Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
death_n	witness_v	work_n	year_n	24	3	4.2326	3	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A05532	Certaine tables sett furth by the right reuerend father in God, William Bushopp of Rurimunde, in Ghelderland: wherein is detected and made manifeste the doting dangerous doctrine, and haynous heresyes, of the rashe rablement of heretikes: translated into Englishe by Lewys Euans, and by hym intituled, The betraing of the beastlines of heretykes	Lindanus, Guilelmus Damasus, 1525-1588.; Evans, Lewis, fl. 1574.	1565 (1565)	STC 15653; ESTC S106730	25,509	82

but of Christe him selfe because shee ignorante in the meaning of the Scriptures dyd marye an other He sayeth moreouer that shee was therefore gilte of synne ☞ The assertion of heretykes Philipp Melancthon affirmed that the oblation of the Sacramēt of Christe his bodie for the dead was not vsed in the tyme of S. Augustine That is vntrue For the hole Churche of Africa in a Synode dyd forbyd that the Sacrament sholde be offered for some sortes and this was done in the tyme of S. Cyprian as he him self witnesseth in the .ix. epistle of his .j. boke which Cyprian was the space of C.Lxx. yeares more before the tyme of S. Augustine Also Tertullian in his woorke concerning Chastitie S. Ambrose in the funerall Oration vpon the deathe of Satyrꝭ his brother S. Chrysostome in the Lxix Homelie vnto y e Antiochians and S. Augustine hym self in his .xxij. Sermone de verb. Apost doe wryte likewise ynoughe at large to the manifest confounding and shame oft Melancthon and suche others ☞ The assertion of heretykes Philipp Melancthon alleageth that the invocaciō of Sainctes creapte into y e church after the tyme of Gregorie the first That is an vntruthe For in the tyme of S. Cyprian that is in the C.LX. yeares after Christ his incarnacion our Ladie the virgin Marye was prayd vnto as Nazianzenus in oratione in Cyprianū dothe witnes Also Nectarius Constantinopolitanus prayd vnto S. Theodorus S. Augustine de cura pro mortuis in the .iiij. chap. of the first sermone prayd vnto S. Laurence Also S. Ambrose de viduis and S. Hierome invocated one Paula in the Epitaphe of the same ☞ The heretykes assertion Philip Melancthon in the Apologie of the confession of Auspurge dothe affirme that no other auncient writer before the tyme of Gregorie y e first dyd make any mencion of the invocation of Sainctes That is false For S. Cyprian in a booke concerning his lyfe in the yeare of our Lorde C.LX. as Nazianzenus dothe declare affirmed that a certayne Christian mayden dyd devoutlye praye vnto the blessed virgin Marye Origines in the CC.xx. yeare of our Lorde in his commentarie vpon Job dothe invocate the Sainctes Nectarius Constantinopolitanus in the yeare of our Lorde .iij c. Lx. prayd as before vnto Theodorus the Martyr Nazianzenus in the funerall song prayd vnto S. Basil in y e yeare of our Lorde .iij c. Lx. S. Chrysostome capitulo primo ad Philip. in the yeare of our Lord .iij c. Lxx. dothe teache that the Sainctes ought to be prayd vnto S. Ephrem in the yeare of our Lorde .iij c. Lxx. dyd pray vnto the virgin Marie S. Ambrose in the yeare of our Lorde .iij c. Lxxx. de viduis saeth that Martyrs ought to be prayd vnto Prudentius in the yeare of our Lorde .iij c. Lx. prayd vnto S. Laurence S. Hierome in the yeare of our Lorde .iij c.xc S. August in the yeare .iiij c. after Christe Vigiliꝭ Tridentinus in the .iiij c.xx. yeare and Theodoretus in the .iiij c.xxx yeare all these holy Fathers Doctors and Martyrs haue prayd vnto the Sainctes and doe teache that wee ought likewise to doe the same Therefore you may see howe Melancthon hathe belyed them with his most impudent lyes would abuse bothe them and vs. ☞ The heretykes assertions John Caluine in his institutions doth alleage that the auncient writers when they spake properlie of the Sacramentes dyd acknowlege to be but twoe That is false For S. Cyprian in the .xij. epistle of his first booke and in his sermone De ablutione pedum dothe affirme that there be more Sacramentes then the Sacramentes of Baptisme and of our Lordes bodie so dothe Tertullian in his boke De poenitentia S. Hierome against the Luciferans Leo Magnus in his xc epistle and S. Augustine in places hereafter recited ☞ The heretickes assertions John Caluine in his institutions doth alleage that S. Augustine dyd acknowelaige but twoe Sacramentes the one of Baptisme and the other of our Lordes bodie That is false For S. Augustine in the .xx. chapiter of his .v. booke against the Donatistes dothe alleage confirmation to be a sacrament and in the .xiij. chapiter of his .ij. booke cōtra epist. Perme he likewise alleageth holy order to be a Sacrament and also in the C.xviij. epistle vnto Januarius he affirmethe that there be more Sacramentes then twoe so he dothe likewise in many other places ☞ The heretickes assertions John Caluine in y e same institutions doth affirme that S. Augustine cōcerning the sacrament of thalter is wholy on his syde That is false For S. Augustine doth teache vs to adore th● same body of our Lorde Christ to eate it in the misteries of Christians being the same bodye that was borne of y e virgine Marie and crucified by the Jewes And vpon the .xcviij. Psalme he saeth becawse he walked here in the same fleash he gaue vs y e selfe same flesh to eate And also in a sermō vpon the .xxxiij. Psalme he saeth For Christ did beare the same bodye in his owne handes And so in like manner he doth most clearly expresse the same in sundrie other places ☞ The heretickes assercions John Brentius with his adherētes in theyr confession of Wirtembrige doe alleage that Transsubstantiation was not knowen vnto the auncient writers That is false For Sainct Cyprian in a sermon of the Lordes supper in the yeare of our Lorde .ij c.xxx saeth this flesh not in forme but in nature changed is become flesh Eusebius Emissenus the yeare of our Lord ij c. L. in his .iiij. Homelie in Pascha affirmeth that these earthlye thinges doe passe over be altered from theyr former being Agayne he saeth these creatures are converted into the substaunce of the body of Christ. Sainct Chrysostome in the yeare of our Lorde iij c. Lx. de Encenijs alleageth the nature of the bread to passe or wast away in Liturgia he saeth y e Priest blessinge with his hand consecratinge those holy thinges saeth altering these o Lorde with thy holy spirite Sainct Ambrose the yeare of our Lorde iij c. Lxxx. lib. de his qui c. the .ix. chap. saeth that remaineth not which nature fourmed but which the blessinge hath cōsecrated For greater saeth he is the power of the blessing then of nature because throwghe the blessing nature it selfe is altered Saint August y e yeare of our Lorde .iiij c. in his .xxviij. sermone de verb. Dom. saeth now it is not bread but the body of Christ. Joannes Damascenꝭ the yeare of our Lord iiij c.x. in the .iiij. chap. of his .xiiij. booke doth affirme that the bread and wyne are super-naturally chaunged into the body and blood of our Lorde Hesichius the yeare of our Lorde iiij c.x. in the .xxij. chapiter of his .vj. booke vpon Leuiticus affirmeth a transferring or changing of the substance Gelasius saeth Transeunt in diuinam naturam that is they passe ouer into a diuine nature And Theophilactus in the yeare of our

yeare in his commune places denied againe by Melanthō y e 30. yeare in y e cōfessiō of Auspurge Three affirmed by Melancthō in his Apologie the .31 yeare denied againe by Melancthon in the .52 yeare in his Commune places wherein he alleageth out of y e woorde of God that holye Order is in the number of Sacramentes Fowre affirmed by Melanthō in his cōmune places y e .31 yeare denied by Theym of Saxonie in their confession vnto the which Melancthon subscribed the .51 yeare Sixe alwayes and somewhere .vij. is affirmed by William Postellus in Panthenosia where he named him self to be Helias Pandocheus that is Helias the inholder or contenter of all companies denied by Lutherans by the Zwinglians ¶ Of Baptisme ¶ Originall synne to be in children is affirmed by Luther his adherentes denied by Zwinglius Caluine and by Seruetus Water to be necessary for Baptisme is by Luther his adherentes affirmed denied by Caluine in his institutions and by Bucer in his cōmentary vpon Matthewe ¶ Abrenūtio to be vsed before Baptisme is affirmed by Brentius in his ordinaūce of y e church at Wirtembrige in the .xiiij. leafe denied by Luther many others ¶ Synnes to be so forgeuē vs in our baptisme as that they shuld not be imputed is affirmed by Luther his adherentes denied by Bucer in his cōmentarie vpon Math. by Caluine in Antid affirming y e water of Baptisme to be of none effect ¶ Concupiscēcie is affirmed to be a synne by Luther Bucer denied by Zwingliꝭ with his adherentes ¶ Children ought to be baptized saeth Luther with his companies denied by the Anabaptistes ¶ Of woorkes ¶ Good woorkes to be necessarie vnto saluation is affirmed bi Luther Melanthō as George Maior in his booke of woorkes dothe declare denied by Luther and Melancthō as Illyricꝭ Gallus do say writing against George Maior ¶ That there are desertes of good deades aswell in this lyfe as after is affirmed by Melancthon in his Apologie and Luther in his declaration denied by Caluin others ¶ That good woorkes deserue life euerlasting is alleaged by Bucer but yeat by free grace as he writeth vnto the Fathers of the Counsaile of Tridentine denied by the Apologie of Auspurge and many others ¶ Of the Sacrament of the Aulter ¶ Bread to be cōuerted in to the bodye of Christ the forme only remaninge is affirmed by Luther in a boke against Zwinglius The bread is chaunged saeth Melanthon in the cōfession of Auspurge in y e .xxx. yeare deliuered vnto Carolus y e Emperour wherein was writen vnder the forme of bread denied by Luter Melancthō in y e cōfession of Auspurge y e xxxj yere printed y e .lvj yere by Iochimꝭ West phalꝭ w t all y e hole crewe against Caluin in y e confessiō of the sacrament Bread to be a bare sygne of the body is affirmed by Zwingl Oecolampadius Caluine and some tymes by Bucer denied by Luther in the cōfessiō of Auspurge by Bucer plaing y e Lutheran in his commentary vppon Mathewe Verie bread to be with y e verie body is affirmed by Luther afterwardes in the fained cōfession of Auspurge by the Lutherans with others denied by Luther at the firste by Carolstadius Zwingl Caluine Very wine to be in the chalice is affirmed by Luther in his booke entituled Capt. Babyl denied by Luther in his second booke against Zwinglius That the sacramēt of y e Aulter ought to be adored is affirmed by Luther in a booke of the Adoration of y e sacrament Carolstadius vnto Alber. Outerius and by Bucer actis Col. Ratisp denied by Brentius in his cōfession of Auspurge by the Lutherans The cōmunion of both kindes to be necessarie is affirmed by Luther in the confession of Saxonie and in y t confession of Wirtemb with others denied by Luther in a boke vnto the Bohemiās and in Captiuit Babyl also in a sermone of the sacrament ¶ Of free will No freewill to be in man is affirmed by Luther Captiuit Baby and in his third boke against Zwingliꝭ by Melancthō in his cōmun places the yeare .22 and also by Illyricus denied by Melancthon in his cōmune places the .52 yeare alleaging yt to be an horrible lye and the rage of y e Manichees to denie man to haue free will ¶ Of the invocation of Sainctes Saintes ought to be prayed vnto saeth Luther in his booke intituled the preparation vnto death and against y e Taborites denied by Luther Melancthō Caluine and others ¶ Of Images Images ought to be kept saeth Luther and manie of Saxonie denied by Luther in all the prouince of Bauaria by Zwinglius Caluine and others ¶ Of holy dayes ¶ Holye dayes ought to be celebrated saeth the Lutherans in the ordering of their church at Wirtembryge denied by Luther vnto the nobilitie of Germanie and also by him through all Germanie ¶ Of prayng for the dead Prayer for the dead is done well and without synne sayeth Luther in Cap. Fidei set furthe a litell before his death in the .xliiij. yeare denied by the Luterās by Melancthō Caluin others ¶ Of Purgatorie That there is a Purgatorie after this lif is affirmed by Luther in sundrie places and y t he doth surelie beleue it Also in the boke de Caepitib fidei in the .xliiij. yeare he teacheth that it is lawfull once or at the vttermost twise to praye for the dead denied by the Lutherās Caluine Melancthon by the Zwinglians Sainct Peter was at Rome as Luther in an Homelie doth declare denied by Sebast. Frāc by Velenus and by Caluine S. Peter was at Rome and also there Bushop as Luther and Bucer doe write denied by Caluine Functius That y e Bushop of Rome is not Antichrist is affirmed by Bucer denieng that y e place vnto the Philipp can sounde to reproue him denied by many others Luther all his adherentes to be heretikes is affirmed by Zwinglius in a booke made against the Lutherans denied by Luther and his adherētes boasting them selfes to be true Gospellers Zwinglius with his hole companie to be heretykes is affirmed by Luther in a booke written against the Zwinglians denied by Zwinglius his companie boasting them selfes to be y e true ghospellers L. EVANS SAinct Hillarye in the .vij. booke of the Trinitie alleageth all the doinges of heretickes to be oncertaine and vaine and that they vary amongst them selues not iudging a lyke of anye one thynge yea when ther is but twoe or three of them they do reproche reprehend and blame one an other and euer iarring the differ aboute theyr owne doynges neuertheles they runne headlong togeather into the selfe same purpose of blasphemie Nowe whether the wordes of S. Hillarye be true or no and whether these heretickes doe varye and iarre as he sayeth it dothe vnto all men more then ynoughe appeare and yeat to make that thing vnto thee more euident which is euident ynoughe