeth the door vnto and the Euchariste which is the end of all the other Sacraments wherfore S. Austin c. 120. in Ioan. infer's that the Sacraments of the new law came from the side of Christ out of his side in the erecting of his Church Also mysteriously represented in Naamans washing himselfe seuen times in Iordan and in the fiue breads and two fishes wherwith Christ fed and satisfyed many Thousands and taken in the strict proper sense they be outward visible signes or rites of inward invisible sanctity and (d) The Council of Trent cast's an Anathema vpon those which shall assert that the Sacraments of the new law do not containe the grace which they signifie or that they be not effectuall instruments Ex opere operato through their own working of the same grace This Catholick assertion is conform to the doctrine of the ancient Fathers in the first Council of Nice which speaking of Baptism say Aquam vides considera viâ—tiâ—tem Dei in aqua absconditam Thou beholdest water consider the virtue of God that lie's hid
in the water Wherfore the new Teachers of these dayes impiously assert that outward works as are the Sacraments exercise no efficiency in the production of sanctifying grace But this their hereticall assertion Luther tought l. de captiuit Babilon effectuall instruments therof by diuine dispensation As God did enable the earth in it's creation to bring forth corporall fruit's to the nourishment of the body so he did enable the Sacraments in their institution to bring forth spirituall fruits to the refection of the soul and indeed t' is mad ignorance or extream madness to thinke that God is sufficient to giue effectuall vertue * Chrys hom 24. in illud Jo. 3. nisi quis renatus fuerit Docet quod quemadmodum terra accepit à Deâ— virtutem producendi fructus ita aqua in institutione baptismi accepit virtutem faciendi regenerationem spiritualâ—â—â— to vnliu'd seed vnto producing liuing bodyes in corporall generation and vnsufficient to infuse effectuall force into Sacraments vnto sanctifying soules in spirituall regeneration that is to say to exercise efficiency in the production of iustifying grace and truly when Christ instructed Nicodemus of the necessity of the Sacrament of Baptisme Io. 3. saying That except a man be borne again of water and the holy ghost he cannot enter into the kingdom of Heauen vndoubtedly he did attribute the same kinde of causality vnto water as vnto the holy Ghost which the particle and sheweth clearly since it joynes both causes together and though an instrument in working be subordinat to the principall cause in vertue wherof it worketh neuertheless there is but one kinde of causality in both Wherfore since reall causality or efficiency is of necessity due to the holy ghost the same with subordination is belonging to the outward element of water in Baptism wherby is conuincingly prou'd that Baptism is not and consequently * Si Sacramenta à Christo instituta essent 7. duntaxat symbola quaedam externa quibus salus per ChristuÌ„ accepta velut sigillis obsignetur coÌ„firmetur noÌ„ dixisset Christus Io. 3 â—isi quis renatus fuerit ex aqua Spiritâ— sancto Nâ—c Apostolus dixisset muÌ„dans cum lauacro aquae in verbo vita Eph. 5. naÌ„ istae particulae non nudâ—m sonaÌ„t obsignationem salutis acceptae sed causalitatem vnde S. Grego Niss Ora. Catech. c. 33. extremae inquit dementiae est ignorantiae animi tribuentis Deo tantam vim semini in generatione hominis existimare eum esse imbecillem vt hoc idem tribuatur aqua ad iustificandum suscipientem Baptismum other Sacraments neither a naked sign only to stir vp or excite to an act of faith or a meer signet to seale the diuine promises for the outward element of water is an effectuall instrumentall cause of inward sanctity Ex opere operato that is doth with it's own outward visible action enabled by diuine institution produce inward grace vnto sanctification of life in such as receiue the Sacrament of Baptism aright Besides if sacramentall water were but a meer sign of justifying grace Christ Io. 3. had spoken as improperly saying except that a man be born again of water c. as if a man should say to his freind that is a thirst except that you drinke of the Iuy bush you cannot quench your thirst for as sacramentall water according to the contrary opinion is a naked sign of grace onely so an Iuy bush is a naked or a sign only of wine or other drink ready for sale wherby is plainly euident that Sacraments euen as outward works do exercise efficiency in the production of sanctifying grace Yet as the water of the pool named in the holy scripture Probatica Piscina did not cure corporall diseases by an innate quality proper to the water it self but through the motion of an Angell that went down at a certaine season and stir'd it so the Sacraments doe not heale spirituall infirmities that is sins but by a speciall extraordinary vertue which they receiue from the holy ghost or Christ who to that purpose did institute all of them Christ the son of God is our great Physician and Apothecary also the catholick Church his shop the Sacraments placed therein the pots boxes vesells that containe and preserue the heauenly medicines which Christ brought with him into the world and the sundry sacramentall graces diuinely prepared vnto effectuall healing of all spirituall wounds are the said heauenly remedies wherfore it is a most extream advantage to be log'd in the bosom of the catholick Curch wherin be present soueraign remedies against all manner of spirituall discases no man how sick or wounded soeuer can despaire of his health while he continueth in the shop of the diuine Apothecary that is furnisht with medicines which cannot miss in the cure of any infirmity if applied aright thervnto As a tree planted by the water's side want's not corporall nourishment to preserue it aliue so such as abide in the catholick Church want not spirituall help 's wherby to nourish them vnto eternall life which be the Sacraments that Christ hath left to his Church as certaine preseruatiues against the poyson of sin CHAR. V. OF CHVRCH-CEREMONIES THE CONTENTS Publick Church-seruice requireth outward acts of Religion namely ceremonies holy ceremonies set forth the majesty of God stirr vp attention moue reuerence beget deuotion Ceremonies pertaining to the sacrifices of Mass Answer to an objection against Church-ceremonies drawn from Christs conference with the Samaritan womaÌ„ Ioan. 4. The beginning of Schisms Hereticks and Schismaticks adore not in spirit and truth holy ceremonies warrantable without expresse authority of scripture CHurch-ceremonies are outward sensible Rites of christian religion yet are but the (a) An Ecclesiasticall ceremony is an outward secundary act of Religion that answer 's to the inward first act thereof which is to will or desire due exhibition of honour and worship vnto Gods and it comprehendes Sacraments sacrifice which is supream outward worship vnto professing Gods omnipotency Sacramental's namely Churches Altars Chalices Priestly ornaments bowing kneeling holy water the sign of the Cross c. secundary acts therof for the first is an insensible desire to aduance the worship due vnto God which Church ceremonies do execute only As ciuill ceremonies vsed in the consecration of temporall Princes they be inoyld inuested with royall robes presented with Scepters crowned with Diadems and beset round with armed guards doe demonstrate their eminent charge and dignity aboue the people which they rule ouer so Religious ceremonies employed in the exhibition of diuine worship doe set forth the majesty of God and his supreme dominion ouer all creatures besides they stir vp attention moue reuerence beget denotion and conduce vnto the vnderstanding of supernaturall mysteries which they imprint also in the memory of the faithfull As pictures so Church-ceremonies are the books of the vnlearned All the visible Rites employed in and about the sacrifice of the Mass tend