there contained and the benefit and good that foloweth of it we receive upon tradition though the thing it selfe we receive not for tradition Of this sort is the Baptisme of Infants which may be named a Tradition because it is not expressely delivered in Scripture that the Apostles did Baptize Infants nor any expresse precept there found that they should so doe yet is not this so received by bare and naked tradition but that we finde the Scripture to deliver unto us the ground of it Bellarmine and Maldonate both doe confesse that the Baptisme of Infants may be proved by the Scripture and therefore Maldonate concludes nobis verò traditio non est Bellarmine * as Whitaker shewes contradicts himselfe for first he saith that the Baptisme of Infants is an unwritten tradition and after that the Catholicks can prove Baptisme of Infants from the Scriptures To this head we may referre the observation of the Lords day the precept whereof is not found in Scripture though the practise be And if for that cause any shall name it a Tradition we will not contend about the word if he grant withall that the example Apostolicall hath the force of a Law as implying a common equity concerning us no lesse then it did them If any man shall call the summary comprehension of the chief heads of Christian doctrine contained in the Creed commonly called the Apostles Creed a tradition we will not contend about it For although every part thereof be contained in Scripture yet the orderly connexion distinct explication of those principall Articles gathered into an Epitome wherein are implyed and whence are inferred all conclusions Theologicall is an Act humane not divine and in that sense may be called a Tradition But let it be noted withall that we admit it not to have that credit as now it hath to be the rule of faith for this is the priviledge of holy Scripture The Creed it selfe was gathered out of Scripture and is to be expounded by the Scripture therefore it is not given to be a perfect Canon of faith and manners By Tradition is noted 1. Whatsoever is delivered by men divinely inspired and immediately called whether it be by lively voyce or by writing 2. In speciall it notes the word of God committed to writing 1 Cor. 15. 3. 3. It signifies rites expressely contained in writing Act. 6. 14. 4. It betokens that which is not committed to writing but onely delivered by lively voyce of the Apostles 5. It signifieth that which is invented and delivered by men not immediately called In Scripture Tradition is taken 1. in good part for any rite or doctrine of God delivered to his Church either by word or writing whether it concern faith and good works or the externall government of the Church 2 Thess. 2. 15. 1 Cor. 11. 15. 23. 2. In ill part it noteth the vaine idle and unwarrantable inventions of men whether Doctrine or Rites Matthew 15. 3. Marke 7. 8 9. When the Fathers speake reverently of Traditions by the word Tradition either they understand the holy Scripture which also is a Tradition it is a Doctrine left unto us Or by Traditions they understand observations touching Ecclesiastill policy D. Moulin Reasons confirming the sufficiency of Scripture against Popish traditions 1. The whole Church is founded upon the Doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles which were not true if any doctrin was necessary to salvation not revealed by the Prophets and Apostles 2. The Prophets and Christ and his Apostles condemne Traditions Esay 29. 13. Mathew 15. 3. 6. Col. 2. 8. Therefore they are not to be received Christ opposeth the Commandement and Scriptures to Traditions therefore he condemnes Traditions not written If the Jewes might not adde to the Bookes of Moses then much lesse may wee adde to the Canon of Scripture so much increased since 3. Those things which proceede from the will of God onely can be made knowne to us no other way but by the Revelation of the Scripture all Articles of Faith and Precepts of Manners concerning substance of Religion proceede from the Will of God onely Mathew 16. 17. 1 Cor. 2. 9 10 11. Gal. 1. 8. As in this place the Apostle would have nothing received besides that which he Preached so 1 Cor. 4. 6. He will have nothing admitted above or more then that which is written See Act. 26. 22. John 20. ult whence it is manifest that all necessary things may be found in Scripture since full and perfect Faith ariseth from thence which eternall salvation followeth Bellarmin saith John speakes onely of the miracles of Christ that hee wrote not all because those sufficed to perswade the World that Christ was the Sonne of God Those words indeede in the 30 Verse are to be understood of Christs Miracles but those in the 31. Verse rather are to be generally interpreted for the History onely of the Miracles sufficeth not to obtaine Faith or Life The question betwixt the Papists and us is de ipsa doctrina tradita non de tradendi modo touching the substance of the Doctrine delivered not of the manner of delivering it and of Doctrine delivered as the Word of God not of Rites and Ceremonies They maintaine that there bee doctrinall Traditions or Traditions containing Articles of Faith and substantiall matters of Divine worship and Religion not found in the holy Scriptures viz. Purgatory Invocation of Saints Adoration of Images Papall Monarchy Bellarmin and before him Peresius distinguisheth Traditions both from the authours and the matter From the Authours into Divine Apostolicall and Ecclesiasticall From the matter into those which are concerning Faith and concerning Manners into perpetuall and temporall universall and particular necessary and free Divine Traditions that is Doctrines of Faith and of the worship and service of God any of which we deny to be but what are comprised in the written Word of God Apostolike Traditions say they are such Ordinances as the Apostles prescribed for ceremony and usage in the Church as the observation of the memoriall of the Nativity Death and Resurrection of Christ the alteration of the seventh day from the Jewes Sabbath to the day of Christs Resurrection Ecclesiasticall ancient Customes which by degrees through the Peoples consent obtained the force of a Law Traditions concerning Faith as the perpetuall Virginity of Mary the Mother of Christ and that there are onely foure Gospels of Manners as the signe of the Crosse made in the forehead Fasts and Feastings to be observed on cetaine dayes Perpetuall which are to bee kept to the end of the World Temporall for a certaine time as the observation of certaine legall Ceremonies even to the â—ull publishing of the Gospell Universall Traditions which are delivered to the whole Church to be kept as the observation of Easter Whitsontide and other great Feasts Particular which is delivered to one or more Churches as in the
the Gospell doth declare evidently that he taught nothing but that which is contained in Scripture seeing the Apostle defineth the Gospell which he preached to be that which is contained in the Scriptures Fifthly That the Thessalonians had some part of Christian doctrine delivered by word of mouth that is by the Apostles preaching at such time as he did write unto them and some part by his Epistles the Text enforceth us to grant But that the Church at this day or ever since the Testament was written had any Tradition by word of mouth necessary to salvation which was not contained in the Old and New Testament we will never grant The Papists doe commonly abuse the name of Tradition which signiâ—ieth properly a delivery or a thing delivered for such a matter as is delivered onely by word of mouth and so received from hand to hand that is never put in writing but hath his credit without the Holy Scripture of God as the Jewes had their Cabala and the Scribes and the Pharisees their Traditions besides the Law of God For the justifying of our translation it is true that we alter according to the circumstances of the place especially considering that the word Tradition which of it selfe is indifferent as well to that which is written as to that which is not written hath been of us and them appropriated to note forth onely unwritten constitutions therefore we must needs avoide in such places as this the word Traditions though our last translation useth it where the simple might be deceived to thinke that the Holy Ghost did over commend any such to the Church which he would not have committed to writing in the holy Scriptures and in stead of the word so commonly taken although it doe not necessarily signifie any such matter we doe use such words as doe truly expresse the Apostles meaning and the Greeke word doth also signifie therefore we use these words Ordinances or Instructions Institutions or the doctrine delivered all which being of one or neere sence the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth signifie and the same doth Tradition signifie if it be rightly understood Ob. 1 Tim. 6. 20. O Timothy keep that which is committed to thy trust By the name of pledge saith Bellarmine not the Scripture but the treasure of unwritten doctrine is understood Depositum say the Rhemisis is the whole doctrine of Christianity being taught by the Apostles and delivered their successors Sol. Though other learned men interprete this pledge or gage to be the gift of the holy Ghost yet we willingly acknowledge that it is to be understood of the doctrine of Christianity as that which hath best ground both by circumstance of this and conferrence of other places Whence we inferre that the doctrine of truth is not the Churches dâ—crees but the Lords given to the Church to keepe onely wherewith the title of a pledge cannot stand unlesse one may lay to pledge a thing in his own hands since in Popery the Church her selfe maketh the doctrine which her selfe taketh to pledge Herein they handle it like a pledge that they lock it up fast where the people of God for whose use it is given to be kept cannot come unto it What had become of the Law of God if others had not been more faithfull keepers of it then the Priests to whom the principall Copy thereof written with the singer of God himselfe was committed There are some points of faith not contained in Scripture neither in the Old nor New Testament therefore it is not perfect In the old Testament no doubt but the females had some remedy whereby they might be purged from originall sin as well as the males circumcision was instituted only for the males the Scripture mentions not what was instituted for the females In the new Testament the perpetuall virginity of Mary the mother of Christ. Two things are considered in circumcision 1. Signum 2. Res signata or the end and use of the signe Sol. The thing signified or efficacie of the outward signe of circumcision was common both to Males and Females the very institution of circumcision teacheth that for it was a signe of the Covenant the Covenant belonged to all which were of the seed of Abraham if they renounced it not Although there were no decision of the other point out of the Scripture yet would it not thence â—ollow which the Jesuits pretend that some necessary point of Christianity wanted the ground of holy Scripture it being sufficient for us to know that she was a Virgin when our Saviour Christ was borne of her as the Prophets did foretell Yet as Chamier saith well we beleeve that she continued a Virgin all her life time for in those things saith he which are not properly de fide we hold the authority of the Church is great if it contradict not Scripture or produce no other absurdity Vide Riveti Apologiam pro virgine Maria l. 1. c. 15. Helvidius would gather from those words 1 Matth. 25. untill and first borne that Mary after had Children by her husband The word till doth not import so much See Gen. 8. 7. and 28. 15. 1 Sam. 15. 35. 2 Sam. 6. 23. Matth. 28. 20. He is called the first borne in Scripture which first opens the wombe whether other follow or no. 7. The Scripture is plaine and Perspicuous The Perspicuity of the Scripture is a cleare and evident manifestation of the truth delivered in it It is Perspicuous both in respect of it selfe and us 1. In respect of it selfe as appeares 1. In the things delivered which although they seeme obscure for their Maâ—esty and dignity yet they carry the light of truth before them therefore the Scripture is frequently termed a light Psal. 19. 8. and 119. 105. Deut. 30. 11. Prov. 6. 2. 2 Pet. 1. 19. 2 Cor. 4. 3. 4. 6. the Scripture is a most bright light There are 2 things in Gods revealed will verbum rei the word and res verbi the mystery The Scriptures are hard if we looke to the mystery but not if wee looke to the word as for example the Scripture teacheth that there is one God in three persons the words are plaine and easie every man understands them but the mystery contained in those words passeth the reach of man we may well discerne these things to be so though we cannot fully conceive how these should be so 2. In the manner of delivering or kind of stile which is fitted to the things and persons shewing the greatest simplicity both in words either proper or figurative and in the cleare sence and mosâ— perspicuous propriety of signification viz. that one which is called literall and Grammaticall 2. In respect of us because the Scripture is to us the principle meanes and inâ—â—rument of faith every Principle ought to be by it selfe and in its own nature knowne and most Intelligible and there being 3 degrees of
Church 2. We grant that the Apostâ—es living and preaching and the Canon of the New Testament being not yet sealed their Gospell delivered viva voce was no lesse a rule of faith and worship then the writings of Moses and the Prophets 3. We doe not reject all the traditions of the Church for we embrace certaine Historicall and Ceremoniall ones but we deny that opinions of faith or precepts of worship can be confirmed by unwritten traditions 4. We call that an opinion of faith to speake properly and strictly when a Proposition is revealed by God which exceeds the capacity of nature and is propounded to be beleeved as necessary to be knowne to salvation Fundamentall opinions are those which by a usuall and proper name are called Articles of faith 5. What is not in respect of the matter an Article of saith may be a Proposition to be beleeved with a Theologicall faith if you looke to the manner of revealing as that the Sunne is a great light the Moone a lesse Gen. 1. 16. that Rachel was beautifull Leah bleare-eyed The Papists doe not cease to accuse the Scripture of imperfection and insufficiency as not containing all things necessary to salvation The Councell of Trent sess 4. decret 1. Saith that the truth and discipline is contained in libris scriptis sine scripto traditionibus The Papists generally divide the word of God into the word written and traditions They affirme that there are many things belonging to Christian faith which are neither contained in the Scriptures openly nor secretly This opinion is maintained by the Papists but it was not first invented by them The Jewish Fathers did use the traditions of the Elders and it hath been said of old Marke 7. 5. Matth. 5. 21. for their errours and superstitions yea at length they affirmed firmed that God gave to Moses in mount Sinai the Scripture and the Cabala or a double Law the one written the other unwritten The Tridentine Fathers session 4th doe command Traditions to be received with the same reverend affection and piety with which we embrace the Scripture and because one Bishop in the Councell of Trent refused this he was excluded In the meane space they explaine not what those traditions are which must be so regarded none of them would ever give us a list and Catalogue of those Ordinances which are to be defended by the authority of unwritten traditions not of the word committed to writing onely they affirme in generall whatsoever they teach or doe which is not in the Scripture that it is to be put into the number of Traditions unwritten The cause of it selfe is manifest that at their pleasure they might thrust what they would upon the Church under the name of Traditions Vide Whitak de Script controviae quaest Sexta c. 5. See also Moulins Buckler of Faith p. 51. Lindan the Papist was not ashamed to say that it had been better for the Church if there had been no Scripture at all but onely Traditions For saith he we may doe well enough with Traditions though we had no Scripture but could not doe well enough with Scripture though we had no Traditions Baldwin saith a Testament may be either scriptum or nuncupativum set downe in writing or uttered by word of mouth But a nuncupative Testament or Will made by word of mouth without writing must be proved by solemne witnesses The solemne witnesses of Christs Testament are the Prophets and Apostles Let Papists if they can prove by them that part of the Testament of Christ is unwritten Because our Adversaries doe contend for Traditions not written hotly and zealously against the totall perfection of the Scripture that they might thrust upon us many points by their owne confession not contained in Scripture and usurpe to themselves irrefragable authority in the Church it shall not be amisse largely to consider of this matter And 1. to enquire of the signification of the words Greek and Latine which are translated Tradition and then to come to the matter which is controverted between us and the Papists The Greeke word signifying Tradition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which in the new Testament is used only in these places Matth. 15. 2. 3. 6. Marke 7. 3. 5. 8. 9. 13. 1 Cor. 11. 2. Gal. 1. 14. Col. 2. 8. 2 Thess. 2. 15. and 3. 6. and in the vulgar Latine is rendred Traditio Matth. 15. 2. 3. 6. Marke 7. 3. 5. 8. 9. 13. Gal. 1. 14. Col. 2. 6. 2 Thess. 2. 15. and 3. 6. and praecepta 1 Cor. 11. 2. Whereto the Rhemists translation which seemeth to be but a bare translation of the vulgar Latine doth wholly agree using the word Tradition every where excepting 1 Cor. 11. 2. where they use the word precepts but set in the margent the word Tradition Arias Montanus in his Interlineall translation doth render it traditio Beza doth commonly expresse it by the word traditio In the English Geneva Bible we translate it by the word instruction tradition calling mens precepts traditions the Apostles doctrine Ordinances or instructions not that we feared the word tradition but because we would not have the simple deceived as though the unwritten verities of the papists were thereby commended or as though we had some honourable conceite of them and what we did herein the signification of the word doth give us free liberty to doe in our last English Translation we use the word tradition as often as the vulgar Latine or the Rhemists have done not that we were driven by feare or shame to alter what was done before but because we would cut off all occasion of carping at our translation though never so unjust First we contend not about the name tradition the word may lawfully be used if the sense affixed thereto be lawfull 2. All traditions unwritten are not simply condemned by us 3. The Apostles delivered by lively voyce many observations dispensable and alterable according to the circumstances of time and persons appertaining to order and comelinesse onely we say that they were not of the substance of Religion that they were not generall concerning all Churches 4. We receive the number and names of the authors of Books Divine and Canonicall as delivered by tradition but the Divine truth of those Books is in it self clear and evident unto us not depending on the Churches authority The Books of Scripture have not their authority quoad nos from the approbation of the Church but winne credit of themselves and yeeld sufficient satisfaction to all men of their divine truth whence we judge the Church that receiveth them to be led by the Spirit of God yet the number authors and integrity of the parts of those Books we receive as delivered by tradition 5. The continued practise of such things as are neither expressely contained in Scripture nor the example of such practise expressely there delivered though the grounds reasons and cause of the necessity of such practise be
of Ales is called Doctor Irrefragabilis Thomas Aquinas after him Doctor Angelicus John Scot the last Doctor Subtilis Yet a learned Doctor of our owne saith of the Schoolmen Scholastici vel hoc nomine non tanti sunt à nobis faciendi quia in Justificationis articulo vix quicquam tradiderunt solidi The Papists themselves note twenty Articles in which their great Master Lombard erred so that that is ascribed to them hic magister non tenetur But now Paul the great Doctor of the Gentiles of whom Chrysostome writes severall Homilies is indeed an Angelicall Subtill Irrefragable Doctor Austin desired three things to have seen Christ in the flesh Rome in its glory and to have heard Paul preach What he speakes is true as Gospell and we can not apply to him what the Papists doe frequently to Peter Lumbard hic magister non tenetur We may exercise our judgement upon the writings of men there being few that write much and contradict not themselves but we must believe the Divinely inspired Writings There is a Booke in the Law called Liber Judiciarius or Doomesday-Booke because as Matthew Paris saith it spared no man but judged all men indifferently as the Lord in that great day will doe The Bible is the true Liber judiciarius or Doomesday Booke The word that I have spoken the same shall judge him in the last day I shall now in a few words discover the usefulnesse of this threefold Treatise Having been in these times of spoile unhappily plundered of my Bookes and Manuscripts which I esteemed as a precious treasure recovering this twice with some others I did resolve for preventing any future dammages in that kind to transcribe it faire for the Presse which was the worke of a whole yeere I know first the subject is very necessary for all Christians to search into and I have perused all the best writers I could find that I might handle it fully common-place wise according to the excellency of the Theme I have made use also of some Manuscrips of three worthy men now with God whose memory I shall ever honour for the compleating of the worke I have gleaned a few observations from some of the worthy Lecturers in Westminster from M. Ley of Budworth in his Lectures in the City and from divers others of the Assembly in their printed Sermons This worke I conceive may be beneficiall for these purposes Chiefly for setling and establishing of Christians in some maine principles of Divinity viz. that there is a God against the Atheists of these times that the Scripture is the Word of God against the Anti-Scripturists that Christ is God against all Arrians Socinians and other Heretickes ejusdem farinae vel potius furfuris that the so 〈◊〉 of man is immortall against such who in these daiâ—â— deny the same 2. For enabling a Christian to all dâ—â—ties prayer meditation holy conference catechizing his family For example suppose a Christian desire to instruct his family in the principles of Religion and would make use of M. Bals Catechisme for that purpose for I know not a better yet extant he may by the helpe of this worke open the heads of Religion from the beginning of that Booke to the Fall of man I would there were the like out on the whole body of Divinity But lest I trangresse the bounds of an Epistle I commend the worke to Gods blessing and desire thy benigne interpretation of my labours still resting Thy faithfull friend and hearty wel-wisher EDWARD LEIGH PROLEGOMENA HEBR. 6. 1. THe Apostle chides the Hebrews in the former Chapter for their ignorance and uncapablenesse of Divine mysteries from v. 11. to the end He tels them they were dull of hearing and that their ignorance was affected they might for their time and means have been teachers and yet now they must be taught and which is strange the very principles of the word of God Here in the beginning of this Chapter he earnestly exhorts them to encrease both in knowledge and obedience Leaving The Apostle alludes to men running a race they leave one place and goe on forward we must leave the principles of Religion that is not sticke there but passe on to a greater perfection The Apostle hath reference to the Schooles of the Jewes where hee was trained up there were two sorts of Schollers 1. Punies or petties 2. Proficients Perfectists Six principles are named as so many heads and common places of the ancient Catechisme not but that there were many other neâ—â—â—â—ary principles yet they might be reduced to 〈◊〉 â— Two maine duties that is 1. the doctrine of repentance from dead workes that every man is dead in sinne by nature and therefore had need to repent 2 The doctrine of faith in God 2 Two meanes 1 The doctrine of Baptismes by which in the plurall number he meanes both the Sacraments and also the inward Baptisme of Christ and that outward baptisme of John that is to say of the Minister though some refer it to the set times of Baptisme 2 The imposition or laying on of hands that is by a trope or borrowed speech the ministery of the Church upon the which hands were laid not the Sacrament of Confirmation as a Lapide expounds it 3 Two benefits Resurrection of the dead that the same numericall body shall rise againe and eternall judgement so called metonymically because in that judgement sentence shall be given concerning their eternall state either in weale or woe Not laying againe the foundation Three things are required in a foundation 1 That it be the first thing in the building 2 That it beare up all the other parts of the building 3 That it be firme and immoveable Simply and absolutely in respect of all times persons and things Christ onely is the foundation upon which the spirituall building of the Church is raised The first principles of heavenly doctrine are named here a foundation because they are the first things which are knowne before which nothing can be known and because upon the knowledge of these things all other parts of heavenly knowledge doe depend The Apostles are also the foundation of the Church Ephes. 2. 20. Rev. 21. 14. in three respects 1 Because they were the first which founded Churches and converted unbelievers to the faith 2 Because their doctrine which they received immediately from God by most undoubted revelation without mixture of errour or danger of being deceived is the rule of faith to all after-commers 3 Because they were Heads Guides and Pastors of the whole universall Church The Proposition or Observation which ariseth from these words thus opened may be this The Principles and Foundations of Christian Religion must be well laid Or thus Catechizing and instructing of the people in the principles of Religion is a necessary duty to be used The Apostle illustrates this by a comparison first from Schooles secondly from building the foundation
must be first laid The excellent definition of catechising which the Apostle here gives yeelds us two good proofes of its necessity 1 It is the doctrine of the beginning of Christ by some rendred not unfitly for the sense which gives beginning in Christ. 2 It is a foundation which beares up all the building without this preaching is to no purpose which though it makes the least shew yet it is of greatest use it establisheth men and keepes them firme from wavering 3 This course is most agreeable 1. To Art all Arts proceed from principles Physitians have their principles Lawyers their maximes Philosophers their chiefe sentences 2 To nature which first formes the vitall parts then the more remote 3. It is sutable to reason Principles are 1. easiest in themselves 2. Facilitate other matters 3. Are the most necessary doctrines of all the rest they beare up all the rest 4. Are of continuall and constant use Prinâ—ipia sunt minima quantitate maxima virtute 4. Gods order and practise hath been still to lay principles things might easily passe from one to another at first they lived so long Cains and Abels sacrificing is an evidence of catechising before the flood there was no word written then therefore it is like their fathers taught them It was practised by Abraham Gen. 18. 19. the fruit of which observe in his sonne Gen 24. 63. and servant Gen. 12. 26. God himselfe writes a Catechisme for the Jewes describing a short compendium of religion in the two authentique tables of the Law Hannah delivered Samuel to Eli his instructor so soon as he was weaned Jehoida taught the young King Jehoash David and Bathsheba practised it 2 Chron. 28. 8 9. Psalm 34. 11. Prov. 4. 4. 31. 1. and Salomon himselfe seeme to give that precept out of the experience of his owne most excellent education Teach a child the trade of his way and when he is old he shall not depart from it though himselfe scarce did so and Eccles. 12. 23. he drawes all which he had said in his whole booke to two heads Feare God and keep his Commandements Catechising was also practised by Christ and his Apostles Luke 2. 46. Acts 22. 3. Heb. 6. 1 2 3. Christ at twelve yeeres old submitted himselfe to be catechised Luke 1. 4. and allowed of Hosanna sung by children He begins with regeneration to Nicodemus and he drew the whole Law into two heads Matth. 22. 37. John and Christ preacht Faith and Repentance and the Apostles after them Theophilus was catechised Luke 1. 4. Apollos Acts 18. 23. Timothy 1 Tim. 3 15. 2 Tim. 2. 2. The Apostle Paul commends to Timothies custody a patterne of wholsome doctrine which he cals a form of doctrine Rom. 6. 17. and the analogy of faith Rom. 12. 6. This duty principally belongs to Ministers their Office is set down under the name of catechising Let him which is catechised make him that catechiseth partaker Gal. 6. 6. Ministers must plant and beget as well as increase and build up feed the Lambs as well as the Sheepe they are compared to Nurses wise Stewards skilfull builders it must be performed by housholders also Ephes. 6. 4. God chargeth parents to performe this duty Deut. 6. 6 7. Rehearse them continually whet them upon thy children often goe over the same thing as a knife doth the whetstone They are bound to bring up their children in the nurture and information of the Lord children were to be taught the meaning of the Passover Exod. 12. 16. Masters of Families also must instruct their servants which are ungrounded as children Christ instructed his Apostles he taught them how to pray he being the Master of the family and they his family as appeareth because he did eate the Passeover together with them and the Law appoints that every family should celebrate that feast together The reason why God specifieth not this point in the masters duty is because if it be performed by the father it shall be needlesse seeing it is done to the masters hand but if the father neglect it surely the master which succeeds in the fathers roome and hath his authority must see it done For as a father in Israel was bound to see his owne sonne circumcised so he was bound to see his servant circumcised and if to circumcise him sure he must as well make him as his child to know what circumcision meaned And what Christ did as a master of a family that must every master of family doe seeing we must be followers of Christ every one in his place therefore every one must instruct his ignorant servants in the truths of Religion The Jewes did use catechizing Cyprian saith Optatus exercised it at Carthage and Origen at Alexandria Clemens Alexandrinus had his paedagogus Lactantius and Calvin their Institutions Athanasius his Synopsis Austin his Euchiridion his bookes de doctrina Christiana and de catechizandis rudibus Catechizing is institutio viva voce a kind of familiar conference The Hebrew verbe Chanach signifieth to instruct or traine up even from childhood and to initiate or dedicate from which word holy Henoch had his name importing nurture in the feare of God The Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth to sound or resound as by an eccho and is applied even by Heathen writers unto that kinde of teaching which is by word of mouth sounding in the eare of him that is taught and especially unto the teaching of the first rudiments of any science whatsoever It signifieth any kind of vocall instruction Acts 21. 21 24. viz. that whereby the principles of Christian doctrine are made known unto the hearers as Luke 1. 4. instructed or catechized Gal 6. 6. taught or catechised See Acts 18. 25. Rom. 2. 18. 1 Cor. 14. 19. Catechizing is a plaine and easie instructing of the ignorant in the grounds of Religion or concerning the fundamentall principles familiarly by questions and answers and a spirituall applying the same for practice What ever the catechizing in the Primitive Church was in private for the publique it seems not to have been Dialogue-wise by question and answer but in a continued speech with much plainnesse and familiarnesse Catechizing differs from preaching preaching is the dilating of one member of Religion into a just Treatise catechizing is a contracting of the whole into a summe preaching is to all sorts catechizing to the young and rude Catechizing is 1. plaine that none might excuse themselves that the most illiterate might not say at the day of judgement O Lord thy waies were too hard for us 2 That the manner of the teaching might be sutable to the hearers 3 That no Governours might pretend the difficulty of it 2 Instructing which implyeth that originall ignorance and blindnesse we were borne with 3 It is such an instructing which is by way of distilling things in a familiar manner our
Ghost is the maker preserver and governour of all things by his wisdome power justice providence Concerning man 1 That he was made by God of a visible body and an immortall and spirituall soule both so perfect and good in their kindsâ— that he was perfectly able to have attained eternall life for himselfe which was provided as a reward of his obedience 2 That being thus made he yeelded to the temptations of the Devill and did voluntarily sinne against God in eating of the Tree forbidden and so became a child of wrath and heire of cursing an enemy to God and slave to the devill utterly unable to escape eternall death which was provided as a recompence of his disobedience 3 That he doth propagate this his sinfulnesse and misery to all his posterity Concerning Christ. 1 That he is perfect God and perfect man the second Person in the Trinity who tooke the nature of man from the Virgin Mary and united it to himselfe in one personall subsistence by an incomprehensible union 2 That in mans nature he did die and suffer in his life and death sufficient to satisfie Gods justice which man had offended and to deserve for mankind remission of sinnes and life everlasting and that in the same nature he rose againe from the dead and shall also raise up all men to receive judgement from him at the last day according to their deeds 3 That he is the onely sufficient and perfect Redeemer and no other merit must be added unto this either in whole or part Lastly concerning the meanes of applying the Redeemer they are three 1 That all men shall not be saved by Christ but onely those that are brought to such a sight and feeling of their owne sinfulnesse and misery that with sorrow of heart they doe bewaile their sinnes and renouncing all merits of their owne or any creature cast themselves upon the mercy of God and the onely merits of Jesus Christ which to doe is to repent and believe and in this hope live holily all the remainder of their life 2 That no man is able thus to see his sinnes by his owne power renounce himselfe and rest upon Christ but God must worke it in whom he pleaseth by the cooperation of his Spirit regenerating and renewing them 3 That for the working of this faith and repentance and direction of them in a holy life he hath left in writing by the Prophets and Apostles infallibly guided to all truth by his Spirit all things necessary to be done or believed to salvation and hath continued these writings to his people in all ages Observe those places Acts 15. 11. 1 Tim. 1. 15. Let a man hold this that there was nothing but death in the world till Christ came and that he is come to save horrible sinners John 17. 3. Secondly there is a practicall place Titus 3. 8. Let us 1. See our selves dead without Christ and wholy trust in him 2. Let us be exemplary in our lives and conversations There are other Fundamentals which are onely comparatively necessary that is expected from one man which is not expected from another and more from those that live in the Church Have these six principles of the Apostle not onely in your heads but hearts 1. That a man is dead in himselfe 2. That his remedy lies out of himselfe 3. Know the doctrine of the Sacraments 4. The Word of God 5. Have some apprehension of the life to come 1. That there is a passage from death to life 2. That there is a fixed and irrevokable estate after this life Hold the doctrine of faith so that Christ may live in you and you be delivered up into that forme of doctrine lay hold on life eternall Secondly there are some particular principles There is a naturall light and supernaturall The light of nature teacheth some principles That you must doe as you would be done by that no man hates his owne flesh that one must provide for his family that there is a God and one God that he is to be honoured and reverenced above all 2. Supernaturall Let all our actions be done 1. in love 2. in humility 3. in faith 4. in God this the Gospell teacheth Shew your selves Christians in power go beyond the Heathen in practising the good rules of nature 1. Be carefull to make a wise choice of principles one false principle admitted will let in many errors and erroneous principles will lead men into erroneous practises 2. Labour to act your principles if you captivate the light God wil put it out 3. Be sure you worke according to your principles we pitty another in an errour when he follows his principles Here is an apology for those teachers which tread in Pauls steps are carefull to lay the foundation well It was the observation of our most judicious King JAMES That the cause why so many fell to Popery and other errours was their ungroundednesse in points of Catechisme How many wanton opinions are broached in these daies I wish I might not justly call them Fundamentall errours Some deny the Scriptures some the Divinity of Christ some the immortality of the soule Errours are either contra against the foundation which subvert the Foundation as that of the Papists who deny the al-sufficiency of Christs once suffering 2. Circa about the foundation which pervert the Foundation as the Lutherans opinion of the ubiquity of Christs body 3. Citra meerly without these divert the foundation as in the controversies of Church-government whether it be Sociall or Solitary this strikes not at the Foundation Laurentius saith the Apostle 1 Cor. 3. 11 12 13 14 15. speakes not of Hereticall Teachers and those which erre in fundamentals but of those which erre in lighter matters because he saith of both that they build upon one and the same Foundation Christ. We should contend for a known Fundamentall necessary truth Jude 3. the common faith not every opinion entertained on probable grounds It is a great question in Divinity An Magistratui Christiano liceat capitales poenas de haereticis sumere Whether Heretickes are to be punished by the Christian Magistrate with death The Papists say Haeretici qua Haeretici comburendi That Hereticks for Heresie sake though they doe not trouble the State ought to be put to death Luther doth not approve of the capitall punishment of Heretickes especially for the pernicious sequell of it among the Papists against the Protestants He thinkes it better that they be banished The present Lutherans hold the same almost concerning that question Meisner doth distinguish between haereticus simplex and haereticus seditiosus ac blasphemus these last he saith may be punished with capitall punishments The Socinians being themselves the worst of Hereticks would have no outward forcible restraining of any errour though never so grosse and pernicious For the Protestants heare what Zanchy saith Omnes fere ex nostratibus hujus sunt sentenâ—iae quod haâ—retici sint
Arts and Sciences but they could not learne of them the knowledge of the true God they themselves being ignorant and grosse Idolaters Neither could they erre in that which they delivered for by them the Spirit of Christ and Christ himselfe did speake 1 Pet. 1. 11. 2 Pet. 1. 21. Acts 28. 25. 2 Cor. 13 3. In thâ—ir owne judgement the most holy did erre as 1 San 16. 1 and Nathan 2 Sam. 6. which errour is truly related in the Scripture but when they spake according to the guidance of the Spirit which did ever assist them in the penning of the Scripture they could not erre I have learned saith Austin to Jerome to give this honour onely to the Canonicall bookes firmely to believe that no authour of them erred in writing from all others he expected proofe from Scripture or reason 12. The wonderfull consent singular harmony and agreement of the Scriptures shewes that they came not from men but from God John 5. 46. each part sweetly agreeth with it selfe and with another and with the whole Acts 26. 22. 11. 17. Luke 24 27. John 5. 46. Matth. 4. 4. what was foretold in the old is fulfilled in the new Testament If there seem any contrariety either in numbring of yeeres circumstance of time and place or point of doctrine the fault is in our apprehension and ignorance not in the thing it selfe and by a right interpretation may easily be cleared See Dr. Willet on Gen. 24. 38. These considerations strengthen this argument 1. The length of time in which this writing continued from Moses untill John to whom was shewed the last authenticall revelation which prevents all conceits of forgery since they were not written in one nor yet in many ages 2. The multitude of books that were written and of writers that were imployed in the service 3. That difference of place in which they were written which hinders the writers conferring together Two other arguments may evince this truth that the Scriptures were from God 1. Miracles both of 1. Confirmation which the Lord shewed by Moses Exod. 19. 16. 24. 18. 34. 29. the Prophets 1 Kings 7. 24. Christ himselfe and the Apostles for the confirmation of their doctrine such as the devill was not able to resemble in shew The raising of the dead the standing still or going backe of the Sunne the dividing of the Sea and the Rivers the making of the barren fruitfull My works testifie of me saith Christ and believe the workes which I doe if you will not believe me 2. Preservation of the bookes of the Scripture 〈◊〉 the fury of many wicked Tyrants which sought to suppresse and extinguish them but could not As God caused it to be written for the good of his people so by divine providence he hath preserved the same whole and entire Here we have three arguments in one 1. The hatred of the Devill and his wicked instruments against the Scripture more then any other booke Antiochus burnt it and made a Law that whosoever had this booke should die the death yet secondly it was preserved maugre his fury and the rage of Dioclesian Julian and other evill Tyrants Thirdly the miserable end of Julian Antiochus Epiphanes Herod Nero Domitian and Dioclesian and other persecutors of this doctrine The bookes of Salomon which he wrote of naturall philosophy and other knowledge the profitablest bookes that ever were the Canon excepted are perished but those alone which pertaine to godlinesse have been safely kept to posterity which is the rather to be observed since many more in the world affect the knowledge of naturall things then godlinesse and yet though carefull of keeping them they have not been able to preserve them from perpetuall forgetfulnesse whereas on the other side these holy writings hated of the most part and carelesly regarded of a number have notwithstanding as full a remembrance as they had the first day the Lord gave them unto the Church The Roman Empire for 300 yeeres set it selfe to persecute and extirpate this new doctrine and in all these troubles the Church grew and increased mighily Acts 12. 1. Herod killed JAmes with the sword yet v. 24. the word grew and multiplied The miracles wrought in the confirmation of Scripture differ much from the wonders wrought by the false Prophets Antichrist and Satan himselfe Matth. 24. 24. 2 Thes. 2. 11. Apoc. 13. 13 14. they are neither in number nor greatnesse comparable to these 1. They differ in substance Divine miracles are above and against the force of nature as dividing of the red Sea the standing still of the Sunne the others seem wonderfull to those which are ignorant of the cause of them but are not true miracles simply above the ordinary course of nature but effected by the art and power of Satan or his instruments by naturall causes though unknown to men and many times they are but vaine delusions 2. They differ in the end those true miracles were wrought by the finger of God for the promoting of his glory and mans salvations these to seale up falshood and destroy men confirmed in idolatry and heathenisme 2 Thess. 2. 9. Those were not done in a corner or secretly but openly in the presence of great multitudes nay in the sight of the whole world by the evidence of which an unknown doctrine before contrary to the nature and affections of men was believed Bainham said in the midst of the fire Ye Papists behold ye looke for miracles and here now ye may see a miracle for in this fire I feele no more paine then if I were in a bed of down but it is to me as sweet as a bed of Roses The miracles done by our Saviour Christ and his Apostles receved testimony of their most venemous and bitterest enemies they had 2. The Testimony 1. Of the Church and Saints of God in all ages 2. Of those which were out of the Church 1. Of the Church Both ancient and Judaicall and the present Christian Church 2. Of the members of the Church 1. The Church of the Jewes professed the doctrine and received the bookes of the old Testament and testified of them that they were Divine which invincible constancy remaineth still in the Jewes of these daies who though they be bitter enemies to the Christian Religion doe stiffely maintaine and preserve the Canon of the old Testament pure and uncorrupt even in those places which do evidently confirme the truth of Christian Religion 2. The Christian Church hath also most faithfully preserved the old Canon received from the Jewes and now delivered by the Apostles as a depositum and holy pledge of the Divine will 2. Of the members of the Church the constant testimony which so many worthy Martyrs by their blood have given to the truth Rev. 6.
them for exercising themselves therein he writes to Laeta and Gaudentia and shewes them how they should bring up their daughters Scripturas sacras tenebat memoriter Hieron de Paula in Epitaphio The Apostle would not have commended this in Timothy 2 Tim. 3. 15. that from his childhood he knew the holy Scriptures nor noted it to the praise of his grand-mother and mother that they had trained him up so if he had not known that the holy Scriptures are so plaine that even a child may be able to understand them What may we judge of the other easier bookes when the holy Ghost would have the Revelation the obscurest booke of all the Scripture to be read Revel 1. 3. The people tooke occasion of erring and blaspheming from the humiliation of Christ many abuse preaching and the Sacraments 2. By this reason the Latine Bibles should not be suffered to be read publiquely because many understanding Latine from the reading of them may take occasion of erring There is a greater reason to be had of Gods elect which are edified by reading of the Scripture then of those who wrest them Peter by this reason stirred up the faithfull to read the Scriptures with greater devotion 2 Pet. 3 14 15 16 17. 3. This is common both to the Ecclesiasticall persons and Laity to take occasion of erring and blaspheming from the Scripture If we peruse the Histories of times past we shall finde that learned and Ecclesiasticall men did oftner fall into heresies and blasphenies from misunderstanding and wresting the Scriptures then any of the common sort of people who were often also by the learned drawn into heresie The Papists are not afraid the people should be corrupted by reading their legends and lying fables by their Images which doe naturally teach Idolatry Ob. The Papists further object that the Hebrews did not permit young men to reade part of Genesis Canticles Ezekiel Sol. First we must know the reading of those Scriptures non ablat am hominibus sed dilatam fuisse was not taken away from them but delayed onely Secondly this tradition concerning the age of men did drive away as well the Ecclesiasticke as the lay persons Notwithstanding all this that hath been objected by the Papists we hold that the Scriptures ought to be translated into the vulgar and mother tongues of each nation and that all men ought to read them and meditate diligently in them and that for these reasons 1. From the Commandement and will of God revealed in Scripture he hath commanded all that live in the Church to study the Scriptures and read them Deut. 11. 18 19. John 5. 3. He speaks not to the Scribes and Pharisees but to the people in generall they must try all things 2. From Gods intention which commanded it to be written for that end that it might be obvious to all John 20. 31. Rom. 15. 4. 3. Those are commended which did read the Scripture as the Eunuch 8 Acts 22. the Bereans Acts 17. Acts 11. and dispraised which neglected it as the Israelites Hos. 8. 12. they are pronounced blessed who diligently meditate in the Scriptures Psal. 1. 2. How unlike to Peter 2 Pet. 1. 19. are those which pretend to be his Successors 4. From the fact of the Apostles who as they publiquely preached the mysteries of salvation to the people so also in their Epistles they commended the whole doctrine of salvation to be read by them The Epistles of the Romanes Corinthians Galathians Ephesians were written to the people therefore to be read by them One Epistle of John was written to Gaius a layman another to the elect Lady Timothy from the Cradle was versed in the Scripture 5. From the profit and necessity of this study men are illightned and converted by reading of the Scriptures Psal. 19. 8 9 they are directed by them as most faithfull counsellers in in all their waies Psal. 1. 19. 24. they are armed by them against the fiery darts of Satan Ephes. 6. 16. One seeing a youth reade the Scriptures said it was never well since such were permitted to turne over the Bible but he answered him in the Psalmists words Psal. 119. 9. 6. From the unanimous consent of all the Fathers Chrysostome and Jerome especially who exhort the people to the private reading of the Scriptures and testifie that the Scriptures were publiquely read in their Ecclesiasticall Assemblies not in an unknown tongue but in a tongue understood by the people It was decreed by the Councell of Nice that no Christian should be without a Bible in his house And the Jewes at this day suffer no house amongst them to be without the Bible Christ and his Apostles teaching and disputing before the people appeale to the Law and the Prophets without the name of the Author Booke or Chapter because they knew the Bible text to be familiar to the Israelites In an unknowne tougue they cannot profit the people ergo they ought to be translated into a tongue known to the people 1 Cor. 14. the Apostle in divers verses treateth of this subject V. 6 7 19. He saith all things ought to be done in the Church for the edifying of the people that no man should speak in an unknown tongue without an interpreter and saith that he had rather speak five words be understood then 10000 words in an unknown tongue Those arguments before urged for the peoples reading of the Scripture prove this also for they cannot reade them in every Nation unlesse they be translated into a Tongue they understand Christ and his Apostles taught the people the Scripture in their mother Tongue In the next age after the Apostles saith Gratius l. 3. de veritate Relig. Christ. the new Testament was translated into divers vulgar Tongues the Syriacke Arabicke Aethiopicke and Latine which versionâ— are yet extant and differ not mainly from the Greek In the elder purer times the Scriptures were translated into innumerable yea into all Tongues usuall amongst men See Gregories preface to the notes on passages of Scripture The plain and usuall words the phrase and manner of speech most frequented the comparisons and similitudes in Scripture most familiar taken out of the shops and fields from husbandry and houswifery from the flock and the herd shew that the Scriptures were written for the capacity and understanding of the unlearned John 5. 39. a speciall place if it be indicative it shewes the custome of the Jewes if imperative it shewes what they ought to doe Many amongst us are to be blamed for not having the Scripture in their houses and for not reading it constantly in the same as they ought to doe or else they reade it as other bookes not with such respect to it as the greatnesse of its Authour deserveth I meane with a desire and purpose to believe and obey all that they finde there which must needs be the duty of those that confesse
that time of the writing of the new Testament did speake Syriacke and not Hebrew which language is mixt consisting of Hebrew and Chaldee therefore saith Whitaker it is more probable that Matthew and he which wrote the Epistle to the Hebrewes wrote in Greek because the Greeke tongue was not unknowne to the Jewes which were Hellenists Act. 6. 1. and other Apostles wrote in Greeke which wrote peculiarly to the Jewes as JAmes and Peter Matthaeum Hebraicè scripsisse convenit inter antiquos Citat Irenaeum Origenem Athanasium Epiphanium Chrysostomum Hieronymum Vossius de genere Christi dissertat Scripsit Haebraea lingua quiae praecipuè Judoeorum quos viva voce hactenus docuisset haberet rationem Id. ibid. vide Grotium in libros Evangel It was needfull that the Gospell should be written by many First for the certainty Secondly for the perfection of it Amongst all the Evangelists there is a Generall agreement and a speciall difference they all agree in the maine scope and Subject Christ they differ in the speciall argument and order All describe the life of Christ some more largely some more briefely some more loftily some more plainely yet because all were inspired by the same Spirit they all have equall authority The difference of Evangelists in some smaller matters proveth their consent in the greater to be the voyce of truth for had they conspired all together to have deceived the world they would in all things have more fully agreed The doctrine of the Covenant of grace is more plainly expounded the will of God and way to salvation more plentifully set down in the new Testament then ever it was in the daies of Moses or the Prophets and in these bookes of the new Testament all things are so established as to continue to the end so that we must not looke for any new revelation All these Bookes we receive as Canonicall because they are divine for matter and forme divinely inspired by God sanctified and given to the Church for their direction written by the Apostles or Apostolicall men sweetly consenting with other parts of holy Scripture and with themselves received alwaies by the greatest part of the Church of God They were written after the death of Christ by the direction of the holy Ghost the Apostles by lively voyce first preached because it was needfull that the doctrine of the Gospell should by their preaching as also by signes and wonders be confirmed against the contradictions and cavils of the Jewes and Gentiles and allowed by the assent of believers generally before it was committed to writing that we might be assured of the certainty of those things which were written These bookes are acknowledged Canonicall both by us and the Papists so that touching this matter there is no controversie between us and them The Epistles doubted of by some for a while were first the Epistle to the Hebrews the Epistle of JAmes the second Epistle of Peter the second and third Epistles of John the Epistle of Jude and the Revelation of which I shall treate more when I come to handle the bookes of the new Testament particularly The story of the woman taken in adultery hath met with very much opposition See Gregories preface to his notes upon some passages of Scripture Crojus defends the truth of it Observat. in nov Testam c. 17. Vide Seldeni uxorem Ebraicam c. 11. The inscriptions and titles prefixed before the Epistles are no part of holy Scripture written by the Apostles but added to the Epistles by some others The Subscriptions and Postscrips also of divers bookes are false counterfeit and erroneous not written by the Apostles but added afterward by the Scribes which copied out the Epistles The subscriptions of the latter Epistle to Timothy and also to Titus are supposititious they are neither found in the Syriacke nor in all Greeke copies nor yet in the vulgar Latin translation these additions were made some 100 yeeres after the Apostles The Canonicall Bookes of the new Testament are either Historicall Doctrinall or Propheticall 1. Historicall containing matters of fact the history of 1. Christ exhibited in the foure Evangelists or Gospels as they are stiled by God himselfe Marke 1. 1. Matthew Marke Luke and John so called because they containe a message of joy and gladnesse They all treate of one subject Christ Jesus incarnate most true Historians Luke 1. 2. John 21. 24. 2. His Apostles in the Acts written by Luke thirty yeeres after Christs ascention so termed of the principall subject of the History though the acts of others not Apostles are there recorded Dogmaticall or Doctrinall such as were written by the Apostles for the instruction of the Church of God in faith and manners commonly called Epistles and that by warrant of the Scriptures 1 Thess. 5. 27. 2 Pet. 3. 1. 16. because they were sent to them who had already received and professed the Gospell of God These are 21. written 1. By Paul 1. To whole Churches To the Romans Corinthians Galathians Ephesians Philippians Colossians Thessalonians 1. Gentiles 2. Jewes To the Hebrews 2. To particular persons 1. Timothy 2. Titus 3. Philemon 2. JAmes one 3. Peter two 4. John three 5. Jude one 3. Propheticall wherein under certaine resemblances the state of the Church of Christ till the end of the wolrd from the time of John the Evangelist is most truely and wonderfully described and receiveth its name Apoealyps of the Argument Beza Piscator Calvin Erasmus have doâ—e well on all the new Testament Of the Papists Jansenius hath done well on the harmony of the Lutherans Chemnitus and Gerhard of the Protestants Calvin Maldonate de Dieu Cameron Scultetus and Grotius have done well likewise on the Evangelists Matthew and John were Apostle of the twelve Marke and Luke Evangelists Apostles is a name of office or dignity It notes one sent from another with command in speciall certain famous Ambassadours of Christ. The Evangelists accompanied the Apostles in preaching the Gospell Matthew There was never any in the Church which doubted of its authority Some say he wrote in Hebrew but that is uncertaine as hath been already declared He interprets the Hebrew name Emanuel Chap. 1. 23. and those words Chap. 27. v. 46. therefore it is likely he wrote not in Hebrew for why should one that writeth in Hebrew interpret Hebrew words to such as understand Hebrew and how came this authenticall Copy and Prototype to be lost for it is not now extant How ever the Greeke edition is Authenticall because it came forth when the Apostles were living and was approved by them which the Ancients confirme Of the time when Matthew wrote Authours agree not Eusebius saith that he wrote in the third yeere of Cajus Caesar others say he wrote after Claudius He wrote his Gospell in the fifteenth yeere after Christs ascention saith Nicephorus the 21 saith Irenaeus in the eighth yeere saith Theophylact.
the Reformed Church with one consent admit this Epistle for Canonicall Vide Polani Syntagma I light upon an old Dutch Testament of Luthers Translation saith Wâ—itaker against Raynolds with his preface wherein he writeth that JAmes his Epistle is not so worthy as are the Epistles of St Peter and Paul but in respect of them a strawen Epistle his censure I mislike and himselfe I thinke afterwards seeing these words in a latter edition are left out It is nowhere found in Luthers workes that he called the Epistle of JAmes inanem stramineam Edmund Campian was convicted of falshood about that in England where when he had objected that he could finde no such thing at any time in the Bookes he produced Some in the preface of the German edition say that Luther wrote that it cannot contend in dignity with the Epistles of Paul and Peter but is strawie if it be compared with them Which judgement of Luther we approve not of and it is hence manifest that it was disliked by him because these words are found in no other edition from the yeere 1526. Luthers disciples now hold that it is Canonicall and Apostolicall and they answer the arguments of those that are opposite thereto as we may see in the exposition of that Article concerning the Scripture by that most learned and diligent man John Gerard. Gravitatem ac zelum Apostolicum per omnia prae se fert saith Walther We may reply against the Papists who often object this opinion of Luthers that Cajetan their Cardinall denieth the Epistle to the Hebrews to be Canonicall yea which is far worse he affirmeth that the Authour thereof hath erred not onely in words but in the sence and meaning of the Scriptures Nay Cajetan saith Whitaker rejected JAmes second of Peter and second and third of John and Jude It consists of five Chapters Pareus and Laurentius have done best on it First of Peter This Epistle is called in the Title Catholicall because it is not written to any one person as that of Paul to Timothy Titus and Philemon nor to any one particular Church as those of Paul to the Romans Corintâ—s but to the converted of the Jewes dispersed here and there as appeares by the inscription It consists of five Chapters Gerhard Laurentius Gomarus and Dr Ames have expounded both these Epistles Bifield hath interpreted part of the first Epistle Second of Peter Some in the Primitive Church doubted of its authority and the Syriack hath it not but the Church generally allowed it and many reasons may perswade that it is Apostolicall and was written by Peter 1. Because the Authour of It expresly calleth himselfe Simon Peter the Apostle of Jesus Christ. He wrote it in his old age to confirme them in the doctrine which before he had taught them 2. It s inscription is to the same Jewes that the former viz. dispersed by the Romane Empire and converted to Christ whose Apostle Peter was 3. It shewes an Apostolicall spirit 4. It s stile and composition is agreeable to the former Epistle 5. The Authour of this Epistle witnesseth that he was a Spectator of the transfiguration in the mount Chap. 1. v. 16. now Peter together with JAmes and John were present with Christ. 6. He makes mention of the Former Epistle Chap. 3. v. 1. 7. He cals Paul his deare brother Chap. 3. v. 15. It consists of three Chapters First of John consists of five Chapters Second and third of John They were also in times past doubted of by some as Erasmus Cajetan but there are good reasons to prove them Canonicall 1. Their Authour cals himselfe an Elder so doth Peter 1 Pet. 5. 1. by which name an Ecclesiasticall office is often signified but here age rather now it is manifest that John came to a greater age then the rest of the Apostles 2. The salutation is plainly Apostolicall Grace mercy and peace 3. In sentences and words they agree with the first Epistle 4. The Fathers alledge them for Johns and reckon them among the Canonicall bookes Each of these Epistles is but a Chapter Jude This Epistle also in times past was questioned by some but that it is Apostolicall first the inscription shews the Author expresly cals him a servant of Christ and brother of JAmes 2. The matter it agreeth both for words and sentences with the second of Peter of which it containes as it were a briefe sum and recapitulation That the writer of the Epistle doth not call himselfe an Apostle is of no moment to infringe the authority thereof for the judgement of the writer is free in that case that Title was specially used by Paul and Peter JAmes and John quit the same Title yea Paul in his Epstles to the Philippians Thessalonians and Philemon doth not call himselfe an Apostle and yet those Epistles were never doubted of It is but one Chapter Willet and Mr Perkins have done well upon it Revelation It is called according to the Greeke Apocalyps and according to the Latine Revelation that is a discovery or manifestation of things which before were hidden and secret for the common good of the Church Eusebius l. 3. c. 17. saith Domitian cast John the Evangelist into a fornace of scalding Oyle but when he saw he came forth unhurt he banished him into the Isle Pathmos where he writ this Revelation This booke describeth the state of the Church from the time of John the last of the Apostles untill Christs comming againe and especially the proceedings pride and fall of Babylon the great whore with all the Kingdomes of Antichrist The holy Ghost therefore foreseeing what labour Satan and his instruments would take to weaken and impaire the credit and authority of this above all other Bookes wherein he prevailed so far as some true Churches called the truth and authority of it into question hath backed it with a number of confirmations more then are in any other Booke of Scripture First the Authour of it is set in the forefront or face of it the Revelation of Jesus Christ Chap. 1. vers 1. who professeth himselfe to be the first and the last vers 11. so in the severall Epistles to the Churchs in severall stiles he challengeth them to be his Thus saith he 1. that holdeth the seven starres in his right hand 2. He which is first and last which was dead and is alive 3. Which hath the sharpe two edged Sword 4. Which hath eyes like a flame of fire and his feete like brasse 5. Which hath the seven Spirits of God and the seven starres 6. He who is holy and true who hath the key of David 7. He who is Amen the faithfull and true witnesse the beginning of the creatures of God Secondly the instrument or pen-man his servant John the Evangelist the Apostle the Divine who for the farther and more full authority of it repeateth his
name at least thrice saying I John Chap. 1. 9. 21. 1 2. 22. 8. whereas in the Gospell he never maketh mention of his name there he writes the history of Christ here he writes of himself and the Revelations declared to him Thirdly in the last Chapter are five testimonies heaped together v. 5 6 7 8. 1. Of the Angels 2. Of God himselfe the Lord of the holy Prophets 3. Of Jesus Christ behold I come shortly 4. Of John I John heard and saw all these things 5. The protestation of Jesus Christ vers 18. Fourthly the matter of the Booke doth convince the authority thereof seeing everywhere the Divinity of a Propheticall spirit doth appeare the words and sentences of other Prophets are there set downe part of the Prophesies there delivered are in the sight of the world accomplished by which the truth and authority of the whole is undoubtedly proved there are extant many excellent testimonies of Christ and his Divinity and our redemption by Christ. Fifthly The most ancient Fathers Greeke and Latine ascribe this Booke to John the Apostle Theophylact Origen Chysâ—stome Tertullian Hilary Austin Ambrose Irenaeus To deny then the truth of this booke is contra solem obloqui to gainsay the shining of the Sunne it selfe The Chyliasts abuse many testimonies out of this Booke but those places have been cleared long agoe by the learned as bearing another sence See Dr Raynolds conf with Hart Chap. 8. p. 406. Calvin being demanded his opinion what he thought of the Revelation answered ingenuously he knew not at all what so obscure a writer meant Se penitus ignorare quid velit tam obscurus scriptor Cajetan at the end of his Exposition of Jude confesseth that he understands not the literall sence of the Revelation and therefore exponat saith he cui Deus concesserit It consists of 22 Chapters the best Expositors on it are Ribera Brightman Pareus Cartwright Dent Forbes Mode Simonds 1. The Scriptures written by Moses and the Propheâ—s sufficiently prove that Christ is the Messiah that was to come the old Testament may convince the Jewes which deny the new Testament of this truth John 5. 39. They that is those parts of Scripture written by Moses and the Prophets there were no other Scriptures then written The 53 Chapter of Esay is a large history of his sufferings We have also another Booke or Testament more clearely witnessing of Christ the Gospel is the unsearchable riches of Christ Ephes. 3. 8. So much may suffice to have spoken concerning the Divine Canon the Ecclesiasticall and false Canon follow CHAP. V. SOme Hereticks utterly abolisht the Divine Canon as the Swingfeldians and Libertines who contemned all Scriptures the Manichees and Marcionites refused all the Bookes of the old Testament as the Jewes doe those of the new as if they had proceeded from the Divell Some diminish this Canon as the Sadduces who as Whitaker and others hold rejected all the other Prophets but Moses some inlarge it as the Papists who hold that divers other Bookes called by us Aprcrypha i. hidden doe belong to the old Testament and are of the same authority with the other before named and they adde also their traditions and unwritten word equalling it with the Scripture both these are accursed Rev. 22. 18. But against the first we thus argue whatsoever Scripture 1. is divinely inspired 2. Christ commandeth to search 3. To which Christ and his Apostles appeale and confirme their doctrine by it that is Canonicall and of equall authority with the new Testament But the holy Scripture of the old Testament is divinely inspired 2 Tim. 3. 16. where he speakes even of the Bookes of the old Testament as is gathered both from the universall all writing viz. holy in the 15 verse and from the circumstance of time because in the time of Timothies infancy little or nothing of the new Testament was published 2. Christ speakes not to the Scribes and Pharisees but to the people in generall to search it John 5. 39. this famous elogium being added that it gives testimony of him and that we may finde eternall life in it 3. Christ and his Apostles appeale to it and confirme their doctrine by it Luke 24. 27. Rom. 3. 21. Acts 10. 43. 17. 11. 20 43 26. 20. the new Testament gives testimony of the old and Peter 2 Pet. 1. 19. of Pauls Epistles The Ecclesiasticall Canon which is also called the second Canon followeth to which these Bookes belong Tobit Judith first and second of the Machabees Wisdome Ecclesiasticus Baruch Additions to Daniel and Hester for these neither containe truth perfectly in themselves nor are sanctified by God in the Church that they may be a Canon of faith and although abusively from custome they were called Canonicall yet properly in the Church they are distinguished from the Canonicall by the name of Apocryphall The false Canon is that which after the authority of the Apocrypha increased was constituted by humane opinion for the Papists as well as we reject for Apocryphall the third and fourth Booke of Esdras the prayer of Manasses the third and fourth of Machabees as Thomas Aquinas Sixtus Senensis Bellarmine and so the Councell of Trent confesse when they omit these and reckon up the whole Canon The state therefore of the controversie betwixt us and the Papists is whether those seven whole bookes with the Appendices be Sacred Divine Canonicall We doe not deny but many of these especially Wisdome and Ecclesiasticus are very good and profitable and to be preferred before all humane Tractates but that they are properly and by an excellency Canonicall and of infallible truth out of which firme arguments may be drawne that we deny Those Bookes which the Jewes of old and the reformed Churches now reckon for truely Canonicall in the old Testament are received all even by our adversaries for Canonicall without any exception 2. for the Canonicall Bookes of the new Testament there is no controversie between us and so far we agree but in the old Testament whole Bookes are reckoned by them for Canonicall which we hold Apocryphall The reason why these Bookes at first were added to holy writ was this the Jewes in their later times before and at the comming of Christ were of two sorts some properly and for distinction sake named Hebrews inhabiting Jerusalem and the holy Land others were Hellenists that is the Jewes of the dispersion mingled with the Graecians These had written sundry bookes in Greeke which they made use of together with other parts of the old Testament which they had in Greeke of the translation of the 70 when they now understood not the Hebrew but the Hebrewes received onely the 22 Bookes before mentioned Hence it came that the Jewes delivered a double Canon of Scripture to the Christian Church the one pure unquestioned and Divine which is the Hebrew Canon the other in Greeke
adulterate corrupted by the addition of certaine bookes written in those times when God raised up no more Prophets among his people Drus. praeterit l. 5. Annotat. ad Act. Apost c. 6. Jun. Animad in Bell. cont 1. l. 1. c. 4. l. 2. c. 15. sect 21. Tertul. in Apol. c. 19. They are called Apocryphall i. secret and hidden not because the names of the writers are unknowne by that reason Judges and Ruth should be Apocryphall but because they were not wont to be read openly in the Church of God as the Canonicall bookes but secretly and in private by private persons or because their authority was obscure and doubtfull with the Ancient These bookes our Church rejecteth as not written by Divine inspiration for these reasons All the Canonicall bookes of the old Testament were written by the Prophets but none of these bookes were written by any of the Prophets for 1. The last of the Prophets of the Jewes was Malachy Mal. 4. 4 5. between whom and John Baptist came no Prophet Marke begins with the same words almost with which Malachy ended a good argument to prove that the new Testament is next to the old But these Bookes were written by such who lived most of them after Malachy 2. All the Prophets wrote in Hebrew the language which the Jewes understood but the Fathers affirme and Papists acknowledge that most of these bookes were written in Greeke ergo being not written by the Prophets they are not Canonicall 2. All the bookes of the old Testament were committed to the Jewes and safely kept by them Rom. 3. 2. our Saviour Christ which reproved the Jewes for corrupting the sence of the Scripture did yet never reprove them for rejecting those bookes which were divinely inspired which sacriledge he would not have concealed yea our Saviour sendeth us unto the Scriptures as they received them John 5. 39. Eâ—ras after the captivity is reported to have gathered all the Bookes of holy Scripture and safely to lay them up If the Jewes should have rejected or not received any bookes being Canonicall they had grievously erred which the Papists themselves will not affirme Yea there should have been some Canonicall Bookes which no Church received for besides the Church of the Jewes at that time there was none in the world The Canonicall Bookes of the old Testament were divided into Moses the Prophets and Psalmes with which agreeth the old distribution of the Hebrews into the Law Prophets and Hagiographa 3 There are two waies to know a booke to be Canonicall one by the testimony of some Prophet or Apostle the other by the certaine testimony of them which did live when the booke was published who did witnesse that the booke was written by some Prophet or Apostle But these bookes are known to be Canonicall neither of these waies they were rejected by the Jewes who lived in the times when they were written our Saviour Christ nor his Apostles never commend these Bookes unto us as endited by the Spirit They are cited by Christ and his Apostles for the confirmation of their doctrine All the Canonicall Bookes in generall John 5. 39. 10. 35. Rom. 16. 26. Luke 16. 29 31. Ch. 24. v. 25 27 44. The most of all in speciall Genesis Matth. 19. 4 5 6. Exodus Matth. 5. 21 27 33 38. Leviticus Gal. 3. 12. Numbers John 3. 14. Deuteronomy Acts 3. 22. Joshâ—a Heb. 11. 30 31. Judges Heb. 11. 32. Ruth Matth. 1. 3. First of Samuel Matth. 12. 3. Second of Samuel Heb. 1. 5. First of Kings Matth. 12. 42. Second of Kings Luke 4. 27. First of Chronicles Matth. 1. 3 7 10 13. Second of Chronicles Acts 7. 48. Ezra Matth. 1. 12 13. Job 1 Corinth 3. 19. Psalmes Acts 4. 25. Proverbs Heb. 12. 5 6 7. Esay Matth. 1. 23. Jeremy Heb. 10. 16 17. Ezechiel Matth. 25. 35. Daniel Matth. 24. 25. All the lesser Prophets Acts 7. 42. 15. 15 16. Hosea Matth. 12. 7. Joâ—l Acts 2. 12. Amos Acts 15. 16. Jonah Matth. 12. 40 41. Micha Matth. 10. 35. Naâ—um Rom. 10. 15. Habacuc Rom. 1. 17. Haggai Heb. 12. 26. Zachary Matth. 21 5. Malachy Luke 1. 16 17. These bookes were not cited by Christ and his Apostles for confirmation of their doctrine Ob. If they be not Canonicall therefore because they are not cited then Naâ—um and Zephany are not Canonicall Aratus Menander and Epimenides prophane Poets are Canonicall because they are cited Acts 17. 28. 1 Cor. 15. 33. Titus 1. 12. Sol. They are not therefore not Canonicall onely because they are not cited but especially because they have not the characters of Divine Scripture 2 Nahuâ— and Zephany are implicitely quoted when the bookes of the Prophets are mentioned Acts 7. 41. 15. 15 16. The Poets are not cited as Canonicall but the Apostle applied himselfe to his hearers who did much esteeme their authority Some have well coucluded from Acts 10. 43. that the Apocrypha are not to be received as Canonicall Scripture because they testifie not of Christ. 4 Those bookes which containe manifest untruths coutrary to the Word of God and the books of holy Scripture were not inspired of God for as God is true so is his word John 17. 17 sweetly agreeeng with it selfe and every part with other these bookes commend false things as true and approve things evill as right Judith chap 9 v 2 commends killing the Sichemites against Gen. 49. 6 7. 2 Mac. 14. 42. Razis is commended for killing himselfe the fact is not onely related but commended also in these words nobly manfully and this commendation doth plainly shew that the Authour thereof was not inspired of God when the Donatists out of this booke urged that it was lawfull for them to kill themselves as Razis did Augustine then was forced to acknowledge that the authority of this booke was uncertaine and questionable and proves it by the judgement of the Jewish Church Christ and the Christians Manifest fables are told in some of them for true histories as that of Toby Judith Bell and the Dragon If any desire a particular conâ—utation of the severall Bookes of the Apocrypha I commend to his reading that learned Treatise of Dr Raynolds de libris Apocryphis who hath so exactly handled this subject that to write of it after him were to write Iliads after Homer or to draw a line after Apelles 5. The most ancient Fathers and Councels which lived the best and first 500 yeeres after Christ rejected the same bookes which we doe Jerome on Matth. 23. saith concerning a testimony cited out of the Apocrypha Hoc quoniam ex Scriptura nihil habet authoritatis eadem facilitate rejicitur qua profertur Because this hath no authority out of Scripture it may as easily be rejected as it is offered All that the Papists object for these Bookes in the generall is that the third Councell at Carthage the
he readeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Caru they have pierced my hands and my feet yet it is in the Hebrew 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Caari as a Lion Sol. This is the onely argument which Lindon hath of any shew to prove that the Jewes have corrupted the Hâ—brew Text saith Rainolds against Hart Whitaker saith hoc unum posse ab illis probabile in fontibus Hebraicis corruptelae jundicium inveniri The same say John Isaac against Lindan Muis against Morinus Turretinus against Coton But it is easie saith Whitaker to vindicate this place from their calumnie For first learned men witnesse that Caru is read in many Hebrew Books John Isaac a Popish Jew in his second Book against Lindan witnesseth that he saw such a Book Hoc idem ego Johannes Isaac ipsa veritate bona conscientia testari possum quòd hujusmodi Psalterium apud avum meum viderim ubi in textu scriptum erat 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in margine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Et ita omnia olim exemplaria habuisse haud dubite Hinc itaque manifestum esse puto cur septuaginta etalij transtulerint foderunt Siquidem illi non Keri sed Ketif sunt secuti The Massorites say it was written Caru in many exact Copies It is not therefore a corruption but a divers reading in certain Copies by the mistake of the Scribes as Bellarmine himself confesseth Apparet saith he imprudenter quosdam dum se Hebraeos oppugnare credunt ecclesiam ipsam oppugnare Si enim illae correctiones Scribarum sunt Hebraici textus corruptiones sequitur apertè vulgatam quoque editionem esse corruptissimam quam tanten nobis Ecclesia pro versione authentica tradidit Bellarm. l. 2. de verbo Dei c. secundo Genebrard the Kings professor of Hebrew in Paris on the place concludes that the Jewes did not corrupt this word Vide sil in loc The Chaldee Paraphrast hath joyned both readings together q. d. they have digged or pierced my hands and my Feet as a Lion is wont to dig with his Teeth Varia lectio est in Biblijs Hebraeis in locis 848. Broughton de translat Morinus a learned Papist hath writt n 9. exercitations on the Bible and labours to prove from Beza Amama de Dieu and other Protestant writers that there are many faults in the Hebrew and Greek Copies which we now have Muis a Papist also hath answered him Ob. Psal. 19. 4. The Hebrew Books have in omnem terram exivit linea eorum their line is gone forth through all the earth but the Septuagint turn it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hierome sonus eorum their sound and Saint Paul approved of this version Rom. 10. 18. Sol. Whitaker in his answer to this objection follows Genebrard in his Scholia upon the place and Genebrard follows Beza on the 10. of the Rom. 18. The Hebrew word say they truly signifieth a line but the Septuagint Interpreters respected the sence and the Apostle followed them The scope of the Psalme is that Gods people may see what documents are given unto them of God whereby they may be brought and led to the true certain and saving knowledge of God to the 7. verse it sheweth how they were taught by the works of God thence to the end they were instructed by his word the Apostle alledgeth this Psalme to prove that the Jewes might come to know God by his word and thereby might have faith in Christ Jesus the sense therefore is not onely the delineation and constitution of things created but also the word of God and the doctrine of the Gospell long since propounded to the Jewes and so propounded as they could not but heare because it was published openly to all the whole world by the mystery of the holy Apostles out of the predictions of the Prophets Paul interprets the comparison propounded by the Prophet and teacheth that as certainly as the lines of heaven run forth into all the earth so certainly in these last times the doctrine of the Gospell came forth into all the earth by the Apostles preaching and therefore the Apostle did not rashly change the word of the Prophet because the Hebrew Text in the Prophet was corrupt but purposely in stead of delineation the Apostle put in sonus having respect to the present accomplishment of the promise whereby God had foretold that all the Gentiles should be converted to the communion of the Gospell and to this end he did foreshew that he would give unto them preachers Coton urgeth 2 other places to shew that the Hebrew Text is corrupted 2 Matth 23. and 27. of Matthew Ob. 2 Matth. 23. He shall be called a Nazarene is no where found though the Evangelist say that it is written therefore it followeth saith he that the Hebrew originall which we have is imperfect Sol. Saint Jerome saith that this place was objected to him abâ—ve a hundred times and that he hath as often answered it viz that if the Hebrew be imperfect having no such passage then is also that of the Septuagint and the vulgar so that the objection is not against the Hebrew but against the Scripture in what language soever it be Mâ—ldonat after he had well weighed divers opinions holds that of Jeromes for the most sure which is to draw Nazarene from Netzer a branch Esay 11. 1. Junius in his paralels Piscator Dr. Taylor Master Dod goe the same way Chrysostome and Theophylact because they cannot undoe this knot cut it thus saying that many of the Books of the Prophets are lost Bucer thinketh that place Judg. 15. 5. is here noted Samson being a Redeemer as he was a figure of Christ and the Book of the Judges was composed by divers Prophets Calvin Marlorat Beza Scultetus and Master Perkins seeme to incline to this opinion Our last large Annotations mention both these Interpretations but adhere rather to the former Ob. The second place urged by Cotton to prove the corruption of the Hebrew is 27. of Matthew v. 9. The Evangelist cites Jeremie for that which is to be found onely in Zacharie Sol. Junius in his paralels and Doctor Taylor on the temptation bring 6. answers to reconcile these places 1. Some say it joynes together both one place in Jeremy Chap. 18. 1. 2 3. and that of Zacharie but there is little or no agreement between them Secondly Some say that it is not in Jeremies writings which are Canonicall but in some Aprocryphall writings of Jeremy which the Jewes had and which Chrysostome confesseth he saw wherein these words were but it is not likely that the holy Evangelist would leave a Canonicall Text and cite an Apocryphall or give such credit to it or seek to build our faith upon it and by our rule that Book should be Canonicall which is cited by Christ or his Apostles 3. Some say that Matthew forgat and for Zachary put downe Jeremies so Augustine and Erasmus but with more forgetfulnesse
descent into Hell totidem verbis is not in the Scripture yet it may be deduced thence Acts 2. Wee shall now lay downe some propositions or Theoremes about the sufficiency of Scripture 1. In every Age of the Church the Lord hath revealed so much supernaturall truth as was for that age necessary unto salvation his wayes he made knowne to Moses Psal. 103. 7. and his statutes to Israel Deut. 4. 6. Psal. 147. 20. Heb. 1. 1. Therefore that is an erroneous opinion that before the Law written men were saved by the Law of nature and in the time of the Law by the Law of Moses and since in the time of the Gospel by the Word of grace 2. The substance of all things necessary to salvation ever since the fall of Adam hath beene and is one and the same as the true Religion hath beene one and unchangeable 1. The knowledge of God and Christ is the summe of all things necâ—ssary to salvation John 17. 3. Col. 2. 2. but this knowledge was ever necessary Jer 9. 23. Acts 4. 12. the Fathers indeed saw Christ more obscurely and aenigmatically we more clearely distinctly and perspicuously but yet they knew him and believed in him unto salvation as well as wee John 8. 56. 2. The Covenant of grace which God made with man is an everlasting Covenant therein the Lord hath revealed himselfe to be one and unchangeable as in nature so in will Heb. 13. 8. Rom 3. 29. shewing that as God is one in nature truth and constancy and that as well toward the Gentiles as toward the Jewes so hee would justifie both the circumcision and uncircumcision the Jew and the Gentile by one way of Religion that is to say through faith and belief in his Son Jesus Christ. 3. Christ and his Apostles professed and taught no new Religion but the same which the Scriptures of the old Testament did before instruct Matâ—hew 5. 17 John 5. 39. Acts 10 43 Luke 24. 25 26 27 44. 45. Acts 18 28. 17. 7. 26. 22. 28. 23. Rom. 6. 26. Therefore the beleeving Jewes and the converted Gentiles are sâ—iled the children of faithfull Abraham being justified by Faith as Abraham was Whence wee may conclude that before under and after the Law since the fall of Adam there was never but one true Catholick Religion or way to Heaven and happinesse The Word of God being uttered in old time sundry ways was at length made knowne by writing the Lord stirring up and by his holy Spirit inspiring his servants to write his Will and Pleasure So long as there was any truth in any Age necessary to bee more fully and clearly knowne then was already revealed in the Bookes of Moses it pleased God to stir up holy men whom he Divinely inspired and sufficiently furnished to make the Truth knowne unto the Church thus after Moses during the time of the Law the Lord raised up Prophets who opened the perfect way of life unto the Church of the old Testament more clearely then it was before manifested in the Bookes of Moses the time and Age of the Church requiring the same The Church of the Jewes in the severall Ages thereof was sufficiently taught and instructed in all things necessary to salvation by the writings of Mâ—ses and the Prophets which appeares 1. In that our Saviour being asked of one what hee should doe that hee might inherite eternall life answered what is written in the Law and Prophets how Readest thou Luke 10. 25 26. and out of the Scripture hee declared himselfe to be the Saviour of the World foretold and promised Matthew 21. 44. 26. 31. Luke 4 21. 24 25 26 27 44 John 3. 14. 2. The answer of Abraham to the Rich man sending his friends to Moses and the Prophets sheweth that they sufficed to instruct the faithfull Jewes in all things necessary to salvation Luke 16. 29 30. by them they might learne how to obtaine Life and escape Death when hee saith Let them heare them he meaneth them onely as that place is meant Mat. 17. 5. 3. The Jewes themselves acknowledged the sufficiency of those writings to leade them unto life and happinesse John 5. 39. 5. The Prophets did expound the Law of God and speake more plainely precisely and distinctly touching the comming of the Messias then Moses did but the last full and cleare Will of God touching the salvation of man was not manifested by them that was together and at once to be published and taught by the Messias who also at his comming did establish that order in the Church of God which was to continue therein for ever For 1. Christ was ordained of the Father to bee the great Doctor of his Church a Prophet more excellent then the rest that were before him both in respect of his Person Office Manner of receiving his Doctrine and the excellency of the Doctrin which he delivered 2. This was well knowne not onely among the Jewes but also among the Samaritanes in so much that the woman of Samaria could say I know when the Messias is come he will tell us all things John 4. 25. 3. The time wherein God spake unto us by his Sonne is called the last dayes or the last time Heb. 1. 2. 1 Pet. 1. 20. to note that we are not hereafter to expect or looke for any fuller or more cleare Revelation of Divine mysteries then that which was then delivered 4. Christ is called a mediator of the New Testament or the new Covenant Heb. 9. 15. because all things are established by him as they ought to continue for ever for that which is old decayeth and is ready to vanish but that which is new abideth Heb. 8. 13. 5. It pleased the Lord in great wisdome to reveale the Covenant of grace to the Church that she might not despaire but obscurely at the first that she might earnestly long for the coming of that Messiah who was to make known what he had heard and seene of the Father which dispensation was needfull that the grace of God might not be contemned as haply it would have been if God had fully revealed and made knowne his bounty unto man before he had seen his misery and the necessity thereof Our Saviour Christ for substance of doctriâ—e necessary to salvation taught nothing which was not before in some sort contained in the writings of Moses and the Prophets out of whom he confirmed his doctrine but that which was in them more obscurely Enigmatically and briefely he explained more excellently fully and cleerely the Apostles proved their doctrine out of the Books of Moses and the Prophets Act. 17. 11. and 26. 22. Luke 24. 27. Rom. 1. 2. Act. 28. 23. 6. All things necessary in that manner as we have spoken were taught and inspired to the Apostles by our Saviour Christ and there were no new inspirations after their times nor are we to expect further hereafter which we prove 1. By places
of Scripture John 14. 26. he that teacheth all things omitteth nothing Christ said all things to his Apostles as appeares John 15. 15. and 17. 8. John 16. 13. 2. By reasons drawne from thence 1. The plentifull pouring forth of the spirit was deferred till the glorifying of Christ he being glorified it was no longer to be delayed Christ being exalted on the right hand of God obtained the Spirit promised and that was not according to measure and poured the same in such abundance as it could be poured forth and received by men so that was fulfilled which was foretold by Joel 2. 28. Act. 2. 33. John 3. 34. 35. Act. 2. 16 17. 2. The Scripture and the prophesies of the old Testament doe teach and declare that all Divine truth should fully and at once be manifested by the Messias who is the onely Prophet High-Priest and King of his Church there is no other Revelation promised none other needfull besides that which was made by him Esay 11. 9. Act 3. 23. 24. Joel 2. 23. Vide Mercerum in loc therefore the last inspiration was made to the Apostles and none other to be expected The doctrine of the Law and the Prophets did suffice to salvation yet it did send the Fathers to expect somewhat more perfect 1 Pet. 1. 10 but to the preaching of the Gospell nothing is to be added we are not sent to waite for any clearer vision 3. So long as any truth needfull to be known was unrevealed or not plainly taught the Lord did stirre up some Prophet or other to teach the same unto the Church therefore the Lord surceaâ—ng to speake since the publishing of the Gospell of Jesus Christ and the delivery of the same in writing is unto us a manifest token that the whole will of God is now brought to light and that no new Revelation is to be expected Our 7th Proposition is Christ and his Apostles were able to propound and teach by lively voyce that doctrine which pertaines to perfection John 1. 18. and 11. 11. 32. John 8. 26. and the Apostles perfectly taught all things which are or shall be necessary for the Church Act. 20. 27. Gal. 1. 7. 8. 9. The doctrine of repentance and remission of sinnes in the name of Christ doth summarily containe all things necessarily to salvation Act. 5. 31. and 11. 11. but this doctrine the Apostles preached Act. 13. 38. 39. Luke 24. 47. The word of God is not onely Milke for Babes but strong Meat for men of ripe yeares 1 Cor. 3. 1. 2. Heb. 5. 14. and 6. 1. 2. therefore it containeth not onely matter of preparation but of perfection Or 8th Proposition is The sum and substance of that heavenly doctrine which was taught by the Prophets and Apostles was by them committed to writing the Holy Ghost giving them a commandement and guiding their hands therein that they could not erre so that the word preached and written by them is one in substance both in respect of matter which is the will and word of God and inward forme viz. the divine truth immediately inspired though different in the externall forme and manner of delivery Our 9th Proposition is that nothing is necessary to be known of Christians over and above that which is found in the old Testament which is not clearly and evidently contained in the Bookes of the Apostles and Evangelists Our last Proposition is that all things which have beene are or shall be necessary to the salvation of the Church to the end of the world are perfectly contained in the writings of the Prophets and Apostles long since divinely inspired written and published and now received by the Church of God so that now no new Revelation or Tradition beside those inspired published and comprehended in the Scripture are necessary for the salvation of the Church There are 3 opinions 1. Of the Papists who altogether deny it 2. Of the Socinians which would have all things expressely contained in Scripture and if it be not totidem verbis they reject it 3. Of the Orthodoxe who say it containes all things expressely or by consequence The expresse testimonies of Scripture forbidding even Angels to adde any thing to those things which are commanded by the Lord doe prove the perfection of the Scripture Deut. 4. 5. 12. and 12. 32. and 30. 10. and 5. 12 13 14. and 28. 58. Josh. 1. 7 8. Prov. 30. 5. wherefore the Apostle commands that no man presume above that which is written 1. Cor. 4. 6. 2 Tim. 3. 15 16. Divers reasons may be drawn from this famous place to prove the perfection of the Scripture 1. The Apostle teacheth that the Scriptures are able to make a man wise to salvation therefore there needeth no further counsell nor direction thereunto but out of the Scriptures 2 The Scriptures are able to make the man of God that is the Minister of the word perfect and compleat unto every worke of his Ministery whether it be by teaching true doctrine or confuting false by exhorting and setting forward to that which is good or dehorting from that which is evill Paul would not have us thinke that all and every writing viz. of Plato Aristotle is divinely inspired for in the 15. v. he not onely useth the plurall number calling them the holy * writings thereby to note the word of God and not one sentence or Booke but all the sentences and Bookes of the Scripture and also useth the Article which hath force of an universall note therefore the Greeke word the whole Scripture signifieth the whole altogether and not every part severally in this place 2. No one part of holy Scripture is able to make the Minister perfect therefore it must needs be understood of the whole body of holy Scripture wherein this sufficiency is to be found The Ancient Fathers and other Divines have from this place proved the perfection and sufficiency of the Scripture in all things necessary to salvation We doe not reason thus as the Papists charge us it is profitable therefore it is sufficient but because 1. The Scripture is profitable for all these ends viz. to teach sound doctrine to refute false opinions to instruct in holy life and correct ill manners therefore it is sufficient or it is profitable to all those functions of the Ministery that a Minister of the Church may be perfect therefore muchâ—more for the people Argumentum non nititur unica illa voce utilis sed toto sententiae camplexu Chamierus Hitherto of the perfection of the Scripture absolutely considered now followes the sufficiency thereof in opposition to unwritten traditions or verities as the Papists speake Doctor Davenant premiseth these things for the better understanding of the sufficiency of the Scripture 1. We speake of the State of the Church saith he in which God hath ceased to speake to men by the Prophets or Apostles divinely inspired and to lay open new Revelations to his
time of Austin fasting on the Sabbath day which was kept only at Rome Necessary Traditions which are delivered in the forme of a Precept that Easter is to bee celebrated on the Lords Day Free which are delivered in the forme of counsell as sprinkling of holy water Objection The Scripture it not perfect with a perfection of parts because many parts are either defective or excessive 1. Some labour wiâ—h a defect as Genesis 11. 12. a person is omitted in the Genealogy of Cainaan which was the Sonne of Aphâ—xad but it is reckoned in Luke in Christs Genealogy not in the old Testament therefore there is a defect Sol. Luke reckons it according to the vulgar opinion of the Jewes Junius in his paralels would have the fault to be in the Septuagint whom Luke followed not approving of their errour but yeelding to the time least the Gospell otherwise should have beene prejudicâ—d but Bezas opinion is rather to be approved of that this word is inserted from the Ignorance of those who undertooke to correct this Text according to the translation of the Seventy Interpreters For in an Ancient manuscript which Beza followed this word Cainaan was not to be found therefore he omitted it in his translation and so hath our great English Bible Ob. There is something found in the Scripture against the Commandement of God Deut. 4. 2. therefore there is excesse as well as defect for many Bookes which we beleeve to be Canonicall are added Sol. He doth not forbid adding by Gods Command but from the will of man for God himselfe added afterward The Papists arguments for Traditions answered Ob. Bellarmine saith Religion was preserved for 2000 yeares from Adam to Moses onely by Tradition therefore the Scripture is not simply necessary Sol. By the like reason I might argue that Religion was long preserved not onely without the Pope of Rome but also without Baptisme and the Lords Supper with the like institutions therefore they are not simply necessary yet none of ours hold the Scriptures simply necessary Secondly it is false that Religion was preserved all that while by ordinary Tradition onely for the living voyce of God sounded most perpetually in the Church and the doctrine of Religion was conveighed successivly from the Father to the Sonne which living voyce of God by little and little ceasing writing afterward succeeded and hath the same necessity now which Gods living voyce had before Ob. Whatsoever things are commended from Scripture are necessary but so are Traditions ergo they are necessary Joh 16. 12. I have yet many things to say unto you but ye cannot beare them now therefore say they the Lord spake many things which are not written Sol. 1. He saith not that he had many things to tell them which he had not taught them before but which they were not now so well capable of for it appeareth that he taught them that which they understood not and therefore they needed to be further taught of them by the holy Ghost which should not teach them any new thing that Christ had not taught but onely make them understand that which they had beene taught of our Saviour Christ. 2. If the holy Ghost did teach them any thing which our Saviour Christ had not before spoke unto them of yet that makes nothing for Traditions seeing that which the holy spirit taught them he taught them out of the Scriptures 3. If the holy Ghost should have taught the Apostles some things which neither Christ had told them of nor the Scriptures had taught them yet this is rather against the Papists For that which the holy Ghost taught them they undoubtedly left in record unto the Church as being faithfull Stewards and revealing the whole Counsell of God unto the people 4. It hath been the practise of Hereticks as Austine affirmeth at all times to cover their dreames and phantasies with this sentence of our Saviour Christ. Lastly if it be asked what were those grave and great mysteries which the Apostles could not for their rudenesse beare they are forsooth Oyle and Spittle in Baptisme Candles light at noone dayes which was not in the darker time of the Law Baptizing of Bels and such like gue-gaws as the grossest and carnallest men are fittest to receive Ob. 2 Thess. 2. 15. Therefore Brethren stand fast and hold the Traditions which ye have been taught whether by word or our Epistle From these words say our Adversaries it appeares that all things were not written nullum Papistae in Scripturis locum probabiliorem inveniunt saith Whitaker The Hereticks say the Rhemists on this place purposely guilefully and of ill conscience refraine in their translations from the Ecclesiasticall and most usuall word Tradition evermore when it is taken in good part though it expresse most exactly the signification of the Greeke word but when it â—oundeth in their fond fantasie againâ—â— the Traditions of the Church as indeed in true sense it never doth there they use it most gladly Here therefore and in the like plâ—ces that the reader may not so easily like of Traditions unwritten here commended by the Apostle they translate 〈◊〉 â—onstitutions Ordinances and what they can invent else to hide the truth from the Rimple or unwarry Reader whose translations have none other end but to be guile such by art and conveighance Thus farre the Rhemists Paul taught the Thessalonians some things by word of mouth which he taught them not in his two Epistles which he wrote unto them therefore he taught some doctrines which he wrote not as if that Paul wrote no more Epistles then these two whereby that which he taught not them in writing unto them he taught them by writing unto others Secondly how followeth this argument Paul wrote not all the doctrines of God unto the Thessalonians therefore they are not all written in the Propheticall and Evangelicall writings whereas it is plainly testified that the Old Testament containeth a perfect rule of the doctrine of salvation the new being written for a Declaration of the fulfilling and further clearing of that in the Old Testament Thirdly it appeareth manifestly in the Acts what was the summe of that which Paul taught the Thessalonians by word of mouth For there it is witnessed that Paul taught out of the Scriptures that it behoved Christ to suffer and rise againe from the dead and that Jesus was Christ this teaching then by word is there limited to the Scriptures of the Law and Prophets Neither ought it to seeme strange that this was the summe of all which the Apostle taught at Thessalonica where he tarried so small a while when amongst the Corinthians where he remained longest of any place and consequently taught most he sheweth that he taught nothing but Christ and him crucified Fourthly the Apostle himself in this very place calling verse 14. whatsoever he taught by word or wrote by the name of
in Christ. But they deny that there is an election of this or that particular man But God hath set down with himselfe from all eternity who shall lay hold on Christ to salvation and who not 2 Pet. 1. 10. speakes of an election personall Rom. 9. 11 12. of both elections axiomaticall and personall Some hold that Gods election is so uncertaine and changeable as that the elect may become reprobates and the reprobate elect But Gods election is most firme certaine and unchangeable John 6. 37. 10. 28. Matth. 24. 24. So much concerning Election Reprobation is the purpose of God to leave the rest of men to themselves that he may glorifie his justice in their eternall destruction The Schoolemen and others distidguish between a negatiue and positive or affirmative act of Reprobation The negative act is called preterition non-election or a will of not giving life The positive or affirmative act is called pre-damnation or a will of damning The object of it are some sinfull men or the greatest part of sinfull men which are called vessells of wrath sitted for destruction Rom. 9. 22. that there are more damned then saved is proved Matth. 20. 16. Matth. 7. 14. The end of reprobation is the declaration of Gods justice in punishing of sin There is no cause of reprobation in the Reprobate that they rather then others are passed by of God that is wholly from the vnsearcheable depth of Gods good pleasure but that damnation whereto they are adâ—udged is for their own sins Obj. 1 Tim. 2. 4. Who will have all men to be saved Sol. That is God would have some of all sorts of men to be saved so all men is taken 1. verse Let prayers be made for all men that is all manner of men he instanceth in one kinde viz. Kings All is likewise here to be taken not prosingulis genem but progenerum singulorum All manner of men of all Nations qualâ—â—es All in this place doth not signifie uniniversally every man in every age and condition but all opposed to the Jewes only all indefinitely that in the times of the new Testament of which the Apostle speaketh 2 Pet. 3. 9. Not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance therefore there is not an election of some and reprobation of others Sol. He speaks there only of the Elect he would have none of them to perish He speakes that for the comfort of the godly includes himself amongst them long-suffering to us-ward therefore he meanes those in the same condition with himself He shews why God staies the execution of his wrath because all his Elect are not gathered There is nothing doth more set out the glory excellencie and sufficiencie of God then his Decree O the infinite depth of the wisedome of God which hath fore-seen decreed and determined with himselfe the innumerable things that ever did or shall come to passe we should not search into the depths of his counsells Deut. 29. 29. But in all things professe our dependance on him and refer all to his decree Psal. 37. 5. They are justly blamed that ascribe any thing to chance fate fortune or good lucke as also such as are impatient under any crosse Admiring the methods of Gods eternall Counsell and the execution of it for the salvation of our soules will be a great part of our worke in heaven That is a desperate inference If I be predestinated I shall be saved though I neglect and scoffe at sanctity God hath predestinated the meanes as well as the end he hath decreed us to be holy as well as happy in good things the Devill strives to sever the meanes from the end in evill the end from the meanes We must not reason whether we be predestinated but use the means prove our Election by our calling wee should judge of our predestination not so much descendendo by prying into Gods secret Counsell as ascendendo by searching our own hearts It was good counsell that Cardinall Poole gave to one who asked him how he might most profitably read the Epistle to the Romans He advised him first to read the 12. chapter to the end and then the beginning of the Epistle to the 12. Chapter Because in the 12 â—h Chapter the Apostle falls on matter of duty and sanctification which is the only way to attain to the knowledge of those great mysteries handled in the beginning of Predestination Take heede of abusing this Doctrine 1. In respect of God quarrell not with his justice because hee hath determined not to give grace to some Rom. 9. 14. that any are saved it is from Gods mercie there can be no injustice in refusing when it is the meere mercie of God to take any as if of many Traitors the King spare some and hang up the rest neither have the Elect a just cause to glory nor the reprobate to complaine since undeserved grace is shewed to the one due punishment inflicted on the other It bewraies no more want of mercie in God that he takes but such then it did want of power because he made not many worlds since the exercising of one and the other is determined by his wisdome 2. This may comfort the people of God who may be certaine of their election and salvation Rom. 8. 38 39. Paul had not this by immediate revelation because he concludeth upon such arguments as are generall to all the godly see 1 John 3. 14. Certainty of mans election and salvation is not such as we have of arts and sciences yet the truths of God are more to be adhered unto then any humane principle 3. Nor is it such as we have of doctrinall truths wee are not so perswaded of Gods favour in particular to us as that there is a God and that there is Jesus Christ because the dogmaticall truth is contained in the Scripture the other is but a practicall conclusion drawn from the Generall 3. It is not such an assurance as expelleth all doubting wavering Mar. 9. 24. yet doubting is a sin and we are to bewaile it but the Papists teach doubting and praise it under the name of humility and say it keeps us from presumption 4. It is not such as presumption and carnall security excluding all use of the meanes worke out your salvation with feare those which have been most perswaded of Gods love to them have been most active for him the love of Christ constraineth us 5. It is more then probable conjecturall or morall 6. It is not of our own conscience and Spirit only but inabled by the Spirit of God thus to conclude and determine Rom. 8. The Spirit witnesseth with our Spirit Those that find this in themselves should feed upon this eternall comfort it is absolute eternall immutable nothing shall oppose it who shall lay anything to the Elect It is full of love and grace We may make