mentioned because hereby the widdow perceived that her sonne was dead for that he was indeed dead and was not onely fallen into a swoun is evident in many following passages as vers 18. and 20. where the widow and the Prophet bemoan that God had slain her sonne and vers 21. where it is said that Eliah prayed My God I pray thee let this childs soul come into him again and then again ver 22. And the soul of the child came into him again and he revived which may also be confirmed by that of the Apostle Heb. 10.35 which many think was written partly with reference to this story Women received their dead raised to life again this being the first we reade of in the Scriptures that being dead was restored again to life Vers 18. And she said unto Elijah What have I to do with thee O thou man of God c. That is wherein have I offended thee or whence is it that thou a holy Prophet of the Lord shouldest come to me a mere stranger to thee thus to punish me for my sinnes wherefore art thou come to me art thou come to call my sinnes to Gods remembrance and so to move him to kill my sonne to what end were our lives saved when we were in danger to perish for want of food if now my sonne must die with sicknesse when God punisheth those for their sinnes whom a while he did forbear he is said in the Scripture to remember their sinnes 1. Sam. 15.2 Now the conscience of this poore widow telling her that the death of her sonne was for her sinnes and therefore apprehending that his dwelling with her had been accidentally through her not profiting by his presence as she ought to have done the occasion of her sonnes death or rather that he had besought God thus to punish her as by his prayer he had brought the drought and famine upon the land or that he was sent as the minister of Gods wrath to take away her sonne from her hence it was that she break forth into this impatient bewailing her losse and her sinnes that had been the cause of it the expression she useth is much like that of Peter when the ship began to sink Luke 5.8 Depart from me for I am a sinfull man O Lord. Vers 20. O Lord my God hast thou also brought evil upon the widow with whom I sojourn by slaying her sonne Herein the Prophet pleads first his own interest in God O Lord my God secondly the condition of the woman a widdow and that because women in that estate are least able to endure the losse of those that should be a stay and support to them and God is wont to be very compassionately tender over them and thirdly the interest she had in him because he sojourned with her as grieving that the woman that had harboured him so long and for whose preservation God had wrought so great a miracle should now have all her joy dashed with such a sad losse or that it should be said by any that it had been well for her if the Prophet had never come into her house Vers 21. And he stretched himself upon the child three times and cried unto the Lord c. The meaning of this is either that he stretched himself upon the child and so in that posture of body prayed and then left off again doing this three severall times or else rather that he stretched himself upon the child and then went and prayed unto the Lord and so did by turns three severall times however doubtlesse his stretching himself upon the child was partly that feeling the coldnesse of the childs body he might be stirred up thereby to pray the more earnestly for him and partly that he might perceive when heat and life begun to come into the child and partly also thereby to expresse his exceeding grief for the death of the child and his earnest desire that God would be pleased to restore him to life there being an intimation in this gesture of his that he could have been glad to infuse of his own life into the child and that to move the Lord the rather to heare his prayer and grant his request the like we reade of Elisha 2. Kings 4.34 and of Paul to Eutichus Acts 20.10 Vers 24. And the woman said to Elijah Now by this I know thou art a man of God c. That is now her faith was strengthened concerning this she had called him a man of God vers 18. yet perhaps her faith was shaken with the death of her child and now with this miracle it was strengthened again CHAP. XVIII Vers 1. THe word of the Lord came to Elijah in the third yeare Elijah was sent to Ahab not long before the Lord sent rain again upon the earth so that from the first begining of the drought unto this time when the Prophet was sent to Ahab it was well nigh three yeares and six moneths complete for so long rain was with-held Luk. 4.25 either therefore the third yeare here spoken of must be the third yeare from his first hiding of himself chap. 17.3 or the third yeare since he went to sojourne with the widdow of Zarephath chap. 17.6 or else the third complete yeare since the time they began to want rain the six odd moneths not being reckoned as indeed it is usuall in the Scripture in noting times to set down onely the full complete yeares and not to mention the odd moneths or dayes Go shew thy self unto Ahab and I will send rain upon the earth Though the Israelites continued in their idolatry still yet the Lord determined to take off that judgement of want of rain that now for three years and a half had been upon them and this he did partly for his righteous servants sake that were still in the land who could not but suffer much in this common calamitie and partly because the Lord intended by Elijah to bring Baals prophets to be slain by the people and so thereupon to remove the judgement he had brought upon the kingdome and so now Elijah was sent to give notice they should have rain and so that which he said to Ahab might be made good to wit that there should be no rain but according to his word yea and withall doubtlesse God gave him now in charge though it be not here exprest what he afterwards did concerning the challenge he made to Baals prophets as is evident by that which he saith vers 36. Lord God of Abraham Isaac and Israel let it be known this day that thou art God in Israel and that I am thy servant and that I have done all these things at thy word Vers 3. Obadiah feared the Lord greatly But how could this be if he went not up to Jerusalem to sacrifice I answer so long as he did sincerely feare God and yielded him that spirituall service which was required of him and kept himself pure from the idolatry of the place
to the wicked wayes of their idolatrous fathers yea and did worse then they indeed as relapses in regard of sicknesse bring men usually into a more dangerous condition then they were in before so it is with relapses to idolatrie a Church and people that have been reformed and fall back to idolatry are usually farre worse and more grossely superstitious then they were before Vers 22. That through them I may prove Israel whether they will keep the way of the Lord c. These words may be understood two severall wayes for first they may have reference to that clause in the latter end of the foregoing verse where there is mention made of Joshua his leaving the Canaanites unexpelled the nations which Joshua left when he died and then the meaning must be that the nations were not wholly driven out in Joshua's time but were left for the tryall of Israel to wit to see whether they would be drawn away by their idolatries or no And secondly they may have reference to all that which is said in the two foregoing verses Because this people have transgressed my covenant c. I also will not henceforth drive out any from before them of the nations which Joshua left when he died That through them I may prove Israel whether they will keep the way of the Lord c. and then the meaning must be that God for the sinne of the Israelites resolved not to cast out any more of the Canaanites that remained in the land that they might continually oppresse and vex the Israelites and so thereby he might prove them namely whether by these afflictions they would be brought to repent and turn to the Lord and so again to walk in his wayes And indeed both these may be well here comprehended CHAP. III. Vers 2. ONely that the generation of the children of Israel might know to teach them warre c. Two reasons were given in the latter end of the foregoing chapter why the Lord did not wholly cast out the Canaanites out of the land in the dayes of Joshua and here now a third is added Some conceive indeed the meaning of this clause to be this that by leaving the Canaanites amongst them God would now let this wicked generation know to their cost what warre is their fathers by the extraordinary help which the Lord afforded them did soon vanquish their enemies and knew not the misery that warre usually brings with it but this their degenerate posterity being now forsaken of God should know to their sorrow what warre is But according to our translation I conceive the meaning of the words to be rather this that God left these inhabitants of the land unexpelled that the future generations might hereby be made carefull to train up their people in martiall discipline that so they might be the better able to perform what God had enjoyned them in not suffering any of the Canaanites to remain in the the land And this it is I conceive that in these words the holy Ghost doth chiefly aim at not so much their teaching the people the skill of the warre as their intention therein to wit that they might obey the Lords command in driving out the remainder of this people Vers 3. Namely five Lords of the Philistines c. Here the nations are reckoned that were not cast out of Canaan and the first mentioned are the five Lords of the Philistines to wit the Lords of Ashdod Gaza Askelon Gath and Ekron indeed three of these cities were at first taken by the men of Judah after the death of Joshua to wit Gaza Askelon and Ekron but it seems the Philistines soon recovered them again See chap. 1.18 Vers 5. And the children of Israel dwelt amongst the Canaanites c. from the eleventh verse of the foregoing chapter unto this place we have had a summary description of the state of Israel in the dayes of the Judges and here now the Authour of this story enters upon the particular story of Othniel the first of the Judges telling us in the first place what their sinnes were that brought them into that bondage out of which Othniel delivered them Vers 7. And served Baalim and the groves That is the idols which they set up and worshipped in the groves Vers 8. And he sold them into the hand of Cushan-rishathaim king of Mesopotamia See the note chap. 2.14 And the children of Israel served Cushan-rishathaim eight years It seems to me evident that for some years after the death of Joshua the people continued constant in the worship of the true God chap. 2.7 And the people served the Lord all the dayes of Joshua and all the dayes of the Elders that out-lived Joshua c. and doubtlesse some few years it was after they fell to idolatry ere God sold them into the hand of this king of Mesopotamia and therefore how long after the death of Joshua these eight years began of Israels bondage under the king of Mesopotamia we cannot say Vers 9. And when the children of Israel cryed unto the Lord the Lord raised up a deliverer c. The word in the Hebrew signifieth a saviour but thereby is meant one that delivered them from the bondage they were in and this was Othniel who was the sonne of Calebs brother and withall his sonne in law as being married to Achsah his daughter chap. 1.13 for that noble exploit of his in taking Debir and this was the honour of the children of Judah that the first judge after Joshua was of their tribe the Lord therein making good that prophecy of Jacob Gen. 49.8 Judah thou art he whom thy Brethren shall praise thine hand shall be in the neck of thine enemies thy fathers children shall bow down before thee Many hold that Othniel became Judge of Israel immediately after the death of Joshua but me thinks it is clear in this place that it was not till towards the end of the eight years of Israels bondage under Cushan-rishathaim king of Mesopotamia for it is said that then the children of Israel cryed unto the Lord and thereupon God raised up Othniel to be a deliverer that is God did then by a speciall instinct of his Spirit stirre him up to make warre against this tyrant for the deliverance of his people and furnished him with all necessary gifts and graces of his Spirit both for the vanquishing of the enemie and for the government of the people which it seems upon this occasion he took upon him But yet if Othniel took Debir and thereupon married Calebs daughter whilst Joshua was yet living as many Expositours hold he did hereby we may probably gather that it was not many years after Joshuas death ere the Israelites were thus oppressed by this king and so thereupon Othniel was raised up of God to be their Judge Vers 10. And the Spirit of the Lord came upon him That is God by his Spirit did poure forth upon him an extraordinary measure of all gifts requisite
for the service he was to undertake and withall did secretly but mightily work upon his spirit in moving him to undertake that service for which he had fitted him Vers 11. And the land had rest fourty years That is unto the expiration of fourty years to wit from the death of Joshua It is a great question amongst Expositours whether the years wherein the Israelites are said in this book to have been in bondage under those nations that prevailed over them and the years wherein the Judges are here said to have judged Israel and wherein the land is said to have been in rest are to be accounted as severall distinct years or no and so it is in this particular place some holding that the land had rest fourty years under Othniels government after those eight years wherein the king of Mesopotamia had tyrannized over them and others holding that both the eight years of the bondage of Israel under Cushan-rishathaim and the foregoing years wherein the Israelites lived without a Judge under the joynt-government of their Elders and had not yet by their sinnes brought themselves into bondage are to be all comprehended under the fourty years here mentioned and indeed these last I conceive are in the right unquestionably as may be thus made evident It is expressely said that from the Israelites going out of Egypt to the building of the Temple in the fourth yeare of Solomons reigne there were but four hundred and eighty years 1. Kings 6.1 And it came to passe in the foure hundred and fourscore yeare after the children of Israel were come out of the land of Egypt in the fourth yeare of Solomons reigne c. that he began to build the house of the Lord. Now first if to the fourty years of the children of Israels wandring in the wildernesse and the seventeen years of Joshua we adde the severall years of Israels bondage mentioned in this book of Judges and secondly the years wherein the land is said to have rested and thirdly the severall years of the Judges from Abimelech to Eli and fourthly the years of Eli Samuel and David we must say then that there were well nigh six hundred years from the Israelites going out of Egypt to the building of the Temple in the fourth year of Solomons reigne yea though we allow no time of distance between the death of Joshua and the eight years of Cushan-rishathaims tyranny which would be absurd and this cannot stand with that place 1. Kings 6.1 Besides in one place of this book it is plain that the years of the Judges are confounded with those of the enemies oppressing the land namely chap. 15.20 where it is said of Samson that he judged Israel in the dayes of the Philistines twenty years and why therefore may it not be so with the other Judges too I make no question therefore but under the fourty years here mentioned And the land had rest fourty years we must comprehend both the eight years of Israels bondage under the king of Mesopotamia and all the years before that bondage of the Israelites even from the death of Joshua The main objection against this is how the land can be said to have rested fourty years if part of those fourty years it was wasted with war and the people held under a miserable bondage But to this I answer 1. That it is not unusuall in the Scripture to denominate a full number of years from that which is properly true onely of the greater part of that number as we see Gen. 35.26 where after the naming of the twelve sonnes of Jacob this clause is added These are the sonnes of Jacob that were born to him in Padan-Aram and yet Benjamin is mentioned amongst them who was not born in Padan-Aram but in the land of Canaan and so likewise Acts 7.14 where it is said that Joseph sent and called his father and all his kindred threescore and fifteen souls and yet indeed there went but threscore and tenne of them at that time into Egypt Gen. 46.27 and so again Exod. 12.40 where it said that the sojourning of the children of Israel who dwelt in Egypt was foure hundred and thirty years and yet they were not in Egypt above two hundred and fifteen years And 2. that the meaning of these words And the land had rest fourty years may be that the land had rest unto the end of fourty years to wit counting the fourty years from the death of Joshua to the death of Othniel and so indeed Junius translates these words usque ad quadragesimum annune unto the expiration of fourty years for so the like expression we find chap. 14.17 where it is said of Samsons wife that she wept before him the seven dayes while the feast lasted and yet the meaning is onely that she wept to the ending of those seven dayes to wit from the time he refused to tell her the meaning of his riddle Vers 12. And the Lord strengthened Eglon the King of Moab against Israel c. That is he gave him courage and strength to invade Israel and prospered his attempts against them whereas otherwise happely they would have been afraid to meddle with a people that had been so victorious Vers 13. And went and smote Israel and possessed the city of palm-trees That is Jericho Deut. 34.3 Jericho was indeed wholly burnt by the Israelites Josh 6.24 and was not rebuilt till Ahabs dayes 1. Kings 16.43 but the meaning therefore is that this Eglon King of Moab having vanquished the Israelites in battell possessed himself of the land and territory thereabouts where the city Jericho formerly stood and either built some strong fort there or possessed himself of some fort that might he there before and that to the end he might have the command of the foords of Jordan both because there was the passage over towards his own countrey the land of Moab and because by this means he should be the better able to keep the Israelites within Jordan and those without from joyning their forces together against him and hence it was that when Ehud began to raise the countrey against the Moabites after he had slain Eglon their king the first thing they did was to take the foords of Jordan vers 28. They went down after him and took the foords of Jordan towards Moab and suffered not a man to passe over Vers 14. So the children of Israel served Eglon King of Moab eighteen years How long it was after the death of Othniel ere these eighteen years of the Israelites bondage under Eglon began it is not expressed onely this is clear that first the Israelites revolted to idolatry after Othniels death and then the Lord brought Eglon against them for it However observable it is that whereas their first bondage under Cushan-rishathaim king of Mesopotamia continued but eight years ver 8. this next under Eglon continued eighteen years and so the next too after that under Jabin king of Canaan continued twenty years
order before thy death Hezekiah had not yet a sonne to succeed him in the throne for Manasseh was borne three years after this as being but twelve years old at his fathers death chap. 21.1 and therefore it is probable that this was one chief thing which Isaiah had respect to in these words that he should advise and determine what was requisite concerning his successour for saith he thou shalt dye and not live that is thou art but a dead man by the ordinary course of nature there is no way of recovery for thee unlesse the Lord shall be pleased by his almighty power to deliver thee it is true indeed this condition was not expressed yet was it understood the Lord purposely or else where concealing this part of his will that Hezekiah receiving the sentence of death in himself might the more earnestly seek for help unto the Lord and that Hezekiah took it for a conditionall threatning and not a declaration of what God had absolutely determined is evident by his praying to God for mercy herein Vers 2. Then he turned his face to the wall and prayed c. To wit either because that wall was towards the Temple or rather to hide his tears and that being thereby the freer from distractions he might the more freely poure forth his requests unto God to whom he now turned as to his onely hope and comfort Vers 3. I beseech thee O Lord remember now how I have walked before thee in truth c. Besides that love of life and horrour of death which is naturally in all men and which grace hath much adoe to overmaster even in the best of Gods servants there were many things that made the sentence of death in a speciall manner terrible to Hezekiah as first because he had yet no sonne to succeed him in the throne chap. 21.1 and it must needs be very grievous to him to think that the promise made to David and Solomon 1. Kings 8.25 There shall not fail thee a man in my sight to sit on the throne of Israel should not be made good to him in his posteritie who had to his utmost endeavoured to keep the condition required of God at the giving of that promise Secondly because he could not but fear lest upon his death Religion would go to wrack again lest the reformation newly begun would soon come to nothing and the poore Church of God would quickly be overgrown with superstition again Thirdly because he saw that those that had been already forward enough to ascribe all the calamities that had befallen the kingdome in his time to his suppressing their high places altars and idols would be now much more bold to insult over him if God should thus suddenly cut him off And fourthly especially because his own faith must needs be sorely assaulted and shaken with these temptations and that the rather because the coming of the Prophet to him in such a manner as Gods Herald to threaten him with death Thou shalt die and not live might seem to imply that God meant to hew him down in displeasure doubtlesse in these regards the heart of Hezekiah was almost overwhelmed with terrours as himself afterward expressed in his song Isa 38.10 14. and hence it is that in this his prayer he pleads his integritie that what he had done in the reformation of his kingdome he had done with an upright heart because he knew it was good in his eyes not by way of expostulation or pleading his merits but to support and strengthen his faith against these temptations that he might with the more hope and confidence call upon God and might by this argument move the Lord to shew him mercy Vers 4. And it came to passe afore Isaiah was gone out into the middle court c. Some reade this afore Isaiah was gone out into the middle citie and indeed it is by many held that Jerusalem was divided into three parts whereof one was the citie of David which is called Zion another that which was of old called Jebus or Salem and a third that which lay betwixt these two and joyned them together and was called the middle citie the same where Huldah the prophetesse dwelt chap. 22.14 for so some reade that place she dwelt in Jerusalem in the second part and accordingly they understand this place that before the Prophet was gone out of the citie of David into the middle citie the Lord sent him back to Hezekiah with a promise of recovery but because the text seems most plainly to speak of the Prophets going out of the kings house and the tender compassion of God in the speedy sending back of the Prophet to comfort the afflicted soul of Hezekiah is the more eminently discovered by this that afore Isaiah was gone out into the middle court of the kings house he was sent back again to the king this translation is justly put into the text of our Bibles as the best and this middle court I take to be the same which is called the court within the porch 1. Kings 7.8 Vers 5. Thus saith the Lord the God of David thy father I have heard thy prayer c. In sending to Hezekiah the promise of his recovery the Lord stiles himself the God of David his father because the promise made to David concerning the continued succession of his seed in the throne of Judah should by this means be made good to Hezekiah who should now live to have an heir to succeed him even as in former time to imply that God would perform to the Israelites what he had promised to Abraham Isaac and Jacob he used to stile himself the God of Abraham the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob. On the third day thou shalt go up unto the house of the Lord. The suddennesse of his recovery makes it evident that it was miraculous and the mention of his going to the house of the Lord sweetens the tidings of his recovery since nothing could more glad his heart then to heaâ—e that having received the sentence of death in himself he should yet again praise God in his holy Temple Vers 6. And I will deliver thee and this citie out of the hand of the king of Assyria c. Though Sennacherib were returned as is most probable into his own countrey yet first there might be some garrisons left behind here and there in the cities he had taken and secondly just cause had Hezekiah to fear that having reinforced his army he would return again and endeavour to wipe of the stain of his present flight and to remove those fears the Lord assures him that as he had so he would still deliver both him and Jerusalem out of the hand of the Assyrian Vers 7. And Isaiah said Take a lump of dry figges c. That is a masse made of drie figges Both the boil that Hezekiah had in this dangerous sicknesse and the masse of figges appointed to be laid to the boil which are
his servants Jer. 25.1.11 which accordingly came to passe for immediately after this Nebuchadnezzar the second entred Judea with a strong army besieged and forced Jerusalem and having Jehoiakim in his power did at first intend to carry him to Babylon 2. Chron. 36.6 but was at last intreated to leave him as his vassall taking with him for pledges Daniel being but yet a child with Ananias Misael and Azarias with a great deal of the Temples treasures nor need we stumble at it that this is said to have been done in the third yeare of Jehoiakim Dan. 1.1 whereas the fourth yeare of Jehoiakim is accounted the first of Nebuchadnezzar Jer. 25.1 The word that came to Jeremiah concerning all the people of Judah in the fourth yeare of Jehoiakim the sonne of Josiah king of Judah that was the first yeare of Nebuchad-rezzar king of Babylon since first the first yeare of Nebuchadnezzar might well concurre with the end of the third and the beginning of the fourth yeare of Jehoiakim and again secondly perhaps as some hold Nebuchadnezzar the second came first against Judea whilest his father was yet living in the third yeare of Jehoiakim and prevailed against Jehoiakim but returning soon upon the report of Necho the king of Egypts preparations against him and especially upon the news of his fathers death that he might prevent all commotions at home in the fourth yeare of Jehoiakim having first vanquished the forces of the Egyptians about the banks of Euphrates Jer. 46.1 2. The word of the Lord that came to Jeremiah the prophet against the Gentiles against Egypt against the army of Pharaoh Necho king of Egypt which was by the river Euphrates in Charchemish which Nebuchad-rezzar king of Babylon smote in the fourth yeare of Jehoiakim the sonne of Josiah king of Judah he soon brought Jehoiakim to acknowledge himself his vassal and tributary and so as it is said here Jehoiakim became his servant three years to wit the fifth sixth and seventh years of his reigne the Egyptian king could not like of this and therefore it seems began to think of restoring Jehoahaz now prisoner in Egypt and setting him up as a domesticall enemy against his ungratefull brother the rumour whereof when it came to Judea though Jeremiah prophecied that it should prove idle Jer 22.11 12. Thus saith the Lord touching Shallum the sonne of Josiah king of Judah which reigned in stead of Josiah which went forth out of this place He shall not return thither any more But he shall die in the place whither they have led him captive did much perplex them being now in danger both of the Egyptians if they kept faith with the Babylonians and of the Babylonians if they should revolt again to the Egyptians and this I conceive might be the cause of the fast kept in the fifth yeare of Jehoiakims reigne in the ninth moneth Jer. 36 9. At which time Baruch sent by Jeremiah did publickly reade the roll of Jeremiahs prophesie before all the people which being by the Princes carried to Jehoiakim he having heard part of it cut it in pieces with a penknife and cast it into the fire but at length to wit in the eighth yeare of his reigne which was the fourth of Nebuchadnezzar hearing of many glorious rumours of the Egyptians preparations against the Babylonians emboldned hereby he renounced his subjection to the Babylonian as is expressed here that he turned and rebelled against him and so sided with the Egyptians again Vers 2. And the Lord sent against him bands of the Chaldees c. That is Nebuchadnezzar not without the speciall counsel of God came up against him and that as Josephus saith from that siege of Tyre whereof the Prophet speaks Ezek. 26.7 For thus saith the Lord God Behold I will bring upon Tyrus Nebuchad-rezzar king of Babylon a king of kings from the North with chariots and with horses and companies and much people and bringing thence with him some part of his army consisting of companies and bands of severall nations he entred Jerusalem and laid hold on Jehoiakim and being enraged against him for his perfidiousnesse in revolting from him caused him to be slain and cast out into the fields without Jerusalem to be devoured by birds and beasts for so Jeremy had prophesied it should be Jer. 22.18 19. Therefore thus saith the Lord concerning Jehoiakim the sonne of Josiah king of Judah They shall not lament for him saying Ah my brother or ah sister They shall not lament for him saying Ah Lord or ah his glory He shall be buried with the buriall of an asse drawn and cast forth beyond the gates of Jerusalem and 36.30 Therefore thus saith the Lord of Jehoiakim king of Judah He shall have none to sit upon the throne of David and his dead body shall be cast forth in the dayes to the heat and in the night to the frost This was the eleventh yeare of Jehoiakim and so the seventh yeare of Nebuchadnezzar three years after Jehoiakims revolt for either the siege of Tyre or some other occasions had hitherto detained Nebuchadnezzar from coming against him and hence it is we reade of three thousand and three and twenty Jews carried away by him in the seventh yeare of his reigne Jer. 52.28 This is the people whom Nebuchad-rezzar carried away captive in the seventh yeare three thousand and three and twenty Jews Vers 3. Surely at the commandment of the Lord came this upon Judah to remove them out of his sight for the sinnes of Manasseh c. See the note chap. 23.26 Vers 6. So Jehoiakim slept with his fathers and Jehoiachin his sonne reigned in his stead For when Nebuchadnezzar had slain Jehoiakim as is before noted and was returned again into his own countrey it seems the people made this Jehoiachin king in his stead who is also called Jeconiah 1. Chron. 3.16 and Coniah by way of contempt Jer. 22.24 In the genealogie of Christ Matth. 1.11 Jehoiakim the sonne of Josiah seems to be quite left at least in our most usuall translations for though in some few copies it is thus set down and Josias begat Jakim and Jakim begat Jechonias yet generally in all other copies it runnes thus And Josias begat Jechonias and his brethren about the time they were carried away to Babylon and after they were brought to Babylon Jechonias begat Salathiel and for the resolving of this doubt many severall answers are given by Expositours but the most satisfying one I conceive is this to wit that Jehoiakim the father was called Jeconiah as well as Jehoiachin the sonne and so whereas Mat. 1.11 it is said that Josias begat Jechonias and his brethren that is meant of Jehoiakim the sonne of Josias who had many brethren whereas Jehoiachin had none and then that which follows vers 12. and after they were brought to Babylon Jechonias begat Salathiel that is meant of Jehoiachin the sonne of Jehoiakim and so the severall generations of these kings are fully
verse though called there by another name Vers 11. But Jeush and Beriah had not many sonnes therefore they were in one reckoning c. That is they were joyned together and counted as one family and that because there were not many of their posterity Vers 13. Aaron was separated that he should sanctifie the most holy things he and his sonnes for ever c. That is he and his posterity were set apart to the work of the priesthood to be imployed about the most holy things according to the holy ordinances which God had appointed Vers 24. These were the sonnes of Levi c. from the age of twenty years and upward To wit when they came to serve in the Temple for though at this time when they were assigned to their severall imployments they were onely numbred that were thirty years old and upward vers 3. yet before his death David gave order that in each family and office of the Levites all of twenty years old and upward should be taken in to the service of the Temple vers 27. For by the last words of David the Levites were numbred from twenty years old and above and the reason is prefixed vers 25 26. For David said The Lord God of Israel hath given rest unto his people that they may dwell in Jerusalem for ever and also unto the Levites they shall no more carry the tabernacle nor any vessels thereof c. see the note ver 3. Vers 28. Because their office was to wait on the sonnes of Aaron for the service of the house c. and in the purifying of all holy things c. That is the washing and cleansing both of the holy places and vessels yea and the sacrifices before they were offered by the priests upon the altar Vers 29. And for all manner of measure and cise That is the Levites also took care to see that those things that were employed in the service af the Temple as fine floure and wine and oyle for the meat offerings c. should be given to the priests according to that weight and measure appointed by the law for to some sacrifices there was a greater measure of these required and to some lesse see Numb 15.4 6 9. and Levit. 23.13 and the Levites were to look that the just measures was observed in all these things yea many Expositours conclude from hence that the Levites had the overseeing of all publick measures and kept the patterns or standard of them in the Temple whence they say it is that the just shekel is called the shekel of the sanctuary Exod. 30.31 CHAP. XXIIII Vers 3. ANd David distributed them both Zadok of the sonnes of Eleazar c. That is David distributed all the priests the sonnes of Aaron into two parts all that were of the sonnes of Eleazar in one over whom Zadok was the chief and all that were of the sonnes of Ithamar in the other over whom Ahimelech was chief to wit under the high priest who accordingly attended in the Temple according to their offices in their service Vers 4. And there were moe chief men found of the sonnes of Eleazar then of the sonnes of Ithamar c. That is there were more heads of families found among the sonnes of Eleazer then among the sonnes of Ithamar and consequently being to divide the priests into twenty foure orders or courses in each of which there was one to be the chief and head of the rest he appointed sixteen of these courses among the sonnes of Eleazar and but eight among the sonnes of Ithamar Vers 5. Thus were they divided by lot one sort with another c. That is having divided the priests into twenty foure parts those of Eleazer into sixteen parts and those of Ithamar into eight there were lots cast amongst these divisions promiscuously not preferring those of one Image before those of another to determine both which of these companies should serve first and which second and so in order each company being to serve a week and then to go out and also which of those that were heads of families in each company should be the chief of that company and so the first company was chosen by lot and the lot fell upon Jehoiarib to be the head of that company which was thenceforth called the course of Jehoiarib and so after the same manner in all the rest Vers 10. The eighth to Abijah Of this course was Zachariah the father of John the Baptist Luke 1.5 Vers 19. These were the orderings of them in their service to come into the house of the Lord according to their manner under Aaron their father c. That is as Eleazar and Ithamar did in former times discharge the work of the priesthood in the house of God under Aaron their father so did these sonnes of Eleazar and Ithamar now in their courses discharge the same work after the same manner or else the meaning of these words is onely this that after their manner that is week by week chap. 9.25 or after the manner appointed in the Law these priests in their severall courses did all discharge the work of the inferiour priesthood being all of them under the command of the high priest who is here called Aaron because he held the same place that Aaron formerly did Vers 20. And the rest of the sonnes of Levi were these c. Having in the former part of the chapter expressed the severall courses of the priests here now are added the severall families of the rest of the sonnes of Levi that were not priests to wit the Levites and as some conceive who they were of those families that were heads of the severall companies of the Levites that were to serve in the Temple in their turns and courses as the priests also did or rather because the Gershonites were set down before chap 23.7 these that are here added are said to be the rest of the sonnes of Levi to wit the Kohathites and Merarites who especially attended upon the Priests Vers 31. These likewise cast lots over against their brethren the sonnes of Aaron That is as the priests being divided into twenty foure companies there were lots cast for them as is above-said vers 5. so was it on the other side with the Levites too according to the severall employments whereto they were set a part they were divided into twenty foure divisions and lots were cast who should attend the service in the first course coming in and going out with the first course of the priests and so who should be in the second course with the second course of priests c. This is expressed concerning the singers in the next chapter and the like it seems therefore was done both for the porters and those that attended upon the priests and did the other work of the Lord chap. 23 4 5. In the presence of David the king and Zadok and Abimelech and the chief of the fathers of the priests and Levites even the
33.27 Our hand is high and the Lord hath not done all this or the Lord was not able to give them the land which he had promised them and so will preferre their idol-gods before the Lord God of Israel Vers 11. For they have taken of the accursed thing and have also stollen c. Here the Lord sets forth the severall degrees of the hainousnesse of that sinne of Achans wherewith all Israel was involved for first saith the Lord they have taken of the accursed thing that is they have reserved to themselves some part of that which as an accursed thing should have been burnt to wit the Babylonish garment secondly they have also stollen that is they have taken of that also which I reserved for my self to wit the gold and silver thirdly and dissembled also that is they have done this closely and cunningly the party offending carrying the matter so as if he had done no such thing which indeed must needs be a great aggravation of his sin this being no lesse implicitly but a deniall of Gods omniscience or a bold contempt of his wrath against those that transgresse his Laws and then fourthly they have put it even amongst their own stuffe which is added as the last and highest aggravation of this wickednesse because this argued a remorselesse resolution to hold what he had so wickedly gotten and that he was farre from being smitten in conscience for what he had done Vers 13. Vp sanctifie the people c. See the note upon Exod. 19.10 Vers 14. And it shall be that the tribe which the Lord taketh shall come according to the families thereof c. That is the tribe upon which that lot falleth shall bring all their severall families that so by casting of lots it may also be discovered which is the guilty familie for that the guilty tribe and then the guiltie familie then the houshold were taken by lots is evident by comparing this place with that in the 1. Sam. 14.41 42. where the same phrase is used Saul said unto the Lord God of Israel give a perfect lot and Saul and Jonathan were taken And Saul said Cast lots between me and Jonathan my sonne and Jonathan was taken But why did not the Lord tell Joshua that Achan was the partie that had sinned but cause him thus to be discovered by casting of lots I answer first because by this means the Lord tried Achan whether he would come in voluntarily and confesse his sinne and indeed by Achans holding out so long even till the lot fell upon his own person there was a notable discovery made how hardly men are brought to confesse their secret sinnes and how prone they are to flatter themselves with a vain hope that their secret sinnes shall never be discovered and secondly because hereby the Lord made known that even the most casuall things to wit the casting of lots are certainly governed by the providence of God according to that of Solomon Prov. 16.33 The lot is cast into the lap but the whole disposing thereof is of God a truth the fitter to be cleared to this people because the land was within a short time to be divided amongst them by lot Vers 15. And it shall be that he that is taken with the accursed thing shall be burnt with fire he and all that he hath c. That is after he hath undergone the punishment due to him by the Law as a presumptuous transgressour of Gods command which was that he should be stoned Numb 15.30 35. let him be also burnt with fire according as the things anathematized or accursed were to be consumed See vers 25. And all Israel stoned him with stones and burned them with fire after they had stoned them with stones Vers 17. And he brought the familie of Judah c. That is the families which were foure or five Numb 26.20 21. And he brought the familie of the Zarhites man by man That is the heads of that familie one after another to wit those five mentioned 1. Chron. 2.6 The sonnes of Zerah Zimri and Ethan and Heman and Calcol Dara five of them in all and so Zabdi was taken that is the lot fell upon his posterity and household who were brought man by man Vers 18. And he brought his houshold man by man c. That is Joshua as above vers 16. So Joshua rose up early in the morning c. Vers 21. And behold they are hid in the earth in the midst of my tent and the silver under it That is and the silver you shall find under the garment or rather as the originall may be understood wrapt up within the garment to wit because it consisted of so many severall peices of coyn and this he expresseth that by this particular relating how they were hid it might be the more evident that he spake truly Vers 22. So Joshua sent messengers and they ran unto the tent c. This running of the messengers to Achans tent to fetch the things stollen which he had confessed were hidden there might well proceed from their eager and earnest desire to clear themselves from the accursed thing which had kindled Gods anger against them for they were fetched not onely to discover the truth of what Achan confessed but also that they might be burnt as God had commanded vers 15. yet it may be also that God commanded them to runne lest any upon Achans confession should get thither and remove them elsewhere Vers 24. And Joshua and all Israel took Achan c. Here the story relates how Joshua and the Israelites took Achan with the things he had stollen his children and all that he had and carried them down to the valley called afterwards upon this occasion the valley of Achar that they might be there burnt as God had commanded Now amongst other things there being here particular mention made of his oxen and his asses and his sheep c. it may be gathered from thence that he had before a competent estate and did not therefore steal those things for want which he took out of the spoyl of Jericho but out of mere covetousnesse for the further inriching of himself which was doubtlesse a great aggravation of his sinne Vers 25. And all Israel stoned them with stones and burned them with fire after they had stoned them with stones So that both Achan and his sonnes and daughters were stoned Now though this Joshua might not have done by the ordinary Law Deut. 24.16 The father shall not be put to death for the children neither shall the children be put to death for the father yet here it was just because God commanded it yea though they were no way consenting to their fathers sinne for first God might have respect if they were of grown years to the punishment of other sinnes whereof he knew them guilty or might take them away in mercy but however though they were infants at least some of them to take away the
chap. 4.3 Twenty years he mightily oppressed the children of Israel and thus when lighter corrections did no good the next were sorer and of longer continuance and because they abused Gods readinesse to repent and withdraw his hand when they cried unto him he continued the next judgements the longer upon them Vers 15. The Lord raised them up a deliverer Ehud the sonne of Gera a Benjamite a man left-handed Some conceive that this last particular of his being left-handed is purposely expressed to intimate by what weak means and dispised instruments God is wont many times to effect his greatest works but because it is generally held that no men are ordinarily more able and strong and fit for any service then left-handed men whence it is noted chap. 20.16 that amongst the children of Benjamin there were seven hundred chosen men left-handed every one could sling stones at an hairs breadth and not misse therefore I conceive that this is here noted of Ehud the second judge that God raised to the Israelites to imply rather the fitnesse of the instrument whom God chose for this service of killing Eglon to wit in that the stroke of such men is far the more harder either espied or guarded When Ehud began first to be judge of Israel it is not expressed Some conceive that Ehud was judge immediately after Othniels death and that he was their judge both in the time of their apostasie after Othniels death and likewise all the eighteen years that the Israelites were in bondage under Eglon king of Moab and whereas it is here said that when the children of Israel cryed unto the Lord the Lord raised them up a deliverer Ehud the sonne of Gera they take the meaning hereof to be onely this that God raised up the spirit of Ehud their judge to undertake the deliverance of the Israelites from their bondage and not that he was then first raised to be their judge But methinks according to the plain order of the words it should rather seem that upon the crying of the Israelites to the Lord when they had been eighteen years under the bondage of Eglon the Lord stirred him up to undertake their deliverance and thereupon afterwards he became their judge And by him the children of Israel sent a present unto Eglon king of Moab Which Ehud embraced as a fit opportunity for the killing of Eglon because it would make him to be the lesse suspected Vers 16. But Ehud made him a dagger which had two edges of a cubit length and he did gird it under his raiment upon his right thigh Having resolved with himself to kill Eglon he provided him a dagger accordingly concerning which it is noted 1. That it had two edges that it might peirce the more readily and make the more deadly wound 2. That it was but of a cubit length to wit that it might be the better carried unseen under his garment and 3. That he did gird it upon his right thigh namely for the conveniency of drawing it forth with his left hand as for the same reason those that are right-handed use alwayes to wear their weapons on their left side Vers 17. And Eglon was a very fat man This is expressed to intimate that hereby Ehud had the better advantage to do what he intended for being such a corpulent and unwieldy man he was the lesse able to decline the stroke which Ehud gave him and besides the wound was like to be the more deadly Vers 18. And when he had made an end of offering the present he sent away the people that bare the present These words he sent away the people may imply the greatnesse of the present because there were so many to bear it to the king he sent them away before he would do the act he intended going himself along with them till he came to Gilgal and then returning again both that being alone he might the more conveniently accomplish his designe and also that they might be out of danger and himself not be incumbred with care for them when he was to slie for his life Vers 19. But he himself turned again from the quarries that were by Gilgal and said I have a secret errand to thee O king The word translated quarries may also be traslated graven images as it is in the margine of our bibles and indeed it might well be that this Moabitish king had set up certain idols in Gilgal either to vex the Israelites therewith who happely esteemed Gilgal the more because there their forefathers had been circumcised and there the Tabernacle was for many years together or else that the Israelites might be wonne to worship them or else by way of honouring his idol-gods as it were testifying hereby that by their help he had entred successefully upon the land of Israel and then the mention that is here made of these images may be to intimate one reason amongst other wherewith God stirred the spirit of Ehud against Eglon namely because he had set up his idol-gods in the land of Israel But if we reade the word as it is in our bibles quarries that is pits out of which they cut hewed stones for their buildings then doubtlesse the drift of this clause is onely to shew how far Ehud went back with those that went with him before he returned again to the king of Moab As for those first words which he spake to Eglon when he came back to him I have a secret errand to thee O king it might be truly said in relation to that which he had to do an errand he had which was to be delivered to him in secret though not by word of mouth but by the stroke of his dagger and it was from God from whom he had his commission Yet surely Ehud intended that Eglon should understand him so as if in his return home he had been sent back with some message of great secresie which he was now come back to deliver Neither yet can we say that Ehud did evil in this his dissembling with Eglon and that because he had no doubt his call and warrant from God for what he did Who said Keep silence c. That is he bad Ehud forbear delivering his errand till his servants and attendants were gone out of the room Vers 20. And he was sitting in a summer parlour which he had for himself alone That is wherein Eglon used to be private by himself which is added that it may not seem strange that his servants waited so long without after Ehud was gone it was because it was a room wherein he used ordinarily to be alone by himself And Ehud said I have a message from God unto thee And he arose out of his seat Ehud had told the king before ver 19. that he had a secret errand unto him concerning which see the note there now he addes that the message he brought him was from God partly perhaps that being astonished with that word he might take the
lesse heed to the drawing out of his dagger but especially no doubt because whilst the king was sitting he could not so certainly give him such a sure and deadly wound with one stroke as he desired to do and he hoped that at the mention of a message from God either out of astonishment or in reverence to God from whom the message was brought he would not fail to arise out of his seat as indeed it proved And he arose saith the Text out of his seat So far did those blind superstitious heathens reverence the very name of God that though Eglon was a king and withall a grosse unweildy man yet hearing of a message from God he arose out of his seat Vers 21. And Ehud put forth his left hand and took the dagger c. Ehud was extraordinarily called of God to do this vers 15. When the children of Israel cryed unto the Lord the Lord raised them up a deliverer Ehud the sonne of Gera a man left-handed Nor is this therefore any warrant for the assassination of Princes though tyrants and oppressours of the people Vers 22. And the dirt came out It is rendred in the margine of our bibles It came out at the fundament thereby meaning that he struck with such strength that the dagger that went in at his belly came out behind at his fundament but because the dagger was but of a cubit length vers 16. and the king was such a fat grosse man I rather think that it is better translated as it is in our text that the dirt came out meaning his excrements for though this be usuall with men that die any violent death yet I conceive it is noted here to the reproch of this tyrant who by the just judgement of God was now left tumbling in his own dung that had so many years oppressed the people of God Vers 23. Then Ehud went forth through the porch This his going out the way that he came is expressed to note the composednesse of his spirit after this that he had done as one that knew well that he had done nothing but what was pleasing to God that having done nothing but what God had called him to do God would secure and shield him in his way he went quietly through the kings guard and other servants not discovering in his countenance the least disquiet or perplexitie of mind And shut the doores of the parlour upon him and locked them That is he pulled too the doore and locked it to wit either by clapping too the doore as spring-locks use to shut or with the key which he might carry away with him for that which is said vers 25. may be meant of another key which the kings servants might have in their keeping and this he did that whilst his servants waited long for the opening the doore he might have the more time to escape away before they came to know their master was slain as we see it fell out vers 26. And Ehud escaped while they tarried and passed beyond the quarries and escaped unto Seirath Vers 24. They said Surely he covereth his feet in his summer chamber Or he doth his easement as it is in the margine the long garments which the Hebrews wore loose about them when they sunck down with their bodies to the ground for that purpose covered their feet and hence is this phrase surely he covereth his feet and again 1. Sam. 24.3 And he came to the sheep-cotes by the way where was a cave and Saul went in to cover his feet Yet there is another exposition of this phrase Surely he covereth his feet in his summer chamber that is surely he hath laid himself down to sleep in his summer chamber and many reasons move me to approve of this rather then the former though the whole current of Expositours take the former to be unquestionably the meaning of the words For first it is most probable that the kings summer chamber was a place where he used sometimes in the day-time to lay himself down to rest a while secondly there was more reason why his servants should wait long for the opening of his doors as it is said they did vers 25. even till they were ashamed out of an opinion that he was laid to sleep in his summer chamber then out of opinion that he was all that while easing himself thirdly the reason given why it should be said of him that in easing himself he covereth his feet to wit because in doing that as they sunk down with their bodies their long garments covered their feet seems farre more forced then that which is given why those that are laid down to sleep in the day time should be said to cover their feet to wit because they used to cast some covering over their feet when they laid themselves down to sleep and went not into a bed whence it is said of Ruth when she went to lie down by Boaz as he lay sleeping at the end of his heap of corn Ruth 3.7 that she uncovered his feet and laid her down and fourthly because where the same phrase is used in speaking of Sauls going into a cave where David and his men were 1. Sam. 24.3 Saul went in to cover his feet it may best of all be understood that Saul went in to lie down and sleep there for a while because it is hard to say how David should there cut off the skirt of his robe and not be perceived if he had not been asleep Vers 25. And they tarried till they were ashamed That is till they were ashamed they had tarried so long or that they were so perplexed that they knew not what to think or say or do Vers 30. And the land had rest fourscore years That is to the end of fourscore years to wit from the death of Othniel See the note above verse 11. Vers 31. And after him as Shamgar the sonne of Anath which slew of the Philistines six hundred men with an ox-goad That is say some Expositours with ox-goads for conceiving it improbable that one man with an ox-goad should slay so many hundred Philistines they hold the meaning of this clause to be onely this that the Philistines making some in road into the land of the Israelites Shamgar did on a sudden raise the countrey thereabouts that they having no other arms did with their ox-goads set upon the Philistines slew six hundred of them but because it is not probable that the Israelites that bordered upon the Philistines should be thus unprovided of arms nor is it any more incredible that Shamgar should make such a havock amongst the Philistines with an ox-goad then that Sampson should do the like with the jawbone of an asse therefore I rather think that as the letter of text runnes Shamgar by the wondrous help of God did alone perform this admirable exploit It is not expressed whether Shamgar judged Israel or no yet because it is said And after him was
morning doth shine most brightly and gloriously and that too as Solomon saith Prov. 4.18 more and more unto a perfect day so let them that love the Lord become prosperous glorious and renowned and let their prosperity grow and encrease daily Because the power and strength of the sunnes light and heat is not so much seen or felt when it is covered with clouds it is said to go forth in his might and indeed the expression here used is much like that 2. Sam. 23.4 He shall be as the light of the morning when the sunne â—iseth even a morning without clouds And the land had rest fourty years That is unto fourty years counting them from Ehuds death See chap. 3.11 CHAP. VI. Vers 1. ANd the children of Israel did evill in the sight of the Lord and the Lord delivered them into the hand of Midian seven years By the evill which the children of Israel did is principally meant their fearing and worshiping the gods of the Amorites vers 10. And I said unto you I am the Lord your God fear not the gods of the Amorites in whose land you dwell but ye have not obeyed my voice but yet when the Lord undertook to punish them for this whether it were because they had not proceeded so farre herein as in former times or for some other reason known onely to the Lord evident it is that he laid not his hand upon them so heavily now as he had done formerly both because the misery that God brought upon them lasted but seven years and also because we reade not that these Midianites did bring the Israelites into bondage as other their oppressours had done but onely made inroads every year into the land and so robbed and pillaged their countrey whence it may be it is as some have observed that it is not said here according to the expression elsewhere used the Lord sold them into the hand of Midian but that the Lord delivered them into the hand of Midian What it was at this time that moved the Midianites to invade the land of Israel we need not enquire The Israelites indeed in the latter dayes of Moses had made warre with the Midianites and destroyed multitudes of them of which see the note Numb 31.17 and it may be that the Midianites pretended now the taking revenge upon the Israelites for that but however the Midianites though the posterity of Abraham were alwayes deadly enemies to the Israelites and besides when the Lord means to punish a people for their sinnes he can bring against them what nation he pleaseth Vers 2. And because of the Midianites the children of Israel made them dens which are in the mountains and caves and strong holds That is many of those dens and caves and strong holds which are in the land of Canaan the Israelites made at this time to wit to hide themselves and their estates therein from the Midianites the poorer sort the dens and the caves and the other the strong holds and forts and thus at first they onely thought to shelter themselves by these outward means and did not seek to make God their hiding place but all in vain and therefore at length they saw their folly herein and then as it is said vers 6. They cryed unto the Lord. Vers 3. And so it was when Israel had sowen that the Midianites came and the Amalekites and the children of the East That is and other the children of the East to wit of Arabia that lay eastward of Canaan Even the Midianites were of these eastern nations for they passed over Jordan that was on the east side of Canaan when they invaded the land and therefore when Gideon had overcome them he sent to the inhabitants of mount Ephraim chap. 7.24.25 to stop them from returning over Jordan but they were aided it seems by other of these eastern nations that bordered upon them as the Ishmaelites mentioned chap. 8.24 For they had golden earings because they were Ishmaelites and some others Now it is noted that these nations came up every year into the land of Canaan when Israel had sowen because the end of their coming was to eat up with their cattell the green corn that so they might impoverish and samish the Israelites For the most of these eastern people dwelt not in cities and towns but in tents onely which they used to remove from one place to another carrying their cattell along with them whence is that of the Prophet Esa 13.20 It shall never be inhabited neither shall it be dwelt in from one generation to another neither shall the Arabian pitch tent there neither shall the shepherds make their fold there and so it was it seems with the Midianites and therefore every spring when the Israelites had sowen they came up with their tents and cattell that they might eat up all the encrease of the land and therefore partly are they compared to grassehoppers or locusts vers 5. they came up with their cattell and their tents as grassehoppers for multitude c. Vers 4. And they encamped against them and destroyed the encrease of the earth till thou come unto Gaza c. Gaza lay on the coast of the midland western sea and so they entered on the east and went quite through the land even as farre as Gaza that lay on the Western coasts destroying all as they went so that they left no sustenance for Israel that is none in a manner they took from many of the Israelites all their sustenance and impoverished all by taking away the greatest part of that they had Vers 8. The Lord sent a Prophet unto the children of Israel c. This was to prepare them for the deliverance he intended them by Gideon by calling them to repentance and amendment of life Vers 10. I am the Lord your God fear not the gods of the Amorites c. That is worship not the Gods of the Amorites because religious worship is alwayes accompanied with the fear and reverence of that God whom men worship therefore fear is often put for the whole worship that is to be yielded to God Vers 11. And there came an Angel of the Lord and sat under an oke c. This Angel was the sonne of God who is therefore called Jehovah vers 24. And Gideon built an altar there unto the Lord and called it Jehovah-Shalom but not desiring to seem to Gideon any other then some Prophet sent unto him from the Lord he sat down as a man wearied with travell and desirous to rest himself and therefore as a traveller he had a staff in his hand too vers 21. Then the Angel of the Lord put forth the end of the staffe that was in his hand and that under an oke that was in Ophrah that pertained unto Joash the Abi-ezrite that is who was of the posterity of Abiezer Josh 17.2 and consequently of the tribe of Manasseh as vers 15. And he said unto him Wherewith shall I save Israel
all the men of the tower of Shechem heard that they entred into an hold of the house of the God Berith This tower of Shechem was some fort or castle in some adjoyning village belonging to Shechem but not in the city as is evident because the men of this tower saw not the destruction of Shechem but heard of it and most probable it is that it was the same which was called vers 6. the house of Millo the ruine whereof is here related to shew that Jothams curse vers 20. did fall as well upon the house of Millo as upon the inhabitants of Shechem for hearing what Abimelech had done to Shechem they retired to a strong hold in the house of Baal-Berith to wit as resting not onely in the strength but also in the holinesse of the place and the help of their god and this it may be was the fort from which the village was called the tower of Shechem or perhaps some other place nearer hand of greater strength then that and so there they were all burnt by Abimelech about a thousand men and women as is expressed afterwards vers 49. Vers 50. Then went Abimelech to Thebez c. This was also some place belonging to Shechem for how else vvas Jothams prophecy fulfilled vers 20. that a fire should come out from the men of Shechem and devoure Abimelech Vers 53. And a certain woman cast a piece of a milstone upon Abimelechs head c. Thus he receives his deaths vvound vvith a stone vvho had slain his brethren all upon one stone vers 5. Vers 56. Thus God rendred the wickednesse of Abimelech which he did unto his father in slaying his seventy brethren To vvit because Gideon his father was wronged though dead in the murther of his children and this was the circumstance that did most aggravate Abimelechs sinne and provoke the Lord that he could so farre forget his father as to imbrue his hands in the bloud of his children CHAP. X. Vers 1. ANd after Abimelech there arose to defend Israel Tola the sonne of Puah c. Though there be no mention made of any enemies that invaded the land of Israel in the dayes of this Tola the seventh Judge of Israel if Abimelech be reckoned for one yet it need not seem strange that it should be said of him that he arose to defend Israel or to deliver Israel as the word in the original may also be translated for it may well be that the land was invaded in his time by some of the neighbouring nations though it be not expressed and indeed considering that idolatry and superstition were so rise in the land all the time of Abimelechs three years tyranny as is evident chap. 8.33 and 9.4 46. it is like enough that God did raise them up some adversaries or other to plead the quarrell of his covenant as in former times but then besides it might be said that he did desend or deliver Israel either because he did happely compose the factious tumults and combustions that were raised in the land in Abimelechs time or else because he retained them from their idolatry which was a great deliverance and thence it is said that afterwards the children of Israel did evill again in the sight of the Lord and served Baalim c. vers 6. or else because being raised of God to be Judge of Israel consequently he was to desend or deliver them in case any enemy should rise up against them and oppresse them As for the last clause of this verse where it is said of this Tola that he dwelt in Shamir in mount Ephraim though he were a man of Issachar we need not stumble at that neither for besides that the Israelites did not alwayes live in their own tribes it is probable that in this place Tola lived for the more conveniency of executing judgement amongst the people Shamir in mount Ephraim being near upon in the midst of the tribes within Jordan and not farre too from the Tabernacle in Shiloh which was another considerable advantage Vers 3. And after him arose Jair a Gileadite c. To shew that this Jair the eighth Judge of Israel was a man of great renown before he was raised to be Judge it is noted in the following verse that he had thirty sonnes to wit by severall wives that rode on asse-colts as being princes and men of great place See chap. 5.10 and that they had thirty cities called Havoth-Jair that is the villages of Jair Now though there was one Jair who at the first entring of the Israelites into Cannaan above three hundred years before this took all the countrey of Argob in the land of Gilead and so the towns therein were called after his name Havoth-Jair Num. 33.41 And Jair the sonne of Manasseh took the small towns thereof and called them Havoth-Jair Deut. 3.14 Jair the sonne of Manasseh took all the countrey of Argob unto the coasts of Geshuri and Maachathi and called them after his own name Bashan Havoth-Jair yet this must needs be another Jair and so perhaps these were other towns which had their names from this Jair the Judge of Israel as the other had their names from the other Jair in Moses time and indeed of those that were called Havoth-Jair in Moses time there were but three and twenty 1. Chron. 2.22 And Zegub begat Jair who had three and twenty cities in the land of Gilead yet most probable it is that this man was descended of that Jair and that coming to inherit so many of those towns which his Ancestours had taken from the Amorites the possession or government whereof he divided amongst his thirty sonnes they were also in this regard called Havoth-Jair the old name on a second ground being now renewed and confirmed on them as we see the like in the note upon Gen. 26.33 However this Jair was of that half tribe of Manasseh that inhabited without Jordan though he were raised to be Judge of all Israel and doubtlesse one out of those parts was purposely raised of God to be Judge because those tribes without Jordan were to suffer so much in his dayes by the invasion of the children of Ammon vers 8. and therefore it was most sit that he that was to be Judge should live amongst them Vers 6. And the children of Israel did evil again in the sight of the Lord and served Baalim c. Concerning Baalim and Ashtaroth see the Notes chap. 2.9 13. The hainousnesse of the Apostacy of the Israelites at this time above that of their forefathers is noted first by setting down not onely generally that they worshiped the idol-gods of the nations that were about them Baalim and Ashtaroth but also particularly what a multitude of false gods they had now entertained even the gods of all the nations about them the gods of Syria Sidon Moab the children of Ammon and the Philistines as indeed we find elsewhere that these nations had for the most part some
particular gods as Rimmon was a god amongst the Assyrians 2. Kings 15.18 and Chemosh the god of the Moabites and Milcom the god of the children of Ammon 2. Kings 11.23 and Dagon the god of the Philistines 1. Sam. 5.2 and secondly that by degrees they did so wholly give themselves to the worship of these false gods that at length they quite laid by the worship of the true God in the Tabernacle built by Moses they forsook the Lord and served not him When the Israelites began thus to Apostatize it is not expressely said onely thus much we may certainly conclude from the text that though the death of Jair be mentioned in the verse before yet it was long before his death even immediately after the death of Tola the former Judge and that because about foure years after this Jair began to be Judge of Israel through the just hand of God upon them for their idolatry the Ammonites began their incursions into their land as is evident in the 8. verse of this chapter Vers 7. And he sold them into the hand of the Philistines and into the hand of the children of Ammon So that they were invaded both on the east and west on the west by the Philistines and on the east by the children of Ammon chap. 2.14 Vers 8. And that year they vexed and oppressed the children of Israel eighteen years all the children of Israel that were on the other side Jordan c. That is the Ammonites having eighteen years before in the dayes of Jair oppressed the Israelites by many incursions and inrodes made upon them and especially those tribes that lay without Jordan in the land of the Amorites that year that jair died they did again invade the land and happely in a more sore and greivous manner then ever before did oppresse and crush the poore people in all parts of the kingdome or else the meaning may be that having eighteen years before by severall incursions oppressed the tribes without Jordan that yeare that Jair died encouraged by the death of their Judge they began to vex and oppresse the Israelites in generall even those within Jordan also as it is in the following verse Moreover the children of Ammon passed over Jordan to sight also against Judah and against Benjamin and against the house of Ephraim so that Israel was sore distressed However the eighteen years here mentioned must necessarily be referred to the years of Jairs government for that place 1. Kings 6.1 will not suffer the years of oppression to be reckoned apart from the years of the Judges as is before noted chap. 3.11 and to the years following they cannot be referred if we consider first Israels repenting at present vers 10. and vers 16. And the children of Israel cryed unto the Lord saying We have sinned against thee both because we have forsaken our God and also served Baalim And they put the strange gods from among them and served the Lord and secondly that Jephthah judged the people but six years chap. 12.7 and did in the beginning of his government wholy vanquish the Ammonites chap. 11.32 33. and therefore in his time the people could not be under the oppression of the Ammonites eighteen years Vers 11. And the Lord said unto the children of Israel c. To wit either by an Angel or by some Prophet or perhaps by the high priest who after enquirie made for them returned this answer from the Lord many deliverances are here mentioned which God had given them which if they be not before particularly expressed it is because the Lord did many great things for them which are not written Vers 12. The Zidonians also and the Amalekites and the Maonites did oppresse you c. We reade of a city called Maon in the mountains of Judah Josh 15.55 and of a wildernesse also so called 1. Sam. 23.24 And they arose and went to Ziph before Saul but David and his men were in the wildernesse of Maon It is therefore likely that the Canaanites inhabiting there or in the parts adjoyning are here called Maonites Vers 13. Wherefore I will deliver you no more God speaks here after the manner of men the meaning is that they deserved no more help and that he would deliver them no more to wit except they did truely repent and amend that which was amisse for the condition of conditionall threatnings is not alwayes expressed Vers 15. Do unto us whatsoever seemeth good unto thee deliver us onely we pray thee this day Thus first they acknowledged that for their sinnes God might justly destroy them secondly they did willingly stoop under his hand and submit themselves to whatsoever he would do and yet thirdly they besought the Lord that if it might be he would try them once more Vers 17. Then the children of Ammon were gathered together and encamped in Gilead That is in the land of Gilead as in vers 18. which they now claimed to belong to them chap. 11. vers 13. Vers 18. And the people and the Princes of Gilead said one to another What man is he that will begin to fight c. Thus at first they proffered the principallitie of Gilead to any one that would undertake to lead them forth against the children of Ammon till finding that no body would accept of it they then sent to Jephthah as is related in the next chapter CHAP. XI Vers 1. NOw Jephthah the Gileadite was a mighty man c. Though he were the sonne of one Gilead as is evident in the last words of this verse And Gilead begat Jephthah not the same who was the sonne of Machir the sonne of Manasseh Josh 17.1 2. of whom the greatest part if not all of that tribe were descended but another of his posterity and called by his name yet doubtlesse he is here called a Gileadite either from the land or city of Gilead the place of his birth and education for the most of Gilead was possest by Manassehs tribe Vers 2. And they thrust out Jephthah and said unto him Thou shalt not inherit in our fathers house c. This his brethren did by the help and decree of the Magistrates of Gilead as appears by Jephthahs answer to the Elders vers 17. And Jephthah said unto the Elders of Gilead did ye not hate me and expell me out of my fathers house Whether they onely cast him one from having any share in the inheritance of their father or whether also they denyed him any portion for his livelyhood amongst them we cannot from the words certainly conclude yet because being a bastard he could not challenge any part of his fathers inheritance and his complaint vers 7. seems to imply that he apprehended himself greatly wronged therefore the last is thought most probable Vers 3. And Jephthah fled from his brethren and dwelt in the land of Tob. Where this land of Tob was we reade not but their sudden fetching Jephthah to be their Captain shows plainly that it was
former verse it is said they went up though in after times the Ark was a long while out of the Tabernacle yet in those dayes it was there in the house of God in Shiloh Vers 28. And Phinehas the sonne of Eleazar the sonne of Aaron stood before it in those dayes That is ministred before the Lord in the priests office Deut. 10.8 The Lord separated the tribe of Levi to bear the Ark of the covenant of the Lord to stand before the Lord and to minister unto him and enquired of the Lord by Urim and Thummim before the Ark in the behalf of the people And hereby it appears that this story of Israels warre with Benjamin did not fall out after Samsons death according as it is here set down in order of the Historie but long before for had Phinehas lived after Samson he had been well nigh foure hundred years old whereas in this time it was a rare thing to live till fourescore years Psal 90.10 The dayes of our years are threescore years and ten and if by reason of strength they be fourescore years yet is their strength labour and sorrow for it is soon cut off and we flie away Vers 29. And Israel set liers in wait round about Gibeah c. Though the last time the Israelites enquired of the Lord what they should do God had assured them that they should prevail against the Benjamites Go up for to morrow I will deliver them into thy hand yet were they never a whit lesse carefull to trie if by policie they could get any advantage against them and as may be gathered by severall passages in the following part of the chapter though the relation be somewhat intricate the course which they took seems to be this they divided their army into three parts one part was laid in ambush in the meadows of Gibeah vers 33. the other part was sent against Gibeah who were presently to flie before the Benjamites that they might draw them farre off from the citie vers 30 31. and the third was to stay in Baaltamar and to renew the battel when the Benjamites came thither pursuing the Israelites that fled before them Vers 30. And the children of Israel went up against the children of Benjamin c. That is that part of their army that was to make an assault upon the Benjamites and then presently to give back and flie See the foregoing note Vers 31. In the high wayes in which one goeth up to the house of God and the other in Gibeah in the field This surely was another Gibeah called Gibeah in the field to distinguish it from that Gibeah against which the Israelites now warred which stood on a hill happely it is the same which is called Gaba Josh 18.24 Vers 33. And all the men of Israel rose up out of their place and put themselves in array at Baal-tamar That is the main body of the army which stayed in that place to receive the Benjamites when they should follow on in the pursuit of the flying Israelites See the note vers 19. Vers 34. And there came against Gibeah ten thousand chosen men out of all Israel c. These ten thousand were I conceive the liers in wait mentioned vers 33. but yet that which follows and the battel was sore but they knew not that evil was near them must be meant of the battel betwixt the Israelites that set themselves in array in Baal-tamar vers 33. and the Benjamites that were fallen upon them as they came pursuing the Israelites who did purposely flie before them for these Benjamites they were that knew not that evil was near them but fought courageously till afterward they saw the smoke of the citie arise and then they fled before the Israelites as it is afterward more particularly described vers 38 c. Vers 35. And the Lord smote Benjamin before Israel Though they used now a stratagem which they used not before yet it was not thence that they prevailed but because the Lord was at peace with them and gave them the victorie And the children of Israel destroyed of the Benjamites that day twenty and five thousand and an hundred men To wit eighteen thousand in the fight vers 44. And there fell of Benjamin eighteen thousand men and five thousand which they gleaned in the high-wayes as they found them in the pursuit scattered here and there vers 45. and two thousand which they slew at Gidom vers 45. and the odde hundred which is not expressed in the particulars was slain it seems some in one place and some in another Vers 41. And when the men of Israel turned again the men of Benjamin were amazed This is added to clear that which was said vers 40. to wit how the Benjamites came to look back and see the flame of the citie the reason was that they were amazed to see the flying Israelites on a sudden turn head and renew the battel with such courage and violence and thereupon looking behind them saw their citie was taken and set on fire Vers 46. So that all which fell that day of Benjamin were twenty and five thousand c. There fell that day twenty five thousand one hundred See vers 35. And the children of Israel destroyed of the Benjamites that day twenty and five thousand and an hundred men but here the great number is onely expressed Vers 48. And the men of Israel turned again upon the children of Benjamin c. That is having slain all the Benjamites that were in arms for the defence of Gibeah together with all the inhabitants of the citie they then addressed themselves to take vengeance on the rest of the tribe of Benjamin because they also had a hand in the sending out men for the defence of Gibeah and herein proceeded with such fury and rage that they utterly destroyed both in town and citie where ever they came all that came to hand both man and beast that is they spared neither women nor children nor any living thing that came in their way and this they did either as judging that they were bound to deal with them as with those that were anathematized or devoted to destruction according to the direction which was given by the Lord concerning any citie that should set up idolatrie amongst them Deut. 13.15 16. Then thou shalt enquire and make search and ask diligently and behold if it be true and the thing certain that such abomination is wrought among you thou shalt surely smite the inhabitants of that city with the edge of the sword destroy it utterly and all that is therein and the cattel thereof with the edge of the sword or rather onely out of the fury and rage wherewith they were transported partly because it was such a horribe villanie which the Benjamites had undertaken to defend and partly because so many thousands of their own tribes had perished in this warre against the Benjamites concerning which see what is further noted in the
for it is expressely said in that very place vers 2. that the city out of which the Ark was then fetched was Baal of Judah which was Kirjath-jearim as is before noted Josh 15.9 and the city Gibeah was in the tribe of Benjamin Josh 18.28 Judg. 19.14 The third particular here related is that having carried the Ark into the â—oâ—se of Abinadab in the hill they sanctified Eleazar his sonne to keep the Ark of the Lord that is they chose him to be set apart to this holy imployment even to give continuall attendance upon the Ark that he might keep others from coming near to pollute or defile it and to that end they caused him to fit and prepare himself in all holy manner for this sacred charge under which the washing of his garments with water and such other ceremonies of legall purifying may be comprehended as we see Exod. 19.10 And the Lord said unto Moses Go unto the people and sanctifie them to day and to morrow and let them wash their clothes But may some say when the Israelites had gotten the Ark again out of the land of the Philistines why did they not carry it back to the Tabernacle in Shiloh I answer at first the terrour of the men of Bethshemesh might be the cause that it was presently removed to Kirjath-jearim a city near unto Bethshemesh yet because the Ark stayed there so long it is most probable that either it was at first removed thither or at least afterward continued there not without the consent of Samuel their Judge and the other Elders of Israel yea happely not without expresse direction from the Lord and that because Shiloh was destroyed when the Ark was taken by the Philistines or else rather because the Lord would still shew his indignation against the former wickednesse of that place by not suffering the Ark to be carried thither again Vers 2. And it came to passe while the Ark abode in Kirjath-jearim that the time was long for it was twenty years c. This is not meant of the whole term of the Arks remaining in Kirjath-jearim for between the death of Eli presently after which the Ark was brought to this place and the beginning of Davids reigne when it was first removed thence 2. Sam. 6.2 3. there must needs be fourty years allowed for the government of Saul and Samuel Act. 13.21 all which time the Ark continued in Kirjath-jearim unlesse when it was for a while onely carried forth into the camp in the warre against the Philistines chap. 14.18 And Saul said unto Ahiah Bring hither the Ark of God for the Ark of God was at that time with the children of Israel The meaning therefore of this clause is onely thus that twenty years were expired ere the people by the exhortations of Samuel or by the troubles that God brought upon them could be wonne to that solemne conversion related in the following verses concerning which it is said here in the last clause of this verse that all the house of Israel lamented after the Lord that is they were brought to bethink themselves of their sinnes and began with all humiliation and sorrow to seek the recovery of Gods love and favour and that no doubt because of the heavy oppression of the Philistines for it seems that ever since the taking of the Ark they had kept many of Israels cities in their hands and many wayes tyrannized over them as is evident vers 7. The Lords of the Philistines went up against Israel and when the children of Israel heard it they were afraid of the Philistines And vers 14. The cities which the Philistines had taken from Israel were restored to Israel c. Vers 3 And Samuel spake unto all the house of Israel c. That is to the Elders of Israel resorting to him from all places or to the people as he went about in his circuit Put away the strange gods and Ashtaroth from among you and prepare your hearts unto the Lord and serve him onely That is Content not your selves with the outward act of removing your strange gods but labour to bring your hearts into a fit temper for God purified by faith humbled with the sight and detestation of your sinnes and settled in a full purpose of amendment of life Concerning Ashtaroth see the Note Judges 2.13 Vers 5. And Samuel said Gather all Israel to Mizpeh and I will pray for you unto the Lord. Of Mizpeh see Judges 20.1 Thither the people are at present appointed to gather themselves 1. That they might there in a publick and solemn manner renew their Covenant with God and pray unto him for pardon and favour and 2. That they might there consult about means both for reforming of publick abuses and for making warre against the Philistines Vers 6. And they gathered together to Mizpeh and drew water and poured it out before the Lord and fasted on that day c. What this pouring forth of water before the Lord was and to what end it was done it is hard to say Many Expositours understand it merely of drawing and pouring forth water to wit as a kind of sacrifice or rather as a sacred Ceremony whereby they desired to signifie either First That they wished that those that should return to their idolatry again might utterly perish without hope of recovery as that water that was poured forth that could not be gathered up again according to that of the widdow of Tekoah 2. Sam. 14.14 We must needs die and are as water spilt upon the ground which cannot be gathered up again or Secondly That they did utterly renounce and cast away their idolatry even as that water was wholly poured forth out of their vessels not the least drop remaining behind and were resolved never more to take up their superstitious practises again no more then they would think of taking up that water again which they had so poured forth or Thirdly That they hoped that as the water being poured forth was streight gone out of sight and was not to be seen so the very remembrance of their sinnes should be blotted out before the Lord should be as it were perfectly washed away or Fourthly That in their confessions and prayers that day they did sincerely poure out their hearts to God even as that water was poured forth Thus I say many Expositours understand this to have been done according to the letter of the words and that it is said to be done before the Lord because it was done where they were met together in a way of religion to fast and pray before the Lord and where happely they had for the time the Ark of God amongst them But yet because we find no such ceremony any where enjoyned by Gods Law nor at any other time practised by Gods people others do I think upon better grounds conceive otherwise of these words For some hold that it is a figurative and hyperbolicall expression of their great lamentation and weeping to wit
Christs government to wit because God the father appointed him to be our king according to that Psal 2.6 I have set my king upon my holy hill of Sion and in that David rejected not these Israelites that so long opposed the government which they knew God had appointed there is an intimation of comfort for those that being convinced of the truth of the Gospel do yet stand out a long time against knowledge to wit that if at last yet they repent and come in Christ will not reject them Vers 3. And king David made a league with them in Hebron before the Lord. To wit concerning the government they binding themselves to obey him as their king and he binding himself to forget all that was past and to govern them like a good king according to the Law and because this was done with invocation of God as a witnesse of their league therefore it is said that this league was made before the Lord. And they anointed David king over Israel This was the third time that David was anointed king and so was Christ three times by an audible voice from heaven declared to be the Sonne of God and the promised Messiah First at his baptisme Matth. 3.16 17. And Jesus when he was baptized went straightway out of the waters And lo the heavens were opened unto him and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and lighting upon him And lo a voice from heaven saying This is my beloved Sonne in whom I am well pleased Secondly at his transfiguration Matth 17.5 While he yet spake behold a bright cloud overshadowed them and behold a voice out of the cloud which said This is my beloved Sonne in whom I am well pleased Heare ye him And thirdly a little before his death whilest he was teaching the people John 12.28 when Christ had said Father glorifie thy name then came there a voice from heaven saying I have glorified it and will glorifie it again Vers 4. David was thirty years old when he began to reigne At the same age was Christ also inaugurated as it were into the office of the Mediatour Luke 3.22 23. Vers 6. And the king and his men went to Jerusalem unto the Jebusites the inhabitants of the land c. Jerusalem stood in the very confines of Judah and Benjamin so that part of it which stood on the hill Salem was in Judahs lot and part of it yea the greatest part of it which stood in mount Sion was in Benjamins the men of Judah took that part of it which belonged to them and smote it with the edge of the sword Judg. 1.8 But the children of Benjamin could not drive out the Jebusites out of their portion Judg. 1.21 no not when they had the help of their brethren the men of Judah as may be gathered by that whith is written Josh 15.63 As for the Jebusites the inhabitants of Jerusalem the children of Judah could not drive them out but the Jebusites dwell with the children of Judah at Jerusalem unto this day And therefore we reade that afterward it was a city of strangers when the Levite and his concubine went that way Judg. 19.10 11 12. yea so it continued till this time when David intending not without the instinct of the spirit of God to make Jerusalem the chief seat of his kingdome and having now the advantage of a mighty assembly of the men of warre of Israel that were come up armed to Hebron to make him king took this opportunity and led them forth against Jerusalem resolving that the wresting this out of the Jebusites hands should be his first enterprise Except thou take away the blind and the lame thou shalt not come in hither c. There are many severall expositions of this passage concerning the Jebusites scoffing at David when he came to besiege them But two expositions there are which are both very probable The first which indeed most Expositours follow is this That being over-confident in the strength of the place they in a flouting manner answered David when he required them to yield up the fort that except he could take from them the blind and the lame amongst the inhabitants he should not come in thither implying that though they should man their walls onely with the blind and the lame of the people even they should be able to defend that place against him and all the forces he could make And indeed it seems to have been a place of exceeding great strength because they had held it ever since Joshua entred the land that is almost foure hundred years and yet it was even in the heart of their countrey The second Exposition is That they spake this of their gods in whom they were never a whit the lesse confident because the Israelites despised them except thou take away the blind and the lame thou shalt not come in hither that is even those gods of ours which you in contempt call blind and lame gods shall easily defend us against all thy forces and will in that be found to be neither lame nor blind And indeed this exposition seems best to agree with the following passages in the 8. verse And David said on that day Whosoever getteth up to the gutter and smiteth the Jebusites and the lame and the blind that are hated of Davids soul he shall be chief captain Wherefore they say The lame and the blind shall not enter into the house Nor need it seem strange that they call their own gods blind and lame for this they might do purposely to let the Israelites see how little they were discouraged by these reproches which the Israelites cast upon their idol-gods from putting their trust in them as being most confident of their aid and assistance Vers 7. Neverthelesse David took the strong hold of Sion the same is the city of David For David having proclaimed that whosoever should first scale the walls and so get up to the gutter as it is expressed in the next verse and enter the fort he should be chief captain that is the Generall of his forces Joab the rather happely that he might recover Davids favour whom he had highly offended by killing Abner did hereupon first scale the walls and so was made the Lord General of the kings forces as it is more fully expressed 1. Chron. 11.6 and this was that strong hold of Sion which because it was taken by him was afterward called the city of David Vers 8. Whosoever getteth up to the gutter and smiteth the Jebusites and the lame and the blind that are hated of Davids soul c. That is the blind and the lame Jebusites wherewith they had or pretended they could manne their walls and that it should be sufficient for the defence of the place which are here said to be hated of Davids soul because of that bitter taunt wherewith he had been flouted concerning them and herein David gives his souldiers to understand that if they took the fort
herdmen of Tekoah c. Now Joab resolved to employ a woman in this plot that he had in hand first because men are most ready to pitie them in their misery and secondly because he thought a woman fittest to counterfeit and dissemble a man he thought would hardly have told a forged tale with such lively expressions of bitter sorrow nor would have been so nimble and ready to make fit replies to any thing that David should say and therefore he determined to have a woman to be his instrument because none can better feigne themselves to be mourners then women can why he pitched particularly upon this woman of Tekoah it is not expressed onely we may guesse that she was a woman singularly famous for her wisdome or happely one of those who were usually hired to mourn at funerals and so being grown famous for her notable artificiall performance of that service was therefore chosen to be the agent in this plot Vers 5. And she answered I am indeed a widow-woman and my husband is dead This she premiseth that thereby she might winne the king the more to commiserate her condition for first being a widdow she was the lesse able to defend her self against those that were risen up against her secondly being under such a heavy weight of sorrow for the losse of her husband any addition of further grief must needs presse her the more sorely and thirdly having lost already the stay and support of a husband she was farre the more unable to bear the losse of her onely sonne too Vers 6. And thy handmaid had two sonnes and they strove together in the field c. In these words she seeks to extenuate the pretended offence of her sonne in killing his brother to wit that he did it in heat of bloud without any premeditated malice being together in the field where there was no body by to part them they fell out and quarrelled and so at last fighting together the one happely being sorely first wronged and provoked killed the other Vers 7. And behold the whole family is risen against thine handmaid c. To wit as knowing that my sonnes inheritance should come to them if he were put to death and indeed to this those following words seem to have relation which she pretends her kindred had spoken and we will destroy the heir also namely that by that means the land may come to us but yet some Expositours do otherwise understand those words to wit that the kindred did thereby imply one chief reason why they desired her surviving sonne should be put to death which was that he by killing his brother might not come to inherite his estate And so they shall quench my coal which is left c. As if she should have said this sonne is the onely comfort that is left me in the world like one poor coal in a heap of ashes so is he left alive in the sad ruines of our family so that by seeking to take away his life they go about wholly to extinguish my husbands name and to leave me destitute of all comfort Vers 9. My lord O king the iniquity be on me and on my fathers house and the king and his throne be guiltlesse Because David might happely scruple whether he should do well to shelter one that had killed his brother upon any pretence whatsoever therefore to remove this scruple she offereth to take the sinne upon herself My lord O king the iniquity be upon me c. there is indeed no weight at all in this kind of pleading for when men are perswaded to do evil if they that perswade them do engage themselves to bear the punishment that they are liable to set consenting to do it they engage themselves for that they cannot make good for God will punish both the one and the other but yet because first there is in this a kind of slattering insinuation which may ingratiate men to those they perswade namely that they had rather the evil if there were any to be feared should fall upon themselves then them and secondly it implies so great a confidence in those that engage themselves that there is indeed no evil like to follow upon it therefore it hath been alwayes a plea usuall with men so Rebecca pleaded with her sonne Jacob when he scrupled the course prescribed him for deceiving his father Gen. 2â— â—2 Upon me be thy curse my sonne onely obey my voice and so the Jews sought to winne Pilate to yeild to the crucifying of Christ Matth. 27.25 His bloud be on us say they and on our children Vers 11. Then said she I pray thee let the king remember the Lord thy God c. That is let the king be pleased to remember that this which thou hast said hath been promised as in Gods presence that thou wilt not suffer the avengers of blood to destroy my sonne and thus she covertly also presseth David to confirm what he had said with an oath as we see thereupon he did And he said As the Lord liveth there shall not one hair of thy sonne fall to the earth indeed nothing the woman had said concerning her supposed sonne that had killed his brother contained any just reason why he should not be put to death for the law of God did expressely enjoyn that all manslayers should be put to death excepting none but those that do it by chance or in their own defence and therefore it is strange that David should undertake so solemnly to secure him from punishment But it seems Davids heart did encline to the saving of his own sonne Absalom who was guiltie of the like offence and by this byas was his heart drawn aside to spare unjustly this widdows sonne too Vers 13. Wherefore then hast thou thought such a thing against the people of God As if she should have said since thou dislikest the violence of the men of my family against me in seeking to deprive me of my sonne because he contending with his brother slew him why then shouldest thou entertain the very like thoughts against the whole people of God which they have entertained against me They would deprive me of my onely comfort and quench my coal that is left even so hast thou sought to deprive Gods people of thy sonne Absalom upon whom their eyes are set as the man that should succeed thee in the throne in whom the light of Israel should be renued when thou art gone and that because he hath slain his brother that had grievously provoked him by ravishing his sister thus Joab by his instrument the widdow of Tekoah sought to perswade David that the people were much grieved and were like indeed to suffer very much severall wayes because Absalom the kings heir for it seems by this that Chileab his second sonne chap. 3.3 was dead also should thus long live as an exile amongst an idolatrous people and so endeavours to convince him that he was blame worthy for this his
inspiration of the holy Ghost is clear not onely by the testimony of the Church of the Jews who did alwayes acknowledge them as a part of the sacred Canon of the Old Testament but also by the testimony of the Apostle Paul who in his Epistle to the Romanes cites a passage from hence to wit that in the 1. Kings 19.14 as a part of the holy Scripture as we may see Rom. 11.2 3 c. Wot ye not saith he what the Scripture saith of Elias how he maketh intercession to God against Israel saying Lord they have killed thy Prophets c. But now who were the holy Ghosts pen-men in writing these books we cannot determine onely that which some hold seems the most probable namely that they were written piece-meals by severall Prophets successively in their severall ages and then afterward collected compacted into one continued history by some holy man of God who was guided therein by the spirit of God and that First because it is manifest that many passages in these books were formerly recorded by Nathan Ahijah and Iddo 2. Chron. 9.29 Secondly because it is also evident that the greatest part of the 18 19 and 20. chapters of the second book of the Kings was taken out of the prophecy of Isaiah as we may see Isa 36.1 c. And thirdly because the story of Zedekiah which we have in the latter end of the second book of the kings seems to have been taken almost word for word out of the latter end of the prophecie of Jeremiah As for the dependance of this history upon that which went before in the end of the second book of Samuel though the last thing there recorded be the staying of the pestilence sent for Davids sinne in numbring the people by his rearing of an altar in the threshing floore of Araunah and offering sacrifices thereon as God had commanded yet we must know that Adonijahs insurrection which is the next thing here recorded did not follow immediately upon that but many other things intervened between which are recorded in the eight last chapters of the first book of Chronicles for after the Lord had at that time it seems revealed to him that the Temple should be built by his sonne Solomon in that very place where now he had reared an altar in the threshing floore of Araunah 1. He made great preparations of all materialls requisite for that work and set workmen at work about them to make them ready for the building 2. He set in order the courses of the Priests and Levites for their attendance upon their severall services in the Temple 3. He made known in a publick assembly of the Princes and Rulers of the people what the Lords pleasure was for Solomons succeeding him in the throne and encouraged Solomon to build the Temple and perswaded the Princes and people to assist him therein giving Solomon withall a pattern in writing how all things were to be made according as God had revealed it to him And 4. in another assembly he perswaded the people to contribute willingly to the building of the Temple which accordingly they did It is evident I say that all these things recorded in the eight last chapters of the first of Chronicles were done whilest David was able to go abroad for it is said 1. Chron. 28.2 that he stood up upon his feet in the assembly of the Princes and Rulers and spake unto them and therefore they were done before this usurpation of Adonijah when David lay bedrid and not able to stirre as it is said here and that to shew that hereupon Adonijah took the advantage of making himself king King David was old and stricken in years yea so weak he was that lying bedrid they covered him with clothes but he gat no heat and so thereupon vers 5 Adonijah the sonne of Haggith exalted himself saying I will be king It is much indeed that David should be so farre spent with age before his death for though this were a little before his death he lived in all but threescore and ten years 2. Sam. 5.4 David was thirty years old when he began to reigne and he reigned fourty years and we see in these dayes that many at these years are farre from this weaknesse but yet considering his many labours warres troubles sicknesses and sorrows which do usually much empair the strength of man A broken spirit saith Solomon drieth the bones Prov. 17.22 it is no wonder though David in his old age sunk apace and was sooner decrepite and bed-rid then other men Vers 2. Wherefore his servants said unto him Let there be sought for my Lord the king a young virgin c. David had at this time many wives concubines but these were all it seems well in years and therefore his servants the Physitians advised that some well-complexioned young virgin should be sought out for him to stand before him to cherish him and to lie in his bosome as judging the heat of youth fittest to cause heat in his cold body especially where it had not been empaired by breeding and bearing of children which made them advise that she should not onely be young but a virgin too Now though there be no mention here made of Davids taking such an one to be his wife or concubine but onely of his taking her to lie in his bosome in a medicinall way yet that this was supposed and intended severall reasons may induce us to think 1. Because it is no way probable that David would have yielded to such a way of curing the coldnesse of his body had she not been taken under the name of a wife or concubine which was generally esteemed lawfull in those dayes the other way would have been so ridiculous and scandalous that it cannot be thought that David would ever have given his consent to it 2. Because it is noted ver 4. as an evidence of the great decay of his body that though she lay in his bosome yet he knew her not which doth clearly enough imply that she was taken in such a conjugall way that he might lawfully have known her had he not been disabled by that extreme weaknesse which lay now upon him and thirdly because had not Abishag been taken as Davids wife or concubine Solomon would never have suspected as he did chap. 2.22 that Adonijah in seeking to take Abishag to wife after his fathers death had a plot thereby to get away the kingdome from him to have married the wife of the deceased king might have advanced his purpose some way amongst the people but had Abishag been taken onely to attend on the king in his weaknesse or to lie in his bosome onely in a physicall way there would have been no colour to think that when he should again lay claim to the crown his marriage with such an one would have added the least strength to his title and therefore it was surely the meaning of Davids Physicians that a young wife or
Solomon to Naamah the Ammonitesse before he died as is evident because Rehoboam the sonne of Solomon by this Naamah was born a full year before Solomon was king for Solomon reigned in all but fourty years chap. 11.42 and Rehoboam was one and fourty years old when he came to be king in the room of his father chap. 14.21 so that if Solomon took this daughter of Pharaoh to wife after Shimei's death as it is here set down in the story who had lived three years in Jerusalem after Solomon was king chap. 2.39 this marriage was many years after his marriage with Naamah at least in the fourth or fifth yeare of his reigne whether Naamah were at that time dead or no it is no where expressed but however that one chief aim in this match was to strengthen himself by joyning himself in affinitie with such a potent neighbour Prince as the king of Egypt now was is evident for therefore it is not said barely that he took Pharaohs daughter to wife but that he made affinitie with Pharaoh king of Egypt and took Pharoahs daughter c. implying that to joyn himself in affinitie with the king of Egypt was the great plot of this match it is not said whether she had embraced the Religion of the Israelites when he took her to wife yet considering that he is no where blamed for this marriage nor any thing said but that as yet he continued to walk in Gods wayes the high places onely excepted it is most like she forsook her idolatry and however that either before or after her marriage she became a proselyte and worshipped the true God we cannot well question because Solomon in this marriage is made a type of Christ who wooed the Gentiles and made them his spouse calling them from their idolatries to serve the true and everlasting God for hereto the Psalmist seems to allude Psal 45.10 Hearken O daughter and consider and encline thine eare forget also thine own people and thy fathers house And brought her into the citie of David untill he had made an end of building his own house That is having taken the daughter of Pharaoh to wife he brought her into the citie of David but yet he did not dispose of her in his own house there but in some other part of the citie and that either because his own house was not sufficient to entertain her and all her retinue or because he was at that time in building or at least had purposed to build a fair palace for himself with another adjoyning thereto for his Queen chap. 7.8 and so in that part of the citie of David she continued untill he had made an end of building his own house c. and the wall of Jerusalem round about Now this last clause concerning the wall of Jerusalem is I conceive added onely by the way to give a hint how the glory of Solomons kingdome did still flourish in every thing more and more that Jerusalem was walled about before this time is evident 2. Sam. 5.9 and 1. Chron. 11.8 but it seems Solomon did either erect a new wall without the old or else repair enlarge and fortifie the old building them with many stately towers and bulworks and so this city which was the place of his residence became farre the more glorious Vers 2. Onely the people sacrificed in high places c. This I conceive hath reference to that which is said before concerning the flourishing estate of Solomon in the last verse of the former chapter and the beginning of this his royall glory was every way great onely this saith the text was a blemish which stained the glory of his kingdome that as yet the people yea and Solomon too did offer sacrifices in their high places vers 3. which was directly against the Law Deut. 12.13 14. but of these high places see the note 1. Sam. 9.12 Vers 4. And the king went to Gibeon to sacrifice there for that was the great high place That is the largest and fairest the most famous and most resorted to and that happely because the tabernacle of Moses was there and therefore did Solomon go thither and with him all the chief of the Princes and Governours of the people whom he had called together 2. Chron. 1.2 3. concerning which see the note there Vers 6. And Solomon said Thou hast shewed unto thy servant David my father great mercy c. This he said in his heart being asleep for God understands the langague of the heart as well as that of the tongue and as the Lord can enable men to attend upon that which he sayes to them in their sleep so he can also give them power distinctly and with the full and free use of their reason their sleep no way disturbing their phancy to poure forth the desires of their souls in prayer to him and yet it may well be too that the intention of his mind all the day before upon the service of God made him fitter for the impression of such holy desires and thoughts when he was asleep and particularly to beg wisdome of God which before of all things he had most desired And thou hast kept for him this great kindnesse that thou hast given him a sonne to sit on his throne c. This was spoken in reference to Saul though God made Saul king over Israel as well as David yet he did not give it to Saul and his heirs and successours as he did to David this was a peculiar favour and honour which God reserved for David Vers 7. And I am but a little child I know not how to go out or come in That is young and unexperienced in state affairs and in comparison of this great burthen which must now lie upon me a very child so the Prophet Jeremy also speaks of himself Jer. 1.6 then said I Ah Lord God I cannot speak for I am a child some writers would hence conclude that Solomon was not above twelve years old when he began to reigne if not younger and so withall are forced to maintain that at eleven years of age he begat his sonne Rehoboam for it is manifest Rehoboam was born the yeare before he began his reigne because he reigned in all but fourty years chap. 11.42 and Rehoboam was one and fourty years old when he succeeded him in the throne but there is no cause why we should entangle our selves with such difficulties because Solomon saith here I am but a little child or because David said of him 1. Chron. 22.5 Solomon my sonne is young and tender for on the other side before this we see how David spake of him chap. 2.9 thou art a wise man and knowest what thou oughtest to do unto him for thus the Scripture usually speaks of young men Ishmael is called a child when he was at least eighteen years old Gen. 21.14 15. and David a youth and stripling 1. Sam. 17.23 whereas before 1. Sam. 16.18 he is called a mighty
valiant man and a man of warre and much more might Solomon use this term of himself when he speaks comparatively with respect to that great charge of governing Gods people which now lay upon him though he were as probably it is thought he was at least twenty years old Vers 12. There was none like thee before thee neither after thee shall any arise like unto thee To wit for wisdome some referre this onely to the kings of Israel namely that there was never any king in Israel either before Solomon or after him that equalled him in wisdome and indeed in the following verse where he is promised riches and honour above all others it is expressely limited to kings And I have also given thee that which thou hast not asked both riches and honour so that there shall not be any among the kings like unto thee but yet if we understand this of naturall wisdome and not of supernaturall wisedome which was reserved as the speciall priviledge of Gods servants in the dayes of the Gospel I see not but that these words may be taken as they are expressed without any such limitation namely that there was never mere man since the fall of Adam like unto Solomon for wisdome which seems the more probable because in the next chapter the comparison is made betwixt him and others that were not kings and of other nations too as well as Israelites vers 30.31 Solomons wisedome excelled the wisedome of all the children of the East country and all the wisedome of Egypt for he was wiser than all men then Ethan the Ezrahite c. and herein was Solomon a notable type of Christ Col. 2.3 in whom are hid all the treasures of wisedome and knowledge Vers 13. So that there shall not be any among the kings like unto thee all thy dayes That is among the kings of Israel there shall be none like thee for riches and honour and in the Chronicles this is more generally expressed namely that he should excell in riches and glory all before him and all after him 2 Chron. 1.12 Vers 15. And Solomon awoke and behold it was a dreame c. That is behold he perceived that God had in a supernaturall dreame appeared unto him and so returnâ—ng thereupon to Jerusalem with his Nobles he there offered many gratulatory sacrifices to God Vers 16. Then came there two women that were harlots unto the King c. The Hebrew word here translated harlots signifieth either victuallers or harlots therfore it may be thought that they were such as did openly professe themselves Victuallers though they were more secretly harlots for it is not so likely that they durst thus have presented themselves before the King if they had beene known to be such as lived so openly in so lewd a course of life that the people might the more reverence Solomon the Lord was pleased by this controversie that was brought before him to let them see what a singular measure of wisedome he had conferred upon him Vers 18. And it came to passe the third day after I was deliver'd that this woman was deliver'd also c. Hereby is shown in part what it was that made the case in question so difficult namely that both children were so neare of an age the one being borne but three dayes after the other and indeed if we adde to this first that the feature of the dead child would be so altered by death that it must needs be hard for those neighbours and friends that had seene it alive to say to which of the women it did belong secondly that no body was by when this fact was done that might bear witnesse on either side thirdly that the mother of the live child confessed she was asleep and so did not see when her child was taken away and fourthly that the parties contending for the child were of equall repute the one deserving no more credit than the other because they were both harlots all these things joyntly considered must needs make the case so difficult that when it came to be brought before the king it may well be it was thought the wit of man could not determine it Vers 20. And she arose at mid-night and tooke my sonne from beside me c. But why should she be willing to keep another womans child I answer women are naturally ashamed of overlaying their children to avoid this disgrace in the heat of her passion she could have beene content to nurse up another child in stead of her owne rather than have it said that by her slothfulnesse and negligence she had beene the death of her owne child CHAP. IIII. Vers 2. ANd these were the Princes which he had That is these were his chiefe Nobles and such as were in highest places about him whilst he sate in the throne of Israel especially in the first beginning of his reigne for though there are two here mentioned to wit the sonne of Abinadab vers 11. and Ahimaaz vers 15. that married the two daughters of Solomon Taphah and Bazmach yet that may be because they did some yeares after marry them for when Solomon came to the crowne we read not of any child he had born but only Rehoboam and much lesse could he have any daughter mariageable Azariah the son of Zadok the priest Azariah the son that is the grand child of Zadok for he was the son of Ahimaaz the son of Zadok 1 Chro. 6.8.9 is here said to have been the priest that is Solomons priest because it seems he was continually imployed for him as our Princes houshold Chaplaines are for them in those things that concerned the worship and service of God Or it may be meant of the son of some other Zadok for the word here translated Priest may also be translated chiefe Officer as is expressed in the margin of our Bibles Vers 3. Elihoreph and Ahiah the sonnes of Shisha Scribes We read but of one Scribe or Secretary of State that David had 2 Sam. 20.25 but Solomon had two which shewes that the dominion and royaltie of Solomons Kingdome was greater than his fathers and so therewith the state affaires must needs increase Jehoshaphat the sonne of Ahilud the Recorder He held therefore the same place still which he had in Davids time 2 Sam. 20.24 Vers 4. And Zadok and Abiathar the Priests That is they were the two chiefe of the two families of the priests according to Davids division 1 Chro. 24.3 4. for Abiathar did not cease to be a priest though he were restrained from the execution of his office and confined to his owne house in Anathoth And besides that he had been the chiefe among them is sufficient to make him be reckoned here amongst those that were in eminent place whether in Church or Common-wealth in the first yeares of Solomons reigne Vers 5. And Azariah the sonne of Nathan was over the officers c. Some conceive that these were the sonnes of Nathan the sonne of
thing of that which his father had gotten till himself fell from God chap. 5.4 therefore it is thought that this Rezon did elsewhere shelter himself or lived by secret robbing and pillaging till Solomons declining dayes and that then he brought Damascus to an open revolt and became king thereof and was an enemy to Solomon on the north as Hadad the Edomite was on the south Vers 26. And Jeroboam the sonne of Nebat an Ephrathite c. An Ephrathite that is of the tribe of Ephraim and so in this tribe all the kings of Israel that raigned over the ten tribes had their chief residence and herein was that prophesie fulfilled that Ephraim should be greater then Manasseh Gen. 48.19 now of this man it is said that he lift up his hand against the king to wit by revolting from him and becoming the head of the ten tribes in rending the kingdome from his sonne for though perhaps after he had heard the prophesie of Ahijah he might entertain thoughts of disloyaltie against his Soveraigne and perhaps secretly sow some seeds of sedition among the people for which he was glad to fly into Egypt vers 40. yet we read of nothing he openly attempted against Solomon or against his house till Solomon was dead Vers 28. He made him ruler over all the charge of the house of Joseph That is he made him receiver or treasurer for all the kings revenues in the two tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh Vers 29. When Jeroboam went out of Jerusalem c. To wit to enter upon the office and charge which Solomon had honoured him with the prophet Ahijah found him in the way who is called the Shilonite because he was of Shilo where the Tabernacle was many years together he was one of them that wrote the Acts of Solomon 2 Chron. 9.29 and they two were alone in the field If therefore Jeroboam went attended out of Jerusalem according to the honour of the charge whereto Solomon had now advanced him it seems the Prophet desired to have some private conference with him and then when they were alone delivered his message to him Vers 30. And Ahijah caught the new garment that was on him That is the new garment wherewith the Prophet who now represented Gods person the absolute disposer of the kingdome newly erected in the house of David had clad himself Vers 31. Behold I will rend the kingdome out of the hand of Solomon and will give ten tribes to thee That is all besides Judah and Benjamin some conceive that Simeon was the onely tribe which joyned with that of Judah as having their lot within the lot of Judah Josh 19.2 but this cannot be because those of the tribe of Simeon that joyned themselves with Asa are expressely said to be such as revolted from the kingdome of Israel 2 Chron. 15.9 Neither need it seem strange that the tribe of Simeon having their portion within that of Judah should notwithstanding belong to the kingdome of Israel for it seems that the Simeonites in Davids time went forth with Colonies and planted themselves in other places as is manifest 1 Chron. 4.31 39. However by foretelling Jeroboam what should happen the Lord took order that he should know that whatever should occasion that revolt of the ten tribes from the house of David yet it was by the providence of God who had now conferred the kingdome upon him See the note also vers 13. Vers 33. Because that they have forsaken me and have worshiped Ashtoreth c. This is the reason given for that he had said before vers 31. I will rend the kingdome out of the hand of Solomon c. But why should Rehoboam suffer in the losse of ten tribes for the peoples idolatry I answer first because Solomons giving way to his wives idolatry proved a snare to the people and occasioned their revolting from God and secondly even the people suffered as well as Rehoboam hereby this rent in the kingdome proving the occasion of continuall warre between them of Judah and them of Israel which brought in many miseries from forraigne nations upon both kingdomes Vers 36. And unto his sonne will I give one tribe that David my servant may have a light alway before me c. That is unto one of his posteritie sitting in the throne of David See the note 2 Sam. 21.17 Vers 39. And I will for this afflict the seed of David but not for ever For at length Christ arose out of the tribe of Judah to whom God gave the throne of his father David to reign over the whole house of David for ever Luk. 1.32 33. Vers 40. Solomon sought therefore to kill Jeroboam and Jeroboam arose and fled into Egypt c. Hereby it appears that Jeroboam had some way discovered that which the Prophet had so secretly imparted to him and perhaps began to alienate the hearts of the people from the king and so to escape Solomons fury he fled to Shishak king of Egypt and sheltered himself there till Solomon was dead and yet was this Shishak Solomons brother in law if he were as generally it is thought he was the sonne of that Pharoah king of Egypt whose daughter Solomon had married Vers 41. All that he did and his wisedome are they not written in the book of the acts of Solomon The acts of Solomon were written by Nathan Ahijah and Iddo prophets that lived in Solomons time 2 Chron. 9.29 but this book here mentioned seems to have been some complete historie not now extant of the reigne of Solomon gathered out of the severall writings of these prophets and other records of those times wherein many particulars of his life were recorded not expressed in the sacred storie and amongst other things doubtlesse that of his repentance for though it be not here expressed yet that he did repent before his death may be evidently gathered from other places of Scripture as 2 Chron. 11.17 So they strengthened the kingdome of Judah and made Rehoboam the sonne of Solomon strong three yeares for three yeares they walked in the way of David and of his sonne Solomon where Solomon and David are joyntly commended and from that promise made concerning Solomon Psal 89.33 Neverthelesse I will not utterly take away my loving kindnesse from him nor suffer my faithfulnesse to fail but especially from the book of Ecclesiastes which questionlesse was written as the publick monument of his repentance and that which we reade 2. Pet. 1.20 21. where all the penmen of Scripture are said to have been holy men of God CHAP. XII Vers 1. ANd Rehoboam went to Shechem for all Israel were come to Shechem to make him king Though Solomon had seven hundred wives and three hundred concubines chap. 11.3 yet we reade but of three children that he had two daughters Taphath and Basmath that were married to two of his own Princes chap. 4.11.15 and this his sonne Rehoboam who was born to him of Naamah an Ammonitesse chap. 14.21 a
15. For the Lord shall smite Israel as a reed is shaken in the water That is the Lord shall continually afflict this kingdome of the ten tribes both prince and people with uncessant troubles and warres both intestine and forraigne so that they shall never abide long in any settled condition and so indeed it came passe even as the reeds that grow in the water are continually shaken sometimes with the blowing of the wind alwayes with the force of the stream that glides along by them so was the kingdome of the ten tribes continually shaken partly by the frequent transferring of the crown from one familie to another one still killing the other and making himself king in his room and partly by the frequent invasion of the men of Judah or some other of the neighbouring nations And shall scatter them beyond the river That is the river Euphrates to wit into the land of Assyria Mesopotamia and Media which lay beyond the river whither the ten tribes were indeed afterwards carried captives some of them first by Tiglath-pileser in the dayes of Pekah king of Israel 2. Kings 15.29 but the greatest part afterward by Salmanassar in the dayes of Hoshea king of Israel 2. Kings 17.6 c. Vers 17. And Jeroboams wife arose and departed and came to Tirzath c. This Tirzah was an ancient and goodly citie for here one of the one and thirtie kings whom Joshua conquered did dwell Josh 12.24 and in Solomons time it was famous for the pleasantnesse of the situation and statelinesse of the building and therefore the Church is hereto compared Cant. 6.4 Thou art beautifull O my love as Tirzah though therefore at first Shechem was the royall citie of Jeroboams kingdome yet afterwards it seems he built some stately palace for himself in Tirzah and so both he and the other kings of Israel that succeeded him did usually keep their courts there yea till Samaria was built it seems to have been the chief of the royall cities of the kingdome of Israel chap. 15.33 In the third yeare of Asa king of Judah began Baasha the sonne of Abijah to reigne over all Israel in Tirzah so also chap. 16.6.8 23 24. Vers 19. Behold they are written in the book of the Chronicles of the kings of Israel Many things are said to be written in the book of the Chronicles which we find not in the Scripture Chronicles and therefore it is commonly held that this book of the Chronicles here and elsewhere often mentioned was some other book of the Chronicles of the kings of Judah and Israel wherein all the memorable acts and passages of those times were exactly recorded and out of which the penman of the Scripture Chronicles did afterward by the speciall instinct and the guidance of the spirit of God cull forth such things as are there related and which the Lord thought requisite for the edification of the Church in future ages Vers 20. And the dayes which Jeroboam reigned were two and twenty years Jeroboam therefore out-lived Rehoboam who reigned but seventeen years vers 21. and Abijam his sonne who reigned in Jerusalem but three years chap. 15.1 2. and died in the second yeare of Asa the sonne of Abijam chap. 15.25 being stricken by the immediate hand of God with some remarkable judgement 2. Chron. 13.20 Neither did Jeroboam recover strength again in the dayes of Abijah and the Lord struck him and he died but before this death there was a mighty battel between him and Abijam king of Judah wherein he lost five hundred thousand men a blow which he never recovered Vers 22. And Judah did evil in the sight of the Lord. That is the people of Judah and Rehoboam their king For Three years they walked in the way of David and Solomon doing that which was right in the sight of the Lord 2. Chron. 11.17 as being troubled with the losse of the ten tribes of Israel in which time Rehoboam fortified and victualled fifteen cities in Judah and Benjamin and many other strong holds and the priests and Levites and other Rehoboam whereby the kingdome of Judah was much strengthened 2. Chron. 11.5.17 whereupon he took eighteen wives and sixty concubines 2. Chron. 11.21 and had many children but then having thus strengthened his kingdome and as he thought assured his estate he forsook the Law of the Lord and all Israel with him 2. Chron. 12.1 Vers 25. Shishak king of Egypt came up against Jerusalem c. Rehoboams father married the king of Egypts daughter yet the succeeding king of Egypt invited thereto perhaps by Jeroboam who was a while in Egypt before he was king and now fearing the growing strength of Rehoboam might lay before Shishak the incountable riches of David and Solomon which might easily be had because ten of the twelve tribes were revolted from him came up against Judah with a mighty army twelve hundred chariots sixty thousand horsemen and footmen without number some Egyptians and some of other nations as is expressed 2. Chron. 12.2 3. and having taken many of their strong cities at length he went up against Jerusalem but the king and princes humbling themselves upon the Lords message to them by Shemaiah the Prophet the Lord would not suffer him to destroy them utterly onely Judah henceforth became tributarie to Egypt and Shishak carried away as a ransome of the citie all the treasures of the Temple and of the kings house 2. Chron. 12.4 9. Vers 27. And king Rehoboam made in their stead brazen shields c. See the note chap. 10.16 hereby it appears how exceedingly the kingdome of Judah was impoverished by this invasion of Shishak king of Egypt The Israelites of the ten tribes were farre more grossely idolatrous then those of Judah and yet the Lord suffered them to live in peace but these of Judah had scarce been fallen away two years from the pure worship of God when presently the Lord did with great severitie afflict them a clear evidence of Gods more tender care over them for their welfare Vers 29. Are they not written in the book of the Chronicles of the kings of Judah In 2. Chron. 12.15 the other acts of Rehoboam first and last are said to have been written in the book of Shemaiah the Prophet and of Iddo the Seer concerning genealogies Vers 31. And Abijam his sonne reigned in his stead Or Abijah 2. Chron. 12. CHAP. XV. Vers 2. THree years reigned he in Jerusalem Abijam began his reigne in the eighteenth yeare of Jeroboam vers 1. and died in the twentieth yeare of his reigne vers 9. whereby it may seem that he reigned but two years but to this I answer that when kings have reigned two complete years they then begin to write the third yeare of their reigne and so it was with Abijam the eighteenth yeare of Jeroboam was the first yeare of his reigne the nineteenth yeare of Jeroboam was his second yeare and the twentieth yeare was his third and though in that
Jehoshaphat Did I not tell thee that he would prophecie no good concerning me but evil as if the Prophet had said seeing thou art displeased at what I have said and wilt not believe but that I have spoken it out of ill will I will now largely shew you the whole vision that I saw I saw the Lord sitting on his throne and all the host of heaven standing by him on his right hand and on his left That is the Angels who are the ministers of the God of heaven at whose command they are continually imployed and if in this host the evil spirits are also included they are called the host of heaven onely because they also are under the overruling power of God and are ministers to execute his vengeance on the wicked and were happely such as stood now on his left hand Vers 20. And one said on this manner and another said on that manner This is added onely to imply that God hath divers wayes and means whereby he can accomplish that which he hath purposed in himself Vers 25. Thou shalt see in that day when thou shalt go into an inner chamber to hide thy self To wit lest he should be slain for incouraging the king to go against Ramoth Gilead by his false prophecy Vers 26. Take Micaiah and carry him back unto Amon the governour of the city and to Joash the kings sonne This Joash was it seems either the sonne of Ahab or rather the sonne of Omri the father of Ahab and called usually amongst the people the kings sonne and being in some place of authority in the citie the Prophet was sent to him together with Amon the governour of the citie As for these words of Ahabs Take Micaiah and carry him back from hence it may be probably gathered that when at first they fetched Michaiah they fetched him out of prison whither he is now sent back again and because of this many Expositours incline to think that this Micaiah was that Prophet that formerly threatned that his life should go for the life of Ben-hadad whom he had sent away in peace chap. 20.42 and that for this he had been ever since kept in prison Vers 27. Put this fellow in prison and feed him with bread of affliction c. That is with a diet course and scanty a poore pittance enough to hold life and soul together such as is usually allowed to poore captives and slaves and will onely serve to prolong their affliction and misery See Deut. 16.3 Vers 29. So the king of Israel and Jehoshaphat the king of Judah went up to Ramoth Gilead It was much that good Jehoshaphat should cause Micaiah to be sent for and then suffer a proud Baalitish priest to smite him on the cheek before his face and heare the king with such a severe charge send him back to prison and never open his mouth to speak a word for the poore Prophet but that he should go up to Ramoth Gilead with Ahab after the Prophet had foretold the dangerous event of this expedition is farre more strange and indeed all that can be said herein is this that either he was so farre overborn with the confidence of those foure hundred Prophets that promised victory that he began to think however at first he suspected them that their words might prove true rather then Micaiahs the rather because he knew that they should fight in a just cause which God usually favours or else that having engaged his word already to Ahab with whom he had lately joyned himself in affinitie he was loth to shrink now upon the words of Micaiah but chose rather to hazard the successe and to make triall what the event would be Vers 30. And the king of Israel said unto Jehoshaphat I will disguise my self c. Great personages are usually most laid at in battels and besides the prophesie of Micaiah had scared Ahab doubtlesse though he seemed to slight it yea perhaps he might also heare of the king of Syrias charge to his souldiers concerning him to avoid therefore this danger and so if it might be to elude Micaiahs threat he resolves to disguise himself and to enter the battel in the habit of an ordinary captain But yet happely Ahab pretended that he did this onely that the Syrians might not know there were two kings in the battel lest they should thereby be rendred the more cautelous and wary in their fight And thus he might indeed upon a fair ground wish Jehoshaphat to go on in his robes because he would not put upon him the disguising of himself in the attire of a common souldier or captain Vers 31. Fight neither with small nor great save onely against the king of Israel This the king of Syria commanded his two and thirty captains 1. Kings 22.31 first because he might well hope that the death or taking of the king would be the readiest means to rout the whole army or secondly because he desired to wipe off the dishonour that fell upon him in the last battel by bringing Ahab under his mercie as he was then exposed to the mercy of Ahab So well doth he repay the mercie which the king of Israel had then shown him and that no doubt by the speciall hand of Gods providence to convince him of his folly in sparing him whom God would have had destroyed Vers 32. Jehoshaphat cried out That is he cried out for help to wit both by calling upon Ahab to help him whereby it may be the Syrian captains perceived that he was not the king of Israel and by calling upon God for succour who thereupon helped him as it is said 2. Chron. 18.31 and moved the Syrians to depart from him onely the Lord was pleased by bringing him into this danger to let him see his folly in going out with Ahab notwithstanding the Prophet Micaiah had given him so fair a warning Vers 34. Turn thine hand and carrie me out of the host for I am wounded That is out of the battel for he left not the camp lest his souldiers should fly but was stayed up in his chariot untill the evening vers 35. and thus at last the vengeance of God fell upon him for his idolatry and for his persecuting Gods prophets but especially for the death of Naboth Vers 38. And one washed the chariot in the pool of Samaria and the dogs licked up his bloud c. See the note chap. 21.19 41. Vers 42. Jehoshaphat was thirty and five yeares old when he began to reigne and he reigned twenty and five yeares in Jerusalem Seeing therefore he began his reigne in the fourth yeare of Ahab as it is said in the foregoing verse who reigned two and twenty years in Samaria it must needs follow that whilest Jehoshaphat sate in the throne of Judah Ahab reigned in Israel about seventeen or eighteen years Ahaziah the sonne of Joram two years and Jehoram his brother the second sonne of Ahab about foure years and then Jehoshaphat dyed and
Jehoram his sonne reigned in his stead indeed some Expositours hold that Jehoshaphat was designed and made king by his father Asa ten yeares or thereabouts before his father dyed and that of this it must be understood which is said here that he was thirty and five yeares old when he began to reigne namely when he was designed king in his fathers life time and consequently that he was five and fourty years old when he began to reigne alone by himself and this I conceive to be most probable nor can I well see how we can reconcile that seeming contradiction betwixt the words of the sacred Scripture in 2 Kings 8.26 and 2 Chron. 22.2 unlesse this be taken for granted Besides sure we are that Jehoshaphat himself did thus namely that he made his sonne Jehoram king in his life time to wit about the seventeenth yeare of his reigne happely when he went with Ahab to Ramoth Gilead as may be gathered from the 2. Kings 1.17 and that having reassumed the government to himself at his return home afterwards about the twenty first or twenty second of his reigne he again put the government into his sonne Jehorams hands some two years before he dyed Vers 43. Neverthelesse the high places were not taken away In 2 Chron. 17.6 it is said that he did take away the high places But the like objection concerning Asa is answered before Chap. 15.14 Vers 45. Now the rest of the acts of Jehoshaphat c. Many of these are also recorded in the Scripture-Chronicles as first how in the third yeare of his reigne he sent teachers into all the places of his land where they wanted instruction 2 Chron. 17.7 secondly how he recovered the tribute due unto him by the Arabians and Philistines from the one he had silver from the other he had sheep and goates to the number of fifteen thousand and foure hundred 2 Chron. 17.10 11. thirdly how he joyned himself in affinity with Ahab giving his sonne Joram in marriage to Athaliah Ahabs daughter 2 Chron. 18.1 fourthly how being reproved by Jehu the prophet at his return from Ramoth Gilead for helping Ahab he again visited his kingdomes and reformed what he found out of order both in matters of religion and justice 2 Chron. 19.1 11. and fifthly how the Aramites or Damascens with the Moabites Ammonites and Idumeans invading the land of Israel with a mighty army Jehoshaphat proclaimed a fast and sought the Lord whereupon the prophet Jehaziel foretold the victory which should be obtained without any bloudshed on his part which accordingly came to passe for the next day these nations disagreeing for some causes amongst themselves those of Ammon and Moab set upon the Idumeans and brake them utterly which done they also slew each other in which broil Jehoshaphat arriving took the spoil of them all without any losse on his part 2 Chron. 20.1 30. Vers 47 There was then no king in Edom a deputy was king To wit they had a deputy seâ— over them by the kings of Judah and so it had been ever since the dayes of David 2 Sam. 8.14 and this is here inserted either to intimate that this it was that gave him the advantage of building a fleet at Ezion-Geber which was in Edoms territories of which in the following verse or else to note how to this time God continued this nation in subjection to the kings of Judah though presently after in the dayes of his wicked sonne they rebelled against him indeed we reade that some of the Idumeans were in the field with the Moabites and Ammonites against Jehoshaphat 2. Chron. 20.10 22 23. but first these might be some voluntary mercenaries not sent out by the state secondly even these it seems were not so firm as was expected against Judah in that expedition and therefore were slain by them of Moab and Ammon 2. Chron. 20.23 The children of Ammon and Moab stood up against the inhabitants of mount Seir utterly to slay and destroy them and thirdly most clear it is that the Idumeans did not declare themselves and openly revolt from the crown of Judah and make themselves a king till the dayes of Jehoram 2. Chron. 21.8 In his dayes the Edomites revolted from under the dominion of Judah and made themselves a king Vers 48. Jehoshaphat made ships of Tharshish to go to Ophir for gold c. Or ships to go to Tharshish or Tarshish 2. Chron. 20.36 Concerning which see the note 1. Kings 10.22 Here it is said in the following verse that Ahaziah desired to joyn with Jehoshaphat in that voyage and that he would not consent thereto but in the 2. Chron. 20.36 37. it is said that he did joyn with Ahaziah in this work and that hereupon the Prophet Eliezer came to him and reproved him and foretold that his ships should be broken which accordingly came to passe in the very port of Ezion-geber it seems therefore that at first when Ahaziah desired this Jehoshaphat would not but at last overcome with the king of Israels importunitie he yielded or else that when a second time Ahaziah desired again to joyn with Jehoshaphat in a navy Jehoshaphat did then deny him as it is here said vers 49. as having had sufficient warning by the losse of his former ships Vers 51. Ahaziah the sonne of Ahab began to reigne over Israel in Samaria the seventeenth yeare of Jehoshaphat king of Judah c. But may some say if Jehoshaphat began to reigne in the fourth yeare of Ahab as is noted above vers 4. then the seventeenth of Jehoshaphat must needs be but the twentieth or the one and twentieth of Ahab now since Ahab reigned two and twenty years how is it said here that Ahaziah the son of Ahab began to reigne in the seventeenth yeare of Jehoshaphat I answer doubtlesse Ahaziah was made king by his father Ahab about a yeare or two before Ahab died and then reigned two years after his fathers death so that he began to reigne to wit his father yet living In the seventeenth yeare of Jehoshaphat and after his fathers death he reigned also two years complete ANNOTATIONS Upon the second book of the KINGS Commonly called The fourth book of the KINGS CHAP. I. THen Moab rebelled against Israel after the death of Ahab By David the Moabites were subdued and made tributaries to the Israelites 2. Sam. 8.2 but when that great breach was made in the kingdome of Israel ten of the tribes revolting from the house of David and making Jeroboam king the Moabites it seems revolted also from the house of David and rather chose to give themselves for vassalls to the kings of Israel upon whose kingdome their land bordered and so they continued unto the dayes of Ahab and now upon some advantage espied to wit the late overthrow of the Israelites by the Syrians and the death of Ahab or perhaps the feeble spirit and weak condition of Ahaziah because of his fall Mesha the present king of Moab rebelled
they should by way of derision call upon him to go up the hill as commonly it is thought these words were spoken I cannot conceive Vers 24. And he turned back and looked on them and cursed them in the name of the Lord c. That is by authority from God he pronounced them accursed of God and indeed therefore it is expressed that he looked on them before he cursed them to intimate that he did not do it in a suddain passion to revenge himself but by the speciall instinct of God and that to punish the wickednesse of the parents in the death of these their misnurtured children and to let the Israelites see that if God would so severely revenge the reproaching of his prophets in the mouthes of little children much lesse would he endure it in those that were of ripâ—r yeares It is strange indeed that the prophet after durst go to Beth-el but he went under Gods protection who was able to defend him as he had done his master Elijah against the fury of king Ahaziah when he had fetched fire from heaven upon his captains and their souldiers CHAP. III. Vers 1. NOw Jehoram the sonne of Ahâ—â— began to reigne over Israel in Samaria the eighteenth yeare of Jehoshaphat c. Chap. 1.17 it is said that he succeeded his brother Ahaziah and began his reigne in the second yeare of Jehoram the sonne of Jehoshaphat but that was onely because Jehoshaphat when he went with Ahab against Ramoth Giâ—ead did designe his sonne Jehoram to be king in his room and to govern the kingdome in his absence howbeit at his return he resumed the government of the kingdome to himself as we see in this place and indeed there was good cause for the trouble that Jehoshaphat was put to to reform things at his return 2. Chron. 19.4 argues no small distemper of the whole countrey through the misgovernment of that his ungodly sonne in his absence see the note chap. 1.17 Vers 2. He put away the image of Baal that his father had made That is he suppressed the worship of Baal which his father had set up though he continued still the idolatry of Jeroboam in his golden calves it was much indeed that this wicked king should reform so much especially his mother Jezebel being yet living by whose means the worship of Baal was first brought in but it may well be that his conscience was a little startled with the death first of his father and then of his brother Ahaziah occasioned by the strange fall that he got and with the late revolt of the Moabites from them and besides perhaps he knew that the Prophets of God attributed these things to the idolatry of the Israelites and therefore intending an expedition against the Moabites he resolved first to suppresse the idolatry of Baal that so his warre against Moab might speed the better Vers 7. The king of Moab hath rebelled against me wilt thou go with me against Moab to battel He rebelled in the dayes of Ahaziah immediately after the death of Ahab their father chap. 1.1 but Ahaziah was king little above a yeare and the most of that time perhaps bedrid with his fall and so could not undertake the reducing of Moab to their former obedience and so now Jehoram his brother undertakes it so soon as ever he came to the crown And he said I will go up c. Whether it were out of a desire that Jehoshaphat had to be avenged on the Moabites for their defection from the kings of Judah to Israel for being formerly tributaries to David and Solomon they had left the kings of Judah and given themselves for vassals unto this time to Jeroboam and his successours or for that they had lately with other nations made warre upon him and invaded his land 2. Chron. 20.1 or whether it were because Joram king of Israel had put down the worship of Baal in his kingdome and so in this regard he thought he might the more safely joyn with him in this warre against Moab though he had been formerly reproved by Gods Prophets first for aiding Ahab when he went against Ramoth Gilead 2. Chron. 19.2 and secondly for joyning himself with Amaziah to make ships to go to Tarshish 2. Chron. 20.37 Yet now again he joyned himself with Jehoram the sonne of Ahab and brother of Amaziah in this his warre against the Moabites Vers 8. And he said Which way shall we go up And he answered The way through the wildernesse of Edom. That is Jehoram asked Jehoshaphat which way they should go and Jehoshaphat advised them to go the way through the wildernesse of Edom to wit either that they might come upon the Moabites by a way they looked not for them or that they might take the king of Edom and his forces along with him or else the better to assure that nation of the Edomites by the way of whom they had the more cause to be jealous because some of them had lately been in the field at Engaddi against Jehoshaphat together with the Moabites and the Ammonites 2. Chron 20.22 The Lord set ambushments against the children of Ammon Moab and mount Seir which were come against Judah and they were smitten though at this time they were tributaries to Jehoshaphat and so continued till his sonnes reigne 2 Chron. 21.8 Vers 9. So the king of Israel went and the king of Judah and the king of Edom That is the Viceroy of Edom whom Jehoshaphat had set over them for as yet they had no king of their own 2. Chron. 21.8 Vers 11. Here is Elisha the sonne of Shaphat which poured water on the hands of Elijah That is Here is Elisha the servant or minister of Elijah whether in this particular Elijah made use of Elishaes service we need not enquire because this was the ordinary imployment of servants that attended upon their masters therefore with this proverbiall kind of speech this courtier speaks of him as Elijahs attendant Here is Elishah that poured water on the hands of Elijah and no doubt it was by the speciall instinct of Gods spirit that Elisha was come along with the armie into these deserts of Edom. Vers 12. And Jehoshaphat said The word of the Lord is with him So he judged both because he was the disciple of so great a prophet and perhaps his fame was already spread abroad as also because he conceived there was something in it that he should be now come with the army So the king of Israel and Jehoshaphat and the king of Edom went down to him It was very much that three kings should go down to the prophet and that they did not rather send for Elisha to come to them as at other times the kings of Israel and Judah were wont to do but first the great extremity they were now in might make them desirous to ingratiate themselves to Elisha by all possible meanes secondly it is like enough that Jehoshaphat might advise him hereto and that
time all their chief officers were called Eunuchs As we see Potiphar to whom Joseph was sold though he were a married man is termed an Eunuch Gen. 37.36 Vers 7. And Elisha came to Damascus and Ben-hadad the king of Syria was sick c. The most received opinion is that Elisha went now to Damascus according to a charge given him by Elijah purposely to anoint Hazael king but why was Elijah sent from mount Horeb to Damascus if God meant not that he himself should anoint Hazael 1. Kings 19.15 And the Lord said unto him Go return on thy way to the wildernesse of Damascus and when thou comest anoint Hazael to be king over Syria rather therefore I conceive that Elisha went now by the speciall instinct of Gods Spirit to confirm that to Hazael by a second prediction which formerly upon Elijahs anointing he did not much believe and that the rather because of the present famine in Israel and so coming thither found Ben-hadad sick whether his sicknesse was occasioned through grief as Josephus saith for the shamefull flight of his armie from the siege of Samaria chap. 7.6 especially when he heard it was occasioned by a causelesse feare the Scripture expresseth not but onely notes how in his sicknesse he was glad to consult with the Prophet concerning his recovery whom ere while he sent to apprehend in Dothan chap. 6.13 14. encouraged happely thereto also by the miraculous cure that he had wrought upon the leprosie of his servant Naaman Vers 10. Go say unto him Thou mayest certainly recover c. That is thy disease is not mortall Thou mayest certainly recover of thy sicknesse that therefore which the Prophet addes concerning his death howbeit the Lord hath shewed me that he shall surely die doth not contradict this which he said concerning his sicknesse The question was whether he should recover of that sicknesse wherewith he was visited to this a direct answer is given that he might well recover notwithstanding his sicknesse but withall an intimation is given to the messenger that he should surely die to wit by another means though not by his sicknesse Vers 11. And he settled his countenance stedfastly till he was ashamed That is Elisha did fix his eyes stedfastly upon Hazael untill he began to be ashamed because he saw he could not forbear weeping or rather untill Hazael began to blush and to be ashamed because he saw the Prophet look so earnestly upon him Vers 13. And Elisha answered The Lord hath shewed me that thou shalt be king over Syria Intimating that in this regard it was likely enough he would exercise those cruelties upon the Israelites which now he made so strange of and that because he should then have power to do it and withall when once he sate in the throne of Syria he would bear the same deadly hatred against Gods people which his predecessours had done before him and thence is Damascus threatned under those terms Amos 1.4 I will send a fire into the house of Hazael which shall devoure the palaces of Ben-hadad Vers 15. He took a thick cloth and dipt it in water and spread it on his face c. And thus Ben-hadad was strangled by Hazael and that so that no signe or token could be seen in his dead body of any violence that was offered him and perhaps too under a pretence of allaying the distemper of heat he was in by reason of his sicknesse Vers 16. And in the fifth yeare of Joram the sonne of Ahab king of Israel c. Jehoshaphat had designed his sonne Jehoram to be king and appointed him to govern the kingdome in his absence in the seventeenth yeare of his reigne a little before he went with Ahab against Ramoth Gilead and thence the yeare of Jehoram king of Israel his beginning to reigne is counted to be both the eighteenth yeare of Jehoshaphat 2. Kings 3.1 and the second yeare of Jehoram the sonne of Jehoshaphat 2. Kings 1.17 but at his return he resumed the royall power wholly to himself not communicating the same again to his sonne untill the fifth yeare of Joram king of Israel which was the two and twentieth of Jehoshaphat and then this old king took unto him this his eldest sonne as partner in the government himself yet living the cause whereof in all probabilitie was some discord and differences which brake out even then between him and his younger brethren which as they moved Jehoshaphat to commit to his younger sonnes the custody of strong fenced cities in Judah 2. Chron. 21.3 the better to assure them if it might have been against the power of their elder brother so also on the other side it caused him to put this his eldest sonne in possession of the kingdome whilest himself was living for fear of tumult after his death Vers 17. And he reigned eight years in Jerusalem To wit foure years together with his father and foure years himself alone Vers 18. For the daughter of Ahab was his wife To wit Athaliah vers 26. Vers 19. Yet the Lord would not destroy Judah for David his servants sake as he promised him to give him alway a light c. That is one of his seed in whom the soveraigntie of Judah should be continued though farre short of the glory that formerly they enjoyed before the revolt of the ten tribes Vers 20. In his dayes Edom revolted from under the hand of Judah c. The Edomites ever since Davids time 2. Sam. 8.14 had been tributaries to the kings of Judah and had been governed by a Viceroy whom they set over them 1. Kings 22.47 There was no king in Edom a deputy was king But now they cast off this yoke and so the prophecie of Isaac began to take effect Gen. 27.40 that Esau should break the yoke of his brother Jacob from off his neck 2. Chron. 21.2 we reade first that so soon as his father was dead he presently made use of his power against his six younger brethren and having gotten them into his hands slew them and together with them for company many of the great men of the land such belike as either formerly or then had taken their part that withall he took upon him to make innovations in Religion erecting high places in the mountains of Judah and forcing the people to embrace that idolatry which himself had learned from the house of Ahab vers 10.11 And these combustions in the land of Judah we may well think gave encouragement to the Edomites to revolt at this time and so God punished these his abominable courses Vers 22. Yet Edom revolted from under the hand of Judah unto this day That is though Joram overthrew the Edomites in that forementioned battel vers 21. yet they retiring into their places of advantage persisted resolutely in their revolt and so he was forced to return again into his own land which indeed is not so strange if we consider that he might perhaps heare of the revolt of
blessed Martyr at his death the Lord look upon it and require it before that yeare was expired the Syrians invaded the land again and executed the judgements of God with great severitie for though the Syrians it seems came rather to pillage then to perform any great action for they came with a small company of men and Jehoash went out against them with a very great army yet by the providence of God this small band of Syrian rovers overthrew that great host of Judah wherewith being encouraged they went up against Jerusalem and destroyed all the Princes of the people who had drawn away their king from the worship of the true God and sent all the spoil of them to the king of Damascus and as for Jehoash they left him in sore diseases perhaps by tortures they had put him to which advantage two of his servants apprehending they made a conspiracie against him and slew him in his bed when he had reigned fourty years vers 1. to wit two and twenty years with Jehu and the rest with his sonne Jehoahaz and his grandchild Jehoash which is largely related 2. Chron. 24.18 25. Vers 21. For Jozachar the sonne of Shimeath and Jehozabad the sonne of Shomer his servants smote him and he died This Jozachar was also called Zabad 2. Chron. 24.26 where also it is expressed that Shimeah was an Ammonitesse and that Shomer there called Shimrith was a Moabitesse And these are they that conspired against him Zabad the sonne of Shimeath an Ammonitesse and Jehozabad the sonne of Shimrith a Moabitesse And they buried him with his fathers in the citie of David But not in the sepulchres of the kings 2 Chron. 24.25 CHAP. XIII Vers 1. JEhoahaz the sonne of Jehu began to reigne over Israel in Samaria and reigned seventeen years Yet two years before his death he made his sonne Joash king see vers 10 22. Vers 3. And he delivered them into the hands of Hazael king of Syria and into the hands of Ben-hadad the sonne of Hazael all their dayes That is all the time of the reigne both of Jehu the father and Jehoahaz his sonne Vers 4 And Jehoahaz besought the Lord. Namely when he was brought so low by the Syrians that he had not left him above fifty horsmen and ten chariots and ten thousand footmen as is afterward expressed vers 7. Vers 5. And the Lord gave Israel a saviour c. To wit Joash the sonne of Jehoahaz who afterward prevailed mightily against the Syrians and after that also Jeroboam his sonne chap. 14.27 so that afterward the children of Israel dwelt in their tents as beforetime that is they dwelt in their houses quietly and peaceably see the note 1 Kings 12.16 Vers 7. The king of Syria had destroyed them and had made them like the dust by threshing That is he had broken them to pieces and scattered them as corn may be with too much threshing so that scarse any where was there an army together and they were become a people of no power and no esteem Vers 8. Now the rest of the acts of Jehoahaz and all that he did and his might c That is with what courage and valour he resisted the Syrians though they still prevailed against him which is the rather noted to make it manifest that the calamities that befell the Israelites in his time were of Gods just judgement because of their sinnes rather then from any want of courage and might in their king Vers 9. And Jehoahaz slept with his fathers Having reigned seventeen years vers 1. all which time Jehoash the sonne of Ahaziah reigned in Judah Vers 10. In the thirty and seventh yeare of Joash king of Judah began Jehoash the sonne of Jehoahaz to reigne c. Jehoahaz the father of Joash began his reigne in the three and twentieth yeare of Joash king of Judah and reigned seventeen years vers 1. which must needs be till the nine and thirtieth yeare of Joash king of Judah complete and how then did his sonne begin his reigne in the thirty seventh yeare of Joash king of Judah as is here said I answer that Joash was made king his father yet living and reigned three years together with his father but reigned not alone till the last that is the fourtieth yeare of Joash king of Judah and hence it is also that Amaziah the sonne of Joash king of Judah is said to have begun his reigne in the second yeare of Joash sonne of Jehoahaz king of Israel chap. 14.1 either therefore because Jehoahaz being wearied and broken with long adversity desired to discharge himself in part of those heavie cares that lay upon him or because Elisha had perhaps foretold the victories of this his sonne of which we reade vers 14.15 c. two years before his death he made his sonne king Vers 12. And the rest of the acts of Joash and all that he did c. As namely the three great victories which he obtained against the Syrians of which Elisha foretold him vers 17 18 19. and his rescuing many cities of Israel from the Syrians vers 25. and how he prevailed against Amaziah king of Judah which is related in the following chapter Vers 13. And Joash slept with his fathers Having reigned sixteen years vers 10. to wit after his fathers death besides the three years that he reigned with his father the first yeare of his sole government Joash the sonne of Ahaziah reigned in Judah and Amaziah his sonne the other fifteen years Vers 14. Now Elisha was fallen sick of the sicknesse whereof he dyed To wit about five and fifty years at least as is generally thought after Elijah was taken up into heaven in which time Jehoshaphat Jehoram Ahaziah Athaliah and Jehoash swayed the scepter of Judah and Jehoram the sonne of Ahab Jehu Jehoahaz his sonne and Joash the sonne of Jehoahaz did successively sit in the throne of Israel yet some Expositours hold that Joash his visiting this sick prophet related in the following words was whilest his father Jehoahaz was yet living to wit that when his father had sought unto the Lord as is said before vers 4. then this his sonne Joash came both to visit the sick prophet and to enquire concerning those sad calamities that had befallen the kingdome of Israel and so when he saw him in so weak a condition wept over his face and said O my father my father the chariot of Israel and the horsemen thereof with the same words wherewith Elisha had bewailed the losse of Elijah chap. 2.12 concerning which see the note there Nor is it strange that this wicked king that would not be guided by the doctrine of Elisha should yet thus passionately bewail the sicknesse of the prophet if we consider in what a distressed condition his kingdome was at present and how great things God had done for his predecessours the kings of Israel by Elishaes means Vers 16. And Elisha put his hands upon the kings hands The
prophet putting his hands upon the kings hands when he was drawing the bowe to shoot was to signifie that through Gods assistance whose person the prophet did now represent he should be victorious over the Syrians according to those expressions Psalm 18.34 35. He teacheth my hands to warre so that a bowe of steele is broken by my arms thou hast also given me the shield of thy salvation c. Psalm 144.1 Blessed be the Lord my strength which teacheth my hands to warre and my fingers to fight Gen. 49.24 But his bow abode in strength and the arms of his hands were made strong by the hands of the mighty God of Jacob. Vers 17. And he said open the window eastward c. To wit because Syria lay eastward and it was to signifie the vanquishing of the Syrians by Joash that the arrow was to be shot out at that window The arrow of the Lords deliverance and the arrow of deliverance from Syria c. That is by this arrow is signified that the Lord by thy might will certainly deliver his people and that from the Syrians who have hitherto brought such calamities upon them and thus even that kindnesse which Joash had now shewen to Gods prophets was abundantly rewarded Vers 18. And he said Take the arrowes and he took them And he said unto the king of Israel Smite upon the ground c. Having by the former signe the arrow shot out at the window eastward foreshewen that he should vanquish the Syrians now by another signe he undertakes to shew him how often he should overcome them Vers 19. And the man of God was wroth with him and said Thou shouldest have smitten five or six times c. It seems the Lord had shown to Elisha that so oft as Joash should voluntarily after a generall charge smite the earth so oft should Israel smite Syria and hence was Elishaes anger that he smote the earth no oftner But may some say seeing the Prophet did not enjoyn the king to smite it often why should he be angry with him for this I answer because by the prophets explaining the meaning of his former action to wit his shooting out at the window the king might have easily conceived that even this second action that was injoyned of smiting the earth was also intended as a parabolicall signe of his smiting the Syrians and so thereupon might have been eager to have given many strokes to the earth Some Expositours indeed give another reason of the Prophets anger namely that he was angry not because the king smote the ground no oftner but because by the kings smiting the earth so seldome the Prophet foresaw his future slacknesse in pursuing the execution of Gods vengeance upon the Syrians and the deliverance of Gods Israel but the former reason of the Prophets anger is I conceive most agreeable with the words of the text And whereas this which is here said Thou shouldest have smitten five or six times then hadst thou smitten Syria till thou hadst consumed it whereas now thou shalt smite Syria but thrice may seem to contradict what was said before vers 17. where it was absolutely promised Joash that he should smite the Syrians till he had consumed them we must know that the Prophet there spake onely of an utter consuming those armies of the Syrians over whom he was to obtain three memorable victories but here he speaks of an utter ruining the whole power of the kingdome of Syria in generall which should have been if he had smitten the earth five or six times but now should not be Vers 21. And it came to passe as they were burying a man that behold they spied a band of men and they cast the man into the sepulchre of Elisha c. The meaning of this is that as they were going to bury a dead man they spied a band of Moabites that were broken into their land to rob and spoil their countrey and so not having time to carry him to the place prepared for his buriall they removed the stone that covered Elishaes sepulchre and cast him in there whereupon the dead man revived so soon as he touched the bones of Elisha and stood up upon his feet for we must not think that the sepulchre of Elisha lay open so that in their feare they could presently without any more ado cast the dead man upon the bones of the Prophet however by this singular miracle the Lord was pleased First to teach the people that it was the mighty power of God and not any power in Elisha himself whereby in his life time he had wrought so many glorious miracles And secondly to strengthen the faith of Joash concerning those victories which this holy Prophet of God had foretold him a little before his death in that hereby he might see that God could as easily revive their dead state as he had now revived this dead man yea and besides in this miracle wrought by the dead body of Elisha we have a lively figure of that life which all believers doe obtain by applying to themselves by faith the death of Christ their Saviour Vers 22. But Hazael king of Syria oppressed Israel all the dayes of Jehoahaz That is all the time he reigned alone Vers 23. Neither cast he them from his presence as yet The Lord did not as yet quite root out the Israelites from the land of Canaan which he had chosen for his habitation nor turned them off from enjoying any outward communion with him in his ordinances as he did afterwards CHAP. XIIII Vers 1. IN the second yeare of Joash sonne of Jehoahaz king of Israel reigned Amaziah c. That is in the second yeare of his reigne after he began to reigne alone his father Jehoahaz being dead for he began to reigne three yeares before his father dyed and that was the thirty seventh yeare of Joash king of Judah the father of this Amaziah who reigned fourty years complete See the note chap. 13.10 Vers 2 And reigned twenty and nine years in Jerusalem Of which nine and twenty years Joash reigned in Israel fifteen years complete and something more for he began his reigne the yeare before Amaziah vers 1. In the second yeare of Joash sonne of Jehoahaz king of Israel reigned Amaziah and he reigned but sixteen years in all chap. 13.10 and the other fourteen years complete and something more Jeroboam the sonne of Joash reigned in Israel and therefore it is twice expressed that Amaziah outlived Joash king of Israel fifteen years vers 17. of this chapter and 2 Chron. 25.25 but then may some say if Amaziah lived but to the fifteenth yeare of Jeroboam the sonne of Joash how is it said that Azariah or Uzziah the sonne of this Amaziah began his reigne in the seven and twentieth yeare of Jeroboam chap. 15.1 I answer either Jeroboam was designed king by his father Joash twelve years before his death and so that which was but the fifteenth yeare of Jeroboams
the kingdome of the ten tribes as well as those of Judah and Benjamin the advice which he took with his counsel 2. Chron. 25.17 Then Amaziah king of Judah took counsel and advise and sent to Joash the sonne of Jehoahaz the sonne of Jehu saying Come let us see one another in the face seems to imply that they debated amongst them these just grounds which he had to make warre against the king of Israel and most likely it is that these things were objected by him in this challenge that he sent but because he sent this message in an insolent manner as one that did rather desire to decide the businesse by the sword then to have it otherwise composed and to try the strength and courage of the king of Israel in a pitched battel therefore is this onely expressed that he challenged him to meet him in the field and give him battel face to face for that is the meaning of these words Come let us look one another in the face Vers 9. The thistle that was in Lebanon sent to the cedar that was in Lebanon c. Thus Joash answered Amaziah by a parable and the drift of it was to put Amaziah in mind how vain a thing it was for them that are comparatively weak and of little strength easily overborn and troden down to entertain proud and aspiring thoughts concerning themselves as if they were above the reach of danger and he makes the thistles pride in this parable to be the desiring of the cedars daughter for his sonnes wife therein to couch secretly an argument from the lesse to the greater if it were too much for the thistle to offer affinitie with the cedar much more then to make warre against the cedar which he would have Amaziah know was just his case because he looked upon Amaziah as a poore weak and contemptible king in comparison of himself though proud and quarrelsome he compares him to a thistle the basest of all shrubs though full of prickles and himself who had ten of the tribes of Israel under his command whereas the other had but two to a cedar the most noble of all trees onely he compares Amaziah to a thistle in Lebanon as well as himself to a cedar in Lebanon because Amaziah was a king as well as he again from the foolish pride in the thistle in sending such a message he implies how farre greater the pride and folly of Amaziah was in sending such a challenge to him and last of all by shewing what became of the thistle There passed by a wild beast that was in Lebanon and trode down the thistle he gives Amaziah to understand what his end would be if he persevered in his resolution to make warre against him to wit that his forces would easily crush and ruine him and indeed the miseries that would befall him are well compared to the treading down of a wild beast because warre bellum quasi bellua doth usually destroy and tread down all before it and souldiers as men void of all reason and carried on merely with fury and brutish passions are wont without all consideration in a rude and brutish manner to beat and trample down all where they come and therefore is the time of warre called a day of trouble and treading down Isa 22.5 Vers 11. But Amaziah would not heare To wit because God would have him punished for his idolatry whereunto he was then newly fallen upon his victory against the Edomites 2. Chron. 25.20 But Amaziah would not heare for it came of God that he might deliver them into the hand of their enemies because they sought after the Gods of Edom. Therefore Jehoash king of Israel went up c. That is he stay not till the enemie brake in and spoiled his countrey but entred the kingdome of Judah and so encountred with him in Beth-shemesh which belonged to Judah which is added because there was another Beth-shemesh in the tribe of Naphtali Josh 19.38 Vers 13. And Jehoash king of Israel took Amaziah c. And thus in this Amaziah the sonne of Joash God did yet further revenge the death of Zachariah the sonne of Jehoiada who was most inhumanely and ungratefully murthered in his fathers dayes according to that which he said at his death the Lord look upon it and require it and withall Amaziah himself was severely punished for his Apostacy to idolatry upon his victory over the Edomites And brake down the wall of Jerusalem from the gate of Ephraim unto the corner gate foure hundred cubits Some conceive that this part of the wall was broken down that the inhabitants might be rendred hereby the more fearfull to attempt any thing against the kingdome of Israel the strength of the citie being so farre impaired but such a breach that might be so easily made up again could be no great curb to them others say that it was done at Joash his command that at that breach he might enter the citie in his chariot carrying the king before him as in triumph but why should foure hundred cubits of the wall be beaten down that he might enter with his chariot more probable therefore it is that the citie at first standing out against him he battered down that part of the wall by the north gate which was towards Ephraim and therefore called the gate of Ephraim and so took the citie by force Vers 14. And he took all the gold and silver c. and hostages and returned to Samaria These hostages he took for assurance of their performing the conditions he had imposed upon them but having Jerusalem in possession and their king his prisoner why did he not seize upon the kingdome and joyn the twelve tribes again under his government I answer that which lately had befallen Athaliah shewed plainly how constantly affected the people stood to the house of David neither could he tell what forces the people abroad in the countrey might presently raise against him no marvell therefore though he chose rather to go away with a certain spoil then to hazard all by aiming at the crown of Judah upon such weak and uncertain terms Vers 16. And Jehoash slept with his fathers See the note chap. 13.13 It seems he out-lived not long that sacrilegious act of his in robbing the Temple of Jerusalem Vers 17. And Amaziah the sonne of Joash king of Judah lived after the death of Jehoash sonne of Jehoahaz king of Israel fifteen years To wit un-unto the fifteenth yeare of Jeroboam the sonne of Joash king of Israel See the note verse 2. Vers 19. Now they made a conspiracy against him in Jerusalem c. Ascribing all the miseries that had befallen their citie and kingdome to him who had provoked the king of Israel to invade their land whereupon Jerusalem was taken and pillaged c. they were enraged against him and so conspired together to take away his life which though he discovered and fled to Lachish yet they pursued him thither and there
they slew him Vers 21. And all the people of Judah took Azariah which was sixteen years old and made him king c. To wit in the seven and twentieth yeare of Jeroboam chap. 15.1 but his father died in the fifteenth yeare of Jeroboam vers 14. and then it seems this his sonne Azariah or Uzziah being not above foure years old Concerning which see the note chap. 15.1 In this kings reigne Isaiah and Hosea began to prophecie and Amos and Jonah Isai 1.1 Hos 1.1 Amos 1.1 and verse 25. of this chapter Vers 22. He built Elath and restored it to Judah c. This Elath we find mentioned Deut. 2.8 so that it was now onely repaired or at least enlarged or fortified It was a citie of Edom near the red sea and therefore it seems was recovered from them by Azariah or Uzziah Vers 23. Jeroboam the sonne of Joash king of Israel began to reigne in Samaria and reigned fourty and one years To wit fourteen years and upwards with Amaziah who reigned nine and twenty years vers 1. and twenty seven years in the dayes of Uzziah or Azariah who succeeded his father Amaziah How this agreeth with that which is said chap. 15.1 see in the note on that place Vers 24. And he did that which was evil in the sight of the Lord c. for this cause Amos in these dayes prophecyed against the house of this Jeroboam the second and when Amaziah the priest complained thereof to the king he was enjoyned not to prophecie any more at Bethel Amos 7.10 11 12. Then Amasiah the priest of Bethel sent to Jeroboam king of Israel saying Amos hath conspired against thee in the midst of the house of Israel the land is not able to bear all his words for thus Amos saith Jeroboam shall die by the sword and Israel shall be led away captive out of their own land Also Amaziah said to Amos O thou Seer go flee away into the land of Judah and there eat bread and prophecy there Vers 25. He restored the coast of Israel from the entring of Hamath unto the sea of the plain Concerning Hamoth see the note Num. 13.21 and 34.8 The sea of the plain is that which was called the salt sea Deut. 3.17 the utmost south bounds of the kingdome of Ephraim According to the word of the Lord God of Israel which he spake by the hand of his servant Jonah c. When Israel was brought so low as is expressed in the following verse which was in the dayes of Jehoahaz the sonne of Jehu chap. 13.34 7. the Lord by Jonah foretold it seems how they should vanquish the Syrians and enlarge the coast of Israel which accordingly came to passe first in the dayes of Joash who obtained three great victories against the Syrians chap. 13.25 but more fully in the reigne of Jeroboam his sonne the most prosperous and victorious king that ever reigned over the ten tribes Vers 28. He recovered Damascus and Hamath which belonged to Judah for Israel Though these cities had been in the possession of the kings of Judah yet he recovered them for his own kingdome the kingdome of Israel Vers 29. And Jeroboam slept with his fathers even with c. Having reigned fourteen years in the time of Amaziah and Uzziah kings of Judah as is above noted verse 21. CHAP. XV. Vers 1. IN the twenty and seventh yeare of Jeroboam king of Israel began Azariah c. Manifest it is that Amaziah the father of this Aazariah or Uzziah was slain in the fifteenth year of Jeroboam for in the fifteenth year of Amasiah did Jeroboam begin his reigne chap. 14.23 and Amaziah reigned in all but nine and twenty years chap. 14.2 so that the last yeare currant of Amasiah was but the fifteenth of Jeroboam and how then was it the seven and twentieth of Jeroboam ere his sonne began his reigne Some say that Jeroboam was designed king twelve years before Joash his fathers death and so the first yeare of Azariah or Uzziah king of Judah though it were the seven and twentieth yeare of Jeroboam from his first being designed king yet it was but his fifteenth yeare accounting the years of his reigne from his sitting in the throne after the death of his father But better I conceive it is answered by others that though Amaziah was slain in the fifteenth yeare of Jeroboam yet his sonne Azariah was not settled in the throne by the generall consent of the people till the seven and twentieth yeare of Jeroboam when he was sixteen years old the foregoing twelve years either he reigned under Protectours being but foure years old when his father was slain or perhaps though he were acknowledged king by some who in those troublesome times stuck to him as the heir apparent of the house of David yet generally by the people he was not acknowledged king till some order was taken for the redresse of those grievances which had enraged them so farre against his father Vers 2. And he reigned two and fifty years in Jerusalem Besides therefore the twelve years spent in his minority fifteen years more he reigned in Judah whilest Jeroboam the second reigned in the throne of Israel three and twenty years in the time of Zachariah the sonne of Jeroboam eleven years with Shallum and Menahem whereof Shallum reigned but a moneth two years with Pekahiah and a yeare and upwards with Pekah so that he lived to see six kings in the throne of Israel Vers 3 And he did that which was right in the sight of the Lord according to all that his father Amaziah had done To wit in the beginning of his reigne as Amaziah had done whilest Zachariah the Prophet lived he sought the Lord and so long he prospered wonderfully insomuch that considering the admirable successe of Jeroboam at the same time in Israel it is evident that the state of Israel did never so flourish since the division of the twelve tribes as in the beginning of this kings reigne for having an army of three hundred and seven thousand men of warre under the command of two thousand six hundred captains all whom he furnished with shields and spears and other arms requisite he overcame the Philistins of whose towns he dismantled some and built others also he got the mastery over some parts of Arabia and brought the Ammonites to pay him tribute he repaired also the wall of Jerusalem which in his fathers dayes Joash king of Israel had broken down and fortified it with towers whereon he set new invented engins to shoot arrows c. he improved also the riches he had gotten with all kind of husbandry as keeping of much cattell c. and built towers in the wildernesse for the defence of his cattell and herdsmen and the wells of water he had digged there by which means he might keep the command of the Arabian wildernesse which was hardly passable if men were kept from those few springs of water that were found there all
his father Uzziah but that foure years before he died he wholly resigned his kingdome to his sonne Ahaz and so it was in the fourth yeare of Ahaz when Hoshea slew Pekah and took upon himself the title of king of Israel but this fourth yeare of Ahaz is called the twentieth of Jotham because Jotham had still the title of king though he had foure years before resigned his kingdome to his sonne Ahaz Vers 32. In the second yeare of Pekah the sonne of Remaliah king of Israel began Jotham c. To wit after his father Uzziahs death for he had the government of the kingdome under his father a long time before this to wit ever since his father became a leper as is noted verse 5. About this time therefore did the prophet Isaiah see that glorious vision Isa 6.1 In the yeare that king Uzziah died I saw also the Lord sitting upon a throne high and lifted up and his train filled the temple c. and in this kings reigne Hosea and Micah prophesied to the people Vers 33. Five and twenty years old was he when he began to reigne and he reigned sixteen years c. Some Expositours conceive that he was thus old when he began to reign in his fathers life-time which they hold thereby to resolve that great difficulty concerning the age of his grand-child Hezekiah when he began to reigne of which see the note chap. 18.2 But I rather think it must be understood for so the words seem clearly to import of his age when he began his sixteen years reigne which was after his fathers death to wit to the seventeenth yeare of Pekah as is evident in the first verse of the following chapter In the seventeenth yeare of Pekah the sonne of Remaliah Ahaz the sonne of Jotham king of Judah began to reigne Vers 34. And he did that which was right in the sight of the Lord c. This is more fully expressed 2. Chron. 27.21 And he did that which was right in the sight of the Lord according to all that Uzziah his father did howbeit he entred not into the temple of the Lord and the people did yet corruptly Vers 35. He built the higher gate of the house of the Lord. Or the high gate 2. Chron. 27.3 which was it seems the outer east-gate the gate whereby they went to the kings palace 2. Chron. 23.20 And they came through the high gate into the kings house the same I conceive it was which afterward for the statelinesse of it was called the beautifull gate of the Temple Acts 3.2 and by Jeremy often the new gate as Jer. 26.10 and 36.10 c. Vers 36. Now the rest of the acts of Jotham c. Some of these are related in the Scripture Chronicles as first that he built divers cities in the hills of Judah and in the forrests towers and palaces and secondly that he enforced the Ammonites to pay him tribute to wit of silver an hundred talents of wheat and barley twenty thousand measures 2. Chron. 27.4 5. Vers 37. In those dayes the Lord began to send against Judah Rezin the king of Syria and Pekah the sonne of Remaliah That is towards the end of his reigne they began to conspire against the land of Judah but it seems till his sonnes reigne after his decease they did not invade the land the Lord herein shewing mercy to good Jotham that he took him away before those heavy calamities that immediately after fell upon the kingdome of Judah CHAP. XVI Vers 1. IN the seventeenth yeare of Pekah the sonne of Remaliah Ahaz the sonne of Jotham c. The seventeenth yeare of Pekah was the sixteenth yeare of Jotham chap. 15.32 at which time Jotham did either resigne the kingdome to his sonne Ahaz or at least he left the government to him but yet the lived at least foure years after See chap. 15.30 Vers 2. Twenty years old was Ahaz when he began to reigne and he reigned sixteen years c. If Ahaz was twenty years old when he began his reigne when he died sixteen years after he was but thirty six years old and then was Hezekiah his sonne twenty five years old chap. 18.2 Twenty and five years old was Hezekiah when he began to reigne and he reigned twenty and nine years in Jerusalem whereby it may seem that Hezekiah was born to Ahaz when he was yet but ten or eleven years old which say some Expositours we need not wonder at considering the singular blessing that nation had for generation but because it is very unlikely that the Jews had children so young therefore other Expositours do answer this objection two other wayes to wit first that Ahaz was twenty years old when he that is Jotham his father of whom he had spoken in the former verse began to reigne to wit after the death of his father Uzziah or secondly and I think thus it is better answered that Ahaz began to reigne when he was first designed king in the life of Jotham his father and then he was but twenty years old and the like must then be said of Jotham too chap. 15.30 but when after his fathers death he began to reigne as absolute king himself from which these sixteen years must be reckoned he might be twenty five or twenty six years old or perhaps more Vers 3. But he walked in the wayes of the kings of Israel That is he worshipped idols as they also did for so it is expressed 2. Chron. 28.3 He burnt incense in the valley of the sonne of Hinnom and burnt his children in the fire after the abominations of the heathen Yea made his sonne to passe through the fire c. Concerning this abominable idolatry of making their children to passe through the fire see what is noted Levit. 18.21 But the Ahaz did indeed burn his sonnes at least some one of his sonnes as by way of sacrificing them to his idol-gods is evident 2. Chron. 28.3 where also the place is named where he offered this inhumane oblation to wit the valley of the sonne of Hinnom a valley not farre from Jerusalem Moreover he burnt incense in the valley of the sonne of Hinnom and burnt his children in the fire This high place was called Tophet and was it seems especially used for this execrable idolatry Jer. 7.31 They have built the high places of Tophet which is in the valley of the sonne of Hinnom to burn their sonnes and their daughters in the fire and by Josiah it was defiled chap. 23.10 He defiled Tophet which is in the valley of the children of Hinnom that no man might make his sonne or his daughter to passe through the fire to Molech Vers 5. Then Rezin king of Syria and Pekah sonne of Remaliah king of Israel came up to Jerusalem to warre No sooner was Ahaz settled in the throne of Judah but both Rezin king of Syria and Pekah king of Israel began streight to invade Judah for Pekah reigned in all but
doest advise upon or determine nothing thou doest attempt or accomplish but it is known to me yea thou doest nothing but what I have determined shall be done and this is fully that which David acknowledgeth concerning himself Psalm 139.2 3. Thou knowest my down sitting and mine uprising thou understandest my thoughts afarre off thou compassest my path and my lying down and art acquainted with all my wayes Vers 29. And this shall be a signe unto thee Ye shall eat this yeare such things as grow of themselves c. That is though ye have been hindred from sowing and planting this yeare by reason of the Assyrians that have invaded your land yea though there be no sowing nor planting the next yeare to wit either because it was the sabbath yeare the yeare of the lands rest or because the Assyrians left not the countrey till seed time was past yet there shall be sufficient that shall grow of it self of the scattered seeds of corne that fell upon the earth and hereby some inferre that the Assyrians continued a time in the land even after this promise was made to Hezekiah by the prophet Isaiah at least till the seed time of the second yeare was past and a very miraculous passage this was that for three years they should live of that which grew of it self nor is it any wonder that the Lord gives that for a signe to strengthen their faith which was not accomplished till the Assyrians had left the land we see the like Exod. 3.12 And he said Certainly I will be with thee and this shall be a token unto thee that I have sent thee when thou hast brought forth the people out of Egypt ye shall serve God upon this mountain Concerning which see the note there Vers 30. And the remnant that is escaped of the house of Judah shall yet again take root downward c. Because though they should at present be delivered from the Assyrians they might fear that being brought to such a poore number their nation would never be able long to subsist this promise is added concerning future times to wit that that small remnant of them which had escaped the sword of the Assyrians should like a thriving flourishing tree grow and prosper and replenish the land again as in former times Vers 31. For out of Jerusalem shall go forth a remnant and they that escape out of mount Zion That is that poore remnant that now for fear of the Assyrians is shut up within the walls of Jerusalem shall go forth thence the enemies being fled and shall again replenish the land The zeal of the Lord of hosts shall do this The Lords zeal for his own glory the fervent love he beares to his people and his just indignation against the enemy shall move him to do this however his people have deserved no such favour at his hands Vers 32. He shall not come into this citie nor shoot an arrow there c. It is evident that Rabshaketh came up against Jerusalem with a great army chap. 18.17 if he removed his army thence when he went to Sennacherib to Libnah vers 8. which perhaps he did having heard of the Ethiopian that was coming against them then the meaning of this place is clear that notwithstanding the threatning letters he had sent he should not return again to lay siege unto Jerusalem but if the army of Rabshakeh lay still before Jerusalem then the meaning of these words may be that though the army of Rabshakeh had blockt up Jerusalem and waited for the coming of Sennacheribs army who was happely gone against the Egyptian and Ethiopian army intending then with their joynt forces to assault Jerusalem yet he should never cast a bank against it but should return the way he came which accordingly came to passe vers 35. as was formerly prophecyed by Isaiah chap. 14.25 I will break the Assyrian in my land and upon my mountains tread him under foot then shall his yoke depart from off them and his burthen depart from off their shoulder Vers 34. For I will defend this citie to save it for my own sake and for my servant Davids sake That is because of my promise made to David concerning the perpetuity of his throne which had respect chiefly to Christ the sonne of David of whom David was a type Vers 35. And it came to passe that night that the angel of the Lord went out c. That is that very night after the Prophet had sent this message to Hezekiah concerning the deliverance of Jerusalem or that night when the Lord performed this which the prophet had foretold the angel of the Lord went out and smote in the camp of the Assyrians one hundred fourescore and five thousand and amongst others the captains and leaders of his camp perhaps even Rabshakeh amongst the rest who had lately belched forth such execrable blasphemies against the God of Israel 2. Chron. 32.21 And the Lord sent an Angel which cut off all the mighty men of valour and the leaders and captains in the camp of the king of Assyria c. Vers 36. So Sennacherib king of Assyria departed c. With shame of face 2. Chron. 32.21 So he returned with shame of face to his own land c. the book of Tobit also telleth us that at his return he in a rage slew many of the Israelites in Nineveh Tobit 1.18 but of this we find no mention in any of the canonicall books of Scripture Vers 37. And Esar-haddon his sonne reigned in his stead Who in the beginning of his reigne sent new troops out of Syria into Samaria to fortifie the colony therein planted by his grandfather Shalmaneser Ezra 4.2 CHAP. XX. Vers 1. IN those dayes was Hezekiah sick unto death That is immediately after the slaughter made in the Assyrian army by the angel related in the end of the former chapter and indeed manifest it is that Hezekiah sickned in the fourteenth yeare of his reigne which was the yeare wherein Sennacherib invaded Judea chap. 18.13 Now in the fourteenth yeare of Hezekiah did Sennacherib king of Assyria come up against all the fenced cities of Judah and took them for he reigned in all but nine and twenty years chapter 18.2 now a promise was made him of living fifteen years longer vers 6. and withall it is most probable that he fell not sick before the departure of the Assyrian army because not long before that when he had received those blasphemous letters from Sennacherib he went into the temple and prayed unto the Lord c. chap. 19.14 though he was newly delivered from so great feares yet partly for the further triall of his faith and partly to render him yet better and to honour him with the ensuing miracle God was pleased to visit him with this dangerous sicknesse Thus saith the Lord Set thy house in order c. That is make thy will and dispose of those things which it is fit should be set in
expressed Vers 7. And the king of Egypt came not again any more out of his land c. To wit against Jerusalem indeed in the latter end of Zedekiahs reigne Jerusalem being then besieged the king of Egypt came up to help him against the Babylonians Jer. 37.5 Then Pharaohs army came forth out of Egypt and when the Chaldeans that besieged Jerusalem heard tydings of them they departed from Jerusalem but this here is spoken of his coming to subdue the Jewes to reduce them again under his subjection this Jehoiakim thought he would have done when he heard such glorious rumours of the great preparations he made against Nebuchadnezzer and thereupon had revolted from the Babylonian and for this very cause it is here expressed that he came not and that the king of Babylon had taken from the river of Egypt unto the river Euphrates all that pertained to the king of Egypt to shew upon what vain grounds Jehoiakim had trusted in Egypt and so thereby had brought all this misery both on himself and on his kingdome Vers 8. Jehoiachin was eighteen years old when he began to reigne To wit when he began to reigne alone after his fathers death for in his fathers life time he was crowned king ten years before this when he was yet but eight years old 2. Chron. 36.9 Jehoiachin was eight years old when he began to reigne c. And he reigned in Jerusalem three moneths In 2. Chron. 36.9 it is three moneths and ten dayes but the odd dayes as usually elsewhere in the Scripture are here omitted Indeed there in the Chronicles vers 10. it followes that when the yeare was expired king Nebuchadnezzer sent and brought him to Babylon whereby some may conceive that it was a twelvemoneth ere Nebuchadnezzer took him away and why then should it be said that he reigned but three moneths but that which is said there is spoken of the yeare absolutely considered and not of the yeare of Jehoiachins reigne when the yeare was expired that is at the spring or beginning of a new yeare king Nebuchadnezzer sent and brought him to Babylon which was when he had reigned about three moneths as is here said so that that place in the Chronicles is parallel with that 2. Sam 11.1 and it came to passe that after the yeare was expired at the time when kings go forth to battel that David sent Joab c. Vers 9. And he did that which was evil in the sight of the Lord c. For which cause he was threatened by the prophet Jeremiah that he should die childlesse and should be carried with his mother and others into Babylon Jeremiah 22.21.30 Vers 10. At that time the servants of Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came up against Jerusalem c. It is not expressed whether this Jehoiachin were made king by Nebuchadnezzar when he took Jerusalem and slew his father or whether he was made king by the people when Nebuchadnezzar had left the citie if he were set in the throne by Nebuchadnezzar it may well be as Josephus saith that Nebuchadnezzar bethinking himself how dangerous it was to leave him in the throne whose father he had slain and cast out unburied he changed his purpose presently and sent his captains with an army against Jerusalem to whom himself in person came within a while after as intending to depose him and to set up another king in his room Vers 12. And Jehoiachin the king of Judah went out to the king of Babylon c. That is he yielded up both him and his to Nebuchadnezzar as the prophet Jeremiah had advised him And the king of Babylon took him in the eighth yeare of his reigne That is in the eight yeare of Nebuchadnezzars reigne Vers 13. And he carried out thence all the treasures of the house of the Lord and the treasures of the kings house c. And thus was that accomplished which God had threatened when Hezekiah shewed his treasures to the king of Babylons Embassadours Isaiah 39.6 Behold the dayes come that all that is in thine house and that which thy father's have laid up in store untill this day shall be carried to Babylon nothing shall be left yet this particle all so often mentioned here and in the following verse all the treasures c. must be understood with some limitation as namely that he carryed away all in a manner or all that he pleased for that he carryed not all away now when he carried away Jechoniah is evident Jer. 27.18 c. where there is mention made of vessels that remained in the house of the Lord and in the house of the king of Judah even after this in the dayes of Zedekiah the succeeding king which after this were carried away as is related in the following chapter vers 13.14 c. And cut in pieces all the vessels of gold which Solomon king of Israel had made c. Ezra 1.7 it is said that Cyrus the king brought forth the vessels of the house of the Lord which Nebuchadnezzar had brought forth out of Jerusalem c. but for the resolving of this doubt see the note on that place Vers 14. And he carryed away all Jerusalem and all the princes and all the mighty men of valour even ten thousand captives c. To wit out of the whole kingdome of which seven thousand were carried out of Jerusalem that were men of might and a thousand crafts-men and smiths vers 16. the rest were carried from other places of the land and at this time it was that Ezekiel was carried away captive Ezek. 1.1 2. In the fifth day of the moneth which was the fifth yeare of king Jehoiachins captivity Vers 15. And he carried away Jehoiachin to Babylon and the kings mother c. Yet he had no cause to repent that he had hearkened to Jeremiah in yielding up himself to Nebuchadnezzar for it fared better with him then with those that stayed behind yea in the thirty seventh yeare of his captivity he was greatly honoured by Evilmerodach the sonne of Nebuchadnezzar see ch 25. ver 27. In the seven and thirtieth yeare of the captivity of Jehoiachin c. Evilmerodach king of Babylon in the yeare that he began to reigne did lift up the head of Jehoiachin king of Judah out of prison and he spake kindly to him and set his throne above the throne of the kings that were with him c. Vers 16. And all the men of might even seven thousand c. See the note above on vers 14. Vers 17. And the king of Babylon made Mattaniah his fathers brother king in his stead and changed his name to Zedekiah So Pharaoh Necho gave Eliakim a new name when he made him king in stead of his brother chap. 23.34 and Daniel and his companions had new names given them Dan. 1.6 7. whereby it may appear that by imposing new names the conquerour shewed his power over them and caused them to acknowledge as it were that they
were his servants indeed this new name of Zedekiah which signifies the justice of God was very proper for this new king to put him in mind to be just in keeping the covenant he had made with the king of Babylon and that God would be just in punishing him if he proved perfidious but that Nebuchadnezzar intended any such thing by giving him this new name we cannot say Vers 18. And his mothers name was Hamutal the daughter of Jeremiah of Libnah So that he was the brother of Jehoahaz the first of Josiahs sonnes that was king of Judah and was afterwards by Pharaoh Necho carried into Egypt both by father and mother for this Hamutal was also the mother of Jehoahaz chapter 23.31 Vers 19. And he did that which was evil in the sight of the Lord c. In 2. Chron. 36.12 this is added in particular that he humbled not himself before Jeremiah the prophet speaking from the mouth of the Lord. Vers 20. Zedekiah rebelled against the king of Babylon c. About the beginning of Zedekiahs reigne the people began to insult over Jeremiah seeing Jehoiachin carried captive into Babylon that had yielded to Nebuchadnezzar upon his perswasion whereupon the Prophet under the type of good and bad figges foreshewed that it should be better with those in the captivity then those that were left behind Jerem. 24. After that in the fourth yeare Zedekiah went to Babylon to Nebuchadnezzar at which time the Prophet gave Sheraiah a prince that went with him a book wherein was written all the evil that should fall upon Babylon willing him to read it to the Jews and then to bind it to a stone and throw it into Euphrates in token of the perpetuall sinking of Babylon Jerem. 51.59 64. at his return as we see in the 27. and 28. chapters of Jeremiah all the bordering princes sent messengers to Zedekiah perswading him as it seems to revolt from Nebuchadnezzar but Jeremiah did earnestly disswade both him and them sending to each of those princes yokes in token of the Babylonian yoke whereunto the Lord would have them submit and assuring them that if they would not stoop to his yoke they should all perish by sword fire and pestilence at which time also Hananiah having broken Jeremiahs woodden yoke and vaunting that in like manner within two years Nebuchadnezzars yoke should be broken and Jeconiah with all the vessels and riches of the Temple should be brought again to Jerusalem Jeremiah foretold of an iron yoke and to assure the people that Hananiah had prophecyed falsely he foretold his death which that yeare accordingly in the second moneth seized upon him yet at length in the eighth yeare of his reigne Zedekiah practised more seriously with his neighbours and in confidence of great aids promised from Egypt he rebelled against Nebuchadnezzar though he had formerly taken an oath to be faithfull to him 2. Chron. 36.13 And he also rebelled against king Nebuchadnezzar CHAP. XXV Vers 2. ANd the city was besieged unto the eleventh yeare of king Zedekiah c. The city was surrounded on the tenth day of the tenth moneth in the ninth yeare of Zedekiahs reigne verse 1. and was taken by storm on the ninth day of the fourth moneth of the eleventh yeare the siege therefore continued a full yeare and an half when Nebuchadnezzar first came against the city Jeremiah had prophesied that the city should be taken and burnt and Zedekiah carried away captive though not slain as Jehoiakim was for which he was by the instigation of the princes clapped up in prison see Jer. 32 1 5.34.1 7. Jer. 17.38 c. Indeed a while the Chaldeans left the siege for Pharaoh Hophre a king of Egypt entring the borders of Judah with his army to succour Zedekiah Nebuchadnezzar and his Chaldeans fearing the disadvantage of being set upon by the Egyptian army whilest they lay before Jerusalem where the Jews might also assail them from within the city they resolved rather to raise the siege for a time At this time the Jews begun to entertain great hopes again and as it is probably thought having in their former extremity set free their bondmen as the law required by the advice of Zedekiah when the Chaldeans were gone they repented them of their charity and reduced them again into their former slavery see Jerem. 34.8 9 c. but Zedekiah knowing that if the Egyptians prevailed not they should soon be surrounded again with the Chaldean army he sent to Jeremiah the prophet to pray for him and received this message from him by his servants that the Chaldeans should return again and take the city and burn it with fire and being cast for this by the enraged princes into the dungeon under a pretence at first of his attempting to fly unto the Chaldeans he often earnestly perswaded Zedekiah to yield himself to the Chaldeans and so to save both himself and the city See Jerem. 37. and Jerem. 38. but he not hearkening to him what the Prophet had said came exactly to passe for the Egyptians not daring to encounter with Nebuchadnezzar did soon return again into Egypt and abandon their enterprize and on the other side the Chaldeans did as speedily return to the siege of Jerusalem and never after that left it till they had taken it Vers 3. The famine prevailed in the city and there was no bread for the people of the land Insomuch that as Ezekiel had prophecyed who begun to prophesie in the fifth yeare of Zedekiahs reigne Ezekiel 1.2 parents did eat their own children and children their parents Ezekiel 5.10 Therefore the fathers shall eat the sonnes in the middest of thee and the sonnes shall eat the fathers c. Lament 4.10 The hands of the pitifull women have sodden their own children they were their meat in the destruction of the daughter of my people Vers 4. And the city was broken up c. And so the middle gate was immediately taken Jerem. 39.3 And all the princes of the king of Babylon came in and sate in the middle gate c. and then as it followes all the men of warre fled by night by the way of the gate between two walls which is by the kings garden for there was it seems a secret gate in some place near to the kings garden closed upon each side with a false wall provided on purpose for a means of escape in such a time of danger and through this therefore the souldiers with the king Jerem 39.4 fled now out of the city being helped in their flight either by the darknesse of the night or by the advantage of a cave or vault under ground into which the secret gate led them and through which they might steal away the besiegers not seeing them and thus it came to passe as Ezekiel had foretold Ezek. 12.12 And the prince that is among them shall bear upon his shoulder in the twilight and shall go forth they shall dig thorough the wall to carry out
had kept himself out of the storm with Baalis king of the Ammonites Jer. 40.14 and being of the kings seed he now envied that the government should be committed to Gedaliah and stirred up also by the king of Ammon he made a conspiracy with some few more to slay Gedaliah this Johanan mentioned above vers 23. discovered to Gedaliah and offered his help to slay Ishmael Jer. 40.13 14. but Gedaliah being incredulous Ishmael had the better advantage to effect his purpose for whilest he was feasting with him he slew him and those that were with him Jer. 41.1 2 3. Ishmael the sonne of Nethaniah of the seed royall and ten men with him came to Gedaliah and they did eat bread in Mizpah together and Ishmael arose and ten men with him and smote Gedaliah the governour and all the Jews that were with him c. after this fourescore men coming from severall places of the kingdome in a most sad and mournfull manner because of the desolation that was fallen upon Jerusalem having certain offerings and incense with them which they purposed to offer to the Lord in the place where the Temple had stood the place which God had chosen though now ruined by the Chaldeans Ishmael having notice of it went forth to meet them and with counterfeit tears making shew that he also bare a part with them in their sorrow he invited them to go with him to Gedaliah thereby to try how they stood affected to him and so having gotten them into the city he slew them all ten of them onely excepted whom he spared because they promised to discover unto him some treasures hidden in the fields during the warres he also addressed himself presently to return to the Amonites and carried with him as captives all the inhabitants of that place and amongst the rest Zedekiahs daughters committed to the care of Gedaliah by Nebuchadnezzer but Johanan hearing of it with such forces as he could get pursued him presently and overtaking him at Gibeon the captives fell off him and Ishmael with eight men onely escaped by flight all which is largely related in the 40. and 41. chapter Vers 26. And all the people both small and great and the captains of the armies arose and came to Egypt c. Fearing the Babylonian would take occasion upon the murder of Gedaliah and the Chaldeans that were with him utterly to destroy all the Jewes that remained in the land Johanan and the other captains resolved to fly with the people that were left into Egypt first indeed they came to Jeremiah and asked counsel of him vowing to do as he should direct them from the Lord but when he answered them that if they stayed in the land God would shew them mercy but if they went down into Egypt they should all perish there they charged him with prophesying falsely in the name of the Lord and despising the oracle of God they went away to Egypt and carried both Jeremiah and Baruch along with them and inhabited near unto Taphnes where when Jeremiah continued to reprove them for their idolatry and to foretell the destruction of Egypt and of the Jews that sought to shelter themselves there for this with all before mentioned is largely related by Ieremiah in the 41 42 43 and 44. chapters of his prophesie he was at length there as other histories report stoned to death by his own ungratefull countrey-men Vers 27. And it came to passe in the seven and thirtieth yeare of the captivity of Jehoiachin c. Zedekiah died in prison in Babylon Jer. 52.11 Then he put out the eyes of Zedekiah and the king of Babylon bound him in chains and carried him to Babylon and put him in prison till the day of his death and had onely the honour of being buried as a prince and lamented at his buriall by his people Jer. 34.5 But thou shalt die in peace and with the buryings of thy fathers the former kings which were before thee so shall they burn odours for thee and they will lament thee saying Ah Lord for I have pronounced the word saith the Lord. But Jehoiachin because he yielded himself at Jeremiahs counsel to Nebuchadnezzer was at length by Evilmerodach the sonne of Nebuchadnezzer taken out of prison and used with all princely respect indeed whereas here it is said this was done on the seven and twentieth day of the twelfth moneth Jerem. 52.31 it is said to have been done on the five and twentieth day but the reason of this may be because order was given for his release on the five and twentieth day but it was not done till the seven and twentieth day as is here said ANNOTATIONS Upon the first book of the CHRONICLES CHAP. I. ADam Sheth Enosh c. In the book of the kings there is frequent mention of the book of the Chronicles of the kings of Israel and of the kings of Judah as 1. Kings 14.19 and 1. Kings 15.23 and in many other places But it is clear that these books of the Chronicles which are a part of the sacred Scriptures are not the very same that are there mentioned because many things which are there said to have been related are not here to be found as we see 1. Kings 14.19 Yet these were happely collected out of those and that by Ezra as it is generally thought Their chief scope is to give us the history of the kings of Judah entirely by it self without intermingling the story of the kings of Israel as it is in the books of the kings and especially to adde such remarkable passages concerning Judahs kingdome as were omitted in the books of the kings whence they are called by the Greek Interpreters Paralipomena that is passages formerly passed by and omitted In the first foure verses we have the line of Adam to Noah no other of the posterity of Adam being mentioned because they were all destroyed in the floud Vers 5. The sonnes of Japheth Gomer c. See Gen. 10.1 Vers 10. And Cush begat Nimrod he began to be mighty upon the earth See Gen. 10.8 Vers 18. And Arphaxad begat Shelah The Septuagint in their Greek translation of the old Testament do both here and also Gen. 10.14 insert one generation more then is in the Hebrew reading the text thus And Arphaxad begat Cainan and Cainan begat Shelah And yet herein according to our translation Luke the Evangelist followeth the corrupt Septuagint translation rather then the Hebrew copies Luke 3.35 36. making Salah or Shelah the sonne of Cainan and Cainan the sonne of Arphaxad Now to this it is answered that the Evangelist did this because the Septuagint translation was then of great esteem and of most frequent use amongst the Jews and therefore he would not for so small a matter and of no importance minister any occasion of contention it being sufficient for him to shew that Christ was the sonne of David even according to the genealogy of David set down by the Septuagint which in
yeare of king Jeroboam began Abijah to reigne over Judah c. Or Abijam see the notes 1. Kings 15.1 2. Vers 4. And Abijah stood upon mount Zemaraim which is in mount Ephraim and said Hear me thou Jeroboam and all Israel c. To wit having first by his Heralds or messengers desired a parley or at least liberty to say somewhat that he had to say both to Jeroboam and the people for otherwise being so near the enemy that they might heare what he said he could not have stood thus to speak to them without danger Vers 5. The Lord God of Israel gave the kingdome over Israel to David for ever even to him and to his sonnes by a covenant of salt See Numbers 18.19 Vers 7. And there are gathered to him vain men the children of Belial See Deut. 13.13 And have strengthened themselves against Rehoboam the sonne of Solomon when Rehoboam was young and tender hearted c. That is when Rehoboam was newly entred upon his kingdome unexperienced in matters of state and much more in warlike affaires as having alwayes been brought up in his fathers peaceable reigne delicately and daintily and being not yet settled in that throne as a plant that hath not yet taken root was easily shaken and terrified with the insolencies of his rebellious subjects that thus we must understand these words is evident because Rehoboam was one and fourty years old when he began to reigne as we may see 1. Kings 14.21 Vers 10. The Lord is our God and we have not forsaken him c. Though he walked in all the sinnes of his father Rehoboam 1. Kings 15.3 and suffered idolatry in his kingdome which his sonne Asa did afterwards reform 1. Kings 15.12 13. yet because withall the true religion was openly professed and the true worship of the true God openly and incorruptly maintained in the Temple at Jerusalem he boasts of their assurance of Gods favour and seeks to scare the Israelites from hoping to maintain their party against them Vers 11. The shew-bread also set they in order upon the pure table c. That is upon the tables of the shew-bread And so we must also understand the next clause and the candlestick of gold c. for there were in the Temple ten candlesticks and ten tables chap. 4.7 8. and it is but a poore conceit of some that because but one table here is mentioned therefore Shishak had carryed away the rest for thus also table is put for tables 1. Kings 7.48 Vers 17. So there fell down slain of Israel five hundred thousand And yet the men of Judah that slew them were but foure hundred thousand in all vers 3. Vers 19. And Abijah pursued after Jeroboam and took cities from him Beth-el with the townes thereof c. Which stood in the borders of Benjamin and Ephraim Josh 18.13 and had in it one of Jeroboams calves 1. Kings 12.29 some conceive that this is meant of another Beth-el because Jeroboams idol stood still and was not destroyed in the dayes of Asa c. but this is no sufficient argument since perhaps this Beth-el was afterwards recovered from the kings of Judah and perhaps was now taken by composition c. Vers 20. Neither did Jeroboam recover strength again in the dayes of Abijah and the Lord stroke him and he dyed That is Jeroboam for of Abijahs death the text speaks after chap. 14.1 perhaps he was struck in the dayes of Abijah but he dyed not till the second yeare of Asa the sonne of Abijah Vers 21. But Abijah waxed mighty and married foureteen wives and begat twenty and two sonnes and sixteen daughters Partly before he was king and partly after for he reigned in all but three years 1. Kings 15.2 CHAP. XIIII Vers 1. SO Abijah slept with his fathers c. and Asa his sonne reigned in his stead In the twentieth yeare of Jeroboam 1. Kings 15.9 where also are many severall Annotations that may serve for the explaining of severall passages in this chapter Vers 9 And came unto Mareshah A city in Judah Josh 15.44 Vers 13. And Asa and the people that were with him pursued them unto Gerar. Which was a city of the Philistines whereby it seems very probably that they also joyned with the Ethiopians in invading the land of Judah especially because it is expressely also said in the following verse that they smote all the cities round about Gerar. Vers 15. They smote all the tents of cattell c. That is the tents of the Arabians who indeed were wont to dwell in tents and so to remove from place to place for the feeding of their cattell It seems the Ethiopians passing through Arabia the Arabians aided them in their invasions of the land of Judah and so now Asa and his souldiers smote their tents and carryed from them abundance of cattel CHAP. XV. Vers 2. THe Lord is with you whilest ye be with him c. As if he should have said By experience you now see in this your victory over the Ethiopians that whilest you walk in Gods wayes he will not fail to blesse you Vers 3. Now for a long season Israel had been without the true God c. That is now for a long time ever since their revolting from Rehoboam the ten tribes have lived under Jeroboam in a manifest apostacie from the true God not having Gods priests to instruct them and not regarding the law of God according to which they ought in all things to have ordered themselves Vers 4. But when they in their trouble did turn unto the Lord God of Israel and sought him he was found of them That is in former times when the Israelites in their trouble did repent and return unto the Lord he was alwayes ready to receive them into his favour again And this is added to imply that though the ten tribes had thus forsaken the Lord yet if they would as in former times have returned to the Lord he would have pardoned them Vers 5. And in those times there was no peace c. That is ever since the revolting of the ten tribes from Rehoboam and their apostacie from the true God whereof he had before spoken vers 3. Vers 6. And Nation was destroyed of nation c. To wit in the warres betwixt the kingdome of Judah and the kingdome of Israel wherein they also made use of the auxilliary forces of other nations Vers 7. Be ye strong therefore and let not your hands be weak for your work shall be rewarded That is go couragiously and constantly forward in the reformation begun amongst you and the Lord shall be still with you Vers 8. And when Asa heard these words and the prophecy of Oded the prophet he took courage and put away the abominable idols c. Either this is meant of some prophecy of Oded the father of this Azariah which he declared unto them at this time together with this his own exhortation or else of some prophesie of
32. Also we made ordinances for us to charge our selves yearely with the third part of a shekel for the service of the house of our God Vers 7. For the sonnes of Athaliah that wicked woman had broken up the house of God c. To promote the worship of Baalim they robbed the Temple and so there was not in the treasuries of the Temple any competent summe of money whereby the decayes thereof might be repaired Indeed the sonnes of Joram by Athaliah were all slain by the Arabians save onely Ahaziah chap. 21.17 But this might be done before that Vers 8. And at the kings commandment they made a chest The Levites being forbidden by Joash to meddle any more with the collection of the money because of their former neglect 2. Kings 12.7 And set it without the gate of the house of the Lord. To wit by the gate whereby they went out of the great court and on that side the gate where the altar stood 2. Kings 12.9 Vers 14. They brought the rest of the money before the king and Jehoiada whereof were made vessels for the house of the Lord c. See 2. Kings 12.13 Vers 16. And they buried him in the citie of David amongst the kings because he had done good in Israel both towards God and towards his house That is the house and family of David or rather the Temple the house of God Vers 17. Now after the death of Jehoiada came the princes of Judah and made obeysance to the king c. In the most fawning and flattering manner they presented themselves before him and withall petitioned him that every one might worship God as they pleased themselves namely in the high places after the manner of their fathers to wit because it was burthensome to go up from all places to the Temple or because every one desired to have his own proper place of devotion Now this request is implyed though not expressed in the following words then the king hearkned to them and they left the house of the Lord God of their fathers Vers 18. And wrath came upon Judah and Jerusalem for this their trespasse For Hazael king of Syria as it is related 2. Kings 12.17 invaded the land and having taken Gath addressed himself to Jerusalem having sufficient pretence for what he did if his ambition cared for pretence because the kings of Judah had formerly assisted the Israelites against the Syrians at Ramoth Gilead and so formidable to Joash was this approch of Hazael towards Jerusalem that he took all the hallowed things and all the gold that was found in the treasures of the Temple and in his own house and with that present purchased his peace Some conceive that this invasion of Hazael mentioned in the Kings is the same with that inrode of the Syrians spoken of vers 23. of this chapter but that cannot be for this was before the slaying of Zachariah vers 20. that after it vers 23. in this the matter was compounded without a battel in that a battel was fought to Joash his great losse vers 24. in this Hazael was present 2. Kings 12.11 in that the Syrians sent the spoil they took to their king at Damascus vers 23. And last of all in this the Syrians had great forces else Joash would not have been afraid of them in that they came with a small band of men vers 24. Vers 20. And the spirit of God came upon Zechariah the sonne of Jehoiada the priest c. It is a great question amongst Expositours whether this were that Zechariah of whom our Saviour spake Matth. 23.35 From the bloud of righteous Abel unto the bloud of Zacharias sonne of Barachias whom ye slew c. Most conceive it is and that because this Zechariah was slain by the Jews and that as is expressed in the following verse in the court of the house Lord nor do we reade in Scripture of any other Zechariah that was so slain for though this was the sonne of Jehoiada and that Zachariah of whom Christ speaks is expressely called there the sonne of Barachias yet to this it may be answered that Jehoiada was so called Barachias or that he is called Barachias which signifies the blessed of the Lord because he was in his time such a blessed instrument of so much good to the people of God and it may well be the drift of Christs words to shew that the bloud of all that were long ago slain should be charged upon that generation and so in that regard this Zechariah is joyned there with Abel But now others hold that it is not this Zechariah of whom our Saviour speaks there but that Zachariah which is last but one of the small Prophets that was raised up of God to encourage the people that were come back from Babylon to rebuild the Temple And indeed first because that Zachariah is expressely called the sonne of Barachiah Zach. 1.1 as it were purposely to distinguish him from this Zechariah the sonne of Jehoiada And secondly because the words of our Saviour seem rather to imply that all the bloud of Gods righteous servants slain in former times from the first to the last should be charged upon them and so Abel is mentioned as the first and Zachariah as the last I cannot see but that very probably it may be understood of that Zachariah and that he after the reedifying of the Temple flying to the altar for Sanctuary when the Jews were for some cause enraged against him was there slain as our Saviour saith between the Temple and the altar Vers 25. For they left him in great diseases To wit by reason of wounds received in the fight or some exquisite tortures which happely the Syrians had put him to His own servants conspired against him for the bloud of the sonnes of Jehoiada the priest c. Hereby it may appear that having slain Zechariah they slew also his brethren the sonnes of Jehoiada perhaps lest they should avenge his death yet some conceive that the plurall number is put for the singular sonnes for sonne as it is also in many other places CHAP. XXV Vers 1. AMaziah was twenty and five years old when he began to reigne c. To wit in the second yeare of Joash king of Israel See the notes for this chapter 2. Kings 14.1 c. Vers 13. But the souldiers of the army which Amaziah sent back that they should not go with him to battel fell upon the cities of Judah from Samaria even unto Beth-horon Beth-horon was one of the cities of Ephraim Josh 15.3 but because some of the Israelites cities had been taken by the kings of Judah in the warres betwixt those two kingdomes therefore it is here said that in their return from Samaria they fell upon the cities of Judah from Samaria to Beth-horon Vers 23. And Joash the king of Israel took Amaziah king of Judah the sonne of Joash the sonne of Jehoahaz c. That is the sonne of Ahaziah
Persia above twenty years he gave the Jews libertie to return again into their own countrey we must know that Nebuchadnezzar after the taking of Jerusalem had subdued all the nations round about as was prophesied of him yea even Egypt amongst the rest the greatest and strongest of all those bordering nations Jer. 25.9 10 11. Behold I will send and take all the families of the north saith the Lord and Nebuchadrezzar the king of Babylon my servant and will bring them against this land and against the inhabitants thereof and against all these nations round about c. And this whole land shall be a desolation and an astonishment and these nations shall serve the king of Babylon seventy years Isa 20.4 So shall the king of Assyria lead away the Egyptians prisoners and the Ethiopians captives young and old naked and barefoot see also Jer. 43.10 11. and 44.30 and thus was the Babylonian Empire raised by Nebuchadnezzar which he left to Evilmerodach his sonne and he to Belshazzar his sonne according to that Jer. 27.7 All nations shall serve him and his sonne and his sonnes sonne But then in Belshazzars time this great Empire was ruined by the Medes and Persians who besieged Babylon took it and destroyed it utterly and slew Belshazzar and so fulfilled what was prophesied Isa 47.1 Come down and sit in the dust O virgin daughter of Babylon sit on the ground there is no throne O daughter of the Chaldeans c. and so Jer. 50.1 2 3. and thus the Empire was translated from the Babylonians to the Persians indeed in this warre against Babylon the Medes had the chief stroke for Darius Medus or Cyaxares did command in chief in this warre and the army consisted most of his people Isa 13.17 Behold I will stirre up the Medes against them which shall not regard silver c. and Jer. 51.11 The Lord hath raised up the spirit of the kings of the Medes for his device is against Babylon c. and therefore when Balthazar or Belshazzar was slain he was made king Dan. 5.30 31. In that night was Belshazzar the king of the Chaldeans slain and Darius the Median took the kingdome being about threescore and two years old but yet withall first because Cyrus who was then absolute king of Persia or Viceroy thereof under Darius the Mede did joyn with Darius in this expedition against Babylon and by his valour and policie chiefly the citie was taken as being the man preordained and forenamed by God himself for this great action secondly because Darius it seems stayed not in Babylon but returned into Media and left Cyrus as his Viceroy in his room and thirdly because Darius who was Cyrus his great uncle and as some think his father in law also lived not full two years after but left all to Cyrus his heir therefore even from the first Cyrus was esteemed the Monarch of those parts and however in truth till the death of his uncle Darius the Mede he was absolute Monarch but held also under him as his Viceroy as is evident Dan. 6.28 This Daniel prospered in the reigne of Darius and in the reigne of Cyrus the Persian yet the very first yeare after the conquest of Babylon was reckoned as the first yeare of Cyrus reigne as we see here where it is said that in the first yeare of Cyrus king of Persia God stirred up his spirit to let the Jews go home to their own countrey c. that the word of the Lord by the mouth of Jeremiah might be fulfilled to wit the promise concerning the deliverance of the Jews out of their captivitie at the end of seventy years through the favour of Cyrus Jer. 29.10 After seventy years be accomplished at Babylon I will visit you and perform my good word towards you in causing you to return this place Vers 2. Thus saith Cyrus king of Persia The Lord God of heaven hath given me all the kingdomes of the earth c. It seems that by Daniel or some other of the Jews that it was discovered to Cyrus that many years before the Lord had told them by his prophets that one Cyrus should vanquish Babylon with other nations and then should freely deliver the Jews out of their captivitie and cause their citie and Temple to be again built all which for his better satisfaction they might shew him in the writings of the Prophet Isaiah Isa 44.1 13. And hence it was that he acknowledged that God had charged him to build the Temple and confessed that those kingdomes which he had subdued were given him of God using these high terms The Lord God hath given me all the kingdomes of the earth either out of an affectation of the universall Monarchy of the whole world or out of an hyperbolicall ostentation of the largenesse of his Empire to which all the kingdomes in those parts of the world were subdued according to those expressions we meet with elsewhere Luke 2.1 There went out a decree from Cesar Augustus that all the world should be taxed and Acts 2.5 And there was dwelling at Jerusalem Jews devout men out of every nation Vers 4. And whosoever remaineth in any place where he sojourneth let the men of his place help him with silver c. That is whosoever abideth as a stranger or sojourner in any place of my dominion and hath a mind to go up to Jerusalem let the men that dwell in that place furnish him with all provisions requisite for his journey beside that which they shall send by them as a free-will-offering for the building or service of the Temple the transporting of silver and gold and other commodities is in many places severely forbidden and so happely it was there the king therefore gives licence to the Jews by his proclamation for the carrying away of these things and withall encourageth the people to afford them what help they could by letting them know that his desire was they should be plentifully furnished with all things necessary Vers 5. Then rose up the chief of the fathers of Judah and Benjamin and the priests and the Levites with all them whose spirit God had raised to go up c. To wit both of these and the other tribes also some even of Judah and Benjamin went not as being well settled where they were and loth to remove or desirous to see first how these will speed but those whose spirits God had stirred up went not of these tribes onely but of others also 1. Chron. 9.3 And in Jerusalem dwelt of the children of Judah and of the children of Benjamin and of the children of Ephraim and Manasseh and therefore some conceive that at this time that prophesie of Ezekiel was fulfilled Ezek. 37.16 17.21 22. Sonne of man take thee one stick and write upon it For Judah and for the children of Israel his companions then take another stick and write upon it For Joseph the stick of Ephraim and for all the house of Israel his
of the dedication of the Temple was on this moneth 1. Kings 8.2 c. therefore the people having spent some time in settling their own domesticall affairs in the severall towns and cities where they were to dwell at least the seventh moneth approaching they did unanimously assemble together unto Jerusalem that they might build the altar and prepare for the keeping of these solemnities Vers 3. And they set the altar upon his bases c. That is they built the altar upon the foundations of Solomons altar which were still standing and the reason of this is added in the following words for fear was upon them because of the people of those countries that is they laid not a new foundation for haste because they feared that if it were not soon dispatched they should be hindred by the Samaritanes the neighbouring inhabitants of that countrey who already it seems began to threaten them and to bandy against them Yet some conceive that in these words a reason is given not why they built the altar upon the old bases or foundations of Solomons altar but why they would not stay the building of the altar till the temple was built it was because they were afraid of the Samaritanes and so they hastened the building of the altar that by offering up sacrifices to God they might seek his favour and assistance against those their envious and malignant neighbours Vers 4. They kept also the feast of tabernacles c. With what extraordinary solemnity this feast was afterward kept we see Neh. 8.13.18 Vers 6. From the first day of the seventh moneth began they to offer burnt offerings c. Which was the day appointed by the law for the feast of trumpets Levit. 23.24 In the seventh moneth in the first day of the moneth shall ye have a sabbath a memoriall of blowing of trumpets Vers 9. Then stood Joshua with his sonnes and his brethren c. Not the sonne of Josedech the high priest but a Levite of the same name of whom mention is made before chap. 2.40 Vers 11. Giving thanks unto the Lord because he is good for his mercie endureth for ever towards Israel c. To wit singing the 118. or the 136. Psalme See 2. Chron. 5.13 and 7.3 Vers 12. Ancient men that had seen the first house when the foundation of this house was laid before their eyes wept with a loud voice c. To wit both because many of the holy things that were in the former house were like to be wanting in this and especially because the glory of this building was not likely to equall the glory of the first which Solomon built a shadow intimating the wearing away of the legall ceremonies Yea thus it continued to be with the people when afterwards the building of the Temple went forward in the dayes of Darius whence it was that Haggai the Prophet who prophesied in the second yeare of Darius the king Hag. 1.1 did encourage and comfort the people with that promise Hag. 2.9 The glory of this latter house shall be greater then of the former which yet he meant not of the glory of the building but of the glorious appearance of Christ the promised Messiah herein nor needs it seem strange that some were now living that had seen the former Temple for that was destroyed in the eleventh yeare of the captivitie 2. Kings 25. and therefore it was but threescore years after that when the foundations of this new house were laid CHAP. IV. Vers 2. THen they came to Zerubbabel and to the chief of the fathers and said unto them Let us build with you c. This they did doubtlesse not out of any sincere desire to set forward the building or to advance the worship of God for these Samaritanes that spake this were alwayes deadly enemies to the Jews but either to curry favour with Cyrus for because he now favoured the Jews and gave way to the building of the Temple therefore they would be as one people with them and approve it by joyning with them in this holy work or else out of hope that their people being mingled with the Jews in this work there would some contention arise and so the work would be hindred yet to the end they might prevail with the Jews they alledged they served and sacrificed to the true God of Israel as indeed they pretended to do though withall they served their idol-gods too 2. Kings 17.33 They feared the Lord and served their own Gods even since the dayes of Esarhaddon king of Assur who was the sonne of Shalmaneser and grandchild of Sennacherib 2. Kings 19.37 and it seems brought a new colony of severall nations into the land of Samaria as his father had done before him Vers 3. You have nothing to do with us to build an house unto our God c. Thus Zerubbabel and the rest answered the Samaritanes because they were idolatours and neither were of the stock of Israel nor did purely worship the God of Israel therefore they protested against them that they had nothing to do with the Temple to sacrifice there and so also not to joyn with them in the building of it alledging withall that they would build it themselves as say they king Cyrus the king of Persia hath commanded us wherein they give them to understand that the commission they had from the king did warrant them to do what they did Vers 4. Then the people of the land weakned the hands of the people of Judah c. That is when Samaritanes could not by fraud accomplish their desires because the Jews would not admit them to joyn with them in building the Temple then they used other means to hinder them in their work to wit partly by threatning them and by raising any false rumours that might discourage them and partly no doubt by using all means that they might not have those materials and money out of the kings revenues which Cyrus had commanded should be given them for the building of the Temple chap. 6.3 4. Vers 5. And hired counsellours against them to frustrate their purpose c. That is the Samaritanes did not onely do what themselves could to hinder the Jews in building the Temple but by bribes also they secretly hired such as were powerfull with the king of Persia to wit the deputies and governours in Samaria and other provinces yea and those that were of his privie counsel in Persia to advise the king by many false pretences and informations to disanull that decree which had been made for the building of it and this they did all the dayes of Cyrus king of Persia even untill the reigne of Darius king of Persia that is all the dayes of Cyrus and Cambyses his sonne and Smerdis the Magus who a while usurped the kingdome after Cambyses death unto the second yeare of Darius the sonne of Hystaspes when the work of the Temple was again set forward vers 24. So it ceased unto the second yeare of
of comforting him or that he might come into the court yea happely that he might come to her and acquaint her with the cause of his sorrow Vers 7. And Mordecai told him of all that had happened unto him c. That is he told Hatach whom Esther had sent to him how Haman had taken offence at him for not bowing to him and how in his rage he had procured a decree for the destroying the whole nation of the Jews which was doubtlesse the more grievous to Mordecai because it proceeded from the rage of that proud wretch against him in particular Vers 8. And to charge her that she should go in unto the king c. To wit in the name of Mordecai whom she still reverenced as her foster father chap. 2.20 Esther did the commandment of Mordecai like as when she was brought up with him and for a publick service of Gods Church notwithstanding her greatnesse he doubted not to lay a charge upon her Vers 11. Whosoever whether man or woman shall come unto the king into the inner court who is not called there is one law of his to put him to death c. Thus the Persian kings provided for their own safety and withall as they conceived to work the more â—aw and reverence in the hearts of the people But I have not been called to come in unto the king these thirty dayes This she addes as a ground of some fear lest the kings affection toward her should by some means be abated and if so her attempting to go in to the kings presence without a call must needs be perillous Vers 16. I also and my maidens will fast likewise It is evident that on the third of the three dayes appointed for the fast chap. 5.1 Esther laid by her mourning weeds and put on her royall apparell and feasted the same day vers 4 5. both the king and Haman and there is no doubt to be made but that she went in to the king ere the last of their fasting was ended purposely that she might then venture to go in to the king unsent for when her brethren were imployed in fasting and prayer to beg of God that the king might shew her favour Either therefore this is meant onely that as they fasted so would the likewise and not that she meant to fast three entire nights and dayes as they should or else it must be said that as they so she likewise fasted three dayes night and day because she fasted three nights for the Jews began their dayes at the evening and part of the third day much after the expression of the time of Christs being in the grave Matth. 12.40 Nor needs it seem strange that she undertakes for her maids that they should fast likewise for first though they were before of an other religion yet doubtlesse she did what she might to instruct them in the knowledge of the true God and secondly partly by her favour at first with Hegai the kings chamberlain chap. 2.8 9. and partly by the respect afforded her by all when she was queen she might well have liberty to make choice of her own servants and so might choose such as were of the stock of the Jews And if I perish I perish That is I referre my self to Gods good providence not being unwilling to die rather then shrink from my duty herein And indeed considering what had befallen Vashti the former queen for disobeying the kings command she could not but think there was much danger to attempt to go in to the king against the law CHAP. V. Vers 1. NOw it came to passe on the third day c. To wit of their fasting before that day was fully ended of which see the note in the foregoing chapter vers 16. She put on her royall apparell and stood in the inner court of the kings house over against the kings house It seems at the entrance of the kings house there was some large and stately porch such as was Solomons porch of judgement 1. Kings 7.7 where the king sate upon his royall throne as it is here said and so by this means as soon as Esther was come into the inner court and stood before the kings house he presently saw her c. Vers 2. She obtained favour in his sight and the king held out to Esther the golden sceptre c. To wit in token that he called her to come near to him and consequently had pardoned her coming in to the inner court not being sent for and indeed considering what absolute obedience the Persian Monarchs required of their subjects to all their decrees and that Vashti his former queen whom happely he had formerly loved as well as Esther was cast off for as small an offence as this of Esthers and withall that it was above thirty dayes since Esther was called in to the king which was hinted chap. 4.11 as some ground of fear lest the heat of the king to her began to abate we may well think there was a speciall hand of God in moving the kings heart to shew her favour which was the gracious answer returned to his peoples fasting and prayer So Esther drew near and touched the top of the sceptre As happely the custome was and that as a sign of reverence and subjection and of her thankfull apprehending and embracing that favour he had now afforded her by holding out that his sceptre unto her Vers 3. What is thy request it shall be even given thee to the half of the kingdome This was it seems a proverbiall speech whereby in those times princes used liberally to promise what ever should be desired though not intending literally that if they asked half of the kingdome it should be given them As we see in the promise of Herod to the daughter of Herodias Mark 6.23 And he sware unto her whatsoever thou shalt ask of me I will give it thee unto the half of my kingdome Vers 4. Let the king and Haman come this day unto the banquet that I have prepared for him Esther shewed much wisedome in desiring that this favour might be done her before she made known the petition she had to make unto the king first because by her intended entertaining the king at a feast she hoped his love might yet further be enflamed towards her secondly because she might not hold it so safe to discover at this time either her parentage or petition when the king was attended with his nobles and courtiers who out of their zeal to have the decrees of the Persians preserved irrevocable or in favour to Haman might oppose her request for the recalling of that decree concerning the Jews which the king had made but judged it more seasonable to do this at a private banquet where onely her own servants might be by to attend them thirdly because Haman not being now present what she alledged against him might be presently carried to him and then he might have slipped away and hid himself
house of the Lord and came by the way of the gate of the guard to the kings house That is the gate of the kings house where the guard usually stood CHAP. XII Vers 3. BUt the high places were not taken away c. So long had the people been inured to this erroneous worship of God that it seems even Jehoiada himself durst not advice the king to proceed to the reformation of this evil also for fear of causing some tumult amongst them Vers 4. And Jehoash said to the priests all the the money of the dedicated things c. The Temple was at this time sallen into great decay through the wickednesse of former kings but especially of Athaliah For the sonnes of Athaliah that wicked woman 2. Chron. 24.7 had broken up the house of God and also all the dedicate things of the house of the Lord did the bestow upon Baalim the first act therefore that Jehoash took in hand when he began to rule without a protectour was the reparation of that holy place as indeed most requisite it was that he should be carefull to uphold the Temple that had been the nursery of his infancy and the best means to secure his life and to uphold his just title to the crown of Judah and to this end he enjoyned the priests carefully to gather all the money of the dedicated things that is all the money dedicated to the service and repair of the Temple and then the particulars are expressed purposely I conceive to distinguish this money from that which was brought in for the use of the priests themselves as the money for the redemption of the first born and such like namely first the money of every one that passeth the account that is the half shekel that they were to pay when they were numbred from twenty years old and upward Exod. 30.12 13. which is therefore called 2. Chron. 24.6 the collection of Moses the servant of the Lord and of the congregation of Israel for the tabernacle of witnesse and vers 9. the collection that Moses the servant of God laid upon Israel in the wildernesse concerning which see the notes Exod. 30.12 13. secondly the money that every man is set at that is the money which any man shall by the priest be appointed to pay for his redemption when he hath vowed himself to God according to that law Levit. 27.2 c. of which see the note there and thirdly all the money that cometh into any mans heart to bring into the house of the Lord that is which any man shall voluntarily give for the reparation of the house Vers 5. Let the priests take it to them every man of his acquaintance In 2. Chron. 24.5 it is said that Joash appointed them to go out unto the cities of Judah and gather this money from yeare to yeare this receiving it therefore every man of his acquaintance is meant of their gathering it in the severall cities where they dwelt for the Levites were dispersed in severall cities of Judah where they were acquainted and well known amongst the people Vers 7. Now therefore receive no more money of your acquaintance but deliver it in for the breaches of the house That is he enjoyned them to meddle no more with the receiving of the money but to pay in that which they had already received when the king first set on foot this work as he appointed them to collect the moneyes above mentioned for the repairing of the temple so also he charged them to hasten the work 2. Chron. 24.5 Go out unto the cities of Judah and gather of all Israel money to repair the house of your God from yeare to yeare and see that ye hasten the matter when therefore in the twenty third yeare of his reigne he saw that yet nothing was done he took it for granted that either they had been negligent in collecting the money or that they did not faithfully pay in what they received or at least that the people suspecting their diverting of it to their own private uses did not pay it so willingly as otherwise they would and therefore he took the work out of their hands and appointed another way for the gathering of the money as is afterward expressed Vers 9. But Jehoiada the priest took a chest and bored a hole in the lid of it c. To wit by the command of the king 2. Chron. 24.8 to prevent all suspicion for the time to come of any corruption in this businesse first they made this chest whereinto the money should be put and wherein it should be kept and then they made a proclamation throughout the kingdome that every man should bring in the appointed contribution which accordingly was done with much alacrity and willingnesse 2. Chron. 24.9 10. Vers 10. The kings Scribe and the high priest came up and they put it up in baggs c. In 2. Chron. 24.11 it is the kings Scribe and the high priests officers came up and emptied the chest c. Vers 13. Howbeit there were not made for the house of the Lord bowls of silver snuffers c. That is not till the temple was fully repaired but when that work was finished the money that was left was imployed in making these vessels for the house 2. Chron. 24.14 Vers 16. The trespasse-money and sinne-money was not brought into the house of the Lord it was the priests That is the money which by the law those men were to pay by way of satisfaction according to the estimation of the priests that had any way wronged the Lord in his holy things Levit. 5.15 whether it were done ignorantly or wittingly in both the cases satisfaction was to be made and the one of these is called trespasse-money and the other sinne-money Vers 17. Then Hazael king of Syria went up Notwithstanding this fair beginning of Jehoash his reigne no sooner was Jehoiada dead but by his flattering princes he was drawn away to the worship of idols and so wrath came upon Judah and Jerusalem for this their trespasse 2. Chron. 24.17 18. namely by Gods letting loose Hazael king of Syria upon them as is here said from whom they were fain to purchase their peace by a great summe of money as is expressed vers 18. Vers 20. And his servants arose and made a conspiracie and slew Joash c. Some other passages are recorded in the Chronicles not here expressed as first when sundry prophets had in vain laboured to reclaim both king and people from their idolatry at length Zachariah the sonne of Jehoiada the priest was by the Spirit of the Lord stirred up to admonish them of their wickednesse who did it accordingly with great courage assuring them that this was the cause of Hazaels prevailing against them whereupon a conspiracie was made against him and by the kings commandment who forgat what his father Jehoiada had done for him he was stoned to death secondly that according to the prayer of this
of the countrey and therefore the royall citie of the kings of Israel before Samaria as is here clearly implyed in that it is said that Menahem smote all the coast of Tiphsah from Tirzah that is as farre as Tirzah therefore I conceive that this was some other Tiphsah that was not farre from Tirzah The cause why Menahem smote this city is here said to be because they opened not to him it seems they refused to acknowledge him for their king and would not open their gates to receive him whereupon being enraged against them like a true tyrant to make the other cities afraid to follow their example he smote not onely the city but all the coasts about it destroying the inhabitants and exercising therein all kind of crueltie as appears by the particular instance here given all the women therein that were with child he ript up Vers 19. And Pull the king of Assyria came against the land c. This was the first Babylonian Monarch called in other writers Belosus and Phul-Belosus The Assyrians had hitherto been the great Monarchs of the world but this Pull or Belosus joyning with Arbaces the Mede besieged Sardanapalus the last of the Assyrian Monarchs an effeminate prince and hated of all his subjects untill at last after two years siege in despair he burnt himself and thereupon his Monarchy was divided Arbaces taking to himself the Empire of the Medes and Persians and Pull or Belosus the Empire of Babylon and Assyria and therefore called himself the king of Assyria and this was he that now invaded the land of Israel and though the cause of the invasion be not here expressed yet most likely it is that by the Arabians and Syrians from whom Jeroboam the second had taken much chap. 14.28 He recovered Damascus and Hamath c. he was now called in to invade the kingdome of Israel when it had been many years together weakened by those civill and intestine broiles before mentioned that were in the land And Menahem gave Pull a thousand talents of silver that his hand might be with them c. That is he not onely purchased his peace with the Assyrian king by that gift but also procured a promise of his aid upon all occasions for the establishment of his kingdome whereby it is evident that though he had usurped the kingdome yet he enjoyed it not without opposition Vers 25. And smote him in Samaria in the palace of the kings house with Argob and Arieh and with him fifty men of the Gileadites These it seems were Pekahs partners in his conspiracie against Pekahiah the sonne of Menahem Vers 29. In the dayes of Pekah king of Israel came Tiglath-pileser king of Assryia c. He is called Tilgath-pilneser 1. Chron. 5.26 and was doubtlesse the sonne of Pull king of Assyria that had not many years before invaded the land in the dayes of Menahem vers 19. and therefore called Tiglath-pull-assir the cause why he now came into the land of Israel is expressed elsewhere though it be not mentioned here it seems this Pekah king of Israel combined with Rezin king of Syria against Ahaz king of Judah and did first severally invade his land and sorely oppressed him and then afterwards joyntly went up to besiege Ahaz king of Judah in Jerusalem whereupon Ahaz being at the same time invaded also in other parts of his kingdomes by other neighbouring nations sent to this great king of Assyria to desire his help against these two kings as is expressed in the following chapter vers 7. So Ahaz sent messengers to Tiglath-pileser king of Assyria saying I am thy servant and thy sonne come up and save me out of the hand of the king of Syria and out of the hand of the king of Israel which rise up against me and thereupon he came as he desired into the land of Israel the rather happely because this Pekah had slain the sonne of Menahem whom his father Pull had settled in the kingdome of Israel as is before noted and so took the severall places here mentioned in the kingdome of Israel to wit Ijon and Abel-beth-maachah and Janoah a town belonging to Ephraim Josh 16.6 and Kedesh and Hazer cities of Napthali Josh 19.36 37. and Gilead that is all the land without Jordan where the Rubenites and Gadites and half tribe of Manasseh had their possessions and Galilee all the land of Napthali and carried them captive to Assyria so that indeed at this time he subdued in a manner five tribes of Israel to wit those without Jordan who as they had first their inheritance given them so they were now first carried away captives and the tribes of Zebulon and Napthali who were seated in the land of Galilee And this was the first captivity of Israel Neither do we ever reade that these that were now carried away or their posterity did ever return again into the land of Israel as those of Judah did that were afterwards carried into Babilon whence it is that when the prophet Isaiah threatned the Jewes with the captivity of Babilon he added this as a comfort that their calamity should not be such as when their brethren of Israel were carryed captive into Assyria Isa 9.1 Neverthelesse the dimnesse shall not be such as was in her vexation when at the first he lightly afflicted the land of Zebulon and the land of Naphtali and afterwards did more grievously afflict her by the way of the sea beyond Jordan in Galilee of the nations Vers 30. And Hoshea the sonne of Elah made a conspiracie against Pekah c. Doubtlesse the people of Israel were greatly enraged because so many of their tribes were carried away captive into Assyria by Tiglath-pileser king of Assyria and laid all the blame upon this their unfortunate king Pekah partly because by making warre against Ahaz king of Judah causelessely he had provoked Ahaz to call in the Assyrians to his help and partly because he got the kingdome by slaying Pekahiah the sonne of Menahem whom the Assyrian king had settled in the throne of Israel Now being thus fallen under the contempt and hatred of his people it is no wonder that Hoshea should find enow that would joyn with him in a conspiracy to kill him which accordingly they accomplished and so the Lord cut him off by a conspiracy of his subjects that himself got the crown by the murder of Pekahiah his Sovereigne And reigned in his stead in the twentieth yeare of Jotham the sonne of Uzziah Here it is expressely said that Hoshea having slain Pekah began his reigne in the twentieth yeare of Jotham and yet afterwards vers 33. it is said that Jotham reigned but sixteen years and in the first verse of the next chapter it is said that Ahaz the sonne of Jotham began his reigne in the seventeenth yeare of Pekah But to reconcile these seeming contradictions we must know that Jotham lived twenty years after he was settled in the throne of Judah upon the death of