infallible ground there is none such of supernatural truth but the Scripture Because our Adversaries do contend for Traditions not written hotly and zealously against the total perfection of the Scripture that they might thrust upon us many points by their own confession not contained in Scripture and usurp to themselves irrefragable authority in the Church it shall not be amisse largely to consider of this matter And first to enquire of the signification of the words Greek and Latine which are translated Tradition and then to come to the matter which is controverted between us and the Papists The Greek word signifying Tradition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which in the New Testament is used onely in these places Matth. 15. 2 3 6. Mark 7. 3 5 8 9 13. 1 Cor. 11. 2. Gal. 1. 14. Colos 2. 8. 2 Thess. 2. 15. and 3. 6. and in the vulgar Latine is rendred Traditio Mat. 15. 2 3 6. Mark 7. 3 5 8 9 13. Gal. 1. 14. Col. 2. 6. 2 Thess. 2. 15. and 3. 6. and Praecepta 1 Cor. 11. 2. Whereto the Rhemists translation which seemeth to be but a bare translation of the Vulgar Latin doth wholly agree using the word Tradition every where excepting 1 Cor. 11. 2. where they use the word Pâ—ecepts but set in the margent the word Tradition Arias Montanus in his interlineal Translation doth render it Traditio Beza doth commonly express it by the word traditio In the English Geneva Bible we translate it by the word Instruction Tradition calling mens precepts Traditions the Apostles Doctrine Ordinances or Instructions not that we feared the word Tradition but because we would not have the simple deceived as though the unwritten verities of the Papists were thereby commended or as though we had some honourable conceit of them and what we did herein the signification of the word doth give us free liberty to do in our last English Translation we use the word Tradition as often as the Vulgar Latine or the Rhemists have done not that we were driven by fear or shame to alter what was done before but because we would cut off all occasion of carping at our Translation though never so unjust First We contend not about the name Tradition the word may lawfully be used if the sense affixed thereto be lawful 2. All Traditions unwritten are not simply condemned by us 3. The Apostles delivered by lively voice many observations dispensable and alterable according to the circumstances of time and persons appertaining to order and comelinesse only we say That they were not of the substance of Religion that they were not general concerning all Churches 4. We receive the number and names of the Authors of Books Divine and Canonical as delivered by tradition but the Divine Truth of those Books is in it self clear and evident unto us not depending on the Churches Authority The Books of Scripture have not their Authority quoad nos from the approbation of the Church but win credit of themselves and yield sufficient satisfaction to all men of their Divine Truth whence we judge the Church that receiveth them to be led by the Spirit of God yet the Number Authors and Integrity of the parts of those Books we receive as delivered by Tradition 5. The continued practice of such things as are neither expresly contained in Scripture nor the example of such practice expresly there delivered though the Grounds Reasons and cause of the necessity of such practice be there contained and the benefit and good that followeth of it we receive upon Tradition though the thing it self we receive not for Tradition Of this sort is the Baptism of Infants which may be named a Tradition because it is not expresly delivered in Scripture that the Apostles did baptize â—nfants nor any expresse precept there found that they should so do yet is not this so received by bare and naked Tradition but that we finde the Scripture to deliver unto us the ground of it Bellarmine and Maldonat both do confesse That the Baptism of Infants may be proved by the Scripture and therefore Maldonat concludes Nobis verò traditio non est Bellarmine as Whitaker shews contradicts himself for first he saith That the Baptism of Infants is an unwritten Tradition and after That the Catholicks can prove Baptism of Infants from the Scriptures To this head we may referre the observation of the Lords-day the precept whereof is not found in Scripture though the practice be And if for that cause any shall name it a Tradition we will not contend about the word if he grant withall that the example Apostolical hath the force of a Law as implying a common equity concerning us no lesse then it did them If any man shall call the summary comprehension of the chief heads of Christian Doctrine contained in the Creed commonly called The Apostles Creed a Tradition we will not contend about it For although every part thereof be contained in Scripture yet the orderly connexion and distinct explication of those principal Articles gathered into an Epitome wherein are implied and whence are inferred all Conclusions Theological is an Act humane not divine and in that sense may be called a Tradition But let it be noted withall that we admit it not to have that credit as now it hath to be the Rule of Faith for this is the priviledge of holy Scripture The Creed it self was gathered out of Scripture and is to be expounded by the Scripture therefore it is not given to be a perfect Canon of faith and manners By Tradition is noted 1. Whatsoever is delivered by men divinely inspired and immediately called whether it be by lively voice or by writing 2. In special it notes the word of God committed to writing 1 Cor. 15. 3. 3. It signifies Rites expresly contained in writing Act. 6. 14. 4. It betokens that which is not committed to writing but only delivered by lively voice of the Apostles 5. It signifieth that which is invented and delivered by men not immediately called In Scripture Tradition is taken 1. In good part for any Rite or Doctrine of God delivered to his Church either by word or writing whether it concern faith and good works or the external Government of the Church 2 Thess. 2. 15. 1 Cor. 11. 15. and 23. 2. In ill part it noteth the vain idle and unwarrantable inventions of men whether Doctrine or Rites Mat. 15. 3. Mar. 7. 8 9. When the Fathers speak reverently of Traditions by the word Tradition either they understand the holy Scripture which also is a Tradition it is a Doctrine left unto us Or by Traditions they understand observations touching Ecclesiastical policy Du Moulin Reasons confirming the sufficiency of Scripture against Popish Traditions 1. The whole Church is founded upon the Doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles which were not true if any Doctrine was necessary to Salvation not revealed by the Prophets and Apostles 2.
Christ had told them of nor the Scriptures had taught them yet this is rather against the Papists For that which the holy Ghost taught them they undoubtedly left in record unto the Church as being faithful stewards and revealing the whole counsel of God unto the people 4. It hath been the practice of Hereticks as Augustine affirmeth at all times to cover their dreams and phantasies with this sentence of our Saviour Christ. Lastly If it be asked What were those grave and great mysteries which the Apostles could not for their rudeness bear they are forsooth oyl and spittle in Baptism Candles light at noon dayes which was not in the darker time of the Law baptizing of Bels and such like gue-gaws as the grossest and carnallest men are fittest to receive Object 2 Thess 2. 15. Therefore Brethron stand fast and hold the Traditions which ye have been taught whether by word or our Epistle From these words say our Adversaries it appears that all things were not written Et nullum Papistae in Scripturis locum probabiliorem inveniunt saith Whitaker The Hereticks say the Rhemists on this place purposely guilefully and of ill conscience refrain in their Translations from the Ecclesiastical and most usual word Tradition evermore when it is taken in good part though it expresse most exactly the signification of the Greek word but when it soundeth in their fond phantasie against the Traditions of the Church as indeed in true sense it never doth there they use it most gladly Here therefore and in the like places that the Reader may not so easily like of Traditions unwritten commended by the Apostle they translate Instructions Constitutions Ordinances and what they can invent else to hide the Truth from the simple or unwary Reader whose Translations have none other end but to beguile such by Art and Conveyance Thus farre the Rhemists Paul taught the Thessalonians some things by word of mouth which he taught them not in his two Epistles which he wrote unto them therefore he taught some Doctrins which he wrote not as if that Paul wrote no more Epistles then these two whereby that which he taught not them in writing unto them he taught them by writing unto others Secondly How followeth this Argument Paul wrote not all the Doctrines of God unto the Thessalonians therefore they are not all written in the Prophetical and Evangelical writings whereas it is plainly testified that the Old Testament containeth a perfect Rule of the Doctrine of salvation the New being written for a Declaration of the fulfilling and further clearing of that in the Old Testament Thirdly It appeareth manifestly in the Acts what was the summe of that which Paul taught the Thessalonians by word of mouth For there it is witnessed that Paul taught out of the Scriptures that it behoved Christ to suffer and rise again from the dead and that Jesus was Christ this teaching then by word is there limited to the Scriptures of the Law and Prophets Neither ought it to seem strange that this was the summe of all which the Apostle taught at Thessalonica where he he tarried so small a while when amongst the Corinthians where he remained longest of any place and consequently taught most he sheweth that he taught nothing but Christ and him crucified Fourthly The Apostle himself in this very place calling vers 14. whatsoever he taught by word or wrote by the name of the Gospel doth declare evidently that he taught nothing but that which is contained in Scripture seeing the Apostle defineth the Gospel which he preached to be that which is contained in the Scriptures Fifthly That the Thessalonians had some part of Christian Doctrine delivered by word of mouth that is by the Apostles preaching at such time as he did write unto them and some part by his Epistles the Text enforceth us to grant But that the Church at this day or ever since the Testament was written had any Tradition by word of mouth necessary to salvation which was not contained in the Old and New Testament we will never grant The Papists do commonly abuse the name of Tradition which signifieth properly a delivery or a thing delivered for such a matter as is delivered onely by word of mouth and so received from hand to hand that is never put in writing but hath his credit without the holy Scripture of God as the Jews had their Cabala and the Scribes and the Pharisees their Traditions besides the Law of God For the justifying of our Translation it is true that we alter according to the circumstances of the place especially considering that the word Tradition which of it self is indifferent as well to that which is written as to that which is not written hath been of us and them appropriated to note forth onely unwritten Constitutions therefore we must needs avoid in such places as this the word Traditions though our last Translation useth it where the simple might be deceived to think that the Holy Ghoâ—t did ever commend any such to the Church which he would not have committed to writing in the holy Scriptures and in stead of the word so commonly taken although it do not necessarily signifie any such matter we doe use such words as doe truely expresse the Apostles meaning and the Greek word doth also signifie therefore we use these words Ordinances or Instructions Institutions or the Doctrine delivered all which being of one or near sense the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth signifie and the same doth Tradition signifie if it be rightly understood Object 1 Timothy 6. 20. O Timothy Keep that which is committed to thy trust By the name of pledge saith Bellarmine not the Scripture but the treasure of unwritten Doctrine is understood Depositum say the Rhemists is the whole Doctrine of Christianity being taught by the Apostles and delivered their Successors Answ. Though other learned men interpret this pledge or gage to be the gift of the Holy Ghost yet we willingly acknowledge that it is to be understood of the Doctrine of Christianity as that which hath best ground both by circumstance of this and conference of other places Whence we inferre That the Doctrine of truth is not the Churches Decrees but the Lords given to the Church to keep only wherewith the Title of a pledge cannot stand unlesse one may lay to pledge a thing in his own hands since in Popery the Church her self maketh the Doctrine which her self taketh to pledge Herein they handle it like a pledge that they lock it up fast where the people of God for whose use it is given to be kept cannot come unto it What had become of the Law of God if others had not been more faithful keepers of it then the Priests to whom the principal Copy thereof written with the finger of God himself was committed There are some points of faith not contained in the Scripture neither in the Old nor New
The Prophets and Christ and his Apostles condemn Traditions Isa. 29. 13. Mat. 15. 3 6. Col. 2. 8. Therefore they are not to be received Christ opposeth the Commandment and Scriptures to Traditions therefore he condemns Traditions not written If the Jews might not adde to the Books of Moses then much lesse may we adde to the Canon of Scripture so much increased since 3. Those things which proceed from the will of God only can be made known to us no other way but by the Revelation of the Scripture all Articles of Faith and Precepts of Manners concerning substance of Religion proceed from the will of God only Mat. 16. 17. 1 Cor. 2. 9 10 11. Gal. 1. 8. As in this place the Apostle would have nothing received besides that which he preached so 1 Cor. 4. 6. He will have nothing admitted above or more then that which is written See Act. 26. 22. Iohn 20. ult Whence it is manifest that all necessary things may be found in Scripture since full and perfect Faith ariseth from thence which eternal salvation followeth Bellarmine saith Iohn speaks only of the miracles of Christ that he wrote not all because those sufficed to perswade the world that Christ was the Son of God Those words indeed in ver 30. are to be understood of Christs miracles but those in ver 31. rather are to be generally interpreted for the History only of the miracles sufficeth not to obtain Faith or Life The Question betwixt the Papists and us is De ipsa Doctrina tradita non de tradendi modo touching the substance of the Doctrine delivered not of the manner of delivering it and of Doctrine delivered as the Word of God not of Rites and Ceremonies They maintain that there be doctrinal Traditions or Traditions containing Articles of Faith and substantial matters of Divine Worship and Religion not found in the holy Scriptures viz. Purgatory Invocation of Saints Adoration of Images Papal Monarchy Bellarmine and before him Peresius distinguisheth Traditions both from the Authors and the Matter From the Authors into Divine Apostolical and Ecclesiastical From the Matter into those which are concerning Faith and concerning Manners into perpetuall and temporall universall and particular necessary and free Divine Traditions that is Doctrines of Faith and of the Worship and service of God any of which we deny to be but what are comprized in the written Word of God Apostolick Traditions say they are such Ordinances as the Apostles prescribed for ceremony and usage in the Church as the observation of the memorial of the Nativity Death and Resurrection of Christ the alteration of the seventh day from the Jews Sabbath to the day of Christs Resurrection Ecclesiastical ancient Customs which by degrees through the Peoples consent obtained the force of a Law Traditions concerning Faith as the perpetuall Virginity of Mary the Mother of Christ and that there are onely four Gospels of Manners as the sign of the Crosse made in the Fore-head Fasts and Feastings to be observed on certain dayes Perpetual which are to be kept to the end of the World Temporal for a certain time as the observation of certain legal Ceremonies even to the full publishing of the Gospel Universal Traditions which are delivered to the whole Church to be kept as the observation of Easter Whit sontide and other great Feasts Particular which is delivered to one or more Churches as in the time of Augustine fasting on the Sabbath-day which was kept only at Rome Necessary Traditions which are delivered in the form of a Precept that Easter is to be celebrated on the Lords Day Free which are delivered in the form of a Councel as sprinkling of holy Water Object The Scripture is not perfect with a perfection of parts because many parts are either defective or excessive 1. Some labour with a defect as Genes 11. 12. a person is omitted in the Genealogy of Canaan which was the Sonne of Arphaxad but it is reckoned in Luke in Christs Genealogy not in the Old Testament therefore there is a defect Answ. Luke reckons it according to the vulgar opinion of the Jews Iunius in his Parallels would have the fault to be in the Septuagint whom Luke followed not approving of their errour but yielding to the time least the Gospel otherwise should have been prejudiced but Beza's opinion is rather to be approved of that this word is inserted from the Ignorance of those who undertook to correct this Text according to the Translation of the Seventy Interpreters For in an Ancient Manuscript which Beza followed this word Canaan was not to be found therefore he omitted it in his Translation and so hath our great English Bible Object There is something found in the Scripture against the Commandment of God Deut. 4. 2. therefore there is excess as well as defect for many Books which we believe to be Canonical are added Answ. He doth not forbid adding by Gods Command but from the will of man for God himself added afterward The Papists Arguments for Traditions answered Object Bellarmine saith Religion was preserved for two thousand years from Adam to Moses onely by Tradition therefore the Scripture is not simply necessary Ans. By the like reason I might argue That Religion was long preserved not only without the Pope of Rome but also without Baptism and the Lords Supper with the like Institutions therefore they are not simply necessary yet none of ours hold the Scriptures simply necessary 2. It is false that Religion was preserved all that while by ordinary Tradition only for the living voice of God sounded most perpetually in the Church and the Doctrine of Religion was conveyed successively from the Father to the Son which living voice of God by little and little ceasing writing afterward succeeded and hath the same necessity now which Gods living voice had before Object Whatsoever things are commended from Scripture are necessary but so are Traditions Ergò They are necessary Iohn 16. 12. I have yet many things to say unto you but ye cannot bear them now therefore say they the Lord spake many things which are not written Answ. 1. He saith not that he had many things to tell them which he had not taught them before but which they were not now so well capable of For it appeareth that he taught them that which they understood not and therefore they needed to be further taught of them by the holy Ghost which should not teach them any new thing that Christ had not taught but onely make them understand that which they had been taught of our Saviour Christ. 2. If the holy Ghost did teach them any thing which our Saviour Christ had not before spoke unto them of yet that makes nothing for Traditions seeing that which the holy Spirit taught them he taught them out of the Scriptures 3. If the holy Ghost should have taught the Apostles some things which neither
raised The first principles of heavenly Doctrine are named here a foundation because they are the first things which are known before which nothing can be known and because upon the knowledge of these things all other parts of heavenly knowledge do depend They must be so firmly laid and received at the first as they should never be questioned more not that Ministers may not preach again of Principles Those that deny Fundamentals must of necessity destroy Religion Perfection is building on the old foundation In no age since the Gospel dawned in the world were all fundamentals in Religion denied till now The Apostles are the foundation of the Church Ephes. 2. 20. Revel 21. 14. in three respects 1. Because they were the first which founded Churches and converted unbelievers to the faith 2. Because their doctrine which they received immediately from God by most undoubted revelation without mixture of errour or danger of being deceived is the Rule of Faith to all after-comers 3. Because they were Heads Guides and Pastors of the whole universal Church The Proposition or Observation which ariseth from these words thus opened may be this The Principles and Foundations of Christian Religion must be well laid Or thus Catechizing and instructing of the people in the Principles of Religion is a necessary Duty to be used The Apostle illustrates this by a comparison first from Schools secondly from building the foundation must be first laid The excellent definition of catechising which the Apostle here gives yeelds us two good proofs of its necessity 1. It is the Doctrine of the beginning of Christ by some rendred not unfitly for the sense which gives beginning in Christ. 2. It is a foundation which bears up all the building without this preaching is to no purpose which though it makes the least shew yet it is of greatest use it establisheth men and keeps them free from wavering 3. This course is most agreeable 1. To Art all Arts proceed from principles Physicians have their principles Lawyers their maxims Philosophers their chief sentences 2. To Nature which first forms the vital parts then the more remote 3. It is sutable to reason Principles are 1. Easiest in themselves 2. Facilitate other matters 3. Are the most necessary Doctrines of all the rest they bear up all the rest 4. Are of continual and constant use Principia sunt minima quantitate maxima virtute 4. Gods order and practice hath been still to lay principles things might easily passe from one to another at first they lived so long Cain and Abels sacrificing is an evidence of catechising before the Flood there was no Word written then therefore it is like their Fathers taught them It was practised by Abraham Gen. 18. 19. the fruit of which observe in his sonne Gen. 24. 63. and servant Gen. 12. 26. God himself writes a Catechism for the Jews describing a short compendium of Religion in the two Authentick Tables of the Law Hannah delivered Samuel to Eli his Instructor so soon as he was weaned Iehoiada taught the young King Iihoash David and Bathsheba practised it 2 Chron. 28. 8 9. Psal. 34. 11. Prov. 4. 4. 31. 1. and Salomon himself seems to give that precept out of the most experience of his own most excellent education Teach a childe the trade of his way and when he is old he shall not depart from it though himself scarce did so and Eccles. 12. 23. he draws all which he had said in his whole Book to two heads Fear God and keep his Commandments Catechizing was also practised by Christ and his Apostles Luke 2. 4. Acts 22. 3. Heb. 6. 1 2 3. Christ allowed of Hâ—sanna sung by children He begins with regeneration to Nicodemus and he drew the whole Law into two heads Matth. 22. 37. Iohn and Christ preacht Faith and Repentance and the Apostles after them Theophilus was catechized Luke 1. 4. Apollos Act. 18. 23. Timothy 1 Tim. 3. 15 2 Tim. 2. 2. The Apostle Paul commends to Timothies custody a patern of wholsome Doctrine which he cals A form of Doctrine Rom. 6. 17. and the Analogy of faith Rom. 12. 6. that is certain plain rules unto which all others must hold proportion The Magdeburgenses observe from these places and that Heb. 6. that there was Catechismus ab Apostolis traâ—itus that the Apostle drew the Doctrine of the Gospel into short heads for the instructing of the children of the Church This Duty principally belongs to Ministers their Office is set down under the name of catechizing Let him which is catechized make him that catechizeth partaker Gal. 6. 6. Ministers must plant and beget as well as increase and build up feed the Lambs as well as the Sheep they are compared to Nurses wise Stewards skilfull builders it must be performed by Housholders also Ephes. 6. 4. God chargeth Parents to perform this Duty Deut. 6. 6 7. Rehearse them continually whet them upon thy children often go over the same thing as a knife doth the whetstone They are bound to bring up their children in the nurture and information of the Lord Children were to be taught the meaning of the Passeover Exod. 12. 16. Masters of Families also must instruct their servants which are ungrounded as children Christ instructed his Apostles he taught them how to pray he being the Master of the Family and they his Family as appeareth because he did eat the Passeover together with them and the Law appoints that every family should celebrate that Feast together The reason why God specifieth not this point in the Masters duty is because if it be performed by the Father it shall be needlesse seeing it is done to the Masters hand but if the Father neglect it surely the Master which succeeds in the Fathers room and hath his Authority must see it done For as a Father in Israel was bound to see his own sonne circumcised so he was bound to see his servant circumcised and if to circumcise him sure he must as well make him as his childe to know what Circumcision meaned And what Christ did as a master of a Family that must every Master of family do seeing we must be followers of Christ every one in his place therefore every one must instruct his ignorant servants in the truths of Religion The Jews did use Catechizing Cyprian saith Optatus exercised it at Carthage and Origen at Alexandria Clemens Alexandrinus had his Poedagogus Lactantius and Calvin their Institutions Athanasius his Synopsis Augustine his Enchiridion his Books De Doctrina Christiana and De Catechizandis rudibus Catechizing is Institutio viva voce a kinde of familiar conference The Hebrew verb Chanach signifieth to instruct or train up even from childehood and to initiate or dedicate from which word holy Henoch had his name importing nurture in the fear of God The Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth to sound or
vers 14. 1 Pet. 3. 15. Christians should be ready to give an answer to every man which doth ask them a reason of the hope which is in them the foundation is that which is first and surest laid and hath an influence into all the building Men should do all upon trial and solid conviction 1 Thess. 5. 21. 1 Ioh. 4. 1. The Papists would have the people take things upon trust they say those places concerne the Doctours of the Church not the people but compare the 20 and 21. vers in the Thessalonians and 1. vers with 6. in Iohn and we shall see the contrary This trial is profitable First Because truth then will have a greater force on the conscience Secondly This is the ground of constancie 2 Pet. 3. 17. Thirdly Hereby we shall be able to maintain the truth Matthew 11. 19. The Scriptures are fundamentum quo the fundamental writings which declare the salvation of Christians Iohn 5. 37. Christ fundamentum quod the fundamental means and cause which hath purchased and doth give it Iohn 4. 42. The person we must build on is Christ 1 Cor. 3. 11. He is called the foundation of foundations Isa. 28. The doctrinal foundation is the written Word of God which is not only the object and matter of our faith but the rule and reason of it Hold Christ as your Rock build on him the Scripture as your rule and the reason of your believing this is general there are some particulars First Some things are simply necessary It were a notable work for one to determine this how much knowledge were required of all Secondly Not absolutely necessary Some make the foundation too narrow some again too wide some say that if a man nean well and go on according to the light he hath though he know not Christ he shall be saved Others say that all are bound to know distinstly the Articles of the Creed Fundamental truths are all such points of Doctrine which are so plainly delivered in Scripture that whosoever doth not know or follow them shall be damned but he that doth know and follow these though erring in other things shall be saved All the principles of Religion are plain and easie delivered clearly in 1. Scripture they are to be a rule to judge of other Doctrines 2. They are very few say some reduced to two heads by Iohn Baptist Mark 1. 15. and by Paul 2 Tim. 1. 13. 3. In all principles necessary to salvation there hath been agreement among all the Churches of Christ Ephes. 4. 5. though they may differ in superstructures Quod ubique quod semper quod ab omnibus creditur Catholicam est Vincent Lyrin These Fundamentals said a Reverend Divine now with God are twelve three concerning God three concerning Man three concerning the Redeemer three concerning the means of attaining good by this Redeemer Concerning God 1. There is one God which is an Infinite Perfect and Spirituall Essence 2. This one God is distinguished into three Persons or manners of subsistence after an incomprehensible way which we believe but cannot perfectly understand The Father begetting the Son begotten and the holy Ghost proceeding 3. This one God the Father Sonne and holy Ghost is the Maker Preserver and Governour of all things by his Wisdom Power Justice Providence Concerning man 1. That he was made by God of a visible body and an immortal and spiritual soul both so perfect and good in their kindes that he was perfectly able to have attained eternal life for himself which was provided as a reward of his obedience 2. That being thus made he yielded to the temptations of the Devil and did voluntarily sin against God in eating of the Tree forbidden and so became a childe of wrath and heir of cursing an enemy to God and slave to the Devil utterly unable to escape eternal death which was provided as a recompence of his disobedience 3. That he doth propagate this his sinfulnesse and misery to all his posterity Concerning Christ. 1. That he is perfect God and perfect Man the second Person in the Trinity who took the Nature of man from the Virgin Mary and united it to himself in one personal Subsistence by an incomprehensible Union 2. That in mans Nature he did die and suffer in his Life and Death sufficient to satisfie Gods Justice which man had offended and to deserve for mankinde Remission of sins and Life everlasting and that in the same Nature he Rose again from the Dead and shall also Raise up all men to receive Judgement from him at the last Day according to their Deeds 3. That he is the only sufficient and perfect Redeemer and no other merit must be added unto this either in whole or part Lastly Concerning the Means of applying the Redeemer they are three 1. That all men shall not be saved by Christ but onely those that are brought to such a sight and feeling of their own sinfulnesse and misery that with sorrow of heart they do bewail their sins and renouncing all merits of their own or any creature cast themselves upon the mercies of God and the only merits of Jesus Christ which to do is to repent and believe and in this hope live holily all the remainder of their life 2. That no man is able thus to see his sinnes by his own power renounce himself and rest upon Christ but God must work it in whom he pleaseth by the cooperation of his Spirit regenerating and renewing them 3. That for the working of this Faith and Repentance and direction of them in a holy life he hath left in writing by the Prophets and Apostles infallibly guided to all truth by his Spirit all things necessary to be done or believed to salvation and hath continued these writings to his people in all ages Observe those places Act. 15. 11. 1 Tim. 1. 15. Let a man hold this that there was nothing but death in the world till Christ came and that he is come to save sinners Ioh. 17. 3. Secondly There are practical places 1 Cor. 6. 9. Titus 3. 8. Let us 1. See our selves dead without Christ and wholly trust in him 2. Let us be exemplary in our lives and conversations There are other Fundamentals which are only comparatively necessary that is expected from one man which is not expected from another and more from those that live in the Church Have these six Principles of the Apostle not only in your heads but hearts 1. That a man is dead in himself 2. That his remedy lies out of himself 3. Know the Doctrine of the Sacraments 4. The Word of God 5. Have some apprehension of the life to come 1. That there is a passage from death to life 2. That there is a fixed and irrevokable estate after this life 6. Hold the Doctrine of Faith so that Christ may live in you and you be delivered up into that forme of Doctrine lay hold on
soul. 2. It separates the heart from lusts and the world 3. Alters and changeth the customs of men 4. It keeps the heart up against all the power of the devil It quickneth the dull Psal. 119. 93 107. comforteth the feeble Rom. 15. 4. giveth light to the simple Psal. 19. 7. convinceth the obstinate 1 Cor. 12. 3. 14. 24. reproveth errors rebuketh vices 2 Tim. 3. 16. is a discerner of the thoughts 1 Cor. 14. 24 25. and aweth the conscience Iam. 4. 12. 10. The Candour and Sincerity of the Pen-men or Amanuenses respecting Gods glory only and not their own and in setting down not only the sins of others but their own slips and infirmities doth testifie that they were guided by the holy Ghost Moses shews his disobedience Numb 11. 11. Ionah his murmuring Ionah 1. 4. Ieremiah his fretting Ier. 20. 14. David shames himself in his Preface to the 51 Psalm St Mark wrote the Gospel out of Peters mouth and yet the denial of Peter is more expresly laid down by the Evangelist Saint Mark then any other and Paul sets down with his own Pen his own faults in a sharper manner then any other Matthew the Evangelist tels us of Matthew the Publican The Pen-men of the holy Scripture were holy men called sent inspired by the Spirit which had denied the world with the lusts and affections thereof and were wholly consumed with zeal for the glory of God and salvation of men 2 Pet. 3. 15. 2 Tim. 3. 16. Matth. 16. 17. Gal. 2. 11 12. Ephes. 2. 3 5. They learned not of men what they wrote Moses David Amos were Herdsmen Ieremiah was almost a childe Peter Iames and Iohn were in their ships other Apostles were unlearned before their Calling Acts 4. 13. Moses learned of the Aegyptians and Daniel of the Caldeans humane Arts and Sciences but they could not learn of them the knowledge of the true God they themselves being ignorant and grosse Idolaters Neither could they erre in that which they delivered for by them the Spirit of Christ and Christ himself did speak 1 Pet. 1. 11. 2 Pet. 1. 21. Acts 28. 25. 2 Cor. 13. 3. In their own judgement the most holy did erre as 1 Sam. 16. 1. and Nathan 2 Sam. 6. which errour is truly related in the Scripture but when they spake according to the guidance of the Spirit which did ever assist them in the penning of the Scripture they could not erre I have learned saith Augustine to Ierom to give this honour only to the Canonical Books firmly to believe that no author of thâ—m erred in writing from all others he expected proof from Scripture or Reason 11. The wonderful Consent singular Harmony and Agreement of the Scriptures shews that they came not from men but from God Luk. 1. 70. Acts 3. 18. Iohn 5. 46. each part sweetly agreeth with it self and with another and with the whole Acts 26. 22. 11. 17. Luke 24. 27 44. Iohn 5. 46. Matth. 4. 4. what was foretold in the Old is fulfilled in the New Testament If there seem any contrariety either in numbring of years circumstance of time and place or point of Doctrine The fault is in our apprehension and ignorance not in the thing it self and by a right interpretation may easily be cleared See D. Willet on Gen. 24. 38. Doctor Vane in his lost Sheep returned home Chap. 2. saith Seeing no man is infallibly sure that all the answers used to reconcile the seeming contradictions of Scripture are true no man can be assured by the evidence of the thing that there is that perfect Harmony in the Scriptures nor consequently that they are thereby known to be the word of God Moreover if we were infallibly assured that there were this perfect Harmony in the Scriptures yet this to me seemed not a sufficient proof that they are the Word because there is no reason forbids me to believe that it may not be also found in the writings of some men yea I make no question but it is to be found and that with lesse seeming contradiction then is in the Scripture yet no man accounts that this proves their writings to be the Word of God After he saith We believe it to be harmonious because it is the Word of God not to be the Word of God because it is harmonious which we do not infallibly see How well this agrees with what I have in the margent quoted out of Bellarmine who urgeth that as an argument to prove the Scripture to be from God let the intelligent Reader judge Vid. Aberic Gent. Ad. 1. Mac. Disput. c. 10. These considerations strengthen this Argument 1. The length of time in which this Writing continued from Moses untill Iohn to whom was shewed the last authentical Revelation which prevents all conceits of forgery since they were not written in one nor yet in many ages 2. The multitude of Books that were written and of Writers that were imployed in the service 3. The Difference of place in which they were written which hinders the Writers conferring together Two other Arguments may evince this Truth that the Scriptures were from God 1. Miracles both of 1. Confirmation which the Lord shewed by Moses Exod. 19. 16. 24. 18. 34. 29. the Prophets 1 King 17. 24. Christ himself and the Apostles for the confirmation of their Doctrine such as the devil was not able to resemble in shew The raising of the dead the standing still and going back of the Sunne the dividing of the red Sea and the Rivers the raining of manna in so great a quantity daily as to suffice all the multitude in the wildernesse the making of the barren fruitfull My works testifie of me saith Christ and Believe the works which I do if you will not believe me See Ioh. 15. 24. 2. Preservation of the Books of the Scripture from the fury of many wicked Tyrants which sought to suppresse and extinguish them but could not As God caused it to be written for the good of his people so by Divine Providence he hath preserved the same whole and entire Here we have three Arguments in one 1. The hatred of the Devil and his wicked Instruments against the Scripture more then any other Book Antiochus burnt it and made a Law That whosoever had this Book should die the death 1 Macchab. 1. 56. Yet secondly It was preserved maugre his fury and the rage of Dioclesian Iulian and other evil Tyrants Thirdly The miserable end of Iulian Antiochus Epiphanes Herod Nero Domitian and Dioclesian and other Persecutors of this Doctrine The Books of Salomon which he wrote of natural Philosophy and other knowledge the profitablest books that ever were the Canon excepted are perished but those alone which pertain to godlinesse have been safely kept to Posterity which is the rather to be observed since many more in the world affect the knowledge of natural things
also 2. This tradition concerning the age of men did drive away as well the Ecclesiastick as the Lay persons Notwithstanding all this that hath been objected by the Papists we hold that the Scriptures ought to be translated into the Vulgar and mother Tongues of each Nation and that all men ought to read them and meditate diligently in them and that for these reasons 1. From the Commandment and will of God revealed in Scripture He hath commanded all that live in the Church to study the Scriptures and read them Deut. 11. 18 19. Ioh. 5. 39. He speaks not to the Scribes and Pharisees but to the people in general They must try all things 2. From Gods intention which commanded it to be written for that end that it might be obvious to all Ioh. 20. 31. Rom. 15. 4. 3. Those are commended which did reade the Scripture as the Eunuch Acts 8. 22. the Bereans Acts 17. and dispraised which neglected it as the Israelites Hosea 8. 12. they are pronounced Blessed who diligently meditate in the Scriptures Psal. 1. 2. How unlike to Peter â—2 Pet. 1. 19. are those whith pretend to be his Successours 4. From the fact of the Apostles who as they publickly preached the mysteries of salvation to the people so also in their Epistles they commended the whole doctrine of salvation to be read by them The Epistles of the Romans Corinthians Galatians Ephesians were written to the people therefore to be read by them One Epistle of Iohn was written to Gaius a Lay-man another to the elect Lady 5. From the Profit and Necessity of this study men are illightned and converted by reading of the Scriptures Psal. 19. 8 9. they are directed by them as most faithfull counsellors in all their waies Psal. 119. 24. they are armed by them against the fiery darts of Satan Eph. 6. 16. One seeing a youth read the Scriptures said It was never well since such were permitted to turn over the Bible but he answered him in the Psalmists words Psal. 119. 9. 6. From the unanimous Conseâ—t of all the Fathers Chrysostom and Ierom especially who exhort the people to the private reading of the Scriptures and testifie that the Scriptures were publickly read in their Ecclesiastical Assemblies not in an unknown tongue but in a tongue understood by the people It was decreed by the Councel of Nice That no Christian should be without a Bible in his house And the Jews at this day suffer no house amongst them to be without the Bible Christ and his Apostles teaching and disputing before the people appeal to the Law and the Prophets without the name of the Author Book or Chapter because they knew the Bible Text to be familiar to the Israelites In an unknown tongue they cannot profit the people Ergo They ought to be translated into a Tongue known to the people 1 Cor. 14. The Apostle in divers verses treateth of this subject vers 6 7 19. He saith All things ought to be done in the Church for the edifying of the people that no man should speak in an unknown tongue without an interpreter and saith That he had rather speak five words and be understood then ten thousand words in an unknown tongue Those Arguments before urged for the peoples reading of the Scripture prove this also for they cannot reade them in every Nation unlesse they be translated into a Tongue they understand Christ and his Apostles taught the people the Scripture in their mother Tongue In the next age after the Apostles saith Grotius lib. 3. de veritate Religionis Christ. the New Testament was translated into divers Vulgar Tongues the Syriack Arabick Aethiopick and Latine which Versions are yet extant and differ not mainly from the Greek In the elder and purer times the Scriptures were translated into innumerable yea into all Tongues usual amongst men See Gregories Preface to the Notes on passages of Scripture The plain and usual words the phrase and manner of speech most frequented the comparisons and similitudes in Scripture most familiar taken out of the shops and fields from Husbandry and Houswifery from the Flock and the Herd shew that the Scriptures were written for the capacity and understanding of the unlearned Iohn 5. 39. a speciall place if it be indicative it shewes the custome of the Jewes if imperative it shewes what they ought to doe Many amongst us are to be blamed for not having the Scripture in their houses and for not reading it constantly in the same as they ought to do or else they read it as other Books not with such respect to it as the greatnesse of its Authour deserveth I mean with a desire and purpose to believe and obey all that they finde there which must needs be the Duty of those that confesse these writings come from God We should receive it with reverence believe it with confidence exercise our selves in it with diligence and delight practise it with obedience Reading the Scripture is a rehearsing out of the Book such things as are there written â—arely without any interpretation It is to be done publickly as it was in the Synagogues of the Jews who had the reading of the Law and Prophets amongst them The Prophets were read in their ears every day saith Paul and after the lecture of the Law and the Prophets in another place From hence hath been continued the custom of Lessons of the Old and New Testament to the same purpose saith Mr Thorndike We honour God more by a publick then a private reading of it 2. Pâ—ivately The godly Jews of Bâ—rea did search the Scriptures and both King and people are commanded to read the Law Deut. 17. 19. and 6. 7. 8. 9. What is written in the Law How readest thou Luke 10. 26. Matth. 12. 5. and 21. 16 42. Christ Peter and Paul in their preaching quote not the Chapter and verse only say Isaiah saith Isaiah is bold It is written in the Psalms because people should be so acquainted with the Scripture as to know where it is See Grotius on Heb. 4. 4. Some good Divines hold that the Scriptures barely read though preaching be not joined with it may be the instrument of Regeneration since the Doctrine of the Gospel is called The ministration of the Spirit Psal. 19. The Law of the Lord converteth the soul it is so when not preached The word is a means of conversion whether written preacht or lived 2 Cor. 3. 2 3. 1 Pet. 3. 1 2. Psal. 51. 13. But the Word of God is made effectual by the Spirit more often more ordinarily to beget a new life in the preaching that is the interpreting and applying of it then in the bâ—re reading 1 Tim. 4. 13. Matth. 28. 29. Christs custome was as we may collect out of Luke 4. where one instance is recorded to make us conceive his ordinary practice when he had read to interpret
Apostles wrote in Greek which wrote peculiarly to the Jews as Iâ—mes and Peter Matthaeum Hebraiâ—è scripsisse convenit inter antiquos Citat Irenâ—um Origenem Athanasium Epiphanium Chrysostomum Hieronymum Vossius de genere Christi dissertat Scripsit Hebraea lingua quia praecipuè Iudaeorum quos viva voce hactâ—nus docuisset haberet rationem Id. ibid. Vide Grotium in libros Evangel It was needfull that the Gospel should be written by many First for the certainty Secondly for the perfection of it Amongst all the Evangelists there is a general Agreement and a sp 〈…〉 rence they all agree in the main scope and subject Christ they dâ—â—â—â—r in 〈…〉 al Argument and Order All describe the life of Christ some more largely some more briefly some more loftily some more plainly yet because all were inspired by the same spirrit they all have equal Authority The difference of Evangelists in some smaller matters proveth their consent in the greater to be the voice of Truth for had they conspired all together to have deceived the world they would in all things have more fully agreed The Doctrine of the Covenant of Grace is more plainly expounded the will of God and way to Salvation more plentifully set down in the New Testament then ever it was in the dayes of Moses or the Prophets and in these books of the New Testament all things are so established as to continue to the end so that we must not look for any new Revelation All these Books we receive as Canonical because they are Divine for matter and form divinely inspired by God sanctified and given to the Church for their direction written by the Apostles or Apostolical men sweetly conâ—enting with other parts of holy Scripture and with themselves received alwayes by the greatest part of the Church of God They were written after the death of Christ by the direction of the holy Ghost the Apostles by lively voice first preached because it was needful that the Doctrine of the Gospel should by their preaching as also by signs and wonders be confirmed against the contradictions and cavils of the Jews and Gentiles and be allowed by the assent of believers generally before it was committed to writing that we might be assured of the certainty of those things which were written These Books are acknowledged Canonical both by us and the Papists so that touching this matter there is no controversie between us and them Among the confest writings of the Scriptures attested by all and not contradicted by any The four Gospels are first to be placed and then the Story of the Acts of the Apostles See Euseb. Eccles. Hist. lib. 3. cap. 3 4. and lib. 5. cap. 8. and lib. 6. cap. 18. The Epistles doubted of by some for a while were first the Epistle to the Hebrews the Epistle of Iames the second Epistle of Peter the second and third Epistles of Iohn the Epistle of Iude and the Revelation of which I shall treat more when I come to handle the Books of the New Testament particularly The Story of the woman taken in Adultery hath met with very much opposition See Gregories Preface to his Notes upon some passages of Scripture Crojus defends the truth of it Observat. in Nov. Testam c. 17. Vide Seldeni uxorem Ebraicam cap. 11. The Inscriptions and Titles prefixed before the Epistles are no part of holy Scripture written by the Apostles but added to the Epistles by some others The Subscriptions and Postscripts also of divers Books are false counterfeit and erroneous not written by the Apostles but added afterward by the Scribes which copied out the Epistles The Subscriptions of the later Epistle to Timothy and also to Titus are supposititious they are neither found in the Syriack nor in all Greek Copies nor yet in the vulgar Latine translation these additions were made some hundred years after the Apostles The Canonical Books of the New Testament are either Historical Doctrinal or Prophetical 1. Historical containing matters of fact the History of 1. Christ exhibited in the four Evangelists or Gospels as they are stiled by God himself Mark 1. 1. Matthew Mark Luke and Iohn called Gospels because they contain a message of joy and gladnesse They all treat of one subject Christ Jesus incarnate are most true Historians Luk. 1. 2. Ioh. 21. 24. 2. His Apostles in the Acts written by Luke thirty years after Christs Ascention so termed of the principal subject of the History though the acts of others not Apostles are there recorded 2. Dogmatical or Doctrinal such as were written by the Apostles for the instruction of the Church of God in faith and manners commonly called Epistles and that by warrant of the Scriptures 1 Thes. 5. 27. 2 Pet. 3. 1 16. because they were sent to them who had already received and professed the Gospel of Christ. The Apostles being oft times unable to instruct by their personal Presence supplied that by writing Epistles These are one and twenty written 1. By Paul 1. To whole Churches 1. Gentiles To the Romans To the Câ—ninthians To the Galatians To the Ephesians To the Philippians To the Colossians To the Thessalonians 2. Jews To the Hebrews 2. To particular Persons 1. Timothy 2. Titus 3. Philemon 2. Iames one 3. Peter two 4. Iohn three 5. Iude one 3. Prophetical wherein under certain resemblances the state of the Church of Christ till the end of the world from the time of Iohn the Evangelist is most truly and wonderfully described and receiveth its name Apocalyps of the Argument Beza Piscator Calvin Erasmus Grotius have done well on all the New Testament Of the Papists Iansenius hath done well on the Harmony of the Lutherans Chemnitius and Gerhard of the Protestants Calvin Maldonate and De Dieu Cameron Scultetus and Grotius have done well likewise on the Evangelists Matthew and Iohn were Apostles of the twelve Mark and Luke Evangelists Apostle is a name of Office or Dignity It notes one sent from another with command in special certain famous Embassadours of Christ. The Evangelists were Comites vicarii Apostolorum they accompanied the Apostles in preaching the Gospel and had curam vicariam omnium Ecclesiarum as the Apostles had curam principalem The Title Evangelist is taken 1. For such as wrote the Gospel 2. For such as taught the Gospel and these were of two sorts either such as had ordinary places and gifts or such whose places and gifts were extraordinary such Evangelists were Timothy and Titus Smectymn Answ. to an Humble Remonstrance Sect. 13. Matthew There was never any in the Church which doubted of its Authority Some say he wrote in Hebrew but that is uncertain as hath been already declared He interprets the Hebrew name Emanuel Chap. 1. 23. and those words Câ— 27. 46. therefore it is likely he wrote not in Hebrew for why should one that writeth in Hebrew interpret Hebrew words to such as
for leaving out that Title in our English Bibles for it is well known that that Title is not given by the holy Ghost but by the Scholiast who took it from Eusebius General is a meer English term and of no doubtfull signification Catholick is both Greek and by their saying of double and therefore doubtfull signification The Syriack Interpreter hath this Inscription of these Epistles as Tremellius sheweth Tres Epistolae trium Apostolorum ante quorum oculos Dominus noster se transformavit id est Iacobi Petri Ioannis For the Syrians doe not esteem the second of Peter nor the second and third of Iohn nor the Epistle of Iude Canonical The Apostles Iames Peter Iohn and Iude have publisht seven Epistles as mystical as succinct both short and long short in words long in sense and meaning Iames For the difference which seems to be between Iam. 2. 21 22. and Rom. 4. 2. and 3. 28. most likely this Book was doubted of in ancient times as Eusebius and Ierom witnesse But yet then also publickly allowed in many Churches and ever since received in all out of which for the same cause Luther and other of his followers since him would again reject it Erasmus assents to Luther and Musculus agrees with them both in his Comment upon the fourth of the Romans both they of the Romish and we of the Reformed Church with one consent admit this Epistle for Canonical Vide Polani Syntagma I light upon an old Dutch Testament of Luthers Translation saith Whiâ—akâ—r against Raynolds with his Preface wherein he writeth that Iames his Epistle is not so worthy as are the Epistles of St Peter and Paul but in respect of them a strawen Epistle his censure I mislike and himself I think afterwards seeing these words in a later Edition are left out It is no where found in Luthers Works that he called the Epistle of Iames Inanem stramineam Edmund Campian was convicted of falshood about that in England where when he had objected that he could finde no such thing at any time in the Books he produced Some in the Preface of the German Edition say that Luther wrote that it cannot contend in dignity with the Epistles of Paul and Peter but is strawy if it be compared with them Which judgement of Luther we approve not of and it is hence manifest that it was disliked by him because these words are found in no other Edition from the year 1526. Luthers disciples now hold that it is Canonical and Apostolical and they answer the Arguments of those that are opposite thereto as we may see in the Exposition of that Article concerning the Scripture by that most learned and diligent man Iohn Gerard. Gravitatem ac zelum Apostolicum per omnia prae se fâ—rt saith Walther We may reply against the Papists who often object this opinion of Luthers that Cajetan their Cardinal denieth the Epistle to the Hebrews to be Canonical yea which is farre worse he affirmeth that the Author thereof hath erred not only in words but in the sense and meaning of the Scriptures Nay Cajâ—tan saith Whitaker rejected Iames second of Peter and second and third of Iohn and Iude. It consists of five Chapters Paraeus Laurentius Brochmand and Mr Manton have done best on it First of Peter This Epistle is called in the Title Catholical because it is not written to any one person as that of Paul to Timothy Titus and Philemon noâ— to any one particular Church as those of Paul to the Romans Corinths but to the converted of the Jews dispersed here and there as appears by the inscription It consists of five Chapters Gerhard Laurentius Gomarus and Dr Ames have expounded both these Epistles Bifield hath interpreted part of the first Epistle Second of Peter Some in the Primitive Church doubted of its authority and the Syriack hath it not but the Church generally allowed it and many reasons may perswade that it is Apostolical and was written by Peter 1. Because the Author of it expresly calleth himself Simon Peter the Apostle of Jesus Christ. He wrote it in his old-age to confirm them in the Doctrine which before he had taught them 2. It s inscription is to the same Jews that the former viz. dispersed by the Roman Empire and converted to Christ whose Apostle Peter was 3. It shews an Apostolical spirit 4. It s style and composition is agreeable to the former Epistle 5. The Author of this Epistle witnesseth that he was a spectator of the Transfiguration in the Mount Chap. 1. vers 16. now Peter together with Iames and Iohn were present with Christ. 6. He makes mention of the Former Epistle Chap. 3. v. 1. 7. He cals Paul his dear Brother Chap. 3. v. 15. It consists of three Chapters First of Iohn consists of five Chapters Second and third of Iohn They were also in times past doubted of by some as Erasmus Cajetan but there are good reasons to prove them Canonical 1. Their Author cals himself an Elder so doth Peter 1 Pet. 5. 1. by which name an Ecclesiastical Office is often signified but here age rather now it is manifest that Iohn came to a greater age then the rest of the Apostles 2. The salutation is plainly Apostolical Grace mercy and peace 3. In sentences and words they agree with the first Epistle 4. The Fathers alledge them for Iohns and reckon them among the Canonical Books Each of these Epistles is but a Chapter Iude This Epistle also in times past was questioned by some but that it is Apostolical first the inscription shews the Author expresly cals him a servant of Christ and brother of Iames. 2. The matter it agreeth both for words and sentences with the second of Peter of which it contains as it were a brief summe and recapitulation That the writer of the Epistle doth not call himself an Apostle is of no moment to infringe the authority thereof for the judgement of the writer is free in that case that Title was specially used by Paul and Peter Iames and Iohn quit the same Title yea Paul in his Epistles to the Philippians Thessalonians and Philemon doth not call himself an Apostle and yet those Epistles were never doubted of It is but one Chapter Willet and Mr Perkins have done well on it Revelation It is called according to the Greek Apocalyps and according to the Latine Revelation that is a discovery or manifestation of things which before were hidden and secret for the common good of the Church Eusebius l. 3. c. 17. saith Domitian cast Iohn the Evangelist into a fornace of scalding Oyl but when he saw he came forth unhurt he banished him into the Isle Pathmos where he writ this Revelation This Book describeth the state of the Church from the time of Iohn the last of the Apostles untill Christs coming again and especially the proceedings pride and fall of
Babylon the great Whore with all the Kingdoms of Antichrist The subject of it is two-fold 1. The present state of the Church 2. The future state of it The things which are and the things which shall be hereafter Revel 1. 19. The three first Chapters of this Book contain seven several Epistles to the seven several Churches of Asia the other following Chapters are a Prophetical History of the Church of God from Christs Ascension to his second coming The holy Ghost foreseeing what labour Satan and his instruments would take to weaken and impair the credit and authority of this above all other Books wherein he prevailed so far as some true Churches called the truth and authority of it into question hath backed it with a number of confirmations more then are in any other Book of Scripture First The Author of it is set in the fore-front or face of it The Revelation of Iesus Christ Chap. 1. vers 1. who professeth himself to be the first and the last vers 11. so in the several Epistles to the Churches in several styles he challengeth them to be his Thus saith he 1. That holdeth the seven starres in his right hand 2. He which is first and last which was dead and is alive 3. Which hath the sharp two edged Sword 4. Which hath eyes like a flame of fire and his feet like brass 5. Which hath the seven Spirits of God and the seven stars 6. He who is holy and true who hath the key of David 7. He who is Amen the faithful and true witness the beginning of the creatures of God Secondly The Instrument or Pen-man his servant Iohn the Evangelist the Apostle the Divine who for the farther and more full authority of it repeateth his name at least thrice saying I Iohn Chap. 1. 9. and 21. 1 2. and 22. 8. wheâ—â—â—â— in the Gospel he never maketh mention of his name there he writes the History of Christ here he writes of himself and the Revelations declared to him Thirdly In the last Chapter are five testimonies heaped together vers 5 6 7 8. 1. Of the Angels 2. Of God himself the Lord of the holy Prophets 3. Of Jesus Christ Behold I come shortly 4. Of Iohn I Iohn heard and saw all these things 5. The Protestation of Jesus Christ v. 18. Fourthly The matter of the Book doth convince the Authority thereof seeing everywhere the Divinity of a Prophetical Spirit doth appear the words and sentences of other Prophets are there set down part of the Prophecies there delivered are in the sight of the world accomplished by which the truth and authority of the whole is undoubtedly proved there are extant many excellent Testimonies of Christ and his Divinity and our redemption by Christ. Fifthly The most ancient Fathers Greek and Latine ascribe this Book to Iohn the Apostle Theophylact Origen Chrysostome Tertullian Hilary Austin Ambrose Irenâ—us To deny then the truth of this Book is contrasolem obloqui to gainsay the shining of the Sun it self The Chiliasts abuse many testimonies out of this Book but those places have been cleared long ago by the learned as bearing another sense See Dr Raynolds Conf. with Hart c. 8. p. 406. Calvin being demanded his opinion what he thought of the Revelation answered ingeniously saith one He knew not at all what so obscure a writer meant Se penitus ignorare quid velit tam obscurus scriptor Cajetane at the end of his Exposition of Iude confesseth that he understandâ— not the literal sense of the Revelation and therefore Exponat saith he cui Deus concesserit It consists of two and twenty Chapters the best Expositors of it are Ribera Brightman Paraeus Cartwright Fulk Dent Forbes Mede Simonds Foord 1. The Scriptures written by Moses and the Prophets sufficiently prove that Christ is the Messiah that was to come The Old Testament may convince the Jews which deny the New Testament of this truth Iohn 5. 39. They that is those parts of Scripture written by Moses and the Prophets there were no other Scriptures then written The 53 of Isaiah is a large History of his sufferings We have also another Book or Testament more clearly witnessing of Christ The Gospel is the unsearchable riches of Christ Ephes. 3. 8. So much may suffice to have spoken concerning the Divine Canon the Ecclesiastical and false Canon follow CHAP. V. Of the Books called Apocrypha SOme Hereticks utterly abolisht the Divine Canon as the Swingfeldians and Libertines who contemned all Scriptures the Manichees and Marcionites refused all the Books of the Old Testament as the Jews do those of the New as if they had proceeded from the Devil Some diminish this Canon as the Sadduces who as Whitaker and others hold rejected all the other Prophets but Moses some inlarge it as the Papists who hold that divers other Books called by us Apocrypha i hidden do belong to the Old Testament and are of the same authority with the other before named and they adde also their traditions and unwritten Word equalling it with the Scripture both these are accursed Rev. 22. 18. But against the first we thus argue Whatsoever Scripture 1. Is divinely inspired 2. Christ commandeth to search 3. To which Christ and his Apostles appeal and confirm their Doctrine by it that is Canonical and of equal Authority with the New Testament But the holy Scripture of the Old Testament is divinely inspired 2 Tim. 3. 16. where he speaks even of the Books of the Old Testament as is gathered both from the universal all writing viz. holy in the 15 verse and from the circumstance of time because in the time of Timothies infancy little or nothing of the New Testament was published 2. Christ speaks not to the Scribes and Pharisees but to the people in general to search it Iohn 5. 39. this famous elogium being added That it gives testimony of him and that we may finde eternal life in it 3. Christ and his Apostles appeal to it and confirm their Doctrine by it Luke 24. 27. Rom. 3. 21. Acts 10. 43. and 17. 11. and 20. 43. and 26. 20. the New Testament gives testimony of the Old and Peter 2 Pet. 1. 19. of Pauls Epistles The Ecclesiastical Canon which is also called the second Canon followeth to which these Books belong Tobit Iudith first and second of the Maccabees Wisdom Ecclesiasticus Baruch Additions to Daniel and Esther for these neither contain truth perfectly in themselves nor are sanctified by God in the Church that they may be a Canon of faith and although abusively from custom they were called Canonical yet properly in the Church they are distinguished from the Canonical by the name of Apocryphal The false Canon is that which after the authority of the Apocrypha increased was constituted by humane opinion for the Papists as well as we reject for Apocryphal the third and fourth Book of Ezra the prayer of Manasses the third
and fourth of Maccabees as Thomas Aquinas Sixtus Senenfis Bellarmine and so the Councel of Trent confesse when they omit these and reckon up the whole Canon The state therefore of the controversie betwixt us and the Papists is Whether those seven whole Books with the Appendices be Sacred Divine Canonical We do not deny but many of these especially Wisdom and Ecclesiasticus are very good and profitable and to be preferred before all humane Tractates but that they are properly and by an excellency Canonical and of infallible truth out of which firm arguments may be drawn that we deny Those Books which the Jews of old and the Reformed Churches now reckon for truly Canonical in the Old Testament are received all even by our Adversaries for Canonical without any exception 2. For the Canonical Books of the New Testament there is no controversie between us and so far we agree but in the Old Testament whole Books are reckoned by them for Canonical which we hold Apocryphal The reason why these Books at first were added to holy Writ was this the Jews in their later times before and at the coming of Christ were of two sorts some properly and for distinction sake named Hebrews inhabiting Ierusalem and the holy Land others were Hellenists that is the Jews of the dispersion mingled with the Grecians These had written sundry Books in Greek which they made use of together with other parts of the Old Testament which they had in Greek of the Translation of the LXX when they now understood not the Hebrew but the Hebrews receive only the two and twenty Books before-mentioned Hence it came that the Jews delivered a double Canon of Scripture to the Christian Church the one Pure unquestioned and Divine which is the Hebrew Canon the other in Greek adulterate corrupted by the addition of certain Books written in those times when God raised up no more Prophets among his people Drus. praeterit l. 5. Annotat. ad Act. Apost c. 6. Jun. Animad in Bell. cont 1. lib. 1. c. 4. l. 2. c. 15. Sect. 21. Tertul in Apol c. 19. They are called Apocryphal i. secret and hidden not because the names of the writers are unknown by that reason Iudges and Ruth should be Apocryphal but because they were not wont to be read openly in the Church of God as the Canonical Books but secretly and in private by private persons or because their Authority was obscure and doubtful with the Ancient These Books our Church rejecteth as not written by Divine Inspiration for these reasons All the Canonical Books of the Old Testament were written by the Prophets but none of these Books were written by any of the Prophets for 1. The last of the Prophets of the Jews was Malachi Mal. 4. 4 5. between whom and Iohn Baptist came no Prophet Mark begins with the same words almost with which Malachi ended a good argument to prove that the New Testament is next to the Old But these Books were written by such who lived most of them after Malachi 2. All the Prophets wrote in Hebrew the language which the Jews understood but the Fathers affirm and Papists acknowledge that most of these Books were written in Greek Ergo being not written by the Prophets they are not Canonical 2. All the Books of the Old Testament were committed to the Jews and safely kept by them Rom. 3. 2. our Saviour Christ which reproved the Jews for corrupting the sense of the Scripture did yet never reprove them for rejecting those Books which were divinely inspired which sacriledge he would not have concealed yea our Saviour sendeth us unto the Scriptures as they received them Ioh. 5. 39. Ezra after the Captivity is reported to have gathered all the Books of holy Scripture and safely to lay them up If the Jews should have rejected or not received any Books being Canonical they had grievously erred which the Papists themselves will not affirm Yea there should have been some Canonical Books which no Church received for besides the Church of the Jews at that time there was none in the world The Canonical Books of the Old Testament were divided into Moses the Prophets and Psalms with which agreeth the old distribution of the Hebrews into the Law Prophets and Hagiographa 3. There are two wayes to know a Book to be Canonical one by the testimony of some Prophet or Apostle the other by the certain Testimony of them which did live when the Book was published who did witnesse that the Book was written by some Prophet or Apostle But these Books are known to be Canonical neither of these wayes they were rejected by the Jews who lived in the times when they were written our Saviour Christ nor his Apostles never commend these Books unto us as endited by the Spirit They are cited by Christ and his Apostles for the confirmation of their Doctrine All the Canonical Books in general Iohn 5. 39. and 10. 35. Rom. 16. 26 Luke 16. 29 31. and Chap. 24. 25 27 44. The most of all in special Genesis Matth. 19 4 5 6. Exodus Mat. 5. 21 27 33 38. Leviticus Gal. 3. 12. Numbers John 3. 14. Deuteronomy Acts 3. 22. Ioshua Heb. 11. 30 31. Iudges Heb. 11. 32. Ruth Mat. 1. 3. First of Samuel Matth. 12. 3. Second of Samuel Heb. 1. 5. First of Kings Mat. 12. 42. Second of Kings Luk. 4. 27. First of Chronicles Mat. 1. 3 7 10 13. Second of Chronicles Acts 7. 48. Ezra Matth. 1. 12 13. Iob 1 Cor. 3. 19. Psalms Act. 4. 25. Proverbs Heb. 12. 5 6 7. Isaiah Matth. 1. 23. Ieremiah Heb. 10. 16 17. Ezekiel Mat. 25. 35. Daniel Matth. 24. 25. All the lesser Prophets Acts 7. 42. and 15. 15 16. Hosea Mat. 12. 7. Ioel Act. 2. 12. Amos Act. 15. 16. Ionah Mat. 12. 40 41. Micah Mat. 10. 35. Nahum Rom. 10. 15. Habakkuk Rom. 1. 17. Haggai Heb. 12. 26. Zachary Matth. 21. 5. Malachi Luke 1. 16 17. These Books were not cited by Christ and his Apostles for confirmation of their Doctrine Object If they be not Canonical therefore because they are not cited then Nahum and Zephany are not Canonical Aratus Menander and Epimenides prophane Poets are Canonical because they are cited Acts 17. 28. 1 Cor. 15. 33. Titus 1. 12. Answ. They are not therefore not Canonical only because they are not cited but especially because they have not the characters of Divine Scripture 2. Nahum and Zephany are implicitely quoted when the Books of the Prophets are mentioned Acts 7. 41. and 15. 15 16. The Poets are not cited as Canonical but the Apostle applied himself to his hearers who did much esteem their authority Some have well concluded from Act. 10. 43. that the Apocrypha are not to be received as Canonical Scripture because they testifie not of Christ. 4. Those Books which contain manifest untruths contrary to the Word of God and the Books of holy
not only the delineation and constitution of things created but also the Word of God and the Doctrine of the Gospel long since propounded to the Jews and so propounded as they could not but hear because it was published openly to all the whole world by the mystery of the holy Apostles out of the predictions of the Prophets Paul interprets the comparison propounded by the Prophet and teacheth That as certainly as the lines of heaven run forth into all the earth so certainly in these last times the Doctrine of the Gospel came forth into all the earth by the Apostles preaching and therefore the Apostle did not rashly change the word of the Prophet because the Hebrew Text in the Prophet was corrupt but purposely in stead of delineation the Apostle put in sonus having respect to the present accomplishment of the promise whereby God had fore-told that all the Gentiles should be converted to the communion of the Gospel and to this end he did foreshew that he would give unto them Preachers Coton urgeth two other places to shew that the Hebrew Text is corrupted Mat. 2. 23. and Mat. 27. Object Mat. 2. 23. He shall be called a Nazarene is no where found though the Evangelist say that it is written therefore it followeth saith he that the Hebrew original which we have is imperfect Answ. Saint Ierom saith That this place was objected to him above a hundred times and that he hath as often answered it viz. That if the Hebrew be imperfect having no such passage then is also that of the Septuagint and the Vulgar so that the Objection is not against the Hebrew but against the Scripture in what language soever it be Maldonat after he had well weighed divers opinions holds that of Ieroms for the most sure which is to draw Nazarene from Netzer a branch Isa. 11. 1. Iunius in his Parallels Piscator Dr Taylor Mr Dod go the same way Chrysostom and Theophylact because they cannot undo this knot cut it thus saying that many of the Books of the Prophets are lost Bucer thinketh that place Iud. 15. 5. is here noted Samson being a Redeemer as he was a figure of Christ and the Book of the Iudges was composed by divers Prophets Calvin Marlorat Beza Scultetus and Mr Perkins seem to encline to this opinion The last large Annotations mention both these Interpretations but adhere rather to the former Object The second place urged by Coton to prove the corruption of the Hebrew is Matth. 27. 9. The Evangelist cites Ieremiah for that which is to be found only in Zachary Answ. Iunius in his Parallels and Dr Taylor on the temptation bring six answers to reconcile these places 1. Some say it joyns together both one place in Ieremiah Chap. 18. 1 2 3. and that of Zachary but there is little or no agreement between them 2. Some say that it is not in Ieremiahs writings which are Canonical but in some Apocryphal Writings of Ieremiah which the Jews had and which Chrysostom confesseth he saw wherein these words were but it is not likely that the holy Evangelist would leave a Canonical Text and cite an Apocryphal or give such credit to it or seek to build our faith upon it and by our rule that Book should be Canonical which is cited by Christ or his Apostles 3. Some say that Matthew forgat and for Zaechary put down Ieremiah so Augustine and Erasmus but with more forgetfulnesse for holy men wrote as they were moved by Gods Spirit 4. Some think it the errour of heedless Writers who might easily so erre but all the oldest Copies and the most Ancient Fathers have the name of Ieremiah 5. Some say that Zachariah being instructed and trained up with Ieremiah did deliver it by tradition from Ieremiah and so Ieremiah spake it by Zachariah which might be true because it is said in the Text As was spoken by Ieremiah not written But sixthly the most compendious and likely way of reconciling is this that Zachariah and Ieremiah was the same man having two names which was very usual among the Jews as Salomon was called Iedidiah Iehoiachim Ieconias and Coniah Simon Peter Cephas and Bariona Matthew Levi. So far Iunius and D. Taylor See M. Robert Baily on Zach. 3. 1. p. 11. and last large Annotat. The best of the Popish Writers cannot deny but that the name Ieremiah the Prophet is put for Zachary either through the negligence of the Scribes or else it was inserted into the Text out of the Margent the Evangelist saying no more But that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the Prophet as both Iansenius and Maldonat◠in loc do confesse Chamier distinguisheth of a two fold depravation one of Interpretation herein we excuse not nor defend the Jews Second of the letter herein they are to be patroniz'd against the Papists who thorow their sides strike at the very Scriptures and labour to overthrow their Authority The Hebrew Edition then notwithstanding these and such like frivolous Objections is sincere and uncorrupt and if any errors crept in through negligence or ignorance of the Pen-men which copied out the Books yet Bellarmine himself granteth they are of no great moment In matters pertaining to faith and manners saith he there is nothing wanting in the integrity of the Scriptures Vide Capel Critica Sac. l. 6. c. 2. Haud negare ausim temporum injuria descriptorum incuria errata quaedam sphalmata in textum Hebraeum irrepsisse Amama Antibarb Bibl. lib. 1. c. 1. What reasons can the Jesuites alledge why the Hebrew and the Greek which kept their integrity four hundred years together after Christ amidst as bitter Enemies as ever they had as troublesome and tempestuous times as ever were since should after in time of lesse danger and greater quiet lose not their beauty only but their chastity also And we marvel that the Jesuites are not afraid to suffer this blot to fall upon their Popish government which boasteth and saith It is the pillar of truth and yet hath had no better care to preserve the truth Objections of the Papists against the Purity of the Greek Text in the New Testament Object They instance in Rom. 12. 11. to be corrupt the Greek hath serving the time 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for serving the Lord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Answ. Many of the ancient Greek Copies and Scholiasts have also 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Salmeron the Jesuite confesseth Serving the Lord and it appeareth in the Syriack Translation and who seeth not that it might rather be an oversight of the writer taking one word for another rather then a fault in the Text and the cause of the mistake saith Beza was the short writing of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which was taken by some for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whereas they should have taken it for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 If we should admit the other reading we
we are not hereafter to expect or look for any fuller or more clear Revelation of Divine Mysteries then that which was then delivered 4. Christ is called a Mediator of the New Testament or the New Covenant Heb. 9. 15. because all things are established by him as they ought to continue for ever for that which is old decayeth and is ready to vanish but that which is new abideth Heb. 8. 13. 5. It pleased the Lord in great wisdom to reveal the Covenant of grace to the Church that she might not despair but obscurely at the first that she might earnestly long for the coming of that Messiah who was to make known what he had heard and seen of the Father which dispensation was needful that the grace of God might not be contemned as haply it would have been if God had fully revealed and made known his bounty unto man before he had seen his misery and the necessity thereof Our Saviour Christ for substance of Doctrine necessary to Salvation taught nothing which was not before in some sort contained in the writings of Moses and the Prophets out of whom he confirmed his Doctrine but that which was in them more obscurely aenigmatically and briefly he explained more excellently fully and clearly the Apostles proved their Doctrine out of the Book of Moses and the Prophets Act. 17. 11. and 26. 22. Luke 24. 27. Rom. 1. 2. Act. 28. 23. Sixthly All things necessary in that manner as we have spoken were taught and inspired to the Apostles by our Saviour Christ and there were no new inspirations after their times nor are we to expect further hereafter which we prove 1. By places of Scripture Ioh. 14. 26. he that teacheth all things omitteth nothing Christ said all things to his Apostles as appears Iohn 15. 15. and 17. 8. Iohn 16. 13. 2. By reasons drawn from thence 1. The plentiful pouring forth of the Spirit was deferred till the glorifying of Christ he being glorified it was no longer to be delayed Christ being exalted on the right-hand of God obtained the Spirit promised and that was not according to measure and poured the same in such abundance as it could be poured forth and received by men so that was fulfilled which was fore-told by Ioel 2. 28. Acts 2. 33. Iohn 3. 34 35. Acts 2. 16 17. 2. The Scripture and the Prophecies of the Old Testament do teach and declare That all Divine Truth should fully and at once be manifested by the Messias who is the only Prophet high-Priest and King of his Church there is no other Revelation promised none other needful besides that which was made by him Isa. 11. 9. Act. 3. 23 24. Ioel 2. 23. Vide Mercerum in loc therefore the last inspiration was made to the Apostles and none other to be expected The Doctrine of the Law and the Prophets did suffice to Salvation yet it did send the Fathers to expect somewhat more perfect 1 Pet. 1. 10. but to the preaching of the Gospel nothing is to be added we are not sent to wait for any clearer vision 3. So long as any truth needful to be known was unrevealed or not plainly taught the Lord did stir up some Prophet or other to teach the same unto the Church therfore the Lord surceasing to speak since the publishing of the Gospel of Jesus Christ and the delivery of the same in writing is unto us a manifest token that the whole will of God is now brought to light and that no new Revelation is to be expected Our seventh Proposition is Christ and his Apostles were able to propound and teach by lively voice that Doctrine which pertains to perfection Iohn 1. 18. and 11. 11 32. Iohn 8. 26 and the Apostles perfectly taught all things which are or shall be necessary for the Church Acts 20. 27. Gal. 1. 7 8 9. The Doctrine of repentance and remission of sins in the name of Christ doth summarily contain all things necessarily to salvation Act. 5. 31. and 11. 11. but this Doctrine the Apostles preached Act. 13. 38 39. Luke 24. 47. The Word of God is not only Milk for Babes but strong Meat for men of ripe years 1 Cor. 3. 1 2. Heb. 5. 14. and 6. 1 2. therefore it containeth not only matter of preparation but of perfection Our eighth Proposition is The summe and substance of that heavenly Doctrine which was taught by the Prophets and Apostles was by them committed to writing the holy Ghost giving them a commandment and guiding their hands therein that they could not erre so that the Word preached and written by them is one in substance both in respect of matter which is the will and word of God and inward form viz. the Divine Truth immediatly inspired though different in the external form and manner of delivery Our ninth Proposition is That nothing is necessary to be known of Christian over and above that which is found in the Old Testament which is not clearly anâ— evidently contained in the Books of the Apostles and Evangelists Our last Proposition is that all things which have been are or shall be necessary to the salvation of the Church to the end of the world are perfectly contained in the writings of the Prophets and Apostles long since divinely inspired writteâ— and published and now received by the Church of God so that no new Reveltion or Tradition beside those inspired published and comprehended in the Scripture are necessary for the salvation of the Church There are three opinions 1. Of the Papists who altogether deny it 2. Of the Socinians which would have all things expresly contained in Scripture and if it be â—â—â— totidem verbis they reject it 3. Of the Orthodox who say it contains all things expresly or by consequence Crocius in his Antiweigelius cap. 1. Quaest. 8. shews that private Revelation Dreams Conferences with Angels are not to be desired and expected in matters â—â— faith the Canon of the Scripture being now compleat The Weigelians talk of â—â— Seculum Spiritus Sancti as God the Father had his time the time of the Lâ—â— Christ his time the time of the Gospel so say they the holy Ghost shall â—â—â— his time when there shall be higher dispensations and we shall be wiser then the Apostles See Mat. 24. 14. and 28. 20. 1 Cor. 11. 26. See Mr Gillesp. Miscel. c. 10. Some say the Scriptures are but for the training up of Christians during their â—â—nority as Grammar rules for boyes and are not able to acquaint the soul â—â— the highest discoveries of God and truth And most corruptly they serve themselâ—â—â— with that expression of the Apostle 1 Cor. 13. 11. This Glasse say they is â—â—â— Scriptures through which we see something of God indeed whilst we are â—â—â—â—dren in understanding but very obscurely and brokenly and therefore say theâ—â—â— if ye would discern of God clearly and see him as he is ye must break the Glasse and look quite beyond Scriptures
7. The object of it are some sinful men or the greatest part of sinful men which are called vessels of wrath fitted for destruction Rom. 9. 22. that there are more damned then saved is proved Matth. 20. 16. Matth. 7. 14. The end of reprobation is the declaration of Gods justice in punishing of sin There is no cause of reprobation in the Reprobate that they rather then others are passed by of God that is wholly from the unsearchable depth of Gods good pleasure but that damnation whereto they are adjudged is for their own sins There are five dreadful consequences of reprobation or preterition 1. Such whom God passeth by he never calls or not effectually calling is according to purpose 2. He deserts leaves them to follow their own corrupt lusts 3. Hardens them Rom. 9. 4. They shall prove Apostates 1 Tim. 2. 18. 5. They are liable to that dreadful sentence Matth. 25. 41. Obj. 1 Tim. 2. 4. Who will have all men to be saved Ans. That is God would have some of all sorts of men to be saved so all men is taken verse 1. Let prayers be made for all men that is all manner of men he instanceth in one kinde viz. Kings All is likewise here to be taken not pro singulis generum but pro genâ—ribus singulorum So Austin expounded this place above a thousand yeers since All manner of men of all Nations and qualities All in this place doth not signifie universally every man in every age and condition but All opposed to the Jews onely all indefinitely and that in the times of the new Testament of which the Apostle speaketh Obj. 2 Pet. 3. 9 Not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repen tance therefore there is not an election of some and reprobation of others Ans. He speaks there onely of the Elect and he would have none of them to perish He speaks that for the comfort of the godly and includes himself amongst them long-suffering to us-ward therefore he means those in the same condition with himself He shews why God staies the execution of his wrath because all his Elect are not gathered See 1 Pet. 2. 8. There is nothing doth more set out the glory excellency and sufficiency of God then his Decree O the infinite depth of the wisdome of God which hath fore-seen decreed and determined with himself the innumerable things that ever did or shall come to passe We should not search into the depths of his counsels Deut. 29. 29. but in all things professe our dependance on him and refer all to his decree Psal. 37. 5. They are justly blamed that ascribe any thing to chance fate fortune or good luck as also such as are impatient under any crosse Admiring the methods of Gods eternal Counsel and the execution of it for the salvation of our souls will be a great part of our work in heaven That is a desperate inference If I be predestinated I shall be saved * though I neglect and scoff at sanctity God hath predestinated the means as well as the end he hath decreed us to be holy as well as happy 2 Pet. 1. 3. Ephes. 1. 4. Christ laid down his life not onely to save us from the guilt of our sins but to sanctifie us Tit. 2. 14. The Spirit of God is a Spirit of sanctification 2 Thess. 2. 13. In good things the Devil strives to sever the means from the end in evil the end from the means We must not reason whether we be predestinated but use the means prove our Election by our calling we should judge of our predestination not so much descendendo by prying into Gods secret Counsel as ascendendo by searching our own hearts It was good counsel that Cardinal Poole gave to one who asked him how he might most profitably reade the Epistle to the Romans He advised him first to reade the twelfth chapter to the end and then the beginning of the Epistle to the twelfth chapter Because in the twelfth chapter the Apostle falls on matter of duty and sanctification which is the onely way to attain to the knowledge of those great mysteries handled in the beginning of Predestination Take heed of abusing this Doctrine 1. Quarrel not with Gods justice because he hath determined not to give grace to some Rom. 9. 14. That any are saved it is from Gods mercy there can be no injustice in refusing when it is the meer mercy of God to take any as if of many Traitors the King spare some and hang up the rest neither have the Elect a just cause to glory nor the reprobate to complain since undeserved grace is shewed to the one due punishment inflicted on the other It bewraies no more want of mercy in God that he takes but such then it did want of power because he made not many worlds since the exercising of one and the other is determined by his wisdome It were unjust say the Polonian Churches in their Catechisme to punish any one because he hath not done that which by no means he could do But when God punisheth the wicked and those that are refractory to his word what doth he do else but punish those which do not do that which they cannot do See more there cap. 10. of the same branne 2. This may comfort the people of God who may be certain of their election and salvation Rom. 8. 38. 39. Paul had not this by immediate revelation because he concludeth upon such arguments as are general to all the godly see 1 Ioh. 3. 14. Certainty of mans election and salvation is not such as we have of arts and sciences yet the truths of God are more to be adhered unto then any humane principle 3. Nor is it such as we have of doctrinal truths we are not so perswaded of Gods favour in particular to us as that there is a God and that there is Jesus Christ because the dogmatical truth is contained in the Scripture the other is but a practical conclusion drawn from the General 3. It is not such an assurance as expelleth all doubting and wavering Mar. 9. 24. yet doubting is a sin and we are to bewaile it but the Papists teach doubting and praise it under the name of humility and say it keeps us from presumption They say we can have but a conjectural and wavering knowledge of our salvation justly therefore did Luther terme the Romish Doctrine concerning uncertainty of salvation Non Doctrinam fidei sed diffidentiae no Doctrine of faith but distrust 4. It is not such as presumption and carnal security excluding all use of the means work out your salvation with fear those which have been most perswaded of Gods love to them have been most active for him the love of Christ constraineth us 5. It is more then probable conjectural or moral 6. It is not of our own conscience and Spirit onely but inabled by the Spirit of God
pardon Nullum peccatum est veniale dum placet sicut nullum mortale si verè displicet August Ambrosius saith All mortal sins are made venial by repentance Object Mat. 5. 22. There are two punishments lesse then hell fire Therefore all sins are not mortal Answ. That which our Saviour speaketh here of three several punishments is spoken by allusion to the proceeding in the Civil Courts in Iudaea and all that can be gathered from thence is but this That as there are differences of sins so there shall be of punishments hereafter 2. Maldonate the Jesuite ingeniously confesseth that by councel and judgement the eternal death of the soul is understood yet with this difference that a lesse degree of torment in hell is understood by the word Judgement then Councel and a lesse by Councel then by hell fire Object Mat. 5. 26. 7. 5. Luke 6. 41. 1 Cor. 3. 12. Some sins there are compared to very light things as hay stubble a mote a farthing Answ. 1. Some sins in comparison of others may be said to be light as a mote is little to a beam a farthing to a pound yet no sinne committed against God may be simply termed light or little Zech. 1. 5. being committed against an infinite God and having cost an infinite price 2. A mote if it be not taken out of the eye hindereth the sight so the least sinne hindereth grace and is sufficient to damn the soul. 3. Christ by the farthing Matth. 5. understands the last paiment of debt not sinne and the Apostle light and vain Doctrine by hay and stubble Purgatory is to cleanse men from their lesser sins but precious Doctrines or good works are there tried by fire Object James 1. 15. Sin When it is perfected brings forth death therefore not every sin not sin in every degree Answ. The Apostle there sets forth the method and order how sin comes to the height the word he useth for sin is of the feminine gender speaking of the conception and production of sin he saith Sin when it is finisht brings forth death actually the least sin merits death or the Apostle shews when death appears to us most not in its conception and production but when it is finisht Object Mat. 12. 36. He saith not we shall be condemned for every idle word but only that we shall be called to answer for it Answ. The same phrase is used concerning all kinde of sins yea those that are greatest and most grievous Object There is a mortal sin 1 Iohn 5. 16. therefore a venial sin Answ. He speaks of a mortal sinne not by nature or by merit but by event the event of which shall certainly be death and the person out of all hope of pardon Vide Bezam Of all words sin hath no diminutive not in any tongue known to us commonly only the Spaniard hath his Peccadillo a petty sin Dr Clark Sinnes considered in reference to the object are all great so Peccata sunt aequalia 2. The least sin that ever was committed had in it the whole nature of sin it is tam peccatum as truly sin as the greatest CHAP. VIII Of the Cause of Sinne. SIn properly is nothing formally subsisting or existing for then God should be the author of it but it is an ataxy or absence of goodnesse and uprightnesse in the thing that subsisteth Psal. 5. 4. 1 Iohn 2. 16. 1 Iohn 1. 5. Hab. 1. 13. Iob 34. 10. The Church of Rome slanders the Protestants and saith that they maintain God to be the cause of sin but we hold that the Devil and mans corrupt will are the cause of it Sin in man at first came from Satan Iohn 3. 8. 8. 44. Iohn 6. 17. Matth. 16. 23. the cause of sinne now man is fallen is from our selves Matth. 15. 19. God hath no hand in the acting and approving of sinne Rom. 3. 5. 9. 14. He is of purer eyes then to behold iniquity with approbation He is the wise permitter powerful disposer and eternal avenger of it God cannot sin or cause others to sin 1. Because his will is most holy and pure and the rule of perfection Isa. 6. He is holy in his Nature Actions he hath so confirmed his Angels in holinesse that they cannot sin 2. To sinne is to turn away from the chiefest and last end therefore he cannot sinne 3. God threatens sinners in his word and punisheth them therefore he allows it not 4. All deservedly hate the Manichees Marcionites and Libertines who would make that sacred and dreadful Majesty the cause of their detestable enormities therefore Bellarmine doth wickedly in imputing to Protestant Divines that which they detest with the greatest loathing That is a great Question in Divinity An Deus author peccati ex reformatorum placitis statuatur Four several kinds of power though not in yet over sinne may be ascribed to God a permissive desertive restrictive and disposing power First A permissive power else it could not be he may permit what he is not bound to hinder Secondly A desertive power it would not be if he withdrew not his grace sinne needs no efficient cause no more then darknesse Causa deficiens in moralibus efficiens Thirdly A restraining power there may be an act of restraining grace on the Devil Fourthly A disposing power whereby he disposeth and ordereth sinne to some excellent and good end his glory When God doth dispose or order the sin of any man 1. He doth not infuse this evil but use it 2. He useth it not as an evil or sin but as an instrument 3. He would not use it to such an end but that he is able to raise more good by it and to counterpoise all the evil in the action 4. God did not infuse malice into Iosephs brethren but made use of it rather to a sale then a murder he sent him before to save much people alive Gen. 45. 8. In the beginning of sin Gods will is exercised First By way of inhibition in giving a Law against it Secondly By way of permission leaying a lawlesse man to a lawlesse way In the progresse of sin God either hinders or over-rules it in the end he either punisheth or pardoneth it And all this without sin or the least blemish of sin For in the beginning of sin he sheweth his Wisdome In the progresse he sheweth his Power In the end he maketh manifest both his Justice and his Mercy Mr Wischart on the Lords Prayer Petit. 3. Those places Acts 2. 23. 2 Sam. 1. 43. besides a permission do expresse an active providence he is said to harden and deceive Gods permission is not otiosa but efficax permissio 1. God permits sin 2. Cooperates to the act as natural 3. Decreed it 4. As a just Judge he denieth grace 5. As the supream Judge he useth all these as instruments of his glory Papists and Arminians allow God no other power about sin but what is
constitution he can bear it without any disturbance and this hath a woe Woe to those that are strong to drink that have strong brains and bodies to carry their liquor away and never cry out with him Duos soles video 2. Actual either total and compleat when reason is fully intercepted and that is to be stark drunk to be a vivum cadaver as Chrysostome cals it well a breathing carkasse one cals them Ventri-dâ—mones belly-devils who like Dâ—genes could live in a barrel all their life time 2. Partial when a mans fancy is not wholly disturbed yet he is so farre tipled that both his fancy and judgement are darkned and the house runs round with him Means to avoid it 1. Shun the company of drunkards and all occasions 2. Cry to God to help you against this vice and consider the terrible threats against it 1 Cor. 6. 9. 3. Get thy sensual appetite mortified 4. Taste of Christs wine the sweetnesse of having Communion with him Ephes. 5. 18. CHAP. XVIII Of Envy Error Flattery Gluttony ENVY ENvy is a grief for the prosperity of others Est aegritudo suscepta propter alterius res secundas quae nihil noceant invidenti The first instances that we have of sinne are Adams pride and Cains envy Envy is the mother of strife they are often coupled Rom. 1. 29. 13. 13. 1 Cor. 3. 3. 2 Cor. 12. 20. Gal. 5. 20. Iam. 3. 14. Natural corruption doth most of all bewray it self by envy The Devil first envied us the favour of God and ever since we have envied one another The children of God are often surprized with it Numb 11. 29. Iohn 21. 20 21. It breaketh both Tables at once it beginneth in discontent with God and endeth in injury to man Macrobius l. 2. Sat. c. 2. saith acutely of Mutius a malevolous man being sadder then he was wont Aut Mutio nescio quid incommodi accessit aut nescio cui aliquid boni The Heathens when they saw an envious man sad they would demand whether harm had happened unto him or good unto his neighbour Aristotle cals it the Antagonist of the Fortunate Parum alicui est si ipse sit foelix nisi alter fuerit infoelix Livor semper lippus est saith Petrarch this humour is alwayes ill-sighted All blear-eyed men are offended and hurt with the light so envy is provoked at anothers good and honour The better the party envied is the better he behaveth himself the more bitter the envier doth grow against him and the more his hatred increaseth Saul had still a more violent spleen against David by how much he discovered more wisdom courage and the more the hearts of his servants were set upon him Who can stand before envy saith Salomon Prov. 27. 4. It is the rottennesse of the bones Pro. 14. 3. and so the justest of all vices because it bringeth with it its own vengeance Sed videt ingratos intabescitque videndo Successus hominum carpitque carpitur unà Suppliciumque suum est Ovid. Met. 11. Fab. 12. As the rust consumes iron so this vice the envious man Anacharsis cals it serram animae and Socrates Ulcus When Hercules had vanquished so many fierce monsters Comperit invidiam supremo fine domandam He grapled at last with envy as the worst Erasm. lib. 17. of his Epist. in an Epistle to Sir Thomas More saith of Conradus Goclenius Invidere quid sit ne per somnium quidem unquam intellexit tantus est ingenii candor The objectum quod of it is Good of any kinde true apparent honest profitable pleasant of minde body fortune fame vertue it self not excepted the objectum cui is generally any other man Superiour Inferiour Equal We envy a Superiour because we are not equalled to him an Inferiour least he should be equal to us an Equal because he is our equal Men of the same Trade or Profession envy each other Figulus figulo invidet Faber Fabro Death frees a man from it Extra omnem invidiae aleam Pascitur in vivis livor c. The chief cause of it is pride and inordinate love of a mans self the impulsive cause is manifold as if he be an enemy a corrival Hatred when one loaths and wisheth ill to another agrees with envy 1. In the subject alwayes he which envies another hates him but not on the contrary Secondly In the efficient cause which is pride and a blinde love of a mans self It differs from it First In the subject for hatred may be in one in whom envy is not Secondly In the objectum quod which in envy is only good but in hatred it may be evil Thirdly In the objectum cui which is larger in hatred then envy for we envy men only not God nor our selves but others but we may hate not only other men but our selves and other creatures yea God himself Error Error is to judge otherwise then the thing is taking truth for falshood or falshood for truth Usquequaque fidei venena non cessant spargere saith Augustine of his times In Gregory Nazianzens dayes there were six hundred errors in the Church Selat on 1 Cor. 11. 18 19. The Doctrine onely of the Trinity remains undefiled in Popery Obstinately to defend an error in things indifferent makes a man a Schismatick and in points necessary and fundamental an Heretick It is the greatest judgement in the world to be given over to error Revel 13. 8. Iudâ— v. 4. 2 Thes. 2. 11. All the primitive Fathers spend most of their zeal and painful writings against heresies and errors All the Primitive Churches to whom the Apostles wrote Epistles areexpresly warned either positively to stand fast in the truth to hold fast their profession or negatively to beware of and to avoid false teachers and not to be carried about with divers and strange Doctrines See Mr Gillesp. Misc. c. 11. 12. It is not difficult to enumerate those heresies which gave occasion for the introducing of every Article in the Creed Vide Sanfordum de Descensu Christi ad inferâ—s l. 4. p. 29 30. It was well concluded in the 39 Session of the Councel of Constance That every tenth year at the farthest there should be a general Councel held to reform such errors in the Church as probably in that time would arise Preservatives from error 1. Have a care to be established in the truths of God 2 Pet. 1. 12. specially the main truths of religion look to repentance faith daily examination Matth. 13. 45. Rom. 6. 17. Corrupt teachers beguile none but unstable souls 2. Get experimental knowledge Ephes. 3. 17. and mourn to see the truths of Christ corrupted Revel 11. 3. 3. Love not any sin 2 Tim. 2. 19. 4. Try the Spirits 1 Iohn 4. 1. Every man pretends to speak by the Spirit bring their Doctrine to the rule try to what end the Doctrine tends whether to exalt God and abase man Matth. 7.
15 16. or to set up the dark wisdom and proud will of man as Free-will Universal Redemption the denying of Gods Decrees and Perseverance Sub laudibus naturae latent inimici gratiae Aug. 5. Beware of communion with false teachers Rom. 16. 17. Titus 3. 10. 2 epist. Iohn 10. 6. Make use of the Ministry Flattery Flattery is a speech fitted to the will and humors of others for our own advantage One may please others much and yet not flatter them when he seeks not his own advantage in it 1 Cor. 3. ult We flatter First When we ascribe to them good things which they have not Or Secondly Applaud their evils as goodnesse Or Thirdly Amplisie their good parts above their merit Or Fourthly Extenuate their evil more then is meet Isa. 5. 10. Flatterers are men that dwell at Placenza as the Italian saith Isa. 30. 10. They may well be called Caementarii Diaboli the Devils daubers Ezek. 13. 10. Dionysius the tyrant had flatterers about him who like dogs would lick up his spittle and commend it to him to be as sweet as nectar Diogenes compared flattering language to a silken halter which is soft because silken but strangling because a halter and saith As tyrants are the worst of all wild beasts so are flatterers of all tame None can be flattered by another till he first flatter himself Canutus King of England and Denmark well repressed a flatterer at Southampton who bare the King in hand that all things in the Realm were at his will and command He commanded that his chair should be set on the shore when the Sea began to flow and then in the presence of many said to the Sea as it flowed Thou art part of my dominion and the ground on which I sit is mine wherefore I charge thee that thou come not upon my Land neither that thou wet the cloathes or body of thy Lord but the Sea according to his usual course flowing did wet his feet then he said None was worthy the name of a King but he to whose command the earth and sea were subject and never after would be King Chalac in Hebrew signifies either blandus smooth or Mollis soft because the flatterer useth smooth and soft speeches or dividere to divide because in flatterers the tongue is divided from the heart See Prov. 27. 6. 29. 5. Open hostility is better then secret flattery An ungodly mans sins are acts of hostility his duties acts of flattery Psal. 78. 36. We should shut our ears to flattererâ— and rather seek to do what is commendable then to hear our own commendation Plus aliâ—â— de â—â— quam tu tibi credere noli Gluttony Gluttony is a sinne Isa. 56. 12. Amos 6. it is an immoderate delight in meats and drinks This was Dives his sinne one of the sins of Sâ—dom Fulnesse of bread and of the old world This sinne is committed five wayes Praeproperè Lautè Nimis Ardenter Studiosè Reasons 1. From the causes of it it ariseth from sensuality a brutish vice where by one metamorphoseth himself into a swine in disregarding the divine spiritual excellent supernatural good offered to his reason and by that alone to be conceived and placeth his happinesse in corporal delights and pleasures that tickle his senses Such a one that so feeds eats not to live but lives to eat and in that sense is said to serve his own belly and not the Lord. Secondly The effects of this vice are very bad 1. It hinders Mercy and Liberality to the poor Lazarus could not have the crums of the Rich mans Table either they have no heart to give or nothing to spare 2. It often overthrowes Estate He that loves Wine and Oyl shall not be rich 3. Oppresseth the heart and burieth all good Meditations and Affections for fat is alwayes senslesse 4. Draws men to the practice of Unjustice as 1 Sam. 21. 30. A Christian must take heed of all excesse in food 1 Cor. 9. 29. Reasons First A moderate Diet keeps the body healthful that we may glorifie God and have ability of strength to serve him Secondly Excesse of Diet will breed lusts and further the power of concupiscence in men Thirdly The Body is to be an Instrument of the Soule in all service to God glorifie God in Soul and Body much eating unfits and is sinfull Fourthly We must eat to the glory of God when we are hungry that hereby God may be glorified in our calling Fifthly It is Idolatry to minde the belly Phil. 3. 19. Rom. 16. 16. such belly-gods were the Monks and many of the Romans Sixthly It is a sin against the body the Apostle aggravates fornication from this consideration Seventhly It indisposeth to any spiritual duty Luke 21. 34. a full belly cannot study Impletus venter non vult studere libenter In Scripture a fat heart is as much as stupid and senslesse First Many like Iosephs master Potiphar take account of nothing but what they must eat and drink that they may be sure to fare well our feasts usually are turned meerly to an exercise of this vice Secondly All should exercise Temperance in Diet let a little content thee let the end of thy eating be strength and health not a pleasing of thy tooth the rich must inure themselves sometimes to a hard short meal that they may do more good to others Motives First Gluttony is a beastly sin yea it makes men worse then beasts for they can take delight in such things yet will not exceed Secondly It is an abuse of the creatures which are given to us for our good Thirdly Injurious to the poor CHAP. XIX Of Heresie Hypocrisie Idlenesse Impenitence Injustice Intemperance HERESIE I Dolatry was the prevailing sinne of the Old Testament and Heresie of the New It is a pertinacious defending of any thing which overthrows the Fundamentall Doctrine of faith contained in the Word of God An obstinate errour against the foundation Dr Halls Case of Consc. 5th Case It was a wilde fancy of the Weigelians That there is a time to come which they call Seculum Spiritus Sancti in which God shall by his Spirit reveal much more knowledge and light then was revealed by Christ and his Apostles in Scripture Mr Gillesp. Miscel. c. 10. The Gnosticks had their name propter excellentiam scientiae from profound knowledge and greater light They which pretended to know above all others yet were but a prophane sect as the Ancient Writers tell us The Socinians doctrine is as it were a filthy sink into which all the Heresies of former and later ages have emptied themselves They will receive no interpretation of Scripture nor article of faith unlesse it agree with reason Scriptura est norma recta ratio est judex all is ultimately resolved into reason Infaustus Socinus omnium Hareticorum audacissimus Rivet What doth Socinus think more highly of Christ then the Turks of Mahomet yea what doth he think
brought to a sense of his sin and to repentance for it Matth. 21. 31. 2. In the life to come because they have sinned against greater means and light they shall receive the greater damnation Matth. 11. 24. Many an hypocrite will 1. Constantly hear and frequent the best Ministry Isa. 58. 2. Ezek 33. 31 32. 2. Will keep a constant course in prayer and that not in ordinary prayer only but even in extraordinary too Luke 18. 12. compare Zach. 7. 5. 8. 19. together 3. Is a strict observer of the Sabbath day Luke 13. 14 15. Iohn 5. 10. 4. Loveth the sincerity of Religion and hateth Popery will-worship and idolatry with all the reliques and monuments of it Rom. 2. 22 23. 5. Goeth a great deal farther in the reformation of his life then the civil man doth 2 Pet. 2. 20. Luke 11. 42. We should labour for a spirit without guile Psal. 2. 2. That spirit is 1. An humble spirit before in and after duty 2. An honest spirit carried equally against all sin 3. A plain spirit Idlenesse Idlenesse is a vice of spending time unprofitably It is vivi hominis sepultura Salomon often condemneth sluggishnesse Prov. 6. 9 10 11. which saying he repeats again Proverbs 24. see Proverbs 20. 13. An idle man is a burden to himself a prey to Satan the devils cushion semper aliquid age ut te diabolus inveniat occupatum A grief to Gods Spirit Ephes. â— 28. 30. Bodily sloth you cannot bear and soul-sloth Christ cannot bear Matthew 25. 26. Sins accompanying idlenesse 1. Inordinate walking 2 Thess. 3. 11 12. 2. Talebearing 1 Tim. 5. 13. Prov. 11. 13. 3. Theft Ephes. 4. 28. 2 Thess. 3. 12. 4. Drunkennesse Amos 6. 1. 5. Filthinesse see 2 Sam. 11. Ezek. 16. 49. Idlenesse is the mother and nurse of lust Quaeritur Aegistus quare sit factus adulter In promptu causa est desidiosus erat Otia si tollas periere cupidinis arcus Ovid. Water standing still will putrifie and breed toads and venemous things so ease will breed diseases The punishments of idlenesse 1. Diseases Cernis at ignavum corrumpunt otia corpus 2. Dulnesse idlenesse is the rust of wit 3. Poverty Prov. 10. 4. 20. 13 19. 6. 10 11. 24. 34. 4. Shame Prov. 10. 5. 6. 6. 12. 11. It is against the order of nature which God set in all his creatures at the first the heavens stand not still but by miracle Adam laboured in Paradise much more since the fall Iob 5. 7. The rust fretteth unused iron and the mothes eat unworn garments This is the sin of great persons who â—â—ve received great mercies from God Cretians idle slow-bellies This sin is condemned 1. Exceedingly in the word by Salomon Prov. Eccles. Isaiah and by Paul and in morall Philosophy 2. It is a mother-sin as was shewed before 3. Produceth many plagues rheums obstructions and other inconveniences as hath been also shewed and exposeth one to great danger A good remedy against idlenesse is diligence in some honest calling Iacob and his sons Moses and David were shepherds 1 Sam. 12. 1 2. Let him that hath an office wait upon it This humbleth the minde profits the estate and makes a man able to do good to himself and others interests a man to the things of this life he that labours not must not eat in all labour there is abundance It fits him for religious duties if it be moderate makes the life cheerfull prevents evil fancies Impenitence Impenitence is a great sin under the Gospel Acts 8. 22. The longer one lies in any sin the more is the heart hardened Ier. 16. 1. Ephes. 4. 18 19. He which hardeneth his heart against many reproofs shall surely perish obstinate impenitent sinners shall be destroyed 1 Sam. 12. 25. Impenitence perfectly conforms one to Satan who is in malo obfirmatus and sins without remorse In malo perseverare diabolicum Reasons 1. Repentance is Gods gift therefore denying of it is Gods curse 2. Hereby the highest favour of God is despised the offering of repentance is a mercy that belongs to the second Covenant obstinacy in sinning is a denying of Gods justice and abusing his mercy 3. So long as one lives in any sin without repentance so long God looks on him as continuing in that sin his minde is not changed 4. Without repentance there is no remission Acts 5. 31. Luke 24. 47. therefore the sin against the holy Ghost is unpardonable Heb. 6. 6. because one cannot repent 5. Final impenitency is a certain evidence of ones reprobation Rom. 2. 5. Heb. 12. 17. 6. Under the Gospel there are the greatest arguments and motives to repentance Matth. 3. 2. Acts 17. 30. Christ himself sent Iohn before him to preach the doctrine of repentance and he himself did also preach it he bad men amend their lives because the Kingdom of God was at hand and his Apostles also preacht the same doctrine of repentance He is a wilfull sinner which either holds in himself a purpose that he will sin or is irresolute and not settled in a firm purpose of not sinning or that purposeth to mend but not till hereafter Injustice Injustice is a sin Every man is to have his own and to be permitted the quiet enjoyment of that wherein he hath interest They execute no judgement Salomon saith in the place of judgement there was iniquity I looked for judgement and behold oppression Isaiah Reasons 1. The excellency of the thing abused judgement is a part of Gods authority It is Gods judgement which you execute saith Iehosaphat therefore it is a foul thing to abuse a thing so sacred and of such high respect 2. The causes of it are covetousness distrust of Gods providence shaking off the fear of God and extinguishing the light of nature denying Gods Lordship over the whole world 3. The effects of it are bad 1. It defiles a mans conscience Iudas cast away the thirty pieces which he came unjustly by 2. It will ruinate his state and family A man shall not rost what he caught in hunting 3. It blemisheth the name and stains a mans reputation The Publicans were in such hatefull esteem among the Jews that they were ranked with the very harlots and most notorious sinners because they cared not what nor from whom they gat 4. Riches deceitfully gotten is vanity tossed to and fro by them which seek death a man shall be damned for unjust gain unlesse repentance and restitution come between The Apostle saith God is an avenger of all which do such things Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the Kingdom of God Intemperance It is an inordinate appetite or immoderate desire and use of meat and drink and this is when a due mean is exceeded either in the costly preparation of them for our selves or others or in the too liberall and excessive use of them so prepared Degrees of intemperance 1. More secret
manhood from the stain of sin wherewith those are polluted which are begotten by carnal generation though the holy Ghost could as easily have sanctified the substance of a man as of a woman to frame of it the humane nature of Christ. 2. To shew the greatnesse of his love to man by transcending the course of nature for his restitution and that the making of the second Adam might no lesse commend the power of God then the making of the first for it is no more beyond the power of nature to produce a man of a Virgin then to frame a man of the dust of the earth This is a great mystery God manifested in the flesh 1 Tim. 3. 16. The second person did assume humane nature to it so as these two make one person Iohn 1. 14. Rom. 1. 3. The second person I say for it is not proper to say that the Divine nature was made flesh but the second person though the second person have the Divine nature in him and is God For though God was made flesh yet it was not the Divine nature in all the persons that was incarnated but the very person of the Son subsisting in the Godhead The Schoolmen have divers curious questions 1. Whether it was convenient for God to be incarnate 2. Whether it was necessary for the repairing of mankinde that the Word should be Incarnate 3. Whether God should have been Incarnate if man had not sinned Aquinas part 3. quaest 1. Artic. 1 2 3. That Christ should have come although man had not sinned will scarce be made good The Scripture acknowledgeth no other cause of Christs coming in the flesh but to save sinners and redeem them who are under the Law and so subject to the curse Matth. 1. 21. 9. 13. 18. 11. Gal. 4. 5. Christ was born of a Virgin but such a one as was espoused to a man Luke 1. 27. and that for these reasons 1. To avoid the infamy and suspition of immodesty 2. That her Virginity might be the better evidenced viz. He bearing witnesse to whom it specially belonged to understand how things were and who was most worthy to be beleeved in that matter 3. That she might have a most intimate helper in bearing all other cares and troubles 4. To represent our spiritual conjunction with Christ for we are espoused to him and yet we ought to be virgins cleansed from all pollution both of flesh and spirit 2 Cor. 7. 1. see 2 Cor. 11. 2. Rev. 14. 4. The place where Christ was born was Bethlehem which signifies a house of bread the best place for the Bread of life and in Ephratah a most fruitfull place In the year 3967. say some others say it is uncertain in what year In the 42 year of Augustus his reign For the moneth there is great difference also Epiphanius thinketh he was born in the 6th of Ianuary Beroldus at the middle of September Clemens Alexandrinus at the Spring-time Others at the 25th of December Scaliger objects that the winter time was not fit for a Master of a Family to undertake so long a journey with his wife to be taxed also that Shepherds are not wont in the night time to watch their flocks at that time of the year Vossius de Natali Iesu Christi Dr Drake in his Chronology gives probable grounds why Christ was not born in December but rather about August or September God of purpose concealed the time of Christs birth as he did the body of Moses as well foreseeing how it would have been abused to superstition had it been exactly known Interpreters indeed render the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vigilare or excubare but it may be better translated sub dio agere It properly notes to live in the fields as the original of the word shews which agrees to the day-time as well as to the night In England saith Vossius we have travelled both before and after the Nativity of Christ. For the day of our Saviours Nativity it is not certain this was the day which we celebrate Some learned Divines gather from the computation of the time when the Angel saluted our Lords Mother being the sixth moneth Luke 1. 26. that this cannot be the day though 't is true the tradition is ancient Scultetus thus concludes the fourteenth Chapter of his Delit. Evang. Tacâ—nte Scriptura taccamus nos Christum servatorem in tempore natum adoremus et si in quo temporis puncto natus sit ignoramus A late Writer saith that opinion of the Romans is true which held that Christ was born on the 25 day of December and undertakes to demonstrate it As for the day saith scaliger Unius Dei est non hominis deâ—inire This Jesus of Nazareth perfect God and man is that Messiah promised of old What ever was said of the Messiah was accomplished by him and him alone The first Christians beleeved in him Luke 1. 68. Christ much instructed his Disciples in this great truth Luke 24. 25 26 27 44 verses The Apostles proved this great doctrine Acts 18. 24 27. 26. 22 23. 28. 23. Arguments that prove this Jesus to be the Messiah All the times of exhibiting the Messiah delivered in the old Testament are expired Acts 13. 32. See 1 Pet. 1. 10. The old Testament speaks of a twofold coming of Christ in a state of humility and glory The Jewish Rabbins could not reconcile these two the Talmudists distinguished of a twofold Messiah Ben-Israel or Ben-Ephraim and Ben-David The Prophets speak not of several persons but of several states of one person See Ezck. 37. 24. Gen 49. 10. The power of ruling and authority of judging is departed from Iudah and hath been a long time Therefore Shiloh the Messiah is come Hag. 26 7. 9. The outward glory of the first Temple was greater all the vessels of the first Temple were beaten gold Dan. 5. 2 3. of the second brasse but Christ honoured the second Temple by his own Presence Doctrine and Miraâ—les 〈…〉 Jews confesse that there were five things in which the latter Temple was inâ—â—â—â—â—ur to the former First Heavenly fire came down visibly on their Sacrifices They had the Ark of the Covenant The Cloud a witnesse of the Divine presence Urim and Thummim And lastly a succession of Prophets which the latter Temple wanted Rain in loc de lib. Apoc. tom 2. Praelect 134 135. Dan. 9. 24 26. Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy City to finish the transgression That is The time that the Jews were to live in their own land and enjoy their own worship after their return out of Captivity We are wont to apply the seventh number to daies that a perfect week should comprehend seven full daies So Dan. 10. 2. Levit. 23. 15. The Prophecy cannot â—e understood in this common and usual manner so Seventy weeks rise but to Four hundred and ninety daies within
2. 5. God doth work most mightily with such preaching Ioh. 4. 18 19. Act. 2. 36 37. Reasons 1. Every man through the self-love and hypocrisie that is in his heart is apt to put from himself to others general Doctrines and Reproofs Matth. 21. 41. see 45 46. verses 2. Till mens sins be effectually discovered to them they can never attain to any saving grace Iohn 16. 8. Tit. 1. 13. 3. Practice is the end of knowledge and nothing is perfect till it attain its end If you know these things happy are you if you do them Truths are never fully and exactly known but in the experience and practice of them hence that expression Tast and see CHAP. III. Of Ecclesiastical Iurisdiction and Government THat there is an Ecclesiastical Government distinct from the Civil it is apparent seeing the Church and the State are distinct their Governments must be also distinct Yea the Church may be not only distinct but separate from the State neither the supream nor subordinate powers being incorporate in the Church but meer aliens from it and perhaps enemies to it God hath established two distinct powers on earth the one of the Keys committed to the Church the other of the Sword committed to the Civil Magistrate That of the Keys is ordained to work on the inward man having immediate relation to the remitting or retaining of sins That of the Sword is appointed to work upon the outward man yeelding protection to the obedient and inflicting external punishment upon the rebellious and disobedient Some call it the power of the Keys others Ecclesiastical Discipline others Church-government That there is a Church-power appeareth plainly by Christs giving them the Keys Matth. 16. 18 19. Iohn 20. 23. and also in the titles of Shepherds Governours Rulers and Guides Heb. 13. 7 17. 1 Cor. 12. 28. God hath set in the Church the other things there reckoned are all peculiar to the Church There is a two-fold Ministerial power 1. Potestas ordinis which consists meerly in preaching the Word and administring the Sacraments 2. Iurisdictionis whereby they govern in the Church by binding the Impenitent and losing the Penitent The Object of this spiritual power are religious things in a religious consideration but it is not an absolute supream power The Ministerial power manifests it self 1. In doctrinal decisions of matters of faith 2. In making wholsom ecclesiastical Laws 3. In executing Church-censures But though they have power of declaring Gods will concerning matters of faith and worship to the people yet they cannot make any new Article of faith nor propound any thing as necessary to be beleeved to salvation It is a great Question Penes quos sit potestas Ecclesiastica Who are the subject of this Ecclesiastical power The Community of the faithfull much lesse two or three separated from the world and gathered together into the name of Christ by a Covenant are not the proper and immediate subject of power ecclesiastical Matth. 28. 19 20. Iohn 20. 21 22. 21. 15 16. were spoken to special persons not the whole community The Apostle Act. 20. 28 speaks unto the Presbyters of Ephesus and saith That they were appointed Overseers by the holy Ghost that they might govern the Church of God M. Rutherford saith The Keys were given for the Church but not to the Church Mr. Norton urgeth Act. 14. 23. to prove the power to be in the fraternity it is said there That Presbyters were ordained by Paul and Barnabas in every Church They were ordained in the Churches but not by them He urgeth also Act. 6. that proves nothing but that the election of Officers doth some way belong to the people but that their Authority depends on the people cannot be thence collected Mr. Norton Chap. 5. of that Book saith Quod exercetur nomine Christi recipitur immediatè à Christo. At officium Rectorum exercetur nomine Christi 2 Cor. 5. 20. Here he not only grants but also proves Rectores Ecclesiae esse immediatum subjectum potestatis against which he asserted and argued in his fourth Chapter And after in the same fifth Chapter he saith Multitudo non committit potestatem Ecclesiae Rectoribus tantum designat personas therefore it is not the first and immediate subject of ecclesiastical power which he endeavoured to prove Chap. 4. Excommunication is the greatest and last censure of the Church Iudicium maximum tremendum See Mat. 16. 18. Mat. 17. 18. 1 Cor. 5. This Ordinance is usefull 1. To the whole Church hereby the honour and beauty of the Church of Christ is preserved from the defilement and scandal which such an offence would bring upon it otherwise the evil example would infect 1 Cor. 5. 4. this was typified by the Leper whom God would have shut up in his Tent least the rest of the Congregation should be infected 2. Gods people are hereby made more watchful 3. It is useful to the offender himself for the saving of his soul is the end of it 1 Cor. 5. 3. and that he may not commit the like fault again 1 Tim. 1. 20. The power of Excommunication Formaliter executivè is proper to the company or assembly of Governours and Rulers in the Church derived from Christ to be exercised as Christ shall go before them but with notice to and due regard had of the whole society The Parts of Excommunication are First Admonition 1 Thess. 5. 14. 1. This must be for a sin reprovable 2. For scandalous matters not infirmities which are mourned for 3. Managed with wisdom zeal and love Gal. 6. 1. Secondly Excommunication which is to be executed on men for corrupt opinions Titus 3. 9 10. Revelat. 2. 15. 2. Sinful practices 2 Thess. 3. 6. 1 Cor. 5. 11. It is a Question An Episcopus prasit Presbytero jure divino A Bishop is a man chosen out among the Ministers to have chief Authority in the ordaining of Ministers in a certain Circuit and overseeing them with their flocks The Christian world saw no other Government for fourteen hundred years after Christ. Some urge this for the lawfulness of their Office by Gods Word By proportion of the chief Priests under the Law and of the Apostles under the Gospel The high Priest was set over the other Priests and over the Levites Numb 3. 4. Chapter The twelve Apostles were more eminent then the seventy Disciples and not only exceeded in excellency of Gifts but in amplitude of Authority and power Now say they it is the constant Doctrine of all the Fathers that the Bishops succeeded the Apostles in the ordinary Government of the Church as also the Presbyters succeeded the Seventy Disciples Episc. Dav. Determinat 42. See B. Barlow Antiq and Superiority of Bishops Ierom saith The order of Bishops came in by meer custome of the Church to avoid Schisms which arose for want of Heads but how can that be when it was
against Arius who denied the Deity of Christ. The first Constantinopolitan Councel called by the Emperour Theodosius the elder against Macedonius who denied the Deity of the holy Ghost The first Ephesine Councel called by the Emperor Theodosius the younger against Nestorius who held that there were two Persons in Christ. Fourthly The Chalcedonian called by the Emperour Martian against Eutyches who held that the one Nature in Christ consisted of the Divine and Humane These Councels were celebrated within five hundred years after Christs birth Councels there have been called Ancient because lesse Modern and General because lesse Particular for the first was not till more then three hundred years after Christ nor to the largest appears it that ever any were summoned beyond the bounds of the ancient Roman Empire though Christianity were much far extended Rainold part 2. Plenariis Conciliis quorum est in Ecclesia saluberrima Authoritas Augustin epist. 118. cap. 3. That a Synod be general and lawful three things are necessarily and essentially required 1. The first which concerns the generality of it is That the Calling and Summons to the Councel be general and Oecumenical Quod omnes tangit ab omnibus approbari debet The lawfulnesse of Synods consists partly in their orderly assembling by lawful authority and partly in their orderly Government and proceedings when they are assembled Crakanth Vigil Dormit c. 19. The nature of Synods is all one when they be Provincial National or oecumenical and they only differ as greater or lesser Their power is not meerly consultatory and swasive but authoritative and to be submitted unto by those for whom their delegation is so farre as their acts are according to the Word of God In Synodo est authoritatis apex totius Ecclesiae unitas ordinis firmamentum Leyd profess de concil A few private men yea one man or woman may counsel advise or perswade M. Hudsons Vindicat. c. 7. It is a Question between us and the Papists Cujus sit congregare Concilia Who hath the power of calling a Councel The Papists generally say the Pope Vide Bellarm. de Concil lib. 1. cap. 12 13. We the Emperour and other Christian Princes The four first general Councels were called by four Emperours as was before mentioned The Pope of Rome out of his own Province hath no right nor authority of calling a Councel The true cause saith Doctor Ames why general Councels were called by the authority of the Emperour was because the Emperour alone not the Pope had universal power It is a Question between us and the Papists Quinam sunt ad concilium convocandi Who are to be called to a Councel The Papists hold only the Clergy may be of the Councel and of the Clergy only Bishops as Judges Men that are famous for wisdom holinesse of life and experience of things men that are inflamed with a zeal to God and to the salvation of men with the love of the truth and peace From Acts 15. 6. 23. it is manifest that not only the Apostles but also the Elders and the people likewise and the whole Church were present and had their voices in this Councel See Acts 16. 4. That famous Paphnutius was a Lay-man A general Councel represents the Universal therefore there ought to be present there some of all kinds and orders of men An Concilia possint errare Whether general Councels may erre Every Assembly which consists of members subject to errour may be seduced But General Councels are Assemblies consisting of members subject to errour for all men are so Rom. 3. 4. Secondly If the determination of General Councels were infallible all Christians were necessarily bound to stand unto them and to submit to their authority Thirdly If General Councels may contradict the one the other they may certainly erre The General Councel held at Laterane under Leo the tenth contradicteth the Councel of Constance in the point of the Councels superiority above the Pope Fourthly That which hath befallen some General Councels may befall any other unlesse they can alledge some special priviledges to the contrary See 1 Kin. 22. 12. Mat. 26. 65. Ioh. 11. 52. Mark 14. 64. Bellarmine saith they cannot erre if confirmed by the Pope De concil lib. 2. cap. 2 3 4 5. That General Councels though gathered and confirmed by the Pope may erre not only in fact as the Papists confesse but also in faith and manners Vide Whitaker controv 3. de Concil Quaest. 6. In eo Pontificii se praebent ridendos nam Papae confirmatio sequitur Concilii decreta non praecedit Cameron The Rhemists bring Iohn 16. 13. Luk. 1. 3. Some urge Matth. 18. 20. for this purpose None amongst them is like to Luke nay all of them gathered together are not like him he was an extraordinary instrument of the holy Ghost Iohn 16. 13. speaks not of the Church but of the Apostles but if it be applicable to the Church yet it belongs only to the Spouse of Christ not that she doth not sometimes erre also even in Doctrine but not deadly she shall not erre in things which are necessary to salvation See Cameron Miroth in loâ— If from this promise an infallibility of judging might be gathered it would agree not only to Bishops gathered together but severed neither only to the Pope of Rome as the Jesuites would have it but also to the Successours of the rest of the Apostles saith B. Davenant That place Mat. 18. 20. means any particular Assembly of the Saints Vide Calv. in loc Act. 15. 22. is also brought This Councel consisted of Apostles which had an extraordinary assistance and illumination of Gods Spirit there is not the like authority of other Councels Panormitan the great Popish Canonist and Lawyer saith Plus credendum est simplici Laico Scripturam proferenti quam toti simul Concilio There is another great controversie not so much as Whitaker hath well observed between us and the Papists as between the Papists themselves An Concilia sint supra Papam Whether Councels be above the Pope Many amongst them and those of great note prefer a General Councel before the Pope but others a Pope before the Councel If Peter himself saith Whitaker in the place before-quoted be sent to the Church as to a certain superiour judgement and tribunal and be commanded to bring the faults and offences of others to it then it follows that the Church is greater and superiour to Peter or any other in authority The Assumption saith he relies in expresse words of Scripture The consequence of the major is evident from the confession of the Adversaries For they say That a Church is represented in a Councel Secondly The Universal Church is called the mother of all the faithful and Christians Gal. 4. 26. The Pope is the Churches son if he be faithful But the son is not above his mother only God and his word is above the Church of God
Scripture but prosperity See Ier. 15. 9. Amos 8. 9. They also urge that place Rev. 21. 22. Brightman understands it not of the Church militant but of the Jewish Synagogues They shall not worship God after their own manner and worship when the Jews are converted 1. God hath chosen these to be Canales gratiae the Conduit-pipes whereby he derives himself and his graces to his people 1 Cor. 1. 24. 2. He hath commanded us to wait upon them attend to reading search the Scriptures Ioh. 5. 39. be baptized for remission of sins do this in remembrance of me pray continually Despise not prophesying 1 Thess. 5. 19. Paul there intimates an aptnesse in men under the notion of magnifying and advancing of the Spirit to despiâ—e prophesying and sheweth also that the means to quench and extinguish the illuminations of the Spirit is to have low and unworthy thoughts of the word of God and of prophesying according to the Analogy and proportion of that Word We use the Ordinances not only for the enjoyment of God in them but as a testimony of our obedience God gave not the Spirit for this end to be the onely rule for man to live by but to help him to understand the rule and enable him to keep it 3. God hath limited us so to them that we have no warrant to expect the communication of grace but by the Ordinances 4. He hath threatned a curse to those that reject them Heb. 10. 25 39. Observe the punishment both of Jews and Gentiles which slighted the Ordinances 1 Cor. 1. 22 23 compared with v. 24. If these therefore be children which set so light by the Ordinances they will not live long without bread God hath given up the leaders of this errour to borrid blasphemous opinions they think they have no need of Christ Some think that they are Christ Others that they are God and that they are glorified and cry down Sanctification as an Idol This may suffice for the Ordinances in general of the Ministry and preaching of the Word I have spoken already the other particular Ordinances I shall handle and defend afterwards Others run into another extream and make Idols of the Ordinances 1. By resting in a bare formal attendance upon them as the Harlot in the Proverbs I have had my peace-offerings to day We must remember they are but means the end is communion with God and Christ and therefore we should not rest in the work done 2. By leaning too much upon them they are means to which we are limited but we should not limit the Lord when thou hast done all loathe thy self and all that thou hast done and rest on free-grace We should be careful of duty as if there were no grace to justifie us and so rest upon grace as if no work were to be done â—y us The Ordinances are either 1. Ordinary as Hearing the Word Singing of Psalms Prayer Receiving the sacraments 2. Extraordinary Fasting Feasting Vows CHAP. II. Of Ordinary Religious Duties and first of Hearing the Word I. That we must hear the Word HEaring of the Word preached is a duty that lies upon all Saints Ephes. 2. 17. Heb. 12. 25. 1 Pet. 1. 11. 3. 18 19. It is a necessary and beneficial duty 1. Necessary It is seed to beget and meat to nourish 1 Pet. 2. 2. It is â—eedful in respect of our ignorance Ephes. 4. 18. Forgetfulnesse Heb. 2. 2 3. Isa. 62. 6. 2 Pet. 1. 12. This is the word by which we are to examine our estates and by which God will judge us at the last day 2 Cor. 5. 15 16. All the Persons of the Trinity speak to you in every truth discovered The Father Iohn 6. 45. the Son Heb. 12. 25. the Spirit Hear what the Spirit saith to the Churches 2. Beneficial 1. Souls are converted unto God as death comes by hearing so life Rom. 10. 17. Revel 6. 1. 2. It is a great means of salvation Rom. 1. 16. it is called salvation it self the one thing necessary Iam. 1. 21. 3. The Spirit is conveyed by it both in the gifts and graces 2 Cor. 3. 8. Rom. 1. 12. 4. Growth in grace comes by it 5. Satans Kingdome is overthrown by it he fals from heaven like lighâ—â—ning Object I can reade the Word at home which is more truly the Word then what others preach If he were a man of an infallible spirit it were something but they may erre as well as we some therefore will hear none but look for Apostles Answ. If they were men of an infallible spirit thou must try their Doctrines by the Word If God should send you Prophets and Apostles you must take nothing upon trust from them Gal. 1. 8. 1 Iohn 4. 1. II. How we must hear the Word SOme things must be done 1. Afore hearing 2. In hearing 3. After hearing I. Afore hearing Thou must pray for thy teacher that he may so speak as he ought to speak Ephes. 6. 19. Col. 4. 3 4. and for thy self that thou maist hear profitably and be blessed in hearing Prov. 2. 3 5. Psal. 25. 4. 119. 10 18 27. II. In hearing 1. One must set himself as in Gods presence when he is hearing of the Word Deut. 32. 2. so Luk. 10. 16. 1 Thess. 2. 13. so did Cornelius Acts 10. 33. 2. Attend diligently to what he heareth Luke 19. 48. Gods people are oft called upon to attend Mark 4. 9 23. 7. 14. It is seven times repeated Revel 2. He that hath an ear to hear let him hear so did Lydia Acts 16. 14. Attentivenesse implies 1. Earnestnesse and greedinesse of soul Bibulae aures James 1. 19. 1 Pet. 2. 2. so the people that slockt after Christ. 2. The union of the thoughts and all other faculties of the soul it is called attending upon the Lord without distraction 1 Cor. 7. 35. 3. Hear the Word with understanding and judgement Matth. 15. 10. Psal. 45. 10. 2 Tim. 2. 7. 4. He should hear with affection and delight Deut. 32. 46 47. Mark 13. 37. Acts 2. 4. 5. He must take every thing as spoken to himself Matth. 19. 25 27. 26. 22. Iohn 5. 27. III. After hearing 1. We must meditate of what we have heard Acts 17. 11. 2. Apply it to our selves To apply the Word is to take it as that wherein I have an interest Psal. 119. 111. every precept promise and priviledge The life of preaching and hearing both is application If one could repeat the Bible from one end to another it would not make him a knowing Christian. When our Saviour told his Disciples One of them should betray him they all ask Is it I A good hearer Isa. 55. 2. is said to eat which notes an intimate application the stomack distributes to every part what nourishment is sutable to it 3. Conferre of it with others Ier. 33. 25. See Iohn 16. 17 19. Mark 4. 10. 7. 17. 10. 10 11. Conference is that whereby
to be an hypocrite a devil a traitor yet admitted him to be at the last Passeover which ever he received though not to the Supper for that was not administred till his departure not because it had been unlawfull to have received with him Because the Lord who commandeth his worship never puts in any such limitations and exceptions unlesse a wicked man be present Object Christ was the Son of God and as so knew the theft and hollowness of Iudas and therefore his example in this case cannot be our warrant Answ. Though he did know as God his wickednesse yet he did receive the Passeover with him as man and how he came by the knowledge of his faultinesse it matters not since he knew him faulty Therefore our Saviour also went up to the usual feast and to the Temple when he was sure to meet there with the most abominable Scribes and Pharisees 1 Sam. 2. 2. Hannah and Elkanah went up to the house of God to Shiloh to worship there with the sons of Eli Hophni and Phineas there not alone with wicked people but Priests they did partake in divine service Some endeavour to prove out of 1 Sam. 2. 17. that wicked men by coming to the Sacrament do pollute it because the sinful carriage of Eli's sons caused men to abhorre the offering of the Lord but note the reason why the offering became abominable because they offered not the Sacrifice according to the Commandment of God they would not have sodden flesh but raw If the doctrine of the Sacrament be corrupted if it be celebrated under one kinde if water be mingled with wine this is to pollute the Ordinance Object We are commanded to separate our selves from the wicked and to come out from amongst them 2 Cor. 6. 17. Answ. We must indeed come out from amongst those which do serve false gods and separate our selves from the familiar society of wicked persons but other separation was never practised by any Prophet or Apostle or ever meant Immediately there it follows Touch not the unclean thing that is do not joyn with others in their pollutions Ephes. 5. 6 7 11. Some say he speaks to professours of Christian Religion concerning Heathens to leave familiar fellowship with them as joyning in marriage and the like which is the thing he had spoken of immediately before To have none good is the property of a Church malignant to have all good and none bad is the property of the Church triumphant to have some good and some bad is the property of the Church militant Men openly wicked and scandalous should be cast out of the Congregation of Saints but it follows not that because such should be cast out and be not therefore others should abstain from the Assemblies of the Saints The Brownists abstain from coming to the Word and Sacrament amongst us because many openly prophane and known wicked men are admitted to our Assemblies therefore they think they cannot with good conscience serve God with such persons but no good man in the Scripture did therefore withdraw himself from the Temple or their Synagogues See M. Hilders on Iohn 4. 22. This Ordinance saith M. Burroughes must be received in a holy Communion or in a Communion of Saints 1 Cor. 10. 16 17. therefore all that come to receive the Sacrament must so come as they must be one body one spiritual corporation This Sacrament saith he is not defiled to the right receivers of it meerly because wicked men are present there but because the Congregation neglects their duty of casting out the wicked from thence when they discover themselves The example of the incestuous Corinthian 1 Cor. 5. saith he is a plain place for it A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump The Lump there is the Church communion and the Leaven the incestuous person while this leaven continues if you do not your duty to cast out this scandalous person your whole lump your whole communion will come to be defiled Particular persons and communicants come to be defiled in this if they neglect the duty that belongs unto them as Christians Matth. 18. 15 16 17. if thou â—ast done this duty to all scandalous persons in the Congregation then the sinne be upon the Church thou maist receive the Sacrament with comfort though wicked men be admitted there As I never found one word in Scripture where either Christ or his Apostles denied admittance to any man that desired to be a member of the Church though but onely professing to repent and believe So neither did I ever there finde that any but convicted Hereticks or scandalous ones and that for the most part after due admonition were to be avoided or debarred our fellowship M. Baxters Saints everlasting Rest c. 4. Sect. 3. See more there The rest of the Congregation is not polluted by the mixture of unworthy persons with them unlesse they be consenting to their wickednesse no more then in the duties of hearing and prayer with the wicked in a mixt Congregation M. Lâ—fo Princip of Faith and a good Consc. c. 52. For that Objection A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump Answ. This is a Metaphorical speech the meaning of it is not that one or two sinners cause the whole Congregation to be so corrupt and unpleasing to God that whosoever joyneth with them is polluted but alone this One sinner suffered and not punished the infection spreads farther and farther Objection We are commanded not to eat with a brother if he be so and so Answ. It signifieth to have familiar civil society with them in inviting them or feasting them But if one may not have familiar civil conversation with such much lesse may he eat with them at the Sacrament It follows not for in withdrawing our selves from them we punish them and shew our dislike of them but in withdrawing our selves from the Sacrament because of them we punish our selves The Church of Israel in the time of Hophni and Phineas was a mixt multitude In the time of Christ the Church of Ierusalem for they plotted Christs death and had decreed to cast out of the Synagogue every one that should confesse him Mr Downame saith None ought to refrain coming to the Lords Table because they see scandalous sinners and unworthy guests admitted For 1. The Apostle 1 Cor. 11. 28. doth not enjoyn us to examine others but our selves 2. Because the Apostles yea even Christ himself did joyn with those Assemblies in the service of God and particularly in the use of the Sacraments which were full of corruptions both in respect of doctrine and manners as viz. this Church of Corinth it self See 1 Cor. 11. 21. The word usually signifies to be drunk and here they are sharply reproved for a great fault 3. Because one mans sinne cannot defile another nor make the seals of the Covenant uneffectual to him who cometh in faith and repentance and even hateth that sinne which he seeth committed
will destroy the whole world as in the Angels Adam all sin is virtually in every sin It is also a Judge condemning sin Iohn 5. 41. Ezek. 22. 2. it passeth sentence on mens estates and actions 1 Cor. 14. 24 25. Heb. 4. 12 13. 10. 27 mortifies their corruptions Tit. 2 13. 2 Cor. 7. 1. The Spirit mortifies sin not only by infusing a new principle of grace but by restraining the old principle of sinne Rom. 6. 12. Psal. 19. 13. Secondly The Law Habet rationem fraeni hath the nature of a bridle to check and restrain sin 1. By setting before men its perfection Psal. 19. 7 13. Iam. 1. 25. 2. By exalting in a mans heart its authority Iam. 2. 8. 3. By shewing the danger of the curses in it Iob 31. 23. 4. By setting before men its preciousnesse Psal. 119. 103 104. 5. By shewing us that God observes what respect we bear to his Law Isa. 66. 2 3. Thirdly The Law is arule to direct in the way of duty It is 1. A rule within ordering a mans inward disposition The Spirit of God in the work of Regeneration stamps the Law of God in the heart and makes use of it to change the inward disposition Rom. 7. 9. Psal. 19. 7. See Ier. 31. 32. Act. 17. 38. Grace is given by the Gospel but it makes use of the Law Fides impetrat quod lex imperat Aug. 2. It is a rule without to guide a mans way a rule of all Gospel-obedience 1. Because the Gospel sends us to it for a rule Luke 16. 29. Iames 1. 25. and 2. 8. 2. Christ hath left us an example of all obedience Matth. 11. 29. Iohn 13. 15. 3. So far as the best men come short of the Law they sin 1 Ioh. 4. 3. 4. It hath all the properties of a rule it is 1. Recta Psal. 19. 7. 2 Promulgata published Hos. 8. 12. 3. Adaequata Psal. 119. 9. shall be our Judge hereafter Rom. 2. 14 15. God requires not only abstinence from evil but the doing of the contrary good Isa. 1. 16 17. Psal. 34. 14. Rom. 12. 9. Reasons 1. In regard of God 1. He hates evil and delights in good 2. The divine mercies are privative and positive Psal. 84. 11. 2. In regard of the principles of spiritual life we must have communion with Christ both in his death and resurrection Rom. 6. 11. The Law as a Covenant of works is in all these respects a servant to the Gospel and Gospel-ends I. As a Glasse and a Judge 1. By exalting free grace Paul and Luther being cast down with their sins exalted free grace 1 Tim. 1. 13 14. 2. By exalting the bloud of Christ the more one apprehends his sinne the more orient will the bloud of Christ be to the soul Philip. 3. 8 9. Rom. 7. 24 25. 3. By qualifying the soul and preparing it for Christ Luke 3. 5. Matth. 11. 28. 4. By making a man pliable to God ever after the discovery of our sin and misery by the Law and of free grace works a childe-like obedience Isa. 11. 6. 5. By making a man fear sin ever after he hath been under the hammering of the Law Psal. 85. 8. Hos. 3. 5. 6. By making one set a high price on the Spirit of Adoption Res delicata Spiritus Christi Tert. II. As a bridle the Law is the Gospels servant in restraining sinne the Gospel can use the Law above its nature and contrary to the use that sinne makes of it The Law cannot give grace to assist in duty and to restrain in sin Restraining grace serves the ends of the Gospel 1. In respect of wicked men though the Law restraining kils not sin in the ungodly yet the very restraint of the action is a great mercy 1. It makes a man lesse wicked 2. Keeps men from corrupting others 3. Lessens their torments the common graces of the Gospel making use of the restraints of the Law keep some wicked men from those grosse enormities that others run into 2. In respect of the godly 1. Preserves them from sinne before their conversion 2. It restrains their lusts Act. 23. 1. and after their conversion keeps them from sin Psal. 19. 13. by the restraints of the Law and the Gospel I shall in the next place lay down certain general rules which may direct us in the right interpretation of the ten Commandments 1. Because the Law doth comprehend all our duties to be performed both to God and man Luk. 10. 26. therefore the interpretation of it must be sought and fetcht out of the Sermons of the Prophets and Apostles and the Doctrine of our Saviour 2. Whereas some Laws are laid down in the form of a command and most of them viz. eight in the form of a prohibition we must conceive that under every command there is implied a prohibition of whatsoever is contrary to what is commanded and in every prohibition a command of all duties opposite to that which is forbidden For example in the second Commandment which under the name of Images forbids the inventing or using of any form of worship of mans devising there is withall commanded the worship of God according to his own will in the use of the Ordinances prescribed and warranted by his Word as prayer and hearing of the Word receiving the Sacraments And in the third Commandment under the prohibition of taking Gods name in vain is commanded the taking up of it with all holy reverence and fear Thou shalt have no other gods that is thou shalt have me for thy God Keep holy the Sabbath that is do not break it 3. Every Commandment of God is spiritual and doth binde the inward man as well as the outward Humana lex ligat manum linguam divina verò ligat animam Original sinne is condemned in the whole Law but it seemeth to be directly condemned in the first and last Commandment for these two concern properly the heart of man the first respecting it so far as it concerneth God the last so far as it concerns man whether himself or others 4. In respect of the authority that commands all the precepts are equal Iames 2. 11. In respect of the objects of the duties commanded the Commandments of the first Table are of greatest importance Matth. 22. 38. if equal proportion be observed and comparison made because the services therein required are more immediately directed unto God and consequently he is more immediately concerned in them then in the duties of the second Table 1 Sam. 2. 25. Isa. 7. 13. The negative Commandments binde us more strongly then the affirmative for they oblige us alwayes and to all times the affirmative although they binde us alwayes yet they binde us not to all times A man is not bound alwayes to worship God but he is bound never to exhibit divine worship to a creature He is not bound at all times and in all places to professe his faith but he is
monstraverint ubera lacrymis suis te voluerint retrahere contemne lacrymas conculca pedibus parentes nudusque fuge ad crucem Christi Vox Hieronimi impiahaeâ— Diabolica vox Lutherus a Lib. 2. de Monach. cap. 5. Ante revelatam Evangelii lucem putabatur sanctissimum vitae genus esse Monachum fieri sed profectò perdite viximus quotquot in monasteriis viximus Iam lucente verbo una hora plus boni facimus quam toto umpore vitaeâ—in Caenobiis Luth. in Gen. 19. * Lib. 2. de Monachis c. 5. The famous Armachanus wrote seven Books De paupertate salvatoris yet proves that he was not a beggar He wrote also Contra fratres mendicantes and should have been canoniâ—ed but for the Friers Dr Fcatlâ—ys Case for the Spectacles c. 8. From that time forward the Monks of this order have been alwayes imployed in the inquisition Phil. 2. 20 21. Next to the title of God Christ values that title of being head of the Church Rom. 4. 13. See M. Lockyers Church-Order from p. 29. to 62. Mr Firmine last Book pag. 82 83. The Apostles could not at that time go by this rule upon the hearing of a Sermon a thousand perhaps profest to be satisfied in that Doctrine and that they would live and die in it I am verily peâ—swaded that were the union and communion of the people of God rightly known there is no Saint in any part of the world but where ever he comes might demand upon the profession of his faith and his voluntary subjection to the Gospel his right in the Ordinances hear the Word with them pray with them receive the Sacrament with them Mr. Martiall on Rom. 12. 4 5. See more there See Mr. Hilders on John 4. 22. We know what we worship and Mr. Bals Trial of the Church-way Haec communio est inter Deum hominem inter sanctos Angelos homines electos inter sanctos homines in Coelis sanctos homines in terris seu inter Ecclesiam trium hantem militantem denique inter omnes cives Ecclesiae militantis Alsted Theol. Cas. c 8. See Dike on Philemon Our Communion is with the Saints as with Christ the Head in two things we receive the same Spirit and walk in the same way Ephes. 4. 4. 1 Cor. 12. 12. Communio sanctorum in co est fita quod singuli electi capiti suo per fidem sunt insiti caeterisquâ— corporis illius membris arctissimè per Spiritum uniti Alsted Theol. casuum The Papists make the Pope a god in divers particulars 1. In that they make the Scriptures subject to him in that no man is bound to beleeve the Scriptures unlesse he determine that they be so 2. In that they make him able to dispense with the oaths and vows which no Scripture dispenseth withall 3. In that they make his Decrees to binde the conscience with the same necessity that the Scripture doth 4. In that they give to him the Keyes of Purgatory The Fathers hyperboles this way followed by Luther gave occasion to this a Dr. Hill on Ephes. 4. 15. b That is partaker of one and the same Spirit and so united by the Spirit There is a union between Christ and his people 1. In reference to imputation so that what Christ did is accounted theirs 2. In reference to inspiration they have the Spirit dwelling in them 3. In reference to compassion 4. In reference to vindication what injury is done to them is looked on as done to him Some say the actions of the Saints are of infinite value as the obedience of Christs humane nature because of the hypostatical Union and that they are so one with Christ that they can sinne no more then Christ can sinne Not imaginary Ephes. 5. 30. We reade of Christs being in us our being in him 1 Co. 1. 13. Col. 1. 27. Rom. 8. 10. of Christs dwelling in us and our dwelling in him 1 Ioh. 3. 24. of Christs abiding in us Ioh. 15. 17. and our abiding in him Christs living in us and we in him Gal. 2. 20. The hypastatical union A spiritual or mystical union This union non mutat naturas nec miscet personas sed confoederat mentes consociat voluntates I may know that I am one with Christ also by my faith Ephes. 3 17. I may know I have that by two principal effects of it 1. It purifieth the heart Act. 15. 9. not only the wayes and outward man 2. It is an operative vertue Gal. 5 6. sets all graces awork From our union with Christ flows 1. Spiritual life 2. Spiritual acting 3. Spiritual growth 4. Spiritual duty Ioh. 15. 5. Col. 2. 19. Eph. 4. 15 16. Omnis communio fundatur in unione Christ will do nothing unlesse we be united to him whatever he doth he doth as a head a root Ioh. 15. 4. As by the personal union he meriteu all things for us so by this union of persons he dispenâ—eth all to us We should labour 1. To get into Christ. 2. To grow up into him That consists 1. In being emptied more and more of our own righteousnesse and going to Christ for acceptation of our persons 2. In going to him for strength in duty and acceptation of our services 3. In doing all for Christ and his glory 4. In going to Christ for a rule in all our actions 5. In doing all out of a principle of love to Christ 2 Cor. 5. 14. 6. In making Christ the reward of our services to serve Christ for Christ. See Mr Pembles Vindiciae Gratiae pag. 42 43. Vocatio alta secreta Aug. Efficax vocatio Rom. 8. 30. Solenne vobis est profitert facultatem credendi resipiscendi ex mera Dei gratia dari Sic olim Epicurus verbis Deos posuit resustulit 〈…〉 ed Pelagius post Ecclesioe censuras professus est Dei gratiam quo artificio propemodum imposuerat Augustine adeò ut ipse Augustinus professus fit se gavisum esse quod dogmata ejus aut recta essent aut correcta Quibus tamen diligenter expensis advertit tandem haec ab eo ita disserta esse tantum ut frangeret invidiam affectionesque declinaret Nam sola suafione hortatione gratiam Dei circumscripsit Twis contra Corvin c. 9. Sect. 7. Vide plura ibid. Isa. 53. 1. Trahit Deus volentes Praebet vires efficacissimas voluntati The Arminians say Effectual Calling is nothing but holding out an object and using arguments Those are special places against them Rom. 9. 15 16. Jam. 1. 18. 1 Pet. 1. 3. In praeparationibus tam regenerationi quà m generationi propriis agnosco successionem at ipsam regenerationem instantaneam esse judicant Theologi sicut generationem instantaneam esse tradunt Philosophi Twis contra Corv. Tam essicax tam potens Dei operatio optimo jure dici potest irresistibilis si terminum barbarum nuper malis avibus excogitatum liceat aut
Psalm 92. being a Psalm of the Sabbath v. 2. David saith He will declare the loving kindness of the Lord in the morning and his truth in the night making the night a part of the Sabbath It begins at midnight on the Saturday and ends at midnight next following Matth. 28. 1. Mark 16. 1 2. John 20. 1. compared together it appears that the Jews Sabbath ended at the dawning of the first day of the week and then the Lords day or Sabbath day began Act. 20. 7. Elson on the 4th Command Act. 2. 42. The Jews were 1. Assembled 2. Had the Apostles doctrine that is the Old and New Testament read and expounded 3. They had fellowship that is they did communicate these earthly things as every one had need 4. They had breaking of bread that is the administration of the Lords Supper 5. They had prayers Ford on the 4th Commandment For publick prayer see Act. 16. 13. and receiving the Sacraments at the times appointed Act. 20. 7. Both the Family-duties and secret duties which we are bound to perform every day are by the equity of that Law Numb 28. 9 10. to be doubled upon the Sabbath-day Hilders on Psal. 51. â— Lect. 135. The Sabbath must last as long as other dayes that is the full space of 24 hours f Isa. 58. 13. Call it a delight to consecrate it to the Lord that is take you as much delight in doing the exercises of religion as many do in the works of their callings or recreations and also much more for they are far more easie comfortable and profitable M. Dod on the Com. 4. See M. Hilders on Psal. 51. 7. Lect. 135. Mal. 1. 14 15. What shall one do in heaven if the Sabbath be wearisome to him there we shall keep an eternal Sabbath Labour to get a spiritual and heavenly frame of heart so much of heaven as is in you so much you will count these duties a delight Some have found a beginning of the taste of heaven on the Sabbath Yet this is to be observed when the duty is performed to man the obedience is given to God who commandeth us to perform these duties to our neighbours Ford. This is the first Commandment of the second Table upon which all the rest do depend As in the first Table the keeping of all the Commandments following dependeth on the keeping of the first so here if this Commandment were well observed both of Superiours Inferiours and Equals there could be no disorder against any of the Commandments following M. Dod. Of all the Commandments of the second Table this first only is affirmative the other are all negatives This Commandment is the first of the second Table because there can be no order or state that can stand without this Commandment nor could the other Commandments be kept without this Richardson Philol. makes it one of the first Table so doth Hudson in his Divine Right of Government l. 2. c. 11. but our orthodox Divines generally do upon good grounds make it the first of the second Table Honoris interesse majus est omni interesse jam vel vita ipsius generosae indoli emâ—ri sic satius est per honorem quam per dedecus vivere Episc. Andr. Tortura Torti Vult Deus hoc Praecepto sancire ac stabilire tres illos praeclaros in genere humano ordines ac status Oâ—conomicum videlicet Ecclesiasticum Politicum omnesque in his ordinibus comprehensos sui officii admonere ad illud praestandum obstringere Fabric in Decalog Prov. 23. 22. 15. 20. Gratius nomen est pictatis quam potestatis etiam familiae magis patres quam Domini vocantur Pater in hoc mandato naturalis est spiritualis est politicus omnibus aequaliter sine discrimine dicitur Honorate Parentes omnes Parentes honorate Honora Patrem Matrem honore reverentiae fidelitatis tolerantiae Sub nominibus Patris Matris intelliguntur etiam avus avia aliique majores qui in lineâ quam vocant ascendentem numerantur quemadmodum sub filiorum nomine nepotes omnes qui ab aliquo originem ducunt significantur Maccov loc commun c. 9. Honor est agnitio dignitatis vel excellentiae illius quae est in alio cum ejusdem debita testificatione Agnitio fimul dicitur testificatio quia neque in externa observantia sola neque in interna consistit sed in utroque Ames Medul Theol. Honora Tum aliis reverontiae signis tum ad vitam necessaria illis exhibendo quod sub voce 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 comprehenditur ut 1 Tim. 5. 3 17. Aiunt Hebraei vel in pistrino laborare filium debere ut subveniat parentibus Patrem tuum Matrem tuam Ut terrestres Deos à quibus originem trahitis Grotius in cap. Exod. xx Notat hic Aben Esdras solere Deum ubi quid vetat poenaÌ„ addere ut modò bis ubi quid imperat praemium ut hoc loco Quidam Hebraea verba exponunt Ut prolongent dies tuos Scilicet Parentes ipsi suo favore ad Deum precibus Sed vereor ne id nimis subtile sit rectius Graeci aliique interpretes vocem quanquam sormae activae sumant in sensu passivo aut reciproco nimirum ut prolongentur aut prolongent se dies tui Absolomo hoc praeceptum violanti curtati sunt dies Grot. explicat Decal Ut prolongent dies tuos Scilicet Parentes est enim prolongandi verbum hic activae significationis Sed quo modo parentibus triluitur quod solius Dei Propterea quod Parentes sunt quodammodo medium causa instrumentalis per quos Deus filiis aliquando vitam prolongat exaudit enim Deus saepè preces benedictiones quibus filiis suis obedientibus ac morigeris benedicunt ac bene precantur R. Aben Ezra haec verba ita explicat Ut prolongent dies tuos scilicet mandata Dei sed prior lectio simpliâ—â—or est Paul Fag Annotat. in Chald. Paraph. Vide Cartw. in loc * Calv. Instit. l. 2. c. 8. Sir Thomas Moore being Lord Chancellour in his time and having his own Father then living and at that time a Judge for he was one of the Judges of the Kings-bench never went to Westminster-Hall to sit in the Chancery there but first he would up to the Kings-bench where his Father then sate and there on his knees would ask him blessing before a world of lookers on How respective was Ioseph to his Father and Solomon to his Mother 1 King 2. 19 20. Luk. 2. 51. * Ephes. 6. 1. Right implieth three things 1. That it is agreeable to the Law the Law of God of Nature of Nations 2. That the place of Parents requireth as much for right requireth that every one have his own that which is his due 3. That Parents deserve as much for right presupposeth desert D. Gouges Domest Dut. Coloss. 3. 20. compared with Ephes. 6. 1. so
Christo praedicat the Hebrews read osculamina filium which is more forcible to prove the mystery of Christs Kingdom and celebrate his ample dominion over all That place Isa 53. contains both the prophecy and whole passion of Christ in itself Yet what is wanting there in the Hebrew Text is there a letter taken away or altered to violate the sense of the mysteries Isaac Levita saith That this Chapter converted him that he read it over more then a thousand times and compared it with many translations and that more of the mystery of Christ is contained in it then in any translation whatsoever He addeth further that disputing with five Rabbines at Frankford he urged this Chapter against them and thereby brought them into those straights and so stopped their mouthes that they could not reply to his arguments We have the second Psalm the 21. the 110. and all others entire and compleat in which there are most manifest prophesies concerning Christ. There are many besides the Papists who have stood for the uncorrupt truth of the fountains and have defended the Jews faithfulness in preserving the Hebrew Copies as Whitaker Lubbertas Iunius Ames Rivet and others But none hath performed more for the vindicating of particular places which are either suspected or openly charged of corruption by certain Papists then Solomon Glassius a most learned man who in his Philologia sacra hath vindicated seventy two places of the Old Testament and twenty of the New All know that that place in the 7th of Isa. A virgin shall conceive was constantly objected to the Jews from the beginning and yet they have left it untouched Chamier de Canone l. 12. c. 4. Objections of the papists against the purity of the hebrew text in the old Testament Bellarmine onely produceth five places of the Scripture in which he endeavors to prove not that the Hebrew Text is corrupted by the labor or malice of the Jews that opinion he evidently and solidly refutes yet that it is not altogether pure and perfect but hath its errors brought in from the negligence of the Scribes and ignorance of the Rabbines Coton saith The originals are miserably corrupted and that there is a multitude almost incredible of depravations and falsifications made by the Rabbines and Masorites But Bellarmine who was more learned then he and from whom he hath stollen a great part of his Book against the Genevah Translation doth sufficiently confute him Object Psal. 22. 16. There is no Christian but he readeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Caru they have pierced my hands and my feet yet it is in the Hebrew 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Caari as a Lyon Answ. This is the onely argument which Lindan hath of any shew to prove that the Jews have corrupted the Hebrew Text saith Rainolds against Hart. Whitaker saith Hoc unum posse ab illis probabile in fontibus Hebraicis corruptelae indicium inveniri The same say Iohn Isaac against Lindan Muis against Morinus Turretinus against Coton The Jews they say corrupted that word pierced because they saw that it proposed that manifest prophecy of the crucifying of Christ. But it is easie saith Whitaker to vindicate this place from their calumny For first Learned men witnesse that Caru is read in many Hebrew Books Iohn Isaac a Popish Jew in his second Book against Lindan witnesseth that he saw such a Book Hoc idem ego Iohannes Isaac ipsa veritate bona conscientia testari possum quòd hujusmodi Psalterium apud avum meum viderim ubi in textu scriptum erat 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in margine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Et ita omnia olim exemplari habuisse hand dubito Hinc itaque manifestumesse puto cur septuaginta alii transtulerint foderunt Siquidem illi non Keri sed Ketif sunt secuti The Massorites say it was written Caru in many exact Copies It is not therefore a corruption but a divers reading in certain Copies by the mistake of the Scribes as Bellarmine himself confesseth Apparet saith he imprudenter quosdam dum se Hebraeos oppugnare credunt Ecclesiam ipsam oppugnare Si enim illae correctiones Scribarumsunt Hebraici textus corruptiones sequitur apertè vulgatam quoque editionem esse corruptissimam quam tamen nobis Ecclesia pro versione authentica tradidit Bellarm. l. 2. de verbo Dei c. secundo Genebrard the Kings Professor of Hebrew in Paris on the place concludes that the Jews did not corrupt this word Vide sis in loc Hulsii Annot. in loc Mr Iohn Foord who hath written an Exposition of the Psalms in Latine gives divers reasons to prove that Caru is a true reading one is this The History of the Gospel witnesseth that Christs hands and feet were pierced by the Souldiers with nails Secondly The Vulgar Latine the Seventy Ierom Augustine Pagnine and Vatablus Tremellius and Iunius Arias Montanus and some other Translators so reade it The most learned Hebricians teach in their Hebrew Lexicons that it is so to be read The Chaldee Paraphrast hath joyned both readings together q. d. They have digged or pierced my Hands and my Feet as a Lion is wont to dig with his teeth Elias Levita writes That he observed all the words which are otherwise read and otherwise written the Hebrews call them Keri and Ketib and that he numbred eight hundred fourty eight sixty five of which are in the Law four hundred fifty four in the Prophets three hundred twenty nine in the Hagiographa But Buxtorf in his Masoretical Commentary c. 13. observed many more words which differ in the reading and writing Morinus a learned Papist hath written nine exercitations on the Bible and labors to prove from Beza Amama De Dieu and other Protestant Writers that there are many faults in the Hebrew and Greek Copies which we now have Muis a learned Papist also hath answered him Object Psal. 19. 4. The Hebrew Books have In omnem terram exivit linea eorum Their line is gone forth thorow all the Earth but the Septuagint turn it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hierom Sonus eorum Their sound and St Paul approved of this version Rom. 10. 18. Answ. Whitaker in his Answer to this Objection follows Genebrard in his Scholia upon the place and Genebrard follows Beza on Rom. 10. 18. The Hebrew word say they truly signifieth a Line but the Septuagint Interpreters respected the sense and the Apostle followed them The Scope of the Psalm is That Gods people may see what documents are given unto them of God whereby they may be brought and led to the true certain and saving knowledge of God to the seventh verse it sheweth how they were taught by the works of God thence to the end how they were instructed by his word the Apostle alledgeth this Psalm to prove that the Jews might come to know God by his Word and thereby might have faith in Christ Jesus the sense therefore is
thus to conclude and determine Rom. 8. The Spirit witnesseth with our Spirit Those that finde this in themselves should feed upon this eternal comfort it is absolute eternal immutable nothing shall oppose it who shall lay any thing to the Elect It is full of love and grace We may make our election sure by our calling Rom. 8. 29 30. and our effectual calling by two things 1. By a new light 2. A new life 2 Cor. 4. 5. 1 Pet. 2. 9. Iohn 12. 36. Ephes. 5. 8. We have a new knowledge wrought in us of our selves we see our misery by sin and our inability to help our selves Rom. 2. 23. 2. Of God God in Jesus Christ is discovered to us 2 Pet. 1. 3. We see our need of Christ and know him to be a mediatour who must reconcile God and us 3. A new life is wrought in us Ephes. 2. 1. We now die to sin and live to God 1. By faith Rev. 17. 4. These three are put together faithful chosen and called 2. By new obedience 1. It is every mans duty to give diligence to make his election sure both for the glory of God and the comfort of his soul but in Gods way and according to his Ordinance first Calling then Election 2. When he hath used his utmost diligence if he cannot make it sure it is his misery not his sin 3. When the Spirit of God reveals to a man either the truth of his own graces or else Gods eternall love to him then a man is bound to beleeve it It is 1. A certain assurance 2. Secret Rev. 2. 17. 3. Exceeding sweet rejoyce in that your names are written in the Book of life 4. It is an imperfect assurance the assurance of faith not of sight it may be eclipsed CHAP. II. 2. The Execution of Gods Deeree GOD executes his Decree by Actions Creation and Providence Gods works are in time 1. Past Creation of all things 2. Present Government and preservation Creation is taken 1. Strictly when God makes any Creature of nothing meerly of nothing not as if nothing were the matter but the terme so the souls of men and Angels are created of nothing 2. Largely when of some prejacent matter but very unfit and indisposed a creature is made as Adam of the earth Creation is the action of God whereby out of nothing he brought forth nature it self and all things in nature both substances and accidents in and with the substances and finished them in the space of six daies both to his own glory and the salvation of the Elect. Or It is an action whereby God the Father by his word and holy Spirit made all things exceeding good for the glory of his Name Or thus Creation is a transient or external action of God whereby in the beginning He made the world by a meer command out of his own free will in six dayes space to the glory of his Name 1. An action not a motion or change motion argueth some succession but in the things created the fieri factum esse is all one nor is it a change because that supposeth some alteration in the Agent 2. Transient it passeth from the Agent to the thing created whereas in immanent actions as Gods will decrees and personal actions they abide in himself 3. Of God The efficient cause of all things is God the Father Son and Holy Ghost Creation is the proper work of God alone so that he is God which created the world and he created the world who is God Ier. 10. 11. It is without controversie that the work of creation agrees to God the Father the same is expresly given to the Son Iohn 1. 3. Col. 1. 16. and to the Holy Ghost also Psal. 33. 6. He brooded on the waters Gen. 1. 1 2. Aquinas parte prima Qu. 44. Artic. 1. hath this question Utrum sit necessarium omne ens esse creatum a Deo The Schoolmen much dispute whether God may not give a creating power to a creature and answer no creature can be so elevated as to concur to the execution of an almighty act In Scripture it is alwaies made the work of God Gen. 1. 1. Prov. 16. 4. Psal. 33. 6. 8 9. Creation is an act of omnipotency The Apostles when they dealt with the Heathens urged the works of creation Acts 14. 10. 7. 26. Rom. 1. 19 20. 4. In the beginning by the Scripture it is a matter of faith to hold that the world was not from all eternity in the beginning notes not that there was time first and then God created the world for time is a creature and concreated but it denotes order that is at first 5. The world that is the Heaven and Earth and all things contained in them Act. 4. 4. and 17. 24. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that well ordered decent beautiful and comely frame of heaven and earth 6. By his meer command as appears Gen. 1. Let there be light let there be heavens which argues his omnipotency 7. Out of his own free will for God did not need the world and therefore he created it no sooner He was happy enough in himself without men or Angels Psal. 115. 5. Prov. 8. 30. 8. The final cause to the glory of his Name Rom. 2. 30. Three Attributes especially manifest themselves in this work of Creation Gods power wisdome goodnesse his power in that he made all things by a word and of nothing Isa. 40. 16. his wisdome is seen in the order and variety of his works Psal. 136. 5. and their exceeding wonderful and particular uses his goodnesse in that he would communicate being to the creatures Plutarch writeth that the old Philosophers the ancientest Divines amongst the Pagans were wont to describe pourtrayed out in stone wood and other matters the Images of their Gods with musical Instruments in their hands not that they would teach others or did beleeve it themselves that the Gods were Fidlers or Pipers or used to solace themselves with Lute or Viol but because they held nothing more fit or answering to the nature of God then to do all things in sweet harmony and proportion which the Wiseman calleth in number in measure and in weight Mountague against Seld. c. 1. The work of Creation say some is set out generally in a general proposition In the beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth Which proposition He after explains by its parts That the world was not from eternity but was made by God these arguments may perswade First and principally Faith Heb. 11. 3. which is grounded upon divers places of Scripture as the first and second chapters of Genesis 38 39 chapters of Iob and some Psalms almost whole as 104 136. this also is the first Article of our Creed that the world was created in time by God The Apostle Paul Acts 14. 15. 17. 24. 28 doth point out God to the Heathen by this work
above others The Doctrine of Creation is a mixt principle partly discovered by nature and chiefly in the word Consider it 1. Ex parte rei so the thing it self was known to the Heathens 2. Ex parte modi faith onely teacheth what it is the manner and circumstances of the Creation how and wherefore the world was made was wholly unknown to them because these things are not matters of sense but depend on the limitation of Gods will nor matters of reason but depend on the exuberancy of his power The same individual assent to the same truth may be both Cognitio Scientiae and Cognitio Fidei By Faith we know that the worlds were made and assent to it And by demonstrations it may be proved that the world was made and these also are sufficient to perswade assent Now we from both grounds jointly assent to this proposition that the world was made The which Assent in respect of the Ground propter evidentiam rei is an assent of Science or natural knowledge In regard of the other Ground propter anthoritatem dicentis is an assent of Faith or supernatural knowledge Mr. Wallis Truth tried ch 8. Secondly and probably the light of nature shining in these reasons 1. The original of Nations laid down by Moses Gen. 10. and elsewhere which could not be fained by him since some memory of them was then extant among many which yet in progresse of time was extinguished 2. The beginning of Arts the first inventers whereof are known and in what time they flourished for it is not probable that so many ages before mankinde lived without Arts and that in these last times they were all both invented and perfected 3. The newnesse of all Heathenish Histories the ancientest of which tell of nothing before Noah's flood or the beginning of the Assyrian Empire under Ninus The holy History it self is only of 4000 yeers or thereabout which neverthelesse is the greatest mouument of antiquity Now it would be a most unworthy reproach and contumely cast upon all those men who had lived so many infinite ages ago to say they were so ignorant that they could not or so slothful that they would not deliver in writing what was done in their times 4. The decay of mans body and age which from a great strength quantity bignesse and time of life is now come down to a narrow scantling which if had decreased so alwaies in infinite ages it would by this time have been brought almost to nothing 5. The certain series and order of causes and impossibility of their proceeding in infinitum for it must needs be that there should be one first which is the universal cause but first it is not unlesse it be One nor One except it be God 6. As a thing is so it works but God doth not depend upon another in his being therefore neither in working doth he require a pre-existent matter 7. Art presupposeth nature and nature matter but God in working is a more excellent cause then art or nature therefore presupposeth nothing in working 8. The first cause viz. God is infinite therefore he can do whatsoever implyeth not a contradiction but the Creation of things in time implieth it not 9. Whatsoever perisheth hath a beginning the world doth perish because all its parts decay and are subject to corruption therefore the whole The Angles and souls of men are changeable by nature as appears by the fall of the Devil and mans fall 10. Either the world was eternal or had a beginning It could not be eternal 1. Because it is compounded of divers parts and those in nature contrary one to another which could not meet together in that order themselves therefore it was made by some-what and then either by it self which could not be for that which makes is before that which is made and the same thing cannot be before it self or else it was made by some creature which could not be because that is but a part of the whole and therefore meaner then it considered as whole and not able to make it 2. The world could not be eternal because it is limited in respect of place quantity power therefore it is not infinite in time That which is eternal is the first thing and consequently the best therefore God is only so having no parts nor being subject to corruption By these reasons it is evinced that the world is not eternal but was created by the chief work-man of all things in time But concerning the time of the yeer when the world was made whether in Summer Autumn or the Spring we will not raise any curious and unprofitable questions See Sarsans Chronologia vapulans page 123. Let it suffice to know that it was created by God in the beginning Gen. 1. 1. that is in the beginning of time or rather together with time then in time for the instant and moment of Creation was the beginning of all following but not the end of precedent time Hitherto concerning the efficient cause there followeth the matter of Creation Of the first and immediate Creation there was no matter at all the Divine power drew out nature it self not out of any Pre-existent matter but out of meer nothing Materiam noli quaerere nulla fuit Nothing but nothing had the Lord Almighty Whereof wherewith whereby to build this City Thus were created all incorporeal and immaterial Substances the Angels the reasonable soul and the highest Heaven as some say for those things which are void of matter cannot be framed out of matter 2. The mediate Creation is when a thing is brought forth of a praeexistent matter yet so rude and indisposed that it may be accounted for nothing so Adams body was created of the dust or slime of the Earth Gen. 2. 7. Beasts and birds out of the Earth Gen. 1. 19. which God did meerly of his good pleasure no necessity compelling him nor the matter he took any way helping him in working it was nothing privatively as they call it Divines observe four things in Gods Creation 1. His Command whereby he said Let there be light and there was light Gods words are things 2. His Approbation whereby all things are acknowledged as good God saâ— they were good They were so in respect of their own kinde and nature 2. In respect of the universe that is apt for the end for which they were made free from all defect and deformity God made all the creatures to be serviceable one to another especially to man 1 Tim. 4. 4. I cannot tell by what Logick we call a Toad a Bear or an Elephant ugly they being created in those outward shapes and figures which best expresse those actions of their inward forms And having past that general visitation of God who saw that all that he had made was good that is conformable to his will which abhors deformity and is the rule of order and beauty D. Browns