holy profitable and necessarie argument I began foorthwith to read the Booke with great affection and easily perceiued that the authour being indued with singular humanitie and modestie did of purpose conceale his name not regarding to make it knowen For hee woulde not seeke to gette any praise of the worlde which manie foolishly doe by setting foorth Bookes but was rather willing to further extolle and sette foorth the glorie of GOD onely and of his woorde I sawe also in the man a feruent desire to bringe the syncerenesse of pure Religion to knowledge and to further the manifest profite of the louers of godlinesse To bee briefe I acknowledged the giftes of God to appeare in this man I meane his dexteritie and happinesse in handeling this famous argument hauing beene long in controuersie among the learned and diuersly expounded For whatsoeuer may be spoken thereof necessarily and profitably hee hath wholy conteined it in this booke yea and that briefely euidently plainly and in verie good order For hee hath distinguished the whole matter being otherwise copious into Chapters then hath â—ee placed before euery Chapter the Argument so that euen by these briefe Chapters thou mayest easily perceiue the scope and ende of the whole Booke the summe and maner of the handeling of the â—ame Wherevpon I haue prefixed before this woorke the Title of the Booke fraâ—ed of the matter handeled therein that thou mayest euen with one viewe and foorthwith in the beginning beholde all thinges in a verie briefe summe whiche are conteined in this Booke He setteth foorth plainely and confirmeth all his matters especially as it is meete by the holie Scriptures then also by fitte testimonies of the blessed auncient Fathers Neither hath this his profitable trauaile â—iked mee onelie but also certaine other godlye and learned men vnto whome thou mayest worthilie ascribe more than vnto mee I haue therefore placed this mine Epistle before this Booke least the woorke beeing sette foorth without â—he Authours name shoulde eyther â—ee little regarded or suspected of thee Neither shall this Booke bee namelesse if it meete with anie stoute aduersarie which can assaile it and oppugne it Those thinges which I haue hitherto spoken in praise of this booke thou shalt by experieÌ„ce and with admiration witnesse to be true so that thou reade it diligently and with a sincere minde and also weigh it duely Farewell gentle Reader From Zurich the moneth of August 1571. ⧠A briefe summe of the chiefest pointes handeled in this Booke as it is deuided by Chapters THE reasons of those which doe extoll the authoritie of the Church abooue the Scriptures Cap. 1. Fol. 1 The deceitfulnesse of them is reprooued which doe diminish the authothoritie of the Scripture wherevpon the authoritie of the church doeth depend Cap. 2. Fol. 4. That the authoritie of the Scripture is greatest because it containeth the woorde of God which in the begining was deliuered to the church by liuely voice cap. 3. Fol. 8. The place of Hieremie his 31. chapter is discussed also it is shewed that the Apostles wrote the Gospel by the will of god cap. 4. Fol. 14. That all things which concerne faith godlinesse and saluation are fully and sufficiently contained in the Scripture cap. 5. Fol. 26. That the Scripture was giuen by inspiration to correct euill manners to confute heresies that forth of it onely controuersies must be iudged And that it is neither darke nor doubfull cap. 6. Fol. 30. Whervpon the Scripture is called Canonical Also testimonies of the Fathers touching the most excellent authoritie thereof cap. 7. Fol. 42. That the authoritie of the Canonicall Scripture is more excellent then the Councels the Fathers yea then the decrees and ordinaunces of all men Cap. 8. Fol. 44. That the Canonical Scripture hath the chiefe perfection of her authoritie from the holie Ghoste and of her selfe And coÌ„trarily that the Church receiueth her authoritie from the Scripture cap. 9. Fol. 51. Howe the Canon of the newe Testament was ordained and that it hath authoritie of it selfe and from the Authors thereof and that the authoritie of the Church is maintayned thereby cap. 10. Fol. 55. Howe vngodly and wicked it is to preach without the warrant of holy Scripture cap. 11. Fol. 11. That the true Church is to bee sought in the Scripture to bee included ded therein and to be esteemed by the Scriptures cap. 12. Fol. 65. Of the dueties of the Church about the Scriptures and first of this that she keepeth the holy Bookes of the scripture as a witnesse cap. 13. Fol. 69. That the Church publisheth the word of god cap. 14. Fol. 70. That the Church discerneth the Books of holy Scripture from Apocryphall and counterfaits cap. 15. Fol. 71. Of the saying of Augustine I would not beleeue the Gospel but that the authoritie of the Church mooueth mee also cap. 16. Fol. 74. Of the gift of interpretation Cap. 17. Fol. 77. Of the the saying of Christ If he will not heare the Church let him be vnto thee as an Heathen man and a Pubcan Mat. 18.19 cap. 18. fol. 82. Of the saying of Paule The Church is the piller and grounde of the trueth 1. Tim. 3.15 Chap. 19. Fol. 84. Of the saying of Paule Brethren stand fast and holde the ordinances which ye haue taught whether it be by our preaching or by our Epistle 2. Thes 2.15 Chap. 20. Fol. 86. That the doctrine which the Apostles taught by liuely voyce and which they deliuered in writing is all one and that this is the fourme of the traditions of the Apostles if they agree with the holie Scriptures Chap. 21. Fol. 88. A perfite proofe of those Traditions which are indeede the Apostles foorth of the moste auncient Writers Irenaeus and Tertullianus Chap. 22. Fol. 91. Of the subtiltie and deceitfulnesse of Sophisters which vse guilefully the woorde Tradition which is diuersly taken Chap. 23. Fol. 101. Of the vncertaintie repugnancie and varietie of Traditions Chap. 24. Fol. 104. That the Church hath beene deceiued euen from the Apostles time vnder the pretence of Traditions Chap. 25. Fol. 106. A Catalogue of the Doctors and writers whose testimonies the authour of this Treatise doth alledge in this Booke Ambrose Athanasius Augustine Basil Chrysostome Clemens Cusanus Cyprian Cyril Epiphanius Enagrius Eusebius Gerson Gratian Hillarie Hyperius Ierome Irenaeus Lactantius Nicephorus Origen Panormitanus Philaster Saluianus Sozomenus Tertullian Theodoretus Theophilactus Whether the holie Scripture haue authoritie from the Church Or whether the Church doe rather take authoritie from the holie Scripture The first Chapter The reasons of those which do extoll the authoritie of the Church aboue the Scripture THE chiefest reuerence after God God his woorde is due to the Churche Christe his spouse whiche God so dearelie loued that his will was that his onely begotten sonne should be a sacrifice for the same whome he endueth with his spirit that the sayde Church may be the temple and image of God wherein his
of the auncient fathers haue done also as of the Greekes Melito Origines and Eusebius Bishop of Caesaria and of the Latines Cyprian Bishop and Martyr and Hierome Priest But long before their iudgement the bookes of holie Scripture had diuine authoritie among christians which they would haue had although Councels had neuer bene celebrated Notwithstanding the holy men of God thought good to giue foorth their senteÌ„ce also against theÌ„ which were wickedly beÌ„t against the canonical bokes If the Church were able to bring to passe that the Scripture might be receiued certainly she would haue perswaded long before this time Epicures Talmudikes and Mahometistes to haue receiued it For the authoritie of the Gospel doeth not hang on the Church but what authoritie soeuer the Church hath it hangeth wholy on the worde of god And if the authoritie of God his woorde decay the authoritie of the Church must needes decay with it For if thou demaunde of them howe they proue the authoritie of the Church or howe they bee certaine that it erreth not in the vnderstanding of holy Scriptures and in discerning them from others They will say because it is gouerned by the holie Ghost And if thou saye And howe knowe you this They will answere because Christ hath promised that he will bee with the Church vnto the ende of the worlde And because he hath sayde also Where twoo or three are gathered in my name there am I in the middest of them And I will sende the comforter vnto you and hee will leade you into all trueth These are the thinges say they which perswade the authoritie of the Church But whence take you these thinges good men but foorth of holie Scripture Wherefore we must rather conclude that the Churche hath her authoritie from the Scripture Therefore as no man deemeth but the testimonie of the Church is greatlye to bee weyed aboute the woorde of GOD so euerie man well seeth that the authoritie of the Church is of greate renowme therefore because it is sette foorth by the cleare light of God his worde The .xi. Chapter Howe vngodly and wicked it is to preache without the warrant of holie Scripture BY those things which we haue saide of the worthinesse of the scriptures it is manifest that that doctrine whiche the Prophetes and Apostles haue deliuered to vs in writing is the foundation of our faith Wherefore the Ministers of the Churche and Preachers ought to learne hereby what they shoulde preach euen the worde of God onely set forth in the Scripture and not mens traditions although they presume to say they bee God his worde which by no meanes they can proue because they be vncertaine contrarie one to an other sometime abolished and sometime newly deuised which by no meanes can agree to the worde of god Neither be there any Apostolike Churches wherin the traditions of the Apostles be sincerely kept But wee will speake of traditions more at large in place conuenient Moreouer Christ his sheepe are not quiet vntill they heare the certaine voice of their shepheard And the minde desiring to liue to God is not certaine vntill it vnderstande those things which it heareth to bee grounded vppon this firste principle of Diuinitie Thus sayeth the Lorde Christ his spouse can not be quiet in minde vntill she may say I heare the voice of my beloued Nowe his voice according to the common rule of God his disposition towards vs doeth not sounde any where more cerâ—ainely vnto vs then forth of holie Scripâ—ure Well saide Chrysostome If anie â—hing be spoken without Scripture the â—hought of the hearers halteth But wheÌ„n the Testimonie of God his voice â—s come forth of the scriptures it conâ—irmeth both the speache of the speaker and the minde of the hearer And Esaie hauing admonished the people to â—eeke after none but God onelie addeth â—he meanes also saying Get thee to the â—awe and testimonie Wherefore well â—ayde Augustine Let our bookes be â—aken away from among vs and let God his booke be brought foorth among vs Heare Christe telling â—eare the trueth speaking Hee sayâ—th also in an other place Read vs this â—oorth of the lawe foorth of the Prophetes foorth of the Psalmes foorth of the Gospell reade it foorth of the Apostles writings and we will beleeue â—t Againe Vrge them to shewe some manifest testimonies foorth of the Canonicall bookes Remember that this is the saying of the Lorde They haue Moses and the Prophetes let them heare them If an Angel from heauen preach any other Gospel Paul coÌ„mauÌ„deth that he be accounted accursed Now if the Angels ought also to be in subiection to God his worde to obey it then are they worthely brought into this order that if they doe otherwise They are iudged Deuils And although that cannot come to passe yet such is the maiestie of the Gospel that to sette foorth the dignitie thereof it is not vnlawfull after a sorte to abuse the name dignitie of Angels Wherfore their wicked and cursed rashenesse which presume to preach in the church of GOD beside the Scripture is as it were stoned to death with the most graue sentences of most holy fathers Let vs therefore recite some testimonies of the Fathers Tertullian against Hermogenes sayeth I reuerence the fulnesse of scripture Let Hermogenes his shoppe shewe that it is written If it be not written let him feare the curse pronounced against them which adde and take away from GOD his worde Saint Augustine likewise against Petilian his letters in his thirde booke and sixth Chapter hath these woordes If anie I will not say if wee but which Paule added If an Angel from heauen shall preache either of Christ or of his Churche or of anie other thing whiche pertayneth to faith or to the leading of our life otherwise then you haue receyued in the holie Scriptures of the lawe and of the Gospel Let him bee accursed Wherevnto agreeth that also whiche hee writeth in an other place saying Let him whiche preacheth any other Gospel bee accursed or let him reade it mee in the holie Scriptures and not be accursed He saith also in his treatise of Pastoures Christ hath appointed the mouÌ„taines of Israel the authours of the holie scriptures Feede there that you may feede safely Whatsoeuer you heare thence let that sauour well vnto you whatsoeuer you heare not thence refuse that you wander not in a cloude gather your selues to the meaning of the scripture There be the dainties of your heart There is nothing venemous nothing from the purpose There be onely the most fuitful pastures Also in his boke of the goodnesse of widowehood in the first Chapter he saieth What shoulde I teach thee more then that which we reade in the Apostle For the holy Scripture fashioneth the rule of our doctrine least we shoulde presume to be wiser than wee ought Therefore let it be to
diuerse not an other but one and the selfe same For although they wrote not all thinges yet had they an especial care that what they deliuered by tradition might bee manifestly inferred foorth of those thinges which were written by them selues or in other holy Bookes of Scripture Otherwise diuers superstitions might be bragged off euery where as receiued from ancient time as deliuered by the Apostles which can be knowen by none other meanes but because they are not agreeable to the Scriptures whereby as by a rule and squire all traditions constitutions and rites ought to be examined and tried because the Churche doeth not binde the consciences of the faithful vnto her constitutions but onely so farre foorth as they doe agree with the commaundements of our Lord Iesus Christ For she knoweth that it is written Thou haste charged that we shall diligently keepe thy commaundements The xxi Chapter That the doctrine which the Apostles taught by liuely voice which they deliuered in writing is all one that this is the fourme of the traditions of the Apostles if they agree with the holy Scriptures WWhereas I haue boldely affirmed that it is one and the selfe same doctrine which the Apostles taught whether it were by liuely voice or by Epistles it may bee proued both foorth of the holy Scriptures and by the testimonies of the Fathers and is also manifest by the consent of the Church It is a tradition of Paule that a woman haue her head couered in the Church and that Christians which are poore laboure with their handes and liue not idlely But whereas he professeth these traditions to be his owne doeth he propose them nakedly and simply to the Churches both without proofe and iudgment onelie vnder this title he wil haue them receiued bycause they be the traditions of the Apostles Not so but he goeth about to approue and confirme them by effectuall reasons yea and by proofes drawen forth of the Scripture and giueth the Church leaue to iudge of them The same Apostle writeth also in an other place that all things be doone honestly and in order We haue therefore the forme of the traditions of the Apostles foorth of these Namely if they agree with the holye Scriptures if they be confirmed by substanciall reason by aptnesse of edifying by the example of Churches by comlines and order And we also ought to examine the traditions of the Church by the very same proofes But now a dayes when as testimonie forth of the holy Scriptures is required touching any thing or when a reason should be yeelded concerning abuses and superstitions Antichristes haue alwayes in their mouth It is a tradition you may not inquire of it But the traditions which are proposed vnto vs are to be examined by the rule of God his word neither would Paule that they should otherwise be beleeued And let our aduersaries doe this also if they woulde haue their traditions to take place And it is the consent of the Catholike church that the Apostles did not deliuer to the Church such things as are straunge and disagreable to those thinges which are contained in the Canonicall Scripture Cōcerning the which thing I wil allege some moste euident testimonyes of certaine olde writers Irenaeus declareth that the very same Gospel which the Apostles preached with liuely voice they did afterwarde deliuer vnto the Church in the Scriptures by the will of God that this written Gospell might be the ground and piller of our faith euen of that true liuely faith which the Church learned of the Apostles and distributed to the children Therefore the Apostles taught nothing by liuely voice contrarie to those things which they haue comprehended in the Scripture of the new Testament The saying of the same Irenaeus in Eusebius is worthy memory where he sheweth that Polycarpe preached those thinges which he had learned of them who had seene the woorde of life themselues 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to saye all agreable to the Scriptures This surely is a golden saying of Irenaeus which also declareth certaine sentences of olde writers touching traditions and doeth fully agree with that fourme of traditions whiche wee haue taught foorth of Paule The Apostles taught many things with liuely voice Apostolike men receaued them beeing so taught which afterwarde they deliuered ouer againe to their disciples but Irenaeus saith that those thinges were all 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 agreable to the Scriptures Therefore by the testimony of Irenaeus the Apostles deliuered nothing to the church by liuely voice which might dissent frō the Scriptures Wherfore if the Papists wold haue vs to receaue and reuerence as Apostolike the traditions which they haue vndertaken to defend let thē shewe their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 agreablenesse with the Canonicall Scripture And if they can not shew this let thē with shame acknowledge their vanitie For no traditions are to be esteemed necessarie for saluation which are not proued firmly and strongly forth of the scripture For Tertullian saith We haue no neede of curiositie after Christ nor of inquisition after the Gospel When we beleeue we desire nothing beyond our beliefe For this wee beleeue first that there is nothing which we ought to beleue more Wel saith Ierom the sword of God which is the liuely worde of God striketh those things which men of their owne accorde finde forth and faine as it were by the tradition of the Apostles without the authoritie testimonies of the scriptures And Augustine pronounceth a curse against all Angels and men which shall preach vnto vs any thinge either of Christe or of his Church or of any other thing which pertaineth vnto faith or to our life besides that which we haue receiued in the scriptures of the lawe and of the Gospel We alleged lately more testimonyes of the Fathers which the diligent Reader may consider in their place VVe haue therefore by the tradition of the Apostles preached none other Gospell then that whiche is contained in the canonicall Scripture and that by the saide Scripture wee may iudge which be the traditions of the Apostles If our aduersaries did reuerence the consent of the Church with al their heart as in woordes they take vppon them would they dispise it at their pleasure with such impudencie They brag of their tradition vnto the Churche as though they came from the Apostles which euen by their own witnesse can be proued by no Scriptures Are they so senselesse and blockishe that they vnderstand not what the Catholike consent doth pronounce touching them Wee lastely heard that such like traditions are to be stroken with the sword of God his worde and that the preachers thereof are subiect to the curse and to be sente into the tentes of Heretikes O foolishe and miserable louers of darkenesse O blasphemous corrupters of the Scriptures when will you waxe wise when will you acknowledge your errour when
will you examine your doctrines and traditions by the Touchstone of the Scripture Are you so mad and blinde that you wil neuer confesse and reuerence with the Catholike Church of God the fulnesse the perfection and sufficiencie of the Scripture will you still be turned from the moste pure wheate of God his worde to the chaffe and coddes of traditions The xxij Chapter A perfect proofe of those traditions which are in deede the Apostles foorth of the moste auncient writers Irenaeus and Tertullian IRenaeus and Tertullian moste auncient writers and neerest to the Apostles time doe moste plainely proue vnto vs what traditions are moste auncient and the Apostles in deede For they when as they did contende with Heretikes about Doctrines doe alledge the tradition of the Apostles and of the Church that they might by the authoritie thereof confirme their cause and doe with great honour make mention of the same But it is worth the while to consider by what occasion for what cause in what sorte and with what moderatenesse they doe it For so shall it plainely appeare that the Churche at that time had no doctrines by traditions no mysteries of Faith but what were grounded in the Scripture Irenaeus had to deale with moste wicked Heretikes whiche were neither mooued with the authoritie of the Scripture nor with the consent of the vniuersall Churche Therefore they did either slylye shifte off or impudently refuse what so euer was obiected If they were ouerthrowen and conuicted by the Scriptures they did debase their authoritie yea they did accuse them as not Authentical or as hauing an obscure and an vncertaine meaning or as insufficient But they bragged that they had by tradition wisedome more high then the Apostles and more perfect If they were called backe to the consent of the Church they said that it was no meruaile if the Church doe not keepe the pure doctrine which receiued it corrupted and sowered with leauen not onely of the Disciples but also of the Lorde himselfe And therefore they boasted that they were the correctours of the Apostles And what sayeth Irenaeus herevnto We haue saieth hee the dispensation of our saluation by none other then the Apostles which what they published by preaching afterward they deliuered vnto vs in writing to bee the grounde and piller of our faith Afterwarde he vrgeth this parte also that all Churches taught and instructed by the Apostles did imbrace the vnitie of Faith grounded in the Scriptures And yet so that hee confuteth the doting opinions of Heretikes by the Scriptures as by the rule of perfect and absolute wisedome Tertullian also stroue with the like monsters Their vsuall maner was to escape by subtile shiftes If they were pressed with the authoritie of the scriptures they did either refuse them or if they did receiue them they did peruert them by putting to and taking awaye for the framing of their owne purpose or else corrupted them by their peruerse interpretations Therefore because Tertullian coulde not well goe forwarde against such mangling of the Scriptures hee doeth his diligence to confirme the doctrine certainly set foorth in the Scriptures among the simple and weake by this note also that the Apostles deliuered it by liuely voyce from hande to hande Wherefore because in these disputations the Heretikes refused the Scriptures as not in all poyntes to bee receiued and as though they were of an obscure and doubtfull meaning by whome onely the trueth coulde not bee knowne except one knewe the Tradition both the sides appealed to the tradition And because both the parties bragge of traditions this question was disputed of Which was the true tradition of the Apostles Irenaeus and Tertullian proue that that is the true traditiō only which Christ receiued of God and deliuered to the Apostles and which the Apostles againe deliuered to the Churches and which was kept in the Churches by the succession of Bishops And doeth this tradition conteine a doctrine contrarie to that which is sette foorth in the Canonicall Scripture No. For for this cause they did condemne those traditions which the Heretikes bragged of as erronious and forged Therefore what doeth the Tradition alledged in disputation againste the Heretikes conteine No doctrine contrarie and disagreeable to that which is taught in the Scripture but the selfe same articles of fayth which doe as it were comprehend the summe of all the Scripture For both of them doe shewe what that Tradition is whiche the Church receiued of the Apostles and also kept sincere and they bee the same poyntes of doctrine whiche the Apostles Creede doeth conteine And no man doubteth but they are sette foorth in the Scripture by manie manifest testimonies They doe not then proue any other doctrine of fayth besides those which are conteined in the Scripture but they shewe and proue by tradition the verie same doctrines which are comprehended in the Scripture And what needeth that Forsooth that they might proue the consent of the true Apostolicall Tradition with the Scripture so that the doctrine whiche the Scripture doeth teach and that which the Primitiue Churche receiued by the preaching of the Apostles is all one And this is diligently to bee considered that our position of the authoritie perfection and sufficiencie of the scriptures is most strongly mainteined by this disputation of Irenaeus and Tertullian and also that the disputations of the Papistes touching Traditions which can bee prooued by no Testimonie of Scripture are refuted For the Traditions of the Apostles and the Scriptures prooue the consente so that the Tradition be not opposite against the Scripture as though the Scripture were either false or doubtfull or vnperfect as the Heretikes quareled but the trueth the authoritie the certaintie and absolute perfectnesse of the Scripture is proued and confirmed by the tradition Wherefore when as there bee traditions proposed whiche doe not agree with the Scripture and which cannot bee shewed and prooued foorth of the Scripture it is moste certaine that those traditions are not the Apostles These are sure and sounde reasons which can not bee ouerthrowen with anie subtile shiftes of Sophisters Now if you aske which that true ancient and Apostolike tradition is it is not needful to search it without the scripture For Irenaeus and Tertullian in that disputation whereof wee spake speake not onely generally but declare specially euidently in expressed wordes what that tradition of the Apostles is Let vs then heare Irenaeus expounding the tradition of the trueth which the Church hauing receiued it from the Apostles keepeth The Church sayth he being sowed throughout the whole worlde vnto the endes of the earth receiued both of the Apostles and of their disciples that faith which is in one God the father almightie which made Heauen and earth the sea and all thinges which are in them And in one Iesus Christ the sonne of GOD incarnate for our saluation in the holy Ghost which preached by the Prophetes the
the church of Rome was saide to be otherwise The place of S. Augustine is worthie memorie in his 76. epist. to Casulanus where he intreateth of fasting sayth If it be answered that Iames taught this at Ierusalē Iohn at Ephesus the rest in other places which Peter taught at Rome to wit that men should fast on the sabboth day but that other countries were departed frō this doctrine that Rome continued in it still it is replied to the contrarie that rather certaine places of the west wherin Rome is kept not that which the Apostles deliuered but that the coūtries of the East from whence the Gospel began to be preached haue remained without anie varietie in that which was deliuered by all the Apostles with Peter himselfe that men should not fast vpon the Sabboth day this is an endles contention ingendering strifes not ending questions Therefore since there is so great varietie and diuersity of Traditions al cannot be iudged to be Apostolike Certainly Paule witnesseth that he taught euerie where and in euerie Church the self same Therefore Cyprian wrote wisely to Pompeius that he would not allow traditions but what were conteined in the gospels the Epistles of the Apostles or in the Actes of the Apostles VVherevnto thou maiste adde those which are necessarilily inferred foorth of the holy Scriptures VVhatsoeuer else are brought in are vncertaine and not euerie where receiued yea if the matter be well wayed we shal confesse that traditions haue ministred occasion of verie manie superstitions in the Church of errours and controuersies Therefore neither the rule of faith nor the certaintie of doctrine doth depend of the custome of the Church but if a iust consent ought to be kept in the Church it is necessarie that we sticke firmely and constantly in the oracular Scripture onely The xxv Chapter That the Church hath beene deceiued euen from the Apostles time vnder the pretence of Traditions NOw forsomuch as the name of Traditions hath alwayes beene a Patrone of superstitions in the Church and because now adayes all kinde of abuses corruptions and superstitions is defended vnder their title wee had neede to vse heerein verie greate attentiuenesse and warinesse And in very deede whilest the Apostles yet liued false prophets fayned many corruptions which they obtruded to the Churches and extolled for this consideration as though they had beene deliuered by liuely voyce from the Apostles the which thing the Epistles of Paul do manifestly shew VVhich was the cause that the Apostles beganne to comprehend their doctrine in writing And Paule when he began first to write gaue a verie wholesome admonition saying That ye be not sodenly mooued from your minde nor be troubled neither by spirit nor by woorde nor yet by letter as from vs. A caution in deede most woorthie consideration foreshewing three manner of craftie deceites whereby counterfeiters were woonte for the most parte to deceiue The first is a spirit that is to say a reuelation or a prophecie the second is a woorde that is to say a reason or mans coniecture the third is an Epistle that is to say a forged writing and counterfeite Traditions Of with kinde of leigerdemain except the churches take very diligēt heed they cannot choose but be deceiued verie perilously and dangerously Yea and he warneth the Church of the Colosians foorth of bandes that they take heede least they be spoyled through vaine deceit after the tradition of men And Peter whē as now the end of his life approched whē he wrote his last epistle forewarneth that there should come false teachers which with feigned woords should make marchandise in the Church And experience sheweth that those forewarninges of the Apostles were not vaine For when as the doctrine of the Apostles was yet in so fresh memorie that the purenesse therof might be prooued euen by the succession of Bishops yet did heretikes that notwithstanding beginne to obtrude pestiferous doctrines vnto the Churches vnder the pretence of traditions If there were obiected vnto them the doctrine of Christ and his Apostles deliuered to the Churches by the succession of bishops they did cauil or that I may speake more truely they falsely accused the Apostles saying that they vsed the room of teachers in hypocrisie and dissimulation not as the truth it selfe was but after the capacity of the hearers and that they so framed their doctrine and answeres as euerie one was affected teaching blinde things to the blind according to their blindnesse to the feeble according to their feeblenesse to those which were in errours according to their errours that they opened the misteries to them only which were worthie could vnderstand them than the which what can be deuised more vnwoorthie and more impudent against the most holy and moste faythfull Ambassadours of Christ But if they were vrged with the scriptures they accused the scriptures as not being well as spoken diuersly and as such forth of the which the truth cannot be found by them which are ignorant of the tradition euen of the tradition not deliuered by writing but by liuely voice whereof Paule saith We speake wisdome among them that are perfect Yea and the Carpocratians did defend their errours by this colour affirming that Iesus spake such thinges priuately to his Apostles in a mysterie and that the Apostles deliuered the same secretly not to all but to them onely which were worthie and agreed therevnto The like pretenses of heretikes doth Tertullian also make mention of And so did the heretikes folowing take the impostumes of their corruptions with this galand colour of tradition Artemon referred his doctrine to the foregoers yea euen to the Apostles themselues Basilides bragged that his maister was one Glaucias with had beene the interpreter of Peter Valentinus bosteth that he was one Theodatus scholar who was of Paules familiar acquaintance The Marcionites gloried that they had to their maisters the disciples of Matthias and that they held the doctrine deliuered by them How say you by this that not onely heretikes seduced men by this pretence but this cloke of traditions deceiued Apostolicall men also and ministred occasion of errour Let Papias Bishoppe of Hieropolis Iohn his scholer be an example whose woordes in Eusebius are these I thought that I should not receiue so much profite by bookes as by liuely voyce You see that Papias preferred traditions before the Scripture wherefore he made inquirie chiefely of the traditions of Andrew Philip Thomas and of other Apostles of whome there are no writinges extant But marke whither so greate admiration of traditions drewe him Papias addeth saith Eusebius manie Paradoxes and certaine other thinges as brought to him by Tradition not written and certeine straunge Parables and doctrines of our Sauiour with some other fabulous matters among the which also is the opinion of the Chiliastes Therefore Papias beyng blinded with ouer muche search and estimation of vnwritten traditions brought
doting and fabulous deuises into the Churche and did not erre himselfe onely from the sinceritie and purenes of the faith but gaue occasion of erring to many woorthie men also For Irenaeus Tertullian Apollinarius Victorinus Lactantius and many other famous and woorthie men as Hierome witnesseth imbraced this doting toy of the thousande yeares as a tradition of the Apostles Good God what men became companions of this errour pretending as Eusebius saieth the antiquitie of the errour of so woorthie a man euen of Papias their guide Beholde whether the authority of traditions not written once receiued may leade vs out of the way O laudable agreement of traditions with the Scripture spoken of by Policarpe an Apostolicall man also whiche kepte him in the kinges highe way Therefore this deceite and guile of vnwritteÌ„ traditions stuck in the church which gaue occasion of going out of the right way euen to them which seeme to defende the Churche which may be proued by many examples whereof I will recite one or two which are plaine The fame of Clement of AlexaÌ„dria is great in all antiquitie And hee was a man which both most diligeÌ„tly searched forth and greatly reuerenced vnwritten traditions Wherefore he sayeth that the labourer which is sent foorth into the Lordes haruest hath a double husbandrie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vnwritten written And hee yeeldeth this reason why hee searched other traditions touching the doctrines of faith beside the Scripture because forsooth the Lorde did not reueale to manie those thinges which did not belong to manie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Secretes saieth hee are committed to woorde not to writing Also Mysteries are deliuered mystically And in his fifth booke of Stromates hee disputeth at large that euen as the Philosophers did so hide certayne secretes touching their doctrines that they shoulde not bee knowen to all men so doeth the Apostle also reteining that auncient conceyling say Wee speake wisedome among them that â—re perfect Hee citeth also foorth of a â—ertaine Apocriphall Gospell this preâ—ept of the Lorde My mysterie is mine owne and the Sonnes of mine house But if it may please you to compare the one with the other you â—hall finde that these are the very selfe same thinges whiche in Irenaeus and Tertullian the Valentinians Carpocratians and other Heretikes alledge for the defence and confirmation of their doctrines Therefore although this iudgement in Heretikes were then grauely repressed by Irenaeus and Tertullian yet Clement his talke doeth shewe that the infection stucke in the Churche to the posteritie And Clement doeth extoll in many woordes a certayne kinde of Gnostikes whom in these woordes hee describeth That is the knowledge which maketh a true Gnostike which commeth deliuered without writing by succession to a few from the Apostles This description of Clement is to be noted For although the heresie of the Gnostikes were condemned in the Church yet certaine seedes of this plague remained in the Churche and that in greate men Therefore Clement doeth magnifie vnwritten traditions and doeth not onely make them equall with the Scriptures but see whither this rule of traditions doeth lead him out of the way yea casteth him downe headlong I wil report of manie thinges a fewe whereby it shall appeare howe perilous a thing it is to followe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thinges vnwritten He intermedleth the Gospel with the decrees of Philosophie and maketh it equal with the lawe of god For saith he as the law was an instruction for the Iewes to Christ so was philosophie for the Greekes also And he attributeth power to iustifie to both as well to the lawe as to Philosophie which is most manifestly against the doctrine of Paule He â—enieth that men committing sinne after â—aptism ought to be receiued into grace â—hich also is contrary to the doctrine of â—e Gospel and the consent of the Cathoâ—â—ke Churche Hee yeeldeth place to reâ—entance after this life in his sixth booke â—e contendeth in manie wordes that the â—reekes were saued through Philosoâ—hie which iudgement if we do imbrace 〈◊〉 not Christ dead in vaine according to â—e doctrine of Paule Is not Christ beâ—â—me vnto vs of none effect and doe wee â—t fal from grace to make short he reueâ—ceth many doting toyes as traditions 〈◊〉 the Apostles Loe whither they fall â—hich wil be wise beyond the scripture Origen his witte than the which â—here was skant any other among the faâ—hers of the Church either more fine or â—ore excelleÌ„t was depraued by this Clement who had vnwritten traditions in so â—reat admiratioÌ„ For he hath stuffed full his bookes euerie where with straunge â—octrines which hee had receiued from Clement vnder the title of the traditions of the Apostles wherevppon he is so often noted reprooued and nipped both of the olde writers and of the newe Hierom calleth Origen his doctrines impoysoned But from whence supped he his poyson but from the instruction of Clement And by whom was Clement deceiued but by the admiration studie and reuerence of suche traditions In deede the Apocriphall booke of Hormas the Pastour doeth teache that in the interpretation oâ— Scripture wee must departe from the letter and searche foorth the allegorie Clement receiued this as a tradition of the Apostles and deliuered it to Origen vnder the same title Herevppon was kindled an incredible desire in this man to transforme the Scriptures into allegories with the infection of the which disease it is woonderfull howe hee corrupted afterwarde the mindes of all doctours For after they had once tasted the sweetnesse of allegories as of a more loftie vnderstanding they vaunted themselues immoderately and brought euery thing to allegories so that euerie one thought that he might lawfully say what he woulde herein And this euill did not stay it selfe within the East but inuaded Afrike Italie France and Spayne also So by a little and a little the purenesse of Christian Theologie was transformed into a certaine Philosophie And wee may thanke suche traditions for this fruite And Epiphanius was a great boaster of such traditions who sometime alledgeth thinges vnder this title which are taken foorth of Apocriphall writers What neede many woordes Whosoeuer haue beene bewitched with the admiration of suche like traditions they haue all turned from the purenes of the Apostles doctrine vnto strange opinions vnsauorie follies So that these traditions seme vnto me to be like the meteorologicall fire which will burne nothing which naturall Philosophers call leaping goates For as that fire appeareth in the night ouer moist feÌ„nie places leadeth trauellers in the night out of their way if they meruayle at it and bee afrayde to beholde it vppon the which fraude it is called in Duitche Droechliecht deceitfull lighte euen so the Ghost or phantasticall appearance of Tradition leadeth them which haue it in admiration out of the way from trueth and throweth theÌ„ into errours And this
propertie of the doctrine of the newe Testament is so appointed by God him selfe that it can neither be written in tables nor in papers nor with penne nor with ynke nor by any other meanes What and if some Libertine with the Euthusiastes make further exception that the â—â—â—â—rine of God cannot be deliuered by 〈◊〉 voyce forsomuch as God his will â—â—to illuminate mennes mindes with â—â—â—â—ledge that they shall all know him 〈◊〉 the least to the greatest so that no 〈◊〉 shal haue neede to teache his neighâ— saying Knowe the Lorde What 〈◊〉 they I beseeche you aunswere for 〈◊〉 traditions yet dare they goe furthâ—â— insomuch that they say that it was 〈◊〉 without his commaundement in 〈◊〉 the Euangelistes and Apostles did â—â—mitte certeine things to writing beâ—â—â—se the Lorde commaunded them to â—â—eache and not to write and also beâ—â—â—se the worde of God conteyned in the â—â—spell is of such a nature that it can 〈◊〉 be expressed in writing And yet the â—â—hour of the Epistle to the Hebrues â—he middest of his writing whilest hee â—â—eth downe the doctrine of the niewe â—â—â—enant in writing alledgeth the selfe â—ne sentence of Hieremie And Paule â— nowe alreadie written both the Eâ—â—â—tle to the Thessalonians and the first â—pistle to the Corinthians when hee â—yed Not with ynke but with the spirite of God yea he did deliuer the selfe same then not with liuely voice but in writing did purpose to write more afterwarde It is therefore plaine that neither the Apostles did so vnderstande the sentence of Hieremie nor Paul his owne saying as these triflers faine that is to say that the doctrine of Christe and his Apostles cannot beare to be comprehended and deliuered in writing Certainely if their sentence may preuaile it will followe that the Apostles and Euangelists did wickedly beside yea rather against the minde of the Lorde blemishe the doctrine of grace in that they did committe that worde to writing and papers which is vnapt to bee written and vnto which suche a propertie is allotted by God that by no meanes it ought to bee committed to writing And hath hellish rage so blinded them that they cannot consider this These are they forsooth which bring the professoures of the sincere doctrine into hatred and accuse them of noueltie when as they them selues doe mocke the Churche with niewe foolishe and 〈◊〉 deuises Who at anie time beâ—â—â—hem did so vnderstande or interâ—â—â— Hieremie Augustine a man of a 〈◊〉 sharpe witte in that booke which â—ote of the spirit and letter handleth place of the Prophete at large and â—eaketh he not so much as one worde â—â—is interpretation neither doeth anie 〈◊〉 olde writers agree with them there 〈◊〉 Where is then this consent of the â—â—rche which they so greatly bragge â—â—nd require Are these Giauntes so â—â—de to thinke that they haue seene 〈◊〉 which hath escaped the most excelâ—â—â— lights of the Church Fie for shame â—â—e foolishe and friuolous is that diffeâ—â—â—ce of the olde and newe Testament â—â—ich they appoint Truely this reward â—â—e they for contemning the scripture â—â—t they may staine the maiestie thereof â—â—h their wicked toyes you may see â—â—m that I may vse the woordes of Baâ—â— weaue the lenowe webbe of the spiâ—â—t But let vs singularly reuerence the â—earle troden vnder foote by hogges â—â—d keepe it most religiously Let vs therefore see the most sweete sentence of this excellent prophesie full of Euangelicall and heauenly comfort Therefore shall it appeare that the Prophetment nothing lesse than that which these goe about to wreste forth of his wordes yea rather that this place is directly against them Moreouer no man will doubte which shall heare Paule the Apostle and the epistle to the Hebrues who are the most certaine interpreters of this prophesie but that this prophesie doeth wholie appertaine to the kingdom and time of Christ and that the diuine Prophete did prophesie in this place of the benefit of Christ And God doth promise by expresse wordes That hee will make a newe couenant with his people to heale the weakenesse of the first and to correct the corruptions whiche were crepte into it by no faute of God but thorowe the noughtinesse of the people who as league breakers were departed from it neither tooke him according to the conditions of the league for their God in beleeuing him worshipping him and obeying his lawes For they â—ere weaker by meanes of their natuâ—â—ll vanitie corruption and stubburnesse â—â—en that they coulde frame themselues â—â—roughly to the folowing of GOD his â—ill and to perfect obedience Whereâ—ore that league was broken oftentimes â—hrough their vnfaithfulnesse What â—houlde God therefore doe if he had bin willing to haue dealt according to extremitie of lawe and to haue punished them for breaking the league he might forthwith haue forsaken the people which brake the league and as they deserued haue cast them of and haue appointed them to suffer euerlasting torments But the vsing his greate mercie suche is his goodnesse and loue towardes mankinde was rather willing to spare those miserable men and their weakenesse then without mercie and with seueritie to reuenge the iniuries done vnto him Therefore he shewed the remedie when he promised that he woulde make a niewe couenaunt with his people which once he chose vnto himselfe Which couenante as touching the matter and substance is moste niew For his will was not by changing his purpose after the manner of men to backe and to make frustrate that which once he had decreed neither did he make a newe couenant cleane contrarie to the first For God his purpose is vnchangeable although as touching the properties or qualities it may be iudged after a sorte niewe Which thing Chrysostome hath expressed by a verie goodlie similitude Beholde saith he this also is niew when as some things thereof are taken away and some things remaine as if one alter an olde ruinous house thorowly and lay new fouÌ„dations we say foorthwith he hath made it niewe when as he hath but taken away some thinges and chaunged some thinges Therefore GOD pitying the state of mankinde hath dayly ioyned greater benefites and hath more and more polished that which as yet to his ancient benefites was rude and only begonne and hath made it perfecte Of this new or rather renewed league there be chiefly three principall pointes whereby GOD cureth all the inwarde diseases of mankinde and reâ—â—oreth him to perfect health And these â—ointes are the inwarde reforming of â—ens heartes the lightening of their mindes to the knowledge of God and â—he free forgiuenesse of their sinnes of the which inestimable benefites to bee bestowed in the time of the Gospel not onelie Hieremie but also the rest of the prophetes haue prophecies And of the reformation and correction of heartes that is to say of regeneration and newe birth Ezechiel hath prophesied moste clearely of all I will sprinckle saith he cleane water
which thrust vpon vs a doctrine defiled and corrupted with the deuises of men in steade of the true doctrine of Christ and his Church endeuouring to bring to passe with fires with flames with water with swoorde and with halter more cruelly than euer did Nero or Dioclesian that we shoulde receiue the sayde doctrine as God his woorde because it is approued and confirmed by the Decrees and Councels of men So that wee being become the Disciples and scholers not of Christ the chiefe and heauenly maister but of men shoulde hang not of the authoritie of GOD but of men and worshippe him not after that Religion which was appointed by his owne lawes but after that Religion which mans rashnesse and boldenesse hath deuised and counterfeited With so great Religion forsooth is the fiercenesse of crueltie clothed The Samaritanes being moued by a woman of their owne nation after that they had 〈◊〉 Christ themselues answered that did no longer beleue Christ because â—e womans wordes but because they heard Christ themselues But howe â—h more rightly shal we answere these â—cers of mindes which goe about by â—eanes possible not to leade vs to â—ist as did that woman of Samaria to turne vs from him that wee doe beleeue them but Christ and that â—e doe not for their sake imbrace the â—â—spel but because wee haue hearde â—ist himselfe teache and that wee doe 〈◊〉 therefore approoue and receiue their â—â—cked deuises because they set them â—ale vnder the pretence of the Churche 〈◊〉 Councels but that wee doe conâ—ntly refuse and detest them because â—y are manifestly agaynst GOD 〈◊〉 trueth and because they doe their â—st endeuour to make the authoritie 〈◊〉 GOD subiect to the authoritie of â—n And what madnesse is this in that â—â—ey saye that it was done without the â—ill of GOD that the Apostles and Euangelists write the Gospel when as in the first writing of the newe TestameÌ„t that is to say in the Epistle of the Synod of the Apostles this gorgious flower is expressely read It seemed good to the holy Ghost Paule also witnesseth that all Scripture is geuen by inspiration of god To be briefe Iohn in the Reuelation is coÌ„maunded often to write for the instruction of the Church Yea the Lorde himselfe witnesseth It is not yee that speake but the spirite of your Father he it is which speaketh in you And we place speaking writing both in one degree so that he which said God into all the worlde and preach vnderstoode that the Gospel was also spread abroade by writing forsomuche as writing is plainely contained vnder doctrine To conclude the Catholike Church with one consent doeth witnesse that the bookes of the niewe Testament were written by the instinct of the holie Ghoste Doe these men with whom â–ª so ofte as they liste it is a greate offence to departe euen a little from the consente of the Churche not onelie â—â—â—â—rt from it but are directly contrarie 〈◊〉 it I meane in this place to repeate discusse the most beautifull sentence â—â—enaeus lately cited And this is it â—t is the onely true and liuely fayth â—â—â—ch the Church hath learned of the â—â—ostles and distributed to her chilâ—â—â—n For the Lord of all gaue to his â—â—ostles the power of the Gospel â—row whom we haue also knowne truth that is to say the doctrine of 〈◊〉 sonne of God to whom the Lord 〈◊〉 also he that heareth you heareth 〈◊〉 and he that despiseth you despiâ— me and him that sent me For we â—e not knowne the disposing of our â—ation thorow anie other but thoâ—â—w them by whom the Gospel came â—o vs which then they preached â—d afterward thorow the will of God â—iuered vnto vs in the Scriptures to the foundation and piller of our â—th This sentence of Irenaeus speaâ—h generally of the Scripture of the 〈◊〉 Testament the authoritie perfectiâ—â— and sufficiencie whereof he sheweth 〈◊〉 most strong demonstration That is without controuersie the onely true and liuely faith which the primitiue Church receiued from the Apostles and distributed to her children This faith was in the beginning conceiued of that doctrine which the Apostles receiued from the sonne of god And this doctrine whereof the faith of the primitiue Church sprang did the Apostles deliuer first without writing by liuely voice Afterwarde they put the same doctrine in writing By what aduise Was it by the aduise of man No but by the will of god But did they put the same doctrine in writing Euen the verie same which being receiued from the sonne of God they preached with liuely voyce out of the which onely the Primitiue Church receiued the true and liuely fayth from the Apostles and distributed it to her children Wherevnto tendeth this That these particular Churches onely vnto whom the Epistles of the Apostles were writteÌ„ should vse those writings for theiâ— present necessitie onely Not so Vnto vs say I haue the Apostles deliuered in the Scriptures the selfe same which they â—â—â—ached Remember that the Epiâ—s of the Apostles sayth Augustine 〈◊〉 not written for them onely which â—ard them in the same time when â—â—ey were written but for vs also neiâ—â—er are they recited in the Churche 〈◊〉 anie other purpose And what 〈◊〉 of the sayde Scripture woulde the Aâ—â—stles shoulde bee in the Church Ireâ—us answereth that that which they â—iuered to vs in the Scriptures might â—e in time to come the foundation and â—er of our faith euen of that true and â—ely fayth which the Church receiued the Apostles distributed to her chilâ—â—en Therefore we haue the foundation â—d piller of fayth in the Scriptures â—iche the Apostles by the will of God â—â—ue deliuered to vs Therfore that faith â—â—ich is conceiued proued confirmed â—â—th of any other then of the Scriptures â—iuered by the Apostles is not the true â—ely faith the Apostolike faith the faith the Primitiue Church These things most manifestly firmly agre togither 〈◊〉 Irenaeus his demoÌ„stration Therefore â—e â–ª sheweth for what purpose the Apostles deliuered their doctrine to vs in the scriptures and what they would the end of the sayde scripture should bee in the Church euen that it might be the foundation and piller of our faith which hauâ— not heard the liuely voice of the Apostles For wee will hereafter consider those thinges whiche Irenaeus in the same place reporteth of the accusers of thâ— Scriptures And that yet there wicked vanitiâ— may more plainly appeare which darâ— affirme that it was not done by the commandement of Christ that the Euangelists and Apostles committed certainâ— things to writing I will bring concerning this matter the most cleare witneâ— of Saint Augustine Hee in the firsâ— booke of the consent of the Euangelist the last chapter sayeth thus Through the manhoode which he tooke vpon him hee is the heade of all his Disciples as of the members of his own bodie Therefore when they wrote these
reproue to witnesse and to set forth the holy Scriptures plainely yet doth she not require to be beleued but because she speaketh the words of god And the church hath iiii goodly offices about the Scriptures First shee keepeth safe the bookes of holy Scripture as a witnesse Secondly she preacheth and publisheth them Thirdly she discerneth them from counterfeites Fourthly shee interpreteth them And these functions proue not that the Church hath authoritie ouer the Scripture as many foolishly suppose For whereas the Church keepeth the scripture safe as a witnesse it cannot bee inferred thereby that it is lawfull for the Church to peruert or change anie thing in the holye Scriptures For so should she weaken the force of her testimonie and shew her selfe to be an vntrustie witnesse And this would be a corrupting and not witnesse bearing For the pure and simple fourme of the commandement sayth Ambrose is denounced by earnest testimonies to be kept A witnesse for the most part when as he addeth any thing of his owne deuising to the orderly report of things done staineth the whole credite of his testimonie by the lying report of the part Nothing must therefore be added although it bee neuer so good It is a common vse to committe publike and priuate euidences to recorders whome commonly men call Notaries to keepe and conserue with all diligence and yet no wise man will say that they may lawfully chaunge any thing that is conteined in them And it is not to be beleeued that the authoritie of the sayd Notaries is of greater strength than was their willes which requested that those things might be so recorded Neither is it any matter that the Churche receiued the worde of God deliuered by liuely voyce before it was committed to writing In deede the worde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say vnwritten in time is before the woorde which afterwarde was written yet both were bestowed vpon the Church being of one authoritie and of like efficacie For the Scripture sayeth of the woorde written They haue Moses and the Prophets let them heare them And as it was then the duetie of the Churche to heare GOD speaking in the writinges of Moses and the Prophetes so is it nowe the duetie of the Church to heare Christ with all reuerence speaking in the writings of the Euangelists and Apostles to imbrace the instructioÌ„ of the spirite Although the honour of the Church be great that shee is chosen of God to be as it were the keeper and defender of this most excellent and worthie treasure yet maye the Churche by no meanes either wreith or change or corrupt those writings but ought as a faithfull keeper with chiefe care and prouision to keepe the bookes of holy scripture vncorrupted for them which shall come after The xiiij Chapter That the Church publisheth the worde of God. WE said that the second dutie of the Church about the Scripture is to publish and preach the wordes committed to her by god Wherein the Church is like to a crier who although he doe proclaime the Edictes and commandements of Princes Magistrates yet is he not aboue them or of equall authoritie with them but all his indeuour is to pronounce all things faithfully as he hath receiued them from the Princes and the Magistrates and if he doe otherwise he may worthily bee holden for a traitour Well sayeth Chrysostome For as the crier proclaimeth to all that are present in the stage so do we saith the Apostle proclaime publikely with this condition that we adde nothing but that we proclaime those thinges onely which we haue heard For this â—s the vertue of a crier to publish those â—hings truly which are committed to him not to adde any thing or to change or to take away Tertullian agreeth with Chrysostome saying We may not follow our owne appetite in deuising any thing of our selues neiâ—her may we choose any thing which â—ny other hath deuised wee haue the Apostles of the Lord for our authors who chose not any thing of their own â—udgement which they might bring 〈◊〉 but faythfully assigned to nations â—he doctrine receiued of Christ Therefore though an Angell from heauen preach otherwise we may call him accursed Let vs therefore auoyde them which intrude mens deuises and traditions as necessarie to bee obserued and beleeued let vs heare with all attentiuenesse the sincere preaching of the Gospel in the Church and reuerence it The .xv. Chapter That the Church discerneth the bookes of holy Scripture from Aprocryphal and counterfeit THirdly forsomuch as the Church is indued with the spirite of God we doe confesse that it is her function to discerne the sincere and true bookes of holy Scripture from the counterfeit and Apocryphal So hath the Church disallowed and reiected the Gospell of Thomas of Bartholomewe of Thaddee of the Nazarites of Nicodemus as also the actes of Peter the diuers reuelations of the Apostles the Booke of the Pastour and such like Contrarily shee hath allowed and receiued the foure Gospels which wee haue and the writings of the Apostles which in these dayes we reade in our Churches And although the conseruation of the assured bookes of the Prophetes and Apostles as of a certaine diuine Treasure be the singular worke and benefite of GOD notwithstanding both the diligence and authoritie of the church is to be acknowledged herein which hath partly giuen foorth her Testimoniall of the assured writinges and hath partly by her spirituall iudgement refused the writinges which are vnworthie and which agree not with the rest of the writinges of the Prophetes and Apostles Which was so much the more easie because as saith Augustine they wrote in suche a time wherein they were thought worthie to bee allowed not onely of the Churche of Christ but also euen of the Apostles who then remayned aliue But to discerne Bookes is not to bee of greater authoritie than are the sayde Bookes as some foolishly dreame For when as the King his letters be brought some gouernours of Cities and presidentes of Prouinces are able by vse and ciuill skill sufficientlie to iudge whether they be true letters or forged which are deliuered them in the Kinges name and yet may they not at their owne pleasure either change or wrest them when they shall perceiue that they are not couÌ„terfeited or feigned And wee may not otherwise esteeme of the Church Who although she haue giuen foorth her faythfull testimonie to the bookes of holy Scripture and not to the workes of other who peraduenture did not onely digresse from the truth of the historie but also reported many things which are cleane contrarie to the olde testament and to the other Euangelists yet may shee not otherwise vnderstande or ordaine any thing then God hath defined and taught in these bookes of holie Scripture But if they which being lighted by the holy Ghost acknowledged the holy Scriptures to be the words of God
will is to bee celebrated both heree in the euerlasting life Therfore it is godlinesse diligently to collect with thankful minde to coÌ„sider all the giftes all the riches wherewith the Church is adorned enriched Shee hath the soÌ„ne of God for her head spouse and sauiour vnto whom she is maried in faith shee hath the ioyfull newes of the Gospel she hath the holy Ghost for her gouernour shee hath the ministerie prolonged by the Fathers the Prophetes Christ the Apostles which haue most plentifully bestowed vpon her as vpon a riche treasure house as saith Irenaeus all things apperteyning to trueth that euerie one which will may drawe forth of her the drinke of life shee hath Pastours authoritie to call Ministers for the setting forth and conseruing of the gospel of whom it is writteÌ„ How beautiful are the feete of theÌ„ which bring good tidings of peace bring good tidings of good things Shee hath excellent gifts vnderstanding the inerpretation of doctrine giuen by diuine inspiration shee hath also the administration of Sacramentes a certaine iurisdiction of her own lawes of her owne The holy Scripture adorning her with marueilous prayses calleth her thoroughly â—re The paradise of the great workeâ—n The citie of the holy king cleare as â—e dawning of the daye bright as the â—orning beautifull as the Moone elect the SuÌ„ne who smelleth of ointments â—tandeth at the right hande of the king â—cked with imbrodered gardes of diuers â—â—lours who hath no obscure thing and 〈◊〉 through Christ altogither most white Therefore because the sweete name of the Church is ful of worthinesse reâ—erence herevpon it coÌ„meth to passe that â—anie eloquent learned men doe with â—ately plentiful gorgious speache exâ—ll amplifie exaggerate the maiestie â—reheminence authoritie dignitie therâ—f so that they doe affirme that she hath â—orce and power aboue the written word â—f God thinke that Christians ought â—o giue place to her in all thinges For â—herevpon the aduersaries of the trueth gather that the Church is more ancient than the Scripture that the Scripture hath her authoritie from the Church that the Church of the Fathers continued 2449. yeares before anie thing was written touching religion Also that the Church of the new Testament was gathered togither many yeres with the liuely voyce of the Gospell before any thing was written by the Apostles And because the Church receiued the Scripture allowed it by her owne iudgement that the authoritie of the Church which receiued and allowed is greater than the authoritie of the Scriptures which were receiued and allowed And therefore that the authoritie of the Church is not only not inferiour not only equall but rather superiour and better knowen than the authoritie of the scripture For the Church hath approued the chiefest scriptures to be Canonical whiche approbation they neither had of theÌ„selues nor of their authours Otherwise what cause is there why wee should receiue the Gospell of S. Marke whiche sawe not Christ and yet not receiue the Gospell of Nicodemus which nowe also is extant who notwithstanding both saw Christ and was his schollar Moreouer why is the Gospell of Luke the disciple admitted the gospel of Bartholomewe the Apostle reiected Truelie they haue â—r authoritie not from the authours â—n whome they come but from the â—â—urch No holy Scripture doth shewe 〈◊〉 the rest of the Scriptures which we â—e are canonical and worthie credite 〈◊〉 coÌ„sent of the Church hath made them â—benticall So that Augustine saieth â—ll I would not beleeue the Gospell â—re it not that the authoritie of the â—tholicall Church doeth moue mee â—o And especially because there were â—e in times past which both reiected â—o written gospels the Euangelistes â—o which wrote them sticking forsooth â—ought false religion to Christ only who â—ither wrote him self neither commanâ—â—d to be written but to be preached and â—â—lled his doctrine not scripture that is 〈◊〉 say writing but the Gospell that is to â—y ioyfull newes But if wee giue place â—rein to the Church as by right wee â—â—ght al to giue place vnto her why then â—ould we not also giue place vnto her in â—e matter of the holy Sacramentes in â—â—her pointes That the Apostles did â—rite certaine things not that their wriâ—â—ngs shold rule our faith religion but â—at their writings should rather serue our faith and religion And that it is not to be thought that the Apostles were able to comprehend in their Epistles al the preceptes and mysteries of our faith and of christian doctrine that Christ and his Apostles in so many yeres preached much more than could be coÌ„prehended within the narow roome of the bokes of the new testament And that therefore so short an abridgemeÌ„t of the gospell was put in writing that the greatest part thereof as a rich treasure might be left to the traditions fastened in the inward bowels of the church That therefore many things are to be beleeued which are not written that the constant sentence of the church ought to be accepted as the gospel that therefore in matter of doubt in anie raised coÌ„trouersie the authoritie of the traditioÌ„ of the church is more effectuall to cause credit to be giuen to proue certainly then the scriptures because the tradition is more euident and plaine altogether vnflexible when as contrarilie the Scriptures be oftentimes very obscure and do suffer them selues to be wrested applied to a diuers meaning yea to that meaning which any shall presume with him selfe â—efore hand easily to be shifted of with 〈◊〉 craftie exposition And that therefore the common sentence of the tradition of the church is the certaine and inflexible â—â—le of the Scriptures And to be briefe â—hat the exactest squier paterne rule of â—â—ith is not the scripture but the iudgement of the Church That the saying of Christe is If hee will not heare the church let him be to thee as an heatheÌ„ man a Publicane That the church is the piller ground of trueth and that â—he can not erre because Christ promised to her the holy Ghost which shoulde leade her into al truth S. Paul exhorteth vs saying Brethren stand fast holde the ordinances which yee haue bene taught c. To be brief they go about to proue by the testimonie of the Prophete Hieremie that this is the propertie of the doctrine of the newe testameÌ„t which first was published by Christ and afterward by the instruction of the holy ghost was preached by the Apostles spread abroad throughout the whole world wherby God would haue it to be knowen froÌ„ the doctrine of the olde testament that it should neither bee ingraued in tables of stone nor written with inke and paper That the Apostles were commaÌ„ded by Christ to preach not to write Finally they dispute much of the briefnesse insufficiencie flexiblenesse ambiguitie and
obscurenesse of the Scripture and rolling in all their pointes of Rethoricke do goe about to proue the necessitie authoritie perfection certaintie plainnesse of vnwritten Traditions that is to say That we should fetch the rule of faith not from the worde of God but from the Traditions of the Church and that there is so much force in the Scripture as is granted therevnto by the consentes voyces of the Church The second Chapter The deceitfulnes of them is reproued which do diminish the authoritie of the Scripture wherevpon the authoritie of the Church doth depend I Do not denie that they which make these reasons are prompt wittie â—â—arned and eloquent woulde to God â—â—ey were all so vpright and gentle minâ—â—d that they would put to their furtheâ—â—nce rather to buyld vp the kingdome 〈◊〉 Christ then to defend the kingdome of â—â—e Pope and that they woulde rather â—llowe the sincere doctrine of the Gosâ—ell then mainteine corruptions and abâ—ses But whilest they are willing to gratifie these antichristian rulers they â—un on so farre through the heate of their contention that through their wicked cursed and prophane Rhetorike they â—laspheme and â—pise the holy Ghost For wheÌ„ they do so beset and besiege the Scripture that they call it a Labyrinth in the which we may go out of the right way A nose of waxe which is apt to be bowed vnto either side A matter of controuersies A nourse garden of discentions obscure doubtfull intricate What is this if it be not a reproch agaynst the holy Ghost the authour thereof But the marke whereat they shoote is this that whereas they may bee perceiued oftentymes to haue decreed and ordeined farre otherwise in the Sacraments and doctrines then holy scripture can beare they are willing to mainteine that it was lawfull for them so to doe because the Church which maketh the holy scriptures to be of authoritie and credite can change therein whatsoeuer shall seeme good vnto her Therefore least the maiestie of the Scripture should let their lust they are not afrayde to diminish the authoritie thereof wherein they do seeme to imitate the craftinesse and naughtinesse of the auncient heretikes who being willing to eschew least they being pressed with the authoritie of the Scriptures shoulde bee ouercome presumed boldely to denie certaine bookes of the Bible to be canonicall reiecting them and with great disdaine disallowing them For when as they are reproued by the Scriptures sayth Irenaeus they do accuse the Scriptures as though they were not well handled neither be of authoritie and because they be diuersly spoken because the truth can not be found forth in them by those which know not the tradition Carpocrates Seuerus Cerdo Manes reiected as August witnesseth the bookes of the law although Tertullian report of Cerdo as also doth Irenaeus of Marcio that they reiected al the Euangelists but Luke Philaster reporteth that Cerinthus allowed Mathew onely We reade in Eusebius that the Seuerians disalowed Paul his Epistles and the Acts of the Apostles For they did suppose it to be an aduantage for the obteyning of victorie if they did condition that they whose dartes they saw were to be feared might bee throwne foorth of the campe of the Church before they should come to the battell Euen so also do these thinke that they shall triumph if they may most vnworthely slander the Scripture of vncerteintie imperfectioÌ„ ambiguitie obscuritie And euen as those old heretikes did coÌ„tentiously affirme that the truth could not be founde by them which knewe not the tradition deliuered not by writing but by liuely voice in like maner do these also mainteine that the Apostles haue not comprehended in their writings all things which wee ought to beleeue and most obstinately contend that all things apperteyning to godlinesse are not conteyned in the Scripture that thou maist vnderstand that both the one and the other are inforced with the selfe same spirite of errour Wherefore we must withstand them by all meanes possible For it is a most hurtfull and perillous errour to holde that the credite of Scripture shoulde hang on the determinatioÌ„ of the Church which being granted Christ shall not be Christ nor the Gospel the Gospel neither shal we take the Apostles for the Apostles nor the writings of the Apostles for the Apostles writings but so farre forth as they be allowed in their Councels by their owne consents and iudgements Here truly must the seruaÌ„ts needs be greater then the Lorde that the Lord may not be beleeued but onely so farre forth as his seruants will that he shall be belieued as though forsooth God his eternall and inuiolable truth shoulde be grounded and staied vpon the iudgement of men Neither is it lawfull nor sure to dallie in diuinitie as shall please mens deuises For the naturall man perceiueth not the things of the spirite of God and all the thoughts sayings deedes of men doe more resemble lying then truth for God onely is true Neither â—â—e the argumentes strong and sounde â—hich these patrones of superstitions take for the defence of their opinion â—ut rather feeble and weake as in discussing and examining them shall appeare although the simple being deluâ—ed with the onely shew of truth be holâ—en still in errours and superstitions and â—lienated from the truth But let not vs â—uffer our selues to bee brought to this passe that we graunt that the holy scripture hath receiued credite and authoritie from the Church seeing that the matter â—s farre otherwise For what authoritie or estimation soeuer the Church hath it â—ommeth wholy from the worde of God whereof also the Church hath the beginning Euen as Peter saith Ye are borne â—new not of corruptible seede but of â—ncorruptible by the worde of God which liueth and lasteth for euer And â—aul saith In Christ Iesus I haue begotâ—en you through the Gospel Therfore as is the daughter to the mother so is the Church to the Scripture And since we do all confesse that the Church is susteined by the foundation of the Prophets Apostles truly if the doctrine of the Prophets and the Apostles be the stay of the Church it must necessarily follow that the authoritie of the doctrine doeth excell the authoritie of the Church Neither is there anie cause that they shoulde cauill that the Church was 2449. yeres before Moses before the Scripture because they make Moses his bookes most ancient which in deede I do confesse in respect of those bookes which now are extant But how know they whether that ancient Church which was before Moses had written his Pentatenche had anie bookes of holy Scripture or none Moses doth cite the booke of the warres of the lord And in Iosua is the booke of the Iust cited And it may be that Noah Abraham Isaac Iacob wrote those things which did pertein to their times as Moses did afterward gather them togither and by
the inspiration of the holie ghost set them in order What say you to 〈◊〉 moreouer that Iudas in his Epiâ—… alledgeth certaine things forth of the â—…ke of Enoch Neither is there anie â—…e why ye should say vnto me that that â—…e is apochyphal PeradueÌ„ture that 〈◊〉 was apochyphal which was caried â—…ut after that age wherein the Apoâ—…s liued but those things which Iudas alledged were firme certaine But be â—…or I wil not contend that the word of 〈◊〉 was not written before Moses but 〈◊〉 only vttered by the mouth and as it â—…re deliuered froÌ„ hand to hand What â—…keth this to the matter w we haue in â—…d For the same word wheÌ„ afterward 〈◊〉 was put in writing must needes be so â—…erued and restrained that nothing â—…ght be altered therin by meÌ„ The word 〈◊〉 God is inuiolable cleane without corâ—…tion whether it be deliuered by voice â—…y writing neither can it sound coÌ„traâ—… things I confesse that the vnwritten â—…de was more ancient theÌ„ that which â—…r was put in writing But I acknowâ—…ge onely betweene these two the diffeâ—…ce of time not of efficacy or authoriâ—… But in that the church is gathered by the worde of God it must needes folow that the Church is later then the woorde of God and inferiour to it Wherefore it is most euident that the Church taketh her excellencie and dignitie from the worde of God. The third Chapter That the authoritie of Scripture is greatest because it containeth the worde of God which in the beginning was deliuered to the Church by liuely voyce THe authoritie of holie Scripture is farre greatest because it containeth the worde of God him self and tooke her beginning of the holy Ghost For the doctrine conteined in holie Scripture was not vttered enlarged and plainelie set foorth by Philosophers which liued in Grece or Italie but published by God him selfe and reuealed from heauen to certaine chosen men The heauenly Father did declare it with his owne voyce 〈◊〉 the Patriarchs and Prophets The â—â—erlasting in heauen and in the verie â—ome of his father I meane the onely â—â—gotten sonne of God our Lord and saâ—â—ur Iesus Christ comming downe to 〈◊〉 shewed it The holie Ghost in al ages â—â—spired certaine excellent men who deâ—ered the worde vncorruptly Knowe â—s sayth Peter that no prophesie in tâ—e Scripture is of anie priuate interâ—â—etation For the prophecie came not â—olde time by the will of man but â—â—ly men of God spake as they were â—oued by the holy Ghost Wherefore â—ul defineth this doctrine The wiseâ—â—me not of this world neither of the â—â—nces of this worlde which come to â—ught but the wisedome of God in a â—ysterie euen the hid wisedome which â—od had ordeined before the worlde â—â—ich God hath reuealed by his spiâ—e Therefore all most excellent points â—e to be attributed to the Scripture the â—cles and diuine sayings whereof are â—h in diuinitie as are in euerie science 〈◊〉 principles of the same which must â—edes be supposed and graunted Moreouer vntill Christ came into the worlde the Scripture was conteined in the lawe and prophesies So do wee see that Moses and the Prophets are cited by Christ and the Apostles as approued witnesses whose writings were receiued amongst the people of God without controuersie none otherwise then publike registers The Apostles did first witnesse with liuely voice that which was giuen them in commaundemeÌ„t But after that the doctrine of Christ was spread wide and broade and confirmed with innumerable miracles and wonders and after that the Church was established which tooke her beginning of the preaching of the worde by fayth but yet so that the worde went before when as many false Apostles rose vp who vnder the pretence of reuelations and traditions of the Apostles brought monstrous toyes into the Churche and corrupted the purenesse of God his worde it seemed good to the holy ghost that the summe of the Apostles preaching shoulde bee sette foorth in writing that it might bee left perfect for â—â—em which should come after Whereâ—â—â—e by the instinct of the holie Ghost â—wo of the Apostles wrote as witnesses of thinges which they had seene and two of the Disciples and Apostoâ—â—e men wrote also as witnesses of â—â—ose thinges which they had hearde 〈◊〉 the Apostles whome other doe affirme to haue seene also the thinges that they wrote Those writings make the foure Gospels touching the which â—renaeus debateth manie thinges in the â—leuenth Chapter of his thirde Booke agaynst Heresies where hee shewâ—th that there must bee foure Gospels â—nely not because the Church hath receiâ—ed foure onely but because God hath so appointed Touching the Gospel of Matâ—hewe Saint Hierome writeth this Historie Pantaenus when hee was sent by Demetrius Bishop of Alexandria into India founde that Barâ—holomew did preach there the comming of Christ according to the Gosâ—el of Matthew the which being also written in Hebrue he brought from thence with him to Alexandria Herevnto agree those things which Nicephorus sheweth in the 32. chapter of his 4. booke The same Nicephorus reporteth in the 36. Chapter of his 7. booke that the Gospel of Matthew was founde in Barnabas his tombe written with Barnabas his owne handes Whereby may be gathered how greatly Apostolik men did esteeme this Gospel Eusebius forth of Clement doth report that Peter the Apostle did approue and confirme by his own iudgement the Gospel of Mark and did ordeine that it should be reade in the Churches Nicephorus sayth that Peter indited the Gospel of Marke and decreed that it shoulde from thenceforth be read in the Congregations Irenaeus sayeth Marke the Disciple and interpreter of Peter hath deliuered vnto vs those precepts which were preached by Peter The same Irenaeus writeth of Luke thus The Apostles deliuered to al men simplie and enuying no man those thinges which they themselues had learned of the Lorde And therefore â—â—ke also enuying no man deliuered to vs in like maner those thinges which he had learned of theÌ„ Furthermore Iohn perused ouer the writings oâ—â—he three Euangelists and witnessed tâ—â—t they were true Finally he finished 〈◊〉 writing of the Gospel Therefore he â—cludeth the Historie written by him â—â—is And manie other things truely did Iesus before the eyes of his disciâ—lâ—s which are not written in this â—â—ke These are written that ye might â—â—â—eeue that Iesus is Christ the sonne 〈◊〉 God and that in beleuing ye might â—e life thorowe his name Vnder â—â—th wordes he comprehendeth not onâ—â—is owne Gospel but also the Gospels 〈◊〉 â—he rest of the Euangelistes as also 〈◊〉 olde writers haue vnderstoode this â—ce And then trulie was the truth of 〈◊〉 Gospel acknowledged and receiued â—â—en as yet there remained aliue which 〈◊〉 both heard and seene the Lorde 〈◊〉 selfe in his mortall fleshe or had â—rde the chosen Apostles and Disciâ—â—â—s which were familiar and conâ—sant with him And because also
counterfeite Epistles as though they had come from Paul and from the other Apostles were obtruded vnto the Churches Paul did note his owne naturall Epistles with a peculiar signe of his owne hande least false Epistles should be put in the place of those which were true For this cause read we in the ende of the second Epistle to the Thessalonians The salutation of me Paul with mine owne hand which is the token in euery Epistle So I write The grace of our Lord Iesus Christ be with you all Amen What say you to this moreouer that Tertullian reporteth that the authentike and originall Epistles of the Apostles that is to say their owne hand writings were kept euen in his time in those Churches to whome they were written And the Epistles of Paul are approued by the expressed testimonie of Peter And Iohn concludeth his Epistle thus These things haue I written vnto you that beleeue on the name of the Sonne of GOD that you may knowe that you haue eternall life and that you may beleeue 〈◊〉 the name of the Sonne of God. â—â—d hee finisheth the Reuelation with â—â—is most weightie calling to witnesse â—â—estifie vnto euerie man that heareth tâ—e woordes of the prophecie of this â—â—oke if anie man shall adde vnto â—â—ese sayings God shall adde vnto him â—â—e plagues that are written in this booke And if anie man shall take away from the wordes of the booke of this prophesie God shall take awaye â—is part out of the booke of life and â—ut of the holie Citie and from the â—hings which are writteÌ„ in this booke Therefore that is the Gospel of the Caâ—â—olike Church whiche being put in â—riting God hath sealed for his worde And this is the cause that the Churches â—f all ages haue taken the bookes of the â—ewe Testament for authentike which â—n these dayes we do with reuerence acâ—nowledge for authentike and which we doe most constantly affirme ought to he beleeued There is a most euident testimonie touching this matter in Irenaeus The Church sayth he learned the true and liuely faith of the Apostles and distributed it to her children For the Lorde of all gaue the power of the Gospel to his Apostles through whom we haue also knowne the trueth that is to say the doctrine of the soÌ„ne of God vnto whom also the Lord said He that heareth you heareth me he that despiseth you despiseth me he that despiseth me c. For we haue not knowne the setting in order of our saluation by any other then by them by whom the Gospel came to vs which then they did preach and afterwarde by the will of God deliuered vnto vs in the Scriptures to be the foundation and piller of our fayth Thou hearest by the testimonie of this most ancient and holy Bishop that the Apostles did afterward by the will of God deliuer vnto vs in writing the same Gospell which first they published with liuely voyce that this written Gospell might be the foundation and piller of our fayth And although hee doeth vrge this poynt That all Churches taught and instructed by the Apostles shoulde keepe the vnitie of 〈◊〉 founded in the Scriptures yet doth â—â—twithstanding maintaine this also â—â—at the Scripture is the schole of perâ— and absolute wisedome Moreouer although all thinges that â—â—ist did be not written nor all the serâ—â—s which he made bee not set downe writing worde for word least the numâ—â—â— of bookes should be infinite yet hath 〈◊〉 holy Ghost chosen forth those things â—e written which might suffise for the â—â—â—â—ruction and confirmation of the faith â—he elect as Augustine plainelie teaâ—â—th forth of the word of Iohn the Eâ—â—â—gelist For whereas the Lord Iesus â—eth he did manie things all are not â—â—itten as euen the selfe same holy Eâ—â—ngelist him selfe witnesseth That the â—â—rde Christ both did and spake maâ—e things which are not written But â—â—ose things were chosen foorth and â—ritten which did seeme to be sufficiâ—â—t for the faith of the faithful Thereâ—â—re euen by the witnesse and consent of â—ugustine those things are plentifullie â—ritten which the holy Ghost iudged to 〈◊〉 inough for the obteyning of the true knowledge of Christe and of the blessed life Cyrillus in his 12. booke vpon Iohn doeth agree to Augustine All thinges saith he which the Lorde did are notwritten but the writers thought those thinges which are written sufficient aswell for manners as for doctrine that we shining in right faith good workes may come to the kingdome of heauen through Iesus Christ Thus much hath he Neither doth it followe herevpon that those thinges which were not written were vaine and to no purpose They were then verie profitable for the confirming and erecting of the Church of Christe Yet notwithstanding the whole Gospel was moste faithfully drawen into that summe which might fully suffise them that should come after The iiii Chapter The place of Ieremie his 31. Chapter is discussed also it is shewed that the Apostles wrote the Gospel by the will of God. â—Ntichrist his garde setteth vpon vs 〈◊〉 in this place wresteth a dart forth 〈◊〉 Ieremie which wee must needes â—e howe weake it is to proue that â—â—â—ch they goe about Truely they abuse â—oo shamefully the holie oracles of â—â—d who by wresting these woordes of 〈◊〉 Prophete vnto a cleane contrarie â—ishe and absurde sense goe about to â—â—â—re the eyes of the simple and to diâ—ishe the maiestie of the Scripture â—â—d as they which in scholes geue them â—â—â—ues to shew their fine witts and which â—â—ercise themselues in eloquence do fight â—â—ainst elequence with the weapons of â—â—oquence euen so doe these by the counâ—â—naunce of Scripture endeuour to oâ—â—rthrowe the authoritie of Scripture â—ut they are cloudes easie to be scatteâ—â—d with a verie smal blast of an answere â—ieremie doeth prophesie that an other â—ouenaunt must bee made in the name â—f God but not so as it was made in time â—ast with the fathers And amongst other â—hinges he saith vnder the person of God â— will plante my lawe in the inwarde partes of them and write it in their heartes and will bee their God and they shal be my people And froÌ„ thence foorth shall no man teache his neighbour or his brother and saye Knowe the Lord but they shall all knowe me from the lowest to the highest saieth the Lorde for I will forgiue their misdeedes and wil neuer remember their sinnes anie more Vnto this prophesie do they ioyne the place of Paul in the second to the Corinthians and third chapter Ye are our Epistle written in our heartes vnderstoode and read of all men For as much as ye are manifestly declared that yee are the Epistle of Christe ministred by vs written not with ynke but with the Spirit of the liuing God not in stonie tables but in fleshlie tables of the heart They would proue forth of these places that the
thinges which hee shewed and spake it may not be said that he himselfe did not write because his meÌ„berâ— â—…ote that which they knew the head â—…structing them For whatsoeuer hee â—…ould that we shoulde read touching â—…s deedes and wordes that did hee â—â—mmauÌ„d them to write as his owne â—…ndes Whosoeuer shall vnderstande â—…is fellowship of vnitie and ministerie â—f members agreeing in diuerse offiâ—…s vnder one head he wil none otherwise take that which he shall reade in â—he Gospel by the report of the disciâ—les of Christ then if he had beholden â—he verie hand of the Lorde which he â—are in his own bodie writing it Loe what can be more euident then this witâ—esse of this most holie man Christ wrote in his Disciples inasmuch as â—hey wrote that which hee shewed and â—pake yea and whatsoeuer he would that we should reade of his deedes wordes â—hat did he commaund them to write as â—hough they had beene his owne hands â—o that we ought none otherwise to take â—he report of the Euangelists then if we had beholden the verie hand of the Lord writing it Are not these most vaine men ashamed to scatter cloudes in so cleare weather Marcus Scaurus when he was accused of treason openly before the people of Rome by one Varius sayde thus Varius Sucronensis sayeth that Marcus Aemelius Scaurus hath committed treason agaynst the common wealth Marcus Aemilius Scaurus denieth it whether will you beleeue At this worde the people forthwith stopped the accion Howe much more iustly may I in this controuersie appeale to indifferent iudges and say Irenaeus and Augustine being most ancient and holy fathers yea and the consent of all the Catholike Church d ee affirme that the Apostles and Euangelists haue comprehended in writing the doctrine of Christ by the commaundement and will of the lord The Herinates the Pighicâ— the Peresies the Lindanes the Andradies denie it I pray you whether will you beleeue Let them therefore leaâ—◠〈◊〉 to barke against so cleare truth let them reasse to diminish the holy authoritie of Scripture yea rather let them repeâ—t them of their errour and madnesse The fifth Chapter â—hat all things which concerne faith godlinesse and saluation are fully and sufficiently conteined in Scripture NOw our aduersaries are cast forth of their fortresse by the force of Truth we shal haue more liberty to cope with them in the open field It remaineth â—herefore that wee handle now more at â—arge that which lately we touched in â—ewe woordes that is to say that wee proue that all thinges which concerne â—ayth and godlinesse are fully and absolutely conteyned in the Scripture And God hath giuen so perfect a law that he hath straghtly forbid anie thing to be added therevnto And howe seuerely the Lord hath reuenged this presumption if any thing haue beene added in the rites much more in the doctrine so many most graue sermons of the Prophetes which are the interpreters of the lawe made touching these matters all the holie Histories yea and Christ himselfe doe most euidently witnesse There must be the same iudgement touching the Gospel forsomuch as it is much more excellent then the Lawe Except we should peraduenture thinke that God after hee had sent his Sonne into the worlde had lesse care for his Church or shoulde suppose that the Apostles vsed lesse diligence in that poynt then did the Prophetes Tertullian exclaimeth saying Happie is the Church for whome the Apostles haue powred foorth all the doctrine of GOD euen with their bloud Paule witnesseth that he hath expounded to the Ephesians all the counsell of God touching euerlasting saluation without anie shifting dissimulation Can it bee proued that Paul taught anie thing which he did not write Can it bee denied that the full doctrine of the Gospell is plainely comprehended in his Epistles But least I shoulde bee long I will content my selfe to alledge one but yet a verie plaine sentence of Paule For that being thorowly handled will plainely shewe the perfection and sufficiencie of the Scripture Hee â—â—refore aboute the ende of his life â—â—en as the bookes of the newe Testaâ—â—nt were written and set foorth speaâ—â—th thus to Timothie the Bishoppe â—t continue thou in the thinges â—hich thou hast learned which also â—ere committed vnto thee knowing â—f whome thou hast learned them and that from an infante thou hast â—nowne the Scriptures which are aâ—le to make thee wise vnto saluation â—hrough fayth which is in Christ Ieâ—â—s All Scripture is giuen by inâ—piration of GOD and is profitaâ—le to doctrine to reproue to correcâ—ion to instruction which is in righâ—eousnesse that the man of God may â—e perfect throughly instructed vnto â—ll good woorkes Herevnto agreeth â—he place Rom. 15. Whatsoeuer things haue beene written afore time were written for our learning that we thoâ—ough pacience and comfort of the Scriptures might haue hope Which two places being weyed it will plainâ—y appeare that the Scripture is in â—ll poyntes most perfect For in them doeth the Apostle comprehende all the vse of holye Scriptures and deuideth it into fiue pointes 1. Doctrine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth the documentes of our Religion as when we intreate of God of Gods prouidence of Predestination of the Iustification and glorification of men of the Lawe of sinne of the Gospel of Fayth of charitie of hope of Christes incarnation of his death and resurrection of the resurrection of all the dead and of such like matters 2. Reprofe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is whereby we reproue and conuince them which do not reason rightly and which commit faultes in gathering their arguments Wherevpon Aristotle instituteth that part of Logike wherein he sheweth the way to discouer the guiles and deceytes of Sophistes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of Elenghkes that is to say of Reprofes It is therefore Reproofe whereby the errours of Heretikes of Philosophers or of anie other whiche iudge euill of Religion are vanquished and confuted 3. Instruction 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 conteineth the teaching of godly life 〈◊〉 the informing of manners as when â—n of all degrees are put in minde of â—ir duetie that euerie man maye haue â— care for that whiche belongeth vnto â—m as when wee teache what is seemeâ— for the ministers of the Church what â—r husbandes what for wiues what â—r children what for maisters what for â—â—ruantes what for riche men what for â—oore men It is also instruction when â—xhortations are made to moue men to â—raye to doe almes deedes to fast to oâ—ey the Magistrate to repent and to â—mbrace all kinde of vertues For those â—hinges which perteine to this place are â—erie large For vnder instructions is â—omprehended all doctrine of vertues â—nd vices is comprehended whatsoâ—uer concerneth the gouernement of a man him selfe of his house of a state â—is comprehended whatsoeuer maye bee referred to the Churche to the common wealth to all kindes of life Admonition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is of the same nature as is Instruction whereof 1. Cor. 10. All these things saith Paule hapned vnto them for ensample but they are written for our admonition This doeth perteine to the instruction and amendment of life the which the examples applied by the Apostle and all the course of his speache doeth witnesse For hee sayth that the Fathers which came forth of Egypt were baptized and that they were refreshed with the spirituall meate and drinke as well as wee notwithstanding when they did not keepe them selues from sinnes that they were grieuously punished through God his iustice and vtterly destroyed by death Therefore doeth the Apostle admonishe all Christians by their examples that although they bee baptized and fedde with the spirituall foode of the bodie and bloud of Christ yet may they not esteeme that sufficient to saluation but desire moreouer to liue godly and innocently whiche except they doe that they shall perishe by the example of the old Fathers 4. Correction 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is whereby men are reprooued corrected and reformed if anie negligence or faults appeare in their liues maners â—â—erefore by it are men reproued for deâ—â—â—ing the doctrine of religion for hypoâ—â—â—e pride ambition couetousnesse 〈◊〉 such like And by it is also shewed â—e they which haue offended both â—â—ght and may be amended Consolaâ—â—â—n 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is whereby their â—ndes are comforted and confirmed â—â—ich either through errour in doctrine through faulte in actions or through â—ne inconuenience either spirituall or â—porall were discomforted and discouâ—â—ged To be briefe doctrine and reâ—â—oofe are occupied in expounding docuâ—entes instruction admonition and corâ—â—ction treate of life and manners vnto â—ose two are referred the chiefe pointes 〈◊〉 fayth and vnto the other two the â—eties of charitie as vnto consolation â—e pertaine properly those things wherâ—y hope is stirred vp The first two conâ—â—ine speculation instruct the inwarde â—an the other two containe action and â—mploy all their labour in instructing the â—utwarde man The two first discerne â—rue doctrine from false when as the one â—onfirmeth the trueth stoutely the other confuteth falshood pithily The two other discerne godly and honest deedes from wicked and dishonest deedes for the one teacheth and persuadeth honest deedes the other sharpely reproueth dishonest deedes and doth labour and indeuour to amende them And these pointes haue I written foorth of the most learned Hyperius touching al the which since the most plentiful fountaine of the scriptures doth yeelde aboundantly most wholesome and sweete preceptes doeth it not largely minister that whereby the whole man as wel the inward as the outwarde may be rightly instructed in faith charitie hope So that Paule did wholesomely admonishe Timothie to take heede to himselfe and vnto doctrine for in doing this he shall both saue himself them that heare him Therefore the Authours lastly cited and Augustine also do teache right wel that those thinges are written by the Euangelistes Apostles which they iudged to be sufficient for the saluation of the beleeuers as well for manners as for doctrine that they shining in right 〈◊〉 in wordes and vertue might come â—e kingdom of heaueÌ„ through Christ 〈◊〉 whome Chrysostome agreeth disâ—ing of the worthinesse of the Scripâ—es Whatsoeuer saith he is requiâ— for saluation the same is fully conâ—ned in the scriptures Also The Gosâ—â— containeth all things both things â—esent and thinges to come honour â—â—dlinesse faith comprehendeth 〈◊〉 things together vnder the name of â—â—dlinesse Athanasius also accordeth â—rein contra gentes The holy scripâ—â—res saith he geuen from God by in â—iration are sufficient for all instructiâ—n of truth I omit many testimonies â—hich I could alledge here foorth of the â—oly fathers which geue in plaine witâ—es of the perfectioÌ„ fulnes sufficiency â—f the Scripture I doe therefore conâ—lude that all things which concerne the perfection of the man of God are plentiâ—ully contained in the Scripture So that Paule did moste wisely admonishe the Euangelicall pastour that it behoued him to bee wise foorth of the written woorde of GOD onelie wherein are perfectly sette foorth whatsoeuer to pertaine as well to the knowledge establishing of true doctrines and to the ouerthrowing of false doctrines as also to the correcting of euill manners and instructing of good manners Therefore do the aduersaries wrongfully complaine of the straitnesse and imperfection of the Scripture and they doe also vainly contende that all thinges which concerne faith are not contained in the bookes of holie Scripture As by these thinges which followe more plainely shall appeare The vi Chapter That the Scripture was geuen by inspiration to correct euill manners and to confute heresies That foorth of it onelie controuersies must be iudged And that it is neither darke nor doubtful BAsill Archbishoppe of Caesaria in Cappadocia in the beginning of his Homilie vppon the first Psalme sayâ—â—â— All the Scripture being geuen 〈◊〉 God by inspiration and proâ—â—ble is constantly receiued as it is â—â—ten by the holie Ghost for this â—â—ose onelie that euerie one might â—ose foorth of it as foorth of a cerâ—â—e common shoppe for the curing â—oules a medicine healthful and fitt â—his disease Well and wisely said Baâ— forsomuch as all thinges which perâ—â—e to the instruction of true godlinesse 〈◊〉 the framing of our life are fully comâ—â—hended and set forth in the Scripture doeth appeare by those things which â— haue alreadie spoken Scripture is â—e to make the man of God wise vnto â—â—uation through faith which is in â—â—rist Iesus which was therefore giuen 〈◊〉 inspiration of God that foorth of it a and onelie foorth it true doctrine â—â—ght be confirmed and false doctrine â—nfuted and good manners might bee â—ught and euill manners reformed â—s Chrysostome teacheth most finely 〈◊〉 his first Homilie vppon Matthewe It â—ad bene meet saith he that we should â—ot neede the helpe of writinges but that wee shoulde leade so pure a life in all thinges that wee mighte vse the grace of the spirit in steed of bookes But because wee haue put this grace from vs let vs at the leaste sette our mindes on the seconde remedie Euen so God spake to the Patriarches not by writinges but by himselfe because he founde their heartes naked But after that all the people of the Iewes were fallen into the sinke of sinnes then were writinges necessarily geuen and the tables and that admonition which is geuen by them And wee doe vnderstande playnely that this did not onely happen to the holie men of the olde Testament but also of the newe For neither did Christe deliuer anie thing in writing to his Apostles but promised to geue theÌ„ the grace of the holie Ghost in steede of writinges And that this was muche better for them Hieremie chapter 31. and Paule 2. Cor. 3. doe witnesse But because in processe of time some erred
therefore stande that I may vse Basill his woordes to the arbitrament of Scripture geuen by inspiration from God and let the sentence of trueth be adiudged vnto them amongest whom doctrines agreeing with God his worde are founde It liketh me to set downe in this place the most beautifull sentence of Cyprian which Augustine affirmeth to bee without doubte moste excellent It is a short way saith he with religious and simple mindes both to lay away errour and to finde foorth and trie out the truth For if we returne to the heade and fountaine of GOD his tradition man his errour ceaseth if the Conduit pipe of water which before did runne plentifully and aboundantly doe faile of a souddeine doe they not goe to the fountayne that the cause of the defecte may foorthwith bee knowen whether it bee drie in the head by meanes that the vaynes of the well are dried vp or whether it runne sounde and full from thence and stoppe in the middle of his passage The which thing also the Priestes of GOD must doe and if in anie thing the trueth shall totter and shake lette vs returne to the fountayne and welspring of the Lorde and of the Euanlistes and to the tradition of the Apostles and from thence let the reason of our doing rise from whence both the order and beginning sprang These thinges are written in his Epistle to Pompeius agaynst the Epistle of Stephanus Therefore by the consente of al the olde writers the writings of the Prophetes and Apostles are the rules of iudgementes in euerie proofe examination and triall of doctrines I knowe Tertullian writeth elsewhere that wee must not appeale to the Scriptures neither offer in them to contende wherein the victorie is eyther none at all or vncertaine or at the least none verie certayne But marke against whom hee reasoneth For so hath hee a little before these woordes This heresie doeth not receiue certayne Scriptures and if it receiue anie it altereth and chaungeth them craftely by putting to taking from for the framing of their purpose Although it doe receaue them yet doeth it not receaue the whole And though it doe receiue the whole after a sorte yet doeth it notwirhstanding peruerte them deuising straunge expositions As greately is an adulterous sense against the trueth as is a corrupt maner of writing Diuerse presumptions will not acknowledge those thinges whereby they are ouerthrowen c. Therefore forsomuch as proofe foorth of the Scriptures coulde nothing preuayle amongest suche he deemeth that controuersies touching faith are to be discussed foorth of the Scriptures because those which were of the right faith wearied themselues without fruite and because the malapertnesse of Heretikes coulde not bee brideled but that they woulde still contende although they were an hundred times ouercommen Hee woulde therefore haue an ende of vayne and vnprofitable strifes and contentions and especially seeing that the Apostle forbidâ—eth after the first or second admonition to reason anie more with him that is â—n Heretike Otherwise what doeth he himselfe in so manie bookes With what swoorde with what weapons hath â—e slaine Marcion Praxeas Hermogenes and others but with the simple woorde of God Therefore when the matter so requireth he proueth not onely the wordes but also by example that we must both dispute and define none otherwise but onely forth of the worde of God it selfe Neither haue all the professours of the right fayth vsed anie other meane when they defended the right â—nd pure faith against Heretikes as we â—aue alreadie shewed The bookes of God are open sayth Augustine let vs not turne away our eyes The Scripâ—ure crieth let vs hearken For they would not haue the authoritie of man â—ut of God to be able to ende controuerâ—ies and to heale men Yet doe the Papistes reclaime afâ—irming that controuersies cannot be deâ—ermined forth of Scripture onely or â—hat iudgement can be giuen forth of it touching the matter of fayth For they say that the Scripture is subiect to the wicked and ambitious expositions of Heretikes and that it may be wrested to diuerse meanings and that it is doubtfull and darke Therefore doe they call vs backe foorthwith to the definition of the Church which as it is without all falsehood so may it be taken for the true and certaine rule of fayth It is a solemne thing amongest these Sophistes to declaime of the doubtfulnesse hardnesse and darkenesse of the Scriptures to turne mens mindes from the Scripture to the traditions of their Church that is to saye from the authoritie of God to the authoritie of men neither is this shift of theirs newe The old Heretikes also vsed the same who when they were reproued by the Scriptures vsed these cauillations that the Scriptures are diuersely spoken that is to saye according to the speech of our aduersaries doubtfull apt to be applied euerie way vncertaine moreouer that the truth can not be founde forth by the Scriptures if a man know not the tradition that is to say as our aduersaries nowe vtter it that the scriptures are not sufficient and that the trueth was not deliuered by writings but by liuely voice For the which cause say they Paule sayde We speake wisedome among them that are perfect not the wisedome of this world Iulianus also the Pelagian with whom Augustine had so great conflictes and whose wordes and argumentes these our aduersaries vse in their disputations verie willingly was wont to stande muche vppon this that the knowledge of holie Scriptures is verie harde and meete for a fewe of the learned sort Neither are these fellowes ashamed to haue the saying of an Heretike in so great admiration But Paule when he affirmeth that faith commeth by hearing God his worde doeth not onely make it the true and certaine rule of fayth but the onely rule thereof But when wee must contend with Heretikes say the aduersaries of the truth then doe the scriptures little preuaile because they can so easily shift theÌ„ off Yet thought I that the word of God is that sword of that spirit wherwith SataÌ„ might be thorowly ouerthrowne But if it be the victorious triumphant sworde agaynst the head Lorde and maister of all Heretikes how commeth it to passe that it is a dull weapon and as it were made of a reede agaynst his members To what purpose is this worthie testimonie of Paule All Scripture is giueÌ„ by inspiration of God is profitable to doctrine to reproue to correction to instruction which is in righteousnesse that the man of God may be perfect And although the slienesse of all Heretikes and Sophistes be great in wresting and deprauing of the Scriptures yet doth not God his trueth lie so open to their mockes but that it may stoutely be set at libertie by the sayde Scriptures Clowdes may darken the Sunne for a season but they can neither put out nor choke vp the light thereof but that it wil
did beholde therein the power of God that the Scriptures are come vnto vs euen from the verie mouth of God by the administration of men Therefore the Spouse in the Ballets sayeth with marueilous ioy My beloued sayd vnto me I saye nothing of that which euerie one which is lightned with the light of true fayth must needes finde by experience in himselfe By this experience wrote once Augustine the man of God howe God by a little and a little tempered and disposed his heart with his most meeke and most mercifull hande and at the last thorowly perswaded him so that at the last he knew and beleeued that those bookes were deliuered to mankinde by the spirite and the onely true and most true god Therefore the authoritie of the Scripture doth depend not of the iudgement of the Churche but of the inwarde testifying of the holy Ghost And Iohn witnesseth that Christ sayd thus concerning the spirite If God were your father why do ye not know my speach For it is most certaine that we are adopted to be the sonnes of GOD by the meanes of the holie Ghost Which when we haue obteined Christ witnesseth in this place that wee by the lightning of the same Spirite may so discerne his speache from a strangers that it may be manifest and certaine vnto vs In the which selfe same sense Christ sayth also in another place He that entereth in by the doore is the shepheard of the sheepe To him the porter openeth and the sheepe heare his voyce and he calleth his owne sheepe by name and leadeth them out when he shall put forth his owne shepe he goeth before theÌ„ the sheepe follow him for they know his voice A stranger will they in no wise follow but flie from him for they know not the voice of strangers Neither is it to bee doubted that we become Christs sheepe through the power of the holy Ghost that we follow not falshood errours corruptions and heresies which are the voices of strangers but heare the onely voice of Christ that is to say imbrace the true and naturall sence of the Scripture And Paule saith to the Corinthians The naturall man perceiueth not the things of the spirite of God for they are foolishnes vnto him neither caÌ„ he know them because they are spiritually discerned But he that is spirituall discerneth all things And in the same place The spirit searcheth the deepe things of God. And Christ also saith The comforter which is the holy ghost shal bring all things to your remeÌ„brance whatsoeuer I haue said vnto you Also Iohn hath these wordes in his Epistle The anointing teacheth you of al things Againe He that knoweth God heareth vs. To be briefe August in the place lately cited saith Therfore when as we were weake to finde foorth the truth by cleare reason and when as we had need of the authoritie of the holy Scriptures for the same purpose I began to beleue forthwith that thou wouldest by no meanes giue â—o excellent authoritie vnto that scripture throughout al lands but that thy will was that thou wouldest be sought by it and wouldest be beleeued by it Behold it is God I say it is God which hath established his holy bookes with so great authoritie in all nations And August addeth the cause why God will be sought through them why he wil be beleued through them I conclude therfore â–ª that the scripture hath not her authoritie chiefly froÌ„ the Church For the firmnes strength thereof dependeth of God not of men And the word being both firme sure was before the church For the church was called by the word And seeing the doctrine of the prophets of the apostles is the foundation of the Church it must needes bee that the certaintie of the Church must consist in the said doctrine as in her foundation and ground worke before the said Church can take her beginning For if the Church of Christ were founded in the beginning by the writings of the Prophetes and with the preaching of the Apostles wheresoeuer the saide doctrine bee founde certainely the allowing of the doctrine went before the Church without the which doctrine the Church could neuer haue beene And because the spirit of God wrought in the heartes of them which heard the word of God read it that they might acknowledge that it was not the word of man but of God vndoubtedly the worde of God receiueth authoritie from the spirite and not from the Church The .x. Chapter How the canon of the new Testament was ordeined and that it hath authoritie of it self from the authours thereof that the authoritie of the Church is mainteined thereby THey which reason that we haue receiued manie things to be beleeued â—f necessitie by the authoritie of the Church which are expressed in no part â—f the Scriptures make this as a great â—rgument as they thinke that there are â—ut foure Gospels onely which may not â—e discredited without the perill of losse â—f saluation and that it appeareth by no Scripture that the other Scriptures which we haue are Canonicall worâ—hie credite Neither are the titles thereâ—f the titles of the Scripture but put to â—y others Therefore say they if we shall â—eceiue nothing but that which is in the Scriptures then shall wee not receiue â—he scriptures themselues Nowe that I may disclose the deceitfulnesse of this argumeÌ„t the indifferent reader must know â—hat the Canonicall Scripture hath her â—uthoritie chiefly from the holy Ghost â—y whose motion and inspiration it was â—et forth as lately wee did declare And â—fter that from the writers vnto whome God gaue certaine and peculiar testimonies of the truth Wherevnto is added the witnesse of the primitiue Church in whose time those bokes wer published receiued And they which haue the spirit of faith do not dispute peeuishly of the receiuing of the said bookes who receiued them or who reiected them but acknowledge in them the sweete sauouring force of the spirit by whose instinct they were set forth The canon of the new Testament was ordeined by the authoritie of God and receiued by the Church of the Apostles Neither can I sufficiently meruaile at their rashnesse which saye that the authoritie of the church hath giuen canonical authoritie vnto certaine of the scriptures yea and those the chiefest which otherwise neither of themselues neither of their authours they could haue had amongst vs Words Not the authoritie of euery one but of the Apostles is required to make any writing in the new Testament Canonical or giuen by inspiration from God. As well saith Tertul. when as he confuteth the counterfeit gospel of Marcion First we do holde that a true Gospel must haue the Apostles for the authors thereof Iohn sawe the writings of three Euangelists allowed â—hem And by writing his Gospel hee â—ade an ende of writing Gospels And â—herefore saieth hee
me nothing else to teache thee but to expounde to thee the wordes of the teachers In Gratian his xi decree and third question whiche beginneth Is qui post you shall finde these woordes Let him be accompted as a false witnesse and a committer of sacriledge which saieth anie thing or commaundeth aâ—ie thing beside the will of God or â—eside that which is euideÌ„tly coÌ„maunâ—ed in holie scriptures Iohn Gerson in the first parte of the â—xamination of doctrines citeth a cerâ—aine glose vpon this place There appeaâ—ed vnto them Moses and Elias talking â—ith him which is this Euerie reuelaâ—ion is suspected which the lawe and â—he Prophetes and the Gospell doe â—ot confirme Hierome vpon the Epistle to Titus â—aieth Babling without the authoriâ—ie of the scriptures hath no credite Basil in the sermon of the true and godâ—ie faith saith thus If the Lord be faithâ—ull in all his woordes and if all his â— commaundements be faithfull then â—s the falling from the faith in Greeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the crime of pride manifest namely either to refuse any of â—hose thinges which are written in the Scriptures or to bring in anie thing which is not written in the Scriptures considering that our Lord Iesus Christ hath sayde My sheepe heare my voice And a little before he saide also A stranger will they in no wise followe but will flee from him for they knowe not the voyce of straungers And the Apostle by a humane example doeth vehemently forbidde either to adde anie thing to the holy scriptures or to take any thing from them when as he saith Though it be but a mans Testament yet if it be allowed no man reiecteth it or addeth thereto The same Basil saieth also in his eighty rule of morals and xxi Chapter What is the propertie of the faithful Euen this to be throughly persuaded in his minde that those thinges are true and effectuall which are vttered in the Scripture and to reiect nothing or to presume to deuise any newe thing For if whatsoeuer is not of faith be sinne as saith the Apostle and if faith commeth by hearing and of hearing commeth the woorde of GOD without doubte when any thing is without the holie Scripture which cannot bee of fayth it is of sinne Theophilact vpon the Epistle to the Romanes the last Chapter saith They which bring any thing beside the doctrine of the Apostles bring in offeÌ„ces â—nd heresies and dissentions Chrysostome vppon the Epistle to the Romanes the last Homilie saith Thereâ—ore there will be none offences there â—ill be no discordes except some doctrine shal be deuised which is contraâ—y to the doctrine of the Apostles Origen vpon Mathew the xxv Hoâ—ilie faith For the proofe of all the â—oordes which wee vtter in our doâ—trine wee ought to bring foorth the â—ense and meaning of the Scripture to â—onfirme that sense which wee expouÌ„d â—or euen as all the golde whatsoeuer â—s without the temple is not halowâ—d so euery sense which is without hoâ—ie scripture although it seeme to some â—oonderfull is not holy because it â—s not contayned in the sense of the Scripture Therefore we may not for the â—onfirmation of our owne doctrine take â—ur owne interpretatioÌ„s except it may be shewed that they are holy because they â—re contayned in the holy Scriptures as in certaine temples of God. Ambrose in his fourth booke of Virginitie sayeth We doe rightly condemne all newe thinges which Christ hath not taught because Christ is the way to the faithful Therefore if Christ haue not taught that which we haue we our selues iudge it also detestable It appeareth also by the most graue sentences of the Fathers that it is a verie greate wickednesse yea accursed and execrable vngodlines to preach any thing in the Churche of God beside the holie Scripture Wherefore I exhorte you whose vsuall manner is and that with great solemnitie to preache beside the Scripture and to abuse the simplicitie of Christian people whom you make madde with your dutifulnesse and subtill reasoning and whom you bewitch being wakened with so manie moste graue sentences of the men of God to acknowledge your detestable boldenesse vanitie and rashenesse and to leaue it of For if we beleeue Tertullian you ought to be afrayd of that curse which is pronounced against them which adde to the Scripture or take from it If we geue credite to Ambrose and Augustine you are accursed you are detestable you are wiser than you ought to be and you walke in a cloude If we credite Gratian his decree you are the false witnesses of God and committers of sacriledge If wee will geue eare to Basil you are manifestly fallen from the fayth you are stayned with the crime of pride and you teache sinnes If we hearken to Chrysostome and Theophilact you bring in offences heresies and dissentions If wee be of Origens and Hieromes mind you bee prophane and vaine bablers which deserue no credite Therefore either cast awaie and treade vnderfoote the authoritie and consente of the auncient Fathers by your wicked impudencie or else confesse your selues to be as you are euen wicked and cursed persons and repent with the true sorowe of the hearte and with true groninges The xii Chapter That the true Churche is to be sought in the Scripture to be included therein and to be esteemed by the Scriptures CHrist pronounceth in the Gospel that they are of God which heare God his words that they are his sheepe which confesse his voyce to be the voice of the Shepheard and esteeme the voice of euerie one else to bee the voyce of a straunger By the same reason the spirite by the mouth of Paule doeth pronounce that the Churche is built vppon the foundation of the Prophetes and Apostles And that the Church is sanctified vnto the Lord in the fouÌ„taine of water in the word of life He teacheth vs the same more plainely by the mouth of Peter also wheÌ„ as he instructeth vs that the people of God are borne anew of incorruptible seede by the word of God which liueth lasteth for euer To be briefe the preaching of the Gospel is called the kingdome of God wherby the heauenly king gouerneth his people Therfore God his word is the chiefest marke to knowe the church by commended vnto vs euen by the Lorde himselfe For this cause Augustine disputing against Petilian what the church is and where it is will not haue it sought pointed forth in the wordes and rumours of men nor in Councels nor in signes and wonders but in the Canonicall Scriptures Let vs not heare saith he this say I this saiest thou But this sayth the Lord There be the bookes of the Lorde vnto whose authoritie both of vs do agree both of vs yeeld credit There let vs seeke the Church there let vs discusse our cause Againe Let those â—hings
foorth of Augustine and Chrysostome wee haue declared What saye you to this that the same Christ the Lorde will hereby chiefly haue his disciples and so consequently and vndoubtedly his church also knowen and esteemed if they keepe his sayings faythfully and obserue them And doeth plainly witnesse that they are cast off which will not keepe his doctrine and followe it As for this power aboue the Scriptures which these felowes claime vnto themselues by their subtile Sophistrie the auncient Fathers neuer knewe nor sought as lately we haue shewed Constantine the Emperour commaunded the Fathers when as they were assembled in the Nicene Councell that they should define the controuersie of the one and selfe same substaunce of the father and the sonne foorth of the Propheticall and Apostolicall Scriptures And yet none withstoode him there saying that the Churche ought to discusse the controuersie by her owne absolute authoritie because shee was not subiect to the Scriptures but had them rather in subiection vnto her Neither did they complaine that the Emperour did anie whitte at all debase the Churche when as hee made her subiect to the rule of the Scriptures And how will these men bring the Scriptures in subiection to the authoritie iudgement and censure of the Church seeing Christ our Lorde doeth not saye that the Churche is iudge of his Doctrine but pronounceth rather that his doctrine shall be iudged of all mankinde in generall And thus maye wee vnderstand that Christe is not to bee iudged by men with what title soeuer or prerogatiue they bee adorned but all mankinde to bee iudged by him according to the Doctrine of his worde The .xix. Chapter Of the saying of Paule The Church is the piller and ground of the trueth THey say that the Church is the piller and ground of truth and that it can not erre The Apostle speaketh not of the Church of anie one time or place but of the Catholike Church of al times and places which also conteineth the Prophets and all the Apostles with all their doctrine and Christ the Lorde himselfe as the chiefe and euerlasting heade and therefore her onely head This Church is the piller and grounde woorke of the trueth of the Prophetes and Apostles doctrine VVherefore we also following Augustine doe confesse that we are mooued by the testimonie of this Churche which also before wee sayde rather to beleeue the Gospel then the Popes and their Decrees and all their Councels But the Church of anie one time or place especially after the Apostles is not the piller and grounde of the trueth but so farre foorth as shee hath the word of God with her preacheth it reteineth it conserueth it and not because she strengthneth it being weak or maketh it to be of authoritie being vnconstant much lesse because she vsurpeth vnto her self a censours rod ouer it or setteth downe any thing concerning it after her owne iudgement Therefore as she speaketh foorth of God his worde she erreth not neither can she erre but either speaking or doing without it she not only can erre but doth erre But these men whilst they cloke their tyranny with the beautifull title of the Church faine vnto vs a Churche which although it ordeine any thing beside or against God his worde yet erreth not And therefore would they that shee should rather be beleeued then the worde of god But whilst they stay them selues vpon this opinion they differ as much as may be from the olde fathers and from the consent of the Catholike Church For the fathers in their councels did alwayes confirme their decrees by the testimonyes of Scripture And although they yeelded no small honour to councels yet â—n the greatest controuersies they did not â—o much appeale vnto councels as to God â—is oracles which are the Scriptures Heereof Augustine is witnesse which would not that the authoritie of the councell And this which Hilarie wrote long agoe may much more truely be applyed to our times For the greeuous and perilous errour in many and the fall of many although it doe vnderstande it selfe yet through shame to rise presumeth authoritie to it selfe hauing this impudencie of the number that wheras it erreth it would haue it esteemed wisedome and where as it erreth with many it affirmeth it to bee the vnderderstanding of the trueth whilest lesse errour is supposed to be in the trueth The xx Chapter Of the saying of Paule Brethren stand fast and holde the ordinaunces which ye haue beene taught whether it bee by our preaching or by our Epistle I Had almoste passed ouer the place of Paule whiche the defendours of superstitions obiect vnto vs as a moste strong and an vnanswearable argument And it is thus 2. Thes 2. vers 15. Therfore brethren stand fast and holde the ordinaunces which yee haue beene taught whether it be by our preaching or by our Epistle By this place it is manifest say they that all things which are necessarily to be holden are not comprehended in the writinges of the Apostles but that those thinges also which beeing deliuered by the Apostles with liuely voice are come vnto vs by traditions are to bee receiued with like reuerence and affection of godlines But when as they can not prooue that those traditions which they defende bee Paules they are woorthy to be laughed at and very foolish whilst they will holde vp their stinking piller of their superstitions by the testimonie of the Apostles And when Paule wrote this Epistle the Canon of the Scripture of the newe Testament was not yet made Which when it was once made by the authoritie of the holy Goost as we haue lately taught after the making thereof we make men the authours of thinges to bee beleeued not without the great reproche of the same spirit Wherfore in this matter we must consider with great heede that which Paule wrote aboute the ende of his life concerning the sufficiencie of the Scriptures when as hee sayth All Scripture is giuen by inspiration of God is profitable to doctrine to reproue to correction to instruction which is in righteousnesse that the man of God may be perfect instructed to all good woorkes For if the Scripture make the man of God instructed perfecte and throughlye furnished to euerye good work than doth it not leaue him to be instructed to be made perfect and to bee thorowly furnished by traditions in any good worke Wherefore so ofte as they bring in a worke which they contend to be good or any thing necessary to be beleeued which can not be proued foorth of the holy Scriptures I had rather say that that which they bring in is not good or profitable then to pronounce otherwise of the moste excellent authoritie of the Scripture than the Apostle hath appointed concerning the same What saye you to this moreouer that the doctrine which the Apostles taught whether it were by preaching or by Epistle was not contrary not
and was Iesus Christ and that afterwarde he preached the newe lawe and the new promise of the kingdome of heauen wrought miracles was fastened to the crosse rose againe the thirde day that he beyng taken vp to heauen sitteth at the right hande of the Father that he hath sent the power of the holie Ghost in his steede to gouerne the beleeuers that he shall come in brightnes to take the Saintes into the fruition of euerlasting life and of the heauenly promises and to iudge the prophane with perpetuall fire the resurrection of both partes beyng wrought with the restoring of the fleshe This rule ordained by Christ as it shall be proued hath no questions among vs but what heresies bring in and which make heretikes Thus farre Tertullian who thorowly agreeth with Irenaeus in describing the tradition of the Apostles And the testimonies of these most auncient writers doe shewe from whence the briefe summe of our beleefe commeth which commonly they call the Apostles Creede whiche certainely is the most auncient tradition which being receiued from Apostolike men the Churche keepeth still And Tertullian addeth in the same booke of prescriptions The Church hath knowen one GOD the creatour of all thinges and Christ Iesus of the Virgin Marie the Sonne of God the Creatour and the resurrection of the fleshe She intermedleth the lawe and the Prophetes with the writings of the Euangelists and the Apostles frō thence doth shee drinke the same faith she signeth with water clotheth with the holy Ghost feedeth with the Euchariste exhorteth with martyrdome and so doeth she receiue none against this institution By the which woordes it is cleare that the primitiue Churche acknowledged no traditions which were not founded in the Scripture Although I haue handled these things at large yet because the Papistes oftentimes hold foorth as Aiax his shielde the place of Paule 2. Thes 2.15 against the Scripture for their traditions whereas he sayeth Stande fast and holde the ordinaunces which ye haue bene taught whether it were by our preaching or by our Epistle can I not omitte but must euidently shewe foorth of the same Irenaeus that Paule preached to the Gentiles with liuely voyce the same and none other doctrine which hee taught them also by his Epistles For Irenaeus doeth most plainely describe Paule his tradition in two places in the fifth Chapter of the thirde booke and also in the fourtie one Chapter of the fourth booke These are the chiefe pointes of his description that the Gods of the Gentiles are not onely Gods but the Idols of Deuils And that there is one true God which is ouer all and aboue euery name that is named and that hee onely is to be woorshipped That they woulde therefore departe from the superstition of idols leaue their vaine wood and stones which they supposed to bee Gods and woulde woorshippe one true God the maker of heauen and earth and the framer of euery thing that is made Which ordayned made all mankinde and by his framing of them nourished increased them stedfastly gaue them beyng And that his word is his Sonne by whom hee made all thinges And that he in the last times although hee were naturally the inuisible worde was made visible and palpable man among men humbled him selfe to death euē to the death of the crosse refourmed mankinde destroyed and ouercame man his enemie and gaue vnto man whom he made victorie against his aduersarie that they which beleeue in him shall bee incorruptible and impassible That they shoulde therefore sette before themselues this lawe as the rule of life Not to committe adulterie not to steale not to deceiue and that al thinges which are done to the hurt of our neighboures are euill and hated of god The trueth sheweth that these deedes are euill and hurtfull and vnprofitable and damnable to them that doe them That they shoulde therefore liue blamelesse and looke for the Sonne of God Iesus Christ which redeemed vs from Apostacie and going astray by his blood to this ende that we might be also a sanctified people to ascende to heauen in the vertue of the Father which shall iudge all men and shal giue vnto them which haue kept his commaundements those good thinges which are from god Beholde Paule his tradition deliuered to the posteritie by Irenaeus a most auncient writer of the Churche And doeth he not euerie where teach with al diligence the very self same things in his Epistles So that the doctrine is all one which hee taught with liuely voice which he cōmitted to writing Yea the tradition described by Irenaeus may seeme to be the brief summe of those things which he wrote So that hee wrote most truely that those thinges which the Apostles taught were all 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 agreeable to the Scriptures Therefore all traditions which are giuen foorth as the Apostles haue beene are and ought to be such And for this cause they are alwaies to be examined whether they haue this Irenaeus his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 agreemēt with the Canonicall Scriptures The .xxiii Chapter Of the subtiltie and deceitfulnesse of Sophisters which vse guilefully the woorde Tradition which is diuersly taken WE haue hitherto shewed that it is all one doctrine which the Apostles published with liuely voyce and which the Canonicall Scripture setteth foorth Wee haue also declared howe vaynely the Papistes reason that many thinges which are necessarie for the instruction of faith and ordering of manners although they can be prooued by no testimonie of Scripture are neuerthelesse to be receiued and beleeued forth of the naked tradition Wherefore this is alwaies to be holden which we cited lately foorth of Augustine That faith is learned foorth of the Scriptures There is often times mention made of traditions by the auncient Writers but not to this end that our fayth shoulde runne out of the Scriptures wherein they alwaies inclosed it And where as this woord Tradition is diuersly vsed among the olde writers and all Traditions are not of one kinde it is a detestable sophistrie by the mixture of them all to deceiue Therefore it is to be considered what testimonies of olde writers doe pertaine vnto what kinde of Traditions and what is to be thought of euerie one of them least all without difference bee applied to the defense of corruptions abuses and superstitions Let vs therefore distinguish Traditions into certaine kindes First the fathers by this word Tradition oftentimes vnderstand the Canonicall Scripture of the newe Testament as when Cyprian to Pompeius saith From whence is this Tradition Whether descending from the authoritie of the Lorde and of the Euangelistes or comming from the commaundementes and Epistles of the Apostles For that those thinges ought to be doone which are written GOD witnesseth and proposeth to Iosuah saying Let not the booke of this Lawe departe out of thy mouth that thou maiste obserue and doe according to all that is written
therein Therefore if it be eyther commaunded in the Gospel or conteined in the Epistles and Actes of the Apostles let this holy tradition be also obserued Also Basill in his third booke against Eunomius hath Our Baptisme is according to the very tradition of the Lord in the name of the father and of the Sonne of the holy Ghoste And it is a pointe of diligence to marke where the olde Writers vse the woorde Tradition in this sense For wheresoeuer the Papistes finde this woorde they wrest it foorthwith to their traditions with they cannot prooue foorth of the Scripture Secondly the olde writers by this woord Tradition vnderstand the articles of our fayth which are conteined in the Apostles Creede as we haue lately declared more clerely than the light it selfe forth of Irenaeus and Tertullian Which writers propose the saide badge or Creed as a perfect rule of faith whervnto there may nothing be added and from the which there may nothing be takeÌ„ which remaining whole men may safely inquire of all thinges Thirdly by the woorde Tradition the fathers vnderstand a sentence or meaning not expressed woorde for woorde in the holy Scriptures but gathered by the true interpretation thereof which the Apostles preached with liuely voyce and their auditours and successours deliuered vnto vs and conserued as for example that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth a person that there are in the diuine nature three persons and yet one and the selfe same substance that the Sonne is coequall with the Father and of one substance with him that there be two natures in Christ the Lord and yet but one person that the holy Ghost is to be woorshipped and glorified together with the father and the Sonne that the flesh of Christ is of one substance with vs that infantes ought of right to be baptized others of this kinde which although we reade not expressed in the oracular scripture yet haue we learned by the authoritie of the auncient Fathers and most graue Councels that they are to be vnderstode by the meaning and vnderstanding of the Scriptures And this vnderstanding is not to be separated from the scripture it selfe forsomuch as it may be conteined therein either as the definition in the definitiue or as the conclusioÌ„ in the premisses And although the tradition of the Church haue shewed vnto vs the scripture and vnderstanding thereof yet hath it not bestowed authoritie vpon it which it hath greffed in it froÌ„ god For they froÌ„ whoÌ„ we haue receiued this tradition are onely witnesses of the heauenly doctrine and not authours therof VVhereof we haue reasoned plentifully in the place belonging therevnto Lastly where the olde writers make mention of traditions they doe not entreate of the doctrine of faith to be receiued without and beside the Scripture although it can be prooued by no testimonie of Scripture but they speake of certaine olde rites which for their antiquitie they ascribed to the Apostles Part of the rites seeme to take their beginning from the Apostles and parte of them are vnwoorthie such authours But we haue declared alreadie by what rule such manner of rites are to be prooued and examined Nowe since that this woorde Tradition is so diuersly vsed of the fathers truely it is wicked sophistrie to intermeddle all these thinges without difference that superstitions being deriued partly froÌ„ the Iewes partly froÌ„ the Ethniks may haue their defence maintenance without the scripture vnder the cloke title of traditions The xxiiii Chapter Of the vncertaintie repugnancie and varietie of traditions AND their madnesse is to be noted and auoyded which will haue the â—ertaintie of doctrine to depend rather of â—e authority of traditioÌ„s of those things â—hich they call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vnwritten thaÌ„ of â—e scriptures this especially coÌ„sidered that â—â—ey caÌ„not prooue vnto vs the traditioÌ„s of 〈◊〉 apostles gathered described any where â—se but in the scriptures neither can they â—ooue that the traditions which by this â—tle they commend come froÌ„ the Apostles â—â—eir authours There be traditions reciâ—â—d by the fathers in diuers places as reâ—â—iued froÌ„ the Apostles but those traditiâ—â—s w they gather are partly abolished partly do not wel agree one with an other â—hervpon it commeth to passe that al traâ—â—tions are not to be esteemed Apostolike â—ither can the faith of christians be holâ— vp with so weake feble a fouÌ„dation as â—e traditions which faith must stand vnâ—nquered against al the engines of hell â—here was a tradition in TertulliaÌ„s time â—t milke honie should be giuen foorth â—â—th them which were baptized where with as he saieth they might bee fedde like infantes It was a tradition in the time of Cyprian and Augustine that the Euchariste and that vnder both kinds shoulde be geuen to infantes and shoulde be so giuen as necessarie to saluation Hierom in his Commentaries vppon Matthewe Chapter 25. sayeth that the tradition of the Apostles remained That in the day of the vigiles of Easter it was not lawfull to let the people goe looking for the comming of Christe before midnight Although these and other like bee read in olde writers vnder the title of the traditions of the Apostles yet are they a bolished are obserued now in no nation so that Tertullian wrote well in his book Of couering virgins There is altogeather one rule of faith onely vnmoueable irreformable to beleeue in one God almightie maker of the worlde and in his Sonne Iesus Christ borne of the Virgin Marie crucified vnder Pontius Pilate raysed againe the thirde day from the dead receiued in heauen sitting now at the right hande of the Father to come to iudge the quicke and the dead euen by the resurrection of the flesh This Lawe of faith remaining al other points of discipline conuersatioÌ„ admit the newnesse of correction the grace of God working and profiting euen vnto the ende Thus much hath that flourishing Septimius Tertullian Therfore the onely rule of faith grounded in the Scripture hath runne on euen from the beginning of the Gospell vnchangeable vnmoueable and vnreformeable when as in the meane season rites and traditions be mutable variable and such as may somtimes be taken away and sometimes restored againe The west churches in progresse of time inioyned the Lawe of single life to the ministers of Churches coÌ„trarily the east Church euen vnto this day will haue mariage to be lawfull for them Wherevpon Stephanus Bishoppe of Rome saith The Tradition of the east Churches is after one sorte and of this holy Church of Rome after an other sorte For their Priestes Deacons and Subdeacons are maried but none of the Priestes of this Church or of the west churches froÌ„ the Subdeacon to the Blshop hath licence to marie It was an Apostolical traditioÌ„ at Ephesus and in Asia that Easter should be kept after the maner of the Iewes Again the Apostolicall traditioÌ„ in
be supported by the determination of the Church â— Cor. 2.14 * Psal. 62 9. and 116.10 * Rom. 3.4 1. Pet. 1.23 1. Cor. 14 15. Moses bookes are called the Pentatenche because they are fiue in number Numer 21.14 * Iosu 10. â—3 * Iudas 1.14 * These bookes are called Apochyphal whose authours are not knowen * In Greeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Scripture was reuealed from heauen by God. 2. Pet. 1.20.21 1. Cor. 2.6.7.8 10. The scriptures are the principles of diuinitie The lawe and the Prophets The writings of the Euangelists and of the Apostles Irenaeus li. 3. ca. 1 â–ª The Gospel after Matthew Hieronymus Nicephor lib. 4. cap. 32. lib. 7. cap 36. The Gospel after Marke Euseb lib. 1. cap. 5 Nicepho li. 2. ca. 1 Irenaeus li. 3. ca. 1. The Gospel after Luke Irenae li. 3. ca. 14. The Gospel after Iohn Euseb li. 3. ca. 24. Iohn 20.30 31 The writings of Paul. 2. Thes 3.17.18 Tertullianus lib. de praescriptione aduersus haereticos 2. Pet. 3 15. 16. The Epistle of Iohn the Apostle 1. Iohn 5.13 Reuel 22.18 19. Irenaeus lib 3. in praefacione The Gospel preached by the liuely voice of the Apostles is put in writing Luke 10.16 Irenaeus li. 3. ca. 1. Irenaeus lib. 2. cap. 47. lib. 5. All things in deede are not written notwithstanding those things which are sufficient for the Church are written * Iohn 20.30 August in Ioan. tract 49. Iohn 20.30.31 21.25 Cyril in Io. lib. 12 The places of Ieremie chap. 31. verse 33. 34. and of the 2. to the Cor. chap. 3. verse 2. and 3. doe not proue that the Apostles ought not to write Iere. 31.33.34 Ierem. 31.34 Mat. 28.19 Mar. 16.15 Heb. 8.8 2. Cor. 3.3 Mat. 7.6 The place of Hieremie the 31.33 is discussed 2. Cor. 3.3 Heb. 8.8 Chrisost In Haebraeos Homilia 14. Three principall pointes of the new renewed league Ezech. 36.25.26 27. The reformation of heartes Esaie 11.9.2 The lightening of the mindes Iohn 6.45 Esaie 54.13 Actes 2.7 18. Ioel. 2.28 29. The remission of sinnes * Esai 53.4.5.6.8.11.12 Dan. 9.26 Miche 7.18 19. The difference of the olde and newe Testament * Gal. 3.24 * Enthusiastico modo 2. Cor. 3.6 The place of Paule 2. Cor. 3. ver 2 3. is discussed August De spiritu littera cap. 26. * 2. Cor. 5.17 * Psal. 1.2 * Rom. 7.23 * Rom. 7.24 Against them which go about to obtrude meÌ„s traditions to the Church Iohn 4.24 The Apostles wrote by the coÌ„mandement and will of God. Actes 15.28 2. Tim. 3.16 * Reuel 1.11 2.1 8 12.18 3 1 7 41. Mat. 10.20 Marke 16.15 Irenaeus li. 3. ca. 1 Luke 10.16 Those things which are written by the Apostles are written for vs also August contra Cresco Grammat lib. 1. ca. 9. Irenaeus loco supra citato For what purpose the Apostles wrote Augustine referreth the writings of the Apostles to the Lord the writer and authour thereof Augustinus de consensu Euangelistarum lib. 1. cap. vlt. Consider Valerius Maximus lib. 6. cap. 3. Tertullianus de praescrip haeret Acts. 20.27 Ephes 3.4 The place of the Apostle 2. Tim. 3.14 15 16 17. is discussed Rom. 15.4 * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1. Doctrine 2 Reproofe 3. Instruction Admonition 1. Cor. 10.11 1. Cor. 10.2 3 4 5. 4. Correction 5. Consolation Hyperius 1. Tim. 4.16 The fathers also witnes that the way of godlinesse is fully set foorth in the Scriptures Chrysost In Matt. 22. Homil. 1. Chrysost Institutum Homil. 1. Athanasius contra gentes * 2. Tim. 3.16 2. Tim. 3.15 Basilius Homilia in psalmum primum * Tim. 3.16 2. Tim. 3.14.15.16 17. A worthie place of Saint Iohn Chrysostome touching the scripture Chrysostomus In Matthaeum Homilâ—a 1. * Io. 14.26 Ieremie 31.33 34. 2. Cor. 3.2 3. 16. 17. Testimonies of other Fathers touching the same matter Theophilactus Hieronymus Augustinus in Epistolam Iohannis Tractatu 2. * Luke 24.44 In all controuersies we must haue recourse to the Scriptures not to the authoritie of men Actes 9.22 Act. 17.11 Augustinus contra Maximinum Libro 3. cap. 14. Augustinus Contra Cresconium lib. 2. cap. 32 Augustinus contra Faustum Manichaeum Augustinus in Psalmum 57. Hist Trip. lib. 2. cap. 2. ex Sozomeno Theodoritus lib. 1. cap. 7. Hist Trip. lib. 2. cap. 5. ex Theodorit 2. Tim. 3.16 Enagrius lib. 2. cap. 16. Cusanus epist. Basilius epist. 80. 2. Tim. 3.16 A worthie saying of Cyprian Cyprianus in Epi. ad Pompeium contra epist. Stephani The place of Tertullian is handled de praescrip Haereti Tit. 3.10 Augustinus Heretikes must be confuted by the scriptures A false marime of Papists Irenaeus li. 3. ca. 2 1. Cor. 2.6 Augustinus aduersus Iulia. lib. 5. cap. 1. Rom. 10.17 Ephesi 6.17 2. Tim. 3.16.17 The scripture is plaine not obscure Psal. â—9 7.8 Psal. 119. parte 14. verse 1. Psal. 19.7 Psal. 119. parte 13. verse 3.4 2. Pet. 1.19 Marke 16.15 Iohn 14.14 Iohn 7.16 17. Iohn 5.44 2. Cor. 4.3.4 The fathers also commende the scripture for the clearnes thereof August de peccátorum meritis remiss li. 2. ca. 36 Cyrillus contra Iulianum lib. 7. Lactantius diuinarum institutionum lib. 6. cap. 21. Basil in Hexam Homilia 3. Chrysost Homil. 1 in Iohannem Ambrosius Against the aduersaries 2. Tim. 3.15 Canon and canonicall writings Aristoteles 2. Politi cap. 8. Psal. 19.4 Gal. 6.16 Philip. 3.16 Cyprian in serm de baptis Christi Cyprian in expositione Symboli Cyprian loco praedicto Irenaeus li. 3. ca. 1. August de ciuit Dei. lib. 19. ca. 18. August de ciuit Dei. lib. 11. cap. 5. August contra Faustum li. 11. ca. 5 Basillius contra Ennonnium li. 1. Theophilactus August contra epist. FuÌ„damenti Augustinus de Baptismo contra Donatist lib. 2. cap. 3. Hieronimus in Epistolam ad Galatas The testimonies of Augustine touching this matter epist. 19. Augustinus in proemio in 3. lib. de Trinitate distinctione 9. Augustinus aâ— Fortunatianum The writinges of sincere Catholikes hovv farre foorth to be receiued August ad Paulina â— cap. 16. Augustinus contra Câ—esconium lib. 2. cap. 31. August ad Vincentium epist. 48. Testimonies of other Fathers touching this pointe â—asil in Moral Summa 72. cap. 1. Gal. 1.8 Epiphanius lib. 2. To. 2 haer 65. Cyrillus de recta fide ad reginas Ambrosius de officiis lib. 1. Hieronimus in Psalmum 86. This testimonie is alledged after the Septuaginte and not according to the Hebrue veritie Cyrillus in Leuiticum cap. 5. Leuit. 7.16 17. This place is alledgâ—d accorâ— to the 〈◊〉 Al the writings of other men must be tried by the Canon of Scripture Panormitanus Iohannes Gâ—rson Sâ—zomenus historiae ecclesiasticae lib. 1. cap. 22. Learning holinesse antiquitie and consent of many Churches of what credite they be ought to be in matters of faith * Rom. 15 1â— Aug. de Baptism contra Donatistas lib. 2.
greatly in doctrine some in wickednes of manners that admonition also which is in writing was needefull And he adâ—â—â—h Consider how great madnesse it â—n vs which haue lost that firste digâ—â—tie not to bee willing to vse the seâ—â—nd remedie to saluation but to deâ—ise the heauenly writinges as geuen to no purpose and in vayne This â—ace of Chrysostom doth not only shewe 〈◊〉 what cause and to what ende GOD â—â—ue vnto vs the Scripture not onely in â—e olde Testament but also in the newe â—t also sheweth the vanitie of the mainâ—yners of the Pope which reasoÌ„ foorth 〈◊〉 Hieremie and Paule that it is proper 〈◊〉 the doctrine of the newe Testament â—euen of God to bee possible to be writâ—â—n neither in tables nor in paper neiâ—â—er with pen nor with ynke nor by any oâ—her meanes but that it must be kept with â—ut writing and deliuered from hande to â—and These bee toyes Because by the â—estimonie of Chrysostome we haue lost â—hat first dignitie when as the doctrine â—f the Apostles was deliuered by liuely voyce onelie so that now we haue need of admonitioÌ„ put in writing But because â— haue reasoned of this matter before I will nowe spare to speake anie more hereof And that which Chrysostome spake at large Theophilactus hath comprehended as he is woont in fewe wordes Because saith he There were heresies sprong vp which might haue corrupted our manners it seemed verie expedient that the Gospels shoulde be written that we learning the trueth foorth of them shoulde not bee deceiued by the lies of heresies Hieronymus also agreeth herevnto For as it was necessary saith he that the Gospel should be preached for the confirmation of faith so was it also necessarie that it shoulde be written against Heretikes Herevnto also doeth Augustine geue his consent who vppon the seconde Epistle of Iohn Tractatu 2. hath these wordes You ought chiefly to coÌ„sider and to commit to your remembraunce that God his will was to put a chiefe stay in the Scriptures against deceiptful erroures against the which no man dare speake who in anie sorte is desirous to seeme to be a Christian â—or when he had offered himself to be â—â—ndled it suffised him not but that 〈◊〉 did confirme the hearts of the faith â—ll out of the Scriptures For he did â—rouide for vs which were to come â—hat which we may handle wee haue â—ot but that which wee may reade â—ee haue Loe God his wil was to put â—rong defence against the deceiptes of â—rroures in the Scriptures Therefore â—orâ—th of the Scriptures are all hereâ—es to be confuted and doctrines to be â—â—dged with this shield with this sworde â—ith these weapons must heresies be put â—acke For the Scripture is as it were a â—peciall singular and sure preseruatiue â—efending vs against the paysons of all kinde of errours Herevpon is it that the auncient faâ—hers so often as controuersies rose in reâ—igion fled rather to the Scripture then â—o councels or to anie authoritie of men because the Scripture onelie can iudge firmely soundely and holily Beholde Paule being furnished with the weapons of Scripture onelie disputed against the Iewes although they were roughe and ouerthwarte if Luke reporte the trueth And the holie Ghost commendeth the Iewes of Berrea who when they had receiued the woorde with all readinesse of minde searched the Scriptures whether those thinges were so Worthily sayeth Augustine vnto Maximinus Neither ought I to alledge the Councell of Nice nor thou of Ariminum as by preiudice to hurte one another his cause Neither am I bounden to the authoritie of the one nor thou of the other Let matter contende with matter cause with cause reason with reason by the authorities of Scriptures witnesses not proper to anie but common to either Cresconius the Grammarian disputing with Augustine obiected vnto him the authoritie of Cyprian Augustine answereth I am not bounden to the authoritie of this Epistle for I esteeme not the writinges of Cyprian as Canonicall but I consider of them foorth of the writinges which are Canonicall and that which in them agreeth with the authoritie of holie â—criptures I receiue with his praise â—ut that which doeth not agree I â—efuse by his leaue Against Faustus â—ib 23. he sayeth That which Faustus â—ath sette downe touching the geneâ—ation of Marie which is not Canonicall bindeth mee not Also vpon â—he 57. Psalme he hath these woordes Let our owne wrytinges bee taken away let GOD his booke be brought foorth emongest vs Heare Christ speaking heare the trueth talking And woorthely doeth Augustine the man of GOD write these thinges forsomuche as it is meete to yeelde this honour to the Scripture that all things be tried by the examination thereof Whatsoeuer is proued by the authoritie therof may not anie more bee called in doubt Againe nothing but that which agreeth therewith may be receiued and whatsoeuer is contrary therevnto must bee accompted damnable that all the definitions of faith may depende therevppon and consiste therein So that they are found more vayne then vanitie it selfe whiche dare write that the Apostles wrote certaine thinges not that those their writinges shoulde rule our Faith and Religion but that they shoulde be in subiection therevnto Sozomenus reporteth that the sentences of them which assembled at the Councell of Nice were diuerse Some giuing counsell to alter nothing from the fayth deliuered 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from the beginning some other affirming that they ought not to sticke to olde opinions 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 rashely with out search and examination wherevppon the matter was protracted through diuerse questions therefore Constantine the Emperour sitting amongest the Bishoppes exhorted them to conferre quietly and to searche foorth the trueth setting Sophistrie aparte and bannishing the grudging of their mindes There are saith he the bookes of the Apostles and the decrees of the Prophets which doe instruct vs what we ought to thinke of holy matters Therfore setting enuious contention aside let vs search the solution of questions foorth of the Scriptures giuen by inspiratioÌ„ from god Enagrius writing of the Councel of Ephesus Chalcedon doth in like manner rehearse the sentence of Iohn Bishoppe of Antioche approoued by Cyrill Wee doe knowe that holy men haue set downe their determinations touching the Lorde foorth of the woordes of the Euangelistes and of the Apostles And Cusanus writeth that the forme of the olde generall Councelles was to place the holie Gospels in the middest And that the same was also obserued in priuate disputations touching religion Augustine is a witnesse Wheresoeuer saith he the place shall be appointed let vs cause the bookes of Canonicall Scripture to bee readie And if they can bring foorth anie proofes of eyther side all the rest sette aparte let vs make a full ende of so weightie a matter Therefore the examination of Scripture is lawfull for the triall of doctrines Let vs