hys part for here are many byshops proctors whō he doth not recken because they are not of his opinion Neither is the dignities of the fathers to be respected in the Councell as he sayth but onely reason nor anyethyng more to be looked for then the truth neyther will I for my part preferre a lye of any byshop be he neuer so rich before a veritie or truth of a poore priest Neither ought a byshop to disdayne if he be rude or vnlearned that the multitude doth not follow hym or that the voyce of a poore learned and eloquent priest should be preferred before his For wisedome dwelleth oftner vnder a bare and ragged cloke then in rich ornamentes and apparell Wherfore I pray you my Lord byshops do not so much contēne your inferiours for the first which dyed for Christ the which also opened vnto all other the way of Martyrdome was no byshop but onely a Leuite As for that whiche Ludouicus and Panormitane do allege touchyng the voyces of Bishops I know not where they haue it Wherfore I desire them that they would tell me where they haue foūd it But if we repeat the examples of old councels we shall finde that the inferiours were alwayes present with the Bishops And albeit that Ludouicus do forbid vs the examples of the apostles I stay my self most vpon their doings For what is more comely for vs to followe then the doctrine customes of the primitiue Church It is sayd therfore in the 15. chapter of the Acts of the Apostles it seemed good vnto the holy ghost and to vs. The whiche word to vs is referred vnto them which are before named the Apostles and the Elders Neither this word it semed good signifieth in this place consultation but decision and determination whereby it appeareth that other beside that byshops had determining voyces In an other place also of the sayd Actes when as the apostles shoulde intreate vppon anye wayghty matter they durst not determine by themselues but the xii called together the multitude Here Ludouicus sayth that it doeth not appeare y◠the Apostles called other of necessitie but I say vnto hym how knowest thou that they did not call thē of necessitie But for so much as both partes are vncertayne nothing doth prohibite vs to follow the Apostles For seeing that all thinges were written for our learning it appeareth that the Apostles wold geue vs exāple that in wayghty matters we shold admit our inferiours And therfore in all Councels which were celebrate holden afterwards we find that Priestes were also present as in the Councell of Nice whiche of all other was most famous Athanasius being then but onely a priest withstood the Arrians and infringed their argumentes Albeit there were also other priestes And albeit mention be made of 322. byshops yet is not denyed but that the inferiours were there whome I thinke to be omitted for this cause for that they were almost innumerable for as you know well enough the denomination for the most part is taken of the most worthy In the Synode of Calcedon which was counted one of the foure principall Synodes it is sayd that there were present 600. priestes the which name is common both vnto byshops and Priestes In other Councels the name both of Bishops and Priestes is omitted mention made onely of Fathers which hath the same signification the thys worde Elders had in the actes of the Apostles Wee haue also a testimony of the ecclesiasticall history how that ther was a Councell gathered of Rome of lx Byshops and as many Priestes Deacons agaynst the Nouations which called themselues Cathari Also when Paule the Byshop of Antioche in the tyme of Galiene the Emperoure preached that Christ was a man of common nature the Councell assembled agaynst hym in Antioche wherunto there came Byshops out of Cesaria Capadotia out of Pontus Asia and from Ierusalem and many other Byshops Priestes and Deacons and it is said that for that cause the Councel was often holden And at the last in the same place vnder Aurelius the Emperour Paule was condemned of al Christian Churches which were vnder heauē neyther was there any mā which did more confound the sayd Paul then Malchiona Priest of Antioche which taught Rhetorike in Antioche But to make no long digression from the matter we haue most euident testimonies for the defence of the inferiours For the chiefe and principall amongst all the Diuines S. Austen vpō the wordes of Mathew where as Christ saith vnto Peter I wil geue thee the keyes of the kingdome of heauē sayth that by those words the iudiciall power was geuen not only vnto Peter but also to the other Apostles and to the whole Churche the byshops and Priestes If then Priestes haue a iudiciall power in the churche what shold iet that they haue not also a determining voyce in the coūcels The famous Doctour S. Hierome doth also agree with S. Austen whose wordes are these vpon the Epistle of Paule vnto Titus Before that difference was made in Religion by the instigation of the deuill or that it was spoken amongest the people I holde of Paule I of Apollo I of Cephas the Churches were gouerned by the common consent and Councell of the Priestes for a priest is the very same that a byshop is Wherefore all Byshops ought to vnderstand that they are of greater power then Priestes rather by custome then by the dispensation of the truth of God and that they ought to rule the church together And this we do also gather out of Paule vnto Titus which maketh so much concordaunce betweene bishops and priests that oftentimes he calleth priestes Byshops whereby it doth euidently appeare that priestes are not to be excluded from the conuentions of byshops and determinations of matters And albeit as S. Hierom writeth that byshops onely by custome are preferred before Priestes it may be that a contrary custome may take away that custome For if priestes ought to rule the church together with the byshops it is euident that it also pertayneth vnto them to decide and determine the doubtfull matters of the Church Wherfore the testimony of S. Paule is euident for as he writing vnto the Ephesians sayth If Christe instituted hys Apostles Prophetes Pastours and Teachers to the worke of the ministery for the edifying of hys Church vntill such tyme as we should meete hym for this purpose that there should be no doubt in the diuersitie of doctrine who doubteth then but that the gouernaunce of the Church is committed vnto others together with the Apostles Let these our champions now hold their peace and seeme to be no wiser then they ought to be The memoriall of the coūcell of Constance is yet fresh in memory wheras diuers of vs were present and I my selfe also whiche was neither Cardinall nor byshop but onely a Doctour where I dyd see without any maner of doubt of difficultie the inferiors
the church with very good reason doth receiue And that to the great merite both of the geuer and offerer as it appeareth of Constantine and others In the which foresayd 1. cap. the reason of diuersity is well proued For that the Apostles did foresee that the Church should be among Gentiles and not onely to be in Iuda c. And further at the beginning Christ and his Apostles were wholy bent and geuen to our health saluation crudition litle sticking or standing vpō the exercise of euery churches iurisdiction hauing regard to that which is written in the 6. chapter to the Corinthians All thinges are lawfull vnto men but all things are not expedient And likewise in the 8. chapter of Ecclesiastes it is read that euerye thing hath his time But now through the grace of God the whole people of the realme of Fraunce haue submitted themselues to the christian fayth worthely therefore the Church is occupyed about ministring of Iustice and punishing of vice For peace shal be the work of Iustice Esay the 33. chap. And in these iudgements this onely is to be considered that the life of man be reformed c. Thus you see how this our conclusion somewhat is confirmed by the Scriptures Now will I proue it by naturall law reason first after this maner He seemeth most fittest to play a good iudges part which followeth nerest God For properly God is the ruler and directer of al iudgements who sayth Prouerb capite octauo By me the law maker shall decree iustice and iust thinges But Ecclesiasticall persons follow next to God and be neerest him For that they be elected of God into a peculiar people Whereof it is sayd 1. Peter 2. you are a chosen generation a royall priesthood a holy nation and a peculiar people that you should shew the vertues of him that called you c. Ergo it is most fittest that persons Ecclesiasticall and churchmen should iudge of such matters Moreouer none doubteth but that the correction and punishment of sinne belongeth to ecclesiasticall persons wherfore whē such things be not committed without sinne offence of the one party it is euident that the Church may haue cognition thereof Also who so hath power to iudge of the end hath also power to iudge of thinges ordeined to the end for the consideration of the thinges ordeined to the end riseth of the end When therefore the body is ordeined for the life and soule and tēporall thinges for spirituall as to the end The Church which doth iudge of spirituall things may in like maner lawfully iudge of tēporall things All which is sufficiently confirmed In extra c. Iudicijs Where it is sayd that the Accessarye followeth the nature of the principall which appeareth sufficiently by example For so much therfore as these two iurisdictions be compared to two lightes that is to say to the Sunne and to the Moone and all the whole clearenes and brightnesse of the Moon both in forme and vertue dependeth of the Sunne in the Sunne And that the brightnes of the Sunne is not of the Moone or in the Moone it is playne that spirituall iurisdiction which is compared to the Sunne hath it both in forme vertue the iurisdiction temporall and not contrary Many other like reasōs might be brought in But for that the time waxeth short I will omit them Thirdly I proue by the ciuill law Auth. Diffe Iud. ¶ Si tamen ix col where it is sayd If a secular iudge be suspected let the Bishop of the Citty be ioyned vnto him But if he be negligent then let the whole iudgement be referred to the bishop In like sort Theodosius the Emperor enacted such a law that whosoeuer suter being plaintife in any kinde of matter whether at the beginning thereof or after contestation of law or when the matter came to confirmatiō or to sentēce If the plaintife had once chosen the court iurisdiction the holy sec there without all doubt though the defendant resisted and dissented the matter before the bishops other ecclesiastical Iudges should be determined and ended Which law afteward Carolus the great who was king of Fraūce confirmed in these words We will commaund that all our subiectes as well Romaines and Frenchmen as others vnder our dominion whatsoeuer be by law and custome henceforth bound and charged to keepe this for a perpetuall and prescript law That whosoeuer began or commenced a sute c. as is aboue mentioned c. 11. q. i. Quicunque c. 2. But that you may obiect and say that this law is abrogated as the glose seemeth there to touche But all will not serue For although this law is not redacted into the body of the law yet for al that it is not abrogated But surely it is a priuiledge honorably graunted to the whole vniuersall church which the Emperor cannot take away no more then any other liberty of the Church By the canō law also this priuiledge is confirmed extra de iud c. timor Nouil and moreouer seemeth to be confirmed by the ciuill law C. de sacros Si eccl priuilegium although it be not expressely but generally named And so it is cleare by the ciuill law that such iurisdictiū doth pertain to Ecclesiastical persōs By canon law in like maner in places infinit Dist. 22. cap. Omnes Patriarchae 2. quest 5. ca. Si quis praesbyter 11. quae 1. cap relatum 25. distinct cap. ecce Extra de iudicijs Nouit De competenti foro cap. licet With many other places infinite yea further the canon law so farre proceedeth that whosoeuer goeth about by custom to interrupt or hinder any hauing such iurisdiction encurreth sentence ipso facto of excommunicatiō as is proued cap. quoniam intelleximus de immunitate eccl li. sext Which is most playne by the notorious custome time out of mind in the dayes of the good christian Princes where to violate such custome it is playne sacriledge 11. quest 1. tit 1. c. 2. For by law custome winneth and gaineth iurisdiction especially to him that is Capax thereof yea and further custome time out of mind is amongst all persons in place of written confirmed law Now seing the church of Fraūce hath in common vsed with the temporalty to iudge decree both of actions personall and reall touching the Church it is playne that such custome winneth iurisdiction to it Ergo. c. But the Lord Peter auouched that the custome could not preuayle in this case because here lacked true dealing Besids the said law is called inprescriptible for that it is Ius fisci But this maketh nothing agaynst vs. For the Church of Fraunce rather chalengeth this law by custome then by prescription Which custom semeth rather to be brought in of the free will and election of the people frequēting more the ecclesiasticall Consistories then the secular courts Besides this custome in that it hath bene oftentimes
singular Apostles For he that said to Peter Feede my sheepe said also to all and singular his Apostles Go into all the world preach c. Math. vlt. Moreouer for as much as this man collecteth out of Chrysostome that the whole world was committed to Peter how shall we then ioyne this meaning of Chrysostome with S. Paule which sayth that the Gospel was committed to Peter euer the circumcision as was Paule ouer the vncircumcision And here an answer to this doughtie argument both to the forme to the matter thereof albeit concerning the matter here lacketh much to be said more of Peters successours in the text of Chrysostome By the which successours is not ment the bishop of Rome onely as the Papists would beare vs in hand but all such true and faithfull Pastors whom the Lordes calling sendeth and setteth ouer his flocke where so euer or whatsoeuer they be For as Peter beareth a representation of the church by the testimonie of August in Ioan. tract 124. Praefat. in Psal. 108. so the successours of Peter be all faithfull Pastors and ouerseers of Christes Church to whom Christ our Lord hath committed the charge of his flocke Wherefore they are not a little deceiued which looking vpō the rocke onely of the person and not the rock of confession contrary to the rule of Hilarie De trinit lib. 6. doe tie the Apostleship or rocke of Peter to one onely Bishop and the succession of Peter to one onely sea of Rome where as this being a spiritual office and not carnall hath no such carnall race or discent after any worldly or locall vnderstanding but hath a more mysticall meaning after a spirituall sense of succession such as Hierome speaketh of epist. ad Euagrium Omnes inquit Apostolorum successores sunt c. That is All saith he speaking of Bishops be successours of the Apostles c. Of like force and fashion and out of the same figure the same Author patcheth moreouer another argument proouing that the Bishop of Rome was tituled the head of Christes church in the primitiue time of the old aunciters before the age of Gregory His argument procedeth thus in the third figure S. Peter was called by the auncient fathers head of Christes church S. Peter was bishop of Rome Ergo the bishop of Rome was called head of the Church in the old auncient tyme. This argument expositorie beyng clouted vp in the third figure and concluding singularly hath rather a shew of an argumēt then maketh any necessarie conclusiō standing vpon no moode in the said figure if the Author thereof were put to his triall Albeit to leaue the forme and to come to the matter of the argument First how wel he wil dispatch himselfe of the Maior prooue vs that S. Peter although he were at Rome and taught at Rome and suffred at Rome yet that he was bishop and proper Ordinarie of that citie and speciall sea of Rome As touching the allegation of Abdias Orosius Ado Tertullian Cyprian Hierome Optatius and Augustine brought forth for his most aduantage to prooue his Maior thus I answer cōcerning Orosius Tertullian Cyprian Hierome and Augustine that where they speake of S. Peters chaire or planting the faith at Rome straightway this man argueth there upon that Peter was Bishop of Rome But that doth not clarkely follow For the office of the Apostles was to plant the faith in all places and in euery regiō yet were they not bishops in euery region And as for the chaire as it is no difference essentiall that maketh a bishop for so much as a Doctour may haue a chaire and yet be no bishop so cannot he conclude by the chaire of Peter that S. Peter was Bishop of Rome For all this proueth no farther but that Peter was at Rome and there taught the fayth of Christ as Paul did also and peraduenture in a chayre likewise yet we say not that Paule was therefore Bishop of Rome But that he was there as an Apostle of Christ whether he taught there standing on his feete or sittyng in a chayre In the Scripture commonly the Chaire signifieth doctrine or iudgement as sitting also declareth such as teach or iudge whether they sit in the chaire of Moyses or in the chaire of pestilence Planting likewise is a worde Apostolicall and signifieth not onely the office of a Bishop Wherefore it is no good consequent he sate he taught he planted at Rome his chaire and seate was at Rome Ergo he was Bishop of Rome And thus much touchyng Orosius Tertullian Cyprian Augustine As for Abdias Ado Optatus and such other although we should haue much wrong offered and neuer should make an ende if we should be prest with the authoritie of euery one that could or did mooue pen in all the whole first age of the church to be our iudges in euery ecclesiasticall matter and much more wrong should haue if the authors either corrupted or countersaited should be layd vnto vs speaking not in the same sense or in the same tongue or in the same time wherin they wrote yet to helpe and to faine the authorities of these authors so much as we may I answer to their allegations with this distinction of a bishop which is to be taken either generally or specially After the first a bishop is he to whom so euer the publike cure and charge of soules is committed without any limitation of place And so the name of Bishop is concident with the office of Apostle or any publique Pastour Doctour or Curator of the vniuersall flocke of Christ. And thus may Paule Peter or any other of the Apostles be called Bishops So also is Christ himselfe by expresse worde called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Bishop and Pastor 1. Peter 2. And thus may Peter wel be named a bishop of these foresaid authors after this maner of taking But this publike and generall charge vniuersally ouer the whole without limitation ceased after Christ and the Apostles For then were bishops by places and prouinces appointed to haue speciall ouersight of some perticular flock or prouince and so to be resident and attendant onely vpon the same The other diuersitie of this name bishop is to be taken after a more speciall sort which is when any person orderly called is assigned namely specially to some one certain place citie or prouince wherunto he is only bound to employ his office charge and no where els according to the old Canons of the Apostles and of the Councell of Nice And this Bishop differing from the other is called Episcopus intitulatus hauing his name of his citie or Dioces And thus we deny that Peter the Apostle was euer Bishop elected installed or intituled to the Citie of Rome neyther doth Optatus Abdias Ado or Hierome affirme the same And if Ado say that Peter was bishop of Rome 25. yeares vntill the last
whereof the occasion beyng taken onely of the Iewes the slaunder therof therfore he prooueth to be falsly and wroÌ„gfully laid to the charge of the Christians And likewise against all other lies and slaunders obiected of the Heathen against the Christians the sayd Tertullian purgeth the Christians declaring them falsly to be belied wrongfully persecuted not for any defect of theirs but only for the hatred of their name And yet notwithstaÌ„ding by the same persecutions he prooueth in the same Apologie the religion of the christians nothing to be empaired but rather encreased The more saith he we are mowen doune of you the moe rise vp The bloud of Christians is seede For what man sayth he in beholding the painfull torments and the perfect patience of them will not search and inquire what is in the cause And when he hath found it out who will not agree vnto it And when he agreeth to it who will not desire to suffer for it Thus faith he this sect will neuer die which the more it is cutdoune the more it groweth For euery man seing and wondring at the sufferance of the Saints is mooued the more therby to search the cause in searching he findeth it and in finding he followeth it Tertul in eodem Apolog. Thus Tertullian in this daungerous tyme of persecution being stirred vp of God defended the innoceÌ„cie of the Christians against the blasphemy of the aduersaries and moreouer for the instruction of the church compiled many fruitfull workes whereof some are extant some are not to be found Notwithstanding the great learning famous vertues of this worthy maÌ„ certaine errors and blemishes are noted in his doctrine as were before both of Origine Irenaeus and likewise of them were they neuer so excellent that followed them Which errors all here in order to note and comprehend were too long a matter for this story to prosecute This by the way shall be sufficient to admonish the Reader neuer to looke for any such perfection of any man in this world how singular so euer he be Christ onely excepted but some blemishe or other ioyneth himselfe withall whereof more perchaunce shall be sayd when we come to Cyprian And now to returne agayne to the order of bishops of Rome intermitted after Eleutherius afore mentioned next in the bishoprike of Rome succeded Victor who as Platina sayth died quietly in the dayes of Seuerus But Damasus Supplementum Lib. 8. and such as folow the common Chronicles affirme that he died a Martyr after he had sitten x. or as some say xij yeares This Victor was a great styrreâ— as partly before is signified in the controuersie and contention of Easterday For the which he would haue proceded in excommunication against the churches of Asia had not Irenaeus then bishop of Lions with the counsaile of other his brethren there asseÌ„bled repressed his intended violence As touching that coÌ„trouersie of Easter in those dais of the primitiue Church the originall thereof was this as Eusebius Socrates Platina and other record First certain it is that the Apostles onely being intentiue and attendaunt to the doctrine of saluation gaue no heed nor regard to the obseruation of dayes times neither bound the Church to any ceremoniâ—s and rites except those things necessary mentioned in the Actes of the Apostles as strangled and bloud which was ordayned then of the holy Ghost notwithout a most vrgent and necessary cause touched partly in the history before For when the murdering and bloud of Infants was commonly obiected by the Heathen perseâ—utors agaynst the Christians they had no other argumeÌ„t to help theÌ„selues nor to refell the aduersarie but only their own law by the which they were commauÌ„ded to abstaine not onely from all mens bloud but also from the bloud of all coÌ„mon beastes And therefore that law seemeth by the holy Ghost to be geuen also to the same end continued in the Church so long as the cause that is the persecutions of the Heathen Gentiles continued Beside these we read of no other ceremonies or rites which the Apostles greatly regarded but left such things free to the libertie of Christians euery man to vse therein his own discretion for the vsing or not vsing thereof Whereupon as concerning all the ceremoniall obseruations of dayes tymes places meates drinks vestures and such other of all these things neither was the diuersitie among men greatly noted nor any vniformitie greatly required In so much that Irenaeus writing to Victor of the tradition of dayes and of fastings and of the diuersitie of these things then vsed among the primitiue fathers saith Nihilo tamen minus omnes Illi pacem inter se retinuerunt retinemus etiamnuÌ„ leiunij dissonantia fidei concordiam commendat c. That is Notwithstanding all this varietie all they kept peace among themselues yet we keepe it still and this difference of fasting among vs commendeth more the concord of faith And so long did the doctrine of Christian libertie remaine whole sounde in the Church till the tyme of Victor which was about the yeare of our Lord 200. Although the diuersitie of these vsages began something before also in the dayes of Pius and Anicetus about the yere of our Lord 163. to be misliked yet restraint hereof was not so much vrged before as in the tune of Victor And yet neither did the violeÌ„ce of Victor take such place but that the doctrine of Christian libertie was defended and maintained by meanes of Irenaeus and other and so continued in the Church till after the Councell of Nice And thus much concerning the doctrine of Christian libertie of the differences of rites and ceremonies Now to returne to Victor agayne to shew what diuersitie there was in obseruing the day of Easter and how it came thus is the story First in the tyme of Pius and Anicetus an 163. the questioÌ„ of Easter day began first to be moued at what tyme Pius by the reuelation of Hermes decreed the obseruatioÌ„ of that day to be chaunged from the wonted maner of the 14. day of the moone in the first moneth vnto the next Sonday after After him came Anicetus Soter and Eleutherius Bishops of Rome which also determined the same Agaynst these stode Melito Bishop of Sardis Polycarpus and as some thinke Egesippus with other learned men of Asia which Polycarpus being sent by the brethren of Asia came to Rome as is aforesayd to coÌ„ferre with Anicetus in that matter wherin when they could not agree after long debating yet notwithstanding they did both coÌ„municate together with reuereÌ„ce departed in peace And so the celebration of Easterday remained Adiaphoron as a thing indifferent in the Church till the time of Victor Who folowing after Anicetus and hys fellowes and chiefly stirring in this matter endeuoured by all meanes and might to draw or rather subdue the Churches of Asia vnto hys opinion thinking moreouer to
miracles what straunge sightes this Berthwalde or Drithelm did see after hys death read the ix booke of Henr. Huntington King Etheldred made Abbot of Bardney Adelmus Gu. Malmesâ— lib. 5. de pontifiâ— Lying miracles Malmesbery commended for hys stile Lying miracles reproued Aldelme Byshop Swithune Bishop of Wine Bedo lib. 5. cap. 23. Ex historia Iornalensi do regib us Northumb S. Iohn of Beuerlay Anno. 717. Annother lying fable of Sainct Eguyne Ranulphus in Polychro lib. 5. cap. 23. Beda lib. 5. de gestes Angl. Polycron lib. 5. cap. 17. A generall rule seruing for the obseruation of Easter day This rule of Easter seemeth to be taken out of the booke of Numer And they going out of Ramesse the 15. day of the first moneth the next day after held their Easter c. Why priestes crownes were shauen Bede de gest lib. 5. The copy of a Monkish letter of Colfride to King Naiton for the shauing of Priestes crownes How proueth he that the Apostles Iob and Ioseph were shauen Much sayd nothing proued Diuersitie of rites hurteth not the Church See how these shauelinges would father their shauing vpon Peter which is neyther found in Scripture nor in any approued story but onely in paynted clothes Why Priestes and Monkes be shauen in the crowne The shauing of the crowne what it representeth How doth the signe of the crosse defend Churches from euill spirites when it cannot keepe them from euill Priestes If shauing of the crown doth each men patience in suffering how commeth it that we see none more washpish and irefull then these shorne generations of Monkish vipers Simon Magus 〈◊〉 as he sayâ— The difference betweene the shauing of Peter and Simon Magus In outward habite christians ought not to reliâ—â—ble wicked doers * There is but one mediator betweene God and man Christ Iesus The Scottish monke and the Englishe monkes differed in their shauing If Peter shall let in the elect of God into heauen Christ theâ— serueth in little stede A note to admonish the reader Fabia cap. 141. Guliel Malmesb de Reg. An. 724. Ethelburge the Queene perswadeth her husbaÌ„d to be a monke The crafty head of a woman King Iue resigning hys kingdome went to Rome and became a Monke Ethelburga the Queene made NuÌ„ne of Barking Peter pence first graunted and payd to Rome The lawes made by King Iue to his people Celulphus King of Northumberland Bede An. 729. The life of Bede briefly described This Benedict maister to Bede was the first that brought in the vse of glasse windowes into England Also the sayd Benet 〈…〉 An Epistle of Pope Sergius The famous learning of Bede Bede commended for integritie of lyfe Anno. 735. S. Iohns Gospell translated into English by Bede Celulfus of a King made a Monke Egbert Kyng of Northumberland Anno. 747. Ex Malmesb. lib. de gestis pontifi Anglo Cutbert Archbishop of Caunterbury The rogation dayes had not then that superstition in them as they had afterward Boniface an English man Archb. of Mentz Ethelwold kyng of Merceland Edelhim a strong 〈◊〉 valiant warriour Pride ouerâ—throwne A letter of Boniface otherwise called Winfridâ— sent to kyng Ethelbald Nihil factum quod non factum prius The corrupt lyfe of Nunnes noted The popish actes and doynges of Boniface Archbishop of Magunce The Monastery of Fulda in Germany builded by Boniface Childericus The French king deposed and Pipinus intruded Dist. xl cap Si Papa Images in Churches subuerted by Emperours mayntained by Popes Philippicus for holding agaynst Images lost hys Empyre his eyes The author of the book called the dialogues of Gregory Memoriall of reliques offring and sacrifice for the dead brought into the masse Canon The Popes feete first kissed of the Emperours Segebert king of Westsaxons Sigebert slayne Cruell tyranny with like cruelty reuenged Kenulphus king of Westsaxons Anno. 748. Murder reuenged with murder Offa King of Mercia An vntruth noted in the story of Fabianus The primacy of Canterbury remoued to Lichfield Lambrith Archbishop of Cant. This Alcuinus is commended for hys learning nex to Adelmus and Bede aboue all Saxons Ethelbert king of Eastangles wrongfully murdered by Offa. The vayne suspicion and wicked counsell of a woeman Ex historia Iornalensi Malmesocriensi Cruell murder reuenged Offa and Kenredus of Kinges made monkes at Româ— Egfretus King of Mercia Alcuinus Osbâ—â— to patritio The fathers fault punished in the childe Egbert King of Kent taken prisoner A princely example of clemency in a noble king The Church of Winchcombe builded by K. Kenulphus Egbert King of Kent released out of prison A place of Fabian doubted Pope Steuen the second The donation of Pipinus falsely taken to be the donation of Constantine Ex polyer lib. 5. cap. 25. Pope Paule the first Images agayne mayntayned by the Pope agaynst the Emperour A lay man pope who was deposed and had hys eyes put out Pope Steuen the third The counsell of Constantinople the 7. condemned of the Pope for condemning Images The pope also ordayned Gloria in Excelsis to be song in the masse at S. Peters altar by the Cardinals Pope Hadrian the first Images agayne mayntayned by the Pope to be mens Kalenders The body of S. Peter clothed iâ— siluer The order of the Romish masse book when it came in Ex Duraâ—do Nauâ—â—ro Iacobâ—â— Voragine in vita Greg. Et tameâ— ipsis commentum placet Terent Note well the practise of Prelates in planting their popish masse Gregories masse taketh place in Europe Carolus Magnus beneficiall to the sea of Rome Rex Christianissimus intituled to Fraunce A letter of Charles the great sent to king Offa. How the Pope heareth the cry of poore widowes and Orphanes The Empire translated from Greece to Fraunce Images written agaynst as contrary to the true fayth This Albinus was Alcuinus aboue mentioned The Bishops and Princes of England against Images King Egbert made a monke Anno. 757. Osulphus Mollo otherwise called Adelwold Alcredus or Aluredus Ethelbert otherwise named Adelred or Eardulphe Alfweld Osredus Adelred agayn kinges of Northumberland Anno. 764. Northumberland kingdome ceaseth Alcuinus otherwise called Albinus The troubles of the kingdome of Northumberland and described by Alcuinus Ex Historia MalmesberieÌ„si How it rayned bloud in Yorke Anno. 780. Brigthricus K. of Westsaxons Edelburga daughter to Offa poysoned her husband Wickednes reuenged Irene Anno. 784. Images restored agayne by Irene at Constantinople The second councell at Nicea The wickednes of Irene condingly rewarded Kenelmus king of Mercia innocently slayne Celulphus Ceolulphus Bernulphus kings of Mercia The kingdome of Mercia ceaceth Vniust dealinges of men iustly rewarded Paules Church The first aultar and crosse set vp in England The church of Winchester The church of Lincolne The church of Westminster The scholes at Cambridge Abbey of Knouisburgh Malmesb. Abbey of Glocester Mailrose Heorenton Hetesey The monastery of S. Martin at Douer Lestingey Whitbie This Hilda was first conuerted to the fayth by Paulinus a godly and learned
and oxen and all the whole cattell of the field WheÌ„ therefore it is sayd he made all thinges subiect to him He excludeth nothing as the Apostle there sayth whereby it is apparant that as concerning his humain nature in the which he was made lesse then the Angels all things were subiect to him Also this appereth in the 2. chap. to the philippians he humbleth himselfe wherefore God exalteth him c. And it foloweth that in the name of Iesus should euery knee bow both of thinges in heauen and of things in earth and of things vnder the earth Beholde here that by nature by which he did humble himselfe he was exalted because euery knee should bow downe to him Thys in like maner hath S. Peter in the 10. chapter of the Actes where he sayth he was constituted of God the iudge ouer the quicke and the dead And he speaketh of that nature which God raysed vp the third day as the whole Scripture proueth And likewise S. Peter had this power geuen him whoÌ„ Christ constituted and made his Uicar who also condeÌ„ned by sentence iudicially Ananias and Saphira for lying and stealing Act cap. â— Paule also condemned a fornicator conuicted 1. Cor. 5. And that Christ would the correction and iudgement of â—â—he matters to appertayne to his Church a text in the â—â— of Mathew expressely declareth where it is sayd If thy brother trespasse agaynst thee goe and tell him his fault betweene him and thee if he heare thee thou hast wonne thy brother But if he heareth not theÌ„ take with thee one or two that in the mouth of two or three witnesses all thinges may be established if he heare not then tell vnto the congregation if he heare not the coÌ„gregation take him as an heathen man and a Publican Uerily I say vnto youâ— whatsoeuer you binde on earth the same shall be bounde in heauen and whatsoeuer you lose on earth the same shall be losed in heauen Beholde how expressely it is commaunded that when soeuer in any matter one offeÌ„deth the other he being first charitably admonished the matter must be published and referred to the order of the Church and congregation But if the offender do not obey and heare the admonition he is to be taken as an heathen a Publican Which is as much to say like one that is excommunicate by the Church congregation so that he may haue no communion or participation with it And that this was the intention of Christ this seemeth much to proue it where in geuing the reason hereof he immediately addeth Uerely I say vnto you Whatsoeuer c. where note this terme distributiue whatsoeuer so as the Apostle argueth to the Hebrewes the 2. chapter that if he ordained al things to be subiect vnto him he excludeth nothinge vnsubiected Wherefore thus I may argue If all things that the church and congregation doth lose be losed and euery thing that the Church bindeth is bound There is nothing that the church may not lose bynd Or by Logicke thus I may reason There is nothing bounde by the Church that is not bound in heauen whiche argument is good by a certayn rule of Logicke which sayeth that contraries if the negatioÌ„ be put after are equiualant For euery thing nothing what soeuer thing and no maner of thin be coÌ„trary one to the other And so nothing not is as much to say as all thinges Secondly I doe proue it out of an other text of S. Luke cap. 22. Which place alledged to make for his purpose I will strike him with his owne weapon For where he sayd that by the two swordes the two powers teÌ„porall spirituall were to be vnderstood it was so in deede but to whose handes would he I pray you haue these two swords coÌ„mitted Truely to the handes of Peter other the Apostles c. But the holy Father the Pope succeeded Peter and the other Apostles the Bishops disciples curates persons as in the glose appeareth Luk 10. wherby thus I argue that by the 2. swords the 2. powers are ment But Christ willed those two swordes to be put into the churches handes ergo he would likewise the two powers But you may reply and say that Christ did reprehend Peter because he strake with a temporall sword and cut of an care saying vnto him put vp thy sword c. whithe reason is of no force For Christ did not will Peter to cast away quite froÌ„ him the sword but to put it into the skabard to keepe it geuing to vnderstand therby that such power although it be in the churches hands yet the execution therof as much as appertaineth to bloud shedding in the new law he would haue to appertayne to the secular iudge notwithstanding yet perhaps according to the discretion and will of the Clergy Thirdly I proue this by the intent of S. Paule in the 1. Cor. 6. where he sayth that they which haue secular busines and conteÌ„d one agaynst another ought to be iudged by the sayntes And that they should iudge therin therfore he made this argument know you not that the saynts shall iudge the world and if the world be iudged by you are ye not good enough to iudge smal trifles As though ye wold say do ye not know how that ye shall iudge the Angels How much more then may you iudge things secular And it followeth If you haue iudgement of secular worldly matters take them which are dispised in the Church and congregations make them iudges neither doth it make any thing against because the Apostle in the same place inferreth AdverecundiaÌ„ vestram dico I say it to your shame For that is to be referred to those where he saith appoynt those which are dispised Wherfore the Apostle speaketh ironiously in this matter as meaning thus Sooner the rather you ought to runne to the iudgemeÌ„t of the dispised which be in the church theÌ„ to the iudgemeÌ„t of those which be out of the Church Ergo the rather to resort to the iudgement of the wise who remayne in the Church and congregation Wherfore the Apostle by and by added wheÌ„ he sayd I speak to your shame What not one wise maÌ„ amoÌ„gest you that can iudge betwene brother and brother Meaning thereby that there was some By these therfore and many other like reasons it appereth which for breuity I omit that both the powers may be in an ecclesiasticall mans hand And that an ecclesiasticall man is Capax both of the temporall and spirituall iurisdiction Nor is it any matter if it be obiected that Peter and other Apostles Christ himselfe vsed litle thys temporall power For in them was not the like reason as now is in vs as is proued in the 22. q. 1. ca. and in many other places of the law The Apostles at the first beginning took no receipt of landes possessions but the price onely therof which now