emendandae In Pref. p. v. l. 16. Marg. for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In the Body of the Book p. 2. l. 12. Marg. for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A DEMONSTRATION That the Church of ROME and her Councils have actually Erred c. CHAP. I. The Fathers of the Nicene and Trent Councils teach That Image-Worship is a Tradition of the Apostles received by all Christians from the beginning § 1. The Councils of Constantinople and Frankford in the same Age say It was the Tradition of the Apostles and the Fathers that Images were not to be worshipped § 2. This last Assertion is proved 1. From express Testimonies of the Fathers saying They had no such Custom or Tradition That Christ and his Doctrine taught them to reject and abandon Images and That they taught all their Converts to contemn them § 3. 2ly That Image-Worship was by them represented as an Heathenish Custom It being say they proper to the Heathens to make and worship them and proper to Christians to renounce the Worship of them § 4. 3ly When Heathens objected this to Christians That they had no Images or Statues yea that they laught at those who had them they own and justify the thing § 5. 4ly They commend the Policy of the Jews for having none and the Wisdom of those Gentiles who had none and held it a mark of their own Excellency that they had them not and that they shut their Eyes when they worshipped that they might not see any sensible Object § 6. 5ly They answer and reject those very Pleas when used by Heathens which afterwards were used by the Nicene Council and the Romish Church in the behalf of Image-worship § 7. 6ly These Fathers represent the having Images of Christ and of his Saints for Worship as a thing proper to the vilest Hereticks § 8. AMongst the many Evidences that might be easily produced to shew that the pretended General Councils of the Church of Rome have with great vanity and most apparent falshood defined That they received the Doctrines which they endeavoured to impose upon the Christian World from Primitive and Apostolical Tradition one is The Veneration or honorary Worship of the Images of Christ his Virgin Mother the Martyrs and the Saints departed For the second Nicene Council and the chief Bishops mentioned or residing in it do very frequently but also very falsly say That the Doctrine and Practice there declared and required touching the Adoration of S. Images is Apostolical from the beginning and that which hath been always practised by the Church of Christ § 1. Pope Gregory the Second having like a true infallible Interpreter of Scripture told us That in that Expression of our Lord's (a) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Concil Nic. 2. Con. To. 7. p. 12. Where the Carcass is there will the Eagles be gathered together by the Carcass was to be understood Christ and by the Eagles Religious Men and Lovers of him He adds That (b) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 13. these Religious Men flew like Eagles to Jerusalem and having seen our Lord and James his Brother and Stephen the first Martyr they painted them as they had seen them And that Men no sooner beheld them but leaving the Worship of the Devil they fell immediately to worship these Images not indeed with Latria but with Relative Worship Pope Hadrian saith That (c) Sicut à primordio traditionem à sanctis Patribus susceperunt Act. 2. p. 103. Hoc enim traditum est à sanctis Apostolis p. 110. p. 99. In universo mundo ubi Christianitas est ipsae S. Imagines ab omnibus fidelibus honorantur p. 106. all Orthodox and Christian Emperors all Priests and religious Servants of God and the whole company of Christians observed the veneration of Images and Pictures for memory of pious compunction and even till then worshipped them as they received a Tradition from the beginning from the Holy Fathers to do That the special Honour Adoration and Veneration of them was delivered by the Holy Apostles And that throughout the whole VVorld where-ever Christianity was planted these venerable Images were honoured by all the Faithful Tharasius Patriarch of Constantinople declares That this of the Venerable Images was (d) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Act. 5. p. 348 388. the Tradition of the whole Catholick Church of God from the beginning Gregory Bishop of Possene cites for it a Synod of the Aposties met at (e) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Act. 1. p. 64. Antioch commanding Christians no longer to err about Idols but instead of them to paint the Image of Christ God and Man. And Leo Bishop of Rhodes adds That the Holy and Venerable Images were to be in the Church (f) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ibid. according to the Custom delivered of old Times from the Apostles And at the conclusion of many of their Actions the Fathers (g) Act. 2. p. 132 133 136 152 153. 3. p. 188. Act. 4. p. 328. 5. 389. 7. 576. generally affirm That they embraced and practised the worship of Images 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 according to the Tradition of the Holy Apostles and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 (h) Act. 2. p. 145. as they delivered to them who from the beginning were eye-witnesses of the VVord Yea the whole Synod doth frequently assert they were taught thus to judge of the (i) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Act. 4. p. 321. Adoration of Images by the Holy Fathers and by their Doctrine delivered by God. That their Tradition concerning it was (k) Act. 7. p. 553. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Divine Tradition of the Catholick Church And that in defining and asserting it (l) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 556. they followed the Doctrine of the Holy Fathers taught them by God and the Tradition of the Catholick Church and knew this was the Doctrine of that Holy Spirit which dwelt in her That they (m) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ibid. item p. 588. followed in observing this Tradition St. Paul and the whole Apostolical College and that thus the Doctrine of the Holy Fathers was confirmed thus the Tradition of the Catholick Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from one end of the Christian VVorld to the other held and practised That this was (n) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 581. the Doctrine received from the first Founders of the Christian Faith and their Divine Successors And lastly they do often with full Voice (o) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Act. 7. p. 576. Act. 8. p. 592. cry out 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this is the Faith of the Apostles this is the Faith of the Fathers this is the Faith of the Orthodox this is that Faith which establisheth the VVorld And suitable to this is the Language of the Trent Council which commands all Bishops and others whose Office it is to
instruct the People to teach them diligently That the Images of Christ the Mother of God and other Saints are especially to be had and retained in Temples and that due Honour and Veneration is to be given to them because the Honour tendred to them is referr'd to the Prototype so that by the Images which they kiss before which they uncover their Heads and prostrate themselves they worship Christ and venerate the Saints whose Similitudes they are And this say they is done (p) Jâ—xta Catholicae Apostolicae Ecclesiae usum à primaevis Christianae Religionis temporibus receptum Sanctorumque Patrum consensionem Sess 25. according to the custom of the Catholick and Apostolick Church received from the first Age of the Christian Faith and the consent of the Holy Fathers § 2. On the other hand the Council of Constantinople consisting of 338 Bishops assembled in the Year 754 declares That (q) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Concil Nic. 2. p. 452. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 508. this evil invention of Images neither hath its being from the Tradition of Christ or his Apostles nor of the Holy Fathers And having forbidden all Christians to worship any or to place an Image in the Church or in their private Houses they conclude unanimously thus (r) Ibid. p. 532. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this is the Faith of the Apostles this is the Faith of the Fathers this is the Faith of the Orthodox The Council of Frankford consisting of 300 Bishops assembled by Charles the Great out of Italy Germany and France A. D. 794. declares That the (s) Quia ut hoc facerent ab Apostolis sibi traditum mentiebantur Lib. Carol. l. 2. c. 25 27. second Nicene Council had offended in two things 1. in decreeing that Images should be worshipped And 2. in saying falsly that this was delivered to them from the Apostles They add That (t) Relictis priscorum patrum traditionibus qui imagines non colere sanxerunt novas conari insolitas Ecclesiae consuetudines inferre Praesat in lib. 1. leaving the Traditions of the Ancient Fathers who decreed That Images should not be worshipped they endeavoured to bring into the Church new and unusual Customs That they endeavoured to bring into Christian Religion the new Adoration of Images (u) Absque Sanctorum Patrum doctrina consacerdotum per diversas mundi partes consensu L. 4. c. 21. without the Doctrine of the Holy Fathers and the consent of their fellow Priests throughout the World. That this of Image-Worship was (w) Praefat. p. 10. impudentissima traditio a most impudent Tradition And that this pretended Tradition was (x) Neque in Evangeliorum tonitruis neque in Apostolorum dogmatibus vel quorumlibet Orthodoxorum Patrum doctrinis uspiam reperimus insertam L. 4. c. 13. neither to be found in the Oracles of the Prophets nor in the Writings of the Gospels nor in the Doctrines of the Apostles nor in the Relations of the former Holy Synods nor in the Doctrines of the Orthodox Fathers That it was instituted by them nullo Antiquitatis documento vel exemplo without all Instruction or Example from Antiquity A Synod held at Paris under Ludovicus Pius and Lotharius Anno Dom. 824 saith That the (y) Contra Authoritatem divinam sanctorum Patrum dicta P. 23. second Nicene Council declared for Image-worship against the Divine Authority and the Sayings of the Holy Fathers And that (z) Ed. Pith. p. 25 26. they determined against the Worship of them according to Divine Authority and juxta sententias sanctorum Patrum according to the Judgments of the Holy Fathers Agobardus Bishop of Lions having declared against all Image-worship saith (a) L. de Imag. §. 30. p. 263. This is sincere Religion is Mos Catholicus haec Antiqua Patrum Traditio this is the Catholick Custom this is the Ancient Tradition of the Fathers as is easily proved even out of the Book of Sacraments which the Roman Church useth And again (b) Nullus Antiquorum Catholicorum unquam eas colendas vel adorandas fore existimavit P. 265. None of the Ancient Catholicks did ever think that Images were to be worshipped or adored Hincmarus Arch bishop of Rhemes informs us That (c) Secundum Scripturarum tramitem traditionémque Majorum Opusc 55. cap. 20. this Nicene Synod was condemned and evacuated by a General Synod call'd by the Emperor Charles the Great according to the way of the Scripture and the Tradition of the Ancients (d) De Gestis Franc. Lib. 5. cap. 28. Aimoinus also complains of them That they had decreed touching the Adoration of Images alitèr quà m Orthodoxi Patres antea definierunt otherwise than the Orthodox Fathers had before defined In that Synod saith (e) In èa Synodo confirmatum st Imagines adorari debere quod omnino Ecclesia Dei execratur Annal. Part. 1. ad An. 791. Roger Hoveden it was confirmed that Images should be adored which the Church of God doth wholly execrate Now in this Matter let the Truth lie where you please 't is sure no little Prejudice against receiving any thing as a Tradition upon the evidence of a few single Fathers in Matters of meer Speculation as some Traditionary Doctrines of the Church of Rome most surely are that in a thing of this Nature which must be either daily practised or omitted by the Church whole Councils of 300 Bishops at the least in the same Age maintain such contradictory Assertions one saying frequently and expresly That this was the Doctrine of the Apostles and all the Ancient Fathers the others as expresly That it never was the Doctrine of either of them One That this was the practice of all faithful Christians the other That they never found it practised by any of the Orthodox Professors But though such contradictory Assertions in another Case might cause a wary Person to suspend his assent to either of them yet I am confident that whosoever is unprejudiced must in this case give in his Verdict against the Doctrine and Assertions of the Trent and of the second Nicene Council § 3. For notwithstanding all the confident Assertions of these Councils the Testimonies of the Ancient Fathers are so full and clear against that Honour and Veneration of Images which by these Councils is imposed upon all Christians with an Anathema to them who do assert or even think the contrary that he who doth impartially read them and doth not conclude that the whole Church of Christ did for 500 Years and more condemn this practice and in plain terms or by just consequence assert they had no such Tradition cannot sustain much loss if he quite want the use of Reason For 1. the Fathers do expresly say The Church of Christ hath no such Custom or Tradition (a) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Apud 2 Nic. Concil Act. 6. p. 492. We Christians saith Theodotus have no Tradition to form the Images of Saints
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Act. 6. p. â—17 second Nicene Council having told us That never any Christian Man did give Latria to an Image Nor can it reasonably be conceiv'd that many who profess'd the Name of Christ should be such Sots as to believe an Image made by their own hands could be the Great Creator of the World the Maker of the very Man that made it and of that very Metal which composed it Moreover St. Austin here requires the Manichees Not to upbraid the Church of Christ with the practice of these naughty Children whom he calls worshippers of Pictures they being only a rude multitude of superstitious People of such as either did not know or did not answer their Profession such as the Church condemned and still endeavoured to correct Had then St. Austin and all good Christians of his Age been themselves worshippers of Pictures had he believed that the Doctrine and Tradition of the Church of Christ required all good Christians to give them honorary Worship would he so generally without distinction or exception have condemned all Worshippers of Pictures as superstitious rude and ignorant of what Christianity required Would he so fully have declared That the Church of Christ condemned and did endeavour to correct them for it Would he have charged the Manichees with great injustice for imputing Picture-worship to the Church of Christ and not have given some of those Limitations and Distinctions with which the second Nicene Council and the Romish Doctors do so much abound to put a difference betwixt the avowed and constant practice of the Church and what both he and she condemned in these Worshippers of Pictures St. Austin therefore must be a very dolt or else must here demonstrate the Church of Christ did in his Time conceive all Picture-worship to be superstitious and opposite to the Profession of Christianity and that which she condemned and did endeavour to correct in those that practised it § 6. And as those Fathers so expresly declared against the Doctrine of the second Nicene Council before they had decreed it so afterwards from the 8th to the 15th Century it was expresly contradicted and rejected by the most Eminent Persons of the Western Church In the same Century it was condemned by the Council of Frankford consisting of three hundred Bishops A. D. 794. as hath been shew'd already It was condemned in the same Century not only by Albinus or Alcuinus Tutor to Charles the Great and Scholar of Venerable Bede who wrote a Book against the second Nicene Council and that Assertion of it (d) Contra quod scripsit Albinus Epistolam ex Authoritate Divinarum Scripturarum mirabiliter dictatam ilamque in persona Episcoporum Principum nostrorum Regi Francorum attulit Hoved Ann. part 1. F. 232. B. That Images ought to be adored confuting it from Holy Scripture but also by the Princes and Bishops of the Church of England in whose Name that Book was sent to Charles the Great It was condemned in the 9th Century by the Council held at Paris A. D. 824. It was in the same Century declared to be (e) Pseudo-Synodus l. contr Hincmar Laudan c. 20. Chron. ad A. 792. ad An. 794. falsly called a Synod because it decreed for Image-worship by Hincmarus Rhemensis by Ado Viennensis and by Regino Abbas Prumiensis It was condemned also by Agobardus Bishop of Lyons who was made Bishop by the consent of the whole Clergy of that Nation for in his Book yet extant against this Image-worship he declares amongst many other things already cited from him thus (f) Nemo se fallar quicunque aliquam Picturam vel fusilem five ductilem adorat Statuam non exhibet cultum Deo non honorat Angelos vel Homines Sanctos sed simulacra veneratur Sect. 31. Let no Man deceive let no Man seduce or circumvent himself Whosoever adores any Picture any molten or graven Statue he doth not worship God or honour Angels or Holy Men but he venerates Idols And yet (g) Ego crediderim Agobardum scripsisse quod omnes tum in Gallia ut etiam à Sirmundo observatum est sentiehant Bal. Not. in Agob p. 88. Baluzius and Sirmondâ—s do ingenuously confess that Agobardus hath writ only that which the whole Church of France did then acknowledg Papirius Massonus who abridged him saith (h) Graecorum Errores de Imaginibus Picturis manifestissimè detegens negat eas adorari quam sententiam omnes Catholici probamus c. Praefat. That he did manifestly detect the Errors of the Greeks i.e. the Nicene Coâ—ncil coâ—cerning Images and Pictures denying that they were to be adored which Doctrine all we Catholicks approve and follow the Testimony of Gregory the Great corcerning them which as you have seen was this That Images were neither to be broken nor yet adored (i) Ecclesiae Gallicanae Germanicae in hac sententia constantissime aliquot seculis perdurarunt Cap. de Imag p. 173. The German and French Churches saith Cassander after the Council held at Frankford most constantly continued for some Ages in that Sentence which they first received from the Church of Rome viz. That Images were neither to be broken nor yet to be worshipped If for some Ages they must assuredly continue in it till the 11th Century and that they did so is evident from the Chronicle of Hermannus Contractus who stiles the second Nicene Council a false Synod on the forementioned account Chron. ad A. D. 794. That the Germans continued of the same mind in the 12th Century is evident from the plain words of (k) Quippe apud Alemannos Armenios S. Imaginum adoratio aeque interdicta est L. 2. de Imp. Aug. Angel. p. 199. In qua Synodo de Imaginibus adorandis aliter quam Orthodoxi Patres antea diffinierant statuerunt Nicetas Coniates who saith That then among the Almains and Armenians the worship of Holy Images was equally forbid That the French Church was still of the same mind is evident from the Continuator of (l) De Gestis Francorum l. 5. c. 28. Aimoinus who plainly saith That the Fathers of the Nicene Synod otherwise decreed concerning Image-worship than the Orthodox Doctors had before defined And from the Collection of Decrees made by Ivo Bishop of Chartres who declares the Judgment of the Council of Eliberis to be this That (m) Picturas in Ecclesia non esse adorandas Decret Part. 3. c. 40 41. Pictures ought not to be worshipped but that they only ought to be Memorials of what is worshipped and cites the Passage of Pope Gregory to that effect In the same Century Simon Dunelmensis an Oxonian Doctor and Roger Hoveden their Professor both assert That in the second (n) In quo proh dolor multa inconvenientia verae Fidei coÌ„traria reperiebantur maxime quod pene omnium Orientalium Doctorum unanimi assertione confirmatum fuerit Imagines adorari debere quod omnino Ecclesia
Dei execratur Hoved. Ibid. Dunelm ad A. 792. Nicene Synod were many things contained which were inconvenient and contrary to the true Faith and that in the said Council was established a Decree That Images should be worshipped which thing the Church of God wholly abhors And here let it be noted that in these Writers we find not the least hint of a Distinction between due and undue worship of an Holy Image or betwixt Worship which the Church of Christ allows and which the Church abhors but Imagines adorari debere that Images should be worshipped is declared to be the Doctrine which God's Church abhor'd In the 14th Century Robert Holcot Professor in Oxford most plainly asserts That (o) Ideo aliter potest dict quod nulla adoratio debetur Imagini nec licet aliquam imaginem adorare Quia autem propter Imaginem Christi excitamur ad adorandum Christum coram Imagine adorationem nostram facimus Christo ergo dicitur large loquendo N. B. quod Imaginem adoramus In Ecclus Lect. 158. c. 13. Vide Reliqua no Adoration is to be given to any Image nor is it lawful for any Man to worship Images And Matthew of Westminster condemning the Decree of the second Nicene Council as Hoveden had done before him Ad A. D. 793. In the 15th Century (p) Omnino prohibentur fieri ad hunc viz. finem ut adorentur colantur unde sequitur neque adores neque colas ea ad adorandum igitur colendum prohibentur Imagines fieri Sequitur non adorabis neque coles inter quae sic distingue non adorabis sc veneratione Corporis ut inclinando eis vel genu-flectendo neque coles sc affectione mentis Comp. Theol. in Explic. 1. praecepti Tom. 2. p. 25. Gerson Chancellor of Paris saith We do not worship Images and that they are forbidden to be worshipped that the second Command forbids us to bow the Body or the Knee to them or to worship them with the Affection of the Mind And (q) Quod vero Christiana Religio Imagines sustinet in Ecclesia Oratoriis non permittit eo fine ut adorentur ipsae sed ut fidelium mentes per earum inspectiones excitentur ad reverentiam honorem exhibendum his quorum sunt Imagines in quorum cognitionem recordativam ducunt Et hic modus dicendi videtur esse Rob. Holcot super illud sapientiae infelices sunt mihi videtur dicendum quod neque adoro Imaginem Christi quia lignum nec quia Imago sed adoro Christum coram Imagine Christi quia scilicet Imago Christi excitat me ad amandum Christum hic modus loquendi originem videtur trahere ex dicto quodam B. Gregorii Sereno Episcopo c. Et quidem quia eos adorare vetuisses omnino laudamus fregisse vero reprehendimus c. In Can. Miss Lect. 49. F. 127. Gabriel Biel an Oxonian Doctor teacheth That then some of their Doctors held that any Image is not to be worshipped either for it self as it is Wood or Stone nor yet consider'd as a Sign or Image And that the Christian Faith permits them to be reserved in the Church not that they may be worshipped but that the Minds of Men may be excited to give reverence to them whose Images they are and that this they said according to P. Gregory In the 16th Century (r) Imagines in Ecclesia ideo tolerantur ut admoneant non ut colantur alioquin omnino excusari possunt minime In Act. Apost cap. 7. p. 94. Ferus a Learned Preacher at Mentz saith That Images are tolerated in the Church that they may admonish not that they may be worshipped for otherwise they can admit of no excuse Yea a Council held at (s) Can. 14. Mentz A. D. 1549 during the Session of the Trent Council speaks thus Let our Pastors accurately teach the People that Images are not propounded to be worshipped or adored but that by them we may be brought to the remembrance of those things which we ought profitably to call to mind CHAP. V. Against this pretended Tradition of the second Nicene Council it is farther argued 1. Because the Jews though zealous for the observance of the Law of Moses and generally believing that it forbad the having and much more the bowing to an Image did never for the five first Centuries condemn the Christians for this practice as afterwards when Images began to be received into Churches and adored they always did § 1. 2ly Because the Apostles and succeeding Fathers who answer all the other Scruples of the Jews against the Christian Faith speak not one word in Answer to this great Objection that it allowed of Image-worship in opposition to the second Commandment § 2. 3ly Because the Evidence of Truth hath forced many Learned Writers of the Romish Church to confess That the Primitive Church had no Images or did not adore them § 3. From this Discourse these four things are inferr'd 1. That the Councils received by the Church of Rome as general are not infallible Interpreters of Scripture or infallible Guides in Matters of Faith. § 4. 2ly That the second Nicene Coucil hath imposed that on Christians as a Tradition of the Church of Christ which was not so and therefore was deceived and did deceive in Matter of Tradition § 5. 3ly That Roman Catholicks do vainly boast of the Consent of Fathers on their side § 6. 4ly That the Doctrine of the Church of England is much safer in this particular than that of Rome § 7. MOreover that Image-worship was no Doctrine delivered to the Church of Christ either by Writing or Tradition from the Apostles that it was not practised in the first Ages of the Church will be apparent from the deportment of the Jews towards the Christians and the consideration of what they thought of the erection of an Image in the place of Worship and of the adoration of them § 1. And (1.) Act. 21.20 we know that even the believing Jews were zealous for the strict observance of the Law of Moses and were much offended at St. Paul because they apprehended he had taught the Jews to forsake the Law of Moses and not to circumcise their Children or walk after the Customs of their Fathers We also are informed by (a) Tum poene omnes Christum Deum sub Legis observatione credebant Sulp. l. 2. c. 45. Euseb Chron. Eusebius and Sulpitius that this Zeal continued among the Jewish Christians for a considerable time after the death of the Apostles viz. till the destruction of the City by Hadrian For till that time the Bishops of Jerusalem were of the Circumcision and almost all who believed in Christ did yet observe the Law. The Sect of the (b) Ep. ad August August contr Faust l. 19. c. 18. Orig. contr Cels l. 2. p. 56. l. 5. p. 272. Ebionites and Nazarens continued till the days of Jerom they were dispersed
to St. James in pilgrimage adding that St. James had no foot to come against them no hand to welcom them neither tong to speak to them so reproving the worship of Images I have openly said Alize Higuel Feb. 5. 1490. That Images of Saints be not to be worshipped that when devout Christian People of their Devotion be wont to offer their Candles burning to the Image of St. Leonard I have for their devotion called them Fools furthermore shewing in this wise when St. Leonard woll ete a Candle and blow out an oder then I will offer him a Candle else woll not Also when I have seen Cobwebs hanging before the Face of the Image of our Lady I have said and reputed them Fools that offereth to that Image but if she would blow away the same Cobwebs from her Face I have affirmed Robert Makam June 17. 1506. and said That the Crucifix and other Images in the Church made of Stocks and Stones are but Idols and ought not to be worshipped adding and saying that Ball the Carpenter or Pyke the Mason could make as good as the Crucifix for it is but a crooked Stick I have said John Bennet Feb. 7. 1507. That no manner of Image ought to be worshipped for that they can neither smell speak nor hear Sometimes their Confessions and Abjurations run after this manner viz. I have said Isabel Dort July 19. 1491. That it were better to give a poor blind or lame Man a Penny than to bestow their Mony in Pilgrimages and worshipping the Images of Saints for Man is the very Image of God which ought all only to be worshipped and no Stocks ne Stones I used to say Thomas Stochin March 22. 1498. We should rather worship the Image that God hath made that is to say the poor Man than the Image that Man hath made and painted the which standeth in the Church All these things they renounce as contrary to the common Doctrine and Determination of the Vniversal Church of Christ and as false Doctrines contrary to the Christian Faith as great Heresies and false Opinions reproved and damned by all Holy Church and against the Doctrine of Christ and his Apostles And yet these Sayings thus condemned by the Second Nicene Council and thus renounced as great Heresies in all parts where the Power of the Church of Rome prevailed in these latter Ages are either the express Sayings and Doctrines of the Ancient Fathers or little different from them in sense whence any Man may easily discern how great an opposition there must be betwixt the Doctrine of the Ancient and of the present Church of Rome the true Catholick Church of Christ in the Primitive Ages and that which now usurps the name of Catholick CHAP. III. That the Ancients did not bow down to or venerate Images is farther proved 1. Because they never were concerned as are the Romanists to Answer the seeming repugnancy of this practice to the Second Commandment or to use any of the Distinctions so frequent in the second Nicene Council to that effect § 1. 2ly Because they answer all the Objections urged by the Nicene Council against the Protestant sense of this Precept viz. the instance of the Cherubims and of the Brazen Serpent c. § 2. 3ly Because many of them declare that this Precept rendred the very Art of making Images unlawful to the Christians § 3. 4ly Because they generally declare that by this Precept the Christian is forbid to give any outward Worship to Images or to bow down to them § 4. 5ly Because they reject and confute all the Distinctions used by the second Nicene Council and by the Romanists to reconcile this Precept to their Practice asserting 1. That this Command is moral and perpetual and obligatory to all Christians 2. That this Precept doth not only forbid the Worship of Images with Latria but all outward Adoration of them 3. That this is the Second Commandment and not a part of the first only 4. That not only Idols but Images are by this Precept forbid to be adored § 5. § 1. THat the Ancients knew nothing of this pretended Tradition will be still more evident from their Discourses touching that Commandment which so expresly saith Thou shalt not make unto thy self an Idol nor the similitude of any thing in Heaven or Earth For had they generally practised had they received a Tradition touching the Veneration of the Images of Christ his Blessed Mother and the Saints and Martyrs is it not wonderful that none of all the Fathers ever did that which all Christians who entertained the Worship of them ever did viz. That they should never offer any Answer to the obvious Objection from this Commandment against it or in the least attempt to reconcile this Precept with their Practice or to propose any of those Distinctions Limitations or Excuses which are so frequent in the Writings of the Romish Doctors and which they judg so necessary to prevent Idolatry and to inform aright the Minds of them who venerate their Images and to satisfy the importunity of those who scruple at it and do suspect it is a breach of this Commandment The Matter of this Image-worship looks so ill it seems so manifestly repugnant to the Command forbidding us to worship any similitude of any thing in Heaven or Earth it is at least in appearance so like to that very practice which they derided in the Heathens that it was highly reasonable if this had been the Doctrine and Practice of their Times that these Primitive Fathers should at least have considered and stated the Question How far and in what sense it was lawful and with what Intention and in what Degree and with what Cautions and Distinctions this might lawfully be done The present Doctors of the Church of Rome are not so careless now adays as were the Fathers in this Matter When they write Catechisms for the Instruction of the People sometimes they (a) Vid. Dall de Imag. p. 77. wholly leave out this Commandment sometimes they do abbreviate it and make it only say Thou shalt not worship Idols Or if they be so daring as to present the whole Commandment to the view of Roman Catholicks they carefully expound and clog it with many Limitations and Distinctions that their Proselytes may not be tempted to think the words do mean what in their plain and obvious sense they do import Thus was it also with the Bishops of the Second Nicene Council who introduced this Image-worship into the Eastern Church Constantinus Bishop of Constantia in Cyprus seems to insinuate That the Reason which moved God to make this Injunction was not the Evil of Image-worship but the propenseness of the Jews unto Idolatry For saith he (b) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Act. 4. p. 200. vid. Act. 6. p. 468. when the People were moved to commit Idolatry then God spake thus to Moses Thou shalt make no similitude to serve them In
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 200. The Old Testament had Cherubims shadowing the Mercy Seat let us have Images of Christ and of his Holy Mother shadowing the Altar for because the Old Testament had such Things the New received them This say the (m) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ibid. Synod is the truth This say the Princes is the Command of God. But why did they not conclude also for another Ark and Mercy-Seat another Tabernacle a Golden Censer and a Pot of Manna seeing it was but saying as in the case of Images they do because the Old Testament had these things let us Christians have them too and it infallibly must be so And tell me now Can any one who reads these powerful Demonstrations from and excellent Expositions of the Holy Scripture doubt of the Truth of that which is so oft asserted by this Synod That (n) Act. 3. p. 157. Act. 7. p. 580 581 585. they were certainly assisted by the Holy Ghost But to be serious If all or any of these places have any strength to prove that Images should be set up in Churches or adored by Christians why do not any of their Writers use them to that end if they do not Why may not they be taxed with weakness who use such Proofs as none but the most undiscerning Persons could produce and which their best Friends are ashamed of § Inference 2. 5. 2. Hence it is evident that the second Nicene Council grosly was mistaken in that Determination and Assertion so frequently repeated in that Council That Image-worship had been delivered to them by the continual Suffrage and Approbation of the whole Church of Christ and was the Tradition of the whole Church Catholick even from the Times of the Apostles And consequently that this Council hath been actually deceived in Matter of Tradition as well as in her Interpretations of the Holy Scripture For whereas it is frequently there said That this was the constant Doctrine and Tradition of the Holy Fathers of the Catholick Church the opposition is not greater betwixt Light and Darkness than betwixt the Assertions of the Fathers and the Determinations of the Council For 1. The Fathers of that Council do pronounce Anathema (o) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Act. 1. p. 57.4 p. 317.5 p. 389.7 p. 576.8 p. 592. against all Persons who take such places of the Holy Scripture which are spoken against Idols as spoken against Holy Images i.e. who say the second Commandment forbids the Worship not of Idols only but of Holy Images And so they do pronounce Anathema against Justin Martyr St. Clemens of Alexandria Origen Tertullian St. Cyprian St. Austin Theodoret Fulgentius Agobardus the Councils of Constantinople Frankford and Paris 2ly The Fathers of the same Council pronounce Anathema (p) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Act. 1. p. 57. against all Persons who say That the erection of Images is the Invention of the Devil and not the Tradition of the Catholick Church and so they do pronounce Anathema against Clemens of Alexandria St. Ambrose Theodotus Amphilochiùs St. Jerom and St. Chrysostom Agobardus Hincmarus and the three foremention'd Councils who all declare That this was no Tradition of the Catholick Church And against Clemens of Alexandria Tertullian Lactantius Eusebius Theodotus Anoyranus and the whole Council of Constantinople who say expresly That Image-making or Image-worship was the Invention of the Devil 3ly These Fathers do pronounce Anathema (q) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Act. 4. p. 317.5 389.7 p. 576. to all who violate break or dishonour S. Images which Epiphanius Serenus and all the Fathers of Constantinople did and upon all that knowingly communicate with them who contumeliously speak of them or dishonour them Now seeing all the Christians of the 4th Century did certainly communicate with Epiphanius of the 6th Century with Serenus since all the Fathers mentioned in my second Chapter do in their sense dishonour Images they in effect pronounce Anathema against them all 4ly They pronounce Anathema (r) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Act. 4. p. 317.5 p. 389. against all Persons who detract from or who speak evil of their S. Images Now since the Fathers have declared concerning Images in general That they are worse than Mice and Worms that they are the Invention of the Devil with many other things of a like nature mentioned Chapter the second they must be all obnoxious to this Anathema 5ly They pronounce Anathema (s) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Act. 4. p. 212. against all who do not call them Holy and Sacred Images that is against St. Clemens of Alexandria Origen Lactantius Eusebius and others who have declared That they cannot be Sacred and that they are Men of impotent Spirits and lame Minds who so esteem them 6ly They denounce Anathema (t) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Act. 1. p. 61.7 p. 584. against all those who do not worship Images or who doubt of or who are disaffected to the worship of them Now this Anathema if what is here produced cannot be refuted must certainly be pronounced against the Blessed Apostles and all the Christians of the five first Centuries Lastly Whereas Origen declares That the first thing which Christians taught their Converts was the contempt of all Images the Fathers of this Synod pronounce Anathema (u) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Act. 1. p. 61. to all who do not diligently teach all Christian People to adore the Images of all Good Men from the beginning of the World. § 6. 3ly Hence also may be seen how vainly and unjustly Roman Catholicks do boast of the consent of Fathers on their side and say That they expound the Scriptures according to that Sense which they received from the Ancients it being evident from what hath been discoursed that in their Exposition of these words Thou shalt not make to thy self the Similitude of any Thing in Heaven or Earth c. Thou shalt not bow down to them they do embrace a Sense which no Father for the first six Centuries did ever put upon them and do reject that Sense they generally did impose upon these words § 7. 4ly Hence I infer That the Religion of the Church of England is in this particular much safer than is that of Rome For if Image-worship be not forbid in this Commandment nevertheless we only do neglect that practice which their best Writers deem (x) Illud ante constituendum Imagines ex carum per se genere esse quae 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nominantur hoc est quae ad salutem omninò necessaria non sunt nec ad substantiam ipsam religionis attinent sed in potestate sunt Ecclesiae ut ea vel adhibeat vel ableget pro eo atque satius esse decreverit Petav. Theol. dogm To. 5. l. 15. cap. 13. §. 1. Ea est hujusce miserrimae dissensionis materia sine qua sicut multis videtur salva per fidem spem charitatem incunctanter in hoc seculo in futuro salvari potest Ecclesia quorum sensus sententia talis est quid fidei spei charitati obesse potuisset si Imago nulla toto orbe terrarum picta vel ficta fuisset Epist Eugenii P. 2 Act. Synod Paris P. 130 134. indifferent which no Jew ever did perform to any Patriach or Prophet nor any Christian for 600 Years to any Apostle Saint or Martyr and which no Scripture hath commanded and so we only do neglect to do that which neither Example of the Ancients nor any Precept doth commend to our practice Whereas if Image-worship should be here forbid to us Christians which to speak modestly seems highly probable the Church of Rome must practise and enjoin that Worship which provokes God to jealousy exhort and force her Members to perform that Worship from which God doth exhort them to abstain least they corrupt themselves She must enjoin that Action upon pain of her Displeasure and of the Wrath of God which he commands us to avoid because he is a jealous God she must imprison and cut off by Excommunication and by the Sword Christ's Servants because they will not by doing that which God so frequently and so directly hath forbid incur the hazard of his Wrath who saith Deut. 4.25 26. If ye corrupt your selves and make a graven Image of the likeness of any thing I call Heaven and Earth to Witness this day that you shall soon utterly perish And it is easy to determine which we ought most to fear the Wrath of God or Man. FINIS
throughout the Churches of the East and were stiff Assertors of the Obligation of the Law of Moses and held (c) Euseb Hist Eccles l. 3. c. 27. That Men were to be saved by the observation of it 2. We know that in the Judgment of the Jews who lived about our Saviour's Time and after nothing was more detestable nothing was more repugnant to the Law of Moses than the admitting of an Image in the place of Worship much more the bowing down to it They constantly declared to Pilate upon occasion of the Roman Eagles That (d) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Joseph Halos l. 2. c. 14. they could not permit any Image to be placed in their City And that (e) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 L. 2. c. 8. l. 18. c. 4. l. 2. c. 17. their Law was violated by the little Images of Caesar annexed to the Roman Standards and that they would rather die than endure them there They tell Petronius That it could not be permitted to have the Image either of God or Man in their most sacred Temple or elsewhere They perswade Vitellius not to come thither with them because it was not suitable to the Laws of their Country to see an Image brought into it And they declared to Herod Son of Antipater That (f) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Archeol l. 18. c. 7. l. 15. c. 11. whatsoever they endured they would not suffer the Images of Men within their City 3. Certain it is that for a long time no Samaritan or Jew ever objected to the Christians their violation of the Second Commandment or at the least pretended to be scandalized at their defection from this Law of God. No single instance of this Nature can be produced from all Antiquity till after the fifth Century when Images began to be admitted into Churches provided that they were not worshipped Then was it that the Jews began to call the Christian Churches upon that account Batte Aboda Zara the Houses of Idolatry And from that time they have not ceased to object to them the violation of this Law and to profess that they were scandalized at it In the second Nicene Council Germanus Patriarch of Constantinople confesseth That (g) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Act. 4. p. 300. p. 240. upon this account the Jews did often cast reproach upon them and that the Saracens did the same Gregrory in his Epistle to him adds That (h) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 288. if any one do accuse this Image-worship of Idolatry he is one who calumniates after the manner of the Jews In the fifth Action a Jew is introduced speaking thus (i) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 356 357 384 348. I believe in a crucified Jesus who is the Son of God but I am scandalized at you Christians because you worship Images whereas the Scriptures every where command us not to make any graven Image or Similitude The Christians are to be reckoned Idolaters saith (k) Dr. Pocock Not. Miscell p. 322. R. Kimchi because they bow down and adore the Image of Jesus of Nazareth (l) Catechism c. 33. p. 68. B. Fabianus Fiogus a Jewish Convert informs us That the Jews dispute after this manner God in the Decalogue writ with his own Finger hath command that no kind of Image or Similitude should be made c. but Christians make and worship Images they therefore violate this Precept this saith he is an undoubted thing among them and therefore they call the Christians Worshippers of Idols Joseph King of Cosri is said to prefer the Jews before the Christians (m) Buxt Praesat ad Cosri because the latter bow themselves to the Works of their own hands Had therefore the first Christians received a Tradition from the Apostles to adore Images and had all Christians practised suitably to this supposed Tradition both the Believing and the Unbelieving Jews being such Zealots for the observance of the Law of Moses and professed Enemies of Images and of the adoration of them must have been scandalized at it We see that they were very much incensed against St. Paul for teaching Act. 21.20 That the Gentiles were not obliged to observe their Law that they would not endure him unless he also would walk orderly and keep the Law. If then St. Paul and Peter as (n) Apud 2. Nic. Conc. p. 101. P. Hadrian averrs if the rest of the Apostles as the second Nicene Council saith had taught and practised this Image-worship so flatly opposite to their Law and therefore execrable to them this must have stirred up their indignation against St. Paul and Peter much more than their asserting That the Ceremonial Law did not oblige the Gentiles could have done 'T is surely difficult to conceive that they who thought their Law so highly violated by framing the Picture of a Man or of an Eagle and would rather die than admit of them because they held they were forbidden by their Law should either being Christians continue zealous to assert the Obligation of that Law and yet admit the Doctrine which did enjoin them both to frame and worship Images or should continuing unbelieving Jews never accuse the Christians of a Crime so execrable in their sight nor disswade any Christian from complying with this great violation of their Law § 2. Yea farther had this Practice or Tradition obtained in the days of the Apostles or the five following Ages the Apostles and Primitive Fathers would likely have endeavoured to remove this Scandal from the Jews and to return some Answer to an Objection so very obvious for their prejudice against Image-worship being greater than against any other thing they had the greatest reason upon the supposition of such a practice of the Christians to labour to remove it And yet we find not that St. Paul in his Epistles writ partly to satisfy the Jews that Circumcision was not to be imposed upon the Gentiles and partly to warn the Gentiles not to bear the Yoke of Jewish Festivals and Cerimonies or in that purposely designed to teach the Jews that the Priesthood being changed the Ceremonial Law must also change together with it or that St. Peter or St. James in their Epistles to the dispersed Jews take the least notice of so great a Prejudice or spend one word to reconcile the Jew to this supposed Image-worship Justin Martyr Origen Tertullian St. Cyprian G. Nyssen Epiphanius St. Chrysostom St. Austin with many others have writ on purpose to take off the Objections of the Jews against Christianity and in these Writings they have been very diligent in taking off the Scandal of the Cross and proving That the Jewish Festivals and Sabbaths were abolished and that their Laws concerning Circumcision and Sacrifices were abrogated but they spend not one word to shew that Christians were exempted from that Precept which forbad the bowing down to any Image or Similitude or to excuse that Worship of them they are supposed to