I vvil take as sure certainâ vz. that Christ not only gaue thankes to his father but also blessed sanctified and consecrated the bread because vve are taught so to beleeue both by the plain vvords of the Evangelists by S. Paule by consent of al fathers oâ al auncient I ââuâgies or soâmes of Masse in al churches of Christendome vvhereof some example shal be geuen hereafter also by vâââât of M. Ievvel Caluin Eââ a vvho so effectually by innumerable places of cripture pâoue it and refel Musculus and consequently M. B. in thââ point vvâo against al scripture wil haue blessing of these elements to be al one vvith geuing thanks to God VVherefore according to this most sufficient authoritie as Musculus truly telleth vs that Christ at tvvo seueral times first ouer the bread next ouer the cup gaue thanks to God so must vve also assure our selues the scripture these Protestans leading vs therevnto that Christ at tvvo seueral times blessed sanctified and consecrated those 2. seueral elements of bread and vvine vvhich he tooke in his hands Concerning the breaking and deliverie of the bread Musculus vvords are Christ brake it with his owne hands gaue it to his disciples He gaue not the bread whole to them which they afterwards should breake but him self brake it He gaue it not them to distribute but him self did distribute it willed them to take and eate it He deliuered with his owne hands this sacrament of grace signifying withal that it was not possible for any man to haue participation of his grace except himself gaue it by the vertue of his spirite Of which point I warne the reader not without cause Thus much saith Musculus concerning the external fact doing of Chrisi so far furth as agreeth to the institutioÌ of the mystical Supper After al vvhich finally for declaration that they might vnderstand vvhat he meant by the premisses he addeth This is my body which is geuen and broken for yow Do this in commemoration of me Again This cup is the new Testament in my blud which is shed for yow and for many to remission of sinnes Do this so oft as ye shal drinke it in commemoration of me This is the summe of that which Christ did vvhich he spake about the sacrament vvhich as the same author vvitnesseth Christ first of al did in the eyes of his disciples both that they afterwards should do the same them selues and also deliuer the same order to his church ¶ And this being agreed vpon according to the manifest storie of the Gospel exposition of the purest Protestants that Christ thus did as hath bene novv in particular described and thus spake item that thus he did spake as things apperteyning to the Sacrament and which he would not haue omitted by his Apostles disciples and aftercomeââ to returne to M. B vvho affirmeth al the actionâ and speeches which Christ did and vttered to be so essential to the Supper that if any one yea any iote be omitted the whole Supper is marred and peruerted let vs conserre these doings of Christ vvith the Scottish Supper ministred after their order vvhich is this Commonly once in a moneth the minister vvhen the supper is to be ministred first of al out of the pulpit reherseth briefly to the people a peece of the 11. chapiter of S. Paule touching the Institution of this sacrament Afterwards he maketh some Sermon against ether the Pope and Catholike religion vvhich is their common argument or in praise of their owne which is more seldom or as seemeth good to the minister The Sermon or exhortation ended the minister cometh downe from the pulpit and sitteth at the table now beginneth the communion euery man and woman likewise taking their place as occasion best serueth Then he taketh bread and geueth thanks ether in these words folowing or like in effect The thankes-geuing set downe for a paterne for al ministers to folow as in sevv vvords it rendereth thanks to God for his benefites of creation sanctification and redemptioÌ by Christ as is ordinarie in many good prayers so it maketh no mention of the Supper or any thing vvhich Christ spake or did therein saue that in one place they mention a table and remembrance of Christs death in these vvords Although we be sinners neuertheles at the commaundemeÌt of Iesus Christ our lord we present our selues to this his table which he hath left to be vsed in remembrance of his death vntil his coming again to declare and witnesse before the world that by him alone we haue receiued libertie and life c. and that by him alone we are possessed in our spiritual kingdom to eate and drinke at his table with whom we haue our conuersation presently in heauen This is al that approcheth any thing nigh to the vvords and Institution of Christ Immediatly after this thankes-geuing the ministâr breaketh the bread and deliuereth iâ to the poeple who distribute and diuide the same amonge them selues according to our Sauiour Christ commaundement Likewise he geueth the ââp Here is the entier forme and essence of the Scottish communion For that during the time of eating and drinking some place of the scripture concerning Christs death is read this is a sequele and fashion folowing after and not included in the nature substance of the communion vvhich al goeth before Let vs novv seuerally confer Christs supper vvith this communion and consider how many the same most substantial and essential points after their ovvne graunt vsed there are wanting here Christ first of al tooke bread in to his hands and afterwards gaue thanks and blessed vvhich albeit it may seeme vsual and ordinarie yet saith Musculus it is not so and the very vvords of scripture shevve that it apperteyned to the order and institution of a sacrament Here the minister cleane contrariwise inuerting the order of Christ first geueth at large a thanks after taketh the bread the vvhich vvithout any thanks or any vvord at al he deliuereth to the people Secondarily Christ made a special and seueral thankes-giuing blessing and sanctification or consecration first of the bread and next of the cup and this also he did as a thing perteyning to the verie order and institution of his sacrament Here is no such matter but a confuse thankes-geuing vvithout relation to ether and vvhich conteyneth a blessing sanctification or consecration of nether Christ did not only breake the bread once and afterwards bid them breake and distribute it amonge them selues but him selfe brake and distributed and deliuered it to them ech one with his owne hand signifying thereby that it was not possible for them to haue any participation of grace except he gaue it them by the vertue of his spirite Of vvhich point Musculus geueth the reader a special warning and prouiso Here the minister loth belike to take so much paynes
est Christianum hominem non esse qui non eadem fidei certitudine credit Dominum Iesum esse filium Dei se per eum esse percepturum vitam aeternam VVe professe âaith Bucer Brentius Georgius Maior vvith other Lutheran Divines disputers against the Catholikes in that conference that he is not to be taken for a Christian man who beleeveth not with the same certitude or assurance of faith both that Christ our lord is the sonne of God and that him self in particular by Christ shal possesse life eternal This is that vvhich M. B. meaneth vvhen he saith that the applying of Christ eating of Christ by faith is to beleeue that he hath shed his blud for me that he hath purchased remission of sinnes to me VVhich iustification and remission of sinnes being in particular beleeved of the Protestant in such sort as is any article of his âaith thereby geveth a spiritual manducation to him vvhich the Catholike hath not Thus writeth M. B. afterwardes vvhere he spendeth many pages in magnifying this âaith This faith âaith he workes a wonderful assurance and persuasion that God loves me that he wil saue me that meâââ life saluation at perteynes to me This works the seeling of mercy in our hart a particular application whereby we claime Christ and God as proper to vs as if no man bââ title to him and his promises but we Again This particular application is ãâ¦ã difference the chief marke and note whereby our ââith who are iustified in the blud of Christ is discerned ãâ¦ã faith of the Papists c. For the Papist ãâ¦ã promise of mercy to his ownesowle He countes it preâââtion as in truth it is and for presumption counted and coâdemned by the Apostle Rom. 11. 20. 21. ââ Corint 9. â7 Philip. 3. 11. 12. Hebr. 4. 1. 2. c. to say I am an elect I ââ saueâ iustified This is the vvonderful faith of the Protestants vvhich to them is al in al. This M. B. calleth their iustifying faith By this thy eate Christ so as no man doth ãâ¦ã theââ By this they are sure of heaven in heaueÌ to be felowes equal vvith S. Peter S. Paule yea vvith the blessed virgin mother of God For so Luther foundeâ and first inventor of this faith writeth expressely Quââ hac side renati sumus pares sumus in dignitate honore D. Paulo Petro S. Deiparae virgini ac divis omnibus VVââ now that at last vvâ know exactly vvhat faith it is vvhich geveth the Protestants so deep holdfast in their spiritual maÌâucatioÌ let vs retouâââ to our principal purpose And as by this vvhich hath bene said of this special Protestant faith I confesse M. B. hath a sufficient ground to chalenge such kind of eating by this faith I meane to him self and his companions Protestants and to exclude out al Catholikes be they as holy as S. Peâer or S. Paule vvho never had such a special faith and therefore could never thus âaâe Christ so yet the blocke lyeth stil in M. B. vvay and the rest of his consâaternitie that by this saith evil Protestants receive Christ no lesse then good For among the Protestants the most detestable and most blasphemous heretikes have this assurance of their iustification and remission of sinnes no lesse then M. B. or Iohn Calvin or Luther him self vvho by the helpe of an old man whose name Luther expresseth not saith M. Fox but belike it vvas the same man vvho in an other forme frequeÌted Carolostadâê° instructed him first of al inveÌted this special iustifying faith For as after Luther al Lutherans have it most assuredly and after Zuinglius al Zuinglians and after Calâin al Calvinists so the Anabaptists more then any of those former sects and Libertines Familie of love by vvord and deed by life and death most confidently chalenge to them selves this assurance that they in Christ have remission of their sinnes that Christ died for them that he shed his blud for them that they are spiritually vnited to Christ they are inwardly so fed by him and outwardly so clothed vvith him that as it is testified by sundry stories many such Protestants both men vvemen and maydens long sithence in Bohemia and of late in Holland at none dayes in the sight of thousands vvould vvalke naked thorough the streetes preaching the vvord of the Lord and could not be vvithdrawen from that furious vnnatural madnes by the terror of present death continually even to death and in death some crying Praise the Lord others Open your eyes ye blind Papists others Revenge O Lord the blud of thy servants and thus not by vvords as M. B. doth but by deeds and facts by patient suffering of death approved they their confidence and assurance of such special faith as M. B. teacheth and Luther the Calvinists describe If then the Anabaptists to make stay and exeÌplifie this matter by them vvhom Calvin condemneth for heretikes and vvhose martyrs though in shew marvelous holy and in number never so many he accounteth and calleth martyres diaboli the devils martyrs by vvhich name likewise the Lutherans cal the martyrs of Calvins sect have this sure faith that Christ dyed for them in special and that Christ shed his blud for them in particular and they in this sort spiritually eate Christ how vvith vvhat prohabilitie can M. B. deny such eating to al Protestants of his owne sect though evil livers vvho much more certainly have this faith and therefore much more spiritually eate Christ If an heretike can have a constant persuasion in the death of Christ and then al goes wel and he therefore truly receives Christ by faith according to M. B. definition how much more may a vvicked Calvinist vvhom M. B. accounteth no heretike reteyne this constant persuasion Hath an Anabaptist a âââth of the sowle apt for such receiving hath not a Calvinist Is evil life a greater bar to such receiving then naughty faith vvhereas this receiving is vvrought only by faith not by life And vvhat need I to rest exemplifie this by Libertines or Anabaptists vvhereas the best surest ground to refute M. B. in this point is the general doctrine of Calvin and Calvinists and the same preached at large by M. B. him self in these Sermons For as M. B. is sure that he is iustified he is elect he is saved he hath this special faith vvhich applieth Christ to him so properly and peculiarly as though no man had interest in Christ but him self alone so this faith vvhich is the right perfit iustifying faith and proper to the elect being once obteyned is never after lost nor never can possibly depart from them commit thy sinnes never so greavous and horible Thus teacheth Beza in the Confession of his Christian Geneva faith most plainly This Calvin in his Institutions
crosses And thus far they joyne vvith French English Scottish gospellers as likevvise in much sacrilegious spoile of churches ouerthrovving of altars calling in the Mores and Mahometans of Africa to assist them against the Christians But vvithal they held many articles vvhich the Protestants as yet coÌdemne for vvicked heretical as that with Manicheus they taught that there were two first creators beginnings of al creatures a good and a bad god the deuil and that god created some things and the deuil other some 2. VVith the Sadduces they denyed the resurrectioÌ beleeuing the sowle to dye with the body neuer to returne againe 3. They scorned at praier for the dead beleeuing no purgatorie nor yet hel 4. They refused baptisme as altogether superfluous vnprofitable These vvith some fevv other of like qualitie vvere the faith of the Albigenses in defence whereof there vvere ouethrovven slaine in one battaile a 100. thousand in an other 70. thousand and many being taken and hauing free offer to abiure their opinions liue or els to be burnt to death if they stoode stil in them made voluntary chose rather to suffer death by fyer then to forsake their heresie At the same time rose Almaricus vvhom M. Fox in his martyrologe calleth a worthy learned man and of a simple doctor maketh a great bishop as though he had bene some Archpâotestant This man in his opinion against altars images and especially the Sacrament vvherein he acknovvledged vvith the forenamed Albigenses the body of Christ to be no otherwise then it was in any other bread or creature may be and is iustly chalenged oâ the Sacramentaries for a brother of theirs but for some other bad heresies they must I thinke needs abhorre him as a detestable hâââtâke as for that he denyed 1. the resurrection of our ãâã 2. he denyeâ both heauen heâ âaing that vvho so had in him the knowledge of god he had in him heauen on the other side vvho so coÌmmitted mortal sinne he had in him hel 3. he said that god spake in Ouid as vvei as he did in S. Augustin 4. besides certaine other most vile opinions against god For al vvhich his doctrâne by solemne sentence of the church is adiudged not so much heretical as playn mad frantike for vvhich cause belike our great prelate M. Ievvel against M. Fox Crispine the martyr-makers refuseth both Almaticus and the Albigenses as no âight gospellers saying plainly of them we haue no skil they are none of ours ¶ Finally our countreman Ihon VViclef albeit he by the more part of Protestant vvriters be accompted for a perfect Protestant vvhom M. Fox calleth the valiant Champion of the truth no lesse famous Diuine of whom he vvriteth that vvhen al the vvorld vvas in most desperate and vile estate the lamentable ignorance darknes of gods truth had ouershadowed the whole earth then this man stepped forth like a valiant champion vnto whom that of Ecclesiasticus may be iustly applied Euen as the morning star in the middest of a cloud as the moone being ful in her course and as the bright beame of the sunne so doth he shine glister in the temple church of god yet this notwithstanding that he vvas both a vile heretike as a most pernicious flatterer parasite applied his vvhole learning gospellizing to please the humors of certaine noble men his favourers vvhich gaped for the spoile of the church his ovvne preaching teaching doth abundantly conuince For to let passe other heresies against god him self recorded by Catholikes and to make stay vpon a fevv of the articles vvhich as most plausible M. Fox reciteth as I graunt that he ioyneth vvith them in many namely in that he taught vvith M. Fox the sacraments to haue bene instituted by Christ only for memorials that Christ is not in the Sacrament truly really to omit these and some other agreing vvith our Caluinists vvho can deny but it is both grosse heresie and palpable flatterie vvhen he teacheth 1. thââ a prelate or bishop excoÌmunicating any which hath appealed to the king or to the kings Councel is thereby him selfe a traitor to the king and the realme 2. Thât temporal lords may according to their owne wil and discretion take away the temporal goods from the church men when so euer they offend 3. That it is against the scripture ecclesiastical ministers to haue any temporal possessiens 4. That tenthes are pure almes that parishioners may for the offence of their Curates deâeyne kepe them backe bestow them vpon others at their owne wil and pleasure â That if a bishop or priest be in deadly sinne he doth not order consecrate or baptize Yea that so long as he is in deadly sinne he is nether bishop nor prelate in the church of god 6. That who soeuer geue almes to friers are accursed Do not these articles ââevv manifestly that his gospel âor so M. Fox vvil needs haue it tended only to spoyle the church clergy to spite his aduersaries to gratifie the temporaltie among vvhom by his seditions preaching he had gotten a litle estimation Doth not Caluin Beza the vvhole consistorie and church of Geneua detest condemne as prophane and Antichristian the first article of suspeÌding the right of excoÌmunicatioÌ vpon the vvil of the temporal magistiate Do the Ministers approue the second and third that the Lords temporal parishioners may take avvay at their discretion their liuings rents services tithes geue to them as almes hovv much vvhen in vvhat sort they please Do they beleeue that it is against the vvord of god that ministers bishops enioy ecclesiastical liuings Or make they voyd al their baptilmes suppers orderings if he that ministreth the sacraments be in mortal sinne in vvhich they liue euery hovvre and moment can not be vvithout them being of opinion as is Luther Caluin and al the crue of Protestants that vve sinne perpetually yea the iust man sinneth in euerie good vvorke as Beza saith euery the least cogitation of the least sinne is a mortal sinne and deserueth hel syer eternally I omit other things specified by M. Fox vvhich in my opinion should quit exclude VViclef from being a gospeller saue that euerie heresie scemeth sufficient to make a gospelleâ some vvhereof are good Catholike some most vvicked Satanical but for a conclusion let this suffise that VViclef no lesse then Berengarius saue that VViclef dyed an heretike tvvise or thrise relapsed periured recanted al his gospelling noueltie at the lest thrise as M. Fox signifieth And therefore if these men vvil needs haue him a Protestant because he some times in some things sayd as they say surely they haue no cauâe so extremely to brag of him as M. Fox doth seyng he so oftentymes reuoked such sayings
Paule and cited by M. B. is examined and by it is cleerly proved that the Protestant faith which they cal so is no faith such as S. Paule meaneth but mere fansie and imagination Christ in this world did esteeme of carnal cognation which M. B. wickedly denieth His wicked corruption of Christs words that Christs flesh is vnprofitable is directly against Christs owne preaching and our faith of the incarnation He in taking from the body al real coniunction with Christ infinuateth a denyal of the resurrection of the body as Luther and the Lutherans prove plainly against the Calvinists M. B. his obiection taken out of the Gospel that corporal tuitching of Christ is vnprofitable VVhy Christ required faith what maner of faith in them whom he cured from diseases The place of scripture which M. B. obiecteth as likewise many other proveth the cleane contrarie of thât for which be pretendeth it vz that corporal tuitching was a ââre immediat cause of health then tuitching by only faith May had benefite of Christ by only corporal tuitching of hiâ much more by both corporal also spiritual receiving him in the B. Sacrament CHAP. 16. HEnce forward the principal argument concerning the sacrameÌt newly entreated of for here is much tedious repetition of old things of the vvord sacrament vvhat word is necessarily required to make the sacrament the doctrine of seales and confirmation of mens right and title by seales c. vvhich being already drawen in to their several places and answered before I vvil therefore omit here coÌsisteth ether in refelling the Catholike doctrine tââching Christs real presence or in confirming a vulgar opinion that Christ is eaten by faith vvherein he bestoweth many vvords vvhich of them selves are not amisse but that they are applied to an evil end as that the spirit of God vniteth Christians to Christ that Christ is conioyned to vs with a spiritual band that this is wrought by the power and vertue of the holy spirite as the Apostle saith 1. Cor 12. 13. that al faithful men and women are baptized in âne body of Christ that is are conioyned and fastned with Christ by the moyen of one spirite c. that faith is a spiritual thing that it is the gift of God powred downe in to the âââ of men and women wrought in the sowle of every one and âââ by the mighty operation of the holy spirite that we âââ Christ spiritually by remembring his bitter death and pa ãâ¦ã c. These and a number such other sentences in which he spendeth many pages of this sermon are in them selves good true Christian and Catholike But vvhen âe applieth al this coniunction of the spirite to exclude the coniunction vvhich is wrought by Gods spirite to but yet not only spiritually but also corporally vvhen he acknowlegeth no other receiuing of Christ in the sacrament then that vvhich is vvrought as vvel vvithout the sacrament vvhen soever vve remember his death and passion vvhen he so advaunceth this manducation by faith as though there vvere not only no manducation so profitable but also besides that no true manducation of Christs body at al in this he plaieth the sophister in vndermining one veritie by commending an other he plaieth the part of a craftie enemie vvho sheweth bread in the one hand and vvhile we behold that striketh vs on the head with a stone which he holdeth in the other in one vvord he plaieth the very heretike vvho ether thinketh him self or would his audience to thinke that one part of Catholike faith gaynsaith an other that the spirite of God vniting Christians vvith Christ their head spiritually excludeth al corporal participatioÌ which most of al confirmeth increaseth that spiritual coÌiunction that spiritual eating by faith or remembring Christs death passion is an enemy opposite to the real coniunction of his body vvhich Christ him self appointed for that special end amonges other that it might streÌghthen our faith spiritual maÌducation both in the sacrament out of the sacrament and make vs perpetually more mindful of his death passion Vnto vvhich mindfulnes careful meditatioÌ we are a thousaÌd times more stirred by one thought vvhen vve conceive the same his most pretious body here truly and really present and though glorious eternal invisible and indivisible in it âell yet visible divided and broken in the sacrament for our benefite and nurriture vve are I say more stirred to remembrance of Christs death and passion by one such cogitation then by al the bread broken and al the âânkardes of wine that are in a vvhole yere filled out and empâied by the bretherne and sisterne in al the suppers communions of Scotland and England ¶ Before M. B. come to extol his spiritual manduââtion by âaith he frameth an obiection as made by the Catholikes and by answering the same maketh way as it vvere and entrance to that matter His obiection is this If say they Christs flesh blud be not received but by faith in the spirite then we receive him but by an imaginatioÌ by a conceit and fantasie This is the obiection as he frameth it vvhich albeit it be none of ours if it be taken generally as though al manducation of Christ out of the sacrament vvere imaginarie or fantastical which is wicked to speake or think yet being applied to the Protestants receiving by their âaith it is good and for such I acknowlege it For their receiving by their âaith is mere imaginarie and fantastical to speake the best And let vs see how M. B. can answere this obiection So saith he they count faith an imagination of the mind a fantasie and opinion But if they had tasted and felt in their sowles what âaith bringes with it alas they would not cal that spiritual iewel only iewel of the sowle an imagination That we account faith an imagination or fansie is âalse though one of the founders of your faith that is Zuinglius and his Tigurine church cal it so Howbeit we cal it not so nor thinke of it so but esteeme it as a verie iewel of the sowle though not the only iewel as yow falsely terme it For that besides the cardinal vertues which also an iewels of the sowle and a number of graces of the hoâ ghost reckened vp by the Apostle every man that haââ a litle skil in his Christian Catechisme knoweth that among the 3. Theological vertues hope is a iewel of the sowle as wel as faith and charitie a iewel of the sowle more pretious and better then âaith as the Apostle expressely teacheth â Cor. 13. 13. and by the one and the other is engendred in good Christian Catholike men a great confidence ioy and consolation of mind and by the one and the other they feele in their harts the holy ghost making them to crye Abba pater they hope confidently by the testimonie of that spirite that