Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
death_n	word_n	work_n	wrath_n	108	3	6.8702	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A09819	The substance of Christian religion soundly set forth in two bookes, by definitions and partitions, framed according to the rules of a naturall method, by Amandus Polanus professor of diuinitie. The first booke concerneth faith. The second concerneth good workes. The principall pointes whereof are contained in a short table hereunto annexed. Translated out of Latin into English by E.W.; Partitionum theologicarum, logica methodo institutarum. English	Polanus von Polansdorf, Amandus, 1561-1610.; Wilcocks, Elijahu, b. 1576 or 7.	1595 (1595)	STC 20083.7; ESTC S121514	121,376	286

principally is called Antichrist 2. Thess 2.7 and that false Prophet Reuel 16.13 In this place especially two things are to be considered first Antichrist himselfe secondly the Church of Antichrist Concerning Antichrist himselfe the question is both what he is who he should be That Antichrist is a man exercising a kingdome the head of the vniuersall Apostacy or falling away from the fayth and professing the name of a Christian indeede but yet setting himselfe both against Christ and the doctrine of Christ hauing a double and supreme power to wit a spirituall and secular boasting himselfe with deceaueable signes and miracles an inchaunter making a compact with the deuill an idolatrer an hypocrite a blasphemer ambitious and proude lawlesse leading a single life and forbidding marriage and yet hee himselfe a filthy fornicatour and adulterer a Sodomite and that whoore of Babylon abstayning from certaine kindes of meates and yet giuen to riotousnesse couetous cousening men of their money wily giuen to vanitie alyer cruell a tyrant a persecuter murtherer of the Saints vaunting himselfe as God and lifting vp himselfe against all powers and maiesties both in earth and also in heauen arrogating to himselfe the deuine power and absolute dominion of Christ by a double and fourth fall that is to say by the Romaine Monarchie out of the rubbishes thereof by litle and litle rising and increasing by the power forcible working of Sathan in the citie compassed with seuen hils that is to say at Rome and in the temple of God that is to say in the Church but he shall be discouered in the last times of the world and at the length by the glorious comming of Christ shall vtterly be abolished 2. Thess 2.3 Dan. 7.8 Reuel 17.1 18.3 13.11 and euery where throughout the Reuelations Thus farre is shewed what Antichrist is now who it is THAT ANTICHRISR IS THAT POPI OF ROME euen as both the Canon lawe and also the liues and actes of the Bishoppes of Rome doe expressely shew Thus farre concerning Antichrist himselfe now concerning the Church of Antichrist The Church of Antichrist is the Church of Rome falsely called Apostolicall and Catholike wheras it is indeede an Apostaricall Church that beast and indeede disguising it selfe and which doth represent the liuely image of the Monarchy of the Romaines heretofore defaced of their gouernement power honour and seat among all Nations Reuel 11.7.8 and 13.3 and so forward and euery where in the Reuelations and experience also doth watnesse the same Of this Church there be two parts to wit the head and the members The head of this Church of Antichrist is Antichrist himselfe the Pope of Rome the sonne of perdition and minister of the Dragon The members of it be eyther the Clergie or the Lai●y The Clergy are those vncleane spirits comming out of the mouth of the Dragon of that beast and false Prophet Reuel 16.13 Of them there be three orders Cardinals false Bishops and the filthy heape of Canonists scholemen and Monkes Cardinals are those vncleane spirits comming forth of the mouth of the Dragon of that beast and false Prophet who goe to the Kings of the earth and of the whole world honored by that Antichrist of Rome with a Cardinals hatte and sent out that euen like frogs by their clamorous and vnpleasant craking they might be importunate which all men to the intent they may gather them to the battle against God Reuel 16.13.14 False Bishops are vncleane spirits cōming out of the mouth of the Dragon of that same beast false Prophet who for a great price do buy their cope at Rome and haue speciall iurisdiction both ciuill and ecclesiasticall That heape of Canonists Scholemen and Monkes are vncleane spirites comming out of the mouth of the Dragon of that same beast and false Prophet euery one according to his place vnderpropping the sea of Rome by murders and lyes But amongest the Monkes those newe Monkes now adayes haue the cheifty who by a false name are called Iesuits whereas they are indeede Esauites or Iebusites So much concerning Antichrist now concerning false Christs False Christs are dissembled enemies of Christ who vaunt themselues to be Christ Matth. 24.26 Mar. 13.21 Luk. 17.23 Such were Simon Magus Bencocab Dauid Gorgius who was burnt at Basill The end of the first Booke of the partitions of diuintie THE SECOND BOOKE of the definitions and partitions of Diuinitie framed according to the rules of a naturall Methode by Amandus Polanus of Polansdorfe Of good workes THE second part of the word of God is concerning good workes that is to say which prescribeth and commandeth what works are to be done by the faithfull that so men may performe thankefulnes due to God for the deliuerance from sin and eternall death Phil. 1.27 Iam. 2.20 Tit. 3.8 Good workes are workes commanded by God which are done of a true faith to the glory of God alone Rom. 14.13 Heb. 11.6 And yet they are before God neither righteousnes it selfe nor any part of righteousnes neither haue they any whit of merit in them Esa 64.6 Rom 3.28 Ephes 2.8.9 Luk. 17.10 Euery singular good worke hath two sins set against it the one as disagreeing the other as contrarie Of hypocrisie The former of them is hypocrisie that is to say a fayning of godlinesse and honesty or if you will a new found godlinesse the workes whereof doe seeme to haue some affinity and agreement with good workes and therefore they doe oftentimes delude men with a shew and nearenesse of goodnesse but in very deede are diuerse from them eyther because they are not commaunded by God but are fayned and cōmanded by men vnder the opinion of vprightnes or although they are commanded by God yet they are done of hypocrisie either to deceiue others or for the shewe of godlines after the manner of the Pharises Although sometime there may be more differēces or disagreemēts then one But the sinne which is opposed to a good work as contrary therto is that which is simply contrary to it And euen as the summe of our faith is comprehended in the Creed of the Apostles so the law of God is the direction and rule of good workes Both the adioints and also the kindes of good workes are to be considered Of the adioynts of good works The adioynts of good works are two fold some if we respect God and some if we respect men If we respect God they are two fold that is the childlike feare of God and subiection that we owe to God Of the childlike feare of God The childlike feare of God is a feare of the anger and iudgement of God against sin whereby we are stirred vp reuerently to obey God and flie sinne Or else the childlike feare of God is that whereby we feare as the chiefest euill of all least we displease God through disobedience Psal 5.8 Such a feare is in the elect and it consisteth in three things First

inward or outward The outward calling is a calling which is done by the Ministers of Gods word And that is two fold effectuall or vneffectuall Mat. 22.2 The effectuall calling belongeth to the elect in whose harts the word preached doth abide The vneffectuall calling belongeth to the reprobate in whose harts the word of God either findeth no abode or else vanisheth away so that it is become to them the sauour of death and a matter of more grieuous condemnation Thus much concerning the outward calling now concerning the inward The calling that is inward is a calling which is wrought by the holy spirit by whō the father draweth vs and giueth vs to his sonne Iohn 6.37.44 and 17.11 Hitherto concerning our calling to Christ now concerning our calling to some office The calling to some office is the separating of a fit person to some office Rom. 1.1 Thus farre concerning our calling now concerning Gods couenant Gods couenant is a bargaine which God hath made with me● in which God promiseth to men some good requireth of them again that they performe those things which he commandeth And that couenant is either eternall or temporall The eternall couenant is a couenant in which God promiseth men eternall life And that is two fold the couenant of workes or the couenant of grace The couenant of workes is a bargaine of God made with men cōcerning eternall life to which is both a condition of perfect obedience adioyned to be performed by man also a threatning of eternall death if he shal not performe perfect obedience Gene. 2.17 The couenant with Moses is the couenant of workes The repetition of the couenant of workes is made by God Exod. 19.5 Deut. 5.2 1. King 8.21 Heb. 8.9 and that chiefly for foure causes 1. That God by all meanes might stirre vp men to performe obedience 2. That euery mouth might be stopped and all the world might be made subiect to the condemnation of God for not performing perfect obedience Rom. 3.19 3. That he might manifest mans sinne and naughtinesse Rom. 3.19.20 and 7.7.8.9.10.11 4. That he might thrust vs forward to seeke to be restored in the couenant of grace Gal. 3.22 and 5.23 Thus much concerning the couenant of workes now concerning the couenant of grace Of the couenāt of grace The couenant of grace is the reconciling of the elect with God by the death of the only mediatour Rom. 8.30 2. Cor. 5.17.18.19.20.21 Heb. 9.15 The mediatour That onely mediatour is our Lord Iesus Christ who onely doth reconcile vs to his father by his satisfaction and merit Gene. 3.15 and 11.35 Gal. 3.12.13.14 Gene. 15.18 17.2.10.11 Exod. 6.4 the Epistle to the Heb. Chap. 7.8.9 10. The couenant made with Abraham is the couenant of grace Actes 3.25 The couenant of grace is also called the Testament because this reconciliation was made and ratified by the death of the testatour Christ comming betweene Heb. 9.16.17 Christ purchased reconciliation between his heauenly father and vs by his death and there withall left it vnto vs no otherwise thē parents dying doe leaue their goods to their children And that perpetually is one and the selfe same if we consider the substance thereof as there is but one Church in all ages one true faith Religiō of Saints one God one mediatour Christ but one sacrifice for sins but one righteousnesse redēptiō of the world one manner for all the ages of the world to obtaine saluation namely by faith in Christ Heb. 13.8 Reuel 13.8 1. Tim. 2.5 Rom. 12. and 4.3 Ephes 1.10 Rom. 9.5 Col. 1.18 Ephe. 2.21 Actes 4.2 Mat. 11.27 Iohn 14.6 Luke 10.24 Iohn 8 56. Gene. 3.15 and 22.18 But by the circumstances it is called the old or new Testament It is called the old Testament or couenant because it was hid from the faithfull by diuers shadowes and figures before Christ was manifested in the flesh Gene. 12.7 Heb. 9.4.18 Exod. 24.8 It is called the new Testamēt or couenāt because it is clearely manifested to the faithfull by Christ himselfe shewed in the flesh Heb. 8 6. Therefore the faithfull in the old Testament had Christ as yet couered in a type or rather they looked for a true manifestation of him but we haue him manifested indeede They had figures we haue the thing it selfe they did reioyce in outward and ceremoniall things we triumph in spirituall and the things signified without types Ierem. 31.31 Matth. 26.28 1. Cor. 11.25 Heb. 8.9.10 and Chap. 9. and 10. Of the couenant of grace there be two parts the promise of grace the answering againe of a good conscience The former respecteth God the later respecteth the faithfull Heb. 8.10.11.12 Of the promise of grace The promise of grace is the first part of the couenant of grace by which God promiseth freely his benefites purchased by Christ vnto all those who beleeue in Christ The benefites purchased by Christ for vs and promised in the Gospell are these the giuing of the holy spirit the communion with Christ and our preseruation in this communion and the giuing of eternall life Of the giuing of the holy spirit The giuing of the holy spirite is a benefite of God by which he giueth vs his holy spirite who maketh vs partakers of Christ and of all his benefites Of the knowledge of the holy spirit there be two parts the first conc●rning the person of the holy spirite the second concerning his office If we consider his person he is true God equall with the father and the sonne Actes 5.3.4 Gene. 1.2 Math. 28.19 Mar 16 15. But the office of the holy spirite is this that by him the father and the sonne doe shew foorth their power and execute the decrees of their will in creating sustaining and mouing all things but chiefly in mouing the harts of those that heare Gods word and in sanctifying and quickning the elect with eternall saluation Thus farre concerning the giuing of the holy spirite now concerning our communion with Christ Of our communion with Christ Our communion with Christ is the benefit of God whilest he giueth to the beleeuers Christ himselfe and his merits that he might powerfully worke in them eternall life Iohn 3.16 Rom. 8.32 That is also called our ioyning vnion knitting together with Christ our ingrafting into Christ the eating of Christes flesh the drinking of Christes bloud the bringing of vs vnder one head ioyning into one body vnder one head to wit Christ Ephes 1.10 our washing in the bloud of Christ the quickning of vs the raysing of vs from the dead the placing of vs in heauen together with Christ Ephes 2.5.6 Now the communion of all Saintes with Christ is one and the selfe same that is to say onely spirituall There is not a bodily entrance and remayning of Christ within the bodies of the Saints neither doth Christ dwell spiritually in some and bodily in other some but in all beleeuers spiritually onely And that is

the table of the Lord. 1. Cor. 10.21 Therefore thou doest come to the banket of Christ thou art his guest as oft as thou doest eat and drinke of this supper The Lords supper commeth in the roome of the Paschall Lambe therefore it doth also keepe the analogie or proportion thereof For both the one and the other is a Sacrament of nourishment and spirituall bringing vp And as the eating of the Paschall Lambe was often vsed so also the vsing of the Lords Supper is oftentimes performed For as the Passeouer was the nourishing of Iudaisme so the Lords Supper is the nourishing of Christianity which nourishing often times standeth in neede of meat and drinke that is to say restoring and renewing euen as our life doth daily want refreshing which is performed by meat and drinke The parts of the Lords Supper as of other sacraments are two the earthly matter and outward action in the Supper The earthly matter in the Supper is two fold the bread and the wine Because we liue not only by meat but by drinke also The bread in the holy Supper is a signe or image of Christs body giuen to death for vs. Ioh. 6.35.48.50.51.55.56 The wine in the holy Supper is a signe or image of Christs bloud shed on the crosse for vs. Therefore the bread also is called the body it selfe and the wine or cup in which the wine is is called the bloud it selfe Not that the body of Christ descendeth from the seate of his glory out of heauen and doth hide it selfe inuisibly in the bread and his bloud in the wine which opinion is most absurd but therefore the bread is called the body of Christ because it is a signe remembrance token figure similitude and image of his body giuen for vs. And the wine or cup is called the new Testament or couenant in the bloud of Christ because it is a signe of the new Testament or couenaunt that is to say of reconciliation wrought with God by the bloud of Christ shed vppon the Crosse for the forgiuenesse of sinnes The bread by a metaphor is called the body of Christ deliuered for vs because the bread being broken is a signe calling into our remembraunce or imprinting in vs and as it were setting before our eyes the breaking that is to say the crucifying of the body of Christ The wine by the same metaphor is the bloud of Christ because it is a signe calling into our remembrance and imprinting in vs the shedding of Christs bloud done on the crosse for the forgiuenesse of our sinnes Yea the bread is not a signe of his glorious body as it is now already glorified but of his body deliuered vnto death of his body broken on the crosse and slayne for our sakes as the Lord expresly sayth This is my body which is giuen for you And the wine is not a signe of his bloud contayned in the veines but of his bloud shed on the Crosse or as it was shed as the same Lord expresly testifieth And therefore the body of Christ is not now in the bread because it is already glorious and shall not before the last day descend from heauen vnto this miserable earth neyther is his bloud already in the wine because he once shed his bloud and died now he sheddeth it no more death shall no more raigne ouer him By the bread being broken is represented vnto vs as by a similitude a certaine image his body that suffered for vs. For the whole action of the Lords Supper is to be referred to this end that we might preach the death of the Lord vntill he come The metaphor seemeth to be more conuenient in the laying open of these wordes because not the bread simply but the bread broken by a certaine similitude doth represent the body broken as Paul sayeth that is to say deliuered vnto death For the breaking of the bread putteth vs in mind of the breaking of the body of Christ as it were by a certaine picture set before our eyes Christ did not simply call the bread his body but the bread which is broken But to what end As I see with mine eyes that the bread is broken for me so I am certainely confirmed in my faith that the body of Christ was giuen vnto death for me Secondly as certainely as the minister of the word doth giue me the bread broken so certainely doth Christ giue me his body deliuered to death for my sake That this is the naturall meaning of the words of Christ by this it appeareth For Christ commaundeth to doe all these things in remembraunce of him and Paul expoundeth that saying yee shall preach the death of the Lord vntill he come Christ truely hath not said the bread is the signe of my body but because he ordayned the Sacrament he speaketh of it as the Scripture is alwayes wont to speake concerning Sacraments vnder a metaphor calling the signe by the name of the thing signified And therefore the faithfull comming to the holy Supper when they behold with the eyes of the body the Sacramentall bread they are admonished that withall by the eyes of faith they behold and embrace the body of Christ broken or crucified vppon the crosse for vs. For therefore the bread hath the name of the body not that the faithfull should stand vppon the bread onely or seeke the body of Christ in the earthly Element but that they should by faith lift vp themselues into Heauen whither he did ascend and where he is and by the eyes of faith should behold and eate the vnspotted Lambe that was slaine for them on the heauēly Altar the Church nameth it saying Lift vp your hearts By the same metaphor the bread which we breake is by Paul called the communion of the body of Christ the cuppe of blessing which we blesse is called the communion of the bloud of Christ 1. Cor. 10.16 Because by this bread and cup as by a seale the faithfull are assured that they haue communion that is to say fellowship with Christ Both the matters that is to say the earthly and heauenly are indeede present in the holy Supper the former indeede bodily and visibly but the other spiritually by the sight which faith affordeth vs. We with the eyes of the body see the bread and wine but with the eyes of the soule that is to say with faith we see the body and bloud of Christ Therefore as certainely as we see the bread and wine to be present so certainely doe we beleeue that the body and bloud of Christ is present to vs yea we doe not beleeue that it is the Lords supper except his body bloud be present to vs. Otherwise if they were absent how could it be made the partaking of the body and bloud of Christ for the partaking is not of things that are absent but present But the body and bloud of Christ are truly present to the faithfull that is to say to those who receiue it

vnion The personall vnion of the two natures in Christ is such a coupling of them as they might be one person 1. Tim. 3.16 Coloss 2.9 Gal. 4.4 Heb. 2.16 In this personall vnion both the distinction of the two natures is to be considered and also the effectes of the vnion In the personall vnion the natures remaine distinct and not confused whether we respect their essence or the properties or operations Rom. 1.3.4 and 9.5 1. Tim. 9.16 Heb. 9.14 1. Pet. 3.18 and 4.1 As therefore in that one person of Christ there be two natures so there is a double minde or vnderstanding a double will working wisedome strength power vertue and so forth The one heauenly and not created the other humane and created Luke 2.52 Mar. 11.13 and 13.32 1. Iohn 2.1.17 Iohn 2.25 and 6.64 and 5.20 Heb. 1.9 Iohn 1.33 and 4.6 Heb. 1.3 Iohn 2.19 and 10.18 And each of the natures retaineth and keepeth his owne essentiall properties neither doth it communicate them to the other nature and that for two causes the first is least the natures should be mingled and confounded the other that there might foreuer remaine a difference betweene the natures Luke 24.39 For he that confoundeth the properties D. Luther confoundeth the natures and he that taketh away the properties taketh away the natures Thus farre concerning the distinction of the natures in the personall vnion now concerning the effects of the vnion Of the maiestie of the humane nature of Christ The effectes of the vnion are two fold the one the exaltation of the nature assumed to the highest and vnspeakeable dignitie and the communicating of the Idioms or proprieties The exaltation of the assumed nature to the highest and vnspeakeable dignitie is that honour which the person of the sonne of God hath communicated to the nature assumed so that he hath exalted it aboue all Angels men whom he surpasseth and excelleth by most farre and vnspeakeable degrees Heb. 14. Mat. 28.18 Iohn 17.2 Phil. 2.9 Ephes 1.20.22 That exaltation consisteth chiefly in these three points 1. In the personall vnion with the word because the humane nature is assumed into the vnitie of the person of Gods sonne so that it is the proper flesh of the eternall son of God Heb. 2.16 2. In the giftes because it hath the fulnesse of all the giftes of the holy spirite which can be in a creature that is to say it hath not onely some giftes as the rest of the Saints who haue them according to measure but all giftes not onely in number but euen in the most excellent degree Iohn 3.34 Those giftes giuen to the humanitie of Christ are created qualities because his humanitie is crea●ed That truely is adorned with most excellent and incomprehensible giftes but such as doe not ouerthrow and destroy the same 3. In the fellowship of the office both of the mediatour betweene God and the beleeuers and also of the head of the Church and of the Iudge of the whole world Mat. 28.18 Phil. 2.9 Ephesians 1.20.22 Psal 110.1.1 Timot. 2.5 1. Iohn 2.12 Heb. 7.25.26.27 and 8.1 and 9.24 Hitherto concerning the exaltation of the nature assumed now concerning the communicating of the Idioms or properties Of the communicating of the Idioms or properties The communicating of the Idioms or properties is a Sinecdoche whereby that is spoken of Christs person which is proper to one of the natures in the person Iohn 3.13 Actes 20.28 1. Cor. 2.8 1. Iohn 1.1 and 3.16 For because of the personall vnion of the two natures their properties are common to the person And the communicating of the Idioms or properties haue a place in the concreet or primitiue but not in the Abstract or deriuatiue The concreet is the name of the person The Concreet or primitiue is a name vnderstood of the person of Christ as these God Man Christ Iesus the sonne of God the sonne of man and so forth The Abstract is the name of the nature The Abstract or deriuatiue is a name vnderstood of one of the natures onely in the person of Christ as these the Godhead the manhood flesh Iohn 1.14 The seed of Abraham Heb. 2.16 And if in steed of the Abstract the Cōcreet be sometime vsed for the most part there is added a note or particle of difference restraining it to one or other of the natures sometime also it is vttered absolutely without any note of difference expressed yet vnderstood The notes of difference are these by nigh to as long as or vntill in through as much as and those that are like these Rom. 1.3.4 1. Tim. 3.16 Heb. 9.14 1. Pet. 3.18 and 4 1. Rom. 9.5 Actes 2.30 And by these notes of difference is signified the property of the one nature which cā not be spoken of the other nature As therefore it is most rightly sayd of Christ God is borne of the virgine suffered vnder Pontius Pilate crucified dead and buried and so forth So also it is most rightly sayd of the same Christ he is a man eternall present euery where omnipotent knowing all things Contrariwise as this is a most wicked and blasphemous speech to say the Godhead is borne of the virgine suffered vnder Pontius Pilate crucified dead and buried so this is a most wicked and blasphemous speech to say that the humanitie of Christ is eternall present euery where omnipotent knowing all things Thus much concerning the personall vnion Of the natiuitie of Christ The natiuitie of Christ is that whereby he was borne of the virgine Mary at Bethlehē that he might be our Sauiour Luke 2.4 Mat. 2.1.5 Thus farre concerning the incarnation of Christ now concerning his obedience Of the obedience of Christ The obedience of Christ is the other part of his humiliatiō whilest he was in all things obedient to his father It is also called the righteousnesse of Christ Esay 53. Heb. 5.8 Although he were the sonne of God yet he learned obedience by those things which he suffered Of the obedience of Christ there are two parts the fulfilling of the law and the paying of the punishment for our sinnes The fulfilling of the law is the first part of Christes obedience whereby in his whole life he performed for vs perfect obedience to the law of God Otherwise it is called the actiue righteousnesse of Christ and also the obedience of the holy life of Christ The paying of the punishment for our sinnes is the other part of Christes obedience whilest he for vs sustained the punishment which we had deserued that he might satisfie for vs the most seuere iustice of God so that we are no more bound to suffer that punishment seeing Christ hath payed it for vs. Otherwise it is called the passiue righteousnesse of Christ or the obedience of his Passion and death The partes of paying the punishment for our sinnes are both his Passion and death also his burying and descending to hell Of the Passion

of Christ The Passion of Christ is that part of his obedience when hee in body and soule sustained the wrath of God against sinne Heb. 9.26.28 and 10.11 Dan. 9.24 Esay 53.5 The parts of the Passion of Christ are the suffering of manifold euils euen presently from his birth to the institution of the holy Supper and that solemne and most grieuous Passion in the end of his life The manifold euils from his birth to the institution of the holy Supper are either of the body or of the soule The euils of the body were both pouerty dangers of life and also diuers infirmities He sustained pouertie Mat. 8.20 and 21.1.2 and 27.55 Luke 9.58 that he might enrich vs with heauenly gifts 2. Cor. 8.9 The manifold daungers of his life were these for which he was both led into exile Matth. 2.14.15 and also he did often yeeld for a time to the furies of the enemies Mar. 3.6.7 Iohn 7.1 and 11.53.54 The infirmities of the body Heb. 5.2 were hunger Mat. 4.2 and 21.18 and thirst Ioh. 4.8 wearinesse Iohn 4.6 teares Iohn 11.35 The euils of the soule were both ignorance and temptations as also sadnesse and ignominie For Christ knew not certaine things vntill he knew them by feeling Mat. 11.13 he knew not the day houre of iudgement Mar. 13.32 Of the temptations of Christ His temptations were the assaultes of the deuill and his ministers by which they did endeuour to seduce him to sinne Mat. 4.1 or else to confound him and lay him open to reproch Matth. 22.35 or to cast him into danger of life Mat. 22.15.16 But he was therfore tempted that he might helpe those that are tēpted Heb. 2.17.18 4.15 Also that he might teach vs by his example how we ought to meet with and resist the temptations of the deuill and his instruments His sadnesse was that whereby his soule was heauy and troubled Iohn 12.27 His ignominies were manifold vniust accusations and slanders Mat. 12.24 Mar. 11.19 reproches reuilings Iohn 8.48 His base account and neglect Mar. 6.3.4 reiection contempt and that truely among his owne Hitherto of the euils which Christ suffered from his birth euen to the last and solemne acte of his Passion That last and solemne act of Christes Passion comprehendeth both his striuing in the garden and his betraying as also his iudgement Of the striuing of Christ in the garden The striuing of Christ in the garden was that whereby he did terribly striue with the most vehement feeling of Gods horrible wrath against sinne and with the horrour of Gods curse Mat. 26.37 so forward Out of which he at the length scaping conquerour he brought so to passe that death should no more be fearefull vnto vs. The parts of his striuing are both the feare and trouble of the soule The feare of Christ was that he feared more and more that horrour hanging ouer him Heb. 5.7 The trouble of his soule was the sadnesse of his soule whereby it was most grieuously touched with sorrow anguish and griefe Mat. 26.37.38 The effectes of his striuing were his affectionate and earnest prayer and his sweating of bloud The affectionate and earnest prayer of Christ was that whereby he asked of his father the taking away of that horrour Matth. 26.39.42.44 Christes sweating of bloud was when sweat as it were drops of bloud did fall on the earth Luke 22.44 Thus farre concerning the striuing of Christ now concerning his betraying His betraying was this whereby Iudas Iscariot that vnfaithfull disciple receiuing thirty peeces of siluer for an hire deliuered Christ to the Princes of the Priestes and to the elders of the people of the Iewes Matth. 26.47 and so forward Thus much concerning the betraying of Christ Christ was drawen into two sorts of iudgement to the iudgement of the Priest and of the ciuill magistrate In the former false witnesses being produced in vaine he was at length by Cayphas slandered and condemned for blasphemy Mat. 26.57 and so forward The ciuill iudgemēt is two fold the one before Pilate the other before Herod by whō Christ was sent backe again to Pilate who at the length condemned him to be beatē with rods and to be crucified Now therfore Christ was condemned that he might redeeme vs from eternall condemnation His beating with rods is set downe Mat. 27.26 His crucifying is that wherby he was fastned on wood or on a crosse that he might take the curse of the law from vs vpō himselfe As it is written cursed is euery one who hangeth on a tree Mat. 27.38 Mar. 15.27 Luke 23.33 2. Cor. 13.4 Heb. 13.12 Iohn 19.18 Hitherto concerning the passion of Christ now concerning his death and those things which followed his death namely his burying and descending into hell The death of Christ is part of his obedience when commending his soule to his father hee gaue vp the ghost on the crosse to ratifie his Testament and to loose the feare of death Heb. 9.15.16.17 and 2.14.15 Of the burying of Christ The burying of Christ is that whereby his body was layed into the new tombe Mat. 27.59.60 Mar. 15.46 Actes 13.29 1. Cor. 15 4. Christ was buried for foure causes 1. That it might appeare that he was dead indeed 2. That hee might bury our sinnes with himselfe 3. That we might with him be buried to sinne Rom. 6.4 4. That he might sanctifie our sepulchres Of Christes descending into hell The descending of Christ to hell is the very last degree of Christes humiliation when he was kept downe in the graue vnder the bondes of death three dayes and three nightes as though he had bene vtterly ouercome Actes 2.24.27.29.30 Psal 16.10 Ephes 4.9 Mat. 12.40 The end of this is that he might abolish the sting of hell 1. Cor. 15.55 Hitherto concerning Christes humiliation now concerning his exaltation Conce Christes exaltation Christes exaltation is his state in which he was caried vp into the highest and vnspeakeable glory Luke 24.26 Phil. 2.9 That doth comprehend both his resurrection and manifestation of himselfe fourtie dayes vpon the earth and also his ascension into heauen and his sitting at the right hand of God his father Of Christes resurrection Christes resurrection is that whereby he hauing ouercome death and the dominion thereof by his owne diuine power he rose againe the third day from the dead and liueth with God for euermore 2. Cor. 13.4.1 Pet. 3.18 Rom 6.8.10 and 14.9 There are foure endes and vses of the resurrection of Christ 1. That he by his resurrection hath ouercome death to the intent that he might make vs partakers of his righteousnesse which by his death he hath purchased for vs. Rom. 4.25 1. Pet. 1.1 Thess 1.10.3.4.5.21 1. Cor. 15.16.17.54.55 Or that he by his resurrection hath fully confirmed to vs the redemption righteousnesse purchased for vs by his death 2. That the deuill and death being ouercome he might rule ouer the dead and the liuing Rom. 14.9 3.