Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
death_n	word_n	write_v	wrong_n	21	3	8.1490	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A19147	A iust defence of the slandered priestes VVherein the reasons of their bearing off to receiue Maister Blackwell to their superiour before the arriuall of his holines breue, are layed downe, and the imputation of disobedience, ambition, contention, scandall, &c. is by able arguments and authorities remoued, the obiection of the aduerse part sufficiently answered, and the Popes sentence in the controuersie truly related. By Iohn Colleton.	Colleton, John, 1548-1635.	1602 (1602)	STC 5557; ESTC S116469	291,516	340

not assigne vs a Superiour without our priuity and consent we take it to be more then all our aduersaries can proue that we euer spake And as for the citing of the g Dist. 61. ca. Nullus inuitis dist 63. ca. si in plebibus ca. 1. de electione Canons that permit or authorize the Cleargie to chuse their Superiour they were not cited by any of vs to the end to proue that his Holinesse could not appoint vs a Superiour without asking our voices or acquainting vs first with the dessigne but were only alleaged to shew that it was a custome receiued in holy Church not yet discontinued euery where that the Cleargy should haue the chusing of their owne Superiour and which being a fauour allowed to many by the Sea Apostolicke and by censure of common reason a great furtherance to peace and of electing the fittest person we could not thinke if his Holinesse had bene rightfully informed but that his pastorall loue and benignitie would haue graunted vs venturing our liues as we do for the primacy of his seate and oppressed with many sorts of afflictions the chusing of our Superiour or at least not to haue giuen as the Constitutiue Letter specifieth the perpetuall election of him to the Cardinall Protector a stranger vnto vs vnacquainted with the difficulties of our countrey and distant by more then a thousand miles from vs. To this end were the Canons alleaged as the circumstances and drift of the places where they are alleaged do witnesse And therefore we cannot but feare a sinister intention in father Parsons and in our other aduersaries that thus adde to and wrest our wordes to the sense and purpose which themselues like best But to returne The Constitutiue Letter giueth also authoritie to our Archpriest to take away faculties granted by whom soeuer and he hath de facto taken away such faculties from some of vs as his Holinesse himselfe immediatly gaue to the parties from whom he took them A larger iurisdiction then any Metropolitane Patriarke or legate Cardinal in the world hath as we thinke adioyned to his person or office Which supereminencie together with the reasons aforegoing seemeth most apparantly to enforce that M. Blackwe●● cannot be but reputed such a superiour Prelate as is intended by the words of the Extrauagant Episcopi alij Prelati superiores quocunque nomine conseantur Bishops and other superiour Prelates by what name soeuer they are called Or if we should denominate the authoritie according as it is practised we must needes cal it a high prelacy because it either dispenseth with the law of God nature and man or violateth the same IT either dispenseth with the law of God or violateth the same because what God commaundeth our Archpriest forbiddeth for example God commandeth Libera eum qui iniuriam patitur deliuer him Eccl. 4. who suffereth iniurie Againe Liberate vi oppressum de ●nanu calumniatoris Ier. 22. Deliuer ye the violently oppressed from the hand of the calumniator Prou. 24. And in another place Erue illos qui ducuntur ad mortem Rescue them who are vniustly lead to death But now our Archpriest prohibiteth vnder heauy penalties euen when our good names were rather in the act of dying then in leading to death and after the Vniuersitie of Paris had giuen sentence for vs not onely our lay friends or our fellow Priests but also our ghostly fathers who by priuiledge of that office knew saw and were feelingly sure of the wrong and calumniation obiected to defend vs by word or writing directly or indirectly although they were bound by the foresaid law of God and by the right of truth charitie and h Nau. in Manu ca. 24. nu 17. 18 22 ca. 14. n. 10. Decretum 18. Octob. 1600. §. 4. iustice to speake in our purgation The words of our Archpriests decree and prohibition were these Prohibemus in virtute sanctae obedientiae omnibus praesbyteris etiam sub p●na suspensionis atque interdicti quort●m absolutionem n●bisipsis reseruamus addo ettam amissionis omnium facultatum ipso facto incurrendarum Laicis verò sub poena interdicti ipso quoque facto incurrendi ne quisquam illam praeteritam inobedientiam vnde tanta inter nos extiti pacis perturbatio quouis modo verbo vel scripto directè vel indirectè defend●re praesumat We prohibite all Priests in vertue of holy obedience and vnder paine of suspension interdict the absolution of which we retaine to our selues I adde also vnder paine of leesing all faculties to be incurred in the deede it selfe and the laity vnder paine of interdict to be likewise presently incurred that no one any maner of way in word or in writing directly or indirectly presume to defend the foresaid disobedience past which bred so great contention among vs. Which part of our Archpriests decree may seeme the more seuere §. 3. in that he himselfe in the paragraph next before hauing sentenced and denounced to the whole Realme that we were truly and really disobedient to the Sea Apostolicke and rebellious against his office instituted by the same Sea would immediatly after the condemnation bearing no more truth then the foregoings haue shewed forbid vs and all others in the manner as is set downe not to defend that disodience by name Which ●red so great contention among vs which as the whole world knows was for that we would not yeeld our selues guiltie of the crimes and most grieuous abhominations that were obiected and maintained by the Societie and their adherents against vs. And indeede had not father Lyster father Garnet and father Iones with some other most dispiteously and alike vniustly massacred our good names or our Archpiest not approued and patronized their infinite wrongs done against vs vndoubtedly all had bene at quiet long since and neuer growen to the thousand part of that most rufull excesse to which the violent prosecution of their wrongs and the vnconscionable seeking to oppresse vs by strong hand haue caried the contention and do still alas increase and nourish the flame Saint i Prima par titu t●rtio c. 10 §. 10. reg 4. Antonine k In ca. cum conting it de rescriptis remed 2. nu 30. in manu c. 1. 27. nu 282. Nauar and other l Albert. Magnus Panormit Imola Felinus Alexander Ne●o Ioānes Andreas Dominicus Perusius cited in the places aforesaid authors of greatest name affirme that a man may with safe conscience follow and practise that which one Doctour of fame resolueth to be lawfull so that it be neither repugnant to the authoritie of expresse Scripture nor decree of holy Church as we trow the censure of Paris is not nor will our aduersaries euer proue it to be Againe m Tom primo q. 63. art 4. contro 2. conclu 4. vers est hic idem colligitur ex tomo 2. in disp de trib vest ar 3. contro