Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
death_n	word_n	worthy_a	write_v	113	3	4.7809	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A93702	Rome ruin'd by VVhite Hall, or, The papall crown demolisht: containing a confutation of the three degrees of popery, viz. papacy, prelacy, and presbitery; answerable to the triple crowne of the three-headed Cerberus the Pope, with his three fold hierarchies aforesaid. With a dispelling of all other dispersed clouds of errour, which doth interpose the clear sun-shine of the Gospel in our horrizon. Wherein the chiefe arguments each of them have, for the vindication of their erronious tenents are incerted, and refuted; with a description of such whem [sic] the true Church of Christ doth consist of: as also how, and by whom, they may be gathered, and governed, according to the will, and appointment of Jesus Christ, and his apostles, in the primative purity thereof. / By Iohn Spittlehouse, assistant to the Marshall Generall of the Army, under the command of his Excellency, the Lord Generall Fairfax. Imprimated by Theod. Jennings, and entred in the Stationers Hall.	Spittlehouse, John.	1649 (1649)	Wing S5013; Thomason E586_2; ESTC R203633	304,213	396

love And hereupon some think that our blessed Saviour alludeth to this name in his prayer Luk. 17. 16. where he saith Father I have manifested thy name unto the men which thou gavest me that is say they he declared openly the Doctrine of the Trinity commanding his Disciples to baptize in the name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost Mat. 28. 19. 2. Damascen doth most excellently prove the Trinity by this demonstration Vnus Deus non sine verbo est God being but one is never without the Word but the Word he hath in himselfe begotten of his owne substance not like unto our word which hath no substance but vanisheth in the ayre because the conditions of our natures is temporall But like as our word proceeding from the minde is neither the same with the minde nor yet altogether divers from it so is the Son unto the Father which is his Word being the same in substance but divers in subsistence But the Word must also have a Spirit for neither is out word without a Spirit but here is the difference our spirit is not of the same substance with us but the drawing in of the Ayre for we are of a compound nature but the Spirit of the Word is of the same substance with the Word He also saith that it is impossible that God should be without naturall fecundity the Lord therefore must needs beget but he begetteth out of his owne substance and that from all eternity but if the Son had not been from the beginning coexistent with him of whom he was begotten we shall bring in a change of his substance for so when he was yet no Father he should afterward become a Father 3. Bernard also thus eligantly inferreth What meaneth this number without a number if there be three how can there be but a number if one where is the number but here I have what I may number and what I may not number there is one substance and three Persons 4. Philo the Jew commenting upon Ephesians 5. 8. where the Apostle speaking of the state and condition of the Ephesians before their calling saith Ye were sometimes darknesse but now are light in the Lord. God is the soveraigne Giver and next to him is the Word of God also there is two firsts the one is Gods Word and the other is God which is before the Word and the same Word is the beginning and end of his good pleasure intent and will And like as a City whereof the Plat-forme is but yet set downe in the minde of the builder hath not being elsewhere but in the minde of the builder so the world had no being elsewhere then in the Word of God which ordained all things and seperated light from darknesse both in the world and mens mindes 5. Rabbie Azariel termeth God Spirit Word and Voyce saying that the spirit bringeth forth both the word and voyce but not by speech of the tongue or by breathing after the manner of men and these three being one spirit viz. one God one Spirit rightly living Blessed be he and his Name who liveth for ever and ever Spirit Word and Voyce that is to say one Holy Ghost and two spirits of that Spirit 6. Rubbie Joseph also saith that the light of the Soule of the Messiah is the living God and the living God is the fountaine of the living waters and the Soule of the Messiah is the river or streame of life and none but the Messiah knoweth God fully He is the light of God and the light of the Gentiles and therefore he knoweth God and God is knowne by him 7. Mercurius Thresmigests saith also to this purpose I thy God saith God am light and minde and of more antiquity then nature of moysture that is issued from the shadow and this light some speech which doth proceed from the minde is the Son of God that which seeth and heareth thee i● the Word of the Lord. and the minde is God the Father these differ not one from the other As for their Vnion it is the union of life and this speech being the work-man of God the Lord of the world hath chiefe power next him and is uncreated infinite proceeding from him the Commander of all things which he made of the perfect and naturall first-bor Son of the most perfect 8. Numius a Pithagorist saith the first God is free from all worke but the second is the Commander which maketh heaven and God the worker and maker saith he is the beginner of bebetting and God the Good is the beginner of being the second is the lively expresse of the first as begetting is an image of being and that this worker being the Son is known to all men by reason of the creating of the world but as for the first Spirit which is the Father he is unknowne unto them 9. Jamblicus another of the Philosophers saith plainly that God made the world by his divine Word and the first God being before the Beer is the Father of a first God whom he begetteth and yet neverthelesse abideth still in the solenesse of his Vnity which thing farre exceedeth all ability of understanding This is the originall patterne of him that is called both Father to himselfe and is the Father of one alone a God verily good indeed 10 Aemelius the Disciple of Plato notwithstanding how great an enemy he was to Christians speaking of the second Person yeeldeth to that which John speaketh Chap. 1. 1. in these words viz. Surely saith he this is the Word which was from everlasting by whom all things which are were made as Heraclitus supposeeth and before God saith he this is the very same word which that barbarous fellow avoucheth to have been with God from the beginning in the ordering and disposing of all things when they were confused and it is the same God by whom all things were absolutely made and in whom they be living and of whom they have their life and being which very Word cloathed it selfe with mans flesh and appeared a man so much that after he had bin put to death he took unto him his God-head againe and was very God as he had bin before ere he came down in bodily flesh and man 11. Another of Plato's imitaters speaking to the same effect saith That the beginning of St. Johns Gospel was worthy to be written every where in letters of gold 12. Suidas relateth that the Devill being asked by the King of Aegypt who he was that reigned before him and who should reign after him answered in these foure verses First God and then the Word and then the Spirit Which three be one and joyn'd in one all three Their force is endlesse get thee hence fraile weight The man of life unknown excelleth thee Thus have I brought a jury of Rabbins Fathers Philosophers yea and the Devill himself to evidence against the Athists and Anti-trenitarians of these times who were compelled to glorifie God in their speeches making as

communicated unto Christs humane nature Christ there is a communion reall and personall the Graces created and finite are really communicated to Christs humanity as his wisedome knowledge holinesse c. but the gifts which are infinite and peculiar unto God as to be omnipotent omni-present knowing all things c. are imputed only personally As the man Christ is omnipotent omni-present knowing all things but not the Manhood of Christ for our blessed Saviour saith that the Son himselfe that is in his humanity knoweth not the day and houre of his comming to Judgement Mat. 13. 32. And this is further to be considered that the Manhood communicateth not any property to the God-head of Christ really for the Divine nature receiveth nothing but giveth all but only personally ●in concreto non in abstracto As Mary is called the Mother of God-Christ not of his God-head and God suffered for us but not the God-head but the Diety of Christ communicateth to his Humanity both really and personally SECT 7. Hereticks condemned touching Christs Divine Nature HEre then are condemned all such Hereticks which erre touching the Divine and Human nature of Christ 1. As touching Christs divine Nature some utterly denying it making Christ a meere man and not to have been before he was conceived in the Virgin Mary which was the Heresie of Corinthus and Ebion contrary to Scripture which saith that the Word which was made flesh was in the beginning Joh. 1. 1. 2. Them that would have another Nature in Christ besides his Human but not of the same substance with God yet of an higher nature then any creature as Carpocates and Arius but our blessed Saviour himselfe saith I and my Father am one Joh. 20. 30. 3. Them that affirme that Christ besides his Human nature consisted of a Divine yet not begotten of the Father but makeing one Person with the Father as well as being of one substance so the Sabellians and Patro-passians whereas the Apostle saith God sent his Son made of a woman Gal. 4. 4. the Person then of the Son and not of the Father was made man for us SECT 8. Touching Christs human nature 1. IT condemneth all such as affirme that Christ was not a true man but only in outward appearance as the Manaches and The like touching his Human nature Mertionites who are confuted by Christs owne words Luk. 24. 29. Handle me and see me for a Spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me have with 1 Cor. 15. 47. Act. 2. 22. 1 Tim. 2. 5. 2. Those which hold that Christ had not his flesh of the Virgin Mary but brought it with him from Heaven contrary to the Apostle who saith that he was made of the seed of David according to the flesh Rom. 1. 3. 3. Those who hold that Christ had a true Human nature but in respect of his body only as Apollonaris of La●dicea who is convinced by the words of our Saviour Mat. 26. 38. My soule is heavie unto the death 4. Those who grant that Christ tooke upon him our whole Nature but not our human infirmities for the Apostle teacheth the contrary that Christ was in all things tempted in like sort as we are yet without sinne Heb. 4. 15. For infirmities are of two sorts Personall and Naturall SECT 9. Of Personall and Naturall infirmities 1. SOme are Personall as blindnesse sicknesse diseases as Leprosie c. and these Christ was not subject unto 2. There are Naturall infirmitios which doe belong to the whole Human nature as wearinesse hunger griefe and such like and these our blessed Saviour undertooke that he might in all things be like unto us Heb. 5. 2. which is also evidenced Mat. 4. 2. where it is said that after he had fasted forty dayes and forty nights he was afterwards an hungred and Mat. 26. 38. where himselfe confesseth that his soule was exceeding sorrowfull even to the death c. 5. Those that hold that Christ had a true Human Nature but after the uniting thereof with the God-head it was absorpt of his Divine Nature which only remained and this was the Heresie of Swen●feildius But we are otherwise taught in the Scriptures that Christ ascended up in a true visible Human Body and that he shall with the same returne again into the world at the last day Act. 1. 11. 6. Those who hold that the Divine Nature of Christ causeth his Humanity which by the property of its owne nature which The Luthreans error it retaineth for ever can be but in one place at once to be every where which is the opinion of the Luthreans their reason being this viz. because say they the God-head being every where maketh the Humanity for the union sake partakers of its glory To which we answer SECT 10. The Luthreans confuted 1. THat the Assertion concludeth a contradiction for how doth Christs human nature retain the naturall property thereof for ever in being but in one place at once if it be every where by vertue of the God-head 2. If by vertue of this union the human nature can doe all things which the Diety doth then the human nature should be absorpt and as it were changed into the Divine 3. There is a mutuall communion of the properties betwixt the two Natures of Christ but such as destroyeth not the true properties of either but if the property of the Diety were communicated to the humane nature to be every where the Humanity of Christ should be altered in nature being without the true property thereof which is to be but in one place at once 4. As the reason of this Assertion is not sound so the conclusion it selfe viz. of Christs omni-presence in his Humanity is contrary to the Scriptures where the Apostle Peter saith Whom the heavens must contain untill the time that all things must be restored Act. 3. 21. This which hath been spoken I suppose is sufficient to convince all such as deny the Divinity of Christ or that he is not equall with the Father and the Holy Ghost but least some curious Naturalists should not be herewith satisfied in the unity of the Trinity and the Trinity in unity relying more upon human or carnall reason then Scripture I will therefore recite the opinions of sundry men touching the Trinity and Vnity of the three Persons in the same by which they may be made unexcusable and also shamed out of their absurd Heresies and Blasphemies and so revoke them for ever SECT 11. Severall sorts of people proving a Trinity of Persons in the God-head 1. TO which purpose some of the Rabbins doe in the name Jehovah comprehend a Trinity for Jehovah say they betokeneth a God begetting or giving essence and if there be a God begetting there must also be a God begotten and because it is impossible but that betwixt the God begetting and the God begotten there should be a coeternall and substantiall love therefore in this name is also insinuated the Holy Ghost the God of

last day as also that his flesh is meat indeed and his blood is drink indeed and that he that eateth his flesh and drinketh his blood dwelleth in Christ and Christ in him Joh. 6. 53 54 55 56. Ans The wicked and unbeleevers neither have eternall life The wicked neither eate or drink the body or blood of Christ neither doe they dwell in Christ or Christ in them neither doe they live by Christ which life is by faith in the Son of God Gal. 2. 20. therefore they can neither eate nor drink the body and blood of Christ this proposition therefore is directly opposite to the Scriptures but yet to give such of them satisfaction that are yet kept in ignorance and in the chaines of darknesse by that man of sinne I will therefore branch the Argument into these three particulers 〈◊〉 as 1. What a Sacrament is 2. How Christ is said to be eaten in the Sacrament and 3. Who they are that eate Christ in the Sacrament SECT 2. VVHat the Sacrament of the Lords Supper is Bernard termeth What the Lords Supper is it Canalis grati lavacrum anime the cunduit of Gra●● and the hath of the Soule which the whole company of the faithfull doe consecrate and sacrifice as well as the Priest or Mi●ister and it consisteth of two things viz. the visible substance which is Bread and Wine 2. The invisible grace which is redemption by Christs death from the punishment due unto our sins that like as by Baptisme we are inis●iated into the Church so by this spirituall Banquet we are preserved in that life into which he hath begotten us through the Word and in this holy Mystery three things are to be considered as 1. The signification 2. The matter and 3. The effect now the signification is placed in the promise the matter is Christs death and resurrection and by the effect is meant redemption righteousnesse and eternall life which is the fruit which a worthy receiver obtaineth by being partaker of that Divine Mystery In the second Circumstance the great controversie will fall by course to be disputed upon viz. Whether or no our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ whom the Apostle saith the heavens must containe untill the restauration of all things or untill the day of Judgement be so eaten in the Sacrament as these Popelings seeme to be confident of according to the former expression delivered SECT 3. ANd for the better clearing of the truth in this particular When Scripture is to be taken literally and when spiritually there is a way discovered whereby we may understand when Scripture are to be understood literally and when spiritually for the first when Christ seems to command a foule and wicked act that must not be taken litterally as in them words of our Saviour formerly expressed in which he seems to command a foule and wicked act it is therefore figuratively spoken now it is the spirituall understanding that saveth him that beleeveth Joh. 6. 47. For the letter killeth but the Spirit quickneth Joh. 6. 63. neither is it Christs bodily presence if it were in the Sacrament according to their opinions that could save a receiver of it for Judas a Son of perdition received panem Domini sed non panem Dominum the bread of the Lord but not the bread the Lord. So that when Christ saith This is my body he meaneth the figure of his body and therefore we are to understand it by way of signification and not properly for it is his presence in our hearts through faith in his blood which we receive profit by and not by his bodily presence in the Bread and Wine as I have formerly said and if we beleeve not his bodily presence there that will not damne us but it is his absence out of our heart● which bringeth damnation SECT 4. THis Sacrament then being a Spirituall thing must be spiritually The Soule cannot 〈◊〉 ●●d wi●h co●po●al●●ood deserned for the food of the Sou●e upon earth is no other then the food of Angels which is the joy and delectation which they have of Gods glory and therefore not to be fed with corporall food such as they would make Christs body and seeing that all corporall food is digested into the stomack and so cast o●t into the draugh● I blush to think of their audacious blasphe●●●s who doubtlesse cannot be ignorant that if they eate him ●●rnally that they doe also expell him in that manner as they doe other meat which thing is a shame to any Christian to conceive much more to expresse and vindicate And it may very ●ell be thought that though the Apostles of Christ would have been ●●y s●r●pilous to have drunk Christs very blood seeing it was so plain against the Law of Moses and their owne decrees A●● 15. 29. if they had understood him in that grosse sence which these Papists doe Ag●in the writers of Scriptures must be examined as Spirituall Scripture must be 〈◊〉 st●od 〈◊〉 spirituall sence men and not as Carnall men in regard they were delivered by holy men of God as they were moved by the Holy Ghost and therefore one taking upon him the person of our Saviour to whom in the sixtieth verse of the sixth of John who is said to murmur● at his sayings answereth them thus by expounding of our Saviours words in the 63. ver You saith he shall not ●at● this body which you see nor drink this blood in my v●●nes but I shall give a certain Sacrament unto you which if it be spiritually understood quick●●th you otherwise it profi●eth nothing SECT 5. IT is also evident from Exod. 12. 11. that the Paschall Lambe The ●●gne called by the name of the thing signified was called the Lords Passeover whereas it was but a signe and representation of the Passeover As also Circumcision was called the Lords covenant Gen. 17. 11. whereas it was only a signe and seale of i● Then as neither the Lambe was the Passeover it self nor Circumcision the Covenant it self it is but weakly inferred by these people from the words of our Saviour that the bread should be the body of Christ Mat. 26. 26. so that it must needs follow from hence that the Sacrament of the Lords Supper is only a signe or representation of the body of Christ yea the Apostle Paul expounding them words of our Saviour in the institution of the Sacrament viz. This is my body exhorteth us to doe it in remembrance of him And that so oft as we eate this this bread and drink this cup we shew the Lords death till he come 1 Cor. 11. 26. If then it be but a signe and representation of his death it is not his absolute death for if it were so then must Christ be really s●aine and crucified at every Sacrament which God forbid we should imagine and therefore the Apostle saith it is a remembrance of the Sacrifice of his body and blood which was shed for

place helpeth not Lot sinned in the Mountaine Adam fell in Paradice the Angels in Heaven it is then but a meere fancy for them to think that a Monkes Coule a Cloysters life of a Hermites Weede can make a man more holy but it is to be seared that as Drunkennesse and Incense were committed in the Cav● so the Cloysters and Seles of Popish Votaries are not free from the like uncleanesse Obj. We read that holy men required often to desart 〈◊〉 as Moses Elias John Baptist yea our Saviour himself who often went apart to pray Ans That is no warrant for these Popish Professions aforementioned for these holy men did but for a time sequester themselves that thereby they might more seriously be given to Prayer and Meditation not leaving and renouncing their callings as the other superstitious people doe .. Againe they also in time of persecution fled into desart places therein shewing their humanity and infirmity least they might have been forced by persecution to deny the faith but these doe place the greatest perfection in this life in that solitary profession Like unto these is their superstitious Washings when they addresse Of their superstitious Washings themselves to consecrate the Heast and to approach unto the Altar muttering these words of the Prophet David I will wash my hands in innocency and so will I compasse thine Altar But this superstitious washing doth not justifie their Idolatrous service who whilst they wash their hands doe prophane Christs Supper and take away the fruitfull application and efficacy of his death by instituting a new Sacrifice Therefore as Pilate washed his hands and yet delivered Christ even to be Crucified so they wash their hands and yet doe crucifie Christ daily in the Masse in offering him up still in Sacrifice SECT 5. Of their Pennance and auricular Confession THeir Pennance consisteth of these three particulars viz. Contrition of the heart confession of the mouth and satisfaction of the worke Now all these may be in a reprobate as in the example of Pharaoh who confessed that he had sinned though it was no true confession being forced thereunto by the grievous plagues of Haile and Lightning that was upon him and his people Gen. 9. 27. for he simply confessed not his owne sins but now that is at this or that time I have sinned in this or that manner yea he also imitated satisfaction for he was also content to let the people goe As also in the example of Judas in 〈◊〉 may finde them all three as contrition and confession in these words I am guilty in betraying the innocent blood and satisfaction in the restoring of the money which be had taken to betr●y Christ But he wanted the fruit of true repentance the peace of the Conscience and clearing thereof before God by remission of sins as the Apostle sheweth Rom. 5. 1. Being justified by faith we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ As also 2 Cor. 7. 9. 11. where he sheweth that repentance to salvation is wrought by godly sorrow not to be repented of and contrariwise that the sorrow of the world worketh-death viz. the counterfett repentance before mentioned as was evident in Judas But more fully to expresse their meaning in these three particulars they would have contrition to be just due full and perfect and such as shall last to the end of a mans life never expressing when a man may be out of doubt that he hath performed this contrition but shall be in a continuall suspence of the pardon of his sins they also appoint a full and perfect contrition of heart appointing no measure unto it and so make it a part of satisfaction of their sins before God appropriating that unto man which is only proper to God himself Auricular confession is that which they would have made to their Priests and Shavelings to whom say they we must reckon up all our sins which can never be for as the Prophet saith Who can recite all his transgressions As also Whom have I in heaven but thee or in earth in comparison of thee Again I said I will confesse my sins unto the Lord and so thou forgavest the iniquity of my sin As also in Psal 51. Against thee only have I sinned c SECT 6. Obj. THe Apostle James doth exhort us to confesse our sinnes one to another c. Ans In those words the Apostle doth not meane that we should confesse them to Popish Shavelings neither doth he injoyne us to confesse our sins one to another as though we might expect pardon from one another but to the end that we might pray one for another as the ensuing words doe make it appeare for otherwise none can forgive sins but God only Satisfaction say they is made by teares and prayers by tayle before this or that stone Taper Lamp Coules with fasting Sack-cloth Almes Pilgrimages large Offerings or the like by which they think they pacifie the Lord and pay that which is due to Justice and make amends for their sins whereas Christ being our Advocate Mediator and Propisiation for our Sins we need no other recompence or satisfaction our sins being forgiven for his Name fake 1 Joh. 2. 2. 12. seeing he is the Lambe of God which taketh away the sins of the World Joh. 1. 26. whose satisfaction being perfect and absolute is imputed to us by faith which no man can obtaine but he that is also sanctified by the Spirit so that the Apostle speaking of such like traditions Colos 2. 20. saith That they all perish with the using being the commandements and doctrines of men having only a shew of Religion and humblenesse of minde but the body is of Christ Col. 2. 17. which very words of the Apostle like a Thunderboult breaketh in pieces all the traditions of the Romish Church as of Vowes Auricular Confession Satisfaction Purgatory Pardons and whatsoever is by them added to the Word of God which their Monks define to be the Service of God and by which they declare themselves to be Anti-christians SECT 7. Of speaking in an unknowne Tongue in the exercise of Divine Worship THe next thing that presents it self is their reading the Scriptures in an unknowne Tongue whereas in common reason if a man make a Covenant he ought to know those things whereunto he bindeth himself and therefore the Papists erre exceedingly in that they suffer not the people to understand those things which they binde them to keepe seeing neither the Scriptures are read or the Sacraments delivered in such a tongue as they doe understand for the Apostle saith If I come unto you with tongues what shall I profit you 1 Cor. 14. 6. in which Chapter this errour is so sufficiently confuted as that it is needlesse to speak any thing more to that purpose Another of their positions is that faith is not to be kept with Hereticks for so contrary to the safe conduct given by the Emperour to John Hus and Hierome of