of our Blessed Lady It is certain that in former times men did not set themselves to search into that particular subject because they did not so much as reflect upon it There was onely a confused kind of knowledge and a general Idâ—â— of the priviledges and Prerogatives of the Blessed Virgin above the rest of Mankind without descending to particulars People were wholly taken up with opposing those Hereticks who drew up against the Honour of the Blessed Virgin who would have deprived her of the glory of her admirable and perpetual Virginity even after Child-bearing and above all those who so violently pleaded against thâ— glorious title of Mother of God which is the ground of all her other Priviledges They were satisfied to ascertain that true source or fountain of all her greatness fortifying it by Scripture and Apostolick Tradition without regarding to penetrate further into that suite or train of other priviledges which did accompany that one great prerogative or examining particularly whether it were to be concluded by a legall ensequence flowing from that Principle that she was preserved at the first instant of her being from Original sin It was not at that time positively believed that she was exempt from that stain neither was the contrary in their Creed And this because it was not so much as thought upon At another time it has been thought good to employ many serious-thoughts upon this subject and to search more narrowly into the business Great Contests have risen about it Whole Volames have been written by Learned men who have produced strong and clear testimonies out of the Holy Scriprures for it and have endeavoured to derive it from the very Fountain of Apostolical Doctrine by the way of Tradition Whole Universities and especially that of Sorbon have spoken loud in favour of that Opinion and engaged themselves by solemn Oath to maintain it And yet notwithstanding the Church has not thought fit absolutely to determine any thing concerning this matter of so great importance But leaves us at liberty to believe what we please concerning it She has not proceeded in the same manner concerning her exemption from all guilt even of venial sin For this she has decided and resolved upon as a matter of Faith not that she had any new revelation thereof since the time of the Apostles but that before the proposing this verity to the world 〈◊〉 be believed she consulted with the holy Scriptures Apostolical Tradition and the opinions of holy Fathers coâ—cerning the preeminence and qualition of the Mother of God for the finding out the whole extent of them An having discovered by this means thâ— her being exempted from venial sin wâ— comprehended in that Supreme Dignty as a necessary consequence is â—â—cluded in its Principle she has defined as a Point of faith revealed in the We of God in which it is contained Thâ— is the reflexion of the most eminent as Learned Cardinal de Lugo in his excâ—lent Treatise of Faith Disp 3. Sect. 5. n. 7. Let us now imagine the Churd should do the same concerning the 〈◊〉 emption of the Blessed Virgin from Original sin Let us suppose that she hâ—ving examined the passages of Host Writ and the Testimonies of Tradâ—â— on which are alledged upon this subject should find this also included as in necestary consequence as she did the other as it is not unlikely she would If she should think fit to proceed to a further examin of the business then all we who are Catholicks and agreed in this that the Church is Judge of Controversies and that we are bound to submit to her Decrees should quickly lay aside all difference of opinions â—â—d although we had not hitherto held seas matter of Faith should then believe it to be so not because there had been any new Revelation concerning it â—â—t because the Church should have declared it to have been alwayes revealed although there was not a general Agreement concerning that Revelation 16. Behold then us and Protestants agreed as I take it upon this Principle that the true Church of Christ has power to decide and propose that as an Article of Faith which antecedently to that decision and proposal was not of obligation to be believed From whence is easily concluded that for the franing an exact rational discourse in matters of Faith it is necessary to avoid these two extremes which a loose kind of reasoning is apt enough to fall into The first is That this has not alwayes been believed therefore it is not now to be believed The second This is 〈◊〉 believed ergo it has alwayes and in aâ— Ages of the Church been distinctly believed It is evident by our Principleâ— that this way of reasoning is very salk and erroneous Here then is the reason why when there happens a Contest between two Parties of the same Church supposed alwayes the true Church as we shall by and by shew it is not alwayes necessary that we search narrowly into the doctrine of Antiquity for the discovering what was held in those dayes concerning the matter in Dispute It suffices for ending all debates that we know what the Church having taken full cognisance of the matter shall have determined by a solemn judgement and Sentence according to the usuall form and method What she resolves in such occurrences according to the Word of God the true meaning whereof she faithfully gives us is to be received as matter of Faith whether it were beforehand known or not known to be so And the contrary is an Error which we are obliged with her to condemn and anathematise unless we intend to become Infidel and Schismaticks Here is the Principle we are agreed upon on all sides as I have made appear both by the Doctrine and proceedings of our Adversanes themselves It imports now very much to apply this to the particular subject we have in hand and it shall be my endeavour to effect it CHAP. III. The applying this agreed-on Principle to the Subject of the Holy Eucharist TO make a due Application of this general Principle to the subject of the Holy Eucharist with the same peaceableness and quiet we have hither to endeavoured to maintain and together with the consent of Parties we must needs step a little aside but still in such order and measure that we may go friendly on in the same path hand in hand together without justling one another still laying all Disputes aside The first step therefore that I make of this kind is to produce what is agreed upon on all sides to have been in all Ages believed concerning the Holy Eucharist to wit that it is a Sacrament which is a Memorial of the Death of our Lord Jesus Christ who is there present and wherein his blessed Body and precious Blood are truely received by the Faithful according to the express words of the Son of God himself who says Take and eat this is my Body do this in memory of me This is what
if they do not pretend to the honour of a victory neither do they hold themselves obliged to yield it unto us And thus the war continues still since at the conclusion of all our Disputes they find themselves still in a condition to rally their forces to begin the battel again resolutely to deny what we maintain and to maintain what we deny 6. This is clearly to be seen in that famous Contest which has lately made so much noise in the world by occasion of a Book written concerning The perpetuity of the Faith of the Catholick Church in the matter of the Holy Eucharist The Author of the said Book and of in Defence has in three several Works proposed his reasons why it seemâ— impossible that that change of Beleeâ— in point of the most Blessed Sacrament should have happened as they are pleased to charge us chiefly because this could not have been done without some remarkable opposition which notwithstanding we find not at all to have been made in any Age of the Church until the appearing of the Sacramentaries On the contrary he makes it appear that in those very dayes in which this strange Innovation is pretended to have been brought into the world this Doctrine of ours was the common belief of the whole Church which had also received it from former Ages And this he shews by an exact inquiry into all the Authors of the Greek and Latine Church who lived from the seventh unto the tenth Age which is the time they allot for this their pretended alteration and by the general consent of all the Eastern Churches from that time unto this very day Mr. Claude who was the man ingaged himself from the beginning in this quarrel resolved in point of honour to maintain it to the very last And instead of yielding unto the Truth as it would have been honourable enough for him to have done and to have given that glory unto God which is his due chose rather to keep up that credit which he had gotten amongst his own party by publishing there other Treatises in which to give him his due he has done as much as Wit could do in pursuit of his Resolution to defend a very bad Cause for his own and his parties reputation For he pretends to prove by more Reasons than one which he advances with a great deal of freedome and fair shew such as is apt enough to surprise a man at first sight that that alteration or change was not at all impossible Nay he endeavours to lay down the very manner how this came to pass at such time as the Church was fallen off from that particular and distinct knowledge of the truth of this great Mystery into a more confused and general belief oâ— it which reflected not precisely upon either Real Presence or Absence it was easy to fall upon the belief oâ— such things as some did add by way of illustrating the matter and which they were apt to present and the World insensibly to receive under the specious pretence of rendring the Mystery more full of Majesty And being far from giving ground upon the last piece which was set out against him and upon which a finall Conclusion of the difference was to be hoped it is commonly reported that he is already prepared to enter again into the List with more earnestness and resolution theâ— ever to the end to maintain a Dispute in the which being resolved to come to no agreement with his Adversary he opposes him in every petty matter and circumstance For making use of all the Art and Subtilty humane Wit affords which is alwayes sufficiently furnished with some ground or other for contradiction and tracing him in all those by-wayes which the nature of disputation leads into he every where opposes him and by a necessary sequel obliges him to a Contest concerning the matters of fact which he alledges concerning the Authors he cites concerning their interests concerning their inclinations concerning their intrigues concerning the meaning of their expressions concerning the force of his and their reasons concerning the Critical and Historical part In a word he runs quite counter to him in every thing denying as Tertullian has it whatsoever his Adversary maintains and maintaining whatever he denies So true it is that it being once resolved never to yield in such kind of encounters there will never be wanting matter for Dispute even in such things which otherwise appear evident and uncontroulable 7. I make no doubt but the Author of that Learned Work of the Peertuity c. will be able to stand his ground and to gain yet more with the same advantage which so good a Cause has hitherto afforded him The honour which is gotten by the happy mannaging such Disputes is proper for those Great Wits and able Persons who take such pains chiefly for the satisfaction of those who have the same abilities For this cause as I dare not pretend to make one of that number having no other aim in this my undertaking but to serve those who hold not themselves obliged to give themselves the trouble of tedious searches into Greek and Latine Authors so do I willingly and entirely give up that Honour unto him and make choice rather of another Method inferiour indeed in outward shew but much more easy and at the least full as profitable if I obtain the end of my endeavours which is to reduce Protestants by a sweeter way and without contest For this end it will be necessary as we have already infinâ—ated that we make choice of some Rule which is out of Contest between us of some fixed settled Points of some certain Principles which are equally agreed upon by both Parties and from whence by necessary consequence clear and certain Conclusions are deduceable which may unite all understandings in the same Belief concerning this great Mystery To this end I am resolved to alledge nothing in this little Treatise but what Monsieur Claude himself is pleased to grant us and what our Adversaries themselves make use of for the establishing their Pretenses Although absolutely speaking as I touched before there is not any thing which is not subject to exceptions cavils and contentious wranglings even in things themselves most evident supposing a resolution obstinately to defend a Party engaged for and that it comes to be accounted a Point of Honour so to do I cannot for all that understand how that can again be questioned which has once been granted and of which they have at another time endeavoured to make their own advantage So that I cannot well fear lest the Principle which I shall advance should fall under that contest which I so industriously endeavour to eschew For in the establishing of it and in applying of it to our present subject my special care shall be to lay aside all those general Pleas which may be subject to Contest and to make use of none but such as Monsieur Claude himself and his Friends shall
which you give for the holding or renouncing an Article be the true one The first of these you can no more know or be secur'd of then we Aug. cont Ep. Man qu. voc fund unless by means of the Church to whom it is derived by certain Tradition Learn the second then by the same way since there is no other by which you can come to any light thereof This is what Vincentius Lirinensir shews in that excellent Work of his All is not done when we have got the Rule it must also be rightly applyed and according to art For when in the heat of those earnest and tedious contests which do arise about some subject or other every one will confidently affirm that he applies it right and that it is in his sence that Scripture is to be understood who can end the quarrel or who has so much power and authority with the parties as that his Opinion or judgement shall be regarded and bear the sway with them Is it not absolutely necessary that it be some Judge who has received both authority and light from God himself for the performing this office And who can be that Judge but the True Church in which the Parties were before separation and her lawful Representative a Canonical Assembly which alone has full power and Soveraign Authority to say â—uridically It seemed good to the Holy Ghost and us Visum est Spiritui sancto nobis Act. 15. Whatever else you can alledge may as well be alledged by another who may make his advantage of it in as good measure and proportion as your self can possibly do The gift of Understanding the interiour Unction the revelation of the Father the private Spirit and a hundred other pretty inventions which have been and are at this day made use of contain nothing of regular general or certain in them or which an adversary may not affirm he has as much right to challenge as you Who then is able to free us from uncertainties in such encounters as these who can restore us a calm after such a Tempest who will bring back day to us after so dark a night who will bless us with peace after war who can bring such spirits together again into the same Sheep-fold under one and the same Shepherd Can this be done but by the Church of Jesus Christ That Church which is The pillar and ground of 1 Tim. 3.1 Truth That House of God which is built upon a living Rock Mat. 16.18 and when all the powers of Hell shall never shake which most certainly they had done before this had she once erred in defining matters of Faith Finally that Spouse of Jesus Christ which he has endowed and quickened with his own Spirit for the instruction and education of the Children of his Family 7. I know you will approve of this Nay I know it is to her you pretend to resort and make your addresses in your Assemblies or Synods for the cleering your doubts and determining matters of difficulty and differences which often arise among you I ask but this one thing at your hands Do but proceed faithfully and sincerely therein Omnes nos necesse est apud Christi tribunal adstare redentes rationem imprimis ipfius Fidei Tertull. de praescr c. 44. And to this end I beg of you in the Name of that Great God whom we adore and who is to be our Judge demanding of us principally an account of our Faith that returning back to the source of our divisions you will be pleased to reflect that those who first questioned and disputed the Points which made the breach were even in their own judgements of the same Church which before the breach was the only and by necessary consequence the True Church That consequently that Church during the contest had full power to judge according to Rule and Order and to define what was to be believed and that the Parties were bound to submit to her Decrees That those who stood condemned by her Canons having separated themselves from her became Schismaticks as well as Hereticks Because not adhering to the Doctrine of the True Church of which they were members before their condemnation they made a Party against her and withdrew themselves into a society apart which was cut off from Communion with her And that finally all those who follow or take part with them though a thousand years after are no other then disciples and followers of Schismaticks and Hereticks This is the Totall of what in this linde Treatise principally in the matter of the Blessed Sacrament I have endeavoured to evince without conâ—â—ing or Disputing the matter out of such Principles or the necessary consequences drawn from them as we have been perfectly agreed upon 8. Now I beseech you Gentlemen give me leave to tell you with as real a desire of your eternal Salvation as the Prophet Nathan had for that of David when he spoke those moving words to him which pearc'd his heart Tu es ille vir Alas Gentlemen it is you who unfortunately are engaged in the party of those first rebells who forsook the Church to revenge themselves of those Decrees which condemned their Opinions As the Laws both Humane and Divine right reason natural understanding and the order and method which your selves do observe oblige you to acknowledge that they were bound to submit to the Judgement of that Church which themselves owned to be the True one and that they could not separate from her but by evident Schisme so is it certain that you after so many ages which have passed since their Condemnation cannot joyn with them following their Doctrine and proceedings without bearing a part with them in their crime and becoming guilty of their defection Rather quit their company wihose origin your selves condemn Return into the bosom of that Church from which you find the first Authors of that Sect could not in Conscience and natural equity withdraw themselves as they did upon that score onely that the Decree was not in favour of their cause Do not any longer trouble your selves as they do with Disputing pleading and excepting after Sentence is once pass'd Allow me to speak unto you in the language of that worthy Martyr of Christ and great Bishop of Lyons St. Irenaeus Why do you Non opâ—rteâ— adhuc quaerere apud alios veritatem quam facile est aâ— Ecclesiâ sumere cum Apostoli quasi in depositorium dives plenissimè in eam contulerint omnia quae sunt veritatis ut omniâ— quicunque velit sumat ex eâ potum vitae Haec est enim vitae introïtus omnes autem reliqui fures sunt latrones propter quod oportet devitâ—â— quidem ilios quae autâ—m sunt Ecclesiae tum summa diligentia deligere apprehendere vertatis tâ—â—â—tionem â—ren lib. 3. adv haer c. 4 Câ—ucirc mâ—â—sta quaeâ—in flu 〈◊〉 varâ—â—â— haberet iâ—ter se collega um salâ—â unâ—ta 〈…〉 hoc
explication oâ— their Doctrine so fully as it was afterwards thought fitting to do and thâ— they did not judge it necessary to descend to all those particulars which were examined and looked into in afteâ— Ages It was possible also that the would not deduce all those particular sequels which were inclosed or shut up as it were in those Principles which they established as our Blessed Saviour himself had formerly dealt with theâ— It is also very likely that men oâ— of neglect not preserving those Truth in memory as they ought to have done they came insensibly to â—e forgotten or that whilest mens wits were wholly taken up in defending some part oâ— them against Hereticks who opposed them there was not so much heed taken of those others which never came into Controversy However it be this iâ— indubitably certain that a time there was when many things were not clearly and distinctly known nor at such time obligatory as to exercise of faith which the Church has since placed in the number of such things as are belonging to Faith For although all those things were comprehended in Holy Scripture and in the Doctrine of the Apostles and that there alwayes were the same marks to know them by yet they were not alwayes taken notice of with the same reflexion or application But now by occasion of Disputes which have been raised at certain times the Church having set her self to examine them legally and according to form and making reflexions upon Holy Scripture and looking back upon the neighbouring times of the Apostles making up by such means unto the Fountain-head of true Apostolical Tradition she has declared them to be of faith as being exactly conformable to the Rule of Belief 6. I do not say therefore what some haply of our Adversaries who are not so well acquainted with our Tenets may reproach me with that the Church has Authority to frame new Articles of Faith No I do acknowledge together with them that she cannot act but according to Rule which is the holy Scripture and Tradition truely and purely Apostolical from which also we have received the holy Scripture it self She holds forth nothing new but she proposes unto us Antiquity which we knew not before She does not give new birth to Scars which never were before but she makes them appear in that Instre which formerly they had done by removing those clouds which did obscure them She has no new revelations she onely publishes those antient ones of which we had no formeâ— assurance Finally she settles no other Principles but such as she receiveâ— from our Saviour himself out of which by force of her light and certain necessary sequels she makes those Veritieâ— appear which were hidden and as 〈◊〉 were Quid est Depositum Id est quod tibi creditum est non à te inventum quod acceptisti non quod excogitasti 〈◊〉 rem non ingenii sed doctrinae non usurpationiâ— privatae publicae traditionis rem ad te perductam non a te prolatam in quae â—on author debes esse sed custos non instituâ—or sed sectator non ducens sed sequens Comment 1. c. 27. shut up in those Principles This is that which Vincentius Lirineâ— sis expresses most admirably applying unto the Church those words of S. Paâ— to his Disciple Timothy Depositum câ—stodi keep well the Depositum which 〈◊〉 put into your hands What is the meaning of this Depositum saith he speaking of matters of Faith It is that which you are intrusted with and by no means that which your self have invented It is that which you have received and in no wise that which your self have found out it is not the result of your own Wit or understanding but it is what you learn from that Doctrine which has been taught you It is not any thing which you have established in the World by your own private Authority it is a Point of Tradition which you have been trusted with for the publick good It is a Treasure of which there was no Mine in your own Land You are not the Author â—ut the conserver of this Doctrine You are not here the Guide but he that follows the Guide What Guide The Word of God which is this Guide and the true Rule of Holy Church Vald. l. 2. Doct. fid c. 22. Can. l. 2. de Com. 7. à castro de Luâ— go valentia alii Videte quid dicat qui fuerunt non qui sunt ut exceptis Apostolis quodcunque aliud postèa dicetur abscindatur Hier. in Ps 86. All our Divines agree in this Doctrine which they have taken from the Holy Fathers For St. Hierome has it in exâ—ess terms upon the 86. Psalm where he Psalmist sayes that Our Lord will delare in Scriptures of People and of Prinoes and of those that have been in her He makes use sayes St. Hierome of a word signifying time past fuerunt that have been because we are to hold nothing for a Point of Faith in the Church but what we find in the Prophers and in the Apostles who are the Princes of the Church And upon this ground it is that St. Irenaeus and after him S. Augustine saith That the faith of our Ancestors and ours makes but one and the same Faith because we believe nothing at this day which was not contained in the whole Body of their Faith The Church therefore never did make Iren. l. 3. c. 2 lib. 4. c. 13 Aug. Ep. 51 and undoubtedly never will make any new Articles of Faith since it is not in her power to define any thing but according to the Word of God which she is alwayes to consult with as with her Oracle and the Rule she is bound to follow But there is no question also but upon occasion of Differences from time to time in mens judgements and opinions she has often declared for and defined some Points which were antecedently by some questioned and that without offence or at least were not known before unless in general and by a confused kind of knowledge There is nothing more certain nor more common in the History of the Church and Councils where you shall frequently see defined and proposed as a Point or Principle of Faith that which before Conteâ—â—s did arise and before that violent clashing which has been in almost every Age of the Church about some Point or other in Controversy which was neither defined nor so much as thought of For example concerning the authentickness of some Canonical Books concerning the validity of Baptisme conferred by Hereticks concerning one or two Wills and operations in our Blessed Saviour concerning the Procession of the Holy Ghost and many such like All which are now no more to be called in question although before the definition of the Church it might have been done without offence For if it be true that it belongs unto her to propose that as matter of Faith which was not before
particularly into the Difficulties of this Holy Sacrament they were struck at them and did accordingly seek to lessen the weight of this Mystery by humane wayes and Philosophical explications and to qualify them with certain solutions which drew near to those of the Calvinists Moreover whether Ioannes Scotus and Bertramus be two several Authors or but one and the same Whether he or they did directly oppose the Doctrine of Poscâ—sius or whether they onely gave him a hit indirectly by teaching a Doctrine contrary to his in the ninth Age Whether his or their Schollers did or did not follow the blow in the tenth Age Whether their Disputes grew cold or hot at the beginning of the eleventh Age And whether Leutherilus Arch-Bishop of Sens did or did not engage in the quarrel for a Real Absence all which is matter of Contest between Monsieur Arnaud and Monsient Claude it is enough for me that after opposition was made against the Doctrine of Pascasius at such time as his Book was come to be publick and common there were occasioned again very frequent and most earnest Disputes concerning the same Subject during the life of Berengarius and after his death For although we should grant unto Mr. Claude what we may with reason enough refuse him we shall still find ways enough to come handsomly and quietly off and we find our selves still in that very posture condition where we should just be for the ending this difference without violating that peace we endeavour to preserve For in fine Monsieur Claude will have it that people had for some time only a coufused kind of knowledge without positively believing or rejecting a Real Presence or Real Absence That Pascasius was the first who took upon him to propose distinctly the Doctrine of Real Presence by way of addition explication and confirmation of the Mystery that notwithstanding the opposition which was made this Doctrine insensibly got the upper hand by the care which his disciples took for the spreading of it abroad and establishing it in the world He is obliged also to acknowledge that in the time of Berergarius those who stood for a Real Absence taking courage from the number of their Partisans renewed the Contest with a great deal of heat and earnestness even to the making a great noise in the Church which continued many years after the decease of Berengarius The Controversie was concerning Scripture and the meaning of those Places which were alledged on both sides out of the Holy Fathers Every one pretended to have them on their sides and boasted of Antiquity which they would needs have to stand for them Each Party maintained that their Opinion had the true marks thereof and that such had been the Belief of former Ages Behold here the very state of affairs between the Arminians and the Gomarists before the National Synod Here are just the circumstances in which as we have seen the Church had power to make use of her legal Right in deciding and proposing Points of Faith and obliging the Faithful to a belief of them even although they were not clearly and distinctly known for suczh before the raising of the Contest And consequently laying all other Disputes aside for the present I think we have now outhing else to do but to see whether the Church did in those dayes define any thing concerning this matter that we may stick to this as to the setled and resolv'd of Point which 〈◊〉 never to be forsaken And this is what remains to be done in this last undertaking 6. It is not my intention here to â—â—course the matter concerning the maâ—â— and qualities of the True Church This is already done to my hand by the Learned Cardinal Bellarmin and Câ—dinal Richelieu with exceeding great strength of wit and clearness of reasâ— in those great Works of theirs in which they have also apprepriated them to the Church of Rome Should I take 〈◊〉 road I know I should be stopped more than once by those Gentlemen who will not at all allow of what they 〈◊〉 of this kind in those Works although those Great men say nothing upon this subject as I must needs think but what they prove most evidently and convincingly But since it does not please these Gentlemen to think so and I for my part profess not to intermeddle in this small Treatise with things of that nature and to reliuquish some part of my right rather than come to Dispute it I am willing to take another more peaceable way and propose nothing as yet which themselves are not â—â—liged to grant me if they be not reâ—â—ved to condemn their own proceedings I have therefore only this little short Discourse to make by way of cerâ—in Corollaries which follow out of what seems already agreed upon First When we are of a Community or Church which is presupposed to be the True one we are bound to acknowledge that an Assembly of the Passors of that Church which is made by publick Authority according to Rule and Custome does represent the said Church Secondly That that Church of which the first Contestors were Members before one Party separated themselves upon their condemnation was the true Church because she was the onely Church before separation made It cannot then be questioned both Patties must of necessity be agreed upon it but that she being the onely Church owned by both Parties was also without all doubt at that time even in their own opinions the True Church and the Spouse of Christ Thirdly That it belongs to this Assembly representing this Church to determine all Differences and Contests which may arise in any matter of Religion whatsoever Fourthly That particular persons who argue pro or con concerning the Point in Contest of what quality soever they be and those who take part with one or other side for the upholding either are the Parties Contesting and as such and under that notion cannot represent the Church which is Judge in the case Fifthly That they as all others are bound to submit to the Decisions of the said Assemblies Sixthly That if they refuse obedience and separate themselves from her framing another independent Body and Community by themselves they are declared rebells and Schismaticks And finally That those who adhere unto them whether presently or a long time after are guilty of the same crime I think there is nothing more evident and certain than what I have now proposed Otherwise the Church which Jesus Christ who is the God of Order has established with so much Wisdom He who is Wisdom it self would prove a meer Babylon and a fearfull Confusion of all things where there never were any distinction to be made between good and bad true and false since it would be in the power of every one with the assistance of a Party to make himself at his pleasure Judge and Church and any thing for the making that pass for Truth which was rejected as a notorious falshood 7. In Civil
have made a wilful separation from them and declared themselves new Protestants by a new Protestation that according to and in conformity with Holy Scripture which they onely relyed upon their Doctrine was purely Orthodox and that they were the true Church it is certain they would have either heartily contemned their rashness or commiserated their extreme folly And if they had continued refractory and obstinate in their resolution they would have cut them off as corrupt members from the Body of their pretended Reformed Church And this is not to be wondered at because in this they are agreed as well as we That an Assembly of Pastors convocated by Authority represents that Church of which those persons who were at Debate are members and is acknowledged by them to be the True Church because the only Church before Separation and that it belongs to her to end all Differences it not being in the power of the contestors to refuse submission to her Decrees or to fall off from her calling themselves the true Church at a less rate then being esteemed Schismaticks and people that proceed very irrationally This being so solidly grounded and setled by mutual consent it seems to me we are now in a very ready way to end all our quarrells and reunite our understandings by an application of this undubitable maxime unto the matter in hand according to the Principles of Monsieur Claude himself For he will needs have it as we have already taken notice and in this very knack it is that consists the great Secret of the change he so strongly fancies that there was a time when the True Church had but a confused knowledge of this Mysterie without so much as dreaming of a Real Presence or Real Absence Those who first took upon them as he sayes to maintain a Real Presence were of that Church and those who opposed it were also of the same Church because before Sentence given in the case the Church which was fallen into that confused knowledg had not yet resolved which distinctly and positively Presence or Absence was of obligation to be believed and consequently of what belief soever any one for his particular was there was no separation from her made or intended Afterwards Debates and Disputes increased confiderably and broke out at length into very great heats and violence which forced the said Church to call an Assembly of her Pastors who were her Representatives for the clearing and deciding a Point of so great importance Behold us now in the very same conjuncture of things and upon the self-same terms with the Synod of Dort And it is very certain that that Church in which the followers of Pascasius were and those who according to Monsieur Claude opposed his Doctrine held no Council in the ninth or tenth Age wherein this difference was decided in favour of a Real Absence There is not any one of our adversaries who so much as pretends to this advantage against us I am also satisfied that there was none during that time which did conclude the business by setling the Doctrine of Real Presence We can onely infer from hence that the Church having not as yet declared for either side was in the same state and condition she then was in when both Parties acknowledged her for the True Church And even this gives us sufficiently to understand that those disputes if there were any concerning the Doctrine of Pascasius were not then come to any great height or heat since the Church in which the Parties were did not as yet take any notice of them And certainly it is no easie matter to make it out that there was any considerable Contest concerning this subject during the time of the tenth Age. But when in the eleventh Age those who appeared in opposition to this Doctrine made so much stir and noise as to oblige the Church to prevent the mischief by a seasonable and solemn Judgement then was it that this same Church which before she declared her self was owned for and in reality was lawful Judge in the case did not omit to call a Canonical Council for deciding the matter And which is very remarkable never did hold a more solemn one nor ever did she expresse her self more clearly and more effectually concerning any subject For when Berringarius Arch-Deacon of Angiers who had also wrought upon and gained Bruno Bishop of the same Church unto his Party began to take up and engage for the Doctrine of Iohn Scotus or Bertram which at the first had made no great noise and to maintain it with a great deal of vapouring and busle against the Real Presence two Councils were held in one year Anno 1050. the one at Rome and the other at Vercelles where the Opinion of Berengarius was declared heretical as being contrary to the Word of God and the Book of Iohn Scotus from whence he had taken it raising it a strain higher against the Real Presence was also condemned About some five years after another Council was held at Tours where berengarius himself appeared to give an account of his Doctrine which was examined in his presence and condemned by a Decree made against it to which he subscribed with his own hand abjuring his Error and promising under oath never to defend it more But he breaking his oath and falling again to broach his old Principles another Council of an hundred and thirteen Bishops was solemnly held at Rome where this Arch-deacon was again heard speak for himself also and his Doctrine again condemned not onely by the Council but by himself who publickly renounced and anathematised it according to that famous Formula Ego Berengarius c. de consecr dist 2. which was composed and approved by the whole Council himself having desired it should so be done after he had burnt the Books of Iohn Scotus in full and open Council But he being of a most unsetled spirit and finding much difficulty to quit the honour of being Head of a Party which was highly agreeable to his ambitious humour quickly began again to instruct his Schollers in the old way and that he might make them the more sure to him had the boldness to write against that very Formula which himself had signed with his own hand This was the cause that twenty years after another Council was called at Rome where this poor Relapsed creature being now about fourscore years old did again ask pardon for that miserable relapse he had made into that Error which he now the third time retracted and abjur'd signing a new Formula which did contain in more clear and express terms the Real Presence and the changing of Bread and Wine into the Body and Blood of our Lord. And he signed it purposely in that manner because his Disciples following his example had perverted the words of the other Formula into quite another sence This last time he shewed himself by his constancy to be more man than formerly For he