lapsus peccati statu alijsque peccatis excepta sola impenitentia considerantur c. Sicut fidelibus quatalibus fructus impetratae gratiae proprié obtingit ita infidelibus rebellibus qua talibus gratia impetrata non est c. pag. 312. The second sort of Divines distinguish the sufficiency and efficiency of Christs death In respect of the worth and greatnesse of the price he died for all men because it was sufficient for the redemption of every man in the world if they did repent and believe and God might without impeachment of justice have offered Salvation to every man in the world upon that condition if it had been his pleasure In the efficiency as every man or any man hath fruit by the death of Christ so Christ died for him But this is not of one kind some fruit is common to every man for as Christ is Lord of all things in heaven and earth even the earthly blessings which infidels injoy may be tearmed fruits of Christs death Others proper to the members of the visible Church and common to them as to be called by the word injoy the Ordinances of grace live under the Covenant partake of some graces that come from Christ which through their fault be not saving and in this sence Christ died for all that be under the Covenant But other fruits of Christs death according to the will of God and intention of Christ as Mediatour be peculiar to the sheep of Christ his brethren them that be given unto him of the Father as faith unfained regeneration pardon of sinne adoption c. and so they hold Christ died efficiently for his people only in this sence namely so as to bring them effectually to faith grace and glory Now let us come to examine what the Scriptures teach in this particular The Apostle writeth expressely that by the grace of Heb. 2. 9. God Christ tasted of death for all men or distributively for every man Some referre this to the sufficiency of Christs death but all men cannot be referred to man-kinde considered in the common masse or lapse for the words must be understood of the death of Christ as it was suffered in time and not as it was decreed of God and of men considered as at that time But at what time Christ suffered mankind could not be considered as in the transgression of our first Parents The Jewes were of opinion that Christ the Messiah was promised a Saviour to them only How to impetrate Salvation No but to be applied as in Covenant Now to beate downe their pride the Apostle saith Christ tasted of death for all sc both Jew and Gentile who stood in relation by virtue of the Covenant as the Jewes did So that the Apostle speakes of the application of Christs death which is not absolutely common to all and every man in the world and by every man is meant every man who heareth receiveth and is partaker of the fruit and benefit of Christs death offered in the word of reconciliation every man who is under the new Covenant as it is propounded of God in the Gospell and accepted of them But every man under the new Covenant as he is under the Covenant is partaker of the fruit benefit of Christs death That the passage is to be understood of them that apply and possesse the fruit of his death is manifest by divers reasons from the verses precedent and subsequent The world to come verse 5. may well be that all or every man for whom Christ tasted death but that world to come is that happy age which the Prophets did foretell should begin at the comming of Christ whose accomplishment or fulfilling we expect as yet Beza an not in Heb. 2. 5. Corvin in Mal. cap. 29. § 1. Heb. 2. 10 11. 13 Isa 53. 10. Heb. 2. 16. They for whom Christ died are in the same Chapter described to be one that is of the same nature and spirituall condition with Christ to be his brethren such as trust in God the children of God given unto Jesus Christ the generation or posterity of Christ as the Prophet speaketh whom Christ tooke by the hand and lifted up from their fall the seed of Abraham But these things agree to them only that possesse the fruits and benefits of Christ for whom he died by way of application If the maintainers of universall redemption consider their owne grounds it will be hard to fit this Text to their purpose or rather from them the former exposition may be confirmed For either by all men they must understand mankind in the common lapse as fallen in Adam and then Christ by his death hath restored them into the favour of God they stand actually reconciled they be regenerated and if they die before by actuall sinne committed in their owne person they fall from that estate are undoubtedly saved or they must understand all men considered as obstinate impenitent rebellious unbelievers And then Christ died for all and every man as obstinate impenitent and unbelievers which I cannot find that any of them hath or dare affirme or by all men they must understand all beleevers who apply and possesse the benefits of Christs death which is that we affirme They say how truly I dispute not his dominion over all men that they are bound to obey him and live unto him is grounded upon his dying for every one But if that be granted is it not necessary that his death should be applied to every one in some sort at least made knowne unto them in the word of life For men are bound to obey and live unto Christ as they will grant not because he hath impetrated righteousnesse and salvabilitie but because he hath entred into Covenant with them made knowne unto them the way of life imparted unto them his blessings and they have accepted of the condition and received him to be their Saviour And these words By the grace of God I should thinke import more to them then that velleity or common mercy or generall affection of doing good which Armin. and Corvin make naturall and as they teach God beareth towards them that he hateth Corvin in Molin cap. 29. Sect. 2. which was the cause why he gave Christ to die for all men even that free grace and love whereby he quickens them that were dead in trespasses and saveth them that believe Ephes 2. 5. As for the particle All or every one examples are usuall in Scripture where it is used with fit limitation though neither all precisely nor the most part be signified and that confessed by all sides But what need paralell places to prove it may be when the circumstances of the text shew it must be limited and they that most presse universall redemption are enforced to acknowledge a limitation in this matter It is objected that the holy Ghost speaketh generally in the beginning of the Chapter What is man But how to frame any Heb.
of God the people of God Saints by calling and so Christ died for them efficiently and by way of application as they be within the Covenant made in Christ and doe partake of those fruits and benefits of his death which of themselves tend to salvation but are perverted of them to destruction through their owne default But others comprehended under the world be faithfull indeed living members of Jesus Christ sealed by the Spirit and for these Christ died efficiently in a peculiar manner scil to bring them to life and happinesse as already they are called savingly and effectually to faith and repentance The argument à pari is of no weight manifestly confuted both by Scripture and experience it selfe For to many that perish is the word of Salvation sent they receive it professe it rejoyce in it live under the Ordinances of grace be partakers of sundry graces of the Spirit all which be speciall fruits of Christs death speciall to some not common to all men and in which respects Christ is said to die for them But to affirme the same things of every particular man in the world is to offend against common sence If Christ had died for one wicked man that perished because he had been wicked or for that reason there had been some truth in the argument but some fruits of Christs death are imparted to some although they be wicked not because they are wicked or for that reason Besides it is one thing to say Christ died for some that perish as they partake the fruits of his death in themselves belonging to Salvation which is granted another to say Christ died for all men considered as fallen according to the will of God and intention of Christ as Mediatour with full purpose to purchase for them actuall reconciliation on Gods part which is that they contend for So that this objection will be of no force untill it can be proved that impretation is application they be in Covenant who be not nor never were in Covenant they have the Gospell who never heard of the Gospell they have received the promise of Salvation who are rejected and cast off of God as aliens from the Covenant Christ is amongst them who never had possible meanes imaginable to come to the knowledge of the truth and they are enlightned and have tasted of the good word of God and of the powers of the life to come who all their life long have lived in ignorance and infidelity and not heard that there is a Christ 2 Cor. 5. 14 15. We thus judge saith Paul that if one died for all then were all dead And that he died for all that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves but unto him which died for them and rose againe Here the Apostle saith expressely Christ died for all simply meant in respect of the impetration of a new Covenant and salvation according to that Covenant common misery is concluded from this that Christ died for all men sc that all were dead which is universally true of every man And upon this ground he exhorts men to live unto Christ scil that Christ died for all men Some learned Divines not partiall referre See Estium in 2 Cor. 5. 14. pag. 586. this to the greatnesse of the price and dignity of Christs death which was sufficient for the redemption of man-kind if they did repent and believe but the Apostle rather speaks of Christs death for all in respect of application event or effect for all not simply but for all to whom the fruit and benefit of Christs death is offered in the Gospel and received by faith Thus Vorstius Vorst in 2 Cor. 5. 14 loc com Illud quoque hic obiter notandum Christ died and was raised up for all men in generall if we consider the amplitude of divine grace offered in Christ but in respect of the event or effect both are done for all the elect and believers only And in this latter sence that phrase is used of the Apostle in this place And this the circumstances of the text will plainly enforce For he speaks of the death of Christ not as it was purposed and decreed of God but as it was actually suffered by Christ when the farre greatest part of the world was for present state drowned in Infidelity and Idolatry wherein they had continued a long time being rejected and cast off of God The end of Christs death and resurrection there named by the Apostle sheweth it is to be meant of the fruit and application that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves but to him which died for them that is that by force of that communion which they have with him their head being dead unto sinne they should live unto righteousnesse But that can agree unto none who are not partakers of the fruits of Christ none are fitted by grace to live unto Christ but they that have put on Christ by faith That All for whom Christ died is that world which God in Christ hath reconciled unto himselfe not imputing their sins ver 19. whereby is meant the world of Jew and Gentile of which we have spoken before in the fore-cited places which must have the same meaning and cannot be affirmed of the world universally according to that present state wherein it stood when Christ suffered How then doth the Apostle conclude common misery from this If one died for all then were all dead It may well be understood of death unto the world and sinne and not of death in sinne as if he had said if Christ died for all then all that are his are dead to sinne and to the world The words and scope of the Apostle do both agree well to this interpretation It hath been alleadged that the words speake of a death passed not present as our translation sheweth and so could not be understood of death unto sin But Vorstius upon that very word noteth that he understandeth Vorst in 2 Cor. 5. 15. Schol. all Christians in which the efficacie of Christs death sheweth forth it self as they also by the example of Christ are dead to sin and the flesh Confer Rom. 6. 2 c. 1 Pet. 4. 1. Some foolishly understand this of the guilt of death that the sense should be because Christ is dead for all men hence it is truly gathered that all men are guilty of death which is refuted in the verse following This is Vorstius his censure of that interpretation As for the words seeing they speake of the death of Christ applyed in the time past it was requisite these that intreat of the death of sin in them that be Christs should be put in the time past also And so the words doe more confirme then weaken the interpretation It is further objected that it will not agree with the argument of the Apostle who by Christs death for all could not prove all to be dead to sin nor so much as all
Gentiles in the place of the Jewes and is to be understood of the world opposed to the Jewish Nation That world concerning whom the Lord had spoken before to Abraham saying In thy seed shall all the Nations of Gen. 12. 3. and 18. 18. Psal 2. 8. and 22. 27 28. Isai 11. 9 10. Psal 72. 11. the earth be blessed That world which the Prophets foretold should be added to the Church and given to the Messiah This world I say which God hath promised to blesse and adde to the Kingdome of the Messiah he hath reconciled unto himselfe to wit as they are blessed in Abrahams seed actually and effectually This is the Priviledge of the New Testament that God was Synod ubi supra Illi hoc loco per vocem Mundi intelligantur ad quos sermo reconciliationis pertinet in Christ reconciling the world unto himselfe as is most apparent in the words next following and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation and by the sentence it self God was in Christ But what is proper to the times of the New Testament cannot be attributed to every man in the world even those that sate in darknesse and the shadow of death before the light did shine upon them The reconciliation here mentioned is actuall effectuall particular reconciliation purchased by Christ published by the Apostles to the world of Jew and Gentiles and received Meritum Christi subordinatur gratiae dilectionis generali ex ea enim fluit ordinatio hujus medii c. non enim ut vellet nostri misereri fecit Christus sed ut salva justitia nostri misereri posset Stegma pag. 54. Rom. 5. 9 10. by them in the Covenant of grace For it is explained by the non-imputation or remission of sinnes at least as one part or branch of reconciliation which is a transient act conferred in time and inferreth a change of state and condition in the partie justified or reconciled and of other reconciliation betwixt God and man the Scripture speaketh not And it is to be observed that the Apostle saith not Christ hath purchased that God is reconcileable or actually reconciled on his part as if before he were irreconcileable but God was in Christ reconciling the world unto himself where the world is the subject or matter of reconciliation which is changed in respect of state or condition now received into actuall favour whereas heretofore it lay under wrath In another place the Apostle puts reconciliation by the death of the Sonne of God and justification by Christs bloud for the same where justification cannot be taken for possibility of justification but for actuall justification by faith in the bloud of Christ wherewith Salvation is joyned whereby we are acquitted from the guilt and punishment of sinne and so the justified or reconciled are opposed to sinners ungodly and enemies In respect of vers 6 8. our antecedent state we were enemies when In Scriptura ut saepè res dicitur quod paulò antè fuit ut coeci vident surdi aâ—diunt claudi ambulant Matth. 11. 5. esurientes qui prius miserè victitabant in solo sterili â—sal 107. 36. Joh. 9. 17. leprosus qui jam mundus est Matth. 26 6. Virgo quae jam nupta Matth. 10. 35. baculus qui est serpens Exod. 7. 11. publicanus qui est Christi discipulus Matth. 10. 3. discipulum Christi qui eum reliquit Joh. 6. 66 Sic contra saepè in sacris literis res describitur qualis â—utura est non qualis nunc est Ephes 5. 20. Ita Christi oves dicuntur qui tunc adhuc erant lupi Joh. 10. 16. Dei filii qui tum aâ—huc erant filii diaboli Joh. 11. 52. Tarn exercit l. 2. Job 3. 2. 561. reconciled to God by the death of his Son but by reconciliation we are received into grace and of enemies made friends and sons In these passages we cannot find reconciliation put for reconcileablenesse nor predicated of all the world nor all the enemies of God nor in any other Scripture For though all were enemies before reconciliation yet all enemies are not reconciled but they that be converted to the faith Thus we are taught in the word of truth to distinguish the state of the Gentiles living in their infidelity without God from the state of the Gentiles reconciled But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were farre off are made nigh by the bloud of Christ c. And that he might reconcile both unto God in one body by the crosse having slaine the enmity thereby Eph. 2. 13 16. And you that were sometimes alienated and enemies in your minds by wicked works yet now are reconciled Col. 1. 21. Now scil the Messiah being exhibited they are reconciled and their sins pardoned the promise of mercy pertaining to them as well as to the Jewes when formerly abalienati à foedere promissionum they were not reconciled And when in the precedent verse he saith that it pleased the Father by him scil Christ to reconcile all things unto himselfe whether they be things in heaven or things in earth he speaks of actuall reconciliation not reconcileablenesse and all things must be limited as that signification of the word and scope of the place doth necessarily require The sentence is diversly interpreted some think it not absurd to extend it simply to all things without exception but especially to reasonable creatures Angels and men Others think it must necessarily be restrained to creatures of a certaine kind and interpret it of Angels and men reconciled one to another who were formerly separated by mans disobedience Others restraine it to the faithfull in heaven and earth and expound it of Vorst in Col. 1. 20. Sch Eph. 1. 10. the Church and men in Covenant who are received into favour and reconciled by the death of Christ laid hold on by faith But to interpret it simply of all men penitent impenitent believers infidels obstinate separated from God by their evill works is directly contrary to the Text and hath scarce a second Author No man is to be excluded from seeking the benefit of reconciliation but from the benefit it self the Apostle excludes them that be not in Covenant and in the state of grace to whom only this spirituall blessing doth pertaine And in the same manner this and the like words are to be limited in other places Eph. 1. 10. Rom. 11. 32. And this they must not deny if they would be at one with themselves for they say all men are under a new Covenant and received into favour and that pardon of sin is promised unto all that shall continue in that Covenant and not transgresse against it Arm. respon ad Art 13 14. so that to consummate happinesse there is need of continuance only in the state which evermore hath effectuall communication conjoyned And restitution into the state of grace and actuall reconciliation if they be not one thing they
17. of John ver 21. That the world may beleeve that thou hast sent me Some by the world in that place understand the elect who then were dispersed abroad or them that were to be converted from infidelity to the faith But because the word world in the whole Chapter is taken in another sence it is most naturall in this place to understand it as before for men that be of the world not illightened or converted to the faith and the word Beleeve to be put improperly for to acknowledge or confesse The sense is that the world although unbeleeving although Maldonat in Joh. 17. 21. Iansen hac 136. an adversary to me yet seeing the great love and concord of my Disciples may be compelled to beleeve that is to acknowledge and confesse that I was sent of God that is that I am not as now it thinketh a seducer but that I am truly sent of the Father or that the Infidels may by experience be convinced to confesse my glory and be compelled to acknowledge and confesse that thou hast sent me a Saviour into the world This sense is so plain and easie that we need not seek any further for the meaning but if we grant it to be meant of true and sound faith it will not follow thence that Christ made intercession for every man in the world that he might beleeve For the world is usually taken for men in the world indefinitely and not simply for every man nor yet for the greater part of men in the world There went out a decree from Cesar Augustus that all the world should be taxed Luk 2. 1. but this cannot be extended to every nation much lâ—sse to every man The Vide Psal 118. 10. 1 Chro. 14. 17. Jer. 27. 7. Dan. 2. 38. Matth. 10. 22. Rom. 15. Rev. 18. 3 23. impure spirits goe forth unto the Kings of the earth and of the whole world Rev. 16. 14. All the world wondred after the beast Rev. 13. 3. The whole world lyeth in iniquity 1 Joh. 5. 19. He was in the world and the world knew him not Joh. 1. 10. Behold the world is gone after him Joh. 12. 19. The Syriacke Interpreter vulgar Interpreter and Mannus the Greeke Paraphrast adde the universall particle and reade it the whole world But if the world be taken for every man in the world we must conclude that every man in the world did follow Christ and that no man in the world did know him They aske again what is it the Intercession of Christ required Psal 2. 8. Aske of me and I will give thee the heathen for thine Inheritance Is it not for unbeleevers to bring them to the faith and doth not Christ intercede for the comming of Gods Kingdome as he taught his Disciples to doe There is therefore an Intercession of Christ for them that beleeve But here we cannot find that generall Intercession of Christ they speake of that every man might come to the faith by fitting meanes but for the most part ineffectuall The prayer required in the second Psalme Arminius Armin. Orat. de Sacerdot Chr. referreth to the prayer which Christ offered to the Father for himselfe according to the commandement and promise of the Father Aske of me and I will give thee the heathen for thine Inheritance to which Promise of the Father Christ having respect said Father glorifie thy Sonne that thy Sonne also may glorifie thee as thou Joh. 17. 2. hast given him power over all flesh that he might give eternall life to as many as thou hast given him And from this prayer are to be distinguished saith he those supplications which with strong cries and teares he offered to his Father in the dayes of his flesh by those he craved to be freed from his Agony by this he prayeth that he might see his seed and that the will of God might prosper in his hand But howsoever it be the prayer spoken of in that place is absolute certain and effectuall for what God there promised Christ prayed for in particular and he was heard therein and therefore it cannot be applyed to that generall Intercession of Christ which they would maintaine as every man may plainly see They further reply that this Intercession of Christ Joh. 17. pertaineth to the application of Christs death that Christ maketh Intercession for beleevers and by the world they are signified who did or would contemne and reject Christ offered to them in the word of his Gospell as the word world is used in many other places Joh. 1. 10. and 3. 19. and 14. 17. 16. 8 9. 14. 22. But if it pertain to the application of Christs death it followeth thence that the death of Christ shall be applyed to them who were given unto him of the Father that in speciall manner he might lay down his life for them seeing Christ offered up himselfe a sacrifice to the Father for them and them only for whom according to his office of Mediatorship he made speciall Intercession If by the world obstinate contemners of the Gospell be understood what shall we thinke of them to whom the word of reconciliation was never sent or Christ offered in the Ministery of the Gospell are they partakers of the benefits of Christs speciall Intercession or is the death of Christ applyed unto them If only contemners of the Gospell be meant by the world for which Christ would not pray why should it be interpreted of speciall Intercession seeing our Saviour as they confesse neither laid down his life nor made generall Intercession for such as such that they might be brought to the faith or be partakers of the merits of his death Our Saviour in that his prayer opposeth the world to them that are given unto him of the Father and as to be given unto him of the Father notes somewhat precedent to effectuall vocation and lively faith though every one that is given unto him doth or shall beleeve so the world notes a state antecedent to wilfull contempt though they that be of this world if they live under the Gospell will prove themselves contemners Joh. 6. 37. All that the Father giveth me shall come unto me and him that commeth unto me I will in no wise cast out saith Christ But to come unto Christ is to beleeve in him by effectuall vocation Joh. 1. 10. The world knew not Christ but they were the world before they shut their eyes against the light and refused Christ offering himselfe unto them Joh 3. 19. They are the world who are not given unto Christ are not his sheep his people his brethren believe not in him be disobedient cast out though they never stubbornly contemned the Gospell because the sound therof never came into their eares that light never shined amongst them And now for conclusion of this argument let this one thing be added that if we search the Scripture we shall find no mention of this two-fold Intercession of Christ properly
Matth. 11. 28. The old Covenant was from Mount Sinai Heb. 12. 18. the new from Sion heavenly amiable and pleasant Psal 2. 6. The old Covenant excludes the Gentiles the new admits them The old promiseth life in Canaan the new in Heaven But not to examine these things particularly by this explication it appeares the Divines of this opinion make the old Covenant differ from the new in substance and kind and not in degree of manifestation as also did the former Most Divines hold the old and new Covenant to be one in substance and kind to differ only in degrees but in setting down the differences they speake so obscurely that it is hard to find how they consent with themselves For most commonly they distinguish them thus The old Testament promiseth life to them that obey the Law and condemnes all not perfectly conformable the new doth freely pardon sinnes and give Salvation to them that believe in Christ The old was written by the finger of God in tables of stone the new by the Spirit of God in the fleshie tables of the heart The old was the ministery of death a killing letter the new the ministery of the quickning Spirit The old did lay upon the necks of the Fathers an intollerable yoke of rites and commandements the new doth impose the easie yoke of the Spirit enduing us with the Spirit of Adoption and liberty of the Sonnes of God The old doth involve the Doctrine of the Grace of the Messiah under the shadowes of types and rites the new doth containe the fulfilling of the tipes and figures Moses is the typicall Mediatour of the Old Testament Christ is the true Mediatour of the New The old is sealed by the blood of Sacrifices the new is ratified by the blood of the Mediatour the and death of the Testatour The Old by oblations did not pacifie the wrath of God nor purge the conscience the new containes the true propitiation in the blood of Christ The old was imperfect intolerable weake and therfore to be abolished the new perfect easy and to continue for ever c. with other the like before mentioned And many things herein are spoken truly but how all these differences should stand if they be not Covenants opposite in kind it is not easy to understand Some few have laboured to reconcile them one of these two wais First that the Old Testament doth promise life eternall plainly under the condition of morall obedience perfect that is under a condition altogether unpossible together with an heavy burden of legall rites and an yoke of most strict pollicie but covertly under the condition of repentance and faith in the Messias to come prefigured by tipes and ceremonies that by this forme of doctrine worship and policie a proud grosse and stiffe-necked people might be more tamed and convinced of their owne unrighteousnesse and that by such a pedagogue they might be led to Christ who was more obscurely manifested under those shadows The second is By a distinction of Moses his proposition of the Law from God unto that people which as they would is done either with exaction of perfect obedience deserving eternall life and threatning eternall curse to all that continue not in every thing of the booke of the Law to doe it Deut. 27. 26. or in a comfortable moderation and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 promising blessings to those who doe what they can to performe it The first is a perfect and exact draught of the Law of prime nature the second a â—erswasion and incouragement to corrupt nature to stirre up the relicks of power and the Image of God upon hope of future good The first is propounded to all mankind this to the Church though others take benefit by it In the first the Law breaths nothing but wrath to fallen nature for that hath no grace nor mercy Joh. 1. 17. In the second Moses speakes Gospell to the Israelites for the outward happinesse of particulars and the prosperity of the whole The first and rigid proposition is of the Morall Law alone and as it was contained in the first writing Exod. 20. The second is laid downe in Moses whole frame and oeconomy to that people The first stands in full opposition to the Covenant of Grace containing a perfect Covenant of workes but the second is and may be subordinate to the Covenant of Grace as will appeare And this distinction as they conceive is further strengthened by the preparation unto the first delivery Exod. 19. and what strictnesse was there required in the people to prepare themselves for their persons and what a straite charge was given not to come neere the Mount least they die Vers 12. in the delivery what terrible voices lightnings thunders fire c. with the quaking of the earth so that neither Priest nor people must come neare least they should be consumed of wrath in the giving of the Law which when the people heard and saw they could not endure but desired Moses to be Mediatour betwixt God and them least if they should heare God they should die which was the ground of that Aphorisme Who ever saw God and lived yea such was the terror that Moses himselfe said I feare and quake Heb. 12. 21. Thus the Morall Law was first given by God but not written till the second going up Exod. 24. 12. where God promiseth to find the tables and write in them with his owne finger and such was the feare of the second delivery that Moses was glad to lenifie the former by reading the judicialls which he had writ and to offer sacrifice And thus Moses goes up the second time and receives the two tables tarrying there forty dayes Whilest Moses stayed the people brake the Covenant by Idolatry God sent Moses downe and by wise providence so ordered that Moses brake the Tables of the Covenant and now was all dasht and Moses to begin againe to mediate for this sinne in Aaron and the people Exod. 32. 19. Deut. 9. Hitherto in the delivery and writing of the Law Morall thunders nothing but wrath and the more Law the lesse obedience till the Law was vailed and shadowed from them in the curse of it Moses having thus travailed and broken those bare and open Tables wherein was curse and plague with open face painted he is called up againe Exod. 34. Deut. 2. 1. but consider with what alteration For first Moses now must hew the Tables God would not deale with that signifying that he would have the Mediatour Moses to have more to doe with the delivery of the second writing then at the first which was the prologue to the lenifying of the Law wherewith man had to doe 2. Moses must bring the Tables up and God would write the words before written which shewed that God could not nor would not alter the Law which was a perfect draught of the first Law imprinted in Adam 3. Consider that here was no preparation nor any terror of wonders but a
into Covenant with them and vouchsafe unto them the meanes of grace but unto some he shewed more speciall love so as to call them effectually and make them heires of salvation In like manner in the last times or daies of the new Testament God manifested so much love to the world as it is opposed to the Jewish Nation as that in the ministery of the Gospell he entreated them to be reconciled and entered into a Covenant of peace with them but unto some he bare and manifested more peculiar love in that he called them effectually and made them heires of life Neverthelesse when these Texts be expounded of the daies of grace or times of the new Testament we must not conceive that all men now called Gentiles were in former ages of the Church utterly cast off and shut out of Covenant or that the gift of Christ to Jew and Gentile is so restrained to the daies of grace as that he was not given to the faithfull whether Jew or Gentile in all ages but that the transcendent love of God in giving his Sonne to die and in him receiving the world of Jew and Gentile into the new Covenant is peculiar specially after the distinction of Jew and Gentile to the times of the Gospel This might easily be confirmed both for the substance of matter and the sence of these passages out of their writings that be the stiffest maintainers of the point in hand See Vorst Parasc cap. 4. 7. Corv. in Mol. cap. 31. § 33. Exam. censur cap. 8. Vorst de Deo not ad disput 1. Now then let us compare their position and those texts together and see whether they consent or dissent one from another First The love wherewith God so loved man fallen as to give his Sonne to die I speake according to their opinion is common to all men an incompleate will and affection whereby God loved them as men or a volition and intention of being reconciled But the love mentioned in this text is a love speciall to some ages and some men not common to every man in all ages It was a speciall love whereby the Lord loved the Jewes as his peculiar treasure above all Nations of the earth in the time of the Law Deut. 7 6. 10. 14. 26. 6. 32. 8. 2 Sam. 7. 23. 1 King 8. 53. Psal 33. 12. 100. 3. 143. 5. And it is a speciall love not common to all ages much lesse to every man in every age whereby the Lord hath loved the world of the Gentiles in the daies of the Gospell to take them for his people And this love is true love though many pervert the grace of God to their owne destruction Secondly The world for which Christ died was man-kind considered as fallen in Adam for unbeliefe followeth the death of Christ cannot be precedent to it But here the world comprehends unbeleevers and impenitent in respect of their present state and not such only as may fall into unbelief and impenitencie even such impenitent and obstinate as the Scripture saith could not believe Joh. 12. 39. Thirdly The world for which Christ died as they teach doth comprehend every particular man of what estate or condition soever in what age of the world soever But the world in the text doth not comprehend all men of all ages nor every man of any age yet passed but the world as it is set against the Jewish Nation only not comprehending every particular man of the Jewes or Gentiles but so many and so considered as they give reason of that opposition Looke in what respects God is said to have chosen the Jewes to be his peculiar people in the time of the Law but now in times of the Gospell to love the world in opposition to that peculiar favour at that time manifested to them alone in that sence is the world of Jew and Gentile to be understood and so many comprehended under it Fourthly They say Christ died for the world in respect of impetration or acquisition of righteousnesse not of the application of his death But this world which God so loved was called by the Gospell and did enter into Covenant with God and God with them The world which Christ came to save was a world in Covenant and whereunto he preached peace and so the death of Christ was applied unto them by the word and Sacraments and received by them in respect of faith temporary and profession For when God enters into Covenant with a people and they accept the conditions and give up their names unto God they doe in a sort apply the death of Christ unto themselves and possesse some fruits and benefits thereof And therefore either these passages must be interpreted of Gods giving Christ to die for the world in a speciall manner or from them it may undeniably be concluded that he died not for all man-kind For that which in speciall love was given in peculiar manner to the world of Jew and Gentile in the times of the new Testament that is not the effect of common love given to all and every man in all ages but God of his speciall love to the world of Jew and Gentile in the daies of the new Testament gave Christ to die for them therefore of common love he did not give him to die for all man-kind of every age and condition And seeing God loved some and but some according to the true sence of these places so as to give Christ to die that whosoever believeth in him should not perish c. Yea some considered for the present in the state of impenitency unbelief and obstinacy and it may be given up unto a reprobate sence Deut. 9. 9. 32 28. whereas he cast off many Nations in former ages much more particular persons who never proceeded so farre continued so long Josh 24. 2. Psal 100 3. Isa 43. 8. 65. 1. Ezek. 16 3. in these sins as this world had done must we not of necessity acknowledge some free election or choice according to the good pleasure of God Certainly it cannot be concluded hence that Christ did equally lay down his life for all men without exception to purchase for them actuall reconciliation on Gods part It is here objected that this world doth comprehend many impenitent Synod deâ—ens sent Remonst circ Art 2 pag. 301. and unbelievers that shall not be saved and if Christ died for one that shall not be saved it followeth à pari that he died for all And it is true as many be externally in Covenant and have all out ward things common with the faithfull who be not true members of Jesus Christ so also this world opposed to the Jewish Nation called of God and admitted into Covenant doth comprehend many which in deed and truth be not lively members of Jesus Christ In like manner many indeed wicked men and ungodly living in the visible Church and under the externall Covenant are called the chosen
the Elect or all at Corinth And the drift of the place is to prove not that all men simply are dead to sinne for that is notoriously false and was neither taught nor confirmed by any Pen-man of holy Writ nor that all the Elect or all at Corinth are dead to sin for he speaketh to the Church or faithfull in Corinth not to the place or inhabitants universally but that the faithfull who had believed in Christ as himself and the converted Corinthians had done and did for the present were dead to sin which he strongly confirmeth from the communion they have with Christ in his death and resurrection that is that Christ died for them in effect and event that the vertue and efficacy of his death did shew forth it self in them If the other Interpretation be admitted the consequence is good thus Christ died for all believers therefore all men by nature are dead in sin for the state of believers before conversion is the same with the others and if they by the merit power and efficacy of Christs death be delivered from the guilt and dominion of sin who so is not set free by the death of Christ from the power of sin must needs be dead therein Arguments not much unlike we have 1 Cor. 15. 22. As in Adam all die so in Christ shall all be made alive In the first part all simply in the latter all with limitation scil that be in Christ must be understood See Gal. 3. 22. And Rom. 5. 18. and 11. 32. But of that there is no need to make many words because the former interpretation is most naturall The 15. verse they say need not be restrained because all are bound to live unto Christ Whether all men be simply bound to live unto Christ because he simply died for them though his death had never been signified unto them I will leave to another place But the discourse of the Apostle is of them for whom Christ died and who believe in him and in whom the efficacy of Christs death doth exercise it self They that are dead with Christ should live unto God They object moreover that reconciliation is predicated of the vers 19. whole world which is reconciled thus farre through Christ that God will not deale with man as he might have done to cast him away utterly without hope so as he hath the Angels that sinned but he will accept of him upon termes fitting according to a new Corvin in Mol. cap. 28. §. 35. Covenant In which sense a Father is reconciled to his Son a Master to his Servant when he is content upon repentance submission and amendment to receive him into favour Upon this Text they would build a two-fold reconciliation one generall as some expresse it another speciall one not an actuall taking away of sins not actuall remission of sins not Justification not actuall redemption of these or these but an impetration of remission Justification and redemption whereby God may his justice not hindring remit sins to men transgressours which doth imply another member to wit reconciliation justification and redemption actuall Arm. in Perkin § 25. pag. 76. or a reconcileablenesse whereby men might be delivered from the captivity of sin or the necessity of thraldome and reconciliation whereby they are delivered from captivity Voss Hist Pelagian lib. 7. part 1. thes 3. Others call it an actuall reconciliation on Gods part and an actuall reconciliation whereby it comes to passe that all sinners do actually please God Exam. Censur cap. 8. pag. 59. Vorst in 2 Cor. 5. 15. and 1 Joh. 2. 2. Christ sufficiently and efficiently doth expiate the sins of all and reconcile the world to God quantum in ipso est that is as much as pertaines to the execution of his office laid upon him by his heavenly Father What distinction they make of reconciliation and actuall reconciliation or reconcileablenesse and actuall reconciliation the same may be made of redemption remission of sins justification and adoption regeneration and sanctification so that we may distinguish of them also that there is an actuall redemption and redemption actuall remission of sins and remission actuall justification and justification actuall sanctification and sanctification The terme actuall remission or reconciliation being set against reconciliation as the distinct member doth require that reconciliation potentiall be understood which may be called reconcileablenesse And then Christ hath not obtained of the Father by his death that he should remit sins but that he hath power to remit them he hath not obtained redemption but a possibility of redemption or the redemption purchased is a potentiall remission of sinnes he hath not merited sanctification but a right that he may sanctifie or sanctifiablenesse he hath obtained also that God might pardon sin as well as that man might be pardoned or reconciled and notwithstanding any redemption that Christ hath purchased every man might perish and be condemned for ever But if reconciliation potentiall or a possibility of remission only be purchased by the death of Christ how is this made actuall by application If it be actuall and effectuall why is it not applyed and given to every man will not God give to every man that which Christ hath merited and purchased for every man The merit of reconciliation by Christ and the application thereof must be distinguished but for whomsoever eternall redemption is purchased for them he hath obtained grace and glory and upon them he will actually conferre that grace and mercy sanctifying them to be a peculiar people to himselfe Heb. 9. 12. Matth. 1. 21. Joh. 4. 14. Application is as necessary an effect of redemption or reconciliation purchased as burning is of fire and there can be no redemption but of necessity it must bring application both in respect of Gods justice and Christs sacrifice Dan. 9. 24. Heb. 10. 10 14. Therefore there is but one reconciliation and that actuall and effectuall though it may be universally proposed in the Gospell and that particular actuall reconciliation is none other but that very same which God meritorie and impetratorie hath proposed by the death of Christ As for the present Text alleadged reconciliation is not predicated of the whole world taking the world for every man in the world nor reconciliation put for reconcileablenesse For it is manifest the Apostle speaks of the world as it was to be considered in the times when Christ suffered or after when in respect of present state the farre greater part were impenitent if not obdurate sinners aliens from the common-wealth of Israel without God in the world and I desire to see that Text of Scripture where God is said to reconcile unto himselfe the whole world of impenitent and obdurate sinners as such or where we shall find that all such Eph. 2. 12. Rom. 3. 8 17. Gal 3. 26. Eph. 2. 3 4. be brought under a new Covenant It is also as plaine that he speakes of the surrogation of the
for them both and being graciously invited he is without further dispute or delay to cast his soule upon the promises of mercy and come unto Christ that he might be refreshed But they are in vaine commanded to believe if Christ died not for them because they cannot believe Is it then in vaine that the obstinate and rebellious are commanded and invited to believe who as such cannot believe Was it in vaine that God commanded Pharoah to let Israel goe that our Saviour would have gathered Jerusalem when the things concerning her peace were hid from her eyes Might not men argue by the same reason that it was in vaine for God to intreate and perswade them to believe when he did fore-know that by such invitation they would not be allured to come unto him And if they cannot believe it is not through the unreasonablenesse or absurdity of the thing commanded which doth excuse nor impotency of weaknesse as if they would believe but cannot which is to be pitied but impotency of wilfulnesse and prave affection the more unable to believe the more wilfull to refuse which is inexcusable And though I cannot say God hath given to every man to believe if he will Yet sure God is not wanting to any man in that which either in justice or promise he is bound to give and did men deny themselves nourish the motions of Gods Spirit and earnestly desire to believe without question they should find the Lord gracious If men believe it is of grace not only that whereby they are inabled to believe but whereby they are discerned from other men if they believe not it is of themselves of their own pravity and they be not further from believing then from desire to believe It is objected further that Christ as he died to impetrate remission of sins for me in particular is the object of justifying faith The mercy of God reaching to the pardon of sin in and through Jesus Christ is the object of faith justifying as it is proffered unto us in the word of life but it is one thing to believe that mercy is to be had through the death of Christ and that it is offered unto us in the Gospell and we called to imbrace it another to believe that Christ according to the compleate and full will of God hath laid downe his life for us in particular to purchase for us both grace and glory Proportionable to the perswasion a man hath of Gods willingnesse to be mercifull is his perswasion of the sufficiency of Christs satisfaction and proportionable to his perswasion that God is mercifull to him in the pardon of his sin is his perswasion that Christ died for him in particular Justifying faith is not without an apprehension of mercy in Christ to be obtained but implieth not an apprehension of mercy reaching to the pardon of sin already obtained It is not without an application of recumbency reliance or imbracing which presupposeth the offer oâ— mercy in and through Jesus Christ to be received but the application of particular perswasion that Christ died for me in particular as well as for any other or hath purchased for me grace and glory is Corvin in Mol. cap. 29. Sect. 24. not required in justifying faith Some have affirmed that faith whereby I believe that Christ died for me is the foundation of faith whereby I believe in Christ but I should desire better proof than their bare word for it seeing the Scripture makes the mercifull offer of salvation in Christ to the burdened hungry and thirsty the ground of this affiance and that perswasion according to their positions may be in good and bad them that never shall be justified neither will nor can rest upon Christ for salvation To believe that Christ is an all-sufficient Saviour and that salvation is offered to me in his name is lesse then to believe in Christ for remission of sins and in order of nature goeth before it But to believe that according to the purpose of God Christ is my Redeemer who hath purchased for me in particular grace and remission of sins and eternall redemption and hath actually reconciled me unto God this is the consequent of resting upon Christ for salvation and cannot be believed according to the Scripture unlesse a man doe first believe in Christ and according as men rest upon Christ superficially or soundly with a soveraigne and well-rooted affiance so they believe the other For when we reade in Scripture that Christ tasted of death for every man Heb. 2. 9. died for all 2 Cor. 5. 15. is the reconciliation for the sins of the whole world 1 Joh. 2. 2. shed his bloud for many Mat. 26. 28. gave his life for the ransome of many Mat. 20. 28. Mar. 10. 45. purchased the Church by his blood Act. 20. 28. Ephes 5. 25. gave himselfe for us all Tit. 2. 14. Rom 8 32. for his people Mat. 1. 21. for his sheepe Joh. 10. 15. for them that were given unto him of the Father Joh. 17 9 19. In these and such like passages by All the World Many and Vs are meant men in Covenant partakers of the benefits of Christ redeemed from all iniquity and purified unto him as a peculiar people delivered from this present evill world Gal. 1. 4. that they might live unto God 2 Cor. 5. 15. Peter Act. 3. 26. saith to the Jewes that crucified Christ Vnto you first God having raised up his Sonne Jesus sent him to blesse you in turning away every one of you from your sinnes But he spake to them who were in Covenant the children of the Prophets and of the Covenant and as they were in Covenant so God raised up Christ for them which cannot be referred to the impetration of righteousnesse but the application of Christs death in some sort Otherwise if it be observed that the Apostle speaks of the Jews according to the present state when Christ was incarnate or actually raised from the dead I thinke the greatest Patrons of universall redemption will not affirme that Christ died for every man good and bad believer or Infidell obstinate and rebellious to purchase for them actuall reconciliation on Gods part according to that state wherein they stood when Christ came into the world or was raised from the dead Once againe it is objected that if this proposition Christ died for all men be not the ground of particular affiance it can have no ground at all neither promise of mercy absolute nor conditionall generall nor speciall But already it hath been shewed that bare assent or belief that Christ died for all men cannot be the ground much lesse the only ground of justifying faith and it may further be made evident by these reasons First That is the foundation of faith whereupon particular affiance leaneth or is immediately grounded But no mans particular affiance on Christ for salvation can be grounded on his generall belief that Christ died for all men because this
for then all must comprehend even those that sinne sins unto death amongst the rest unlesse we beleeve that there are no such sinners in the world and he had need be of a strong faith and have some extraordinary revelation that beleeveth that Then are we to pray for all and every Infidell obstinate rebellious person even the whole Kingdome of Antichrist that they might come to the knowledge of the truth but he must be a man of strong faith that can believe that God will give his Gospell to every of these in particular that they might come to the saving knowledge of the truth The distinction of antecedent and consequent will hath no place in this matter because such are to be understood as have most egregiously abused the common grace of God received Moreover we shall never find in Scripture that the faithfull ever made such prayers but as God hath signified his will and pleasure concerning the calling and gathering of his people Jews or Gentiles so they have prayed as we may pray for the fulnesse of the Gentiles and calling of the Jews wherein we doe not exclude any though Act. 5. 31. aâ—d 11. 18. we know God hath mercy on whom he will have mercy and gives the grace of repentance and to repent also to whom he please the habituall grace serving for the one and the actuall and effectuall motion of Gods Spirit being requisite to the other Some pleade further The meanes to this end that men may have part in Christ are unlimited the word written Joh. 20. 31. and preached Act. 3. 24 25 26 27. yea a command to preach to every creature Mark 16. 15. which Paul understood and therefore warned every man and taught every man Col. 1. 18. to repent Act. 17. 30. and to beleeve Rom. 1. 5. But if all this be granted nothing will follow which is not freely granted For as on the one side no man will affirm that Christ died to this end namely to procure forgivenesse of sinne and Salvation to all and every one whether they beleeve or no so on the other side none will deny but that he died to this end that salvation and remission of sinnes should redound to all and every one in case they should beleeve and repent For this depends upon the sufficiencie of that price which Christ paid to God his Father for the redemption of the world No man denieth but God made a Covenant with Adam fallen and his posterity as now with the faithfull and their seed that all mankind had continued in this Covenant if they had not discovenanted themselves and their posterity that no man is deprived of the benefits of Christs death but through his own sinne and corruption that God is not the cause efficient or deficient of any mans infidelity but man himself That men are seriously invited to repent in the Ministery of the Word and that the promise of Salvation is faithfull and true so that he that beleeveth shall never perish These things be not questioned nor whether some effects or benefits of Christs death be common to all men but whether he died equally for all men to purchase actuall reconciliation for them on Gods part and set all Infants in the actuall state of salvation but to procure faith and beliefe for no man so that he had obtained the full immediate end of his death though no man had ever beleeved on him or been saved by him But that which is assumed in this argument is apparently false as it is applyed The Covenant of grace is revealed to some no man being shut forth by name but if he repent and beleeve he shall be saved but many thousands never heard of never had probable meanes to come to the knowledge of the Covenant The commandement to preach the Gospell to every creature was given to the Apostles in the dayes of grace upon the publication of which Covenant they which formerly served dumbe idols were bound to repent and beleeve but that commandement was peculiar to the Apostles not given till after the resurrection of Christ after such commandement the Apostles were injoyned to tarry for a time in Jerusalem nor could they possibly disperse themselves in a moment into every part of the world nor the world take notice of any such commandement given unto them or of the doctrine revealed by them Before that time the Lord suffered the Gentiles for a long time to walk in the vanity of their minds without the light of his truth and since that time divers nations have been cast off left to themselves as aliens from the Covenant and deprived of all meanes to come to the knowledge of God in Christ And if there were any force in this reason The meanes of grace be unlimited and command given to preach to every creature therefore Christ died for all men This must be of greater weight The meanes of grace be not vouchsafed unto all and every man therefore Christ died not for all and every man For if meanes necessary to Salvation be not propounded if they be not nor ever were called to the faith by the ordinary and only effectuall meanes ordained of God to bring men thereunto we speake of our selves and not according to Scripture if we affirme God gave Christ to die for their redemption Amongst many effects of Christs death reckoned up in this argument this is the most generall and all the rest depend upon it and if the meanes be not vouchsafed to all none of the rest can be common to every one It is a received principle amongst them that as God loved the world and Christ gave himselfe a ransome for all men or is the propitiation for the sins of the whole world so God willed that the Gospell concerning Christ should be published to all men in the world Corvin in Mol. cap. 31. sect 33. If then the Gospell be not published or God willed not that the Gospell should be published to all and every man in the world Christ died not for all and every man Adam and Noah having received the Covenant were bound to teach their children and so successively in all ages Psal 78. which had it been observed none had failed to have the same published unto him If this be applied to the present purpose they must teach only that Christ died for all and every man if they that be in Covenant shall carefully observe the charge and commandement of God And by the same reason they may conclude that God gave his Sonne to die and that with plenary purpose that no man should ever sinne by ignorance infirmity impenitency unbeliefe or any particular transgression that God purposed to give to every man the plentifull and effectuall meanes of grace and that every man should actually apply the death of Christ For if every man successively had obeyed the commandement given to Adam and fulfilled that charge the doctrine of salvation had been published to every man every man had been
were all their life subject to bondage But when the Scripture nameth death generally it comprehends all that which God threatned in that sentence Thou shalt die the death that penall death which is the reward of sinne but not sinne it selfe which is penall only not sinfull Other mens debts are answered diverse wayes some answer them simply as redeemers some as sureties He that answers them as a suretie must pay the Heb. â— 6. same summe of money that the debtor oweth Now Christ is not only our Mediatour but our suretie Heb. 7. 22. and hence the mediation of Christ is called a propitiation Rom. 3. 25. 1 Joh. 2. 2. and the surety is of debt and justice to make full satisfaction because he hath voluntarily promised it and God the Father did in justice exact it Rom. 3. 24 25. and 8. 32. In the sufferings of Christ we must consider the circumstances and substance of his sufferings The circumstances as the person of the sufferer the cause of suffering and efficacy of the passion in which respect it was more then the Law required for the Law did not require that God should die nor that any one should die that had not finned nor such a death and of such efficacie as not only to abolish death but to bring in life and that by many degrees more excellent then that which Adam had lost but if we respect the substance of punishment it was that which the Law required which he paid of love free and voluntary and yet of justice Justice requireth the same summe of debt the dignity of Christs person nothing hindering and according to justice Christ made satisfaction As concerning the substance of punishment Christ suffered what was due to us but in the circumstances which pertained not to the substance of the debt some thing was pardoned to the dignity of the person In this stands the dignity of Christs person that he might be fit meritoriously to pay our debt so farre was it from freeing or acquitting him for any part of our debt He that knew no sinne was made sinne for us 2 Cor. 5. 21. Surely he hath born our griefes and carried our sorrowes Isai 53. 4. When the Scripture speakes so fully why should humane curiosity limit the sufferings of Christ as if they were not fully satisfactory but by divine acceptilation only Christ suffered not every particular punishment that every particular sinner meeteth withall but his passion was a common price payed at once for all his people satisfying justice for all their offences Rom. 5. 19. Heb. 10. 14. Rom. 8. 33. He bore our sinnes in his body upon the tree 1 Pet. 2. 24. We are redeemed by his bloud Eph. 1. 7. The bloud of Christ cleanseth us from all sinne 1 Joh. 1. 6. Phil. 2. 8. Col. 1. 20. He hath made peace by the bloud Voss respons ad Iudic. Ravens cap. 6. Robert Loeus Examen Eccl. The saur effigiet veri Sabbath of the crosse Touching the punishments which Christ suffered they were not ordinary but beyond measure grievous bitter and unsupportable yea such as would have made any meere creature to sinke down under the burthen of them to the bottome of hell For he suffered grievous things from all the things in heaven earth and hell He suffered at the hands of God his Father and of men of Jewes of Gentiles of enemies insulting of friends forsaking of the Prince of darknesse and all his cruell and mercilesse instruments But whereas of the punishments of sinne some be sinnes and punishments both others punishments only and some common to the nature of man others personall growing out of some imperfection and defect in the vertue and faculty forming the body disorder in diet or some violence offered and some for sinne inherent others for sinne imputed Our Saviour Christ suffered the punishments that are only punishments and not sinne common to the whole nature of man not personall to this or that man the punishments of the sinnes of other men not his own and that of them that should breake off their sins by repentance not of them that would sin for ever if they might live for ever The whole life of our Saviour was a life of suffering but his speciall sufferings were those he endured in the Garden or upon the crosse In the Garden he was in an agony upon the crosse he was pressed with the weight of grievous and unsupportable evils His agony was that sorrow wherein his soule was beset round with heavinesse and feare even unto death Thus the Evangelists describe it He began to be sorrowfull and very heavy Matt. 26. 37 38. Then saith he to them scil Peter James and John My soul is exceeding sorrowfull even unto death He began to be sore amazed and to be very heavy And saith unto them My soule is exceeding sorrowfull Mar. 14. 33 34. Joh. 12. 27. unto death Now is my soul troubled His soul was smitten with horrour that all powers and faculties for a time left their proper functions and did concurre to relieve nature in that extremity as when a man hath received some gashly wound the bloud doth at first retire to comfort the heart But this stay came not from any internall defect which had been sinfull but from an externall cause to wit the horrour which fell upon him as the wheeles of a Watch may cease from motion without any fault in them when they are stayed by the hand of the Artificer He feared also the stroke of the justice of God his Father sitting on the Tribunall or Judgement seat to punish the sins of men for whom he stood forth to answer this he feared as a thing impossible to be escaped in respect of the resolution and purpose of God his Father that by his satisfactory death and no other way man should be delivered And he declined everlasting destruction as a thing he knew he should escape without all doubt or uncertaintie of event though not without conflicting with the temptations of Sathan and the enduring of many grievous and bitter things These passions in Christ were most pure because he himselfe was most free from all taint of sin as if you put cleare water into a cleare glasse though you shake and stirre it never so much it will raise no mud The effects of this agony were two Earnest prayer and bloudie sweat Being in an agony he prayed more fervently He Luk. 22 44. fell on his face and prayed He prayed thrice the same words O my Father if it be possible let this cup passe from me neverthelesse Matt. 26. 39. not as I will but as thou wilt As the sense of nature and inferiour reason presented death and the ignominy of the crosse unto him as they are in themselves evill without the consideration of any good to follow he desired to decline them But as superiour reason considered them with all circumstances knowing Gods resolution to be such that the
profitable and pleasant answerable in some sort to the nature excellency and use of the thing known And in this case the heart is not over-ruled contrary to the full spirituall and infallible evidence of divine truth seriously thought upon unto a practicall judgement This is the learning of Christ the teaching of the Father the knowing of things which passe knowledge Christ is not known if he be not acknowledged as he is propounded what perfect Si ignorare accipitur pro non attendere dici potest voluntatem humanam vix unquam peccare sine aliqua ignoratione quia quando voâ—untas peccat intellectus ut plurimum aliud agit nec attendit ad regimen voluntatis knowledge doth perfectly that imperfect knowledge doth imperfectly As the end acknowledged cannot be refused by like right neither can the meanes acknowledged the meanes I say necessary only necessary and without which there is no possibility or likelihood to obtaine the end For will is a reasonable appetite and therefore doth not stirre from such a good as is fully and spiritually represented unto it with evidence certainty profit and delight as the most universall adequate and unquestionable object of the desires and capacities of an humane soule and that both simply and in comparison for the freedome and willing consent of the heart is not lawlesse or without rules to moderate it but it is therefore said to be free because whether out of a true judgement it move one way or out of a false another yet in both it moveth naturally in a manner sutable to its owne condition If it be objected the heart being unregenerate is utterly averse unto any good The answer is that it is true the will must not only be moved but renewed and changed before it can yeeld to Christ But withall God doth never so fully and spiritually convince the judgement in that manner without a speciall work of grace upon the soule whereby the will is framed and fashioned to accept embrace and love those good things of which the minde is thus prepossessed The third help is a formall cause a free gracious disposition or Scimus non impetrari remissionem ante prece â—ed dicâ— decretam esse ante preces eam peti precibus quamvis sit decreta P. Malin de eâ—ect ex fide pag. 316. habite of faith by which the will is inclined agreeable to the disposition of it to come unto God This habite is necessary because without it the will being in bondage stained and defiled it is altogether unable to will or desire that which is spiritually good If there could be a will without such habite man might performe the act of a man spiritually alive before he was made alive So that the full answer to this question viz. what is that effectuall help whereby I come to God is this It is a mixt thing standing partly of that almighty power of his put forth for my good partly of that inward Word and inspiration by and with which his power is put forth partly in that spirit of faith and supernaturall life which his almighty power through his Word bringeth forth in my soule What was that help whereby Christ made Lazarus able to come to him out of the grave of naturall death The principall was Christs power the instrumentall his voyce the formall cause immediately helping to it or working it was the spirit of naturall life which the power of Christ by his Word restored to this dead corps which now was fallen And thus we have the effectuall help or grace by which we come actually to convert which are all given from Gods free grace and favour towards us And when God doth infuse the habite of faith into the minde of one of ripe age he doth cause him actually to beleeve as the nature of the thing it selfe and condition doth manifest For if the Spirit by inlightening the minde and renewing the heart doe perswade and move the soule effectually to embrace adhere unto and love the Lord Jesus Christ then the condition of the thing will not beare that grace should be given effectually but the act and motion of the soule must necessarily follow But though the connection of these two be indivisible yet the flexion or turning it selfe is not indivisible or in a point or moment but it may be sooner or slower more speedy in one more remisse in another The will is necessarily bowed or bended but more vehemently in one more slackly in another freely or willingly in all that are turned and yet necessarily And this first thing is well to be noted for from hence we may gather in what standeth the efficacy of grace effectuall to Conversion viz. In Gods effectuall power put forth to execute his intention which he hath of converting some actually before other some It Quaestio non est de irresistibilitate sed de insuperabilitate finali Nam quomodo traberemur gratia irresistibili cum id ipsum quod nolumus Deo resistere â—it ipsa Deigratia Illud ipsum velle resistere nihil aliâ—d est quam resistere doth not stand in any congruity or temperature of grace correspondent to our nature For this doth argue there is inward an incorrupted connaturall disposition to receive grace This maketh the effect of Conversion as much if not more to depend on the active capacity of the will as on the grace of God For it maketh the grace of God worke it morally and externally by perswasion only and the will of man from a power within it selfe which doth more inwardly enter the effect of Conversion then the other It may be questioned in what order doth the Spirit make us come unto God whether immediately or by some preparation going before wherein it is further to be considered what that preparation is or wherein it consisteth To the first branch of the Question it is truly answered that God doth use so to worke our comming to him by beliefe that he doth first for the most part prepare us thereunto As before we engraffe a Sciens we cut it and set it for incision and if a Timberlogg lie sunke in mudd men set to their tacklings first to draw it out of the mire before they lay it on a Cart to carry it away Thus God doth by his power often worke some preparative change in a sinner before he doth by his power and word worke the spirit of faith in them and make them come unto him So God by afflictions is said to boare the eare and prepare to conversion 2 Chron. 33. 11 12. Act 2. 37. When Manasseh was humbled in great misery he sought the Lord. Thus by conviction of sin others were pricked in heart and said What shall we doe to be saved and then speedily they received the Gospel beleeving Sometimes by extraordinary terrours rising from externall accidents yea hidden naturall causes God is pleased to bring men nearer unto him Thus the Jaylor Act. 16.