constituted these extraordinary calls are no warrant for men in our dayes to assume that office for Christ now and afterwards more plainly appoints them to give power to others for the execution of those things having made it an Ordinance and from them and by them to continue to the end of the world And now as these people have constituted themselves a Church and have in that notion by man or woman received the Ordinances of the Church cast out and took in in the times of a Church long agoe constituted we pronounce them to be no Churches but nurseryes of Faction and prusumptuous Boasters That they are no Churches we shall endeavour to prove so clearly as we hope any indifferent or unprejudiced reader will not long halt between two opinions They appear to be no Churches For 1. They have no Bishops Preists Ministers or Teachers call them what they please deriving their authority from the Apostles of Christ. The Apostles were the masters of our Israel ordained by Christ to preach the Gospel to all Nations and where they Taught they Ordained and appointed Ministers for the Ruling and Governing of that Church and gave them power also to Ordaine others For this cause saies Paul to Titus I left the in Crete the same place now called Candy that thou shouldest set in order things that art wanting and ordain Elders in every City as I had appointed Tit. 1.5 The word Elder in the original is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Presbyters or Priests he must ordain Priests he cals them Bishops v. 7. Titus was therefore left in Crete to Ordain Bishops or Priests in every City that the Gospel might be purely taught and the Sacraments administred Thus holy Polycarpus Saint Iohn's Disciple was placed by him in the Church of Smyrna Ignatius that had his name given ab igne charitatis he was also called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as being born of God was the second Bishop of Antioch next Peter For Peter ruled that Church 7. years and afterwards came to Rome An. Christ. 71. The succession of Bishops I would have none offended at the word suppose what other name they will only this is the antient Word from Peter or any other Apostle was a certain sign of a true call into Holy Orders among the Antients Let us suppose a man Ordained by the present Bishop of Canterbury and let it be inquired what power he had to do it he shews it from Abbot Whitgift and so upward for a thousand Years the Records of that Sea being known until you come to Augustin the first Bishop of Canterbury Then ask who gave him power to Ordain for that Office he names you Gregory a holy Catholick Bishop Rome not yet being Antichrist servus Serverum Dei as he called himself He again was Ordained by Pelagius he by Benedictus he by Iohn he by Pelagius the First he by Vigilius he by Sylverius he by Argapetus Anno Christi 535. and so upward for 400. years or more until you come to Alexander the great An. Chr. 121. He was Ordained by Evaristus he by Anacletus he by Clemens he by Cletus he by Linus and he by Saint Peter the Apostle of our Lord the First Bishop of Rome who after he hâ—d ruled the Church of Antioch 7. year in which City the Apostles and Disciples were first called Christians Acts 11.26 came An. 67 in the 14. Year of Nero the Emperours Reign to Rome by whom he was crucified with his head downwards and all the Bishops after him until Elutherius were put to death by Heathen Emperours for he was the first of 13 Bishops that dyed a naturall death It is said of him Est Primus Episcopâ—rum Româ—norum qui non perjit morte violenta By this Bishop Lucius who Reigned in England Anno Christi 180. had some knowledge of the faith and Doctrine of the Gospel Bring this succession down again from Peter to Linus from him to Cletus from him to Clemens and so down for 400 years to Gregory who sending Augustin into England set up his Bishops seat first at Dover then removed it as the Gospel prospered unto London whence he was removed to Canterbury where his continued succession remains unto this day In all those places he taught the Gospel and Ordained Priests or Ministers and gave them power to Ordain others Planted Teachers in Winchester York Carlisle and from these again as from fountains came the Authority of Ordination to water other dry parts of the Nation about them and so from age to age was it delivered untill it came upon the Authours head by unquestionable Authority Now let us ask one of these Mechanicks By whom were you constituted and appointed a Church-Officer to exercise the power of the Keys if you say from Christ we deny it for he Ordained none but his Disciples if from his Disciples show or produce your Warrant for Ordination was given to them and by their hands given to others that the succession might be preserved unto the end of the World So Saint Iames the Apostle sate Bishop in the Church of Ierusalem Evodius was Bishop of Antioch next Peter next to him Ignatius and to Theophilus and downward If we had the Register of the Church of Crete in which place Titus was set to Ordain Elders in every City and then ask one By whom were you appointed to dispence the Word and Sacrament and exercise the power of the Keys by such a one he by him and he by him and so you should fal on Titus himself And Timothy who was Ordained by the same Apostle the First Bishop of the Church of Ephesus had a charge in the Epistle sent unto him to commit the Doctrine to faithful men that they might be able to teach others 2. Tim. 2.2 Which Commitment is by laying on of hands that being the Ceremony for translating the power viz. the Authoritative of Teaching from one person to another as afterwards shall be discovered which Commitment Timothy must not be too rash in but weigh and examine what manner of man he is 1 Tim. 5.22 For a Bishop must be blamelesse sober apt to teach 1 Tim. 3.2 Or if it be a Deacon that Tim. so Ordain the lowest authoritative Office in the Church he must be grave 1 Tim. 3.8 Which Office of Deacon-ship if they use well they may be through their faith in God receive a higher Office called a purchasing to themselves a good degree 1 Tim 3.13 Which may truly bear this construction that good degree though a low one shall make them esteemed of God and esteemed so wel of his Church as to make him a Presbyter or a Bishop for that that Office was made a step to that of the Priest-hood is clear both in gospell and Church-History A Deaconship being only a Probationers place for it and according as the Church gave them a Benegessit for the one they received the degree of the other But what authority had Timothy to
do all this viz. to ordain Bishops and Elders because he himself had the power given unto him by the laying on of the hands of the Presbytery 1 Tim. 4 14. at which Ordination or laying on of hands Paul had his hand upon Timothy's head with the Priests or Presbyters 2 Tim. 4.6 suitable to the practice of the Church of God unto this day where there are Clergy-men or Presbyters and these with the Bishop or Superintendent ordain Ministers by Prayer and using the Ceremony of laying on of hands in that time the Bishop laying on first as chief and by that Ordination they have power to ordain others and they others to keep up the Apostolical Succession in the authoritative way of teaching Now let us go to the Church of Ephesus and ask those Elders or Presbyters that were in every City what power and Authority they have to dispense the Word and Sacraments c Since there is a Church constituted by what Authority therefore do you you you The Answer will be I had it from such a one he from him and he from him and he from him and he from such a one and he from Timothy and he from the Presbytery where Paul was present But now we call to mind What Authority had Paul to ordain for Christ ordained none but his Disciples could Paul therefore give that Power to another which he never had himself Is not Paul in this irregular presuming to ordain Timothy a Church-officer he having no such power given unto him by Christ For the understanding of this cast your eye upon Acts 13.1 2. in which place we finde that after Saul or Paul hath given good experience of the truth of his conversion for the Church was at first afraid of him Acts 9.26 we finde a meeting of the Church of Antioch and as they were ministring to the Lord or exercising their Ministry let it be in preaching and praying for the Text will hold it out the holy Ghost calls saying Separate me Barnabas and Saul for the work whereunto I have called them And when they had fasted and prayed and laid their hands on them they sent them away c. These two were called before by God for the Work of the Ministry that the holy Ghost witnesseth in these words for the work whereunto I have called them In a word qualified they were for that work and of their Abilities the Church had sufficient experience but now that that order might not be subverted which in the Church by Christ and his Apostles had been constituted Separation that is a solemn setting of them apart from all other Members by constituting them Church-officers is required by the holy Ghost that in their going thorow the World they might have power to constitute others and also be looked upon by the Church as men sent of God in an authoritative way for preaching of the Word delivering the Sacraments and exercising the power of the Keys not onely by their inward Qualification but by external Ordination that Law being established When a gifted-Brother who boasts of an inward Call can give as good testimony to the Church as Paul is able to do touching his power none but beasts will move their tongues against them and when they can shew their Abilities to the Church to be deserving I dare promise to any that they may have Ordination which Paul though I suppose as well qualified as they after trial received and had and that by especial order the Church it seems being backward by reason of his former being a persecutor and desirous of further trial from God to prevent irregularity or any breach though in so eminently a gifted person of that Law which Christ had appointed in his Church Thus Timothy can make good his Ordination to be Apostolical in each part Bring this line down again By the Ministers and Prophets of Antioch was Paul ordained he ordains Timothy and Timothy again gave this power to other faithfull men sometimes ordaining them Deacons and sometimes Priests and so throughout the famous Church of Ephesus though afterward it languished Rev. 2.9 and whether Timothy be the Angel that that Epistle is sent unto is uncertain but certain that all the Presbyters and Deacons in the Church of Ephesus are able to produce their power as Church-officers from the Apostles who were as before was said the Masters of our Israel and he that would be owned a Church-officer shall be owned by me producing his power from them or deducing that power from them to himself according to that Apostolical way constituted in the Church of Christ and in all the Churches of the Saints But of Ordination by Gods help we shall speak more at large when we come to that Ordinance in particular For the present know that by this succession of Ministers Priests or Bishops were the Hereticks known from Catholicks the antients knew no other division in the Church and whence they derived their power to administer the seales by putting them to show their succession from the Apostles who instituted the way of Ordination to be a standing Ordinance for ever in the Church Thus Ireneus confuted Valentinus Cerdon and Marcion we are able saith he to reckon up those that were appointed Bishops by the Apostles in their severall Churches unto our time he then reckons up such as succeeded Peter and Paul in the Church of Rome to them succeeded Linus who sat eleven years in that Chair to him succeeded Cletus who sat twelve years to him Clemens who sat nine years c. By this Ordination which from the Apostles is received in the Church the publishing of the faith hath come even to us which being able to show consundimus omnes cos qui quâ—quo modo vel per suam placentiam c. we put to silence all that through vaine glory or ignorance broach new Doctrin in the Church for none of the Hereticks can derive their succession from the Apostles nor show how their doctrines were received by tradition from them And indeed the rise both Old and New Hereticks and the time that they were first received and oftentimes the first broacher or Authour of them is known The Doctrine of the Nicholaitans was not for 50. Years after Christ. The Menandrians for 68. The Ebionites in the year 71. were first heard to preach their Doctrine the Millenaries or Fifth Monarchy men did frame theirs An. 108. The Valentinians theirs An. 130. the Manicheans theirs An. 275. the Arrians theirs An. 310. this did almost drown the World The Donatists theirs An. 315. the Photinians theirs An. 350. the Macedenians theirs An. 360. the Pelagians theirs An. 415. the Eutycheans their An. 447 with an infinite number more The Ananabaptists first broke out An. 1520. the wildest Hereticks of all that had gone before them The Ubiquitaries An. 1580. the Arminians An. 1612. All these having their Rise in the Church from their several Patriots after the Apostles had confirmed and declaâ—ed
the doctrine of Christ and appointed a way for the publishing of that viz. by Ordination were known not to be Catholical As the Church grew by her continued succession of Teachers she found Heresies to grow by her side and by casting her eye back by succession she found them to be no Teachers and finding by Tradition no such Doctrine taught by the Apostles as those men held out still as they appeared condemned them as heretical having no Disciple for the Author of their Doctrine taught nor no Apostolick man whom they did succeed as Teachers The Church usually spoke to those upstarts in appearing in this or the like language Quando unde venistis quid in meo agitis non mei shew when and whence you came what make you here since you are none of my Sons none of my Teachers knows you no such Doctrine hath been taught them by the Apostles who put them in their places and Offices Polycarpus was placed Bishop in the Church of Smyrna by S. Iohn unto whom no such Doctrine was taught as is by you Valentinians and Anabaptists Linus was made Bishop by Peter of the City of Rome who was taught no such Doctrine as you Novatians Arrians and Quakers do teach and from them downward in a right moral succession they were found but starcups by the way side God suffering in every Age some Heresie to grow whereby the faith and stedfastness of the Saints might be known and tried This Succession was one thing amongst many that kept S. Augustine in the bosome of the Catholick Church Multa saith he in Ecclesiae gremio me justissime tenent The succession of Priests from S. Peter's Chair keeps me of right in the Church Tenet Catholic ae nomen For whereas all Hereticks would be called Catholicks yet if they be demanded by a stranger where the Catholick Church is at which they meet that is where is that Catholick Church that teacheth as you do and where had it beginning they having neither Doctrine nor Teacher of hers all being upstarts there is none that dare undertake to do that In a word Catholick Ministers in all Ages could shew the very Places Chairs wherein there was not onely a moral succession in purity of Faith and Doctrine but a local Succession of Priests or Ministers from the Apostles themselves who were immediately called by Christ as the Church was in constituting and by him directed to be given to others by them as they did and enjoyned those to give it to others as in the Epistles of Timothy and Titus and so to keep it in the Church constituted until the end of the World He himself not once offering to alter that estâ—blished Rule as in the case of Saul though he was furnished with all inward Graces and naturâ—l Abilities for the Work yet he must have an external Call by Ordination and those seven men that were of good report full of the holy Ghost and of wisdom Acts 7.3 could not or did not exercise the Offices of Deacons the lowest Offices of the Church and therefore by our upstart-Preachers never medled withal without Ordination or Imposition of Hands Now Reader weigh but with indifferent judgement the above-named Succession and let me ask thee if any Mechanick Tradesman or every Lâ—y-person ought or should assume to themselves the Power of exercising in an authoritative way any Office in the Church in the least degree of it without this external Call of Ordination now the Church is constituted that way Or ought they to receive that power from the People For from the beginning the Church had never such power given to her Ordination is an act of Authority and the power of ruling was never in the People but in her Officers Every one or any two or three gathered had no power to constitute Elders but Timothy onely and such as were deputed by him Ought then according to the Scriptures any of our Hereticks to be looked upon as Gospel-Ministâ—rs not having this Gospel-call Or ought he so to look upon himself because of his Holiness Parts Abilities Graces Gifts doth he finde the Spirit prompt him call him furnish him with whatever belongs to that Office in an inward way and the Spirit to assist him at all times in an eminent way so had Saul so had the seven Deacons yet they must be ordained and by those that had the power given unto them from Church-Officers of an Apostolical nature viz. by Ordination And though some few Members of the Church should out of their over-much zeal choose one to be a Teacher to them to be râ—led guided taught and instructed yet this can never give them authority to dispense the Sacraments or exercise the Keys or make him to be owned as a constituted Minister no more than when two or three give up themselves to be advised ruled commanded by another man which their so doing makes him not a Constable Judge or Justice in respect the power of making such Officers was not given at all to them So here though their rash zeal will have a Lay-person to teach them yet they ought not to own him nor he to esteem himself as a Church-officer since Ordination makes onely that which the People had never in their power and therefore cannot give that Office unto any When Christ was taking his leave of his Apostles and going to the Father Matth. 28.20 he promised to be with them to the end of the world Now Peter and Thomas and the rest being dead it cannot be personally understood of the Apostles but successively in their followers and they were to teach whatever Christ commanded But the Apostles never taught such Doctrine to their immediate Successors as our Hereticks teach now particularly this That people might ordain or that men by reason of their Gifts or Graces might assume to themselves the authoritative Act of reaching binding and loosing nay of exercising a Deacons Office which is the lowest which I cannot remember any of our Hereticks to go about once to touch though it be the passage to the oâ—her Offices of the Church by Apostolical Constitution but jumps immediately from the Shop into the Pulpit by his Gifts judging himself sufficiently qualified and because of the peoples call sufficiently ordained for such an Office unto whom that power was never given Neither do I envie any mans gifts would all the Lords People were Prophets let these men shew me their Succeâ—sion and let me perish if I give them not the right hand of fellowship And seeing they give out themselves for lawfull constituted Teachers in the Church as Paul as Timothy as Titus or as the seven Deacons give me leave to ask them how they came in and how they got thâ—t power if they came not in by this door they must pass for thieves and robbers and therefore no Teachers and those people that ordain them for rebels and traytors for setting up Governors and appointing Officers in another way than he
of Church did the Apostle Paul write most of his Epistles to the Romans to the Corinthians to the Galathians and as in the text to the Thessalonians that is to the company of believers that lived in and about those Cities and Countries called to be Saints 1. Cor. 1.2 This National Church as the case now stands with us and for the better understanding of some things hereafter to be handled must be divided into the Romish Church and Reformed First The Romish Church by this we understand all those Christians that hold the new invented Doctrine of the Church of Rome that believe as that Church believes and in all points conform thereunto either in point of practice or in point of doctrine Secondly The reformed Church by this we understand those believers whether Nationall or Provinciall that have forsaken the Church of Rome so far as she hath forsaken the truth of the Gospel and cleave to the Ancient Doctrin taught in the Catholick Church whether by the Lord or by his Apostles or by Ministers sent from them whether taught at Jerusalem Antioch Athens or at Rome it selfe disowning the Doctrine of Purgatory praying for the dead worshiping of Saints or what ever as is contrary to true Doctrine such are the reformed Churches of France Helvetia Basil Bohemia Belgie Auspurge Wittemburge Saxony Scotland or England whose Doctrine in these and such other points opposing Rome as may be seen in their publick confessions Now know that all these together are but one and the same Church diversly considered for as the great Seâ— which is but one sends out her Branches and Rivers which receive names according to the Countries they pass through and become as it were distinst Seas as the British Sea the Germane Sea the Atlantick Sea Even so the Church sending her Doctrine through the Kingdome and Nations of the Earth receives a denomination from the place where she is received and from them whom she washes with water in the name of the Lord and so of old were the Churches of the Corinthians or Thessalonians and so now the Churches of France or England which yet made not severall Churches for as there is but one head one Lord one Faith one Baptisme one Bridegroom one God and one way to â—eaven so there can be but one Church but severall considerations of that one Church which we believe to be holy and Catholick and is the whole society and company of Believees Elected and appointed c. And now we have seen her whom the Lord loves This is the Spouse of Christ only and besides her we know no other this is she whom Men and Devils Hereticks and Infidels for the present labour to destroy and alwayes did desire to root out but all in vain Mathew 16.18 This is she whom Iohn saw as a Bride come down from Heaven adorned for her Husband Revelations 21.2 who is jealous over her and rejoyceth over her as a Bridegroome rejoyceth over his Bride Isa 62.5 He rejoyceth over her with singing Zepha 3.17 This is the body of Christ Ephesians 1.8 which from Christ as from the Head receiveth Life and Spirit by his Spirit she is governed in all things and of whom also she receiveth increase that she growes up Ephe. 4.16 This is she that for her justification by faith in Christ and her mystical union with him is in name and nature a Queen Christs Spouse for her Nobility the new Jerusalem the Brother Sister and Mother of our Lord the first born of God for her illumination perfection defence of Evangelical truth is called the light of the world a Golden Candlestick a Pillar of truth and for her Sanctification of life a peculiar People a vessel of Honour a Garden inclosed the Temple of the holy Ghost Sancta Dei Ecclesia est mater virgo Spousa This is she who from her fruitfulnesse in bringing forth many Children unto God is called a Mother and that is by keeping her Châ—stity pure from the embracements of the world and Sathan is known and esteemed a Virgin and from those engagements that she hath given to the Lord of constant fidelity to him she is honoured as the Lambs wife This is the Vineyard of the Lord which he hath planted in this world warred with his Blood fenced it about with holy Angels builded the winepress of his passion in the midst of her and is dayly gathering out the stones that do offend her This is she whose property it is to vanquish when she is hurt to understand when she is reproved to be in safety when she is forsaken to obtain victory when she is almost over-thrown to be strongest when she is weakest to grow highest when she is most crushed to be most glorious when she is most reproached to be honourably acquitted when she is scornfully condemned to be crowned when she is dishonoured to be rich when she is impoverished to be illustrous when she is despised then she is neâ—rest life when death is nearest to her He that is a member of this Church ought not to be calleâ— a Lutheran nor a Calvinist nor a Protestant no more then to be called a Petrir or a Paulis or a Nicean for following the doctrin of Paul or Peter or for adhearing to the positions of the Councels of Nice or Paphnutians for approving the opposition of Paphnutius in reference to the coelibat life motioned in that Councell since it is the doctrine of no private Person he believes in but of that that hath taught by the Spirit of God to the Saints in all ages therefore he is to be called a Catholick laying the ground of his Salvation on the foundation already and long agoe laid by the Prophets Apostles or Evangelists the opinion and invention of men being no part of his Religion or Articles of his Creed It is true the members of the Church of Rome subscribe themselves Catholicks but falsely many points of the Doctrin of that Church which they have made necessary to Salvation were not known by the Fathers and Teachers of the old Churches Unknown to the Apostles and to their Successors for severall ages when the fire of Purgatory first kindled We know and what Spirit or whose Breath first blew as it hath been demonstrated by Catholick Champions of this Nation and other reformed Churches Their own Histories discover that it hath neither the Spirit nor the word of God for its entry but the Bishop of Romes pollicy the peoples simplicity the Emperours inadvertency and Phochas's treachery for unto these causes may we reduce his Holinesses Supromacy and infallibility the foundation and Basis of all their other errors the Doctrin of Purgatory of Pardons of Auricular confession of Venial sin of Merit of Transubstantiation of Adoration of Saints Communicating under one kind of private Masse of the Pax of the Agnus Dei of Hostly or Ghostly processions we know to be but yesterday so that whosoever takes hold of this Doctrin deserves
earnest or desirous they are to have us to do it that adjure us The Institution of Magistrates being from the Lord though the constitution of them be of man calls loud for obedience and that danger that might attend the Gospell of the Lord if believes should not obey is possibly the ground of this high charge For indeed whatever Government be set over us though possibly disaffected by us ought in such things to be yielded unto if not for his sake who is in the Throne yet for his sake who set him in But by this time I conjecture I see some in this Generation affirming that by this some passages mentioned before I take from them all liberty and the death of Christ advantageth them nothing and therefore they condemn me as Antichristian Having heard so much of that and seen it used so often by those that did not understand it as a proper shield against the Magistrates commands I shall in a word discover the severall parts of Christian liberty that consists 1. In our being delivered from the curse of the Law Galat. 3.23 2. From the Law of sin and death Rom. 8.2 3. From all Jewish Rites and Ceremonies as such Acts 15.24 4. From all humane Ordinances and Traditions whatsoever when they are imposed upon the Consciences of men to be observed under the pain of damnation Col. 2.8 This is the whole of Christian liberty from these Christ hath made us free but as touching the Observation of Laws and Ordinances such as were before spoken of Christ's death hath tyed us to them so farr are the Thrones of Princes or Church Governours seats from being shaken by Christs bowing down his head at which time our liberty began that they are much strengthned by it as appeared by his own life before he dyed and by his Apostles Doctrine when he was ascended The same reach the Reformed Churches in the Articles above mentioned Quest. 5. Whether the segregated Churches now in England be true Churches For the resolving of this Question we must consider the members of these Churches 2. ways 1. Either as holding the same fundamentall Doctrine that is by Law professed in England under the Guardship of an Ecclesiastick person by him taught in all necessary and saving truths though differing from the Church of England in other smaller points these must and ought to be accounted of our body and are indeed real and true Churches However if they would take counsell it were to be wished that they would go no further in this separating way For though I am perswaded they are not the real Fathers of that Bastard brood of Hereticks that now lies at every door yet they have given and still do give too much occasion by their wanton dalliance to be suspected for the reputed Father of them all as could be proved most clearly from the exercises of those Churches at their meetings But I forbear 2. Or we shall consider them as holding the same fundamentall Doctrine with us as the authority of the Scriptures the necessity and utility of the Sacraments and the like and these gather themselves together and Ordain a Mechanick or Lay-person to be their Teacher in Ordinary We shall take no notice of his Learning whether he have any or no or if you will suppose him to have all learning acquainted in all the Mysteries of Art wanting nothing to compleat a Scholar yet a Trades-man Mechanick or secular person either not Ordained or Ordained by the people and by vertue of that Ordination whether assumed by himself or imposed by the people dispenseth the word and Sacraments exerciseth the power of the Keys and as a Minister sent them of God to perswade them in an Authoritative way to be reconciled to God And these we must also consider 2. ways 1. In their private or civill capacity as they are Christians liveing about or among us and so both their Teacher and themselves are Members of the same Church with us viz. the Catholick Or 2. In their publick formal or supposed Ecclesiastick capacity as they have formed themselves having appointed Mechanicks for their Teachers whether certain or not whether Male or Female exercising worship among themselves by such or receiving Sacraments at the hands of such Let me now lay down and open one distinction which well considered will answer all objections that in the handling of the Question may arise in the Readers judgement that is this We must note there is a vast difference between a Church constituting and a Church constituted This holds not only in Churches but in other things when a government is going to be erected some things extraordinary may be done through necessity which necessity being removed by the thing competed those extraordinary acts cease being as at the creation in constituting the World God made trees herbs plants fishes beasts yea man in an extraordinary way being necessitated to do upon the account of his naturâ— that admitting no creature to be from eternity but having once made these he ceased that extraordinary act of creating and appointed the conservation of the species of the creatures to be in the successive generation of the Individuals Man is not now made out of the ground nor the woman made at an instant out of man God hath put an end to creation and constituted now generation for the means of keeping man upon the Earth So in his constituting of the Sacrament of circumcision to be a standing Ordinance to the Church of the Jews we know by Gen. 17.24 25. that Abraham was Ninety nine years old and his Son Ishmael 13 and the servants of his house some elder some younger but being in their flesh constituted it was from them to all posterity to be given at Eight days old Ishmael was thirteen years but his sons must be circumcised sooner because when the Ordinance was constituted he was not to look to that age wherein God did institute that Ordinance So in setling the Priesthood upon Aaron Levit. 8. Moses was the man that sanctified him and sprinkled the blood on the Altar seven times and other Levitical Rites which in after-ages was not lawfull save by the Priests because God having instituted Aaron he had appointed a natural Succession and by that Succession was he to be found out whom the Lord would make to offer upon his Altar So in setling the Crown of Iudah upon David he was anointed by the Prophet when he followed the Flocks but having constituted him and by that extraordinary act deputed the Son of Iesse to be the Captain of his People he will now have us to look no more after that but among David's Sons and after Solomon the First-born the ordinary way that God hath now appointed for bringing forth one to rule that People So Christ in constituting a Church for himself upon earth took from Boats and from the receipt of Custom men and immediately ordained them to preach Repentance to the People now they being
between the Summers heat and the Winters Frost All the Christian Churches in the World have been or are Synagogues of Sathan if these segregated Congregations be the Churches of Christ the Church of Ierusalem was no Church the Church of Antioch was no Church the Church of Crete was no Church the Churches of Corinth of Galatia of Philippi of Ephesus of Smyrna of Philadelphia of Sardis were no Churches if these be See the Confession of Faith of all Reformed Churches now in Christendom of Helvetiae Bohemia of France of Basil of Belgiae of Auspurge of Saxony of Wirtemberge of Swedeland of Scotland of England all of them do with one joint consent teach the contrary Doctrine of Separation of Ordination of Sacraments of the Keys unto those Congregations Cast your eye upward to the Writings Sermons Expositions Epistles Disputes of the most Ancient Worthy Learned Godly Patriarchs Martyrs Fathers that lived in any age of the Church or in all the Centuries of the purer times that immediately followed the Apostles and you shall by the whole Body of the Church see these mens practises and Doctrine as they have constituted themselves to be doomed judged sentenced as schismatical or heretical there being no such Doctrine touching those points they maintain in reference to the Ordinances above named taught by the Apostles or their immediate Successors Saint Iohn the Apostle taught no such Doctrine to Polycarpus whom he ordained Bishop of Smyrna Anno Christâ— 71. about forty years after Christs death nor Peter to Linus whom he made Bishop of Rome Anno 70. Neither did he teach any such Doctrine to Evodius the Second nor to Ignatius the Third nor to Theophilus the sixth Bishop of Antioch after himself who lived Anno 170. These would have been faithfull in delivering that Doctrine if they had received any such command frâ—m the Apostles But they teach the contrary and to Posterity deliver the contrary and from Generation to Generation it hath been taught until it came to the very Age wherein we live Cyprian Bishop of Carthage who lived anno 240. Athanasius Bishop of Alexandria anno 376. Hilarius Bishop of Poicttiers in France anno 355. Optatus Bishop of Millaine anno 365. Basilius the great Bishop of Caesarea anno 370. Gregory Bishop of Nazianzum anno 370. Epiphanius Bishop of Salamine in Cyprus anno 370. Ambrose Bishop of Millain anno 374. Gregory Bishop of Nâ—ssa anno 380. What shall I do I might weary myself in copying out the worthy Champions of the Church that lived in other times as Hierom the best of Presbyters Chrysostome Augustine Cyrill who all before a Papist was heard of taught the very self-same thing that we are now proving viz. That such as separate themselves from the Catholick Church upon the account of mixture and assume to themselves the power of executing in an authoritative way the Ordinances Seals Censures of the Church upon what account soever be irregular persons unlawfull Assemblies and ought to be curbed suppressed and punished by all in authority unto which consent the Reformed Churches To Church these men and to sentence their Doctrine for truth at the same breath we must unchurch all Churches that are that have been in the Christian World and before we condemn them let us sentence these And we do by these Presents censure them as proud boasters blasphemers disobedient to Parents the Church is their Mother whom they ought not to forsake because she is old unthankfull unholy to be without natural affection to be truce-breakers false accusers incontinent fierce despisers of those that are good all the Army of the noble Worthies that have gone before us traytors heady high-minded lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God having a form of godliness but denying the power thereof 2 Tim. 3.2 3 4. And Lord have mercy upon their souls This may be thought a harsh censure yet it is no other than upon my own knowledge I am able to justifie having an unhappy curiosity a long season to be frequently at the meetings of several sorts of Hereticks where I saw more and heard more than ever I should have believed from any other 4. Should we hold them to be rightly constituted Churches we should never be sure of a right Church in the World which is expresly contrary to the ninth Article of our Creed for there we believe the holy Catholick Church that is that there is was and shall be a Châ—rch whereof we believe our selves to be Members For that with us may be accounted as the true and onely Church this day and wherein we intend to live and die and by prayers and tears seek its preservation The next offence we take at some party or other of that Church or next turn or new Religion that is turned up we are of another mind and we conclude that the Church of Christ is onely those that hold that opinion which for the time past we have spoken against and if we would walk in the mind and agreeable to the will of God we mâ—st be of that society that holds such an opinion and so from one Congregation to another still keeping from the Doctrine of the Catholick â—od in justice suffering few of them to come back until through pride we be puffed up That we hold it needless to be of any Congregation or create our selves one which the better to procure some new opinion is broached the novelty whereof the giddy heads of men being taken withal brings disciples in a short time to that teacher which is the very cause that scarce shall we finde one Heretick maintaining one heresie but hath with that some other mingled There being therefore such a mixture of Religions in every one that its hard from which to give him his name yet for a mark of distinction he gets a denomination from some opinion that he principally holds hence one is called a Quaker though in many points he agree with the Anabaptist and the Anabaptist with him and the Millenaries or Fifth Monarcy men with them both and each Heresie maintaining stifly that that is the Church makes him that goes from the Catholick to doubt of the very being of a Church which doubt is the immediate parent of those turnings and windings in points of Religion and opinion as the looseness and iniquity of late years hath cleâ—rly discovered to any understanding Christian. Of all those Congregations or Opinionists that have revolted from the Apostolick Catholick Church I should chuse to be of that society known by the name of Seekers they know that there is no Church visible in the World no Ordinance at all and therefore they spend their days in seeking one out and enquiring after one which makes them of all Opinions the most uncertain and yet there is great hopes that for the future they may be of some certainty Some of them affirm the Church to be in the Wildernesse others are seeking her in the smoak of the Temple where lest I lose my self
near as hot as hell he must believe the least point of Reliques with as strong a faith as the greatest mysteries of the God-head and if he deny any of the former he is no lesse an Heretick then if he had denied the latter and he that believes not the Churches tradition to be as necessary to be believed as the Epistles of Paul he cannot be saved Indeed there is not an Article of the Church of Rome that is Catholick wherein reformed Churches differ from her but in those Articles that are but of Yesterday such as those above mentioned they stand at a distance praying for her but loth to touch her she being not sick of a small Ague but hath running sores Ulcers Infections Pestilential humours within her which makes them write over her as if she were visited Lord have mercy upon her but dare not make themselves one body with her H. The Apologist of the Church of England declares That we have Renounced that Church wherein we could not have the Word of God sincerely taught being mixed with tradition nor the Sacraments rightly administred the one half of the Lords Supper being but given to the people and Baptisme being given to Bells c. Nor the Name of God duly called upon praying to the Saints and Angels and in a Latin tongue which the people understand not To conclude we have forsaken the Church viz. of Rome as it is now not as it was in old time past c. and come to that Church viz. of England wherein all things be governed purely and Reverendly This overthrowing of the foundation thou maist call Heresie in dâ—ctrine Yet by caution take not the manners of the people for doctrine let the people be what they will the man what he pleaseth it is neither the good lives of men nor the bad lives of men that makes or unmakes Churches but false and corrupted doctrine Much loosenesse was in the Church of Corinth and Prophanenesse particâ—larly about the Sacrament of the Lords Supper yet the Apostle gives no ground at all for separation only exhorts to a more orderly peaceable walking and a more holy and prepared celebration Neither must we take things indifferent for doctrine nor every blemish for fundamentall Heresie It is an errour in our age to take Circumstances and outward Ceremonies for essentiall parts of worship There was much corruption in the Church of the Jews in our Saviours time and much false glosses put upon the Law yet in regard the fundamentals were not razed he commanded his disciples to hear even the Pharisees who yet were thieves and robbers being none of those appointed to expound the Law which justified not their manner of teaching but the truth of the doctrine taught who sate in Moses chair Matth. 23.1 2 3. but gives them a Caveat to beware of the practices and leven of the Pharisees that is hearken and obey to those truths and fundamental precepts that they give out teach to be in my Fathers Law first taught by Moses as cirumcision the way and manner of the Sacrifices which in the Jewish Church were necessary points but refuse those things they lay down as from tradition as Corban washing of cups for not these but the other are commanded you to do Moreover you must be sure not to separate your selves from those who possibly are ignorant of the depths of Sathan in that particular doctrine delivered for Christ pities such and speaks comfortably to them Revel 2.4 nor from others whom you can perceive in the least to disown that corrupted doctrine though privately being troubled at the razeing out of necessary principles How many poor souls are led away from the truth by those that creep into houses in our days that are ignorant possibly of the designes of their prime Teachers following them as much as the people followed Absolon viz. in the simplicity of their heart these giving great encouragement to those that so teach makes them bolder to go on against the unity of the faith showing the Number of their Disciples loving to hear those Doctrines that either add to or take from the infallible and unalterable rule of the Word in both which the Church of Rome is erroneous and therefore the separation from her justifiable 2. We may lawfully separate our selves from a Church when she enjoyns those acts of worship as necessary not enjoyned by Christ when a Church preacheth corrupted doctrine as from God we may separate from her so may we nay so ought we to do when she injoyns false worship to be performed to God whether it be in worshipping him after a false manner or giving another besides him true worship Deut. 10.20 This is another cause of the reformed Churches separation from Rome their Beads their Ave Maries their Fastings a great part of worship with them their praying to Saints as those that have the plague must pray to St. Rochus those that have the tooth-ache to Apollonia those that are poysoned to Saint Iohn those that are in Captivity to Saint Leonard those that have the Fistulâ— to Saint Quintin Women that are in labour must pray to Saint Margaret but especially to the Virgin Mary besides those common prayers that you must make in common to all the Saints and to the Angels also must prayer be made There is a little Book published by the Authority of Pope Pius the V. in which almost at the beginning that all might prosper the better you have this Prayer Precibus meritiâ— beatae Mariae semper Virginis omnium sanctorum perducat nos Dominus ad Regna Coelorum The Summe of which Prayer is this that God would be pleased to lead bring the Petitioner unto Heaven by the intercession praers and merits of the blessed Virgin and of all the Saints I do wonder that Christ should be left out by whose merits and intercession alone we are saved but I marvail most whether all these shall be a distinct Company by themselves for of the whole company of the Virgins they cannot be the foolish Virgins had no Oyle the wise had but enough to save themselves where is there any of their merits then left for me yet this is better then Tu per Thomae sanguinom c. These with many more of the like nature as praying for the Dead offering or burning up of incense praying in an unknown Tongue that common people know not what they pray their Ordination of the Hoast their holy water their penance their Pilgrimages their oyl or Chrisme salâ— and spittle used in Baptism was the cause of that separation made from her by the reformed Churches these points and this kind of worship being not Catholick for as before they separate not from Rome in any point of worship that she holds in Common with the Châ—rch of Christ but these being brats of her own begetting they deny them entertainment or Countenance and separate themselves from her and their separation is justifiable
This Errour in point of worship you may call Idolatry But beware that you take not decent or comely Ceremonies for essentiall parts of worship The Apostle urging women in the Church of Corinth to be covered 1 Cor. 11.6 that which they might think was too much precisenesse in him for we may be apt to suppose he discontented them that did otherwise was decent in his eyes and commanded to be done but not making it a point of worship nor pressing it upon them as part of Gods service declares that ceremonies may be used in but ought ever to be differenced from the worship performed In brief whatever Ceremony of what nature or kind soever that is enjoined that is not contrary to the Word of God and by the Officers of the Church thought comely to be used as tending to make that worship then used to be the more Reverenced and esteemed by the performers is not to be opposed This age discovers what a dis-respect contempt undervaluinig thoughts most men have even good men in a great measure of the house of God table of God service of God and Servants of God since decent and comely ceremonies were banished from the Church of God and where such ceremonies are injoyned and thou separatest thou art guilty of renting the seamlesse coat there being no cause for making that separation justifiable For Hereâ—â—e then and Idolatry only then is there a cause of separation and what ever is more then these cometh of Satan Wherefore though our departure were a trouble to them sayth Reverend Bishop Iewel speaking of Rome yet they ought to consider how just cause we had of our departure And in another place he saith It is true we have departed from them and for so doing we give thanks to Almighty God but yet from Christ from the Apostles and from the Primitive Church we have not departed Romes Heresie and Idolatry gave a just ground for the Reformed Churches separation But In our days there is made such a separation as by no Scripture can be justified there being nothing in matter of doctrine taught nor in point of worship performed that in the least contradicts the Word written or the worship injoyned and therefore their sin is the greater tending to the destroying of that love charity concord union that ought to be in and amongst the members of the Church we must not cut off the arm for every scratch or smal hurt much lesse cut off our nose because it seems to stand awry through a false glasse neither ought we to separate from the body of the Church for every small errour in it as for every Ceremony that in our judgment is amisse and indeed those that are most separate from the Church now in the highest points of doctrine and fight against her did but at first dislike her Ceremonies so dangerous it is to yield in the least to the sin of Schisme for the hurt in that quickly turns to the Gangreen of Heresie Those that disliked her Suâ—plice now scorn her preaching those that disliked her prayers will not now pray at all those that disliked standing at the Creed now will fall down to no God those that disliked her Crosse in Baptism now scorn the Spiritual washing those that looked sowr upon my Lord the Bishop now casts stones at the Preacher Master G Those that dug down her Altars now would pull down her Churches they that saw her kneel at the Lords Supper and grumbled because she sate not are now so holy that they scorn it Which thing duly and seriously weighed might make men afraid to play about the hole of the asp or to put their hand in the Cokatrice den nay to touch it were it but with a stick least as it befals him that toucheth the Torpedo a spiritual numbnesse or Judiciall stupefaction befall them that they shall noâ— move one foot forward in a right way more Seldome can we see them returning to their mother Church and to that doctrine wherein they were baptized but like sheep out of the Fold as soon as out of the Church porch they wander further and further and so far they are gone that for the present I am not disposed to go after them but to such as are within hearing I give this short direction viz. to behold such as have gone before them that at first did but stâ—mble at straws were troubled at trifles thought to have gone no further yet whither are they now hurried look back to the Church you have left view her orders her Sacraments her points of worship study them try them by the Sciptures if you can find them contrary or repugnant to the written Word of God stand stil and save thy own soul but follow not them for they went in the way of Cain and run greedily after the errour of Balaam perished in the Gainsaying of Coâ—e Clouds without Water carried about of Winds raging waves of the Sea foaming out their own shame wandring stars Jude 11.12 13. By good Words and fair Speeches they deceive the hearts of the simple not for our Lord Iesus Christ but for their own belly Romans 16.18 Quest. 7. Whether more Religions then one may be Tollerated where the true Church is Established In the opening of this Question knowing the times wherein I live and the fewnesse of my years I will not shew you my opinion but you shall hear the Judgement of a Master in our Israel that was gathered with gray hairs to his Fathers and lately fell asleep One Religion is to be Tolerated and no more to be publickly taught then one 1. Because there is but one God who is the object of Religion his Essencâ— being simple and indivisible his worship is also to be diversitie of Religion breeds and produceth only diversity of Opinion touching God which in time may in the conceits of men dâ—stroy his unity and Onenesse 2. As there is but one truth so there ought to be but one Religion for false Religions either teach to worship false Gods or else in a false way and manner to worship the true God which made God himself in constituting the Church of the Jews in a strict manner to give charge touching that and in his constituting the Church of the Christians to do the same by commanding them to stone that Prophet that taught otherwise and us to curse that Angel that should teach other Doctrine then he did then by Moses and now to us by his Son give teach command and appoint Deut. 13.1 Gal. 1.8 3. There is but one Church which is the ground and pillar of truth 1 Tim. 3.15 and one Spirit to lead that Church in the way of truth and therefore there ought to be but one Religion which is the Doctrine of that one Truth 4. There is but one way to heaven and eternal Life in which way few through ignorance and errour walk or find and ways to Hell and destruction which many through corrupted nature fall
met something must and ought to be done for the peace of the Church yet nothing contrary to the meaning of the Holy ghost It is a sin and a high one to think that either Peter or Paul or Barnabas in this taught false Doctrine which must be granted if any part of the ceremonial Law be obliging Iames therefore who was Bishop of Ierusalem demands attention maintains that to be true which Peter Paul and Barnabas had said confirms it from the Words of the Prophet Amos Am. 9.11 12. So that by Iames also This is a fourth witnesse guided by the Spirit of God the Ceremonial Law it not now obliging Iames by Peters Argument seems to apply that the teaching of it might hinder the gospell v. 19. and gives it as his sentence so that still even by these eating of blood is not forbidden under the gospel being a part of that Law which they all consent not to be binding Iames also declares that the Church ought to be satisfied in matters of salvation when God is satisfied and since he requires not that Law none is to introduce it However Authoritatively appoints that the Gentiles be written to that they may abstain from pollutions of Idols from Fornication from things strangled and from Blood his reason is and let his reason be noted for the not observing of that is the ground of the errour for Moses of old time hath in every City them that Preach him being read in the Synagogues every Sabbath day vers 19.20 21. Which determination pleased all parties the controversie ceaseth the councell writes these Letters to the Churches of Syria Cilicia and of Antioch Before the breaking up of this councell that Creed called the Apostles Creed is supposed to be made as a Standart of Doctrine now we come to 2. The parties written to the direction of the Decrees or Cannons of this Councell runs thus The Apostles Elders and Brethren send greeting unto the Brethren which are of the Gentiles in Antioch Syria and Cilicia c. Now we must note that in all these Countries the Jews were mingled among the Gentiles and had their Synagogues in many places at this day and the Law read therein and in them such as preached Moses God yet permitting in some sort the Jewish ceremonies to live in the World the Temple of Ierusalem yet standing this gave great occasion of quarrelling and caused conteâ—â—â— the Jews were angry that the Gentiles were not circumcised that they eat blood that they eat in Idol Temples or any part of that that had been sacrificed to Idols a thing in it self indifferent 1 Cor. 8. they wonder that the Gentils wil not abstain from fornication an act much practised among the Gentils held by many indifferent and consistent with Religion 1 Cor. 5.8 and Chap. 9. The Gentiles again wonder and proved that they were not obliged to circumcision nor tyed to worship at Jerusâ—lem nor to observe the distinction of clean and uncle in Beasts Foul or fish wondred they would abstain from blood since Christs was shed and proves and disputes that it is no sin to abstain from things strangled There is no discourse in Antioch but his every Meeting every Sabbath may every House is divided in the truth of these Doctrines some for one some for another Paul and Barnabas are for the Gentiles some of the Sects of the Pharises are for the Iews there is meeting after meeting â—bout it no smal division Moses being read and taught in the Synagogue every Sabboth day confirms the Jews in his opinions Paul and Barnabas's teaching confirms the Gentile in his judgement Paul indeed brings good arguments from Christs death but the other brings stronger from Moses writings shall Moses that was but a servant in the house have his Laws kept now the Son is come cals one and shall the Laws and customes that God himself commanded be sâ—â—ghâ—d says another In th is garhoil the Gospel is hindered the new plants of the Christian Religion are discouraged Paul thereto â—â—akes great care for them Barnabas and he maintain that the Law is not to be urged so sayes Peter so says Iames in the Counsel yet that this rock of offence might be removed the Holy Ghost puts it in the minde of Iames to decree that the Gentiles should abstain from Fornication and from Blood at which the Iews were offended And that the Iews should not teach circumcision washings c. at which the Gentiles were offended and discouraged the reason of both is Moses is read every Sabbath day and by this decree some part of the Law is kept by which the Jews might be pleased and yet not all the Law by which the Gentiles might be encouraged and that which is commanded is one of the easiest parts of the Law that the Jews might not boast and yet what is commanded is in the Law that the Gentiles might not brag for Moses is read c. and happily this determination did agree them Yet still remember that Paul Peter and Iames maintained that the Ceremonial Law was not to be taught as obliging and that yoake ought not to be put upon the disciples for the peace of the Church therefore rather then for any necessity of Salvation is that part of the Law Ceremoniall here enjoyned But this leads us to the 3. Thing written of or determination of the Councel it self with the grounds of it the Canon or decree it self is this with its preface For it seemed good to the Holy Ghost and to us to lay upon you no greater burthen then these necessary things that ye abstain from meats offered to Idols and from blood and from things strangled and from Fornication It is observable that in this Epistle the Council gives the Gentiles information that they had heard that some preached to them Circumcision and the keeping of the Law unto whom says the Councel we gave no such Commandement v. 24 Where know if it had been sin for the Gentiles to have eaten blood then without question they had been commanded to have preacht it down This decree of the Councill hath 3 parts 1. Something Ceremoniall as to abstain from things strangled and from blood Here call to mind the Reasons given above for the prohibiting of blood things strangled may have some relation to them the blood not being out of them and therefore that sort of meat might be unhealthy and if this were a sin viz. to eat blood it behoved every man to assure himself of a good Cook Nay we question whether ever he would eat meat We are sure the Mysticall use of blood is gone viz. to make an Atonement for the soul what vse it is prohibited now for hath not yet been discovered 2. Something there is indifferent viz. to abstain from meats sacrificed to Idolls now we know that is not in it self unlawful for an Idol is nothing 1 Cor. 8. The Apostle there speaking of it condemns it not as a sin but only
just men made perfect Revel 14.1 2.2 read they do not hear Sermons they cannot receive Sacraments they need not in performing this they cease not and by this ordinance above all is the communion of Saints help up that it perish not SECT III. After what manner men are to sing the Scripture is not darke but clearing commanding that it be done 1 With understanding Psal. 47.7 2 With grace Gal. 3.16 3 With affection Eph. 5.19 SECT III. Questions Resolved Quest. 1 Whether it be lawfull to sing Davids Psalmes in a publick Congregation Quest. 2 Whether those psalmes containing direfull imprecations ought to be sung or how with a safe conscience they may be sung Quest. 2. Whether it be lawfull to sing Davids Psalmes in a Publick Congregation Some who are for the blotting out of every thing though never so good just lawfull or laudable that was practised by the ancients sentence the Church for her singing Davids Psalmes chiefly in publick in respect of those spiritual graces which are sometimes exercised in the composing of them as Psal. 131. wherein he attests that he is not puff't up in mind but this is not sufficient for us to suffer our selves to be deprived of this holy practise For 1 It is lawfull to read them in our congregations those that would thrust out the singing of those Hyms and bring in their own songs instead as many of them presumptuously do may upon the same reason cancel them out of the Bible and teach for doctrin their own inventions As many of those that are professedly of our Church by their practises give much Apostates too too occasion to performe 2 It hath been the ancient way of the Church of God both of Jews and of Gentiles since the establishment of the Church There were prophets and holy men of God when the whole Church of Israel used these Psalmes in their congregation and yet never was it condemned for so doing We may assure our selves that God was as tender of his own name as ever these men were or are and since he let those Psalmes be sung by all in a Church where he so often was visibly present they may be used in that Church wherein we have his promise he shall spiritually be untill the end of the world 3 Davids Psalmes seem most deserving if wee looke upon the worth of them they are much to be preferred For 1 For matter they are infallible they were composed by the unerring spirit of God and therefore their extemporary raptures and inventions are not to be put in the ballance with them 2 For number they are various the soul can bein no condition state or temper but in the book of Psalmes there are expressions that suite with that condition state or temper 3 For the users of them they have been the most excellent the whole body of the Church of God under the law used them Christ the Son of God at his last Supper used them Math. 25.30 It being a custome of the Jews at their passover to sing one of those Psalmes betwixt the 113. and 118. Our Saviour submitted also to this Lawfull custome though in his Fathers law not commanded and for some reason we conjecture he and his Apostles to have sung the 116. and since his dayes the noble worthies of the Christian Churches in all Nations used the same 4 Those prophesies that are in them touching Christ call upon beleevers for the siging of themâ— our faith may be confirmed in the doctrine of our Lords passion his resurrection and if a Jew be in our congregations he may learn to believe on Jesus the Son of Mary whom his fathers crucified by our very singing Touching what is Objected against our singing the 131. Psalm when some of the congregation may be puffed up we gâ—ve this short reply 1 They judge others proud in regard they are so full of pride themselves 2 As a Prince he was not proud of his glory and Kingship though he was taken from the sheepfold 3 As a Saint and so at that time the grace of humility might be eminent in him 4 This as well as other scripture is written for doctrine for reproof for correction for instruction so that by this we shew others what we are or what we ought to be 5 It is very lawfull to read it meditatâ— upon it and by consequence lawfull to sing it Quest. 2. Whether those Psalmes that containe direfull Imprecations ought to be sung or how wiht a safe conscience they may be sung THis is one grand argument brought against the Churches practices That there are many curses prâ—yed for in severall Psalmes as 109. and 69. c. Which seemes to be much against that charity that ought to be in Christian meetings but this zeal or charity not being grounded on knowledge is not sufficient to disswade us from the using of so holy and ancient a practise For 1 They are not curses but prophesies the Spirit of God promised them to speak of those things that were to come hereafter When David was not moved by the spirit of prophesie he fasted and prayed for his enemies but when that stirred him he prophesied because he fore saw their destruction As before it is lawfull to reade them to have them much upon our mind therefore it is not against Christian love to sing them As touching the second part of the question we are to sing these 1 not with any consideration of our enemies let them curse but let us blesse 2 With consideâ—â—â—ion of the incorvertible enemy of God rather then the Church should perish let them become as dung for the earth Let God arise and make them that hate him flee before him 3 With serious meditation of Gods justice against sin and sinfull men which may induce us to mortifie the old man and crucifie the lusts that are in us Thus farre of the ordinances referring to the word the first part of what in the beginning we undertooke Fides Catholica OR THE DOCTRINE OF THE Catholick Church Referring to the Sacraments With a particular DISCOURSE Touching the Ordination of Confirmation By WILL. ANNAND Minister of the word and SACRAMENTS LONDON Printed for Edward Brewster at the sign of the Crane in St. Pauls Church-yard 1661. To The Worshipfull and Hopefull young Gentleman Iohn Wells Juni Esq of Heath in the Parish of Heath SIR BEing necessitated to divide where a union was both principally and primarly intended I am emboldened to divulge my thoughts of the Churches Sacraments under the umbrage and tuition of your name and eminent vertues To despond of your favorable Acceptance were to make my self the Subject of their Censure who are more acquainted with that innate candor which attends your refined Abilities Your Education being in the same Colledge with my self makes me more intencely ambitious of your Happinesse and Honor of which last Divinity shews and to her in this Philosophy agrees there are four species or sorts 1 Naturall by birth
Church for though every one that are members of the visible are not of the body of the invisible Church yet he is not of the invisible that acknowledgeth not himself a member of the visible he that hath God for his Father hath the visible Catholick Church for his only mother and must have her if he would be saved She is like the Ark of Noah as all without that was drowned so all without this is damned In the judgement of Charity we must indeed suppose that God hath his own among the heathen and by working upon them by his Spirit in an extraordinary secret and hidden way brings them unto the knowledge of his Son by which they are ingrafted into his body and so made members of the Catholick Church for as before out of it there is no salvation the reason is out of it is to be out of Christ for that is his body and to be out of Christ is to be without God and to be without him is to be without eternal life For this is eternal life to know thee to be the only true God and Iesus Christ whom thou hast sent Quest. 12. What are the marks of a true Church General notes and marks are set down by the Church of Rome whereby it is pretended that the true Catholick and Holy Church may be distinctly and perfectly known from all false Congregations or Churches as 1. Visibility 2. Antiquity 3. Durability 4. Prosperity 5. The name of a Catholick Church 6. Agreement with the ancient Church 7. It s union with the head viz. the Pope 8. Holiness of Doctrine 9. Efficacy of Doctrine 10. Holiness of life 11. The glory and power of miracles 12. The gift of Prophesie 13. The acknowledgement or confession of her enemies 14. The unhappy and unfortunate success of her enemies 15. A succession of Bishops With several others which in their own nature are either separable from the true Church or may agree to a false and may constitute a Synagogue of Satan as well as a Church of Christ for which with many other reasons they are rejected of the Reformed Churches as proper Characters of that body whereof Christ is the head that being able to consist pure holy and visible without some of them though in some points they agree to her also in that but not as essential or Characteristical and knowing also that many of them are forged by and in Rome that she may appear the better and stand the firmer in her Pontificalibus The proper and essential Characters of a true Church whereby she is differenced from all false also from the Church of Rome and which gives her her esse vivere sentire are these viz. 1. The pure dispensation of the Word Act. 2.4 Where the Word is taught in a pure manner according to the institution of it without detraction from or addition to it wherever that is taught what Christ commanded and the Gospel holds out so farre there is a pure Church and where that is mixed and mingled with mens Inventions as points of doctrine so far the Church is impure 2. The pure Administration of the Sacraments Matth. 28.19 30.1 Cor. 11.23 That Church that keeps to the institution of those Ordinances appointed as Seals of the Covenant by Christ putting nothing to them nor taking nothing from them as necessary for the making of them Seals so far that is a pure Church and where that is not done it is so far impure Some adde Church discipline but that holds out rather her well being then her being in times of persecution she hath wanted that and may want it and yet a true Church by the keeping pure of the Word and Sacraments which a visible Church cannot consist without hence we behold and look upon Ierusalem Galatia Thessalonica Corinth Colos. and once those famous Churchs of Asia though the gospel was taught in them in a glorious and a pure dispensatory way yet for the present wanting those two we eye them not nor number them among the Churches of Christ. The same teacheth the Reformed Churches of Helv. Art 14. Behem Art 8. France Art 27. Belg. 29. Ausp Art 7. Sax. Art 11. Wirtem Art 32. Swed or the 4. Cities Art 15. Sâ—ot Art 15. and of England Art 19. That Article it self is this Art 19. of the Church of England The visible Church of Christ is a Congregation of faithfull men in which the pure word is preached and the Sacraments be duly administred according to Christs Ordinance in all those things that of necessity are requisite for the same c. All which considered it follows 1. That the Church of Rome is no true Church or pure Church making the Scriptures to be imperfect for salvation without their own Tradition They will not suffer the Church to be clean through the word that Christ hath spoken The Church is only tyed to the Gospel For if an Angel from heaven teach any other Doctrine he is to be accursed by her 1 Gal. 9. With her Baptismal water she adds oyl salt and spittle as essential parts of Baptism and useth this holy Ordinance upon Bells Stocks and wood With the Sacramental wine she must mingle water of which the Lairy must not taste With her Sacramental bread she visits the sick salutes Emperors makes Procession it must be also a wafer Câ—ke and it must not be broken with both these Elements she maketh a Sacrifice for the dead and she teacheth that a Priest may give it to himself alone that the vertue or efficacy both of that and Baptism depends upon the intention of him that doth administer and yet the efficacy must not be questioned but believed and forasmuch as they are administered in Latine which the common sort may not understand they must act implicite faith 2. That those segregated Congregations in England are not true Churches The word preached by many that are not men in Sex nor Ministers in Office prayer being preached down and preaching only to be heard from men of their own principles teaching for Doctrine not Traditions but fancies blasphemies affirming the nullity of Apostolical Ordination c. The Sacraments are either abused as re-baptizing those that were baptized before making dipping necessary to that Ordinance and the Sacrament performed by a Laick person The Sacrament of the Lords Supper being either preached down altogether or grosly abused in nature It s vertue depends upon his goodness that gives it a sin to receive it with any that we conceit not to be holy or know him to be prophane though he be never admonished by them and if he were yet he is not to be eaten withal least I eat and drink damnation to my self through his sin the Elements not consecrated through which that only is an Ordinance and the body or blood of the Lord they are not consecrated for he that often attempts to do it hath no power so to do wanting Apostolical Authority viz. Ordination 3. That the
silver which might give the Occasion of the Fable These Colossians our Apostle would have them turn as it were by faith even dung into gold Moses esteemed the reproaches of Christ great Treasure Heb. 11.26 and would have them desire to do so nay wishes them and commands them to do so when they have tryed all they will never have cause to repent of their choice If the Word of Christ dwell richly in them Psamneticus a King of Egypt gave Verdict that the people of this Country was of greatest antiquity for heshutting up 2 children forbidding that any humane company should come nigh them that he might understand what Language was most ancient and most natural to men the Babes were all that time suckled by Goats at the expiration of the which two years the Infants pronounced only the Word Bee which in the Phrygian Language signifies Bread which they had learned of the goats cry Our Apostle would have the Colossians to shut up their Infants ears from the doctrine whether of Heathenish Idolatry or Jewish Ceremony and by embracing of the truth become of the oldest and truest Religion which was unknown to the Gentile and shadowed out to the Jew and learn the Language of Canâ—an the Word that shall be as bread that the King of Saints might give this good report that they pleased him which he shall do if they let the Word of Christ dwel richly in them This Chapter is filled with divers Christian duties which the Colossians during Pauls imprisonment at Rome are exhorted to perform and walk by and they are either such as concerned believers in general of what sort or condition soever qua believers or such as concerned their particular Relations to and with each other as qua Fathers or qua Wives c. His generall Instructions extend themselves to the 18. ver and may be reduced unto these heads 1. For the right ordering and placing of their affections though naturally they be as Sisera nailed to the things of this world he would have them rinched off and set upon things that are above v. 1. Nempe per serium studium pretatis 2. For the mortifying of their Members that are on earth Metonymia subjects understanding those Earthy sensual natural brutish lusts desires inclinations actions that war against the soul As Fornication Uncleanensse v. 5. which they must put off now together with wrath anger malice v. 8. q.d. hoc â—empus alios mores postulat Now you are become Christians you must not live as you did you must now walk worthy of the Gospel 3. For the exercising of holy and sacred virtues as Mercy kindnesse humblenesse meeknesse as the Elect of God v. 12. q.d. Deus vos dilexit in Christo ex misericordia elegit ad vitam aeternam ergo vos diligite alii alios c. God having shown all these graces eminently to be in himself for their good he would have to be in them for they are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Intrals or bowels of mercy towards each other for their own good yet more they are to put these on that as they would notbe seen without their cloaths they should never come abroad without their graces some indeed use Religion for a cloak to put off and on at their convenience but Religion should be worn as a garment as an inward garment bowels of mercy such garments as we cannot live without without starving and truly where there are not bowels of mercy to keep our affections warm Love wherein consists the very life of Religion soon waxeth cold 2. His particular directions such as concerned their particular relations to and with each other whose measure reacheth almost to the bowels of the 4. ch and may be reduced to these principles 1. Of Husbands and Wives v. 18 19. 2. Of Fathers and Children v. 10 11. 3. Of Masters and Servants v. 22. Vt Sol inter Planetas medium locum occupans c. As the Sun among the Planets so is my Text placed in the midst of these directions giving light to those above and communicating splendor to those below that these Colossians might know both the one and the other that they might be performed with as great a zeal by them as they were by the Apostle proposed to them he will have the Word of Christ to dwell in them We might be mistaken touching the nature of bowels of mercy and teach others to neglect great points of duty were it not for this Worship of Christ this wil raise up their affections to the things that are eternall and cause a holy and a decent respect to be given to each other so long as they behold the things that are temporal In the body of the words we may behold two general parts one tending to the perswading of those Christians to the study and practice of the whole word of Christ Let the Word of Christ c. The other inducing to the speciall practice of a part of it viz. Psalms Hymns and Spiritual Songs In the first part you have these particulars 1. The Author of that Word he would have so studied that is Christ the Word of Christ. 2. The manner how we must study it follow it or enjoy it that is expressed by the Word Dwelling 3. The persons whom he would have it so dwell withall or in that is in you 4. The manner how he would have it to dwell in them that is 1. Richly 2. Wisely 5. The ends why he would have it so to dwell in them 1. That they might teach 2. That they might Admonish one another In the Latter take notice distinctly 1. Of the form and manner how he would have those Psalmes Hymns and spiritual Songs used that is with grace 2. with affection in their hearts Non vox sed votum this is the best Tune to any Psalm 2. The Object of their singing or the end they propose to themselves that is the Lord. Cantemus 〈…〉 He that sings more for the praise of the Lord then for carnal pleasure or worldly delight may be called the chief Musician Dum gratiae ti aguntur pro acceptis beneficiis In their returning thanks unto the Lord for his favours their hearts must be lifted up through grace unto his glory which is ars bene cantandi the highest note of all Before we come to any doctrinal Observation we shall enquire after these particulars which may give us light more fully into the Text in an extraordinary manner viz. 1. What it is that here is called the Word of Christ. 2. What is the Importance of the Word Dwelling 3. The parties he would have the World to dwel in 4. What is held out in general by the words richly and in all wisedome 5. The Discrepancy or Identity let the Phrase be pardoned between Psalms Hymns and Spiritual Songs which shall be done in these following Sections SECTION I. LEâ— the Word of Christ The Word of Christ may be taken two ways
of prejudice nor malice but by simplicity and ignorance By beliefe is not meant a saving beliefe or such a faith as may save him but to cause him behold the Bible as a true History not a fiction now this beliefe may be wrought in such a one by these and the like Argument 1 From the Churches tradition in all ages and through all generations were the books of Moses received and owned to be his Solomons to be his yea they were by the whole consent of the Church owned as the very word of God spoken in the mouths of men Now as he believes the books going under the name of Ovid to be his and of Virgil to be his of Cicero to be his because that former generations yea that age they lived in then gave them down to the next as theirs and they to the next untill it comes to us so he may be brought to a Historical beleiving of these books to be true and not Supposititious 2 The nature of the men that made it They were good just and upright in their generation As Moses Samuell David Solomon Esaiah c. who would not have took pains to have cheated the world nor deceived men as to write those Histoâ—ies of Israels comeing out of Egypt c. Had they not been true 3 The miseries that the writers of the Scriptures went through is a proof of some concernment if men would cheat it would be for some profit but what honour or preferment had Paul for his preaching or for his writing The Apostles in general might have lived at home in ease and not go abroad to the hazzard of their lives as they did What could their policy or reason suggest to them by being at so much trouble to themselves purely to cheat others What needed or what could provoke Ieremy to undergo such dangers as he did purely to cheat the world We know they were in Jeopardy every hour for writting and preaching of it Which in reason shews that they had no purpose to delude 4 The distance of the place it was written in if it had been done all in one place there might have been some cause of suspicion but what consultation had Moses in Arabia or in Egypt with Daniel in Babylon or what agreement had Paul in Rome with David in Ierusalem severall ages they lived in and no compact had the one with the other which if they had made yet what would have been the issue of their undertaking but stripes death and imprisonment enough to have diverted their thoughts from such a dangerous enterprize 5 The agreement of every part of it with the whole Nothing that David writ contradicted Moses nor nothing that Samuel writ was spoken against by Solomon no prophet spoâ—k against another nor none of the Apostles wrot against them yea so far were they from that that they strengthened and confirmed each others doctrine Had it been of men there would have been real jangling and apparent contests writing so long after one another and at such a distance from each other 6 The submission of the gravest soberest persons that are now in the world to the practice of it There are men that will not easily give a credence to what they read or hear but are carefull of their reputation that way But yet yeildeth and gloryeth in that yeilding to the truth of what is therein writ and when their glory wisdome parts vertues are tryed they appear to be the most eminent persons in the world 7 From the sincere dealing of the coâ—posers of it men that would go about to flatter or allure woâ—â—◠〈◊〉 by some arguments at least seemingly pleasing to thâ—â—◠〈◊〉 they would delude but now the Scriptures are contrary they will â—aâ—â— men to forsake houses wives and land for it Call upon them â—o forsake that which above all things they love most plucking out the right eye hatred affliction persecution is that which the Scripture declares men must undergo that come to her Nothing that is pleasing to flesh and blood throughout the whole Scripture that is promised to or allowed of unto men 8 From the Silence of its greatest and most Implacable enemies How was Christ hated in the times wherein he lived And Ieremiah and Paul and yet none durst nor none did write books in confutation of those books written by them nor to perswade the people that it was but a feigned story The Scribes and Pharises that hated Christ and did persecute him to death yet wrot no book in confutation of Matthew or of Luke which if in the least they could have falsifyed the gospells should not have come to us without a Salvo Quest. 7. How far the Saints be our Rule besides the Scripture That the Saints lives ought to be a Rule for us and that we are to walk according to their steps is Catholick Doctrine Heb. 6.12 Phil. 3.17 But how far they are to be followed is the ground of our Question That the Saints had failings haltings and miscarriages is not to be denied but in such things they are our Examples for evitation but not for Imitation Follow the Saints we must But 1. So farre as they were approved of God where we can hear God saying whether in providence or by his presence Well done good and faithful servant we may be bold to tread in that step and to keep in that Road. 2. So far as their actions tended to the glory of God What we can see Abraham Iacob David doing which brings in any revenue to the Exchequer of Gods praises so far may they be our pattern copy and example 3. So far as they gave no just cause of offence to the Church of God Peter that seemed to be a Pillar yet in this is not to be followed but blamed Gal. 2 11 12 13. In this we must be wary that we tread not in their steps least we make the enemies of God to blaspheme and slay him for whom Christ dyed 4. So far as they had the promise of God we may safely walk in that way wherein wee find God promise to be with them keep them blesse them and in his favour to protect them 5. So far as their own hearts did excuse them before God where we find them doing and afterwards their hearts smite them for their so doing let us by their fall look the better to our own way and by by that blot seek to mend our hand Always provided 1. That be not done by us which was but for a time approved and to some peculiar persons granted as was was the Offerings Washings and Sacrifices under the Law and Iebu with Elishas going into Baâ—ls Temple 2. That for which God was silent only for a time as concerning the Saints Polygamy or plurality of Wives he was c. 3. That which for a season was only granted that the gospel might not be hindred as Pauls care in giving of offence which was in great measure but untill the Jews
onely in respect of giving cause of offence to others is things sacrificed to idols not to be eaten and by consequence eating of blood is no more necessary the cause therefore of that forbearance being removed viz. the reading of Moses Law and the tenderness or ignorance of new converted Iews through the establishment of the gospel being also taken away that the consciences of few or none that are Christians are wounded for useing our liberty in that particular we may without sinning against our own souls eat blood as safely as ever the Corinthians might eat things sacrificed to idols or in an idols Temple since both these by the Canon of the Council were esteemed necessary not in themselves but in respect of weak consciences peace of the Church which now in these two particulars is in no danger for had things sacrificed to idols been in it self necessary to prevent sinning against a mans own soul then meat had commended us unto God which it doth not 1 Cor. 8.8 Nay our Apostle would have urged it and pressed the not doing of it upon that account but contrary he yields and would have them to abstain for the consciences of their weak brethren onely withoâ—t once mentioning any other cause 2. From the holy Apostles attestation speaking of things indifferent and of meats Rom. 14.2 3. Commands that be that eateth meats forbidden in the Law despise not him that eateth not viz. for conscience of the Law Every man living not to himself only ought to have a care of his Brother or not judge him Or put no stumbling block in his Brothers way v. 13. But why must not one judge another in eating or not eating meats forbidden in the Law the Reason he gives v. 14. I know and am perswaded by the Lord Iesus that there is nothing unclean of it self but to him that estesmeth any thing to be unclean to him it is unclean the Apostle is speaking of meats of which not by Moses but by the Lord Iesus he knows none unclean in it self therefore not blood but if a man be conceited through ignorance or conscience to that man any thing were it bread it is unclean He perswades therefore that though men by Christ may eat any thing yet if any Brother be grieved for his eating any meat forbidden by the Law he would not have him cause his Brother to sin For the kingdom of God is not in meat and drink but righteousness peace and joy in the Holy Ghost For he that in these things serveth Christ is acceptable to God and approved by him Now if it were so that that Law touching eating of blood were necessary then a part of the kingdom of God should consist in meat and though we followed after peace righteousness yet could we not neither should we be acceptable to God without abstaining from meats or something that were in it self edible for what is such is meat What ever therefore is forbidden as eating of blood is not to be forborn upon any account but onely upon the weak consciences of our brethren and in eating or forbearing none ought to judge the other for God hath received both him that eats and him that eateth not vers 3. Which God would not do if abstaining from or eating things edible had in it self been either a grace or duty 3 From the Apostles unlimited proposition 1 Tim. 4. where warning Timothy of some that in the latter days should fall from the faith and teach the doctrine of Devils Forbidding to mary and commanding to abstain from meats which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which beleeve and know thâ— truth v. 3. Blood is a creature that God hath created for the use and service of man is in it self edible and therefore meat God was pleased for a time to forbid the eating of blood having appointed it for his own Altar to make an atonement for the sin of the soul but now Christ being come and his blood shed which was Typified by that No man is now to judge us in respect of meat Col. 2.16 The time is expired and he that under the Gospel preacheth up the use of forbearing meat as a point of Doctrine binding the consciences of men under what seeming purity soever is but a messenger of Sathan and his doctrine the doctrine of Devils c. To prevent an Objection which might have been raisd against that which the Apostle is asserting suppose blood eating he affirmes that every creature of God is good and nothing to be refused if it be received with thanksgiving v. 14. But are there not some creatures that are in themselves good yet for us to eat them it is a sin and a part of unholiness No says the Apostle Every creaturo is good none is to be refused for it is sanctified by the Word of God and Prayer v. 5. Suppose S. Paul to have blood before him he is not afraid to eat he hath craved a blessing by which it is Sanctified and he wil eat for no creature is to be refused and these things if Timothy teach he shall be a good Minister of Iesus Christ v. 6. He is not a Minister of the Law and therefore he is not to look to that but of Christ and what the Word of God and Prayer hath sanctified and they sanctifie every creature let no man call it impure unlawfull and if they do as what will not some men do we are to avoid them they are seducing Spirits and teachers of lyes not apprehending the Law of the Counsel and the reason of that Law nor comparing it also with other Scriptures makes the ignorant and unlearned wrest this as wel as other Scriptures to their own hurt and the Churches disturbance making this not eating blood to be a standing law in the Gospel upon the account of sin when by the Apostles themselves it is made no more necessary then that of not eating what was Sacrificed to Idols a thing by that faithfull Labourer in the Gospel Saint Paul in it self lawful enough to be done but to be forhorn for the sake of the consciences of others and yet that very forbearance but for a time till ignorance did turn to perverseness and the Iiws weakness became stubornness then other doctrine was taught but still having a regard to the peace of the Church the ground of Iames his determination which otherwise in point of Doctrine did agree to Paul and Peter in opposing every part of the Ceremonial Law yet it seemed good in regard the Iewes in a great measure were not yet unchurched nor wholy cast off for their sakes to forbear meats in themselves lawful enough as blood was since Christs was shed But to teach now as a matter of faith the forbearance of any thing edible particularly blood the Iews being wholly unchurched and the Gospel confirmed is not of God but of Satan For every creature and therefore this is Sanctified by the Word of
her Sons and Daughters her man-servant her maid-servant and the stranger within her gates or within her roof 2. To shew the mutual love and care that ought to be in all governours of families the precept of keeping this Law is not given to one single but to every one alike the wife is charged as much as the husband and the husband no less then the wife with looking well to their families touching the worship and Law of God 3. The parties here to be cared for are the parties usually most apt to break our the Son the Daughter c. Marriage is honourable and that in all and God in this precept so far honours the married woman that he will not suppose her to transgress he takes it as it were for granted that she needs not be looked after in that particular She hath been brought up and looked after by her Father and her Mother when she was a Daughter and now she being a wife she will walk according to her education and the heart of her husband trusts safely in her 4. From that oneness that is between a man and his wife God after he had made two made these two one again and whom he had joyned together in marriage he will not disâ—oyn in a precept the husband is the head the wife therefore must be the body What is spoken to the head as a duty nature teacheth the Members are to be imployed to perfom Let thou be said to a husband yet the man and his wife being but one flesh the same is spoken to her Quest. 6. Why is not the change of the Sabbath in Scripture mentioned That the Sabbath is changed is apparent why it is changed and that change not recorded or spoken of is not made manifest it might not be mentioned 1. Because not publickly taught by Christ he spoke many things in private to his Apostles Paul intreats the Elders of Ephesus Acts 20.35 to remember the words of the Lord Iesus how he said it is more blessed to give then to receive which words we find not in the history of our Saviours life The doctrine of the change might be taught among those that pertained to the kingdom of God of which the Scripture gives us no account Acts 1.3 If it had been publickly delivered before his death it had been recorded in the Evangelists 2. Because the publication of it might have been a great stumbling block to the Iews God is pleased to bring his people on by degrees After our Savirour came to preach and after he was ascended the sacrifices of the Law were not forbidden he never opposed circumcision the Temple standing things in some sort went on as before to have dashed the sabbath in pieces by a publick Law might have made the people to scruple at Christianity the Apostles wisely take their liberty to keep the first day of the week according to the private precept or in word instinct of Christ and the Spirit prohibite not the Iews their meeting that the Gospel of Christ might not be hindered knowing that time and knowledge might make them leave those things and of their own accord comform to their practice 3. Because it was not publickly opposed things that were much struck at as the necessity of circumcision justification not to be by the works of the Law that Jesus was the Christ the Saviour of the world these were the grand controversies in the Apostles dayes and these we have fully maintained now this of the Christians first day little or nothing medled withal since by the decrees of the Councel the Christians were freed from circumcision sacrifices and the converted Iews might be indifferent also as touching the Sabbath they see the first day kept Holy unto the Lord God of the Hebrews and the converted Gentiles see one day in seven kept to the honour of Christ one party noâ— opposing the other the Question is not much disputed and the 〈◊〉 therefore not recorded that caution given to the Col. 〈◊〉 2.16 doth exhort the Christians to their liberty in regard Chrâ—â—â— is dead says nothing to the Iews by way of reproof still hoping 〈◊〉 time they might be brought to the observing of the Lords 〈◊〉 Being therefore not publickly opposed at least in those places 〈◊〉 which the Apostles writ it is passed over in silence their dispuâ— being generally about things then and in that age called in quâ—â—â—ion Quest. 7. Whether the Church may Command any other day to be rested on besides the Sabbath God Commanding the seventh day to be kept Holy and giving six dayes for man to work some conclude it unlawful to set apart one day or more for Gods publick worship then he did but it is otherwise the Church may set apart one day or two or more for the publick worship For 1. Because the Commandement is not preceptive but permissive when we are allowed six days to work the meaning is not that we shall fill up all those dayes by working as if it were unlawful for men to do any thing but work shall God never be served in those six dayes must we do nothing but work the meaning therefore is that when we have six dayes before us we shall do all our work not spend them all in working but upon the seventh day we shall do no work at all nothing hinders but that the Church may set apart a day for Gods service there being nothing in this Law that contradictâ— it 2. Because the Church of the Iews unto whom this Law was given did use such a liberty God gave the children of Isâ—aâ—l three feasts in the year each of them seven dayes long and commanded them to be strictly observed Levit. 23. Good Merdecai added a fourth in the Canon of the Scripture Est. 9.26 27. to be kept every year two dayes for the mercies shewn the Iews in their deliverance from Haman Holy Hezekiah added seven dayes more to the feast of Passeover then God did 2 Chro. 30 23. Valiant Iudas added a fifth feast in the book of the Apocrypha 1 Macha 4.59 to be kept seven dayes also at which feast our Saviour himself was present and never reproved it Iohn 10.22 Sure if this was done under the Pedagogy of the Law it may be done under the liberty of the Gospel 3. Because the frailties and imperfections of men require it it is often urged against the set times of the Church that if the Sabbath the day set apart by the Lord be kept it is no matter whether other dayes be kept or no but it would be asked if ever they kept a Sabbath mens frailties failings nay crosses may be much helped sanctified pardoned by their diligent worship in other dayes besides the Sabbath It is strange to hear to read how men will preach that ordinary Lectures ought to be kept and observed by people and yet at another time tell them it is sufficient to keep the Sabbath Ridiculum â—apus purely to oppose the Law of the
we defend that baptisme can only lawfully be Administred by the Gospel Minister thereunto appointed by Apopostolical Ordination For 1. Those only have a commission to baptize who have a visible commission to teach Matth. 28.19 Go ye and teach all nations baptizing them or as it is in the Original Disciple all nations batizing them c. teaching them That the Apostles were outwardly visibly called by Christ though extraordinarily to preach to the world the things concerning the Kingdom of God whereof baptisme is one and after their call that Christ called no other in that exordinary way is clear from Scripture whereof Paul is an eminent instance And that the Apostles might be encouraged in this great work he goeth on saying I am with you alway even unto the end of the world Now the world is not yet ended and Peter and Iames are gone with you therefore must be understood to be meant not of the whole multitude of believers but of them that are outwardly visibly called to preach all things that Christ had commanded in an authoritative way as the Apostles were And as it is said that Kings never dye that is regally and successively though personally they do so the Apostles never dye that is successively though personally they do for to the end of the world so oft as any is visibly and outwardly ordained and commissioned to teach and baptize the Apostles are not dead but alive and Christ prospering and blessing the doctrine of any so ordained in his being with his Apostles that is with them who are outwardly commissioned to teach to the end of the world To the multitude of belevers then was never the power to baptize given because not the power of teaching because not thereunto ordained as hath at large been discovered above unto which for brevity sake the Reader at present is referred 2. The nature of the Ordinance is against it baptisme is a declarative sign of the parties admission into the Church and not only so but an outward sign of the parties inward regeneration and a seal of the covenant of promise a manifestation of the forgiveness of sin Heb. 10.22 Acts 2.38 39. Tit. 3.5 And therefore to be given by none but by them unto whom the power of keeping the seals are given and in no age in no time in no place in no Text did ever God give the power of his seals to a multitude or appointed them to be used by any that â—â—d indeed real gifts without an ordinary call even outwardly after the constituting of the Church Stephen Nicanor c. Acts 6.3 though full of the Holy Ghost presume not to exercise the office of Deacons without an ordinary call from the Apostles by imposition of hands the Church being constituted in their Election So Paul and Barnabas though full of worth and eminent in gifts yet must be set apart having given testimony of their abilities by ordination for teaching and baptizing by the Church Acts 13.13 2. Thus also was Timothy set apart for the same work by a Presbytery 1 Tim. 4.14 The baptisme therefore of these Lay persons or gifted brethren whence is it From Heaven or of men if from Heaven shew it from the Apostles for since them Christ ordained and set apart none and we shall believe it if of men let them Repent for the Kingdom of God is at hand or produce the Text that gives power to uncommissioned men purely upon the account of their gifts to exercise the power of the keyes and Administer the seals of the Church and that constantly and then their baptisme shall not be speak against The ability that a man hath to be a Minister is one thing and his putting into the office of the Ministry is another thing Saint Paul thanks God that he had both 1 Tim. 1.12 and we know by the Scriptures he had both by inspiration was he inwardly qualified and by ordination outwardly called he was separated unto the Gospel Rom. 1.1 by fasting prayer with laying on of hands Acts 13.2 3. 3. It is not to be found in all the New Testament implicitely or explicitely that ever any baptized upon the account of their gifts without an outward call from Church officers when those of this perswasion produce a man baptizing in the Church allowed of by the Church upon the account of his gifts then it may be a good argument for him that hath gifts to baptize without a visible commission 4. It would open a door to all irregularity and to all confusion imaginable Once make it lawful for any to baptize upon the account of his gifts we should find that Sacrament to be attempted by many that have no gifts at all what will not arrogance and pride puss men to what will nor ambition cause men to act this doctrine hath taken grace away from some and shame from many each Heretick laying a foundation for a new heresie by this man we are taught that preaching is not tyed to the Gospel Ministery and therefore not baptisme but the spirit that bloweth where it lifteth makes men sitted for that work and by it sufficiently called This being granted by another teaching is not tyed to men but common also with them to women since in Christ there is neither male nor female c. It is time for thee O Lord to work for they have made void thy Law Psal. 119.126 5. It is against the Doctrine of the Reformed Churches of Helv. Art 24. Of Bohe. Art 9. Of Pran Art 23. Of Belg Art 30. Of Ausp Art 14. Of Wirtem Art 21. Of Irel. Art 71. Of Scot. Art 22. and of Eng. Art 23. The Article it self is this Article 23. Of the Church of England IT is not lawful for any man to take upon him the Office of publicke Preaching or Ministring the Sacraments in the Congregation before he be lawfully called and sent to execute the same And those we ought to judge Lawfully called and sent which be chosen and called to this work by men who have publicke Authority given unto them in the Congregation to call and send Ministers into the Lords Vineyard SECT VI. Questions Resolved Quest. 1. VVHether Dipping be essential unto Baptisme Quest. 2. Whether Infants ought to be be baptized Quest. 3. Whether Baptisme is or ought to be readministred Quest. 4. Whether witnesses at Baptisme according to the Law of the Church of England be to be approved Quest. 5. Whether the Cross at Baptisme according to the Law of the Church of England be to be approved Quest. 1. Whether Dipping be essential unto Baptisme That dipping is lawful is not questioned by the Church of Christ but whether it be essential that is If Baptisme be not Baptisme without it or whether none is or cannot be baptized without he be dipped is the ground of our Quere It is to be denied Dipping is not essential to that Sacrament for 1. The word baptize used in the Scripture for that Sacrament signifies not
said it four times a day SECT III. Questions Resolved Quest. 1. VVHether Confirmation be a standing Ordinance in the Gospel Quest. 2. Whether the Church might not be advantaged by the râ—stâ—ring of Confirmâ—tion Quest. 1. Whether Confirmation be a standing Ordinance in the Gospel There are that defend the Ordinance now pleaded for to have ceased and coninued no longer in the Church then the giving of the Holy Ghost in that miraculous way through it yet we learn by the Scriptures that it is no more ceased upon that account then prayer though the holy Ghost was gived by that Acts 4.31 for though that miraculous way be ceased whether as to prayer or imposition of hands yet that secret and saving way is still continued to both That Confâ—rmation is a standing Ordinance â—ppears It is numbrâ—d among standing Principles Heb. 6.2 Therefore leaving the Principles of the doctrine of Christ leâ— us go on unto perfection not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works of faith of baptismes of laying on of hâ—nds of the resurrection and of eternal jugdement Was not this Apostle a wise master bâ—ilder and will these men have him to erre in the foundation out of charity they close in to the last supposition look to all the parts of this Text and pick out one that was but for a time is faith repentance baptisme to endure always and imposition of hand for a time because we would hasten It lies upon them to produce that Teâ—t in which imposition of hands is limited or then by vertue of this Text it is to stand as a principle and remain in the world as long as faith repentance or baptisme Possibly by imposition of hands they conceit Confirmation is not here meaned so willing are men to fightâ— against the truth an opinion that riseth up against all ancient writers and modern expositors as Calvin Piscator Beza and as a learned writer sayes all interpreters agree in it except a few straglers but come let us reason together And 1. By imposition of hands the Apostle must mean something that laying on of hands was used in since he expresly mentions that Ceremony 2. There were three acts in the Apostles time at which this Ceremony was used 1. In healing of the sick Mark 6.5 Acts 28.8 2. In Ordaining Ministers Acts 13.3.1 Tim. 4.14 3. In praying for or blessing the baptized that he might receive the holy Ghost Acts 9.17 Unto which last all antiquity bears witness this of the Text is to be referred for though the holy Ghost in that miraculous way be not given by it yet Christ that will be with his ministers to the end of the world gives his spirit in a sanctifying strengthening and confirming way by using of this as well as other Ordinances which made the ancients bring their baptized to the hands of the Bishop of the place as the Apostles successor for his blessing and benediction and it seems was of that concernment that its doctrine was a chief head in the Apostles Catechisme taught here unto the Hebrews For 1. Healing of the sick cannot be the imposition here spoken of that being no Principle common to believers nor necessary doctrine to be taught such as were learning heads of Divinity the Imposition here must be of as large extent aâ— faith repentance Baptisme which the curing of the sick is not nor cannot be supposed 〈◊〉 2. By the same reason Ordination of Ministers is not solely to be the imposition here in the Text that is an act of office and not common to believers no woman must have it and every man is not a partaker Now all here in the Text is common to all the Hebrews and are principles wherein they are all as equally concerned and as general as in faith and baptâ—â—me except a place be produced wherein this impositâ—â—â— of hands is limited we must hold it to be a principle as laâ—â—e and common as the other which Ordination is not We say Ordination solely cannot here be understood yet since it is a standing Ordinance and must hold as long as baptisme that is to the end of the world also given with impsition of hands it may to this place be referred but cannot onely be understood for the reason above given 3. It follows therefore that imposition of hands here holds out that blessing or benediction that was given to Christians after their baptisme by the Apostles and by their successors that the spirit might sanctifie them all the dayes of their warfar and that they might be endued with power from above to conquer all the spiritual enemies of that faith wherein they were baptized and this being of Catholick concernment was taught the Hâ—brâ—â—w at their first coming to Christianity which benediction is called Confirmation from the effect and end of it and imposition of hands from the gesture it was given by and sometimes â—nction in regard superstition hath added Oyle to it It is to observable that the Apostle in the forementioned principles puts imposition of hands immediately after baptisme which ceremony even in practice and in all ages of the Church followed after it In the adult shortly and in Infants at the years of Puberty which according to some is about ten or twelve years of age as is fully demonstrated in one of the fore-mentioned treatises To conclude therefore imposition of hands being ranked among standing Ordinances particularly with bapâ—isme the Text must be produced that limits it or it ought to be accounted of equal extent with it and by consequence not ceased though the Apostles be fallen asleep And since Antiquity and the best modern Interpreters do hold in this place by Imposition is meaned Confirmation and since no other kind of Imposition of hands can be rationally defended they discover but their pride and arrogance or spleen or rancour that denie it Quest. 2. Whether the Church might not be Advantaged by thâ— restoring of the Confirmation What advantage would this bring unto the Church may some say We Answer Much every way For 1. It is an Ordinance of God and what Sacrifice can the Church offer that will do her more good then Obedience 1 Samuel 15.22 2. It would in a great measure prevent Apostacy we find the baptized fall from the Faith and Church both wherein they were baptized Now a solemn Protestation in the face of the Church might in a great measure bind men fâ—ster to her 3. It would silence the mouths of the Enemies of Infant-Baptisme It is usually Objected that the Infant hath no engagement to stand to its first Baptisme in regard it promised never to keep it It is true they nevâ—r promised to keep it yet hardly was there ever so prophane a wretch found that thence concluded he would not stâ—nd to his Baptisme The Church knows it is an Infant and therefore cannot speak yet being born within the Church and children of the Promise she gives them that holy washing upon
before the Councel of Basil that Councel sent Ambassadors to debate the matter in the City and University of Prague the Ambassadors gave the Bohemians the reasons why the Church of Rome did not give the Communion in both kinds unto the people and that the reader may see how reasonable they are we shall present them before him 1. To avoid errour that the people might not think part of Chrâ—st body to be in the bread and part to be in the cup. 2. To avoid irreverence for the wine might through heedlesness both of the giver and the receiver be spilled and might fall to the ground 3. To avoid inconvenience for the wine in the cup might not be sufficient to serve all the Communicants so that either there must be a new consecration or wine given not consecrated To these reasons given by these Ambassadors we may add others given by Râ—mish Doctors 4. The consecrated wine might sour and turn to vineger this in the Authors judgement might be prevented by drinking of it up 5. In some countries wine is hard to be got whether wine be hard or not to be got in Arabia deserta is uncertain sure it is not in France Spain and Italy 6. Lay-people should then touch the cup what great and hainous sin were â—hâ—s if they did 7. Some palsie hand might shake and spill the wine The Priest might give it him with the more care 8. Then the People and the Priest should be alike in dignity In this case they are both guilty of sin and stand both in need of the same redemption 9. Equ ' donati non sunt inspiciendi dentes A given horse ought not to be looked into the mouth that is it was Christs free gift to give us that Sacrament and therefore the people are not to grumble if they have not the cup By the same reason they might take from them the bread also and by the samâ— the people are to have the cup. For if the Sacrament be a free gift none ought to diminish that present if a horse be given to one young sprightly and lusty and the servant present one old and decayed it may be looked in the mouth 10. Some men have long beards and the wine might stick thereon surely those men might wipe their beards dry again 11 Some sick person would be distempered if they drank wine they might drink the less 12. Because the blood of Christ is really received in the bread that is by transâ—bstantion that is as soon as the Priest says hee est corpus moum this is my body to himself no body hearing and speaking true Latine for corpus mea or mins or mea would spoil all and also if the priest intend a Sacrament for otherwise it s none when all these things meet together the wafâ—r is turned to the very real natural flesh of Christ and is no longer a wafer which being granted the wine they hold nor necessary This doctrine of transubstantiation puts the most subtil to their shifts what to think if a Worm or a Mouse should chance to eat some of the Wafer some conceit that Christ altogether leâ—ves the Wafer others think he doth not but the Mouse eats the flesh of Christ Loâ—â—aâ—â— that is the great Doctor of all and undertakes to reach all professeth he knowâ—â—ot what the Mouse eats Deus novit but how ever it be he must do penance forty days that suffered this to be done and if the poor Mouse can be found she must be burned and buried under the altar others more tender will have her ripped and if the Wafer can be found to be carefully preserved until it consume of it self but if the Priest will eat it it is a high piece of service specially if he be fasting One of the Kings of France which to this day receive the Communion under both kinds asking his clergy why others might not receive so as well as he had this Answer that Kings were anointed as well as Priests and therefore he might have the cup as well as they for that Text bibite ex hoc emnes Math. 26.27 was only spoken to the Apostles as Apostles not as believers and therefore priests may haâ—e the cup but not the people is their doctrine When these reasons are weighed and the Commandement of Christ examined the parts of the institution well studied it may be said to the Church of Rome for all her reasons which are altogether void of reason that she hath made void the Commandements of God through her tradition For this Rome is condemned of the Reformed Churches of Helvet Art 21. of Basil. Art 6. of Bohe. Art 13. of France Art 36. of Blâ—g Art 35. of Ausp Art 2. of Sâ—â— Art 14. of Wirt Art 19. of Irel. Art 97. of Scot. Art 22. of Eng. Art 30. the Articles itself is Art 30. Of the Church ofEngland THe cup of the Lord is not to be denied to the lay-people for both the parts of the Lords Sacrament by Christs Ordinance and Commandement ought to be Ministred to all Christian men alike Quest. 3. Whether kneeling be a gesture lawful to be used at the Communion Before we positively Answer this Question we shall premise 1. There is no gesture in Scripture enjoyned we find our Saviour instituting it with bread and wine we find the Saints often using it with great eagerness and Saint Paul perswading to a holy doing of it with great earnestness but in what gesture it should be taken they all remain in silence 2. That our Saviour sat nor All the Evangelists that mention our Saviours sitting do it by a word that signifies lying the common gesture of the Iews both at that time and long before It would be an odd â—ight with us to see 6 or 7. beds cast down and the Communicants lie upon them one leaning upon anothers breast as Iohn did on Jesus Iohn 13.23 which gesture was ordinary among the Iews Ezek. 23.41 and Amos 2.8 for which cause they plucked of their shoes and washed their feet before they did eat But how came our Saviour to sit or lie since in the institution of the Passeover he ought to have stood and the Iews also Exod. 12. How or when this alteration was made or whether made by Ezra or no we have no certainty yet in regard that standing is not enjoyned in the repetition of the Law the Church altered standing into lieing signifying their rest obtained which was used also by our Saviour 3. What gesture soever he used binds not without his precept and for this we have none we conclude then kneeling to be lawful For 1. It is a decent gesture where there is no particular act required in Scripture it is most lawful for us to betake our selves to general precepts In the case in hand being there is no gesture required our Saviours sitting binding us no more then his receiving in an upper chamber or after Supper doth we may betake ourselves to that