whereas in the abstract it is alleaged that the Bishop by vertue of the order and forme appointed by act of Parliament bindeth the Minister as well to Minister the discipline of Christ within his cure The Minister by promise bindeth himself to minister the discipline of Christ page 55 page 60 as the doctrine and Sacraments of Christ as the Lord hath commanded c. hereunto first he answereth that these clauses doe not dispositively ordaine any thing for discipline as though the law meant by authoritie hereof to establish that the order in these things by the Realme received should bee holden as agreeable to the Word of God but must be taken enunciatively to declare and affirm that following the order by law established they should doe agreeable to Gods will But alas what repugnancie is there heard for how can the law declare and affirme that the Ministers following the order by law established shall doe agreeable to Gods will if the order in these things by the Realme received should not by the meaning of the law be Repugnance â—â— the answer to the abstract holden as agreeable to the Word of God What doth the law meane that a man can doe agreeable to Gods will in any thing which is not agreeable to his word or if the law have established an order in the discipline which is not agreeable to Gods word shall the Ministers doe agreeably to Gods will if they follow the Law For the meaning of the Law is plaine viz. that the Minister by vertue of his promise made to the Bishop shall bee no further bound to Minister any Doctrine Sacraments or Discipline received by the Realme unlesse the Realme have received the same according to the commandement of God For the Parliament having a religious consideration that the Minister of Christ must not have so much respect what the law of the Realme as what the Law of God commandeth carefully provided for his indemnitie in this behalfe Besides what a frivolous comment hath he made upon the words of the booke when he saith that these words of the Bishop do not A frivolous comment upon the words of the book of ordaining of priests c. dispositively ordaine any thing for discipline When as the question is not whether the Bb. words but whether the law and booke dispose any thing for discipline For the Bishop being but a servant to the booke and to the law and one unto whose fidelitie the execution of the law and booke is committed though he doe not by his words dispose any thing of discipline yet by his demand he sheweth unto the Minister that the office of the Ministration of Discipline within his cure and charge is committed unto him and that by his ordination his person is fully enabled as well to minister the Discipline as to preach the doctrine of Christ And hereupon also falleth to the ground his other answer as wholly impertinent to the point in question For where he saith that the Law meant not by authoritie hereof to establish that the order of these things by the Realme received should be holden as agreeable to the word of God The answer to the abstract wholly impertinent to the point in question this I say seemeth wholly impertinent to the purpose of the abstract For there is no such thing insinuated to be intended by the statute only the scope of the Authors drift in that place seemeth to be this viz. That every Minister by vertue of his promise enjoyned by act of Parliament to be made by him and by the office of ministerie taken upon him at the time of his ordination hath bound himselfe to minister the doctrine sacraments and discipline of Christ as the Lord hath commanded And what then if the law have not authorized disposed or established in particularitie the order The not disposing in particularity all rites and ceremonies of discipline doth not hinder the exercise of discipline by the Minister of these things or if the Scripture have not delivered every ceremonie forme or circumstance about these three things shall not the Minister therefore minister these or any of these three things at all And suppose I pray you that neither this nor any other law had in particularitie appointed the ceremonie of the Crosse the ceremonie of Godfathers or any other ceremonie in Baptisme or that the Law had not appointed the ceremonie of kneeling or any other ceremonie at the celebration of the Lords Supper should not the Minister therefore minister neither Baptisme nor the Lords Supper in the charge committed unto him yes he should And why forsooth because he hath promised so to doe and because the Lord hath commanded him so to doe Besides sithence every Minister by vertue of his promise and force of this law is bound to teach the doctrine of Christ to the people of his charge notwithstanding he be not tyed by the law of the Realme nor by the holy Scripture to any rite ceremonie or circumstance or to any exact forme or particular manner in teaching what reason can any man pretend that the not particularising of all rites ceremonies or circumstances in the Scripture or the not establishing of any order by the law of the Realme touching discipline should altogether hinder Answer to the abstract pag. 59. page 55. every Minister from the administration of all discipline in the Church For as touching the Answer that the Ministers may and doe exercise not the least parts of Discipline of declaring by Doctrine according to the word of God mens sinnes to bee Dis of declaring by doctrine is called disc erroneously bound and loosed and the censure of rebuking and reproving openly and that the discipline which the Minister is to execute reacheth no further than to teach his parish with all diligence to keepe and observe so much of the Doctrine Sacraments and Discipline of Christ as appertaineth unto them as touching this answer I say it is as erroneous as the former weâ—e frivolous and impertinent For as consolation and comfort by way of exhortation so reproofe and sharpe rebuking by way of dehortation belong properly to that part of the Ministers function which concerneth the binding and loosing of sinners by doctrine and not by discipline and is but an application of the doctrine to a wounded or seared conscience He therefore that leaveth no other dissipline to be executed by the Pastour of the Church than of declaring by doctrine mens sinnes to be bound or loosed and by teaching his Parish to observe doctrine sacraments and discipline confoundeth the matters both of discipline and doctrine Againe if not any other discipline Dâ—scipline and doctrine confounded by the Answerer was meant to be attributed to every Minister than such as is declared by doctrine then these words viz. and the discipline of Christ were superfluously and idlely added by the Parliament For then had it beene sufficient for the Parliament to have enjoyned the
they joyntly should not execute the discipline of Christ viz. excommunication and other censures of the Church in every parish within his kingdome If it bee answered that in this case the Presbyter alone doth excommunicate is it not as if one should say that the executioner doth give judgement when at the commandement of the Judge he smiteth off the head or casteth downe the ladder or may not as much be said for the execution whereof we speak that the Pastor only should excommunicate when by vertue of his office with the consent and not by the prescript of the elders associated unto him he should declare and pronounce the partie to be excommunicated but let it be granted that Rowland Allen denounceth the lesson which is written in the paper for him to read yet it is cleare by the precept that the same must bee done by the prescript of Doctor Hone Besides Doctor Hone he citeth he precognizateth the parties and they being absent hee pronounceth them contumaciter absentes and in poenam contumaciarum suarum hujusmodi decreeth them to bee excommunicate and are not all these necessarie parts incident to the execution of discipline by excommunication And how then can the Minister bee said to excommunicate alone when Doctor Hone of necessitie must play three parts of the foure without all or without any one of which parts the excommunication by reason of a nullitie is meerely voide Againe the Act being done as it were uno puncto ac uno halitu and Rowland Allen and Doctor Hone having their commission from the Archdeacon in solidum how can their judgement be divided Furthermore to say that Rowland Allen doth excommunicate by the authoritie of Doctor Hone were to overthrow the intendment of the article Because by the scope of the article it is plaine that the presbyter to be associated to the officiall must only derive his authoritie from one who hath taken Ecclesiasticall orders But those orders Doctor Hone never tooke otherwise Rowland Allens presence had been unnecessarie and superfluous And therefore if the excommunication bee of any validitie then is discipline by excommunication in the Church of England exercised partly by our lay-Elder as they call him and partly by one Ecclesiasticall Elder wherein againe it is worthy the observation for the matter we have in hand that D. Hone a meere lay and temporall man hath authoritie from the Archdeacon to call and associate unto him and to prescribe R. Allen a Presbyter and an other mans hireling Curate in Southwarke to excommunicate not only the Parochians of an other Pastors charge but any other Pastour whatsoever subject to the Archdeacons jurisdiction And hath not the Kings highnesse then as good right as great a priviledge and as high a Prerogative to command Master Doctor Andros or Master Doctor King and lay Elders by a lawfull election to be associated unto either of them to excommunicate either of their owne parishioners for publike drunkennesse or other notorious sinnes committed in their owne parish For if it be lawfull at the voice of a lay stranger that an hireling and stipendarie Curate should chase an other mans sheep out of his owne fold how much more is it it lawfull that a true shepheaâ—d should disciplinate his owne sheepe feeding and couchant within his own pasture and within his owne fold Furthermore touching the admittance of governing Elders or lay Elders as they call them unto the Minister of every congregation according to the former pattern of one lay Elder that the same is not a matter so strange for lay men to bee joyned in this charge Lay men appointed by the Queenes injunctions to execute some part of discipline of ecclesiasticall government as the opposites beare us in hand to bee it shall not be amisse to call unto their remembrances one of our late Soveraigne the Queenes injunctions whereby certaine lay persons called overseers were commanded to be chosen by the ordinaries in every parish for the better retaining of the people in obedience unto divine service In every parish saith the Injunction three or foure discreet men which tender Gods glory and his true religion shall bee appointed by the Ordinaries diligently to see that all the parishioners duely resort unto their Church upon all Sundayes and holydayes and there to continue the whole time of the Godly Service And all such as shall be negligent in resorting to the Church having no great or urgent cause of absence they shall straightly call upon them and after due admonition if they amend not they shall denounce them to the Ordinarie Thus farre the injunction Which that it is not meant of the Church wardens appeareth by the very next article for unto them as is assigned an other name so also another office That sidemen also are not these kinde of overseers is plaine in that they be neither so many in number as are here required neither chosen by the Ordinaries neither yet doe they admonish and denounce according to this article Wherefore because it is meet that the effect of this injunction being religious should be put in due execution it seemeth a thing very reasonable and much tending to the honour of the King that his Highnesse under his letters patents would bee pleased to appoint three foure or more discreet and faithfull persons in every Parish not only to performe the effect of this article but also generally to oversee the life and manners of the people that without great and urgent causes they resort not unto Typling-houses or houses of evill note and suspected fame and that upon the Sabbaths they use no heathenish dancing about their disguised May-poles And after due admonition if they amend not to denounce them to the Pastor of the place For then might the Pastor Book of the form of ordeining Priests be encouraged to give his faithfull diligence as at the time of his ordination he solemnly promiseth unto the Bishop alwaies to Minister the Doctrine and Sacraments and Discipline of Christ as the Lord hath commanded by which words inserted it the booke there is a plaine and open confession made by all estates in Parliament that Christ hath not only established discipline but a certaine forme of discipline in his Church and that the pastour to whom Every Minister ought to minister the discipline of Christ in his owne cure by consent of Parliament the care and charge is committed to teach the people ought to minister the same discipline For it had beene a very absurd part for the Parliament to appoint the Bishop to receive a promise from the Ministers to minister the discipline of Christ if Christ had not instituted a discipline or that the same discipline which he instituted had not in their judgements belonged unto the Minister And therefore this very letter of the booke convinceth the whole answer made unto the abstract touching this point to be very erroneous frivolous and impertinent to the point in question For
Bishop to demand of the Minister only this and no more viz. whether will you give all faiâ—hfull diligence to minister the Doctrine and Sacraments of Christ There is therefore some other kinde of Discipline of Christ intended by the Parliament to The Parliament intendeth some other disciplinâ—â—â—han of declaring by doctrine be attributed unto every Minister and wherewith also the law of the Realme doth enable every Minister than is this manner of discipline oâ— declaring by doctrine and teaching the people And this discipline also must needs be understood to be of the spirituall censures of the Church because Christ never instituted any other discipline And therefore because our opposites agree with us in a generalitie that the doctrine Sacraments and discipline of Christ are to be ministred as the Lord hath commanded only and none otherwise and yet neverthelesse doe dissent from us touching the persons Answer to the abstract 55 60 by whome this discipline is to be ministred because say they every particular ceremonie rite or circumstance of externall policie are not set downe in Scripture because of this their answer I say it is to be considered First unto what persons the function of the ministration of the discipline of Christ by the holy Scriptures is committed Secondly whether the same persons with their functions bee arbitrable ceremonious â—â—â—rituall or circumstantiall To what persons the discâ—pline of Christ by the Scriptures is committed and whether the persons be arbitrable or no Phil. 1. 1. Tit. 9 5 7 to bee altered and changed by authoritie of the Church as things indifferent yea or no. To the first seeing to one and the selfe same person the holy Scriptures attribute these two names Bishop and Pastor thereby signifying what are the two duties which belong to the same one person and seeing also no one person by Gods word is called a Bishop or Pastour in regard of his fellow brethren the other Bishops or Pastours but in regard of his owne flocke which hee overseeth and seeing also in well ordered Churches by the Ordinance of God certaine men of approved godlinesse 1 Tim 3 1 called according to the common name of the Hebrewes by the common name of Elders whom partly calleth Governors 1 Cor. 12 28. were joyned as Ecclesiasticall Magistrates to the Bishop Pastor or teaching Elder by whose common direction and authority Ecclesiasticall discipline was practised seeing I say these things are so we affirme that the persons to whom the ministration of the discipline of Christ rightly belongeth are the persons onely above specified and none other And further we say if any spirituall Discipline or The Discipline of Christ pâ—ophaned if the same be ministred by other persons than the holy Scriptures do appoint power which directly be longeth unto the Conscience be ministred in the Church by any other persons than by those persons onely that the same Discipline is not to bee called the Discipline but a meere prophanation of the Discipline of Christ For as it is unlawfull for any person to usurpe any part of the Bishops or Pastors office which consisteth in spirituall teaching the word and administring the Sacraments so is it also unlawfull for any person to usurpe any part of a Bishops Pastors or Elders office which consisteth in spirituall rule and government Whereupon it secondly followeth that the same persons with their functions are not arbitrable ceremoniall rituall and circumstantiall as things indifferent to bee altered by the authority of the Church but perpetuall substantiall essentiall and as it were the very maine and fundamentall pillers to uphold and stay the House of God from all spirituall sliding and falling downe And therefore from the execution of the Discipline of Christ we seclude the persons of all humane Archbishops humane Bishops Suffrafanes Arch-deacons Chancellors Commissaries Officials and all Rowland Allens because their persons together with their functions are arbitrable ceremonious rituall traditionall or circumstantiall yea and removeable at the pleasure of the King and State Neither doth this disagree from that which was erst said of a A Bishop Pastor and Elder and our Lord â— diffr Bishop or Pastor that they be all one in respect of their function For it is not said that an humane Bishop and Pastor but that a Bishop and Pastor are all one For a Bishop simply so called is not a Bishop and Pastor in respect of his fellow brethren but only in regard of his flocke which he over-seeth feedeth and ruleth But a What a Lord â— is humane Bishop is hee that is promoted unto this dignitie by man and who by mans authority taketh upon him superiority and preheminence over them which are equall unto him touching their function that intangleth himselfe with civill government and worldly affaires and whose Bishoply office consisteth not so much in the dispensation of Gods Word and Sacraments as in Lordly and Bishoply apparell Crossing with the signe of the Crosse confirmation of Children sole imposition of hands sole excommunication sole enjoyning of Articles upon the people and Clergie of his Diocesse consecration of Oratories delegation of his Episcopall authority to his Suffragane Vigar generall and principall officiall and other such humane and Bishoply functions All which are after the customes precepts and traditions of men And albeit D. O. by vertue of the Queenes congedelier were chosen by the Deane and Chapter of Lichfield in Episcopum Pastorem Ecclesiae Lichfieldensis The Lord Bishop of Lichfield is never honored with the title of being Lord Pastor Pastorall authority of a Lord Bishop and of other Pastours is equall yet is hee never intituled with the dignity of being the Lord Pastor but onely with the honour of being the Lord Bishop of Lichfield so that one and the selfe same person being a Bishop and a Pastor may bee a Lord Bishop over Pastors but not a Pastor over Pastors Whereupon it followeth that the Pastorâ—ll authority which he hath in common with his brethren the other Pastors of his Diocesse is of superiority or proheminence above theirs and that touching the function both of his and their Pastorall cure and charge there is a paritie betweene him and them by reason whereof hee can have no power over them because par in parem non habet imperium But why is it that he can not be called Pastor Pastorum Ecclesiae Lichfieldensis Lord Pastor of the Pastors of the Church of Lichfield and yet may be called Dominus Episcopus Pastorum Ecclesiae Lichfieldensis Lord Bishop of the Pastors of the Church of Lichfield Why but only for that there is custome tradition and the Law of man for his Episcopall jurisdiction and for that his pastorall function if he have any belongeth unto hâ—m in common with his brethren the other Pastors jure divino The Whether a lord Bishop minister the doctrin Sacrament discipline of Christ by vertue of his lorldly episcopall or pastorall office
Bishop then having these two severall and distinct offices imposed upon his person the one by divine the other by humane Law the one humane and Episcopall the other without pomp and pastorall there ariseth from thence this question by which of those two functions hee may lawfully I meane according to Gods Law minister the Doctrine Sacraments and censures of Christ If it bee answered that it is lawfull for him by vertue of his Pastorall office to minister the doctrine and Sacraments and by force of his humane Episcopall office to minister the censures of Christ then is not the answer fitted to the question the same being made à bene conjunctis ad male divisa For the censures of Christ as well as the doctrine of Christ being simply of divine ordinance it must follow if his Episcopall power be onely of humane right and pastorall power be onely of divine institution that the censures may bee ministred by authority derived onely from man but the doctrine and Sacraments by power derived onely from God Which commixion of divine and humane right in the execution of the ordinances of God can no manner of wayes be sound pure and sincere and therefore also can not be pleasing unto God For no more can the censures of Christ to the pleasure of God be lawfully administred by the authoritie of any one whose function is of man and not of God than could the sacrifice of God bee offered by one who was a priest of man and not of God Now that humane Episcopality or Bâ—shoppisme in the Church of England is authorized and deduced from Lordly Episcopality authorized only by the Law of the Realme the power and Law of man viz. of the King and Realme alone is evident as well by the donation and endowment of the Bishoprickes founded by the Kingly Prerogatives of the Kings of this Realme as by the erection and establishment of the new Bishopricks of Chester Gloucester Bristoll Peter borough and Oxford with their Cathedrall Churches Seas Cities meeres and bounds of those humane Bishops for the exercise of their Episcopall administration according to act of Parliament authorizing the Kings Highnesse to make Bishops by His Letters Patents Nay further that humane Episcopall Note that King Henry the eight by letters Patents made Bish therefore c. 31. H. 8. c. 9 jurisdiction within the meres and bounds of every Diocesse within England is meerely of humane and not of divine institution appeareth by that power and authority which the King hath in translating and dissolving of Bishopricks in conserving Episcopall jurisdiction sometimes to such persons as be no Bishops as did William the Conqueror when hee gave Episcopall power to the Abbot of Battaile and lastly by the very manner and forme of the nomination licence of Election and authority of investiture confirmation and consecration of Archbishops and Bishops established by the more positive Law of the Realme But if it bee answered 25. H. 8. c. 20 that the Bishop by his humane Episcopall power doth minister the Doctrine Sacraments and discipline of Christ then is the case worse with him than it was before because then not onely the Discipline of Christ but also the doctrine and Sacraments of Christ should bee ministred by that authority which is of humane institution Besides the answer should be untrue because the Bishop at the time of his consecration doth not receive any authority to preach the Word and minister the Sacraments for that authority was then committed unto him when first he was ordained to be a Presbyter But the authority which hee receiveth at the time of his consecration is to correct and punish such as bee unquiet disobedient and criminous within his Diocesse Whereby once againe is that confirmed which was erst said viz. That Episcopall power in England is not of divine but of humane institution Especially for that by the Scriptures it can not be proved that there bee two severall and distinct formes of ordinations the one called consecration proper to a Lord Bishop for the exercise of Discipline the other called ordination peculiar to a Pastor or teaching Elder for the ministration of the Word and Sacraments Whereunto lastly may bee added another maine reason that Episcopall power in If the Lord Bish have power to minister disâ—ipline by divine right then no more can he commit that his power to an other than he can commit the power which hee hath of preaching to another England to minister the Discipline can not therefore bee of divine institution because if it were of divine institution the Bishop could no more surrogate the same his Episcopall power to his Suffragane to his Vicar generall or Rouland Allen to minister the censures of Christ in his owne name than hee can depute them or any of them to minister the doctrine and Sacraments in his own name But how doth it appeare that the Vicar generall Rowland Allen or any other Presbyter did ever excommunicate by the power or in the name of the Bishop For the proofe hereof we shall not need to search any other authenticall record then the precept and the practice before intreated of For it is not said in the precept that the Presbyter being armed with authority from Christ but it is said that the Presbyter being armed with authority from the Bishop or Archdeacon shall denounce the sentence of excommunication the practice also of Doctor Hone every way confirmeth as much For therein Doctor Hone doth not challenge to be an Officer unto Christ but he saith that he is the officiall of the venerable Archdeacon of Surrey and that Master Rowland Allen Presbyter by vertue of his office doth excommunicate the parties who obeyed not his mandates who made not their appearances before him c. If it be answered that Rowland Allen though he be not an immediate officer from Christ that yet neverthelesse he is a mediate officer depuâ—ed to his office by an immediate officer unto Christ viz. the Lord Bishop or Archdeacon then wee reply and say First that the Lord Bishop and Archdeacon be neither immediate or mediâ—te Officers appointed by Christ to bee ministers of his discipline Secondly if they were immediate officers from Christ that yet they have no authority by the Law of Christ to transfer their right or any part thereof to an other person in their name or by their authoritie to excommunicate As for these words viz. In Dei nomine Amen nos Iohannes Hone or nos Roulandus Allen c. sometimes used in their scedule of excommunication it is but a prophaning of the holy name of God whereby they make themselves guilty of the taking of the glorious name of God in vaine And thus much touching both the question and answer whether the discipline of Christ may be ministred by the Bishops humane Episcopall power yea or no. But now on the other side because no divine censure can lawfully be executed in the Church by that authority
108 How a Minister ought to be called to a place of his examination and approbation by Ministers and the Parish and of his ordination and actuall calling to a place 108 This way laid down before is no such innovation as is pretended it being agreeable to the ancient Lawes of the Land 100 The spirit of the Prophets are subject to the Prophets how to be 112 What is to be done if suit fall out betwixt two Patrons 113 Patrons not so strictly curbed is pretended 114 Prophets to be taken from the Schooles of the Prophets upon difference in judgment of the abilities of men what then to be done 114 Concerning refusall upon non abilitie 116 The benefits insuing the platforme of ordination and required 117 118 What perfection is required in a Minister 120 Prelacy and a learned Ministery cannot stand together 120 That objection answered that the reward of learning being taken away learning it selfe must needs fall to the ground 121 Prelacy the bane of learned Ministers 122 That argument answered concerning the drawing of Schollers out of the Vniversities before they are fit 123 124 The argument concerning excommunication answered by whom excommunication ought to be performed 125 126 127 what it is 128 The inconvenience of the Bishops excommunication 129 It hath many deformities 130 By the Bishops excommunication one may be a communite 130 Excommunication toucheth them only who professe themselves members of the Church 133 The different manner of discipline exercised by Ecclesiasticall Commissioners severall instances in diverse persons set down 134 135 136 The Articles objected by her Majesties High Commissioners for causes Ecclesiasticall against G. B. of B. and F. B. of B. in the County of L. with observations on the Bishops proceedings 1637. 138 139 140 141. with a Copy of the Arch-bishops Letter and answer from the Bishop to that Letter The Argument concerning the bringing in of Aristocracy into the Church answered 143 Prelacy either oligarchie or tyrannīe 144 It is to be feared lest by the examples of the Prelates Oligarchie be brought into the Common-Wealth and therefore a caution is put in against it 145 The government of the Church by Prelates is not Monarchicall 145 If it be so then the government by Pastors may be so too 145 No cause for the Monarch to feare Aristocracy in Church government 147 Pastors disclaime to meddle in civill matters 147 The people of England are rather possessed with the sense of Democracy and Aristocracy 148 The manner of Policy by Pastors and Elders in the Church is agreeable to the government in the Common-wealth but the government by Prelacy is disagreeable 149 The answer of an Italian Bishop being asked vis ne Episcopari And the answer of an English Bishop having obtained his Congedelier 149 150 The manner of administration of justice spirituall in the Church by Prelacy 150 The administration of Iustice spirituall by Pastors and Elders agreeable to the execution of civill justice in the Common-weale 151 No matters of justice civil administred by one alone in the Common-wealth 150 152. Severall ordinances set downe in severall Courts how they proceed 152 153 154. The Government of the Church ought not to bee by one alone 155 156. Severall ordinances thereof in the same pages No exception to bee taken against Lay Elders to be authorized by the King in every Parish since the King authorizeth Lay Elders in Ecclesiasticall commission 157 Discipline of excommunication exercised by one Lay Elder and one Ecclesiasticall Elder an instance of this discipline set downe 157 158 The King hath as good right to command excommunication to be exercised by a Pastor and Elders as the Bishops have to commit the same to a Curate and one Lay Elder 159 Lay men appointed by the Queenes injunctions to execute some part of discipline 160 Every Minister ought to minister the discipline of Christ in his owne cure by consent of Parliament 161 The Minister by promise bindeth himselfe to minister the discipline of Christ 162 The not disposing in particularity all rites and ceremonies of discipline doth not hinder the exercise of discipline by the Minister 163 To what persons the discipline of Christ by Scripture is committed and whether the persons be arbitrable or no 164 165 A Bishop Pastor and Elder and our L. Bishop differ 165. and what a L. Bishop is No Lord Bishop called L. Pastor Pastorall authority of a L. Bishop and of other Pastours is equall 166 Whether a L. Bishop minister the doctrine Sacraments and Discipline of Christ by vertue of his Lordly Episcopall or Pastorall office 166 Lordly Episcopality authorized only by the Realme 167 If the L. Bishop have power to minister Discipline by divine right then no more can hee commit that his power to an other than hee can commit the power which he hath of preaching to another 168 Whether L. Bishops by Pastorall Authority may excommunicate a Pastour 169. Pastors over small Flocks are as truly Pastors as Pastors over great Flocks 169. As great parity between Pastors and Pastors as between Apostles and Apostles 169 Not onely Kings of great kingdomes but also Kings of small kingdomes bee true Kings 170. Rurall Deanes in Cheshire c. use some part of Episcopall power 171 Episcopall power to excommunicate granted by papall priviledges or prescribed Vse 171. Power to excommunicate if it be of divine right may not bee prescribed 171. No more preheminence given to a Bishop than to a Minister or to a Lay-man in some places for the use of Excommunication 172 AN ASSERTION FOR True and Christian Church-Policie Wherein certaine politike Objections made against the planting of Pastors and Elders in every Congregation are sufficiently answered And wherein also sundry projects are set downe how the Discipline by Pastours and Elders may be planted without any derogation to the KINGS Royall Prerogative c. ADMONITION THE reason that moveth us not to like of this Pag. 79. platform of Government is that when we on the one part consider the things that are required to be redressed and on the other the state of our Countrey People and Common weale we see evidently that to plant those things in this Church will draw with it so many and so great alterations of the state of Government and of the Lawes as the attempting thereof might bring rather the overthrow of the Gospell among us than the end that is desired ASSERTION THe benefit of all exceptions and advantages to the invaliditie uncertaintie imperfections and insufficiency of this admonitory bill and matters therein contained alwayes saved for answere to so much as concerneth this clause and every other clause and article of the bill hereafter following and without that that there is any matter or thing in the same bill of admonition materiall to be answered unto and not herein or hereby sufficiently answered confessed and avoided traversed and deemed is true in such manner and forme as in the same is set forth and declared