eldest dye having issue a sonne though this issue be heire to B the other sonne after the death of Alice shall have the land as néerest of blood and by Greene and Seaton if there had béene severall issues of divers sonnes and daughters to the devisor when the remainder vested it should have gone to them all But here because the daughter of him had issue a daughter when the tenant for life died and there was not issue of any sonne at the instant to take from her or with her this Daughters Daughter shall have all and though there came an after borne sonne of any of the brethren she may detaine all c. for a remainder vested is not like to fée simple discended to a daughter where a sonne Posthumus may enter And if lands be letten for life the remainder to the right heires of I. if I. dye having issue a son which entereth after the death of the tenaÌ„t for life then dieth his son shal have nothing because he was not capax at the fal of the remainder likewise where there is a brother sister lands are let for life to an estranger the remainder to the right heires of the brother if he and the tenant for life die the sister may enter and retaine the possession and fée though the brothers wife bee afterward delivered of a sonne in like sort did the remainder rest in the child of Maâ—d in Eliz. viz. which recovered by award 30. Assi p. 47. But where there is father and sonne which sonne purchaseth and dieth without issue and an uncle entereth if two yeares after the father hath a sonne by the mother of the purchasor this sonne may enter and put out the uncle and the reason of Law is that hée that comes in by purchase must be capax at the time when the purchase vest in him but in case of discent it is not so requisite Perk. in his Chapter of devises saith that if a devise bée made to a colledge which is not a colledge at the time of the devise it is a void devise although afterward it be made a colledge upon the same reason is Dier 13 Eliz. 303. of a devise to an infant in ventre sa mere And where a man dieth seised and his daughter entereth c. a son borne afterward may enter but it is not so in case of purchase c. for if a woman consent to a ravishor her daughter and heire enter by the statute 6. R. 2. ca. 6. the son Posthumus shall not put her out no more shall he where a daughter and heire entereth for condition broken and where a daughter hath a villain by discent which purchaseth she entereth into the perquisits an after borne sonne her brother shall have that which discended viz. the villien but not the land these cases hath Brook Discents 58. out of the Doct. and Student 5. Ed. 4. fo 58. in the case of Elizabeth Venor agreeth concerning entry made by 6. Ri. 2. And so doth Hales and Mountague in the case of Wimbish and Talbois yet Mountague Chiefe Iustice taketh there a learned difference if a man devise land for life the remainder to the right heire male of the devisor the heires of his body c. now if the devisée for life die and a woman which is heire generall to the devisor entereth and hath afterward a sonne the sonne shall never out the mother in whom is vested the inheritance for want of other persons to take the falling remainder per le melior opinion 9. H. 6 yet he saith the cases of ravishment possession of a brother abatement of a bastard c are all to bee understood of fée simple for where the entry gaineth but estate taile one may beate the bush and another take the bird so if a man seised by discent from his mother make a feofment with condition c. and die without issue if a woman heire on the father side enter for condition broken an heire male or female on the mothers side may oust her Plow c. fo 56. a. b. 57. a. West 1. ca. 22. THen West goeth on with heire females that so soone as they come to the age of fourtéene yeares if the Lord for covetousnes will not marry them yet he shall not kéepe their land above two yeares after they have accomplished 14 within which two yeares if they be not married by their Lord they may take action against him for their inheritance to recover it without paying any thing for the custody or for marriage If so be that of their proper malice or through the mischievous counsell of others such women refuse convenable marriage offered by their Lord he may in this case retaine their land untill they be of 21. yeares and longer untill he shall receive the value of their marriage Littletons words upon this statute in his 2. booke cap. 4. BY Littleton if tennant by service of Chivalry die his here female being 14. yeares old or more the Lord shall have custody neither of the land nor body for at that age a woman may have a husband able to doe knights service but if such an heire be under 14. and unmaried at the time of her auncestors death the Lord shall have ward in her land untill she be of 16. yeares age West 1. cap. 22. which getteth the Lord 2. yeares to tender marriage without disparagement and if during these two yeares the Lord tender no such marriage shee may enter and oust the Lord. If such an heire female be married under the age of 14. in the life of her ancestor which ancestor dieth before she accomplisheth 14. yeares the Lord shall have no more but the wardship of her land till shee be 14. yeares old and then her husband with her may enter into her land and put the Lord out for this is out of the Statute because the Lord may not tender marriage to her that is already married for before the Statute of West such an heire female that was under the age of 14. at the death of her ancestor and had atteined afterward to the age of 14. yeares without any tender of marriage by her Lord made unto her might well enter into her land and put out the Lord as appeareth by the rehearsall and very words of the Statute which as it séemeth so saith Littleton was made altogether for the advantage of the Lord. A suspition of Littletons error NOw saving Mr. Littletons inspiration I am greatly afraid that ye shal not finde by the text of the Statute That an heire female being under 14. at the death of her ancestor might by the common law before this Statute enter and oust her Lord as soone as she had accomplished 14. yeare of age without tender of marriage The law perhaps was so but this Statute proves it not Againe I doubt Littleton was deceived in taking this Statute to be all for the advantage of Lords yet it is
likewise said by Davers 13. H. 7. 11. that this Statute was made for advantage of the Lords Glanvill ibro 7. cap. 12. HEare what Glanvill saith women shal be in ward vntill they be of ful age the Lord shal mary them being of ful age euery one of theÌ„ with their reasonable portion thoughthey be of ful age they shal remaine notwithstanding in their Lords custody vntil they bée married by his aduise for by the law of the land no woman heire can be married but by her Lords disposing and assent In so much that whosoever having a daughter or daughters heire or heires shall in his life time without grée of his Lord marry any of them he suffereth by the right and generall custome of the Realme perpetuall disinherison without ever recovering any thing but by the grace méere mercy of his Lord. If it be prooved that any woman holden in ward do forfit with her body she shal be deprived of her heritage her portion shall goe and accrue to her parceners And if they all offend the whole heritage shall fall as escheate to the Lord. But after such heires be once lawfully maried though they become widdow afterwards they shall no more be holden in ward nor then by their incontinency can they forfit any inheritance But yet they may not remarry without their Lords assent Thus far Glanvill Bracton his 2. Booke cap. 37. BRacton who as it may very well be gathered wrote one halfe hundred yeares after Glanvil and but very little before the making of West 1. In his 2. Booke and 37. Chap. finding it a question at what time an heire female should bee out of ward whether at 14. or 15. or at 21. acknowledgeth a greater capacity of deceipt and maturity of desire to be in women then in men And that therefore a woman might be out of ward at 14 and marry because at that age she is able disponere domui suae et habere cone et key et virum sustinere that is to order and dispose a to have the key clog at her girdle and to be a jolly stay vnto a man But this early emancipation of women heires he taketh to be onely of such as inherit laÌ„d of socage tenure for drawing toward the end of the Chapter he falleth in with Glanvil And saith of heires coparceners in Chivalry si ab initio omnes maiores extiterunt nihil ominus in custodia dominorum â—rint donec per consilium et dispositionem eorum maritentur quia sine ipsorum coÌ„silio et assensu mulier haereditateÌ„ habens maritari non potest non etiam in vita antecessorum quod si olim fecissent hereditatem amitterent sine spe recuperanâ—i nisi solum per gratiam Hodie tamen aliam paenam incurrent And presently hee sheweth the reason why they might not marry without their Lords assent viz. lest the Lord might be constrained to take homage of his capitall enemy or of a man altogether vnfit or vnworthy SECT X. How the law came to a certainty in the point of a womans being out of ward CHoose now whether ye will learne of Glanvil and Bracton what the law was in their time or of Mr. Littleton that wrote many score yeares after the making of Westm 1. In mine opinion neither did this law bring any advantage to Lords neither doth it shew that heires females oftenants in Chivalry might enter at 14. yeares neither is there any cléere proofe that the law was cléerely so taken The letter of the Statute doth not expresly give 2. yeares to tender mariage but rest raineth covetous Lords that they shall not hold the land above 2. yeres after the 14. which séemech plainly to import as it is reasonably taken both by Needh Billing 35. H. 6 that before the making of this law the age of male and female in this point tooke no difference I may be asked how it commeth then to passe that the law is so cléere in that which Littleton concludeth withall viêªt That the Lord shall not have two yeres to tender his woman ward marriage save onely where she is under 14. and unmaried at the death of her ancestor before the Statute it was either out of doubt that a daughter and heire should not be cleane out of ward at 14. or at the least it was doubted whether she should or no and the words of the Statute whatsoever Mr. Littleton saith maketh not the matter plaine enough But we have the helpe of Reverend Prisot in the Booke above mentioned 3. 5. Henrici 6. Westm 1. saith he was made in the time of Edward the first who purposing to put all the law into certainty and in writing begun to makes Bookes thereof by helpe of the most sage men of the law in this Realme Iudges and others And he made a Booke two yeares after the making of this Statute in which all the Statute is rehersed which booke goeth on and saith by expresse words that no woman shal be said to be vnder age thereby to be in ward after she is past the age of 14. Thus saith Prisot By him therefore and by other Iustices in the Eschequer chamber it was ruled cleere that where the Kings tenant in Chivalry died leaving his daughter and heire of the age of 15. yeare she should not be in ward And Billing saith for law that if betwéene the 14. and 16. yere when an heire female is in ward another ward falleth which holdeth in Chivalry of the first the Lord shall not have gard per cause de garde for the first ward is out of his power to all intents excepting onely tender of mariage And another Iustice saith if a tenant hold ofone lord bypriority of another by posteriority the daughter heir vnder 14. shal be in custody of the anteriour Lord till she be 16. but shée may enter vpon the land by posteriority as soone as shee commeth to 14. likewise if the Lord hath once maried this woman-ward after the age of 14. she may presently enter into her land for now the Lord hath had all that which to him belongeth the marriage And the course of the Chancery is to make livery before 14. cum exitibus but after 14. livery tantum vid. 4. Eliz. 213. Dyer Dyer 20. Eliz. 362. 1. Hen. 720. on livery for then such an heire is to have the profits by the law To come to an end of this matter I will not forget that even in Mr. Littletons daies very néere two hundred yeares after the making of West 1. by the last Statute that ever Hen. 6. made in the yeare of his reigne 39. ca. 2. it was established by Parliament that women being of the age of 14 yeares at the death of their ancestors without question or difficulty shall have delivery of their lands and tenements discended to them for so the Law of the land wils SECT XI A search for the true reason why a woman is hors du
garde at the age of 14. yeares THe principall reason that mooved our law founders so soone to set women out of ward is none other then hath béene already declared she is quickly able domui preesse viro subesse and her husband for her shall doe Knights service or some other for him and in his stead the cases are therefore 26 H. 8. fo 2 If the Kings tenant in chiefe having feoffees to his use marry his daughter vnder age to a man of full age and dye this daughter being heire is out of ward for her body though not for her land for that shal be in ward in this case an the Kings possession must bee voided by suite and livery But had she béene of full age of 14. yeares at her fathers death no such thing had néeded neither should she have bin in ward nor the King have any primer seisin For that was not as yet seene into by the Statutes of H. 7. which had given ward reliefe and herriots upon the death of him which died intestate and seised of onely a bare use againe if the King have a woman ward which he marrieth before she be 14 she shal be be to all intents out of ward at 14. and may immediatly sue her livery 28. H. 8. for as a ward masculine married by his Lord vnder 21. shal be sui luris at 21. so shall a ward feminine being maried before 14. bee out of ward at 14. altogether In the old Natura brevium in the writ de electione custodiae it is said that where the tenant marieth his daughter being under age to a man of ful age dieth the daughter shal be out of ward But if he mary his daughter being of full age to a man under age and die she shall be in ward This Mr. Brooke taketh to be no law even so doe I his reason is that no Lord can have the marriage of her that is already married or compell any heire to be twice married For if a tenant marry his son and die and then the sonnes wife dieth holden the Lord shall not have his body in ward to marry him Which is cleare specially if the sonne were infra annos nubiles at the time of his fathers death But certainely if the Lord couple his ward to a wife which dieth the ward is at full liberty for his body and shall not be married by his Lord. The reason why an heire female of full age married by her father to a man under age should not be out of ward must be because the supposition of law faileth her husband is not able arma portare officiis fungi militaribus vel pro iisdem faciendis cum alio pacisci But this notwithstanding me thinketh a woman married should bee out of ward for all her husbands nonage thought the woman bee but twelve yeares old a boy knight shall be out of ward for his body shall a woman innupta matura viro be in kéeping of any but her husband shall shee at 14. yeares age bee ward because she hath a husband but 19. yeare olds who should not have béene in ward had she had no husband at al non videtur The husbands ability to doe souldiers service is neither the onely nor the principall cause in mine opinion why a woman is by law out of ward at 14. yeares age But law going with the trace or tide of nature that hath made women as Bracton saith fit to carry cey and key cloge betimes suffereth them to mary very early And it should be a mischievous inconvenient unjust and unnatural law that should hold a woman from her husband or from her inheritance which is without offence of law maried fully able to bring forth children because her husband is not fully fit for all mannor of horsemanship Be not therefore good woman absterred from a young husband by old natura brevium SECT XII How a woman that hath beene in ward shall come by her land A Woman past 14. yeares of age at her ancestors death shall not be in ward And where she is in ward till 16. she may have action at 16. against her Lord for her inheritance according to the Statute By Littleton she may enter which standeth with reason for the Statute giving action to her affirmatiuely doth not disaffirme the entrie which she might have had by the auncient catholicke Common law if shee cannot or dare not enter she may have alone if she be alone or with her fellowes if she be a coheire a writ of mortdancester as well against her Lord as against any other abator Marlbridg ca. 16. But if shee be ward to the King against whom a mortdancestor writ of Aile Besaile or Cosinage then it melts into petition and she must sue for livery And where the King hath a woman in ward with some lands holden of other Lords in socage such a ward shall not so soone as shee is 14. yeare old have livery of that socage lands but she must arry unlesse she be married in the meane while till she be 16. because livery must be at once parcell not by percels Yet if 3. copartners be in ward to the King she which first commeth to age shall sue her livery and have partition vpon it SECT XIII Of Parceners FOr it must not be omitted there where a man dieth seised of any manner of inheritance having issue none but daughters to whom such inheritance descendeth when they have entered by Litt. they are parceners one heire to their common ancestor so are the heires of females parceners and they ought to come in by descent for if by purchase they are jointenants they are called partners saith he because they are compellable by a writ de partitione facienda to divide the inheritance amongst them Like or the same law is where a man dying seised having no issue his land goeth to his sisters or aunts that are partners if one of them dye before partition made her part shall descend to her issue and for want of issue to her coheires which shal be déemed and adjudged in by discent and not by survivour SECT XIII Difference betweene partners and jointenants FOr although partners have a conjoyned estate yet law maketh a great diversity betwixt them and jointenants Partners by the cōmon law are onely females or the heirs of females which also must be in by descents for if sisters makeajoint purchase they are jointnants and not partners Betwixt whom observe here the germaine apparent difference If two coparceners be of lands in fee simple wherof one before partition made chargeth her part with a rent dieth without issue her coparcener taking as heire and by discent shall hold the land charged But it is otherwise betwixt jointenants Also partners may devise and give away their part by testament so cannot jointenants SECT XV. Difference betweene partners and tenants in common ANd as in the cases precedent parteners are like tenants in
such Lease there shall be reserued yearly to the Lessors their heyres and successors to whom the Lands should haue come after the Lessers death if such Lease had not béene made or to whom the reuersion shall appertaine so much or more annuall ferme or rent as hath béene most accustomably yéelded c. within twenty yeares next before such Leases were made And euery person to whom the reuersion shal appertaine after the death of such Lessors or their heyres shal haue such remedies a aduantages to all intents against the Lessées their executors or assignes as the Lessor might haue had So that if the Lessor were seised in in speciall taile c. the issue or heyre of that speciall estate shall haue the reuersion rent and seruices c. Prouiso that the wife bee made party to euery Lease made by her Husband of any Mannors Lands Tenements or Hereditaments being the wiues Inheritance and that euery such Lease be by Indenture in the name of the Husband and the Wife and she to seale the same And that the ferme be reserued to the Husband and wife and to the heyres of the Wife according to her estate of Inheritance And that the Husband shall not in any wise alien discharge grant or giue any the rent or any part therof longer then during Couerture without it be by fine leuied by the Husband and wife but the rent shall remaine descend reuert or come c in such sort and manner as the land should haue done if no such Lease had béene made prouided that this act extend not to giue liberty of taking more fermes c. then before was lawfull c. nor inable Vicar or Parson to make or grant their Lease of Messuages Lands Tenements Tythes c. or Hereditaments belonging to their Church or Uicarage And it is further enacted that all Leases made within thrée yeares before the twelâ—th of Aprill in the 31 yeare of H. 8. made by Indenture sealed by person or persons of full age of whole memory not vnlawfully coacted nor vnder Couert Baron for terme of yeares of any Mannors Lands tenements or Hereditaments whereof the Lessor or Lessors were seiâ—ed in any estate of Inheritance to their onely vse at the time of their Lease-making and whereof the Lessées their executors or assignes at time of this act Making were in possession by vertue of the Lease no cause of re-entry or forfeiture being had or made shall be good and effectuall in law against the Lessors their heyres and successors according to the couenants and agréements specified in the Indenture c. so that there be reserued to the Lessors their heyres successors c. as much yearely rent as was at any time yéelded within 20. yeares before making of any such lease or else the Leases to be of none other effect then they were of before this act And moreouer it is ordained that no fine feoffement act or acts to be made suffered or done by the husband onely of any Mannors Lands c. being the Inheritance or fréehold of the wife during Couerture betweene them shall in any wise be or make any discontinuance or be preiudiciall to the said wife or her heyres or to such as shall claime right title or interest by her death But that shée or her heyres or they to whom such right or title shall appertaine after her decease shall and may lawfully enter into such Mannors Lands c. any such fine feoffement or other act notwithstanding except fines onely leuied by Baron and Feme wherunto the wife is priuie and a partie Prouided that this clause extend not to giue any liberty to any Wife or her heyres to auoid any Lease hereafter to bee made of any her Inheritance by her husband and her selfe for 21. yeares or vnder or for thrée liues at the most whereupon yearely rent shall be reserued vt supra Prouided also that this act extend not to any Lease heretofore made by Ecclesiasticall or other person by Coâ—eâ—t or Common-seale which Lease is made voyd by act of Parliament nor to make good any Lease of any Ecclesiasticall person made by câ—uent seale or otherwise or of any other person attainted of â—reason c. SECT XXIII The Exposition THis Law in the first part is affirmatiue or I may say leasatiue a leasing Law or Statute Tenant in fée-simple iure mero suo nothing restrained by it No more is Tenant iure vxoris but he may make a Lease for yeares to continue till the last hower of Platoes great yeare or till King Arthur come againe for all this Statute for no greater rent then thrée bundle of bulrushes as well as he might before although her land were neuer leased before since Noaâ—s floud and such a Lease shall bind him during Couerture But if the Husband make a Lease by paroll or by poll déede or by Indenture and the wife not partie or if the Land were not informer times demised or if the ancient rent or more be not reserued then as the earth stayeth in the worlds center vpon nothing but Gods prouidence and permission the Demisée leaneth vpon no Statute but hangeth at the wiues courtesie ponderibus librata suis as at Common Law SECT XXIV Law before the Statute HOw that was yée shall perceiue by the cases following If before the Statute of quia emptores tenant in fée iure vxoris infeoffed a stranger expressing no tenure the feoffés was to hold of the Baron by such seruices as he and the Wife held by of the Lord Paramount If the Baron and Feme had ioyned in a Feoffement to hold of the Baron c. th expressed tenure had béene voyd and the Feoffee must haue held of them both by such seruices as they held ouer c. If the Baron in this case had died and the Wife accepted the rent in her viduity this acceptance here barred her for euer from auoyding the Feoffement by Writt of cui in vita If Tenant iure vxoris and his Wife had made a Feoffement to hold of the Wife the Feoffor should haue held of them both and if the Wife had died the Feoffor was to hold of the Baron till the feoffement were auoyded by sur cui vâ—a Par. 126. Againe if before this Statute of 32. H. 8. Tenant in fée iuro vxoris and his wife had ioyned in exchange for other lands in fée and the exchange being executed the Husband had dyed now the Feme by entring in vpon the Land giuen her vpon the exchange should be barred for euer from defeating the exchange But if it had béene made by the Baron alone she might haue defeated it notwithstanding her entrie for that could giue noseisin by force of the exchange to her that was neither partie nor priuie to it Par. fo 8. And if a man seised in right of his Wife c. make a Lease for life rendring rent with a letter of Atturney to his Wife to make liuery the Wife deliuers
of the death of her sonne If a woman haue issue a sonne which is murdred and there is no heire to him on the fathers side by Billing chiefe Iustice Needham and Choke none vncle nor other kinsman which must coâ—â—â—y as heire by the mother can haue the Appeale because the Statute before remembred excludeth her from whâ—m they must deriue Briaâ— Littleton Nâ—ale and the chiefe Baron are contra For said they the Vâ—cle on the â—â—ther side may haue Appeale of the Nephewes death which the father from whom the Vncle must conueigh 〈◊〉 haue any more than the mother But Billing tels them the Cases are nothing like for a father may haue an Aâ—peale of his Ancestors death but so cannot another iâ— any case the bridge therefore being once broken â—d eâ—â— the meane of conueyance stopped and disabled the Appeale is altogether and for euer taken away â—7 Eâ—â— 4 fol. 1. And so is it adiudged likewise â—0 Hen. 6. fol. â—â— where there was grandfather mother and sonne the mother died the grandfather was murthered the sâ—nnâ— might not haue Appeale because hee conueyed by a woman scilicet by his mother and there it was stood â—â—â— that an Appeale shall neuer discend but hee to whom it first falleth shall haue it and if he dye the Aâ—tion dâ—â—â—â— It is a good case well argued in the booke at large Sée the booke of 11. Hen. 4. 1â— It appeares that in Appeale oâ— Rape by the husband ne vnques accouple c. nest pâ—â—â— for the husband in Act or possession shall haue that wâ—erâ— the marriage is not void and yet that plea is good in Appeale by the wife of the death of her husband for there shée shall not râ—uenge his death to whom she was not lawfully married and see 50. E. 3. 15. Brâ—â—â—on agrées with Bracton qui null â—ee puisseare appeller de felonie de mort â—orsque de mort son baron â—uâ— deins â—â—â— lâ—â—our enter ses braâ— And it is true that by the ancient Law neither woman or other person might haue appeale of death vnlesse the appellant â—â—â—â— prâ—sâ—nâ— or did sée the dead man at the tiâ—â— when hee was slaine But the Law is changed by â—loâ— cap. 9. which willeth that no Writ henceforth shall goe out of Chaâ—â—â—ry for the dâ—â—â—â— of man to enquire whether a man killed another by â—â—â—aduenture or in his owne defence or â—therwiâ—e â—eâ—â—niouâ—â—y but he shall remaine in prison till the comming of Iustices errants or gaiâ—â— deliuery and before them put himsâ—lfe to the country for triall of good and euill And if it â—e â—ound by the couâ—try that what he did was â—â— his owne defence or by â—â—sadâ—enture the Iâ—â—â—â—â—es â—â—â—ll dâ—e the King to wit and thâ— King doe the party grace â—â—luy pleiâ—â— Also it is prouided that no Appeale shall be â—â—â—ted si le gâ—â—r menâ— come 〈◊〉 aâ—â—eâ— â—uâ— if the Appeal ouâ— shew tâ—â— dâ—â—d the yâ—â—re the day and â—oâ—â—â— â—â—â—â—mps lâ—â—â—y the Towne where and the weapon wherewith the sâ—aughter was committed â—he appeale shall stand goâ—d and â—â—â—â—e appeale shall bee abated for want of â—resh â—uâ—â— iâ— it bee perâ—â—ed within a yâ—â—re and a day after the â—â—â—t coâ—â—iâ—â—â—d Before this Statute the Appellâ—nt alwayes 〈◊〉 oâ—â—â—s proper view â—ow â—â— nâ—â—ds not The 〈◊〉 â—hat â—â—â—ll â—â—ing â—his appeale 〈◊〉 be wiâ—e to thâ—â—aâ—â—◠〈◊〉 â—◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 â—or â—â—enâ— accouple in loyall matrimony is a good plea in barre oâ— her appeale as before is said But this plea is not so perâ—mptory but that after the Bishop hath â—â—◠〈◊〉 â—â—yâ—â—ment â—ccoâ—â—â—e c. the Defendant may afterward â—â—â—ad non culpable and this in 〈◊〉 in vitâ—â— but he cannot â—â—â—ad on to the fellony immediately vpon the â—â—rst plea. Therefore here is requisâ—te two trials as it séemeth 50. â—â— â—â—â— Idem 27. 〈◊〉 p. â— Furthermore it is requistâ—e that she be sole and vnmarried married that made this Appeale for if she marrie again 〈…〉 her Appeale is gone though the new married husband be dead within the yeare and day after his death that was slaine Yea and not onely a widdow which hath an Appeale hanging abateth her Appeale and loseth it for euer by new marriage but also if after Iudgement and before execution she take an husband she loseth execution of the Iudgement 11. H. 4. fol. 48 By Brian and Hussey 2â— F. 4 fol. 72 72. If a woman pursue her Appeale till the Defendant be outlawed and then marrie she may sue execution And so did Skrâ—â—nâ— hold the Law to be in the 〈…〉 â— â— â— â—ut Gaseoâ—gâ—e Chiefe Iustice denyes it And â— or 2. Mariae Brooke Appeale 100 the Iustice of the Kings Bench did all agrée that a widdow loseth her Appeale by taking of a second husband Et idem videtuâ— saith Brooke de executione for the reason wherefoâ—â— this Action is giuen to a widdow is not as Glanuell makes it Quia vna caro est v 〈…〉 vxor For then the Baron might haue an Appeale Dâ— morte vâ—oris which is neuer granted but her heire shall haue it And if the wiâ—â— kill the husband his heire shall haue the Appeale And I hearâ— saith Stanford Pleeâ— de Coron fol. 5â— it hath been adiudged If she King pardon the woman all manner of treasons the heires Appeale is gone But the true reason why a woman hath the Appeale De morte viâ—i is because by his death shee is thought lesse able to liue and maintaine her selfe so said the Iudges in Q 〈…〉 ne Maâ—â—â—s dayes and that therefore when she taketh another husband ccâ—â—ante causa ceâ—â—at effectus and her Appeale is gone like as a widdowes Quarentine is determined when she is once remarried But where a woman continueth sole she 〈…〉 d â—â—ne other shall haue this Action either in her life or after though she dye within the yeare and before Appealâ— commenced 20. H. 6. 42. It is not requisite that the Appellant here â—e dowable of his possessions which is slaine for though a woman â—lope from her husband and neuer be reconciled yet 〈…〉 may haue Appeale of his death per Iâ—glibie 50. â— â— 15. Sir Edw. Cokes Comment vpâ—n Littleton fol. 3â— saith That if the Baron be attainted of treason c. his wife shall not be indowed and yet if any doe kill him the wife shall haue an Appeale So likewise agrées the Booke of 35. H. 6 58. where in an Appeale de morâ—â— viri the Defendant said the Baron wâ—s indicted arraigned forâ—d culpable and iudgement to be hanged c. and to the felonie nient culpable It was agréed that there is no such corruption betwixt a man and his wife by Attainder as is the corruption of bloud betwixt a man and his heire for the heire of a man attainted shall not haue an Appe 〈…〉 e and she is his wife notwithstanding the Attainder but the other is not heire And per Markham If an Appeale bee not good the Defendant shall not bee arraigned
at the Kings suit when the Plaintiffe is at non suit Also in this case it was deliuered that the Marshall of the Kings Bench the Viscount or such Officer that is commanded to execute a man condemned is a Felon if hee execute him in other manner than he is commanded as if he cuts off his head where the iudgement was he should be hanged But if he doe execution according to the iudgement then he may iustifie in an Appeale and néeds not plead non culpable Yet in Appeale against a Iudge for adiudging a man to death he cannot iustifie but must néeds plead non culpable and giue the matter in euidence Simile 27. assi p. 41. where in Appeale de morte viri the Desendant pleaded vtlagary de felonie Iudgement si c. Shard said it was no more lawfull to kill an Outlaw than to kill another man and therefore the Defendant pleaded non culpable Ludd said that one was excused of the death of the Baron of Woodhall by the Outlawrie c. It appeares now what wife and of what husbands death she may haue an Appeale Stanford in his third Booke cap. 15. notes that in ancient time there were certaine presumptions so vehement that they were a condemnation of the partie without other triall they â—oe not so at this day but euerie man shall haue his triall how great soeuer the presumption were But the vehemencie of presumption may oust battaile For 6. H. 3. The Coroner and others testified that the Defendant was taken cum cultello sanguinolento c. ideo consideratum est quod se non defendat per duellum SECT II. How a woman shall sue this Appeale IT séemes that all Appeales ought to be sued in proper person and not by Atturney as Appeale of Mayhem must be in proper person 21. E. 4. 7â— 73. A woman which was grossment enseint sued this Appeale and the Defendant was attainted the womans appearance was recorded for the whole terme and yet by the better opinion she might not pray execution by her Councell but ought to come in proper person therefore one of the Iudges did ride to Islington to her to sée if she were aliue and desired execution which she required and the Defendant had iudgement An Appeale is called but a suit of reuenge and therefore is not much fauoured Dver 5. M. 152. If one of the Defendants in an Appeale makes default the Court cannot procéed but otherwise in an Inâ—itement as it is there said This by Common Law If any Liege subiect be slaine by another subiect in any forreine Realme the wife of him which was slaine may haue an Appeale in England before the Constable and Marshall c. And this is by Statute 1. Hen. 4. cap. â—4 Stanford fol. 65. Feme auerâ— appealâ— de mort viri tue in escoâ—e per commen Lâ—y comme semble 13. H. 4. Brooke 153. By the said Statute it is also ordained that none Appeales from henceforth bee pursued in Parliament Likewise I finde by Statute vâ—z 15. R. 3. cap. 2. That of the death of a man anâ— of Mayhem done in great ships being and houering in the streame of great riuers onely beneath the bridges of the same nigh to the sea and in none other places of the same riuers the Admirall shall haue conusance c. sauing to the King all manner of forfeitures c. SECT III. The Statute 3. H. 7. cap. 1. BVt for the ordinarie course of suing of Appeales 3. H. 7. cap. 1. layeth the best foundation This Statute reciteth the Law of the land to be that if any man bée slaine in the day and the Felon not taken the Township shall bee amerced If any man bee wounded and in perill of death the offender should be arrested and put in suretie till knowledge be had whether hée which is hurt will liue or no. And where any man is found dead the Coroner vpon view of the body should enquire who were the murderers their abettors consenters and who were present at the murder committed whether man or woman and he ought to inroll and certifie their names The vse had béene also as saith the Statute that within a day and years after any death or murder the felony should not bée determined at the Kings suit and that for sauing of the parties suit or else the partie was agréed with by which it is the more chargeable and thereby murders were increast and also he that will sue in Appeale must sue in proper person The constitution of this Law therefore is that euerie Coroner henceforth doe his office and that if any man be slaine or murdered the slayers murderers their abettors maintainers and comforters should bée indicted arraigned c. at the Kings suit within the yeare after the felony or murder done without tarrying a yeare and a day for any Appeale And if any either principall or accessarie thus arraigned bée acquited at the Kings suit withâ—n the yeare and day the Iustices before whom he is acquite shall not suffer him to goe at large but either remit him againe to prison or let him to baile till the yeare and day be past And the wife or next heire of the partie slaine may take their Appeale within the yeare and day after the felony or murder done if the benefit of Clergie be not yet had with all aduantages that acquitall or Attainder at the Kings suit notwithstanding Furthermore the wise or heire of the person slaine or murdered may commence their Appeale in proper person any time within a yeare after the felonie done before the Sheriffes and Coroners c. or before the King in his Bench or Iustices of Gaole deliuerie And the Appellant in any Appeales of murder of death of man where battaile by the course of Common Law lieth not may make Atturney and appeare by the same in the said Appeales after they bée commenced to the end of the suit and execution of the same And if the murderer doe escape vntaken the Township c. shall be amerced and the Coroners shall deliuer their inquisition afore the Iustices of the nâ—xt Gaole deliuerie which Iustices shall procéed against the murderer if they bee in Gaole or else the said Iustices shall put the Inquisition before the King in his Bench. The Statute also giueth the Coroner thirtéene shillings and foure pence for taking inquisition super vâ—sâ—m corporis By this Statute and the other of Gloc. cap. 9. a womon perceiues that within a yeare and a day she commeth timely enough with her Appeale Stanford notes that though the Law haue béene taken otherwise if hée which is robbed make fresh suit albeit he commence not his Appeale two or thrée yeares after the robberie yet his Appeale is good for if the partie robbed haue his endeuour to take the Felon he may commence his Appeale at any time at the Iustices discretion For Gloc. if it be rightly vnderstood seemeth to speake only of Appeales de mort And
to make void the Obligation or Statute if there be cause with a seuere penalty of 300. li to bee forfeited by the Sheriffe if hee did not execute she same Writ duly according to the tenure thereof This Statute was too méeke and gentle something like him that made it H. 6. SECT XXVII 3. H. 7. c. 2. BVt 3. Hen 7. cap. 2. beginning with a better complaint against takers for lucre of maids widdowes or wiues hauing substance of lands or goods or being heires apparant which takers sometimes married them and sometime desâ—owred them to the breach of Gods Law and the Kings the disparagement of such women and vtter heauinesse and discomfort of their friends ordaineth that whosoeuer taketh against her will vnlawfully any maid widdow or wife shall together with the procurors abbetters and receiuers of any such women knowing her to bee so taken against her will bee felous and euery of them béene reputed and iudged as felons principall But this extendeth not to taking where a woman is claimed as a ward or bondwoman And Mr. Lambard noteth that anno 3. 4. Phil. Mar. this Statute was construed to make no felony vnlesse the woman married were either taken or deslowred SECT XXVIII 4. 5. Phi. Mar. cap. 8. THerefore to supply what hitherto was wanting against takers and also intisers rauishing by allurements and flatterers 4. 5. Phil. Mar. cap. 8. saith that for want of sufficient Law it remained still a famlâ—ar and common mischiefe in the Realme That maidens and women children of Noble men Gentlemen and others which were heires apparant or had lands in great substance left by their Ancestors or friends by flattery trifling gifts or faire promises of light persons and also by subtility of such as bought and sold them for reward were many times allured to contract matrimony with vnthrifty persons and thereupon oftentimes with sleight or force were taken from their parents friends or kinsâ—olke to the high displeasure of God the disparagement of the children and perpetuall condolence of their friends Therefore it is ordained that it shall not bee lawfull to conuey any maid or woman child vnmarried or vnder the age of sixteene yéeres out of the possession and against the will of her father or of such person to whom by his will or otherwise in his life time he shall haue appointed the kéeping education and gouernance of her except such taking as shall bee without fraud by the Master or Mistris or Gardian in Soâ—age or in Chiualry of or to such maid or woman child And if any person that is aboue the age of fourtéene yéeres shall conuey or cause to bee conueyed any such maid being within the age of sixtéene yéeres out of the possession and against the will of the father or mother or any other person which then shall haue by lawfull meanes the order keeping education or gouernance of her the offender duly attainted or conuicted other than such of whom shee shall hold by knights seruice shall suffer two yéeres imprisonment without baile or mainprise or par such fine as shall bee assesed by the Quéenes Councell in the Starchamber And if any shall take away and deflowre any such maid or woman child or shall against the will of her father or he not knowing if the father be in life or without the assent or knowledge of the mother hauing â—ustody â—nd gouernance of the child the father being dead by letters messages or otherwise contract matrimony with any such mard except it bee by the consent of the person or persons by interest of wardship intituled to haue the marriage he shall suffer being lawfully conâ—â—ted fiue yéeres imprisonment without baile or maineprise and pay such fine as shall bee assessed in the Starrechamber c. the one moity of all which fines shall bee to the Quâ—â—e and her successors and the other to the grieued And the Councell in Starrechamber by Bill of complaint or information and Instices of assise by inquisition or indictment in which processe shall be awarded as inditements of trespasse at tâ—e Common law haue authority to heare and determine the offen â—s Moreouer if any woman child or maidâ—n being aboue the age of twelue yéeres and vnder sixteene doe at any time consent to such person as shall make contract of matrimony contrary to the forme of this Statute the next of kin to whom the inheritance should come after her death shall from time of such assent haue and enâ—oy all such lands tenements and her editaments as shee had in possession reuersion or reâ—â—â—nder at the time of assent during the lâ—te of such peâ—son so contracting matrimâ—ny and after her â—â—cease so contracting c. then the said lands shalldescen reâ—eâ—â— remaine and â—ome to such person or persons other than tâ— him that shall so contract matrimony as they should haue done in case this Statute had neuer beenâ—mâ—deâ— But thâ—s At extenâ—eth not â—o diâ—â—â—sh any libeâ—ty custome or authorite in London or like corporations as touching Orphancs their lands goods or chattels Sée Ratcliffs Case in Sir Edward Cokes 3. Rep. fol. 38. vpon this Statute of 4. and 5. of Phil. and Mar. In an Eiectione firme vpon speciall pleading a speciall verdiâ—t was thus in effect that William Wilcokes married the daughter and heâ—re apparant of Iohn Edols and Alice his wife and hath issue by her Iohn Elizabeth and Martha William Wilcokes afterwards by his will in wrighting appoints the order custody education and gouernment of his said three children to their said grandfather and grandmother during the grandfather and grandmothers liues and then dyes the widdow of Wilcokeâ— marrieth Raphe Radcliffe Iohn Edois dyes and his widdow being Tenant in â—ee simple of the lands in question holden in soccage by her will deniseth them to her grandchild Iohn Wilcokes in taile the remainder to Elizabeth and Mortha and the heircs of their two bodies equally to bee diuided the remainder in fee to her said daughter and heire apparant the mother of these thrée deuisées and dieth Iohn Wilcoke dieth without issue his sister Elizabeth married one Andrewes and he his wife and her sister Marthâ— enter the lands and were seised accordingly and Marâ—ha abiding with Raph Râ—tclâ—ffe and his wife being aboue fourtéene and vnder sixtéene yéeres of age with Raph Râ—tâ—lâ—ffe his consent and of her owne accord departs eight miles off from them where six houres after shee was married to Edward Raâ—cliffâ— who enters and made the Plaintisâ—e his lease And the issue being whether Elizabeth Ratcliffe the wife of Raph Ratcliffe had the custody of Martha the wife of Edward Râ—tcliffe the lessor at the time of their contract and marriage all the Iudges and Coâ—rt of Kings Bench resolued that Elizâ—beth had the gouernance of her daughter Martha at the time of her contract and marriage within the intent and meaning of the Statute It was resolued in that case that those words father mother within the
THE LAVVES RESOLVTIONS OF WOMENS RIGHTS OR THE LAVVES PROVISION for WOEMEN A Methodicall Collection of such Statutes and Customes with the Cases Opinions Arguments and points of Learning in the LAVV as doe properly concerne WOMEN Together with a compendious Table whereby the chiefe matters in this BOOKE contained may be the more readily found LONDON Printed by the assignes of IOHN MORE Esq and are to be sold by IOHN GROVE at his Shop neere the Rowles in Chancery-Lane over against the Sixe-Clerkes Office 1632. A PREFACE TO THE READER VArious are the Conceipts and Judgements of Men Nature teacheth each to preferre his Owne Hence it is that the number of Bookes multiply insomuch that according to the Wise-man Thereof is no end To expect new Matter were to give the old Proverb the Lie Nihil jam dictum c. It 's enough if what was before be now so changed by Method and Application that it shewes as new and becomes more ready for Vse Habit and Apparell alter the Shape sometimes the Conditions of Men. An old Theame in a new dresse ingenuously contrived makes the Composer an Author Why then should this Booke blush to shew it selfe or doubt to bee servant to the Printer whose Master neverthelesse it is To give it as absolute or free from faults were to make it more then the Worke of Man whose incident is Error Such as it hath are rather accidentall then originall and may bee fairly excused Not to insist That the Author's dead That it was long since collected Alteration of some Cases by Moderne Statutes Or this the first Impression Goodnesse is the Parent of Confidence The Act is crowned by the End which was this A publique Advantage and peculiar Service to that Sexe generally beloved and by the Author had in venerable estimation To implore their Patronage and prevaile were to guard this Booke beyond Opposition The strong neither needs nor desires a Champion Meeknes protects it selfe What here you finde reall and perfect therefore accept It will subsist Remit the rest the rather for that nor the Tract nor This is peremptory But onely proposed for your favorable sense and Approbation I. L. TO THE READER BY whom this following DISCOVRSE was Composed I certainly know not neither by what inducement the Authors paines therein was procured But if for no other consideration then to make this scattered part of Learning in the great Volumes of the Common-Law-Bookes and there darkly described to be one entyre body and more ready and clearer to the view of the Reader his love deserves thanks and his endeavours kinde acceptance The VVorke hath beene carefully and with much labour and diligence collected The Theame as the subject is The Lawes Resolutions of Womens Rights which comprehends all our Lawes concerning VVomen either Children in government or nurture of their Parents or Gardians Mayds VVives and VVidowes and their goods inheritances and other estates It is profitable and usefull Learning to be well knowne I am sure it will please all them whose actions are guided virtutis amore and offend none but those ill manners who can have no other antidote made them then formidine poenae for it sets forth Law and Iustice things honest and things convenient I had such a good conceit of the matter and frame of the whole VVorke that having a Copie there of lying by me somtimes within the Compasse of a Lent vacation I pluckt my intentions from my own course of Studies and cast them upon this And those vitia Scriptoris and Authoris which I found I amended and haue added many reasons opinions Cases and resolutions of Cases to the Authors store wherfore those oversights or neglects that thou maist impose upon the Printer or mee which I suppose wil be some if not many thou shalt have thanks to supply or amend which is all I expected and more then the Author as I beleeve had or now being dead can receive and perhaps thou maist have a better reward for the old Adage is true pretium non vile laboris Vale T. E. THE TABLE ACceptance pag. 177 Accidents of Marriage pag. 62. Actions by the Husband Wife how brought 196. 197. Acts done by the Wife when good 141. Age of a Woman at 7. her father shall have ayde at 9. shee 's Dowable at 12. she may consent to Marriage at 14. out of Wardship at 21. shee may make a feoffement 7. Appeale of the husbands death 332. How it shall be sued 338. within what time it shall be brought 141. before whom it shall be sued 343. Pleas in Appeale 353. 355. Attainder of the Husband loseth the Wives Dower 152. Chattells reall of the Wife what interest the Husband hath in them 130. Contribution of Parceners 47. Curtesie of England what 79. there must be Marriage 80. and seisin ibid. and issue 81. 87. shall not be of a reversion ibid. nor of a right 82. nor after the Husbands discontinuance 83. nor of an estate suspended ibid. nor of a bare use 84. A second Husband shall bee tenant 85. when the title thereof begins 88. How the Husband shall lose it 9. It shall be though the child die 89. Clergie in appeale 364. Damages in an appeale 365. Declaration in an appeale 348. Degrees how they shall bee accounted 76. Descent how altred 12. Discontinuance 155. Divorce what 64. 122. Causes thererof as Impotencie 65. Affinity 66. long absence 66. Dower 90. what it is 91. when to be recovered 93. what seisin is requisite 93. the husband must have both Frank-tenement and Inheritance 95. Of what things it is granted 98. of what not 99. Of what inheritance the husband must be â—eised 101. When given of an estate determined and when not 103. How much it shall be and how held 106. 107. It shall be of the Husbands best possession 108. when the wife may elect 109. when of Land and rent issuing out of that Land 109. At the Church-doore 111. Lost by elopement 144. How the Husband may hinder it 148. lost by his attainder 152. who may assigne it 243. 244 c. what things shall be assigned 281. Election of Lands Dowable by the wife 109. of Dower or loynture made during the coverture 184. Elopement a woman thereby loseth Dower 144. Executor of his own wrong 129. Executorship 233. Exposition of the words Lands Tenements Hereditaments 188. of the Stat. of Westminster 1. cap. 4. 17. of the Stat. of 32. H. 8. cap. 28. 166. 170. 173. of the Stat. 27. of H. 8. cap. 10. 183. Evidences detained 261. Felonie 206. Fines 176. Fourcher what 218. Forfeiture of Estates 313. Frank-Marriage what 73. whether it may bee to a man 74. It may be given at before or after Marriage 74. That word maketh inheritance 75. Heyre what and how 8. 9. Hermaphrodite what 5. Hotchpot what 40. 41. when used 42. Husband and Wife are one person 116. 119. where one and where severall persons 4. they cannot enfeoffe one another 120. How Lands
the woman they shal remaine ioyn-tenants of the Franke Tenement and the Inheritance is gone Tailâ— 9. But per Dyer fo 147. and 12. assi p. 22. and 19. assi p. 2. If Tenants in Franke Marriage be diuorced the Woman shall haue all the Land for the Land was giuen for the womans sake and for her aduancement and by Iohn Bracton her husband hath no more in it but Custodiam as he is the wiues tutor and Guardian By the same reason therefore that the wife shall haue the land if she be diuorced by the same I should thinke she should haue it if her Sponsus refuse to marry her But where I giue Land to one to marry my Daughter or if hee marry my Daughter there if hee marry another woman I may enter SECT XXXVI The word Franke Marriage maketh Inheritance IF a man giue lands with his Sister to I. S. in Franke Marriage habendum â—is haeredibus suis in perpetuum By Kniueâ— Mowbray and Finchden 45. Ed. 3. fo 19. this maketh neither Frank Marriage nor estate taile with an expectance of fée as in Case where Lands are giuen expresly in taile habendum eis haeredibus but the fee-simple passeth presently by the gift for Frank Marriage must be holden of the Donor which here hath nothing left in him but all is holden of the Lord Parainount and the words doe not make any other estate taile yet 13. Ed. 1. lands were giuen to one with the Cousin of the Donor in Franke Marriage habendum eis haeredibus and it was taken for good Frank Marriage This saith Brooke was in the yeare that estates taile were made in But for all that if yee look the case in Fitzherbert Formedone 63. whither Brooke sendeth you you shall perceiue that at the time of the gift it was Franke Marriage in fée-simple for by those dayes the Donee had potestatem alienandi post prolem suscitatâ—m But in a gift made after the Statute of quia emptoreâ— on such a fashion I take it the Law will be as before in the case 45. Ed. 3. According as it was also holden in the yeares of H. 8. that if a gift bee made in Franke Marriage the remainder to I. S. in fée this is no good Franke Marriage for warrantie and acquitall that are incident c. bee only in regard of the reuersion to the Donor and they cannot be had when the fée-simple is presently conueyed to a stranger SECT XXXVIII The Accompt of the Degrees LIttl accounts the Degrees from the Donor to the Donees the first Degrée from the Donées to their Issue the second from the Donées Issue to his Issue the third c. and the Issue in the fift Degrée shall doe seruice And this saith he because the Issue of the Donor and the Issue of the Donée after the fourth Degrée past may inter-marrie by holy Churches Law Bracton accompts thus donatarius facit primum gradum haeres suus facit secundum haeres haeredis facit tertium haeres secundi haeredis facit quartum qui tenebitur ad seruitium yea hee maketh it an expresse rule that onely the Donée and two heyres succéeding lineally shall enioy the immunitie of being acquitted And hee seemeth to vnderstand no other reason of the acquitall so long but onely an abstenancie from homage lest the taking of it should hinder a reuerting if it betided the Donée or the Issue to die without Issue Fitzherbert titulo droit 55. and 60. citeth 6 H. 3. and 15. H. 3. in warrant of Bractons Computation which I thinke he fetched not any further then out of the Author himselfe in whom fo 21. I find it And fo 22. hee answereth a doubt of his owne asking that is Whether all other seruice shall follow and continue if homage be done ante terâ—ium haeredem wherein he concludeth that the seruice euer followeth homage quamuis ad damnum soluentium And I conclude whether it be the third heyre or the fourth that shall doe seruice he may still vouch haue a Writ of me ne as if the fourth Degrée were not past and if he bring a Formedone the Writt shall be Dedit in liberum Maritagium SECT XXXIX A Woman giues Lands to one to marry her AS Franke Marriage maketh Inheritance without the words Heyres and is alwayes made to a woman and for her sake so there is another Donatio propâ—er nuptias that is conditionall without words of Condition made euer by a woman to a man That is where a woman giues Land to a man in fee-simple or for tearme of his life to the intent that hee marry her who if hee afterwards when hee is thereto within conuenient time required refuse c. there is now an ordinary Writt for remedy granted in this case to reduce the Land which Writt may be sued in the per cui or post after one or more alienations either by the woman sole or by her and her husband married against such a one as should haue married her after the refusall or after her death by her Heyre whether it bee Sonne or Daughter or Daughters with the child of another and there needs no scripture or writing to proue that the feoffement was for intent of Marriage nay if a woman infeoffe a stranger to the intent to infeoffe her and one which she intendeth to marrie if now the espousals take not effect she may haue Writt causa Matrimonij prelocuti against the stranger though the déed of feoffement were simple and sans Condition an 34. Ed. 3. li. assi and 40. Ed. 3. li. assi a woman enfeoffed one which had a wife and entred for non-performance of the Condition heritance of woman and in this part because it resembleth the Donations that are propter nuptias the Doctrine of it being something like that of Dower SECT XLI Marriage THis Courtesie is in the Inheritance of a Wife therefore a consequent of lawfull Marriage and exceptions of Concubinage or such like which are impediments of Dower must needs be good exceptions here SECT XLII Seisin THere must be in the wife a seisin and possession for if she were but heyre in appearance die before her Ancestor this auaileth her husband nothing Similie If the Father being seised of Lands dye and soone after his Daughter and Heyre dyeth before actuall seisin had by entrie either by the husband wife or other person for them so that no possession and a naked possession in law here is all one yea the law is taken that if a man dwell in Essex with his wife and lands descend to her in Yorkeshire if she die the next day after before entrie the husband shall not bee Tenant by the Courtesie for euen in this case is found a default in him that he did not constitute one to make entrie for him maintenant after the Auncestors death yet if rent descend to a woman Couert c. which dieth before day of payment or after the day and no
demand made of the rent by her husband hee shall haue Courtesie in the rent notwithstanding So it is if an Advouson in grosse descend to a woman married hauing Issue c. though she die afore auoydance the husband shall present and though the Bishop after the descent present by lapse yet the husband shall haue the second presentment for there cannot in these things possession be taken maintenant and at all times as they be in Lands And take with you here these Cases out of Dier 1. Ma. fo 95. Tenant per Cheualrie in cap. dieth his Daughter and Heyre being vnder age office is found and the King grants the wardship of body and Land to me which marrieth the ward and hath Issue by her and after shee accomplisheth the age of sixetéene yeares and the King is satisfied for the two yeares profit they tender a generall liuerie and before it be past the Wife dieth the Baron shall haue the Courtesie come semble saith the Booke And 6. Eliz. Dier 229. the like descent is to a Daughter and married hauing Issue by her husband and she dieth ten dayes after her Father no Liuery being sued that is found by office the Baron shal be Tenant by the Courtesie and shall sue liuery SECT XLIII No Courtesie of reuersion after estate for life THe seisin must be to the Wife in estate of Inheritance not mangled or cut off from the Frank Tenement and therefore by Parkins where a Woman an Heyre enters after her Fathers death and being seised in fée-simple makes a Lease of her Land to I. S. for terme of his life if she now marry haue Issue and die during the Lease the Husband shall neither be Tenant by the Courtesie of the Land when it reuerts nor of the rents in the meane while Also 8. assi p. 6. If a Daughter and Heyre enter endolâ— den and haue Issue by her and the condition being broken she dyeth if now the Feoffor enter the Feoffée shall not be Tenant per le Curâ—esie of the Seignorie But if a feme sole haue a rent or common in or out of certaine Lands and the Tenant leasseth the Land to a stranger during the life of I. S. and the woman intermarrieth with the Lessée hath Issue and I. S. dyeth now if the wife die the Baron shall haue Courtesie in the rent or Common And if the Tenant leased his ground for 20. yeares and a woman hauing in the ground a rent charge in fée intermarrieth with the Lessée c. dieth during the terme it is a question in Parkins whether the husband shall haue Courtesie in the rent after the terme determine see Parkins cap. By the Courtesie SECT XLVII No Courtesie of a bare vse IF a Woman sole seised c. make a feoffement to the vse of her selfe her heyres and then she marrieth hath Issue and dieth before any estate in the same lands be againe by entry or otherwise executed to her her husband shall not be Tenant by the Courtesie and this aswell after the Statute of 27. H. 8. as before if the Feoffement were since the Statute SECT XLVIII What Husband may be Tenant by the Courtesie and of what estate WHere the Wise is actually seised of Lands in â—éesimple see-taile generall or as Heyre of sée-taile speciall the second Baron may bee Tenant by the Courtesie as well as the first for so is the Maxime And Parkins Fitzherbert and Brooke haue all of them the Case 21. H. 3. viz. A woman Inheritour hath Issue by her Husband and he dieth she takes another Husband hath Issue by him and that Issue dieth the woman dieth her second Husband shall be Tenant by the Courtesie Bracton agréeth also who when hee hath shewed this Ciuilitie of England concludeth Quod dicitur de primo diâ—i poterit de secundo siue de primo viro haeredes apparentes extiterunt siue non plenae aetatis vel minoris But hee addeth Quod iniuriosum est secundum Sâ—ephanum de Segraue qui dicebat quod lex illâ— male â—uit intellecta male vsâ—tata Nam quod dicitur de lege Angliae intelligi debet de primo virâ— communibus haeredibus non de secundo maxime cum haeredes apparentes extiterint de primo My mind giues mee that hee said truth and that Law turning a little out of her Channell here before Iustice Segraues time could neuer since bee brought to her course SECT XLIX Of speciall Taile BEfore West 2. cap. 1. all the Estates which wée now call tailed that is curtailed or cut off were sée-simple Conditionall If Lands had béene giuen to a man and a woman in Franke Marriage or to them and to the Heyres of their two bodies which gifts make now a speciall Taile as soone as they had Issue the Condition was thought to be performed And as a woman suruiuing her first Husband in this case might alien the Land so might she by bearing a Childe to her second Husband c. this makes him Tenant by the Courtesie be inforced to proue that the Childe sent forth some voyce or cry arguing life and naturall humanity for if it bellowed bleated brayed grunted rored or howled there accrued no courtesie by getting such an vnciuill vrchin By him therefore there must be a naturall crie heard inter quatuor parietes for he saith though a Child be borne mutus surdus tamen clamorem emittere debet sive masculus sit siue foemina nam Dicunt E. vel A. quotquot nascuntur ab Eâ—a E. or A. all crye that from Eue come Though they be borne both deafe and dumbe Non sufficit igitur tantum baptizatus scpultura yâ—t 28. H. 8. Dyer fol. 25. sets downe Fitzherberts opinion that a man may be Tenant by the Courtesie though the Childe neuer crie car paraduenture lissue soit nee dumbe And so saith Parkins 9. 4. 7. viz. that if the issue bee borne aliue though it die before it be heard crie or before it be baptized for that is a matter also with Bracton if there were no lachesse contumacie or contempt in the Baron he may be Tenant by the Courtesie But by negligence or by contempt he shall preiudice himselfe ascuns diont SECT LI. A Childe borne beginneth the title of Courtesie NOw this hauing a Childe is such a matter as it séemeth that maine tenant thereupon the title of Courtesie beginneth for example if a bond woman purchase Land and marrie if the Lord enter before Issue be had no Childe borne afterwards shall make the husband tenant by the Courtesie But if the Baron haue Issue by his wife before the Lords entrie he shall be tenant by the Courtesie and the auourie from that time forward shall rest vpon him solement And the possession in Law if the wife die shall not light vpon the Heyre but vpon the Baron which shall be tenant to euery praecipe Câ—o est cleere lei Brooke out of the Doctor and Student vide Brooke
villenage 35. And if a woman Heyre haue issue by her husband commit felonie and be attainted it hath béen mostly holden that the husband shall be Tenant by the Courtesie notwithstanding and that after Issue had the Lord may auow for homage vpon the husband without the wife 21. Ed. 3. 49. By Parkins 91. 475. Likewise if the Wiues Inheritance be recouered against Baron and feme by false oath or erronious Processe and execution is had and sued of this recouerie if they haue Issue afterwards and then the wife dieth the Baron now reducing the Land by attaint or error shall hold per le Courtesie SECT LII What if the Childe die IF a man haue Issue by his wife that is here in possession the death of the Issue is no losse of Courtesie and by Parkins if a Daughter and Heyre apparant take a Husband haue Issue by him and the Issue dieth if now the Father die and the Baron and feme enter he may be Tenant by the Courtesie without hauing other Issue Brooke makes it questionable Also by Brooke if a man die his wife being priuement enseient a Daughter entreth as heyre taketh a Husband and hath Issue if a Sonne post-humus enter vpon the Baron and feme and the Issue of the Daughter dieth and the posthumus dieth without Issue the Baron cléerely shall not be Tenant by the Courtesie vnlesse hee re-enter in his wiues time and he doubteth though the Baron enter sans other Issue bility his wife may beare him may by possibilitie be heyre of that estate Si le possession le Baron ne soit loyalment anient As addeth Parkins the Wife shall be endowed SECT LVI The Husband must be seised DOwer is of the possession of a Husband the ground of it therefore is Marriage a Concubine then shall haue no Dower no more shall shee which is but onely contracted and it was holden by some 10. H. 3. that she which was married in a Parlor or Chamber should haue no Dower but it is now taken otherwise Also where Marriage is cleerely voyde and vnlawfull there groweth no title of Dower But if a woman first contracted to E. I. intermarry afterwards with T. K. this Marriage is voydable but not cléerely voyde and if it be not frustrated otherwise then by death of T. K. the Wife shall haue Dower of his Land Here yee may perceiue that which destroyeth an absolute true Marriage destroyeth Dower also for though by Bracton there may be by speciall Constitution a Dower appointed that shall stand good against the tempest of diuers assaults yet by ground of the Common Law Matrimonium est fulcimentum doâ—is And Bracton saith in his second booke and 39. Chapter Vbi nullum omnino Matrimonium ibi nulla dost igitur vbi Matrimonium ibi dos quod verum est si Matrimonium in facie ecclesiae contrahatur SECT LVII Matrimony may be and yet no Dower THough Matrimony doe alwayes precede Dower yet doth not Dower alwayes follow Matrimony for first where the husband had no Land the Wife can haue no Dower by the Common Law Bracton and Breton which giue a woman Dower in a certaine somme of money or in other Chattels speake rather as Ciuill Lawyers then méere English Also Dower is not granted vnlesse the Husband is aboue 7. yeers old and the wife aboue nine 13. Ed. 1. Fitzherbert Feme perdera Dower si son Baron morust deuant 9. ans d'age Dyer 14. Eliz. fo 313. Also if a man marry his bond-woman in grosse and die she shall not recouer Dower against the Heyre for shee is his bond-woman but against the Feoffée of her husband she shall recouer Dower vnlesse she be regardant to the Mannor whereof the Feoffement was made SECT LVIII What Seisin is requisite in a Husband WHere the Huband hath neither possession in fact nor possession in Law during the Couerture nor any thing saue onely a right or title the wife shall not haue Dower as also if the Baron suffer a Disseisin an abatement a Condition broken an alienation in Mortmaine or cesser of his rent or seruices by two yeares space c. and then he take a wife dieth before reduction of his Land or if iudgement be giuen for him in a plea of Lands and hee marryeth afterward and die before entry or suing of execution the wife shall not haue Dower of these Lands So is it if I. S. exchange Lands with T. K. and I. S. entreth but T. K. taketh a wife and dieth before entrie his wife shall not haue Dower in any of the Lands exchanged but where a husband is once actually seised the wife shall bee endowed notwithstanding any disseisin afterward done to him or feoffement made by him either absolute or conditionall And if before or after Marriage celebrated and not dissolued a possession in Law be cast vpon a Husband by descent escheate or fall of some remainder the wife shall be endowed though the Baron die before entrie as if the Kings Tenant die seised and his Heyre being married dieth before office or entrie the wife of the heyre is dowable so if rent desâ—end to a husband which dyeth before day of payment c. for there is not requisite in the husband such a seisâ—n as whereof an assise lyeth but if a precipe quod reddat might lie against him it sufficeth 4. He. 7. fo 1. Brooke 66. in Dower A husband may haue possession in law by descent of a villaine in gros or possession in law of a rent charge by excepting the déede of grant and hereof the wife shall be endowed although the Baron doe afterwards refuse receit and seisin of the rent But iudgement in a Writ of annuity for the Baron taketh away Dower of a rent charge from the wife and a woman may haue Dower of an estate that was suspended as if the Lord married with his Tenant now is the Seignorie suspended but if he die the wife shall haue Dower a third part of the rent per retâ—igneâ— for the Seigniorie though it slept yet there was still a possession in Law of it in the husband Here it must not be forgotten that it â—éemeth doubtfull whether an abatement of a stranger which is a possession in fact destroyeâ—h a Possession in Law it appeares by Park â—o 72. sect 371. 372 4. H. 7. 1. per meux that it doth not But 21. Ed. 4. â—o 60. which is accorded for good Law 4. H. 7. fo 1. where in a Writt of Dower the Tenant pleadeth ne vnques seisie in dower c. the demandament sheweth that Lands descended to her husband she being then his wife and that he dyed before entry made either by him or by other person issuit est donable per le lâ—y and shee was inforced by the Court to plead that none entred for if a stranger had entred she had not béene dowable And if she had pleaded 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 que Dowâ—e la Poet this had wayned the speciall
the acres to be of equall value it must needs bee against law also for one acre of three equally vallued or of euery acre one third part is a iust Dower But if the acre vnsold were inferior in value there is both conscience and law for the woman to claime Dower of the two acres or of the rent for a woman must be endowed of the best possession and not according to the number of acres but according to the value of the Inheritance whilst it was the Husbands Therefore if I make a feoffement of my lands and dye and the feoffée builds a house vpon it or otherwise improoues it my wife shall be endowed no otherwise then according to the value of my possession yet if a disseisor or a feoffée sur condition doe edifie the disseisie or feoffor re-entring shall haue the building If being married I make a feoffement and the feoffee ruinateth a house which was vpon the Lands before the feoffement and that was worth foure or fiue pound annually my wife shall be endowed according to the value that the land was of at time of my death because a woman hath no right to possession of Dower before the death of her husband But Parkins dares not let this Case goe without a quaere SECT LXIX Of Dower at the Church doore THe old kind of endowment at the Church Doore commeth now a dayes seldome in vse But for all that I would haue women better learned then to be ignorant of it it is when a man seised in fee-simple being of full age comming to the Church doore to be married doth there affirme affiance and endowe his spouse of all his lands or of part as of halfe or a lesse quantity openly and with certainty the woman thus endowed may enter into her Dower after the husbands death without assignement and this Dower may be at the Church doore in one County of Lands in another County and without déed Parkins sect 217. Vide Plowd in Sharington ca. fo 304. b. it is good without liuery of seisin Et per Shelly 28. H. 8 Dyer fo it may be done within view and the puisne sonne of Land in borow English may not make such a Dower Also a sonne and heyre apparant when he is espoused by consent of his father may endow his wife at the Church doore in part of such lands and tenements as are the Fathers in fee-simple and the sonnes wife after his death the father liuing may enter presently without further assignement into the parcels thus certainly appointed But if shee enter after her husbands death and agrée to any of these endowments ad ostium ecclesiae she is concluded from claiming any other Dower Thus farre Littleton By Bracton none can endowe his wife in this manner vnlesse hee bee Liber homo for in his time if I bee not much deceiued the greatest number of bond-men held in manurance Lands of their Lords which they occupied to the Lords vse and profit in pure villeinage These hauing none other lands could not endow c. Also by Bracton Quis posset dotem constituere sciendum quod tam minor quam maior masculus Cui vxori tam Church doore to be married deliuer the Deed to her shewing her the lands saying his will is she haue them according to the déede if the Baron neuer claime otherwise then in right of his wife that is a good feoftement But he may endow her of his owne lands ad ostium Ecclesiae without déede though the Land be in a forraigne Countie marry when the Dower is of the fathers Land ex assensu there must bee a deed for assent lieth not in auerment 40. Ed. 3. 43. yet this is contrary to Bracton and in old Bookes the consent hath beene tried by proofes Dowment may be good ex consensu matris but as they say now not ex consensu fratris sororis vel consanguinei The assent ought to be at the Church or Church doore yet 2. H. 3. the sonne married against the will of his parents and eight weekes after indowed his wife of his fathers lands ex assensu patris per curiam it was holden good Fitzherbert 199. Of the head of a Baronie or the Capitall Messuage of a Knights fée Dowmente ad ostium c. is not good but it may be of a moity of all such Lands as the Baron shall hereafter purchace in fee or of all such Lands as the Barons mother holdeth in Dower But if the Father lease his Lands for life and the Sonne and Heyre apparant endow his wife ex assensu c. of the reuersion now if the Lessée die the Lessor enter and the sonne die the wife shall not haue Dower because she was not Dowable of the reuersion at the Common Law though it had beene in her husband during couerture so is it if the Father were seised for life or iointly with another in fee But if the father had beene Tenant in taile the endowment by consent had beene good during his life though no conclusion after his death to his Issue or his wife claiming Dower euen as by Election if tenant in taile being himselfe in actuall seisin endow his wife ad ostium Ecclesiae die if his wife enter the Issue may out her and so may hee in the reuersion if issue faile If the Father at time of endowment ex assensu bee seised none otherwise then in his wiues right Yet Parkins argueth hee shall bee bound during his life quaere I haue held young Maides now indeed somewhat long in the old endowments and I would proceed to instruct them in the dower of the new learning iointures I meane for my desire is that they should be able to haue when they are Widdowes a coach or at the least an ambler and some money in their purses But they are of the minde for themselues I perceiue that Themistocles was in for his daughter He desired a man rather without money then money without a man here is a wise adoe yee say I tell you of Dower of the Widdowes estate and God knowes whether ye shall euer haue the grace to be widdowes or no yee would know what belongeth to wiues on then in a good way I haue brought you to the Church doore if ye be not shortly well married I pray God I may FINIS with her Husbands protection and supereminency Now the Law that giueth Dower to her that is able to deserue it and enableth at so greene yeares knoweth well enough that women are at their Husbands commandement If Titus being dead haue left his wife her maidenhead immunis a culpa a poena immunis erit This I might dilate as in probabilitie or likelinesse of reason at Common Law but it seemeth the matter resteth otherwise determinable For in action of Dower the Tenant shall not plead nunquam carnaliter cognouit nor the demandant be driuen to auerre a knowledge c. But the case may perchance bee drawne to
an issue of ne vnques accople in loyall Matrimonie and that must be tried by the Bishop Therefore for the better direction of Brides take the case verbatim as it is propounded with the solution 22. Eliz. Dyer 369. A woman of full age contracts Matrimonie by words of the present instant with a young man of twelue yeares age and this being solemnized in face of the Church with consummation after a sort the young man being put to bed to her died vnder age quaere if the Ordinarie ought to certifie an accomplement in loyall Matrimonie Solutio doctorum quindecem We be all of opinion that she is to be taken for a loyall wife coupled in loyall Matrimony and in question of Dower that the Bishop ought so to certifie for albeit that in other regards these were but Sponsalia de futuro yet in case of Dower and the priuiledge thereof they are extended to Matrimony consummate Et iudicium datum pro dote heere ye say was the Law as cleere as Christall on your side when supper is done dance a while leaue out the long measures till you be in bed get you there quickly and pay the Minstrels tomorrow SECT II. Baron and Feme one person NOw that Matrimony is celebrated and consummate here is so strait a fellowship or rather identitie of person that if a feoffement bee made to a man and his wife iointly with I. S. the Baron Feme take but a moity and in a feoffement to Baron and Feme and I. S. and T. K. they take but a third part and where a feoffement is made to a man and his wife ioyntly they take not seuerall moities as other ioynt Feoffees doe but the Baron and feme take intirely together and in Law they are said to be seised by intierties and there is no halfing betwixt them For if the Baron charge the whole land or part of it with a rent the wife shall hold it discharged after his death and if he sell all or part and die the wife shall recouer all by Writt of cui in vita See 40. assi pla 7. If a Villeine and his Wife purchase land ioyntly the Lord enter and the Villeine die the Feme or her Heyre shall haue the whole Land Eadem lex videtur where the Husband ioynt-purchaser is an Alien borne or attaint in premunire or of fellonie But the booke of Assises goeth not so farre The videtur is Parliament 43. in Brooke where likewise ye shall see it was holden 5. H 7. fo 31. that if T. infeoffe W. and A. his wife afterward it is by Parliament enacted that all estates made by T. to W. shall bée voyde that the feoffement shall be voyd as well towards the wife as towards the Husband because they are but one person in Law and the Feme taketh nothing but by agréement of the husband And vpon the like reason is the case Dyer 3. Eliz. fo 196. Sir Rob. Catline purchase land held in capite to him and his wife and his heyres without licence and the Queene pardons all offences pro quacunque alienatione sibi facta and doth not speake of the wife in the pardon and yet it was allowed in the Exchequer But if the feoffement had beene to W. and I. S. this I. S. should haue held his moity notwithstanding the Parliaments decrée and this seemeth to bee the better opinion though there were in manner equall number to maintaine That if the feoffement were before couerture the Parliament should voyd it for a moity but if it were after couerture it should voyde for no part against the Feme when shee was discouerte leauing to Parliaments their omnipotencie it is cléere the husband cannot seuer the Ioynture betwixt him and his wife as an other Ioynt-tenant may if the Ioynture were made during Couerture because there is then no moity Otherwise it is if the Ioynture were made before the Marriage And if lands be giuen to a man and his wife habendum one moity to the husband and habendum the other moity to the wife now they bee seised of moities as Tenants in Commom But for this I finde no other authority then the opinion of Knightly in Dyer 28. H. 8. 10. b. SECT III. Baron feme cannot infeoffe one another MOreouer this Conglutination of persons in Baron and feme forbiddeth all manner of feoffing or giuing by the one vnto the other for a man cannot giue any thing vnto himselfe therefore 27. H. 8. fo 27. In action of debt vpon an obligation to performe couenants where it passed for the Plaintiffe because the Defendant had not paid annually seauen pound to his wife it is alleaged in arest of Iudgement that the Couenant was impossible in it selfe c. But Chomeley Shelley and Fitzherbert moued the husband to agrée with the Plaintiffe Car le exception sert de riens for although in strict intelligence of Law money and Chattels paid deliuered or giuen to the wife by the husband are still his owne yet a man may giue his wife a paire of hose saith the booke as a man is bound by honesty so he may be bound by red waxe and parchment to finde his wife sustenance and to bee bound to giue her money for her securitie is all one from this Lanthorne I thinke he tooke his light which bound a gentleman of mine acquaintance to giue his Wife the Obligée his Daughter yearely such and so many gâ—wnes Hertles c. And the meaning must bee taken and obserued in the booke of 4. H. 7. fo 4. is another memorable Cause A man was bound to I. S. by obligation to make a sure estate to a woman in certaine tenements within three moneths after his fathers death The Obligor marrieth the woman in his fathers life time and the Matrimony continueth till the three moneths be expired the obligation is forfeited Vauisor said the husband might well haue performed the condition by fine leuied vpon a writt of Couenant brought by a stranger against the Baron and feme Fisher said he might haue performed it by making a Lease vnto a stranger the remainder to the wife quaere of that Vauisors performance had beene good I thinke if there had beene in the beginning a full purpose and intent of intermarriage betwixt the woman and the Obligor But that appeares not and therefore being that hee hath brought himselfe to an impossibility of performance either of words or meaning the Obligée must néeds be allowed the aduantage If the obligation had béene to the woman her selfe the condition by inter-marriage had béene dispensed with for where the Obligee is a cause that the condition cannot be performed the not performing is without penalitie to the Obligor as if in the old dayes I had béene bound to an Abbot that A. should infeoffe him c. before Christmas if A. had presently entred into Religion my bond had presently beene forfeited not so If A. had béene professed vnder the obedience
NOw let vs looke backe a little and see what shall become of the dealings which Mistris Titus had whilest shee was Sempronia an agent in the world widdow or maide sola and vncouert SECT XII Of Infancie TO debate matters of infancie would aske a whole volume perse But breefly know that all deeds gifts grants c. made by an Infant which take not effect by deliuery of the infant be absolutely void By matters in fait or writing which take effect by hand and deliuery are onely voydable by the infant or by them which haue the infants estate Out of his rule are excepted acts apparently of necessity or profit to the infant or which can be no disprofit to him for manger boire necessarie apparell and schooling the obligation or couenant of an Infant is good Also an Infants presentation to a Church is good enough for danger of lapse and because it is no matter of emolument and things done by vertue of office as giuing of goods or payment of debts by an infant Executrix are good so are acts which concerne the infants proper purchace As if estate be made to an Infant of two acres to haue and to hold the one for life the other in fee a feoffement of one acre made by the Infant is a good election And it is said fo 104. in Dyer that an Infant is bound by all Statute Lawes if there be not an expresse exemption Now whatsoeuer a Feme sole might auoyd by infancie she and her husband may auoid it by entry or action after Marriage if they take the time else not For example An infant feme sole hath title to enter for Mortmaine within a yeare after alienation or title to enter into the purchase of her villeine before his alienation if by lachesse she let slip her aduantage as she may doe notwithstanding her infancie no wise husband that she taketh afterward can mend it for here was but a title to that which neither she nor her auncestor euer had But if an infant Feme sole haue a right as vpon disseisin done to her or her auncestor she may alwayes enter whilst she is sole notwithstanding any descent during infancie And so may her husband which marrieth her after the descent Littl. teacheth vs fo 95. Chap. Descents that lachesse of a husband which suffers descent shall not toll the entry of a Feme couert or her heyres after Marriage dissolued But there is an addition to Littleton that it is otherwise where a title is already giuen to a Feme sole which taketh a husband and suffers descent c. for it shall now be accounted the Womans folly that shee would take such a husband Howsoeuer it be Law or howsoeuer it be vnderstood the Case before must néeds be good Law for an infant Feme hath as much fauor as an infant Male And taking of an husband cannot toll an entry which was saued to a Feme sole by infancie neither doe I perceiue how the husbands lachesse at the time of descent can toll the Wiues Infancie to make any imputation of folly where infancie might excuse it By Parkins If a man lease two acres to me for life the remainder of one of these acres to a Feme sole which afterwards takes a husband and then the Lessée dying the Baron entreth into one acre and thereof enfeoffes a stranger by mets and bonds the wife shall not after his death enter and if Baron and Feme make a gift in taile or lease for life of the wiues Land rendring rent so soone as the Baron dies the reuersion is onely in the wife who by accepting the rent shall bind her selfe and her heyres But if shée will refuse the rent because she was vnder age at time of the feoffement it séemes she may be receiued to a dum fuit Infra etatem wherby she affirmes the feoffement to be her owne If this be infallible Law I doubt not then if a Feme infant disseised doe marry and during her infancie the husband suffereth a descent but her entry is saued and she may enter after Couerture dissolued if not before But Fitzherbert concludeth with a quaere and so must I. SECT XIII Acts c. of a Feme sole being full Age. VNderstand now by a Feme sole a Woman of sull age If a Feme sole become indebted and marry the Baron and Feme may be sued for this debt during life of the Feme If the Creditor sue the recouer the Baron shall be charged with it after the wiues death aliter non A Feme sole Lessée for life rendring rent takes a husband the rent is arrere the wife dieth though here be no recouery in the wiues life time yet because the Baron tooke the profit he is still chargeable in a Writt of debt for the rent for quisentit commodum sentire debet onus If a Feme endowed of rent take a husband and die the husband shall haue action of debt for the rent arere for it was a duty accrued during couerture But if a man be bound to a Feme sole and she takes a husband and the day of payment comes during Couerture now if she die her husband cannot haue an action of debt vpon the obligation for this was a thing in action before marriage Nat. bre fol. 120. 121. And agréeing to that is 39. H. 6. 27. Br. Testaments 10. but by that booke the Wife may make the Baron her Executor and so saith the Booke of 12. Hen. 7. 22. If a Feme sole being made Executrix take a husband she remaine still a disposer of the Testators goods to his vse and after payment of his debts she may deliuer Legacies and after all that giue the rest for Gods sake maugre le test sa Baron But vpon such a giuing of goods or deliuering of Legacies before payment of debts the husband may haue an action of trespasse for gift before payment is not a right administration but a deuastation of the Testators goods Par. fo 2. and 18. H. 6. A feme sole seised of a carue of land grants out of it a rent Charge by déed and deliuers this deed to a stranger with Condition to deliuer it to the grantée as her déed if he goe to Rome and returne before Easter the Woman takes a husband the grantée performes the Condition the déed is deliuered to him he hath a good rent Charge yet the Baron was seised of the land before the grant tooke effect what though if the Feme had infeoffed a stranger of the land he should haue held it charged for to some intent the grant hath relation from deliuery of the deed as an escrow though for the rent the grantée cannot haue that but for the dayes incurring after the darraine deliuery and if the Feme at the deliuery of the escrow had béene marryed all had béene voyd Par. fo 2. 3. and fo 29. some hath maintained he saith where a Feme sole deliuers an
obligation or other déed of grant as an escrow with condition c. vt supra that it should haue no relation at all saue onely to the last deliuery for if hée to whom an obligation is so made release all action to the Feme sole before performance of the condition and before deliuery of the déed by the baylée he may notwithstanding sue vpon the obligation when it is deliuered which proues that it takes none effect till the last deliuery and then it must néeds bee void if the Woman be married at time of this deliuery if all were not countermanded presently by taking a husband But Parkins will not yéeld to these reasons for the Feme sole was a person able to oblige her selfe in any manner of Contract and her couenants and agréements made vpon consideration she could not countermaund though she would If a Feme sole seised of Land infeoffe a stranger by déede indented reseruing rent to her and her heyres to be paid annually at Easter with a conditionall clause of entry for non-payment and then they two inter-marry c. héere can be no failing in performance of payment during couerture for all this while the rent and condition are suspended If the condition had béen to pay ten or an hundred pound it had béene drunke vp by the inter-marriage for if a feme sole make a feoffement to a stranger vpon condition to pay her ten pound and then she marrieth with I. S. I. S. before the day of payment may release all manner of conditions duties and demands and the condition shall be determined But such a release comming after the day wherein the condition should haue beene performed at what time the wife hath a title of entrie will not binde her or her heyres after the husbands death Par. fo 148. There followeth a question if a Feme sole infeoffeth a man of blacke acre by indenture with Condition that hee shall infeoffe her of green acre before Easter and they two marry and continue married till after Easter whether the husband be maine-tenant seised of blacke acre in-the right of his wife There followeth in Par. fo 149. a case ayding towards solution of this doubt If I be bound by obligation to a Feme sole to marry her by munday next if shee marry a stranger and the espousals continue till tewsday I néed not tender my selfe to her A Feme sole makes cognizance of her right to leuie a fine before Commissioners per dedimus potestatem hauing the Writt of Couenant vt oportet and at the day giuen in banke when the Concord should be recorded the woman is married but notwithstanding the fine was recorded and ingrossed as leuied by a Feme sole the question was whether it should binde the Husband or not it was said death of a partie c. which as the act of God dissolues the whole busines by abatement of the Writ but marrying after the teste of the Writ of Couenant and dedimus potestatem and Cognizance made doth not so The woman therefore and her heyres are bound for euer and the Husbands release of all his right to the Conusée makes all cléere 7. 8. Eliz Dyer 246. the Lord Keeper of the great seale of England his case SECT XIII Of Acts done by a Feme Couert EUery Feme Couertis quodammodo an infant for sée her power euen in that which is most her owne A wife may be seised in her owne right with her husband in estate of Inheritance but if she make liuery and seisin to another in any parcell of this Inheritance by her selfe alone without grée of her Husband it is voyd yea her Husband and shee together may maintaine an assise vpon the entry but where onely the Baron is seised and the Feme maketh liuery the assise must bee onely by the Baron in his owne name Par. 38. Likewise fo 2. he telleth vs where a man is seised in the right of his wife and the wife grants a rent charge out of her owne Land the Husband not knowing it or the Husband knowing but not consenting but the déed is onely in the name of the wife this grant is voyd Admit the Husband be vagrant out of the Countrey and the Wife ignorant of his life or death grants a rent Charge by deede reciting that shee is sole yet if the Grantée enter and distraine for the rent the husband may maintaine an Action of Trespasse for this entrie Admit that this vna caro Baron and Feme through false loue or iealousie bee set at nine miles asunder variance and certaine Lands are assigned to the Wife by the Baron for her maintenance if the Wife grant a rent Charge out of this Land it is meerely void If a Feme Couert grant a rent Charge out of her land by fine as though she were sole this bindeth not the Husband but if he die before hee and his Feme haue reuersed their fine by error the Feme shall be bound And if to a Feme Couert there be a feoffement made a feoffement and liuery is of great celebritie yet a naked disagréement of the Baron auoydeth it 1. H. 7. fo 16. If a Feme Couert her Husband being beyond the Seas bee enfeoffed of an acre of Land and the Husband comming home refuseth and causeth the Wife likewise to relinquish all manner of seisin or taking any profits of the Land this in a Writt of entry sur disseisin in le per brought against the Baron and Feme will discharge the Husband of damages from the time of the refusall but not for the occupation before refusall tamen quaere Par. fo 10. yet saith he they remaine Tenants for all the refusals of the Franke Tenement to vse any action so long as none other person entereth but if a Tenant when his Seignior is beyond the Seas doe infeoffe his Lords wife ioyntly with a stranger of the Tenancie and the Lord comming home distraines the cattle of the stranger for his rent this distresse is a compleat disagréement and puts the Wife out of seisin so that now the possession remaines intirely to the stranger the ioynt feoffée otherwise the husband should be at a shrewd mischiefe viz. without remedie for his rent for all the time incurred before the distresse Par. 10. Note that in these Cases it is no plea for the grauntor to say that the Baron did not agrée but hee must shew the disagréement A Feme Couert may be a disseiseresse without assent of the Baron and hee shall be charged with damages in assise against him and his wife But if the Baron doe a disseisin to the vse of his wife and she agrées to it the Franke Tenant for all this setleth not in her for the entry of a husband gaineth nothing to his wife but where she hath either right of entry as vpon disseisin or title of entry as vpon a Condition c. A Feme Couert makes a Testament of the goods of her husband she dieth
the Executors proue the testament if the Baron now will deliuer the goods to the Executors this maketh the Testament good for howsoeuer it might be accounted voyd being made without the husbands consent yet being once proued it gathereth spirit as it were and the deliuery of the goods shall imploy an assent before the will was made note that licence or assent here is sufficient per paroll Par. 97. A Feme Couert may take an assumption from any man for her Husband shee may take an obligation or feoffement to her selfe she may commit a disseisin and her husband by his assent shall be a disseisor ab initio Shee may giue sell or charge her husbands Chattels by his assent as a horse or such like and she is not so like a Monke that all her acts should haue an impossibility of taking any strength but her husbands agréement comming after them shall make them good whether they be to his aduantage or disaduantage 27. H. 8. fo 24. But the acts of a Monke cannot be made good by agréement of the Soueraigne And in the end of the case Fitzherbert affirmes that when a Woman makes a gift of her husbands goods the Husbands post-assent is a new gift One thing I will adde That though a gift made by a wife of things which are quickly gotten and quickly gone chattels I meane which require no solemne conueyance and the Wife hath a medâ—â—ng with them may bee made good by agréement yet a feoffement made by the Feme cannot be made good by the Husbands bare consent succéeding Now for Executorship of a Feme Couert note that per Brian 2. H. 7. fo 15. b. she cannot be an Executor without the agréement of her Husband and per mesme le reason she cannot giue goods of the Testator without his consent for vpon returne of deuastauerint the Husbands goods shall be put in execution The case in the booke is of an Executorship before Couerture And remember that Fitzherbert saith 28. H. 8. Dyer fo 7. If the wife haue a Lease by Executorship the husband connot sell it sed tota curia conâ—ra eum But a Feme Executrix to her first husband may retaine goods against the Executors of her second Husband if hee neueâ— did alienate them 21. H. 7. per Fineux SECT XIV Of Elopement AMongst the acts of a Feme Couert I must not forget to admonish her that she take héed of Elopements A woman shall not forfeit Dower by not suing appeale of her Husbands death or by not visiting her husband or not comming to comfort him when he is wounded or excéeding sicke in a forraigne shire but iâ— he be in his home Countie where he dwelleth quaere A woman in her frenzy may cut her husbands throat and it is no forfeiture of Dower but if she make an Elopement which is a mad tricke Dower is forfeited Elopement by the sound and quality of the offence might séeme to be deriued from alopex a foxe for it is when a woman seekes her prey farre from home which is the foxes qualitie But the word seemeth to bee French there is a faire Statute against Elopement West 2. ca. 34. Si vxor sponte reliquerit virum abierit mâ—retur cum adultero suo amittat in perpetuum actionem pâ—tendi dotem quae â—i competere posset de tenementis viri sui si super hoc conuincatur nisi vir suus sponte absque cohertione Ecclesiastica cam reconciliet secum habitare permitâ—at in quo casu restituatur â—i actio A Woman that leaues her husband goeth away and abides with her adulterer if she be conuicted thereof loseth for euer her command of Dower c. vnlesse the Husband of his owne frée accord without ecclesiallicall compulsion suffer her to be reconciled and to cohabite with him in which case her action is restored for Dower It is commonly holden saith Parkins that a Woman shall lose her Dower by voluntary Elopement though her abiding be inuoluntary and though she make none abode at all with her Adulterer But if she be rauished and demurre with the Rauishor against her will she loseth no Dower If when the husband is commorant at one mannor his wife depart to another of his mannors and there liue in adultery this is none Elopement for it cannot but be intended she cannot abide there without grée and goodwill of her Baron ye shall haue a case for your erudition out of my Lord Dyer concerning this matter of Dower was demanded of a Mannor ex dotatione Domini Powes by R. H. and Anne his Wife it was pleaded that the said Anne in vita Domini Powes Frankly of her owne accord Left her Husband and her Lord And from Bednall Greene she ran With Mathew Rochlei Gentleman To the parish of Saint Clements Danes where she liued in adultery all the life long of Lord Powes absâ— hoc that euer she was reconciled the demandants pleadeâ— a reconciliauiâ— cohabitare permisit the reioynder is non reconciliauit modo forma To proue the reconciliation a lying together diuers nights at diuers places was giuen in euidence with demeanure as Baron and Feme against this it was obiected that they neuer were resient or abiding in one house together but alwayes in sunder and that the woman continued in adultery with one or other continually as long as her husband liued Et non allocatur for there may be many Elopements with many reconciliations and the Defendant at his perill must take issue vpon one 1. 2. Phi. Mariae Dyer fo 107. But me thinkes here wanteth equality in the Law women goe downe stile and many graines aâ— lowance will not make the ballance hang euen A poore Woman shall haue but the third foote of her Husband lands when he is dead for all the seruice she did him during the accouplement perhaps a long time and a tedious anâ— if she be extrauagant with a friend vt supra this is an Elopement and a forfeiture c. But as the saying is men are happy by the masse they may goe where they list I warrant yée and because they are enforced to trauell in the world they will pay deare abroad for that which they stéeme of no value at home Their adulterous soiâ—â—rningâ— is not discerned they may lope ouer ditch and Dale a thousand out-ridings and out-biddings is no forfeiture but as soone as the good wife is gone the badman will haue her Land not the third but euery foote of it Haue patience my Schollers take not your opportunitie of reuenge rather moue for redresse by Parliament and in the meane season be perswaded that liberty or impunity in doing euill by immodest life and lasciuious gallops is no freedome or happines no but rather act thus farre your Husbands duty of instruction namely to learne him to leaue his incontinencie abroad by your modest and chast life at home And if this will not produce you the
hath not the force of a negatiue implying in nul auter manner then is therein described Amy is therefore a ioynt purchaser with her husband in estate for life and not in or by descent of estate taâ—â—e Now to say that her right and estate should change by silent operation of the Law after shee was repossessed that cannot be for the whole entry is tolled and if she be not remitted by her first possession and reprisall she is neuer remitted If a Disseisour make feoffement to the vse of the Disfeisée and after the Disseisor enter he shall be remitted but before his entry he shall not be remitted for he shall be adiudged in possession by vertue of the Statute but so soone as hee entreth he is remitted for his entry was neuer tolled But Amy Townesends entry was cleane taken away by the discontinuance c. further if she should be remitted by the Statute of 27. the remainders should be all destroyed contrary to the text of the same Statute And to the inconueâ—iencie alleadged if she shall not be remitted shee shall hold incombred with the charges of her Husband that is none at all for Amy after her husbands death might haue disagréed and relinquished the vse with possession annexed to it by bringing a cui in vita against him next in remainder for in him by such disagréement or vser of action had the remainder vested as though the woman had beene a Monke or dead person in Law or neuer named in the limitation If the vse had béene to Amy Townsend in fée she might haue brought her cui in vita against the Feoffor or his heyre by which they shall be Tenants to her action and so might the inâ—umbrance haue béene auoyded for when a feoffement is to the vse of one which refuseth the vse it shall be in effect as if the vse had beene limited to Paules stéeple or to Charing-Crosse all falling or reflecting because the Feoffor hath no recompence or consideration to his vse and hee shall be Tenant to euery Precipe It was further agreed that as the Cause fell out Amy Townesend could not be remitted though her possession had returned by refeoffemeÌ„t at the Common Law because Sir Roger Townesend her Husband outliued her for 21. Ed. 3. the Case is Baron made a Feoffement the Feoffée â—einfeoffe the Baron and Feme and heyres of the wife she woman dyed the Heyre entred the Baron brought an Assise which was iudged maintainable for whilest the Baron liued he was tenant to the heyres action And the thâ— Iudgement was that Amy Townsend was neuer remitted the reason was indéed because there is nothing in the Statute of 27. to make a remitter for the clause of sauing of Drâ—its Titles and Actions is of such right c. as was before the Statute and not of any right title or action risen since or after it Now note that as a Lease made for twenty yeares by Baron and feme Tenants for life binds not any remainder by the Statute which speaketh onely that Leases made by Tenants of Inheritance shall binde heyres and Successors so I would inferre that if the Leassors inheritance be determined whether it were iure vxoris in taile or otherwise in taile the remainder must be frée from the Statute But note that the point which made me choose this case for illustration of the Statute is this Amy Townesend was iudged not remitted because she had no title of entry but onely by the 27 c. of vses and therefore she must néeds claime her possession according to the vse But put Case the Feoffement had béene since the Statute of 32 the Law would then haue iudged a remitter for by Littleton where any persons entry is congeable which taketh estate for life or in fée it is a remitter if the reprisall be not by Indenture or record or some matter of estoppell for alwayes where there is a double right or title the Law must iudge for the best as well in the entry as in the possession and an Indenture made by Baron and Feme is none estoppell to the Wife by the Common Law Concerning the Case 21. Ed. 3. Wilby which gaue iudgement thought the Barons aduantage a hinderance to the Remitter yet if he died the wife should be remitted But if you looke Brooke remitter 21. and 41. ye shall finde that the Feme was maintenant remitted though to saue the husbands aduantage of warranty they would not so iudge it quod mirum saith Brooke and quaere quia contrarium a ceo iour SECT XXVII Whether acceptance or taciturnity may not take away an entry at this day NO fine feoffement or other act done by the husband onely shall make any discontinuance or be preiudiciall to the wife but that she may enter c. what if Baron and Feme make a feoffement or Lease for life by solemne Indentures with Liuery and seisin cleere this takes not away at this day the wiues entry after Couerture ended But admit when shee is a widdow shee refuseth to enter and accept payment of rent or performance of couenants is not now both her entry and her action gone also euen as in case of an Infant which makes such a feoffement or Lease and accepts the rent when he is of full age The question must be answered out of the Statute and in mine opinion there is nothing in it to ayde a woman after such ratification by acceptance volenti non fit iniuria nec inuitis confirmantur beneficia A Lease by Baron Feme per Indenture is not voyd presently by the Barons death But whereas before she was driuen to suit and action shee may now enter by the Statute yet it compels her not to enter neither caâ—teth any frée-hold vpon her In like manner if the Baron alone alien his Wiues Land by fine with proclamation the Wife may enter by force of this Statute but per opinionem totius curiae Ed. 6. Dyer fo 72. If she suffer fiue yeares to passe and expire without entry or vser of action she and her heyres shall be barred for euer for this Statute of 32. though it limit no time for the womans entry yet it speaketh nothing of fines with proclamation and therefore it takes not the generall Law made 4. Hen. 7. cap. 24. of fines with proclamation And sée Sir Ed. Cokes 8. Rep. fo 72. in Grenlies case SECT XXVIII Of Fines SEe further the case 18. Eliz. Dyer 351. Land holden in socage was giuen to a man and his wife in taile the remainder in sée to the Barons right heyres the Baron alone leuied a fine with proclamation to his owne vse and afterward by his last will and Testament in writing deuised the Land to his wife for life the remainder ouer to a Stranger vpon condition to pay certaine rent annually out of the land with Clause of distresse c. the Baron died the wife entering and claiming estate onely for life paid rent
kéepership newly granted and sans fée which is a charge without gaine or vtility SECT XXXIII Estates Taile ALl estates tayle are within the equitie or compasse of this branch of 27. and the formes or species within the â—etter are but as patternes or examples of Ioyntures And therefore where an estate is limited to Baron and feme and to the Heyres Males of their bodies or to them and the heyres Males or Females of the body of one of them although this be an abridgement or amputation of one sexe from the examples within the very Statute yet it is a good Ioynture There is a Case in proofe thereof Dyer 97. 1 Marie the Duchesse of Somerset was ioynt-purchaser with her husband of estate to them two and to the heyres Males of her Husbands body betweene them begotten which is none of the fiue estates expressed in the Statute but the Iustices held cleare vnlesse it were refused it excluded Dower So is it if estate be made to Baron and Feme to them and the heyres Males which the Baron shall haue of the body of his wife vel e conuerso Or if the gift be to Baron and Feme and thrée heyres of their two Bodies which is an estate determinable vpon death of the third Issue or if it be to them and to the heyres de corpore the sonne of both of them or of one of them all these estates limited for Ioynture are good enough SECT XXXV Estate for Life c. THese words Or for life of the Wife are intendable as well for an estate made to the Wife onely during her life as of an estate made ioyntly to Baron and Feme during the life of the Wife Therefore an estate made onely to the Wife for her life or to the Baron for his life with a remainder to the Wife for her life is a good Ioynture within meaning of the Statute yet it seemeth not to agrée with the nature of a Ioynture by the etimology of the word and the Statute speaketh not of any remainder Dyer 14. 15. Eliz. fol. 387. agréeth and saith that Ioyntures may bee conditionall which if the Wife accept after the husbands death she shall be barred of Dower as where the condition is that shee shall kéepe her selfe vnmarried and saith he a Conueyance to a wife during her life in remainder after the immediate death of her Husband vpon condition reasonable may well bee intended pro iunctura yet he himselfe afterwards fo 340. thinketh that such a remainder to the wife for her life after the death of her Husband cannot bee termed a Ioynture because the Etimologie serueth not and 11. H. 7. ca. 20. 27. H. 8. demonstrateth no such Ioynture for women in possession or in vse of any estate in remainder after the Husbands death c. quaere If an estate bee conueyed to a mans Wife and to a stranger for their two liues for the Wiues Ioynture it is good enough yet the Statute mentioneth onely estates betwixt Baron and Feme And although the estate be not conueyed to the Feme by precise termes for her life yet words that amount to as much shall be of as great effect As if Lands be giuen to a wife vntill I. S. hath leuied an hundred pound or till he be promoted to a Benefice This maketh an estate for life within the branch of 27. c. SECT XXXVI Estate to the vse of Baron and Feme IF estate be conueyed to Baron and Feme to the vse of a Stranger this is no Ioynture but if it be to Baron and Feme or to one of them or to a Stranger to the vse of the Feme it is a good Ioynture and in euery limitation of vse to the Baron and Feme it is requisite that he or they that shall take the possession may be seised to an vse for if Lands be giuen to the King or a Corporation or to an alien borne to the vse of Baron and Feme this is no good Ioynture for these persons cannot stand seised to another bodies vse no more can a Rector or Parson of a Church or a Bishop vnlesse it be in respect of their naturall capacitie but a man attainted may take for another bodies vse and therefore a Feoffement to him to the vse of Baron and Feme may be a Ioynture SECT XXXVII How a Woman may haue a Ioynture and Dower and how neither Ioynture nor Dower A Woman may haue Dower notwithstanding her Iointure by the kind ouersight of her Husband or of his heyre As if a Ioynture assigned the Baron himselfe will endow his Wife ad ostium Ecclesiae or ex assensu patris Or if after the husbands death his heyre or Feoffée will assigne other Lands in Dower to her which hath a Ioynture already Or if the heyre plead to her in a Writt of Dower ne vnque seisique Dower c. or nient accouple in loyall matrimonie or any other plea saue Ioynture c. in barre of Dower for in such Case if it be found against him the woman shall recouer Dower and retaine her Iointure neuerthelesse quia volenti non fuit iniuria On the other side a Woman shall haue neither Ioynture nor Dower if by her owne folly or wrong done she haue forfeited her Ioynture As by breach of a condition annexed to her estate or doing of wast or making a Feoffement And if her Ioynture by lawfull title and without any folly in her be euicted from her yet where the heyre is remitted to another estate then that which her husband was seised of during Couerture she getteth no Dower So is it if the estate whereof Dower is demanded were conueyed to the Baron and his heyres during the life of I. S. But if it were to the Baron and his heyres for so long time as I. S. had heyres of his body lawfully begotten this estate may yéeld Dower SECT XXXVII The first Prouiso for Dower vpon euiction of Ioynture THis Prouiso is to be construed fauorably for women as the premises be in fauour of the Heire And therefore as well tayled Lands as Fée-simple are bound to render value and recompence if therefore the Ioynture euicted were to the value of twenty pound per annum and the heyre haue twenty pound per annum of Land tayled to his Father the woman shall recouer euery whit of it in recompence of her lost Ioynture for this latter and new Statute controlleth the ancient Statute de donis conditionalibus SECT XXXVIII In what case a Woman may refuse her Ioynture to demand Dower THe Statute is plaine that a woman may refuse a Ioynture made during Couerture and take her Dower or waiue Dower and rest on her Ioynture vnlesse the Ioynture were by act of Parliament c. And M. Brograues opinion was that if the Ioynture were made by other assurance and afterward confirmed by Parliament that such ratification tooke away a womans election as well as if the originall assurance had béen
Iudge ought to command execution presently for this benefit shall bee claimed but once If the Iudge inquire further of it it must be but to set a fine on the Marshall or Sheriffe for looking no better to her Stanford lib. 3. ca. vlâ—imo And by the bookes which he citeth the obiection must be not priuiment ensoint but enâ—â—int de viue enfant SECT XLIV Of Treasons ANd this obiection of enseintment is aswell to delay execution for treason as for felony A woman for committing either grand or petty treason shall be burned The latter part of the Statute 25. of Ed. 3. ca. 2 is That if any seruant kill his Master any woman kill her husband or any man secular or religious person kill his Prelate to whom he owes obedience this is treason and euery Lord shall haue the Escheates for such treasons of his owne proper fée the Statute is but declaration of the common law titulo Coronae in Fitzh A woman compasseth with her Adulterer the death of her husband they assailed him riding on the high way beating wounding leauing him for dead and then they fled The husband got vp leuied hue and cry came before the Iustices they sent after the offendors which were gotten arraigned and the matter found by verdict the adulterer was hanged the woman burned to death the husband liuing voluntas reputabitur per facto 15. E. 2. A woman seruant conspired to rob her Mistris and brought a stranger to the bed-side where the Mistris lay asleepe the stranger killed her the seruant silent nothing doing but holding the Candle the two chiefe Iustices and Hâ—re thought the seruant a Traytresse and a principall 2. 3. Eliz. Dyer 128. yet Mistris is not verbatim in the Statute Stanford was one of them against the chiefe Iustices opinion in this case yet in his owne booke he teacheth that abettors procurers are within the meaning and intent of the Law The seruant and the wife conspire the husbands death he is killed by the seruant in absence of the wife this is petty treason in them both by opinion of diuers Iustices otherwise it is if the murtherer be no seruant Dyer 16. Eliz 332. for Saunders wife which procured Browne to kill her husband but barely hanged as accessarie because the principall was but a murtherer 8. Eliz. Dyer 254. SECT XLV Actions by Baron and Feme together THe baron and feme may ioyne in a writ of trespasse quare vi armis clausuÌ„ fregit c. for trespasse done in the wiues land either before couerture or during couerture Sée 21. H. 6. fol. 30. such a Writ brought of trespasse in the Close of Baron and Feme and féeding vp blada sua Iudgement is asked of the Writ because a Feme couert hath no propertie in goods and chattels during the couerture The Declaration saith Markham is blada sua dum sola fuit depastus fuit That saith Newton is not possible but it ought to be blada ipsius Katherinae c. Yeluerton saith that both the Writ and Declaration ought to haue béene Dum sola fuit which Newton denies and saith that the Count ought only to be so and affirmeth that as the matter is brought forth there is an intendment of depasturing before couerture and of breaking the Close after couerture of which the Baron and Feme may haue a Writ Clausum suum fregit c. So the Action seemeth to be by two seuerall titles But in the end the record was viewed which was Quod clausum ipsius Katherinae fregit blada eiusdem Katherinae depastus fuit and the Declaration Dum sola fuit which made the Writ to be awarded good And there it is said that by the Register the Writ is not Dum sola fuit but generall and the Declaration speciall Yet 7. H. 7. fol. 2. vpon the like Writ of Quare clausum fregit bonâ— catella sua cepit which Declaration of trespasse to the Feme Dum sola fuit iudgement being giuen was afterwards found erroneous for fault in the Writ which should haue béene not bona sua but bona ipsius le Feme and therefore a Repleader awarded The baron feme may haue a Writ of trespasse of assault made to the Feme and imprisonment of her vntill the Baron compounded and paid a fine and the briefe and count shall be ad damna ipsorum quod nota 46. Ed. â— 3. Nota per Cuâ—iam saith Brooke Baron and Feme may ioyne in appeale De â—â—pe le feme for the husband alone cannot haue it without his wife 8. H. 4. fol. 21 The case there is A woman prisoner in the Marshalsey makes a suggestion to the Court that the Marshals man had rauished her in prison Gâ—scoigne commanded the Marshall to take his man to his custody and his staffe from him and the Court told the woman that she alone could not bring appeale sans son Baron but if her husband would come and they two together would proue the rape the rauisher should be hanged By this case it is plaine that the wife alone cannot haue the appeale but the Baron and Feme may haue it But neither by this case or any other statute can I finde that the baron may not haue it alone Whether ne vnque a couple in loyall matrimony be a sufficient plea in this appeale and whether he which is but Baron in possession only that is that husband which is at the time of the rape may haue it quaere and see 11. H. 4. 13. Baron and Feme may ioyne in a Writ of Debt and 16. Edw 4. fol. 8. such a Writ brought for arrerages of account with Declaration that the defendant was the wiues receiuer Dum sola fuit puraccount render and that the Baron and Feme after espousals assigned Auditors which found the defendant in arrerages c. Insomuch as the ground of the Action begun by the wise and the assignment of the Auditors was pursuing And likewise by the wife they might ioyne So if an Obligation be made to Baron Feme they may ioyne in a Writ of Debt and if the Baron die his wife and not the Executors shall haue the Action 3. H. 6. fol. 37. Per curiam Baron and Feme may ioyne in a Writ of Debt vpon an Obligation made to them during couerture And Babington affirmes that the Baron may haue the Action alone if he will 43. Ed. 3. fol. 10. such a Writ was brought and exception taken that it ought to haue been by the husband alone sed non allocatur Though for chattels vested as goods that are giuen to a man and his wife the Baron alone must pursue his Action for taking them out of his possession Otherwise it is of matters consisting onely in Action c. for they suruiue to the Feme like to a Lease granted to Baron and Feme for yeares So is it of rauishment or eiectment of Guard for these are Chattles reall But if
companion diuorced for lands wherein shee claimeth inheritance or estate for life so if he haue aliened in sée â—ée tayle â—r for life the lands which he had in fée simple â—ée â—a le or for terme of life to a stranger she may as soone as she iâ— diuorced bring a Writ called a â—â—i ante diuorâ—â—â—m against the Alâ—enee And this Writ may be in the per cuâ— post If shee dye before action commenced or before recouery her heire may haue a Writ called a surâ—uranâ—e diuortium and the Aunt and Néece may joyne in iâ— But for her estate tayle her heire shal be put to a formidone But note Reader that it séemeth both the woman and her heire may enter after the Statute of 32. Hen. 8. and neuer bring Cui in vita nor sur cuim viâ—a c. for the opinion in Grenlies Case Sir Edw. Cokes 8. Rep. fol. 73. is that if the baron alien and after the wife is diuorced causa praecontract which dissolue the marriage à vinculoma rimonii the wife during the life of the husband or after his death may enter for the words of the Aâ—tare nâ— fine feâ—ffeinent c. during the Couerture betwéene them and although the Statutâ— saith But that the same wife c. that is to be intended of her which was his wife at the time of the alienation c. Note that whereas West 2. cap. â— giueth a cui in vita vpon recouery by default against the husband c. shée shall haue a cuâ—â—hâ—e diuortium vpon the like â—eâ—ouery by equity extension of the Statute and the processe is summons grand cape peâ—iâ— cape I wil here set the bounds and limits of my third booke not because this sequell and consequence â—iuorte I meane whereby the issue had is basâ—â—â—â—â—zed and the wâ—â—an restored to her goods and lands conforteth with the marriage so perfectly begun as I meant it for this is not the vntying of true wedlocke but rather a dissipation of marriage tainted at the beginning and in Christian Court adiudged to a â—â—llity as if it had neuer béene the Baron and Fâ—me that I hâ—â—â— spoken of all this while if they were not married in their infant loue and very first flowing age yet were they not â—rostbitten or so blasted either of them when they were young but they might well haue frâ—â—tified neither was either of them a common Law breaker intangled with promise or praecontract and as for consanguinity or affinity there was no more betwixt them than is betweene Iack Flecher and his bolt You may imagine some matter by onely imagination perhaps more visible than it could haue béene being true whereupon a publike sentence of seperation being published a Thoro mensa but then there was a monition of chast liuing and prohibition to both the parties that neither of them should flâ—â— to other marriage so long as both of them were liuing And the Author of seperation that is the party suing diuorce did put in sufficient caution to doe nothing contrary to this prohibition So that the holy liues of matrimony were not cleane broken and pulled asunder but within a yéere or two they were reconciled voluntarily of their â—wne accord And soone after so I will make it hauing the Distaffe Spindle and Shéeres all in mine owne hand the husbands life was suddenly cut off or else the wiâ—e had béene sole executrix THE WOMANS LAWYER The fourth BOOKE PAle death equo pulsans pede pauperum tabernas regnumque â—urres Death I say to whom the Poet did attribute so much power in this his verse Omnia sub leges mors vocat aâ—â—a suas hath called the husband hence left the house full of mourning and specially the wife cannot chuse but sorrow and lament If my â—oure legged beast should fall into halues the one halfe starke dead without motion or spirit and the other halfe standing still vpright senting séeing féeling gazing must it not thinke you be wonderfully astonished If an Elephant in whom as some dâ—e write is vnderstanding of his countries spéech a wonderfull memorie and recenting of things past a great delight in loue and glorie besides prudence equitie and religion should haue his head cut off his body remaining still for all that vegetable and sensitiue would he not trow yée be excéeding sorrowfull for the forgoing such an ornament I dare be bold to giue a woman as much as Pliny gaue the Elephant She hath vnderstanding and spéech firme memorie loue naturall and kindnesse desire of glorie and reputation with the accomplishment of many meritorions vertues But alas when she hath lost her husband her head is cut off her intellectuall part 〈…〉 gone the verie faculties of her soule are I will not s 〈…〉 cleane taken away but they are all be 〈…〉 ned di 〈…〉 ed and dazled so that she cannot thinke or remember when to take rest or refâ—ction for her weake body And though her spirits and naturall moysture being inwardly exhausted with sorrow and extreme griefe she be called and inforced to seeke restauration by such aliments as life is prolonged by yet is she nothing desirous of life hauing lost a moytie of herselfe yea the principall maytie now best prised and estéemed but neuer best loued Time must play the Physitian and I will helpe him a little Why mourne you so you that be widowes Consider how long you haue beene in subiection vnder the predeminance of parents of your husbands now you be frée in libertie frée propriiâ—uris at yoâ—r owne Law you may see num cap. â—0 That maidens and wiues vowes made vpon their soules to the Lord himselfe of heauen and earth were all disauowable and infringible by their parents or husbands vnlesse they ratified and allowed them either expresse or by silence at the day when such vowes came first to their notice and knowledge But the vow of a widow or of a woman diuorced no man had power to disallow of for her estate was free from controlment Must a woman néeds wéepe thus for the losse of her Buckler Shield and defence in the person of him with whom she held daily commutation of all offices proceeding from loue and superlatiue kindnesse Let her learne to cast her whole loue and deuotion on him that is better able to loue and defend her than all the men in the world Him I meane that hath forbiddâ—n to afflict widdowes or orphans with promise to heare their cries and vindicate their wrongs by killing them by the sword and making the wiues widdowes and their children fatherlesse of them which breake this Commandement Exod. cap. 22. Then because a sober carefulnesse and moderate sedulitie in businesse of profit or disprofit doth mitigate greatly the sorrowing for such actions as opinion or fancie makes thus grieuous let her looke to her affaires as cause and need requireth SECT I. Of Executorship and Administration SHe is not made an Executor because the office is troublesome let her take
That the Charters ought to concerne the land whereof Dower is demanded and not other lands descended to the heire 2. He that pleads that plea ought to shew the certainty whereof a certaine issue may be ioyned or that they are in a chest or box sealed which import sufficient certainty whereof certaine issue may be taken and in both cases action of detinue may be brought by the heire 3. No stranger although that he bée Tenant of the land and hath the euidences conueyed vnto him may plead in a Writ of Dower deteiner of Charters but that plea is only in prinity for the heire of the husband Also the heire shall be in the degrée of a stranger in fiue cases First if the heire hath the land by purchase Secondly if the heire hath deliâ—eâ—ed the Charters to the wife Thirdly so the heire be not immediate vouchee namely by the Tenant in the Writ of Dower but by his vouchée Fourthly if the heire comes in as vouchée hauing no lands in the County where the land is demanded Fifthly if he comes in as Tenant by receit And Gardian in Chiualry may not plead deteinement of Charters for hée may not conclude his plea if the Demandant will deliuer to him the Charters c. for the Charters which concerne the heritage of the heire shall not be deliuered to the Gardian as it is adiudged in 10. Edw. 3. 49. SECT XI Deteining of the heire AS the heire only may deteine Dower for deteining of euidence so the Gardian in Chiualry onely may deteâ—â—â— Dower for deteining the heire and that he may plead and conclude qÌ„ il ad en touts temps prist for the ward belongeth to him If a widow eloigne the infant or heire of her husband though some other body haue him by her deliuery yet the Gardian in Chiualry may detaine Dower except shee can redeliuer him to the Gardian in as good plight as hée was at the time of the eloigâ—ment that is vnmarried if he were eloigned vnmarried But a woman nourishing her owne Infant the sonne or heire which her husband left her if a stranger clauning as Gardian fake him from her the right Lord shall not detaine dower for this cause But if a woman take and remoue the heire from the place where hee was nourished at time of the Barons death Now if a stranger wrongfully take him from her the true and right Gardian may detaine dower And this matter is pleadable by Gardian in Chiualrie though hée come into Court by reason that the heire is vouched to be in his ward for by right the custodie of the Infant can appertaine to none but to him vnlesse it be by his grant or agréement Certaintie is required in pleading of this detainer aswell as in the other viz. that she which demandeth dower hath eloigned or detained I. S by name son or daughter W. c. 22. H. 6. fol. 16. 2. H. 7. fol. 6. SECT XII Possession in the Demandant 39. Ed. 3. 17. DOwer was demanded a third part of a carue of land the tenant said the demandant her selfe was seised of a third part of it already Iudgement de briefe per Knyuet it was no good plea without shewing who assigned it or that she recouered it For if shee were in by disseisen shee must haue dower of the other two parts remaining neuerthelesse by which the tenant was chased to answer for the two parts 7. oâ— H. 6. 33. 34. In action of dower against tâ—â— one said he had assigned rent out of the land six shillings and eight pence annuall to the demandant for terme of her life which she accepted c. The other pleaded touâ—s tâ—mps prist c. The assignment was holden a good plea c. the demandant said she neuer agreed Now per Strange she was to recouer a moytie maintenant though the other plea were not yet tried for this was a confession of one and pleader in bar of the other 2. H. 4. fol. 7. A Lady sued in Chancerie to be endowed of diuers Mannors which were her husbands where the heire was in gard of the King as was found by the Diem clausit extremum there returned and because it appeared that King Richard had committed wardship of the lands and body of the heire till full age of the said heire to her by patent without foreprise or mention of dower shée was ousted of dower per agard de toutes les Iustices till full age of the heire simile 11. of H. 4. in case of the Lady Arrundell Fitzherbert saith likewise If a woman take a lease for yeares of land whereof she is dowable she shall not sue for Dower during these yeares Nat. br 149. c. Bracton propoundeth to be considered what shall be done when the widdow brings her Writ of Dower vnde nihil habet and yet it is so that she hath part of her Dower already If saith he it be proued or she cannot deny it cadit breue and she shall not recouer the residue but by Writ de recto de dote Therefore let her accept no part of her Dower before she purchase her Writ and let it containe all the Deforcers be they in one Countie or in many When they are so put together if now she accept any thing of her Dower without Iudgement the acceptation of part shall be no exception against her for she may confesse satisfaction for that part If peraduenture shee haue already taken part of her Dower from some one person before the obtaining or purchase of her Writ let his name and the summons for him be in the Writ notwithstanding and then if it be obiected she hath accepted part shee may acknowledge that hee hath satisfied her for his part and whether before or after suit is not greatly to be stood vpon But if he of whom she receiued part be not named in the Writ she cannot against the obiection of acceptance reply that the land which she accepted is not in the same Towne but in another For vnde nihil habet in the Writ non debet referri ad villas sed ad dotem It is nothing worth therefore to say she hath nothing in tali villa if she hath any thing nomine dotis wheresoeuer it be it is not then materiall And when a woman replyeth nihil habet her defence shall not be per legem that is wager of Law but per patriam Likewise if a woman plead that she hath nothing nomine dotis but by some other title as ratione custodiae huiusmodi Inquisition may be in the Countie where it is supposed shee receiued Dower to finde whether shée haue any thing in Dower of the tenements which were her husbands and if shée had and now hath not to enquire what is become of it this was a Norâ—â— case of Holda the late wife of W. in Trinitie Terme 4. H. 4. as Bracton in his fourth Booke 13. Chapter and fol. 312. relates vnto me SECT XIII Ne
seised 20. Hâ—â— â— The Statute oâ— Moâ—â—on cap. 1. ordeineth concernâ—ng widdowes qâ—â— post moâ—tem vâ—â—oâ—â—â— expeâ—luntur de dotibus suis dores sâ—os vel quaâ—â—â—â—enam habere non possâ—nâ—â—iâ—e placito That whosoeuer shall dâ—force them of Dower â—r â—â—arâ—ntino in any tenemâ—nts whereof their husbands dyed seised if they bee conuiâ—ted de iniâ—â—â—o dâ—forciâ—meâ—to they shall râ—nder dammages to the widdowes so much as the Dower should haue bâ—â—ne worth to them from the time of the husbands death till the day where the widdowes recouer seisen of Dower pâ—r â—udicium Curâ—e And the Deâ—orcers shall â—eâ— in â—iseâ—icordia Regâ—s neuer awâ—it the lesse It is plaine now that the Baron dying sâ—ised if the wife be deforced sâ—e shall recouer dammages which are sometime comprised in the iudgement oâ—seisin and sometime awarded 〈◊〉 iudgemâ—nt â—â—â—â—â—uerâ—â—nt or sâ—râ—â—â—se vt sâ—pâ—â— But for all this Statute of Mâ—â—toâ— de iniusâ—â— deforciamento a widdow shall not in all cases recouer dammages by this dying seiâ—â—d for if the Tenant plead touts temps prist c. and it be confessed or found to haue béene so there iâ— now no fault in him â—â—â— Câ—â—yâ— Hill â—â— Hâ—â— 4. fol. 40. 41â— foreuery hâ—â—re hath right to all the parts of hiâ— since storâ— iâ—heritaâ—â—e â—till the widdow will â—â— indowed The case they say obiected viz. that in a Writ of Coâ—sâ—â—â—â—â— touts â—emps prist will not excuse the Tenant of dâ—â—â—ages is no thing â—like for the Oâ—cuâ—iour there hath not iust â—itlâ— c. Doctor and Student tels vs fol. 82. 8â— that though the husband dieth seised if hiâ— widdow â—oth not deâ—â—â—d Dower sâ—â— shall recouer no daâ—â—ages for it is a gâ—â—â— plea in a Writ of Dower â—â—â—â— the Tenants appeare the first day to say touts tempâ— pâ—ist a yeeldâ—â— Dower if it be deâ—â—â—ded and that plea â—â—all â—xcuse him of dâ—mmages but iâ— he had made refusâ—â—â— he shall bée chargeable as well for dammages before the request as after But in Sir Edward Cokes 4. Rep. 30. b. in Shawes Case a woman recouered Dower by plaint in a Court Baron and shee recouered dammages from the death of her husband because he died seised and it doth not appeare that there was any request and refusall I dare not say that it is Idemius whether the heire or his feoffée plead his plea though I cannot findâ— any presâ—â—ent of dammages giuen vpon it being true but often sur plea de touâ—s temps prâ—st the iudgement ended thus niâ—ilde materia quiâ— venit primo edis vide â—â— Ed. 4. fol. 7. I doe referre the Reader for his better instruction touching this matter where hee shall finde variety of store Sir Edward Cokes Comment vpon Litleton fol. â—2 b. The second Chapter of Merton giues power to all widdowes to make wils as well of Corne growing vpon their dowry lands as vpon their inheritance saluis sâ—ruâ—â—s dominorum de â—eodis quae de doâ—ibâ— aliis tenementis suis debentur Britton séemeth to be taken with a Chancâ—â—y spirit vpon â—ight of this Statute cap. 10â— fol. â—â—0 where he saith that in euery iudgement of seisâ—â— awarded of reasonable Dower there ought to be a â—oreprisâ— or exception de bleâ—â— câ—â—ssaunâ—s femes â—auches I will subioyne Bracton as an Adiutor perhaps more orthâ—doâ— Dower saith he lib. 2 cap. 40 shall â—â— assigned by the heire if he â—e of full age or by the Lord in the heires name if he be vnderage And this within forty dayes after the husbands death for otherwise occurâ—iâ— tempus sequantur damna nisi rationâ—bilis causa excuset This assignation must be made of the land as it was by the husband tilled or vntilled with the fruits growing vpon it allowing nothing to the heire or Executor for manuring husbanding or culture of it for of old time it was obserued that in what â—â—sâ— or plight a woman had receiued her Dower whether it â—â—â—â— tilled or vntilled shee must restore in like plight to the heire c. she might not make her Will of any corne groâ—ing or fruit not sâ—parated from the francktenement Sed nouâ— superueniente gratia sicut pâ—â—et de prouisionibus apud Merton A woman may now ordeine her Testament of corne or fruit growing on her dowry or seuered growing all is one If the husband alien all his lands and the Tenants need not yéeld dower to the widdow as soone as shée demandeth it if there bee iust cause of calling to warranty one or more successiuely till the heire bee vouched And all that time the Tenants are not charged with dammages or cosâ—s But when the heire entreth into warranty if he doe not presently yeeld Dower but stand out â—bstinately hee shall pay dammages as much as dower mâ—ght haue béene worth to the woman from the time of the husbands death to the day wherein shee hath iudgement and the heire shall be amercered In like manner is it if a widdow without any assignation enter into her Dower that was certainly nominated to her ad ostium Ecclesiae and which shee findeth empty at her husbands death if she be eiected or put to suit and delayes she shall recouer dammages So shall shee if shee be eiected the tenement assigned for quarentine during the forty dayes or before dower assigned after the forty dayes So likewise is it if shée haue no place at all assigned to dwell in vbi recliâ—et caput suum c. Thus Bracton and thus long wee haue béene in the Writ de dote nihil vnde habet which though it bee aptliest brought in the common place for the reason aboue declared yet it may bee sued in the County before the Sheriffe per Iusticies as saith Fitzherbert in his na bre 148. But then it séemes it must bée remoued by recordari facias if the Tenant plead ne vnque accouple c. so the booke of Entries 223 224. for in the base Court that issue cannot be tryed SECT XVIII The Writ de recto de dote THere is another Writ called the Writ of right of Dower not because the former Writ hath any â—orciousnesse in it or claimeth vpon wrong title but because this second Writ hath fewest ambages in pleading and the forme of it is vpon pure right Britton saith there are cases wherein a woman is driuen to a Writ of right of dower pleadable in Court One is where a woman hath lost seism of her dower as if shee were disseised and after long peacable seism of the desseisor shee reentred with force if the desseisor recouer against her by assise she hath no remedy but onely by Writ de recto de doâ—e counting of her owne seism Aâ—other is where a woman demands lands or tenements which were her husbands as part of her dower when shee is seised of a surplus or greater part already And the third is when shee demands something as appertenant â—â— hâ—r dower Fitzherbeâ—â— séemes not to allow Bractonâ— relation of vnde nihil
be declared with what immunity a woman shall hold her Dower First Bracton saith Si peculia maâ—iti sufficiant ad solutionem tenentur sed vxori dos sua deonerabitur Et heres defendere dotem warrantizare eam mulieri debet pro ea sequi comitatus hundreda curia dominorum vt viduatae domui suae intendat nutritioni suorum si qui fuerint puerorum If the husbands goods bee not sufficient for payment of his debts the heire must discharge Dower of the burden c. for he is the widdâ—wes warrant of her Dower and ought to follow for her County Court Court léet and hundred c. That shée may sée to her house and nurture of her children Fitzherbert in his Writ of Admeasurement first affirmes that a woman shall not be distreined in her Dower in her Inheritance or in the ioynt purchased lands to her or her husband for her husbands debts The Writ which he sets downe for remedy saith almost as much Râ—x Vicicounti c. cum secundum legem consuetudinem regni angliae mulieres in terris tenementis quae tenâ—nt in dotem de dono virorum vel quae sunt de ipsarum haereditate vel quae sibi quesiuerint pro debitis virorum distringi non debent c. And in some Writs is this Clause Dum tamen haeredes vel Executores testamenti ipsius c. ad debiâ—a illa reddenda nobis sufficiant But it séemes reasonable saith Fitzherbert that a woman shall not hee distreined in her Inheritance for the Kings debts neither in her Dower or Ioynt purchased lands which her husband if her title commenced before her husband became debtor and there is a Writ in the register importing no lesse yea hee affoordâ— it to be good reason that lands purchased by Baron and Feme after the Baron is entred in debt to the King should be discharged in the widdowes hands But let widdowes agrée with the King as well as they can the heire is lyable to the debts of his Ancestor before the widdow The heire likewise dischargeth her of suit and seruice and is so farre forth her warrant that by Britton if shee be impleaded and vouch any other to warranty she forfeiteth her Dower pur sa malice and though her husbands feofee be not called her warrant yet if she be indowed by him shee must hold of him And regularly Tenant in Dower must be Attendant to her husbands heire or to the heires Gardian or to the Gardenis Executor or to him in the reuercion according to the rate of rent whereby they hold ouer if Tenent by fealty and xij d. rent bée disseised and dye his wife being indowed by the disseisor shall be an attendant to the same dissessor of iiij d. annuall And now if the heire will bring a Writ of entry in to quibus against the woman thus indowed shee may shew her speciall matter and that shée is ready to attend to whom the Court will award which shall award that she retaine her Dower still and bee attendant to the heire quaere saith Parkins if the heire haue any other remedy for hee cannot enter vpon the Tenant in Dower D.st 82. a. saith That a Feme tenant in Dower leaueth the reuersion in him against whom shee demands her Dower although he be a disseisor and doth not reduce the reuersion by her recouery to him which hath right as other Tenants for life doe And as it is said in Sir Edward Cokes 8. Rep. 35. in Paynes ca. if she recouer against Tenant for life shee leaueth the reuersion in him But by nat br fol. 265. a. if the King assigne Dower in Chancery as Gardian the reuersion reposeth in the heire for which he shall sue liuery If after iudgement the heire grant his reuersion and the woman atturne she shall be Attendant to the grantée If Lord Meane Tenant be the Tenant holding by iij. d. rent and the Meane by 20. d. If the Tenant marry and the Meane release to him all his right in the tenancy the Tenant dieth the wife must bee endowed according to her husbands best possessions and therefore shall bee Attendant to the heire by a penny and not the third part of twenty pence If hee which holdeth by fealty and xij d. hauing a wife sell the tenancie to his Lord and the estate is executed the Tenants wife shall be indowed sans attendancie for the Seignory extinct is not reuiuable If Lord Measne and Tenant be the Tenant holdeth by xij d. which dieth his wife is endowed shee shall bee attendant to the heire by iiij d. now if the Lord release all his right in the tenancy to the heire the meanalty is extinct and the attendance gone for it was but in respect of the charge which the heire was at to his next Lord. But where there is Lord and Tenant by fealty and xij d. rent if the Tenant make a gift in tayle of the land to hold of him and his heires by xx s. rent c. if the donée dye without issue his wife endowed shall be attendant to the donor by v. s. and viij d. although the Lord release to the donor for his attendance is not in respect of the charge ouer but by a speciall reseruation If there be Seignor Meane and Tenant by fealty and iij. s. rent the Meanes wife after he be foreiudged in a Writ of meane and dead shall be endowed without attendance If Tenant by fealty and xij d. make a gift in taile of the land reâ—â—â—â—ing â—ij d. rent c. and the doâ—ce hauing a wife and issue by her â—iscontinueth in fee and dieth now though the wife recouer Dower and haue execution of it against the discontinues yet she shall not be attendant to him for hâ—s is not chargeable as the Baron was because the Dowers â—uowry resteth of â—ereâ—â—â—â—â— vpon the issue to whom for all that the widdow shall not bee attendâ—â—t till hee haue recontinued the 〈◊〉 resayle quaere tamen saith Perkins If the Tenant whilst hee Itâ—â—â— held of his Lord by fealty and a 〈◊〉 of forty shillings price the Tenants widdow when shée is endowed shall bee attendant by xiiâ— â— iiij â—c 〈◊〉 she tenure were by fealty and a nag without expresse value shée shall bée Attendant by a nag euery third yéere Perkins fo 84. â—â— SECT XXIII Of the cui in vita I Have béene long in Dower and I feare mee some women had rather neuer be endowed that is they had rather die with their husbands or soone after them than bée bound to learne this Catechisme yet I must come to it once againe But first let vssée how lands whereunto a woman may haue right by ancient indowment or by discent or gift in franckmarriage or by some other acquisition before or during Couerture in fee fée tayle for life or for yéeres may bee reduced if the husband haue aliened them for it the possession continued alwayes in the
husband till his death then by his death the widdow is made sole Tenant of them so little needing either assignation or other circumstance that without new entry claime or challenge shee may haue action of her owne possession against any other that shall enter If the husband aliened intirely any lease for yéeres of his wiues it is gone irreuocable and if hee make no sale and the wife dyes hee shall haue the leafe except shee bee ioyntly possest with another and the seruing ioyntenant shall haue Commentar vpon Fitzherbert 185. If he aliened part of the estate as for ten yéeres next ensuing where the terme was for twenty the widdow may enter when ten yéeres expired But sée in that Case that if the husband rested a rent and dyes the Executors of the husband shall haue the rent for it was not incident to the reuersion yet the wife shall haue the resioue of the terme Sir Edw. Cokes Commentar vpon Fitzherbert fol. 57. b. if he aliened for the ten last yéeres shee may continue possession till those ten yéeres be commenced If the husband deuise away by his last Testament a terme for yéeres which he hath by right of his wife I suppose the deuise is â—â—id as well as if it were made of some higher estate as it appeares by Perkins chap. Dâ—â—â—ses and Plowd 419 in Bra 〈…〉 gâ—â— case And the Law is all one in all respects where the Baron and Feme are possessed of lease for yeares by intâ—eâ—ties that if the estate be made to them during their couerture or by moyties that is to them ioyntly before marriage or where the Baron is possessed of a lease iure vxoris Sée Dame Haâ—â— case Plowd 260. And if the Baron possest of a lease for yeares in the right of his wife charge the land with a rent and die the rent is gone Plowd 4â—8 in Bracebridges case for shee is remitted And if Feine Gardian in Socrage be and her Baron alienateth it and die the wife may enter And sée Dyer 8. Eliz. 25 the same is of Coppy holds per 〈…〉 der to the vse of a Feme for yeares the wife die the estate rests in the husband without a custome be to the contrary If an husband be possest of a terme for yeares in the right of his wife and Iudgement is had against him and the terme is extended and the husband dieth it shall be good against the wife as appeares by Sir Edw. Cokes 8 Rep. 96. in Maâ—â—ing case And see the 9. case of 50 E. 3. lib. Ass note Sir Edw. Cokes Rep. in â—ulwoods case and Plowd 26â— in Damè Hales casâ— where a lease made to Baron and Feme is extended for the debt of the King after the wiues drath If a man possest of a te me deuiseth it to one for his life the remainder to a woman for her life who takes an husband the husband may release that to the particular tenant although it be but a possibilitie Sir Edw. Cokes 10. Rep. 47. Lampeâ—â—s case And if a woman hath a lease for yeares as Executâ—iâ— and takes an husband hée may sell it per â—oâ— curi 〈…〉 pr 〈…〉 r Fitzherbert Dyer â—8 H. 8. 7. A woman hath a terme 〈…〉 trir the husband s 〈…〉 wits to 〈…〉 vâ—â—n which a moytie is awarded to the pretendor of the title the wife is bound thereby but because the defendant in detinue brought by the wife for the Indenture of lease plead non dâ—tinet and not the speciall matter Iudgement was against him Dyer 2. E 〈…〉 183. 21. H. 7. 6. agrees If the husband discontinue the Franck tenement of his wife the apt instrument whereby to recouer it when she is a widdow is a Cu 〈…〉 vita Which though it be not so necessarie and néedfull perhaps since the Statute of 32. which disableth husbands to discontinue as it was before yet I. perceiue not by what reason the vse of it is forbidden euen in those cases where the entrie is â—ongeable for the vertue of the Writ is not decayed by lawfulnesse of the entrie neither doth free libertie to take possession prohibit the resort to Iustice and action at Law when perhaps a woman cannot or dares not enter By Common Law therefore if the Baron alien in fée the heritage of his wife or her Francktenement by Feoffment or by Demise for terme of life or in taile she may haue remedy after his decease by this Writ Of which the generall forme is Praecipe A. quod â—â—d â—â—â— Bâ—quae fuit vxor Câ—â—â—um messuagium 〈…〉 quod clamat esse ius hereditat suam Et in quod A. noâ— habet ingressum nisi per C. quondam virum c qui illud â—â— de 〈…〉 isit cui in vita contradicere non pot 〈…〉 Th 〈…〉 may be in the per â—ui and post and some varietie it hath according to title of the Demandant as Quâ—â—â— clamat 〈…〉 ius haereditatem or Vt ius maritagium or Vt ius exâ—onâ— I. qui ipsaâ— B. C. virum suum feofavit in quo c. or Quam clamat tenere sibi haeredibusde corpore suo de 〈◊〉 C. quondam viri sui exâ—untibus â—â— d 〈…〉 ne I. or Quam clamat essâ— dotem suam ex dono E. pri 〈…〉 vel secundi c. If Baron and Feme lose the wiues landâ— by de 〈…〉 shée may haue this Writ when shee is a widdow But if the wiues lands be recouered in a Cessauit perâ—de 〈…〉 â—â— Baron and Feme vpon a C 〈…〉 during esp 〈…〉 shall neuer haue a Cuâ—â—â— vita 4. Ed. 2. If Baron and Feme and a third person being Ioyntenants in Fée the Baron alien the intiertie and die his widdow shall haue a Cui in vita of a inoytie during the life of the third person for it séemed the alienation was a seuerance of Ioynture saith Fitzherbert But hée sends vs to 36. Ed. 3. in his Abridgement titulo Cui in vita By which booke the wife in this case cannot haue a Cui in vita for any part so long as the third person suruiueth because they two may ioyne in a Writ of right and if hee die she may haue a Cui in vita of all Vide Librum Of lands which a man and woman purchase ioyntly before couerture the Cui in vita shall be but of a inoytie but of lands purchased ioyntly during coâ—eâ—â—ure the Cui in vita is of the in 〈…〉 e and being brought of a inoytie the Writ is not good 39. H. 6. 45. for in the one case they are seised by inoyties in the other by intireties A woman by excepting lands which she and her late husband tooke in exchange or by excepting rent reserued out of it shall be bâ—â—â—ed in a Cui in vita or any other action Fitzherbert and â—6 Ed. 4. 8. Idem ius if shée accept parcell â—â— her owne land in Dower but 17. Assisarum pl. 3. Brooke 24. Cui in
vita If the assignment of this Dower be sans fait it is no barre or conÌ„clusiou but a Remitter otherwise if it be by Deed or Record If a man giue lands to a woman to marrie with him and after espousals he alieneth the same land and dieth she may haue a Cui in vita And note that the gift or demise alleaged in a Cui in vita is trauersable Thus much Fitzherbert 48. Ed. 3. 8. In a Cui in vita claiming to hold sibi 〈…〉 de corpore without shewing of whose donation the 〈◊〉 pleaded to the Writ and it was abated But in a Quod â—â— de 〈…〉 the Demandant needs not shew by whoâ—e gift she claimeth 49. Ed. 3. fol. â—9 The Writ was Qua 〈…〉 sib 〈…〉 W. N. The tenant said she neuer had any â—â—ing of the gift of W. N. per Belknap the answer was not good for were the gift from one or other if the husband aliened she might haue the action and the Writ may be Quâ—m elamaâ— vt ius haereâ—â—aâ—em though she purchased the lands adiorâ—atâ—r The latter point is affirmed 7. H. 4. fol 5 per Littleton accorded but for the first vide 50. Ed. â— fol. 6. in a Cui in viâ—a quam clâ—mat â—enerâ—â—x dimissione per termino viâ—ae â— N. it was admitted vpon argument a good answer per â— uâ—iam for where one maketh title it â—ught to be true And there finde sur release made to Baron and Fâ—me and to the herres of the baron by I. N. was holden no demise for it must be supposed the baron and feme were in possession tempore finis And Persy said it had béene adiudged if a woman claimed in her Writ ad termiâ—um vitae if it were found she had estate taile the Writ should abate So likewise if a woman claime by lease for terme of life per A. and it was sound that A. made no lease shée had now no estate and consequently hath none action Likewise said Kirton if in Assâ—ze of nouell disseism the plaintiffe make his title by fâ—offâ—â—nt of A. and is found that A. infâ—offed him not but B. did hée shall bee barred in the Assize for where a man maketh his title vpon a point which is boâ—nd against him it cannot be intenâ—â—â— that he hath a better title and there he shall not haue aduantage of any other 39. H. 6. fol. 38. In a Cui in vita quod clamat esse ius suâ—â—â— ex dâ—no I. which infeoffed tâ—â— Demandant and her fate husband with declaration that they were seised as of Franktenement and lâ—e les explees as teâ—ants for life c. Priâ—oâ— said That in cases speciall this Writ ought to make mention of whose gift lease or demise the Demandant claimeth as Ad â—erminum vitae ex dono I. S. or Sibi haeredibus ex dono I. S. But in demand of Fée â—â—â—nple it is enough to say Qâ—â—m â—lâ—mâ—t vt â—us haeâ—â—ditatem without shewing by whose gift or feâ—ffment 7. H. 7. fol. 2. If this Writ â—e againsâ—â—aron and feme for lands holden in the wiues right it must bee in quod vxor ingressa est per I. N. non quod vir vâ—or ingressi sunt per I. N. Sâ—CT XXIV west 2. Case 3. 2. Eâ— 4. foâ— 13. IF a man be seisod in right of his wife and recouerie is had against them by default the woman after his death may haue a Cui in vita but not a Quod ei deforceat per Moyle Iustice It séemes that at Common Law this writ of Cui in vita was onely granted vpon actuall discontinuance by the baron for West 2. casâ—â—â— iâ— Qâ—ando vir amiserit per defalcum tenementum quod â—uit in vxoris suae duruâ—â— fuit quod vxor post mortem viri non habuâ—rit aliud recupâ—rare quam per breue de recto propter quod Dâ—minus Rex â—â—atuit vt mulier post morâ—â—in â—iri haâ—eat râ—â—â—pâ—raâ—â— pâ—n breâ—ede ingressu cui â—â—â—a in vita c. But in this case if the tenâ—â—â— can proue that hee had right on his side when hee recouered Muâ—er â—iâ—il capit per â—reueâ— Nâ—tâ— also by the way that this heat wâ—â—s Si vir se absentaveriâ— â—â—luerit â—â—â— vxoris 〈◊〉 defendâ—re vâ—d si in vlta vxoris reddâ—â—◠〈◊〉 â—â— vâ—â—â— anâ—◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 paraâ—a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 deâ—â—â—dete 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to further for recoueries If Iudgement of â—or eiudger be giuen against Baron and Fâ—uie this is not void as soone as the Baâ—on is dead but vâ—ydable by error for the woman cannot haue a Cui in vita 〈◊〉 fol. 2â—â— A 〈◊〉 â—y 〈◊〉 â—◠〈◊〉 alienation â— and therefore vpon suâ—â— a â—â—coverie as soone â—â— the husband is dead the woman may haue a Câ—â—â—â—â—â—â— by the Common Law 4 Ed. 2. â—rook◠〈◊〉 vitâ— 18. If a râ—coâ—eriâ— be â—â—â— by 〈◊〉 Wâ—â—â— of waâ—â—e thâ— wâ—â—e cannot â—â—uâ—â—◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 either because the recouerie is not méerely by default or else because the 〈◊〉 of waste hath no demand of land quaere if shée shall haue a Quod eâ— deâ—oâ—ceat 9. Ed. 4. 16. If Baron and Feme be impleaded by one which hath good title and the Baron confesse the action the woman hath no remedie Yet the Statute is that vpon rendring by the Baron the wife may be receiued â—â— But if Baron and Feme be receiued vpon default of tenant for life where the reuersiâ—n is in the wife the Baron cannot confesse the action for hée must be 〈◊〉 Ad ius 〈◊〉 defâ—â—â—endum 7. Ed. 4. 17. SECT XXV The Sur â—ui in vita IF she which hath cause to bring a Cui in vita of Fée simple lands die before she hath sued c. her heire shall haue â— Sur â—â—â— in vita But if the wiues lands which the husband aliened were in state of Fee taile and the wife neâ—â—◠〈◊〉 her heire must sue a 〈◊〉 in disâ—onder and not a 〈◊〉 â—â—â—â—â—â— for though both these 〈◊〉 hée the children of the ancient Common Law and were before West 2. Yea and this latter Writ was maintainable for lands giuen to the mother in francke marriage or to the heires of her body which at the first was Féâ—â—â—â—pte yet when 〈◊〉 made 〈◊〉 â— taile it did also expressely set downe â— Writ whereby the heire should recouer such estates The Sur câ—â—â—n vita for it is no â—ore but Praecipe quod 〈◊〉 c. quod 〈◊〉 esse iâ—â— haeâ—â— ditateÌ„ suâ—â— in quod non habuit ingressum nisi per Eâ— and so in the Cui oâ— in the 〈◊〉 And the Aâ—â—t and Néeâ—◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in it vpon alienatioâ— made by the husband of their common Ancestor or vpon recouerie had against â—â—â— and her If a second husband alienhis wiues Fée siâ—ple landâ— and she dieth the issue by her first husband 〈◊〉 â—uâ—â— Sur cui in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 these â—â—nd husband still liuing if hée were neuer intituled to be Tâ—nant by the Curtâ—sie But
to be recouered after the first day of December next comming in the forme aforesaid should appertaine to enter into all and euery of the Premisses and peaceably to possesse and enioy the same in such manner and forme as he or they should haue done if no such discontinuance warranty or recouery had beene had or made And if any of the said husbands and women or any other seised or that shall be seised to the vse oâ— them of the estate afore specified after the said first of December doe make or cause to be made or suffer any such discontinuance alienations warranties or recoueries in forme aforesaid that then it shall be lawfull to the person or persons to whom the said manors lands and tenements should or ought to belong after the decease of the woman to enter into the same and to possesse and enioy them according to such title and interest as they should haue had in the same if the woman had béene dead no discontinuance warranty nor recoueries had as against the said husband during his life if the discontinuance alienation warranties and recoueries he hereafter had by or against the same husband and woman during Couerture and espousals betwixt them â—â—â—uided that the said women after the decease of their said husbands may reenter and enioy c. according to their first estate And ouer this it is enacted that if the woman at the tune of such discontinuance alienation recouery warranty c. besole that then shee shall bee barred and excluded of her title and interest in the same from thenceforth and the person or persons to whom the title interest and possession of the same should belong after the womans decease shall immediately after the discontinuance alienation warranty and recouery enter possesse and enioy the same Manors Lands c. according to his or their title Prouided that this Act extend not to auoid any recouery discontinuance or warranty after the forme aforesaid heretofore had made or suffered but only where the husband and wife or either of them now being aliue or any other to their vse now haue title and Interest to the said Manors c. or take the issues and profits to their vseâ— Prouided also that this Act extend not to any recouery or discontinuance where the heire next inheritable to the woman or â—e or they that next after â—er deatâ— should haue estate of inheritance c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or agréeing to the reâ—â—uerieâ— where â—he same assâ—ent and agréement is of record or inrowled Prouided also that it shall bee lawfull to euery woman being â—olâ— or married after the death of her first husband to giue sâ—ll discontinue c. for terme of her life only after the course of the common Law SECT XXXIV The Expâ—sition BEfore this Statute if Tenant in Dower had aliened in fée with warranty and dyed the warranty discending vpon him in reuersion had barred him for against collaterall warranty of Tenant in Dower or for life the Statute of Gloucester cap. 3. determined nothing Lâ—â—â—â—eton fol. 164. He addeth that if the heire were vnder age both at time of alienation and also when the warranty discended hée should hee at no preiudice by this collaterall warranty But if he wore vnder age at time of the alienation and came afterward to full age during the womans life and neuer entered then perchance hee should be barred This was Law when Littleton wrote and had continued so aboue two hundred yéeres and during the raigne of nine Kings after the making of Glocester cap. 3. which Statute Dyer comparing with the later he reputes the last cruell against women for by this Aâ—t of 11. Hen. 7. all alienations recoueries releases and warranties of Tenant in Dower or â—oynture of the husbands lands are of no strength And where Glocester alloweth Tenant by the curtesie to alien with warranty and assets this from women is cleane taken away this he saith is vn case fort dure That if a woman â—oyntresse in taile whose warranty is lincall to her heires doe aliâ—n and leaue assets yet the heire may enter Therefore hee is of the minde that this Statute being rigoroâ—s of it selfe ought to receiue a streâ—t and litterall interpretation fol. 148. But Stamford Browne Brook eâ—poâ—â—ded these words giuen by the Ancestors to bée intendible of all manner of assurances for money or otherwise There are two Cases in Plowden that inâ—ued great Argraments vpon this Statute The first is betwixt Winibishe and Falboâ—es a man enfâ—offed diuers persons to the vse of himselfe and his wise in speciall taile before the Statute of 27. Heâ— 8. of vses and after the Statute the husband died a stranger recouered in a formedone per ment deduc the first day by couin and vpon false tiâ—le he to whom the title appertained after the womans death entred and the entry waâ— adiudged lawfull though hee could not haue Iudgement for a default in the pleading and that was want of certainty in his replication and not shewing how he was heire or the party to whom the entry was giuen by the Statute The greatest matter vpon the Statute obiected to inforce a proofe that the widdow which suffered the recouery was not bound by this Act was that she held not ioyntly with her husband any lands or tenements but only shée was seised of an vse in taile for they tooke it cleare on all paâ—ts that the case came into consideration as if the Act of 27. had not béene made and that seemes to bee directly within the letter of the Lawes But Montague chiefe Iustice shewing how greatly the marriage of women and their aduancement by it is respected in Law as appeareth by the Writ of â—aâ—â—a matrâ—moâ—iâ— proloâ—â—â—i and the â—â—i ante diuâ—rtium taken by equity of West 2. cap. â— and also by that that where donées in frankemarriage are diuorced the woman shall haue all the lands aâ—â—irmeth it to bee reason against such women thus fauored and who abuse such fauors as the Law bestowes vpon them and will be of Couin and Faâ—â—ity to impaire their deceased husbands inheritance and disinhe it their heires to construe this Law for their coâ—â—â—â—tion for the Law-makers of the statute were bent extremely against them though it be penall in some sort oâ—it selâ—e And so it was agreed that if the widdow were not within the words yet she was within the intent and meaning of this Statute The other case was this betwixt Eiston and Stud. Baron and Feme leâ—ied a fine of lâ—nds of the wiues inheritance taking backe an estate in taâ—le the remainder to the right heires of the wife the question was whether the woman after her husbands death might alien without danger of this Statute adiudged that she might because shée was cleare without the intent and meaning of the Act For whatsoeuer the words import the matter that this Statute aimed was and is to restraine women which haue Ioyntures procéeding originally from their husbands or
the husbands Ancestors that they should doe nothing preiudiciall to the heires But in this case there came no Ioynture from the husband but contrariwise the wife had made a Ioynture to her husband and after his decease to bridle the woman to doe what shée listed with her owne inheritance were against all reason and as farre from any affinitie with 11. H. 7. as it should be when a woman seised in Fée simple giues lands to the father of him whom she intends to marrie to the intent that he regrant this land to his sonne and her after marriage with a remainder in taile c. to restraine her when after marriage regranting and death of the husband she should leuie a fine to other vses or suffer a recouerie which case though it be cleane out of the Statute yet it is within the words for the â—oynture was made by the Barons Ancestor though not originally c. And so note those two cases of Plowd one is taken to be within the intent though out of the letter and the other though within the letter yet out of the intent and yet both constructions most reasonable and iust And see Sir George Brownes case Sir Edw. Cokes â— Râ—p that a lease made by a woinaâ— tâ—nant in taâ—le of the gift of her husband c. make a lease for thrée liâ—sâ— that is not warranted by the Statute of 32. H. 8 and although the lease be without clause of Warrantie yet it is within the Statute of 11. H. 7. for those words in the act with warrantie refer to releases and confirmations which makes no discontinuance without warrantie for the inteâ—t of the Act is to proâ—ibit not onely euerie barre but â—ueriâ— manner of discontinuance which puts the heire to his reall action And in that case it was resolued that if the issue in taile had before the womans for feiture granted his remainder onely in that case hee by the exâ—resse letter of the Act shall enter vpon the discontinuance of the woman for his act doth not biâ—de his estate But when the issue in taile leuie a fine with praclamation in the life of the woman tenant in taile c. that shall binde the taile and therefore there the Conusée shall enter for hée which hath the immediate title interest or inheritance at the time of the for feiture shall enter by that Statute And it was said by Anderson Chiefe Iustice of the Common Pleas that where it was inâ—ented for to makâ— euaâ—â—â—ne out of the Statute that if such a woman tenant in taile accepts a fine sur conusans de droit come câ—o c. and by grant and renders the land for a thâ—usand yeares that is an alienâ—tion within the intention of the Act although the words of the Act are discontinuance aliâ—nation c. and of that opinion was Wâ—ay Chiefe Iustice and Dyer and all the Court of Commoâ— Pleas was of the same opinion 18. Eliz. And in Sir Edw. â—okes 3. Rep. Lincolne College case It was resolued that if the heire in taile conuey the lands to others and the woman tenant in taile release or maks conâ—â—râ—nation with waâ—rantie which is not but to perfect and corroborate the estate which the heire in taile hath made such a warrantie is not restrained by the said Act for that which the woman hath done is for the benefit of the heire and not for his preiudice and by his aâ—â—ent And she and the heirâ—â—â—ight haue iâ—yned a fine and so barre the estate taile not with standing the Statute of 11. H. 7. therefore such Acts by the woman shall not be void to grant the hâ—ire or any else any aduantage by the Statute of 11. H. 7. And note the opinion of Sir Edw. Coke in the said case of Lincolne College that the sonne borne after shall by this Statute out the daughter who entred for forfeiture and â—â—ewâ—â— other opinions concurring yâ—â— in Dyer 21. Eliz. 362. the heire in such a case is said to be in by purchass And note Reader that it hath â—â—â—ne adiudged that although the Déed of conueyance and assurance of the womans Ioynture or estate dâ—therpresse her marriage portion as well as her marriage to â—e the cause and consideration of such Ioynâ—urâ— or â—statâ— yet if the estate prâ—â—éds from the husband or his Ancestors she is within the said â—tatute of 11. H. 7. and sâ—e Villers and Beauâ—â—â—ritâ— case 4. Mar. 146. But â—â—â—uâ—râ— if the portion money appeare to be the full price of the land if that differ not the case Sée Sir Edw. Cokes Comment vpon Littleton 365. These â—ases put a man seised in Fee leuie a fine to the vse of himselfe for life and after to the vse of his wife and of the heires males of her body by him begotten and had issue male and after he and his wife leuied a fine and suffered a common recouerie the husband and the wife died and the issue male entred by the Statute of 11. H. 7. and the entrie was â—olden lawfull and yet this caâ—e is out of the letter of the Statute for she neither leuied the fine c. being sale or with any other saue her husband who made the Ioâ—â—ture Sed qui â—aeret iâ— littera â—aeret in cortice and therefore this case being within the 〈◊〉 of the Statute is within the remedy But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that this case was deâ—yed for Law by the Râ—â—â—rder oâ— London in his argument in the case hereunder 〈◊〉 betweene Copland and Pyat Another case in Sir 〈◊〉 Cokes Commentaries vpon Littleton which agrée with Eiston and Studs case in Plowd is A man seised of land â—ure vâ—oris and they two leuie a fine and the 〈◊〉 grant and render the land to the hâ—sband and wife in speciall taile the remainder to the right heires of the wiâ—â— they haue issue the husband dieth the wife taketh another husband and they two leuie a â—â—ne in Fée the issue entreth this is within the letter of the Statute and yet is out of the meaning because the state of the land 〈◊〉 from the wife so as it was the purchase of the husband in letter and not in meaning But where the woman in â—â—nant for life by the gift or conueyance of any other â—â—â— alienation with Warrantie shall binde the heire at this day The case of Copland and Pyaâ— adiudged Hillar 7. Car. in Banâ—â— Regis in effect was thus I. S. his sonne was to marrie to the daughter â—â— I. N. And the Deed 〈◊〉 that I. N. for thâ— consideration of foure hundred 〈◊〉 paid by I. S. and of a marriage c and for the 〈◊〉 of the bloâ—â— of I. N. coâ—enants to stand seised to the vse of the sonne â—â— I. S. and his daughter whom the 〈◊〉 of I. S. should marrie â—â—taile the remainder to another 〈◊〉 of I. N. thâ— remainder to the hâ—ires of I. N. 〈◊〉 dieth hauing issue and the wife alieneth by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was resolued that it was not within
greatest and most difficult part of Law peculiarly belonging to a widdow and come now to consider whether she shall marrie againe or no. If Iohn Boccace de Câ—rtaldo in his Booke De duris mulieribus may be beleeued When the sister of couetous King Pigma â—â—â— and widdow of Sycheus Hercules his Priest had built the Wals Temple Market Towne house and priuate dwellings of Carthage giuing lawes and rules of life to the inhabitants amongst the rest that were filled with loue of her great vertues and singular beautie the King of Malaca was one he grew so vehement in his desires that he threatned the Citizens of Carthage with warres and vtter subuersion of their new Citie vnlesse he might haue the Foundresse of it to be his wife They knowing how highly their Quéen would remaine displeased by any direâ—â— sollicitation to a second marriage not knowing how otherwise to saue themselues determined to win her assent without asking The chiefe of them went therefore to Dido and told her how the King of Malaca required Masters and Instructers of humaâ—â—tis to be sent him out of Carthage from whom he and his people might learne to doe off their naturall â—â—â—â—atousnesse and inciuilitie and further how hée had menaced fire sword and extreme dissolution vnlesse his request were accomplished But they knew not they said whom to send or who would be willing to goe and leaue his owne habitation to dwell with a King of such sauage nature and wilde behauiour as was this King of Malaca Dido when she heard them answered that she was ashamed there should be found in any Carthaginian such 〈◊〉 and cowardly feare affirming plainly that men were not borne onely for themselues and whosoeuer he were that would not aduenture losse perill yea and death though it were certaine for safegard of his Countrey hée was she said vnworthy to dwell in Carthage or that either he or his posteritie should euer be receiued to any honour or reputation amongst them The Carthaginians thought they had obtained their desire and vncouered their counsell to the Quéene telling her plainly the Kings demand Dido not knowing how to reply against her owne râ—darâ—utions replenished with sorrow and aâ—xietiâ— was enforced to yeeld her assent to wedlocke and craued a day before which she said she would goe vnto her husband but before thâ— terme was expired she caused a great fire to be made in the most eminent place of the Citie and there in view and concourse of all other people after many ceremonies and offering of sacrifice as it were to appease the ghost of â—câ—â—us she suddenly with a knife strake her selfe tâ— the heart and told her subiects that now she went to her husband her Sicheus her deare Sichâ—us on whose name still inuocating she sunke to the ground haning chosen rather to shed her dearest lifes bloud as she said than to violate the vowes of chaste widdowhood Boccace mine Author here may haue some colour of reason to extoll the resolution of Dido but not to condemne so bitterly as he doth all women that marrie a second husband Some of them are destitute of friends their parents brethren and kindred dwell farre off sutors câ—me euerie day who can obsist them Another widdow hath lands rents store of goods some suits at Law and no body that she can trust in help to gouerne that which shee hath or to inherit it when she is gone Another is tolled to marrie by mightie perswasions of her dearest friends and kindred Another hath 〈◊〉 youth on her side 〈◊〉 Indians leape into the dead mans fire if they will she hath learned that it is better to marrie than to burne SECT XXXVI A 〈◊〉 to marriâ— so 〈◊〉 it be not vncertaine who shall 〈◊〉 her to theâ—â—â—◠〈◊〉 I For my part that am like neuâ—r to be feared vnlesse some widdow be moued with compassion towards mée will not speake villanie of Bigamie or Octogamie let euerie woman marrie when she seeth her time but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a slow speed perhaps will be best and let her examine well whether the pannier be emptie or no. If saith Sir Thomâ—s Smith in his Treatise De Repub. Angliae â—ol 104. I marrie the widdow of one lately dead which at the time of her husbands death was with childe and the childe is bâ—â—ne after marriage solomnized with me this childe shall be mine 〈◊〉 and lawfull sonne so precisely doe we take the letter Peterest quem 〈◊〉 demonstranâ— Littleton â—aith 18. E. 4. fol. 30. If a man marrie a woman which is groâ—â—ment ensâ—â—nt by another and within foure dayes after marriage she is deliuered this childe shall be his that hath newly married the woman and inherit his land for it is no bastard It 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 would haue it vnderstood of a woman enseint by â—â—p â—â—zard and in such cases it is reason that hee which takes the Dame should haue the Fole So â—s it also when â—â—â—man elopes with a stranger in 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 her husband Iohn at Noke being betwéene 〈◊〉 foure 〈◊〉 must father the â—hilde and it shall be his heire it he die for the Law will not â—â—ing into triall directly wh◠〈◊〉 the childe 44 Edw. 3. fol. 10. and â— Hâ—â— 4. 〈◊〉 â—â—â— though issue may 〈◊〉 â—â— taken whether a woman 〈◊〉 ensâ—mâ— by her 〈◊〉 â—â—â—hâ— time of his deathâ— deaâ—ing out the question by whom as appeareth by the forâ—â—â— Bookes and 1. H. 6. fol. 3. Then if it may be found by Enguâ—st that a woman was with childe at her husbands death the Law which permits not to enquire by whom affirmes it to be the husbands and that husbands which might lawfully begâ—t it I thinke â—urely â—ir Thomas Smith mistooke the Law for by Thorpe and Willowby 24. E. 2. fol. â—9 If a man dye seised of land in Fee simple and the wife which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with a soâ—ne marrie againe and after is deliuered â—â—is sonne shall bée adiâ—dged sonne and herro to the first Barâ—n and not to the second Though Iustice Beâ— there were of opinion that the Infant might â—huâ—e his father It were better reason perhaps that the second husband might 〈◊〉 whether hée should be his soâ—ne or no and by allowance make him hiâ— heire Sir Ed. Coke in his Comment vpon Littleton fol. 8. a. saith Iâ— a man hath a wife and dieth within a â—erie short time after the wife marrieth againe and within nine monethâ— hath a childe so as it may be the childe of the one or the other some haue said in this case the childe may chuse his father Quia in hoâ— casâ— filiatio non potest probari and so is the Booke to be intended For auoyding of which question and other inconcemences this was the Law before the Conquest Sit omnis vidua â—ine marito 12. mensibus si marita verit perdat dorem But if women had all béene of such sobrietie as many are many of these questions had neuer risen and I must confesse
it is great pâ—â—ulancie in any widdow that slippeth to second wedlocke wâ—ilst she yet nourisheth in her wombe the pledge of vnâ—â—n and loue betwixt her and her late husband I thanke God I cannot say that I haue knowen in my life time any widdow so wantâ—n In old time women vsed now and then to saine themselues left with childe and to bring forth borrowed brats to depriue the Deceaseds right heire of his inheritance sometimes of their owne mischieuous malice and deceitfulnesse and sometime by consent and combining with the Lords of whom the lands were holden Bracton in his second Booke cap. 32. hath a large discourse De partu supposito and there is a Writ to the Sheriffe to call before him and the Kéeper of Pleas of the Crowne the woman that pretendeth to be enseint to haue her examined by tractation and search of good and lawfull women per vbera per ventrem whether she be pregnant or no and if the matter he found doubtfull to commit her to a Castle and warie custodie without accesse of any suspected woman Quâ—usque de partu suo corstare possit But this is a péece of learning so obsolete and worâ—e out that I thinke since I was borne and a long time before there neuer was any such Writ put in â—re I conclude therefore that our widdâ—wes now adayes are honester than they were in Henry the thirds time in the fifth yeare of whose reigne Mariell widdow of William Constable de Mauton in Comitat. N. rff practised this cousenage widdowes of this age are nothing so deceitfull though deceiued sometimes by bad husbands THE WOMANS LAWYER The fifth BOOKE THe widdow married againe to her owne great liking though not with applause of most friends and acquaintance But alas what would they haue her to haue done she was faire young rich gracious in her carriage and so well became her mourning apparrell that when shee went to Church on Sundayes the casements opened of their owne accord on both sides the stréets that bachelours and widdowers might behold her Hic trahebatur â—lle erâ—â— cunctis amor vnus habendi Her man at home kissed her pantables and serued diligently Her late husbands Physitian came and visited her often The Lawyer to whom shee went for councell tooke opportunity to aduise for himselfe If shée went to any feast there was euer one guesâ— sometimes two or thrée the more for her sake If she were at home suitors ouertooke one another and sometimes the first commer would answer the next that she was not within All day she was troubled with answering ê‘etitions And at night when she would go to rest her maid Marion was become a Mistris of requeâ—â—s and humâ—le supplications This kinde of life the widdow liked not I aske againe what she should haue done he to whom she gaue a denâ—all would not take it if shee denied him twise hee said two negations made an affirmation and hée challenged promise therefore to set mens haâ—ts and her owne at rest shee chuse amongst them one not of the long robe not a man macerate and dryed vp with study but a gallant gulburd lad that might well be worthy of her had hee béene as thrifty as kind hearted or halfe so wise as hardy and aduâ—nturous This youth within lesse than a yeere had set the Nuncios which his predecessor kept in prison at liberty round about the Countrey the bags were all empty the plate was all at pawne all to keep the square bones in their amble and to relieue Companions One of which notwithstanding that had cost hâ—m many a pound for none other quarrell but vous meâ—tes challenged him one day into the field which was appointed and there my new married man was slaine Now his wife will bring her Appeale SECT I. Appeale of the husbands death BY Bracton li. 3. cap. 29. A woman can haue an Appeale but only in two cases per quod alicui lex debeat apparens adiudicari As in case where iniury and force is committed against her person by rauishment or when her husband is killed imer Brachia iua This forme of appeale therefore is A. late wife of B. appeales â— that whereas B. her husband was at such a place such an houre such a day and such a yéere C. came with force â—equiter in felonia contra pacem regis and killed him betwixt her armes and that he did this against the Kings peace and fellonioâ—sly shee will proue and maintaine as the Court shall thinke good Againe the same A. appeales E. of this that at the same place the same yéere day and hâ—wer E. â—ame with C. felloniously and against the Kings peace and held B. till C. killed him c. If hée which is appealed de facto were taken vpon the fact with his knife or sword all bloudy and this veryâ—â—ed by Testimony of good and lawfull men non erit vâ—terius â—â—quirenâ—â—â— Thus Bracton Now let vs â—â—â— how shee shall be vnderstood there is no doubt but a woman may haue other Appeales besides thâ—se twâ— of rape or death of her husband 11. Hen. 4. fol. 9â— An Appeale of Robbery was brought by a woman the defendant said the Appealant was his 〈◊〉 iudgement si el â—erra respondue and to the robbery non culpaâ—le So that hee pleaded to the fellonie and the â—â—â—fty admitted a good plea And a woman may haue an appeale of may hem 13. Hen. 7. 14. Hussey saith it was demanded of him for a doubtfull question where parish Clarke â—ell out with another man and threw the Church â—â—re keyâ—s at him with such force that they â—â—ang out at the Chamber window and put out a womans eye whether it were may hâ—â— or no And for the euill intent of the Clarke it was déemed may hâ—â— but consideratiâ—n ought to be had in aâ—â—eâ—â—â—ng â—aâ—â—ages But true it is a woman shall not haue appeale of any mans death saue only of her husbands therefore if a man bee killed that hath neither wiâ—â— nor sonne but his next heire is either daughter sister or female Cosâ—â— albeit he hath many other â—â—â—red Eâ—siâ—s or Vâ—eâ—es the proâ—â—â—ity of a female heâ—â—e â—â—â—es away the Appeale quite and cleane for of â—â—â— Ancestors death if he had no wife the Appeale belongs ouer to the heire who here cannot haue it because it is a female for Mag. Char. doth directly dâ—ny it â—ap 34. Nâ—llus câ—pictuâ— aâ—â— imprisonetâ—â— propter apellum â—eminae de moâ—â—e aâ—â—â—â—â—uâ— quam viri sui And vpon such an Appeale brought by an heire female the Defendants cannot bee arraigned at the Kings suit because the Appeale was neuer good Neither shall the Defendants recouer dammages because as Shard maketh the reasoâ— hee may bee arraigned and condemned otherwise ad Sectam regis for any thing yet done to the Contrary 27 Aâ—â— p. 25. A daughter or sister c. can haue none Appeales of a fathers or brothers death no more can a mother haue Appeale
the Action may bee pleaded that the woman which bringeth the Appeale c. hath taken another husband or that shee was neuer accoupled in loyall matrimony to him of whose death shee brings the Appeale And if it bee brought by the heire it is a good plea in Barre to say the wife of him which is dead is yet aliue and the Action giuen to her In the booke of Entries fol. 50. Praedicta Alicia dicit quod â—â—mpore mortis praedicti Thomae â—adem Alicia fuit vâ—oâ— praedicti Thomae in quo casu â—idem Aliciae non praedicto Nicholao de â—ure pertinet hâ—bere prosequi appellum c. Et vâ—terius â—adem defendens dicit quod praedictus Nicholaâ—s appellum praedictum versus â—andem Aliciam inter Alios per couinam ea intentione ad eam de prosecutione appellinus de morte praedicti Thomae excludendam impetrauit que oia singula c. petit inde allocationem c. quoad felonia non culpabilis Et inde de bono malo ponit se super patriam 30. H. 6. Also it is a good plea in Barre to say that the Plaintiffe hath succeased her time in that shee hath not brought her Appeale within the yeere and day after his death which is supposed slaine or to say that he of whose death the Appeale is brought is yet aliue at such a place and to bring him in the Court that hee may bee viewed and knowne sée thereof 43. Assis pa. 26. in Appeale de morte viri the Defendant pleaded le Baron in viâ— c. and the Plaintiffe contraâ— day was giuen to bring in their proofes which when they came were found one both sides defectiue The Defendant therefore for his safest way pleaded â—on culpabilis videâ—ur ergo that the first issue if it had béene found against him should haue béene peremptacy and that hee may waiue it before triall in fauorem vitae And note that if a man plead not guilty and pute himselfe vpon the Iury in an Inditement of felony and hée may confesse the fact before verdict and pray a coroner otherwise in an Appeale as it was holden 11. Hen. 7. 5. 8. Hen. 4. fol. 18. In Appeale de morte viri and at the day the Baron was brought into Court examined 〈◊〉 knowne and the woman for her false Appeale was committed to prison till she payd a fine The generall barres against all Appeales of which some may bee obiected against the Plaintiffe here are those That the Plaintiffe is attainted of felony or treason or a Monke or a Priest a mayhemed body by some other than by the Plaintiffe or of non sane memorie or deafe and dumb or a layâ—r or a naturall foole Attainder by outlawry if it be erronious is a barre no longer than vntill it bee reuersed It is a good plea in barre also that heretofore the Plaintiffe brought an Appeale of the same felony in which shée was at non suit after Declaration or withdrew her selfe from her Action Or that heretofore shée sued Appeale of the same fellony against another person which was acquited or condemned at her suit Or the Plaintiffes release may bee pleaded in barre if it were made to the Defendant himselfe for release made to another will not serue though it were made to one ioyned with the Defendant in the Appeale Corone in Fitzherbert 9. and 2. Rich. 3. 9. agrées And so if the Plaintiffe withdraw her selfe as against one of the Defendants her Appeale shall stand good against the other And note where the Defendant pleads in barre any of these pleas yet in fauour of 〈◊〉 the Law permits him to plead ouer to the fellony and his pleading shall not therefore be counted double exceptin the case of release in which indéed he may not plead to the felony for not guilty in contrary to accepting of relâ—â—â—â— which â—â—tâ—liâ—th guilt So also of a woman bring Appeale of robery and the Defendant pleads villenage in the Plaintiffe hee shall not conclude ouer to the felony 〈◊〉 culpable for that were an iâ—franchisment But perchance when the villenage is found against the Defendant hee may then take his plea of rien culpable as well as hee shall haue when hée plead any other pleas for if he plead them without concluding to the fellony hée may after his barre is found against him plead rien culpable notwithstanding quod vide 28. E. â— fol. 91. 22. E. 3. fol. 38. 18. E. 3. fol. 32. except only in pleas of release as is said which implieth alwayes a confession of felony 9. Hen. 4. fol. 2. in Appeale de morte viri the Defendants pleaded the wiues release made since the darraine continuance of all accords reall and â—â—rsonall and shée demurred the best opinion was tâ—at reall actions are of things reall and durable as lands rents c. and personall actions are of dammages and such like yet p Hulls personall is as well the punishment of the person as dammages and the punishment here is death which is released le barre is good But Littleton teacheth vs contrary in his booke for hée saith that Appeales of robery rape or death or any Appeale wherein the â—â—dgement is of death are more high than personall Actions and therefore they are not barred by release vnlesse it be of all manner of Actions or of all Appeales See Sir Edward Coke in his Commentaries vpon Littleton fol. 287. b. in any Appeale wherein iudgement is of death a release of all Actions reall and personall is no barre for that release extendeth but to common or ciuill actions and not to criminall but if a release of actions personals is good in an Appeale of mayhem for euery Action wherein dammages are onely recouered is in Law taken for personall fol. 288. a. And in Sir Edw. Cokes 4. Rep. in Hudsons Case it is said although the Appeale of mayhem runneth feloniously â—uy mayma yet he shall recouer but dammages and therefore recouery in trespasse is a good barre therein SECT XII Auterfoits acquit ALthough it be now no plea in Appeale of death for the Defendant to lay that he was here to fore acquite of the same felonie yet because Stanfords handling of it containeth good learning and it may still serue in appealâ— of rape And likewise in Indâ—ctments of death for hée that was acquite in appeale may haue it I will not omit it By Common Law therefore in all Appeales or Inditements of felony for the Defendant to say that hée was Aâ—terâ—oirs aâ—raigne de mesme le felonie before â—uth Iustices and acquited vouching the record is a good plea and he néeds not to haue the record in Court because this plea is not delatorie but in barre Coron in Fitzherbert 2 â— This plea the Common Law disalloweth not because it alloweth that a man should not put his life in ieopardy twice for one and the same offence The acquitall then must be of the verie same offence or
the Law so méeke in Edward the first his time that the first Statute against Rape speaketh of it so mildly as if it had béene at Common Law a verie small trespasse SECT XXIII West 1. cap. 14. anno 3. E. 1. THe King commands that no man rauish or take by force any damsell within age either with her consent or without Nor any dame or damsell of sull age or other mans wife against her will If any doe the King will doe iustice and common right at his or her suit that shall sue within 40. dayes if none commence suit within 40. dayes the King shall haue the suit they which are culpable shall bee imprisoned two yéeres and bee ransomed at the Kings pleasure And if they haue not to satisfie the ransome they shall suffer a longer imprisonment as the trespasse shall require a man may well suspect that there was something which had allayed the rigour of former Law before this Statute was made It may bée the importation of Clergy men vrging satisfaction according to Moises Law if the woman rauished were vnmarried and otherwise the bashfulnesse of those which are betrothed and espoused kept in the truculent Law of King William Howsoeuer it were this Statute of West 1. in my poore opinion being rather affirmatiue than otherwise runneth not in fauour of rauishers to abrogate their old punishment but inflicteth a greater punishment vpon them than that which had lately béene put in practice Or it may bee very well that the common right which King Edward promised here to doe for them that would pursue within forty dayes was according to the seuerity which Bâ—acâ—on speaketh of SECT XXIV West 2. cap. â—5 THe mitigation of the old Law one way or other in a few yéeres brought forth so many enormities That at the next Parliament which King Edw. held ten yéeres after it was ordeined as followeth It is ordeined that if any man rauish any woman espoused or damsell or other woman which consenteth not afore nor after that hee shall haue iudgement of life and member And whosoeuer rauisheth any woman by force though she consent afterward shall haue iudgement as afore is said if he be attainteâ— at the Kings suit And if any woman bee carried away with the goods of their husband the King shall haue the suit for goods so carried away This Chapter conteineth also the ordinance against Elopement and another for Nunnes qui monachialem a domo suo aâ—â—ucat liâ—et monachâ—â—liâ— consentiat puniatur perpriâ—onam trium annorum c. satisfaciat domâ—i a qua abducta fuerit nihâ—lominus redimatur ad volâ—â—ratem regâ—â— SECT XXV 6. Richard 2. cap. 6. A Man would haue thought that this Statute should haue repressed for euer all violence towards the persons of women but quantos motos scies reclamante ratione Priape In the sixt yéere of King Richards reigne and about the 16th of his age this villany of rape was so encreased and women so little offended with the iniury or so ashamed to confesse the outrage that a new Law was made to punish women which consented to their rauishors vt sequitur Against rauishers of Ladies and daughters of Noble men and other women in euery part of the Realme now a dayes more violently offending and oftener than was wont It is ordained that wheresoeuer and whensoeuer such Ladies daughters or other women bee rauished and after rape doe consent â—o such reuishers that as well the rauishers as they which be rauished bee from henceforth disabled to haue or challenge Heritage Dower or Iointfeoffement after the death of their husbands and ancestors And that incontinently the neâ—t of the bloud of those rauishers or of tâ—em that bée so rauished to whom such Heritage Dower or Iointfeoffement ought to reuert remaine or fall after the death of the rauisher or of her that is so rauished shall haue title mâ—â—ntinently after the rape to enter vpon the rauisher or her that is rauished and their Assignes and lands tenements in the same heritage Dower or Iointfeoffement and the same to hold in state of Heritage And that the husbands of such women if they haue husbands or if they haue no husband liuing the father or other next of the bloud haue from henceforth the suit to pursue against the Offenders and Rauishers in this behalfe and to haue them thereof conuict of life and member though the woman after such rape doe consent to the rauisher And the Defendant in this Case shall not bee receiued to wage battaile but that the truth of the matter shall bee tried by the Country Sauing alwayes to the King and other Lords of the Realme their escheats of the Rauishers if they be conuict This is a shrewd Statute Till this time he that had rauished a woman might hope for a clemencie at the least at her hands because he had ventured his life for her sake but what shall lusty leachers now doe the more a woman is worthy to bee won because shee hath or shall haue wherewith to kéepe a man the more danger it is to medle with her She that perhaps might haue bâ—ene perswaded had this Statute not 〈◊〉 to 〈◊〉 a matter of greater astonishment then 〈◊〉 bares not now be mercifull lest shâ—e bâ—e cruell to herselfe Therefore now men looke on faire Gentlewomen heires and widdowes as the eaâ—â— looketh at a fish in the water she would 〈◊〉 â—e dealing but is lâ—th to go 〈◊〉 And now comes in the second rape by aâ—duction wherein auarice is as great an agâ—â—t as caâ—â—â—lity aâ—d something wiser in auoâ—ding of danger now men turned themselues for loues sake into Centaures first and tooke on them the shape of Buls afterward SECT XXVI 31. Hâ—â— â— cap. 9. THerefore in the 31. yâ—ere of Hen. 6. was a Statute made beginning with complaint that in all parts of the Realme diuers people of power moued by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 cousnesse against all right and gentlenesse had 〈◊〉 new 〈◊〉 to the danger trouble 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of Ladies Gentlewomen and other women sole hauing substance of â—â—nd tenements or moueable goods 〈◊〉 then great innocency and simplicity wishing to take them by force or otherwise come to them seeming to be their great friends promising them theâ—r faithfull loues and to by great 〈◊〉 they caught them into their possession coâ—â—â—ying them into places where the Offenders were of power not suffering them once gotten into their gouernance to gâ—â— aâ— liberty till they hâ—d bound them by Obligation or Statute merchant and enforced them to marry against their owne liking otherwise they would leuy the said summe in the said Obligation or Statutes to preuent danger of forfeiture of the same Obligation or Statute or further perill to their persons The purueyance of this Statute is but a Grant of a Writ whereby to call before the Chancellor or before the Iustices of Assises in the County or before some other noble persons assigned by the Chancellor of England the persons offending
second branch of the Statute shall bee expounded father or mother after the death of the father And it was resolued in that Case that there bee two manners of custodies or wardships the one by the Common Law the other by the Statute And that also at the Common Law there are foure manners of Gardians namely Gardian in Chiualry Gardian in Soâ—age Gardian in nature and Gardina for nurture and now the Statute makes a new Gardian namely by assignation but the mother in that case cannot be Gardian for nurture because her daughter was past 14. yéeres of age But she had the custody of her within the prouisâ—on of the Act â—ure naturae and the assent of Raph Ratcliffe the mothers husband was not materiall for the custody of a child is an inseparable incident to the parent and marriage may not transferre that to a husband And that was resolued that although the issue was whether Elizabeth had the custody of Martha at the time of the contract and that did appeare that shee departed from her mothers house six houres before the contract yet in iudgement of Law her mother had the custody of her at the time of the contract And that was resolued that in that Case Edward Ratcliffe and Martha his wife had good title to the land against Andrewes and his wife for the one daughter as that Case is shall not take benefit of forfeiture of the other for the statute giues the forfeiture to the next of kin to whom the inheritance should descend or come after her decease during the life of such person that so shall contract matrimony so that first hee ought to be of the bloud and secondly to whom the inheritance should descend or come c. and although the wife of Andrewes bee of the bloud yet in that Case by the death of Martha the land if shee hath issue shall deseend to her issue and if shee hath not issue that shall reuert to her mother c. but iudgement was against the Plaintiffe for that the issue was found against him These are the Lawes whereby rapes and rauishments of women are repressed which if they bee well looked vnto will proue that there is now no cause why lying Lâ—onicus Chalcondilus should be beleeued who writing of Englishmen affirmeth that we haue no care what becomes of our wiues and children That in our peregrinations and trauels wee interchange and vse one the others wiues mutually That we count it no reproch by whom soeuer our wiues or daughters bee got with â—hild That with vs if a man come to his friends house hee must lye with his wife the first thing that he doth vt deinde benigue hospitio accipâ—arur And though some of the last recited Lawes were vnmade when Chalcondilus did write aboue one hundred yéeres since yet there were then Lawes enough to proue him a déepe lyer and had hée â—éene in England to haue trussed him vp too perhaps for lechery had his learning steaded him no better than his honesty this is no lesse cause why I should be thus bitter against Chalcondilus a dead man for that it may séeme he wrote by hearesay nullo odio gentis and in other matters hee reporteth honourably of vs. But it is strange that a man writing not a great while since but euen the other day not at Athens neither at Rome or Reams where they vse to belie vs head and foot but here at London should be bold to wrâ—te and put in print matter to this effect That beggers and the poorest sort of our women we doe vse to punish and to whip them when they are taken for leachers and dishonest liuers But Gentlewomen and Ladies of honour and worship they are neuer pâ—nished for incontinency but rather for their amorous wantonnesse and lubricity the more estéemed and magnified This follow deserueth plainly better to bee hanged than to bee beléeued For neither is it true that any womâ—n with vs can better her reputation by dissolute life and manners Neither can any woman learne a more deuillish lesson than so to be perswaded And seeing the Lawrs themselues declare what detestation they haue of bruitish concupiscence by punishing consent with lâ—sse of inherâ—tance I would I could perswad all women to eschew not only these gulfes but also the ecclesiasticall Censures which I meddle not with together with the â—â—â—â—my which they purchase sometime with outward laâ—â—â—â—iousnesse from the report of them which iudge a careâ—â—ssâ— liberty in behauiour an infallible argument of sensuality whereby some men haue béene imboldened to offer â—orâ—â— because they thought it was expected SECT XXIX Appealâ— of rape NOw let vs consider a little how these Lawes 〈◊〉 to bee put in practice if any virgin widdow or â—â—gle woman be rauished shee her selfe may sue an Appeale of rape prosecute the feâ—on to death and the Kingâ—â—â—â—don as it séemeth cannot helpe him If a Feme coâ—â—â—â— be rauished shee cannot haue an Appeale without her husband as appeares 8 Hen. 4. fol. 21. But if a Feme â—ouert be rauished and confent to the rauisher the husband alone may haue an Appeale and this by the Statute 6. Rich. 2. cap. 6. The husband that this Statute speaketh of which may sue the Appeale must be a lawfull husband in right and possession for ne vnques accouple in loyall matrimony is a good plea against â—im 11. Hen. 4. fol. 13. So doth Iustice Stanford affirme the booke to proue without question and that the Law is so too where Appeale is brought by Baron and Feme Brooke abridging the case 11. Hen. 4. séemeth to incline to the contrary opinion The case at length is thus Thomas Hausegle sâ—â—th Appeale de rauishment sa feme against Thomas V. and others according to the Statute 6. Rich. 2. reheaâ—â—â—â—â— in his Declaration the order of the Statute and that they had rauished her against the forme of the said 〈◊〉 The Appellâ—â—â— said the Plaintiffe had another Writ hanging returnable the same tearme of the same rape and because the Writ was not serued he had obtained a sicut alias Ergo this Writ of the same nature should abate Haâ—â—said he might pursue which Writ â—e would And by their writ a Praecipe quod reddat or an Assise for the like cause shall abate for of one land a man cannot haue two recoueries But in this case it may bee there were two rapes at seuerall times c. and also the first Writ was not entred in the roll nor the â—â—cut alias in the Record then the Declaration was challenged as insufficient because it was â—elonice rapuit and not carnaliter cognouit but to that it was answered that felonious rape implied carnall knowledge for rape without such knowledge is buttrespasse Another exception to the Declaration was that two had rauished as principall c. which Rolfe said could not be therefore the Plaintiffe ought to haue declared against one as principall and against the other as accessary or
else to haue brought seuerall Appeales whereunto was answered that it two or twenty goe and come together to commit any felâ—ny as robbery or murder though one of them onely commit the Act yet all the rest are principals A third exception against the Declaration was that the Plaintiffe had not shewed how his wife assented after the rauishment and the Appeale was giuen by Wâ—st 2. to the Baron and Feme and not to the Baron alone by the Statute of Rich. 1. But this exception also was disallowed because the Count had recited the whole purueyance of the Act and the rauishment was contra formam c. Last of all the Appellées pleaded that long time before the espousals betwixt the Appellour the woman supposed to be rauished one of the Appellées had affianced the same woman after which affiance the Appellour married her at a certaine Church against her will after which marriage whereunto she neuer agréed she came of her owne accord to the Defendant who had now married her so that the Appellour and she were neuer coupled in loyall matrimony This manner of pleading was said to be a conâ—ession both of the first marriage and of the rauishment which the Councell would haue taken by protestation But â—â—â—scoigne told them they might not haue protestation to proue them guiltie of felony Therefore the Defendant pleaded generally Ne vnques accouple c. which the Plaintiffe accepted of his owne accord and a Writ was awarded to the Bishop But all mens opinions seemed to be that this was no good plea because the Statute is that the husband shall haue the Appeale though they agréed that when the Action is by Common Law as an Appeale De morte viri ne vnques accouple is a good plea for no woman shall reuenge her husbands death by Appeale vnlesse shee were wife as well in right as in possession The Statute of Richard giueth the Appeale where the woman rauished hath no husband to her father or next of bloud c. which is vnderstood vt supra where the woman consenteth to the rauisher for otherwise the woman her selfe must pursue the Appeale vpon West 2. cap. 34. for the father cannot haue by the Common Law either Appeale of rape of his daughter or of death either of son or Daughter But it séemeth that by this Statute if a woman be next heire to her which is rauished and consenteth she may haue an Appeale of rape against the rauisher as well as any procheuie heire male may And learne If a woman which is rauished dye and her husband takes another wife whether hée may now haue an Appeale or no. It is said that if a Lord rauish his Nief she cannot haue an Appeale of rape against him but the King may punish it by way of Indictment SECT XXX Within what time Appeales of Rape must be commenced BY Bracton Si virgo sit corrupta oppressa conâ—â—â— pacem Domini Regis she ought to goe straight way Dâ—â— idem factum recens est and with â—ue and Cry complaine to the good men of the next towne shewing her wrong her garments torne 〈◊〉 and then she ought to goe to the chiefe Consâ—â—ble to the Coroner and to the Viscount and at the next Countie to en er her Appeale and haue it enroâ—led in the Coroners â—oll and then day was to bee giuen her till the comming of the Kings Iustices before whom she was againe to re-intreat her Appeale and if she varied from the Coroners roll she lost her suit Briâ—ton tieth the commencement of this Appeale to fortie dayes after the fact agreeing with West 1. â—ap 13. But by this Statute saith Sâ—aâ—ford rape was but trespasse insomuch therefore as it is since made felony by another Statute and no time limitted within whiâ—h the suit shall be begâ—n it séemeth a woman is at choyse to bring it when shée listeth so that shee exceed not time reasonable SECT XXXI Wiâ—hin what Countie Appeale of Rape shall be brought APpeale of rape must be brought within the Countie where the rauishment was committed and if a man take a woman against her will in one Countie and leading or carrying her into another Countie he there rauisheth her the Appeale must bée where the rauishment was committed and though the Declaration be of taking in another Countie yet the triall shall be onely where the Writ was brough Titulo vâ—sâ—e in Fiâ—zherbert 28. And it séemeth that to speake of the taking in another Countie in a Declaration of Rape is but surplussage and more than needeth for it abates not the Count if it be left out But perhaps such a leauing out in Action of trespasse would abate the Writ because the Plaintiffe is to recouer dammages for the taking in another Countie and they of the Countie where the Writ is brought cannot assesse dammages for the taking But in this Appeale there is nothing to be recouered but onely that the offâ—nder sâ—ffer death for his offence SECT XXXII The Declaration in Appeale of Rape 47. E. 3. fol. 14. IS a good forme of Declaration in this Appeale where in a Writ of Appeale of rape the plaintiffe counted how she was in Gods peace and the Kings such a day such a yeare and in such a place and the Defendant came feloniously and as a Feion againâ—â— the Kings Crowne and dignitie then and there did râ—â—iâ—â—â—er and carnally know her and that shée did pursue him from Towne to Towne and from Countie to Countie till he was taken at her suit and that A and B. were at the same time and place in force and aid of the same Felon c. And if the Defâ—ndant will this deny she is ready to proue it as the Court shall award that a woman ought But know that the seuerall Statutes haue made two seuerall formes of Appeales of rape one vpon the Statute of West 2. and in that there needs â—â— mention of any Statute But in the other which is vpon the Statute of Richard the vse is alwayes to recitâ— the Statute in the Declaration and that the words Contra formam statuti implyeth sufficiently that the woman hath consented to the rauisher SECT XXXIII Pleas to the wâ—it PLeas to the Writ may be many as false â—atine or want of â—orâ—â— or that the Plaintisse hath another Writ hanging of the same feâ—ony as is sâ—ewed you before â—â— the other Appeale And 5. H. 6. Fol. 1. Exception was taken against the Writ â—â— Appeale of â—apâ— because it was ad respoâ—dendum the Plaintiffe seâ—undâ—m formam staâ—â—ti c. Whereas it ought to haue béene Vnde eum appellat secundum formam statuti Whereunto it was anâ—â—dred that the Statute of 6. â— 1. giueth not the Appeale for that is by the Common Law but he must answer according to the Statute which outeâ—h â—attaile for the Statute saith Ad duellum vadiandum non recipiatur issint le briefe bone Another exception was taken against the
Writ because it was not felonice rapuit but the Defendant durst not stand vpon it but pleaded ouer rien culpable for rapuâ—t implyâ—th felony But in euerie Appeale of rape if the Writ want the word rapuit it shall abate though it haue words amounting to as much as carâ—â—â—â—ter cognovit or any such â—tâ—â—e 9. E. 4. â—ol 26. SECT XXXIV Pleas to the Action THough it bee true that where â—â—â— shall bee charged with rape in Appeals or otherwise it â—ust be by the Word rapâ—it and â—â—t carnaliter cognouit onely yâ—t by Bracton it is a gâ—â—d plea in Appâ—ale of rape to say Non abstullt eâ—â—ucellagiumâ— suum quâ—a aâ—â—uâ—h vâ—â—go est veâ—iâ—â—â— probabâ—â—uâ— pâ—â— aspâ—câ—â—â—â—oâ—poâ—iâ— peâ— quatuoâ— legales femâ—nas iuratâ—s de veâ—itate dicenda quaere Stamford saith it is a good plea for the Defendant though hâ—e lay with the woman yet hée did not carnally know her for the force of the Declaration resteth in that And by â—â—iâ—ton fol. 45. If at the time of rape supposed the womâ—n conceiue childe there is no rape for none can concâ—â—â—e without consent Also by Bracton it is a good plea to say that before the rape supposed he kept the Plaintiffe and vsed her as his Concubine But by the same Bracton it was no plea to say she was another mans Concubine or Harlot Quia licet meretâ—â—x fuerit aâ—ea cerâ—â—â—â—â—c â—emporis non fuit cuâ— nequiâ—iae eius reclamando consentiâ—e noluit And note if she which is rauished assenâ— for feare of death at the time of the rauisâ—â—ent â—t â—s a rape against her will notwithstanding such consent for assent must â—e voluntarie per curiam 5 E. 4. Crompton 44. SECT XXXV A question what is meant by rauishment with force in Wâ—st 2. cap. 34. STamford leaueth it doubtfull and to be learned what the difference is betwixt rauishment with force and without force M. Lambard thinketh the word to be but declaratorie signifying all rauishment to bée forcible And it is true that no woman is rauished in this sort only by parroll or influence of Rhetoricke But in mine opinion the Statute must néeds intend two kinde of rauishments because it maketh one more odious than the other and propoundeth death ineuitable to him which rauisheth with force though the woman forgiue hâ—â— and consâ—â—â— to him A more detestable villany I thinke therefore was meant in this parase of him which being himselfe ouercome with concupisâ—â—nce ouercommeth a woman hand to hand by length of breath and strength of his owne sinewes You shall vnderstand thâ—refore that about those dayes there was an Appeale of â—orâ—e in vse as it were against the rauishers yeomen of the stirrâ—p viâ— against him or them which were holders and assisters to the principall carnall oppressour as appeareth about the end of the 28. Chapter of Bracton Lib. 3. Eadem A. appellat C. quod eadem die eodem anno c. quo praedict B. eadem hora dum idem B. abstulit pucellagium suum fuit idem C. in fortia ita quod tenuit eandem A. dum idem B. absâ—ulit pucellagium suum vel concubuit cum ea postquam c. Such fellowes were termed appellati de fortia and they which take such Coadiutors might verie well be called rauishers with force and aid of all other most hatefull in iudgement of all indifferent honest women SECT XXXVI De muliere abducta cum bonis c. THis Statute toucheth also the most couetous rauishment that is when a mans wife and his goods are rauished together so much against womans minde that she is loth to leaue either money or plate behinde her and because some men vsed in those dayes to let their goods goe lest otherwise they might perhaps call their wiues home againe the suit is giuen to the King if the husband neglect it 44. Assi p. 12. A man brought a Writ of trespasse against a Knight and his Lady and two others in Banke le Roy for taking away the Plaintiâ—â—es wife and his goods and they all came by Capias in custodie of the Viscount and the Plaintiffe counted of rauishment of his wife and his goods carried away c. a protection was shewed forth for the Knight and his wife and allowed and Iudgement was demanded of the Writ because the Plaintiffe and his wife were diuorced Iustice Kniuct said that though the woman were dead the husband might haue the Action of rauishment notwithstanding aâ—d so is it if they were diuorced For he was not to recouer his wife by the Action nor any thing else saue dammages for the trespasse Then it was said the diâ—orce was causa frigiditatis Kniuet said the weather might wax warmer with him Il poet recouerer son nature ouerer come home reauer sa feme and therefore answered to the Writ Then Iudgement was asked againe of the Writ because it was against a man and his wife and one woman cannot rauish another sed non allocatur for a woman may be assenting or aiding to any rauishment therefore the Defendants pleaded non culpable The verie same or verie like case is againe 23. E. 3. 23. Sée 21. H. 7. fol. 13. The opinion of Finâ—ux that it is lawfull for a man to trauell with another mans wife to London at her request and to carrie her behinde him when shee will ride to sue a diuorce or a reuersment of Outlawrie or for a warrant of the peace against her goodman Yaxley was of contrarie opinion And where the partie which taketh another mans wife cum bonis c. is indited at the Kings suit of trespasse onely the Indictment is Quod vi armis Mariam vxorem cuiusdam A. B. apud S. rapuit â—am cum bonis cattallis viz. c. ipsius A. B. cepit abduxit â—a â—idem A. B. adhuc iniuste detinet contra pâ—cem c. contra formam statuti c. So likewise at the husbands â—â—it the Writ is Attachias B. quod sit coram nobis c. ad respondendum prefato A. quare vi armis vxorem prefati A. apud N. rapuit â—am cum bonis cattallis c. ad graue dâ—mnum contra formam statuti c. as appeares by Fitzherbert So that you see the differâ—nce betwixt rapuit in Trespasse and in Appeale or Indictment of felony Presidents whereof are in M. Laâ—â—bards Booke and M. Cromptonâ— SECT XXXVII The case of Elizabeth Venor NOw that women may learne to stand vpon their owne guard partly and not trust altogether to defence or courtesie of Lawes which are not more rigorously penned than sometime put in execution against them let them markâ— this caâ—e Lands were giuen in â—aâ—le to William Veâ—or and to Elizabeth his wife and to the heires of their two bodiâ—s the remainder to the said Elizabeth and the heires of her body the remainder to Robert Babbington in taile the remainder to the right heire of T. S.
father of Elizabeth William Venor dyed without issue and Elizabeth being sole seized was afterward rauished by Iohn Worth which after that hâ—â— had married her was indited of rape and tooke â—anctuarie at Westminster Elizabeth his wife being there with him was aduised to disassent and to part from him to saue her inheritance which she refused to doe and was afterward brought before the Councell in the Star-Chamber being there demanded if she assented or not and shée answered that Iohn Worth was her husband and she would not forsake him whereupon the issue of Robert Babbington Robert being dead entred vpon her land by the Statute of 6. R. 2. which willeth saith â—rookâ— if any woman assent to the rauisher that he to whom the land should descend reuert remaine or escheat may enter And though it were contessed that there was another person more neere in bloud to Elizabeth than was this issue of Robert Babbington yet because he was next in remainder his entrie was lawfull But Elizâ—beth did â—ust him and hâ—â— brought an Assise Then to proue the assent it was giâ—en in â—uidence that she had married him assenting to him as well in Sanctuarie as before the Councell And for Elizabeth it was alleaged that the espoâ—saâ— and all the assentings were by dures and force and for feare of the rauisher which might not be called assenting for none consenteth but frankly voluntarily and sans féare Quod videtur Lexibidem But in the end because shée might haue disagréed before the Councell and did not her assent was holden voluntarie and the Assise passed for the Plaintiffe And it was agreed for Law that if title of entrie into lands be giuen to a daughter by force of this Statute and she entreth that she shall retaine and enioy them notwithstanding the birth of any sonne Posthumus comming afterward though he be more néere or worthy of bloud And so it is generally where the entrie is giuen by Statute but if by Common Law adiscent bée cast vpon a daughter which entreth shee must giue place to a sonne borne afterward It was remembred in this case that in former time a woman being rauished after she had continued seuen yéeres with the rauisher and had borne him a childe escaped from him and sued in Parliament in the time of H. 6. against him till he was attainted And being demanded how she could now say that she neuer assented hauing conceiued c. shee answered that her flesh consented to him but her soule and conscience did euer abhorre him 5. E. 4. fol. 58. SECT XXXVIII The Statute 18. Eliz. cap. 7. I Am at the end of my voyage but before I take shore I will â—hew you how our late most excellent Law-giuer renowned Quéene Elizabeth whose vigilant care hath alwayes béene that all her people might liue vnder her in peace and without oppression hath giuen strength and perfection to the former functions of other Princes to make them a firme bulwarke against all manner of iniurers that possibly might oppresse women and I can but maruell that when so daâ—â—ablâ— a crime â—â— rape had giuen so often to the whole Realme such cause of bitter complaint and men in sundry ages had beaten their braines so carefully in finding out remedy against it how it was possible so long space together to leaâ—e such a priuilege to him that could read the blessed Psalmâ— of Miâ—erere c. that though hée had rauished the fairest Lady in the Land hée might almost goe away without touch of breast for it Therfore the eightéenth of Quéene Elizabeth for repressing of felonâ—ous rapes and rauishments of women and of felonious Burglaries it was enacted that they which were found guiltie by verdict or by confession or outlawed of or for such felonious Rapes or Burglarie they should suffer death and forfeit as in cases of Felony had béene vsed by the Lawes of the Realme without allowance of priuilege or beneâ—â—t of Clergie Further that they which were in other cases to haue benefit of Clergie should immediately after burning in the hand according to the Statute in that case prouided be forthwith enlarged by the Iustices and not be deliuered to the Ordinarie But yet that the Iustices before whom the Clergie shall be allowed may detaine such persons in prison for correction as long as they shall think conuenient so it be not aboue a yéere Then because in the fourtéenth yéere of her Maiesties reigne as you may perceiue in Dieâ— fol. 304. in the case of a Scot which had rauished a girlâ— being not past seuen yeeres old the Iustices were in doubt whether rape could be of a childe of such tender yéeres not yet nine yeeres old and therefore they went not to iudgement of the Scot though by euidence of diuers Matrons he seemed guiltie this Statute ordaineth that if any person vnlawfully and carnally know and abuse any woman childe vnder age of ten yeeres euerie such vnlawfull and carnall knowledge shall be felonie and the offender being duly conuicted shall suffer as a Felon without allowance of Clergie And as M. Lambard and M. Crompton doe both of them note it is not materiall whether she consent or no for the Law adâ—udgeth her vnable to consent at so tender age The last prouiso of this Statute is that they which are admitted to their Clergie shall answer to all other manner of felonies whereof they haue not formerly béene acquited conuicted attainted or pardoned as they should haue done if as Clerkes conuicted they had béene deliuered to the Ordinarie and made their purgation SECT XXXIX The Statute 39. Eliz. cap. 9. LAstly because this exemption of Clergie was leuelled onely against Burglaries and felomous rapes by violence and of the antique Faulkoners fashion leauing vnto couetous rautshers by abduction and I might say by insinuation the benefit of their Booke by reason whereof diuers maids widdowes and wiues had of veriâ— laâ—â— dayes béene first carried away and then defiled married c. It was enacted at the first Parliament begun Ann. 39. of the late Quéene Elizabeth That whosâ—euet shall be conuicted or attainted of or for any offence made felony by the Act aboue specified 3. H. 7. or which being indited or arraigned of or for any such offence shall stand mute or make no direct answer or shall challenge peremptorily aboue the number of twelue shall in euerâ—â— such case suffer death without benefit of Clergie prouided that nothing in this Act contained shall extend to take Clergie from any person or persons which â—â—â— not either principals or procurors or accessaries before the offence committed SECT XL. The Conclusion THus haue I sailed betwixt the capes of Magna Charta and Quadragesima of Queene Elizabeth collected the statutes principally belonging to women conioyning customes cases opinions sayings argumeuts iudgements and points of learning of like sort and subiect dispersed in our Law books now comming to take hauen God grant I may fall in at port Grace and good acceptance of all that shall read what I haue gathered they which are lesse learned than my selfe in this studie which I accompt to be those that haue but newly taken acquaintance of Littleton may spend some tâ—me here not without some fruit and profit They that are better learned than I into which company some may crowd that perhaps might bee challenged of intrusion will giue mee no thankes for my paines Rather I must thanke them if they vouchsafe to read them without open scorne and bitter censuring but they to whom my trauels are chiefly addressed are women so many as beare the title of honest women how good and vertuous soeuer they be I sâ—e not how they can scape the taint of ingratitude if they giue not a reasonable fauour and applause to my good intention and labour whereby things behoouefull for thâ—m to know are laid plaine together and in some orderly connexion which heretofore were smoothered or scattered in corners of an vncouth language cleane abstruded from their sex Which concealement because it seemed to me neither iust nor conscionable I haue framed this worke admonishing them not to take it for so strong and substantiall a péeâ—e as London bridge is whereon you may boldly set vp great builâ—ings but I willsay to you as Littleton said in his Tenures to his sonne There â—ée some things in these Bookes which are not Law yet euen those may enable you the better to vnderstand the reasons and arguments of Law and to conferre and enquire what the Law is amongst the sage Masters thereof FINIS