Selected quad for the lemma: doctrine_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
doctrine_n	apostle_n	church_n	primitive_a	4,139	5	9.1134	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A05532	Certaine tables sett furth by the right reuerend father in God, William Bushopp of Rurimunde, in Ghelderland: wherein is detected and made manifeste the doting dangerous doctrine, and haynous heresyes, of the rashe rablement of heretikes: translated into Englishe by Lewys Euans, and by hym intituled, The betraing of the beastlines of heretykes	Lindanus, Guilelmus Damasus, 1525-1588.; Evans, Lewis, fl. 1574.	1565 (1565)	STC 15653; ESTC S106730	25,509	82

beholde the very woordes translated out of the booke which Luther wrote against the Zwinglians The woordes are these These dissensions and diuisions amongst those Zwinglians doe not procede from the holye spirite but from Sathan because the spirite of suche geaddynes doth cōtrarye him selfe Wherefore yt may be cōcluded that the dyuel the father of al dissension stryfe is the doctor teacher of those Zwinglians But the Zwinglians doe aunswere him thus O Luther vse and turne these woordes to thee and thy fellowes whiche doe varye more amongst your selfes then wee doe then shalt thowe speake most truely Wherefore as in the first Table is plainelye declared vnto thee the frowardenes varieng and iarring of Luther Zwinglius Melancthon and suche others against the tradicions of the Apostles and doctrine of the Catholyke churche so here in this second Table is conteyned most manifestlye the rancour incōstancie stryf and controuersye concerning the chiefest poincte of faythe betwene those faytheles foes and enemies of Christianitie wherein they not only write say and preache the one against the other but also in one and the self same yeare eache one against him self Luther this yeare writeth against Zwinglius Zwinglius against him and Melancthon against them bothe Luther will haue at the first .vij. Sacramentes then loasing fyve he alloweth but twoe and at the lenght he affirmeth to be but one or none at all Melancthon will cast a better accompte for twoe he avowcheth to be at the first then three afterwardes fowre but in the ende he flyeth vnto the fonde fancie of them of Saxonie and so denieth all that he before hath done Thirdly William Postellus one of the self same companie and of the lyke cōcorde alleageth .vj. Sacramentes and somewhere .vij. Thus so wavering you see ys ther waywarde wilfullnes and so onstedfast ys this their strange fancies as they are lead from one self wil to another from one shamefull secte to a nomber and from extreme folye to rage and meare madnes Lo suche is the deceateful spirite of the dyuel as alwaies hating vnitie still nowseleth his schollers children in the noysom damnable doungeon of stryf and dissention being so I think there is none onles he be benoōmed and there is none onles he be desperate and bewiched but will beholde the headdy inconstante counsaill of heretickes and whether he ought to beleue their blind oncertaine fantasies orels the vniforme plaine and perfecte doctrine of Christ and of his Catholyke churche ❧ This table treateth of the hatefull heresies once sprong vpp in the primitiue churche and then condemned by the holy and learned Doctors and Apostles of Christ all which heresies nowe budding againe be vpholden and imbraced by Luther Zwinglius Bucer such other like newe fangled fond felowshipp of Sathan CCC.L. yeare after Christ as S. Hierome in a Preface to the dialogue against Pela doeth witnes y e Manichees did affirme man to haue no free will so dothe Luther Brentius Illyricus Caluine also at the first Melancthō but againe he denieth it as appeareth in his cōmune places in the .52 yeare The Cerdionistes as S. Augustine doeth witnes ad Quod vult affirmed Christ his spirite to haue bene in none of the Prophetes so doth Michael Seruetus as Caluine dothe witnes CCC.L. yeare the Manichees did affirme it impossible for man to kepe the lawe of God so doth Luther and Caluine in his institut CCC.XC yeare the Pelagians as S. Augustine in sundrie places doth witnes affirmed no original synne to be in infantes so doth Zwingliꝭ Seruetus and the Anabaptist The Pelagians as S. Augustine in his .iij. booke .iij. chapiter against Iulianus dothe witnes affirmed the Christians childrē not to be maculated with synne but to be pure from the same so doth Zwingliꝭ Caluine ● Bucer CCC.L. yeare the Massilianistes as Damascenꝭ towching heresies doth witnes affirmed that baptisme maketh a man neyther ꝑfect nor holy nor that the Diuine sacramentes receaued doe purge vs from synne so dothe Luther and zwingliꝭ The Pelagians as S. August ad Quod vult doth witnes affirmed the infantes of y e Christiās to be borne good and heires of lyf euerlasting that they are not new borne againe to lyf by Baptisme so dothe Bucer Caluine CCC.L. yeare y e Massilianistes affirmed originall synne not to be forgyuen in Baptisme but so to remaine as it be not imputed vnto vs. so doth Luther The Seleucianistes and Herminians as S. Augustin in his worke ad Quod vult doth testifie alleaged the Baptisme of water not to be necessarie so dothe Caluine in his instituciōs CC.X. yeare the Nouatianistes as Theodoretus doth witnes affirmed confirmacion not to haue any anoynting of holy oyle so dothe Bucer Caluin CCC.XXX yeare the Donatistes as Optatus Mileuitanus alleageth did saye y e holy vnction ought not to be vsed so doth Luther Caluine in his institutiōs 1000. yeare Berengarius dyd affirme y t the sacramente of the Aultar is but a sygne of the Lordes bodye so doth Zwingliꝭ Occolampadius Caluine 1000. yeare y e Gerengarians as recordeth Guitmundus Auersanus affirmed that the sacramēte of the aultar hath the very body of Christ w t very bread so doth Luther his adherentes CCC.XXX yeare y t Massilianistes as Theodoretus saeth affirmed y t the Eucharist vnder y e forme of bread hathe not the verie blood so dothe the Luthera● in Polonia as the confesion of Polonia declarethe And that the sacramēt eaten doth neither preuaile nor hurt so doth Bucer XL. yeare the Nestorians as S. Cyrill in an epistle ad Col. doth testifie affirmed that the sacrament had not the body of Christ without the vse of the sacrament so doth the Lut●●ran● CCC.L. yeare Aerius as witnesseth S. August Epiph. affirmed that no sacrifice ought to be done for y e dead so dothe the Lutherā● Zwinglius CCC.X. yeare the Jouinistes as witnesseth S. Hierom. in his second boke against Jouinianus affirmed that good men cold not synne nor be at any tyme voyde of the holy ghoast so dothe the Anabaptistes CCC yeare the Audianistes as Theodoretus doth witnes affirmed that y e sacramental confession is not necessarie so dothe the Lutherans and Zwingliās CCC.L. yeare y e Massilianistes as Damascenus in haeresib doth record alleaged y e Sacramēt of order to be no sacramēt of a true name y t the cleargie are not coparcioners of y e holy ghost by ther ordinaūce which thing also affirmed y ● Alpigenistes in y e. 1250. so dothe the Lutherās zwingliās CCCC.L. yeare the Armenistes Catharistes affirmed the sacramentes to be faigned by man and that they worke no grace so doth the Lutherans the Zwingliās vij c. LXXX yeare the Felicianistes the Waldenses affirmed y t the images of Christ and his Saincts are Idololatrous so doth Zwingliꝭ Caluine the Lutherans in the highest Bauaria CCC.L. yeare Porphyrius Eunomicus Eustathiꝭ affirmed as the Counsaile Gangrensis doth witnes

that Miracles are the illusions of deuels so doth Luther and also Caluine CCC.XX yeare Vigilantius as witnesseth S. Hierome affirmed y t y e reliques of sainctes ought not to be worshipped so did the Catharistes y e .308 yeare so doth the Lutherās and also y e Zwingl CCC.XX yeare the same Vigilantius as S. Hierome sayethe affirmed that the Sainctes ought not to be prayed vnto so doth the Lutherans Zwinglians CCC.LX. yeare Jouinianus as witnesseth S. Hierome dyd affirme y t virginitie was no better then mariage so doth Brētius the confession of Wirtembrige and Luther in Epithal CCC.L. yeare Aerius as Epiphanius doth reherse affirmed y t wee ought not to faste vpō any one certaine daye so doth the Lutherans Zwinglians L. yeare Simon Magus as Theodoretus Irenaeus doe declare affirmed vs to be saued not throughe woorkes but throughe faithe onelie so doth Luther and Illyricus CCCC.L. yeare the Armenistes and Catharistes affirmed y t there was no purgatoire for the soules after this lyfe so doth the Confessiō of Wirtembrige the Lutherans and Zwinglians The Armenistes affirmed that the soules sleapte vntill the daye of iudgement so dothe the Anabaptistes L. yeare Simon Magus the .xc. yeare Menander affirmed the resurrection of the fleshe to be feigned so dothe Seruetus y e Libertines in Fraunce as Caluine saethe CC.LX. yeare Sabellius affirmed Christe to be none other in person from the father so dothe Michael Seruetus Hetzerus being the guide of the Anabaptistes CCC.XXV yeare Arrius affirmed Christe not to be equall vnto God the father nor of the same substance so doth Hetzerus as Sebast Frāc dothe alleage also Luther began to dowbt as appeareth in his boke against Lathomꝭ L. yeare the Basilides the .iij c. yeare the Manichees affirmed y t Christ tooke not on hym our nature of the virgin Mary so doth Melch. Hofin in y e descriptiō of the churche at Auspurge sett furthe the Lvj. yeare and also Menno in Coll. wismarien̄ Seruetus in a dialogue William Postellus in claue absconditarum dyd affirme that Christ as concerning the soule had a substance eternal CCCC XXV yeare Nestorius affirmed y t Christ in the twoe natures was of twoe persons so doth Adam Pastoris as George Cass. dothe alleage CCCC LV yeare Eutyches affirmed Christe in one person to be but of one nature so doth Seruetus and Swenchfielde as George Cassander saethe CCC.LXXX yeare the Origenistes affirmed that the damned and the dyuels sholde be saued so dothe Ioā Denekius y e Anabaptistes L. yeare the Chiliastes also Cerinthus plaing the Jewe in the tyme of y e Apostles affirmed that the kingdome of Christe was corporall and that but for the space of one thowsande yeares so doth certaine Anabaptistes as witnesseth Sebast. Franc. ☞ The acclamacion of S. Polycarpus against the blasphemies of heresies O good God vntill what tymes hast thowe kepte me that I should forbeare these blasphemyes L. EVANS Yf holye Polycarpus exclamed thus againste the doctrine of one Florinus the● varieng frō some parte of the Apostles traditions what shoulde we thinke hym thy day bothe to doe and saye yea to exclam against those who haue violated ouer throwen and troden vnder feete the whole doctrine of the Apostles who haue reiected the tradiciōs of the primitiue churche who haue and doe speake against fasting prayer almes deedes charitie and chastitie who vtterly forsaking Christe haue gyuē them selfes ouer vnto their ruefull rage bytter beastlines and lothesome luste You see that there hathe bene no heresie sythence Christe his tyme but that nowe these wylie wicked wantons doe welcome and imbrace the same yowe see their ambicious myndes and that their whole intent ys to enlarge the libertie of the filthie fleshe to pamper vpp theyr cursed carcasses to enioye their beastlie carnall luste and desire and so to wallowe in all the wanton waies of the dyuell Christe him self teacheth vs to beware of these for by their fruictes saeth he you shall knowe them these be their fruictes louers they are of their owne selfes couetous bosters hauing nothing els in them but beastlines prowde cursed speakers disobedient vnholy stubborne false accusers vnkind riatours despysers of them which are good hye mynded greadie vpon voluptousenes more thē the louers of God hauing a symilitude of godlye lyuing but hauing denied the powre thereof yf suche therefore be the fruictes of the newe founded faythe of these malicious ministers as most truelye it is their owne cutted consciences testefyeng the same howe can they thē longer seduce vs doe wee not see their iuglinges doe we not see their dreadefull dealinges doe wee not beholde their dyuelishe drudgerie and deceate Let vs beleue the doinges of auncient Doctors lett vs credyt the preachinge of the Apostles let vs herken vnto the Ghospel let vs truste the woordes of our Sauiour him self and then wee can not choyse but abhorre the beastlye libertie and whoredome of heretykes but defye theyr fickled fancies and byd farewell to all their folishnes so doing we can not againe choyse but be holy and imbrace holynes but be godlye imbrace godlines but be vertuous and imbrace vertue but be Christians and imbrace Christe And so doing we shall fynally enioye the prosperytie health and saluacion of bodye and sowle accordinglie ¶ This Table conteyneth in yt the ignorance of heretykes in the vnderstanding and alleaging of the Doctors and Scriptures Herein is expressed their impudent and past shame facyng in vpholding of theyr vaine dead doctrine and in treading downe the truthe of Christe here finallie is opened theyr pievishe peruerse manifeste falshod and deceapte ☞ The assercions of heretykes PHillip Melancthon affirmeth that yt was vsed of olde tyme in the churche that after diuorcement made it was lawfull for the person innocent to marie againe the former husband yet liuing And for the proofe therof he noteth vpon the place of S. Mathew Origenes and Eusebius Cesariensis out of the Apologie of Justinus affirminge a Christian woman to haue deliuered her husband a lible or testimoniall of diuorcement And also howe S. Hierome doth recite the example of one Fabiola who maried an other husband That is false and ontrue For Origenes writing vpon S. Mathewe sayth y t some Bushops dyd suffer this yuell for feare of a woorse Eusebius Caesariensis dothe alleage in deede howe that that Christian woman dyd make suche a diuorcement but he saethe not that shee dyd mary agayne And therefore was Phillipp not fondlie but wilfullie deceaued S. Hierome dothe recite the facte of Fabiola which no man deniethe and the self same like thing is to be seene euerie where in the onlawfull assemblies and wicked malignante churche of heretikes But is yt yeat adiudged whether Fabiola dyd well therein or not Yea S. Hierom dothe so disallowe the facte of Fabiola as he saieth yt to be contrarie vnto the Ghospell that she dyd therein contrary vnto the Lawe not onely of Pawle