citizens and such other like names IV. The church consisteth onely of the elect alreadie incorporate into Christ Now that these many of whome the church consisteth are none but elect already ingrafted into Christ and indued with Christs holinesse the same scriptures do plentifully teach both in other places chieflie to the Ephesians where the Apostle speaking of the church and the members thereof saieth Eph. 1 VVe are all chosen in Christ and haue redemption in him and are sealed vvith the holy spirite of promise That Christ is giuen to bee the head of the church and the church is his body It is therefore such a bodie whereof all the members are ioyned by the same spirite both to the head Christ among themselues and are quickned or haue life from the head and are indued with his holinesse so that this whole body is truely holy and called the holie church V. The holy Angells are not excluded from the bodie of the church Neither from this bodie of Christ which is the holie church doe we exclude the Angells both because the Apostle speaking plainely of the church comprehendeth the Angells therin and also because they with vs are likewise gathered into our bodie Heb. 12.22 Eph. 1.10 Col. 2.10 Apo. 229 vnder one and the same head Christ and Christ is expresly called of the Apostle the head of the Angells yea and also because they call themselues our fellovve seruants and haue the saine father with vs and serue the same God and we all of vs shall bee for euer together in the same citie the heauēly Ierusalem lastly they are also Saintes and the church is the communion of all Saints VI. The reprobate hypocrites though they are in the church yet they are not of the church So wee rightly beleeue and confesse that the reprobate hypocrites though they dwell in the church and liue among the Saints yet they are not of the church nor members of the church when they are not truely ioyned to the head Christ nor indued with his spirite and consequently not truely Saints As the Apostle Iohn saieth 1. Ioh. 2.19 of certaine hypocrites they are gone out from vs as filth from the bodie but they were not of vs. For if they had beene of vs they had continued with vs. They therefore are not of the church which at last doe fall from Christ and keepe not that perpetuall communion with Christ and with all his Saints howsoeuer great and rare men they seeme in the church for a time yea and hold the gouernment ouer the christian common wealth and rule ouer the whole church For they are members of Sathan not of Christ whosoeuer haue the spirite not of Christ but of Antichrist VII That there euer vvas and is one onely church of Christ And wee confesse that there euer was and is one onely church of Christ Eph. 4.4.5.6 because there euer was is one onely bodie to which Christ was giuen of the father to bee the head one onely spirite by which all the members are knitt vnto the bodie onely one God to the seruing of whome and glorifying for euer we are all chosen and called one onely faith of al the faithfull beleeuers one saluation lastly one heauenly inheritance of all To which purpose also Christ euer called the church one one flock wherfore we make that church which hath beene since the first creation and before the cōming of Christ no other but the same that it is nowe and shal bee to the ende of the worlde but wee call it one of all times of all places and all persons ioyned with Christ consequently one cōmunion of al the Saints from which they that make an vtter seuering and departure we are persuaded by the holie scriptures that they belong not to this bodie VIII Of the christian church there is one onely head Iesus Christ Hereuppon we are strengthened in this beleefe that sith there is one onely church of Christ which is his bodie there euer was and is yet therefore one onely head of it by this name head we meane him which was giuen of God euen from the worlds beginning to that ende that he might be made of the same nature with it that he might redeeme it that he might ioyne it to himselfe that he might quicken it that he might deck it with the glory of his wisedome that he might kindle it with the fire of heauenlie loue that hee might effectuallie moue it to all good affections and good workes that he might euermore gouerne it keepe it For that this is the proper duetie of the head towards the whole bodie besides dailie experience in nature we learne also out of the holy scripturs But who could perform hath and wil performe this to the church we acknowledge none other besids Christ Iesus meane while not denying but there may bee one head of all hypocrites which are in the church and so of the hypocriticall church sith the Prophets foretold it should be so and the Apostles confirmed the same Eph. 1.22 4.15 5.23 Col. 1.18 But that there is one onely heade Iesus Christ of the holie church we beleeue and confesse with the holie Apostles IX This church is truely holie Whereupon it followeth this church therfore to be truely holie because it hath a head that is most holie maketh it holie because no sinnes are imputed vnto it because from him it draweth the spirite of sanctification and because whatsoeuer holinesse is in the head that is wholy imputed to euerie member X. It is also truely catholicke We also confesse it to be truely catholicke that is vniuersall because the head thereof is also catholicke and euerlasting at all times euen from the foundation of the world to the ende thereof ioyning vnto himselfe members out of all places from all kindes of men and all nations and gouerning and preseruing them to himselfe for eternall blessednesse XI This one church is partly in heauen triumphant and partly on earth militant But wee acknowledge that this church though it is and euer was one yet it is so distinct that one part is triumphant in heauen with Christ alreadie raised from death and sitting at the right hand of the father another part on earth fighting still with flesh blood with the world and the deuill Whereuppon ariseth that vsuall distinction among all the godlie writers of the church of the triumphant and militant church CHAP. XXIV Of the militant church ALbeit by this which wee haue confessed of the church in general euery one may easilie perceiue what we beleeue particularly of the militant church yet that our faith may more clearely plainly be known wee haue purposed to declare our opinion of this church seuerally partly referring that which was spoken of the whole in a briefe rehearsal to this and partly adioyning the properties of this peouliarly I. A description of the militant church Wee therefore beleeue Eph. 1.4
in the same manner that he was to the Apostles namely visibly seeing he saide not I will be but I am neither is there any necessity to alter the sense of those wordes 46 Adde this that if he speake of the same reall presence of his body and that this promise pertained not to the Apostles onely but also to all the faithfull which were then in the world Christ had not spoken a trueth For he was not before his death or after his Resurrection present in a visible presence with all the faithfull which were then in the world and which were gathered together in his name 47 VVherefore the doctrine of the reall and substantiall yet invisible presence of the body of Christ Iesus on the earth and euerie where is not agreeable with the holy scriptures but seemeth to come neere to the Maniches who as Augustine sheweth against Faustus saie that Christs bodie doth invisiblie hang on euerie tree 48 If Christ also satte not at Gods right hand in his bodie before his resurrection and ascension into heauen as the wholle Church confesseth then their doctrine is impious and hereticall which teacheth that Christ Iesus euen from his mothers wombe according to the flesh he tooke hath sitteth at the right hand of Gods power 49 If this also be true which the Apostle teacheth and the whole scripture confirmeth and the Catholike Church confesseth that Christ Iesus not only then sate at his Fathers right hand after he ascended into heauen but also is so placed in the same at Gods right hand as he is neuer read to sitte at such a right hand in any other place then in heauen therefore then it cannot onely not be saide according to the holy scriptures that Christ Iesus sitteth any other where at God the Father his right hand then in heauen but also it is false that he also so sitteth in the earth that he is no lesse present really in substance of his body in the bread of the Lords supper and in euerie place then he is in heauen 50 For the Apostle also in other places and specially in the epistle of S. Paule to the Hebrues denieth that he is vpon the earth namely in a corporall presence for as much as hee sitting at the right hand of the throne of maiestie in heauen executeth his office of priesthood 51 Moreouet wee hold beyond all controuersie that Christ sitting at Gods right hand is a figuratiue speach seing God to speake properly hath neither right hand nor left hand neither is it lawfull to imagine any carnall thing concerning the seates and thrones in heauen wherein they are saide to sitt and often-times in the scriptures this word sitting is vsed besides other significations for dwelling ruling exercising iudgment and for resting 52 But that the Apostle Paule ment not by this phrase that Christ Iesus in his owne bodie is truely and substantially present in all places besides that which hath bin already saide it is also euident by that which for declaration sake he adioyneth 53 For to this sitting of Christ at Gods right hand the Apostle addeth for declaration sake three thinges First that Christ is so placed at Gods right hand that he is aboue all principallitie that is that he hath no creature aboue him or equall to him no not in heauen but is made higher then the heauens and al heauenly things then he addeth that all thinges are made subiect to him that is that there is nothing beneath him ouer which he hath not power and authoritie thirdly that he was giuen to be a head of the church 54 Now as we said that whatsoeuer wee haue before spoken of the resurrection from the dead and so of the ascension ought to bee vnderstood according to the humane nature of Christ so wee thinke with the sound fathers that these thinges also must bee vnderstood especially according to the same humane nature 55 The exaltation of Christs humane nature aboue al things may be vnderstood two waies either in re-pect of the locall placing as this he ascended aboue all the heauens that the meaning may be the humane nature was placed locally aboue all created things or in respect of the excellēt preheminence of the dignitie and power thereof then the meaning may be Christ euen touching his humane nature was set ouer all created thinges and to him was giuen power and authoritie ouer all things For in these two manners any thing of the same kinde is said to bee ouer another eiin place or in dignitie 56 If then this saying be vnderstood the latter waye thereupon the vbiquitie cannot be proued seing Christ in that in his humane nature he may vse his authoritie ouer all creatures although he be not in substance of body euerie where If the former way then he is not euery where seing that which is euerie where is aswell beneath and at and within as aboue all creatures 57 But Paule doeth plainely teach that Christ touching his humane nature did so rise from the dead that hee was no longer among the dead and so ascended into heauen that hee was no longer on earth and so being exalted aboue all creatures sitteth at the fathers right hand that he is nether beneath nor within created things seing all thinges are put vnder his feete 58 Neither can the head bee saide to bee in it owne substance where the feete are although it be in them in vertue and operation and indeed aswell the head to the feete as the feet to the head are ioyned together in their substāce by the sinues and by the soule 59 But the Apostle saieth Christ Iesus is giuen for a head of the church namely according to his humanitie nowe the head is aboue all the bodie 60 The Apostle therefore ment nothing lesse by his wordes of Christs sitting at Gods right hand then to conclude that Christs bodie in it owne substance is present in all places Wherefore they doe great wrong to the Apostle which by their cauills labour to conclude this out of his words 61 Neither can any such Vbiquitie be proued by any necessary consequence out of that article of faith 62 For although it were graunted which cannot bee graunted that by the sitting at Gods right hand the humane nature is made truely by it selfe omnipotent yet vnlesse it bee prooued to bee so made omnipotent that it is also made infinite and immeasurable it can by no meanes bee conuinced that Christs bodie in it owne substance is euerie where present 63 For so is this the onely cause why God also in his owne essence is euerie where that if ye take immeasurablenesse from him he cannot be saide to be euery where in his owne essence 64 And if also yee faine an infinite body and therefore euerie where yet that it is whollie in all places at once you shall neuer prooue while the world stands vnlesse yee can shewe that the same body is also a most simple essence seing God is
a garment For this manner of speach although it doe not perfectlie declare the personall vnion Hypostatica yet it sheweth a manifest difference beetweene the person of the sonne of god taking and our nature taken For this same cause we embrace those kindes of speaches of the Fathers as mans nature was borne of the sonne of god to subsist in the person of the sonne of God and such like separating the person of the sonne of god taking from the nature taken and teaching that the person of the sonne of God by the comming of mans nature was made neither other nor more perfect VII A confirmation of the former opinion with an exposition of the place of Athanasius Surelie we confesse with Athanasius that as the reasonable soule and flesh is one man so God and man is one Christ that is Christ is onelie one person although there bee in him two natures yet not that the person of Christ if we will speake properlie is constituted or made of both these natures as of the parts as to the perfect cōstitution of man no lesse the bodie as an essential part then the soule must ioyne together seeing the person of Christ was alreadie 1. Cor. 10.9 1. Pet. 3.19 and that whole and most perfect before it was shewed in the fleshe but the person of man as of Adam was none at all vntill the foule was coupled with the bodie and sith that nether the soule doth assume vnto it selfe a body or the body a soule as the sonne of God assumed vnto himselfe the seed of Abraham into vnitie of the same person And further sith the bodie and the soule are two existences as it is manifest in the creatiō of Adam but mans nature did neuer subsist by it selfe but onelie in the person of the sonne of God so that verie vniustlie doe some abuse this godlie saying of the holie man for proofe of their owne dreames For he which did shew himselfe and he is the person of the Sonne of god must needs differ frō the flesh wherein he did shewe himselfe and that not onelie before but also after his resurrection and sitting at the right hand of his father which as saith Augustine added a glorie to the flesh but took not away the nature VIII How Christ is one onely person and that eternall and vnchangeable but there are in the same two natures and how it is said to consist of them We therefore acknowledge and confesse against Nestorius that in Christ is onelie one person and that eternall most simple most perfect and the same shall remaine for euer namelie the person of the euerlasting sonne of God Further that vnto this eternall person there came in time not another person but another nature namelie mans nature and the same not as a parte of that person of whome it was taken but a thing farre different from it and yet takē vnto it into vnitie of the same And therefore we thirdly confesse that in one the selfe same person of Christ there is now two natures the diuine and the humaine in which we doubt not that the same doth subsist doth liue and doth worke for which cause also we feare not to speake thus Christ consisteth now of his diuine nature his humaine being taken into the vnitie of person that he is after a sort compounded of them both IX Hovve the tvvo natures are vnited into one person without alteracion or confusion the properties and actions of either of them remaining whole and distinct But we beleeue and confesse that these two natures are truelie and inseparablie ioyned and vnited into one person of Christ that yet we doubt not but each of them remaineth whole and perfect and the one truely distinct from the other yea and that they do hold the essentiall properties and operations of each of them distinct without all manner of confusion so that as the diuine nature holding the properties remaineth vncreated infinite immeasurable simplie omnipotent and simply wise euen so the humaine nature holding hirs remaineth created comprehensible determined with certen limitts And as the diuine nature hath will and power whereby Christ willeth worketh as god such things as are of God so hath the humaine nature will and power whereby Christ as mā willeth worketh those thinges which are of man so farre forth as Christ in that he is God hee willeth not nor worketh by humaine will or power so neither as he is man willeth he or worketh he by diuine wil or power as it hath bin learnedly determined by the fathers both against Eutyches and against Macarius We therefore did alwaies like wel of that saying of Leo the first Epi. 10. c. 4 writing vnto Flauianus about the same thing where he saith He which is true God the same is also true man and in this vnitie there is no vntrueth whereas there meet together the basenesse of manhood and the excellencie of the godhead For as God is not chaunged by the partaking so man that is mans nature in Christ is not consumed by the dignitie for each forme vvorketh with communion of the other their ovvne propertie namelie the vvord vvorketh that which is proper to the vvord and the flesh performeth that vvhich is proper to the flesh Thus farre Leo that learned man which hee afterwards fetteth out by examples whereby it is plainelie shewed that as the natures are truelie vnited in Christ yet remaine distinct and not confounded so also were and are the actions for thinges which were proper to the word the flesh did not performe but the word that which was proper to the flesh the word performed not but the flesh To raise againe Lazarus from death was proper to the word but to crie Lazarus come forth was proper to the flesh yet both those actions were vnited to the raising vp of Lazarus because they were both one and in one Christ tend both to one purpose and yet they were distinct Likewise to forgiue sinnes was a proper actiō to the diuine nature but to say thy sinnes bee forgiuen thee was proper to the humaine nature To restore his sight that was born blinde was an action of his diuine nature but to put clay vppon his eies and to say goe and wash was of the humaine nature Therefore this personall vnion as it did not confound the natures so neither did it the actions but kept them distinct neither yet did it confound the properties of the natures For there be in one the same person of Christ these three things Natures the proprieties and faculties of the natures and the actions of them and these proprieties of natures in Christ are after the verie same manner that the natures and actions are Therefore as it is cleere that one nature passeth not into another nor one action is confounded with another so is it apparent that their proprieties are after the same sorte X. That it cannot bee prooued by the vnion
remembrance of it and to waigh in their minds to what ende they were baptized or what they haue obtained of God by baptisme what also they promised to God therein whereby they may the more be confirmed in faith and grow vp into the communion with Christ and bee made more carefull of performing their dueties For baptisme is not bestowed on vs for remission of originall sinne onely or our sinnes past but of all the offences of our whole life euē as the pulling out of the waters is a signe of a newe life not for one day but for al our time as the Apostle saith Rom. 6.4 VVe are buried with him euer into his death by baptisme that as Christ rose from death by the glory of his father so we should alwaies walke in newnesse of life Wee were once washed with outward water but the blood of Christ is a continuall streame washing and cleansing vs daily from our sinnes VIII By whome baptisme ought to bee administred Wee beleeue also that holie baptisme is to bee administred by those by whome also the gospell is preached For to whom Christ said Goe into the whole worlde and preach the gospell to them he also said Baptizing them in the name of the father and the sonne and the holy ghost teaching them to obserue whatsoeuer is commaunded you IX Errors Therefore we condemne all aswell auncient as late herisies which haue at anie time beene scattered against the sound doctrine of baptisme Seleucus and Hermias who baptized with fire The Cerdonians and Marcionites who vsed another forme of words then that which was prescribed by Christ baptized in the name of another God then of the father sonne and holy ghost those also which baptized in the name of Iohn or any other man the Cataphriges who baptized dead mē with all Donatists and Anabaptists who rebaptize them which come vnto them which denie that infants ought to be baptized and those also that denie baptisme to be true vnlesse there bee added exorcismes spittle salt and other cerimonies deuised by men CHAP. XVI Of the Lords supper BY that which we haue saide of the communion with Christ and of the worde of the gospell of the sacramentes in generall and of Baptisme may easilie be gathered what our faith is concerning the Lordes Supper I. The sacrament of the supper is an instrument of the holie ghost to helpe forvvard the communion with Christ and with the church We beleeue that the sacrament of the supper is not onely a testimonie of our communion with Christ and with his flesh and blood and with the whole church but also an instrument of the holie ghost to confirme helpe foreward the same the Apostle saying the bread vvhich we breake 1. Cor. 10.16 is it not the communion of the Lords bodie the breaking and the taking of the blessed bread he calleth the communion of the Lordes bodie because they which eate with an actuall faith in the Lorde doe ioyne in communion with the Lord and with his flesh and blood as also they that imbrace the word of the Apostles in faith do receiue a communion with the Apostles that cōmunion is with the father and with his sonne Iesus Christ II. A confirmation of the former opinion For as baptisme is an instrument to begin this communion because by it wee are borne againe in Christ so is the supperinstituted to make perfect the same because in it wee are fedd or nourished with the flesh and blood of Christ that we may growe vp in him as the Apostle saith 1. Cor. 12.13 vve are all baptized into one bodie and we all drinke of one drinke into one spirite III. The increase of our communion with Christ is the principall end of the Lords supper There are also other endes of the institutiō of the Lords supper namely that beeing admonished both by the words signes which represent vnto vs Christs death and his blood shedd for vs we should reuerently esteeme of the benefite of our redemption as the Apostle saith As oft as yee shall eate of this bread 1. Cor. 11.20 yee showe the Lords death And therefore the ende is that we may be confirmed in the faith concerning remission of sinnes we may be nourished into hope of a blessed resurrection wee maye giue thanks to him for so great a benefite we may be stirred vp to repentance and lastly we may openly before the whole congregation renue our couenant begunne with God But sith all these things tend to this that we may more more be vnited to Christ be made one with him and he more feelinglie liue in vs and we in him being now made flesh of his flesh and bone of his bone therfore we doubt not but the supper is principally instituted for the increase of this vniting and communion with Christ wherein our saluation is made perfect and accomplished Whereunto it also tendeth that bread and wine are the nourishments of the bodie so as wee may hold it for most certaine the flesh and blood of Christ is the same in nourishing of our soules preseruing thē in life that the bread and wine is to our bodies IV. The bread why it is called the bodie of Christ Whereuppon we may also vnderstand why Christ called this bread his own body namely not for that it is either properly his verie true bodie or that there is any such body cōtained within it or also that it is onely a bare signe of his bodie broken and dead for vs but that it is a sacrament for sacraments saith Augustine take vnto them the names of the things whereof they be sacraments and therefore an instrument also of the holie ghost to communicate vnto vs the true body of Christ to confirme vs in his communion Like as for the same cause the Apostle also called baptisme not the signe of regeneration Eph. 5.26 but the vvashing water it self of regeneration namely because that by this washing of water through the worde as by a fitt instrument Christ by the working power of his spirite doeth inwardly wash and cleanse vs and begett vs a new V. The true and substantiall body of Christ is spoken of the bread but improperly and figuratiuely Wherefore we doubt not but in the words of the supper the true and naturall bodie of Christ is spoken of the bread especially sith it is added for expositions sake which is giuen for you So that it is most truely said that the bread is Christs bodie euen that true bodie which was giuen for vs but yet this is improperly figuratiuely sith in verie deede the bread was not giuen for vs but the verie bodie of Christ whereof the bread is a sacrament VI. The bodie of Christ is not in the bread reallie and properlie Hereby we are also confirmed in this opinion that as the bread is not properlie the verie bodie of Christ but a sacrament thereof so also Christ is not
ministers teachers studentes libraries and bookes all kinds of instruments and thinges necessarie for churches and schooles but also spittles and hospitals and other such like places where such liue as are peculiarly to be releeued and cared for of the church XXX VVhat manner of tēples or churches christians ought to haue what language to vse therin of churches and ceremonies what habitt apparell what holie dayes to bee kept to whome they must praye and lastly that the ceremonies which were not prescribed by Christ and the Apostles ought to be free And sith it is none of the least causes why faithfull people so farre forth as may bee are wont and ought to dwel together in the same cities townes and villages that they might not onely priuately among themselues dayly nourish a cōmon faith by godlie conferences practise mutuall charitie by christiā duties but also that they might meete together in certaine places at certaine knowne times publikely to praise pray vnto God to heare his worde to receiue the sacraments to performe publicke workes of charitie towardes the poore which thinges indeede cannot be done without language without rites ceremonies therefore concerning thē also what our opinion is we will briesty declare Seing it is beyond all controuersie that all thinges in the church ought to be done to edification all shew of superstition ought to be auoided we iudge that true pietie and the churches edification requireth Temples or churches first concerning places that if they may vse the olde and prophaned temples the same must be cleane purged of all idolls and all reliques and monuments of idolatrie and superstition 1 Cor. 6.16 For vvhat agreement hath the temple of God with idolls Language Moreouer no lāguage is to be vsed but that which is known to the whole congregation For what edification can come to the church by an vnknowne language 1 Cor. 14 28 the Apostle surely commaundeth thē to keep silence in the church which speak languages if there be no interpreter Thirdlie all pride and vanitie of garmentes are to bee shunned and all those ornaments Garments which doe rather beseeme the prophane theaters of the Gentiles then the sacred temples of christiās and which rather tend to delight the flesh thē to edifie the spirit but all things must be done in the churches with most high reuerence and modestie as in the verie sight of God and his Angells And albeit concerning the fashion of garments which ministers ought publikly to weare either in their ministerie or out of it we doe not thinke it a matter to bee so stood vpō that for it the peace of the church ought to be troubled yet where they come neerest to the simplicitie of the Apostles there wee iudge the church rather to bee approued Holie-daies Fourthly that vpon euerie Lords day the cōgregation should come together and make an holie assemblie sith we see that euer since the Apostles time that day hath beene religiouslie consecrated and dedicated to that holie businesse Next vnto the Lords day we can not but allow of the hallowing of those daies likewise wherein we keep the memorie and the auncient church did celebrate the natiuitie of our Lord Iesus Christ of his circumcision his passion his resurrection his ascension into heauen his sending downe the holy ghost vpon the Apostles Vpon other daies euen as each church shall thinke to be conuenient so also let them call an holie assemblie to the word to the sacramēts to prayers or collects Col. 2.16 But euermore let all superstitious obseruation of dayes be farre from them Praiers Fiftlie that prayers may be made to God onely and to Iesus Christ without inuocation of Angells or any Saints that are dead euen as the Prophets and Apostles did and the whole auncient church as it is manifest to bee seene in the old collectes Heb. 13.56 to say nothing of Gods owne commaundement who will haue this sacrifice of praise and of the mouth to be offered vpp to him onely Ceremonies Sixtly concerning rites and ceremonies to be kept in the church the same pietie and edification of the church doth require that they should not so bitterly and sharply bee controuerted as though the contention were vppon life and death but should be left to euerie congregation in free choise as wee read in Socrates and other ecclesiasticall writers it was in the olde church concerning which matters in generall wee allow and imbrace both the epistles of Augustine to lanuarius Tom. 2. ep 118 119 For these tend to the churches edificatiō XXXI Publike fastes ought sometime to be commaunded and the same are most profitable commendable Of fastes yet no man must be constrayned to them It appertaineth also to a profitable gouernment of the church that as priuate fastes are in mens free choise so also to the publike fastes al men are to be counselled but no man to be constrained The commoditie of fastes cannot sufficiently be commended yea it often happeneth that they are verie needfull so that godlie magistrats and ministers of the church are compelled to commaund publike fastes vnto the whole church for the appeasing of some greeuous wrath of God as it was wont to be done in the old testament and in the primitiue church not that by them we cā deserue remission of sinnes and mitigation of gods anger but that by taming of the flesh the spirite may be stirred vp more feruently to call vppon God to appease him by faithfull inuocation By the waye it pertaineth to the churches edification that no mans conscience bee compelled and bounde vnto such fastes sith they ought to proceed from a free willing and truely humbled spirite as also the Apostle writeth of almes to bee bestowed on the poore that they ought to be done not with heauinesse or vppon constraint but as euerie man can finde in his heart XXXII At no time Choise of meates not in the times of publike fastes the faithfull ought to bee forbidden any kinde of meates Hereof it also followeth that at no time either of fastes or not fasts any kinde of meats is to be forbidden to any sith none of these things cā defile a man Mat. 15.11 Tit. 1.15 1. Tim. 4.1.3 but to the eleane al things are cleane And the Apostle calleth their doctrine who cōmaund abstinence from meats for religions sake the doctrine of deuills that doctrine therefore how can it tend to the churches edification XXXIII Sick people must be visited Of sickmen and buriall comforted and strengthned in faith and they that are dying must bee acompanied with prayer commended to Christ the bodies of the dead reuerently buried Neither ought the church to take lesse care of the sicke thē of the whole nor of the dead then of the liuing seing all are members of Christ and their bodies temples of the holie ghost We therfore acknowledge that
feet themselues are Is then the vnion which the soule hath with the head dissolued because out of the head it is wholly also in the feet 8 Finally that all things which haue bin spokē of this personal vnion may more plainely be declared I add these also The soule is Hypostasis to the eyes to what eyes such as they are namely instruments vsed for sight not for hearing on the other side to the eares for hearing not for seing So the word was Hypostasis to the humaine nature not to destroy death which was a propertie of the word but to suffer death which was a propertie of the flesh Lastly it is Hypostasis to the flesh not to this end that the flesh should bee it and such like which of which sort the word is but it should be it and such like which and of which sort it is it selfe either by nature or by grace reallie put into it which they call infused or habitual grace For the grace of this vnion is this that it is taken into this vnitie of person This same doctrine of ours is confirmed by those things which are deliuered both by the scriptures and the fathers concerning the office of the mediatour that is concerning the end of his incarnation Many ends of this incarnation are noted of the fathers in the scriptures and particularly of Anselme in his booke intituled Cur Deus homo why God is man but the principall and immediate ende was not simplie that the vvorde God might saue vs for he could haue performed it by his omnipotencie and by his onely commaundement without taking flesh but that hee might by such meanes saue vs from death namely by death of his owne person and by his owne resurrection might raise vs to life according to that of the Apostle to the Hebr. 2. ver 14. That by death he might destroye him vvho c. And in the 2. to Tim. 1.10 VVho hath abolished death and hath brought life c. To which the old church consented saying vvho by dying destroyed death and by rysing againe repaired life Leo the first declared this end saying The sonne of God tooke our flesh that by one nature he might dye by the other he might not dye Therefore he tooke vpon him flesh to this principal ende that for the performing of our saluatiō he might doe such thinges by that flesh which of himselfe being in the forme of God hee could not performe as to suffer and to dye For to kill death simply he could by himselfe haue done it but to kill it by death he could not in himselfe doe it without taking mortall flesh into vnitie of his person Wherefore the vvorde did not take flesh that by the flesh it might doe such actions as were the proper actions of it selfe but that it might worke our saluatiō by such meanes namely by the owne proper actions ioyned with the actions of our flesh Vpon the 12. chapter The 8 aphorisme Concerning this true and essentiall vnion of vs and of our owne flesh with the flesh of Christ there is a notable place in Cyrill vpon Iohn lib. 10. cap. 13. Col. 500. We denie not but wee are spiritually ioyned to Christ by true faith and sincere loue but that wee haue no manner of coniunction with him according to the flesh that we flatly denie and affirme it to bee cleane against the scriptures For who euer doubted but Christ is so the vine and we the braunches that from him we draw life vnto our selues Heare what Paule saith Wee are all one bodie with Christ for though we are many yet in him we are one for wee all are partakers of one bread Doth he perchaunce thinke that the vertue of the misticall benediction is vnknowne vnto vs Which being in vs doeth it not also make Christ to dwell in vs corporally by communication of the flesh of Christ For why are the members of the faithfull the members of Christ know ye not saith hee that your members are the members of Christ shal I then take the members of Christ and make them the members of an harlott God forbidd Our Sauiour also said He which eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood abideth in me and I in him whereby wee maye consider that Christ is in vs not onely by dwelling in vs which is perceiued by loue but also by a naturall participation For euen as if one take waxe melted by the fire mingle it with other waxe likewise melted so as of them both hee make but one thing so by this communication of the bodie and blood of Christ he is in vs and we in him For otherwise this corruptible nature of the body could neuer be brought to incorruption and to life vnlesse the bodie of naturall life were ioyned vnto it Beleeuest thou not me telling thee this Beleeue I pray thee Christ himselfe Verily verily saith he I say vnto you vnlesse yee shall eate the flesh of the sonne of man and drinke his blood yee shall haue no life in you He which eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hath eternall life and I will raise him at the last day Thou hearest him plainely crying out that we shall haue no life vnlesse we drinke his blood eate his flesh In you saieth he your selues that is in your bodie By life may well bee vnderstood the flesh of life for that doth raise vs vpp at the last daye And so need I not think it an vncurrant speach to say the flesh of life being made flesh of the onely begotten sonne is brought to the vertue of life and therefore cannot bee ouercome of death And therefore being made in vs putts death from vs For gods onely begottē sonne is neuer absent from it whereuppon because he is one with his flesh I saieth he will raise him vp Why then should it be denied that we are called braunches according to the flesh May it not fittly be said that the vine is his humanitie and we the braunches for the identitie or likenesse of our nature For the vine the braunches are of the same nature So both spiritually and corporally are wee the braunches and Christ the vine Thus farre Cyrill In this whole text Cyrills purpose was to shew that Christ not onely according to his deitie as his aduersaries the Nestorians did thinke but also according to the flesh was the vine from which life flowed into vs as braunches and cōsequently that we as braūches were ioyned not onely to his deitie but also to his humanitie and so to his flesh doe draw life and all our spirituall nourishment not onely from his deitie but also from his flesh And the reason is brought from the Hypostaticall vnion which maketh the word his flesh taken into vnitie thereof to bee but one person one and the same Christ one and the same vine Therefore that we cannot be ioyned to the deitie of Christ but also we must be vnited to his flesh nor can we
is true God and the same true man existing vnspeakably of two natures vnited together in one person in the virgines wombe which natures seing that in this wonderfull covnion they are not abolished in him to shew a plaine extance and appearance of the proprietie of them both in himselfe being one he did and spake thinges belonging to both not deuiding the wordes nor parting the aspects nor seperating his deeds but he himself being one speaking and doing in himself and by both that which was agreeable and was proper to both natures And to make it more plaine which we haue said let vs vse an example as thus I my selfe am hee which with my bodilie eyes doe behold a white colour or a blacke and againe I am hee which by sight of my minde doe iudge of the euill of iniquitie and the good of righteousnesse yet notwithstāding I am not now diuers persons because I doe both these in a diuerse respect For I doe not see the difference of coulours with the same eyes with which I see the diuersitie of speaches and yet I am the verie same which doe this both the wayes both are in me not to see righteousnesse but onely with the eyes of my minde and it is in me not to see colours but onely with the eyes of my flesh and it is in me not to heare wordes with my eyes and in me not to see light with my eares in me not to iudge of tastes with my nose and in me not to perceiue smelling at my mouth And whereas it is wholly mine owne proprietie in my selfe to see to heare to smel to taste and yet it is one thing in me whereby I see another whereby I heare another wherby I taste or smell and all this being in me wholly and yet in a certaine priuate respect deuided and diuers I my selfe notwithstāding cannot be deuided or seperated So therefore Christ himselfe also being one and the same created and not created hauing beginning being without beginning growing in age vnderstanding and receiuing no increase of age and vnderstanding suffering death not yeelding to the lawes of death receiuing honor for his desert yet hauing need of no mās honor and al these things being diuers in him yet are meerely proper vnto himselfe And therfore he diuideth not in himself the words affects and deedes agreeable both wayes in himselfe because both are properly his owne yet hauing one proprietie by the nature of the word which remaining God he lost not and another by the nature of the flesh which being made man hee receiued Wee will yet speake more to confirme more plainely this one nature for their sakes which through their vnsaide skilfullnesse not vnderstanding the proprietie and communion of the natures howe it is said to be in Christ do abuse and vtterly refuse the same words It is diuerse and another thing not to haue beginning and to subsist by a beginning to die and not to bee able to suffer yet as they are both proper vnto Christ so are they both common not vnto him but in him For if wee say common vnto him we must needs bee vrged and driuen to giue and shew some other with whom the same should be common vnto him which necessity of instance cannot but incline to the impious opinion of Nestorius We therfore better and more catholically saye it is common in him and not to him and so wee say better it is proper to him and not in him Therefore it is proper to him to dye by the nature of his flesh which is mortall and it is proper to him not to dye by the nature of the vvord which cannot dye Likewise by that vnspeakable misterie of the vnion of both the natures the mortallitie of the flesh was common in him to the nature of the vvord which could not dye and the immortalitie of the vvorde was common in him to the nature of the flesh which yeelded to death Therefore as it is proper vnto him in respect of both natures to dye and not to dye so it is common in him in both natures to doe that which is their proprietie and as I maye for example sake say it is proper to me to carry the marke of the blacknesse of a stroakein my bodie by the nature of my flesh so it is proper to me to carrie the stripe of a word that is of some hard speach in my minde by the nature of my soule and it is also proper to me not to carrie the same stripe of wordes in my bodie by the nature of my flesh And sith both these are proper to me and both of them different from my bodie and from my soule because neither my bodie vnderstandeth anie hard or any pleasing speaches neither can my soule be made blacke by the stroake of a whipp yet both these are common in my selfe both to my soule and to my body because neither my soule placed out of my bodie doth feele that which is proper to it to feele nor my bodie without the companie of my soule can carrie the marks of the blowes That therefore which is proper vnto me in either of them and yer different from neither of them that is common in my whole selfe to either of them which is proper to either of them And yet I am the verie same in them both being both of them common in me and I am the very same in either of them being both proper to me This saith Vigilius What can more fittly be said for the deciding of this present controuersie of the reall communication of the proprieties For this whole treatise of Vigilius is resolued into these speciall propositions pertaining to our cause For setting first downe a rule of the catholicke faith which in the text is marked with the letter A then from the same hee draweth certaine positions by which he manifestly confuteth the heresie of Eutyches The summe of that rule of faith is this that one and the same Christ is God and man both natures are kept whole in him Out of this rule Vigilius gathered these positions 1 The Lord Iesus Christ is the same true God and the same true man The reason for he existeth of two natures the diuine and the humaine vnspeakablie ioyned and vnited together in one person and that in the virgins wombe This is against Nestorius against Eutyches is added another position 2 These natures in that wonderfull covnion are not abolished in Christ The confirmation followeth by the life of Christ because the Lord Iesus both by his sayings and deeds did shew that the proprieties of both the natures remained safe and whole in him therefore he addeth 3 To she we an extancie that is an existence of the proprieties of them both in himselfe being one namely that the proprieties of both the natures did exist distinct in him he spake and did things of both natures himselfe being one This is also against Eutyches But how namely so that
he shewed howe these sayings and deeds were not the actions of two persons but of one Therefore against Nestorius he also addeth Not in making a diuersitie in vvords or shewing sundrie aspects or seperating the deedes but hee himselfe being one speaking and doing in himselfe and by both that is by both natures that vvhich was agreeable and vvas proper to both the natures By these words we may perceiue these two thinges as cleare as the noone day one that there were not in Christ two which did worke and will vnderstand but onely one namely the very worde incarnate which is called Christ therefore he saith in himselfe being one c. Also hee himselfe being one speaking and doing in himselfe this is the first and that against Nestorius The other is That yet there were and are in Christ working two beginnings of actions distinct in themselues by which those actions as the schoolemen saye were formallie performed by the agent namely the faculties or powers of the two natures and this is against Eutyches And therefore hee ioyneth by both that is by both natures speaking and doing that which is proper to both natures Nowe who seeth not that the the thinges which Christ did according to one nature the same he did not according to the other For he did by both such thinges as were proper to each he did not therefore according to his humanitie such things as belonged to his deitie nor contrary wise Moreouer to cōfirme and set forth the same he bringeth in an example of one the same man who according to the diuers faculties of the soule doth worke diuers actions and bringeth foorth deedes agreeable to each facultie The example appeareth of it selfe there And to make it more plaine c. But we must warily marke his particles not onely the affirmatiues but also the negatiues For he denies that a man sees those thinges with the eyes of his flesh which he seeth with the eyes of his minde and contrariwise Therfore hee also denies that Christ doeth those things according to his flesh which he worketh according to his deitie This he plainely declareth whenas applying the example besides other thinges he saieth of Christ But hauing one propertie by the nature of the word vvhich remaining God he lost not and another by the nature of the flesh vvhich being made man hee receiued c. It is also to bee marked that Vigilius aswell denieth that Christ doeth by the flesh that is according to the flesh those thinges which are proper to the deitie as hee denieth that hee suffred did those things according to his deitie which were proper to the flesh Vigilius also adioyneth a speciall declaration of the proprietie and communion of the natures and the same verie perspicuous certaine where he saieth We vill yet speake more to confirme this nature for their sakes c. The summe is this 4 The proprieties of both the natures are proper to the verie person of Christ but are common to the natures betwixt themselues not in the verie natures but in the person The declaration is this For to die which is the proprietie of the flesh is proper to Christ For in that hee is saide to haue died it is properlie spoken in respect of the humaine nature which is in him Also not to die is proper to him in respect of his diuine nature which cānot die Likewise to die is common to the vvorde or deitie of Christ not in the diuine nature it selfe which cannot be partaker of death but this was common to him with his flesh in the person because the person which carried the flesh could dye in the flesh and Iesus Christ did dye The same is to be thought said of the other part as Vigilius also declareth adding the example of himselfe that is of a mā where he saith And for example sake to say c. In this example there is nothing but that which is plaine But the conclusion is diligentlie to be marked where he saith That therefore which is proper to me in either of them and yet different from either of them the same is common in me to either of them vvhich is proper to either of them And yet I am the verie same one in them both being both of them common in mee and I am the verie same in either of them being both proper to me Nothing can be said more cleare for the declaration of the question concerning the reall communication of the proprieties For first he teacheth that the proprieties of the one nature are so proper vnto it selfe that they are quite different from the other nature and so different that in their proper essence they can by no meanes be made common that is they cā not be so really communicated that the same should be made that verie same or the like vnto the other nature as for example that the humanitie should bee made the deitie or bee made omnipotent or on the contrarie that the deitie could be made the humanitie or be made partaker of passion or suffring 2 He deliuereth in plaine tearms that the proprieties of each nature are proper vnto Christ because indeed it is proper vnto him in himselfe for example in one nature to suffer and in his other not to bee able to suffer so as this he hath common with no other thing either in heauen or on earth or in himselfe For there is nothing besides himselfe that is both God and man and neither of the natures in him hath also the proprieties of the other nature besids their owne in their proper essence Therefore it belongeth onely to Christ God and man to haue in himselfe really therefore proper to himselfe the essential proprieties of each nature both diuine and humaine Wherefore hereby is it manifest also which before was said of the communication For if this bee proper to the person of Christ that these contraries namely to suffer and not to be able to suffer may truely and indeede bee said of him and yet not simplie but in respect of some other thing that is in respect of his other nature Then can it not agree to anie of both his natures seuerally that the same nature should truely and really be said to be able to suffer and not to suffer in it owne proper essence 3 The proprieties of the natures which he said were proper to Christ these hee taught to be made common in themselues not indeed in the very natures themselues but in his person For example To susser which is proper to the humaine nature simplie and by it selfe in it owne essence but proper to the person in respect of some other thing that is onely in respect of the flesh I say this essentiall proprietie of the flesh by reason of the vnion which the flesh hath with the deity it selfe in the same person is made also cōmon to the verie diuine nature it selfe with the humaine how cōmon namely that to susser
cannot bee mooued from place to place according to it whole selfe as true philosophie teacheth christian theologie cōfirmeth which sheweth that God therefore is not mooued from place to place because being immeasurable he fileth all things 78 Neither can that bodie also which is euery where be rightly said to sitt at the right hand or the left of another but you must needs cōfoūd the substance of him that sitteth with the substance of the right hand at which with the substance of him whose right hand he sitteth at seing therefore euen the father the sonne the holy ghost filling heauen earth are euery where both all and each of them because they are one and the same essence 79 Finally we think this doctrine of the inuisible vnpalpable presence of Christs flesh euery where is neither true nor profitable 80 Not true indeed because wee could neuer see the same shewed either by any manifest testimonies of holie scriptures or any necessarie consequences drawne out of them nay wee haue obserued the same to bee repugnant to the scriptures and to the catholicke consent of the old church rightlie expounded by the rule of faith contained in the Apostles creede 81 Yea and wee see it so contrary to the scriptures that without a manifest implying of a contradiction yee cannot graunt both those things which the creed deliuereth and those things which the authors of this Vbiquitary doctrine do deliuer 82 Neither is it profitable because that which is not agreeable with gods word to propoūd beleeue and obserue it as agreeable and necessary vnto saluation is a sinne The Lord saying Add not nor diminish and the Apostle Deut. 12 32 Rom. 14.23 Rom. 6.23 All that is not of faith is sinne and the wages of sinne is death 83 Finally because if that opinion of the Vbiquitie of Christs bodie should be beleeued to be true it would bee a hinderance that a man could not apprehend and eate with a minde lifted vp Christ to the true flesh of Christ Iesus being in heauen whereunto notwithstanding both the Apostle the church calleth vs saying lift vp your hearts And seeke those thinges which are aboue where Christ is sitting at gods right hand 84 They thē do nothing lesse then eate Christs flesh which doe not behold the same in heauen where indeede it is but imagine him to bee really present euerie where in his owne substance Aesops dogg leauing the true flesh did foolishlie catch at the vaine shaddowe of the flesh because it seemed a bigger peece A question out of the 1. of Ioh. 4.3 S. Iohn describing Antichrist saith Euery spirite which confesseth not that Iesus Christ is come in the true humane flesh is not of God and this is that spirit of Antichrist And seing that Christ neuer laid aside that flesh which he once tooke but carried it with him vp into heauen and shall returne againe in the clouds in the same apparēt vnto all mē to iudge the quicke and the dead The question is of what spirite they are and by what name to bee called who make no doubt with the old heretikes to forge for our Lord Iesus Christ I know not what kinde of inuisible flesh vncircumscribed vnpalpable whole and in his whole substance forsoth really existing in all places in heauen in the starres in the ayre in the earth vnder the earth in hell in all the seuerall partes of the world and the parcells of the partes yea and in the least parcells of the parcells against Scripture and against the sound agreement of the whole catholike church Of the dispensation of saluation by Christ Out of the first chapter of the Ephesians yeare 1580. 1 OVr Lord Iesus Christ ver 7 8 in whome wee were elected vnto saluation not onely once redeemed vs by his owne blood hauing obtained remission of sinnes and gottē the victorie but doth also dayly dispense and communicate vnto his the grace of redemption and saluation 2 For it belongeth to a perfect redeemer not onely by paying the ransome to redeeme but also to make the redemption knowne to them that be redeemed and to deliuer them quite out of the hands of the tyrant into freedome as it also belongeth to a good head to impart the life sense and motion which it hath vnto the members 3 Nowe Christ vseth to dispense this grace of saluation by the word of trueth that is ver 13 by the gospel of our saluation with which wee ioyne the Sacraments as seales and instruments of saluation 4 For by the gospell hee makes knowne vnto vs the misterie of his diuine wil ver 9 10 concerning our saluation through Christ and concerning the gathering together aswell those that are in heauen as these that are on earth concerning the knitting of them to one head Christ 5 Neither doth he onely make knowne vnto vs the mistery of saluation by the gospell ver 13 but also effectually calleth draweth vs to himselfe to the communion of himselfe so to the participation of redemption saluation 6 For by the preaching of the gospell ver 13 Rom. 10 hee vseth to stirr vp faith in our hearts whereby wee beleeue in him and are receiued into his communion 7 For he giueth vs his holy spirit by which he regenerateth vs ver 13 and sealeth vs with the expresse image of God to the full possession of an eternall inheritance 8 By the same spirite he stirreth vp worketh and leadeth vs to the studie of a holy life and good workes 9 And if it so be ver 14 we fall into sinne such is our frailtie he lifteth vs vpp by repentance giuen vnto vs maketh vs more assured of forgiuenesse and by that meanes through the same spirite as it were a pledge he more and more daily confirmeth vs in that assurance of saluation 10 And these benefits Christ bestoweth on vs neuer vtterly forsaking vs till he hath brought vs by his grace and singular loue towards vs from the first redemption which is our redēption from the guilt and seruitude of sinne and from the power of the deuill to the other redemption namely the full libertie which consisteth in the perfect assuring and full possession of the heauenly inheritance 11 But our Lord Iesus as he is our redeemer the head of the whole church ver 22 according to both the natures so also he cōmunicateth eternall life saluation not onely as he is god but also as he is man according to that same Beleeue my sonne thy sinnes be forgiuen thee And immediatly after but that he might know that the sonne of man hath power to forgiue sinnes he saieth to the sicke of the palsey arise take vp thy bed goe vnto thy house where each nature worketh that which is proper to it with communion of the other 12 For as the natures are so vnited within thēselues in one person that yet there is made no