Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
death_n word_n world_n write_a 22 3 9.6449 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A15388 A confutation of certaine articles deliuered vnto the Familye of Loue with the exposition of Theophilus, a supposed elder in the sayd Familye vpon the same articles. By William Wilkinson Maister of Artes and student of diuinitye. Hereunto are prefixed by the right reuerend Father in God I.Y. Byshop of Rochester, certaine notes collected out of their Gospell, and aunswered by the Fam. By the author, a description of the tyme, places, authors, and manner of spreading the same: of their liues, and wrestyng of Scriptures: with notes in the end how to know an heretique. Wilkinson, William, d. 1613.; Young, John, 1534?-1605.; Niclaes, Hendrik, 1502?-1580? 1579 (1579) STC 25665; ESTC S101312 139,324 194

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

I promise him lykewise that hereafter I will not further medle with him or his for I like not to spend good leasure wherof I haue not such plenty that in speaking in the ayre I both may mispend my tyme and abuse the reader with emptines The last and least reason whereby Theoph. would proue that no man ought to deale agaynst the Fam. is taken from the counsell of Gamaliell in the Actes of the Apostles This reason is as it were by common consent receiued and alledged by all those that are any thing at all sene in the Fam. euer in their mouthes if it be of God it will stand c. The which reason the Anabaptistes vsed very often and is by a learned expositor termed a reason not fit for any man of wisedome First concerning Gamaliels wordes that they are not alwayes to be taken for a law it is manifest neither are they a right rule or conteine a generall doctrine how at all tymes false teachers are to be delt withall neither were the holy Apostles false teachers as Theophilus comparison doth afford but he onely vpon that present occasion because of that imminent perill that hangeth ouer the heads of the Appostles at that instant vttered that speach as a worldly wise and politique man to stay the fury of the priestes and set frée the Apostles in so great a daunger Wherefore he that shall stretch Gamaliels wordes further then he ment them and of one priuate politique action by and by publish a principle in Diuinitye and thereupon ground a generall doctrine without an especiall precept to the warrant thereof shall of the lyke examples in the scriptures gather many and marueilous inconueniences Concerning the doctrine of the first table if this example were generall by this gapp many heretickes would stirre coles in the Church and in the second tables many theues harlots and godles persons would swarue to the vtter ouerthrow of the common weale The first will not haue any man compelled to religigion therefore much lesse to be put death for the same The second is a plausible doctrine to fill the world full of theues and harlots to the confirmation whereof no honest man will once breath to the confutation euery man both by the law of nature and much more by the written word of God is bound to agrée with all possible resistaunce if he meane to kéepe a good consciēce towards God or maintayne the dutye of Charitye towardes his neighbour But because the oportunitye and the instance of this place doth séeme to enforce a word or two concerning this question by sound and straunge reasons out of holy Scripturres I will approue that a Christian magistrate both may and ought to punnish by death and otherwise those that are heretiques agaynst the fayth and blasphemers against religion 1 The Manachies Donatistes and ould Heretiques were of the opinion that all heretiques ought fréely and without punnishment professe what they listed and not be compelled to fayth but they might embrace what religion best they lyked without controulement whome S. Augustine in many places confuted shewing that a magistrate might lawfully compell heretiques to the fayth and sharpely punnish false teachers for broaching of their opinions And therefore speaking to the heretiques he sayth very well Recte faciunt imperatores Catholici qui eos cogūt ad vnitatem the Catholique Emperours doe very well when they compel heretiques to come to vnitye The first reason is taken from S. Paule who reasoneth Reason 1 from the end of the institution of the magistrate That he beareth not the sword for nought for he is the minister of God to take vengeaunce on him that doth euill Séeing then heretiques and false teachers doe euill in blaspheming the holy name of Christ after the which we are named in making a schisme amongest the people in disturbing the commē quietnes of the land wherein they liue and the state of priuate men also therefore it is not to be doubted but they may and ought to be punnished of him not onely in their wealth and goodes but in their bodyes with the losse of lyfe also Secondly God by manifest precept and commaundement Reason 2 hath prescribed how heretiques ought to be dealt withall for when they stirre vp tumultes amōg the people and drawe them from the doctrine deliuered out of the word of God which teacheth that we should haue but one God one fayth one Baptisme c. And séeing I say there be perticuler preceptes of this matter and God in his word hath commaunded that they should be slayne It can not neither is it to be thought that God hath commaunded that he hath not allowed of heretiques Therfore lawfullye may by the commaundement of God be put to death by the ciuill Magistrate Reason 3 Thirdly the Lord hath not left this vnto vs by precept onely or as a thing indifferent in the pleasure of the magistrate to chuse whether he will punnish them by death or no but he hath also hedged in this his law by example that whosoeuer shall transgresse in this behalfe shall be guiltye of a heinous transgression The man that gathered stickes on the Saboth day was slayne Godly kinges by their example haue approued the same by their continuall practise Asa put downe his owne mother from her estate because she made an Idole in a groue and he destroyed her Idols and burnt them by the brooke Kidron Iosias put downe the Chemerims he defiled Tophet he brake downe the Images and put downe the alters sacrificing the priestes of the hye places vpon them Iehoiada destroyed Baals temple brake his altar and his Images and slew Mattan the priest of Baal before the altars Elias put to death all Baals prophets and would not let one of them escape Iehue put all Baals priestes to death Neither was this onely in the tyme of the law of Moses but after Christes assention when there was not a Christian Magistrate S. Paule made Elimas blinde S. Peter slew Ananias and Saphira because they lyed agaynst the holy ghost Lastly in the tyme of Christian Emperours namely Constantine Gratiā Valentinian Theodosius Archadius Honorius Valentinus and Martianus And many others which by waight of lawes did forbid all wicked sectes and factions contrarye to the word of god And therefore did they commaunde to all their Liuetenants Proconsuls and Presidents in all their Empires that Idolatrye should be forbiddē the temples of Idols should be shut that they should not be permitted to sacrifice in them that all the heretiques as the Manichies the Donatistes the Arians Apollinaristes and Euchians with their doctrine should not be suffered their Churches should be spared and their conuenticles forbidden That their heretical bookes should be openly burned that those which fostered them or receiued them to house should be greeuously punished and the heretiques themselues should be depriued of honours goods
definition sith already euery part is confuted it shal in this place spare me a further labour In the definition as he termeth it there are cōtained diuers out-roades extrauagant varying of phrases altogether repugnyng vnto Arte which willeth that euery deffinition be as brief and playne as possible may be yet is HN. his definition so compacted together as if the one part of it stode at Collen and the other at Amsterdam but herein rather pitie we his folly then enuy his learning and dexteritie in formyng a fit definition But seyng we haue founde fault with HN. his definition of the vpright fredome let vs sée if there may a more playne and pithy definition be drawne then erst he hath set downe Christian libertie is the forgiuenesse of sinnes Psal. 32.1 a Rom. 4.8 Purchased by the death of Christ Rom. 4.25 d. Ephes 1.7 b. Preached vnto vs by the Gospell Ioh. 8.32.2 Tim. 1.10 c. sealed by the vse of the word Actes 13.26 d. Rom. 1.16 b. and Sacramentes Rom. 4.11 1. Cor. 11.26 The which definition I reale to amplifie or to prosecute the partes therof because the testimonies of the holy Scriptures shal be my sufficient warrant in that behalf The second crime that HN. burtheneth our Ministry withall is that those that preach are vnregenerate vnrenewed which that it hindreth not the truth of doctrine in that it is taught by a wicked person is apparaunt by the testimonie of our Sauiour who biddeth the Disciples and the people obey the doctrine of the Scribes and pharisies which sit in Moses chaire but do not after their lyfe which he would not haue done if the Pharisies euill lyfe had made voyde the truth of their doctrine But this is touched more in the 5. Article where it is impugned by HN. that a man lewde in lyfe can not speake the truth in doctrine The thyrd crime of preachyng out of the learnednes of the letter we shall haue a fitter place to touch it afterward in the next Article The fourth crime which HN obiecteth is coalewortes more then tenne times sodden and yet being refused by vs eftsone is in the next seruice set downe For how often doth he in his wofull exhortation still heate vpon this a ceremonie seruice that maintayneth dissention and agayne which stretcheth no further but to the breding of schisme partialitye and sedition among the people quoting Math. 24. a. 5. ve and b. 24. v. Where Christ sayth Many false Christes shall arise and deceiue many HN. expoundeth it of those which professe religion without his loathsom and schismaticall Familye and in the same place he quoteth 1. Cor. 3. a. 3. Iam. 3. b. which conteineth a discription of the intemperancie of the tongue being abused he vilanously doth aply it to those preachers which reuerētly handle the pure word of God without his hereticall secresie and frentique conuenticle and in the same 15. Chap. of HN The simple and vnlighted people Ierem. 23. c. d. Ezech. 13. b. ver 8.9.10 c. become therewith seduced and beguiled Math. 24. c. 2. Tim. 3.4 2. Pet. 2. a. Iude. 1. b. still HN. applieth those places to the preachers of Gods worde which are ment of him and such lyke bedlem heretiques as he is as also captiued with many diuises and sectes the which knowledge of the worde that the same preachers haue HN. termeth in the same blasphemous and schismaticall chap. Variaunce renting or diuision bringing forth discordable disputations about vnprofitable argumentes Rom. 1. d. Galla. 5. c. 1. Tim. 6. a. Titus 3. a. Iam. 3. b. then the which what can be vttered with more malice or set abroach with more cancred hatred and yet will HN. néedes be counted the Father of the Familye that in it hath nothing but loue and méeke mindednes The which accusation of his as it is most pestilent and full fraught with an hart wholy resolued to raile and backbite vnder the cloake of calmenes so is it a thing that continually hath ben obiected agaynst the Church to infring the trueth thereof after this sort There are in such and such particuler Churches disagreementes in some pointes of doctrine varietye of iudgemētes ergo there is no truth in those Churches This I say is an ould Argument framed first by heretiques vsed by the Papistes as an Iron flayle and now againe furbushed and being new fethered is shotte againe cleane besides the white and the butt also For the auncient Fathers hauing it often obiected to them frier Hosias and the graceles runnagate Staphilus and M. Harding himselfe hath often turned this stone which so is fastened by the Father of blessed remembraunce the Byshop of Salisburye that if all the Famblers of Loue and heretiques in the world shall set their shoulders vnto it therewith to ouerwhelme the truth they neuer shall be able so much as once to stir it and yet if they should they must take héede that in the rembling therof they crush not all their bones in sunder to their vtter confusion But that this gappe may finally be stopped that hereafter HN. neuer with his fellow hereticks breake in to disturbe the peace of Sion let it be remembred that is written Gen. 13.7 b. 27.11 Luke 22.24 c. Actes 15.39 f. 1. Cor. 1.11 b. Gal. 2.11 c. that alwayes in the Church of God there hath ben iarres aswell in maners as also in religion And thus much brieflye for this second part of HN. his doctrine of the dignitye of the word and the opinion of the truth thereof As for Theophilus who frendly geueth me counsell to blaze my selfe in the former definition of a Libertine I doe him to know that such libertye as is to be claymed by mercye and imputation of the death of Christ that libertie from sinne I loke for and none other and this is that which in my poore iudgment all the children of God doe loke for Rom. 8.20.21 both in this lyfe as also in the lyfe to come As for his Rhetoricall terme of blazing and Blazonrie I wish him to spare it tell he come in place where he may haue occasion to vse it for vnto me if he be that party whome some that wishe well to the Familye report to me that he is he should not haue needed to haue shadowed him selfe by a terme of heraultrie but if I were disposed to blase his coate perhaps if I should say that he were like to be that E. R. which ouershot himselfe in his Epistle to I. R. I might so dissipher his personage that the vizard of Theophilus should not be sufficient to saue him that he be not knowne by blushing but it is good for him to kéepe him to that which he is called and rather to learne the principles of the Catechisme and the first groundes of Gods feare then to busie bimselfe in that which he hath no skill of to the hurt of the Church the offence of the weake and endamaging of