exactly the Merits and Circumstances of every mans case that is to be tryed before him and who will be Advocate as well as Judge for every sinner as far as his case will bear And therefore as in humane Judicature or Exercise of distributive Justice amongst men when a Criminal is to be judged although his case be such as can neither admit of a Justification nor yet of a Plenary Pardon yet it is thought no more than reasonable that some consideration should be had of the rest of his Life especially if there be any Good Evidence of any Special Laudable Actions done by him they may be considered toward the abatement of utmost severity in the Penalty where any such abutement is possible as in Punishments which are not Capital So though I cannot assure any man that it shall be so in the case of any Persons falling under the necessary Sentence of Condemnation yet I think there is some Reason to hope that he that hath shewed Mercy to Men in this Life though he be not saved may find some Mercy in the degrees of his Punishment And that not only upon the account of such an abatement of his Guilt as was before signified respecting his sins of omission but also with respect to his sins of commission That there will be some kind of Counterpoise or Ballance of Good and Evil Works in the Divine Judgement and execution of Justice is not in my opinion to be rejected as a meer Rabinical or Platonical conceit Mal poâ—se qui ne contre poise Is the French Prov. though it be so too but seems to be in some measure probable as it is agreeable to the nature of Justice exercised amongst men privately and publickly The Summ of what I have said in the Explication of that Sense of the Apostles words which I here maintain is this That Charity if it be sincere as the Fruit of an unfeighed Faith and Repentance will be available towards a plenary Covering or Remission of a mans sins at the last Judgement If it be not so yet it will procure him some Remission at least if not Exemption from temporal Punishment in this Life besides other positive Rewards ordinarily given to the practice of this Vertue and may also be available towards the Abatement of the Degrees of positive Punishment in the Life to come I say of Positive Punishment commonly called Paena Sensûs Pain or Punishment of Sense because the Privative Punishment Poena Damni the Punishment of Loss can admit of no degrees of Abatement For the loss of Eternal Life will be equal to all that are not saved and can be no other from the Nature of the thing though the sense and affliction of that Loss may differ much according to the different capacities Men were in to obtain that Life and the inequality of the Means thereof received and rejected or neglected For in this respect the Loss of Eternal Life will be more tolerable as our Saviour saith for Sodom and Gomorrah for Tyre and Sidon that never had the like means of Salvation though they were not excluded from all means or possibility thereof then it will be for Bethsaida or Capernaum And so it will be proportionably for all People under like Inequality of the means of Life neither is it possible for any Person that never had any such Means as some other had and therefore cannot be guilty of Rejecting or Neglecting them I say it is not possible for any such Person to fall under the same Degrees of that necessary Punishment of the never-dying Worm as that is supposed to signifie the anguish and torment of the guilty Conscience This natural punishment of the Afflicted or afflicting Conscience for the same Reason must needs be abated also to him that hath done some Good works of Charity in this Life because his Conscience cannot charge him at the same rate as it must needs do him that hath totally neglected them under an equal or larger Ability Whether the substance of this Interpretation of the Text either necessary or most probable must be left to the judgment of the Reader but that it is neither Popish nor Singular as some may be ready to charge it I must take leave to challenge whiles I find that this Sense of the Words hath neither been received by all Papists nor rejected by all Protestants Some of the Pontificians baulking this Interpretation as Estius Tirinus and others which I insist upon do give the same which is given by most Protestants namely That Charity will cover the sins of other Men not the sins of the Charitable Person in such a Sense as is hereafter to be declared And some Eminent Protestants do admit that other Sense which I prefer as most probable And that not only in this Text but also in that of St. James wherein the same Phrase is used Jam. 5.20 He which converteth a sinner from the Errour of his ways shall save a Soul from Death and shall hide a Multitude of sins The origiginal Words are the same in both Texts and are thus Paraphrased by a Learned Doctor of our own Church Dr. Hammond It is a most excellent glorious Work which he hath wrought the Effect of which is that God will free him on whom this Change is wrought from Death eternal and perhaps from present temporal Death through Sickness fallen upon him for that sin vid. v. 15. And besides he will accept and reward the Charity of him that hath wrought that good Work with the free Discharge of whatsoever sins he hath formerly been guilty of but hath now repented of See the same Authors Annotation upon the Text. This Sense is agreeable to the words of the Prophet Daniel Dan. 12.3 They that turn many to Righteousness shall shine as the Stars for ever viz. in Heavenly Glory which necessarily implyes a Remission of their sins And why the zealous Endeavouring to convert sinners from the Error i. e. evil of their Way should be available to procure the Covering of a multitude of sins in him that makes it his care and study so to do a very good Reason may be given from the nature of the Act which imports one of the best Testimonies of Repentance that can be In that Penetential Psalm wherein David sues to Almighty God for the Pardon of his gross sins of Murder and Adultery he urges this as a Motive towards the obtaining of his Request Psal 5.13 Then will I teach Transgressors thy Ways and sinners shall be converted unto Thee And surely no greater Reparation can be made by sinfull man to Almighty God for the dishonour done to his Majesty by his own sins than when the penitent sinner together with his own Hearty repentance and amendment of Life shall endeavour also as much as lies in his power the Conversion of other sinners unto God So did Abner design to make his peace with King David after his professed Enmity and Rebellion first by Promising
Sense of his words and confining it without necessity to any other of less concern and weaker efficacy as most clearly that is which respects only the sins of other men But that which most strongly confirms this to be the special Sense of the Apostles words is to be collected from the Connexion of this Verse with the foregoing wherein he forewarneth the Jewish Christians to whom the Epistle is directed of a Fatal End that was near at hand and thereupon adviseth them what they should do to secure themselves in that event The end of all things is at hand be ye therefore sober and watch unto prayer And above all things have fervent Charity among your selves for Charity will cover a multitude of sins Whether by the end of all things be meant the End of the world according to the common Interpretation and that said to be at hand in a certain Latitude of sence because it was now the last time the last hour the last days as was elsewhere frequently declared by himself and his fellow Apostles 1 Pet. 1.5 and 2 Pet. 3.3 Heb. 1.2 Jam. 5.3 1 Jo. 2.18 Jude 18. Meaning the last Age of the World whereof although the duration was not to be so short as might then be imagined from such words as these yet it was not to be long in the eyes of God with whom a thousand years are but as one day as he advertiseth them in his second Epistle Chap. 3.8 I say whether it be the end of the World or which is more probable to be the Apostles meaning the Fatal Destruction of the obdurate Jews their Nation Politie Royal City and Temple foretold by Christ himself and often spoken of by his Apostles which was then very near indeed This being the ground and occasion of the Apostles Exhortation to fervent Charity leads us to the most reasonable Interpretation of these latter words of the verse For Charity will cover a multitude of sins That is when the end of all things which is near at hand shall come fervent Charity added to and joyned with Repentance signified by the foregoing expressions of Sobriety Watching and Praying is the likeliest means to propitiate the wrath of God deserved by a multitude of sins and to save you from the formidable judgement of God which is to be expected I appeal to any indifferent Person whether this coherence of the Apostles words doth not determine his meaning to relate to the sins of the Charitable Person much rather than the sins of others For although it be no less true that the same Vertue of Charity will cover a multitude of sins in other men in such a sence as shall be declared afterward yet how that should be referred as by the Context in this place it is to the end of all things That is how Charity should cover a multitude of sins in other Persons when the end of all things is come is hard to conceive but easie enough to understand how it may then cover a multitude of sins in the Charitable Person as shall be shewed in its due place The most rational Objection against this Interpretation and Argument for the preference of the other Sense is raised from a parallel Text Prov. 10.12 Hatred stirreth up strife but Love covereth all sins And if the Apostles words seeming to be borrowed from that Sentence must receive the same Interpretation with that it must necessarily be understood of other mens sins by the two contrary effects of Love and Hatred set forth in that Text the one stirring up strife the other preventing it by covering the faults of other men by not taking notice of them or looking favourably upon them in order to a peaceable and friendly living with them But to this Objection it may be answered 1. That it is not evident that St Peter did intend any quotation of that Proverb there being no such intimation in the Apostles words as usually there is when any Text of the Old Testament is cited in the New by those words as it is written or other like not found in this place But to this Objection together with some others a fuller answer shall be made afterward § 2. The probability of this Sense being thus declared from the Context the Truth of it remains to be further confirmed from many other Texts of Scripture but I suspend the addition of them till I have answered the second Question viz. Supposing the sins spoken of in this Sentence to be the sins of the Charitable person the question is what 's meant by the word Covering or in what Sense they may be said to be covered by Charity The Answer to this Question is to be collected from the ordinary use of the same Phrase in other places of Scripture wherein it is frequently used to express the pardon or forgiveness of sin as Rom. 4.7 quoting Psal 32.1 Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven and whose sins are covered So Psal 85.2 Thou hast forgiven the iniquity of thy People thou hast covered all their sins In these Texts I suppose no doubt can b◠made but that the Covering of sin signifies the same thing with the Forgiving So Neh. 4.5 Cover not their iniquities an◠let not their sin be blotted out i. e. let i◠not be forgiven And because Covering a◠thing is one way of hiding therefore ou◠Translators have rendred the same Greek word used in another Text of like signification by the word Hiding 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Jam. 5.20 He which converteth a sinner from the error of his way shall save a Soul from death and shall hide a multitudes of sins i. e. shall procure the Pardon of them as the words are commonly interpreted or shall obtain the Forgiveness of a multitude of sins in himself as the learned Grotius and Dr. Hammond interpret them agreeable to the fore-given sense of the same Words in our Text. The converting of a sinner from the errour of his Way is an eminent act of Charity whensoever it is industriously sought and intended whatever the success be Nor is there any appearance of Incongruity to say or suppose that to endeavour the Conversion of an other man and thereby to procure the Pardon of his sins should be available towards the obtaining of a pardon of sins in the charitable Procurer For if that Sense which I have given of the words of St. Peter be admitted to import a certain Truth as I doubt not to evince from many other Texts afterward the like Sense of this of St. James whether by him intended or not will necessarily follow to contain the same Truth The Converting of a sinner or the sincere and earnest Endeavour thereof being as before was said an eminent act of Spiritual Charity But for the probability of that Sense of St. James his words I must at this time refer the Reader to the Notes of the forenamed Doctor upon the Text because it would be too great an Excursion to undertake the Confirming
be sufficiently avoided by alledging that although it be true that Faith is the only thing that is effectual to Justification or remission of sin and that no other Act or Vertue can contribute any thing to this end yet neither are the forementioned Promises nor the Exhortations void or useless in reference to this effect 1. Because there is a Necessity of presence though not of efficacy of those other Acts and Vertues which are mentioned in the Promises and Exhortations And so Charity amongst other things may be a causa sine quâ non of Salvation and remission of sin in respect of its necessary presence together with Faith 2. Because the same things are necessary to the verification of Faith i. e. to manifest the Truth of it though they have no concurrent efficacy with Faith to the Justification or Salvation of the Believer 3. Because the practice of these Vertues is necessary or at least usefull for the assurance of a mans Justification Pardon of sin and Salvation though it be no ways effectual to any of those ends considered in themselves Heb. 6.10 For God is not unrighteous to forget your work and labour of love which ye have shewed towards his name in that ye have ministred to the Saints and do minister And 2 Pet. 1.5 10 11. And besides all this giving all diligence add to your faith vertue and to vertue knowledge and to knowledge temperance and to temperance patience and to patience godliness and to godliness brotherly kindness and to brotherly kindness charity i. e. an universal Charity extended to all men as well as Christian Brethren Wherefore ye rather give diligence to make your calling and election sure 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as it is in some Greek Copies and though these words are left out in our own and other Translations because they are so in ordinary Greek Copies yet the Sense of them is confessedly included in all readings for so an entrance shall be given you abundantly into the everlasting kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ And 1 Joh. 3.18 19. My little children let us not love in word nor in tongue but in deed and in truth And hereby we know that we are of the truth and shall assure our hearts before him So 1 Jo. 3.14 We know that we have passed from death unto Life because we love the brethren By these Texts and many more of like Sense it is evident that Charity is usefull to procure a mans assurance of those Benefits which are supposed to be obtained by Faith only Another verbal evasion of all the Arguments which are produced for the effectual concurrence of Charity and Good Works to the attainment of the great Benefits of final Justification and Salvation hath been vulgarly expressed by that trite saying of the Latin Father Bernard Bona opera sunt via ad regnum non causa regnandi Good Works are indeed the way to the kingdom of Heaven but not the cause of reigning Which words applied to the Doctrine by us grounded upon the words of the Apostle must have this Sense viz. That Charity is the way to obtain the covering or non-imputation of sin but no cause of it i. e a means but not a cause a very nice distinction to be considered further hereafter This I take to be a just account of the chief Answers that have been made to the premised Arguments from the Promises and exhortations of Scripture for the efficacy or validity of Charity and Good Works unto the remission of sin and the Salvation of a sinner Now in order to a sufficient reply to these Answers I think it necessary in this place to say something by way of explication of the Question tending to the clearing of the true Sense and meaning of the Doctrine what is meant by that Efficacy which any act that can be done by men may have towards the remission of their sins their Justification and Salvation It is evident that all these things are the proper and peculiar Acts and Effects of God himself who is the agent of efficient cause of them all And therefore 't is impossible that any Humane Act should have any direct or immediate influence or efficiency upon these Effects Who can forgive sins but God And 't is God that justifies and saves actively And therefore all the Efficacy that can be in Humane Acts towards these effects can be no more than preparative or passive And what can that signifie more than that they are certain Dispositions and Qualifications of the Patient or Subject to receive these Effects of Divine Grace Nor can Faith it self have any other influence or efficacy upon these Effects any more than Charity Faith it self doth neither pardon our sin or contribute any thing to that Divine Act by which we are pardoned Neither doth qualifie or save us any otherwise then by making such a Change or Qualification in us whereupon this Grace of Justification to Life is freely given us of God But against this Explication of the Efficacy of Faith to the Grace of Justification it hath been alledged that Faith in Christ doth not justifie as an act or qualification found in us but as it hath a peculiar Vertue not common to Charity or any other Act of ours and that is of apprehending and receiving Christ or uniting us to him and so making us Partakers of his Righteousness imputed to us by means whereof we come to be Justified our sins Covered and our Souls saved Whereunto I answer 1. By allowing an union of Believers with Christ the common Saviour to be indeed the true ground and foundation of the Benefits which we receive by him And that this Union is not barely Relative or Political such as is betwixt a King Lord or Husband and their respective Subjects Servants and Wives Nor only Pactional imputed and founded upon the Promise or Covenant of the Gospel to them that believe in him but a true and real Union effected by the Medium of the Holy Spirit communicated to them that believe and are baptized into the Faith of Christ 1 Cor. 12.13 For by one Spirit we are all baptized into one Body and 1 Cor. 6.17 He that is joyned unto the Lord is one Spirit ver 11. of the same Chapter But ye are washed but ye are sanctified but ye are justified in the Name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of God Rom. 8.12 If any man hath not the Spirit of Christ the same is none of his This Spirit of Christ is ordinarily called the Spirit of God abiding or dwelling in all true Believers whereby they are partakers of the Divine Nature as St. Peter speaketh as Christ also was 1 Cor. 3.16 1 Cor. 8.19 2 Pet. 1.4 though not in the same measure and manner Such a real Union there is between Christ the Head and all true Believers Members of his Body as there is between the head and members of a natural Body partaking of one and the
Good Works doth plainly suppose a negation of any antecedent necessity of Conversion and Repentance which are the two first things which he treats of under that Title of Thankfulness unto the Effect of our Justification and Salvation unless it be reasonable to say that a man is obliged to be thankfull for a Benefit before he hath it or to the end that he may receive it Conversion unto God and Repentance by this mans Doctrine must be looked upon as a thing not in it self necessary to our Justification or Remission of sin but as a Duty of Gratitude for this Grace given unto us either before or without respect to our Conversion And we are to repent and turn to God not that our sins may be forgiven but because they are so not that we may be saved but because we believe and are confident that we shall be saved So the whole practice of Christian Piety Holiness and Righteousness before God must proceed upon an account of Thankfulness to him for his free Grace that requires none of these things at our hands as conditions of our Pardon or Reconciliation with his offended Majesty Not but that some other Ends and Reasons and particularly those which we mentioned before are also named by the same Author as part of the necessity of Good Works But all are reduced unto the general account of Thankfulness and exclusive of any Moral causality or condition of Justification and Salvation How well this Doctrine agrees with Natural Religion the Scriptures of the Old Testament or even with the design of the Gospel I must leave to be judged by indifferent Readers Because I hold not my self obliged in this place to engage any further in the great Controversie about Justification by Faith alone or to take particular notice of the Texts of St. Paul commonly alledged for the Solifidian Doctrine which have been exactly considered by so many of our own Divines and my own Sense of them elsewhere delivered in brief Besides that the covering of sins attributed to Charity in the present Text though it extends to the Effect of Justification in the most Eminent Sense of the Phrase yet is not by our Interpretation limited to that signification but extended as hath been said to the removal of punishments in this life and to the abatement of them both in this Life and that which is to come which are the Benefits that may be obtained by Charity without any perfect Justification of a sinner Now if any Person that reads this Discourse having not been prepossessed with any Prejudice against this Doctrine or doubt of the Truth of it shall think that the Work is over-done by the Allegation of so many Texts and Arguments for the Confirmation of it and so much pains taken in answering Objections against it and shall therefore charge me with loading the Readers with a tedious Accumulation of superfluous Arguments thereby abating the Perspicuity of the Matter as Cicero speaks upon occasion of his long Discourse Perspicuitas enim argumentatione elevatur Remque meâ sententiâ minimè dubiam argumentando dubiam facis Tull. de Oratore Lib. 3. to prove the Existence of a Deity I must answer that this Objection can only be made by him that is ignorant of the contrary Doctrine commonly asserted and contended for not only by Lutherans and Calvinists abroad but by several of our English Divines till of late years going that way And 2. Although the bad Consequences of that Doctrine have been strongly averted by the Authors thereof in some of their Discourses yet the Event and Effect thereof hath to my own Knowledge in a multitude of Persons with whom I have had Occasion to converse notoriously abated the exercise of Charity and the Zeal or Conscience of Good Works supposed by this Doctrine to be neither absolutely necessary nor available to the Salvation of a Christian Many Persons I have known who upon this only Ground have neglected and slighted the practice of Charity not only in their Life time but also at their Death comforting themselves against all fear of Peril by this Neglect from a mistaken Notion and Confidence of Justification by Faith alone without Good Works The Sense of this dangerous Errour was one thing that moved me to the Pains of this Plain Discourse Having visited divers Persons in their Last sickness earnestly moving them according to the Injunction of our Church Liturgy in that Office to Liberality towards the Poor with little or no Success upon a Misperswasion of the no Necessity and as little Validity of such Works to the safety of their future State And though I have known Some and do believe there are many of that Perswasion that upon other Considerations and better Principles have been very Charitable and Forward to Good Works yet I have also had a particular Opportunity of observing Knowing something more than other Men concerning the Neglect of this Duty from the Place of my late Habitation for some Years belonging to an Office of Registry kept for the Probate and Custody of Wills and Testaments made within the Jurisdiction of the Arch-deacon of Norfolk wherein I have observed this last Record and Testimony of Charity which should have made up the Neglect and Defects of that Duty before to have been either wholly omitted or very penuriously and disproportionably expressed in many and indeed most Wills of Considerable Estates But to take off all appearance of Scandal to our Religion upon this Account it hath been or may be made Evident upon a just Reckoning that the Publick Good Works and Donations of Protestants to pious Uses in this Nation since the Reformation have been more than Equal to any that ever were done by Papists within the same Compass of Time in any precedent Age This personal Apology for the present Discourse might perhaps have been spared but was piously intended to the best Advantage and greatest Concern of all Persons in the time of their Life and at their Death There being certainly no possible Use to be made of Worldly Goods so Acceptable to God or so Advantagious to the Owners thereof both in their Lives and at their Death as that which I am labouring to promote from this Text. FINIS