Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
death_n	work_n	work_v	write_v	72	3	5.0325	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A89189	A sober ansvvere to an angry pamphlet, or, Animadversions, by way of reply, to Robert Barclays late book (entituled, Truth cleared of calumnies) in answere to A dialogue between a Quaker and a stable Christian by VVilliam Mitchell.	Mitchell, William, 17th cent.	1671 (1671)	Wing M2294; ESTC R43708	69,116	149

likewise confuted what was said proving it to be so Is not the Apostle more to be believed then any Quaker who expounds that more sure word of prophesie calling it verse 20 not the word in the heart but the prophesie rf Scripture or Scripture prophesie which is said to more 〈◊〉 sure then a voice frō heaven not as if there could be any uncertainty of the Lords voice speaking from Heaven this is sure enough in it self but yet Scripture prophesie is more sure quoad nos as to us because a trans●ient voice is more easily mistaken or forgotten then a standing record VI. HEAD Concerning Iustification SECT I. Wherein is cleared the Quakers agreement with Papists in the Doctrine of Iustification Page 32. He raiseth a great storme against me as displaying the banner of disingenuity venting filthy imaginations discovering vanity and malice extending my self in a foolish and vaine excursion Ans I wish the Gentle-man would reflect how much his pen spirit hath been dipt in the gall of Asps and remember that causa firma est semper querula I have not leasure to answere his bitter revilings and railings and therefore passing them I shal endeavour to trace him according to the method he hath proposed in giving as he pretends an honest and plaine and true account of their belief in the matter of Justification He saith page 33. That we are justified by Iesus Christ both as he appeared and was manifest in the flesh at Ierusalem and also as he is made manifest and revealed in us and thus Christ and his righteousness without are not divided from his righteousness within but we do receive him wholly and undivided the Lord our righteousness in the sight of God and which ought not nor cannot be divided Ans Here he insinuats that our opinion is to divide the the righteousness of Chirst without from his righteousness within which is the calumny of Papists against us as if we held that because Christs righteousness is imputed to men there needed no other righteousness When as we mantaine that inherent righteousness and imputed are inseparably annexed so that every one that is justified hath holiness and righteousness wrought in him We may not confound Justification and Sanctification seeing the Scripture distinguisheth them and yet we must not divide them Now that the Quakers fraud and cheatry which I supect he is guilty of in this thing may be discovered it will be necessary to enquire how the word justifie in the present affaire namely as it imports the sinners Justification before God is used in scripture and in this PROTESTANTS and Papists are at variance Papists say that it signifies to make inherently just and righteous as calefaction signifies to make inherently hot on the other hand PROTESTANTS affirme that it signifies not the making of a man just by infused inherent righteousness but to absolve account and pronounce a man righteous Prov. 17.15 he that justifies the wicked and he that condemneth the just even they both are abomination to the Lord. Marke to justify is not to make inherently just and holy for this would not be abominable but acceptable to God but it is to absolve and pronounce a man righteous as to condemne is to declare a man guilty and accordingly sentence him to punishment Now in that he saith that they are justified by Christ revealed in them by which he understands grace and holiness wrought in them by Christ for he afterwards explains it to be that which in scripture is called Christ formed within Here he falls in with the Popish sense of Justification by righteousness infused And his more full agreement with Papists will appear even in that wherein page 34. 35. he saith that they greatly differ from them To make good this I shal do two things 1. Set down the words of G. Keith in his paper to me which Mr. Barclay acknowledges to be in substance the same with that which he hath written Saith he I perceive that by the righteousness of Jesus Christ imputed by which thou queries if we be justified thou understandest not his work of righteousness he worketh in his Saints but his obedience and sufferings even unto death in the flesh not excluding but including his souls sufferings at Jerusalem To which I thus Reply that we are even iustified by the righteousness of his obedience and sufferings in that Vessel or Man-hood not formally but causally forasmuch as by his obedience and sufferings therein he was the procuring cause of that grace and power of his revealed in us which produceth a work of righteousness wrought in us by which we are formally as the School-men speake righteous and this inward righteousnesse wrought by him in us is truely and properly his Righteousnesse and that on a twofold account 1. For that by his obedience and sufferings he procured an enterance to mens hearts to become a Prince and a Saviour in them Secondly In that he is not onely the remote procuring cause in the manner aforesaid but the immediat worker of it in us by his immediate Arme and Power so that he is well called the LORD our righteousness Now that there is no inconsistency between these two to be justified by the obedience of Jesus Christ in the flesh at Jerusalem as the remote procuring cause and to be justified by the work of Righteousness wrought by him in us as the formal cause is manifest being causes of different kinds vvhich do not repugne one to another but sweetly concurre to the producing their effect Thus far G. Keith Second thing to be done is to shew wherein PROTESTANTS differ from Papists in the matter of Justification which will be notably seen by the answer both of PROTESTANTS and Papists to this important and weighty question viz. what is that very thing which causeth a poor believing sinner stand pardoned and so just before GOD and for which he is pronounced righteous or absolved from the accusation and condemnation of the law and accepted unto eternal life Now the Papists in answering this question have recourse to infused inherent righteousness asse ting this to be the thing whereby they are justified in the sight of GOD. But PROTESTANTS though they look upon a principle of Grace within as an excellent gift of GOD yet they cannot leane to that for Justification but think their onely refuge to be the imputed righteousness of CHRIST namely the satisfaction and merit of his Death Passion and Obedience in fulfilling the law judging this to be the very thing by which Believers may appeare before GOD and in the confidence whereof they may live and die And for which they are accounted righteous absolved from death and accepted unto eternal life Now let us hear the Quakers answere to the aforementioned question and it will be found that as Papists make the formal cause of Justification to be an inherent righteousness wrought in us and inspired into us by the Spirit of GOD so the Quakers do

that they will rather confirme them in their deceit Now according to us scripture is the rule which lyes patent open to both parties And therfore a Papist of great note is faine to acknowledge that Scripturis nihil est certius nihil est notius i. e. nothing is more certaine and more evident then the Scriptures And this is profitable 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is for conviction and as was said though the Scriptures do not actually convince the stubborn and stiff-heretick yet there is so much in them as may satisfy an inquisitive adversary who is willing to know right from wrong and truth from errour Appollos mightily convinced the Jews by the Scriptures It is inconsequential to argue that the Scripture or written word is not the rule to us to whom GOD hath set down his mind in write because it was not a rule to them who lived when the Scripture or written word was not As for the Prophets the event of what they foretold was that whereby they were to be tryed Deut. 18.22 When a Prophet speaketh in the Name ef the LORD if the thing follow not that is the thing which the LORD hath not spoken but the Prophet hath spoken presumptuously thou shalt not be affraid of him Ierem. 28.9 The Prophet which prophesieth of peace when the word of the LORD shal come to passe then shal the Prophet be known that the Lord hath sent him But because GOD for the tryall of his people may sometimes suffer such things to fall out as false-prophets fortell Deut. 13.2 Therefore when men pretend themselves to be prophets sent of GOD their doctrine must be brought to the rule and touch-stone of GODS written word and thereby examined Esay 8.20 He saith page 31. that we disjoyne the word and the spirit because many preach and read the scriptures and talk of them without the joyn'd concurrence of the spirit which they ought not to do Answer He hath not offered to prove that the Scriptures should not be read or spoken of without the concurrence of the spirit unless that be his proof we say they ought not to do but upon what ground do ye say so 1. The command for reading and speaking of the Scriptures hath not this condition annexed to it that we should read and speak of the scriptures onely when we have a concurrence of the spirit and never but then where is there such a condition mentioned 2. What shal be the carriage of wicked persons who are strangers to the drawings and motion of the spirit must the Bible be to them as an Almanack out of date Shal it be to them as a book useless to look into 3. When the Saints want the concurrence of the spirit may they not read and talk of the Scriptures as a mean of good to their souls Hovv many cold hearts have been rubbed and chaffed into spiritual heat by reading and talking of the Scriptures In so doing the Lord hath met vvith them and made their hearts to burne within them Now though the scriptures may be read and spoken of without the concurrence of the spirit Yet to affirme this is not to disjoyne the Scriptures and the spirit separating the one from the other for still the Scriptures remaine to be the endytment of the spirit being spoken and breathed forth by the spirit Act. 28.25 Well spake the Holy Ghost by Isaias the prophet unto our fathers Act. 1.16 this scripture must needs have been fulfilled which the holy Ghost spake by the mouth of David Marke the Scriptures which Dav d and others of the Prophets penned they are the breathings forth of the Holy Ghost himself Why doth the Quaker complaine so much for my improving Esay 59.21 as if it made so much against me whereas it is directly to that purpose which it was alledged for namely that GODS Spirit and word go together and doth not the Lord here promise that the Spirit and Word should continue with his Church and People to direct and instruct them in all necessaries throughout all ages sucessivly even unto the end of the world He asketh cannot dead things kill if men feed upon them Answ There is no doubt of it yet the Scripture or that part of Scripture which is called the law is said to be killing in such a way as dead things are not And therefore this killing Letter is spoken of as being the ministration of death and the ministration of condemnation For the Law threatens death against the sinner and curseth every one that abideth not in all things that are written therein 2. Cor. 6.7.9 Now are the dead things which the Quaker reckons up thus killing It shal not be denyed but feeding upon sand gravel stones c. will prove deadly and destructive to the body even as the drinking in of the lifeless poysonous opinions of Quakers will prove hurtful and destructive to the soul SECT V. Quakers have learned their Language about the Scriptures from Papists Now any may perceive a Popish designe in all the Quakers reasonings against the Scriptures for both Papists and they joyne in studing to disgrace them Herein they very much resemble one another Ye may hear how Quakers lisp after the Papists and concurre with them in speaking the language of Ashdod Do not Papists call the Scriptures Do not Quakers say of them 1. A nose of wax or a rule of lead which may be bowed every way as men please If the delusion be strong in the heart will it not twine the Scriptures without to cause the scriptures to seem for it 2. Papists call the Scriptures inky Divinity paper and parchment Quakers speake of the Scriptures as a dead letter 3. Papists blaime the Scriptures the reading of them by the Laity as that which causeth controversies multiplyeth both Heresies and Sects Quakers say ye that set up the Scriptures as a rule what Sects what jangling and contesting is among you 4. Papists preferre the Church before the Scripture Quakers prefer the light within hence they say that it is by the inward dispensation that the outward dispensation of the Gospel is serviceable without which it hath no service at all 5. Papists contemne and vilify the Scriptures Quakers will not have the Scriptures to be so much as a copy to thē but the Spirit is both their teacher and their copy and if they walk according to this by looking upon it and eyeing it they shal be good scholars and proficients they need not go forth for a copy 6. Papists say the church was judge before the Scriptures were written Quakers say there was a rule before the Scriptures were written 7. Papists deny the Scriptures to be the principal compleat rule of faith And Quakers do the same So true is that of Tertullian CHRIST is alwayes crucified between two theives He denyeth That that more sure word of prophesie 2. Pet. 1.19 is the scripture Answer Had it not been meet not onely to have denyed this but